Category: Featured

  • Who becomes APC chairman in Ondo?

    Who becomes APC chairman in Ondo?

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ondo State is set for congresses to elect party officers at the ward, local government, and state levels. The contest for the position of the state chairman will be tough for many reasons. This is particularly because the incoming party leadership is expected to play a crucial role as preparations for the 2027 general election get underway. Correspondent OSAGIE OTABOR reports

    Barring any last-minute change of mind, the All Progressives Congress (APC) leadership will release the timetable for congresses to elect the party’s executives from ward, local government and state levels in Ondo State.

    The forthcoming congress is the first to be conducted under Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa, and it is crucial for those seeking to contest for elective positions during the 2027 general election.

    Moreover, it also presents an opportunity for Governor Aiyedatiwa to take control of the party structure by putting his loyalists at the helm of affairs.

    The Ondo APC has solidified its hold on power in the Sunshine State. It is the first party to continue in power beyond eight years, after winning three governorship elections consecutively. It defeated all the opposition parties in all 18 local governments. The party has an overwhelming majority of seats in the state House of Assembly, and occupies three senatorial seats and eight out of the nine in the House of Representatives.

    Ade Adetimehin has been the Ondo State chairman for the past eight years. His leadership style helped to stabilise the party. For instance, the party secured an overwhelming victory during the two governorship elections conducted under his leadership. Adetimehin ensured the unity of all party stakeholders ahead of every election.

    As a result, his exit might present some challenges to the party, as the void left may be too big for his successor to fill. They said Adetimehin ensured a cordial relationship between the party and the government. He also co-opted members of the opposition party leaders to work for the APC. Under Adetimehin, bigwigs of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), including the former Governor Olusegun Mimiko bloc within the PDP, joined the APC. He also helped to manage the post-election crisis, which had the potential of splitting the party.

    Former Deputy Governor Lasisi Oluboyo described Adetimehin as one of the best state chairmen as far as the APC was concerned.

    Olubayo, “There is no crisis in the Ondo State APC. So if somebody tells you he has something to fix, he is being economical with the truth; you cannot fix what is not broken. The only option left is to maintain the status quo and ensure continuity. That’s why I give kudos to our present and past leaders, including Ade Adetimehin, the present APC chairman.

    Read Also: Nigeria’s foreign policy, from Afrocentrism to ambiguity?

    “That man has done a yeoman’s job. He is the best chairman when it comes to the membership drive. Check all people who joined the APC during his time, he integrated everyone seamlessly into the fold. That is why, when the election came, there was not much opposition. People who are supposed to be in party B are already in party A. Their impact will be in the present party they are in.”

    The contest to become the next Ondo APC chairman is likely to be a tense one. For one thing, the 2027 general election is already around the corner. As it stands, the amended constitution bars Aiyedatiwa from seeking another term in office. Some APC leaders believe the governor may not support many incumbent lawmakers in getting a return ticket to the National Assembly and the House of Assembly. They insist the governor would want to get total hold of the party structure by ensuring his loyalists get elected. Having a stronghold on the party would give the governor a smooth ride to back those he is rooting for to win the party primary ahead of the general election.

    Political analysts argue that many PDP leaders who defected to the APC before the last governorship election would be part of the new Ondo APC leadership. This is because many of the PDP chieftains now in the APC came purposely to support Aiyedatiwa’s election.

    Those interested in replacing Adetimehin as chairman are Victor Olabimtan, former Deputy Governor Oluboyo, former member of the House of Representatives, Kolawole Babatunde (a.k.a. Amechie), Prince Akingbade Amodeni and Mr. Jide Owoka.

    Adetimehin hails from Ondo Central, and the party has zoned the position to the Ondo North Senatorial District. However, no date has been fixed yet for the congresses.

    Those in the good books of power brokers are Olabimtan, Amodeni, Babatunde and Oluboyo. Olabimtan is the current chairman of the State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB). He was a former Speaker of the Ondo State House of Assembly. A seasoned politician, he is reputed to be a politician who knows how to play his cards well. He is a man who is well acquainted with party members across the state. Olabimtan is believed to have the support of notable APC leaders, and his emergence would see a good working relationship between the party and the state government.

    Alhaji Oluboyo was the deputy governor under former Governor Mimiko and commissioner for Agriculture and Natural Resources. He is currently a director in Wemabod, a subsidiary of Odua Investments, a multi-million-dollar company. Oluboyo believes he is more experienced than other aspirants.

    His words: “I’ve served, and I’ve been tested and trusted. So if they give me the opportunity, I will demonstrate all the experience I’ve acquired. We have so many good people, but I’m the best. None of them has served as deputy governor. None of them has acted as a governor of this state. I’ve acted as a governor of this state for six months when my boss was not around. Go and ask them for their pedigree. They will say that I’m the best.”

    Oluboyo said he would work in synergy with the state government for party members to benefit adequately. He said, “I’ve been in government before. I know how the government runs. The most important thing is that I will be loyal to the governor and the leadership of the APC. I’ll assist the present governor in running the day-to-day activities. I will ensure that the party leadership and the government are on the same page. That is important; not that your governor will go this side and you go to the other side.

    “Mind you, there is going to be a primary and competent people will be elected. No exploitation and no imposition. It is not going to be based on cash and carry. I will not take it. Only people who are tested and have delivered will triumph. There’s no stopping. We have competent people. We have people who have served and have delivered. So we are going to make use of them. Look at what is happening in Lagos, where there is continuity in government, much progress and development.

    Babatunde served as a senior legislative aide to Senator Ajayi Boroffice before he was elected to represent Akoko Southeast/Akoko Southwest Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives between 2015 and 2019. He served as a special adviser to the late Governor Oluwarotimi Akeredolu on Rural and Community Development. He has a huge following among party youths. He has promised to foster genuine reconciliation among all warring factions within the party and to uphold the values of loyalty, dedication, and inclusiveness within the Ondo APC.

    Prince Amodeni is an entrepreneur who served as the chairman of Akoko Southeast Local Government between 1999 and 2003 under the defunct Alliance for Democracy (AD). He has promised to bring his entrepreneurial spirit into the party leadership. He said, “I tower above others when it comes to the issue of experience, and age is on my side. I am getting older, not younger, and already an elder statesman. I will be able to manage the old and the young.

    “The present crop of leadership, headed by Ade Adetimehin, has done excellently well. But I will improve on what the Adetimehin leadership has done. But by the time I get there, I will improve on what they have done. They have recorded so many firsts. I will add more value to what they have done.”

    Governor Aiyedatiwa holds the aces on who would emerge as the next Ondo APC chairman. He is the leader of the party. However, some party leaders eyeing the governorship may put up a fight.

  • Lagos council polls: 10 APC women to contest in July

    Lagos council polls: 10 APC women to contest in July

    Over 114 women get councillorship tickets

    No fewer than 114 women councillorship candidates on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC) are participating in the July12 local government elections, it was learnt yesterday.

    There are 279 wards across the 20 pre-existing local governments and 37 Local Council Development Areas (LCDAs).

    Also, 10 women are in the race for chairmen at the poll, according to the results of the primaries conducted by the Election Committee headed by Babatunde Ogala (SAN) at the weekend.

    They are Mrs Olayemi Animasahun (Epe Council), Motunrayo Alogba (Ijede), Samiat Bada (Ikosi-Ketu), Muibat Rufai (Ojo) and Yemi Akindele Adunni (Mosan-Okunola).

    Others are Idowu Senanjo (Apapa), Tola Oyedele-Abubakar (Agboyi-Ketu), Bukola  Omope (Bariga), Aminat Alabi (Iru/Victoria Island), and Adeola Adetoro (Etiosa).

    Protests against the results are being collated. Petitions are being received, to be looked into by the Appeal Panel.

    Yesterday, the Election Panel headed by Babatunde Ogala (SAN) started preparing  its report to the party, which has a final say because the tickets belong to the party. The primaries were neatly conducted and substantially credible. Delegates shunned unruly behaviour.

    In fact, the delegates who constituted the electoral colleges are committed and dedicated party officers at the grassroots who knew the aspirants in their respective local councils. Many of them have been involved in grassroots politicking from the first and second republics. For example, the average age of delegates from Imota Council is between 65 and 70 years.

    Delegates who spoke with reporters at the party office on Acme Road, Ogba, Ikeja after the exercise hailed Ogala and his team for their sense of innovation, firmness, effectiveness, efficiency, vigilance and compliance with the guidelines.

    Read Also: We’re laying foundation for self-secured Nigeria – Ribadu

    The security personnel on ground was led by Lagos State Police Commissioner Moshood Jimoh. The exercise was also witnessed by Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) officials.

    House of Representatives member Mrs. Kafilat Ogbara hailed the outcome of the shadow polls, saying that Lagos APC is meeting the criterion of gender inclusivity.

    She stressed:”To a large extent, we are moving close to it. We have to thank our president for making it happen. The instructions on inclusion was effectively and strictly adhered to. The instruction of the party leader was followed. There is an improvement in terms of the number of women now going to be chairmen of councils.”

    The federal legislator said the onus is now on women who are being given the opportunities to live to expectation and justify the confidence reposed in them.

    After the polls, more women are also likely to be appointed as supervisory councillors and leaders of councils’ legislatures. 

    More women obtained the nomination forms, unlike before. While 399 male chairmanship aspirants were cleared after screening, 76 women were also given the nod to contest.

    Lagos APC chairman Pastor Cornelius Ojelabi has directed the local council party chairmen to adhere strictly to the directive to give special consideration to womem aspirants.

    The directive was contained in a letter titled: ‘The 2025 Local Government Councillorship Screening Result and the Party Instruction on Female Aspirants.’

    It reads: “You are strictly advised to comply with the party’s instructions associated with the result on the need to consider female councillorship aspirants in our wards accordingly as per the attached list.”

