Former Vice President Yemi Osinbajo will deliver the keynote at the Law Week of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Yenagoa Branch.
Its theme is: “Setting the pace: Law, leadership and transformational development.”
The plenary session will be held on May 16.
Branch Chairman, Mr. Somina Johnbull, said the theme highlights the pivotal role of the legal profession in fostering good governance, development, and quality leadership.
He said: “Prof. Osinbajo’s insights and extensive experience in addressing societal challenges are invaluable, and we anticipate that his contributions will spark meaningful discussions during the Plenary Session.
“This year’s Law Week is distinguished not only by our keynote address but also by a stellar lineup of panellists for the Plenary Session.
“A highlight of our Law Week will be the Annual Law Dinner, scheduled for May 17, 2025, at the Chief DSP Alamieyeseigha Memorial Banquet Hall.”
The chairman added: “This prestigious event promises to be an exceptional opportunity for networking, exchanging knowledge, and engaging with thought leaders, industry captains, and distinguished legal practitioners of international repute.
“In alignment with our commitment to social responsibility, the Branch will be visiting an orphanage dedicated to children with special needs as part of our Law Week activities.
“This initiative underscores our belief that the impacts of our events should resonate across all sectors of society, embodying our commitment to humanitarian efforts and community support.”
Johnbull appreciated the Governor of Bayelsa State, Douye Diri, and the Deputy Governor of Bayelsa State, Senator Lawrence Ewhrudjakpo, whose consistent support and partnership had enabled the Branch to thrive favourably in the comity of NBA branches nationwide.
He also used the medium to thank the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources (Oil) and a member of the Branch, Senator Heineken Lokpobiri, who had demonstrated time and again that he is not just a political leader par excellence, but also a dedicated Barman.
He equally thanked the Chief Judge of Bayelsa State, Hon Justice Matilda Abrakasa Ayemieye, as well as the entire Bayelsa State Judiciary, for all the goodwill and camaraderie the NBA Yenagoa had enjoyed from the Judiciary under My Lord’s administration.
Johnbull acknowledged and appreciated the management of the Nigerian Content Development Monitoring Board (NCDMB) for their great support towards the hosting of this year’s Law Week.
Chairman of the Law Week Planning Committee, Iniruo Wills, added some emphasis on the array of events lined up for the week, particularly the plenary session taking place on Friday, May 16.
Wills, a former Commissioner in Bayelsa State, said: “One aspect of the theme is the role of the law in the courtroom and beyond that is revolutionising access to justice, and in doing that, we have in mind our stakeholders, that the public.
“So, stakeholders’ satisfaction is at the back of our mind trying to X-ray the issues of access, panel session on driving governance, leadership and development through law to the man on the street, most of them know about the law l, the role of the lawyer in the courtroom but it is important we continually bring out the importance of the rule of law to underpin the entire process of social economic development.
“In fact, there is a sense through which the state interferes with society, social economic affairs but is really a reflection of how well the rule of law is doing. So, you see that the two areas we are focusing on this year’s event week in terms of the plenary session as to do with the role of the rule of law in the overall governance of peace and stability to our society and also in terms of the immediate access to justice.”
The Nigerian Bar Association Section on Business Law (NBA-SBL) has said Nigeria’s tourism sector remains vastly untapped and should be further harnessed.
The Chairman, Ozofu Ogiemudia, stressed that natural and cultural assets ranging from scenic rock formations to heritage sites are underutilised resources that could significantly boost the economy if properly harnessed.
“Most of these sites are natural gates that can attract both domestic and international visitors. We need deliberate policies and investments to unlock this potential,” she stated.
Ogiemudia spoke at a briefing in Lagos on its forthcoming Tourism Retreat and Roundtable in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital, from May 9-11, 2025.
Organised by the NBA-SBL Travel, Tourism and Hospitality Committee, its theme is: “Repositioning Nigeria’s tourism & hospitality from seasonal hype to sustainable prosperity.”
Ogiemudia believes that investment in key sites such as Olumo Rock and heritage relics in Badagry can generate significant revenue if properly maintained and promoted.
“If every state recognises tourism as a vital revenue source and invests accordingly, Nigeria’s tourism industry can become a major economic engine,” she said.
She said NBA-SBL’s legal team is actively reviewing existing laws affecting tourism, with plans to collaborate with government agencies to craft policies that facilitate investment and sustainability.
“Our association has a strong track record of engaging with policymakers to develop supportive legal frameworks. We are committed to ensuring Nigeria’s tourism potential is fully realised,” Ogiemudia said.
Ogiemudia added that perceptions of the sector’s decline are misplaced, asserting that tourism is more untapped than dying.
She said the upcoming retreat will gather stakeholders from the government, the private sector, and civil society to explore strategies for making tourism a sustainable, year-round industry.
Chairperson of the NBA-SBL Travel, Tourism and Hospitality Committee, Chinenye Oragwu, highlighted the importance of legal reforms and policy support in fostering sector growth.
“Our goal is to develop a comprehensive framework that encourages private sector investment, community involvement, and government backing to ensure tourism becomes a continuous driver of economic prosperity,” she explained.
In line with the theme, the retreat will feature site visits to Ibadan’s Olubadan Palace, Heritage Museum, and other cultural landmarks, providing participants with firsthand insights into Nigeria’s rich history.
A key feature will be a roundtable discussion involving notable experts, including the Director-General of the National Council of Arts and Culture, Obi Asika.
Chair of the Planning Committee, Pamileri Akabunwa, added that the event would facilitate strategic partnerships and stakeholder engagement.
“We want to inspire both reflection and action, pushing Nigeria to become a leading destination for tourists all year round,” she said.
Oragwu noted increased awareness among Nigerians, with more groups promoting local tourism sites.
“With continuous dialogue, investment, and community participation, Nigeria’s tourism sector can reach new heights,” she concluded.
