Category: Editorial

  • FIRS’ N3.8 trn harvest

    FIRS’ N3.8 trn harvest

    In just nine months, this is good sport; but where is all the money by the way?

    HOW, what cheery news the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) has infected us with in a season of seeming national moodiness and strife. That the FIRS has been able to gather up into the nation’s treasury, a whopping N3,800,000,000,000.00 in just nine months, is a feat worthy to be lauded. Though we are not told the comparative figures from the third quarter of 2011, it is still a tidy bundle of money by any measure. When we factor in takings from other sources such as crude oil receipts, revenue from the Nigeria Customs and numerous commercial agencies and parastatals, the country’s earnings are bound to exceed her annual budget targets.

    While FIRS’ performance is commendable (and we hope it will surpass the N4.628trn year-end earnings of 2011), there is still ample room to do much more. First, in the areas where it has experienced exponential loss in revenue, for instance, Stamp Duties which fell from N4.42 billion to N1.87 billion and National Information Technology Development Fund which plunged from N2.28 billion to N427 million, efforts must be made to ensure that such huge variance never occurs again in those areas.

    More important, we expect FIRS as the taxman to get more proactive and creative in making Nigerians pay tax, especially the so-called ‘super-rich’ who flaunt their wealth and exhibit so much extravagance. A good case in point is the recent report that there are over 150 private jets in Nigeria. With each jet costing between $40 – $50 million, it is expected that individuals or companies that own such high luxury items are tracked and made to pay adequate taxes. This approach also has the salutary effect of helping to curb ostentatious living and check corruption.

    But, beyond huge tax revenues, we ask, where is all the money? The total federal tax revenue for the year ended 2011 was N4.6 trillion and the federal budget was in the same range; there is also the crude oil sales revenue, among other sources of income for the Federal Government, yet there seems to always be a shortage of funds to back the budget and carry out government programmes.

    Recently, there was furore over non-funding of most of Nigeria’s foreign missions, necessitating a near collapse of her embassies and high commissions across the world. The matter was so severe that some top officials posted abroad were forced to return home in search of funds for the basic necessities of the missions.

    Recall too that since the middle of the year, there has been a running feud between the National Assembly and the Federal Executive Council over the pace of implementation of the federal budget. The impression has been that there was a shortage of cash to back budget proposals, thus the under-performance of the current budget. Recent attempts by the government to access foreign loans, coupled with ever-burgeoning domestic debts re-echo the question: where is all the money gone?

    There is no doubt that government needs to show a lot more transparency, especially as regards accruals to the federal coffers. The people need to know all the possible receivables so that they can be on the same page with the government.

    Above all, we must note that in more developed economies, the fear of the tax man is the beginning of wisdom for most citizens and he helps keep every man on his toes as regards tax responsibilities to the state. In other words, we urge the FIRS to dig deeper. The era where it sits in its lush office and watch tax revenues flow into its till ought to be over now. With ample creativity, Nigeria’s tax revenues could be nigh limitless.

  • Resurrecting Bakassi

    Resurrecting Bakassi

    The challenge now should be how to get the people on their feet again

    The clamour that Nigeria should appeal the judgment of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) which ceded the Bakassi peninsula to Cameroun in 2002 is approaching hysteria. For those convinced on the need for Nigeria to seek a review of the judgment, the opportunity for appeal, which closes in a few days time must be explored, regardless of the chances of success. Many others however believe that there are no new facts to be put forward for the ICJ to review the judgment and as such the nation should come to terms with the loss of Bakassi. On our part, we are yet to see any compelling new evidence why the judgment of the ICJ could be upturned on appeal.

    The opportunity that was open to Nigeria under international law was to have refused, ab initio, to submit to the jurisdiction of the ICJ, considering the history of the peninsula. But of course, it is commonly believed that those who stood to gain materially gave all the assurances that the trial would be a walk-over, regardless of historical missteps. Having submitted to the jurisdiction of the court, and lost; we hope the new demand for a fresh legal battle is not to gift some Nigerians an opportunity to gain, while the country loses face in the international arena.

