The Nation Newspaper

Category: Law

  • UK legal space open to Nigerian lawyers, says Etomi

    UK legal space open to Nigerian lawyers, says Etomi

    • British-Nigeria Law Forum holds summit

    Pioneer Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association Section on Business Law (NBA-SBL), George Etomi, has urged Nigerian lawyers to equip themselves with the capacity to offer cross-border legal services.

    He warned against the instinct to resist international collaboration out of protectionism.

    “It makes no sense to build walls. Instead, we must build bridges.

    “The UK market is open to Nigerian lawyers—but only if we are prepared.

    “We must train our lawyers to meet international standards,” he said.

    Etomi spoke in Lagos ahead of the forthcoming UK-Nigeria Legal Summit organised by the British-Nigeria Law Forum (BNLF).

    Its theme is: “Strengthening legal and business ties between the UK and Nigeria: Navigating opportunity and challenges.”

    Billed for June 26–27 at the Oriental Hotel, Victoria Island, Lagos, the summit is poised to be a catalyst for legal innovation, economic cooperation, and professional synergy between both countries.

    At a briefing in Lagos, prominent members of the BNLF and legal experts from Nigeria and the UK emphasised the urgent need to deepen bilateral legal collaboration, especially in business law, digital innovation, and regulatory harmonisation.

    Etomi, a member of the BNLF, recalled the forum’s roots as a small circle of Nigerian lawyers in the UK.

    Read Also: Ikechukwu Afakwu applauds Governor Oborevwori’s infrastructure strides

    “The BNLF has been in existence for 25 years. What began as a network of Nigerian legal practitioners abroad has evolved into a bridge for strategic collaboration in legal services.”

    Etomi emphasised the enduring partnership between the BNLF and NBA-SBL.

    “We immediately saw the importance of uniting Nigerian and UK lawyers, especially as globalisation began to reshape the delivery of legal services. That vision is more relevant today than ever.”

    He added that legal services are now at the heart of economic development policies, citing the inclusion of legal subgroups in UK-Nigeria Economic Development Forum (EDF) discussions and broader trade negotiations under multilateral and African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) frameworks.

    Etomi also highlighted the disruptive force of artificial intelligence in legal practice.

    “Today, lawyers don’t even have to leave their offices to do cross-border work. But how do we regulate that? How do we ensure Nigerian lawyers don’t lose out in this new paradigm?”

    Etomi underscored the urgency of developing capacity in Nigeria’s legal ecosystem,

    He said: “The Nigerian Law School produces up to 8,000 lawyers annually. Yet, only a fraction is absorbed into quality practice.

    “We must create depth in the legal market through training, exposure, and access to international opportunities.

    “We must invest in training and technological adaptation to ensure Nigerian lawyers can operate seamlessly in cross-border legal work.” The two-day summit will focus on several key themes, including the use of artificial intelligence in legal practice, blockchain, cryptocurrency, and the future of international business law.

    The past Chair of the BNLF, Ololade Saromi, said the event is a significant moment in the BNLF’s nearly 25-year journey.

    “For us, this summit is about creating meaningful long-term partnerships.

    “We are bringing lawyers from both jurisdictions together to share expertise, collaborate, and enhance trade relations.

    “The goal is simple: make it easier for Nigerian and UK lawyers, especially in commercial practice, to work together,” Saromi said

    He added that the legal and regulatory environments of both countries, rooted in common law, already provide fertile ground for synergy.

    “We don’t need to reinvent the wheel. There is already a connection. What we need to do is deepen it,” Saromi added.

    Social Secretary of the BNLF, Funbi Akinsanya, stressed the summit’s inclusive and forward-looking agenda.

    “This is not just another conference. It’s a celebration of connection, a space for alliances and mentorship.

    “We want to engage everyone—from students aspiring to international practice, to seasoned partners looking to expand their networks,” she said.

    She emphasised the forum’s commitment to creating a welcoming space that addresses both the challenges and opportunities in legal practice today.

    “Whether we’re talking about AI, crypto, or the evolving role of lawyers in global trade, we’re asking: how do we prepare our people for what’s next?”

    Also at the briefing were BNLF Summit Organising Committee Member Temilola Ibidapo-Obe, Logistics Lead Kemi Afesojaye, and Summit Organising Committee Member Toyin Asada.

  • Coastal road dispute: Investors sue Fed Govt, HITECH for $250m

    Coastal road dispute: Investors sue Fed Govt, HITECH for $250m

    The Federal High Court in Lagos has been asked to restrain the Federal Government and its contractors from demolishing an 18.8-hectare estate at Okun-Ajah, Eti-Osa, for the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Road project, pending the determination of a suit filed by the landowners.

    The suit, marked FHC/L/CS/1063/25, was filed by the Foreign Investors Network of Nigeria, owners of the affected land, against the Attorney-General of the Federation, the Minister of Works, the Controller of Works, Lagos, and HITECH Construction Company.

    The plaintiff stated that it is the lawful owner of approximately 18.8385 hectares of land covered by a Certificate of Occupancy and a valid survey plan (Plan No. BOM/3538/001B/2024/LA/TOPO).

    It alleged that the first to third defendants (the AGF, the Minister of Works, and the Controller of Works) failed to obtain the required approvals and failed to follow due process in realigning the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Road through its land.

    The plaintiff is asking the court to determine whether the second to fourth defendants followed due legal process before allegedly altering the road alignment of the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Road between Chainage 16 + 500 and 17 + 500, an adjustment they claim has brought the project into direct conflict with their developed estate, known as Winhomes Global Services Estate.

    Read Also: On a more inclusive Lagos-Calabar Coastal Road

    The plaintiff claims that “at no time was it issued with any statutory notice, demolition order, or opportunity to be heard,” adding that the actions of the defendants constitute a “gross violation of the Plaintiff’s constitutional rights as enshrined in Sections 36 and 44 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).”

    The plaintiff said the land, measuring 18.8385 hectares, is fully documented with a valid Certificate of Occupancy, a Governor’s consent, a survey plan (Plan No: BOM/3538/001B/2024/LA/TOPO), and relevant building approvals.

    The estate has also reportedly been subscribed to by multiple allottees under the power of attorney agreements.

    In the written address supporting the summons, counsel to the plaintiff, Valerian Nadike of Valerian Viannay & Partners, argued that “no notice or hearing was afforded prior to the commencement of the destructive markings on its property,” adding that such omission violates the principle of audi alteram partem and fundamental human rights.

