Category: Law

  • Court orders substituted service in contempt case

    Court orders substituted service in contempt case

    The Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered that the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Kayode Egbetokun be served with Forms 48 and 49, directing him to show cause why an order of committal should not be made against him for alleged disobedience of a court order.

    Justice Alexander Owoeye ruled that the contempt processes, including Forms 48 and 49, be served on the IGP by substituted service through the Commissioner of Police, Legal Department, Nigeria Police Force Headquarters, Abuja.

    The order followed the grant of an ex-parte motion filed by a businesswoman, Mrs. Mabel Alabijah Hussein, through her counsel, Kola Sodiya.

    The application alleged a breach of an earlier court order directing all parties to maintain the status quo pending the hearing and determination of a suit she filed against the IGP and others, marked FHC/L/CS/1468/2025.

    Also joined as respondents in the suit are the Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Force CID, Area 10, Abuja; the Assistant Inspector General of Police, Force CID Annex, Alagbon, Ikoyi, Lagos; the Assistant Inspector General of Police, Zone 2, Onikan; CSP P. Bolugi; Inspector Aba Yomi Michael; the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC); Adedeji Adesiyan; and Citadel Views Gardens and Estates Ltd., listed as the second to ninth respondents.

    The application arose from the alleged disobedience of an earlier order made on October 9, 2025, in which the court restrained all the respondents from taking further steps in connection with the suit and directed them to maintain the status quo pending the hearing and final determination of the applicant’s fundamental rights application.

    READ ALSO: ‘Nigeria has not recovered from military rule’

    In her ex parte motion, the applicant sought leave to serve Form 48 dated January 6, 2026, Form 49, and all other processes relating to the contempt proceedings on the IGP by substituted means, through the Commissioner of Police, Legal Department, at the Nigeria Police Force Headquarters, Louis Edet House, Area 11, Garki, Abuja.

    The applicant alleged that the IGP, the eighth respondent, and the Divisional Police Officer (DPO) of Ogombo Police Station, Eti-Osa Local Government Area of Lagos State, disobeyed the subsisting court order by failing to maintain the status quo.

    She alleged that they took further steps in the matter by making attempts to arrest her and her eight-year-old daughter on December 16, 2025, contrary to the court’s order restraining such actions pending the determination of the suit.

    She further claimed that, despite the restraining order issued on October 9, 2025, the eighth respondent continued to instigate police officers to harass, investigate, and attempt to arrest her.

    As a result, she said she and her daughter had been living in fear and had gone into hiding since December 16, 2025, following repeated police visits and invitations.

    The applicant also alleged that the DPO of Ogombo Police Station, who invited her for questioning on December 16, 2025, acted under the authority and direction of the IGP.

    She further claimed that efforts were being made to arrest her with the intention of taking her daughter away and handing the child over to the eighth respondent.

    After hearing the submissions of the applicant’s counsel and reviewing the processes before the court, Justice Owoeye granted the application.

    Ruling, the judge held that the applicant was entitled to serve the contempt processes by substituted means.

    He ordered that Form 48 dated January 6, 2026, Form 49, and all other processes relating to the contempt proceedings be served on the IGP through the Commissioner of Police, Legal Department, Nigeria Police Force Headquarters, Abuja.

    The matter was adjourned to March 10 for a report of service.

  • Teacher jailed for life for sexual assault of pupil

    Teacher jailed for life for sexual assault of pupil

    By Olamide Olakanse

    Justice Rahman Oshodi of an Ikeja Sexual Offences and Domestic Violence Court has sentenced  a teacher, David Oddion a Social Studies teacher at a private school, to life imprisonment for the sexual assault of an eight-year-old student (names withheld).

     Justice Oshodi convicted Oddion of a two-count charge offence brought against him by the state.

    The convict was sentenced for life for sexual assault by penetration and  got a seven-year sentence for the indecent treatment of a child. 

    The judge said both sentences are to run concurrently starting from the date of his arrest on February 8, 2021.

    The judge also ordered that the convict’s name be written in the Lagos State Sexual Offenders Register.

