Category: Law

  • Don’t allow DSS pocket NBA, SAN tells Maikyau

    Don’t allow DSS pocket NBA, SAN tells Maikyau

    Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Shaibu Aruwa has charged the President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Yakubu Maikyau (SAN) to ensure that the body is not pocketed by the Department of State Services (DSS) under his watch.

    Aruwa in a statement, reacted to the recent altercation between DSS and Nigerian Correctional Services (NCoS) officers which ensued at the Federal High Court in Lagos on July 25 after the trial of former Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Godwin Emefiele.

    The DSS operatives and officials of the NCoS engaged in fisticuffs over custody of Emefiele.

    The lawyer reasoned that the NBA’s statement should have reflected exactly what transpired, not an altercation or a clash, adding that it ought to have sympathised with the NCoS officer who was brutalised.

    Read Also: Mixed fortunes for APC, PDP, Labour at tribunals

    The statement reads: “Mr. President Sir, I have just read your statement on behalf of the Nigerian Bar Association regarding ‘the despicable altercation’ between the personnel of the DSS and officers of the NCoS and the call to hold the heads of the two security agencies accountable.

    “Respectfully Mr. President, I feel the statement of the NBA failed to reflect the visual of ‘the despicable altercation’ in circulation as captured by the electronic, print, and social media.

    “What happened clearly was an attack brazenly carried out by men of the DSS on an officer of the NCoS; the NBA statement should have reflected what it is and not an altercation or a clash.

    “One can only imagine the anguish of the family, colleagues, and loved ones of the NCoS officer who was a victim of the thuggish display by the personnel of the DSS which may be made worse by the statement of the NBA.”

  • Lagos Judiciary begins new legal year

    Lagos Judiciary begins new legal year

    The Lagos State High Court has announced activities to mark the commencement of the 2023/2024 legal year.

    A statement by the Acting Chief Registrar, Tajudeen Elias, issued on Thursday said the new legal year thanksgiving service would be held simultaneously at the Cathedral Church of Christ, Marina and Lagos Central Mosque on Monday, September 25, 2023 at 10 am, to  mark the commencement of activities.

    Read Also: UAE lifts visa restriction on Nigerians

    The statement indicated that the Chief Judge of Lagos State,  Justice Kazeem Alogba will be inspecting the Guard of Honour immediately after mosque and church services at High Court of Lagos, Osborne Foreshore Court Complex, Ikoyi Lagos.

    According to the circular signed by the Chief Judge, the court activities will officially commence from Tuesday, September 26, 2023.

  • Estate seeks financial records from six banks

    Estate seeks financial records from six banks

    The estate of the Late Chief Aminat Abiodun has formally requested the detailed statement of accounts associated with its various accounts in six Nigerian banks from January 2010 till date.

    It made the request through its lawyer, Kabir Akingbolu.

    The banks include First Bank of Nigeria Limited, Union Bank Plc, First City Monument Bank (FCMB), Access Bank Plc, Polaris Bank Limited and Cooperative Mortgage Bank.

    The probate registrar, Mrs. S.A Oyediran of an Ibadan High Court had granted an order empowering the administrators, Ahmed Razak Lawal, Oladapo Odubunmi, and Olabisi Abiola, the right to access these records in the banks following Chief Abiodun’s demise in 2018.

    The order stated that if the banks failed to honour the subtle request by giving it urgent attention within seven days, legal action would be taken against them.

    In a letter addressed to the Managing Director of the banks, the legal team representing the estate of Chief Abiodun, who was a former Iyalode of Ibadan, formally requested for detailed financial statement of accounts from January 2010 till date.

    Read Also: Mixed fortunes for APC, PDP, Labour at tribunals

    The administrators to the estate stated that the late Chief Abiodun was a longstanding customer of First Bank, Union Bank Plc, First City Monument Bank (FCMB), Access Bank Plc, Polaris Bank Limited and Cooperative Mortgage Bank.

    They stated that while alive, she maintained a range of accounts, including savings, current, and fixed deposits, all situated in Agodi, Ibadan.                   

    “Subsequently, her beneficiaries, represented by the aforementioned administrators, were granted a Letter of Administration by the High Court of Justice, Oyo State, Ibadan.

    “This legal authorisation empowers them to request and obtain the detailed account statements.

    “The legal team has also attached a copy of the Letter of Administration to support their request.

    “The estate’s representatives emphasised their lawful right to access the account statements in line with their duties as administrators.

    “The comprehensive account history is essential for settling the estate’s financial affairs and ensuring a transparent distribution of assets.

    “This formal request signals the estate’s commitment to managing the late Chief Aminat Abiodun’s financial matters responsibly and in accordance with legal procedures.

    “First Bank Nigeria Limited is expected to respond to this request promptly in compliance with the applicable regulations governing such requests from authorised estate administrators.

    “These statements pertain to a range of bank accounts linked to Bank Verification Number (BVN) 222 96414877, covering the period from January 2010 up to the present. We are also aware, based on information at our disposal, that the late lyalode operated a personal chattel safety scheme through which she deposited and kept all her gold, bracelets and other personal effects with the bank for safe keep but till date, no mention or reference has been made to them.

    “Please note that this step is very necessary to enable our clients to positively kick-start the management of the estate of the late Chief Aminat Abiodun in line with the power granted them by the Letter of Administration.

    “If however, your bank fails, refuse or neglect to grant this subtle request, we shall be left with no option than to take reasonable legal action and probably involve the EFCC to look into the details and surrounding circumstances of the late Chief Aminat Abiodun’s accounts and ascertain those who withdrew money or did any transaction relating to her accounts.”

  • Our professional development plans, by NBA Women Forum

    Our professional development plans, by NBA Women Forum

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Women Forum has restated its commitment to boosting the professional development of members.

    It stated this at its Fourth Annual General Meeting (AGM), held in Abuja as part of the NBA Annual General Conference.

    The Chairperson, Mrs. Chinyere Okorocha, after welcoming the members, the exco, the governing council, committee officers, the state leads and branch facilitators, said the past year has been one of growth, resilience, and remarkable achievements for members.

    She highlighted activities of the past year, which include conferences, webinars and welfare and advocacy programmes, and identified resource constraints and funding as some of the Forum’s challenges.

    On upcoming plans, the chairperson said she would continue to focus on personal and professional development, advocacy, and creating opportunities for networking and collaboration.

    Mrs. Okorocha said plans were underway to create detailed guidelines and bylaws to enhance the organisational foundation of the Forum.

    The chairperson promised to establish new partnerships to facilitate cross-border knowledge sharing, dynamic seminars, and collaborative ventures geared towards empowering members of the Forum.

    Read Also: UAE lifts visa restriction on Nigerians

    She informed members of the global partnerships and exchanges which expand on the agreement with the New York State Bar Women in Law Section.

    Mrs. Okorocha stressed the need to strengthen the Forum’s mentorship programme, adding that more accomplished female lawyers will connect with emerging talents to foster the exchange of insights and advice and enhance career growth.

