The Nation Newspaper

Category: Law

  • SAN: Asaba Int’l Arbitration Commission will boost ADR

    SAN: Asaba Int’l Arbitration Commission will boost ADR

    The Asaba Chamber of Commerce International Arbitration Commission (ASCCIAC) will boost access to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms and bring them closer to the people, its Board Chairman, Dr. Anthony Idigbe (SAN), has said.

    The centre, inaugurated by the Asagba of Asaba,Prof. Obi Epiphany Azinge (SAN), has an inaugural 13-member body of neutrals.

    The Asagba, in cutting the tape, prayed for the success of the Centre and the Commission’s contribution to stimulating the Delta State and the broader regional economy.

    The newly approved panel of neutrals comprises 13 distinguished professionals, each selected for their legal competence, integrity, and experience in arbitration with in-depth expertise across various industries and legal systems, reflecting the Commission’s commitment to providing practical and reliable dispute resolution options for parties engaging in commerce across Nigeria and beyond.

    Dr. Idigbe said: “This panel brings together a strong combination of experience and integrity.

    “Each appointee meets the high standards we set for neutrality and capability, and we are confident that they will uphold the values on which the Commission was founded.”

    ASCCIAC will rely on this panel to handle arbitral appointments and to support the delivery of fair and timely decisions under its rules.

    The panel members are Dr Idigbe, Mrs. Elizabeth Idigbe, Isaiah Bozimo (SAN), Otunba Richard Akintunde (SAN), Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), Prof. Andrew Chukwumerie (SAN), Diane Okoko, Laura Alakija, Foluke Akinmoladun, Deborah Chukwuedo, Uchenna Nmerole, Chinenye Onyemaizu and Emokiniovo Dafe-Akpedeye.

    Dr. Idigbe said the centre was borne out of the need to decentralise access to alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.

    His words: “The centre is to create a hub that serves not just Delta State, but the entire Southsouth and Southeast regions, places like Port Harcourt, Calabar, Onitsha, Warri, Benin, Owerri, Enugu, and Abia states by providing efficient and professional services in arbitration, mediation, and related processes.”

    Idigbe, who stated that the centre is now a duly incorporated legal entity, acknowledged the roles of the Delta State Government, the Attorney-General of the Federation Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), and the Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines, and Agriculture (NACCIMA).

    “It is a call to industry, to legal practitioners, engineers, architects, accountants, and all stakeholders to embrace and utilise this centre.”

    He said the centre would offer training and certification in arbitration and related fields by organising conferences and networking events to strengthen the dispute resolution community.

    “The broader vision includes connecting with other arbitration centres across Nigeria, Africa, and globally.

    Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Delta State, Ekemejero Ohwovoriole (SAN), stated that the commission’s initiative aligns seamlessly with the Governor Sheriff Oborevwori administration’s ongoing efforts to improve access to justice, ease pressure on the conventional court system, and foster a more conducive environment for commerce, investment, and efficient dispute resolution.

    Ohwovoriole said: “The establishment of the ASCCIAC Centre is more than just a notable achievement for the legal and business communities here in Delta State; it also marks a significant step forward for the commercial justice landscape of the South-South zone of Nigeria.

    “The world is witnessing a steady and meaningful shift in how disputes are resolved, and legal systems around the world are moving away from the traditional adversarial model of litigation.

    “No doubt, arbitration, mediation and other forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) have proven to be credible, speedy and indispensable in resolving commercial disputes.

    Read Also: Top Pro Golfers to grace  Delta Governor’s Cup in Asaba

    “Business organisations have also been quick to adopt more flexible and practical alternatives to the well-documented drawbacks of the traditional litigation model.

    “Our government has no intention of being left behind in the realm of commercial arbitration, and we have kept pace by introducing forward-thinking policies to encourage and regulate the use of ADR.”

    President of the Asaba Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (ASACCIMA), Chief Chinwe Monu-Oduah, commended the Asagba of Asaba, saying he had been instrumental in promoting the growth and development of the state capital.

    She said: “The ASACCIMA is dedicated to supporting businesses and promoting economic growth in Delta State.

    “Our objectives include promoting ASACCIMA in line with the National Association’s mandate, vision and goals.

    “We align with the Sustainable Development Goals, the African Union, and the African Continental Free Trade Agreement, supporting government at the Federal and state levels in line with the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    “We also provide resources and relationships that help businesses to thrive, among other things.”

    The event attracted legal luminaries, engineers, captains of industry and politicians.

    Governor Oborevwori was represented by the Commissioner for Trade and Investments, Hon Samuel Oligida.

    The Asaba Chambers of Commerce International Arbitration Commission (ASCCIAC) is a company limited by guarantee with its registered office at the ASCCIAC Centre, Plot 89, Dickson Kingsley, Mbakwe Close, off WAEC Road, Central Spine Area, Asaba, Delta State.

    The Commission and its Centre serve both ad hoc and administered arbitration, as well as other alternative dispute resolution schemes, including mediation, conciliation, and expert determination.

    It also offers training in arbitration and ADR.

    If parties wish ASCCIAC to be the administering institution, they are to use the ASCCIAC Model Arbitration Clause: “Any dispute or claim arising out of or relating to this agreement, including any question regarding its existence, interpretation, validity, breach, performance of obligations, or termination thereof, shall be referred to and settled by arbitration under the rules of the Asaba Chamber of Commerce International Arbitration Commission.”

    ASCCIAC Centre is also available for use in other forms of arbitration and ADR.

  • Retooling Police Act 2020 for better performance

    Retooling Police Act 2020 for better performance

    A five-day Police Reform Conference recently held in Lagos at Protea Hotel, Ikeja principally to review the Police Act 2020 alongside provisions of  Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015. Foremost Police trainer, who is also the Executive Director, Crime Victims Foundation (CRIVIFON) Mrs Gloria Egbuji shared her thoughts with ADEBISI ONANUGA.

