Category: Commentaries

  • Chasing the ‘ghost’ of Sylva?

    Chasing the ‘ghost’ of Sylva?

    SIR: The preoccupation of Governor Seriake Dickson of Bayelsa State with fighting his predecessor Chief Timipre Sylva, even when the latter is a harmless private citizen, reminds me of the story of the corrupt king and his poor but reputable subject.

    Each morning every inhabitant of the village would head for the ruler’s palace to collect money and heap shallow flattering compliments on the man. The poor subject, despite his deprivation, would stay behind, content with his untainted integrity and meagre means that met his basic needs.

    Although the wealthy king could boast of the “loyalty” of several members of the citizens on account of the largesse he doled out, still he complained that his happiness and security were not assured because the poor man did not make up the number of the sycophants. It unsettled the fawning subjects to learn that the king was not satisfied with their homage without the poor man’s. Nothing, he declared, would give him joy and rest until he dealt with the man who had refused to bow like others. But why would a king be afraid of a poor subject?

    I discern a parallel morbidity in what is going on in the post-Sylva era in Bayelsa. It’s quite a while since the departure of Sylva from the Government House, Yenagoa. Sylva was qualified constitutionally to run for a second term as governor. But with the connivance of the forces in Abuja, he was excluded from the poll and Dickson was foisted on the people.

    Practically then, Sylva is supposed to have become a forgotten or spent force in Bayelsa politics. But surprisingly that is not the case! He is still very much present, his name a thorn in the flesh of Dickson and officialdom. And so you have the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) operatives storming houses purportedly owned by Sylva in Abuja and claiming they have seized them as assets alleged to have been acquired through corrupt means.

    Forty-eight such mansions are said to have been retrieved, with a touch of drama as the media and their klieg lights are alerted to cover the raid on the houses.

    The Sylva phobia has lately shifted to Bayelsa with Governor Dickson claiming that his government inherited from Sylva a state treasury with N4,451! Now this is not only laughable but also calls into question the quality of governance and seriousness of the administration.

    Sylva may appear a helpless private man for now. But there is much strength in a man who has a formidable past of achievements, which a year after his exit, are still making his successors uncomfortable in their borrowed garments. Ordinarily, Dickson, the governor, ought to be satisfied with his incumbency and governing the people of Bayelsa without bothering about poor Citizen Sylva. But as with the story at the beginning of this piece, even a king must stand in fear of a man who does not depend on ephemeral power for survival!

     

    •Tom Oruh

    Lagos.

  • All Progressive Congress: Where are the Igbos?

    All Progressive Congress: Where are the Igbos?

    SIR: A historic event took place at Lagos House Marina on Tuesday February 5. Committed men and women gathered to strategize on how to move Nigeria forward after almost 16 years of harrowing hardship in the midst of plenty. It was an assemblage of people with known antecedents, people that can be trusted and people with character.

    After almost two years of search to end tales of misery, anguish and pain in Nigeria, a new baby, (child of necessity) was born in Lagos. Welcome, All Progressives Congress (APC)!

    Before this time, the PDP, desperate to cling to power at all costs, has been scoffing and boasting that the other parties cannot find a common ground to challenge its cosmetic hold on power. That must have informed the way and manner the enablers of this merger worked; keeping the PDP and its acolytes guessing for the most parts of the period the merger talks lasted till February 5 when, unannounced, 10 governors met in Lagos and proclaimed the birth of APC!

    Sadly, I saw poor Igbo representation in the historic event. Only Governor Rochas Okorocha of Imo State and few other Igbo leaders were there. A day after, some all-weather Igbo politicians began to struggle to pull the rug from Governor Okorocha’s feet. I was taken aback that our people through timid and backyard politics are not keying in into this monumental political development in Nigeria. The era of “the president is our neighbour” should be thrown into the dustbin of history. How to retrieve Nigeria from soulless and stone age men and women should be the big picture. During the June 12, 1993 struggle, a greater percentage of Igbo leaders lined up behind IBB and Abacha. We know the consequences thereafter. An attempt to change the cause of political events in 1999 failed also because Igbo insisted on playing PDP politics. In 2011 again Igbo timidly played the “Jonathan Azikiwe” politics. And Nigeria continued to go under.