    “The attempted demolition of the Plaintiff’s estate without a lawful acquisition process, valid gazette, or compensation, amounts to executive lawlessness,” Nadike stated in court filings, citing Ojukwu v. Governor of Lagos State (1986) as authority.

    “No state authority, no matter how well-intentioned, can ride roughshod over constitutional rights.”

    The plaintiff is seeking nine reliefs, including:

    • A declaration that the actions of the Defendants in “marking for destruction and demolition the Plaintiff’s property without recourse to any legal or lawful basis are illegal, null and void.”

    • An injunction restraining the defendants from further acts that interfere with the estate, and

    • An order awarding $250m in damages for what the Plaintiff describes as the “unlawful marking, threat of demolition, and interference with its property.”

    In part of the originating summons, the plaintiff asked:

    • “Whether the actions of the second to fourth defendants in seeking to demolish and destroy the property of the Plaintiff at Okun-Ajah, despite not having contravened the coastal road alignment, is not a discrimination against the Plaintiff and a contravention of Section 42 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

    It further contended that the realignment of the road was not in compliance with the 2004/2006 approved alignment and that any attempt to enforce a new route affecting the estate amounts to “an illegality and is therefore null and void ab initio.”

    Among the documents attached to the suit are copies of the Certificate of Occupancy, survey plan, Governor’s clearance, photographs of the property showing markings allegedly made by agents of the government, and letters of protest previously sent to the Ministry of Works.

    The plaintiff also seeks a mandatory order directing the Federal Ministry of Works to “fully comply with the law with regard to the issuance of statutory notices, if at all there is any contravention,” before taking any enforcement or demolition action.

    “This matter raises fundamental questions about how far the government can go in executing infrastructure without trampling on the rights of citizens and law-abiding companies. If such actions go unchecked, they set a dangerous precedent,” Nadike submitted.

    No date had been fixed for the hearing.

    However, the defendants were said to have 30 days from the date of service to file their appearance and response.

  • Benue killings: When graveyards replace farmlands

    Benue killings: When graveyards replace farmlands

    • By Janet Gbam and Kamo Sende

    Sunday morning brought news that would haunt any reasonable person: over 100 people had been slaughtered in their sleep in Yelewata. These were not soldiers fallen in battle or armed combatants engaged in conflict. (Even then, everyone deserves justice and protection from arbitrary killings) – they were farmers, women, and children murdered in their own homes, their lives snuffed out of them like it held no value.

    As lawyers who grew up in Benue – the food basket of the nation – we have watched our homeland transform from a place renowned for its hospitality and agrarian promise into something resembling a graveyard. The tragedy in Yelewata was devastating enough, but what happened in its aftermath revealed something even more sinister about the soul and priorities of our state.

    Young people took to the streets of Makurdi, the state’s capital, to mourn. They gathered not with weapons or threats, but with placards and tears, demanding answers for the bloodbath that had consumed their people. They exercised their fundamental right of expression, protected under Section 39 of the Nigerian Constitution and Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

    The response from the authorities was swift and brutal. Teargas canisters flew. Protesters were bundled into unmarked vehicles by faceless operatives. Harry Nyam, Omo-Benue (a content creator) and many others whose only weapons were chants, cameras and placards, were detained, battered, and dumped back on the streets hours later – Their only crime was that they cared enough to grieve and demand accountability from authorities. The message and violent response from the authorities was clear: your pain is not welcome here.

    This is what our Benue has become. A place where massacre is met with silence from those in power, but mourning is met with violence. Over 100 people were burned alive in their own homes, yet the leadership has shown no direction. Young people daring to cry out became the real threat to public order.

    We are witnessing the criminalisation of grief itself. Nigeria’s obligations under Article 4 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which guarantees the right to life, and Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which enshrines the right to life, liberty, and security, have been grotesquely violated. When governments fear tears more than they fear the blood that caused them, we have crossed into territories that should terrify every Nigerian.

    The legal implications are staggering. Beyond our constitutional guarantees under Sections 39 and 40, which protect freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, Nigeria has binding international commitments. Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights protects freedom of expression, yet these rights evaporated the moment they became inconvenient for a government that prefers silent suffering to public accountability.

    Read Also: ACF, Sultan condemn Yelwata killings, urge urgent security action in Benue

    The arbitrary detention of protesters, even if for a few hours, violates Section 35 of our Constitution and Article 12 of the African Charter, which protects the right to security and freedom of movement. But beyond constitutional and international law breaches, this represents the death of basic human decency in governance.

    Consider the twisted logic: those who slaughtered over 100 innocent people roam free, whilst those who demanded justice for the slaughtered were hunted down like criminals. The killers face no consequences, but the mourners face teargas and detention. This is moral bankruptcy in action.

    The timing makes it even more obscene.

    These attacks happened during farming season, when our agricultural communities should be planting hope for the future. Instead, they are burying their children.

     The impact is profoundly gendered; women and children bear the brunt of such violence.

    Under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Maputo Protocol, Nigeria has committed to protecting women from violence, yet the recurring violence in Benue demonstrates the stark gap between legal commitments and lived realities.

    We refuse to accept this normalisation of both mass murder and the suppression of legitimate grief. As lawyers, we understand that these are not just constitutional violations but breaches of Nigeria’s international human rights obligations. As human beings, we understand that grief is not a crime to be punished but a sacred response to loss that demands respect.

    The message from our leaders is chilling: we will not protect you from slaughter, we will not acknowledge your pain, and we will definitely punish you for refusing to be silent. This is not governance. It is state oppression and cowardice wrapped in the language of maintaining public order.

    Every society reveals its character in how it treats the grieving. What does ours say about us?

    • Gbam is an International Human Rights lawyer and researcher dedicated to promoting justice, equality, and amplifying silenced voices that challenge oppression. Sende is a lawyer and researcher focused on international trade law and food security, working to advance equitable trade systems and protect the rights of small-scale farmers across the Global South.
  • Beyond reform: Next steps after Nigeria’s arbitration overhaul

    Beyond reform: Next steps after Nigeria’s arbitration overhaul

    By Deborah Chukwuedo

    Nigeria recently included its name in the discourse on favourable seats for arbitration with the enactment of the Arbitration and Mediation Act 2023 (“AMA”).

    The country has taken another pragmatic step with the approval of the National Policy on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution 2024 (“the Policy”).

    The AMA repealed the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (“ACA”) and introduced a comprehensive legal framework for the modernisation of both domestic and international mediation and arbitration.

