Category: Commentaries

  • Nigeria’s foreign debt and China’s globalization strategy

    Nigeria’s foreign debt and China’s globalization strategy

    SIR: It seemed almost like a scene from a Netflix comedy when the federal government, through its Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, accused the Chinese company Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Co. Limited of deception after a French court authorized the seizure of three Nigerian presidential jets. Two of these jets were undergoing routine maintenance, and the third had been purchased but not yet delivered. The government disputes the legitimacy of Zhongshan’s claim against Ogun State, arguing that the 2007 contract with the state government concerning a free-trade zone management does not involve the federal government; that the dispute had already been resolved in Nigerian courts; that the company failed to properly notify the federal and state governments; and that Zhongshan withheld crucial information and misled the French court into wrongly seizing the jets, which are protected by diplomatic immunity as sovereign assets.

    The government’s comparison of this situation to the PI&D case and its argument that Zhongshan’s claim is part of a broader strategy by foreign entities to defraud Nigeria is sceptical particularly given the ongoing trade war between China and the West.

    By capitalizing on globalization and leveraging technological transfers from 20-30 years ago, China has emerged as a major competitor to the U.S. and now dominates much of the world’s production. However, China’s financing of African projects, which often includes conditions for asset forfeiture, is increasingly viewed as undermining Africa’s economic growth and development, even though these projects contribute to the continent’s structural transformation. The strategy of asset seizure might re-echo China’s tactics in recovering debts from African nations, where several strategic assets, such as the Mombasa Port in Kenya and the Hambantota Port in Sri Lanka, have been lost due to debt repayment conditions.

    Read Also: 2024 China-Africa forum holds brightest opportunity for African nations, says udeogaranya

    The seizure of Nigeria’s presidential jets in France could be seen as part of a broader strategy where foreign entities, akin to China, use questionable legal tactics to seize strategic assets in exchange for debt repayment. Nigeria is likely to continue facing such challenges, with foreign entities attempting to claim its assets both overseas and onshore. This concern is highlighted by the recent dismissal of Nigeria’s sovereign immunity claim by a U.S. court in favour of a $70 million award to a Chinese firm, the ongoing PI&D case in the UK, the current $5.16 billion debt owed to China as of the second half of last year, and the caution issued to sub-national entities, such as state governments, by the Minister of Foreign Affairs against engaging in foreign negotiations without proper oversight. The clear lesson is that if Nigeria continues to spend irresponsibly while in debt, it will remain vulnerable to losing strategic assets to foreign creditors.

    Governance and infrastructure issues, rather than a lack of human capital, are the underlying reasons why Nigerian presidential jets are maintained or purchased abroad. At a time when international security risks and espionage are of growing concern, particularly between China and the West, Nigeria’s decision to have its presidential jets maintained or purchased abroad, while describing them as sovereign assets, appears questionable. This contrasts with the practices of leaders from major countries, who use vehicles made in their own nations, such as the U.S. President’s Cadillac One or the UK Prime Minister’s Jaguar XJ Sentinel.

    Nigeria needs to understand that the countries that produce are the ones that lend, emphasizing the need to invest in infrastructure to become a producing nation.

    • ESV. Adeyemi Adebiyi, adebiyiadeyemi@outlook.com  
  • Clark’s latest bluster

    Clark’s latest bluster

    Ijaw Leader, Chief Edwin Clark, savours the appellation of “elder statesman” — a cliche the uncritical media attaches to about any name that has droned, over decades, in Nigeria’s troubled public space.

    But if “elder statesmen” are indeed expected to use wisdom to trouble-shoot and quell crises, this one glories in looking for trouble and compounding crises, by the use of explosive commentaries, like some excitable rookie, who glories in nothing but trouble.

    More worrying: beyond Ijaw tribalism, Clark is well-nigh defanged.  In supreme but laughable pretence, however, he frames such under “national”, altruistic sentiments — skewed nationalism and altruism the Ijaw old man can tell to the Niger Delta marines!

    All of that Clark has manifested, since the Rivers crisis broke out between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and estranged godfather, benefactor-turned-malefactor and predecessor, Nyesom Wike, now FCT minister.

    Clark’s intervention is nothing but naked Ijaw tribalism.  His rally for Fubara, since President Bola Tinubu and respected Rivers elders had tried to put out the smoke very early, was Clark’s uncritical support for his “Ijaw boy”, Fubara. 

