Category: Commentaries

  • Still on the immigration recruitment exercise

    Still on the immigration recruitment exercise

    SIR: The recent report of the spat between the Minister of the Interior and the Comptroller-General of Immigration Service as carried by some dailies including The Nation of Friday, December 28, 2012 over an alleged surreptitious recruitment exercise is symptomatic of the general malaise and decadence in both the Ministry and Immigration Service.

    The Comptroller of Immigration Service (CGIS) had refuted the allegation that she was recruiting officers and men into the Service without following the due process. According to her,the Minister couldn’t have stopped an exercise that was yet to begin. In other words, there was no recruitment going on in the first place. The Minister was lying! Her defense was all sophistry for all I care. Those who know and are close to the workings of the Service know better.

    In August,2011, according to an Abuja based local newspaper The Road, Thursday August 18, 2011, similar recruitment exercise was carried out clandestinely by the same CGIS where it was alleged that out of the 2700 vacancies available for that year, 1000 slots went to the Presidency while copious allocations went to the Interior Ministry, the politicians, the Board of the Service, CGIS cronies and top functionaries of the service etc. Up till now nobody has refuted the allegation.

    Apart from this, recruitments have continued to be made into the service through the process tagged ‘replacement’. Nobody knows those who are being replaced in the first instance. But it would appear that you must know somebody ‘who is somebody ‘ before you could be recruited or pay your way through as alleged. And to imagine that the majority of officers at the service headquarters don’t know about this much less those at the state commands. These have been going on for the past two years.

    Whether you are talking about promotion, transfer or appointment, it’s now a matter of ‘cash and carry’. The recent promotion released in the last quarter of last year nearly tore the service asunder. It was a parody of injustice whereby subordinates and juniors were promoted far and above their more qualified seniors. The dissatisfaction therefrom is already causing ripples in the service.

    The CGIS is therefore not speaking the truth. It was alleged that the recruitment exercise had been designated to hold in a primary school somewhere in Asokoro before the minister wielded the big stick. Even if the CGIS succeeds in deceiving some people, she should understand that she couldn’t deceive those who actually bought their ways through and those who came on the back of godfathers and godmothers.

    I think what may have triggered the recent altercations between the minister and the CGIS was that the latter probably outfoxed the former hence the hammer. Absolutely,both the ministry and the service are culpable.

     

    • Ogidi Martin,

    Asokoro, Abuja.

  • A vote for capital punishment

    SIR: The French revolution of the 18th century featured the introduction of “Madame Guillotine”, which not only helped France, but helped the entire European world in general. Many aristocrats that ruled in France during the time of the revolution were executed, including Louis XVI, the King. This was so because the long-oppressed proletariat which comprised mostly very poor people in France had simply had enough of the nobles who were making life unbearable for them.

    The English civil war also saw the death of Charles I, King of England and Charles II, his son who felt they could do what they wanted and were prepared to forgo the rights of the people to get what they wanted. Whether what they wanted was right or wrong, the truth remains that the leaders are there to serve the people and not to be tyrants over them, not to impose their own desires on them. Vox populi, vox Dei.

    China has made corruption a capital crime, and believe it or not, it is helping them. Once found guilty of corruption in China, there is every possibility that death is around the corner. Corruption is at its minimum in China, and so the people are living a good life – at least better than Nigeria.

    Nigeria has become a hotbed for revolution of sorts. A new order should begin. One corrupt power holder can bring about the death of at least 100 people. If a man steals a purse from one woman at the market, he is instantly burnt to death. Then what is the man who steals from over 170 million people still doing alive? The man who drove another man to steal by stealing from him is still alive, while the man who stole because he had been stolen from is dead.

    We need a Ministry of Death. It will be like the Ministry of Justice, but unlike the Ministry of Justice, the members will actually be incorruptible judges. Once a power holder is suspected of corruption, he is tried for treason against the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and if found guilty, is sent to the world beyond.

    Nigerians should think about it!

     

    • Alapade Pablo

    OAU, Ile-Ife.