    More critically, in our view, is the failure of the Federal Government to keep her promise to protect and rehabilitate the people of Bakassi after the judgment was given in Cameroun’s favour. For us, and we guess many Nigerians, it is unacceptable that the promises made by the government to resettle the people have so far amounted to mere political hyperboles. We believe the people of Bakassi were shortchanged historically by trading their territory for gains for the country in the past; and it would amount to political perfidy to gloss over their present plight, as if it is a natural disaster, for which the country is helpless.

    Under international law, the people inhabiting that territory have a right to choose their future; whether to become Camerounians or remain Nigerians, or even become an independent state were the parameters realisable. But having been Nigerians all their lives, the people obviously prefer to remain Nigerians, even though no official plebiscite has been conducted. But by the implication of the judgment and that choice, they have turned to Nigerians living in a foreign territory, and this has seriously eroded their rights to engage in their main economic activity which is fishing within the waters abutting the peninsula.

    It is even more embarrassing that while Nigeria under the so-called Green Tree agreement, was working assiduously to hand over the territory affected by the judgment to Cameroun, it neglected to put in place a clear roadmap to protect the rights and interests of the people still living on the peninsula. Unfortunately, the people of Bakassi displaced by decisions beyond their control have become soft targets for Camerounian gendarmes, and that is totally unacceptable. In our view, Nigerians, wherever they may reside, deserve protection from their government; and while working out modalities for a permanent solution to the crisis, a strong and clear message must be sent to the Camerounian political authorities to rein in their security agencies.

    Unfortunately, many public figures in the region are using the crisis for political mileage. For them, what is important is that they are seen to be politically correct, even when their positions are untenable or even dubious. Again, some politicians or interests who are removed from the direct effects of the crisis are not disposed to treating the crisis as a national emergency, and tend to downplay the situation. As the nation swings between the two political extremes, the people of Bakassi are left to suffer the misjudgments of a political leadership that has shown lack of capacity to promote and protect its citizens in dire straits.

    We earnestly urge the Federal Government to immediately fulfill its obligations to the people of Bakassi. That obligation will include, adequately resettling them and providing a tenable environment for their economic activities. Again, their natural rights protected under international law must be respected by the Camerounians at a clear behest of Nigeria’s leadership. There is also the need to provide for adequate compensation and protection of their cultural rights, including retrieving physical totems where possible, for transfer to the new territory that will be provided for them.

    For us, it is important that the choice of the people of Bakassi to remain Nigerians does not lead to regret because of the nonchalant attitude of those in authority. As we await the actions of the Federal Government to protect the rights of the Bakassi people, we hope it will be guided by patriotic pragmatism.

  • Mr. Obama’s refreshing defense of free speech

    Mr. Obama’s refreshing defense of free speech

    WHEN ANTI-AMERICAN demonstrations spread around the world this month, the Obama administration focused much of its public response on denouncing the anti-Muslim video that had provoked outrage and provided a pretext for extremists. President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton rightly distanced the U.S. government from the video and stressed the American system of religious tolerance; more disturbingly, the White House asked Google to consider removing the offending video from its YouTube Web site.

    So it was heartening Tuesday to hear Mr. Obama, in his address to the U.N. General Assembly, deliver a vigorous defense of freedom of speech, including the right of individuals to “blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs.”

    “Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right of all people to express their views — even views that we disagree with,” the president said. Without such freedom, he said, individuals might be stopped from practicing their own faith; “efforts to restrict speech can become a tool to silence critics or oppress minorities.” He concluded: “Given the power of faith in our lives and the passion that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech.”

    Mr. Obama went on to denounce violence as a response to speech, and to insist that other leaders speak out against extremism — including “those who — even when not resorting to violence — use hatred of America, or the West, or Israel as a central principle of politics.” The rhetoric was well-targeted: Anti-Americanism has become a tool of extremist and reactionary forces in the power struggles underway in post-revolutionary Arab states. The anti-Muslim video — a vile but obscure piece of Internet flotsam — was seized on by militants in Egypt and Libya as a means for rallying support in Cairo and as a cover for staging an armed assault on U.S. personnel in Benghazi.

    It is important for the president and his administration to try to make clear to the majority of Muslims — who do not participate in demonstrations but follow the controversy — that the United States does not sponsor or endorse religious slander. That fact, while obvious to Americans, is not widely understood in the Middle East. But it is just as important to send the message that American free speech will not be curbed to suit religious sensibilities and that violence will not be tolerated. “We will bring justice to those who harm our citizens and our friends,” Mr. Obama said. Delivering on those words will be another important piece of the administration’s response.