    Now, the big question is this: what have Ndigbo benefited from PDP since 1999? Can we see the benefits in Igboland?

    What have we benefited from ‘Jonathan Azikiwe’s politics since 2011? Which of the promises he made to Ndigbo have been fulfilled as the politics of 2015 is about to kick start? Second Niger Bridge? International Airport? Good federal roads, security? Refineries? Power stations? Additional state(s)? Our people must open their eyes now.

    In 1995, in my book, Igbos: 25 years After Biafra, I challenged Ndigbo to do away with the politics of the stomach and play politics of growth, and survival. It is this politics that has worsened our fate in Nigeria and from a major leg of the tripod that is the Nigerian project, we have been relegated to no leg at all and the elite crop of Igbo politicians continue to grope about without direction. A serious alliance is being built with the coming of APC but Igbo are stranded on the very crossroad of indecision and lack of political vision and foresight.

    There is no alternative to serious politics if you want to change your fortune for the better. I support the likes of Governor Rochas Okorocha, Chief George Moghalu, Senator Annie Okonkwo, Dr Chris Ngige, former Governor Achike Udenwa, and former Governor Ogbonnaya Onu etc who joined the great movement to salvage Nigeria. I urge them to work harder to develop a new and visionary genre of politicians that will be able to articulate Igbo politics and issues to the next level and work to achieve the noble goals that will benefit Ndigbo.

    • Joe Igbokwe

    Lagos

  • Bamanga Tukur eats his words, and crow

    Bamanga Tukur eats his words, and crow

    During his two-day fence-mending trip to Port Harcourt last week, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) national chairman, effusively praised Rivers State governor, Rotimi Amaechi, for unparalleled performance. He even descried the governor as the best. He said much more, enough to unnerve the judicious. “Without mincing words, since Friday, when I arrived Port Harcourt, I have been inspecting one project or the other till this morning (Saturday),” began the party chairman. “…It is very difficult to praise your son (talking to the people of Rivers) because he’s the best for me…Believe you me, PDP will never lose to any party if people like Governor Amaechi stand boldly behind us; we will win and continue to win in any election. Support your governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Amaechi, support our party, and be sure to win your elections.”

    For a chairman who just weeks ago was at war with the Amaechi-led (PDP caucus of the) Governors’ Forum, a war many erroneously thought was a fight to the bitter end, and one that would be irreconcilable and could lead to the fragmentation or even disintegration of the ruling party, the unexpected rapprochement obviously came as a surprise. Unwilling to leave anything to chance, Tukur piled up the praise until Amaechi became saturated. Hear Tukur again: “What I have seen today, gives me hope. I saw first of all, the development of the educational sector and I want to say that education is key, the laboratory facilities in the new model schools and the ICT facilities will indeed spur the students to major in science subjects, thank you Amaechi for doing this.”

    Such effusions were enough to loosen the tongue of Amaechi, who gushed on behalf of the Governor’s Forum. “We assure you that governors will support and remain loyal to the party,” he said, “…we need each other at such a challenging moment. Lead us to victory and it is Important that we don’t take ourselves for granted, so that we will continue to lead ourselves and the party to victory. The PDP Governors will do everything necessary to ensure that they deliver to the people.” It became clear that one of the reasons behind the misunderstanding between the PDP chairman and President Goodluck Jonathan on one hand, and the party’s National Working Committee (NWC) and PDP governors on the other hand was that the former took the latter for granted. It was always clear the PDP would make up after every fight, no matter how acrimonious the quarrel, yet the party is not as cohesive as its opponents think, and can in fact be taken apart scientifically. Indeed, it will take more than a simple disagreement over the dissolution of the Adamawa State PDP caretaker committee to fatally injure the party.

    Given the intensity of the misunderstanding between the two camps in the past few weeks, few expected Tukur’s dramatic volte-face. Well, he will enthusiastically eat more crow whenever PDP unity is threatened. More, though he is advanced in age, it is only now that he is maturing in the art of stooping to conquer. Last week, it was Amaechi, for whom he composed a dithyramb; next month it could be any other troublesome party man. The elastic principles of the ruling party and the formlessness of their war fronts are such that whoever is their party chairman or even president of the country would be willing to eat any species of crow or write doxologies to their worst enemies to sustain the facade of unity.