    The incident, which happened at Hilltop Grade International School (HGIS), Agungi Road, Lekki, Lagos  came into the open when the victim, a Grade 3 pupil, informed her mother, that her teacher was “weird.”

    Upon further questioning, the child revealed a pattern of abuse, stating that the defendant had touched her private parts more than 10  times.

    READ ALSO: Accord, APC, ADC ready for battle

    The incident led  to the arrest of the convict who was a Social Studies teacher in the school,  by the police.

    During trial, the court heard that Oddion had set aside the exam scripts of five students who failed, calling them into his classroom one by one for corrections.

    The court heard that the  victim was the third student called and that after the other students had gone home, the defendant remained alone with the victim, during which time point he penetrated her with his finger.

     The court heard that the convict  removed her underwear, touched her, kissed her on the forehead and cheeks, and hugged her before her mother arrived to pick her  up at about  3:00 pm.

     Following the child’s disclosure, her mother confronted the school’s  head teacher, Mrs. Linda.

    The court heard that  the defendant initially denied the allegations, but his account was inconsistent.

    After the school head advised him that only the truth would set him free, the convict confessed to the acts.

    The court was told that this led to his immediate arrest and a subsequent medical examination of the survivor at a private hospital by Dr. Makanjuola, who also testified as a witness in the matter.

     During the trial, the prosecution team, I.E. Sholarin, S.O. Adesina, and I.E. Balogun, argued that the evidence against the defendant was overwhelming.

    Delivering  judgment in the matter, Justice Oshodi noted that the prosecution had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

    The judge remarked on the defendant’s position as a mentor and trainer, stating that parents entrust their children to teachers and that such a gross violation of trust was unacceptable. The judge also observed that the defendant had shown no remorse throughout the proceedings.

    The defense counsel, H.O. Ndubuisi, pleaded with the court to temper justice with mercy, noting that the defendant was a student at an Open University and a first-time offender.

    However, Justice Oshodi maintained that the law must take its course to serve as a deterrent to others and subsequently sentenced him to life imprisonment.

  • Falake faults SAN’s defamation claim against Senator

    Falake faults SAN’s defamation claim against Senator

    A House of Representatives member, James Faleke, has faulted a pre-action notice sent to the Senate Majority Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele, by a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Victor Opara.

    Opara wrote on behalf of the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Magodo Property Development Company Limited, Mr. Lai Omotola.

    He demanded a public apology and the payment of N5 billion in damages over alleged defamatory statements made against the Lagos-based property developer.

    Opara accused Bamidele of slander, alleging that the Senator falsely portrayed Omotola as a “land grabber” and a “fraudulent person” during a telephone conversation with Faleke.

    But, Falake has distanced himself from the allegation, saying “nothing of such occurred”.

    According to Opara, the alleged defamatory remarks were made on January 12, 2026, and were said to have been heard by several persons because the call was placed on speakerphone at Faleke’s residence in Lagos.

    READ ALSO: Accord, APC, ADC ready for battle

    The statements, the lawyer argued, imputed criminal conduct to Omotola and exposed him to public hatred, ridicule, and contempt.

    The letter described the alleged comments as “false, malicious and injurious,” noting that they had gravely damaged Omotola’s reputation and strained his relationship with Faleke and other associates.

    The pre-action notice also laid out the background to an ongoing dispute over a prime property located at No. 24 Adeola Odeku Street, Victoria Island, Lagos.

    Opara maintained that the land is vested in the Federal Government of Nigeria and was lawfully leased to Magodo Property Development Company for 99 years after the company paid N1.152 billion as consideration.

    He stated that the company took possession of the property without interference until a rival claimant, Kaplan Properties Limited, allegedly laid claim to the land based on a title purportedly derived from the Lagos State Government.

    According to the letter, the rival title is invalid because Lagos State lacked the legal authority to allocate the property.

    Opara further alleged that Kaplan Properties, with the “active support” of Senator Bamidele, enlisted the Police to forcefully dispossess Magodo Property Development Company of the property, despite the dispute being civil in nature.

    The letter said the intervention of the police led Omotola to institute an action at the Federal High Court in Lagos, which subsequently ordered the police to vacate the property.