The suspension of three judges by the National Judicial Council (NJC) for alleged judicial misconduct has continued to generate reactions. Lawyers commended the development but argued that while their conduct aptly depicted how not to be a judge, the option of suspension was inadequate to cure the Judiciary of its deep-rooted ills, writes Assistant Editor ERIC IKHILAE.
On September 20, 2023, Justice Olukayode Ariwoola – then Chief Justice of Nigeria – while inaugurating nine new Justices of the Court of Appeal, rendered what many considered then as an unusual and lengthy homily.
Justice Ariwoola urged the newly elevated judges to flee from unethical conduct and acts unbecoming of a judicial officer.
He said: “The level of public scrutiny of your conduct will, henceforth, assume astronomical dimensions because you have willingly taken up an appointment that will strategically place you perennially in the eye of the storm.
“The tempo and rate of public assessment of your conduct and disposition have also instantaneously assumed an unprecedented spike from this moment.
“You must redouble your effort and dialogue properly with your conscience in order not to fall out of the grace of the Almighty God and the Nigerian people who are curiously looking up to you.
“It takes nothing to join the crowd, but it takes a lot to stand alone with good conscience…
“As judicial officers, you have a divine mandate on earth that you must discharge with unveiled honesty and sincerity.
“You must give a good account of yourselves to justify your elevation to the court of appeal so that you can subsequently earn an elevation to the supreme court to further actualise your dreams.
“Many high-profile cases would definitely come to you on appeal, and they may likely come in some juicy and irresistible gifts that are often intended to dent your reputation and integrity.
“I urge Your Lordships to flee from such disguised temptations, because your reputation and integrity matter much and count enormously in your rise to honour and fame in life,” Justice Ariwoola said.
Justice Jane Esienanwan Inyang was among the nine judicial officers inaugurated that day.
The judge, from Cross River State, was sworn in as a judge of the Federal High Court on February 12, 2015.
Others, to whom Justice Ariwoola directed his admonition, were Justices Hannatu Azumi Laja-Balogun from Kaduna State, who was appointed a High Court Judge on May 24, 1999; Binta Fatima Zubairu from Kaduna State, appointed a High Court Judge on Oct. 31, 2001 and Peter Obiora from Anambra, who was sworn in as High Court Judge on Jan. 17, 2005.
Also in the attendance were Justices Okon Abang from Akwa Ibom, who was appointed a High Court Judge on June 22, 2009; Asma’u Musa Mainoma from the Federal Capital Territory appointed High Court Judge on February 1, 2013 and Lateef Adebayo Ganiyu from Oyo State, who became High Court Judge on June 26, 2014.
There were also Justices Hadiza Rabiu Shagari from Sokoto State, who was elevated to the High Court Bench on February 12, 2015, and Paul Ahmed Bassi from Borno State, appointed to the High Court on July 14, 2017.
Of all the nine judicial officers who listened to the then CJN, Justice Inyang seems to be the only one who gave no heed to the message Justice Ariwoola was passing to them, going by her suspension by the National Judicial Council (NJC) for alleged misconduct.
Her alleged offence
At its 108th meeting held between April 29 and 30, the NJC resolved, among others, to suspend Justice Inyang (Court of Appeal, Uyo division) for one year without pay.
It is on the grounds that she was found to have breached Rule 3 (5) of the Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers.
The NJC added that Justice Inyang was found to have abused her office “by issuing inappropriate ex-parte orders for the sale of Hon. Udeme Esset’s petrol station and other businesses at the interlocutory stage of the case.
“The act of judicial misconduct occurred while His Lordship presided over Suit No. FHC/UY/CS/46/2023, at the Federal High Court, Uyo judicial division, before his elevation to the Court of Appeal.”
The NJC also resolved to suspend Justices Inyang Ekwo and Aminu Baffa Aliyu (both of the Federal High Court).
Justice Ekwo
Justice Ekwo was appointed a Judge of the Federal High Court of Nigeria on January 3, 2008.
He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Cross River State (now University of Uyo), the Bar Qualifying Certificate of the Nigerian Law School, a Bachelor of Theology from the Pan-African Theological College, Post Graduate Diploma in Journalism from the International Institute of Journalism Abuja, Master of Laws of the University of Uyo and Doctor of Philosophy in Law from European-American University.
He has authored many books, including: “Incorporated Trustees: Law and Practice in Nigeria,” “Education Law and Administration in Nigeria”, and “Storm in the Will.”
Within the Abuja judicial circle, Justice Ekwo is admired for his deep grasp of the law, his deft handling of cases and his ability to take charge of his court and, in most instances, coordinate proceedings without permitting delays.
His alleged offence
The NJC said it resolved to place Justice Ekwo on suspension for one year without pay, to place him on the watch-list for five years as well as bar him from elevation for five years, because of alleged misconduct.
According to the NJC, the complaints against Justice Ekwo arose from a criminal case marked. FHC/ABJ/CR/184/2021, in which he “delivered a ruling in a pending application without hearing the parties.”
The NJC said it found that the judge “ignored an application to set aside the proceedings of the court conducted in the absence of the parties.
“Subsequently, His Lordship proceeded to deliver a ruling dismissing the charge against the defendants.
“Consequently, His Lordship was found to have violated Rule 3.1 and 3.3 of the 2016 Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”
The case was brought by the office of the Inspector General of Police (IGP) in the name of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (FRN), against Prof Obiajulu Obikeze (a staff of the Chukwuemeka Odimegwu Ojukwu University), Dr Raymond Ofor, Chief Ezue, Sir Amobi Nwafor and Okafor Bethram.
The prosecution claimed, in the 11-count charge, but the defendants and others now at large, sent a forged letter to the Special Adviser to the Governor of Anambra on Chieftaincy and Towns Union Matters, titled, “Submission of Awa Chieftaincy Constitution,” knowing it to be false, with the intent that it may be acted upon as genuine at the Government House, Awka, Anambra State.”
