Category: Editorial

  • Hajj fiasco

    Hajj fiasco

    THE impasse that riddled this year’s hajj underscores the country’s negligence in adhering to dictates of Islam regarding observance of holy pilgrimage by female Muslims. Yet, the nation has a National Hajj Commission (NAHCON) that ought to be the repository of Islamic values as it relates to pilgrimage codes.

    The commission ought to know that women going on holy pilgrimage, as a divine rule, must be accompanied by their husbands or male relations. It ought to know too that this is one law that the Saudi government holds dear.

    Until the matter was resolved diplomatically by the governments of both countries, not less than 1,000 female pilgrims from the country were falsely imprisoned, with some unlucky ones amongst them deported from Saudi Arabia. This incident expectedly overheated a religiously sensitive country like Nigeria, just as it caused the affected pilgrims (and their relations at home) serious psychological trauma.

    Obviously, NAHCON underestimated the very strict Saudi immigration officials on the requirement of Muharram policy that is not peculiar to Hajj or Umrah but to every trip made by adult female Muslims. The commission should have screened the affected female pilgrims and be sure that they met, especially the Muharram conditionality. But it failed to do this, obviously thinking that Saudi Arabia is like Nigeria where people can get away with anything. While it serves NAHCON right, the degrading treatment that the female pilgrims went through at King Abdulaziz Airport in Jeddah has not in any way done the country any good.

    Though the Saudi Consular in Nigeria claimed that Nigeria was not the only country affected by the exercise, its defence was not completely convincing. While we do not support any breach of the Hajj code, it is apt to point out that the embassy was negligent too in allowing the un-accompanied female pilgrims pass through its consular screening process without being detected. Moreover, the Saudi immigration officials were overzealous with their insistence that wives must compulsorily bear the names of their husbands. This is not compulsory as the case of Nana Fatima bint Rasuulullah serves as locus classicus (an authoritative and often-quoted passage) in this regard.

    NAHCON must put its house in order. It is sad that a country that cannot effectively provide for the immediate needs of her people has governments that perennially spend billions of naira sending people on the holy pilgrimage. Yet, it is not compulsory for people who cannot afford Hajj to make the trip to the Holy Land. Even Almighty Allah puts a caveat that only those who have the means should embark on the holy pilgrimage once in their lifetime.

    While we appreciate governments’ gesture of sending people on holy pilgrimage, we clearly deprecate its being done at the expense of their welfare, which without doubt has not been well taken care of by successive administrations in the country. This development has led to the exodus of Nigerians, especially women, migrating from the country to better managed countries in search of greener pastures.

    Obviously, the Saudi authorities must have been more strident about the Muharram policy because it was reported that not less than 44,000 illegal Nigerian immigrants, majority of them women, live in that oil-rich country. They reportedly entered the country under the guise of coming to perform the pilgrimage. So, governments in Nigeria should do more to alleviate the poverty in the land while everything must also be done to prevent the recurrence of this year’s Hajj crisis.

  • A wake-up call for Barack Obama

    A wake-up call for Barack Obama

    After the most hellish month of his presidential campaign, Mitt Romney finally had a good night on Wednesday with a gutsy debate performance. It will take a few days to gauge if it will have an impact on the 2012 race. But for Barack Obama, whose presence at the podium seemed almost apologetic, the wake up call is well timed. With barely a month to go, the US president needs to lay out a much stronger case for his re-election. After Denver, he may no longer be able to rely on Mr Romney to do that for him.

    Most urgent, Mr Obama needs to spell out how things would work differently in a second term than they have over the past two years. Before the debate, some were speculating that Mr Obama could be heading for such a clear victory it would strengthen his hand in the fiscal cliff negotiations that follow. That now looks less likely. In Denver, Mr Obama made almost no effort to explain how he would better handle a hostile Republican Congress. Voters certainly like the president more than Mr Romney. But he needs to convince them why he would be more effective.