  • Who is afraid of state police?

    Who is afraid of state police?

    SIR: State police is an important component of true federalism and emblem of authority of governance, since sovereignty is divided between the central and federating states. State police is not a new concept in Nigeria, but there is a clamour for modification to the colonial legacy of Native Authority Police which successfully worked alongside the Nigeria Police force till the 1970s before it was abolished and integrated into a single Nigeria Police force by the military oligarchy to achieve their unitary command system.

    The native authority police was very effective as a tool for combating crime and maintaining law and order then, though with some excesses and abuses typical of the way party politics was played at that time. The 1999 constitution provides for a single federal police which precludes states from taking charge of the protection of lives and properties of their states. If Nigeria is really a federation, this is a constitutional lacuna that must be addressed through constitution amendment.

    One of the arguments being canvassed by the antagonists of state police is the likelihood of abuses by governors. Should allocation of resources to government or its agencies for development purposes be stopped based on the assumption that some few corrupt officials would mismanage them? If governors could manage other institutions of governance, there is no reason why they cannot manage state police. After all, the combined team of LASTMA, Federal Road Safety Commission Officials along with the Police are all collaborating and complementing each other on Lagos roads to maintain traffic and discipline among motorists. Imagine Lagos roads with just only traffic police in control!

    It has also been argued that many states cannot afford the cost of establishing and maintaining state police. It is worthy to note that the primary and most fundamental responsibility of any government at whatever level is the protection of lives and property of its citizenry. This is the cross they swore to carry and they must carry it at whatever cost. Indeed, many states have been doing this indirectly by spending huge amount of resources on the Nigeria police in their respective states. In Lagos, Governor Babatunde Fashola has donated dozens of armoured personnel carriers, hundreds of 4X4 trucks, hundreds of power bikes, two helicopters, thousands of bullet proof jackets and helmets, AK-47 rifles, ammunition, welfare and allowance packages running into billions of naira with other logistics to the state police command to enhance their operational efficiency.

    How does one expect the federal police to effectively enforce laws that are promulgated by the states?

    Fortunately, everyone seems to agree to the fact that Nigeria is currently under- policed. The current 370,000 policemen are grossly inadequate to effectively police a population of 170 million. This makes nonsense of the United Nations recommendation of a minimum police-population ratio. The Federal government already has too much on its neck to contend with. The recent revelation through a special broadcast by Channels Television on the sorry state of the Nigeria Police College, Ikeja, is a strong indication that the Federal Government needs to share some of its responsibilities with the state governments to achieve optimal results. The Nigerian Police, as it is presently constituted, is inadequately funded and lack the required capacity to effectively train its officers.

    Nigeria can successfully and efficiently operate state police alongside the Nigerian Police, given the required political will and genuine concern for the security of lives and property. We can start by giving state police some limited operational responsibilities and create the institutional watch dog to monitor their excesses and abuses.

     

    • Ojo Tope Stephen

    Ministry of Physical Planning and Urban Development, Alausa, Ikeja.

  • PDP’s mission to ‘capture’ Lagos

    PDP’s mission to ‘capture’ Lagos

    The militarization of the nation’s politics has once again found expression in the statement credited to the latest chairman of the Lagos state PDP, retired Captain Tunji Shelle that the party will capture Lagos State come 2015 elections. He was reported to have said this during the visit of the leadership of his party to their godfather, retired General Olusegun Obasanjo.

    We had truly thought that this unfortunate statement may have been the product of the typical journalistic zeal in which the man may have been quoted out of context or a case of misrepresenting what the man said. We have waited for a recant and nothing was forthcoming hence our conclusion that he actually made that statement.

    We do not have any grouse with the well-known hunger and salivation for Lagos State by the PDP which has remained a hunger that will never be fulfilled given the very deep political consciousness of the residents. What we do have issues with is the use of language which we consider unethical and careless, capable of creating tension not only within the state but also within the nation. This shows that the PDP may not be prepared to appeal to the people’s conscience for their votes not only in Lagos State but perhaps throughout the federation since they know that they lack the requisite credentials for such exercise but are preparing to capture the ballot in a military style in which they have shown that they have great expertise in deploying its worst forms.