It further claimed that the offence was committed, “to the detriment of the people of Umu-Nzekwe as well as Ezeani Families of Awa, so that the Special Adviser may, in the belief that it is genuine, be induced to treat the said letter”.
The prosecution said the offence allegedly committed by the defendants was contrary to Section 3(6) and punishable under Section 1(2) (c) of the Miscellaneous Offences Act, Cap M17 Laws of Nigeria, 2010.
They were arraigned on February 22, 2022.
As the case, originally being prosecuted by a police lawyer, Celestine Odo, progressed, the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) took it over and appointed Joe Agi (SAN) to prosecute it.
Agi announced his appointment as the new prosecutor during the proceedings conducted on June 11, 2022, a development the defence lawyer, Kelvin Nwufo (SAN) did not object to.
However, in a ruling on September 20, 2023, Justice Ekwo gave a ruling on the defendants’ motion on notice dated April 29, 2022 and quashed the 11-count charge in its entirety on the grounds that it was “invalid, unconstitutional and ultra vires.”
The judge upheld the defendants’ contention that the decision by the police to file the charge after a similar case had already been decided by an Anambra State High Court, with two other cases still pending before the courts on the same subject matter, amounted to an abuse of court process.
He said: “It is the law that where persons have submitted to the jurisdiction of the court, they are bound by the judgment thereof.”
Justice Ekwo further held that even where someone later writes a petition on a matter in respect of which a judgment had been given, it was the duty of the police to advise the parties or any person connected thereto to either obey the judgment or proceed on appeal.
“It can be seen from the respective averments of the parties to this application that the criminal charge in this case is an attempt by the nominal complainants to use the police to intimidate, harass, frighten and cow the defendants/applicants.
“On this ground, I find that this charge is a product of self-help and cannot be allowed to stand and I so hold. I make an order dismissing it,” Justice Ekwo said.
Justice Aliyu
Justice Aliyu, who was serving in the Zamfara division of the Federal High Court, was also suspended by the NJC for one year without pay for alleged judicial misconduct in breach of Rules 3 (1) and 5 of the 2016 Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers.
The NJC placed him on the watch list for three years, during which period he is barred from elevation.
According to the NJC, Justice Aliyu was found liable for the act of judicial misconduct in Suit No. FHC/GS/CS/30/2021 between the Government of Zamfara State and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
He was said to have granted an order restraining security agencies from carrying out their statutory duties and disregarded the doctrine of stare decisis in his adjudication of the case.
Justice Aliyu, born June 30, 1968, studied Law at the Bayero University, Kano, graduating in 1999, before attending the Nigerian Law School, Abuja.
He hails from Yamaltu Deba LGA in Yobe State.
Another petition against Justice Ekwo
In a statement it released on April 30, the NJC said another petition was pending against Justice Ekwo in relation to suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/321/2015
It said it resolved to put the petition in abeyance pending the outcome of an appeal pending on the case before the Court of Appeal.
Other judges hammered by NJC
Justices Inyang, Ekwo and Aliyu were not the only judicial officers against whom the NJC acted during its 108th meeting.
It issued a letter of caution to Justice A. O. Awogboro of the Federal High Court, Lagos division, after investigating a petition filed by one Kasali Azeez Olagoke and S. Hamza in respect of suit No. FHC/CS/2021 between Chief Adesanya Musediku and the Assistant General of Police, Onikan, Zone 2.
Also, for their roles in the unlawful appointment of an acting Chief Judge for Imo State, the NJC resolved that Justice Theophilus Nnamdi Nzeukwu should be issued a query to show cause within seven days why disciplinary action should not be taken against him for presenting himself to be sworn in as the acting CJ of Imo State.
For Justice V. U. Okorie, the President of the Customary Court of Appeal, Imo State, who acted as Interim Chairman of Imo State Judicial Service Commission and recommended the appointment of Justice Nzeukwu, the NJC directed him to show cause within days why disciplinary action should not be taken against him for his complicity in the recommendation.
Justice Ekwo again
Surprisingly, the latest NJC sanction of Justice Ekwo came almost a year after he was earlier punished.
The NJC sanctioned Justice Ekwo and two others at its 105th meeting held on 15 & 16 May 2024.
Justice Ekwo was issued a warning and barred from elevation for two years.
Justice G. B. Brikins-Okolosi of the Delta State High Court was also issued a warning and barred from elevation for three years.
On his part, Justice Amina Shehu of the Yobe State High Court was cautioned.
Their alleged offences
According to the NJC, Justice Ekwo was “warned for abuse of discretionary power of a judge by wrongly granting an ex-parte order in Suit No FHC/ABJ/C/626/2023 Juliet Ebere Nwadi Gbaka & 2 Ors V Seplat Energy Plc & 12 Ors.”
Justice Brikins-Okolosi was equally “issued a warning for failure to deliver judgment within the stipulated period in Joseph Anene Okafor Vs Skye Bank, Suit No A/94/2010 after parties had filed and adopted their final written addresses.”
Justice Shehu was cautioned “for issuing a writ of possession conferring title on the defendant in suit No YBS/HC/NNR/1cv/2020 when there was no subsisting judgment of any court to enable His Lordship to issue the writ.”
Lawyers demand stiffer sanctions
While many lawyers hailed the NJC, describing the sanctions as an indication of a determined effort to sanitise the Judiciary, others argued that the suspensions handed out were insufficient.
The summation of their arguments is to the effect that the sanctioned judicial officers conducted themselves in matters antithetical to the conduct expected of a juristic soul.
They added that the judges acted in a way directly at variance with Justice Ariwoola’s homily, which conduct denigrates the institution, whose creed they swore to abide by, protect and preserve while subscribing to the judicial oath.