    You recently attended a Police Reform Conference held at the Protea Hotel in Ikeja. What was the focus of the conference?

    The conference focused on transforming policing in Nigeria by emphasising accountability, community trust, and respect for human rights. It was titled “Reforming Police Training Curriculum For Recruits and the major thrust was how to bring the Nigeria Police in line with the provisions of the Police Act 2020 and the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015. Discussions centered on reforming internal police structures, ending abusive practices, and creating mechanisms for public oversight, all aimed at restoring public trust in the Force.It mainly focused on reforming police training curriculum  for recruits constable. 

    Would you say the conference was action-packed?

    Absolutely. It was intense, engaging, and practical. This wasn’t one of those forums where people just read papers and leave. We had robust breakout sessions, presentations from top legal minds, panel discussions, and even strategy-building exercises. From morning till evening each day, participants were deeply involved in addressing real issues and proposing implementable solutions. You could feel the seriousness in the room. It majorly focused in ACJA and the new police Act 2020.

    What level of police officers attended?

    The attendees were mostly senior officers from Commissioner of Police, Deputy Commissioners of Police,  ACPs, Heads of Police Training institutions and heads of legal and investigative units and ICT departments. Their participation gave weight to the discussions because they are decision-makers and can directly influence what happens in the field. It was encouraging to see such a calibre of officers engaging deeply with reform issues.

    READ ALSO: Meet longest-serving Olubadan who ruled for 16 years

     Do you think this conference has the power to change the face of the Nigeria Police?

    Yes, it does—provided the outcomes don’t end on paper. The ideas and resolutions were powerful and rooted in the realities of today’s policing challenges. But for change to happen, we need strong follow-through. Implementation is the missing link in many of our reform efforts. If the leadership of the Police and the government commit to executing these resolutions, the ripple effect will be transformational.

     What were the major takeaways and resolutions?

    Some of the key resolutions include  updating the police training curriculum that can be better used and understood by new recruits mandatory refresher training for officers on the ACJA and Police Act 2020, full digitalisation of police records to reduce corruption and delay, creation of community liaison offices in police stations, and regular monitoring of police stations by oversight bodies. We also agreed that public engagement must be strengthened so citizens feel safe reporting misconduct. There was a renewed call for police accountability frameworks at both internal and external levels.

    At the recent NBA Western Zone Summit in Ibadan, ACJA was in focus. What’s your perception 10  years on?

    The ACJA has been one of the most impactful justice reforms in Nigeria’s recent history. It introduced a modern, rights-based system that replaced outdated colonial practices. It promotes fair hearing, protects suspects from abuse, and ensures cases move faster through the courts. But its success has been uneven—some states are yet to domesticate it, and many officers are still unaware of its provisions. More awareness and training are needed.

     Has ACJA helped the administration of justice?

    Without a doubt. It has made trials more efficient and fair. The prohibition of arrest in lieu, the emphasis on bail rights, and provisions for non-custodial sentencing have changed the justice landscape. However, challenges remain in enforcement and monitoring, especially at police and magistrate levels. Implementation is everything.

    What’s your view on the protocols for arrest and framing of charges under ACJA?

     They are clear, lawful, and aimed at protecting rights. Under ACJA, no one should be arrested without cause, and charges must be backed by evidence. It also provides that suspects should be informed of the reason for arrest and allowed access to counsel. The problem is non-compliance—largely due to ignorance or willful disregard by some officers. Training and strict enforcement will fix this.

    Torture of suspects remains a serious concern. What can be done?

    First, let’s remember that Sections 8 and 34 of the ACJA outlaw torture and inhuman treatment. What we need is early access to lawyers for suspects, video-recorded interrogations, and swift punishment for officers who torture. If officers know there are real consequences, torture will reduce. Civil society and the media must also continue to spotlight abuse. See also the Torture Act 2017.

    What more can be done to implement ACJA fully?

    Four things: intensive training, adequate funding, full domestication in all states, and regular public reporting on compliance. The judiciary, police, and legal practitioners must all be on the same page. Civil society must also keep monitoring and holding stakeholders accountable. No law works by itself—people make it work.

     The remand system has led to suspects being forgotten in prisons. How can we change that?

     We must enforce the time limits for remand and make it mandatory for magistrates to review cases frequently. Judges should not keep people endlessly in custody without trial. Non-custodial options like bail, community service, and fines should be used more. Also, proper case tracking systems must be introduced to ensure no one falls through the cracks.

     There’s a call for states to build prisons. What’s your take?

    It’s a welcome idea, especially with the new constitutional amendment allowing states to operate correctional facilities. If properly managed, it will ease congestion in federal prisons and allow states to design reformation programmes tailored to their local realities. But we must ensure standards are maintained and rights of inmates respected.

    The NJC recently punished some judges for age falsification. What’s your reaction?

     It’s a step in the right direction, but the punishment is often too mild. Retirement with full benefits for wrongdoing doesn’t send a strong message. Judicial officers should be held to the highest standards. Where fraud is committed, criminal prosecution should follow—not just administrative discipline.

    Is it punitive enough?

    No, it isn’t. Misconduct by judicial officers must attract real consequences—just like it would for lawyers or police officers. The judiciary is the conscience of the nation. If judges go unpunished for serious offenses, the system collapses from the top.

    What do you think of perjury?

    Perjury is a grave crime. It undermines justice and can ruin lives. Anyone who lies under oath—whether a police officer, witness, lawyer, or even judge—must be held accountable. Our courts rely on truth. Without it, there’s no justice.

    If lawyers can be jailed for perjury, why not judges for falsifying age?

    Exactly. Justice should not have sacred cows. A judge who falsifies age has committed fraud—plain and simple. If we want to preserve integrity in our judicial system, then judges must also be subjected to the law, just like every other citizen. That is how we build trust in the system

    The ACJA directs magistrates and judges to visit detention centres monthly. Why is this not happening?

