Category: Law

  • Reparation about shaping future of humanity – Fagbemi

    Reparation about shaping future of humanity – Fagbemi

    Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, has said that the issue of reparations is about shaping the future of human beings.

    He made the remark in his speech at the 7th Regional Consultation of the Network of National Human Rights Institutions in West Africa held in Abuja.

    The event was organised by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), in collaboration with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).

    Other partners are ECOWAS Commission, United Nations for West Africa and the Sahel (UNOWAS).

    The consultation is held under the theme “Justice for Africans and People of African Descent through Reparations: The Role of National Human Rights Institutions.”

    Fagbemi noted that the gathering offered an opportunity for reflection and forward-thinking engagement on a topic that resonates deeply with our shared history.

    READ ALSO: Of Aregbesola’s hypocritical musings and Tinubuphobia

    “The issue of reparation is not merely about confronting our past; it is about shaping our future.

    “It challenges us to confront long-standing injustices and persistent inequalities that continue to affect millions of Africans and people of African descent across the world.

    “These are not abstract ideas; they are live realities that call for sincere, coordinated and practical responses.

    “In May 2025, Nigeria hosted a seminar themed “Reparations and Transnational Justice: Perspectives and Approaches from Africa and Europe.

    “The seminar brought together legal experts, policymakers, scholars and civil society actors from across both continents to engage in meaningful dialogue on shared historical experiences and evolving strategies for justice and accountability” he said.

    He noted that the discourse not only deepened understanding of the complexities surrounding reparations and transitional justice.

    Fagbemi added that it also generated renewed interest in the role of African states in shaping global conversations on redress, equity and historical accountability.

    The outcomes of that engagement, according to him, continue to resonate, reinforcing Nigeria’s commitment to advancing justice rooted in truth, dignity and reconciliation.

    “ In 2023 also, the African Union convened the Accra Reparations Conference, where significant steps were taken to strengthen the continent’s reparations agenda.

    “The Accra gathering helped place reparations firmly on the continental agenda.

    “Recently, at the 37th Ordinary Assembly of the African Union, member states, including Nigeria, supported the designation of 2025 as the “Year of Justice for Africans and People of African descent through Reparations.”

    He said when institutions become increasingly critical and NHRIs uniquely placed as credible and independent bodies to lead advocacy efforts, they influence public policy and help build inclusive frameworks for reparative justice.

    Their proximity to communities, according to him, mandate them to safeguard rights of the people and make them vital actors.

    “Through strategic engagement with governments, institutions and civil society, including diaspora organisations. NHRIs can help create pathways that are people-centred, legally sound, and anchored in truth and reconciliation.

    “Nigeria remains firmly committed to this course. Our NHRC continues to play an active role in promoting accountability and human dignity.

    “In recent years, we have strengthened our engagement with diaspora communities and worked to combat contemporary forms of exploitation through relevant institutions.

    “These actions reflect our broader understanding that reparative justice must address both historical wrongs and present-day challenges,’’ Fagbemi said.

  • Ubani to NBA: don’t be silent about lawyers’ plight

    Ubani to NBA: don’t be silent about lawyers’ plight

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Dr. Monday Ubani, has urged the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) leadership to urgently rise to the defence of its members and reposition the legal profession for dignity, relevance, and sustainability.

    In a statement titled “Reinventing the Nigerian Bar Association: Urgent Imperatives for Reformative and Caring Leadership,” Ubani decried what he described as the NBA’s glaring silence on critical issues affecting the welfare and career progression of Nigerian lawyers. 

    He warned that unless the association wakes up to its responsibilities, the future of legal practice in Nigeria could face irreversible decline.

    According to Ubani, a growing number of legal practitioners, especially those in public service and private litigation, have become disillusioned with the NBA’s failure to proactively engage with the daily challenges confronting them. 

    He noted that while other professional bodies such as those for doctors and engineers have successfully lobbied for improved entry levels and benefits, lawyers in the public sector continue to stagnate without NBA support.

    Worse still, Ubani said, is the discriminatory rule that excludes public sector lawyers from contesting for certain NBA offices — a restriction he believes violates the provisions of the Trade Union Act, which protects members of professional associations from such political marginalisation.