    The order, the lawyer noted, remains valid and has neither been set aside nor overturned on appeal.

    Despite the subsisting court order and the pendency of a separate suit at the Lagos State High Court, Opara alleged that attempts were still being made to take over the property through police involvement, an action he described as unlawful and an abuse of power.

    While stating that his client found it difficult to believe that Bamidele would be involved in such conduct, given his “sterling record in public service,” Opara said the available facts appeared to support Omotola’s claims.

    On the defamation allegation, the lawyer argued that the statements attributed to the Senate Majority Leader amounted to slander actionable per se.

    He claimed they imputed the commission of a crime under the Lagos State Properties Protection Law.

    The SAN noted that, under Nigerian law, such statements attract damages without the need for proof of actual loss.

    Opara, therefore, demanded a written, unreserved apology to Omotola, with a copy sent to Faleke, to be made within 14 days, and the payment of N5 billion as compensatory damages within 21 days.

    The letter warned that failure to comply with the demands would leave Omotola with no option but to institute legal proceedings, adding that the damages sought in court could exceed the N5 billion being demanded.

    Falake responds

    Falake’s counsel, Gboyega Oyewole (SAN), in response to Opara’s demand, distanced the lawmaker from the claims.

    He stated: “We are Solicitors to Rt. Hon. James Abiodun Faleke, whom you mentioned in your letter addressed to Distinguished Senator Opeyemi Bamidele, dated 19th January 2016

    “Our client has informed us that nothing of such as contained in the said letter as far as making any slanderous statements occurred.

    “This response is for record purposes.”

  • Family writes Sanwo-Olu, police over illegal land sale

    Family writes Sanwo-Olu, police over illegal land sale

    The Ogunnusi Oloko Family of Arapagi-Oloko Village, Ibeju-Lekki Local Government Area of Lagos State, has escalated its petition over the alleged illegal sale of ancestral land to Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and the Police.

    It raised fresh concerns about land fraud in the fast-growing coastal corridor.

    In its appeal to Sanwo-Olu, the family urged the state government to intervene to halt further illegal land sales.

    It also asked the state government to protect innocent buyers and preserve communal land ownership in Ibeju-Lekki, an area experiencing intense real-estate pressure.

    The family called on the police to investigate alleged cases of impersonation, forgery and obtaining money under false pretences.

    The family stressed that its action was aimed at safeguarding ancestral property and preventing further disputes that could threaten peace in the community.

    The family alleged the sale of communal land without authorisation.

    READ ALSO: ‘Nigeria has not recovered from military rule’

    It said documents with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) contains a list of recognised family heads and trustees, including Elder Mumuni Adebola Oloko, acknowledged by the family as Head of the family.

    In a petition earlier addressed to the Paramount Ruler of Ibeju Land, Oba Waliu Olasunkanmi Oniwolu,  and now escalated to the state government and security agencies, the family alleged falsification of family documents, forgery of signatures of senior family members and collection of millions of naira from land buyers.

    A formal resolution issued by the family association also warned against illegal and unapproved land sales and announced plans to prosecute any individual found culpable.

    The resolution noted that the activities allegedly continued despite repeated appeals and internal interventions and warned buyers to beware.

  • ‘Contemporary law of tort in Nigeria’: a review

    ‘Contemporary law of tort in Nigeria’: a review

    By Fabian Ajogwu

    Tort law is a fundamental aspect of the Nigerian legal system, as it addresses civil wrongs, even in the absence of a contractual relationship.

    Yet much of the literature on tort law in Nigeria focuses on traditional principles, leaving little discussion of modern challenges and emerging areas.

    ‘Contemporary Law of Tort in Nigeria’ by Uche Val Obi (SAN) fills this gap, offering a comprehensive and practical guide that is both timely and relevant for students, lecturers, and practitioners alike.

    The Learned Senior Advocate brings his extensive experience as a litigator and commercial lawyer to this work, and it shows in the clarity and precision of the analysis throughout the book.

    The text combines a solid grounding in the traditional principles of tort, including negligence, duty, liability, trespass, and defamation, with an exploration of contemporary issues that reflect modern society.