  • Kwankwaso and Kano’s opposition politics

    It’s not without reason that a section of opposition in Kano State is hell-bent on deflecting attention from the groundbreaking transformation, currently going on in the state. Given their notorious straw-clutching antecedent and their apparent desperation to claw themselves back to reckoning, the last ditch resort to underhand tactic, shouldn’t, however, come as a surprise to any discerning mind. Indeed, politics is not only all about service delivery, but the public perception of it as well. In both, it doesn’t bode well for the members of this disgruntled group.

    Since his return to the government house, Governor Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso has been churning out one noteworthy development project/programme after the other. As a matter of fact, the general consensus in Kano, and even beyond, is that the current political leadership is not only doing fabulously well, but the man at the helm of affairs, is raising the bar to a greater height. Thus members of this group of opposition face the principal advantage of being caught napping on the two significant fronts.

    Today in Kano, these politicians are not only humbled and prostrate but completely paralysed. The Kwankwaso’s second coming to power has sounded the death knell on them, with astounding performance. And going by the beautiful, well thought-out plans he has in the 2013’s budget, the year is obviously earmarked for their political funeral.

    By all means, the last one and a half years, have not been the best of times for Kwankwaso’s detractors. The manner their political stock has plummeted to the lowest ebb, while his, skyrocketed to high heaven, is a case study for the pundits.

    It’s within the period that the good people of the state got the opportunity to make significant comparisons. They could easily put side by side, prudence and profligacy, tangible infrastructure revival and mere abstract moral suasion propaganda, and more importantly, sincerity of purpose and make-believe illusion.

    In 2003, when Kwankwaso left the government house, following the year’s major electoral upset, it was evidently clear that the new occupants were not prepared for the nature of the job in their hands. Perhaps, this was because they never, in the first place, even envisaged nicking it.

    There was something, however, chiefly remarkable about how Kwankwaso tactfully handled his post-electoral defeat politics. The shrewd manner he opted to quietly observe proceedings from the sideline, until the right time for him to stage a comeback had all the hallmarks of political genius. This is, however, in sharp contrast to the disgraceful, amateur manner the current opposition are going about their newly found political misfortune.

    Yet, just like their non-readiness for the power —thrust upon them on the platter of gold- formed the basis of their tragic handling of it, when they held sway for eight forgetful years—their lack of preparedness for parting ways with the so-called trappings of office has now proven to be their major undoing.

    It could easily be recalled that in the build up to 2011 elections, when the cards were clearly stacked up against them- as some of them were already packing their bags to desert the sinking ship—these political apprentices were still burying their heads in the sand of complacency. They thoughtlessly anticipated the politically conscious Kano people to endorse failure for another term, while Kwankwaso – a politician they completely wrote off – was busy baking a gargantuan humble pie for them. His colourful ideology based campaign, his sense of humour –which they mocked at their own peril – and exceptional mobilisation skills, helped to tip the tide in his favour. Today, to the chagrin of his detractors, Kwankwaso has his reputation as the new undisputable doyen of Kano politics well sewn up.

    Thus from the day one, they couldn’t hide their desperation to set the tone of political discourse with their usual mischief. They create much ado about nothing around issues. For instance, when the people are savouring the ancient city is now well illuminated from set to dawn, with functioning streets lights, they wanted the spot light, eternally cast on the little money expended to fuel generators for that service.

    Ironically, these carping lots have, failed to see the folly of whining over the cost of diesel purchased to illuminate the streets, forgetting that Kano people are not oblivious of the fact that billions of naira was squandered to put them in total darkness during the eight years of locust, they put behind them.

    They have similarly tried the same filthy tactic on virtually every good policy or project initiated by the governor. When within few days of his second coming, beautiful blocks of classrooms started adorning the landscape of the state like magic, their fault-finding machine launched sustained attacks on it. Since it’s, however, difficult, to tell the people that raising structures like that at a time when 150 to 200 pupils were packed in a classroom like sardines , was not a cheering development, they tried to dismiss the buildings as UBE-supported project. But what stopped them from accessing the fund meant for the state under the programme, during their days?

    Is it that they didn’t want part away with counterpart cash or they dreaded the scrutiny of supervision that comes with it?

    Again, they comically made the locations of the buildings an issue, querying why the new upstairs classrooms “are so conspicuous for people to see?” as if that would prevent students from using them.

    But before the needless title-tattling they created around the matter died down, Kwankwaso had already put more slices of humble pie on their table –thereby making the battle of wills untenable for them.