    – Washington Post

  • Vanity upon vanity …

    Vanity upon vanity …

    Imelda Marcos’ legendary shoe collection goes to waste 

    The recent announcement that the over 1,220 pairs of shoes amassed by Imelda Marcos, wife of the late President Ferdinand Marcos of the Philippines, has gone to waste is a testimony to the vanity of worldly ambition and the ultimate foolishness of human greed.

    Reports have it that the shoes, clothes, accessories and other materials accumulated by the Marcos family during the two-decade dictatorship of its patriarch, and abandoned by them when they fled the country during the “People Power” revolt of 1986, have been damaged by years of neglect and poor storage. They had initially been kept at the Presidential Palace in Manila, and then transferred to the National Museum after termites and humidity began to affect them. Little effort was made to properly preserve them, and flooding appears to have damaged many items beyond repair.

    Given the monumental avariciousness with which Mrs. Marcos collected shoes and other fashion items, the neglect and damage that they have sustained demonstrate the true extent of her greed. Once kept in custom-built, temperature-controlled and heavily-secured walk-in closets, these things have become a fitting epitaph for a wasteful, corrupt and useless regime. At a time when thousands were starving and denied access to educational, healthcare and other aspects of social welfare, the Marcos family embarked on an orgy of conspicuous consumption that was almost unrivalled in contemporary history.

    Unfortunately, they are the rule rather than the exception. The developing world in particular is littered with insatiable leaders whose greed virtually has no limit. The rogue’s gallery includes star performers like Congo Democratic Republic’s President Mobutu Sese Seko, who was adjudged to be wealthier than his country; Jean-Bedel Bokassa, the “emperor” of the Central African Empire, whose ambition was to become Africa’s Napoleon Bonaparte; Haiti’s “Papa Doc” Duvalier, who used a combination of murder and voodoo to sustain himself in power. Even Nigeria had its General Sani Abacha, whose determination to perpetuate himself in office was exceeded only by the rapaciousness with which he looted the nation he purported to lead.

    Imelda Marcos’ obsession with shoes is symbolic of the moral regression that affects many rulers and their families when they attain the heights of power. She often claimed that the shoes were gifts from adoring citizens, but she never thought to ever give away even one pair of the over 1,220 pairs that adorned her homes. As museum officials struggle to preserve what they can of her tainted legacy, she is currently a law-maker in her country, continuously regaling the citizenry with promises of a return to power. Her superlative shoe collection, however, is as useless to her as it is to her shoeless compatriots who could have benefitted from a timely display of generosity on her part.

    Nigeria in 2012 is eerily similar to the Philippines in 1986. There is the same ostentatious display of wealth by politicians and their cronies, the same contempt for public opinion, the same confidence in impunity. Only recently, it was revealed that the Nigerian elite rank among the most assiduous purchasers of private jets anywhere in the world. The populace is repeatedly assailed with tales of frauds involving the theft of billions of naira. Industrialists, bankers, traditional rulers and other wealthy Nigerians continue to breach the boundaries of good taste in their unending quest for ways to show off their ill-gotten wealth.

    As they continue to indulge themselves, however, they would do well to remember the fate of Imelda Marcos’s shoes: whatever is flaunted will ultimately end up being neglected; all ostentation and luxury will inevitably come to an end, no matter how expensive it is.

  • Steps ahead

    Steps ahead

    The “bloody Sunday” robbery that shook Lagos three weeks ago is still causing ripples with news of the arrest of three suspects by the police: Uche Okeagbu (23), Emmanuel Ezeani (23) and Chinonso Nwuaugwu(23). In the incident which sent the city into panic, a gang of dare-devil robbers shot dead three policemen, a bureau de change operator, a commercial motorcyclist and a commercial bus driver; and more than 10 people were believed to have been injured. The robbers drove round in two vehicles, spreading horror as they escaped with their loot of foreign currencies stolen from a bureau de change in Agege. For hours, the gang terrorised the public as it surfaced at Ifako- Gbagada, Oshodi-Apapa Expressway, Mile 2 and Agege.