    Thanking members for their support, she said: “Your commitment is truly appreciated. Our association thrives on every voice and perspective for collective growth.

    “Thanks for your dedication to our vision and role in our successful Nigerian Bar Association Women Forum. We’re creating a story of empowerment and success, ensuring a bright future.”

    The Secretary, Mrs. Ini Irene Pepple, said two new committees have been created: Corporate Counsel and Public Sector.

    She said there is a plan for a webinar on the challenges faced by young female lawyers in the North; live discussion on Twitter Spaces on the challenges of young female lawyers in the workplace and how to grow their client base, scheduled for next month; and a Facebook live series on soft skills, scheduled for December, among others.

    Mrs. Pepple added: “This current administration has effectively capitalised on the accomplishments of its predecessor, and we are committed to further augmenting our efforts with the unwavering backing of our esteemed members.

    “I wish to extend my special appreciation to all the state leads and branch facilitators whose dedicated endeavours have been instrumental in realising the Forum’s objectives at the grassroots level.

    “I urge those who have encountered obstacles hindering their effectiveness not to lose heart, but rather to persistently labour towards the empowerment of female lawyers within their respective states and branches, fostering their success she noted.”

  • ‘NBA and danger of free meal for exco members’

    ‘NBA and danger of free meal for exco members’

    In the light of allegations and counter allegations following the recently concluded Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Annual General Conference (AGC), Jibrin Okutepa (SAN) has called for reforms to end the culture of “free meals”, curb corruption and financial recklessness in the Bar.

    In the just concluded Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, annual general conference, there were some troubling revelations which were not new, but which took a public show of what appears to be washing our dirty linens in the public.

    Some of our national officers accused the President of NBA of not allowing them to perform their statutory duties. In the most commendable matured approach the president allowed them to air their grievances publicly. He did not stop them. This is commendable I must say.

    Then it was the turn of the president to react. He gave reasons for his actions. Some of these reasons bothered on financial profligacy. That these national officers wanted to share NBA money for nothing. He gave statistics.

    Read Also: UAE lifts visa restriction on Nigerians

    Now these allegations and counter accusations are not new in NBA. I will not go into historical details. We all know. Some lawyers are experts in NBA elections. They graduate from one office to the other. There must be some reasons for always wanting to “serve” in perpetuity.

    But I think time has come for more responsible and accountable leadership in NBA. We need to screen thoroughly those who want to lead the NBA. What are their capacities and professional intergrity. It appears to me that many lawyers who go into NBA offices either at National or Branches are doing so because of free meals in NBA offices.

    When NBA was vibrant and a very responsible and a very respectful association, there were no free meals in the association. Leaders and NEC members paid their ways to attend NEC meetings. There were no free accommodations for National officers and NEC members.

    Everyone paid for his or her accommodations to attend NBA meetings. Some seniors members were willing and ready to assist some of their juniors to attend meetings. Senior lawyers were accorded due respect. These senior lawyers were guiding lights of the profession. Serious issues were discussed and enforced. Attending NEC meeting was for serious business. It was not for social jamborees.

    But since we adopted the policy of payment for accommodations for branch chairmen and secretaries from national purse for those who put themselves forward to serve the association that our problems of jamborees started. Today there is open corruption in NBA. Some branches cannot account for branch dues and money.

    Again, we started to monetise the elections of our colleagues to lead our association. Those jostling to lead the Bar corrupt their ways to be elected. Those who are to vote demand for bribes in many forms to vote for candidates they extorted from. Leadership recruitment in NBA has become very faulty and has unprofessionally been monetised.

    Now that we are going to have new national officers next year those who have their eyes on what they want to gain not the services they want to rendered to members of the legal profession and the association, have started unsolicited morning salutations and have suddenly turned emergency humanists and human right crusaders.

    Honestly the hypocrisy in NBA has lowered the reputation of the profession in grave geometrical proportions. We have closed our eyes to the rots in the profession and things are not well with NBA. We have stomach so many things that are wrong. The sores we keep tolerating in the profession is gradually leading to professional amputation of the credibility and nobility of the profession. We are no more taken serious by any right thinking members of the society. We have been grouped amongst the rogues in the society.

    The free meal in NBA has turned the association to a laughing stock. Time for all of us to agree to return the Association to its past vibrant glory is now. The recruitment processes to national and branch leadership must be thoroughly reviewed. Those jostling to lead NBA at national and branch levels must be scrutinized. Today NBA has been divided. Senior members of the profession are endangered species now. The reverend rank of SAN is now a crime for leadership.

    Yet this division was promoted for leadership positions. Even within the revered rank of silk, some encouraged some lawyers to disrespect elders just because of ambition to lead NBA. We cannot rubbish our best just for two years tenure in office. The traditional respect in the bar appears to have gone. Anyone can just wake up and want to be president of NBA.

    There is a need to stop free meal in NBA. Let those who want to lead the Bar do so from their pockets. They should pay their ways to conferences. There is no need for sitting allowances. If you know you can’t foot your bills, don’t aspire to lead the Bar. NBA free meal must be stopped before it totally rubbished the noble profession. This is my thought. Correct me if am wrong.

  •  Assessing impact of SERAP’s many litigations

     Assessing impact of SERAP’s many litigations

    What is the outcome of the suits filed by the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP)? Are they all hype? Deputy News Editor JOSEPH JIBUEZE reviews some of the recent verdicts in cases initiated by the NGO.

    Civil society is an essential ingredient of development and plays a critical role in a democracy.

    It is an important source of information for both the government and citizens.

    Civil society organisations (CSOs), on behalf of the citizens, monitor government policies and actions and hold institutions and those who head them accountable.

    They engage in advocacy and offer alternative policies for the government, the private sector and other institutions.

    One such CSO that has remained consistent is the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), whose strategies include public interest litigation. But, what becomes of the NGO’s many suits after filing?

    The presidency, under former President Muhammadu Buhari, once claimed that SERAP only files cases without following through.

    But, the NGO’s Deputy Director Kolawole Oluwadare said there is much more to the cases SERAP initiates.

    “I think there is a misunderstanding as to the purpose of these public interest lawsuits,” he said.

    Read Also: Mixed fortunes for APC, PDP, Labour at tribunals

    According to him, while the suits help achieve advocacy objectives in the short term, they have broader significance.

    Oluwadare explained: “They are primarily to sensitise the public about issues of public interest and to create legal jurisprudence and precedents that can help improve our legal system.”

    While not all the outcomes of the suits are in the public domain, SERAP insists the objectives are being realised.

    Oluwadare said: “In some of the judgments that were secured, there has been compliance.

    “Some of the issues litigated against have been dropped by the concerned agencies or respondents after the suits were filed.”

    One of the suits prayed the court to order the Federal Government to recover over N40 billion double pay from former governors who earn life pension while serving as lawmakers or ministers.

