Category: Foreign

  • How partisan schisms defined first full day of Trump impeachment trial

    The U.S. Senate began the first substantive day of the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump on Tuesday with partisan rancour over how the trial will proceed.

    In a lengthy debate that extended well past midnight, the Senate sparred over how the trial would be conducted as the Democrats proposed a flurry of amendments that sought to introduce new witnesses and documents to the trial.

    Ultimately, Republicans rallied around Senate leader Mitch McConnell and rejected the Democrats’ proposals in strict party-line votes of 53 to 47.

    The Republican majority then voted in favour of McConnell’s rules, which establish the conduct of the trial.

    McConnell’s rules set the stage for six days of arguments, split evenly between House impeachment managers and Trump’s lawyers, to make the case for and against impeachment.

    Democrats decried the rules as an attempt to rush the trial, hide new evidence against Trump, and prevent witnesses from testifying.

    Speaking at the Senate, Democrat Adam Schiff, the lead House impeachment manager, called McConnell’s rules the “first step orchestrated by the White House to rush the trial.”

    “To say let’s just have the opening statements and then we’ll see means let’s have the trial, and maybe we can just sweep this all under the rug,” Schiff said.

    McConnell, however, did make a last minute change – extending the days allocated to opening arguments from two to three per side – under pressure from Republican senator Susan Collins, a key moderate swing vote.

    Democrats want to question top White House officials and obtain documents that the Trump administration blocked the House from accessing while they investigated Trump’s dealings with Ukraine.

    The president is accused firstly of having abused the power of his office to pressure Ukraine into announcing an investigation of his domestic political rival, Joe Biden, in order to potentially help Trump’s re-election campaign.

    The second article of impeachment says he obstructed Congress’ investigation of the Ukraine affair.

    Both articles were approved last month by the House of Representatives.

    READ ALSO: U.S. Senate rejects Democrats’ demand for documents in Trump impeachment trial

    The president denies wrongdoing. His legal team said on Monday that the president is the victim of a “rigged process” motivated by politics and that he has done nothing wrong.

    Two-thirds of members are required to agree to remove a president from office.

    The Senate is controlled by Trump’s Republican party and the most likely outcome is an acquittal.

    Pat Cipollone, Trump’s defence attorney, told the Senate his client “has done nothing wrong” and the two articles of impeachment against Trump hold no constitutional merit.

    Earlier, the Democrats suggested Cipollone might have a conflict of interest as they believe he is a material witness in the impeachment trial and demanded that he disclose any knowledge of Trump’s dealings with Ukraine.

    The White House called this demand an “utter joke”.

    The Senate will convene at 1pm (1800 GMT) on Wednesday for the start of arguments.

    While no witnesses or new documents will be introduced prior to the arguments, the Senate will vote on the issue of witnesses likely next week.

    The trial could conclude at the end of next week if the Democrats are unable to convince at least four Republicans to side with them and vote in favour of witnesses.

    Speaking from the Senate floor, McConnell called the trial rules “fair” and in line with the conduct of President Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial.

    Trump is framing the impeachment as an attempt to overturn the outcome of the 2016 election. Democrats say the president’s behaviour is threatening the integrity of the election later this year.

    (dpa/NAN)

  • Trump’s trial resumes with fight over rules

    Agency Reporter

    DEMOCRATS on Tuesday accused Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of trying to rig United States (U.S.) President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial and demanded the president’s top lawyer be made a possible witness in the case.

    Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said he would offer amendments to fix what he called flaws in McConnell’s proposals.

    Schumer blasted the speedy impeachment trial timeline laid out by his Republican counterpart Mitch McConnell, calling it an “Alice in Wonderland-type proceeding.”

    “(Democrats) will require every senator to vote on whether there should be certain witnesses, whether there should be certain documents and whether we should have the kind of unfair, stacked deck, Alice in Wonderland-type proceeding that McConnell has proposed,” Schumer told CNN’s John Berman on “New Day.”

    Hours before the start of Trump’s trial in the Republican-controlled Senate on charges he abused power and obstructed Congress, Democrats said the rules proposed by McConnell would prevent witnesses from testifying and bar evidence gathered by investigators.

    McConnell unveiled a plan on Monday that would execute a potentially quick trial without new testimony or evidence, and give House Democratic prosecutors and Trump lawyers 48 hours, evenly split, to present their arguments over four days.