    Consequently, the State Working Committee (CWC) directed that  women aspirants should be given concessions. The nomination form was slashed to N250,000 for women councillorship aspirants while their male counterparts paid N1 million.

    Women who withdrew from the race before the commencement of the primaries are likely to get refund.

    Two weeks ago,  prominent women leaders in APC stormed the party secretariat to press for 30 percent women affirmation in the spirit of Beijing Declaration. They urged the Governance Advisory Council (GAC) to fulfill the promise of allocating more chairmanship and councillorship seats to women.

    Ogbara, who spoke ahead of the nominations, said “it is crucial that we have gender balance in local government leadership.”

    She added: “For example, where a man serves as chairman, a woman should be vice-chairman, and vice versa.”

    She urged the party to emulate the great example of intentional gender representation set by former Governor Nyesom Wike of Rivers State.

    Ogbara said: “Under his leadership, he ensured that in every local government where there was a male chairman, the vice-chairman was a woman. He also promoted female senators and members of the House of Representatives.

    She added: “We need more leaders like him, men who are truly ‘He For She’ advocates. Recently, we honored such leaders during our National Women Awards, recognising men like President Bola Tinubu and other governors, such as AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq of Kwara State, for their deliberate efforts to empower and position women.”

    “During Tinubu’s leadership of the Action Congress (AC) and Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), he advocated for making politics more accessible to women. Many women can’t afford the high fees for nomination forms. So, we hope to see reforms that reduce these barriers and encourage more women to participate.”

    A party source said President Tinubu and other party leaders reasoned that if Lagos can set a good example of improved women participation, other states may follow suit. Thefore, a deliberate opportunity was created to encourage ease of participation by women.

    According to the source, “in any ward where the contestants are seven, three councillorship slots automatically go to women. Where they are five, two would go to women. This is to enhance women inclusion.”

    But, some women also won the slots by merit. The members of the electoral colleges who gave them second term tickets considered their impressive performance as incumbent chairmen. Three of them-Animasahun, Alogba and Bada- stood out.

    In fact, Animasahun and Alogba secured the tickets through consensus. 

    Bada, who has implemented some developmental projects in Ikosi-Ketu council, thanked President Tinubu for being gender-sensitive. “We are happy with what is happening in Lagos at the moment,” she said.

    Lagos APC Women Leader Jumoke Okoya-Thomas said changed had occurred, adding that the chapter is now determined to encourage more women to cobtribute their quota to development.

    Okoya-Thomas, a former member of the House of Representatives, added:”This time around, the party is actually thinking about women.”

  • One-party controversy: Ganduje, Damagum, Gabam clash

    One-party controversy: Ganduje, Damagum, Gabam clash

    • PDP, SDP chairmen, LP tackle APC chair

    The one-party state controversy, which arose after a spate of defections into the All Progressives Congress (APC) since the tsunami in Delta State, deepened at the weekend.

    Many commentators and opposition figures have accused the APC of plotting a one-party state by wooing and winning over opposition political office holders – governors, federal and state lawmakers.

    But the APC has consistently said those joining it are doing so willingly, having been attracted by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s performance and plans for the country.

    The APC National Chairman, Abdullahi Umar Ganduje, chided those accusing the ruling party of plotting to push the country into a one-party system.

    Ganduje, a former Kano State governor, said: “A one-party state is not by force. It’s by negotiation. It’s because other political parties see the effect of the positive governance of our party.

    “If they decide to come to our party, willingly, I think there is nothing wrong with that.

    “Today, democratic China is one of the strongest countries in the world, and it’s a one-party system.

    “We are not saying we are working for a one-party system, but if this is the wish of Nigerians, we cannot quarrel with that.

    “You know they say too many cooks spoil the soup, too many political parties spoil governance.”

    Ganduje spoke at Aso Villa when he led the three Kebbi State senators – Adamu Aliero (Kebbi Central), Yahaya Abdullahi (Kebbi North), and Garba Maidoki (Kebbi South) – all elected on the PDP platform, to meet with President Tinubu for final negotiation ahead of their defection this week to the ruling party.

    But PDP National Chairman Umar Ilya Damagum and National Chairman of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) Shehu Musa Gabam lashed out at Ganduje on his position.

    READ ALSO: Corruption and failed refineries

    Damgum described the idea of a single-party state as “madness”.

    He said: “One-party system can only happen somewhere else, not in this country.

    “Recall what history says about anybody wishing for a one-party state. Where will such people end?”

    Gabam said: “The PDP, the party in power before the emergence of APC, passed through that route some time ago, deluding themselves that they would be in control of levers of power forever, but that fell on their faces.

    “It is Nigerians who are in the best position to tell if their lives have changed for the better or that they have been impacted positively under the APC.

    “The motivation of the ongoing gale of defections, particularly by some governors and elected political office holders, is not altruistic.

    “It is self-serving and undeniably done for self-preservation. 

    “Nigerians are in agreement that the power of choice through democratic options that multi-party democracy offers is one that cannot and should not be compromised.

    “A one-party system breeds authoritarian rule and erodes the freedom of the electorate.

    “It is not debatable that Nigeria needs a strong opposition for democratic consolidation.”

    Gabam spoke through the National Publicity Secretary of SDP, Rufus Aiyenigba.

    The Labour Party, which criticised the ruling class for being selfish, said self-interest is behind defections to the ruling party.

    Publicity Secretary of the Julius Abure faction, Obiora Ifoh, who spoke on behalf of the party, said Nigerians would not support a one-party state.

    He said: “One-party system is undemocratic and it breeds tyranny. Nigerians will not be pushed into that political system.

    “However, it must be said that many political parties are in crisis today because some leaders of those parties are not willing to subject themselves to party supremacy.

    “As such, political office holders use the inherent confusion in these parties to jump over to the ruling party, hoping to have easy access to political relevance and the cover provided by the ruling party.

    “Is it not absurd that a governor of an opposition party cannot even critique constructively or even appraise the ruling party in the face of the myriad economic challenges in the country today?

    “Or how do you explain how another opposition governor, barely two years into a government, is now campaigning for a president from another party against his own party?

    “The political class is so selfish that what counts for them is survival first, and they can do everything to ensure that they hold onto power, including betraying the party that sponsored them to the office.”

  • Rivers: PDP governors are busy-bodies, Fed Govt tells S’Court

    Rivers: PDP governors are busy-bodies, Fed Govt tells S’Court

    All is set for an epic battle at the Supreme Court between the Federal Government and the 10 governors of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) on the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State.

    The Federal Government has not only faulted the PDP governors action, it is challenging the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to entertain the suit.

    It said the PDP governors have no locus standi to initiate the matter.

    It has also said that the PDP  plaintiffs’ suit is “hypothetical, academic and speculative.”

    It described the PDP states as busy-bodies because  the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State does not affect them or their governors.

    It asked the highest court in the land to dismiss the case.

    The government’s response,  dated May 9, was filed by 16 lawyers, including 10 Senior Advocates of Nigeria and their six colleagues.

    Led by a former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Chief Akin Olujinmi (SAN), others are Prof. Kanyinsola Ajayi (SAN), Jelili Abiodun Owonikoko(SAN),  Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN), Tijani A. Gazali(SAN), Babatunde Ogala (SAN), and Olawale Fapohunda(SAN).

    Others in the team are Olumide Olujinmi (SAN), Akinyemi Olujinmi(SAN), Ademola Abimbola (SAN), Akinsola Olujinmi, Oluwole Ilori, Abdulwahab Abayomi, Mojeed Balogun,  Jideuche Ezi and Ramat Tijani.

    The plaintiffs states are  Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Delta, Enugu, Osun, Oyo, Plateau, Taraba and Zamfara.

    There were Indications that Delta State may withdraw from the matter because it is now a state of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Delta was part of the suit when it was under the control of the PDP.

    The  government put forward five grounds of preliminary objection.

    The pegs are:

    ● The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Section 232(1) of the 1999 Constitution is exercisable only in a dispute between the Federation of Nigeria and a State or between States in so far as the dispute involves any question (whether of law or fact) on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends. The plaintiffs have not disclosed any dispute, let alone, a justiciable dispute, between the Federation and the Plaintiffs.

    ●The plaintiffs’ suit has not disclosed any cause of action

    ● The plaintiffs have no locus standi to institute this suit.

    ●The plaintiffs’ suit is hypothetical, academic and speculative

    ●The suit is an abuse of the process of court .

    The Federal Government said: “The 1st defendant(the Attorney-General of the Federation, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, (SAN) will at or before the trial of this case, raise the following preliminary objection against the competence of this suit notice of which is hereby given to the plaintiffs.

    “The 1st defendant will preliminarily urge the Supreme Court to dismiss this suit on each of the following grounds.”

    The Federal Government said there was no dispute to invoke original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

    It accused the PDP governors of filing a pre-emptive suit to forestall a situation where the President would declare a state of emergency in their own states and suspend them from office.

    It said based on speculation by them, a dispute has arisen, which is a false assumption by the PDP states.

    READ ALSO: Corruption and failed refineries

    It said: “The contention of the 1st defendant (the Attorney-General of the Federation,  Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN) in this ground of objection is that this suit as composed does not fit into the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Section 232(1) of the 1999 Constitution which is exercisable only in a dispute between the Federation and a State or between States in so far as that dispute involves any question (whether of law or fact) on which the existence or extent of a legal right depends.

    “ The plaintiffs have not disclosed any dispute, let alone, a justiciable dispute, between the Federation and the plaintiff States. In support of this contention we rely on paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the plaintiffs’ affidavit. The case made in those paragraphs by the plaintiffs can be summarized as follows:

    (a)  that because a state of emergency had been declared before in Plateau and Ekiti States and now in Rivers State, the plaintiffs’ have filed this suit to forestall a situation where the President would declare a state of emergency in their own States and suspend them from office.