    Jolted by the apparent ease with which the robbers carried out their violent operation, the Inspector- General of Police (IGP), Mohammed Abubakar, reacted with strong words for his men: “There is no doubt, some of you are sleeping on duty,” he said, adding, “We can’t fold our arms; and policemen must be seen and felt on every road and street in Lagos. The robbery incident is an embarrassment to the force. It can never be accepted anymore.”

    Probably prompted by this put-down, the state Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) swung into action and eventually arrested the three suspects that were paraded at the Lagos State Police Command, Ikeja. Also on display were four vehicles which hitherto served as the gang’s mobile armoury, Infinity and Toyota Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs) and two Volkswagen buses, which had been reconstructed to conceal arms and ammunition. Found in the improvised chambers were : two rocket-propelled grenade launchers, five dynamites with a detonator, two general purpose machine guns, nine AK47 rifles, 225 AK47 magazines (fully loaded), 260 rounds of GPMG live ammunition, and over 10,000 rounds of live AK47 ammunition. Police commissioner Umar Manko said one of the gang’s operational vehicles also has a sensor Close Circuit Television (CCTV) to monitor whoever was trailing them.

    The discovery of these arms and ammunition is simply mind-boggling, and shows how well equipped the robbers were for their evil business. The level of sophistication of their weapons and operational devices is also amazing. This development definitely raises a crucial question about the source of such weaponry. Furthermore, it highlights the possibility that there are criminals on the loose who might have an operational capacity that is beyond the police. So, the issue of probable complacency of the police raised by the IGP does not seem to address a fundamental question. We ask: How well equipped is the force to deal with such crimes?

    To go by his words, however, the IGP would have us believe that the police should be up to the task. In his reaction to the incident, he told his men: “They must put more strategy on ground and methodology of fighting crimes. We cannot fold our hands anymore and allow few criminals to terrorise residents. The governor has given us everything that we need in terms of mobility, in terms of technology, in terms of support and we shouldn’t allow the people of Lagos to be terrorised by common charlatans and criminals.” On our part, we wonder whether the matter is really no more than a failure of strategy and process, and whether the force is sufficiently equipped to do its work.

    It is noteworthy that the arrested suspects are young men in their twenties, and we wonder what could have attracted them to a life of crime at their age. In a sense, their alleged involvement in the “bloody Sunday” mayhem could be a metaphor for the state of the nation with its huge unemployment crisis and pervasive corrupt values.

  • The deluge this time

    The deluge this time

    AS at last weekend, about 30 out of Nigeria’s 36 states had been affected by heavy flooding that has displaced hundreds of thousands of people and destroyed properties worth millions of naira. The worst hit are Kogi, Benue, Taraba, Edo, Anambra, Nassarawa, Bayelsa, Plateau, Enugu, Akwa Ibom, to name a few. Taraba, Kogi and parts of Benue states have particularly come under the wrath of a rampaging flood. Kogi’s capital, Lokoja being at the confluence between Rivers Niger and Benue is at the vortex of the flood which has devastated most of the capital, Lokoja, spreading through local council areas, towns and villages like Dekina, Ibaji, Ankpa, Ajaokuta, Bassa and Kotonkarfe.

    Quite troubling was that the deluge could submerge the Abuja-Lokoja highway, a major artery linking the north of Nigeria to the south and rendering it impassable to the throng of commuters plying that road. Vast farmlands are also washed away while houses and properties in many communities across the country were damaged. The flooding has been attributed to many causes which include changing world climate which has triggered excessive rainfall, bursting dams and overflowing river banks.

    With the tide high in the Atlantic Ocean, rivers Niger and its tributary, the Benue which run through the centre of the country are experiencing a backlash and a surge of water into the hinterlands. What this means is that all the areas along the plains of the two rivers will experience flooding for some time. There is also the Lagdo Dam in neighbouring Cameroun and the Kainji Dam in Niger State which water had to be released to forestall damages. If therefore the intensive rains continue as the weather agency has forecasted, it means that more flooding is to be expected.

    It is true that the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) had warned about the impending deluge a few days before, nobody expected this magnitude of disaster. While NEMA had envisaged flood along the plains of the Niger and Benue, the reality has been more extended and devastating, leaving even the Federal Government overwhelmed. And it seems that we are in for a very long night.