    The implications and power of speech in any society is immense especially when wielded by men and women that call themselves leaders. The holy books have urged us all to be careful how we deploy our tongues which is capable of setting fire on nations, dethroning rulers and wreaking havoc in an otherwise peaceful environment.

    We are concerned that Shelle would find it convenient to use the military word capture in a democratic milieu where politics is about the free will of all the citizens who are willing participants in the political space. This concern stems from the fact that the last time this particular word was used in our polity by the host of that meeting – General Olusegun Obasanjo. The contest for political power through elections during that period was more violent with pervasive impunity holding sway.

    Responsible leaders we believe ought to carefully choose their words especially when they are in public space. Their conduct is expected to be exemplary and worthy of emulation and that is why we are at a loss why the PDP chairman was comfortable with words attributed to him.

    Perhaps, he may be sending a message to other parties about the intentions of the PDP in the forthcoming elections in 2015. This may be a signal for others to prepare for war as the PDP is already preparing for war or it may be just bravado which a child depicts in the presence of his father to show that he is truly a chip off the old block. That may explain the choice of time and place for the making of such speech.

    We see that speech as a sign for Lagosians to guard their loins to defend their votes come 2015 as the PDP may be planning to annex the state either by hook or by crook. It is also a sign of how desperate the party has become and how frustrating they must be feeling seeing all their efforts to steal the state rebuffed by the people of Lagos State.

    They are frustrated because Lagosians will not settle for less. ACN’s good work in the state beginning with former Governor Bola Ahmed Tinubu and current Governor Babatunde Raji Fashola has become so monumental that the challenge to surpass it will be too difficult as PDP itself has failed to perform at the federal level and in many states where they hold sway as the party in power.

    It is only through service which makes discernible impact in the lives of the people that we can hope to make any impression on the minds of Lagos people. It is only by investing in them that we can hope to build their trust and earn their confidence. This is what the ACN governments have done and will continue to do and we urge the PDP to do the same with the opportunities given to them to serve at the federal level. Until they do so which has unfortunately proven to be too difficult for them, they cannot win but will continue hoping to “capture”

    We are not surprised however at this turn of events as the PDP is peopled heavily by ex – military men who participated actively in the ruination of our fatherland via the former military regimes. Their psyche has therefore been influenced by crass military language and behaviour since they are yet to learn the language of the civil populace whom they hope to lead. We wonder how they hope to lead a people who they cannot even speak their language and understand, a people who they are complete strangers to and are far removed from both in essence and in traditions.

    In Lagos PDP, Olabode George, a retired military officer and an ex-convict leads the party in the state. The chairman, Shelle is also a retired military officer. No wonder military language which is the opposite of democratic language is prevalent.

    Some rather unguarded statements credited to certain individuals just before and immediately after the 2011 general elections are still very fresh in our minds. The resultant crisis that trailed the announcement of the results in many parts of the Northern region was largely attributed to the unfortunate statements. The wounds of that crisis are still very fresh in the minds of many Nigerians and such occurrences must be avoided by all means.

    That is why we urge the PDP and in fact every other politician to be cautious of the kind of statements they make, avoiding by all means words that will send negative signal to the polity. Free speech, being one of the basic pillars of democracy demands responsibility on the part of the persons exercising this right. It also demands self-restraint and constant observance of democratic rules of engagements which the word capture negates.

    Lagos deserves greater service and commitment from all and sundry so that we can make it one of the best cities in the world to live in. A city that is capable of providing basic infrastructure for its residents and with increased capability for self – renewal that will ensure its place in the future. That is what we think governance is all about and that is what Lagos people demand so that we can continue having their trust and confidence thus winning their votes and not capturing it.