    In a letter on Monday, the seven House Democratic “managers” prosecuting the case demanded White House counsel Pat Cipollone disclose any first-hand knowledge he has of evidence he will present in the trial, calling him a material witness.

    Cipollone was widely criticised for writing an Oct. 8 letter in which he said Trump could not permit the administration to participate in the House probe of the president’s pressuring Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a top Democratic contender to face Trump in the 2020 election, and Biden’s son Hunter.

    Opening arguments began on Tuesday and may well run late each night. With a two-thirds majority needed in the 100-member Senate to remove Trump from office, he is almost certain to be acquitted by fellow Republicans in the chamber.

    But the impact of the trial on his re-election bid is far from clear. Americans go to the polls in November.

    Trump’s legal team has demanded that he is immediately acquitted by the Senate.

    In a brief submitted on Monday, they called the impeachment “a dangerous perversion” of the constitution.

    The 171-page brief submitted by Trump’s legal team is the first comprehensive defence of the president, ahead of the trial beginning in earnest.

    It sets out to undercut the charges against Trump, branding them “frivolous and dangerous” and arguing that they don’t constitute either a crime or an impeachable offence.

    Read Also: North Korea threatens to resume nuclear, ICBM testing

    “House Democrats settled on two flimsy Articles of Impeachment that allege no crime or violation of law whatsoever – much less ‘high Crimes and Misdemeanours’ as required by the Constitution,” it said.

    “They do not remotely approach the constitutional threshold for removing a President from office.”

    At the same time, an opposing brief from House managers – all Democrats – accused Trump of using his “presidential powers to pressure a vulnerable foreign partner to interfere in our elections for his own benefit”.

    “In doing so, he jeopardised our national security and our democratic self-governance,” it added. “He then used his presidential powers to orchestrate a cover-up unprecedented in the history of our republic.”

    On the Senate’s impeachment rules released by McConnell, Representative Adam Schiff, in a news conference alongside other Democrats who will prosecute the case against Trump, said: “This is not the process for a fair trial. This is the process for a rigged trial.”

    “I do think that by structuring the trial this way, it furthers our case that what’s going on here really is a cover-up of evidence to the American people,” he said.

  • North Korea abandons nuclear freeze pledge

    Agency Reporter

     

    NORTH Korea said on Tuesday it was no longer bound by commitments to halt nuclear and missile testing, blaming the United States’ failure to meet a year-end deadline for nuclear talks and “brutal and inhumane” U.S. sanctions.

    North Korean leader Kim Jong Un had set an end-December deadline for denuclearisation talks with the United States and White House national security adviser Robert O’Brien said at the time the United States had opened channels of communication.

    O’Brien said then he hoped Kim would follow through on denuclearization commitments he made at summits with U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Ju Yong Chol, a counsellor at North Korea’s mission to the UN in Geneva, said over the past two years, his country had halted nuclear tests and test firing of inter-continental ballistic missiles “in order to build confidence with the United States”.

    But the United States had responded by conducting dozens of joint military exercises with South Korea on the divided peninsula and by imposing sanctions, he said.

    “As it became clear now that the U.S. remains unchanged in its ambition to block the development of the DPRK and stifle its political system, we found no reason to be unilaterally bound any longer by the commitment that the other party fails to honour,” Ju told the UN-backed Conference on Disarmament.

    Speaking as the envoy from the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), North Korea’s official name, Ju accused the United States of applying “the most brutal and inhumane sanctions”.

    Read Also: North Korea threatens to resume nuclear, ICBM testing

    “If the U.S. persists in such hostile policy toward the DPRK there will never be the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula,” he said.

    “If the United States tries to enforce unilateral demands and persists in imposing sanctions, North Korea may be compelled to seek a new path.”

    U.S. military commanders said any new path could include the testing of a long-range missile, which North Korea has suspended since 2017, along with nuclear warhead tests.

     

  • Prince Harry arrives in Canada to begin new life with family

    Agency Reporter

     

    THE Duke of Sussex Prince Harry arrived in Canada on Tuesday morning after attending the UK-Africa Investment Summit in London on Monday.

    According to reports, the 35-year-old, who recently relinquished his royal duties, was pictured leaving a commercial flight in Vancouver on Monday evening.

    Hours before his departure, Harry took part in an engagement with Prime Minister Boris Johnson and African leaders before boarding a British Airways flight from Heathrow.