    It introduced several innovative provisions to ensure efficiency, transparency, fairness and enforceability in arbitration and mediation and ensure alignment with the UNCITRAL Model Law and international best practices.

    Some of these innovations introduced by the AMA include the introduction of the Singapore Convention for International Settlement Agreements, ensuring that Settlement Agreements reached through mediation can be enforced as binding contracts, or with court approval, as Consent Judgments.

    The AMA moves away from the ACA and prescribes that where the Arbitration Agreement does not specify the number of Arbitrators, the default number of Arbitrators will be one, a Sole Arbitrator. It codifies common law by granting immunity to arbitrators, appointing authorities and institutions for actions taken in good faith.

    It introduces new mechanisms like emergency arbitrations – allowing for the appointment of an emergency arbitrator within two business days for urgent interim relief – and expands the framework for interim measures, empowering both tribunals and courts to grant such protectionism even without notice to the other party.

    It allows for joinder of parties and consolidation of proceedings with party consent, clarifies the statute of limitations for arbitral proceedings and provides a structure for third-party funding, abolishing the torts of maintenance and champerty.

    Read Also: Tuggar expresses Nigeria’s readiness to host WAES

    Additionally, the AMA introduces the option of an Award Review Tribunal for parties seeking a second arbitral review before approaching the court and narrows the grounds for setting aside arbitral awards, notably removing arbitrator misconduct as a basis for annulment.

    Nigeria’s arbitration policy aims to establish the country as a leading hub for domestic, regional, and international commercial arbitration by encouraging disputes arising from Nigerian transactions and contracts to be resolved within its borders, thereby retaining economic benefits and expertise locally.

    The policy seeks to ease the courts’ caseload by promoting arbitration and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as preferred mechanisms for resolving commercial disputes, mandating judicial respect for arbitration agreements, setting strict timelines for court involvement, encouraging punitive costs against lawyers and litigants who use the instrumentality of the courts to frustrate arbitral proceedings and directing that all arbitration appeals conclude at the Court of Appeals.

    It also focuses on capacity building through public awareness, practitioner training and strengthening arbitration institutions, while aligning Nigeria’s legal framework with international standards such as the UNCITRAL Model Law, the New York Convention, and the Singapore Convention. These will enhance the enforceability of Nigerian Arbitral Awards and boost investor confidence.

    The Policy mandates that arbitration agreements arising from all domestic contractual relationships and international contracts with strong Nigerian connections, both private commercial transactions and government contracts performed in Nigeria, should designate Nigeria as the seat of arbitration.

    It mandates that disputes involving Nigerian Ministries, Departments and MDAs must be arbitrated in Nigeria, with the Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration, Lagos (“RCICAL”) as the default appointing authority where necessary.

    The Nigerian Arbitration Covenant, which is part of the Policy, aims to establish Nigeria as a preferred venue for arbitration and ADR and to ensure that the Arbitration and ADR laws in Nigeria keep up with improvements in Arbitration and ADR in the international space.

    The Policy represents a national commitment to empowering the arbitration and ADR sector and ensuring Nigeria’s arbitration laws keep up to date with international principles and developments in Arbitration.

    The Policy addressed the challenges Nigeria has faced in its arbitration process through the introduction of comprehensive measures.

    With both the enactment of the AMA and the adoption of the Policy, Nigeria is now well-positioned to further strengthen its dispute resolution landscape; however, strategic steps are required for implementation to realise the full potential of these reforms.

    Effective implementation of the policy

    Nigeria already has a large number of internationally trained arbitrators, when compared with other countries; there should be continuous training and specialisation of practitioners and the Judiciary to meet international standards.

    The judiciary should establish specialised courts and divisions focused on arbitration and ADR to help reduce delays and adverse rulings and judgments in arbitral matters and thus foster a supportive judicial culture for arbitration.

    I further propose that in arbitral appeals, the Court of Appeal will have the liberty to appoint amicus curiae from reputable Nigerian arbitral institutions to provide expert insights and enhance the court’s understanding of complex arbitration issues.

    Legislative and Regulatory Enhancements

    Periodic review and amendment of arbitration laws and policy will ensure Nigeria remains responsive to global developments and international best practices. There should also be further regulation for third-party funding to attract international investors and legal funders.

    Government and private sector engagement

    The Government should mandate the inclusion of ADR clauses in government and commercial contracts to mainstream arbitration, with mediation as a first-line dispute resolution mechanism. The Policy has included an arbitration clause for use in these agreements.

    Infrastructure and institutional development

    Nigeria has a number of arbitral institutions and ADR centres, including the RCICAL, which was named in the Policy. Expanding and equipping these centres will provide the necessary infrastructure for handling domestic and international disputes.

    This should include the digitisation of platforms for case management, virtual hearings and filing to make mediation and arbitration more accessible and efficient, especially for cross-border disputes.

    Promoting Nigeria as an arbitration hub

    Nationwide campaigns targeting businesses and government agencies are needed to promote the benefits of arbitration and ADR to ensure widespread comprehension and adoption of the new legal framework.

    Nigeria should continue aligning its laws and practices with international conventions and seek reciprocal arrangements with other arbitration-friendly jurisdictions.

    Monitoring and evaluation

    Nigeria hosts several international arbitration conferences annually, where trends in arbitration both domestically and internationally are discussed. The Policy provides for the establishment of the Advisory Council.

    Regular stakeholder engagement with the arbitration community, users in the business community and foreign investors will ensure accurate feedback and data collection to address challenges as they arise.

    Thus, there should be systems for tracking arbitration and mediation cases, outcomes and user satisfaction to evaluate the effectiveness of reforms and guide future improvements.

    I do believe that by focusing on these steps, Nigeria can fully realise the transformative potential of its new Arbitration and Mediation Act and National Policy for Arbitration, and establish the country as a leading arbitration hub in Africa and beyond.

    • Ms. Chukwuedo, FCIArb (UK), is an International Arbitrator and an Insolvency Practitioner. She is a Partner with Accendolaw Partners LP, where she heads the ADR practice.

  • Tinubu’s consistency, determination, patience, liberalism: a lawyer’s perspective

    Tinubu’s consistency, determination, patience, liberalism: a lawyer’s perspective

    By Gbenga Adeoye

    The harm that humanity has done to many great men on earth is that we choose to talk about them after their deaths, but it is a good idea to write or say to the world and to the ears of concerned persons their good deeds while they are still with us.