    The Federal High Court in Lagos had ordered then Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami (SAN), to challenge the legality of states’ pension laws.

    Following non-compliance with the order, SERAP filed a contempt suit against Malami.

    Subsequently, a former Ogun State Governor, Gbenga Daniel, asked the state government to stop the payment of his monthly pension.

    He said he did not want to be receiving double remuneration, having returned to public service as Senator representing Ogun East.

    The former governor said: “good conscience” informed his decision to have his monthly payment of N676,376.95 suspended.

    Oluwadare said: “Senator Daniel has stopped collecting pension in compliance with the judgment SERAP secured. There are plenty more success stories.

    “Former Kwara State Governor and Senate President Bukola Saraki also said he stopped collecting life pension because of SERAP’s lawsuit.”

    SERAP has sustained the advocacy against former governors in government receiving double pay.

    It has asked President Bola Tinubu to ensure the stoppage of further collection of life pensions and other allowances by governors in his administration.

    The NGO stressed that receiving a life pension while serving as a minister or Senator is forbidden by the 1999 Constitution.

    SERAP also recorded success following the threat to revoke the broadcast licences of 53 broadcast stations by the Buhari Administration.

    The National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), on August 19, 2023, revoked the licences of 53 broadcast stations on the grounds of their failure to pay their licence renewal fees worth N2.66 billion.

    The commission ordered those yet to pay to shut down at 12am on August 20.

    SERAP, along with the Nigeria Guild of Editors (NGE), challenged NBC’s action, following which the Federal High Court restrained the Federal Government from shutting down the stations.

    Oluwadare said regarding the case: “The Federal Government said in court that NBC did not fine the 53 broadcast stations because of the injunction issued by the court.

    “I think we need to do more in selling our success stories and educating people about the objectives of these lawsuits.”

     Other success stories

     The Abuja Close Circuit Television (CCTV) project was launched amid fanfare, but its execution was less successful. SERAP took it upon itself to ask questions.

    It filed a suit at the Federal High Court in Abuja, asking the Buhari Administration to account for the $460 million Chinese loan obtained to fund the failed Abuja CCTV contract.

    SERAP sought an order of mandamus directing and compelling the government, through the Minister of Finance, to make available to the NGO information on the total amount of money paid to contractors.

    It sought specific details of names of contractors involved as well as details of the status of the project implementation.

    On May 15, 2023, Justice Emeka Nwite ordered the government to account for how the loan was spent.

    The court also ordered the government to “publish the total amount of money paid to Chinese and local companies and contractors and specific details of the names of the companies and contractors and status of the implementation of the project.”

    The Freedom of Information (FoI) suit was numbered FHC/ABJ/CS/1447/2019.

    It followed the disclosure in 2019 by former Minister of Finance, Zainab Ahmed, that “Nigeria was servicing the loan” and that she had “no explanations on the status of the project”.

    Justice Nwite agreed with SERAP that there was a reasonable cause of action against the government.

    “Accounting for the spending of the $460 million Chinese loan is in the interest of the public.

    “It will be inimical for the court to refuse SERAP’s application for judicial review of the government’s action,” the judge held.

     The Abacha loot case

     Another significant case was the suit by SERAP praying the court to order the previous administrations of Olusegun Obasanjo, Musa Yar’Adua, Goodluck Jonathan and Buhari to account for $5billion Abacha loot.

    The late Sani Abacha was Head of State from November 17,1993 when he seized power, to June 8, 1998 when he died in office.

    Nigeria has continued to receive funds looted by Abacha, such as $44.1million from Switzerland in 2006, $ 227 million from Liechtenstein in 2018 and $311.7 in 2020, among others.

    In the FoI suit numbered FHC/ABJ/CS/407/2020, SERAP urged the Federal High Court to order the previous governments to account for at least $5 billion recovered from the late Abacha.

    On July 3, 2023, Justice James Omotosho granted the application.

    In the landmark judgment, he ordered the disclosure of the spending details of the recoveries by the past governments.

    The court ordered the Tinubu Administration to “disclose the exact amount of money stolen by General Sani Abacha from Nigeria, and the total amount of Abacha loot recovered and all agreements signed on same by the governments of former presidents Obasanjo, Yar’Adua, Jonathan and Buhari.”

    Justice Omotosho held: “In the final analysis, the application by SERAP is meritorious and the Federal Government through the Ministry of Finance is hereby ordered to furnish SERAP with the full spending details of about $5 billion Abacha loot within seven days of this judgment.”

    The judge ordered the government to “disclose details of the projects executed with the Abacha loot, locations of any such projects and the names of companies and contractors that carried or carrying out the projects since the return of democracy in 1999 till date.”

    The judge added: “The excuse by the Minister of Finance is that the ministry has searched its records and the details of the exact public funds stolen by Abacha and how the funds have been spent are not held by the Ministry. The excuse has no leg to stand in view of section 7 of the Freedom of Information Act.”

    Justice Omotosho dismissed all the objections raised by the Federal Government and upheld SERAP’s arguments.

    In the letter dated 8 July 2023 sent to President Tinubu and signed by Oluwadare, the organisation said: “We urge you to demonstrate your expressed commitment to the rule of law by immediately obeying and respecting the judgment of the court.

    “We urge you to direct the Ministry of Finance and the office of the Attorney General of the Federation to immediately compile and release the spending details of recovered Abacha loot as ordered by the court.”

     N200b Delta education funds

     In March 2019, a seven-year-old girl, Success Adegor from Sapele, Delta State, became a sensation on social media after she was sent home because her parents could not pay a fee/levy of N900.

    Miss Success had, in the viral video, said in pidgin: “No be say I no go pay, dem go flog, flog, flog, dem go tire.”

    She was a pupil of Okotie-Eboh Primary School 1, which was found not to be in good condition.

    SERAP followed up and sought to know how the Ifeanyi Okowa government spent over N200billion education fund allocations to Delta.

    Okowa was the Vice Presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2023 general elections.

    Joined as defendants are the Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC) and the Delta State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB).

    In a judgment delivered on July 17, 2023, Justice Daniel Osiagor of the Federal High Court in Lagos made an order of mandamus compelling the Delta government to provide SERAP with the information requested.

    He ordered the state government to “disclose how the Okowa government spent over N7.28 billion received from UBEC between 2015 and 2017, and N213 billion received from the Federation Accounts Allocation Committee (FAAC) in 2018, at an average of N17.8 billion monthly.”

    The court ordered “the disclosure of the spending details of over N200billion public funds collected by the government of former Delta State governor Ifeanyi Okowa from the UBEC fund and allocations from the Federation Accounts.”

    The court ordered the Governor Sheriff Oborevwori to “disclose details of budgetary allocations and actual spending by the Okowa government between 2015 and 2019, including specific projects carried out to improve primary education in Delta State, and the locations of such projects.”

    The suit followed SERAP’s FoI suit numbered FHC/L/CS/803/2019

    Justice Osiagor held: “SERAP has cognisable legal right to inquire and know the way and manner public institutions manage public funds.

