Category: Foreign

  • US Senate won’t uphold Trump impeachment – Putin

    Agency Reporter

    Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday predicted that the impeachment of U.S. President Donald Trump would not be upheld by the U.S. Senate.

    Putin told a nationally televised news conference that Trump’s Republican Party has the majority in the Senate.

    “It’s unlikely that they would want to remove their party’s representative from power for what are in my opinion absolutely fabricated reasons,” Putin said.

    He said that the Democratic Party was seeking revenge for losing the presidential election to Trump.

    READ ALSO: House subpoenas Pentagon, budget office in Trump impeachment inquiry

     

    “One party that lost the election, the Democratic Party, is achieving results with other methods, accusing Trump of collusion with Russia, then it turns out there was no such collusion,” Putin said.

    The Democrat-controlled lower house of the U.S. Congress, the House of Representatives, voted in favour of impeaching Trump on Wednesday.

    Trump is accused of abusing his office by soliciting Ukraine to dig up dirt on his political rival, Joe Biden, and withholding aid as leverage.

     

    (NAN)

     

  • Philippine massacre masterminds jailed for life over 57 murders

    A Philippine court on Thursday found the bosses of an influential political clan guilty of masterminding a 2009 massacre of 57 people.

    The ruling has been described as a partial victory for justice and a challenge to the country’s notorious culture of impunity.

    Eight members of the powerful Ampatuan family were among 28 people sentenced to life imprisonment over their roles in a ambush on an election motorcade in Maguindanao province, and the gunning-down of all who witnessed it.

    Among the victims of the “Maguindanao Massacre” were 32 journalists in what was one of the world’s single biggest attacks on media.

    The ambush was also the biggest instance of election violence in the Philippines, where assassinations are common in provincial politics, especially in Mindanao, a southern region prone to lawlessness and the rule of warlords aided by abundant arms.

    The case was widely considered the trial of the decade in the Philippines due to the infamy of the Ampatuans, a dynasty with political connections that went all the way up to then President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.

    It was also seen as a test of whether democratic institutions could withstand pressure from rich and powerful interests.

    Fifteen other defendants were jailed for accessory to murder and 56 were acquitted.

    Seven cases were dismissed, among them that of family patriarch, Andal Ampatuan, who died in prison of a heart attack in 2015.

    Salvador Panelo, spokesman for President Rodrigo Duterte, said the ruling should be respected and the massacre represented a “merciless disregard for the sacredness of human life” and should never be repeated.

    Over 80 of 197 suspects are still at large, including 12 Ampatuans, raising concerns that witnesses and victims’ families might never be safe.

    “This case has a long way to go,” said Esmael Mangudadatu, a congressman whose wife was shot over a dozen times during the ambush.

    Mangudadatu was the challenger to the Ampatuans in a gubernatorial election however was not in the convoy attacked in broad daylight by his rival’s private army.

    READ ALSO: Philippines remembers 2009 massacre

    The victims were executed beside a rural road in volleys of gunfire, before being buried with their vehicles in a huge pit dug by an excavator.

    The trial involved 357 witnesses and 238 volumes of documents and dragged on for a decade, with much time lost to deliberations over bail requests.

    According to activists, several witnesses were assassinated.

    Rights group Amnesty International hailed the verdict as a positive step however said suspects at large should be prosecuted and an end brought to an “appalling culture of impunity and injustice”.

    Human Rights Watch said the ruling should spur more reforms to hold power to account and outlaw private militias.

    “This verdict should prompt the country’s political leaders to finally act to end state support for `private armies’ and militias that promotes the political warlordism that gave rise to the Ampatuans,” the group’s deputy Asia director, Phil Robertson, said.

    (Reuters/NAN)

  • Four in court to face charges over Slovak journalist’s killing

    A Slovak businessman and three others appeared in court for the first time on Thursday to face charges over the murder of an investigative journalist and his fiancée, a case that triggered mass protests against corruption.

    Jan Kuciak and Martina Kusnirova, both 27, were gunned down in their house outside the capital Bratislava in 2018.

    As she arrived in court, Zlatica Kusnirova’s mother demanded that Kuciak’s unfinished investigations be resolved.

    Prosecutors say entrepreneur Marian Kocner, a subject of Kuciak’s reporting on fraud cases involving politically-connected businessmen, had contracted his killing.