    What that does to the people is that it makes them feel good to continue to do good, and also makes them happy that their deeds are all noted.

    God is also in the habit of making a vow and rewarding great men who choose to do extraordinary things. He made a vow to David that his lineage would forever occupy the throne of Israel.

    For every cross, there is a crown. Those who do good will reap their reward on earth and thereafter.

    The Pareto principle has also shown me that people focus more on just a few negative things about good people, and if care is not taken, those other fantastic things could be neglected.

    Therefore, as an observer of events in Nigeria and a researcher trained in the fields of accounting, banking and finance, business management and law, I have these to say about Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    He is a consistent politician

    He is the only one among many big politicians in Nigeria who remained consistent in terms of political ideology.

    From SDP, to AD, ACN and APC, he has remained a leader in his party after the exit of Chief MKO Abiola.

    Other politicians aspiring to be presidents and governors had cause to run to him in the past. Even Buhari won in 2015 because Tinubu backed him up. We all know the details.

    If Asiwaju tells you to go ahead, and he will support you, you can just go to sleep. He is not a hypocrite when it comes to his political alignment and support declaration for anyone. No one can dispute this in Nigeria. While some play it safe by supporting three or four candidates, Tinubu has remained consistent as a committed leader of his party in Nigeria.

    No wonder, the system he laid down in Lagos is still working. With the GAC and other systems in place, no state can stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Lagos.

    I think politicians in Ogun State and indeed all of us need to go to school in Lagos to learn politics from Tinubu Political & Governance University (TPGU).

    He is a determined politician

    He is so focused that he does not shift from his goal. As a golfer, we have one word during our training which says: “Eyes on the ball.” His eyes are always on the ball. No wonder he has never lost any election.

    When in 2022 the gang up against him in his party became intense, he didn’t back out. He used his political skills to get the ticket.

    Tinubu spoke like a professor of history in my town at Abeokuta, and from that day when he explained the trajectory of his journey in politics and why it had become his turn, I knew he was determined.

    After his speech in Abeokuta, spiritually, all obstacles were removed and the rest is history.

    By the way, Egbaland is a land where people get inspiration to lead and win their wars. He was able to enter the list of those who received their miracles on the soil of my town. The city of many firsts.

    Everything that is major in Nigeria started from Abeokuta. I’m so proud of our town and city as an Egba man.

    Somehow, Asiwaju tapped into that anointing in Egbaland as he spoke like one under the control of the Holy Spirit when he said EMI LOKAN… Indeed, it was his turn ,and God said YES because of where those words were spoken.

    Therefore, if you desire anything good, just come to Abeokuta and visit Alake and go to Itoku and Olumo Rock, and try to visit St. Peter Cathedral, the first Church in Nigeria, and your prayers will be stamped by God with the word. Amen. Try it.

    He is a patient politician

    When others were looking for Presidential tickets in 2007, he was busy building the party.

    In 2011, he remained a leader and did not contest the election.

    In 2015, he supported Buhari with all his energy and campaigned around the country.

    He does not rush at anything. He waited patiently until 2023 to run, and he won.

    Even when Atiku needed a ticket. He gave him. He once supported a wonderful NSA, Nuhu Ribadu. Those are the guys who have seen him inside out and can testify to his personality.

    If you listen to Ribadu speak about Tinubu with his words, such as Tinubu Gains, you will know he has a very deep understanding of the man called Asiwaju.

    Read Also: Sam Amuka: Very unNigerian

    Even when his boys that he has put in power at any position offend him, he will just wait patiently until the second term. Ambode can testify to that. He does not rush to punish an offender or react in a rush to any matter.

    He is a liberal politician

    I’m not sure if in Nigeria today, there is any politician who is as liberal as Asiwaju.

    A lot of Nigerians do not understand why many opposition members are going to APC. The main reason is that Asiwaju is so liberal and ready to welcome anyone willing to join his train, regardless of past differences.

    He wants the best for all. He does not segregate.

    When he appointed some people to be ministers, people started wondering why he should appoint those who once spoke negatively about him.

    He cares less about other factors as long as you are intelligent and you can deliver.

    His focus is intellect and capacity to deliver, not one that just hate people because of their political statement or affiliation.

    Why did Daniel Bwala join him? Because he is a liberal man. Many more are coming to be with him.

    Even during this holiday Eid Kabir, he received many people, and some people just got angry because he received those they think are his enemies. Asiwaju is not the kind of person who will fence people off. If there is anything of such, it may be coming from people around him acting selfishly and not based on any instruction from him to so do.

    Why do you think Ogunlewe and Obanikoro are with him?

    Just look at a brilliant Fashola – why do you think they are with him? Why did Pedro return? A liberal man.

    A brilliant Professor of Law, Prof Osinbajo worked with him, and he ensured the man became number 2 in Nigeria. Why do you think they worked with him?

    Yemi Cardoso and my own brother from Abeokuta Wale Edun, CBN Governor and Minister of Finance respectively – why do you think they worked with him, and now they are with him?

    Segun Sowunmi, who is another brother from my town, why is he speaking so wonderfully about Asiwaju now? Because Asiwaju is a brilliant and liberal politician.

    Why did Bosun Tijani join his cabinet? Or my learned friend Jumoke Oduwole? Simply because he is a brilliant and liberal politician.

    Should I talk about the performing Minister of FCT, Wike? He joined Tinubu because he saw in him a focused, brilliant and liberal politician.

    Akwa Ibom and Delta State governors are now in the APC for the same reason.

    Contrary to the view of people about migration from PDP and other parties to APC, in my considered personal opinion, we have too many political parties, and we may need to adopt the IBB method of just two parties. We don’t need too many political parties in Nigeria if our democracy must grow with a viable opposition.

    We can just have the APC and one other party in Nigeria.

    Tinubu’s cabinet is like the government of National Unity, and so members of other political parties consider the APC a good place to go to. That again underscores the liberal nature of the leader of that party. Can they buy all the migrants? Are they all having problems that pursued them to APC? I don’t think so.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a consistent, determined, patient and liberal Politician that Nigeria has ever produced.

    I pray that we can have at least one of his type in every state in Nigeria…

    As we celebrate June 12 and M.K.O Abiola’s Victory of 1993, who is another man from my town, Abeokuta, again, I pray for peace, prosperity, and progress in Nigeria.

    My only request from Mr President is to declare a state of emergency in the power sector. If we have light, development will be accelerated.

    I commend the government for the student loan programme.