    Particularly striking is the chapter on privacy and data protection (Chapter 12). With the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) tightening compliance, this discussion is relevant and crucial for legal practice today.

    READ ALSO: Accord, APC, ADC ready for battle

    Structured across thirteen chapters, the book balances foundational and emerging topics. It addresses the impact of globalisation, technological advancements, and social media on tortious liability, including defamation and cyber infractions, as well as the shifts introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic in employer-employee relationships. These discussions demonstrate a keen awareness of evolving practical and societal challenges, and ensure the text is not just theoretical but also applicable in real-world contexts.

    The author effectively guides readers through each principle with practical scenarios and tutorial questions. This approach encourages active engagement and makes the book both informative and highly effective as a tool for learning. The text is grounded in judicial authorities, both Nigerian and foreign, and, despite this depth of coverage, the book remains remarkably accessible, using clear language and an organised structure that invites readers to navigate each concept with ease.

    This book is a crucial reference for anyone engaged in legal practice or scholarship. Students, lecturers, and practitioners alike will benefit from its careful attention to contemporary issues in tort and emerging jurisprudence.

    Even those in related fields, such as environmental, corporate, oil and gas, or data protection law, will find insights that are directly relevant to their work. The foreword by the Honourable Minister of Education, Professor Tahir Mamman, SAN, aptly endorses the text with an unreserved recommendation – a sentiment I strongly align with.

    The book successfully marries scholarship with practice. It captures the evolving nature of tort law in Nigeria and offers an indispensable and timely resource.

    Here are a few areas I found particularly relevant and insightful:

    Privacy, data protection, and digital liability

    In Chapter 12, titled “Privacy and Data Protection,” the author explores how rapid technological development has necessitated the evolution of tort law.

    Data privacy and protection are increasingly pressing concerns in modern legal practice. Personal information is one of the most valuable assets in today’s digital age, and the potential harm from its misuse is enormous.

    Big Data is considered the fuel of the current Fourth Industrial Revolution. It powers technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and machine learning.

    These systems allow public and private entities to collect, store, analyse, and process massive amounts of personal data, which companies use to gain competitive advantages, target advertising, and improve their services.

    With this context, privacy breaches have become a major concern for individuals’ rights, reputation, and even economic interests.

    I find this chapter particularly essential as it demonstrates how tort law can effectively hold parties accountable and provide remedies when these rights are violated, which I believe is increasingly important for Nigerian legal practice.

    A key contribution of the chapter is linking the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDP Act) 2023 directly to tortious liability.

    The NDP Act 2023 imposes a duty of care on data controllers and processors regarding the processing of personal data and requires accountability for adherence to data-processing principles, such as fairness, lawfulness, transparency, purpose limitation, data minimisation and integrity.

    This duty, created by statute, is the vital first step in establishing tortious claims for data privacy violations.

    Since a duty of care arises in tort regardless of whether there is an existing contract, the book suggests that claims arising from the breach of data protection principles should be actionable in tort.

    Any accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, or unauthorised disclosure of personal data constitutes a personal data breach, which data processors or controllers are required to implement measures against. A personal data breach then exposes the data processor or controller to potential tortious claims if they fail to uphold this statutorily imposed duty.

    Furthermore, under the NDP Act 2023, principal officers of a company may also be held liable individually unless they can prove that the breach occurred without their connivance or consent. This shows how far-reaching liability can be, hence why an understanding of these provisions is important.

    Defamation and the digital shift

    The book in Chapter 10, titled “Defamation,” takes a close look at the connection between defamation and social media, in its discourse on social media abuse.

    Defamation is generally understood as an incorrect spoken or written statement published about a person that is likely to harm their reputation. The digital age complicates this, as mass publication occurs instantaneously.

    The author highlights legislative efforts to manage digital abuse, noting that Section 24 of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) Act, 2015, criminalises sending messages through computer systems or networks that:

    • Are grossly offensive, pornographic, or of an indecent, obscene, or menacing character;

    • Are known to be false, causing annoyance, danger, insult, injury, enmity, hatred, or ill will;

    • Are intended to bully, threaten or harass another person, placing that person in fear of death, violence, or bodily harm.