    Beyond internal politics, he lamented the NBA’s failure to intervene in the widespread injustices and inefficiencies lawyers face in Nigeria’s judiciary. 

    Read Also: NBA condemns kidnap of judge in Bayelsa

    He listed arbitrary and exorbitant court filing fees, extortion at court registries, undue disciplinary actions by court staff, and the near-impossibility of post-judgment enforcement as examples of systemic dysfunctions that the NBA has failed to challenge.

    “The Bar’s silence in the face of these indignities is not only disappointing but deeply troubling. 

    “A legal profession that cannot defend its own is doomed to irrelevance,” Ubani stated. 

    He also criticised the procedural decline in the National Industrial Court, where delays in filing, service, and assignment of cases have become rampant — a trend now mirrored in many State and Federal High Courts. 

    According to him, this judicial inefficiency is pushing many litigation lawyers into what he termed “professional poverty.”

    Ubani expressed further disappointment over the NBA’s failure to push for the inclusion of the Nigerian Law School in the Tertiary Education Trust Fund, TETFund, noting that while institutions like the Nigerian Defence Academy benefit from the fund, law school campuses remain underfunded and burdened with rising tuition.

    More concerning, he noted, is the harassment and intimidation of lawyers by security agencies while carrying out their legitimate duties. 

    “It is shocking that lawyers are still barred from entering certain security establishments with their phones — a barbaric and unconstitutional policy that the NBA should have long challenged in court,” he said.

    Ubani also raised the alarm over the long delays in appeals at the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, where cases often remain unheard for six to ten years. 

    He described the impact on justice delivery, investor confidence, and the livelihoods of lawyers as devastating.

    “What becomes of litigants who die or lose everything before their appeals are heard?” he asked.

    Despite this grim picture, Ubani acknowledged a few bright spots. 

    He commended the NBA’s recent push for a harmonised and realistic scale of fees in property transactions and conveyancing, describing it as a welcome move that could improve the financial standing of lawyers if properly enforced across jurisdictions.

    He also praised the current NBA President, Mazi Afam Osigwe (SAN), for his energetic and responsive leadership since assuming office. 

    According to Ubani, Osigwe has shown a clear understanding of the profession’s pulse and has already achieved notable milestones in just one year.

    “This critique is not to undermine the good already done,” Ubani clarified. 

    “Rather, it is an appeal to Mazi Osigwe to use the remainder of his tenure to confront these urgent issues head-on.”

    He called for a complete reorientation of the NBA’s leadership philosophy — one that prioritises inclusion, assertiveness, and unwavering advocacy on behalf of lawyers across the country.

    “We need a Bar that does more than organise annual conferences and elections. 

    “We need a Bar that will stand with its members in the trenches of everyday practice, challenge injustice wherever it exists, and defend the legal profession with courage and clarity. 

    “The time to act is now. The survival of the Nigerian legal profession depends on the NBA’s willingness to reform, to lead, and to protect its own,” he concluded.

    Ubani was a former Ikeja Branch Chairman and later Second Vice President of the NBA.

    He also chaired the the NBA Section on Public Interest and Development Law (NBA-SPIDEL).

  • How N3.4b romance fraud syndicate operated, by EFCC witness

    How N3.4b romance fraud syndicate operated, by EFCC witness

    A Bureau De Change (BDC) operator, Al-Hassan Garba, has told the Federal High Court in Lagos how he converted cryptocurrency (USDT) into naira and paid the equivalent amounts into the bank account of Genting International Ltd.

    He testified in the ongoing trial involving former government official, Friday Audu, and three others over an alleged N3.4 billion cyber and romance fraud scheme.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) arraigned Friday Audu, Huang Haoyu, An Hongxu, and Genting International Ltd on a 12-count charge bordering on cybercrime, money laundering, and illegal foreign exchange transactions.

    The defendants were allegedly part of a cyber-syndicate involving one Dualiang Pan (now at large), operating a network of over 792 members.

    The syndicate reportedly lured victims under false identities through online romance scams and other forms of cyber fraud.