To the lawyers, the conduct of the sanctioned judges portrays them as the wrong portraits of what a true judicial officer should be.
Prof. Yemi Akinseye-George (SAN) was of the view that the outcome of the last meeting of the NJC demonstrated an unwavering commitment to upholding the independence, integrity, and constitutional order of the Nigerian judiciary.
He added: “These decisions, although stern, were necessary to reinforce the message that judicial robes do not shield anyone from accountability.
“Under Justice Kekere-Ekun’s stewardship, the NJC has deepened its resolve to cleanse the judiciary of unethical behaviour while promoting transparency.
“At the same meeting, the Council empanelled nine committees to investigate 27 judicial officers facing allegations of misconduct, demonstrating a proactive and institutionalised approach to disciplinary processes,” he said.
Prof. Akinseye-George, who is the President of the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies (CSLS), said the NJC’s recent actions serve as a beacon of reform and integrity.
He added that the Judiciary, under the guidance of Justice Kekere-Ekun, “deserves commendation for its principled and courageous decisions.
“The path may be arduous, but with such leadership, the restoration and preservation of public confidence in the rule of law is not only possible—it is inevitable,” Prof Akinseye-George said.
To Prof. Chidi Odinkalu and Dr. Abdul Malkam, the latest set of sanctions handed out by the NJC is inadequate.
Odinkalu argued, among others, that the decision by the NJC to suspend the judicial officers rather than dismiss them raised serious concerns about judicial accountability in the country.
While questioning the basis for the NJC’s choice of suspension as an appropriate sanction, Odinkalu asked: “If a judge is suspended for one year without pay, what is the person doing coming back to be a judge?”
He added: “If anything, the person is more likely to come back more hungry and more corrupt.
“Many will see these dispositions by the NJC as progress, maybe.
“But, these dispositions are evidence of the deep malaise that currently afflicts the Nigerian Judiciary,
“The conclusion is inescapable that the NJC, as currently constituted, is part of the problem, not part of the solution.
“What it has done in these cases is just not good enough.
“If it is not willing to root out judicial crookedness, then it should be rooted out,” Odinkalu said.
Malkam said that although NJC’s latest decisions indicate an effort to uphold standards in the Judiciary, it also reveal a deep institutional hesitation.
He wondered why the NJC stopped at suspensions for misconduct.
He believes they are grave enough not to merit a one year penalty without pay.
Malkam was of the view that a nation’s Judiciary that accommodates the return of judges found guilty of serious breaches sends the wrong message to society.
He said that although suspension may serve a purpose, where misconduct is proved, reinstatement should never be considered as an option.
Rites Foods Limited has filed a suit at the Federal High Court, Abuja, against Mamuda Beverages Nigeria Limited, Kano, alleging infringement of its intellectual property as regards trade market and design elements of its product, Fearless Energy Drink.
The suit before Justice Emeka Nwite followed alleged breach of a consent judgment arising from an earlier suit filed in January against the defendants.
Dissatisfied with the manners Mamuda re-introduced Pop Power Energy Drink into the market, Rite Foods , in the new suit filed through a writ of summons, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/705/2025, is seeking N1 billion as general damages and N60 million as cost of the suit for alleged injury suffered as a result of the infringement and unlawful use of its registered design and trademark by the defendant.
It, therefore, asked for an order of perpetual injunction restraining Mamuda Beverages, its directors, distributors or any other person(s) from infringing on its registered trademark by engaging in the trade or business of manufacturing, supplying, distributing or selling the drinks in Nigeria,
The writ was filed by the company’s team of lawyers including Oyetola Oshobi, SAN, Boonyameen Babajide LAWAL and Kehinde Daodu of Babalakin & Co.
The plaintiff, Rites Food Limited is seeking a declaration of the court that being the registered proprietor of the registered design no. NG/DS/NT/2020/1099 with certificate no. 004183 and registered trade market no 38227, at the Trade Marks, Patent and Designs Registry, it is entitled to exclusive use and exploitation of the registered design.
It is also seeking for a declaration that the defendant’s business of manufacturing, selling and commercially distributing in Nigeria its Pop Power Energy Drink products, not being the plaintiff’s product, but closely resembling, similar to and or identical to the plaintiff registered design, was capable of being offered to the public as a product of the plaintiff and likely to cause confusion in the course of trade, thereby disturbing the plaintiff’s exclusive use of its registered design no. NG/DS/NT/2020/1099, is injurious to the plaintiff among other players.
It asked for an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from passing off it’s Pop Power Energy Drink as the plaintiff’s Fearless Energy Drink products.
The plaintiff in addition asked for delivery up for destruction of the Pop Power Energy Drink and all other products infringing on the plaintiff registered design and trademark.
Mamuda Beverages Nigeria Limited has, however, filed a preliminary objection to the new suit which it said was an abuse of court process.
Mamuda Beverages denied the claims of the plaintiff, insisting that the new suit constitutes an abuse of court process .
Mamuda Beverages argued and submitted that issues being raised in the new suit had been dealt with in the previous case marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/139/2025 that ended with a consent judgment.
The defendants said the consent judgment ordered modifications to the product design of its Pop Power energy drink before resuming production and that the court order had been complied with before resuming production.
The defendants submitted that the court lacks the jurisdiction to adjudicate on the complaints of the plaintiff in the new suit.
The trial judge, Justice Emeka Nwite has, however, fixed May 28 for the hearing of the preliminary objection filed by Mamuda Beverages.
In January 2025, Rite Foods initiated legal proceedings against Mamuda for infringing on the trademark and design elements of its Fearless Energy Drink with the launch of a similar-looking product, Pop Power.
The case led to the grant of injunctive reliefs, including Anton Piller orders, after which Mamuda opted for a settlement.