     Lack of enforcement, poor coordination, and in some cases, indifference. These visits are a legal duty—not a suggestion. We need to institutionalize the process, publish the findings of these visits, and sanction judicial officers who fail to comply. This single action can significantly reduce illegal detention and abuse.

    Let us come back to police  How can illegal detention be tackled effectively?

     By strictly enforcing the 48-hour detention rule, digitizing custody records, and making station registers accessible to oversight bodies. DPOs who keep suspects beyond lawful periods should be held personally accountable. We also need mobile legal aid teams that visit stations regularly to check compliance.

    Who is more to blame for police misconduct—junior or senior officers?

    While junior officers may be the ones physically committing abuses, the greater blame lies with senior officers. Leadership drives culture. When superiors look the other way or fail to discipline misconduct, they indirectly sanction it. Many infractions persist because the top hierarchy does not act decisively. Accountability must start from the top.

    How can infractions on the public be curtailed?

    By enforcing discipline from within, creating external complaint channels that work, and using technology like body cameras and digital custody records. Officers must undergo continuous training in ethics, human rights, and use of force. But more importantly, there must be consequences—firm, fair, and fast—for any officer who violates citizens’ rights. Impunity must stop.

    Your organisation, CRIVIFON, has been training the police for years. Are we seeing improvements?

    Yes, especially where we’ve had repeated engagement. Officers trained by CRIVIFON often come back to tell us how the knowledge has changed the way they interact with suspects and the public. We’ve seen improvements in understanding of legal procedures, better documentation, and more humane treatment of detainees. But Nigeria is big. We need these trainings institutionalized in the official police curriculum for real, lasting impact.thats why the last conference was crucial

    Beyond the issues discussed at the conference, what else can be done to make the police more responsive and humane?

    Police welfare must be addressed—housing, salaries, equipment, and healthcare. A poorly treated officer can become a danger to the public. We also need to decentralize the Force, promote community policing, and reward good officers visibly. Citizens too should be educated on their rights and how to engage constructively with the police. It’s a two-way street. 

    You championed restorative justice. How many states have adopted it?

    So far, over 10 states have started adopting elements of restorative justice. Lagos, Ogun, and the FCT are leading the way. Some are using it for juvenile offenders, while others are applying it in minor cases like theft and assault. It’s growing, but we need more advocacy and laws to institutionalize it across the country.

    How effective has restorative justice been?

     Very effective—especially in healing the harm done to victims and helping offenders reintegrate into society. It reduces prison congestion and saves time and resources. Offenders take responsibility, victims are heard, and communities are part of the process. It’s a win-win if done right.

    How can states use restorative justice more effectively?

    By passing enabling laws, training mediators, setting up restorative justice centers in courts and police stations, and ensuring victims are supported emotionally and financially. It should be the first option for minor, non-violent crimes—especially among first-time offenders and young people.

  • Court dismisses suit filed in name of deceased

    Court dismisses suit filed in name of deceased

    The Rivers State High Court in Port Harcourt has dismissed a land recovery suit filed by Lawrence Anucha, son of the late Dr. Dominic Anucha, a former Deputy Governor of Rivers State, citing it as an abuse of the court process.

    In suit PHC/233/CS/2025, Lawrence Anucha sued to reclaim a parcel of land originally allocated to his late father and later sold 27 years ago to Rockson Enearu, the defendant and current property owner in Port Harcourt’s GRA.

    Defendant’s counsel, Ozununye Geoffrey Nsirim, questioned the legitimacy of the filings, noting that court documents appeared to have been submitted under two similar identities—Dominic Anucha and Lawrence Dominic Anucha—raising concerns about how the suit was initiated.

    He argued that the claimant’s application to discontinue the suit was a strategic move to avoid the implications of procedural irregularities already identified in the case.

    Although the claimant sought to withdraw the case, the court held that the matter had progressed beyond the preliminary stage as issues had been joined, and affidavits—including a motion for joinder and a counter-affidavit—had been filed, with no further challenge by the claimant.

    Read Also: Women coalition urges Senate to Appeal Court ruling reinstating Natasha

    Justice Rita Oguguo ruled that at such an advanced stage, a withdrawal amounted to an effective admission of defeat and warranted dismissal rather than a mere striking out of the matter.

    “This court finds that the claimant/applicant’s application for discontinuance, though to be allowed, appears intended to avoid the consequences of the issues raised in the Defendant/Respondent’s unchallenged affidavits.

    “The joinder of issues and adduction of evidence via affidavits preclude striking out, as the matter has progressed beyond procedural stages.”

    The court agreed with the defendant that the claimant’s conduct and the resources expended in responding to the suit warranted an award of costs. The judge accordingly ordered the claimant to pay N300,000 to the defendant.

    “Accordingly, this court accepts the application of the claimant to withdraw the matter and same is hereby granted.

    “However, the court rejects the application to strike out the suit. Rather, the suit is liable to and is hereby dismissed. The claimant is to pay the defendant cost assessed at N300,000 only,” the judgment concluded.

  • Mapping future of business law in intelligent age

    Mapping future of business law in intelligent age

    As technology reshapes the global economy, the legal profession faces a defining moment. At the 19th Annual NBA-SBL International Business Law Conference, lawyers, innovators, and policymakers gathered to explore how Business Law must evolve in an intelligent age, challenging legal professionals to move beyond tradition and take the lead in shaping the future of innovation, policy, and justice, ANNE AGBI reports.

    At a time when artificial intelligence is redefining the boundaries of commerce, communication, and legal frameworks, the Nigerian Bar Association Section on Business Law (NBA-SBL) has  called on Nigeria’s legal community to rise to the occasion or risk becoming obsolete.