    Second, Mr Obama’s campaign has given only the sketchiest details of what his second term priorities would be – beyond averting this year’s looming “taxmaggedon”. True to his reputation, Mr Romney in Denver elided all the tough choices implied by his campaign. The Republican nominee set out a plan to cut taxes on the middle class and balance the federal budget without apparently requiring sacrifice from anyone – barring a dig at the minutely-funded Public Broadcasting Service. This is worse than “fuzzy math”. It went unchallenged from Mr Obama. In Denver, Mr Romney appeared belatedly to be tacking to the centre. The president needs to meet him there.

    Third, Mr Obama is suffering from high expectations. A jolt such as this might be precisely what he needed. All of a sudden, the Romney campaign is fired up. This is good for US democracy and ought to raise Mr Obama’s game. In 2008 Mr Obama campaigned with a bang. In Denver on Wednesday night he offered barely a whimper – and a long-winded one at that.

    There are still two debates to go and one next week between Joe Biden and Paul Ryan. The race will probably lurch again. Odd though it sounds at this late stage, Mr Obama must seize every remaining opportunity to make a positive case for his presidency. If Denver has enlivened a campaign that was starting to look predictable, the US voter can only benefit.

    – Financial Times

  • When gold rusts …

    When gold rusts …

    TRADITIONALLY, the nation’s erstwhile blue-chip companies generally see themselves as a beacon of hope in matters of corporate governance. Timely rendition of financial statements to investors, capital market regulators and the general public stood out as their hallmark. However, it is a sign of the changing times that things are no longer as they seem; indeed the rigid requirement of timely rendition of financial statements seems to have become a fading virtue.

    Consider, for instance, a recent report in the Daily Official List of the Nigeria Stock Exchange. Blue-chip companies like Mobil Oil Nigeria Plc, PZ Industries Plc, Forte Oil Plc are said to be among companies in breach of disclosure rules. The companies, 90 in all, reportedly missed the deadlines for filing their financial statements. While pointing out that the companies failed to meet “the minimum listing standards in terms of timely disclosure of their quarterly financial performance and are thus operating below the listing standards of the Exchange”, the NSE drew the attention of the companies to the penalties for non-compliance as spelt out in the statutes governing their activities in the capital market, even as it warned that the “Exchange will protect the integrity of its Rules.”

    Why the companies would run afoul of the rule of disclosure is a question best answered by them. However, it comes across as a major failure that one of the most fundamental rules for listing on the exchange is said to have been observed in the breach. Having elected to be quoted as public entities, the management of the companies cannot claim to be unaware of their statutory responsibilities, particularly the duty to ensure timely disclosure of financial statements as spelt out in the relevant statutes. The rules, which many companies feign to forget, are in place to serve the investing public, the regulators and indeed, the general public. They guide different stakeholders to make informed decisions on the activities of the entities. We need to add that the requirement is at the heart of corporate governance; it is in alignment with global best practices. If only for these, the management of the companies ought not to have treated it with levity.

    The NSE, therefore, cannot be faulted for drawing attention to the infractions. At this time, the market needs such interventions, both to restore confidence and to boost the market. After the lull of the past four years, such measures are needed to sustain the current momentum and to further spur investor confidence. The measure flows from the expectation that those running publicly quoted companies must be seen to act in line with best practices. So, if the planned sanctions are what the erring companies need to sit up – so be it.

    However, we must observe also that timely rendition of financial statements does not, alone, guarantee that the statements will be accurate or even reliable. The NSE cannot afford to keep an eye on the issue of timely rendition of financial statements while neglecting the requirement for their reliability. They represent different sides of the same coin of corporate infractions which need to be dealt with.

    As the recent example of Cadbury-Schweppes Nigeria Plc does show, it is one thing to have a published financial statement; it is another for it to be reliable. In pushing to ensure that quoted companies publish their statements as they fall due, the NSE should also move to ensure that published statements are accurate and reliable. A good way to ensure this is for the exchange to partner with relevant accounting bodies to restore integrity to published financial statements.

  • Total disconnect

    Total disconnect

    Suggesting that all is well with the country in his Independence Day speech, shows the president as not quite attuned to reality

    Nigerians must have resigned to the fact that President Goodluck Jonathan, much like others before him, is not given to making rousing speeches that move a people to reach for greater heights. Repeatedly, the president’s speeches have come flat like expired beer, with little vigour, candour or sound bites. Whereas the citizens are supposed to look forward to the Presidential Address on Independence Day, people hardly remember it these days, and when they listen, there is hardly anything to hold on to.