    Clark isn’t even from Rivers — he’s from Delta.  Besides, where was he, when Wike was pulling all stops to make Fubara governor?  Didn’t Clark’s immaculate Ijaw boy know there were “terms and conditions” attached to being unfairly favoured over others?

    Clark’s latest tirade, in form of an open letter to Umar Damagum, PDP acting national chairman, headlined “PDP needs probe panel, not reconciliation, says Clark” by The Nation (August 21), follows Clark’s same one-sided Ijaw tribalist rally for Fubara.

    Always, Fubara is the saint and Wike is the devil.  His latest call was for Damagun to be nabbed for allegedly abetting Wike’s devilry.  The irony is totally lost on the old man: that Damagun could also call him out — “elder statesman” and all! — for enabling Fubara’s skewed saintlihood, and making the embattled governor to blunder into bad decisions — very bad decisions he may yet gravely regret.

    Between Wike and Fubara, there is no saint — except in Clark’s Ijaw tribal bubble.  Strictly, Hardball harbours no sympathy for either: Fubara does to Wike what Wike did to Rotimi Amaechi; and Fubara’s future beneficiary — if Fubara survives — will surely do to him!  That’s settled by karma. Now, Fubara is trapped in crass opportunism-turned-awry.

    Read Also: PDP needs probe panel, not reconciliation committee, says Clark

    So, Wike and Fubara are only playing games to survive — and so far, the result has been a fearsome stalemate.  If only Clark could snap out of his bubble, he’d realize Fubara had blundered into serious constitutional crimes that could cost him dear.  Yet, “elders” like Clark uncritically urge him on.

    What elders should do is find a middle point in a bad stalemate, in the spirit of give-and-take.  But that wise middle ground hardly exists in Clark’s Ijaw zero sum game — the same tactics that cost Goodluck Jonathan a second term, after which the radical old man promptly disowned the poor bloke from Otuoke!

    Fubara had better be wise, lest Clark’s trenchant Ijaw chorus orchestra push him into political Golgotha.  If he doubts, he should call Jonathan! 

    Clark’s blusters aren’t helping matters.  The old man is better off quiet.

  • Presidential plane seizure and non-state actors

    Presidential plane seizure and non-state actors

    By Jimoh Ibrahim

    Ogun State and Guangdong (a Chinese interest) are non-state actors in international relations. They are legal entities within their respective jurisdictions, and they can legally enter into ja binding contract, which requires the sanctity and integrity of the contract , written or otherwise,   to be respected.  The contract law is becoming so flexible between parties that the court wants to see the intention to enter  into a legal relationship. Recently, the law was expanded in England to make statements  made during pre-contact discussions binding on parties. Once any of the parties to the contract can show that he relies on those reasonable representations, it matters not if such a statement is in writing! The law has advanced beyond the Nigerian mentality that ‘ I did not sign, and it is not a written statement! .’ Now, pre-contract statements are binding on the parties  involved.

    The Treaty of Westphalia,1648, significantly explained the state’s power as actors in international relations, with the inalienable power of sovereignty. It includes the principle of non-interference in the domestic affairs of another. This ordinarily connotes that, except by permission, nations’ domestic affairs are the exclusive jurisdiction of such a nation. The sovereignty argument ordinarily explains why a court should not grant an order of attachment on sovereign assets (e.g., a diplomatic plane) in a contract involving two non-state actors. But where a state is made a co-defendant in such a matter, it has all the opportunities to explain itself. For instance, is the state aware of such a contract, and was the state supporting the non-state actor at any time during the contract? Why should the court writ of attachment order be a problem If the actor (Nigeria) provides support for Ogun State during the contract ?

    If Nigeria’s argument is based on the principle of sovereignty, it must look elsewhere because there is no absolute sovereignty. The increasing role of globalisation and financial institutions increases the viability of the sovereign state. Krasner has argued that sovereignty is organised hypocrisy! It could also be the case that the absence of absolute sovereignty makes the state’s authority and power to govern itself and make decisions hypocritical. Political power – play by hegemonic leaders influences decisions, not the rules of international practice. When Nigeria was made a party to the contract, it knows nothing about why Nigeria didn’t request from the same court that China be made a party such that we can now have complete diplomatic engagement!