    “I must say that every citizen has a duty to demand transparency and accountability in the governance of public institutions.

    “Why should a request for details of disbursement and spending of public funds between 2015-2019 by Delta State be a cause of litigation for four years?

    “Public officials are fast developing a state of anomie and cold feet when confronted with request for audit report of public duties and budgets.”

    The court added: “SERAP’s application cures so much disinformation in the public space. The request by SERAP falls within the categories of records accessible by the public.

    “However, public institutions are becoming increasingly hysterical upon any request served on them for information bordering on accountability.

    “The arguments of the Delta State government and the Delta State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB) that the Freedom of Information Act applies to only Federal Government officials cannot be sustained as public institutions are defined in Section 31 of the Interpretation section to include state institutions.”

    ‘More public interest suits needed’

     A public affairs analyst and columnist, Sonala Olumhense, who has followed SERAP’s work since 2004, said the NGO’s dogged pursuit of the rule of law, accountability and human rights filled him “with pride”.

    He wrote in the aftermath of criticisms by former presidential spokesman Garba Shehu, who had accused the NGO of embarrassing the government.

    “To date, SERAP has not taken their retinue of legal actions to a logical conclusion. They don’t follow through,” Shehu claimed.

    But, Olumhense, who clarified that knew no one from SERAP nor spoke for it, disagreed with the presidency.

    To him, the Federal Government was riled up by the NGO’s lawsuit which sought the arrest of soldiers and police officers indicted by the Lagos #EndSARS report in the 2020 Lekki toll gate shooting.

    The columnist believes the presidency may have also been irked by another lawsuit by SERAP over the government’s failure to publish the names of those indicted in the alleged misappropriation of over N6trillion at the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC).

    Highlighting SERAP’s public interest litigations since the Obasanjo Administration, Olumhense stressed there was an “open-source list of many cases that SERAP has resolved through the relevant legal systems over the years”.

    He urged the government to address the issues raised by the organisation and go after those who flout the laws rather than resort to blackmail, adding: “Thank you, SERAP.”

    A Lagos lawyer, Jonathan Iyieke, believes SERAP should be encouraged.

    He said: “SERAP was established in 2004 and one of the reasons for its formation as an NGO was to fight corruption at all levels. There have numerous public interest litigations at the instance of SERAP.

    “The challenge is that in a country like Nigeria where corruption and disobedience to rule of law are eulogised, it does not matter how many times one goes to court

    “It’s really a travesty of justice that cases ventilated and doggedly won in courts are selectively obeyed. I am in support of SERAP. Let it continue with its work.”

    Activist-lawyer, Tope Alabi, urged SERAP to sustain the public interest litigations. He also does not think they are too many or are a waste of time.

    He said: “The problems in the society that call for public interest litigation are many, so the cases filed by SERAP are not even enough. More public interest litigation is needed.”

    Alabi, however, urged SERAP to provide regular updates on the status of the cases and their eventual outcomes.

    He added: “We hear a lot about SERAP filing cases, so I think the public also needs to know what becomes of them when judgment is given.”

  • Penalise inciting comments against judiciary, says lawyer

    Penalise inciting comments against judiciary, says lawyer

    A lawyer, Chukwudi Enebeli, has called for laws prohibiting lawyers and others from making inciting comments against the Judiciary over cases in court.

    He also called for stringent laws against hate speech.

    Enebeli, partner at a leading law firm Pinheiro LP, said fake news, cyber bulling and hate speeches were very serious issues in Nigeria because of its diversity and high illiteracy rate.

    He stressed that the right to freedom of expression under the Constitution is not absolute, adding that if not curtailed, anarchy will be the order of the day.

    The lawyer spoke at the 63rd Annual General Conference of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), which was held in Abuja.

    He was a panelist at a session on fake news, cyber bullying and hate speech.

    Read Also: NBS’ statistical fantasy

    Enebeli condemned the abuse of the social media by its users.

    According to him, though the Cybercrimes Prohibition Act and the Electoral Act have certain provisions to curtail hate speech, little has been done by the enforcement authorities.

    He faulted lawyers and non-lawyers who comment on judicial proceedings in a manner capable of inciting the people against the judiciary and the legal profession.

    “We have seen an unprecedented increase in the manner in which both lawyers and non-lawyers go to social media space to incite the public against the judicial officers and we are watching and no one is speaking.

    “What is so painful is the fact that these judges cannot speak for themselves,” Enebeli said.

    He believes new laws must be enacted  to regulate social media and the cyber space.

    Enebeli added: “Both the networks and the various social media platforms must be made accountable.

    “In promulgating new laws, we must create an offence aimed at prohibiting both lawyers and non-lawyers from disseminating any information before, during and after proceedings which are capable of inciting the people against the judiciary as it relates to matters in court.

    “There must also be stringent punishment. Section 97(1) of the Electoral Act should also be amended to include the punishment of deregistering a political party as well as banning any candidate that campaigns on the basis of tribe, religion or sectional reasons from participating in any election for a period of ten years.

    “It is the severity in the punishment that serves as a deterrent.”

    Other members of the panel were Director-General of the Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies (NIALS) Prof. M.T. Ladan; Founder of Consumer Advocacy Foundation of Nigeria Mrs. Sola Salako-Ajulo; a Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Uche Ifeanyi Henry, represented by Chief Superintendent of Police (CSP) Omaka Udodinma and Remi Afon of the Cybersecurity Experts Association.

  • Inside NBA’s 2023 AGC

    Inside NBA’s 2023 AGC

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) 2023 Annual General Conference (AGC) ended in Abuja at the weekend with no fewer than 16,340 lawyers in attendance. JIDE BABALOLA and DELE ANOFI, report that despite fisticuffs on the football field, brouhaha over the inclusion of a ‘street’ musician and a dispute over its expenditure, the conference  charted the new course for nation building

    Right from the opening speech of President Bola Tinubu wherein he declared that he would discontinue with failed economic theories that promote spending 90 per cent of the country’s scarce revenue on servicing external debts amid many development challenges facing the country, the just-ended Nigerian Bar Association (NBA)’s 2023 Annual General Conference (AGC) captured national attention. 

    The AGC, with the theme : “Getting it Right: Charting the Course for Nigeria’s Nation Building” featured no fewer than 16,340 lawyers. They participated both in person at the M.K.O. Abiola Stadium, Abuja and online. There were six plenary sessions, featuring 26 speakers, including President Bola Tinubu, to stimulate a journey of intellectual discovery. There were also 99 panellists and 23 moderators.

    For President Tinubu, Nigerians’ much-desired prosperity will only manifest once poverty is banished from the society with the focused cooperation of Nigeria’s private sector leaders, many of whom were present at the opening ceremony.