    (b) that based on that speculation by them, a dispute has arisen which according to them is made manifest by a statement they credited to the 1st defendant at a press briefing in which he was said to have stated that it is Rivers State’s turn today, it can be anybody’s turn tomorrow. That the alleged statement of the 1st defendant amounts to an “imminent threat and present danger that the proclamation of a State of Emergency and suspension of their offices will be replicated in other States of the Federation including their own states.”

    The Federal Government asked the apex court to take judicious notice that PDP states have false sense of “imminent threat and present danger” because  President Bola Ahmed Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers State.

    It also claimed that the main opposition party went into panic mode and instituted the suit because of a press  briefing by the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice,  Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN).

     The government said: “Submit, the following points are clearly deducible from paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the plaintiff’s affidavit, viz:

    ●That the so-called dispute relied upon by the plaintiffs to predicate their suit relates to the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State by the President and an alleged press briefing by the 1st defendant which together have led to the plaintiffs’ false sense of “imminent threat and present danger” that they may suffer a similar experience in the hands of the President and the Attorney General of the Federation, i.e. the 1st defendant herein. Submit, apart from the speculative nature of the plaintiff’s deposition, neither the President nor the 1st defendant or both of them together is synonymous with ‘Federation’ which is defined in Section 318 of the 1999 Constitution as amended to mean “the Federal Republic of Nigeria”. As prescribed in Section 2(1)(2) and Section 3 of the 1999 Constitution as amended, the Federation consists of 36 states and a Federal Capital Territory. That definition of Federation does not include the President or the 1st defendant, the Attorney General of the Federation. We humbly refer to A.G Federation v. A.G. Anambra (2018) 6 NWLR (PT. 1615) 314 at 338GH in which this court pointed out the differences between Federation or Federal Republic of Nigeria and Federal Government. The Supreme Court held at page 338E that the word Federation means Federal Republic of Nigeria, which presently consists of 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory called Abuja. It follows that for a dispute to come within the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, the subject matter of the dispute must be a matter in which the interest of the Federation unit consisting of the interest of the 36 states and the FCT, is in issue.

    ● The term President is also defined in Section 318 to mean the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. As also prescribed in Section 1501) of the 1999 Constitution, the Attorney General is the Chief Law Officer of the Federation and a Minister of Government of the Federation. The power to declare a state of emergency in any pert of Nigeria is specifically vested in the President by section 305 of the 1999 Constitution as amended and not in the Federation and not the Attorney General of the Federation.

    ●Beyond any doubt therefore, the plaintiffs have not shown any dispute between them and the Federation. The complaint of the plaintiffs is directly against the President through the Attorney-General of the Federation who has been sued in this case as the 1st defendant. This much is clear from all the questions formulated by the plaintiffs and the reliefs they are seeking in their originating summons. As held by this Court in A.G. Lagos State v. A.G. Federation & Ors reported n (2014) 9 NWLR (Pt. 1412) 217 for the original jurisdiction to be properly activated, the dispute for adjudication must be between one of the States of Nigeria and the Federation of Nigeria. The Court held at page 270H to 271A-D as follows:

    “From the interpretation of the provisions of section 232(1) of the 1999 Constitution in the relevant cases referred to earlier in this judgment, it is quite clear that for this court to exercise its original jurisdiction under this section, the plaintiff’s action against the 1st defendant, this court has to be satisfied that the dispute for adjudication in the action is one between the plaintiff Lagos State of Nigeria as a constituent unit of the Federation of Nigeria and the Federation of Nigeria also as a distinct unit under the Constitution. The words used in Section 232(1) of the Constitution describing the parties are “the Federation”, ‘a State” and “States”. In other words, the dispute must be between the Federation and a State or between the Federation and more than one State or between a State or States in their capacities as members of the federating units of the Federation of Nigeria. The section in my view is not expected to provide avenue for the resolution of disputes between the Federal Government of Nigeria and a State Government of Nigeria or between a State Government and another State Government of Nigeria all of which ae only products of elections. Therefore, since the reliefs claimed by the plaintiff particularly the injunctive relief is against the Federal Government of Nigeria, its servants and its agencies, the relief not being against the Federation of Nigeria or any State or States of the Federation as constituent units of the Federation, is not within the purview of section 232(1) of the 1999 Constitution to confer original jurisdiction on this court.” See also: A.G. Kano State v. A.G. Federation (2007) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1029) 164 at 182; A.G. Anambra State v. A.G. Federation (2007) 12 NWLR (Pt. 1047) 4 at 42; A.G. Abia State v. A.G. Federation (2007) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1029) 200; A.G. Ondo State v/ A.G. Federation (2002) 9 NWLR (Pt. 772) 222.

    The government counsels said all the questions formulated by PDP states were directed at the actions of the President and not the, AGFand Minister of Justice.

    The government said the plaintiffs’ application before the Supreme Court was incompetent.

    It added: “In the same vein, all the questions formulated by the plaintiffs in their originating summons and all the reliefs they are seeking are directed at the actions of the President and the 1st defendant and not against the Federation of Nigeria.

    “To that extent the plaintiffs’ suit is incompetent and same is liable to be dismissed preliminarily.”

    The government also said the plaintiffs suit has not disclosed any cause of action.

    It said: “The contention of the 1st defendant under this head of the preliminary objection is that the plaintiffs’ suit has not disclosed any cause of action which is a prerequisite for a plaintiff to initiate a suit in court.

    “The Supreme Court in Onvekwasi v. R.T.C.M.Z.C (2011) 6 NWLR (Pt. 1243) 341 at 359H put it as follows: “There must be a cause of action before an intending litigant can seriously think of initiating proceedings in a court.

    “ For the purpose of litigation, a cause of action has been comprehensively defined to entail the fact(s) or combination of fact(s) which gives se to a right to sue and it consists of two elements: the wrongful act of the defendant which gives the plaintiff his cause of complaint and the consequent damage. It is thus constituted by the aggregate or bundle of facts which the law will recognize as giving the plaintiff a substantive right to make a acclaim for remedy or relief against the defendant”.

    “See also: Uwazaruonye v. Governor of Imo State & Ors (2013) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1355) 28 at 56H where this Court held that “a plaintiff has a cause of action when his pleadings reveal that there has been an infraction or trespass to his rights and obligations…….. It must be clearly seen in the plaintiff’s pleadings the wrongful act of the defendant, which in effect gives the plaintiff his cause of complaint and the resultant damage from the defendant’s wrongful act.

    “Now it is settled law that in an action commenced by originating summons, the affidavit in support of the originating summons serves as the plaintiff’s pleadings. We humbly refer to Uwazuruonye v. Governor of Imo State & Ors (2013) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1355) 28 at 56H Looking at the 32 paragraph affidavit in support of the plaintiffs’ originating summons there is no deposition therein of any wrongful act done by the President or the 1st defendant to the plaintiffs which has caused them damage as to give them the right to complain to this court. Indeed as deposed at paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the plaintiffs’ affidavit, they are only by this suit seeking preemptively to “forestall a situation” where the President may declare a state of emergency in their states as has happened in Rivers State. In other words, they have not alleged that any wrong has been done to them or that they suffered any damage as a result of any action of the President or the 1st defendant. Rather, by this suit, they are only ‘standing sentinel’ over the territorial arcade of their offices as Governors of their States. This is no doubt because they found the prospect of a sequestration of their rather exalted offices, even if only temporarily by the engagement of Section 305(1) of the 1999 Constitution, too grim to contemplate.

    “ So they embraced the nuclear option of this pre-emptive action in the misplaced hope that it would offer them deliverance from their baseless fear. Reacting to a similar situation in Uwazuruonye v. Governor of Imo State & Ors (supra) at page 57C-F this court held as follows: “There can be no doubt after examining the plaintiff’s pleadings that the appellant is assuming the role of a watchdog to see that legislation is in order as perceived by him. Since he has been unable to show his cause of complaint and the wrongful act of the respondents he clearly has no cause of action.”

    “Clearly, from the facts deposed to in their affidavit, the plaintiffs have not disclosed any cause of action and this suit is consequently not justiciable and liable to be dismissed.”

    The Federal Government said the PDP states have no any standing to file the suit at the Supreme Court.

    It said: “The third ground of objection raised by the 1st defendant queries the standing of the plaintiffs to institute this suit.

    “It is settled law that for a plaintiff to have the competence to institute an action, he must have the requisite standing. Dilating on the point in Uwazuruonye v. Governor of Imo State & Ors (supra) at page 57G, this court held as follows: “It has long settled that a party instituting proceedings must have locus standi. Locus standi means the legal capacity to institute proceedings in a court of law. “It is only if a plaintiff has locus standi that he can file, maintain an action relating to his rights and obligations. Such a plaintiff can/may be a human being, persons, statutory body, a government and must be a juristic person. In the absence of a reasonable cause of action or any cause of action for that matter the appellant has no locus standi.”

    A major plank of the Federal Government’s argument is the challenge of the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to hear the suit.

    The parties to the case have drawn a battle line which the Supreme Court will address.

    The Federal Government insisted that the apex court has no jurisdiction on the matter.

     It said: “In the context of a suit brought under the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, as herein, it has been held by the Supreme Court in A.G. Anambra v. A.G. Federation (2007) 12 NWLR (Pt. 1047) 1 that the dispute that must invoke the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court must not be personal dispute but must be a dispute affecting the state. “The Court held further that since the dispute in the case was in respect of the tenure of a Governor, even though it was commenced by the Attorney-General of Anambra State the matter did not affect the State and so the plaintiff had no locus to initiate the suit.

    “The Supreme Court again confirmed the same issue in Cross River State v. FRN (2019) 10 NWLR 401 at 448C in which the Attorney General of Cross River State initiated a suit under the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in which the central issue had to do with the plaintiff state seeking to enforce the rights of the former Chief Justice of Nigeria. Hon. Justice Walter Onnoghen.