    The cheering news of the 501 indigenes of the state selected as the first batch of graduates to be sponsored for Masters Degrees in different fields abroad resonated across the country. The development, undoubtedly, drew the attention of the entire nation to the visionary and purposeful leadership that’s now making a difference in state.

    Before then, the establishment of the North West University (NWU), by the state government, which had got the NUC’s approval, had already caught the eye.

    So going by the prolific manner the government keeps churning them out, it’s becoming increasingly hard for his traducers to summon up much enthusiasm.

    Within a year, the Kwankwaso administration has succeeded in improving the Internally Generated Revenue (IGR), from N500 million to N1.3 billion.

    And for the first time in history, 75 per cent of the state’s budget goes to capital expenditure, leaving only 25 per cent for the recurrent. This is an improvement from last year when we witnessed a fiscal budget which provided for capital projects to about 67% and recurrent expenditure of 33 per cent.

    Indeed, so much is currently happening in Kano today especially in the area of infrastructure revival that small pieces like this one, will not be able to accommodate. And at the pace governor Kwankwaso is moving, it’s easier to face a moving train than to attempt to deflect attention from his achievements.

    • Baban-Sumayya wrote in from Kano.

  • Jonathan and his 2013 promise

    Jonathan and his 2013 promise

    SIR: Assailed by the harsh criticisms that have trailed his administration since coming to power almost three years ago, President Goodluck Jonathan seems to be developing cold feet. At every opportunity, he won’t fail to point out that his government is being lashed at by opposition parties, the media and others.

    Somehow he has admitted his administration’s sluggishness. Many Nigerians were very optimistic and expected much from Dr Jonathan when he was elected. Many believe he has so far achieved little in the much-touted transformation of Nigeria. That his government seems so slow in the dispensation of dividends of democracy is no news. Dr Jonathan seizes every moment to defend his slow pace. Speaking in Abuja at a church service to mark the New Year celebration; he remarked “Sometimes, people say this government is slow. Yes, by human thinking, we are slow”.

    At another occasion, at the foundation laying ceremony of the Living Faith Foundation Bible College in Kaduna, the president sued for encouragement and support from Nigerians and promised a better 2013. He spoke of improvement in power, job and wealth creations among others.

    As a nation, 2012 was quite challenging. Sad occurrences seemed to have over shadowed the gains of the year. Corruption cases soared high. The nation recorded three air mishaps. Remember the June 3 air crash that took the lives of about 153 promising persons. The Police helicopter crash that claimed the live of DIG Haruna John and others. The Bayelsa doomed Helicopter. How about the countless road mishaps?

    While President Jonathan may relish rhetoric and theories about the goods of 2013, it is trite to remind him that if he doesn’t change his tactics and adopt more courageous and effective approaches, the year 2013 may be worse than 2012. The manner in which corruption cases are being handled is not encouraging. The scourge is rising daily. Insecurity seems to be one of the country’s biggest challenges. Bombings, suicide attacks and other acts of terrorism continued with the government labeling the perpetrators “faceless”. The president must not continue to tag them “faceless”. He must utilize every workable avenue to stem the tide of terrorism. Cases of kidnapping resurfaced with the kingpins smiling to the banks while causing pains and trepidation in the land.

    President Good luck Jonathan’s cabinet seems to be embroiled in many controversies. Some of his ministers are having one corruption cases or the other hanging on their head. Some are inefficient and redundant. For much impact to be felt this year, the President must sack some of his cabinet members and bring on board patriotic and qualified Nigerians who will help in redefining governance. The nation’s oil industry is fraught with tales of monumental fraud and back- hand deals.

    The subsidy imbroglio still remains a test case for the President. If much is not achieve in “cleansing” the sector, then the promise of 2013 will remain what they are- promises. If he continues with his “go-easy” and “go- slow” style of governance, the New Year may not be different from 2012.

    Nobody is expecting the government to perform magic, but courageous and well articulated deeds could transform to great achievements. Promises are not enough; we must match them with realities.

    • Stanley Ibeku

    Africa Regional Centre for

    Information Science,

    University of Ibadan.