    This discussion reveals the author’s attention not only to the common-law origins of defamation (libel and slander) but also to modern statutory interventions, such as the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.). Act, 2015 (as amended in 2024), which defines and penalises digital communications that injure reputation or cause emotional distress.

    It shows how the book thoughtfully balances the fundamental right to freedom of expression with the need to prevent harm from careless or harmful online posts, which is particularly relevant given how social media can quickly elevate or diminish reputation.

    The COVID-19 impact on employer’s liability

    In Chapter 4, titled “Employer’s Liability,” the book examines how the COVID-19 pandemic has introduced new dimensions to workplace liability.

    The core tort duty of an employer remains a personal and non-delegable obligation to exercise reasonable care for the safety of employees. This includes providing competent staff, adequate plant and equipment, a safe system of work, and safe premises.

    The pandemic, however, brought additional considerations. Employers now need to factor in infectious disease risks and make necessary adjustments to workplace operations. Ensuring a safe system of work requires implementing new safety precautions, updating instructions, and enforcing adherence to public health guidelines.

    Through this discussion, the book confirms that the definition of a safe workplace and a safe system of work must be continually updated to reflect the changing circumstances and best practices.

    ‘Contemporary Law of Tort in Nigeria’ by Uche Val Obi, SAN, is a valuable reference text and practical guide for students, lecturers, practitioners, and all interested in the subject.

    In this book, tort law is presented as a living discipline, responsive to contemporary challenges and evolving societal demands. I confidently recommend this work to all who seek a resource that is rigorous, relevant, and immediately applicable to modern Nigerian legal practice.

    I congratulate the Learned Senior Advocate for a well-considered and timely resource. I have no doubt that many will benefit from this work.

    • Ajogwu, OFR, SAN, is a Professor of Corporate Governance at the Lagos Business School. He holds a Ph.D in Law from the University of Aberdeen.

  • UK court awards Olukoya £100,000 against blogger

    UK court awards Olukoya £100,000 against blogger

    A United Kingdom court has ruled against blogger Maureen Badejo, ordering her to pay £100,000 in damages to Dr. Daniel Olukoya, founder of Mountain of Fire and Miracles Ministries (MFM), and his wife, after she lost a defamation case.

    The UK High Court of Appeal, Queen’s Bench Division, presided over by Mr Justice Lavender, affirmed the orders of Master Thormett made on April 13, 2021 and February 3, 2022 in the case with refence Number QB- 2020-003625 brought by the appellant.

    The court found Badejo’s online statements about the couple to be false and defamatory.

    Read Also: Nigerian doctors perform W/Africa’s first robotic gynaecological surgery

    She was ordered to pay £65,000 to Dr. Olukoya and £35,000 to his wife.

    The court ruled that the defendant’s online statements were false and defamatory, and ordered Badejo to publicly retract her claims and share a summary of the court’s judgment on her social media accounts.

    Mr Lavender said the permission to appeal was refused as the application lacked merit, and in pursuance of CPR52.4(3) the defendant may not request this decision to be reconsidered at an oral hearing.

    “Insofar as the defendant seeks permission to appeal against Master Thormett’s order of 3 February 2022 (the second order), her proposed grounds of appeal are both hopeless and pointless,” the court held.

    The court stressed that false accusations have consequences and individuals are protected against defamatory statements.

  • Court adjourns alleged certificate forgery case

    Court adjourns alleged certificate forgery case

    An Enugu State High Court in Enugu has adjourned the arraignment of Onoh Lambert Onuigbo over an alleged certificate forgery.

    The adjournment was due to procedural lapses that stalled the taking of his plea.

    The charge, filed by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), was numbered E/108C/2025.

    When the matter came up for hearing on January 22, counsel to the defendant, Mr. B. N. Ezeani, informed the court that although the case was slated for plea, a mix-up regarding a motion he filed as far back as October 7, 2025, had prevented the process from moving forward.

    According to the defence counsel, the said motion, relating to the defendant’s bail, was yet to be properly reflected in the court’s case file, a development he said made it impracticable to proceed with the plea.