    As in all natural disasters, there is hardly anything that can be done to temper the intensity of the rainfall or to quell the rage of the attendant flooding. It is an emergency situation that can only be attenuated by quick intervention damage control. Governments at all levels must think relief; ingenious and urgent relief methods must be devised and deployed to disaster areas, pronto. NEMA as currently structured may not be able to do much. There may be need for emergency flood relief committees to spring up quickly and support it in all the flood-prone states.

    There is need to set up more safe grounds and relief centres in the affected localities. Also, in the short run, food, blankets, mattresses, medication, potable water and other household daily needs are urgently required in some of the affected areas. Then reconstruction of houses, homesteads and communities will have to commence in earnest. Long-term measures will include opening up of water ways, dredging of canals and building of even dams in the flood-prone areas.

    With the twists in world climate, these cataclysms of nature are not expected to abate. In this light, sound emergency management will be the new frontier of human development. We therefore call for a total overhaul of NEMA to include a restructuring, reorientation, retraining and provision of adequate funding for the agency. With nature seeming to lend a hand to terrorist activities around the world, the best response is to always prepare for the worst.

  • In the Middle East, a pro-American turn

    IN THE IMMEDIATE aftermath of the attacks on U.S. diplomatic missions in Libya and Egypt, plenty of commentators lamented what they saw as intractable anti-Americanism in the Middle East — even in Libya, where the United States had helped to overthrow a hated dictator. As it turns out, the reactions were hasty. In the days since the riots, there has been a broad backlash against the violence in both countries — culminating Friday in Benghazi, where tens of thousands of people marched on the base of an Islamist militia suspected of involvement in the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate.

    People carrying pro-American signs pushed their way into the encampment of Ansar al-Sharia, which in spite of its denials is suspected of complicity in the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. The militants were forced out of the base, and the demonstrators burned part of it before turning it over to the Libyan army. On Sunday, the interim government, which had been wavering on how to react to the assault on the consulate, ordered the dismantlement of all militias not under its authority and said they must withdraw from government property within 48 hours.

    In Egypt, where the government’s slow reaction to protests outside the U.S. Embassy in Cairo prompted a phone call from President Obama to the newly elected Islamist President Mohamed Morsi, there has been a chorus of condemnation of the violence, with the country’s most prestigious sheiks and other Islamic leaders calling it shameful and contrary to Islam; some even issued fatwas against it. The Middle East Media Research Institute has documented numerous commentaries by newspaper columnists warning against incitement by radical groups.

    Anti-Americanism is a potent force in the Arab Middle East; polls show that in several countries — though not in Libya — U.S. prestige has fallen during the Obama administration. But in a region where power is up for grabs, it is only one of many competing agendas, and much evidence suggests that its champions are in the minority. That means the appropriate U.S. response is not to write off the region, or to cancel aid programs — as some in Congress propose — but to help moderate forces defeat and marginalize the extremists.

    Libya’s biggest problem is that its new democratic government is too weak to take on the scores of militias around the country that do not accept its authority, including some that may be allied with al-Qaeda. Though last week’s popular demonstrations gave it a political boost, the government could use greater security assistance from the United States and other NATO governments — including training and help with intelligence.

    In Egypt, the Obama administration has been working on a $1 billion debt-forgiveness deal that could help revive the Egyptian economy, but the oft-postponed pact was put on hold again after the Sept. 11 demonstration. Mr. Obama may wish to deflect election-eve Republican claims that he is showing weakness in the face of attacks on Americans. But such demagoguery ought not to derail the effort to help stabilize Egypt’s economy and reinforce free-market policies.

    – Washington Post

  • Who killed Citizen Ozuah?

    WHEN criminals stormed Lagos killing all the way on September 9, an irate Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Muhammed Dahiru Abubakar, accused his men of napping, while criminals made hay. Eleven days later on September 20, a worrisome image of the police in Lagos re-emerged: the disturbing possibility of killer cops on the prowl.

    That about sums up the tragedy of Citizen Ugochukwu Ozuah, 36; who wedded on Saturday, but was felled the following Thursday. Our hearts must go out to Joan, the late Ozuah’s six-day wife; and the Ozuah family, for this grave tragedy. But the question is: who did it?