    Read Also; Five Nigerians celebrities who are twins

    The argument about sovereignty may be nonsensical due to the shifting dynamics of international relations, marked by increasing financial obligations, globalisation, and the growing influence of non-state actors. Some of these actors, like Google and Coca-Cola, have more extensive financial balance sheets than the entire budget of Africa! The narratives are changing. It is still difficult for a state to have absolute internal control over its air, road, and water spaces. For instance, a disaster that travels by water has no regard for immigration queries, or air diseases like COVID-19 require no visa to travel across the borders; no country has absolute control over the stoppage of emails travelling from one country to another, so it is in all social media communications.

    The Nigerian government may have one or two options: help Ogun State to pay a negotiated full and final discharge of the judgment sum and deduct the money from the federal account allocation monthly. Or provide an alternative bank guarantee for the judgment sum from an international bank to get the injunction discharged, have your planes back and move to the negotiation table. Or argue Nigeria’s non-involvement and allow the two  actors – Ogun and.the Chinese firm –  to continue the international legal battle. Doing so is essential for Nigeria’s image, as the potential implications of the case’s outcome will be significant.

    How would the judgement become enforceable if Nigeria successfully pulled out and Ogun State lost the case? This is where  power and influence of a country comes in.  Brilliant Lateef Fagbemi, Nigeria’s Minister of Justice, narrowed the options to an outright legal engagement (except that international litigation always ends on the imperativeness of power, influence, and authority). Nigeria can  pursue an international diplomatic option. This is a case of a realist (China) going into financial diplomacy with a liberalist (Nigeria). The realist (China)  celebrates its power, political ,  economic and financial  while the liberalist (Nigeria) wants collaboration and cooperation!

    It is sad to see how a governor will terminate a contract to which he has a deficit of knowledge but arrogantly assumes that the governor’s power is more than the knowledge needed for efficient decision. A whopping $79 million (over N100 billion ) terminated just like that after what had been sunk into its execution !  Of course, there is no firing squad punishment for an elite that terminates a contract of N100billion in Nigeria. He would  only claim that  he made a mistake! The governor’s  recklessness and inadequate knowledge of the complexity of the matter  made him act as his spirit directed. He was connected to the praxis and taxonomy of the currency of power with his usual excess in-stock mantras: power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely! The state will still protect him  while he rides on a convoy of choice cars. Except be becomes a permanent governor , ‘ governor for life ‘ ,  the day of reckoning will certainly come.

    The power to revoke privatised companies and punish the owners or sell banks that belong to successful people out of envy or criminalising simple loan agreements between parties  that usually happens in Nigeria, are unknown to international financial praxis, as we saw during the Buhari Government.

    • Ibrahim is the senator representing Ondo South Senatorial district in the National Assembly

  • Olu of Warri: Three years of purposeful leadership

    Olu of Warri: Three years of purposeful leadership

    By Adeniyi Ifetayo

    The Olu of Warri, Ogiame Atuwatse III, stands as a testament to purposeful leadership, grace, and an unwavering commitment to the advancement of his people, as a traditional authority in Nigeria. Three years have passed since his ascension to the throne, and these years have been marked by transformation, resilience, and a deep connection to both history and modernity. His is a reign of vision, deft leadership, and a reflection of his dedication to the betterment of Iwereland and Nigeria as a whole.

    From the moment he ascended the throne in August 2021, Ogiame Atuwatse III made it clear that his reign would be divinely inspired. He acknowledged this in his one-year anniversary speech when he reflected on the role of God in his ascension: “There is no part of this that has been of my own doing, it was and remains God’s divine project.” This sense of divine purpose has been the foundation upon which he has built his leadership philosophy, positioning the Warri Kingdom for growth and prosperity.

    Reconnecting with the Past for a Better Future:

    Ogiame Atuwatse III’s reign has been steeped in the wisdom of his ancestors, and he has continuously emphasized the importance of connecting with the past to chart a better future for his people. In his speech commemorating his one-year anniversary, he paid homage to his predecessor, Ogiame Ikenwoli, and acknowledged the ancestral guidance that would propel Iwereland forward. This connection to the past is not mere nostalgia; it serves as a reminder that the challenges and triumphs of history inform the decisions of the present.

    His Majesty also made it clear that the Itsekiri people must reposition themselves within the evolving dynamics of modern Nigeria. He asserted that “our ancestors are at this moment, smiling down on us filled with pride and joy as they see us ready and braced for the journey towards repositioning our dear Iwere Kingdom within the prevailing reality of today’s Nigeria and the world at large.” This statement highlights Ogiame’s foresight in recognizing the necessity for the Warri Kingdom to adapt to contemporary realities without losing its cultural identity.