    The outing comes after the Queen announced Prince Harry and Meghan’s decision to step down as senior members of the royal family.

    The couple along with their son Archie, will now split their time between the UK and North America as they begin transition into their new independent life.

    They will stop using their HRH titles, no longer carry out royal duties or military appointments and no longer formally represent the Queen.

    Also yesterday, Harry and the Duchess of Sussex issued a legal warning to the media after photographs of Meghan in Canada were published in newspapers and on websites.

    Lawyers said the photos of the duchess walking her dogs and carrying her son were taken by photographers hiding in bushes and spying on her.

    Read Also: Prince Harry arrives Canada to start royal transition

    They added that she did not consent and accused the photographers of harassment.

    The couple said that they are prepared to take legal action.

    They are believed to be alarmed by paparazzi activity near their current base on Vancouver Island.

    Lawyers said there have also been attempts to photograph inside their home using long-range lenses and they accuse the paparazzi of being camped outside the property.

    This comes after the Queen agreed to the couple’s wish to step back from being full-time royals, to become financially independent and to split their time between the UK and Canada.

    On Monday, Meghan was pictured carrying the couple’s eight-month-old son Archie in a baby sling, while walking her two dogs, Guy and Oz, in North Hill Regional Park on Vancouver Island.

    Prince Harry has long had an uneasy relationship with the media, having grown up aware of the impact the intense media interest had on the life of his late mother, Diana, Princess of Wales, who died in a car crash in Paris while being pursued by paparazzi on motorbikes.

     

     

  • U.S. President decries ‘climate prophets of doom’

    Agency Reporter

     

    UNITED States (U.S.) President Donald Trump has decried climate “prophets of doom” in a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where sustainability is the main theme.

    He called for a rejection of “predictions of the apocalypse” and said America would defend its economy.

    Trump did not directly name the teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg, who was in the audience.

    Later, she excoriated political leaders, saying the world “in case you hadn’t noticed, is currently on fire”.

    Environmental destruction is at the top of the agenda at the annual summit of the world’s decision-makers, which takes place at a Swiss ski resort.

    In his keynote speech, Trump said it was a time for optimism, not pessimism, in a speech that touted his administration’s economic achievements and America’s energy boom.

    Read Also: Teenage activist Greta takes climate campaign to high seas

    Speaking of climate activists, he said: “These alarmists always demand the same thing – absolute power to dominate, transform and control every aspect of our lives.”

    They were, he said, “the heirs of yesterday’s foolish fortune tellers”.

    He also announced that the U.S. would join an initiative to plant, restore and conserve a trillion trees.

    “We’re committed to conserving the majesty of God’s creation and the natural beauty of our world,” he said.

    He was speaking hours before his impeachment trial began in the U.S. Senate.

    Soon after Trump spoke, Ms Thunberg, the 17-year-old Swedish climate activist who has led a global movement of school strikes calling for urgent environmental action, opened a session on “Averting a Climate Apocalypse”.

    She refrained from naming Trump but issued this warning to the world’s leaders.

    “I wonder, what will you tell your children was the reason to fail and leave them facing… climate chaos that you knowingly brought upon them? That it seemed so bad for the economy that we decided to resign the idea of securing future living conditions without even trying?

    “Our house is still on fire. Your inaction is fuelling the flames by the hour, and we are telling you to act as if you loved your children above all else.”

    She strongly criticised politicians and business leaders for what she said were continuous “empty words and promises”.

    “You say: ‘We won’t let you down. Don’t be so pessimistic.’ And then, silence.”

    Economist Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Laureate, criticised Trump’s speech. According to Reuters news agency, he said it was “astounding” and made “as if what we are seeing with our eyes are not there”.

    The joint leader of Germany’s Green Party, Robert Habeck, was scathing.

     

  • Trump takes credit for ‘roaring’ U.S. economy in Davos

    The strong performance of the U.S. economy under the current administration is a model that the rest of the world should follow, U.S. President Donald Trump said at the World Economic Forum.

    Addressing country leaders and executives, Trump took credit for deregulating the U.S. economy, striking new trade deals and creating economic opportunities for ordinary workers and their families.

    “Years of economic stagnation have given way to a roaring geyser of economic opportunity,” he said.

    “The time for scepticism is over,” he said about those who have been wary about his administration.

     

    (dpa/NAN)

  • Prince Harry arrives Canada to start royal transition

    Britain’s Prince Harry has arrived Canada, where he is expected to spend most of his time after announcing that he wants to “step back” from royal duties.