    If Nigerians thought President Jonathan and his people could not muster an exciting speech, they never reckoned that the day would come so soon when the address for such an auspicious occasion as the country’s independence celebration would be riddled with unverified points of fact, half truths and outright untruth. This last October 1st address was not only the limit of a poorly written speech, it also gave an eerie inkling as to how the Presidency works.

    Apart from poor craftsmanship, for an administration that has not managed any sector of the economy, the address sought to paint a rosy picture of the situation in the country. The President actually said that, “…our nation is indeed making progress.” He went on to point areas such as electoral reforms, power, oil and gas, job creation as among sectors that his administration has made improvements.

    If President Jonathan and his handlers had been a little more rigorous in managing the affairs of state, it would have occurred to them that there is really nothing to report whereupon they would channel their thoughts to other themes instead of a speech filled with spurious and unsubstantiated claims. One such claim about the government’s fight against corruption generated embarrassing opprobrium a few hours after the President delivered the speech, forcing aides to issue rebuttals. The address has claimed that,” we are fighting corruption in all facets of our economy, and we are succeeding.” It went further to quote Transparency International (TI) as rating Nigeria the second most improved in the effort to curb corruption. In response to an obvious falsehood, presidential aides would bluster that they quoted a popular business paper which had made the initial error and which, having gone unchallenged, was merely a ‘notorious fact’. It was nothing terribly serious, they seem to suggest.

    But has corruption abated in Nigeria in the last two years? Not by any margin; in fact it has risen exponentially. The fuel subsidy scam which broke out last January has no comparison in Nigeria’s history. We see how the major anti-graft agency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has come a cropper as it has been hijacked and seemingly clamped by the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF). When last did the EFCC successfully prosecute anyone or put any corrupt official behind bars? What we hear daily is how cases are bungled as if by design, by senior EFCC lawyers draped in silk. Indeed, corruption has become Promethean in nature and the real wonder is that the President cannot feel the heave of this massive monster.

    The President said, “We have cleaned up our electoral process; our elections are now globally acclaimed to be free and fair. Nigeria is now on a higher pedestal regarding elections.” This assertion is very far from the truth as many Nigerians know. Elections in Nigeria are still haphazard and very dangerous venture and votes ordinarily do not count unless the entire nation’s army is mobilised to watch over the ballot. How can it be said that there is an electoral process when mere voter registration is still manual and subject to manipulation and abuse? Not even the report of President Jonathan’s electoral reform body (the Uwais panel) was implemented. The truth is, there is no electoral institution, or it is at best, weak and unsustainable.

    The President also remarked that, ‘particularly in the last two years, the Nigerian economy has done appreciably well despite the global financial crisis. Nigeria’s real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has grown by 7.1 percent on average.” In the first place, the statistical basis of this supposed growth cannot be relied upon as the country’s data bases are weak, poorly managed and often applied dubiously. If indeed the country’s economy has been enjoying such growth rate, where is the result to show for it in real terms?

    Adjunct to the seeming phantom growth is the assertion that: “We have improved on our investment environment; more corporate bodies are investing in the Nigerian economy…Nigeria has become the preferred destination for investment in Africa.” The President’s speech also stated that the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) reported that 249 members joined the fold as at July this year. No proper time frame was stated. However, the Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (NACCIMA) said recently that between 2009 and 2011, about 800 companies closed shop because of increasingly unsustainable environment which includes poor power situation, energy crisis and government policy flip-flop. There are still no appreciable improvements in these regards. If indeed 249 firms set up shop in Nigeria recently, where are they?

    It is futile to go on point by point about this address. It is apparent that having not been able to record any tangible achievements in nearly one and half years, the President’s speech-writers, faced with a blank sheet and a blank situation, had to cobble up a speech anyway. We appreciate their dilemma. We urge the President to take it as a wake-up call. Let him focus and begin to deliver promptly on some of his promises. It will be another October 1st so soon. Let the President reconnect with the people.