    Read Also: Tinubu appoints new leaderships for Digital Bridge Institute, NIGCOMSAT

     The Symbolism of the Crowns:

    One of the most significant moments in Ogiame Atuwatse III’s early reign was the introduction of a new pair of gold and silver crowns. The progression from coral to silver and now gold represents the physical and symbolic evolution of the Warri Kingdom. It is more than just a change in royal attire; it is a manifestation of the spiritual, social, and economic advancement that Ogiame envisions for his people. This vision is deeply tied to his belief that the Warri Kingdom has a divine purpose in the formation of a successful Nigeria, a purpose that transcends political divisions and historical grievances.

     Empowering the People: A Commitment to Education and Development:

    Central to Ogiame Atuwatse III’s leadership is his unwavering commitment to education and the empowerment of the people of Warri. Through the Royal Iwere Foundation (RIF), the humanitarian arm of the Warri Kingdom Monarchy, Ogiame has spearheaded initiatives aimed at improving the quality of education in the South-South region. One such initiative is the Teachers’ Training Program, which equips early childhood educators with modern techniques for effective classroom delivery. The masterclass, which took place in August 2024, was designed to align with Sustainable Development Goal 4, which focuses on ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education for all.

    The Queen Consort, HRH Olori Atuwatse III, who has been instrumental in the success of the Royal Iwere Foundation, lauded the importance of empowering teachers, stating, “Educating and empowering the teachers of the South-South region and beyond is crucial for combating the alarming out-of-school population in the Niger Delta and is salient for strengthening quality foundational education which is required for nation-building.” This focus on education underscores the belief that the future of the Warri Kingdom—and indeed Nigeria—depends on the intellectual and emotional development of its young people.

    The Teachers’ Training Program is just one example of how Ogiame Atuwatse III has leveraged partnerships to bring development to his kingdom. In 2023, the Warri Kingdom entered into a partnership with Tampere City in Finland, aimed at fostering cooperation in education, digital transformation, and regional development. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed between the Warri Kingdom and Tampere City is a groundbreaking step in promoting knowledge transfer and capacity building, essential components for the kingdom’s growth.

    Uniting Iwereland and Nigeria:

    Ogiame Atuwatse III’s reign has been marked by a focus on unity, not only within the Warri Kingdom but also throughout Nigeria. He has continuously called on all Itsekiri sons and daughters, both at home and abroad, to join in the efforts to build a stronger, more prosperous Iwereland. His invitation to his subjects during his second coronation anniversary was clear: “Let us make Iwereland better. Together, we can attain the height of greatness.” This call to action reflects his belief in collective responsibility and the need for all Itsekiri people to contribute to the development of their homeland.

    Beyond Iwereland, Ogiame Atuwatse III has positioned himself as a leader with a vision for national development. His efforts to harness the benefits of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) demonstrate his commitment to leveraging Nigeria’s resources for the development of the Warri Kingdom. The Iwere master plan, which aims to develop oil-producing areas in Iwereland while ensuring that non-oil-producing regions are not left behind, is a testament to his inclusive approach to governance.

    A Vision for the Youth and Women of Warri Kingdom:

    One of the hallmarks of Ogiame Atuwatse III’s reign has been his focus on the empowerment of youth and women. Recognizing that the future of the Warri Kingdom lies in the hands of its younger generation, he has consistently urged the youth of the Niger Delta to look beyond oil and gas and to channel their energy into endeavors that will create long-lasting value. “We must look beyond oil and gas, and channel our energy in the right directions towards endeavours that will result in added value across board,” he said during his first year on the throne. This forward-thinking approach encourages the youth to explore opportunities in technology, entrepreneurship, and other sectors that have the potential to drive sustainable development.

    In addition to youth empowerment, Ogiame has placed significant emphasis on the role of women in the development of Iwereland. His commitment to honoring and supporting women is evident in his words: “We will ensure that our women, both old and young, are honored and respected, not only by word, but in actual cultural practice.” This is not mere rhetoric; it is a promise that has been backed by action. The Royal Iwere Foundation has actively sought to empower women through various initiatives, recognizing that their contributions are vital to the kingdom’s progress.