    The murders stoked public anger over perceived corruption in Slovakia, forcing Prime Minister Robert to resign.

    His Smer party will face a tight election on Feb. 29.

    The case is a test of Slovak police and judicial independence given that the investigation exposed business and personal links between Kocner, the police, and public officials.

    “We will be satisfied only when all the cases Kuciak wrote about are solved.

    “Then their deaths will make at least some sense.

    “It’s not enough to convict the murderers,” Kusnirova’s mother told newsmen as she entered the Special Criminal Court in Pezinok near the capital Bratislava.

    At Thursday’s hearing, judges will either set the date for the trial or ask prosecutors to submit more evidence.

    READ ALSO: Malta says €1 million bounty for journalist’s killer still on offer

    At the start of the hearing, the prosecutor and all defendants – including two men who allegedly carried out the murder and a woman accused of being an intermediary said no when asked by the judge if they wanted a deal for a reduced sentence in exchange for a confession.

    Alena Zsuzsova, who prosecutors say was an intermediary, said: “I am not interested, I am innocent.”

    They will all face up to life in prison if convicted.

    The court may impose a reduced sentence if they confess during the main trial.

    Slovak media and Kuciak’s family lawyer have said one the defendants had admitted during the investigation to be the shooter.

    A fifth man has confessed to facilitating the killing and has made a plea deal with prosecutors to act as a witness.

    Prosecutors said in August they had extracted tens of thousands of messages from Kocner’s phone containing communication with “representatives of state bodies and the justice system”.

    The revelations caused several senior officials to resign.

    Slovakia’s former chief prosecutor was charged with abuse of power in a case also involving Kocner.

    (Reuters/NAN)

  • Algeria inaugurates new President

    Algeria is inaugurating its new president, Abdelkader Tebboune, on Thursday, after eight months without a leader.

    The governing elite hopes Tebboune’s inauguration allows their gas-rich country to turn the page on 10 months of protests that have thrown their legitimacy into doubt and stalled the economy.

    Tebboune, a 74-year-old former prime minister considered close to Algeria’s powerful army chief, was elected with 58 per cent of the vote in an election boycotted by members of the country’s peaceful protest movement.

    Algeria’s Constitutional Council on Monday, Dec. 16 confirmed Abdelkader Tebboune as the new president of Africa’s largest country for the next five years — despite mass protests challenging his election last week.

    The council announced on state television that the other four candidates didn’t contest the 58 per cent of the votes won by Tebboune.

    Read Also; Real reasons why Donald Trump was impeached

    The constitutional body said the vote was carried out in a “good climate” — and didn’t mention the protests that had filled the streets of Algiers and other cities every Friday since February.

    The new president has promised to reach out to the protesters and to fight corruption – a major problem in Africa’s biggest country.

    Tebboune inherits a large youth population disillusioned with unemployment and out-of-touch rulers as well as a myriad of economic challenges.

  • Today in History: President Clinton impeached

    Our Reporter

    After nearly 14 hours of debate, the House of Representatives approved two articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton, charging him with lying under oath to a federal grand jury and obstructing justice. Clinton, the second president in American history to be impeached, vowed to finish his term.

    In November 1995, Clinton began an affair with Monica Lewinsky, a 21-year-old unpaid intern. Over the course of a year and a half, the president and Lewinsky had nearly a dozen sexual encounters in the White House. In April 1996, Lewinsky was transferred to the Pentagon. That summer, she first confided in Pentagon co-worker Linda Tripp about her sexual relationship with the president. In 1997, with the relationship over, Tripp began secretly to record conversations with Lewinsky, in which Lewinsky gave Tripp details about the affair.

    Read Also: BREAKING: Donald Trump impeached by House

    In December, lawyers for Paula Jones, who was suing the president on sexual harassment charges, subpoenaed Lewinsky. In January 1998, allegedly under the recommendation of the president, Lewinsky filed an affidavit in which she denied ever having had a sexual relationship with him. Five days later, Tripp contacted the office of Kenneth Starr, the Whitewater independent counsel, to talk about Lewinsky and the tapes she made of their conversations. Tripp, wired by FBI agents working with Starr, met with Lewinsky again, and on January 16, Lewinsky was taken by FBI agents and U.S. attorneys to a hotel room where she was questioned and offered immunity if she cooperated with the prosecution. A few days later, the story broke, and Clinton publicly denied the allegations, saying, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.”