    With over a thousand legal professionals, business leaders, regulators, and innovators in attendance, the 19th Annual International Business Law Conference of the NBA-SBL opened in Lagos with a powerful collective message: lawyers must not merely interpret the law, they must shape the future.

    The conference, with the theme: “The Future of Business Law in an Intelligent Age,” addressed a wide range of issues at the intersection of law, technology, innovation, policy, and ethics.

    Stakeholders tackled how the legal profession should adapt in response to emerging intelligent technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), big data, blockchain, and predictive analytics.

    Setting the tone for the conversation, the 14th Emir of Kano, Khalifa Muhammad Sanusi II, who was the keynote speaker, stated that the legal profession must rise to the realities of the information age or risk irrelevance.

    Represented by Senior Counselor of the Kano Emirate Council and the Wali of Kano, Alhaji Mahe Bashir Wali, Sanusi stirred minds and challenged long-held assumptions about the legal profession’s place in a rapidly evolving world.

    “We are not approaching an era of transformation. We are in it,” Sanusi declared.

    “Artificial Intelligence (AI), machine learning, big data, and blockchain are no longer buzzwords; they have become integral parts of our personal and professional environments.

    “Let us be frank, the legal profession is facing an existential crisis.

    “The lawyer, as we have known him, the draftsman, the custodian of precedents, the gatekeeper of due process is at risk of becoming obsolete.

    “Not because the law is dying, but because the world is moving faster than your doctrines.”

    The former CBN Governor stressed that intelligence in today’s world is not just about speed or automation, but about ethical responsibility.

    READ ALSO: Meet the next Olubadan-in-waiting, ex-Gov Rashidi Adewolu Ladoja

    “It is about making informed decisions, protecting rights, and ensuring equity in a world where technology influences every decision we make.

    “The opportunities are monumental from streamlining operations to enhancing efficiency but with these come serious challenges, especially for the legal profession.”

    Sanusi outlined a series of urgent concerns for lawyers: navigating regulatory compliance in a fast-moving tech environment, protecting consumer data, and redefining intellectual property rights in a world where AI is generating content and inventions.

    According to him, it is no longer enough for lawyers to merely interpret statutes or draft contracts; they must advocate for frameworks that both promote innovation and protect rights.

    “You must embrace legal technology, use AI-driven tools to improve efficiency, and re-skill yourselves to remain relevant. Legal education must be reimagined.

    “A 21st-century Nigerian lawyer must graduate knowing both corporate law and the significance of cybersecurity and data privacy. You cannot continue training for a world that no longer exists.

    “Our regulatory frameworks must reflect this reality, or we will become permanent consumers of legal standards we did not design,” he said.

    Global push for tech revolution

    Representing the Law Society of England and Wales, Ms. Stephanie Brown outlined how professional bodies across the globe are responding to emerging technologies and shaping AI and tech regulation.

    She emphasised the role of professional bodies in bridging the knowledge gap within the legal profession and ensuring lawyers are prepared for the evolving tech landscape.

    “The first thing professional bodies must do is consult with their members, understand what they know about tech, and what support they need,” she said.

    She cited the UK’s collaboration with LawTech UK, an initiative backed by the Ministry of Justice since 2019, which brings together lawyers, technologists, and government leaders to foster innovation in legal services.

    The Law Society has also actively engaged the UK government’s 10-year growth strategy, pushing for more support for legal technology.

    A standout example, Brown noted, was the approval of Garfield.law, the first AI-only law firm licensed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) in England and Wales.

    Focused on low-risk debt recovery services for SMEs, the firm uses an AI-driven email platform to help users navigate small claims court procedures.

    The SRA ensured strict regulatory scrutiny before approval, requiring processes to monitor AI output, enforce confidentiality, manage conflicts of interest, and prevent “AI hallucinations.”

    The firm has restricted the AI from offering legal advice or referencing case law, and one of its lawyer-founders will manually review all AI outputs for the first year.

    Brown said while innovation is necessary, professional bodies and regulators must ensure safeguards are in place.

    “The goal is to create innovation while improving access to justice and ensuring public trust.”

    Regulation should guide, not hinder innovation

    Contrary to the belief that regulation stifles growth, the Director of Legal at IHS Towers, Mrs. Yemisi Diya-Salawu maintained that it can help businesses prepare and protect themselves.

    She said: “Regulation is not a clog, it helps you stay guarded, know where to push the law and prepare ahead.”

    She stated that legal practitioners must move beyond playing catch-up and begin proactively shaping legal frameworks around emerging technologies.

    Speaking on the legal challenges facing the telecoms and infrastructure sector, Diya-Salawu highlighted the absence of comprehensive legislation in Nigeria to govern critical areas like data protection, fintech, artificial intelligence, and future technologies.

    Diya-Salawu noted that Nigeria is still relying heavily on codes, guidelines, and international frameworks in the absence of clear legislative backing on emerging issues.

    She emphasised the critical role of lawyers in staying informed and ahead of the curve.

    “The question is: are we lawyers familiar with those laws that speak to fintech, AI, crypto, or anything innovation-related? Understanding those laws is critical.”

    To navigate these legal grey areas, Diya-Salawu explained how she integrates future-proofing measures into contracts.

    According to her, in anticipation of future developments such as Nigeria’s gradual shift toward 5G, her legal team includes clauses on data protection and tech trends in all contracts.

    “We re-fence our price, FX exposure, and obligations to accommodate future technologies,” she explained.

    She also made a strong case for the establishment of specialised courts to handle fintech and digital infrastructure matters.

    She urged legal professionals and policymakers to demand courts and judicial frameworks that understand and can adjudicate on innovation-related matters efficiently.

    “We must test the law, prepare it, and draft with clarity even when there’s no precedent.”

    Designing with the end in mind

    According to the Growth Advancement Partner, Lagos Business School, Pan Atlantic University, Nkem Nweke, one major gap in the innovation cycle is the failure to think through execution and sustainability.

