Category: Law

  • Otu Oka-Iwu faults regions’ exclusion from committee

    Otu Oka-Iwu faults regions’ exclusion from committee

    Otu Oka-Iwu, the apex organisation of Igbo lawyers in Nigeria, had expressed  disappointment, and concern over the composition of the Presidential Committee on National Population and Housing Census (2025).

    The group expressed their  condemnation in a statement issued yesterday  and signed by the President, Mazi Okechukwu Unegbu, and Secretary, Chief Ben Ihesiulo.

    “We are alarmed to observe that the entire South East and South South geopolitical zones/regions that are home to millions of Nigerian citizens have been totally and deliberately excluded from this critical national assignment.

    “This is not just an omission. This is a clear and calculated act of marginalisation, one that reinforces the entrenched and widening pattern of exclusion and systemic discrimination against the Igbo people and our neighbours in the South South region.”

    The group noted that of the seven committee members, five are from the South West, and the remaining two are from the North Central and North West.

    READ ALSO: Nigerians and lure of Ponzi schemes

    “No person from the South East or South South regions that have contributed immensely to the political, economic, and social fabric of this nation is found worthy of inclusion.

    “This action, under the watch of a government that claims to govern in the interest of all, is not only reprehensible but amounts to a brazen insult to the principles of federal character, equity, inclusion, and justice as enshrined in the Nigerian Constitution.”

    The group stated: “A national census is not a technical exercise, it is political, economic, social, and cultural. It determines representation in government, allocation of resources, and the trajectory of development for decades to come. It defines who counts, and who is counted. Excluding an entire people from the committee that will shape and oversee such a process is an unmistakable declaration that we do not matter in the affairs of this country.”

    Otu Oka-Iwu  said It viewed this development as a continuation of the subtle but persistent agenda to sideline and silence the South East and South South regions in the governance and policy architecture of Nigeria.

    “It is a sad commentary that in 2025, we must still remind the Nigerian state that this country is not the inheritance of any one region or ethnic group. We cannot, and will not, be spectators in our own country.” it said.

    Otu Oka-Iwu  called for the immediate reconstitution of the Presidential Census Committee to reflect the true federal character of Nigeria and to include qualified and capable representatives from the South East and South South zones. Anything short of this is unacceptable, provocative, and a direct invitation to civil disobedience.

    “We also wish to make it abundantly clear that should this glaring injustice not be urgently addressed, we will not hesitate to mobilise our people across Igbo land and the South South to resist and reject any enumeration or census process carried out under such a flawed and exclusionary framework.

    “We will not allow any group to reduce our people to mere statistics to be used and discarded at will.

    “The continued undermining of ‘ndi Igbo’ and other marginalised groups in the governance of this country must end. The unity of Nigeria cannot be built on selective inclusion and calculated injustice. There can be no peace where there is no justice.

    “We call on traditional institutions, political leaders, religious bodies, civil society organisations, and the international community to take notice of this travesty and to join in demanding a reversal of this grievous error.

    “Nigeria belongs to all of us. The census must reflect that or it will reflect nothing at all,” the group said.

  • MRA lauds Supreme Court’s landmark FOI judgment

    MRA lauds Supreme Court’s landmark FOI judgment

    An organisation, Media Rights Agenda (MRA), has commended the judgment by the Supreme Court which confirmed the applicability of the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, 2011 to all tiers of government.

    The organisation described it as “a democratic milestone in Nigeria which affirms the principle that governments at all levels are accountable to the public.”

    In a statement, MRA’s Deputy Executive Director, Mr. Ayode Longe, noted that the Supreme Court’s decision has strengthened the legal foundation for open government and provided additional impetus for the media, civil society organisations and citizens across the country to fight corruption and work to eradicate the scourge of secrecy in all public institutions.

    Longe said: “MRA is obviously pleased by the judgment of the Supreme Court confirming what has always been our position on this issue, that the FOI Act is binding on all public institutions at federal, state, and local government levels.

    “It is a historic decision that has finally settled this issue and we see it as a resounding victory for transparency, accountability, and the right of every Nigerian to access information held by public institutions, regardless of their state of residence or the level of government involved.”