    READ ALSO: Nigeria oil rigs increase to 44, says NUPRC

    The EFCC alleged that the defendants used Nigerian youths to impersonate foreign nationals and helped retain over $2.5 million in crypto wallets controlled by Chukwuemeka Okeke, Alhassan Garba, and Ifesinachi Jacobs—funds believed to be proceeds of fraud.

    The anti-graft agency said the defendants retained N3.4 billion in Genting International Ltd’s Union Bank account and transferred N106 million and N913 million to accounts belonging to Dualiang Pan at UBA.

    The EFCC also accused them of conducting illegal foreign exchange transactions totaling over N2 billion without routing them through the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), in violation of the Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act.

    The defendants pleaded not guilty.

    Testifying before Justice Daniel Osiagor, Garba, who was led in evidence by EFCC counsel Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), alongside Bilkisu Buhari-Bala and Hanatu Kofanaisa, explained the role he played in the alleged illicit financial activities of the defendants.

    Garba told the court that he had been a licensed BDC operator for over a decade, trading under the name Hugo.

    He confirmed knowing two of the defendants Mr. Ken, the first defendant, and Friday Audu, the second defendant, and stated that he also had business dealings with the fourth defendant, Genting International Ltd.

    According to him, Ken approached him in 2023 to convert cryptocurrency (specifically USDT) into naira, after which he was given the account details of Genting International Ltd to receive the naira equivalent.

    “USDT is a digital currency; it’s not physical. When they have USDT, I provide a wallet address for them to transfer it to, and I then credit the equivalent naira value into the account provided, always that of Genting International Ltd,” Garba testified.

    He further explained that the wallet is essentially a set of numbers associated with a digital account used for cryptocurrency transactions.

    He said these transactions, which became frequent from September 2024, often involved amounts ranging from N5 million to N10 million per day.

    When asked about his interaction with the EFCC, Garba confirmed that he was contacted during the course of the investigation.

    He also said that Friday Audu later reached out to him to ask if the EFCC had spoken with him.

    “He asked me what day they contacted me, and I told him Monday. He said he would extend his own response, but I told him I didn’t need any extension,” Garba recounted.

    The witness identified several large payments he made to Genting International Ltd, including N13 million on August 26, 2024, and N15.9 million on August 27, 2024.

    He also acknowledged that other transactions were carried out by his associates, including one Ifesinachi, who had access to the relevant wallets.

    He confirmed a N116 million transaction on September 1, 2024, and another on September 3, 2024, made by his brother, Sani.

    All payments were allegedly linked to the conversion of cryptocurrency for the defendants.

    When shown his previous statements to the EFCC dated January 6, 19, 20, 29; February 11; March 14; and April 4, Garba confirmed authorship.

    The court admitted the statements in evidence as Exhibits B1 to B8 without objection.

    Justice Osiagor adjourned till July 4, 2024.

  • AMCON ex-director exposes flaws in Arik loan deal

    AMCON ex-director exposes flaws in Arik loan deal

    The Lagos State High Court yesterday heard that the controversial multi-billion-naira debt attributed to Arik Air was not a traditional loan as previously claimed.

    The fresh revelation was made in Federal Republic of Nigeria vs Kamilu Alaba Omokide & others: Charge No. ID/24942C/2024.

    A former Executive Director at AMCON, Mr. Abbas Mohammed Jega, told the court during cross-examination that the controversial multi-billion-naira debt attributed to Arik Air was a guarantee facility misrepresented by Union Bank during AMCON’s debt acquisition in 2010.

    Jega, who served as AMCON’s Executive Director in charge of Credit, said the truth came to light during a February 2011 meeting in London with HSBC and Export Credit Agencies (ECAs), where Union Bank disclosed that the facility was a guarantee—contrary to what AMCON had believed at the point of purchase.

    Read Also: E-visa system processes over 14,000 applications in six weeks, says minister

    According to him, Union Bank eventually refunded AMCON the purchase price for the Arik facility.

    He said it was an unusual move that would not have happened if the loans were genuinely non-performing.

    Despite this, the guarantees later crystallised into bad debts, pushing AMCON to restructure the liabilities and seek support from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the Bank of Industry (BOI).

    By July 2011, AMCON was still holding both the Union Bank refunds and funds earmarked to settle future repayments. “We were holding the cash,” Jega said.