    He called for intentional design thinking, one that brings all stakeholders to the table from the start.

    “Too many times, people get too excited about building, but we must pause and ask, what happens if it works? How will it scale? What components must align to ensure success?

    “That’s why we’re pushing to bring these four groups, academia, entrepreneurs, industry, and regulators into the same room to define the design, execution, and evolution of solutions that truly work in the African context.”

    Nweke also spoke on the importance of regulatory sandboxes, and safe environments for testing innovations under monitored conditions.

    “More entrepreneurs need to understand that regulators aren’t the police. They’re collaborators. They’re helping you spot what could go wrong before it actually does.

    “It’s not about shutting down ideas; it’s about creating safer, smarter innovation.”

    ‘Shape policy, don’t just react to it’

    Managing Founder of DigitA and former government adviser, Oswald Guobadia, delivered a pointed message to legal professionals.

    He said that lawyers must not sit on the sidelines while innovation unfolds, they must lead the process of shaping policy and regulation in Nigeria’s evolving digital landscape.

    “A lot of people say lawyers are just supposed to interpret the law, but I disagree. You should be at the forefront of setting the policies that define our digital environment,” Guobadia said.

    “When regulators like the CBN and SEC issue conflicting directives, it creates confusion.

    “That confusion results from poor coordination, and it ultimately reduces the value of what we’re trying to build.”

    He challenged the legal community to stop reacting and start designing frameworks for the future, using their unique knowledge of markets, rights, and comparative research.

    “You lawyers need to take a more aggressive position in how policy is shaped,” he advised.

    “You are not just spectators in this process. You’re living in it, you advise governments, you understand markets, and you have access to what’s happening in other countries. You know where the world is headed, and that’s why your role is so critical.”

    Guobadia warned that if policy creation is left solely to the government, it risks becoming ineffective or narrow in scope.

    “Entrepreneurs and legal minds must be part of the process to ensure policies are smart, enabling, and relevant,” he said.

    Guobadia urged lawyers, regulators, and business leaders to adopt a more intentional and collaborative approach to innovation.

    He stressed that safeguarding Africa’s digital future requires active participation from all stakeholders, especially lawyers.

    ‘We must become shapers of the future’

    Chair of the NBA-SBL, Mrs Ozofu ‘Latunde Ogiemudia, said the legal profession must be bold, adaptive, and responsive in the face of global transformation driven by artificial intelligence, data ecosystems, and predictive technologies.

    She noted that this year’s theme “The Future of Business Law in an Intelligent Age” could not be timelier, pointing out that emerging technologies are no longer futuristic concepts, but real, immediate forces reshaping the way business is conducted and value is created.

    “This moment demands that we, as a legal community, become not just participants, but shapers of the future, we cannot afford to remain observers on the sidelines of technological change.

    “We must be the architects of legal frameworks that are responsive, adaptive, and bold enough to embrace the unknown without sacrificing our principles.”

    Ogiemudia highlighted the role of lawyers as not only legal experts but also as business enablers and strategic thinkers who must understand the commercial, technological, and social dynamics of the environments in which they operate.

    ‘We must anticipate the future’

    Chairperson of the 2025 Conference Planning Committee and Partner at DLA Piper Africa, Solape Peters, delivered a high-energy call to action that framed the evolving role of the legal profession in the face of technological acceleration.

    Peters called on legal professionals to embrace new roles as business enablers and innovation leaders in a rapidly evolving commercial landscape. She noted that businesses were moving at unprecedented speed, demanding greater insight, agility, and creativity.

    “We must not just interpret the law,” she said.

    “We must anticipate the future. We must stand, advise, challenge, and we must lead.”

    She emphasised that being legally sound was no longer sufficient, stressing that modern business lawyers must also be commercially aware, technologically savvy, and deeply attuned to market dynamics.

    “Whether you’re advising a startup, a multinational, or a government agency, the expectation is the same: be a lawyer who understands the business and the sector not just the law,” she added.

  • Afe Babalola a national treasure, says Olawuyi

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and global vice chair of the International Law Association, Prof. Damilola Sunday Olawuyi, has commended the founder and Chancellor of Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti (ABUAD), Aare Afe Babalola (SAN) and the entire academic and non-academic staff of the institution on its recent global recognition. In the latest Times Higher Education Impact Rankings (2025).

     ABUAD achieved a historic milestone by emerging as the 84th best university in the world, third in Africa and maintaining its position as 1st in Nigeria for the fourth consecutive year—2022 through 2025.

    Olawuyi, a frontline professor of international law, who is also deputy vice chancellor (research, innovation and strategic partnerships) at ABUAD made these remarks while speaking in Morocco at the sidelines of the Arab-Africa Forum on Business and Human Rights, held in Marakech.

    While discussing the role of higher education in promoting innovation and sustainable development in Africa, Olawuyi noted that universities have strong roles to play in promoting an innovative economy that advances regional trade and investment in a manner that respects human rights.

     According to him, Africa needs globally-minded universities that unlock entreprenuerial innovation through courses, research, executive education and enterprise development that provide practical solutions to the challenges facing the continent.

    Read Also: Afe Babalola: how to boost trade in Africa

     Noting that unfortunately only few universities in the continent are so minded, Olawuyi commended Aare Afe Babalola as a bold reformist, an icon and continental treasure that has shown us what is possible.

     According to him, “Nigeria’s Afe Babalola has shown us what is possible in this regard.

    Having on his own decided to leave his lucrative law practice, Babalola went back to his hometown in Ado Ekiti to invest his time and energy on developing a modern, word class university that can compete globally.

    Today, his university is ranked as the 84th best university in the world. We need at least one Afe Babalola in each of the 54 countries in Africa.

    “Having 54 Afe Babalolas in the continent will change the world. The reality however is that there is only one Afe Babalola and he is proudly in Nigeria.