    He noted that “over the last 14 years, some state governments and institutions have claimed that the FOI Act only applies to federal public institutions because they had not “domesticated” it in their respective states.”

    READ ALSO: Atiku’s metamorphosis

    “This was obviously a ploy by such state governments to avoid being transparent or accountable as nothing stopped them from passing their own Freedom of Information laws if they genuinely believed that the law passed by the National Assembly did not cover their institutions and agencies.

    “The Supreme Court’s judgment brings an end to that long-standing uncertainty, which we believe to have been contrived by state governments that did not want to be accountable.”

    Saying that the judgment sends a clear message to all government, that no public institution in Nigeria is above the duty to be transparent, Longe commended the courage, foresight and steadfastness of the litigants and their legal representatives who pursued the matter to the highest court of the land.

    He also applauded the Supreme Court for upholding the principle that the public has a right to know how they are governed, including how public resources are managed.

    Longe said: “Media Rights Agenda calls on all public institutions, especially at the state and local government levels, to immediately begin implementation and ensure full compliance with the FOI Act, including by responding to requests for information, proactively publishing all information subject to proactive disclosure, designating FOI Desk Officers as required by Act, and instituting efficient and effective procedures for members of the public applying for information.”

    He urged civil society organisations, the media, and citizens across the country to make full use of the law to demand accountability from public institutions at all levels and participate meaningfully in governance.

  • Oil pollution a national crisis requiring urgent intervention

    Oil pollution a national crisis requiring urgent intervention

    By Olisa Agbakoba

    This article examines the devastating impact of oil pollution in the Niger Delta, analysing its causes, and consequences, and proposing comprehensive solutions for the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    The crisis demands immediate, decisive action to protect the environment, safeguard human rights, and stimulate sustainable development.

    This follows in the spirit of my earlier work on marine pollution, expanding the focus to address the specific challenges of oil pollution in the Niger Delta.

    The Devastating Reality

    The Niger Delta, a south-south part of Nigeria, is a region of immense ecological and economic significance.

    Unfortunately, it suffers from a devastating legacy of oil pollution. Decades of oil extraction by international oil corporations, like Shell Corporation, have left a trail of environmental destruction and human suffering.

    This crisis, characterised by widespread oil spills, gas flaring, and inadequate waste management, necessitates a decisive response from the Federal Government. 

    For over 30 years, the billions of dollars generated from oil wealth have not translated into improved living conditions for the majority of the region’s inhabitants. Instead, they face water contamination, food insecurity, health crises and livelihood destruction.

    The existing regulations governing oil operations in the Niger Delta are inadequate.

    While laws and regulations exist, their enforcement is hopelessly weak, hindered by ineffective regulatory agencies, and sometimes compromised by conflicts of interest.

    The result is a system that permits the continued degradation of the environment and violation of the fundamental human rights of the affected populations. International standards of “good oil field practice” are frequently ignored with devastating consequences.

    The Bodo Creek oil spill of 2008, a typical example of corporate negligence and regulatory failure, highlights the magnitude of the problem.

    READ ALSO: Atiku’s metamorphosis

    The prolonged leak, attributed to Shell’s failure to maintain its infrastructure, caused catastrophic damage to the environment and the community’s ability to sustain itself. The inadequacy of subsequent remediation and compensation efforts exposes the systemic lack of accountability.

    Root Causes: A Confluence of Failures

    Oil spills, resulting from factors ranging from pipeline corrosion and poor maintenance to sabotage and theft, have caused irreparable damage to the delicate ecosystem. The scale of pollution is huge, with thousands of spills documented over the years.

    The resulting impact on fisheries, agriculture, and water resources has devastated the livelihoods of communities that depend on these resources for their survival.

    Beyond the immediate economic impact, the long-term consequences on soil fertility and agricultural productivity pose an even graver threat to food security.