     

    •Hon Jimoh is a member of the Lagos State House of Assembly

  • Re: Okorocha and the limits of ambition

    Re: Okorocha and the limits of ambition

    SIR: After reading the article with the above caption in The Nation of Friday February 8, it was crystal clear to me that it is either the writer, Ogbonna Eze is totally ignorant of happenings in Imo State, or he is a member of the liability political party that was beaten mercilessly by Governor Rochas Okorocha and his APGA in 2011.

    It is shocking because for the first time in Imo State, we are seeing free education; we are also seeing infrastructural leap after a long time. Salaries and pensions are paid promptly, students are even paid for going to school, yet an individual is asking where Okorocha is spending his allocation.

    Eze also committed another blunder when he inferred that Okorocha rode on the back of Ojukwu to become governor. This is another wrong but deliberate assumption. While not trying to undermine the influence of late Dim Ojukwu, it will be in order to point out here that Ojukwu was seriously hospitalised abroad during the time of Okorocha’s electioneering campaign. As a result, Ojukwu did not show up in Imo during that period, even though he sent his goodwill through his wife Bianca.

    As at 1999, Rochas won governorship primaries in Imo State; so he is not a green horn in Imo politics. Their political party candidate who was beaten mercilessly in the last election, also jumped from party to party. He started off in PDP, then he moved to AD in furtherance of his guber ambition; he later came back to PDP only to run off again to PPA from where he was “announced governor”. Then he came back to PDP even as a sitting governor and then failed woefully at the 2011 elections.

    It is good to set the records straight.

    •Uzo Iwuala,

    Owerri.

  • Osun: Recovering from the darkest moment

    Osun: Recovering from the darkest moment

    Recovery,” former Prime Minister of Britain, John Major once said, “begins from the darkest moment.” The circumstances of the State of Osun would readily fit this looking at the dramatic turnaround with the dawn of a new governance era in the state.

    Raising a state that had gone down totally deflated must provide keen economists some good case studies. The lessons to be learnt derives from how the Rauf Aregbesola administration led a recovery job from the state’s “darkest moment”, to use the ex-British Prime Minister’s words, to a stage where all the indices are pointing to sharp departure from the recent depressing past on all the globally acknowledged human development indices.

    The recent assessment of the impact of the local content policy initiative on employment generation in Osun through a survey pointedly explains how ingenious best practices in public finance, accountability, transparency, and a determined objective to turn around a state have moved Osun from an unenviable rating as the state with the highest unemployment rate in the South-west geo-political zone in 2011 to the state with the best rating in the region and the second best employment rating in the country.

    Indeed, there is a less than one per cent margin between the state with the best rating in the country and Osun which has emerged second best throughout the country. Needless to state here, the 2011 survey is a reflection of the scenario that existed in Osun in 2010 before the current administration took over on November 27, 2010.

    And what was the stage like before the new actors emerged? Poor implementation of policies and programmes, heavy reliance on allocations from the Federation Account, preference for recurrent expenditure rather than capital expenditure and poor attention to local content policy in the implementation and execution of projects in the state.

    The combined effect of all these had resulted in what was no less an insolvent state where not only had capital projects become a tall order, recurrent expenditures such as overheads were taken care of through monthly loans.

    Two years after, the Aregbesola administration has been able to halt the trend through policies aimed at injecting life back into the economy.

    In what has directly affected the employment generation rating, the engagement of 20,000 youth for the purpose of community and social works, under the scheme, Osun Youth Empowerment Scheme (OYES) has made massive social impact. Through the huge number of hitherto unemployed and frustrated youths, the government injects a whooping sum of N200 million into the economy monthly. The ripple effect of this is mostly felt in the informal sector of the state’s economy where those without any purchasing power now have the muscle to enrich the markets with their purchase of daily needs.

    The scheme has, in no small measure, also created avenues for the beneficiaries to, within the two years of their service to home state, look for other more profitable means of engagement which helps them quit the rank of the jobless for good.

    For instance, various lucrative self-employment schemes and channels have been opened up such that an OYES cadet has the option of choosing his area of interest based on his academic trainings and qualifications.

    Some of these include beef production through modern cattle ranch established in Oloba Cattle Ranch in Iwo; bee farming project, red brick scheme, and many other vocations which have the capacity to further create employment opportunities across the state.