    The annual event customarily features a unique blend of professional networking, intellectual engagement, and even a dash of entertainment, and the 2023 conference did not disappoint, as it seamlessly intertwined legal matters with ‘unbarred’ leisure activities that included a performance by ‘street’ musician, Portable and also, a football match that some members of the public in Abuja easily labelled as a ‘show of shame’.

    A confluence of legal minds

    The conference, held at the sprawling International Conference Centre, lived up to its reputation as a hub for intellectual discussion. It attracted legal professionals from every corner of Nigeria, with attendees ranging from seasoned lawyers to aspiring law students. Sessions were spread over three days and covered a wide range of subjects, from constitutional reforms and judicial independence to human rights advocacy and emerging legal technologies. Eminent legal scholars, judges, and practitioners shared their insights, sparking discussions that will undoubtedly influence the future of Nigeria’s legal landscape.

    Discordant notes

    Notwithstanding the perceived success of the AGC, NBA President Yakubu Maikyau appeared to share in some of the disappointments that inevitably manifested. Responding to a question during the presentation of the conference communiqué, he expressed great surprise that – in his view – two great proposals he put forward for a constitutional amendment got shot down by members despite the potential benefits for state chapters and individual members of the bar.

    Failed proposal to amend the NBA constitution

    The first was a proposal to amend the NBA constitution and increase the statutory 10 per cent remittance of members’ practising fees to state NBA branches, to 20 per cent so that state organs can be better run.

    The second proposal was for the creation of a Stabilisation Fund, which he reasoned would enhance members’ personal development. 

    Read Also; It’s hard for me to forgive, forget, says Joeboy

    “Our lawyers have been very desirous, and they need support. Young lawyers can make money across the globe on-the-go by reason of technological know-how, so, we’ve been talking about access· to finance for our lawyers,” he said.

    One of the most anticipated highlights of the conference was the friendly football match that brought lawyers, judges, and law students together on the field. It was a remarkable display of camaraderie as professionals swapped their court robes for jerseys. The match provided a platform for participants to unwind, fostering connections beyond legal debates.

    Fisticuffs at football match

    Unfortunately, an unprecedented physical combat and exchange of blows during the match between the NBA Abuja team and their fellow lawyers from Onitsha, following allegedly skewed officiating in favour of the Abuja team occurred on August 28, 2023, a day the NBA had its lecture on Ethics and Professional Conduct of Lawyers, with focus on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing issues. 

    However, there was a prompt official response, as a report by the Chairman of the NBA Sports Organising Committee, Mr. Godwin Madubuko, indicated that after a review of the ugly incident during the semi-final match, a coach and one player were penalized.

    Wahala entertainer

    ‘To the surprise of many lawyers and members of the public in Abuja, popular street musician, Habeeb Olalomi Oyegbile, popularly known as Portable or Dr Zeh, was one of the guest artistes for the ‘Unbarred concert’ of the AGC. The choice of the ‘Wahala’ entertainer brought some discordant notes to the AGC. Is a counter-culture artiste proper company for conservative professionals?

    The inclusion of Portable in the line-up of entertainers sparked public outrage and divided opinion among conference attendees. Some argued that Portable’s presence diminished the dignity of the legal profession. But others argued that his presence added an element of diversity and represented a blend of legal tradition.

    However, NBA National Publicity Secretary, Akorede Lawal defended the organisers, saying Portable’s presence followed independent arrangements made by businessman Obi Cubana’s Cubana Group, a sponsor that brought Portable as a guest artiste without any financial expense from the NBA.

    One of those who defended Portable’s inclusion as a guest artiste was Mutalubi Ojo Adebayo, SAN, who expressed his views in his piece “Portable and the 2023 NBA Unbarred Concert- a sheer display of immaturity’.

    Adebayo said: “Why so much fuss about Portable performing at the NBA conference? During my student days at the Universities of Lagos and later Ibadan, the legendary Fela Anikulapo was always engaged by all the great clubs and associations on our campuses then for live performances. Anybody who had attended Fela’s live concert before will agree with me that the person was then a secondary Indian hemp or marijuana smoker and that included my good self. How will you be at Fela’s concert and will not inhale enough smoke of marijuana which almost every other person beside you was smoking with all latitude. Or do we talk of Fela’s habitual almost naked dress sense? But that was the great Fela for you. It was for the organisers to take him as he was or leave him if they couldn’t cope with his unique identity. After all, they could have also invited and engaged some Islamic or Christian Gospel Musicians and there were truly many of them out there at that time and even till now.

    “I don’t see anything untoward in the NBA inviting Portable to feature and perform at the concert organised during the just concluded and well-organised NBA conference. The unfounded and mischievous criticisms being touted all over now are akin to those who are fond of condemning the Big Brother Africa/Big Brother Naija on any ground.

    “It is therefore my considered opinion that members of the Bar (if any) who truly staged a walkout on Portable who was a Guest Artist at this year’s Unbarred Concert are, to say the least, very immature. Such members of the Bar would at any time walk out on Judges whenever the court’s proceedings became hostile or unfavourable to them or when it failed to meet their expectations.

    Exco rifts, power games

    By far the most surprising discordant tune was reflected in the manifestation of exco rifts and power games. NBA members and members of the public were taken aback by the seriousness of pointed accusations from NBA’s National Treasurer, Caroline Ladidi Anze-Bishop, who alleged that the association’s President, Yakubu Chonoko Maikyau, was making financial decisions without her consent. She refused to present financial reports, stating that she wasn’t aware of the true financial situation. Anze-Bishop revealed that memos bypassed her office and were approved by the president through the secretary’s office. She emphasised that she wasn’t involved in preparing the financial reports and couldn’t vouch for their accuracy.

    Anze-Bishop who told briefly addressed fellow lawyers, also disclosed that she wasn’t part of any NBA finance-related committees. She recounted an executive meeting where Maikyau asserted that he didn’t require her office’s consent to manage the association’s finances.

    However, in response, Maikyau accused some of the national officers of resentment, referencing past attempts to distribute millions in NBA funds, which he opposed.

    Productive Meeting

    Despite various contentions, the NBA 2023 conference came out with very meaningful results.The working sessions of the Conference focused on three main themes: economy, administration of justice, and security.

    In the communiqué signed by Maikyau and NBA’s General Secretary, Adesina Adegbite, they highlighted all observations and recommendations made under the three main themes.

    With regard to Nigeria’s economy, the conference acknowledged the nation’s economic potential but noted several constraints, including inadequate infrastructure, trade barriers, and uncertain government policies.

    “Despite Nigeria’s vast mineral wealth and human resources, challenges like power shortages, insecurity, and divisions among citizens impede economic growth,” they noted.

    Recommendations made towards redressing the situation include the need for sustained broad-based economic growth and poverty reduction, the government’s renewed focus on infrastructure development, improved power generation, agricultural productivity, and youth employment through education and entrepreneurship skills training.