    Sky News and other media showed Harry leaving a plane as he arrived at Vancouver Airport early Tuesday.

    Harry’s wife Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, and the couple’s 8-month-old son Archie returned to Canada earlier this month.

    Buckingham Palace announced on Saturday that Harry, 35, and Meghan, 38, will be “no longer working members of the royal family.”

    They will cease using the titles “royal highness” and “step back from royal duties, including official military appointments [and] no longer receive public funds for royal duties,” the palace said.

    READ ALSO: Prince Harry on leaving royal role: ‘There was no other option’

    The couple’s decision to live mostly in Canada, where U.S. former actress Meghan had lived while filming the legal drama “Suits,” has sparked a public debate over who should pay for their security.

    The government’s response “should be simple and succinct: No,” the Globe and Mail, Canada’s leading newspaper, said in an editorial.

    In a letter published on the newspaper’s website on Tuesday, Olga Eizner Favreau argued that Harry’s decision to “defy family tradition should not suddenly absolve [the royal family] of the responsibility to ensure his safety.

    “It is the royal family, who should foot the bill for protecting him, not Harry himself – and certainly not Canadian taxpayers,” Favreau wrote.

    Harry and Meghan had previously denounced intrusive, inaccurate and hostile reporting in news and social media, including racism against Meghan, whose mother is black.

    (dpa/NAN)

  • Iran seeks help reading downed plane’s black boxes in new standoff

    Iran said it had asked the U.S. and French authorities for equipment to download information from black boxes on a downed Ukrainian airliner, potentially angering countries which want the recorders analysed abroad.

    Canada, 57 of whose citizens were among the 176 people killed in the crash, has said France should handle the flight data and voice recorders as one of the few nations with the capability.

    Kiev wants the recorders sent to Ukraine.

    The U.S.-built Boeing 737 flown by Ukraine International Airlines was shot down in error on Jan. 8.

    Tehran, already embroiled in a long-running standoff with the U.S. over its nuclear programme that briefly erupted into tit-for-tat military strikes this month, has given mixed signals about whether it would hand over the recorders.

    An Iranian aviation official had said on Saturday the black boxes would be sent to Ukraine, only to backtrack in comments reported a day later, saying they would be analysed at home.

    A further delay in sending them abroad is likely to increase international pressure on Iran, whose military has said it shot the plane down by mistake while on high alert in the tense hours after Iran fired missiles at U.S. targets in Iraq.

    Iran, which took several days to acknowledge its role in bringing down the plane and faced street protests at home as a result, launched its missiles at U.S. targets in response to a U.S. drone strike that killed a top Iranian commander on Jan. 3.

    “If the appropriate supplies and equipment are provided, the information can be taken out and reconstructed in a short period of time,” Iran’s Civil Aviation Organisation said in its second preliminary report on the disaster released late on Monday.

    Its initial report was released just 24 hours after the incident, before Iran’s military acknowledged its role.

    A list of equipment Iran needs has been sent to French accident agency BEA and the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, the Iranian aviation body said.

    “Until now, these countries have not given a positive response to sending the equipment to (Iran),” it said.

    “It said two surface-to-air TOR-M1 missiles had been launched minutes after the Ukrainian plane took off from Tehran.

    Iran’s aviation body said in its report it did not have equipment needed to download information from the model of recorders on the three-year-old Boeing 737.

    Iran has for years faced U.S. sanctions that limited its ability to purchase modern planes and buy products with U.S. technology.

    Many passenger planes used in Iran are decades old.

    Under Tehran’s 2015 nuclear agreement with world powers, Iran received sanctions relief in return for curbing its nuclear work.

    But Washington reimposed U.S. sanctions after withdrawing from the pact in 2018, a move that led to the steady escalation of tension in recent months between the United States and Iran.

    READ ALSO: ‘Iran may review cooperation with IAEA if EU pressure mounts’

    Responding to U.S. President Donald Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign designed to shut off Iran’s oil exports, Tehran has scaled back its commitments to the nuclear accord.

    After Iran’s latest move this month to scrap limits on uranium enrichment, a process that can make material for nuclear warheads although Tehran denies any such aim, Britain, France and Germany triggered the nuclear pact’s dispute mechanism.

    Launching the mechanism starts a diplomatic process that could lead to reimposing UN sanctions on Iran.