    The case involves Kamilu Alaba Omokide, Ahmed Lawal Kuru, Captain Roy Ilegbodu, and two others.

    Jega clarified that neither the first nor the third defendants played any role in the original transaction, as they were not yet part of AMCON at the time.

    AMCON bought Arik’s debt, thinking it was a loan; it turned out to be a performing guarantee.

    Union Bank refunded AMCON after the truth emerged, and no evidence implicates the first and third defendants in the original transaction.

    Lead counsel Prof. Taiwo Osipitan (SAN) and Olasupo Sasore (SAN) cross-examined the witness, who also confirmed he declined a post-AMCON consultancy offer from Arik Air’s chairman, after being asked to help negotiate the airline’s exit from receivership.

    The trial continues today with further cross-examination of the witness.

  • Experts: why Investment, Securities Act is a game changer

    Experts: why Investment, Securities Act is a game changer

    The Nigerian capital market community has endorsed the Investment and Securities Act (ISA) 2025 as a transformative law poised to reshape the nation’s financial future.

    At the 2025 Annual Business Summit of the Capital Market Solicitors Association (CMSA), held in Lagos, key stakeholders declared the new legislation a “game changer” for economic development, regulatory modernisation, and market expansion.

    The summit, with the theme: “Innovations and Opportunities in the Nigerian Capital Market,” brought together a cross-section of the country’s financial elite: regulators, legal experts, investment professionals, commodity traders, and government representatives.

    They unpacked the provisions and possibilities embedded in the newly signed ISA 2025, and all agreed—it signals a new era for Nigeria.

    Chairman of CMSA, Odiaka Iweze, described the new law as more than a legislative upgrade.

    “ISA 2025 is a platform to reimagine the capital market, to drive innovation, and to open up opportunities for inclusive and sustainable growth,” he said.

    Vice Chair of CMSA, Simisola Eyisanmi, emphasised that the timing of the legislation could not be more significant.

    “We are no longer speculating on reform—ISA 2025 has codified it.

    “This Act has blown the doors wide open for virtual securities, bilateral markets, commodity exchanges, and regulatory clarity,” she said.

    The ISA 2025 offers new pathways for real estate tokenisation, infrastructure financing, fintech-backed platforms, sustainable energy investment, and deeper public participation.

    With over 70 million Nigerians under the age of 30 and less than five per cent currently participating in the capital market, the growth potential is undeniable.

    “This is our chance to shape a $1 trillion economy, and the ISA is the foundation. We must seize this moment,” Eyisanmi said.

    Among the most celebrated aspects of the ISA 2025 is its redefinition of what constitutes security.

    Managing Director of the Lagos Commodities and Futures Exchange, Akinsola Akeredolu-Ale, highlighted the inclusion of warehouse receipts, precious metals, and energy products under the law.

    Read Also: Tinubu proposes formal Nigeria-OECS pact to deepen bilateral ties

    “Before now, warehouse receipts were mere documents; now, they are securitised instruments backed by law, recognised by the SEC, and supported by a full risk management framework.

    “The Act gives commodity producers a direct line to capital market financing,” he explained.

    He also noted that the commodities market now spans not just agriculture, but also oil, gas, and solid minerals—each of which presents multibillion-naira investment opportunities.

    Managing Director of Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading Plc (NBET), Johnson Akinnawo, provided an account of how the ISA—when aligned with the Electricity Act 2023—can revitalise Nigeria’s struggling power sector.

    NBET’s leadership revealed plans to establish a day-ahead energy exchange platform, using artificial intelligence to facilitate secure, transparent electricity trading between willing buyers and sellers.

    With power sector debts exceeding N4 trillion and chronic infrastructure bottlenecks across transmission and distribution, the creation of a structured, securitised electricity marketplace could be a major breakthrough.

    He said: “This is about building a financial system that makes energy bankable and investible.

    “ISA 2025 gives us the tools to structure power as a tradable commodity.”

    Minister of State for Finance, Dr. Doris Uzoka-Anite, positioned ISA 2025 as a bold legislative response to Nigeria’s economic ambitions.

    “This is not just a policy document. It is a statement of intent—Nigeria is open for regulated, modern, and transparent investment,” she said.