  • Re: Go-slow government

    Re: Go-slow government

    Our friend Festus Eriye and his friends on Sunday Nation dated 30/12/2012 wrote an editorial titled “Go-slow government” and their peroration reads “the dangers ahead is that if President Jonathan continue at this pace, it will take eternity for Nigeria to witness positive change.”

    At this point, it is pertinent to ask Festus and his friends what they understand as positive change? I think their conceptualisation of the term differs from what the dictionary holds. If Festus and his friends are allowed to define positive change, I think Nigerians will go with the definition stated in the dictionary.

    Whether Festus and his friends lack the capacity to understand what constitute positive change. That I do not know, but I do know that the improvement in our electoral system is a visible indicator of positive change. It is on record that in Nigeria votes now counts. Perhaps, Festus and his friends forgot that this administration has successfully sent ‘riggingticians’ on compulsory retirement.

    O yes! They also forgot that those hired species of homo sapiens whose’s sole duty is to transmute voter’s cards into death certificate on election day via materials of war are now on indefinite vacation. I think we should remind Festus and his friends that those who transmogrify ballot boxes into magic boxes so that it can disappear from polling unit and to re-appear at collation centre are also out of trade courtesy Mr. President. If these electoral progress does not fall within positive change, then what does it fall into?

    It’s all record that power has improved for the first time in Nigeria. There are also visible signs of improvement at our airports, agric sectors, transport sector and work are on-going on some of our roads. Are these not omens of positive change? If I am wrong, please correct me.

    God Bless Nigeria.

    Onehimare G. O.

    Benin City

  • Cabinet rating: Go back on Oduah

    Cabinet rating: Go back on Oduah

    The recent rating of Ministers in President Jonathan’s cabinet published in your Sunday issue of December 29th, 2012 made an interesting reading. Not so much for its content or its veracity, but for the simple fact that evaluation and scoring of performance of public officers fall within the role of all responsible media and meets public expectations. Be that as it may, because of the high premium the public places on such evaluations, Media houses are expected to do a thoroughly incisive professional job that leaves no one in doubt about the scores, given acceptable margins of error. This process becomes more critical when the basis for scoring is founded on the empirical and the usual consideration of “where we were and where we are now.”

    In the face of concrete realities and categoricals, philosophical serenades, effusions and opinionisation become absolutely irrelevant. Not taking cognisance of the above is the fundamental flaw of the scores that led to Stella Odua’s low rating by The Nation. While I do not know how the scores of other ministers were arrived at, I therefore cannot comment effectively on them, more so as I always like to stay on my areas of core competence of which aviation is one. If, however, other scores were arrived at the same way that of the Aviation Minister was arrived at, I will humbly suggest that The Nation, with utmost sense of humility, given its leapfrogged profile and skyrocketing readership, should go back to take a second look at its ratings.

    For want of better words, it is lazy and unprofessional to hinge the conclusions of a very serious national issue on the interview of just one industry analyst, protagonist or antagonist. It is worst when such an analyst is a sworn antagonist who holds an uncompromising publicly advertised disdain that bothers on the personal, for the minister. Such an assessor, under all circumstances, will never have any thing good to say about the assessed. This is the fundamental flaw of your rating of the Aviation Minister. If your staff knew the industry well or cared to check out, he would have found that the aviation analyst he took on, in spite of his analytic competence and long-standing experience, was already fixated and with a mental spectacle that permanently constructs and reconstructs every action of Stella Odua into negatives.

    In the same vein, it would have been prejudicial to choose a protagonist for such evaluation as positive conclusions will lead to the same fault of jaundiced rating even when it is high. In consequence, therefore, I will not attempt to rate the minister, since I am a protagonist.

    But since to be fair to yourself, the minister and Nigerians, you must re-do your assessment, I ask you to send your reporters to check out what is happening to the ramshackle terminals of yesterday at Lagos, Abuja, Kano, Port Harcourt, Benin, Calabar, Owerri, Jos to mention but some. Send your reporters to interview airlines on whether the runway lights in Lagos domestic airport and Enugu, which for over a decade, were not allowing night landings, are now on. Send them out to find out for Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON) whether it is true that approval for removing all duties and taxes on aircraft and spares which they cried for over years without success, have now been granted. Please let your reporters go find out whether it is true that the construction of five new modern terminals by the Chinese in Lagos, Abuja, Kano, Port Harcourt and Enugu with finance from Chinese EXIM Bank will commence in 2013. The Nation should then do a historical or trend analysis to situate these developments in time and consider whether such strides in under 18 months merit a D,F,B or A.