    Of course, many of the services rendered by the cadets have enhanced the quality of life of the citizenry as issues such environmental upgrade through the activities of the cadets, control of traffic, rescue duties in cases of emergencies, and other community and social works have assisted the people to move from the deplorable standard of living to more rewarding and proud lifestyles.

    Another high social impact scheme of the state which has halted the poverty rating is the scheme, Agba Osun, a programme based on care for the elderly who are vulnerable throughout the state. After an enumeration, a total 1,602 senior citizens were identified as very vulnerable and in constant need of financial support. Every month, each of these elderly persons collect a sum of N10,000 as upkeep allowances.

    Of course, closely related to the above is the attention paid to the issue of pension by the current administration.

    For indigenes of the state, who had spent the better parts of their productive years working, unpaid pensions remained another source of poverty with the concomitant socio-economic complications.

    It was this ugly trend that the Rauf Aregbesola-led government halted by ensuring prompt payment of backlogs. By August 2012, a total of N7.7bn had been paid in pension and gratuities.

    Directly or indirectly, many of the policies have chain effects on the dramatic and unprecedented reduction in poverty rating of the state, giving the result of the best managed economy in the country in the face of worsening economic scenarios across Nigeria.

    For instance, not many minds have reasoned that the decision of the state government to instil a culture of saving, no matter how meagre the resources of the state are, have brought some fortunes to the people.

    Under the Omoluabi Conservation Funds, which is accurately backed by law, the Aregbesola administration has ensured that the state is not left vulnerable in the face of dwindling revenues from the Federation Account. This accounts for why Osun, despite the now well-known delay in the release of federal allocations, pays its workers on or before 26th day of every month. Apart from being a radical departure from the painful past of delayed salaries, pensions and gratuities, Osun has set the pace on how, even from the most meagre of resources, a culture of saving can be instituted to foster development.

    Through the same strategy, the government has ensured that funds from the Excess Crude Oil Account are saved for the purpose of development. It is through this that the on-going 10 kilometres roads per local government scheme was made possible, having successfully saved over N10 billion which has served as an attraction to the financial institutions to partner with the state on behalf of the council areas to embark on the ambitious project of constructing the roads.

    With those projects on going, analysts are of the conviction that the state is on the path to unprecedented growth with motorable network of roads.

    In formulating policies to halt the ugly tide, Governor Aregbesola has demonstrated a parallel with Muhammad Yunus, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, Bangladesh pro-poor thinker and author of Creating a World Without Poverty.

    Yunus, who also authored the book, Banker to the Poor, had written in his book, “If the poor are to get the chance to lift themselves out of poverty, it’s up to us to remove the institutional barriers we have created around them. We must remove the absurd rules and laws we have made that treat the poor as nonenties. And we must come up with new ways to recognize a person by his or her worth, not by artificial measuring sticks imposed by a biased system”.

    The above aptly illustrates the rationale behind the policies of the administration which aim to remove poverty totally and set the people on a path to prosperity.

    • Alabi, a Media Assistant to the governor, wrote from Osogbo, State of Osun

  • El-Rufai: In defence of public discourse

    El-Rufai: In defence of public discourse

    At the beginning, a caveat: this is not a defence of Malam Nasir El-Rufai. I believe he is not intellectually deformed to defend himself. I am no supporter of his many elitist policies while in the helms at the Federal Capital Territory. This, rather, is a defence of commonsense and a defence of the culture of public discourse which, unfortunately, has dived below the mark of decent coition of ideas and cocktail of facts. I find myself agreeing with the Nobel Laureate, Prof Wole Soyinka who wrote in a 2007 essay; “We have gone below the Ground Zero of public debate”.