    He told the court that his client had already been granted administrative bail and had been faithfully reporting as required.

    Justice Chinedu Ezeugwu expressed displeasure and concern over the delay, describing it as regrettable that a motion filed several months earlier could not be found in the case file.

    The judge, however, faulted the defence counsel for failing to verify ahead of time whether all necessary processes were properly captured in the court records.

    The judge advised both the prosecution and the defence to agree on a new date for the defendant’s plea, stressing the need for diligence and procedural orderliness in criminal proceedings.

    Read Also: Nigeria, Turkey deepen defence ties as DICON-D7G unlocks advanced Military manufacturing

    The court adjourned the matter to June 16 for plea.

    The prosecution counsel, Mr. Uche Akaa, did not object to the adjournment date.

    Onuigbo was charged following a petition reportedly submitted to the ICPC, alleging that he forged a Bachelor of Science degree certificate in Political Science purportedly obtained from the Enugu State University of Science and Technology (ESUT).

    It was alleged that the defendant used the said certificate to contest for, and subsequently secure, election as President General of his Ngwo community in Enugu North Local Government Area.

    He is also accused of having deployed the same certificate to effect a conversion from junior staff to officer cadre at the Enugu North Local Government Area headquarters, where he is currently employed.

    The charges, if proven, could attract severe legal consequences, as certificate forgery and related offences are punishable under Nigerian law.

  • Lekki property suit adjourned till February 26

    Lekki property suit adjourned till February 26

    A Magistrates’ Court sitting at Tinubu, Lagos, has adjourned the suit filed by one Mercy Ogbonna against one Fuad Oloto over the recovery of possession of a four-bedroom terrace duplex in Ikate Elegushi, Lekki, to February 26, 2026, for cross-examination and defence.

    The case, presided over by Magistrate Paul Albert, was adjourned following an application by defence counsel, A.D. Lasisi, after the claimant closed her case.

    At the resumed hearing, counsel to the claimant, Ayodeji Fasehun, informed the court that the matter had been fixed for trial and that the claimant was ready to proceed.

    A witness, lawyer Siji Agbadaola, testified on behalf of the claimant and adopted his Witness Statement on Oath dated July 4, 2025, which was admitted as Exhibit A.

    During examination-in-chief, the witness identified and tendered several documents in support of the claimant’s case. These included a Power of Attorney dated May 28, 2025, which he confirmed he witnessed, and which was admitted as Exhibit B, as well as the Tenancy Agreement admitted as Exhibit C.

    The witness also identified payment receipts issued by the claimant in favour of the defendant. Although he told the court that the original copies were with the tenant, the receipts were admitted as Exhibits D1 to D5.

    Further documents tendered and admitted included reminder letters dated February 1, March 3, and April 3, 2025, all relating to the expiration of the tenancy notice period. The documents were admitted as Exhibits F1, F2, and F3 respectively.

    Read Also: 15 million Nigerians use drugs, says NDLEA

    In addition, a 7-day Notice of Owner’s Intention to Recover Possession dated May 1, 2025 was admitted as Exhibit G, while a Memorandum of Claim dated May 1, 2025 was admitted as Exhibit H.

    The witness also tendered a printout showing electronic service of notices via WhatsApp, which was admitted as Exhibit I. He told the court that the notices were served electronically without any form of obstruction.

    At the conclusion of the testimony, claimant’s counsel urged the court to adopt the documents tendered and grant the reliefs sought by the claimant.

    However, defence counsel applied for an adjournment to enable him to cross-examine the witness and present the defence’s case.

    Magistrate Albert granted the application and adjourned the matter to February 26, 2026, for cross-examination and defence.

    The claimant, Mrs. Mercy Ogbonna, is seeking recovery of possession of a four-bedroom terrace duplex with boys’ quarters located at Unit 2, No. 10 Eru-Ile Street, Ikate Elegushi, Lekki, Lagos State, which she said was let to the defendant at an annual rent of N4.5 million.

    She is also claiming mesne profit of N375,000 per month from May 1, 2025, until possession is delivered, N5million as general damages for alleged inconvenience, and N1 million as cost of the action.