    I also commend the president for the revival of cotton farms in Ogun State, which is a major breakthrough that will reshape the textile industry in Nigeria.

    Since Dr. Opeifa is my friend, and he is now the M.D of Nigerian Railway Corporation, by way of advice, let’s buy more trains for the Lagos-Ibadan rail line. Let’s link Lagos to Abuja by train.

    Let us keep pushing the upgrade of our tourist locations in Nigeria.

    I have a strong belief that Nigeria is now on the path of greatness. Happy Democracy Day to all Nigerians.

    • Dr. Adeoye is a good governance advocate, a lawyer, chartered accountant, tax & fiscal policy expert with PhD in Management Accounting & Master’s Degree in Banking & Finance and LLM in International Business Law from University of London. He is passionate about Social and Economic Development of Nigeria and Africa. He can be reached via dga@gbengaadeoye.com

  • Exit of legal giant Uwais

    Exit of legal giant Uwais

    • How he will be remembered, by NBA, SANs

    Mohammed Lawal Uwais GCON (June 12, 1936 – June 6, 2025) was a revered jurist who served as the Chief Justice of Nigeria from 1995 to 2006. Aside from his landmark judgments, his legacy includes chairing the Electoral Reform Committee. The Uwais Report is regarded as one of the most comprehensive blueprints for electoral reform in Nigeria. President Tinubu, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and senior lawyers have paid tributes to him, writes Deputy News Editor JOSEPH JIBUEZE.

    “He superintended the Judiciary at a challenging time in our history with tact, patience, and a sense of duty,” said President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in a tribute to former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Mohammed Uwais, who died last Friday at 88.

    Uwais was a towering figure in the Nigerian judiciary and would have been 89 on June 12.

    He is remembered for his commitment to impartial justice, legal integrity, and reform.

    His passing marks the end of a distinguished chapter in Nigeria’s legal history.

    His career exemplified what it means to serve the law with conscience, balance, and unwavering ethics.

    Born in Zaria in 1936, Uwais was called to the Bar in 1963 after studying law in London.

    He quickly rose through the judicial system, becoming a Supreme Court Justice at 43 and eventually serving as Chief Justice from 1995 to 2006—one of the longest-serving in Nigeria’s history.

    His tenure coincided with Nigeria’s transition from military rule to democracy.

    It was a critical period during which he worked to insulate the judiciary from political interference and uphold its independence.

    Uwais was known for promoting merit-based appointments and pushing for judicial integrity.

    As chair of the National Judicial Council (NJC), he introduced processes to ensure transparency and professionalism in judicial promotions and discipline.

    His approach to justice was not only rooted in law but guided by ethical clarity and constitutional fidelity.

    One of his most enduring contributions came after retirement when he led the 2007 Electoral Reform Committee.

    The “Uwais Report” recommended sweeping reforms, including the creation of an Electoral Offences Commission, a more independent appointment process for INEC leadership, and improved judicial capacity to address electoral disputes.

    Although largely ignored by successive administrations, the report remains a foundational text for electoral reform.

    His passing has led to a renewed advocacy for its implementation as a tribute.

    Globally, Uwais gained recognition through his role with the World Jurist Association and other international legal bodies.

    Domestically, he was appointed to lead multiple commissions and inquiries, such as investigations into civil unrest and government contracts, reflecting his reputation for fairness and trustworthiness.

    Senior Advocates described him as a consistent and principled jurist.

    They highlighted his fearless judgments on legislative accountability, prosecutorial discretion, and procedural compliance.

    They noted how his decisions continue to set standards rarely matched today.

    For many, Uwais symbolises what a judicial leader should be: fair, principled, and reform-minded.

    His life’s work offers both inspiration and a roadmap for judicial and democratic progress.

    Born on June 12, 1936, in Zaria, Kaduna State, Uwais was called to the Bar at the Middle Temple, London, in 1963.

    Highlights of his judgments

    Justice Uwais delivered several landmark judgments and played a pivotal role in the development of Nigeria’s constitutional and electoral law.

    Throughout his judicial career, he participated in numerous rulings on federalism, judicial independence, election law, and constitutional interpretation.

    In INEC v. Musa (2003) – a party registration case, the issue was whether INEC could limit the number of political parties to only those that meet certain administrative conditions.

    Justice Uwais ruled that INEC’s restrictions were unconstitutional.

    Read Also: Troops arrest 43 oil thieves, destroy 27 illegal refineries

    The court held that the Constitution permits any association that meets the criteria in Section 222 of the 1999 Constitution to be registered as a political party.

    This judgment led to the liberalisation of Nigeria’s political space, allowing the registration of many more political parties.

    In Buhari v. Obasanjo (2005) – a presidential election petition, the issue was the challenge by Muhammadu Buhari (then ANPP candidate) against the re-election of Olusegun Obasanjo in 2003.

    Justice Uwais, as part of the Supreme Court panel, was involved in the controversial majority decision that upheld Obasanjo’s election.

    However, the case is known for the dissenting opinion by the late Justice Niki Tobi.

    The case became a reference point for presidential election petition jurisprudence in Nigeria, with implications on the burden of proof and admissibility of evidence.

    In Lawal Osula v Lawal Osula (SC 66/1993) [1995] 3 NWLR (Pt. 382) 128; Supreme Court, March 9, 1995, Justice Uwais laid down important principles relating to the substitution of deceased parties in appeals.

    In Momah v VAB Petroleum Inc (SC 183/1995) [2000] NGSC 4, [2000] 4 NWLR 701; Supreme Court, February 25 , 2000, Uwais, as CJN, clarified the Court of Appeal’s jurisdiction in stay-of-execution applications and foreign currency payment orders

    In Mohammed v Olawunmi & Ors (SC 147/1991) (1993) JELR 45349; Supreme Court, May 14, 1993, Uwais authored the leading opinion in this pivotal land/injunction dispute.

    In Attorney General of the Federation & Ors v Atiku Abubakar (Vice President) (SC 31/2007) [2007] 2 All NLR 58; [2007] NGSC 177; Supreme Court, April 20, 2007, Uwais held that the Vice President could not be removed by presidential fiat without following the constitutional process.

    The issue was whether the President (Olusegun Obasanjo at the time) had the power to remove the Vice-President (Atiku Abubakar) from office.

    Uwais (in his post-retirement role leading a panel) emphasised constitutionalism.

    The court held that the President could not remove the Vice-President without following due constitutional process (which involves impeachment by the National Assembly).