    Just as 2012 was folding off, Nigerians got engrossed in a heated debate following the release of There Was a Country, Chinua Achebe’s Civil War memoirs. The hell, to use the cliché, was literally let loose as Nigerians took each other by the throat. You could say this was a healthy engagement in ironing out some key national questions and revisiting our haunting history. It was not. This was because most of the loudest voices, especially in the early days of the quasi-debate, were of the people that had not actually read the book. Opinions were developed based on second-hand information that in most cases were subjugated to subjective interpretations or selective revisionism. The only knowledge to the book held by most commentators then was in form of some early reviews published in foreign titles and, in some cases, snippets of the book published as excerpts by the media. I had wanted to do a meta-review of There Was a Country especially after reading the reviews of the book penned by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Chika Uniagwe and Noo Saro-Wiwa. In particular, I was angered by some careless lines of fiction in Adichie’s review that I had intended to take up. However, I restrained myself to wait and read the primary text first; which I had ordered by then. Alas, I never got around to writing the piece.

    Recently, former Minister of Education, Oby Ezekwesili delivered a pre-convocation lecture at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, where she alleged that our foreign reserve has been deflated by $67 billion since the 2007 election. A cheer group of semi-intellectuals, who, thanks to Dr Reuben Abati, we now come to know as “today’s men” viciously launched a character-assassination attack on her, and anything she was thought to be representing. That also served as launch pad to take all her co-travellers, the “yesterday’s men”, to the cleaners.

    Enter Nasir El-Rufai’s The Accidental Public Servant. Since the commencement of some media reviews of this book, some people began hauling stones, even if aimless. Typical of the age-old orientation, the media went for the more explosive parts; some areas in which some leading dramatis personae of our politics space are ‘negatively’portrayed. And there come the most banal, even grotesque campaign to rubbish the author and, ultimately, throw the bath water with the baby. The book has now become a spring post from which the personality of the author is attacked. Of course his adversaries have been waiting for it thus the spontaneous firing of verbal missiles and the hysteria. However, as with the case with Ezekwesili’s UNN lecture, those who disagreed with El-Rufai’s assertions have not shown readiness to present us with superior arguments. What we have been dished all these days is a confetti of hate-words with an unruly tincture of half-truths. This is the level to which public debate has been reduced. Sad.

    I am writing this not with the mind that El-Rufai wrote the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. In any case, as a student of deconstruction, I know truth itself is contestable and often subjective. However, we must give it to the former minister for not only writing the book but also putting names to faces even when he knows that these people are largely alive and can go any length to defend themselves or fight back. The Atiku Media Office has gone public with invectives while sponsoring adverts in print and broadcast media to point “inconsistencies” between what El-Rufai claimed in the book and what he told the Senate during his clearance for ministerial post. Their undoing is that none of them, it seems, cared to verify what is actually in the book vis-à-vis what was said by El-Rufai at the Senate.

    Some of the more civil critics of the book thought that El-Rufai, in writing the memoir, had thrown ethics of “statecraft” (whatever that means!) and confidentiality to the dogs, thereby baring it all. This is another sad story of our country’s descent into paucity of public discourse. Memoirs should be explosive, political memoirs especially. The advance democracies that we are wont to copy use memoirs to deepen democratic culture and foster transparency. Government business is not a cultic venture. People have the right to know and memoirs are written to reveal what was not in the public knowledge. If all that is written in a memoir is a mishmash of jejune facts that are already known, what is the essence?

    We will do this country and indeed future generation a whole lot of good if we begin to water the culture of a more fertile public debate. This unhealthy reductionism of bringing down serious issues that require intense intellectual reflection and honest introspection is a great disservice for the country. Many a problem bedeviling the very existence of Nigeria as a country is attributed to our lack of sincerity to look at the problems objectively and call a spade by its name, no matter whose ox is gored. Let there be more memoirs, let there be more sincere engagement of the memoirs.

     

    •Abdulaziz is a journalist in Abuja.

  • These are interesting times

    These are interesting times

    SIR: We live in interesting times. The political class is having a hell of a jolly time. The judiciary is courting public scrutiny because judges are now living in interesting times. Public servants are also having a swell of a time. The senators are leading the dance in this interesting milieu. The representatives are not immune to the bug of interesting times. In a nation that brags about as the giant of mother Africa, it should be expected that Nigeria must be a land of interesting people.