Under the terms of that settlement, Mamuda in admittance of the violation undertook to destroy all infringing Pop Power Energy Drink products — an exercise confirmed duly carried out, with visual and pictorial evidence provided.
Mamuda equally agreed to desist from any further violations of Rite Foods’ intellectual property rights.
Mamuda subsequently reintroduced Pop Power into the market, with some changes in appearance but again has become the subject of the fresh litigation.
The International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA) Ikeja Branch and the National Agency for the Prohibition of trafficking in persons (NAPTIP) have called for synergy with various government agencies to fight human trafficking in Nigeria.
The groups made this known at a one-day training organised by the members of the anti-human trafficking committee of the branch, in collaboration with NAPTIP.
The training held in partnership with NAPTIP, was titled: “Strengthening Partnership in Combating Human Trafficking.”
Chairperson of FIDA, Ikeja Branch, Mrs Nnenna Eze said her agency hadpartnered with NAPTIP in the fight against human trafficking.
She, however, said that there was still need for other governmental agencies to collaborate and fight against the menace.
“What we are doing today is a form of partnership because from the training today we discovered that NAPTIP has been doing a lot.
“When we have issues like this, we can easily contact NAPTIP. So if other government agencies come together to form partnership, it will strengthen the fight against human trafficking.
“If there are synergies among governmental agencies, civil societies and NAPTIP, there will be a tremendous progress in combating human trafficking,” she said.
Eze also said the human trafficking training aimed at enlightening the members of the branch on the rising waves of human trafficking in the country and how to fight against it.
Eze said the overriding objectives of FIDA was to protect the rights of children and women.
According to her, trafficking in person is man in-humanity to man.
She said most cases that were handled at the legal clinic of FIDA included domestic and sexual violence which necessitated the need for the training.
Eze said: “All these forms of violence is linked to human trafficking.
“I had the opportunity to speak with some 2015 rescued victims of human trafficking last month and I discovered that majority of them were young girls and 60 per cent of them came back with babies.
“We also discover that when these victims reunite with their families, they still face psychological problem from their family members for bringing unwanted babies home.
“So when these victims approach us, we will know how to go about their case because we are well informed and equipped with this training.”
The Chairperson Committee of the training, Mrs Caroline Ibeh, said the human trafficking training was a real eye opener and a means for FIDA members to be well informed.
Ibeh, the former vice chairperson of FIDA Badagry branch, also said the human trafficking was not only about prostitution and it could happen anywhere.
She thereafter called on government to enforce strict laws to help curb human trafficking.
“The laws are there but are they being enforced?
“The people in high places should allow these laws to manifest because if someone who is well placed in the society involves himself or herself in this menace and he is caught, someone will com from somewhere and kill close the case.
“The laws are there but it is the enforceability we should be working on,” Ibeh said.
The facilitator of the training, Mr Fred Oko, while addressing the participants, said it was a criminal offence to engage a girl or boy below 12 years as house help.
Oko, the Head of Public Enlightenment Unit, NAPTIP, Lagos Zonal Command, said Traffic in Persons (TIP) remained unknown until late 1980s.
According to him, human trafficking currently generates between 32 and 150 billion US dollars every year with over 27 million people trafficked globally.
He identified oath taking, debt bondage, emotional abuse, lies and deception, intimidation and threats as some of the control mechanisms adopted by the traffickers.
Oko further said other forms of human trafficking included sexual exploitation, illegal adoption, forced labour, domestic servitude and forced begging.
Justice Yusuf Halilu, in a ruling, ordered the AMAC Investment and Property Development Company Limited, Commercial Properties Ltd, Manillah Integrated Partners Ltd and their agents to halt any further works on the market project located at plot 1729 Cadastral Zone E27, Apo, Abuja.
The interlocutory injunction, Justice Halilu said, is to subsist until the determination of a suit brought against Dr. Shuaibu Omeiza Musari and his company, Techs and Concretes Nigeria Ltd, by AMAC Investment, Commercial Properties and Manillah Integrated.
The ruling delivered on April 15 was on the application filed by Techs and Concretes Nigeria Ltd, with which it sought to preserve the subject of the dispute between parties in the suit, marked: CV/467/2024.
Techs and Concretes Nigeria Ltd stated in a supporting affidavit that a dispute arose between parties when Manillah Integrated Partners allegedly decided to breach an agreement between them to jointly develop the market.
It stated that by the joint venture agreement executed between them, Manillah Integrated Partners was designated as the “developer” while Techs and Concretes Nigeria Ltd was designated as the “financier, co-developer and sole marketer.”
Techs and Concretes stated that contrary to the terms of the agreement between them, Manillah Integrated Partners allegedly went behind to unilaterally commence the development of the market project.
It stated that the suit by Manillah Integrated Partners and others was intended to shield them from being made to comply with the agreement, with the intention of getting away with their breach of the agreement.
In the ruling of April 15, Justice Halilu said: “From what has played out, as contained in the respective affidavits for and against the application for interlocutory injunction, I am fortified to say that there is indeed an agreement which both parties have signed, is the document at the centre of the misunderstanding.
“The second defendant/applicant (Techs and Concretes Ltd) is entitled, in law, to rely on same (the agreement) as the basis for establishing legal interest and has indeed established same as a matter of right, which deserves legal protections.
“I am minded to hold that the balance of convenience hinges heavily in favour of the applicant (Techs and Concretes).
“On the whole, therefore, I have no difficulty granting the application in the overriding interest of justice and fairplay,” the judge said.
On Monday, Dr. Musari, accompanied by some officials of his firm and security personnel, visited the project site to paste the court order and notify workers on the site to cease operations as ordered by the court.
Dr. Musari said as a law-abiding citizen he was not interested in any trouble, but that the right thing should be done, with parties complying with the order of court and waiting for the final determination of the case.
This is in order to enhance the development of practice-ready lawyers that can contribute meaningfully to the social and economic development of the nation.