  • America debates

    America debates

    Before he flopped in the Republican primaries, Newt Gingrich said he would challenge US President Barack Obama to a series of Lincoln-Douglas style debates. With today’s curtailed attention spans, such loquacity would make for poor ratings. But in an election that has so far been worryingly free of credible vision, Wednesday’s 90-minute debate – the first of three – should come as rain on a parched land.

    Judging by the campaigns so far, that may be too much to hope. Mitt Romney, Republican presidential candidate, promises to “Believe in America” – and wants voters to trust that a US revival will come on a wing and an unfunded tax cut. Mr Obama simply promises to move “Forward”, although to what, and why, are often hard to discern.

    As the underdog, most of the onus will be on Mr Romney. He will need every two-minute rebuttal window he can get. He must clear two very high hurdles – to convince voters the US economy will be stronger under him, and to exude a presidential aura.

    On the substance, Mr Romney remains all over the place. He promises to balance the budget while delivering sweeping tax cuts and expanding the military. Vague pledges to close tax loopholes will no longer do. He needs to say which. Ditto on spending cuts.

    Likewise, Mr Romney would scrap healthcare reform and the Dodd-Frank re-regulation without saying what he would put in their places. He has promised to reform entitlements yet also preserve Medicare. And so on. Mr Romney will need to dig deep to convince voters that he grasps what is ailing the US economy. Judging by his numbers, most voters do not agree that a large tax cut would deliver a magical cure-all.

    As the frontrunner, Mr Obama needs only to avoid being tripped up. But he owes voters an account of how a divided government would play differently in the next four years from the past two. Hope is not a strategy. Playing safe to win is no way to prepare for the steep challenges that follow.

    The moderators may have to stick to the debate format’s stultifying rules. The nominees should try to ignore them. The US deserves a real debate. If it does not happen now it never will.

    – Financial Times

  • ABU at 50

    ABU at 50

    AHMADU Bello University (ABU), Zaria commemorated the 50th anniversary of its existence yesterday. Founded in October 1962 by the Sardauna of Sokoto and Premier of Northern Nigeria, Sir Ahmadu Bello, as the University of Northern Nigeria, the university was tasked with the fulfillment of several objectives: the production of top-level manpower for a region which was relatively deficient in human resources at the time; the initiation of a process whereby the north was brought into extended contact with the latest trends in science, technology, arts and culture; to ensure that the region’s rich cultural heritage was preserved for the benefit of future generations.

    After five decades, there can be little doubt that the revered Sardauna, after whom the university is now named, would be proud of what ABU has been able to achieve. The university stands out among its peers in Nigeria and Africa to the extent and quality of its breakthroughs in different fields of human endeavour. In particular, its achievements in agriculture, education, the arts and political science have won it justified renown across the world.

    When it was set up, ABU was one of the three regional universities that were established to complement the University of Ibadan, the other two being the-then University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University) and the University of Nigeria, Nsukka. It quickly became the country’s largest and most diversified tertiary institution, drawing staff and students not just from the northern region but from across the nation. Its huge Samaru campus was by far the biggest in Nigeria, and one of the most beautiful. Its teaching and other staff were drawn from different parts of the world, and brought with them an exciting mix of academic and scholarly traditions which served to enrich the intellectual atmosphere of the institution.

    Even by the politically-committed standards of the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, ABU was well-known as a hotbed of student radicalism. Motivated by nothing more than the wellbeing of their country and its people, students and staff of the university were dedicated in their opposition to perceived anti-people policies by successive governments, whether civilian or military. The university’s status as a bastion of progressive sentiment was further strengthened by the conscious policy of admitting students from countries like Angola, Mozambique, Zimbabwe and South Africa, which were in the throes of heroic anti-colonial struggles.

    Given its history of qualitative teaching and research, it is no surprise that ABU can count some of Nigeria’s most distinguished citizens among its alumni. They include the late Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, Nigeria’s former President; the current Vice-President, Alhaji Namadi Sambo; the current governor of Kaduna State, Chief Patrick Yakowa; the former governor of Kaduna State, Senator Ahmed Makarfi; the current governor of Bauchi State, Alhaji Isa Yuguda; the current governor of Yobe State, Alhaji Ibrahim Geidam; the former governor of Cross River State, Mr. Donald Duke, the governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi; current Minister of National Planning, Dr. Shamsuddeen Usman; former Federal Capital Territory Minister, Mallam Nasir el-Rufai; former anti-corruption tsar, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu; and the Managing Director of Fidelity Bank Plc, Mr. Reginald Ihejiani.