    The health consequences of oil pollution are equally dire and can’t be overlooked. Every day, communities are exposed to contaminated water, air, and food, leading to a wide range of health problems, from respiratory illnesses and skin lesions to cancer and other chronic diseases. The lack of adequate monitoring and health assessments means that the full extent of the health crisis remains unknown, further compounding the urgency of action.

    The lack of access to information regarding oil operations, even for communities directly affected, worsens the existing injustices. This further promotes distrust and anxiety, severely undermining the quality of life for those living in the Niger Delta region.

    A fundamental shift toward transparency and open communication is essential to rebuild trust and ensure the equitable participation of affected communities in decision-making processes.

    The issue of compensation and cleanup is severely compromised. The current system is slow, inadequate, and often fraught with conflict, leaving communities to bear the brunt of environmental damage while struggling to obtain fair redress.

    Negotiation and overcompensation are often dominated by oil companies, who frequently dispute the causes of spills, leaving communities with limited choices. The lack of independent mechanisms for verifying the causes of spills and assessing damages further disadvantages communities in securing just compensation.

    In summary, the oil pollution crisis stems from a complex interplay of factors:

    Poor infrastructure maintenance: Aging pipelines, inadequate safety measures, and a lack of regular maintenance contribute to frequent oil spills.

    Regulatory weakness: Weak enforcement of existing environmental regulations and a lack of effective oversight by government agencies allow companies to operate with impunity.

    Corporate negligence: Oil companies often prioritize profit maximization over environmental protection and social responsibility, failing to adopt adequate preventative measures or to swiftly address oil spills when they occur.

    Conflict and militancy: The struggle for resources and the lack of accountability have fueled conflict and militancy, further exacerbating the environmental damage and human suffering.

    Lack of Information and Transparency: Communities are often denied access to vital information regarding oil operations and their potential impact on health and the environment, exacerbating anxieties and distrust.

    Proposed Solutions: A Path Towards Regeneration

    Addressing the oil pollution crisis requires a multifaceted approach involving rigid regulations, corporate accountability, community engagement, and technological advancements. The Federal Government must:

    Strengthen Regulatory Oversight: Enhance the capacity and independence of government agencies responsible for enforcing environmental regulations, ensuring compliance with international best practices, and implementing robust monitoring and enforcement mechanisms. This requires significant investment in personnel training, resources, and technological capabilities.

    Promote Corporate Accountability: Hold oil companies accountable for their environmental and social responsibilities. This entails establishing clear and stringent environmental standards, implementing stricter penalties for violations, and demanding transparent reporting on oil spill incidents and remediation efforts. A move towards independent audits and investigations is also needed.

    Empower Affected Communities: Provide affected communities with access to information about oil operations, ensuring their meaningful participation in decision-making processes regarding environmental protection and resource management. This includes establishing effective communication channels and participatory mechanisms that empower communities to voice their concerns and actively contribute to solutions.

    Invest in Remediation and Restoration: Commit significant resources to the cleanup of existing pollution and the restoration of degraded ecosystems in the Niger Delta. This involves both immediate responses to new incidents as well as long-term ecological restoration projects. The work must be carried out efficiently and with community involvement.

    Improve Health Services: Provide comprehensive health services to communities affected by oil pollution, including monitoring, screening, treatment, and preventative care. Investment in accessible healthcare infrastructure and education initiatives focusing on health risks associated with oil pollution is crucial.

    Reforming Compensation Mechanisms: Establish an independent body to oversee and adjudicate claims for oil spill compensation, ensuring fair and timely compensation for affected communities. This process must be transparent, equitable, and free from undue influence.

    The oil pollution crisis in the Niger Delta is not merely an environmental problem; it is a profound human rights crisis that demands urgent action. The Federal Government has a moral and legal obligation to address this issue decisively.

    By implementing the proposed solutions, Nigeria can begin to heal the wounds of the past, protect its environment, and ensure a just and sustainable future for the people of the Niger Delta and the nation.

    Dr Agbakoba (SAN) is a former president of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA)

  • Judge refuses to bar journalists from covering land case

    Judge refuses to bar journalists from covering land case

    The Lagos State High Court in Ikeja has refused an application to bar journalists from covering and reporting on a land case.