     International Recognition and Diplomatic Outreach

    Ogiame Atuwatse III’s leadership has not gone unnoticed on the global stage. Within two years of his ascension, the Federal Government of Nigeria conferred on him the prestigious award of Commander of the Federal Republic (CFR), recognizing his contributions to national development. Delta State Governor Sheriff Oborevwori described Ogiame as a “great image maker” and a “marketer of Warri Kingdom and Delta State to the world,” lauding his diplomatic outreach and bilateral partnerships.

    Ogiame Atuwatse III has successfully used his platform to strengthen diplomatic ties with various countries, furthering the kingdom’s development agenda. His collaboration with Finland, for instance, is a testament to his commitment to forging international partnerships that bring tangible benefits to his people. These diplomatic efforts align with the Delta State government’s MORE Agenda, which seeks to position the state as an investment destination.

     A Legacy of Purposeful Leadership:

    As Ogiame Atuwatse III marks his third coronation anniversary, it is evident that his reign has been defined by purposeful leadership, a deep connection to the past, and a forward-looking vision for the future. His commitment to education, youth empowerment, and the development of Iwereland has already begun to yield results, and his diplomatic outreach promises even greater progress in the years to come. Under his reign, the Warri Kingdom is not only reclaiming its rightful place in the history of Nigeria but is also setting a new standard for traditional leadership in the modern world.

    Ogiame Atuwatse III’s reign is a reminder that leadership, when rooted in purpose, can transcend challenges and create lasting change. As the Warri Kingdom continues its journey under his guidance, there is no doubt that the next chapters in its history will be marked by continued growth, unity, and prosperity.

    • Ifetayo is a journalist, wrote from Abuja

  • Much ado about new presidential jet

    Much ado about new presidential jet

    • By Kenechukwu Aguolu

    Sir: The Federal Government has unveiled the new Presidential Jet -Airbus A330 which it acquired against widespread criticism. Many Nigerians had argued that the acquisition would be insensitive given the country’s economic challenges; some actually suggested that existing aircraft be overhauled while others maintained that the purchase was a necessity rather than a luxury. And that the government should make public the cost of the jet.

    On the other hand, the current presidential fleet is said to consist of old aircraft that have become unreliable and consume high maintenance costs. Recall that the president was forced to use chartered flights to Saudi Arabia and from South Africa; the vice president also had to cancel an official visit to the United States due to faulty presidential aircraft. It is more cost-effective, safer, and convenient to have a functional presidential fleet than frequently chartering flights.  New planes consume less fuel, require less maintenance, and are more reliable than older ones.

    The president and the vice president require a functional and reliable presidential fleet to perform their duties optimally. They are often required to travel to attend summits and meetings, engage in foreign missions, respond to emergencies, etc.

    Lest we forget, presidential jets are also a symbol of national pride and the status of office. Also recently, a good number of high-profile persons including the former President of Iran have died in air mishaps; a call for more caution. New planes have better visibility, navigation systems and are more resilient.

    Read Also: IGP’s dedication to justice, security commendable – Tinubu

    It is worthy to note that three aging presidential aircraft were put up for sale in June and that the presidential jet being an asset is expected to be used beyond this administration.  It is an investment that will facilitate effective governance.

    While wastage in governance should be minimized, cost containment should not be over-emphasized. A leader can save a lot of money during his tenure whilst leaving important things undone; sometimes as a result of lack of initiative. More important is tackling corruption and ensuring that government expenditures pass the cost-benefit assessment before they are incurred.

     Above all, the government should fast-track the implementation of policies that will reduce economic hardship in the country. The call that the cost of the new presidential jet be made public is in order.

    •Kenechukwu Aguolu  FCA,

    kenerek1@gmail.com

  • The home and the missing education

    The home and the missing education

    • By Ganiu Bamgbose

    Sir: The boundary between parental care and social vices has become inconsequential in the scheme of things in Nigeria. How do we explain parents forging documents to change their children’s age to gain admission to higher institutions of learning because they cannot wait to have them clock the required age?

    We euphemise this act as having our children’s interest at heart and downplay the life-long effect of making them normalise forgery and accept lying as a norm. While this will go on subtly in homes, it becomes the liability of the society when such children grow to become administrators and public officers with no regard for standard practices. If helping children secure a good future now means to pay specially for malpractice for their O’ Level and A Level examinations, can we still confidently say we are raising future leaders?

    I remember a student came to me weeping about a course they had failed and she repeatedly said she would not mind the lowest mark because she had never failed in her life. How do we justify raising a generation of future leaders who do not understand failure as a stepping stone to success? Will they not grow into adults who take elections as a do-or-die affair and consider public offices their entitlement?