    “ Upholding the preliminary objection against the suit, this court held at page 441-G as follows: “In the instant suit, it is evident from the originating summons that the cause of action by virtue of which the plaintiff sets out to invoke the original jurisdiction of this court is as to the civil rights and obligations of Hon. Justice Onnoghen, the Hon. CIN, the plaintiff perceives are violated and or threatened with violation by the defendants rather than the plaintiff’s own rights and obligation. On the authorities, therefore, it lacks the necessary standing to invoke the court’s jurisdiction under section 232 of the Constitution.”

    “Just as in the cases of A.G. Anambra v. A.G. Federation and A.G. Cross River v. FRN (supra), even though the suit was commenced by the Attorneys General of the 10 plaintiffs States, the issue they have raised concern only the tenure of office of the Governors of the states, which at paragraph 7 of their affidavit they maintain is for four years. The plaintiffs have also at paragraphs 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15 of the affidavit and all the questions formulated by them for determination and the reliefs they are seeking, shown that the suit is about the tenure of the Governors, Deputy Governors and the House of Assembly of the plaintiff States. As held in A.G. Anambra v. A.G. Federation and A.G. Cross-River v. FRN (supra), such suit about the tenure of office of individuals is not about the civil right and obligation of the State. Therefore the plaintiffs have no locus standi to institute the suit. His Lordship, Onnoghen JSC as he then was in his contribution in the case of A.G. Anambra v. A.G. Federation (supra) put it as follows: “………it is very clear that the dispute that must invoke the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court must not be a personal dispute particularly as the purpose of the Constitution is not to make personal dispute a subject of the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. It is also the requirement of the section 232(1) of the 1999 Constitution that the dispute must relate to the existence or extent of a legal right, which must not be personal”.

    On the declaration of state of emergency in Rivers State by the President,  the Federal Government said it has no effect on the 10 states  and their governors.

     “Again, the other aspect of the case is, that the plaintiffs question the manner of approval of the emergency proclamation in their question no. 6 and their relief no. 6. The question to consider is how did the manner of approval of the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State affect the civil right and obligation of the plaintiff states or even that of the Governors of the 10 States? “Certainly, the manner of approval of the proclamation of emergency is not a matter within the civil right and obligation of any of the 10 states.

    “It follows therefore that the fact that the Governors of the ten states used their Attorneys-General to file this suit on their behalf does not confer locus standi on the plaintiffs.

    “ It is observed that the plaintiffs also in their relief no, 8 seek an order setting aside the Official Gazette No. 47 of 2025 containing the Proclamation of state of emergency in Rivers State. “Again, the proclamation of a state of emergency in Rivers State does not fall within the civil right and obligation of any of the plaintiffs.

    “They are not clothed with any standing at all to seek to set aside the proclamation that does not affect them in any way. They are just busybodies.

    “We further rely on the Supreme Court decision in Inakoju v. Adeleke (2007) 4 NWLR (Pt. 1025) 423 at 602 where the Court held that “A party who seeks a declaratory relief in the Constitution must show that he has a constitutional interest to protect and the interest is violated or breached to his detriment. “The interest must be substantial, tangible and not vague, intangible or caricature. In ascertaining whether the plaintiff in an action has locus standi, pleadings, that is, the statement of claim must disclose a cause of action vested in the plaintiff and the rights and obligations or interest of the plaintiff which have been violated”.

    “Submit, in the foregoing premises, notwithstanding that the suit was commenced by the Attorneys General of the 10 plaintiffs States the suit, none of the issues raised as canvassed above affects the civil right and obligation of any of the plaintiffs.

    “They therefore lack the locus standi to maintain the suit which the 1st defendant humbly urges the Supreme Court to dismiss.”

    The Federal Government said “the suit is hypothetical, academic and speculative.”

    Citing a previous pronouncement of the Supreme Court, it said: “A suit is academic where it is merely theoretical, makes empty sound and of no practical utilitarian value to the plaintiff even if judgment is given in his favour. A suit is academic if it is not related to the practical situations of human nature and humanity. A suit is speculative if it is based on speculation. A suit is speculative if it is not supported by facts or very low on facts but very high in guesses. As courts of law are not established to adjudicate on guesses but on facts such actions are struck out. A suit is hypothetical if it is imaginary and not based on real facts. A suit is hypothetical if it looks like a

     “mirage” to deceive the defendant and the court as to the reality of the cause of action. A suit is hypothetical if it is a semblance of the actuality of the cause of action or relief sought.”

    The Federal Government said the action was an abuse of court process.

    It said: “ The last ground of preliminary objection against the competence of this suit is founded on the contention that the plaintiffs’ suit is an abuse of the process of this court.

    “The Supreme Court has in several cases dilated on what constitutes abuse of court process, such that the plaintiffs ought to have known that inflicting their case on the court would amount to an unpardonable egregious abuse of court process.”

    “How else does one describe a suit founded as it were, on mere speculation, extremely slippery guesses and feeble argumentation? By their suit, the plaintiffs have badly abused the process of this court in a manner that should invite condemnation by a peremptory dismissal of the suit. In Saraki v. Kotoye (1992) 9 NWLR (Pt. 264) 156 at 188E-H the Supreme Court held as follows: “The concept of abuse of judicial process is imprecise. It involves circumstances and situations of infinite variety and conditions. Its one common feature is the improper use of the judicial process by a party in litigation to interfere with the due administration of justice. It is recognized that the abuse of the process may lie in both a proper or improper use of the judicial process in litigation. But the employment of judicial process is only regarded generally as an abuse when a party improperly uses the issue of the judicial process to the irritation and annoyance of his opponent, and the efficient and effective administration of justice.”

    “ In Tomtec (Nig) Ltd vs. FHA (2009) 18 NWLR (Pt. 1173) 358, 377A an instance of abuse of court process mentioned therein by the Supreme Court is where a suit is premised on frivolity or recklessness. No doubt this is the most fitting epithet for this suit which from the facts is premised on frivolity and recklessness.

    “ Submit, what the plaintiffs have done herein amounts to engaging in the improper use of the judicial process by filing a suit founded on speculation, imaginary facts and misleading hypothesis. “For clarity on this we refer to the pivot of the suit erected on paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the plaintiffs’ affidavit.

    “ According to the plaintiffs they only by their suit seek to forestall a situation where the Presidnet would proceed to suspend the offices of the Governors and Deputy Governors of their states, just because the  President had promulgated a state of emergency in Rivers State.

    The Federal Government  urged the Supreme Court to “uphold this preliminary objection and dismiss this suit.”

  • 2027: I’ll campaign with Oluremi Tinubu — Patience Jonathan

    2027: I’ll campaign with Oluremi Tinubu — Patience Jonathan

    President Bola Tinubu’s re-election at the weekend got a boost with former first lady, Dame Patience Jonathan, pledging to campaign alongside the First Lady, Senator Oluremi ahead of the 2027 general election.

    Mrs. Jonathan disclosed this while acknowledging the President’s daughter and Iyaloja-General of Nigeria, Folashade Tinubu-Ojo, after receiving the Women Icon Leader of the Year award from Accolade Dynamics Limited in Abuja on Saturday night.

    The ex-First Lady, who supported the principle of rotational presidency, ruled out any return to Aso Rock Villa in 2027.

    While saying that rotational presidency was essential for national unity, Mrs Jonthan urged those clamouring for the return of the presidency to their region in 2027 “to step back—so that the country can move forward.”

    The former first lady said: “I was supposed to call her first, but I saved her for last: the daughter of our wonderful President, the President of Nigeria, the one and only we believe in — President Bola Tinubu. Iyaloja, thank you for standing with women because these are your women. Carry them along; they are with you.

    “All the way, we are with you. No shaking. We will follow. Direct us, and we will follow. Because there is only one president at a time. We don’t have two presidents. I am outspoken — if I don’t like something, I will say it. But if I like something, I die for it.

    “I believe in one president. I believe in turn-by-turn. When it’s your turn, I will support you. When it’s not your turn, step back—so that the country can move forward.”

    Read Also; Northern govs, monarchs to NASS: Hasten take-off of state police

    Speaking further, she said she has a longstanding relationship with Remi Tinubu from the time her husband (former president Jonathan) was Deputy Governor of Bayelsa State, then as governor of the state.

    The ex-first lady also recalled how Mrs Tinubu and the president supported her and her husband when they contested for the presidency in 2011.

    She insisted that rather than return to Aso Rock, she would support the First Lady and her husband.

    She said, “I didn’t just know her (Senator Oluremi Tinubu) just because she’s the First Lady, no. We worked together. We worked as a group.

    “We are groups. We worked when I was a deputy governor’s wife. We worked when I was a governor’s wife. I know her. I talked with Oluremi. Even when my husband was the vice president, Oluremi stood with her husband and supported us during our first election. They supported us. So, for me, I have a conscience. I cannot abandon my friend, whether you like it or not.

    “Because, you see, this is turn by turn. Today is my turn—I will go. Tomorrow, it will be another person’s turn—then we go. And when we go, will we still meet? Where will we meet? I don’t know.

    “I stand by my friend. My friend is great. I told her I would campaign with her. I’m not denying her. I’m not running. I’m not going back to the villa. If you call me, I will not go.

    “I say it every day. Don’t you like how young I look? People say, “Mama, you are young, you are young!” it is because I have rest of mind, yes. I don’t want to go there—let my friend be there. Let me also “wahala” her the way she used to “wahala” me when I was there! Let me also tease her. And until she comes out, she will be young. But for now, she won’t be young. ”

    She also threw her weight behind the 35 per cent affirmative action for women in governance, lamenting the repeated rejection of gender equality bills by the National Assembly.

    Mrs Jonathan promised to mobilise women for the passage of the gender equality bills by the National Assembly.