    On the administration of justice, the conference expressed concerns that the need to reform the justice sector has been a long-standing concern with issues like poor coordination, case delays, inadequate legal aid, and corruption within key institutions, noting that a fundamental rethinking of justice system infrastructure, approaches to policing, adjudication, and improved relationships between government branches is necessary.

    They therefore emphasized the necessity of an independent judiciary and recommended an urgent review of judicial remuneration while also advocating government support for pro bono schemes and collaborative efforts to enhance access to justice.

    Furthermore, national security’s impact on economic prosperity and effective justice administration, the influence of community non-participation, unemployment, and the need for regional cooperation in insecurity as well as the nation’s porous borders, globalisation’s influence on crime, inadequate security personnel training, and ungoverned spaces were noted challenges all came under discussion.

    Among others, conference attendees recommended greater investment in the military, community policing, youth engagement, regional cooperation, and comprehensive police reforms were recommended in addition to citizens’ complementary roles, legislative interventions and proposals for human rights training for the military were considered.

    Focusing on the role of legal practitioners in advancing the nation’s causes and organising a medical outreach in partnership with various organisations, the conference reviewed legal practitioners’ remuneration and rules on ethical charging practices. Its recommendations on this include ethical charging practices, comprehensive training, and minimum fees for junior lawyers as well as advocacy, awareness campaigns, and educating the public on new remuneration rules.

    The proposed amendment of the NBA constitution was rejected, and the existing constitution was retained by the NBA AGM which then scheduled the 2024 Annual General Conference for August 23 to 30, with the venue to be determined.

    “The recommendations from this conference reflect a commitment to strengthening legal institutions and promoting justice, human rights, and professional integrity for the betterment of Nigeria,” they emphasised.

    Urgent reforms needed

    There were strong expressions of concerns from some quarters such as that of Jibrin Okutepa, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) who stridently called for urgent reform of NBA to avoid further descent of its leadership standards. 

    Also, Bayo Akinlade, a former chairman of Ikorodu NBA, who now serves as spokesman of Nigerian Legal Society (NLS) issued a statement that described disappointments with the NBA conference as ‘multifarious’.

    Okutepa’s statement reflects deep worries about the prevailing culture of ‘free meals’ within NBA leadership, stressing a need for a thorough evaluation of capacities before allowing individuals to come on board in leadership positions. Much unlike now when some take leadership positions because of perks like free meals and hotel accommodation, Okutepa is nostalgic about those days when respect was accorded to senior lawyers who paid for themselves and junior ones even while serving as guiding lights for the profession.

    Former member of NBA NEC, Akinlade’s caustic tone in a statement titled “My Thoughts on the Just Concluded NBA AGC” reflects some of the anger and thirst for urgent, comprehensive reforms by lawyers who formed the Nigeria Law Society of which he is the spokesman.

    “The 2023 NBA AGC suffered many setbacks right from the planning stages but even though the content was not half bad, the internal politics at play in the planning and development stages created quite a bit of a nightmare in terms of delivery,” Akintade stated.

    He went further: “Growing up as a young lawyer in this profession, I met an NBA that was focused. I can’t recall the NBA having grand parties or events like unbarred being part of the AGC but today, almost every night of the AGC; parties were organised that went well into the next morning ….how can anyone concentrate on the practice development areas and content the AGC seeks to provide when conferees go to bed at 3am or 4am each morning? They will get to the conference venue late and with a nasty hangover. It is actually unfortunate that it is the same people who organise these AGCs that also organise these parties or allow these parties to be held.”

    In effect, he tore the supposed logic behind much of the NBA leadership’s disposition into shreds by picking on one item after the other before concluding: “The NBA has come full circle and while some believe that the NBA can be ‘fixed,’ I opine that fixing NBA is not from within its existing structures but rather it must completely re-invent and re-evolve.”

  • A prosecutor’s quest to improve criminal procedure

    A prosecutor’s quest to improve criminal procedure

    Renowned and perhaps the country’s foremost anti-graft prosecutor, Rotimi Jacobs (SAN) has now taken on some of the procedural bottlenecks in the criminal justice system with the launch in Lagos of his book, “Rotimi Jacobs on Criminal Procedure.” ROBERT EGBE, VICTORIA BOBADE and IREDE OKOROAFOR report that the event, which also celebrated the 10th anniversary of Jacob’s membership of the Inner Bar, featured legal giants and other leading lights of the Inner and Outer Bar who pointed the way forward for the country’s never-ending battle to tame corruption.

    One of the country’s leading lights in anti-graft prosecution since the advent of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), immortalised his mastery of the country’s criminal justice system on August 23, 2023, with the launch in Lagos of his book, “Rotimi Jacobs on Criminal Procedure”.

    The event, which also celebrated the conferment of the rank of Commander of the Order of the Niger (CON) on Jacobs and the 10th anniversary of his membership of the Inner Bar, featured legal giants and other leading members of the Inner Bar who pointed the way forward for the country’s challenged anti-corruption war.

    ‘A fundamental aspect of legal jurisdiction’

    One of the top guests was Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu who praised Jacobs for creating time to write and “availing people of the benefits of his rich knowledge and experience on a very fundamental aspect of legal jurisdiction.”

    Sanwo-Olu, who was represented by the Secretary to the State Government (SSG) Bimbola Salu-Hundeyin, recommended the book “to all with the assurance that it will assist in deepening our understanding of the admin of criminal justice law in the country.”

    He added: “The administration of criminal justice is a critical part of our body of laws which has undergone reforms at various levels with the overriding objective to facilitate procedures for fair and speedy dispensation of justice.

    “Lagos State has been at the forefront in this regard and this is a key factor in the progress we have achieved in our justice system.

    “The law or justice system is not static. It keeps evolving and we must keep our system up to date with best global practices and standards;

    “We must all commit ourselves to upholding the tenets of the law. The bar and the bench have significant role play and must work together to ensure that the law achieves the desired objectives.”

    How Nigeria can tame corruption, by Agabi

    A former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice Kanu Agabi (SAN), who was the father of the day, praised Jacob’s role in tackling graft, comparing him to the late human rights lawyer Chief Gani Fawehinmi (SAN)

    He said: “A tribute to you, Rotimi, is a tribute to Chief Gani Fawehinmi, at whose feet you started in this profession. The work that you have been doing in prosecuting those who have come under suspicion of crime is consistent with the expectations of that great patriot.”

    The elder statesman urged the government to act fast against graft, saying the justice sector and law enforcement and anti-graft agencies were overwhelmed.

    Agabi said the Judiciary, the Police, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) can no longer cope with the volume of corruption allegations they receive.

    He identified six kinds of reforms the country must implement to solve the tame the problem.

    They are quality and relevant education, ending governance founded on patronage, economic self-reliance, putting square pegs in square holes in appointments and relaxing state boundaries.

    Agabi said: “We should not hope to solve the problem of corruption as long as the education we offer our young does not equip them for life, as long as the government is founded on patronage, as long as the nation is not self-reliant, as long as people are appointed into high offices for which they are not qualified, as long as the boundaries of the states are rigid.”