    Like other tertiary institutions in the country, the university is beset with a host of formidable challenges. They range from the infrastructural, such as the dearth of teaching facilities and shortfalls in the provision of power, water, good roads and accommodation, to a sharp decline in the quality of teaching and research output.

    However, the university has sought to confront these challenges with the intellectual rigour and moral courage that have been its hallmark over the past five decades. What looks like comprehensive plans have been made to use its golden jubilee celebrations as a platform for the resolution of some of the most pressing problems. As it marches forward, it is hoped that Ahmadu Bello University will continue to attain even greater landmarks in teaching, research and community service.

  • Thanks to longevity

    Thanks to longevity

    The case of Dr. Sama Ekpo Sama who recently recovered his estate from the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA) after a gruelling 36 years legal battle, is a sad post-card for property investment in Nigeria. At 90 years of age, Dr. Sama had spent a better part of his entire life fighting to reclaim his property from the NPA. This is a sad commentary on our legal system. It also casts the ports authority in bad light, because we fail to see the business sense in spending apparently huge sums of money for legal services, fighting to keep what does not belong to it.

    Again, we wonder whether our legal system would make adequate compensation for the 36 years the old man lost, fighting a just cause. Indeed, considering that money is fungible, would it not be right that there is ample opportunity for the courts to grant Dr. Sama aggravated damages in the circumstance? The report also suggested that the NPA took advantage of its members of staff to sit on a property belonging to another business investor, for 36 years, while making a hash of our legal system.

    The NPA’s action calls for an internal enquiry, to see who was benefiting from this legal rigmarole, at the expense of their members of staff. Even if the NPA had appealed the judgment, that in itself would not amount to a stay of execution. What could have served that purpose was the filing of a stay of execution before proceeding on appeal. We are afraid that an appeal alone or pending appeal is not enough to prevent the execution of a valid judgment.

    Had Dr. Sama not been blessed with longevity, he would not have lived to see the end of the case, after being in court for more than three decades. The legal twists and turns are disgusting, as they are unbelievable. In our opinion, this calls for national effort to strengthen the judicial process. The opportunities for abuse by a recalcitrant defendant, exploring all manner of subterfuge to ridicule the judicial process must be eliminated. We are aware that some states, including Lagos State, have taken steps to strengthen their rules of procedure to reduce the chances for procedural abuse; we urge other states to do same.

    At the national level, there is the need to strengthen the appeal processes both at the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court to ensure that cases don’t linger for years. In arguing for the restructuring of our federal system of government through the devolution of powers, the trajectory of Dr. Sama’s case strengthens that argument. For, in a functional federal system, a lot of cases should not go beyound the state or regional apex court. A case of landlord and tenant is municipal in nature, and the cost and time spent going forth and back under our present legal system is unreasonable.

    As we stated at the onset, the economic implication of the debacle Dr. Sama went through is partly why there is crisis in the housing sector. While neglect on the part of government has made housing a nightmare in many bourgeoning cities, many private investments are wary of putting money in the sector, because of the tenuous legal system. To add to the crisis, is the near total absence of a functional mortgage system in the country, and this is partly because those in government have access to unearned resources, to build their own houses, and so do not care about a functional mortgage system.

    While we congratulate Dr. Sama, the leadership of the NPA should be ashamed of exploiting and abusing the legal process to gain this disingenuous advantage for 36 years. They should not hesitate to pay the old man off, for using his estate for 36 years. For the courts, this is a classical case of justice delayed, that nearly denied justice.

  • Anniversary butchery

    Anniversary butchery

    While President Goodluck Jonathan in military ceremonial gear, billeted in Aso Rock and reading a fanciful message on Nigeria’s improved security, a gun-bearing mob of lunatics, numbering no less than 50, hawked hot deaths to defenceless citizens in their sleep. At the end of it all, no less than 48 students from three tertiary institutions in Mubi, Adamawa State, lay dead. No less than 50 others, according to media reports, lay wounded.