    She said, “During Obasanjo’s time, we worked for it, and the Executive approved 35 per cent. My husband also maintained it. But when it comes to elective positions, the men dominate and shut us out. May God touch their hearts to understand that we are their mothers, sisters, and friends. We are not trying to take power from them—we are trying to support them.”

    Mrs Jonathan described the honour as a recognition of collective efforts in the advancement of women’s health and economic well-being.

    She said, “I am deeply humbled to receive this prestigious Women Icon Leader of the Year 2025 award. I accept this honour not just as a personal recognition, but as a testament to the tireless efforts of countless women and men who have worked alongside me to promote good health and economic development for women in Nigeria and beyond.”

    She highlighted the work of her Non Governmental Organisations—Aurora Richard Foundation and Women for Change and Development Initiative—which have empowered thousands of women and youth through skill acquisition programmes and supported children with critical health conditions requiring surgeries abroad.

    Speaking at the event, the Managing Director and CEO of Accolade Dynamics, Ms. Dofan Chizaram described the night as a tribute to both men and women who have significantly impacted Nigeria and the African continent through leadership, mentorship, and community development.

    “This night is about celebrating the legends who have uplifted women and the broader community. We want to acknowledge their value while they are still with us,” Tor said.

  • JUST IN: PDP govs, NWC, others in crucial meeting ahead of NEC meeting

    JUST IN: PDP govs, NWC, others in crucial meeting ahead of NEC meeting

    Ahead of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting scheduled for May 27, 2025, serving and former governors of the opposition party are currently holding a crucial meeting in Abuja.

    Convened at the instance of the PDP Governors Forum, the meeting is taking place at the Bauchi State Governor’s Lodge in Asokoro, with the host and Forum Chairman, Governor Bala Mohammed, leading discussions.

    Present at the meeting are governors Ademola Adeleke (Osun), Caleb Mutfwang (Plateau), Seyi Makinde (Oyo), Ahmadu Fintiri (Adamawa), Peter Mbah (Enugu), Dauda Lawal (Zamfara), and Agbu Kefas (Taraba). 

    The governors of Akwa Ibom and Bayelsa States are yet to arrive as of the time of this report.

    Read Also; Northern govs, monarchs to NASS: Hasten take-off of state police

    Representing the party’s National Working Committee (NWC) are Acting National Chairman, Amb. Umar Damagum, National Organizing Secretary, Umar Bature, and National Legal Adviser, Kamardeen Ajibade.

    Also in attendance are several former governors elected under the PDP platform, including Ahmed Makarfi (Kaduna), Seriake Dickson (Bayelsa), Olagunsoye Oyinlola (Osun), Achike Udenwa (Imo), Liyel Imoke (Cross River), Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi (Enugu), Okezie Ikpeazu (Abia), Samuel Ortom (Benue), Idris Wada (Kogi), Mu’azu Babangida Aliyu (Niger), Adamu Mu’azu (Bauchi), Udom Emmanuel (Akwa Ibom), Aminu Tambuwal (Sokoto), Gabriel Suswam (Benue), Bukola Saraki (Kwara), Sule Lamido (Jigawa), and Ibrahim Dankwambo (Gombe).

    Federal Capital Territory Minister, Nyesom Wike, also joined the meeting shortly before press time, arriving in a black G-Wagon and dressed in a black jalabiya and white cap.

  • Air Peace aircraft hits antelope on Asaba airport runway

    Air Peace aircraft hits antelope on Asaba airport runway

    An Air Peace aircraft was grounded after colliding with an antelope while taxiing on the runway of the Asaba International Airport.

    The incident, which decimated the animal, resulted in the aircraft being marked Aircraft on Ground (AOG), causing disruptions to scheduled flights.

    The Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA), through its Director of Public Affairs & Consumer Protection, Michael Achimugu, confirmed this incident on his X (formerly Twitter) page.

    Read Also; Northern govs, monarchs to NASS: Hasten take-off of state police

    He explained that such unforeseen occurrences are part of the challenges that lead to flight disruptions.

    Achimugu said, “Monitoring reports yesterday indicated that an Air Peace aircraft ran into a large antelope, decimating the animal and leaving the aircraft on ground. 

    “As a result, flights meant to be operated by this aircraft would naturally be disrupted, even though engineers are on the ground to assess and fix the plane. Passengers waiting would naturally be infuriated.”

    He added that while the incident was beyond the airline’s control, Air Peace is still obligated to inform passengers, provide refunds, and extend necessary care, stressing that the NCAA would not hesitate to sanction the airline if it fails in its responsibilities.

    The NCAA has assured passengers of safety measures at the airport and promised to investigate the runway intrusion to prevent future occurrences.

  • Why Plateau crisis demands more than military might

    Why Plateau crisis demands more than military might

    Despite decades of attacks and growing security deployments, lasting peace in Plateau State remains elusive. This report by CORRESPONDENT KOLADE ADEYEMI explores the spiritual, political, and human dimensions behind the bloodshed—and the need for a holistic solution

    The screaming began just after midnight. Mama Saratu had barely laid her baby down when the first gunshot shattered the silence in their village of Kwahaslalek, Bokkos Local Government Area (LGA). “They came like shadows,” she recalled, her voice quivering. “You couldn’t see them—but you could hear death.”

    Clutching her four-month-old and dragging her six-year-old daughter by the arm, she sprinted barefoot into the nearby bush, her wrapper tangled in the thorns. Behind her, flames swallowed the only home she had ever known. When she returned at dawn, the bodies of her husband and two brothers lay motionless among the ruins.

    “They didn’t take anything—just lives,” she whispered. “What kind of enemy kills without a face?”

    Mama Saratu is one of the hundreds of survivors in Plateau State haunted by invisible enemies—killers who come in the dark, without warning, and leave behind silence, ashes, and unanswered questions.

    A cycle of violence

    The recent attacks on several communities in Bassa Local Government Area of Plateau State, despite their proximity to Third Division Headquarters of the Nigerian Army, have raised concerns about the enormity of the security challenges facing the country. The Bassa raid by armed militants claimed the lives of 51 residents. It is coming less than two weeks after a similar one in Bokkos LGA, where 52 people were killed. 

    A few days ago, Plateau indigenes in diaspora voiced their frustrations over the continuous killing and maiming of women and children intermittently. Dr. Bartholomew Shepkong, the National President of Plateau State Association USA, Inc., expressed sorrow over the recent killings.

    Dr Shepkong described the incident as “horrific and inhumane attacks” that have once again claimed the lives of innocent citizens in Plateau. The US-based Plateau indigenes have called on President Ahmed Bola Tinubu to respond to the killing of innocent souls in the state with urgency, leadership and political will.

    However, indications are that the struggle in Plateau isn’t just a matter of territorial clashes — it’s an asymmetric, identity-driven conflict with invisible actors and unpredictable timelines. This makes it incredibly hard to contain conventional military strategies alone. Tens of thousands of Plateau indigenes have been forced into the mass grave within the last 20 years.

    Read Also: Once worn, forever gone: The costly pressure of Red Carpet fashion in Nigeria

    Security experts have described the ongoing conflict in Plateau State as an unconventional war. Plateau’s geography provides attackers with easy escape routes, making it hard to track and stop them.  Unfortunately, authorities in Plateau do not know who the enemies are, where they are and what is fueling the crisis — making it impossible to develop a defensive mechanism against invasion.

    Governors from Joshua Dariye to incumbent Caleb Mutfwang have all faced the same brick wall — a war they didn’t start and seemingly can’t end. The office of the governor, constitutionally a chief security officer, is left toothless without actual control over security architecture.

    Turning to faith

    With the failure of the military approach, residents are increasingly opting for a spiritual solution, as was the case during the conflict between the Israelites and the Philistines in biblical days. The Philistines, led by Goliath, kept invading the Israelites, killing thousands of Israelites. Then David emerged from among the Israelites who saw to the end of Goliath’s torment of Israel and the freedom of the people of Israel.

    However, can a David be found in modern-day life? The Evangelical Church Winning All (ECWA) believes it is possible. Last Sunday, ECWA President, Dr. Job Ayuba Baggat, rolled out the spiritual option to stop the attacks and killings.

    Dr Baggat urged his members worldwide to begin to pray. He said, “I urge all members of ECWA and our friends in the broader community to come together in prayer and action. We must engage in meaningful dialogue to foster reconciliation and healing. Let us support those who are suffering by providing them with material aid and emotional support as they navigate this difficult time.

    “As we move forward, let us remember the words of our Lord Jesus Christ in Matthew 5:43-48, which admonish us to be beacons of hope and love in times of darkness. As followers of Christ, we are called to be peacemakers, and together we can help rebuild trust and understanding in the wake of this excruciating pain.

    “Let us mobilise our faith to dismantle the ideologies of fear, and instead, become champions of love and compassion. In the face of adversity, we must rise as one community, committed to ensuring that such acts of terror are met with resolve, solidarity, and a dedication to the values we uphold.”

    Indeed, Plateau has never departed from the spiritual option to its challenges. At a point in the wake of the killings, the state government has erected a Church in the Government House, Jos, for constant prayers and fasting, all for the state to overcome its enemies.

    While faith remains a pillar for many, the scars of political paralysis run just as deep. This is because the security challenge is not a conventional one. A Jos-based human rights activist and former commissioner in the Jonah Jang administration, Nankin Bagudu, said that since the crisis began about 20 years ago, all previous governors, as the chief executive officer of the state, have been blamed for their inability to provide solutions to this unconventional war. “It is now the turn of Caleb Mutfwang,” he said.

    The resort to a spiritual solution did not begin today. In December 2021, former Governor Jonah Jang formally dedicated a monument, which is now known as “The Ten Commandments”, to tackle the Plateau crisis. It is a significant religious and cultural landmark established at the heart of Jos, where men of God and political leaders across the country can assemble to pray, praise and worship God every year.