    In conclusion, I need to point out that for all of us in the industry, we have over the years watched the industry wallow in ministerial inaction even as the ship of the industry floated rudderlessly on the fluctuating tide of Nigeria’s sea of economic development without sense of direction talk less of a Master Mariner, being in-charge as it now is.

    In the last decade or two, aviation has been in need of sector-specific reform to no avail. But today, there is, at least, a roadmap to follow. Haba! Have we lost our sense of judgement?

    I cherish my copy of “The Nation” daily. Hence, as a discerning reader, I demand or request as of right, that you go back to re-assess Odua and any other minister that may have been inadvertently maligned or misjudged. It is only fair on all as the Rotarians say.

    Chris Aligbe

    Aviation Consultant.

  • Nigerians need a new work ethics in 2013

    SIR: Our attitudes towards work must change positively this year if we must develop and if we must actualize our vision20:2020 et al.

    The lack of enthusiasm is very glaring in the attitude of many workers who see their jobs as dull, laborious, repetitious, tedious, irritating, risky or dangerous.

    The lackadaisical attitudes toward work by both high-ranking and low-ranking workers has become a great obstacles to the development of the most of the Third World countries, because poor quality work reduced productivity and declining services cripple economic growth of any nation.

    After World War II, Japan was greatly devastated. Many of her buildings and people had been obliterated by atomic bombs. The United States and other nations offered help to rebuild Japan. Computer experts, agricultural specialists, scientists, teachers, business people etc. from different nations offered to help Japanese reconstruct their country but with a condition: They demanded that the Japanese will work more and earn less than workers in United States were paid and the Japanese agreed with that condition of work because they wanted to rebuild their country as soon as possible. Today Japan is a power to be reckoned with. Her might is based on economic, not military strength.

    In Nigeria, most of us want jobs but we don’t want to work; we want the money but we don’t want to expend the energy and this is one of the reasons Nigeria is not progressing because nothing is as depressing and frustrating as having someone on a job who is not interested in working.

    Too often we allow the pain and perspiration of work to hide its blessings; we assume work is a necessary evil without looking for the good it brings. We always prefer rest, relaxation and holidays to a good work, but unfortunately, all these are false assumption because rest is only sweet after a good work.

    When God created the world, He worked for six days and rested for one day (Genesis: 2:2). He also instructed us to work six days and rest for one day (Exodus23:12). But our desire to work one day and rest six days has caused us backwardness and unhappiness.

    In this New Year and henceforth, Nigerians must change their orientation to work. We must see work as a gift from God and not as a burden. We must know that work is profitable and honourable and all hard work brings profit for the workers by allowing them to meet their financial needs.

    The young unemployed must not just fold their harms or be sleeping at home; they must think, move around and look for something positive they can do with their lives.

    Governments on its part must also encourage the young unemployed by empowering them financially and make the society favourable for the small scale industries. The working condition and remuneration of the workers must be improved to motivate the workers to put in their best and to discourage brain drain.

    Workers must stop stealing from their bosses or government. Coming late to work, taking extra long lunch hours, going home early, collecting double salaries, converting company properties to personal one etc. are all acts that is tantamount to stealing which must be stopped.

    Governments must stop undermining the power of workers because the power of productivity is evident in the influence of Labour Unions. Unions control the workers, who control the productivity, and as a result, they can cripple a country, destroy an economy through industrial strike and other means. The leaders must know that they can not run a country when people are not working because you can’t force people to work.

    Governments can’t legislate obedience, nor can they force people to cooperate when they are moving in a wrong direction and workers will rebel if they feel they are working for nothing.

    Therefore it is high time we put a stop to an era of”monkey they work, baboon they chop”.

    • John Tosin Ajiboye

    Osogbo, Osun State

  • Amnesty programme deserves support

    SIR: Contrary to the thinking in some quarters that the amnesty programme for ex-Niger Delta militants is a total failure, I make bold to say that the programme remains the most successful programme ever run by the federal government.

    Amnesty declaration remains the most genuine, valiant and profound effort made by any federal government since the country’s Independence to tackle the agitation for fairness, equity and development in the oil-rich Niger Delta.