    Read Also; Burna Boy ready to take over continent, warns Wizkid, Davido

    Praising Jacobs’ sterling record as a conscientious anti-graft jurist, Agabi lamented the country’s slide to dangerous corruption levels.

    He reasoned that but for relentless men like Jacobs, the situation would be even direr.

    Quoting copiously from scripture and referencing the parable of the prodigal son, the eminent lawyer urged Nigeria to return to honesty and accountability.

    The Silk noted that laws were not the country’s problem, adding that law enforcement agencies are only as good as their personnel.

    Agabi said: “Let me start by saying that the laws against corruption are not new. They have always been there. They are as old as the nation itself.

    “However good they are, they are not self-enforcing. They require good men and women to enforce them.

    “As important and as vital as the institutions that the nation has established to combat corruption and crime, they are limited institutions.

    “They are founded on the premise that crime will be limited. If crime becomes unlimited, these institutions cannot cope.

    “And that is what has happened. With the advent of civil rule, the pendulum swung from one extreme of dictatorship to the extreme of liberalism.

    “Corruption has permeated every department of the nation. The police cannot cope. The judiciary cannot cope. The EFCC and the ICPC cannot cope.

    “Therefore, we must re-examine our approach to the fight against corruption.”

    Other guests at the event included Justices, EFCC and ICPC chairmen and eminent SANs including Chief Wole Olanipekun, Femi Falana, Richard Ahonaruogho, Muiz Banire (SAN), Dr. ‘Kemi Pinheiro (SAN), Kunle Adegoke, Muhammad Belgore, Dele Adesina, among others.

    ‘Jacobs succeeded despite travails prosecuting politically exposed persons’

    Activist-lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) also commended Jacobs for ‘codifying’ his criminal prosecution experience, which he did at great personal risk.

    Falana added: “I’m happy that we’re celebrating him. This fellow has gone through a lot in the society. His life was threatened. His liberty was threatened because he was prosecuting the principalities in our society, very dangerous, politically exposed persons. But Rotimi stood his ground. He was as constant as the Northern Star.”

    The celebrant’s brother, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN) also praised Jacobs for the feat, saying the book was a rich resource for criminal matters.

    “Having had the privilege of reading the book, I believe it will serve as a comprehensive resource for anyone seeking to expedite the determination of criminal matters. It has the potential to resolve many contentious issues within criminal jurisdiction,” Oyedepo said.

    Why the book?

    The author noted that there seemed to be a dearth of readily available, up-to-date resources to help actors in a criminal trial, adding that this was affecting judicial decisions.

    The top EFCC prosecutor expressed hope that the book would help change this.

    Jacobs said: “Over the past 32 years, I have been practising law, but unfortunately, I have lost more cases in the last three years than I have in my entire career.

    “It seems that the law is not being appreciated, especially by those who are responsible for enforcing it.

    “Judges are struggling to find a comprehensive guidebook, particularly for criminal cases, which is affecting the outcomes in our courts.

    “It’s disheartening to see the absence of great legal minds that used to guide judges in the past.

    “However, I am hopeful that we can correct this situation with the help of experienced authors and legal experts.

    Importance of ‘Rotimi Jacobs on Criminal Procedure’

    An Associate Prof at the Faculty of Law, University of Lagos, Dr. Akeem Bello, who reviewed the book, noted that the main purpose or vision of the author “is to guide judges, legal practitioners, and academia.”

    He noted that the book is preceded by a couple of other books that attempted to provide commentaries on the Criminal Procedure Act (CPA) and the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) as well as the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015.

    But that “What makes the effort by Mr. Rotimi Jacobs, SAN, unique and necessary is the depth of the analysis he offered on each provision of the ACJA. The analysis of each provision covered the scope of its application, the changes. if any, between the provisions and the CPA and CPC, and a thorough examination of all issues raised by the provisions with the aid of Nigerian judicial authorities, relevant authorities from India, the United States of America, and England.

    “The author also robustly and thoroughly explained and analysed cognate Nigerian legalisations that impact some of the provisions of ACJA. It is my submission, ladies, and gentlemen, and you will agree with me after concluding this review, that this book fills a significant knowledge gap in criminal justice jurisprudence in Nigeria”

    The don congratulated the author, and recommended both volumes of the book to all.

    Bello added: “The two-volume Rotimi Jacobs on Criminal Procedure are worthy and monumental contributions to the jurisprudence of criminal procedure in Nigeria.

    “The clarity of thought, insightful analysis, comparative depth, and the number of relevant judicial authorities cited to explain and expound the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015, make the two volumes comparable to similar legal classics in the mould of Brett and McLeans’ The Criminal Law and Procedure of Six Southern States of Nigeria, and the great Archbold Criminal Pleadings Evidence and Practice.

    “Present and coming generations of Judges, Legal Practitioners, Academia, and Law Students will find the two Volumes a treasure to keep.”

  • President and rule of law

    President and rule of law

    President Bola Tinubu, in his inauguration day speech, made a solemn promise to govern according to the constitution and the rule of law.

    The pledge – simple and straightforward – was critical because it indicated a determination to part ways with the much-criticised path of his predecessor and fellow All Progressives Congress (APC) member, Muhammadu Buhari.

    “In the coming days and weeks, my team will publicly detail key aspects of our programme. Today, permit me to outline in broad terms a few initiatives that define our concept of progressive good governance in furtherance of the Nigerian ideal:

    “The principles that will guide our administration are simple: Nigeria will be impartially governed according to the constitution and the rule of law,” President Tinubu said.

    Interestingly, Buhari made a similar declaration at his inauguration on May 29, 2015.

    Buhari said: “The Federal Executive under my watch will not seek to encroach on the duties and functions of the Legislative and Judicial arms of government. The law enforcing authorities will be charged to operate within the Constitution…”

    His words, slightly different but no less important than that of the incumbent, are now considered by many – in the light of his acts soon after he was sworn in – as having been made tongue-in-cheek.

    In just a few months in office, the Buhari administration cultivated a reputation for wilful disobedience to court orders, such as the ones granting bail to a former National Security Adviser (NSA) Sambo Dasuki, and the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu. His administration was also accused of, among others, the violation of rights with the massacre of Shiites in Zaria, Kaduna State. In 2022, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) accused Buhari of a wilful disregard for the rule of law and human rights, ignoring Nigerian judges on, at least 40 occasions. Facing pushback from critics, he attempted to justify his disobedience by referencing national interest and security.

    The Buhari administration’s culture of defiance of court orders and disregard for the rule of law reached a crescendo with the unpopular naira swap policy implemented by the now-suspended Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor Godwin Emefiele.

    Four months after Tinubu took over the reins of power, many of the issues, including the Nnamdi Kanu situation, are still unresolved.