    Education is the acquisition of skills, knowledge, values and attitude which make one a functional member of the society. It is pathetic that the aspects of value and attitude are now trivialised in our understanding of education. The affective domain of learning which should inculcate the spirit of hard work, dedication, honesty, transparency, accountability, empathy, selflessness and so on into young minds is handled with levity.

    Read Also: Mutfwang suspends two Commissioners, two Special Advisers

    The focus of many parents is the formal education of their children with outright disregard for the informal education which a renowned educationist, Professor Babatunde Fafunwa, described as “eko omoluabi”, loosely translated by Dasylva (2016:65) as the attitude of an “ideal persona”.

    In Ogundeji’s (2009:73) opinion, ọmọlúàbí implies “a person born and raised by someone with good character and, by implication, a person with good character himself or herself”. These elements of informal education are the soft skills which grease hard skills such as competence and ability.

    A competent leader who lacks compassion will starve the followers. An administrator who has ability but lacks humility will ruin a system. Educationists represent the domains of humans as the head, the hand and the heart. A nation that does not properly mould the hearts will not get the best of the heads.

    The school and society can only consolidate and improve on the foundation that the home has set for a child. This is of course why the English proverb says “charity begins at home”, and why the Bible says “train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it” (Proverb 22:6). “If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do (Psalm 11:3)?”

    Inasmuch as parents want to make life easier for their children, they must also ask themselves if they would have got it right if this was the path they were made to take. 

    Our society is a reflection of our family system. If it gets better at home, it will be better out there. Let the education be right from home.

    •Ganiu Bamgbose,  PhD,

    Lagos State University, Ojo.

  • Ogun: The house Daniel and Amosun built

    Ogun: The house Daniel and Amosun built

    • By Folorunso Fatai Adisa

    Sir: Ogun State has been in the news frequently lately, for both positive and negative reasons, with the negative overshadowing the positive. Chief among these is the China business saga involving Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Co. Ltd., which has become a significant source of embarrassment for both the people of Ogun State and Nigeria as a whole.

    Whether former governor, Otunba Gbenga Daniel had good intentions when he entered into the contractual agreement with Zhongfu International Investment is something only he knows. However, the improper government handover, combined with his statements in recent press releases, seems to suggest otherwise.

    The British political publicist Ernest Benn once said, “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    This observation seems to perfectly encapsulate the actions and decisions of Senator Ibikunle Amosun regarding the Ogun Guangdong Free Trade Zone (OGFTZ). The handling of the OGFTZ by his administration reveals several political and administrative shortcomings that have serious implications for governance.

    In his press release, Amosun admits that his administration appointed Zhongfu International Investment FXE as the interim zone manager based on what was later discovered to be false information. This hasty decision, made shortly after he assumed office, suggests a lack of thorough vetting and due diligence. Of course, the failure to properly investigate the claims made by Zhongfu has, now, led to a prolonged legal and diplomatic dispute that could have been avoided.

    The disruption of business activities in the OGFTZ, as mentioned in the news release, coupled with the international spread of the news about the seizure of Nigeria’s presidential jets due to a failed business deal, significantly damages the state’s reputation as a business-friendly environment and could deter future investments. Otunba Daniel’s response to the situation, in which he claimed he would rather help Nigeria find a diplomatic solution through the president, only adds to the perception of poor leadership. His statement lacks evidence of critical thinking and a commitment to serving the people of Ogun State which further shows the self-interest that often plagues Nigerian politics— everyone wants to be a hero without, actually, exemplifying the traits of characters of one.

    Read Also: IGP’s dedication to justice, security commendable – Tinubu

    For Prince Dapo Abiodun, this is a defining moment. I do not, in any way, envy him. He has inherited a state that has literally turned into the Augean stables by previous administrations. When someone finds themselves in such a messy situation, even if they try to clean it, the stench inevitably rubs off on them.

    The Ogun State he seems to have inherited resembles a stable that was expertly locked. As the screws and bolts begin to wear out, the decay starts to show in the form of uncompleted projects, deplorable roads, and bad debts—issues that were concealed until they began to unravel. The challenge before him is enormous, and how he handles it will determine whether he emerges as a hero or is relegated to obscurity.

    Abiodun must tackle the current challenges with the same ferocity and resolve. Given the lessons that can be learnt from the mistakes of his predecessors and ensuring that all decisions are based on well-vetted information, he has the opportunity to set a new standard for governance in Ogun State.