    She highlighted the Act’s introduction of investor protection funds, stricter regulation of digital platforms, and increased penalties for Ponzi schemes and fraudulent operators.

    “New provisions empower the SEC to penalise sponsors of Ponzi schemes and enhance whistleblower protections,” she said.

    Several speakers addressed the ISA’s provision for digital and virtual securities, including blockchain applications, tokenised real estate, and AI-powered trading.

    Managing Director of Coronation Trustees, Yemi Sadiku, said: “The capital market is a mirror of trust.

    “With ISA 2025, we’re not just polishing that mirror—we’re reshaping the image entirely.”

    He called on capital market solicitors to move beyond passive compliance to active leadership in legal structuring, fintech engagement, and investor education.

    CEO of Prosperis Holdings, Samson Fadahunsi, agreed.

    “From ESG-compliant instruments to beta assets like crypto, this Act opens up a new world. We now have the infrastructure to innovate, protect, and scale.”

    Director-General of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Dr. Emomotimi Agama, described the ISA 2025 as “our collective responsibility.”

    “This is the most comprehensive legal document in our capital market history.

    “It allows Nigeria to sit at the same table with the U.S. SEC, UK FCA, and global financial regulators. But the law will mean nothing if we do not execute it,” he declared.

    Agama encouraged lawyers, brokers, and investment houses to read the Act thoroughly and find their roles in implementing it.

    “You are the architects of this transformation. The SEC will enforce, but you must lead,” he said.

    Founder of CMSA and Chairman of its Board of Trustees, Chief Anthony Idigbe (SAN), urged lawyers to develop their skills for cross-border legal services.

    He said: “Your ability to trade or be a good lawyer and walk cross-border also depends on how prepared you are.

    “Are you job-ready to walk into a cross-border situation when you leave law school in Nigeria? How do you do it?

    “The future of legal practice depends on how well we prepare our lawyers for a cross-border world.

    “Collaboration is not optional. It’s a necessity in the face of changing global dynamics.

    “We must ask ourselves: who are we producing in our legal institutions? Are they globally competent?

    “Are we producing lawyers who, from day on,e can plug into a global law firm and work at a cross-border level?”

    According to him, the challenge of liberalisation is how to balance self-determination with the need for global cooperation.

    “Your clients have problems all over the world; you must be ready to help them wherever they are,” Idigbe advised.

  • ‘Enforce law on PwDs’ access to public buildings’

    ‘Enforce law on PwDs’ access to public buildings’

    International human rights expert, Prof. Uchenna Emelonye, has urged the Federal Government to urgently enforce the provisions of the Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities (Prohibition) Act with regard to easy access to public buildings.

    He said the enforcement should be driven by agencies such as the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and the National Commission for Persons with Disabilities (NCPWD).

    His call comes two years after the expiration of the five-year transitory grace period within which all public buildings are to be modified to be disability-compliant.

    Emelonye spoke at a roundtable on the Implementation of the African Disability Protocol in Nigeria, convened in partnership with the NHRC, the NCPWD and the Ability Life Initiative (TALI) alongside other stakeholders from government, civil society, development partners, and organisations of persons with disabilities (OPDs).

    Read Also: E-visa system processes over 14,000 applications in six weeks, says minister

    They deliberated on critical actions and strategies needed for operationalising the rights of persons with disability in Nigeria.

    Emelonye, whose experience spans over 22 countries and four continents, said the Discrimination Against Persons with Disabilities (Prohibition) Act was adopted in 2018 by the National Assembly as a landmark legal instrument to strengthen the protection of the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities in Nigeria.

    He commended the proactiveness of the National Assembly in taking significant steps to protect the rights of persons with disabilities with the enactment of the Act and the establishment of the NCPWD, long before the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Africa came into force in 2024.

    Emelonye noted that the Act was a watershed in the promotion and protection of the rights of persons with disabilities in Nigeria.

    According to him, it provides for various regimes of human rights for persons with disabilities, including non-discrimination, right to equality, life, work, life and security of person, access to justice, education, health and freedom from torture, and harmful practices amongst other rights.

    He stressed that with the enforcement period of the 2018 National Disability Act in place for two years now, there is an urgent need for all stakeholders to mainstream disability in all public buildings and facilities.