These recommendations were made at the inaugural Regional Townhall Workshop on Legal Education held at the Imo State University, Owerri (IMSU).
As part of the NBA’s efforts to enhance legal education and practice in Nigeria, the President, Mazi Afam Osigwe (SAN) inaugurated the Legal Education Committee (NBA-LEC) under the leadership of Prof. Damilola Olawuyi, (SAN), with the mandate to promote and advance functional legal education in Nigeria, especially through training sessions and conferences on modern teaching approaches.
In exercise of this mandate, the NBA-LEC introduced the Regional Town Hall Workshop on Legal Education Series with the maiden edition held in South East region at Imo State University, Owerri.
The workshop recorded a huge turn out of more than 300 attendees.
Key stakeholders including the host of the event, the Vice Chancellor of IMSU, Prof. Uchefula Ugonna Chukwumaeze, (SAN), Chairman of the NBA-LEC Regional Townhall Workshop Series, Prof. Chimezie Kingsley Okorie SAN, law teachers and students across universities in the Southeast attended.
Four institutions delivered presentations on the state of legal education in Nigeria: Abia State University, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Imo State University, and Enugu State University of Science and Technology.
While welcoming delegates to the Workshop, Chairman of the NBA-LEC, Prof. Olawuyi, who is also the Deputy Vice Chancellor of Afe Babalola University, Ado Ekiti (ABUAD), highlighted the growing demand to review legal education in Nigeria to meet global standards.
He emphasised the need to revise the curriculum and leverage technology to enhance legal education, ultimately transforming it into a more effective law practice that can compete globally.
According to him :‘There is also an urgent need to increase investment in learning infrastructure across our law faculties if we are to actively deploy technology-based teaching methods.
He noted that only a few law faculties have functional ICT centres, modern teaching equipments, digital tools and libraries needed to instil contemporary entrepreneurial, technology and project management skills in law students.
Government or the NBA alone cannot provide all the tools.
We all can do something about this by giving back to our law faculties.’ the Learned Silk concluded.
The Vice Chancellor of IMSU, Prof. Chukwumaeze, (SAN) emphasised the need for all stakeholders in Nigeria’s justice sector, including the NBA to support legal education by providing educational materials. The Chairman of the Townhall Sub committee Prof. Okorie (SAN) also stressed the need for the NBA to be a bridge between the legal education and other relevant authorities in ensuring a strengthened legal education in terms of collaboration.
The ensuing roundtable discussions featured presentations by law teachers on the achievements so far and existing challenges that pose a threat to law teachers and students in law faculties.
The reports expressed concern on the falling standard of law practice in Nigeria and the ethical standard depreciation, this was attributed to various challenges faced by law faculties, affecting the quality of legal education and the overall development of legal the profession.
They sought increased collaboration with justice sector stakeholders to alleviate these challenges and improve existing standards.Various challenges were highlighted by the institutions, including infrastructure deficit, poor remuneration of law teachers, excessive workload of law teachers, limited access to legal information and underfunding of law faculties, especially lack of funding to attend international and domestic conferences.
Despite challenges, some faculties showcased good infrastructure and upgraded law libraries from analogue to digital, especially contributions from lawyers and alumni.
While discussing the way forward, the Workshop commended the NBA leadership for providing the innovative platform to reflect on the way forward and called for the swift implementation of the NBA Legal Education Endowment Fund which could go a long way in mobilising financial support for infrastructure and technology upgrade.
While calling on law firms, companies and other stakeholders to contribute to the fund, the workshop also called for more joint research projects between NBA and law faculties, as well as tailored research programmes and subsidised conferences for academic lawyers, as a way of incorporating theoretical and practical law aspects in the profession.
The attack on the Osun State High Court in Ilesa has brought to the fore the need to better secure judiciary infrastructure across the country against attacks, writes TOBA ADEDEJI
The April 20 attack on the Osun State High Court in Ilesa has highlighted the need for more secure courts.
Lagos State is yet to recover from the destruction of the iconic state high court in Igbosere during the 2020 #EndSARS protests.
The attack on the Osun court by arsonists led to the destruction of a section. The Registry and a courtroom were the most affected.
This is the third time that the court will be razed.
The court was attacked on February 17, 2017.
The hoodlums who invaded the court then injured a security man, Olarewaju Owoeye, before burning the Court II, Registry, Library I and the Secretary’s office.
No perpetrator has been brought to book to date.
Last year, vandals also invaded the court to steal electric cables, which threw it into darkness.
This time, amid Easter celebrations, arsonists sidled into the High Court, Ilesa in the Ayeso area via Ile-Ife Road to destroy the buildings in the evening.
The Registrar, Isola Omisakin, who spoke with The Nation, said police have launched an investigation.
When our reporter visited the court, the gate was locked as two Amotekun Corps watched over the premises.
Courts in need of facelift
Before the latest attack, most of the courts in Osun required major renovations.
A worker, who did not want his name in print because he was not authorised to speak,said: “Almost all the courts in Osun are in a very bad state, even that of Osogbo. Some of the courts are in ruins. Sometimes, we kill snakes in the court.
“The court that was attacked in Ilesa was very bushy and unkempt. There was no single security officer even after previous attacks.
“The court is prone to easy attack – free entry and exit, which I believe embolden the attackers.
“It was so terrible that, last year, vandals went in and removed electric cables. Since that time, the court has been in darkness.”
The source added: “There is nothing modern about the court, no basic amenities like computer, television and the like.
“It is the same in most other courts across the state.”
Govt promises to fix courts
Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Oluwo Jimi-Bada, admitted that the Ilesa court was not well secured.
He noted that the height of the perimeter fence cannot prevent marauders from gaining access.
“We need to secure this place because this is not the first time that this will happen.”
Jimi-Bada said the government will work to prevent a recurrence.