  • Falana decries medical doctor’s three-year detention without trial

    Falana decries medical doctor’s three-year detention without trial

    Rights activist, Femi Falana (SAN), has condemned the prolonged detention of a medical doctor, Dr Kenneth Nwafor for over three years.

    Speaking during a visit  by Uturu Development Association of Nigeria (UDAN) Worldwide on behalf of Nwafor, Falana described the detention as a gross violation of the constitution and other extant laws protecting personal liberty and human dignity.

    He stressed that no citizen should be detained without access to family members, legal counsel or proper judicial oversight.

    The learned silk said the doctor, a first class graduate and a lecturer in Abia State University was held in a facility without formal charge or trial in contravention of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) and constitutional provisions on the rights of suspects.

    “For our friends in the media, this doctor was detained for over three years, following his unlawful arrest in July 29, 2022.

    “Under Nigerian law, you cannot keep a citizen in detention for such a period without trial, contact with family or access to a lawyer,” he said.

    Falana explained that the law mandated the police to inform detainees of the reasons for their arrest, their right to remain silent and their right to legal representation before any statement was taken.

    According to him, where a suspect wishes to make a confessional statement, such must be video-recorded, in line with the law, to prevent abuse and coercion.

    He added that certain offences were not legally detainable, adding that no citizen should be held beyond 24 or 48 hours, depending on the availability of a court, without being charged.

    Falana also kicked against the practice of extorting money from detainees, especially during weekend arrests, stressing that bail is free and that demanding payment for bail is illegal.

    “Bail is free in Nigeria. Nobody is permitted to demand money for bail.

    “Any officer who does so is acting outside the law,” he said.

    Falana announced plans for a nationwide sensitisation campaign to educate citizens on their rights and empower communities to challenge unlawful arrests and detentions.

    According to him, lawyers will be mobilised to visit police stations regularly to ensure detainees’ rights are respected and to provide free legal assistance where necessary.

    The human rights activist urged citizens to make the protection of human rights a collective responsibility, calling on communities to engage human rights committees and report abuses by security agencies.

    He thanked members of the public for their solidarity and pledged continued legal action against all forms of unlawful detention and rights violations.

    Earlier, the President-General, of UDAN Dr Chidi Slessor and the Secretary, Mr Titus Eleweke, in a letter, expressed gratitude to Falana for securing the release of Nwafor, popularly known as “Onye Army”.

    The association praised the lawyer’s “exceptional courage, resilience and unwavering commitment to justice” in defending and securing  the doctor’s elease.

    According to UDAN, Falana’s doggedness in pursuing the case of Dr.Nwafor  despite obvious challenges and prolonged legal hurdles,” is a testament to a “lifelong dedication to the rule of law, protection of fundamental human rights and defence of the oppressed.

    “Dr Nwafor, a former President-General of Uturu, is a worthy son whose prolonged detention deeply pained the Uturu people of Abia State.

    “The intervention by the senior advocate restored his liberty and rekindled confidence in the justice system,” they both argued.

    UDAN also appealed for assistance to secure the release of another indigene, Mr Nduka Onyeani, who was arrested the same day with Nwafor and has since remained in detention.

    Narrating his experience, Dr. Kenneth Nwafor said he was sleeping in his house with his wife and children  on July 29, 2023 when officials of the DSS stormed his house at 2:35am and pointed guns at him in his bedroom and was whisked away with only the short boxers on his body.

    Read Also: Nigerian doctors perform W/Africa’s first robotic gynaecological surgery

    “ My parlour was filled up with DSS and soldiers with over 30 Hilux vans outside in front of my house.

    “ I was handcuffed, my eyes tied and I was beaten. At a stage on the way, I heard one of them say, let’s waste this man and go away. But a DSS official, I guess, prevailed on them from killing me at that moment.

    “When I got to DSS office, I was made to face the wall till dawn. The following day, torture started. They used hammer to smash my head, blood gushed out and when my assailant wanted to repeat the feat, a senior officer stepped in and asked why he is hitting a man who has been talking voluntarily to them. So he stopped him”.