    This decision upheld the principle of separation of powers and reinforced the independence of the office of the Vice-President.

    Tinubu, Atiku pay tribute

    President Tinubu described Uwais as “a phenomenal jurist and statesman who served Nigeria with honour, courage and exceptional integrity”.

    He said: “I join family members, friends, proteges and well-meaning Nigerians in mourning this respected patriot and statesman, who passed away as we mark Eid-Al-Adha.

    “Many remarkable high points hallmarked Justice Uwais’ illustrious career on the bench.

    “He superintended the Judiciary at a challenging time in our history with tact, patience, and a sense of duty.

    “This stabilising role helped usher in the current democratic dispensation, which he had the distinct honour of ushering in as the CJN, who swore in the elected president on May 29, 1999.

    “In retirement, the Federal Government called upon Justice Uwais to head a panel to investigate the conduct of our elections.

    “Given his pedigree and personal integrity, he was the right person for that onerous assignment.

    “Not surprisingly, Justice Uwais led the panel to produce a critical report that contained a detailed prognosis of our electoral system.

    “In active service and retirement, the late Justice Uwais maintained a dignified persona, earning him respect beyond his immediate constituency.

    “May God Almighty accept the soul of Justice Uwais and admit him to Jannatul Firdaus.

    “I extend my heartfelt condolences to the Uwais family, the government and the people of Kaduna State, as well as the members of the Nigerian Judiciary, over the death of this colossus.”

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar said Uwais was a towering figure in Nigeria’s judiciary.

    “His legacy of integrity, fairness, and commitment to democratic reforms, especially through the Electoral Reform Committee, which he chaired, will continue to endure,” he said.

    NBA: he was conscience of the bench

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) said Uwais was the conscience of the bench and an architect of electoral reform.

    In a statement by its President, Mazi Afam Osigwe (SAN), the association said: “Justice Uwais was not only a pillar of the Nigerian Judiciary, but a symbol of integrity, learning, and institutional reform.

    “His tenure as CJN from 1995 to 2006 remains one of the most consequential eras for the Nigerian Judiciary.

    “He was the second-longest-serving Chief Justice in the country’s history, and during those years.

    “He championed judicial independence, ethical discipline within the Bench, and the protection of democratic values.

    “A man of scholarly depth, Justice Uwais was instrumental in landmark rulings that expanded the frontiers of constitutional interpretation and civil liberties.

    “His jurisprudence was marked by clarity, depth, and fidelity to justice, hallmarks that earned him the admiration of his peers and the respect of the public.

    “Following his retirement from the Supreme Court, Justice Uwais continued to serve Nigeria with distinction.

    “He chaired the Electoral Reform Committee established in 2007, whose recommendations for the unbundling of INEC, the establishment of an electoral offences commission, and depoliticisation of appointments remain reference points in conversations about electoral reform in Nigeria.

    “His legacy is not only one of legal excellence but of public service, discipline, and visionary thought leadership.

    “He leaves behind an indelible mark on our national consciousness, the legal profession, and the administration of justice in Nigeria.

    “The NBA extends its heartfelt condolences to the Uwais family, the Nigerian Judiciary, and the entire legal community. May Allah (SWT) grant him Aljannah Firdaus and comfort all those who mourn his loss.

    The Bar has lost one of its finest! Nigeria has lost a patriot!”

    SANs pay tribute

    Dr Wahab Shittu noted the significance of the timing of Uwais’ passing coinciding with the Eid Mubarak, remarkable for Juma’h prayers.

    He added: “In my view, however, what is significant about his passing is not just the timing of his exit, but what he stood for while alive. The question is: how will the departed be remembered?

    “Three events in our nation’s history offer insights about the quality of his contributions to our collective consciousness.

    “First, he was a huge lesson in judicial integrity. This attribute offers a model of distinction and an example for our judex.

    “On this index, he shone like a thousand stars and offers a lasting example of how to be a judex.

    “The second example was his role in the elevation of the late Chief Gani Fawehimmi as a senior Advocate of Nigeria.

    “It will be recalled that late Fawehinmi applied many times for the exalted rank unsuccessfully, and at a time resolved never to apply again.

    “It was the departed CJN Uwais who persuaded Gani not to give up and even encouraged him to pick the form again in the year the erudite lawyer adorned the silk.

    “This showed CJN Uwais as an encourager of excellence.

    “History will always remember this gesture to the Great Gani, considering the contributions of the duo to our jurisprudence.

    “The third notable contribution of late CJN Uwais was his additions to our electoral jurisprudence.

    “The Uwais committee on electoral reforms made profound recommendations that undoubtedly redefined and improved significantly our electoral jurisprudence and the conduct of elections in our country.

    “History will never forget his unique role in this regard. These three major contributions are very significant.

    “In addition, the jurist delivered many landmark decisions through the cases. The law reports are replete with his profound and incisive judgments.

    “These cases litter the pages of our law reports and shall remain forever reference points for erudition and sound jurisprudential justifications.

    “He also remains our longest-serving CJN to date. And so, with his exit, the nation has not only lost one of its finest jurists but also a real human being.”

    Dr Muiz Banire (SAN) said Uwais was a CJN like no other.

    “He had a very calm personality and was unassuming. He was very receptive to all without discrimination while firm in his resolve.

    “In practice, he shaped the law to a large extent in a very pragmatic manner.

    “The most admirable aspect of his life that I cherish was the political reform report engendered by him as Chairman of the Electoral Reform Committee.

    “The only justice the country can do to his memory is to implement the report.”

    Dr Anthony Idigbe (SAN), son of the late Supreme Court Justice Chike Idigbe, said he had a great relationship with Uwais.

    “We had a good relationship. He was really nice to me. He had a great relationship with my late dad. He chaired the launch of the biography of my dad, ‘The Path of Justice Chike Idigbe’ in 1999.

    “In 2004, he commissioned our former head office at Plot 45 Oyibo Adjarho St Lekki. He was always there for me when he had the energy.

    “I miss him so much and pray that Allah receives his soul with mercy. I also pray that God gives his family the fortitude to bear the loss.”

    Mike Igbokwe (SAN) said Uwais was an erudite Justice who left an indelible mark in the annals of the Nigerian judiciary through his judgments and dispensation of justice, which could be seen through his decisions.

    “He had the interest and development of not only the judiciary but also the legal profession at heart.

    “He would advise on the need for lawyers to uphold the ethics of the profession.