    The late Ozuah’s family claim it was the police, some trigger-happy or nervy operative or operatives who shot dead a defenceless citizen, under the cover of darkness. But the police have maintained it was indeed armed robbers, firing from a sports utility van (SUV). Who is telling the truth? A thorough investigation should provide an answer.

    Still, the murder story is bizarre. The late Ozuah was dropping off Erikefe Omene, who had come on a congratulatory visit to the newlyweds, to get a taxi cab, outside an estate in Gbagada, Lagos, where he lived. On alighting from the car with his friend, a shot rang out, following a piercing cry of “who goes there”?, according to newspaper reports. The bullets reportedly pierced Ozuah’s body and he fell. The report also mentioned another car parked around the same spot, which was approached by figures suspected to be the police on patrol duty. The occupants of that car also reportedly scrambled for cover behind Ozuah’s car, after the shooting.

    Now, who fired that shot? The police claimed it was armed robbers. But the police claim is curious. If indeed armed robbers shot Ozuah, and the police were nearby, would the most logical thing not be rushing the victim to the hospital to save his life? But curiously the police personnel there preferred first briefing the Anthony Village, Lagos Divisional Police Officer (DPO) to reportedly alert him on the shooting. Now, was this a grave error of judgement or deliberate and a culpable attempt at cover-up?

    More gravely, from the time the call went to the DPO and when he made a hurried arrival at the shooting scene, the victim bled. It was only when Omene (who had fled back in panic into Ozuah’s estate to alert Joan, his new wife) that Ozuah’s wife insisted her husband be rushed to the hospital. But it was too late. Another priceless life of a citizen had been wilfully wasted.

    Also thanks to Omene, an eye witness like the police operatives on patrol, an apparent crafty rearrangement of the sequel of the tragic event is being challenged. Indeed, Omene pointedly told the DPO that his men, not any armed robbers, shot his friend. Although the DPO countered otherwise, it would appear that but for Omene’s presence, a radically different story about the death of an innocent man would have been sold to the public.

    This is indeed a tragedy of monumental proportions. A man got married on Saturday and was killed on Thursday! Yes, accidents do occur, but this particular death is callous and unjustified: Joan enjoyed her marriage for a cumulative six days before becoming a widow – and this, in 21stcentury Lagos, not in some lawless jungle! This is absolutely unacceptable.

    That is why the authorities must launch full-scale investigation into the matter, and ferret out the truth.

  • Prison congestion

    Prison congestion

    •Lagos CJ’s example should be sustained even as stakeholders must facilitate the criminal justice system

    We scoff at official lassitude to the salient issue of prison congestion despite the fact that the matter requires urgent national attention, especially with many of the inmates awaiting trial for years. This depraved official attitude is better underscored by the ennui shown to this over-flogged matter by successive administrations in the country. We had thought the democratic dispensation would make a difference but it has not; little has changed in this regard since the return to civil rule in 1999.

    The Federal Government seems bereft of ideas on the way forward. Abba Moro, its Minister of Interior, recently bemoaned its helplessness in remedying the situation. Moro reportedly said: ‘34,000 of the 42,000 inmates in Nigerian prisons are awaiting trial and a good percentage of them have been incarcerated for at least five years’. He also observed that not less than 1,000 Nigerians are daily dumped in various prisons and remain there for over three years without trial. Yet, he has no clue as to what should be done or is planned to ameliorate the deplorable prison situation.

    While we doubt Moro’s statistics in view of the poor record-keeping profile of the nation (the figures could be much higher), we applaud Justice Ayotunde Philips’, the 14th Chief Judge of Lagos Sate, who seized the occasion of commencement of the 2012/2013 legal year in the state to release a record 233 awaiting trial inmates at the Kirikiri Prisons. The breakdown: 130 inmates from the Maximum Prison and: 103 inmates from the Medium Prison.

    This kind gesture exercised pursuant to the chief judge’s power under Section 1 (1) of the Criminal Justice (Release from Custody) (Special Provision Act) Cap L40, Laws of Federation 2007 is long overdue if the essence of justice in criminal justice system must be achieved. For instance, how can one explain that 2,378 of the 2,502 inmates in the Kirikiri Medium Prison alone are awaiting trial? Only 124 were already convicted with just four on life sentence. Overall, over 80 per cent of inmates in Nigerian prisons are awaiting trial.