    These, the professor said, include taking other measures to modify or abolish existing policies, laws, regulations, customs and practices that constitute discrimination against persons with disabilities.

  • Court discharges, acquits businessman of drug offences

    Court discharges, acquits businessman of drug offences

    Justice Deinde Dipeolu of the  Federal High Court in Lagos has discharged and acquitted a businessman, Nnadi Kingsley Ikenna, of drug related offences made against him by the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA).

    Justice Dipeolu cleared him of the offences last Friday while delivering judgment in the charge marked FHC/L/400c/2023.

    The judge held: “The evidence of the prosecution is made up of ‘conjured evidences’ which cannot secure the conviction of the defendant.”

    Read Also: Tinubu proposes formal Nigeria-OECS pact to deepen bilateral ties

    The judge said the prosecution failed to link the businessman to the offences.

    Justice Dipeolu thereafter pronounced the businessman not guilty

    “The defendant is hereby discharged and acquitted of the two counts against him,” the court declared.

    Ikenna alongside side one Oseni Raheem Babatunde Ayodeji (now a convict), were charged sometimes in 2023 on a four-count charge of conspiracy, unlawful possession of 0.05 kilograms and 2.50 Kilogrames of cannabis Sativa a.k.a. marijuana.

    During their arraignment, the businessman was specifically charged on conspiracy and procuring one Sonuga Temitope to possess 0.50 kilograms of Cannabis Sativa, a Narcotic Drug similar to Cocaine, LSD.

    Prior to the trial, the convict admitted committing the offences and pleaded guilty to the charges against him.

     But, Nnadi pleaded not guilty to the charges of conspiracy and unlawful possession of 0.50 kilogrames of Cannabis Sativa.

    NDLEA  called seven witnesses.

    During the trial, the convict who was charged alongside the businessman specifically told the court that he neither knew Nnadi nor had any relationship with him.

    Other witnesses also told the court that they did not know the businessman.

    In his defence, the businessman consistently and  persistently maintained his innocence and denied all the charges against him.

    He also told the court that during his arrest and interrogation by the NDLEA operatives who told him that the parcel containing the drug was sent to him, he replied that “the parcel did not have his name or phone number.”

    He also told the court that when asked if he was expecting any parcel during his interrogation, he responded that the only parcel he was expecting was his missing luggage.

    He also asserted to his interrogators that he did not procure nor expecting any drug.

    Upon conclusion of his defence, Nnadi through his lawyer, Dennis Warri, informed the court that the prosecution had failed woefully to establish any of the counts of the charge against him.

    He, therefore, urged the court to discharge and acquit him.

    Delivering judgment on the matter, Justice Dipeolu, after citing several legal authorites and  weighed the witnesses testimonies,  held that there was no nexus between the businessman and some of the witnesses called by the prosecution.

  • Kenya verdict: IPOB seeks review of Kanu’s trial

    Kenya verdict: IPOB seeks review of Kanu’s trial

    The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has urged the Federal Government to review the ongoing terrorism trial of its leader, Nnamdi Kanu.

    The call follows the judgment by the High Court of Kenya, which found that his arrest and transfer from Kenya to Nigeria in June 2021 breached international legal norms and constitutional protections.

    Delivering judgment on June 24, 2025, Justice E.C. Mwita held that the actions leading to Kanu’s transfer amounted to a breach of both Kenyan and international law.

    The court awarded Kanu compensatory damages of 10 million Kenyan shillings for what it described as a gross violation of his rights.

    Justice Mwita faulted the conduct of both governments, stating that the process of rendition lacked due legal process and failed to adhere to constitutional safeguards.

    Read Also: E-visa system processes over 14,000 applications in six weeks, says minister

    IPOB, in a statement by its Director of Legal Affairs, Research and Global Communications, Onyedikachi Ifedi, praised the Kenyan court’s ruling as a significant development in what it described as a legal process that deserves fresh scrutiny.

    The group said the Kenyan court found that the events surrounding Kanu’s return to Nigeria did not follow due legal procedure, including the absence of a formal extradition hearing, arguing that this raises questions about the jurisdictional foundation of Kanu’s trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja.