    Of recent, several write-ups containing unsubstantiated allegations of fund mismanagement have been made against the leadership of the Niger Delta Amnesty Office. Some have even suggested that the programme should be brought to an end on the ground that Kingsley Kuku and his team are only enriching themselves from the fund meant for the amnesty, arguing that there is nothing to show for the allocations they have received since inception.

    I do know that many discerning and perceptive Nigerians would agree that such argument is illogical and therefore cannot hold water because the gains of the amnesty programme are there for everyone to see. Although there were doubts at the incipient stage as to whether the programme would yield any fruitful upshot, today, the amnesty programme ably and adeptly coordinated by Hon. Kingsley Kuku has made significant impact in the restoration of peace in the Niger Delta.

    Upon completion of their oversight/inspection visit in September 2012 to the Afrika Union Aviation Academy in Mafikeng and the Flight Training Services in Midrand, South Africa, where 53 Niger Delta youths were being trained as pilots, members of the Senate and House Committees on Niger Delta commended the Presidential Amnesty office for what they termed the judicious utilisation of funds meant for the programme.

    The National Chairman of the Foundation for Ethnic Harmony in Nigeria (FEHN), Allen Onyema, also agree that the Amnesty Programme for ex-militants in the Niger Delta has been a monumental feat. Onyema while speaking to newsmen noted that the programme is celebrated the world over, as the international community seems to be bemused as to how Nigeria was able to get it right from the stage of disarmament, through demobilization to re-integration.

    According to the FEHN boss, the level of crude oil production prior to the programme was about 700,000 barrels a day, but since the commencement of the programme, the level of production has risen to over 2.6 million barrels per day.

    We must continue to encourage the amnesty office to build on the successes recorded so far in the running of the amnesty programme, which involves 30,000 Niger Delta youths.

    For a programme that has been saving about N34 billion per day for the country, it is only appropriate that we all support it to further stabilize our economy.

    • Michael Jegede,

    Abuja

  • US travel advisory is unfair to Edo

    SIR: Galileo was right when he said “I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who endowed us with sense, reason and intellect, intended us to forgo their use”. Sadly, authors of the recent U. S. travel advisory failed to use their sense, reason and intellect in accessing the true state of security in Edo State. The report, in a sheer display of incurable schizophrenia and intellectual hara-kiri, listed Edo State as unsafe.

    One cannot but ask in wonderment, what parameter was used to arrive at this unthinkable malicious misconception which negates common sense and sound ‘empiricality’.

    It is imperative to state at this point that Hardball of December 28, 2012 also misfired when it hurriedly ran to press to anoint the ‘Americanised’ black document faulting the position of the state government which was well articulated by the Secretary to the State Government (SSG). Hardball displayed the height of illogicality when it queried why the Edo SSG related security matters to development in the state. Hardball forgot that development is impossible without security. If the so-called report was right, Edo State would not have witnessed unprecedented development it finds itself now. So the developmental gains of Edo State are a clear indicator that Edo is safe. Therefore our SSG is in order.

    As an Edo man living in Edo State, I think the ‘onus probandi’ falls on me to notify President Obama and Hardball that Edo State is indeed very safe for peace loving and law abiding people. Just as it is also pertinent to place on record that Edo State is unsafe only for criminals or agents of evils.

    Edo is a lovely place to live in, because children do not pick up arms to kill their parents and transmute schools into slaughter house. In Edo State, we do not kill on the bases of race and other social divides.

    In Edo State, our infrastructure such as road, school, hospital, etc. can compete with those in advance countries. This fact should be promoted by the U.S. and not issues that does not matter.

    • Godfrey O. Ehimare

    Benin City.

  • A senator’s questionable charity

    Charity is good. It is preached in both the Bible and the Qur’an. So is it preached in local cultures across Africa. As Africans, we are groomed to imbibe charity as entrenched in our communal lifestyle where everyone functions (or is expected to function) as his brother’s keeper.

    It is lofty, beautiful and worthy of emulation. It has been commended by many non-Africans.

    In fact, we are trained to consider oneself wicked when you live in plenty without giving to the needy in one’s neighbourhood, family, church or even, work place. Hence, charity has grown to become the minimum standards in our giving and caring lifestyle as Africans.