    European capitals say they want to save the deal but have also suggested it may be time for a broader pact, in line with Trump’s call for a deal that would go beyond Iran’s nuclear work and include its missile program and activities in the region.

    Iran says it will not negotiate with sanctions in place.

    The Iranian general killed in the U.S. drone strike, Qassem Soleimani, was responsible for building up a network of militias that created an arc of Iranian influence across the Middle East.

    Since the plane disaster, Iran’s judiciary chief Ebrahim Raisi has said compensation should be paid to families of the victims, many of whom were Iranians or dual nationals.

    Canada, Ukraine, Britain, Afghanistan and Sweden, which all lost citizens, have demanded Iran make the payouts.

    Canada’s Transportation Safety Board said two of its investigators had spent six days in Iran and visited the wreckage.
    Iranian investigators had been “cooperative and helpful”, it said.

    (Reuters/NAN)

  • UK PM Johnson defeated on Brexit legislation for first time since election

    British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government was defeated in parliament on Monday after December election, with the upper chamber voting in favour of a move to protect the rights of EU citizens in Britain after Brexit.

    Johnson’s Conservatives won a large majority in the lower chamber, the House of Commons, at the Dec. 12 vote and lawmakers there quickly approved the legislation needed to ratify his exit deal with Brussels earlier this month.

    The legislation is now passing through the House of Lords, where the government does not have a majority. While the upper chamber is not expected to block passage of the bill, it is seeking to make changes.

    Members of the Lords voted by 270 to 229 in favour of a change put forward by the pro-EU Liberal Democrats which would give eligible EU citizens in Britain an automatic right to stay after Brexit, rather than having to apply to the government to do so.

    READ ALSO: UK PM Johnson says Britain will leave EU by Jan. 31

    It would also ensure they are given physical proof of their right to remain.

    The government has said only that people will be given a “secure digital status” which links to their passport.

    Last week, European Parliament Brexit coordinator Guy Verhofstadt said Britain had told him it was looking into the possibility of providing a physical document to EU citizens but Johnson’s spokesman said he was not aware of any plans.

    The government is facing a second defeat in the Lords later on Monday, when members vote on an amendment which would ensure protections for child refugees, a promise made by Johnson’s predecessor, Theresa May, but absent from his legislation.

    Any changes to the legislation made by the House of Lords have to go back to the House of Commons to be approved and could still be overturned.
    This is the first time Johnson’s government was defeated in parliament since a December election.

    (Reuters/NAN)

  • After fire, dust, hail take over Australia

    Drought-ravaged parts of rural Australia have been hit by dust storms that threaten to drift over more heavily populated cities including Sydney, bringing a new element to the extreme weather that has dominated the country over summer.

    The vast clouds of thick red dust have smothered inland towns such as Dubbo in the country’s most populous state, New South Wales, adding to the run of unusual weather that has disrupted the country since hundreds of bushfires broke out in September.

    “I’m just over it,” said Tanya Fulton, manager of the council swimming pool at Tottenham, a town of 300 people about 500 kms (310 miles) west of Sydney, which was closed on Saturday because of dust in the water.

    “I couldn’t even see the bottom of the big pool, and the toddlers’ pool was all mud,” Fulton added by telephone.

    The storms lashing NSW and neighboring Victoria state have interrupted a few days’ respite from the high temperatures and dry winds that have fanned bushfires across an area one-third the size of Germany, killing 29 people and an estimated one billion native animals.

    Read Also: Catholic church annuls 30 marriages over fake birth certificates, deceits

    In Canberra, the national capital, cricket ball-sized hail stones smashed car windows on Monday. Residents posted videos on social media of themselves sledding through streets in t-shirts.

    Earlier this month, authorities urged people in Canberra to stay indoors as bushfire smoke left the air among the most toxic in the world.

    The smoke also disrupted preparations for the Australian Open in Melbourne last week, although the first Grand Slam of the year got under way on Monday in relatively clean air. [L4N29L4T8]

    The storms were forecast to hit Sydney late on Monday, prompting No. 2 airline Virgin Australia Holdings Ltd to cut some flights, the company said in an email. Larger Qantas Airways Ltd said it had canceled three flights.

    The storms were also expected to hit hundreds of kilometers of coastline to the city’s south, the site of mass evacuations weeks earlier as fires destroyed homes and wiped out swathes of forest.

     

    NAN