    It referenced Section 2(3)(f)(ii) of Nigeria’s Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022, which includes that under certain conditions, unlawful cross-border transfers in violation of treaties as serious offences.

    The group also argued that Nigerian courts should take the Kenyan ruling into account as they assess the broader legal implications of the case.

    IPOB pointed to Article 12(4) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which stipulates that no person legally residing in a country may be expelled except through a process consistent with the law.

    The group urged Justice James Omotosho, who is currently presiding over Kanu’s trial in Abuja, to invite submissions from both parties regarding the impact of the Kenyan judgment on the ongoing proceedings.

    “This is not about political considerations but about upholding constitutional safeguards and respecting international legal obligations,” the statement said.

    The Kenyan government had filed an affidavit stating that there was no immigration record of Kanu’s departure from Kenya after his last arrival on May 1, 2021.

    In the Affidavit by the Attorney-General of Kenya and deposed to in Nairobi, Kenya on 10th February 2022, the Government of Kenya attached Kanu’s arrival and departure record from Kenya from 17th July 2019 to 12th May 2022, when he last entered Kenya.

    Paragraph 12 of the Affidavit states: “That it is evident from the schedule below that since 17/7/2019, the said Nwannekaenyi Nnamdi Kenny Okwu-Kanu has visited and departed Kenya on several occasions.

    “That from the above travel history, it is evident that his last arrival date was 12/5/2021 and there is no evidence exhibited to prove that he thereafter left the country.

    “That I am not privy to his (Kanu’s) arrest, detention or extradition.”

  • LCC crisis: litigant wants officers’ inauguration set aside

    LCC crisis: litigant wants officers’ inauguration set aside

    The crisis in  the Lagos Country Club (LCC) has further deepened as another member of the club and business man, Timmy Kolawole has sued the Registered Trustees and 48 others before the Federal High sitting in Lagos.

    The suit FHC/L/CS/657/2025 is before Justice Ambrose Lewis-Allagoa will be heard on July 15.

    Aside Registered Trustees, first defendant, the second  to 12th defendants were sued as members of the Caretaker Committee pursuant to consent judgment in suit FHC/L/CS/321/2024; 13th to 39th defendants were sued as members of the reconstituted Caretaker Committee while 40th to 49th defendants were sued as members of the Electoral Panel 2025/2026 election of the LCC.

    Read Also: Tinubu proposes formal Nigeria-OECS pact to deepen bilateral ties

    In the Motion on Notice filed and dated June 13, 2025,  the businessman is seeking three orders from the court.

    Kolawole through his counsel,  Oladipo Ojo and Babs Animashaun, is seeking an order of interlocutory injunction restraining 13th, 14th, 17th and 19th defendants from acting as officers of the management council of the LCC upon their purported election or in any manner howsoever from managing the affairs of same pending the final determination of this suit.

    The plaintiff is seeking an order setting aside the purported inauguration, investiture and swearing-in of the management council of the LCC held on June 6, 2025, done despite the pendency of the plaintiff’s suit and Motion on Notice dated March 28, 2025 seeking to restrain such activities and service of same on the defendants pending the final determination of the suit.

    He is also an order setting aside the purported election into the Management Council of the LCC, Ikeja held on or about May, 2025 and the Extra Ordinary General Meeting of the club held on June 3,  2025 by  or upon the directives of the Registered Trustees of the club (1st defendant) and or their agents, servants, privies held despite the pendency of the plaintiff’s suit and Motion on Notice dated March 28, 2025.

    The March 28, 2025 motion before the court was seeking to restrain such activities, and service of same on the defendants, pending the final determination of this suit.

    The motion on notice was based on six grounds.

    “The plaintiff in this suit and in his pending motions seeks to restrain, inter-alia, the holding of any Extraordinary General Meeting of the Lagos Country Club or elections into the Club’s Management Council pending the hearing and determination of this suit.

    “Notwithstanding the service of all relevant court processes on the defendants,  the 1st defendant convened an Extraordinary General Meeting at the Lagos Country Club.

    “The reconstitution of the Caretaker Committee and their agenda seek to decide and/or pre-empt some or all of the reliefs sought by the plaintiff in this suit, in particular, composition of a Caretaker Committee and decision on the petitions.