    In a grim and morbid irony, a few miscreants murderously proclaimed the near-death of statehood on the very anniversary Nigeria proclaimed its arrival at statehood 52 years ago! What is a state if, with all its apparatus of legal coercion, it cannot protect its citizens?

    This is an umpteenth failure of security and intelligence that is not only painful, but also intolerable. From the demonstrable incompetence of the Jonathan administration on security, it could well be a wild try to warn that such should never happen again. But one thing is clear: with mass slaughtering of innocent citizens, victims might just start resorting to self-help. The days of anarchy might just be approaching. That must be averted at all cost.

    The Mubi massacre brought the security crisis in the North to a new high low. For the first time, students from three different tertiary institutions, Federal Polytechnic, Mubi, Adamawa State University and the School of Health Technology, were targeted, in a bloody but cowardly operation that lasted no less than two hours, from about 12 midnight to around 2 am. While the victims from Federal Polytechnic, Mubi and the School of Health Technology were attacked in rented hostels outside the campus, the students of Adamawa State University were shot and knifed right on their campus, though the attackers gained entry from the rear!

    So, whatever happened to the presumed inviolability of Nigeria’s university campus? Since the beginning of the Boko Haram plague and its senseless and cowardly killings, the university campus as a safe haven has almost become a myth. So, are a bunch of misguided criminals leading the country full gallop back into the Stone Age, with this wanton killing of innocent and defenceless students?

    The security and intelligence failure from the Mubi massacre – and that has been a disturbing pattern from previous killings – is shocking and utterly condemnable. A report had it that the attacking gang first disabled the telecommunication masts, to forestall the victims calling for help. That reportedly was done during the day. And at night, they struck!

    Even then, another report quoted Godfrey Okeke, the Commissioner of Police for Adamawa State, as saying he got whiff of the attack at 2 am but neither he nor his men got to the crime scene till the following morning. Why that late response? There are even suggestions that the violence might be a fall-out from the student union election in the Federal Polytechnic, Mubi, which was reportedly contested on North-South divide. That could shed light on the attackers reportedly coming with a list, and butchering whoever was on that list.

    But even if that were true, it underscores an even more culpable failure of intelligence – for a crime of that magnitude to be planned, and for the intelligence network not to have a clue! That is absolutely condemnable. But then, that is the story of the triumph of Boko Haram and allied criminal attacks: it is after the stallion has bolted that the security agencies jerk awake to bolt the stable gate! And the umpteenth “investigations”, after irreplaceable lives are lost, begins! This is not just good enough.

    President Jonathan had better snap out of this security incompetence– and fast too! A situation where a few bad elements wantonly kill fellow citizens, and what the presidency does is just gawk is intolerable. The government must act now! The assailants must be apprehended and brought to book. The Mubi massacre is butchery gone too far!

  • The world’s shame in Syrian conflict

    The world’s shame in Syrian conflict

    There is no limit to the cruelty Bashar al-Assad is willing to inflict on Syria. The death toll from his 18-month war has topped 30,000. The trail of death and destruction has displaced more than 1.5m people within Syria and flooded neighbouring countries with 300,000 refugees, a number the UN says could double by the end of the year. Not only is there no end in sight to Syria’s conflict – worse may yet be to come.

    For all the words of outrage expressed by world leaders at the UN General Assembly, Syria’s 18-month tragedy has dropped off the international agenda. US attention is diverted by the presidential elections and Russia and China disgracefully continue to block action at the UN Security Council. Unsurprisingly, the new international envoy, Lakhdar Brahimi, has been doing his best to lower expectations about his mission.

    As David Cameron, the UK prime minister, told the UN General Assembly, the blood of young children killed in the Syrian conflict is a “terrible stain” on the world body’s reputation. Indeed, Mr Assad has interpreted western paralysis as a licence to kill. With no threat of consequences, he has steadily escalated the war to the point where he has resorted to indiscriminate air strikes on rebel-held territory. In August alone 5,000 people perished in Syria.