    “He was the chairman of the panel set up for electoral reforms, although his recommendations had not been implemented fully or at all.

    “However, one of the things I remember him most for was that in order to avoid delays that hamper the speedy determination of substantive suits, his advice in one of his judgments was that preliminary objections to the court’s jurisdiction which usually caused delays, should be taken along with the final written address at the end of trial and be determined along with the substantive matter.

    “I advise that as a mark of respect and honour to him and his memory, his recommendations on electoral reforms should be dusted and read by the National Assembly, which should implement those that are still relevant today.

    “Finally, he was a good family man. Before his Lordship became CJN and whilst sitting as a Justice of the Supreme Court in Lagos, I once ran into his Lordship driving his wife to Alaba International market to do some shopping for electronics on a Saturday.

    “May the Lord rest his soul and comfort his family,” Igbokwe said.

  • E-Justice system takes off in Borno

    E-Justice system takes off in Borno

    • State partners LawPavilion

    The Borno State Ministry of Justice has launched an e-Justice project in collaboration with LawPavilion.

    The project was unveiled by Governor Babagana Umara Zulum at the Government House in Maiduguri.

    Attorney-General (AG) and Commissioner for Justice, Hauwa Abubakar Isa, said: “The ministry is aligning itself with global standards to ensure that legal professionals in Borno are well-positioned to meet the realities of a rapidly advancing world.”

    She explained that the new Case Management System (CMS) simplifies workflow, enhances access to justice, and improves overall efficiency.

    The AG expressed gratitude to the governor, as well as to the ministry’s directors and staff, for their unwavering support in executing these reforms.

    She appreciated the foundation laid down by previous AGs in Borno, making it possible for the current team to build on their successes.

    The state Chief Judge, Justice Kashim Zannah, described the CMS as a significant milestone in the state’s judicial history, noting its potential to ensure the speedy dispensation of justice.

    He urged the governor to continue supporting the AG’s efforts and called for a comprehensive review of the State’s laws to reflect modern standards and realities.

    Zulum reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to the ministry’s ongoing transformation.

    “The Attorney-General, Hauwa Abubakar, has demonstrated her competence through remarkable achievements.

    Read Also: NAF airstrikes foil Sallah day terror attack on Borno

    “Her dedication is making a positive and lasting impact on the justice system in Borno,” he said.

    He pledged to prioritise law reform and continuous training of legal personnel to sustain institutional growth.

    The governor inspected the ministry’s newly refurbished workspaces, unveiled the Citizens Mediation Centre, commissioned the e-Library, and officially launched the ministry’s new logo, mission, vision, and core values. This transformation aligns with the Borno State Development Plan, particularly the pillars of “Peace and Security” and “Rehabilitation and Resettlement”.

    The technology partner, LawPavilion Managing Director/CEO, Ope Olugasa, said: “Our mission to equip the justice system to enable people and businesses achieve their potential stems from our belief that the rule of law is not just an ideal, but a fundamental infrastructure required for national prosperity.

    “That is why we did not just come to Borno State to deliver a product , we came to walk with the team on a transformation journey, as a committed, strategic partner.”

    Directors and staff members of the Ministry lauded the AG’s leadership, describing her as visionary, diligent, and deeply committed to institutional growth.

    The occasion was attended by dignitaries, including the Chairman,Nigerian Bar Association, Maiduguri Branch, Mr. Zanna Hamza.

  • ‘Why criminal charge was filed against Senator Natasha’

    ‘Why criminal charge was filed against Senator Natasha’

    The decision by the state to file a criminal charge against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has attracted varied reactions. Assistant Editor ERIC IKHILAE writes on why the state opted for prosecution.

    The frosty relationship between Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan and the Senate leadership took a new twist recently when the office of the Director, Public Prosecution of the Federation (DPPF), Mohammed Abubakar, filed a charge against her.

     The three-count charge, marked: CR/297/25 filed on May 15 before the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), principally accused the now suspended Senator – representing Kogi Central Senatorial District on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) – of making harmful imputations.

    She is, in count one, accused of making an imputation which she knew would harm the reputation of the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, by claiming he plotted, with former Kogi governor, Yahaya Bello, to kill her.

    In count two, Akpoti-Uduaghan is accused of making a similar imputation knowing that it will harm the reputation of ex-governor Bello.

    She is, in count three, accused of making another imputation, which she knew would harm the reputation of Akpabio by associating him with the death of one Miss Imoren Iniubong.

    The decision by the government to file a criminal charge against Akpoti-Uduaghan has attracted varied reactions, with her lawyers and supporters crying wolf and alleging bias.

    One of her lawyers, Uju Nwoduwu, in a statement for the Senator’s legal team, accused the state of ignoring her petitions and electing to act on the one filed by the Senate President and others.

     Nwoduwu claimed that Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan submitted 12 petitions bordering on cyberstalking, threats to life, defamation, and an alleged assassination plot.

    She expressed concern that, while Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan’s complaints remain uninvestigated, counter-allegations from Akpabio and Bello have been swiftly processed, culminating in the filing of the criminal charge against her.

    Read Also: My phone line cloned to malign Nigerian dignitaries, Natasha alleges

     “The public expects law enforcement and prosecutorial bodies to uphold fairness, the rule of law, and impartial justice in all matters involving her.

     “This selective response raises deep concerns about biased enforcement of justice,” the statement said.

     The Nation, however, learnt that the decision by the DPPF to file the criminal charge was to allow the court deal with the issues raised and to afford Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan the opportunity to be heard by a neutral party, since she has raised the issue of bias against the state and security agencies.

     An official of the Federal Ministry of Justice explained that during the investigation, which was earlier in time, and which informed the filing of the charge, Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan failed to honour the many invitations extended to her to be heard.

     “While the petitions that led to the charge were being investigated by relevant security agencies, she was invited to provide her response.

     “She never showed up. Instead, her lawyers claimed she travelled abroad. She declined to return or make her response available until the investigation was concluded.

     “The DPPF then decided that, since a criminal case has been established, it was better to have the case decided by the court, where she would have the opportunity to raise her defence, since she failed to honour invitations extended to her during the investigation.

    “I believe that, beside providing her side of the story, her participation in the investigation would have also afforded her the opportunity to draw the investigators’ attention to petitions which she now claims have been left unattended to,” the official said.

     An Abuja-based lawyer, Matthew Dawodu has, however, commended the decision by the DPPF to take the case before a court to allow parties present their cases before an unbiased arbiter, with appropriate constitutional responsibilities in that regard.