    “He is indeed a national treasure that deserves every commendation and honour,”he said.

    While reiterating the need for the African governments, investors and the global community to collaborate with and support forward-thinking institutions like ABUAD, Olawuyi noted that with more support, ABUAD will indeed take education to higher and unimaginable heights, and will in no time produce noble lauraetes that will unlock technlogical and economic prosperity for our nation and continent.

    He also called for cross learning amongst African universities, calling on universities in Morocco and across the continent to learn from ABUAD’s success story.  

  • Tiv communities beseech NSA, NBA over attacks

    Tiv communities beseech NSA, NBA over attacks

    Indigenous Tiv communities in Nasarawa State have demanded a probe of killings, violent displacements and illegal occupation of their ancestral lands.

    In a statement by Terkaa Jerry Aondo (SAN), the communities demanded urgent intervention from the state and federal authorities.

    They also called on the state government to obey the court order by halting all ongoing activities on a disputed land.

    They urged the Federal Government to deploy adequate security forces to the affected areas to safeguard lives and property.

    The Tiv people demanded a full-scale investigation into the spate of violence, to hold perpetrators accountable and ensure justice for the victims.

    They appealed to the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and other relevant institutions to take up the matter of judicial disregard, describing it as a dangerous precedent that undermines the rule of law.

    The communities insisted on the arrest and prosecution of individuals inciting ethnic hatred and disunity among Nasarawa’s diverse population.

    They appealed to President Bola Tinubu, the National Security Adviser, the Department of State Services (DSS), the National Human Rights Commission, and international bodies to urgently intervene in what they described as a growing humanitarian crisis.

    Describing the situation as “a humanitarian and legal emergency,” Aondo warned that continued silence could escalate the conflict, deepen ethnic tensions, and spark another round of bloodshed.

    “Our people are currently displaced, traumatised, and living in fear.

    Read Also: NBA condemns kidnap of judge in Bayelsa

    “The government must not ignore this. Peace must be restored, and justice must be served,” he said.

    The statement said dozens of Tiv villages across Doma, Obi, Awe, Keana, and parts of Lafia Local Government Areas—including Akaha, Utsuwa, Usula, Udugh, Chabo, Wachi, Ayarkeke, and several others—have come under relentless attacks.

    The communities claim that killings and intimidation have escalated in recent weeks, with villagers forced to flee their homes and take refuge in Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) camps in Agyaragu Town and Abaagu Village, Obi LGA.

    The Tiv group pointed to a preservative court order in SUIT NO. NSD/LF/44/2025 restraining the state government from encroaching on Tiv lands.

    They believe full compliance with the order was key to peace.

    The communities warn that current efforts to label the Tiv as “settlers” in Nasarawa are not only false but dangerous, fueling ethnic division and inciting violence reminiscent of the 2000–2001 ethnic attacks in the state.

    The Tiv leadership alleged that as recently as July 2, 2025, a Tiv man, Mr. Kyobo Ndar, was murdered and dismembered by criminals at Keberi-Biu in Rukubi Ward of Doma LGA, along the Ajimaka Road.

    They lamented that despite notifying military authorities in the area, no arrest had been made.

    “We have alerted the GOC of the Army Battalion in Doma, yet there has been no single arrest. The killers continue to walk free,” the communities said.

  • Lagos AG seeks speedy resolution of revenue cases

    Lagos AG seeks speedy resolution of revenue cases

    Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Lawal Pedro (SAN), has emphasised the need for reforms in the resolution of revenue cases in courts.

    Pedro stated this in his keynote address delivered at the Lagos State Ministry of Justice Revenue Recovery Summit in Ikeja.

    He stated that the administration of  Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu placed “the highest priority on strengthening the revenue framework of Lagos State.”

    Pedro stressed Lagos’ position as Nigeria’s economic hub but noted challenges in sustaining development.

    “The answer—unsurprisingly—is revenue,” he said, adding that all sectors, including “schools, hospitals, roads, security and justice systems, welfare of judicial officers, sanitation, and transportation,” depend on revenue.

    He lamented the effects of revenue delays, saying, “When that revenue is delayed, denied, or trapped in legal bottlenecks, the cost is borne by the ordinary people.”

    Highlighting the summit’s theme, “Speedy Dispensation of Revenue Cases in Court,” Pedro stated that Lagos had made progress through the establishment of a Commercial Courts Complex in Tapa, serving as Revenue Courts pending the construction of a dedicated Revenue Court.

    He also cited the special procedure for revenue matters in the Lagos State High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019 and the creation of a Revenue Recovery Unit within the Ministry of Justice.

    “We have the tools. What we need is the will to use them effectively,” he said, referring to enforcement powers under the Personal Income Tax Act and the new Tax Administration Act 2025.

    Pedro called for stronger collaboration with the judiciary, saying, “Government policy is very clear: all revenue matters must be heard expeditiously.

    “This summit is about bringing our judges and other stakeholders into the heart of state government revenue policy and implementation as strategic partners,” he added.

    Pedro called for practical dialogue to improve efficiency and case management.

    “Together, let us build a system that is fast, fair, firm—and future-ready,” he stated.

    Justice Hakeem Oshodi who represented the Chief Judge of Lagos State, Justice Kazeem Alogba called for  effective use of special revenue courts in handling tax-related offenses, emphasising that the judiciary is ready and equipped to tackle defaulting taxpayers if empowered and supported to do so.

    Justice Oshodi said this would  strengthen tax enforcement mechanisms and improved inter-agency collaboration on revenue matters.

    Although Nigeria has designated special courts for revenue cases, Justice Oshodi expressed concern that these courts have not yet been put to meaningful use.

    “I currently sit as a judge in a revenue criminal court, and I must confess I have not conducted any trials. Yet, I’m fully ready to work,” he stated. “What we see is that once defaulting taxpayers are found, they rush to settle because they don’t want to go to jail.”