    In late July, lawyers for Lewinsky and Starr worked out a full-immunity agreement covering both Lewinsky and her parents, all of whom Starr had threatened with prosecution. On August 6, Lewinsky appeared before the grand jury to begin her testimony, and on August 17 President Clinton testified. Contrary to his testimony in the Paula Jones sexual-harassment case, President Clinton acknowledged to prosecutors from the office of the independent counsel that he had had an extramarital affair with Ms. Lewinsky.

    On February 12, 1999, the Senate voted on whether to remove Clinton from office. The president was acquitted on both articles of impeachment. The prosecution needed a two-thirds majority to convict but failed to achieve even a bare majority.

  • Trump gave us no choice on impeachment, says Pelosi

    Agency Reporter

    The United States (U.S.) House Speaker Nancy Pelosi opened the debate on President Donald Trump’s impeachment on Wednesday just after midday on two articles of impeachment, calling the American number one citizen “an ongoing threat to our national security and the integrity of our elections”.

    She charged Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

    A simple majority vote in favour of either article would result in Trump’s impeachment.

    The president called the process an “attempted coup” and a “scam”.

    In a six-page letter to the Democratic Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, on the eve of the vote, the 45th president of the United States argued he had been treated worse than “those accused in the Salem witch trials”.

    Mrs. Pelosi described the letter as “really sick”.

    “Can you believe that I will be impeached today by the Radical Left, Do Nothing Democrats, AND I DID NOTHING WRONG!” Trump said in an early morning tweet. “A terrible Thing.” Later Trump tweeted, in all caps, “THIS IS AN ASSAULT ON AMERICA.”

    Wearing a large pin of the ceremonial mace of the chamber as she rose to speak on the House floor, Pelosi warned that “our founder’s vision of a republic is under threat by actions from the White House”.

    Read Also: Real reasons why Donald Trump was impeached

    “It is tragic that the president’s reckless actions make impeachment necessary,” she said. “He gave us no choice.” Praising the “moral courage of our members”, some of whom court political risks by backing impeachment, Pelosi announced six hours of debate on the matter. Her speech was met with sustained applause from her caucus.

    But Republican Doug Collins of Georgia, the ranking member on the judiciary committee, replied that impeachment had always been”inevitability” under the Democrats. “The founders were very concerned about a partisan impeachment in which the majority in their strength can do whatever they want to do regardless of the facts,” he said.

    After a three-month investigation, members of Congress were prepared to act against Trump for his scheme to cheat in the 2020 election, as Democrats charge, by pressuring Ukraine to manufacture bad news about former Vice President Joe Biden, one of Trump’s rivals, and then blocking congressional oversight.

    “This is a democracy-defining moment,” said the Massachusetts congressman Jim McGovern, the Democratic chair of the rules committee. “History will judge us by whether we keep intact that fragile republic handed down to us more than 200 year ago.”

    From all indications, Trump was set yesterday to become the third president in U.S. history to be impeached, joining Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998. Richard Nixon resigned in 1974 before he could be impeached.

    Following his impeachment, Trump would face a congressional trial in the new year in the Republican-controlled Senate, where a two-thirds majority would be required to convict and remove him from office. With no Republican senators currently voicing support for impeachment, Trump appeared safe to survive.

    Activists gather at a rally to show support for impeachment of Donald Trump outside the Capitol in Washington DC yesterday.

    Zero Republican representatives, likewise, had signed on in advance of yesterday’s vote, to the House impeachment case, fueling the party’s charges that the proceedings were driven by partisanship. Democrats replied that Republicans were hostage to Trump and unable to deliver a sound judgment in the matter.

    Two Democrats, including one whose staff said he would soon be switching parties to the Republican side, broke with their party on an early procedural vote. With four vacant seats in the House, Democrats, who hold a 233-seat majority, would need 216 votes to impeach Trump. They repeatedly sailed over that number in a series of votes to overcome procedural roadblocks thrown up by Republicans as yesterday session got under way.

    The House minority leader, Kevin McCarthy of California, presented a resolution seeking to condemn Adam Schiff, the chair of the intelligence committee, and Jerry Nadler, chair of the judiciary committee, for what McCarthy said were abuses of power and violations of procedure. The resolution was tabled without a vote.