    A gathering of hope

    The 2024 edition was prolific and prophetic. Most people left the centre with the conviction that Plateau had conquered her enemies. The spiritual activities at the 10 Commandments in December 2024 were described as a historic move to promote peace, unity, and safeguard Plateau State’s divine heritage.

    The first Plateau Unity Christmas Carol and Praise Festival was flagged off by Governor Mutfwang. The event, held at the Ten Commandments Prayer Altar in Doi, Jos South Local Government Area, witnessed a convergence of distinguished personalities, including former Head of State Gen. Yakubu Gowon, former President Olusegun Obasanjo, former Minister for Information and Culture Prof Jerry Ghana and several others.

    Together with other indigenes, they joined in heartfelt praise and worship to thank God for the peace and progress being restored in the state. During the interdenominational gathering, Governor Mutfwang described the festival as a significant step towards the unity and prophetic destiny of Plateau State.

    He said, “The Plateau Unity Christmas Carol and Praise Festival is a journey to unity, progress, and the fulfilment of Plateau’s divine destiny. For too long, we have fought many battles, both internal and external, but the time has come—and the time is now—to unite as a people. God has blessed this land abundantly, and it is our collective responsibility to harness these blessings for the greater good.”

    He further emphasised the state’s immense potential. He said, “Plateau is a land of blessing—fertile, resource-rich, and strategically positioned by God. By His grace, the Plateau State will rise as a beacon of hope and prosperity, fulfilling its destiny as a city set on a hill that cannot be hidden.”

    Former Head of State, Gen. Yakubu Gowon (Rtd), commended the initiative and expressed gratitude for the Governor’s commitment to promoting peace and unity. Reflecting on the state’s turbulent past, Gen Gowon noted, “Plateau has endured many challenges, but under Governor Mutfwang’s leadership, the state is experiencing recovery and healing. This gathering is a testament to our desire to worship God and seek His intervention for peace in Plateau, Nigeria, and beyond.” Former Minister of Information and Communication, Prof. Jerry Gana, hailed the initiative as divinely inspired, emphasising that God was pleased with the multitude of souls gathered to praise Him.

    Guns still speak

    The prayers rise like smoke above the Ten Commandments monument, but down in the valleys, the guns still speak. Just when everyone thought they had prayed enough and settled down to enjoy a season of peace, five months later, the enemies came again in that deadly attack in Bokkos and Bassa LGA, respectively, resulting in the deaths of over 100 citizens. These latest killings left everyone disappointed and disillusioned.

    Rev Richard Enemakwu of United Evangelical Church (UEC) Jos said, “Spiritually, Plateau is not lacking in prayers. As a member of the body of Christ nationwide, no Sunday passes without prayers for Plateau State. We pray for the peace of the land, and we pray for the prosperity of the land. After all, our God mandated us to pray for the land because we dwell on the land”.

    Rev Enemakwu said the challenges of Plateau State are not beyond God. His words: “Nothing is impossible with our God. We must follow the word of God by continuing to pray until God answers our prayers. And very soon, God will deliver His divine solution. I can assure you, the Egyptians you see today, you may never see them again.”

    While all hopes lie in God’s Divine solution, the human solution has not been jettisoned or taken for granted. Following the recent attacks in Mangu, Bokkos and Bassa, the security chiefs have taken tougher steps by launching a manhunt for the killers. The Inspector General of Police (IGP), Olukayode Adeolu Egbetokun, ordered an extended aerial patrol across rural communities, using the police operational helicopter, newly deployed after the recent attacks..

    The IGP also ordered the deployment of the Police Mobile Force (PMF) Unit to the scene. He has also deployed additional personnel from the Special Intervention Squad (SIS), Armoured Tanks, and Armoured Personnel Carriers (APCS) to address the security challenges in the State.  

    The Nigerian Army had also taken a special interest in the state’s internal security. Provoked by the recent attacks, the General Officer Commanding (GOC) 3 Division of the Nigerian Army, Major-General Oyinlola, expressed dissatisfaction with the security situation in Plateau State, especially in Bassa, Bokkos and Mangu Local Government Areas.  

    He convened a security meeting, saying the state can no longer afford to continue down the destructive path. Gen Oyinlola said, “In the current situation in Plateau State, silence is complicity and inaction is very dangerous.  When leaders fail to lead decisively against violence, they enable it. 

    “When they fail to hold people accountable, they embolden criminal elements. I must therefore call out this failure, not out of malice but out of solemn obligation to awaken your collective consciousness. The recent spate of attacks in Bokkos, Mangu and Bassa Local Government Areas has led to loss of lives and property.

    “The cycle of attacks and reprisals has become a self-sustaining engine fuelled by ethnic mistrust, religious animosity and historical grievances.”  

    Despite the killings, the Nigerian security forces can still be trusted. The service chiefs are heading the ground forces, while God is directing the divine forces. If the military can clear the Sambisa forest and rout out agents of insurgency, then the same Nigerian military will certainly clear Plateau communities of these gun-wielding killers and land grabbers.

    New Davids rising

    The shadows are still very much around for Bassa and Bokkos LGA residents. However, somewhere across the valleys of Plateau, new Davids are rising—armed not with slings, but with faith, strategy, and unshakable resolve.

  • Ekiti 2026: Will Oyebanji break succession jinx?

    Ekiti 2026: Will Oyebanji break succession jinx?

    Since its creation in 1996, no incumbent governors in Ekiti state has successfully secure a second term in office. But the incumbent governor, Biodun Oyebanji is on cusp of breaking the long standing self-succession jinx come 2026. RASAQ IBRAHIM examines the governor’s push for continuity.

    Ekiti State has a peculiar history when it comes to gubernatorial elections. Since its creation in 1996 by the military junta, no incumbent governor has successfully secured a second term. The second term jinx otherwise called the self-succession puzzle has become a recurring theme in the state’s electoral politics.

    The jinx has been a persistent challenge for incumbent governors, with each one facing fiercely opposition and ultimately losing re-election bid.Ekiti has produced four governors before Governor Biodun Oyebanji fondly called ‘BAO’ assumed the reins of power. Although they sought for second term, their ambitions were twarted by ‘centripetal and centrifugal forces’.

    In 1999, Otunba Adeniyi Adedayo who was elected on the platform of defunct Alliance for Democracy (AD) could not secure his second term; he was defeated by ex- governor Ayo Fayose of People’s Democratic Party in 2003.  Fayose had his first term abruptly truncated in 2006 when the kiti state House of Assembly impeached him and former  President Olusegun Obasanjo declared a state of emergency in the state. The late General Tunji Olurin was appointed as the sole administrator of the state till 2007.

    Former governor Segun Oni was elected governor of the state in May 2007 but his tenure was terminated by Appeal Court in 2009, which brought in Tunji Odeyemi, a former Speaker as acting governor till 2010 when the court declared Dr. Kayode Fayemi as winner of 2007 governorship election.

    Fayemi assumed office in October 2010 to 2014 but failed to  secure a second term. The former Chairman of Nigerian Governors’ Forum (NGF) was  defeated by Fayose, who was staged a dramatic comeback to the Oke Ayoba Government House barely eight years after he was impeached.

    This seemingly political trend has led many keen watchers of Ekiti  electoral  process to wonder if there is a curse or a hex on the state’s politics that prevents incumbents from securing a second term.

    But the question on the people’s mind as the 2026 governorship poll approaches is Can the incumbent Governor Biodun Oyebanji solve self-succession puzzle and secure second term?, will he be able to overcome the challenges that plagued his precedecessors? or will history repeat itself?

    Oyebanji’s growing endorsements within and outside his party, All Progressives Congress have sparked high hopes that he might break the second term jinx and win re-election in the 2026 governorship poll.

    Political analysts believed that Governor Oyebanji is on the cusp of breaking the aged long self-succession jinx because all the causative factors that led his four precedecessors not to secure second term have been eliminated.

    His administration’s achievements, weak opposition, broad appeal, and growing endorsements from critical stakeholders including the political elites, traditional rulers, opposition leaders, civil servants, pensioners and the leaders of thought were cited as evidence that the governor might succeed where his predecessors faltered.

    Governor Oyebanji’s support base and popularity continue to grow day by day. It was whispers from Ikere-Ekiti, echoed in Ado-Ekiti and  rising in Ido-Ekiti, as the name ‘BAO’ resonates in every nook and cranny of the state. His leadership style, bottom-up approach, humility and people -centric policies and lofty programmes have endeared him to all Ekiti people.

    The governor has been able to unite all his predecessors including Fayose, Oni Fayemi and Adebayo as well as other key political figures in Ekiti irrespective of their political leanings, changing the history of the existing hitherto politics of bitterness in the state.

    Oyebanji’s style in Ekiti has silenced the voices of opposition, a development that sharply contrasts existing electioneering processes in the land of Honour. Unlike before, Ekiti politicians across  parties are showing reluctance to challenge the governor in the 2026 governorship poll.

     This unusual development stems from several factors including the governor’s overwhelming popularity, broad appeal, unprecedented achievements, inclusive leadership style, and cut-like followership among the people that have solidified his position.

    The opposition PDP which is expected to pose a challenge to Oyebanji’s second term bid is in the intensive care unit. The party is grappling with internal crisis and power struggle, which has weakened its chances of presenting a formidable and united front against the governor.

    Read Also: Oyebanji flags off aerial mapping of Ekiti to enhance land administration

    Unlike the APC, which has been actively engaging in  politicking and garnering support for Oyebanji’s re-election bid, the umbrella party has been relatively quiet, with little visible activity or  presence in the state.

    The PDP’s leadership crisis has created a power vacuum, allowing the ruling APC to consolidate its strong hold on power and making it harder for the opposition party to challenge the broom party come 2026.