    It is time that Mr Assad is made to rethink his strategy. If Russia is intent on holding the Security Council hostage, then western and Arab governments should start looking at other effective measures, even if outside the UN, including the protection of Syrian civilians through no-fly zones.

    No one wants western involvement in another Middle Eastern war. The constraints must not be underestimated, including the military challenge of enforcing the zones and neutralising Syria’s arsenal of chemical weapons. But it has always been clear that without a credible threat from western nations, the US above all, Assad’s murderous machine will not stop.

    The sooner Mr Assad’s demise comes, the sooner Syria’s slide into full-scale civil war can be halted. The conflict is already destabilising neighbouring states and assuming some alarming features. Disillusioned with the west that they feel has abandoned them, the rebels have been joined by foreign jihadis. Their numbers remain small but could well increase if the conflict is prolonged. Mr Assad cannot be allowed to wreak havoc in the region and his chief supporters in Moscow must know that western patience has its

     

    – Financial Times

     

  • Bayelsa’s absurd honours

    Bayelsa’s absurd honours

    After the unprecedented appointment of Dame Patience Jonathan, the current First Lady, as permanent secretary in the Bayelsa State Civil Service, the state has stirred another controversy on its announced intention to honour General Sani Abacha, perhaps the most vicious military dictator in Nigerian history; and former Bayelsa State Governor, Diepreye Alamieyeseigha, convicted for sleaze.

    A release entitled “Governor Dickson immortalises Late Gen. Sani Abacha for creation of Bayelsa State”, which Daniel Iworiso-Markson, chief press secretary to the governor signed, explained that Bayelsa was “immortalising” Gen. Abacha for creating Bayelsa State now celebrating its 18th anniversary; as it was honouring former Governor Alamieyeseigha for his service to the Ijaw cause.

    While the main auditorium in the Ijaw National Council (INC) complex would be named after Abacha, according to the release, another hall in the facility would be named after Alamieyeseigha, since the former governor started the complex during his tenure.

    To start with, it is the near-exclusive prerogative of every government to honour whoever it thinks is deserving of such honour. On that score, no one can impeach the choice of the two-some of Abacha and Alamieyeseigha, if the state is convinced they are deserving of its accolades. If Alamieyeseigha got honoured on account of cultural nationalism, that is hardly a crime; for cultural nationalism is one of the dynamics of a federation.

    Still, the prerogative of a state to bestow honours must be exercised with a lot of rigour and propriety. It is on these two scores that the choice of Abacha and Alamieyeseigha is wholly impeachable.

    Take Gen. Abacha. He would pass as the doughtiest enemy of democracy, the way and manner he turned the June 12 presidential election crisis into a cheap opportunism to rule – and rule in perpetuity, if he had succeeded. Now, if that had happened, there certainly would not have been a Fourth Republic as we know it today and with all its imperfections. With no Fourth Republic, there would not have been a Governor Seriake Dickson (and his government), who now displays a shocking lack of sense of history, judging by the Abacha “honour”.

    But even if you were to excuse Abacha’s anti-democratic power grab under the general malady of military rule of which not only the dead Abacha was guilty, what of his humongous corruption and his soulless appetite for sleaze, as he used a high office stolen at gun point to steal blind a country he had responsibility to protect? Are these the high values Bayelsa hopes to project by “immortalising” Abacha?

    And on Alamieyeseigha: his commitment to Ijaw nationalism is beyond doubt. Indeed, in those halcyon days of his gubernatorial tenure before the cookies crumbled, Alamieyeseigha bore his moniker of “Governor-General of the Ijaw Nation” with swagger and panache.

    But today, Mr. Alamieyeseigha is a convict of graft and sleaze, convicted of diverting to personal use, money entrusted in his care to cater for the same Bayelsans he was elected to govern. Now, are these the high traits Bayelsa recommends to its future generation?

    After getting away with Dame Jonathan’s controversial permanent secretary appointment, the Bayelsa government appears set to gallop into further infamy it deludes itself is “honour”. How it wants to be perceived is, of course, its business.

    But for a country fighting the deep cankerworm of sleaze and allied corruption, and hardly making a dent on it, the state does the country countless harm by its harebrained “honours”.