    The vote in the Democratic-controlled House is expected to fall almost entirely along party lines.

    Nearly 200 Republicans are united in opposition, except for one lawmaker, Florida’s Francis Rooney, who is retiring and has not ruled out siding with Democrats.

    All but a handful of the 233 House Democrats have said they will back impeachment – about 216 votes are needed for the measure to pass by a simple majority in the lower chamber of Congress.

    The yeses include most of the 31 Democratic lawmakers who represent districts won by Trump in 2016.

    Collin Peterson, of Minnesota, and Jeff Van Drew, of New Jersey, have indicated they will vote no. Van Drew plans to become a Republican.

    Jared Golden, of Maine, said he would vote to impeach on one charge, not both.

    Democrats say Trump dangled $400m of U.S. military aid and the prospect of a coveted White House meeting for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as bargaining chips to prod the U.S. ally into announcing a corruption inquiry into the Bidens.

    The second charge, which is obstructing Congress, claimed Trump blocked his aides from testifying and is accused of failing to co-operate with the House impeachment investigation.

    Under the U.S. constitution, a president “shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanours”. It is a political process, not a legal one.

  • Trump very supportive of my digging up dirt on Democrats, says Giuliani

    PRESIDENT Donald Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani has told CNN that he has been “very supportive” of his continued efforts to dig up dirt on Democrats in Ukraine, including his most recent trip to the Eastern European country.

    The admission bolsters a central Democratic argument of the impeachment proceedings: that the President has allowed his personal attorney to push Ukraine for investigations that benefit Trump’s political agenda.
    U.S. lawmakers gathered yesterday to set the rules of the debate and vote on the President’s impeachment on the floor of the House of Representatives.
    The House rules committee will lay out the framework for the vote, including the length of time for arguments.
    Depending on the outcome, a full vote by all members of the House could take place today or tomorrow.
    In a phone conversation with CNN yesterday, Giuliani suggested that Trump has been well aware of everything he has done in Ukraine, though he declined to say if Trump directed him to go on his most recent trip there.
    “We’re on the same page,” Giuliani said of Trump.
    Visiting Ukraine earlier this month, Giuliani claimed he gathered evidence of a wide-ranging conspiracy to prevent his and the President’s efforts to uncover years of corruption there. In Giuliani’s view, that corruption chiefly involves Trump’s domestic political opponents, including Joe Biden as well as Hillary Clinton.
    Unprompted, Giuliani emphasised that he and the President are “on offence” when it comes to pursuing dirt on Democrats.
    “Just in case you think we’re on defence, we’re not,” Giuliani said. In recent days, he has given a series of interviews about his Ukraine exploits to national news outlets, including The New York Times, Fox News and the New Yorker. Giuliani’s comments come as Democrats in the House prepare to vote on articles of impeachment against the President.
    In his interview with CNN, Giuliani spoke at length about former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, who was removed from office earlier this year and has become a central figure in the impeachment inquiry. Giuliani claimed Yovanovitch perjured herself during her congressional testimony last month and that she should be charged with obstruction of justice.
    He declined to offer specific evidence that would back up his claim, though he insisted he has it.
    “I needed Yovanovitch out of the way,” Mr Giuliani also told the New Yorker.
    Meanwhile, the leader of the Republican majority in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, rejected a Democratic proposal to call four witnesses in the trial in the upper chamber.
    Among the people the Democrats want to hear from is John Bolton, the former national security adviser, and White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney.

    McConnell, who said he is coordinating his moves with the White House, denounced the Democrats’ strange request to have witnesses, calling it a fishing expedition.
    “The House is poised to send the Senate the thinnest, least thorough impeachment in our nation’s history,” McConnell argued on the Senate floor.

  • Mbeki’s visit raises hopes for political dialogue in Zimbabwe

    Former South African President Thabo Mbeki’s visit to Zimbabwe has been hailed as a step in the right direction towards a resolution of the political and economic problems bedeviling the country, an official said.

    Mbeki brokered the accord that led to the establishment of an inclusive government in 2009, following disputed elections pitting former President Robert Mugabe.

    The inclusive government lasted four years with Mugabe remaining President while MDC-T leader Morgan Tsvangirai became Prime Minister.