    Yet the gifts doled out by Senator Smart Adeyemi to some people, including politicians in his Kogi West Senatorial District on Sunday, December 30, 2012 represent the wrong way typical Nigerian politicians miss the point in leading citizens aright.

    As reported by Daily Sun of Monday, December 31, 2012, the senator donated 15 vehicles for commercial purposes and 17 sport utility vehicles (SUV) to party leaders.

    One, it is surprising that a serving senator can flagrantly donate vehicles worth average of N32 million at once. This is an informal way of confirming that our National Assembly members have unfettered access to enormous funds that should ordinarily be channelled to developmental projects such as provision of water, electricity, good roads, good schools, hospitals and so on.

    With the little I know about Nigerian politicians, they spend daily on retinue of aides and on countless citizens that approach them for various forms of assistance. They are not alone in this solicited charity; other middle-class and wealthy Nigerians contend with it willy-nilly on daily basis. And it is unpublicized. So, if a politician comes out and makes a donation of N32 million in a single giving, in addition to his daily routine charity that sometimes runs into millions of Naira, he is communicating to the public, particularly the masses, that the only reasonable business in this country is politics.

    Two, should a serving public officer desire to make such huge donation, not minding that he would be stirring bitterness in the heart of his ‘less lucky’ constituents and insulting the sensibilities of the largely poor voters by whose mandate he got to the Senate, he could have channelled the huge sum to other noble projects that will bring joy to many homes and plug some of the shortfalls in government’s responsibilities.

    Calculating each bus at a conservative estimate of N800,000, the senator must have spent N12 million on the vehicles. If an SUV costs N1,200,000 each (very conservative estimate), the total cost of the 17 vehicles adds up to N20,400,000. That shows that Senator Adeyemi must have spent not less than N32,400,000 on the publicized charity.

    According to the report, 32 people benefited from the largesse as a vehicle went to each person.

    But many of the hungry constituents, angry unemployed youths in Kogi State and in Nigeria at large as well as many concerned Nigerians who do not think like politicians, would easily reason that in spite of the insult on our sensibilities, the distinguished senator could as well considered noble projects if he actually meant to do true charity for his people.

    In Kogi State where buildings in many public schools are derelict, N5 million would be enough to construct a block of three classrooms. That means the huge sum would have been enough to build or renovate at least, six blocks. If the senator constructs a block in six different schools across the constituency, he would reach more people and rebuild the destiny of many more children.

    By analysis, a block of three classrooms would accommodate 120 pupils (40 in each class). If he puts 120 pupils in a better condition of learning in just one school, it shows that he would bring joy to 600 families with his five blocks.

    Otherwise, Senator Adeyemi could have built three cottage hospitals in communities without public hospitals in his constituency. With N10 million, the lawmaker will put up a befitting cottage hospital that will bring healthcare to the doorsteps of thousands of his constituents.

    Following another path, the senator could employ many graduates as teachers into public schools. With monthly N20,000 allowance, the N32 million will be enough to pay 120 graduates for one full year. Taking this option, joy and financial empowerment would enter 120 families with the multiplier effect of over 3,000 pupils that would benefits from their service in schools.

    There are other noble options.

    Anyway, it is clear that Senator Adeyemi’s charity was not the actual charity but a gift to thank his supporters and to sustain their loyalty to him in preparation for coming elections. It is just that the publicity revealed the inner working of the mind of Nigerian politicians.

    These acts show why many employed and unemployed youths care less about our values as Africans or career as they abandon all for partisan politics. The gains are enormous but the effects are on us all, manifesting in material growth for individuals but economic woes for the country. It partly accounts for why our taps are still dry, why standards of education get lower and healthcare in parlous state.

    In other climes, the rich and the not-so-rich coordinate their charity towards lending a helping hand to both the government and individuals, particularly in the areas of healthcare and education. This restores hope to many children from poor homes and offers help for those unable to afford huge bills for treatment of complex ailments.

    It would be good for our politicians and moneybags to borrow a leaf from those climes so Nigerians would no longer look like special specie of humans living in their own unique world. We need to change our thinking and concentrate more on things of value than mundane things that do not bring about common good.

    • Oladele, writes from Ibadan, Oyo State