    A renowned medical doctor and international consultant, Dr. Ojo Ademola Oluwatosin, filed the case following an attempt to forcefully take over a Lagos land belonging to him.

    Justice Akinkunmi Idowu declined the plea by a defendant’s counsel, Mr. Kehinde Akerele.

    Akerele had prayed the court to caution the claimant against publishing the court’s proceedings in the media.

    The judge held that he could not restrain the media from covering the proceedings, especially if the report is accurate and reflects what happened in court.

    Justice Idowu said journalists have a constitutional duty to report whatever occurs in an open court.

    The claimant’s counsel, Dr Adekunle Ojo (SAN), denied publishing the court proceedings in the media.

    He stressed that journalists were at liberty to report on any case without prompting.

    Respondents in the suit LD/15415LMW/24 are Starmark Finance Company Ltd, Stephen Ajibade-Abisuga, Tunju Solaja and Peter Omotosho, an engineer.

    READ ALSO: Nigerians and lure of Ponzi schemes

    The claimant is praying the court to restrain the defendants from usurping his right of ownership of the land in Lekki, Lagos.

    At the last hearing, Dr. Ojo had informed the court of an application dated February 19 praying the court to order the withdrawal of the law firm of the Attorney-General of Lagos State and Commissioner for Justice, Mr Lawal Pedro (SAN), from handling the case.

    The claimant’s lawyer’s application was hinged on the fact that the law firm, Lawal Pedro SAN & Associates, which represents the first defendant, cannot do so “on the ground of conflict of interest.”

    The claimant is also praying the court “to set aside the order for change of counsel of the first defendant to the Law firm of Lawal Pedro (SAN) & Associates granted on the 18th February 2025.”

    The claimant hinged his application on the ground that the “office of the Attorney-General had earlier issued DPP advice against the party his private law firm, Lawal Pedro (SAN) & Associates, seeks to represent.”

    The claimant also argued that the first defendant, as represented by Lawal Pedro and Associates, suppressed fact before the court that the Attorney-General is “the principal partner/founder of Lawal Pedro (SAN) & Associates who issued a DPP’s advice criminally indicting the company and some individuals, recommending them for prosecution”.

    Counsel to the first respondent, Mr Kehinde Akerele, informed the court that he had two pending applications which had been served on all the parties.

    One of the applications, dated April 7, seeks the leave of the court to allow the first respondent to change the address of service.

    The claimant’s counsel informed the court that he had just been served and that he needed time to respond.

    Justice Idowu adjourned until May 20 for the claimant’s counsel to file his response and for hearing.

  • The making of the criminal: nature or nurture?

    The making of the criminal: nature or nurture?

    • By Ben Ijeoma Adigwe

    There is an age-old debate by scholars about the origin of criminal behaviour, whether it is nature or nurture.

    In other words, is it the genetic makeup of a man that makes him a criminal or the influence of the environment that he grew up in?

    Is the criminal made or born?  Even the natives of Africa in our villages recognise an aspect of this controversy.

    Instances abound where people observe that certain traits like stealing and prostitution run in certain families. There is a traditional adage that says: “You don’t tell an old rat to stop stealing. You only advise him to steal moderately.”

    This recognises that certain criminal traits are inherent in certain individuals just like stealing is an inherent trait in rats to an almost helpless level.

    My grandmother, Emily Okwumabua, who died a nonagenarian in 2007, once told me of a criminal trial she witnessed in the days of yore, during the colonial period.

    The presiding judicial officer at the trial had to admit evidence of the fact that the woman who was accused of stealing was from a family that had no history of stealing. She was eventually discharged and acquitted.

    In the days of the notorious deadly armed robber from Edo State called Lawrence Nomanyagbon Anini, a young man was among those publicly executed with him by firing squad.

    It turned out that the young man’s two other brothers had at other different times been also executed for armed robbery. The press reported this phenomenon.

    When the estranged parents of the boys were separately interviewed, each denied having stealing in their bloodline and pointed accusing fingers at each other.