    He was also due to meet MDC-T leader Thokozani Khupe and other opposition officials Lovemore Madhuku, Priscilla Misihairabwi and Lucia Matibenga, according to government spokesperson Nick Mangwana.
    Mbeki comes in as many Zimbabweans call for the two political adversaries to discuss issues that have led to lack of international and local political and economic goodwill for the country.

    Academic Nhamo Mhiripiri yesterday said Mbeki’s visit was very important, given the significant relations between Zimbabwe and South Africa going back to the pre-independence days.

    “Whenever we’re at our most intense moment of problems you see the South Africans coming in.

    “When things reach this extent (political and economic crisis) it means there’s need for mediation,” Mhiripiri said.
    He urged Chamisa to be more engaging and admit that Mnangagwa’s legitimacy as President had been decided by the courts, so he could no longer use any other constitutional means to dislodge the incumbent president.
    “That one is gone, unless he has another constitutional provision that he may want to use. On other pertinent issues, dialogue should be held with the critical opposition, the one people voted for.
    “Let us not pretend that POLAD is the opposition,” the Midlands State University lecturer said.
    POLAD, acronym for Political Actors Dialogue, was launched by Mnangagwa early 2019 bringing together all presidential candidates in the 2018 harmonised elections.

    Speaking to newsmen after meeting Mnangagwa, Mbeki echoed Mhiripiri’s statement on legitimacy saying that the matter had already been resolved by the courts of law.

    “Well, normally, I would say we must all of us respect the view of the people.

    “If people have queries, they must go to the courts because all the countries in the region have that provision that people can go and lodge their complaints about elections to the judiciary.

    “And once the courts have made a ruling then we have got to accept that,” he said.

  • Pope lifts ‘pontifical secret’ rule in sex abuse cases

    THE Pope has declared that the rule of “pontifical secrecy” no longer applies to the sexual abuse of minors, in a bid to improve transparency in such cases.

    The Church previously shrouded sexual abuse cases in secrecy, in what it said was an effort to protect the privacy of victims and reputations of the accused.
    But new papal documents yesterday lifted restrictions on those who report abuse or say they have been victims.
    Church leaders called for the rule’s abolition at a February Vatican summit.
    They said the lifting of the rule in such cases would improve transparency and the ability of the police and other civil legal authorities to request information from the church.
    Information in abuse cases should still be treated with “security, integrity and confidentiality”, the Pope said in his announcement. He instructed Vatican officials to comply with civil laws and assist civil judicial authorities in investigating such cases.

    The Pope also changed the Vatican’s definition of child pornography, increasing the age of the subject from 14 or under to 18 or under.

    Charles Scicluna, the Archbishop of Malta and the Vatican’s most experienced sex abuse investigator, called the move an “epochal decision that removes obstacles and impediments”, telling Vatican news that “the question of transparency now is being implemented at the highest level”.

    The Church has been rocked by thousands of reports of sexual abuse by priests and accusations of cover-ups by senior clergy around the world. Pope Francis has faced serious pressure to provide leadership and generate workable solutions to the crisis, which has engulfed the Church in recent years.

    Pontifical secrecy was designed to protect sensitive information such as communications between the Vatican and papal embassies – in a similar fashion to the secrecy applied to diplomatic cables. But it was also applied over the years to judicial cases, to protect the privacy of victims and the identities of those accused.

  • Brexit bill to rule out extension to transition period

    THE United Kingdom (UK) government is to add a new clause to the Brexit bill to rule out any extension to the transition period beyond the end of next year.

    The post-Brexit transition period – due to conclude in December 2020 – can currently be extended by mutual agreement for up to two years.

    But an amended Withdrawal Agreement Bill the Commons is set to vote on this week would rule out any extension.

    The PM told MPs it would put an end to years of “deadlock, dither and delay”.

    As the House of Commons assembled for the first time since the election, Johnson said his priority was to “get Brexit done”. He also promised to seek “common ground” and to approach politics with a “new and generous spirit” after the rancour of recent years.

    Jeremy Corbyn congratulated the Conservative leader on his victory but said he would be “judged” on whether he delivered on the “many, many promises” he made during the campaign, including to longstanding Labour voters.

    The UK is set to leave the EU on 31 January, more than three and a half years after the public backed Brexit in a referendum.