    It is crucial that this case is resolved amicably to avoid unnecessary strain in our bilateral relationship with such a significant and productive country.

    Taken together, the current administration can engage independent auditors or consultants to assess major projects and disputes to prevent a recurrence of such issues. Consequently, national interests can be protected, the people can be served effectively, Ogun State’s reputation can remain intact, and future investments can be secured.

    •Folorunso Fatai Adisa,

    Glasgow, United Kingdom.

  • Promise of Senegal

    Promise of Senegal

    The promise of Senegal is not the attempt by its youthful President, Bassirou Diomaye Faye, to impose price control over staple foods and essential commodities: rice, bread, cement and fertilizer, to curb inflation.

    Spiralling cost of living appears a global crisis; and any measure to make things more bearable must be appreciated.  It’s a moot point, however, if price control ever works. From reports, however, the latest Senegalese attempt would appear more of subsidy to modulate high prices, than outright price control in its harsh form.

    By it, the government would let go of its earnings, in customs duty on (food and essential commodity) imports, to the tune 53.3 billion CFA (US$ 87 million).  Well, we’ll see as it goes.  But price control hardly works anywhere.

    Again, that’s not the promise of Senegal.  Rather, it’s in its youthful president as a champion of legitimate power; contrasted to at least two of Senegal’s neighbours: Mali and Burkina Faso, preening poster boys of youths as romantic power robbers.

    President Faye is 44.  Mali’s junta head, Assimi Goita is 40 years.  Burkina Faso’s Ibrahim Traore, an Army Captain, is even six years younger at 34.

    Unlike Goita and Traore that betrayed their country’s sacred trust, using legitimate arms to grab illegitimate power, Faye was part of a movement that, against all odds, pushed, campaigned for, and won democratic power.

    Of course, winning power is the easier part, no matter how daunting. The real do is to deliver, which President Faye now tries to do with the food subsidy cum price control.

    Unlike his Mali and Burkinabe pair, however, he doesn’t have to don ludicrous camouflage and over-worked military gears, just to put some sheen over power robbery by state arms, pure and simple. 

    Read Also: Mutfwang suspends two Commissioners, two Special Advisers

    Faye, as elected president, is also commander-in-chief.  If he chooses, he can clad himself in ceremonial military wear, and it would still all be graceful and legitimate.

    At the beginning of that power rascality in Nigeria, Wole Soyinka, in the final, closing phrase of his “Jero’s Metamorphosis”, put down those comics as ‘desk generals’. “After all,” dapper prophetic swindler Jero quipped, “it’s the fashion these days to be a desk general!”

    The inimitable Chuba Wilberforce Okadigbo (God bless his soul!) was even more clinically dismissive: “Our Generals are coup heroes” — and that at the height of that rascality!

    The promise of Faye, therefore, is weaning the thieving power youths of Mali and Burkina Faso from romanticizing power procured by the barrel of the gun.  Their contemporary next door is showing youths can be less knee-jack in their thinking.

    Sooner than later, Mali’s Goita will morph into a socio-economic goiter on Mali’s neck, with dire political consequences.  Only a counter-gun can remove him.  An army power grab seldom ends well.

    Even if Faye falters, the next election is virtually by the corner.  So, no fundamental damage is done.  Youths can take power by the depth of their intellect, not as hare-brained power bums, hiding behind army uniforms. 

    Faye is a living example.

    •This article was first published on June 18, 2024

  • Palliatives or handouts: A culture that must stop

    Palliatives or handouts: A culture that must stop

    By Obamodi Oluwadamilola Faith

    Sir: As Nigeria confronts yet another economic downturn, the government’s response has consisted largely in the distribution of palliatives to citizens. The move dilutes the original intent of palliatives as emergency relief, particularly during crises like the COVID-19 lockdown. These measures are intended to provide quick, temporary relief to ease immediate suffering.

    But are these palliatives truly the solution to Nigeria’s deeper issues, or are they merely distractions from the root causes of our societal challenges?

    I argue that palliatives are a short-sighted approach that overlooks the need for lasting solutions. The federal government has repeatedly turned to palliatives as a method of poverty alleviation, whether through cash transfers, food distribution, or temporary subsidies. However, these measures have consistently fallen short of addressing the underlying issues. Instead of creating meaningful change, they serve as short-term fixes that allow the government to temporarily appease the populace. What Nigeria truly needs is not a series of empty promises or band-aid solutions, but a comprehensive strategy aimed at sustainable development—one that addresses poverty, unemployment, and infrastructural deficits in a meaningful way.