    The American Minister and author, Marilyn Hickey, in her book: Break the Generation Curse, related what she termed a true story of two American families:

    “Max Jukes was an atheist who married a godless woman. Some 560 descendants were traced: 310 died as paupers, 150 became criminals, seven of them murderers, 100 were known to be drunkards and more than half of the women were prostitutes.

    “The descendants of Max Jukes cost the United States government more than $1.25 million in 19th-century dollars.

    “Jonathan Edwards was a contemporary of Max Jukes. He was a committed Christian who gave God first place in his life.

    “He married a godly young lady, and some 1,394 descendants were traced: 295 graduated from college, of whom 13 became college presidents and 65 became professors, three were elected as United States senators, three as state governors, and others were sent as ministers to foreign countries; 30 were judges,  100 were lawyers (one the dean of an outstanding law school), 56 practised as physicians (one was the dean of a medical school), 75 became officers in the military, 100 were well-known missionaries, preachers and prominent authors.

    “Another 80 held some form of public office, of whom three were mayors of large cities. One was the comptroller of the U.S. Treasury and another was vice president of the United States.

    Read Also: Tinubu returns after Europe working visit

    “Not one of the descendants of the Edwards family was a liability to the government!”

    The “Nature” school of thought in determining the root cause of crime posits that biological factors are the cause of criminal behaviour; and that one’s genes do play a prominent role in criminal behavior.

    A study conducted in Denmark and Sweden showed that a biological background exists for criminal behaviour.

    The study conducted on a large Dutch family in 1993 found a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A (a neurochemical in the brain) which was associated with aggressive criminal behaviour among the males in that family.

    The males were reported to have a selective deficiency of that neurochemical which can lead to decreased concentration of 5- hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid in cerebrospinal fluid – thus suggesting that genetics plays an important role in antisocial or criminal behaviour.

    An also low incorrect level of the chemical serotonin and dopamine in the brain has been found to be associated with impulsive and emotional aggression.

    A professor of sociology some time ago at his inaugural lecture at the University of Benin, Nigeria stated that research has shown that there is a very low level of a certain vitamin in the body of thieves. He argued that there was thus a hereditary component in criminals.

    Until the early 20th century, all attempts to explain criminal behaviour pointed to the theory that it was biological.

    Later, by the end of World War 2, the biological theory was challenged by the second school of thought who said that it is nurture, the social environment that is the main reason why individuals commit crimes.

    They say that environmental factors such as parenting, abuse, poverty, discrimination and unemployment account also for crimes.

    Family studies that were conducted show that one could be predisposed to criminal behaviour as a result of inheritance, but the same person’s conduct and personality could still be modified by the environment.

    Research shows that children who are neglected or abused in childhood are at 50 per cent greater risk of engaging in criminal acts.

    Also, involvement with peer groups that are antisocial or delinquent can lead to criminal behaviour.

    Some time ago, news had it that in California, in the United States of America, a survey was carried out on the inmates of a prison by researchers and it was discovered that down to a person, each of those prisoners who were there for a violent crime were all abused as a child.

    The erudite then Chief Judge of Delta State, Nigeria, Hon Justice Marshall Umukoro, during the 2017 prison visits in an interview restated his earlier observation at the 2016 prison visit that most of the inmates were found to be products of broken and dysfunctional homes.

    The great Dr. Nelson Mandela, a jurist in his own right, in his autobiography A Long Walk to Freedom stated that he believes that it was nurture that makes the criminal and not nature.

    I beg to disagree with that great learned jurist in so far as he relegates the contribution of nature to criminal behaviour.

    The general consensus now is that it is a combination of both biological factors and social environment that makes us who we are today.

    Twins, adoption and family studies have revealed the interplay of genes and the environment.

    If individuals with criminal genes are exposed to the right environment, then their chances are greater for engaging in criminal or anti-social behaviour.

    What we now have is what is known in criminology as the biosocial model- recognising that social considerations regarding criminal activity also act on biology.

    Crime is viewed now as a combination of both biological and environmental factors. Genetic disposition and environmental factors are intertwined.