    Though, the ruling APC has a history of intense power struggles, recent events within the chapter suggest that governor Oyebanji might secure the party’s ticket unopposed as he has garnered support of power brokers in the umbrella party including the  Senate Leader, Michael Bamidele, the senator representing Ekiti  Central in the upper chamber who many had thought would give the governor a tough challenge.

    The endorsements of Governor Oyebanji for a second term are spreading rapidly like harmattan fire sweeping across the state. The latest endorsement comes from Ekiti North APC leaders who have unanimously backed Oyebanji and his Deputy, Chief (Mrs) Monisade Afuye, for a second term.This endorsement follows similar gestures from Ekiti Central and South senatorial districts APC leaders, demonstrating statewide supports for Oyebanji.

    The leaders who took the decision at a special meeting of the APC stakeholdres, held at Events Arcade, Ido Ekiti, cited the the governor’s achievement in education, infrastructure, healthcare, human capital development as reasons for endorsing  Oyebanji.

    Among dignitaries at the event were the Senator representing Ekiti North, Cyril Fasuyi, the House of Representatives members representing Ekiti North I and II Hon. Akinlayo Kolawole and Hon. Akin Rotimi; Speaker and Ekiti State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon Adeboye Aribasoye.

    Others were Ekiti APC chairman, Barr. Sola Eleshin, the Special Adviser/ DG Office of  Transformation and Service Delivery, Engr. John Moyo Ekundayo as well as former and serving members of the state and National assembly.

    The leaders said Governor Oyebanji has laid a solid foundation for transformative progress and growth  that must not be disrupted, stressing that his second term would ensure completion of numerous impactful projects, safeguard Ekiti’s future and further elevate the state to new heights of prosperity.

    Speaking while moving the endorsement motion, which was ratified through a thunderous voice vote, Fasuyi, praised Governor Oyebanji for his outstanding leadership and dedication to grassroots development.

    He said that the governor has touched every local government in the Ekiti North Senatorial District with transformative projects that have directly impacted the lives of the people.

      The Senator explained that the Governor has fulfilled all his electoral promise to Ekiti people and effectively delivered on the six pillars of his administration, which include infrastructure, education, healthcare, agriculture, governance, and social development.

    “Because the Governor has done well, he has over performed and we have all seen him, this is the first time we are having this kind of a thing where all political parties will endorse a sitting Governor. He has delivered on all the six pillars of his administration and Ekiti North has felt his presence, we have felt his impact in all the five local governments in Ekiti North and a good turn deserves another.

    “So, I Senator Cyril Fasuyi, representing the good people of Ekiti North move a motion today the 29th of April, 2025 for the endorsement of Governor Biodun Abayomi Oyebanji and his Deputy, Chief (Mrs) Monisade Afuye to continue and contest for second term from 2026 to 2030”.

    In his opening remarks, the Chairman of Ekiti North Progressive Leader’s Forum, Chief Abejide said that the Governor has ensured that the benefit of governance are felt in grassroots level hence their believe that the path to sustain growth and good governance in the state lies in re-election of Governor Oyebanji.

    He said “Governor Oyebanji has governed with integrity, competence, and compassion. In just over two years in office, his administration has had tangible impacts in key areas that are the pillars of his administration”.

    Also speaking, the Speaker, Ekiti State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Adeoye Aribasoye commended the Governor for his exceptional leadership and the tangible development his administration has brought to every corner of the state.

    In a resolute declaration, the Speaker vowed that no individual or group would be allowed to disrupt the pace of development in the state, stressing the importance of unity and collective efforts in sustaining the gains achieved under the Oyebanji led-administration.

    Responding on behalf of the Governor, the Special Adviser on Political Matters and inter-party affairs, Chief Jide Awe, expressed his gratitude to the leaders and stakeholders for the overwhelming support and endorsement, describing their confidence in the Governor’s leadership as a humble reminder of the collective responsibility to serve the people of the state.

    While assuring them that his government remains steadfast in its commitment to delivering the dividends of democracy to the people, the Governor said every decision and project undertaken by his government  has been guided by the overreaching goal of improving the quality of life for all citizens.

    Political pundits believe that Governor Oyebanji’s bid for a second term will be a test of his leadership, stewardship as well as the trust he has built among Ekiti people. Can Oyebanji ride on the back of these stakeholders to secure another term in 2026 ? Can he sustain the tempo of achievements? Will he break the one term jinx? Or will history will repeat itself ? Only time will tell.

  • Rivers Emergency: How has Ibas fared?

    Rivers Emergency: How has Ibas fared?

    May 29, 2023, witnessed the most peaceful transition from one government to another in Rivers State since the current democratic dispensation in the country began in 1999.

    The then Governor, Chief Nyesom Wike, who is now the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Abuja handed over the reins of power to his then begotten godson and successor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara at the Yakubu Gowon’s Stadium in Port Harcourt.

    Fubara, who hails from the Ijaw ethnic stoic, said to be marginalized in the governance of Rivers, was the chosen one and Wike, his benefactor, choreographed the entire process that enthroned the new governor. The state waxing under the mantra of continuity and consolidation was calm and progressive.

    The chemistry between the two leaders was so excellent that Fubara used to address Wike as “our father” and “my leader”. He would hardly make any statement without acknowledging Wike’s role in his emergence.

    Nobody including the prophets foresaw the doom that lurked around the state and no one foretold that an immediate intractable political crisis hovered around the oil-rich state.

    Moreso, there were no signs that the crisis when it started would be so deep that it would force the state out of democratic governance before May 29, 2025, the first of its kind since 1999.

    What started as a mere misunderstanding among members of the same political family was mismanaged and allowed to create rancorous division that kept the state on edge for many months. Politically, the crisis shattered the peace of the state.

    It snowballed into a dangerous power play between the executive and the legislative arms of government. The legislature was absolutely sidelined in the governance of the state following misinterpretations of actions and events. People watched as the rule of law was trampled upon in Rivers rubbishing the whole essence of democracy.

    The judiciary became busy churning out orders, judgements and counter orders on multiple litigations filed by the warring parties. There was political chaos in the state as both the legislature and the executive remained obdurate in their contrived convictions not to work with each other.

    But the Supreme Court waded in and resolved the dispute in favour of the Speaker Martins Amaewhule-led House of Assembly. Despite the Supreme Court judgement, both arms of government maintained their obstinacy. They started another cat and mouse game deliberately refusing to implement the judgement of the Supreme Court.

    Fresh tension began to rear its ugly head in the state and foreboding of violence became stronger following the move by the Rivers State House of Assembly to impeach the governor. The act was perfected; Fubara’s removal was imminent and nothing would have saved the situation. Infact, there was confusion and tension in the state.

    Militants regrouped in the creeks and threatened fire and brimstone. Different groups issued warnings and vowed to vent their anger on critical national assets especially oil installations and innocent residents should anything happen to Fubara.

    In no time, unknown attackers started bombing oil installations. The Trans Niger Delta pipeline was the first target and it went up in flames causing panic among residents. Attacks on other oil facilities were reported in some local government areas in the state.

    Acting on security reports and the need to halt the looming dangers and the economic as well as security  consequences of the plot to remove the governor, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, declared a state of emergency and suspended Fubara and the House of Assembly.

    He immediately appointed Vice-Admiral lbok Ibas (retd), a former Naval Chief, as the Sole Administrator of Rivers thereby truncating democratic governance in Rivers.

    What has Ibas been up to since his appointment? In his presidential brief, Tinubu directed Ibas to oversee the governance of the state for the first six months pending the resolution of the political crisis. He told the administrator not to make laws but to formulate policies for the effective administration of Rivers.

    In fact, Ibas at the resumption of his emergency duties in Rivers was greeted with mixed feelings. Unusual calm enveloped the state few days after his appointment. His maiden state broadcast captured the essence of his mission.

    Addressing Rivers for the first time, Ibas said: “My mandate is clear; to restore law and order, stabilise the polity and to create the necessary conditions for the full restoration of democratic institutions and representation.

    Read Also: Rivers: Governance collapse led to emergency rule, FG tells S’Court

    “My appointment comes at a difficult and consequential moment in history. The political impasse of nearly two years in Rivers State has paralysed governance, desecrated democratic institutions, threatened security and undermined the economic and social fabric of the state.

    “It has deepened divisions among the people, and cast a shadow of uncertainty over the future.  These are realities we can not afford to ignore. As a son of the Niger Delta,  I am one of you. And I recognise the weight of this moment. The expectations of the people, and the challenges that lie ahead. 

    “The uneasy calm that pervades the state is palpable and I feel the weight of families, young and old, businesses, that have made both little and huge investments in Rivers State, uncertain what the immediate future holds.”

    Perhaps, realizing the troubles ahead of him, the sole Administrator held some critical stakeholders’ engagements. Beyond meeting with with senior and junior workers in the Government House as well as security officers in charge of the Government House, Ibas  reviewed files, memos, documents and allayed the fears of the civil servants on the payment of their salaries.

    Ibas immediately disclosed that he had received the seized state revenue allocations and approved the payment of salaries. Ibas met with traditional rulers and Nigeria Union of Local Government Employees (NULGE).

    Ibas told NULGE: “Let me assure that the withheld allocations have now been released, and I hereby issue a directive that all the necessary steps be taken to ensure that these salaries are paid with no further delay.

    “As leaders we must feel the pains of our people and offer them a more positive, inclusive and transformative leadership. This is the mandate I have accepted and it is the standard I expect from all of you.”

    To the traditional rulers, he said: “Let us remind our people that the progress of Rivers State is a shared responsibility and that only unity and cooperation can overcome the challenges before us.

    “Your Royal Majesties, in my quest for peace and stability, it is imperative that traditional rulers shun all acts of partisanship either through their actions, speeches or body language. The traditional institution must remain a neutral and impartial arbiter, respected by all for fearless and integrity.