    The judge highlighted the judiciary’s willingness to act decisively in revenue-related cases, noting that judges can only work with the tools and support provided to them.

     “It is the food you give us that we can eat,” he said.

    Justice Oshodi  urged the executive arm to empower the judiciary with the necessary legal and infrastructural tools to function effectively.

    Justice Oshodi drew comparisons between Nigeria’s federal tax system and South Africa’s unitary model, noting how structural differences affect enforcement.

    In a South African case study referenced during his address, authorities requested personal jet ownership data from all airports and successfully uncovered high-level tax evasion. In one case, a man with two private jets was caught and his aircraft confiscated after he was unable to justify his tax records.

    “In South Africa, the tax evader is considered guilty unless proven otherwise,” Oshodi noted, contrasting this with Nigeria’s criminal law approach where the burden of proof is on the prosecution.

    Despite these challenges, he emphasised that the judiciary in Nigeria remains committed to accountability and justice in taxation.

    Justice Oshodi called for sustained cooperation and emphasised that the summit should mark the beginning of consistent and swift handling of revenue matters. “We are ready to work. Please, let us work,” he said in his closing remarks.

    Solicitor-General and Permanent Secretary Ministry of Justice Lagos State, Hameed Oyenuga described thesummit as another testament to government’s commitment to deepen the synergy between law, policy, and fiscal governance — particularly as it relates to compliance, enforcement, and recovery processes within the rule of law.

    ‘This Summit is a critical platform for collective reflection and strategic engagement on one of the most vital pillars of governance — efficient and lawful revenue generation and recovery.

    “As we all know, revenue is the lifeblood of any government’s ability to deliver on its mandate to the people. Without a robust and sustainable revenue framework, no state can hope to meet the expectations of its citizens in terms of infrastructure, public services, and development”, he stated.

    The Executive Chairman of the Lagos State Internal Revenue Service (LIRS), Ayodele Subar,  emphasized the urgent need for the swift resolution of tax and revenue-related cases in the state’s judicial system.

    He reaffirmed the commitment of the LIRS to working collaboratively with the judiciary, legal practitioners, and relevant agencies to streamline the adjudication process for tax disputes.

    Read Also: Leadway Assurance posts N173.2b revenue

    According to him, timely justice in tax matters not only strengthens revenue collection but also builds public trust in the system.

    He noted that Lagos remains the economic powerhouse of Nigeria, contributing significantly to the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and leading the federation in Internally Generated Revenue (IGR). However, this position comes with its own set of complexities and administrative burdens, especially regarding tax enforcement and legal resolution.

    “As we all know, Lagos remains the economic engine of Nigeria. But with this leadership comes complex challenges. Foremost among them is the urgent need to ensure that tax and revenue cases are treated with the seriousness, speed, and clarity they deserve,” Subar stressed.

    Expressing his strong support for the initiative, Subar extended warm regards to the organisers and commended the Ministry of Justice for convening key players across legal, legislative, and fiscal communities. The meeting, he said, was timely and essential in confronting the slow pace at which revenue cases are being adjudicated in Lagos State courts.

  • Investors allege $250m land grab, seek presidential action

    Investors allege $250m land grab, seek presidential action

    A group of foreign investors have raised the alarm over an  alleged attempt to unlawfully seize land legally allocated by the Lagos State Government.

    In a stetement by Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Mohammed Ndarani, they alleged that the Minister, under the guise of a federal road construction project, has deviated from approved plans to encroach on private property, a move they described as “reckless,” “illegal,” and “dangerous for Nigeria’s investment reputation.”

    Ndarani said the disputed property was obtained through proper channels and involved a consortium of local and international investors. He revealed that the investors had committed over $250 million into the development, with all urban planning permits, title documents, and state government approvals duly acquired and perfected.

    “This is not an ordinary case of bureaucratic disagreement. It is a clear case of abuse of office and unlawful expropriation. A federal road project route  was diverted by approximately seven kilometres away from the originally gazetted path just to forcefully claim this land. This action has no basis in law, no gazette to support it, and no jurisdiction under the Constitution,” Ndarani said.

    According to him, the property’s seizure not only undermines state authority over land matters but also constitutes a breach of Sections 1 of the Land Use Act and 44(1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which protect citizens and investors against unlawful acquisition of private property.

    The  SAN emphasised that, “No federal agency, including the Ministry of Works, can override land rights properly granted by a state government without following due legal process.”

    According to him, the reported use of armed military personnel to enforce the alleged takeover is alarming. Ndarani recounted how on May 4, 2025, armed men in military uniform stormed the project site, destroyed parts of the development, and abducted a site worker, Olamide Obanla, who has since remained missing.

    Read Also: Land grabbing: Olubadan suspends two Mogajis, warns others

    “They came in broad daylight, fully armed, with no court order, no notice of acquisition, and no explanation. Mr. Obanla was assaulted, dragged into a vehicle, and taken away. To date, we have no information on his whereabouts. This is not only an abuse of power, it is a grave violation of human rights and an attack on Nigeria’s already fragile image as a safe destination for business,” Ndarani declared.

    The chambers has made six demands, urging President Bola Tinubu to immediately intervene. These include a public statement reaffirming respect for rule of law, a legal clarification by the Attorney-General of the Federation on the limits of federal power over land, and an investigation by the National Assembly into the “unauthorised deployment of military force against civilians.”

    They also called on the Chief of Army Staff to investigate the use of military uniforms for a non-military land dispute, and most urgently, the immediate release of Mr. Obanla.

    “This situation is not just about land. It touches the very foundation of our democracy, the rule of law, and the integrity of government institutions. If investors with valid documents and approvals can be treated like this, then no one is safe,” Ndarani warned.  