    We recollect that as far back as February, 2008, Amnesty International came out with a report titled; ‘Prisoners’ rights systematically flouted’, in which it pointed out federal authority’s tepid approach to prison sector reform. If the avalanche of recommendations of several committees set up by government to help chart the way forward on prison congestion have been implemented by successive governments, the matter should have become history.

    Unfortunately, the governments failed to take the bold step necessary to eradicate a criminal justice system that encourages prolonged detention and overcrowding in prison yards. Rather, it seems to derive pleasure in touting its phantom respect for the rule of law. We ask: What has the government done to improve prison infrastructure in about a decade? Nothing seems to have been done to improve the prosecution chain that delays arraignment due to poor investigative skills, inadequate Black Maria to convey suspects to courts and more importantly, inadequate/and incessant transfer of judges, among others.

    But Justice Philips’ generous amnesty to inmates would only be meaningful in decongesting the prisons if it could be made a routine and not a one off-thing by her and her colleagues in other states. Above all, the debilitating situation in the prisons demands a declaration of an emergency so as to allow for a complete overhaul of the current criminal justice system that inflicts unjustifiable punishment on inmates that may forever not get justice.

  • Tompolo’s powers?

    Tompolo’s powers?

    •Was ex-minister, Iheanacho arrested or abducted? What about the alleged stolen petroleum products?

    Former Niger Delta militia leader, Government Ekpemukpolo, alias Tompolo, is in the news again. This time, he is reported to have masterminded the arrest of a former Minister of Interior, Capt. Emmanuel Iheanacho, on allegations of his involvement in the theft of petroleum products. “I was abducted by Tompolo and not arrested and thereafter humiliated like a common criminal at a detention point at the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA)”, Iheanacho told reporters.

    The former minister said that the uniformed armed men numbering about 30 who stormed his Apapa Tank Farm and Marine Road corporate head-office of his business in Lagos and carried out his arrest did not have the backing of the law.

    Iheanacho described the theft allegations as strange, explaining that he is involved in “throughput” business, which allows him under the law to accept petroleum products for storage from an importer who does not own a depot or storage facility, for a fee, upon the importer showing relevant clearance documents from the Nigerian Ports Authority, Customs, Department of Petroleum Resources, NIMASA, the Navy and the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA).

    It is a cause for concern that Iheanacho described the manner of his arrest as abduction. Does Tompolo have the powers to arrest him? This question is pertinent against the background of the fact that Tompolo’s company, Global West Vessel Specialist Agency (GWVSA), signed a controversial partnership deal with NIMASA early this year, which was called “Strategic Concessioning.”

    Reacting to public criticism of the agreement, which was seen as displacing the Navy from performing its statutory security roles on the country’s territorial waters, the government had explained that Tompolo’s company would only provide platforms, security boats, equipment and expertise to help in securing the country’s waterways and thereby raise revenue, and that its staff will not bear arms.

    It is, therefore, curious that those who arrested Iheanacho were allegedly in uniforms and armed. Could they really have been Tompolo’s men? If they were, it surely contradicts the stated terms of the so-called “concessioning” deal.

    Iheanacho raised the spectre of kidnapping when he complained that his release was “negotiated” by a team of his lawyers “as a typical case of one held hostage.” We recall that hostage-taking was a major feature of the activities of the Niger Delta militants and hope that this incident is not taking the country back to that ugly past.

    While the public was still puzzled about the nature of Tompolo’s deal with the government, a respected foreign paper, the Wall Street Journal, reported that the ex-militiaman and some of his colleagues had been awarded multi-billion naira pipeline surveillance contracts by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC).

    It is indeed a grand irony that a former outlaw has transformed into an enforcer of the law, all in the government’s contentious effort to pacify the militants of the restive Niger Delta region.

    This episode involving a former minister has again put the spotlight on the implications of Tompolo’s contracts with the government and the NNPC. How far is he empowered to go in securing the country’s maritime environment and its oil facilities? What is the role of the state security apparatus under the arrangement? Can it be said that the state has relinquished its powers to a private contractor?

    However, the circumstances of Iheanacho’s arrest and detention should be seen beyond Tompolo’s alleged involvement. If it is true, the issue of stolen petroleum products deserves to be addressed, and the culprits punished.