    Take our love for life and fun. We are loud. Our men are loud. Our women are loud. Our youths are loud. The rich are loud. The well connected are loud. Our politicians are loud in their habits. They are loud in their manner. They are loud in their tastes. They are loud in their sartorial elegance – whether in suit or agbada. President Jonathan controls 11 aeroplanes. They call it presidential fleet. He goes about with a fleet of darkened SUVs and battalion of minders. His public-funded kitchen budget still stands at N1billion. That kitchen must be loud with expensive utensils that befit the ruler of the giant of Africa.

    Nigeria is now a country without Pentecostal modesty. Our pastors are modern day arrogant Pharaohs. In carriage, in cassock, in speech they all look like medieval emperors. Churches are no longer a place of celestial calm and repose but consulting malls for business deals. The glory of Christ has been replaced by the glory of materialism. They now indulge openly in the things that will make Satan proud.

    The story of one big time crook called John Yakubu Yusufu and his other loud crooks did not surprise me at all. He is the feral meanness of the triumph of corruption in Nigeria. He is a true apostle of loud greed and a good discerner of our interesting times. History of big, loud stealing is not new. What we have are new actors from unlikely places. Abacha stole loudly. James Ibori stole loudly. Actors in the Halliburton scandal stole loudly. Worse, these looters are still living loud and large.

    Why would anyone agonise over a man who defrauded pensioners of a mere N27billion? To be shocked or surprised is to diminish the stature of Nigeria as giant of corruption in Africa. Anyone who is angry over the maltreatment of police pensioners is yet to understand the depth of our soulless embrace of love of money. Look at the president. Despite his utopian pledges to transform Nigeria and exorcise the ghost of corruption, the guy is nothing but a latter day Nero who fiddles away while Nigeria burns.

    John Yakubu Yusufu is hugely heartless. However, we have to thank Justice Mohamed Talba for bringing forward the inevitability of Nigeria’s Spring or grassroots revolution. His judgement on the N2732billion pension scam is nothing but a calamitous retreat from judicial fairness. His inaction to take proper action on the scam is affirming the accusation that in Nigeria justice is now privatised to the highest bidder.

    Abroad, the actions of both John Yakubu Yusuf and Justice Talba will again begin to prompt the racist conviction that Africans are naturally prone to evil, lying, stealing, wickedness, corruption, venality and mismanagement. Revelation of scam like this is guaranteed to contribute to the centuries-old racist slur that Africans – blacks – are inherently amoral, lazy and corrupt.

    •Taju Tijani,

    Lagos.

  • Crime and punishment in Nigeria

    Crime and punishment in Nigeria

    There is inevitably something comic about this political enterprise of ours, something decidedly beyond reason. Does it not seem the people are falsely imprisoned, though it appears it can only happen here, N23.3billion stolen admittedly by one Mr. John Yakubu Yusuf, a former Assistant Director in the Police Pension Office, in inordinate vanity and a dreadful humiliation of the country’s national character in another classic now known as the Police Pension Scam, and after months of back and forth, he gets two years imprisonment with an option of N750, 000 fine only.

    What does the country get? Nothing, but a disgraceful applause. What do the people get? Shock, perhaps mild disbelief, pain and destroyed hopes. Can I ask, did our government not spend more than N750,000 to prosecute that man? Maybe am just wondering. Gleefully, the matter is reported as plea bargain, and even though am a lawyer, being familiar with that word, yet my mind begins to extrapolate the things of the deep, and somehow this epiphany that can only be occasioned by logic leads me to perhaps what plea bargain indeed means here; another word for the arrest of justice and its subsequent trial on the altar of bargain, and by the time bargain is closed, the highest bidder is throwing a party. Sounds to me more like justice auctioned to the highest bidder.

    I thought there is something referred to as the Mischief rule in the Canons of Interpretation, a rule which I suspect solemnly calls on today’s actors in the theatre of law and justice to reach out to the original intention of the Parliament, to help them unearth the mind of the then makers of the Law, to order their steps in doing justice. In the same vein, I would suppose that the makers of our criminal cum penal sanctions must have had the likes of Mr. John Yakubu Yusuf in mind while drafting our laws, but was it the intention of those same lawmakers that a man guilty of stealing N23.3billion be handed a two year sentence that can simply be exchanged for a paltry sum of N750, 000? Certainly, I think not.

     

    By Olusola Adegbite,

    Abuja.