    “They said I belong to IPOB, I told them no”, that I am former soldier, First Class Scholar and lecturer at Abia State University.”

    He continued: “On the 3rd of August, they asked me to prepare that I am going home. What followed was that the man cocked his gun and released a shot into the air.

    My phone was collected and they took me in their car until they passed Okigwe  and we arrived Abuja at 5. 00pm. I entered the DSS headquarters.

    “On  October 7, I was very sick, they woke me up and I came out with 35 others. They handcuffed us and gave us water bottles to urinate on the way. They took us to Wawa Cantonment in Niger State. There I saw hellfire on earth. I found thousands of people, youths, suicide bombers, and bandits all classified according to events in each region.

    “Everyone from the East is regarded as a member of IPOB. Here they charged you as they desired and force you to enter a guilty plea. One guy who refused to plead guilty was beaten until he fainted.

    “While there, I kept praying everyday because I didn’t know I would l come out alive. Some have spent 15 years there without  be trial”, he said.

    Turning to Falana, he said: “ May God continue to replenish you. The God who saved me through you will not allow you to encounter any problem”.

  • Olanipekun to govt: enforce Cybercrime Act against social media abuse

    Olanipekun to govt: enforce Cybercrime Act against social media abuse

    •UNILAG Pro-Chancellor admonishes graduates on character

    Pro-Chancellor and Chairman of the Governing Council of the University of Lagos (UNILAG), Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), has urged the Federal Government to enforce the provisions of the 2024 Cybercrime Act to protect citizens and society from the dangers  of an unregulated social media space.

    Speaking at the 56th convocation ceremonies of UNILAG, the legal giant stressed the imperative of regulation and the need to protect citizens from constant harassment and cyber-bullying.

    He referred to the recent fine of £100,000 imposed on a blogger by a court in the United Kingdom as a measure to regulate the social media space.

    “Citizens are not protected from harassment, from banditry, from assassinations on social media. We are not aware; we are not learning. We don’t know what the law is.

    “And those of us who have a master’s degree in cybercrime, in cyber-protection, please let us look at the law.

    “An occasion like this provides an opportunity for Nigerians to have an idea of the type of protection they have under the law,” he said.

    He berated the desire to denigrate people and spoil their reputation through the internet, especially bloggers.

    The SAN said: “We must not put this country down. It will be a shame. Who will succeed us?

    “Do you disagree with any person, and the next thing you do is to sponsor bloggers to accuse someone falsely? Reputation is so sacrosanct.

    “It’s the duty of the police, the duty of the government, to protect us from bullying.”

    He advised the graduates not to join those who misuse social media for blackmail and reputation-soiling.

    “And thank you, my daughters, my sons. Please don’t be bullied. Don’t join them.

    Read Also: Nigeria’s mines of blood

    “Make a positive impact on society. You are going to shine. You are going to tower. You are going to soar.

    “And when others fail, you will succeed. Don’t be part of the negative people. Don’t be. And don’t let us fall away,” the legal titan added.

    On the recent settlement of the 2009 Agreement, he lauded President Bola Tinubu and Education Minister Dr Tunji Alausa, stressing that the agreement should not be breached.

    The Pro-Chancellor said from next year, he would gift any male student who comes out tops in any faculty a cash prize of N500,000.

    He noted that under his watch, the Governing Council has been trying for the past 18 months to work seamlessly and change the face of the university.

    Olanipekun admonished the graduates to be good and worthy ambassadors of the university wherever they find themselves.

    “As you step into the world outside these gates today, remember: education has prepared you for a living, but character will determine who you become in life.

    “The world you enter will test your convictions before it rewards your competence. It will question your integrity before it celebrates your success. You must, therefore, stand firm.

    “Carry your learning with humility. Wear your achievements with restraint. Exercise your influence with empathy.

    “Wherever you go, let your presence add value. Let your words bring clarity. Let your conduct command trust. Do not merely seek a place in history. Earn one.

    “And when your name is spoken in rooms you may never enter, may it be said, solemnly, and without contention, that here stood a product of the University of Lagos, who lived with purpose, led with courage, and served with honour,” he said.