    Read Also: Tinubu appoints new management team for NDPHC

    The reliance on palliatives perpetuates a cycle of dependency, where citizens come to expect temporary aid without any real improvement in their circumstances. This approach fails to empower the people or foster self-sufficiency. Instead, it preserves the very conditions it seeks to alleviate, trapping the country in a perpetual state of crisis management.

    To break free from this cycle, the government must invest in long-term solutions, such as enhancing education and healthcare systems, building essential infrastructure, and creating a conducive environment for job creation. By focusing on these areas, the government can lay the foundation for sustainable economic development. Furthermore, the government must prioritize good governance and accountability.

    Corruption has long derailed development efforts in Nigeria, and it is crucial that leaders be held accountable for their actions. The public must also play an active role in the governance process, ensuring that policies are aligned with the needs and aspirations of the people. Palliatives offer only temporary relief and fail to address the deeper issues facing Nigeria. Moving beyond short-term fixes and focusing on strategies that empower citizens and drive sustainable development is essential for achieving lasting progress.

    •Obamodi Oluwadamilola Faith,

    Veritas University Abuja.

  • On the escalating cost of living

    On the escalating cost of living

    • By John Amabolou Elekun

    Sir: In recent years, the cost of living in Nigeria has spiralled out of control, pushing millions of citizens into a state of economic despair. This crisis has not only exposed the deep-seated structural problems within the nation’s economy but also the failures of leadership at all levels—federal, state, and local.

    As the prices of basic goods and services skyrocket, the average Nigerian is left grappling with the harsh realities of survival in a country where government officials seem more focused on personal gain than public welfare.

    Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation, has seen a dramatic increase in the cost of living. Inflation, currently at double-digit rates, has driven up the prices of essential items such as food, fuel, and housing. Staple foods like rice, beans, and yams have become luxuries for many families. Transportation costs have also surged, driven by frequent hikes in fuel prices, which ripple through every aspect of daily life.

    For many Nigerians, the struggle to make ends meet is becoming increasingly untenable. The minimum wage, set at #70,000 per month (approximately $42), has not been adjusted to reflect the rising inflation, leaving millions of workers underpaid and overburdened. In urban areas like Lagos and Abuja, the cost of rent alone can consume nearly all of a low-income worker’s salary, leaving little to nothing for other necessities.

    The blame for this dire situation lies squarely on the shoulders of Nigeria’s leaders. At the federal level, poor economic policies, corruption, and a lack of foresight have exacerbated the crisis. The removal of fuel subsidies, for instance, was implemented without adequate measures to cushion the impact on the poor and middle class. Meanwhile, state and local governments have largely failed to implement policies that could alleviate the suffering of their constituents.

    Instead of addressing these issues head-on, many government officials seem more interested in enriching themselves at the expense of the people. The budget allocations meant for public services often end up in private pockets, while transparency and accountability remain elusive. Public funds are mismanaged, and corruption is rampant, leading to a grossly inadequate provision of essential services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

    Read Also: First Dangote PMS delivery set for September

    It is high time that Nigerian leaders are held accountable for their actions. The government’s primary responsibility is to serve the people, ensuring their welfare and providing an environment where every citizen can thrive. Unfortunately, the current reality suggests a leadership that is disconnected from the plight of the average Nigerian.

    Civil society organizations, the media, and the public must continue to demand transparency and accountability from those in power. There is a need for a comprehensive audit of public spending, particularly in areas that directly affect the cost of living. Furthermore, the government must prioritize policies that will reduce inflation, create jobs, and improve access to affordable goods and services.

    The escalating cost of living in Nigeria is a ticking time bomb that requires urgent attention. The government, at all levels, must rise to the occasion and implement policies that will address the root causes of this crisis. This includes tackling corruption, improving economic management, and ensuring that public resources are used for the benefit of all Nigerians.

    If the current trend continues, the social and economic fabric of the nation will be further strained, leading to increased poverty, social unrest, and a decline in the overall quality of life. The time for change is now, and it must start with the leaders who have sworn to serve the people. Nigerians deserve better, and it is the government’s duty to deliver.

    •John Amabolou Elekun,

     Iju-Ajuwon, Lagos.