    “The purported reconstitution and inauguration of the Caretaker Committee set up and elections held and inauguration of the Management Council constitute  a breach of the extant status-quo orders made in this suit and is an attempt to pre-empt the hearing and decision of the court in the plaintiffs pending case and applications.

    “That the said actions constitute contemptuous and pre-emptive attempts to deprive the court of the right to hear the plaintiff’s case and pending applications and it is the duty of the Court to take control in stamping it’s authority by setting them aside without more.”

    In his 13-point affidavit deposed to in support of the motion on notice, the plaintiff averred that he filed this suit on March 28, 2025 by Originating Summons seeking answers to some questions he posed and prayed for eight reliefs in terms of declarations and injunctions and crave leave to refer the court to both the Originating Summons and Motion on Notice filed with it and which were served on all the defendant, with proofs of service in the Court’s file.

    He averred that notwithstanding this suit and the pending Motion on Notice, and its agents including the 29th to 49th defendants thereafter conducted elections into the Club’s Management Council which included the 13th,  14th, 17th, and on defendants as candidates notwithstanding the pendency of this suit and Motion on Notice to bar such.

    According to him, sometime in May, 2025, the 18’ Defendant and it’s said agents published a Notice entitled “May 2025 General Election Results” by which persons including the said defendants, the focus of this suit, were said to have  been elected unopposed.

    He averred that thereafter, an “Extraordinary General Meeting” was announced by the preemptive Caretaker Committee set-up by the 1st Defendant during the pendency of this suit and Motions to be held on 3rd June, 2025 and was so held accordingly.

    He stated further that On June 6, 2025, the 1st Defendant purportedly swore-in the said persons said to have been elected into the Club’s Management Council and attached and marked Exhibits “C”, “C1’” and “C2”’, respectively,  true copies of invitations by the 15th defendant and its agents and the 1st defendant’s address at the swearing-in of the Management Council of the Club.”

    The plaintiff said he ‘believe that these actions of the said 1st Defendant and/or its agents being the 29th” to 49th defendants will prevent this Honourable Court from hearing this suit and my said pending Motions on the merits.

    The plaintiff deposed that the said actions of the said 18th defendant and its appointees being the 29th to 49th defendants are contemptuous of the honourable court and if allowed to stand, will render his suit and  said motions nugatory.

    “verily believe that unless the prayers sought in this Motion are granted before the hearing of this suit and the pending Motions, this suit will be rendered

    nugatory.

    “verily believe that it is in the interest of justice to grant the reliefs sought in this motion.” he contended.

  • Court to hear Bash Ali’s suit Thursday

    Court to hear Bash Ali’s suit Thursday

    The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, will on Thursday hear a suit by Bashiru Ali (aka Bash Ali) against former Minister of Sports, Sunday Dare.

    Other defendants are the Federal Ministry of Youth and Sports Development and the Attorney-General of the Federation.

    The claimant, in suit FCT/HC/CV/6411/2023, is asking for N500 billion in damages.

    Through his 10-man legal team led by former Minister of Communication, Adebayo Shitttu, Ali said he received the assurances of the Federal Government’s support to stage a world-record-breaking boxing fight.

    He claimed that Dare, as minister, later made comments that allegedly damaged his reputation and harmed his boxing career.

    Read Also: E-visa system processes over 14,000 applications in six weeks, says minister

    He said Nigeria would have received an unprecedented level of positive global publicity as the first country outside the U.S.A. to hold a Guinness World Record Boxing Championship.

    Ali claimed that since Dare’s press conference on May 20, 2020, his associates had been avoiding him like a plague.

    He also claimed the International Boxing Union suspended his licence, which stopped him from engaging in any professional boxing engagement.

    But, Dare, through his lawyer, denied defaming the renowned boxer.

    The former minister stated that after reviewing the proposed fight, it was discovered that it was outside the ministry’s purview.

    He stated that the ministry only dealt with amateur boxing rather than professional boxing, as proposed by Ali.

    Dare said he never defamed the boxer, and therefore, he does not deserve any damages.

    He urged the court to hold that Ali’s suit is “frivolous, vexatious and a gold-digging venture” and to dismiss it with a cost of N200 million.