    Read Also: I will not fail Nigerians – Tinubu

    Curiously, and despite him publicly distancing himself from the Buhari regime’s apparent selective compliance with the rule of law, President Tinubu seems to have started off where the ex-military dictator stopped, at least in two prominent cases. The first is the travails of Emefiele. The other is the continued detention of the suspended Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Abdulrasheed Bawa.

    The common denominator in both cases is the self-styled Department of State Services (DSS).

    Emefiele has been in the custody of the DSS since June 10, a whopping 94 days, despite having been granted bail.

    On July 25, hooded, machine gun-toting DSS operatives went physical with NCoS officials and assaulted an unarmed NCoS Commander in public glare. The secret agency exercised its superior coercive power against pistol and rifle-bearing NCoS officials, who had just received the lawful right to take custody of Emefiele following the bail granted him by the court. Having won the muscle-flexing battle, the DSS whisked Emefiele away.

    Emefiele’s re-arrest occurred on the hallowed ground of the Federal High Court in Lagos sitting in Ikoyi after Justice Nicholas Oweibo admitted the embattled apex bank chief to bail in the sum of the N20m.

    The judge also ordered that Emefiele be remanded at the correctional centre pending the fulfilment of the bail conditions.

    The incident caused public outrage with many Nigerians calling for the head of the DSS’ Director-General. They urged President Tinubu to act.

    Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Jibrin Samuel Okutepa warned that the country was abandoning the rule of law.

    Okutepa said: “Nigeria is sliding into dictatorship. Rule of law no more in practice. While we operate the rule of law in theory we operate in practice despotism and totalitarian regime under the colour of democracy. The show of shame today between DSS and Correctional officers supports my position.

    “I have always said that those in power operate political vendetta and no rule of law. Why is DSS now all over the place? Is DSS above the law of the land? In a country where rule of law holds sway, the judiciary is respected and nobody is allowed to subvert judicial orders.”

    On August 17, even the judge handling the firearms case was forced to slam the government following its continued disregard of its order to allow Emefiele to enjoy his bail.

    Justice Nicholas Oweibo said the government had no respect for the rule of law.

    He spoke while giving his ruling on the ‘illegal possession of firearms and ammunition” charges against the banker.

    The Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) at the Federal Ministry of Justice, Abubakar Mohammed, had filed an oral application seeking the withdrawal of the two-count charge on the grounds of emerging facts and circumstances which require closer investigation.

    But chiding him, Justice Oweibo said: “The prosecution has shown that they are not law-abiding and have no respect for the court. The court cannot force them.

    “What good will it be for the defendant who is in custody? Of what benefit will it be to keep the file in the court’s docket?”

    “To stop the embarrassment of the court and to keep its integrity intact, I believe the proper thing is to allow them to withdraw the charge.”

    Like Emefiele, EFCC chair Bawa has also been in DSS custody since his suspension from office by the President and shortly after, was taken into custody by the DSS. He has now been in custody for 82 days without trial.

    Many senior lawyers have warned that the government is acting illegally and frustrating the rule of law.

    Dr. ‘Kemi Pinheiro, for instance, has urged the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) to effect Bawa’s immediate release 

    Pinheiro warned that by holding Bawa, the government risked sending the wrong signal to the international community concerning human rights violations in Nigeria.

    The senior lawyer’s August 21 letter to the AGF was titled “The continuous and unlawful detention of the erstwhile Executive Chairman of the Economic And Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr. Abdulrahseed Bawa”.

    In it, he noted that Bawa was suspended from office by President Bola Tinubu on June 14 and arrested by the DSS in whose custody he has been since.

    Pinheiro said: “Sometime ago, when the public’s curiosity arose on the cause of the purported ‘unlawful’ detention of the erstwhile EFCC Chairman, the officers of the DSS were said to have purportedly stated that the detention of the erstwhile EFCC Chairman was lawful and pursuant to a court order.

    “Even while we might believe that his detention may be based on a remand order issued by a court of competent record, it is of utmost importance to draw your attention to the unjustifiable extended duration of this remand order.

    “Granted that the said remand order may have been obtained pursuant to section 293 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 which provides succinctly on the procedures to be followed in obtaining a remand order, Section 295 of the said Act also provides an opportunity for a suspect to apply for bail during the course of the said remand proceedings or in an entirely independent action.”

    The Silk noted that his present concern is that the continued detention may also be construed as violating Section 35(4) & (5) of the Constitution (as Amended.)

    The section guarantees the right of every person, where arrested or detained, to be charged before a competent court of law within a reasonable time.

    “It is considerably urged by this letter that the rule of law and the interest of justice should prevail and Mr. Abdulrasheed Bawa is released immediately so as not to send the wrong signal to the international community as it relates to human rights violations in Nigeria,” Pinheiro added.

    Another SAN, Rotimi Jacobs also joined the call for the release of the suspended EFCC Chairman, Abdulrasheed Bawa.

    According to Jacobs, the maximum period in which a suspect can be detained in Nigeria through a remand order is 56 days, but Bawa has been in detention for longer than that, contrary to the rule of law.

    He added: “The concern now is not necessarily about the person of Mr. Abdulrasheed Bawa, but the need to respect and observe the rule of law in a constitutional democracy which we practise in Nigeria. 

    “In every constitutional democracy, any conduct which runs contrary to the rule of law must not only be avoided but must be deprecated by all lovers of democracy. 

    “As someone who believes in the truism that injustice to one is an injustice to all and as a lawyer, I see it as a point of duty to draw the attention of the relevant authorities to the obvious constitutional infraction and the illegality which the continued detention of Mr. Abdulrasheed Bawa represents and I, therefore call on the relevant authorities to be properly guided and tow the part of justice in the instant case and other similar cases.”

    Last Monday, activist-lawyer Femi Falana also warned that the government was breaking the law by its continued detention of Emefiele and Bawa.

    He criticised the DSS for refusing to adhere to the rule of law.

    He noted that though both men had a penchant for disobeying court orders while they were in office, the DSS was also wrong for ignoring the rule of law by detaining them illegally.

    “Indeed, under the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, the cumulative lifespan of a remand order is 56 days. Therefore, having exceeded the detention period permitted by the Administration of Criminal Justice Act and the Constitution of Nigeria, the State Security Service should be directed to release Mr. Abdulrasheed Bawa from illegal custody without any further delay.

    “The Federal Government should ensure that the rights of Messrs Emefiele and Bawa are respected by the State Security Service and the office of the Director of Public Prosecution in the Federal Ministry of Justice, even though the duo had a penchant for disobeying the orders of the courts when they were in office.

    “The plight of both suspects should be a lesson for all public officers in Nigeria who always behave as if there will be no tomorrow. However, the government which rules by law is under a legal obligation not to breach the fundamental rights of citizens except in a manner prescribed by the Constitution of Nigeria,” Falana said.

    Since his inauguration, President Tinubu has shown that he listens. A couple of times, he reversed his decisions, and political appointments following public outcry.

    Many Nigerians will now be expecting him to do same in the case of Emefiele and Bawa in the interest of the rule of law