    Dawodu said it should be “the mere filing of the charge has not established Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan’ guilt, adding that the state is still required to prove its case with credible evidence and beyond reasonable doubt.

    “I think the suspended Senator and her legal team ought to be glad that the matter is before a competent court, where they could prove her innocence and have all the issues determined in the open by a competent court,” he said.

     Another lawyer, Abubakar Taufeek said he commended Akpabio for deciding to take the case to the appropriate authorities instead of resorting to self-help.

     Taufeek added: “To me, the Senate President should be commended by being civil in deciding to file a formal complaint which was investigated and resulted in the filing of the charge.

     “I commended him for not resorting to brute force and acting arbitrarily. 

     “I don’t think the complaint by Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s camp about the decision to charge her to court is necessary. They should approach the court and prove her innocence,” Taufeek said.

  • Experts: how to safeguard judicial independence, rights

    Experts: how to safeguard judicial independence, rights

    Legal experts and activists have explored how to attain judicial independence and its role as the guardian of human rights.

    They converged in Abuja for the fourth The C.O. Anah SAN Memorial Colloquium, organised by the Anah Law Practice in collaboration with The Anah Centre for Social Justice.

    Its theme was: “Independence of the Judiciary and the guardianship of human rights.”

    Managing Principal, Anah Law Practice, Ms. Adaeze Anah, who is the daughter of the late C. O. Anah (SAN), said: “Without an independent bench, justice is a rumour. Without human rights, law is a weapon. Without humanity, we are technicians—not guardians.”

    Former Chairman, National Human Rights Commission, Prof. Chidi Odinkalu, said Nigeria’s judicial system has historically lacked genuine independence, a situation compounded by the colonial legacy of a “myth” of independence that never truly existed.

    According to him, since independence in 1960, the judiciary has been subjected to manipulation, appointed and influenced by political actors, often in a system of insider-dealing, nepotism, and external pressures.

    Odinkalu said the country’s judicial institutions—such as the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal—have seen chief justices who served under controversy, tarnishing the integrity of the judiciary.

    The question, he said, remains: “What kind of judges do we need to uphold human rights and social justice?”

    His answer: judges of character and courage—those who stand in the face of threats and inducements.

    Retired Justice Alaba Omolaye-Ajileye reflected on the vulnerability of judicial independence.

    He highlighted that the appointment process, often concentrated in the hands of the Chief Justice and the National Judicial Council (NJC), is susceptible to manipulation.

    “Judges who will make decisions based on the law without fear and favour; judges who will bravely face threats or intimidation and prioritise the integrity of the justice system,” the retired high court judge said.

    He recalled cases involving the removal of Chief Judges, where constitutional provisions were exploited to undermine judicial independence.

    Read Also: Ondo: Diaspora rights group set agenda for OSOPADEC, congratulates new helmsman

    These instances, he said, indicated how fragile the system remains, with constitutional provisions often manipulated to serve political ends.

    At the heart of the debate lies a truth: “judicial independence is a human right”.

    Section 36(1) of Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution states that every person is entitled to a fair hearing before a court constituted to guarantee independence and impartiality.

    When this independence is compromised, rights are violated.

    Justice Omolaye-Ajileye stressed that judges’ character and courage are paramount to defending these rights.

    “Judges with strong character possess high moral integrity, honesty, and ethics. Character-driven judges will remain unbiased and fair in their decision-making.

    “Judges with courage can make difficult decisions, even in the face of the most scurrilous criticism or pressure,” he added.

    An activist, Aisha Yesufu, lamented that the judiciary has become compromised, with cases bought, delayed, or dismissed through bribes or political influence.

    She said: “The judiciary is supposed to be the last resort of the common man.

    “We can have a country where we have an independent judiciary; a country where access to good quality education is not dependent on the economic status of one’s family.”

  • Lagos to amend ‘Obas, Chiefs Law’ to curb land grabbing, title abuse

    Lagos to amend ‘Obas, Chiefs Law’ to curb land grabbing, title abuse

    The Lagos State Government is reviewing the Obas and Chiefs Law of 2015.

     Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Lawal Pedro (SAN), described the review as an effort by the Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu administration to modernise the law in line with realities and good governance.

    Pedro lamented the erosion of respect for traditional institutions, blaming it on misconduct, proliferation of unverified chieftaincy titles, and prolonged litigation over succession rights.

    “Our royal fathers remain symbols of cultural continuity and community leadership. But today, with due respect, the institution is under threat — from land grabbing, unlawful upgrades, and chieftaincy titles not rooted in the customs of communities,” he lamented.

    The AG explained that the review was aimed at addressing gaps in the law and redefining the roles of traditional rulers to include conflict resolution, peacekeeping, and partnership in community development.

    He further said the proposed amendments would recognise traditional rulers as partners in maintaining law and order, mediating disputes, and conveying government policies to the grassroots.

     “The law must evolve. Our obas can help reduce crime by mediating disputes, gathering public feedback, and promoting community initiatives.

    “This process is about partnership, not imposition. We want a law that preserves heritage while promoting justice, peace, and good governance,” he added.

    Many traditional rulers urged the government to give prominence to their activities.

     Ayangburen of Ikorodu, Oba Kabiru Adewale Shotobi, said: “We want a clear legal distinction between traditional and provisional councils. We’ve reported impostors multiple times, yet no action has been taken. This must stop.’’

    Read Also:Makogi monarch debunks allegations of land grabbing, cultism

     The monarch also objected to any attempt to alter the leadership structure of the State Council of Obas, which recognises four vice-chairmen from the state’s four traditional divisions.

     He insisted that Chief Transit Committees should be consulted before any appointments were made at the state level, and urged the government to ensure chiefs were not excluded from the ongoing reform.

     Oba Shotobi requested one month for traditional rulers to review the draft law and return with coordinated input.

     “Our decisions are sometimes ignored in court due to lack of legal backing. We need enabling laws to make our rulings count,” he said.

     Earlier, the Solicitor-General and Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Justice, Mr. Hammed Oyenuga, said: “This gathering presents a unique opportunity for robust dialogue, reflection, and collaboration as we seek to strengthen the law that directly impacts our revered traditional institutions and the communities they serve.

    “The Obas and Chiefs Law, last reviewed decades ago, must now be aligned with contemporary realities, evolving societal dynamics, and constitutional principles without compromising the dignity and historical heritage of our royal fathers,” he added.

     The meeting ended with a call for further deliberations in four weeks before final amendments were submitted.