“These attacks must stop. We will start the renovation immediately. Judges cannot sit in the present condition.
“We have to also prioritise the security. We will also restore power. We will start almost immediately.”
The AG said Governor Ademola Adeleke was committed to improving the court infrastructure in the state.
His words: “What we’ve done in the Ministry of Justice is to make provision for this renovation which we are going to start. We will try to see what we can do with our 2025 budget.
“We don’t need to wait for the judiciary to bring a memo for renovation.
“If we are waiting, no memo will be brought. We cannot wait. That is why we took engineers from the Ministry of Works to the affected court.
“It is very unfortunate that anybody will have the effrontery to come to the court of law and set it ablaze.
“I am bothered and amazed at that kind of boldness. Anybody could wake up to set a court on fire.
“This is very shocking but as government, we are going to start with Ilesa High Court and then extend the renovation to other divisions.
“It is more than barbaric, but justice will catch up with such persons very soon. It is a matter of time. We are going to secure the court and start renovation,” he said.
Files destroyed
Adeleke’s spokesperson, Olawale Rasheed, said files and other sensitive documents were destroyed in the fire which affected the Registry and Court Room II.
The Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN), Osun chapter, condemned the arson.
Its chairman, Comrade Idris Adedayo Adeniran, said: “This deliberate and destructive act resulted in the loss of vital court documents, including case files, legal records, and exhibits.
“This is not the first time this court has been targeted. It marks the third attack on the same premises, following incidents in February 2017 and another in 2021.
“The recurrence of these attacks raises serious concerns about the security of judicial infrastructure and the safety of judiciary workers.”
He lamented that the attack impacted negatively on the business of the court.
He said citizens have been denied access to timely justice, while public confidence in the judiciary has been weakened.
Besides, he said the cost of rebuilding and restoring the records poses an avoidable financial burden on the state.
Adeniran said “Judiciary workers now live in fear of similar attacks due to a lack of adequate protection.
“This is more than an attack on property—it is a direct assault on justice, democratic governance, and accountability.
“In response, JUSUN urgently calls on the Osun State Government and all relevant law enforcement agencies to launch a full investigation to apprehend and prosecute those responsible.
“Promptly implement robust security measures at all court facilities, including armed guards and round-the-clock surveillance—a need that has been neglected for almost a decade.
“Provide emergency funding for the recovery of destroyed documents and the reconstruction of the court.
“Set up a special task force to digitize and securely back up all essential judicial documents.”
The chairman said the union remains committed to working with the government and security agencies to ensure that courts are never subjected to such devastating attacks again.
NBA seeks action
The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Osogbo Branch, also condemned the attack.
It offered to prosecute the perpetrators freely if arrested.
The chairman, Yemi Abiona, said: “The incident is a heinous attack that poses a serious threat to justice delivery and the rule of law.
“I wonder what the perpetrators of such an attack on the courtroom intended to achieve.
“This attack is the handiwork of faceless cowards.
“We commend Governor Ademola Adeleke for his swift response of directing thorough investigations and increased security measures around the court premises in the state.
“We urge security agencies to apprehend the perpetrators and bring them to justice.
“The association is ready to provide free legal services to prosecute whoever was behind the arson.
“We are urging the police to leave no stone unturned in conducting a thorough investigation into the incident.”
Motive unknown
There are speculations that the attack may be politically motivated due to the recent local government control crisis in the state.
The court is adjudicating on the matter.
A judge of the Ilesa division, Justice Adeyinka Aderibigbe, granted the order that the state electoral commission should go ahead with the council election.
This is despite the Court of Appeal reinstating the previously-elected APC chairmen.
Attorney-General of the Federation Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) and Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, had warned against the council election on February 22.
The election was held. PDP candidates emerged as winners.
However, Adeleke warned them against resuming to forestall further violence.
The PDP and its leaders on behalf of the newly elected chairmen of PDP filed a suit before the High Court in Ilesa.
They are praying the court to stop the defendants from obstructing them from assuming office.
The case was yet to be heard before the incident.
The PDP faulted the latest attack, saying it showed the extent those who are adamant about hijacking powers through the backdoor were willing to go to achieve their evil scheme.
State Chairman, Sunday Bisi, called for a thorough investigation by security agents to fish out the perpetrators.
“It is quite disturbing to note that the lust for power has descended into this dangerous level of targeting courts with violence.
“That Ilesa court was the choice of the arsonists says a lot especially when there is a pending suit on the local government dispute before it.
“While politicians can tussle for power, it is totally unacceptable to target the judiciary, one of the pillars of democracy, for violence just to avoid justice.”
APC, through its Media Director, Chief Kola Olabisi, sympathised with the state judiciary over the burning of the section of the court building.
He said the attack should be a source of concern to all right-thinking members of the society.
“We are enjoining the statutory security services like the police, the DSS, the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence to intensify their professional dragnet into the incident by thoroughly investigating the cause of the inferno with a view to bringing the culprits to book.
“No stone should be left unturned to unveil the perpetrators of the crime.
“We shall always, as a party, avail the opportunity provided by the rule of law to solve any knotty issue(s) in the political terrain which is the hallmark of our party since its inception.”
How to secure courts
Securing court buildings from attacks requires a layered, risk-based security approach that balances safety, accessibility, and operational needs.
Here’s a breakdown of best practices, as identified by security experts:
Physical security measures
• Perimeter barriers: Install bollards, fences, or reinforced walls to prevent vehicle-borne threats.
• Controlled access points: Limit entry to a few well-monitored entrances equipped with metal detectors and X-ray scanners.
• Blast-resistant design: Strengthen windows, doors, and walls against explosions.
• Secure parking areas: Separate parking for judges and staff, ideally underground or in guarded areas.
• Buffer zones: Create space between public areas and the building to slow down attackers.