    “I urge you to distance yourself overtly and covertly from any acts of cultism, violence, vandalism or anything that is illegality. Traditional rulers must not condone any action that does not promote economic good. Therefore, you are expected to report any forms of illegality or abuse to relevant authority.”

    Ibas, in his next line of action proceeded to direct the Heads of Local Government Administration (HILGA) in the 23 local government areas to submit reports containing the activities of their respective councils to the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Local Government.

    He announced the suspension of all the political office holders especially those appointed by Fubara. Those he suspended were the Secretary to State Government (SSG), the Chief of Staff, commissioners, chairmen and members of all boards, councils of agencies, commissions, institutions and parastatals, special advisers, special assistants and senior special assistants.

    He insisted that the development said was in line with the powers conferred on him by President Tinubu. He went ahead to appoint and inaugurate a new SSG, Prof Ibibia Lucky Worika.

    Undoubtedly, the suspensions of political office holders and MDAs and the appointment of a new SSG caused some hullabaloo in the state. But Ibas deafened his ears and undertook further controversial decisions.

    The Sole Administrator cancelled all pending procurements and tender processes carried during the period that Rivers operated without budgets saying the decision was in adherence to the Appeal Court’s ruling in suit number CA/ABJ/CV/133/2024.

    He created uproar in some quarters when he hinted that his administration was developing a new budget for the state. He promised that the process would be transparent and all-inclusive.

    Ibas said: “We are in the process of putting together a new budget that reflects our commitment to healthcare, education, social services, as well as the continued infrastructural development of our state”.

    But since he made the statememt, he had said nothing about the new budget perhaps because of the backlash that trailed the announcement. Ibas further took some bullets when  he appointed  administrators for the 23 local government areas in the state. He further  reconstituted some of the suspended boards of agencies, commission’s, and parastatals.

    But he defended his decision to appoint administrators for the 23 local government areas in the state saying it came from his findings when he visited some of the councils.

    He said after the visits, he realized that he needed people to help him at the grassroot level to enable him actualise the mandates of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    But Ibas been inspecting some projects, which were being executed by Fubara before his suspension. The first project he inspected was the ongoing reconstruction of the demolished House of Assembly complex, part of the victim of the crisis. The administrator acknowledged that the project was in an advanced stage. He visited other relics of the crisis such as the local government secretariats of Ikwerre and Emohua, which were attacked during the crisis.

    The administrator has also been dealing with series of protests against his position in the state. He has been battling with legitimacy crisis. Women from various walks of life especially those in support of Fubara have been on the streets querying Ibas’ mission in the state. They have called him many names such as impostor, stranger among others to emphasize their disapproval of his administration. The protesters continued to call on Tinubu to sack Ibas and reinstate Fubara and the suspended lawmakers.

    Others have also been linking their negative actions to the emergency rule forcing reactions from the sole administrator. For instance, the Chief Magistrate of the Judiciary of Rivers State, Ejike King George, recently  embarked on a voluntary retirement citing the ongoing emergency rule in the state.

    George in a letter he addressed to the Secretary, Rivers State Judicial Commission, said his decision was informed by the recent appointment of a quasi-military administration to run the affairs of Rivers.

    George said: “This difficult and regrettable decision is informed largely by my discomfort with the recent appointment ofa quasi-military administration to run the affairs of a modern State like ours.”

    But later, the Rivers State Judicial Service Commission refuted the claims of George in a statement signed by its Acting Secretary, Blessing Vic-Jumbo, clarifying that George was compulsorily retired in February 10, 2025 for truancy. The statement said the decision was necessitated by George’s absence from work without leave from August 25, 2023 to December 2024.

    Ibas is, however, not weathering Rivers storm without support. Other women and stakeholders, who are in the same political family with Wike and the suspended lawmakers had also held demonstrations to drum support for him and to ask the president not to reinstate Fubara.

    Ibas has been flaying the allegations that he was favouring the camp of Wike in his decisions and appointments. But he vehemently denied the accusations saying he remain impartial in his dealings.

    Ibas said: “It is important to restate my impartial stand on the political crisis that has plagued out State. I remain committed to upholding the law and ensuring that all individuals, irrespective of their political affiliations, have a voice in the future of Rivers State. My administration will continue to focus on the collective good of our people.”

    There is no doubt that lack of democratic governance has had a toll on Rivers especially in the aspects of social and economic interactions. Recently, the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) cited the development in Rivers as the reason why it relocated its 2025 National Convention to Enugu despite receiving whooping N300m from Rivers government for the event. While Ibas vowed to recover the money, NBA insisted it would not bulge in its decision and went ahead to list infractions of Ibas.

    The NBA in its statement delivered a worrisome verdict against Ibas when it said: “Rather than the peace-building efforts that was promised by the President, tension has steadily escalated in Rivers State, arbitrariness and impunity have been displayed on a daily basis and democratic institutions have been demobilized in a gestapo, military style.

    “Political appointments are being made by the Sole Administrator, Vice-Admiral Ibok Ete-Ibas with military fiat, without approval being sought from the National Assembly or any known legal institution for that matter.”

    But many commentators said until NBA returns the N300m it collected from Rivers, it lacked the moral right to hold such opinion against Ibas administration.

    Though Ibas denied all allegations against him by NBA, stakeholders believe that the emergency rule has reversed the development trend of Rivers. It has stagnated most of the ongoing projects especially those ones hitherto funded by the nullified budgets.

    But recent grapevine reports that Fubara had taken steps to initiate reconciliation by holding separate meetings with his estranged benefactor, Wike and President Tinubu was described by stakeholders as heartwarming.

    Little wonder some stakeholders are demanding reversal of the emergency rule and appealing to Fubara to deepen the reconciliation process and to stop his supporters from engaging in actions including protests capable of truncating the peaceful resolution of the crisis.

    A former Bayelsa State Labour Party (LP) Governorship Candidate, Engr. Udengs Eradiri, has told Fubara to shut his doors against crisis merchants and step up the ongoing reconciliation. Eradiri commended Fubara for heeding his earlier advice that he should kneel before his estranged benefactor and predecessor, Nyesom Wike and beg him for forgiveness.

    The former President, Ijaw Youths Council (IYC) Worldwide, recalled that when he advised Fubara to beg Wike for forgiveness some Ijaw leaders opposed his position, but said he was glad the suspended governor saw the wisdom in it. Eradiri, a former Commissioner for Youths and later Environment in Bayelsa, said amid the ongoing reconciliation Fubara must learn to keep enemies of Rivers that once surrounded him in abeyance.

    He classified those, who tried to make an ethnic case out of the crisis and others, who choreographed most political mistakes of Fubara and supervised some of his constitutional breaches without guiding him properly as the enemies of Rivers and Fubara. He said most of the people, who claimed to love the governor and offered him pieces of advice, were his real enemies because according to him they were profiting from the crisis and would not want it to end.

    He urged the suspended governor to reestablish his relationship with Wike and heed the directives of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the process of finding lasting political calm in Rivers. He said if Fubara had been allowed by crisis merchants to implement the earlier peace agreement crafted by President Tinubu, whom he described as an old political warhorse, he would have avoided the political turmoil that almost led to his impeachment.

    Addressing Fubara, he said: “Thank God that President Tinubu saved you through the declaration of emergency rule. This opportunity has offered you a second chance, please do not bungle it.

    “I was happy that you heeded my advice, got up from your comfort zone and initiated the reconciliation by first meeting with Chief Wike and apologizing to him. You have done well. But you need to follow-up this process.

    “First, make yourself unreachable to those, who will come and slow this process down and feed you with unsolicited advice to abort this reconciliation”.

    Eradiri appealed to the governor to rein in his supporters and stop them from actions capable of derailing the reconciliation process. He particularly condemned the decision of some pro-Fubara women to walk out on an empowerment programme of the Renewed Hope Initiative (RHI) of the First Lady Senator Remi Tinubu under the guise that Dr. Theresa Ibas, the wife of the Rivers Sole Administrator represented Mrs. Tinubu.

    He said: “Such action is condemnable in the reconciliation process. It can derail and slow down the process of peace in the state as well as casting doubts on the suspended governor’s sincerity to end the political crisis in the state.

    “The suspended Governor must rein in his supporters and stop them from all forms of protest capable of deepening the political discord in the state. He must be seen to walk his talk because every action of his supporters will be attributed to him.”

    Eradiri appealed to Wike, suspended members of the House of Assembly and other stakeholders in the Minister’s camp to forgive Fubara and help him facilitate the process of reconciliation.

    Also, the National President, Movement for the Survival of Izon Ethnic Nationalities in the Niger Delta (MOSIEND), Amb. Kennedy Tonjo-West, urged the suspended governor to demonstrate leadership by guiding his followers to understand the importance of the ongoing reconciliation.

    While commending Fubara for meeting with Wike, he said his efforts might be in futility of his supporters continued to exhibit actions inimical to the peace process. West appealed to the governor ensure his supporters were on the same page with him and stop them from undertaking provocative actions.

    He said: “I will ask the suspended governor to demonstrate leadership by guiding his followers and ensuring that they understand the importance  of the peaceful reconciliation and that they are on the same page with him.

    “He should clearly communicate such actions and intentions to his followers and the public. They should engage in direct dialogue with the minister to resolve their differences.

    “The followers of the governor should avoid embarking on actions that could be perceived as provocative or disruptive to the reconciliation process. They should support the peaceful resolution of the crisis.

    “Both sides must compromise to resolve all the crisis. The governor should not be frantically trying to reconcile with the minister but behind him his followers are doing another thing. It will only create lack of trust and confidence in the process.”

    With the clamour to speed up reconciliation, Ibas will always be on crossroads and will never win the supper of majority of Rivers people no matter what he does to assuage them. Therefore, as the country and different states gear up to mark yet another May 29, Rivers Ibas remains sombre and sober wishing for the reinstatement of the government they voted for.