  • NBA Ijebu Ode visits Custodial Centre, Police Command, others today

    NBA Ijebu Ode visits Custodial Centre, Police Command, others today

    The  Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Ijebu Ode Branch, has mapped out activities to celebrate the 2025 Law Week.

    Chairman of the branch, Prof Fassy Yusuf, announced the programmes.

    The Law Week which started on July 4 will end on July 11, 2025, with the theme: Law and  Governance: The Nexus.

    Prof. Yusuf said  members of the bar will today visit the Ijebu Ode Custodial Centre, The Nigeria Police Area Commands at Ijebu Ode and Ogbere, The Nigerian Army at Ilese, Federal Road Safety Corps, Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps, and TRACE.

    Pointing out that health is wealth, he said members of the bar shall be having Sports Day including Football, Lawn Tennis, Table Tennis, and  jogging. at the Dipo Dina Stadium, GRA, Ijebu Ode.

    He said the novel Chairman’s Cup will be at stake as the NBA Ijebu Ode  football squad will be locking horns with the Nigeria Police Machine team, Ijebu Ode.

    He promised that the competition would be titan battle between the Law and Enforcement.

    Chief Yusuf said the 27th Bar Lecture titled: “Law and Governance – The Nexus and   Panel Discussion will hold on Thursday, July 10 at the Bar Centre.

    “This programme is our signature activity. We expect the best of our legal community and jurists along with public functionaries to attend en masse.”

    The NBA Ijebu Ode Chairman said that 2025 Annual Bar Dinner and Awards will  hold at the Bar Centre starting from 4.00p.m.

    “We intend to reward those who have been instrumental to our journey and modest achievements.”

    Last Friday, members of the bar took part in the Jum’at service  which held at Ijebu Ode Central Mosque.

    On Saturday, they held a Fitness Exercise at the Dipo Dina Stadium, GRA, Ijebu Ode while a Bonding/Hangout/Cocktail  held at the Bar Centre later in the evening.

    The following day, Sunday,  July 6, they joined the Church Service at the Cathedral Church of Our Saviour, Italowajoda, Ijebu Ode while on the following day,

    Monday, July 7,  they took part in the Tree planting exercise at the Bar Centre while a Legal Clinic and awareness campaign held simultaneously in the six  Local Government Headquarters made up of Ijebu Ode, Odogbolu, Ijebu North, Ijebu North East, Ijebu East and Ogun Waterside.

    Read Also: Centre, NBA-SBL sign MoU to drive legislative, economic reforms in Nigeria

    Chief Yusuf  listed  dignitaries expected at the Law Week to include  the Ogun State Deputy Governor, the Ogun State Chief Judge, the Ogun State Attorney-General and Honourable Commissioner for Justice. The President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Mazi Afam Osigwe who will be leading a high-powered team from the NBA national secretariat to the venue.

    Others include a former Federal High Court judge and former Bar activist,  Justice Taiwo Taiwo rtd. who will be giving the Dinner Speech.

    The NBA Ijebu Ode Branch Chairman sought the cooperation and assistance of the media in the coverage of the programme of activities for the Law Week.

    “As you know, members of the legal profession are ministers in the Temple of Justice. Justice, equity and fairness which sustain the society including our democracy.

    “We subscribe to the Rule of Law as the corner stone of our democratic society. Therefore, we champion the rule of law, and where there is any infraction, the profession can be expected to unleash its fangs”, he stressed.

  • Mayowa Sunday Gbenro: Nigerian Attorney building a Colorado practice in oil & gas and eminent domain

    Mayowa Sunday Gbenro: Nigerian Attorney building a Colorado practice in oil & gas and eminent domain

    In the complex world of energy, land rights, and environmental regulation, Nigerian attorney Mayowa Gbenro is building a practice in Colorado at the intersection of oil and gas, land use, and property-rights disputes. With dual admission to the bars in Colorado and Nigeria, an LL.M. in International Business Transactions, and an ongoing LL.M. in Global Natural Resources, Energy, and Environmental Law, he works as an associate attorney at a Denver-based firm specializing in oil & gas and eminent domain cases.

    Gbenro’s practice is litigation-focused. He advises and represents landowners, mineral owners, and other non-industry clients in cases where regulatory and courtroom decisions can impact land use, operational impacts, and long-term planning. His practice primarily involves complex litigation, including proceedings before the Colorado Energy & Carbon Management Commission (ECMC) (formerly the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission) and in Colorado courts, where cases often turn on statutory interpretation, administrative procedure, and the development of a strong evidentiary record.

    Beyond oil-and-gas litigation, Gbenro also handles eminent domain and condemnation cases, where private property rights intersect with infrastructure needs and government authority. These disputes often demand careful attention to statutory compliance, procedures, and the factual record, especially when the case depends on what the condemning authority can legally do and what the evidence shows.

    Gbenro’s professional profile also includes judging and evaluation roles in legal education programs. He has volunteered as a scoring panelist for the Colorado Bar Association’s High School Mock Trial Program, including at the Denver Regional High School Mock Trial Tournament, where volunteers score student advocacy during trial rounds. The program is a statewide initiative and attracts participation from more than 100 teams and about 1,500 students, with volunteers helping evaluate student performance in simulated trial proceedings.

    Having first trained and litigated in Nigeria, Gbenro brings a comparative perspective on how resource disputes develop when law, investment, and community interests conflict. This international outlook informs his work in a field where local conflicts can have wider effects on governance, legitimacy, and long-term land use.

    Reflecting on his role, Gbenro noted that the law of land and resources is never static but constantly evolving with economic and social demands. “Every matter I handle represents more than just a legal issue; it affects livelihoods, infrastructure, and the way communities interact with their environment,” he said.

    From his office in Denver, Colorado, Gbenro continues to build a litigation-focused track record in natural resources and property-rights disputes. With over ten years of experience and advanced legal training across two jurisdictions, he remains focused on contested matters at the core of Colorado’s natural resources and property-rights landscape.