Screening and access control
• Security screening: Screen all visitors, staff, and deliveries for weapons or dangerous materials.
• Credentialing: Issue secure ID badges; use biometrics or smartcards for staff and judicial officers.
• Visitor management system: Track and control visitor access; issue temporary passes after screening.
Surveillance and detection
• CCTV surveillance: Install high-definition, tamper-resistant cameras inside and outside.
• Facial recognition or AI-based monitoring: To identify known threats in real time.
• Motion detectors and intrusion alarms: Especially around sensitive areas.
The children of the late Engineer George Osazoga Idah have issued a firm response to recent statements made by Chief Osaro concerning the ongoing legal dispute over the late engineer’s estate.
In a suit marked B/233/2025, the plaintiffs, Mark Idah and Omoruyi Idah, filed the case on behalf of themselves and other children of the late Engr. George Idah. The defendant is Chief Osaro Idah, a Benin Palace Chief, whom they are challenging over claims to the late engineer’s properties.
The plaintiffs contend that the defendant did not have a legally or customarily recognized relationship with their late father during his lifetime. They allege that there was no acknowledged paternity or formal familial ties established under Benin native law and custom before their father’s passing.
In a detailed statement made available to the press by the siblings, the family expressed concern over what they described as “falsehoods, baseless claims, and personal attacks” directed at them by Chief Osaro. Although they had previously refrained from public commentary out of respect for judicial proceedings, they stated that the seriousness of the allegations necessitated a public clarification.
“Out of deep respect for due process and the sanctity of the courts, we have, until now, chosen not to engage in public commentary. However, the torrent of falsehoods, baseless claims, and personal attacks issued by Chief Osaro compels us to set the record straight. Let it be stated without equivocation: this matter is before a competent court of law.
“No amount of media manipulation, emotional blackmail, or character assassination will substitute for facts and legal truth. As the saying goes, no matter how long falsehood travels, truth will eventually catch up with it. We remain confident that, through proper judicial scrutiny, the truth will emerge, backed by evidence, not empty rhetoric,” the statement read.
At the heart of the dispute is the issue of Chief Osaro’s paternity, which the Idah family insists must be resolved through a scientific process. They challenged Osaro to submit to an independent DNA test, a request they claim he continues to evade.
“What remains most telling in Chief Osaro’s statement is his continued refusal to confront the central question before the court, his paternity. If he is indeed the biological son of our late father, he should have no hesitation in submitting to an independent DNA test. Instead, he avoids the issue altogether. This silence is not only suspicious, it is damning. A simple forensic test would resolve this matter conclusively, yet he continues to hide behind deflection and distractions,” the family asserted.
The statement further emphasized that all recognized children of Engineer Idah are alive, mentally sound, and prepared to affirm the truth both in court and before the public.
“We wish to make it absolutely clear that all known children of our late father are alive, mentally sound, and fully capable of affirming the truth, not only before the court, but before the public if necessary. Our father’s legacy is not up for revision, nor can it be hijacked through a campaign of intimidation and false entitlement.
“Furthermore, Chief Osaro’s personal attacks on our brother, Mark Idah, are nothing more than a smokescreen, a transparent attempt to discredit voices that challenge his narrative.
These petty assaults on character reveal just how far he is willing to go in his bid to lay claim to what is not lawfully his. Such tactics do not intimidate us; they only expose the desperation and moral bankruptcy behind them,” they said.
Reiterating their belief in the legal system, the family urged the public to exercise patience and await the court’s decision.
“This dispute is not about media headlines or public sympathy, it is about truth, justice, and legacy. Our late father, Engineer George Osazoga Idah, was a respected leader whose memory and estate must be honored with dignity, not dragged through the mud of personal vendettas. We urge the public to remain calm and trust the legal process. We will meet Chief Osaro in court, where truth is not determined by volume, but by evidence, integrity, and law.”
Justice Rahman Oshodi of an Ikeja Special Offences Court has fixed May 5 for the arraignment of a business man, Friday Audu accused of $2.6 million USDT and N3.5 billion fraud retention.
Audu is to be arraigned alongside his company, Genting International Limited on a seven-count charge bordering on retention of stolen property, forgery and possession of fraudulent documents, proferred against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC).
When the case was called yesterday, EFCC Counsel, Mrs Bilikisu Buhari informed the court that the case was slated for the arraignment of the defendants.
Dr. Muiz Banire (SAN) appeared for the first defendant (Audu) while the second defendant (Genting International Ltd) was however, not represented by any counsel.
Buhari informed the court that the first defendant resisted service and representation on behalf of the second defendant.
The prosecution thereafter sought the leave of the court to serve hearing notice on the last known address of the second defendant.
Justice Oshodi granted request of the prosecution and adjourned the case until May 5 for arraignment.
According to the charge sheet dated April 15, 2026,EFCC alleged Audu and his company retained stolen property by conspiring among themselves to retain $1,262,000 USDT in the wallet address TP6UTEmch6cto72Y7Pj3Bkn84LSqjSr7PX (binance), property fraudulently obtained.
The anti-graft agency also alleged that the defendants retained $1,300,203 USDT in the wallet address TQbgiFXAf17RX8j2nkFwwzBDo22WWrdcRn (BYBIT), property fraudulently obtained.
The commission also submitted that the defendants conspired amongst themselves to dishonestly retain in Genting International Co. Ltd’s account number 0225100403 domiciled in Union Bank the sum of N3.5 billion funds fraudulently obtained.
EFCC also alleged the defendant sometimes in 2024 knowingly forged a document titled “Ultimate Beneficial Ownership (UBO) Declaration Form” and purpoted same to have been signed by one Mr Baffale Yakubu.
According to the prosecution, the alleged offences violate Sections 328, 365 and 411 of the Criminal Law of Lagos state, 2011 and Sections 6 and 1(3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other fraud related Offences Act, 2006.