    There is evidence that the expression of genes is influenced by a wide variety of environmental factors.

    A possibility exists therefore that disorders relating to such chemicals as serotonin and dopamine could be caused by stressful environmental situations.

    What these studies point out is the fact that these people should be treated and rehabilitated rather than our being too judgmental against them.

    Our Justice and prison system should be more corrective in approach rather than being just punitive institutions.

    This could be the reason the Nazarene was very particular in the way we treat convicts, equating their right treatment with a passport to heaven.

    According to Adrian Raine, a psychologist at the University of Pennsylvania: “If we want to stop crime, if we want to be able to understand the causes and develop treatment programmes to attack the causes, we really need to understand all the pieces.”

    Essentially, the Judgmental aspect should be downplayed as the Master advised. Given the same genes and environment, these criminals have and face, anybody is capable of being a criminal.

    The Mafia is reported to have said that given the right conditions, any man can be a thief. The immortal Abraham Lincoln believed that “ No man was to be eulogised for what he did: or censured for what he did or did not do because all of us are the children of conditions, of circumstances, of environment, of education, of acquired habits and of heredity moulding men as they are and will forever be”.

    •Read more about Adigwe, a lawyer, poet, chartered mediator/conciliator and author, at benadigwe.com

  • ‘Lagos Commercial Court will address commercial delays’

    ‘Lagos Commercial Court will address commercial delays’

    Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu of Lagos State has said that the new Lagos Commercial Court at Tapa on Lagos Island is engineered to address commercial dispute and eliminate unnecessary delays.

    The governor gave the assurance while commissioning the new court house last Tuesday  at Tapa area in Lagos Island..

    Sanwo-Olu described the commercial court building as “ a monument of fairness, progress and prosperity” that will revolutionise commercial dispute resolution in the state.

    The governor said the court was born out of a long-standing vision rooted in judicial reform and a commitment to building a business-friendly environment in Lagos.

    “This court is not just a building, it is the foundation of a vision rooted in foresight, collaboration and deep determination,” Sanwo-Olu said.

    He traced the origin of the project to the administration of a former Chief Judge of Lagos State, Justice Ayotunde Phillips, who first proposed the idea of a specialised court to handle commercial disputes efficiently.

     “Justice Phillips envisioned a court that would reduce litigation time to no more than six to nine months. Today, that vision has come to life,” the governor said.

    “We’ve heard the frustrations of the business community over protracted litigation and bureaucratic hurdles. We want to say to you that those times are over,” he said.

    Read Also: FG rakes in N6.5BN from mining fees, registers 118 buying centres

    Sanwo-Olu said the court is equipped with 10 state-of-the-art courtrooms and staffed by judges with expertise in commercial law.

    He expressed confidence that the new facility would significantly reduce delays in resolving business disputes.

    He commended the contributions of the current Chief Judge of Lagos State, Justice Kazeem Alogba, describing him as a reformer who has endorsed Lagos’ position as a “beacon of justice in Nigeria.”

    The governor also thanked the Lagos State Attorney-General, Lawal Pedro, and over 450 legal practitioners in the Ministry of Justice for their commitment and hard work.

    “This milestone achievement is a reflection of what collaboration between the judiciary, executive and legislature can accomplish. May this court stand as a monument of fairness, progress and prosperity,” Sanwo-Olu added.

    The Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Lawal Pedro, (SAN), described the court as a strategic response to the evolving needs of Lagos as Nigeria’s economic powerhouse.

    “This Commercial Court is not just a building. It is a profound statement of intent  to provide timely, efficient, and specialised adjudication of commercial disputes in a manner that inspires confidence in the rule of law and supports economic growth,” he said.

    He said that the court is designed to fast-track the resolution of business-related conflicts, reduce delays in litigation, and promote judicial expertise in commercial matters.

    He said  Commercial Court will have the jurisdiction to entertain matters relating to the recovery of taxes, levies, Land Use Charges, rates, fines, and other government revenues.

    He said it would also complement the state’s revenue drive by ensuring that defaulters are held accountable through legal processes that are swift, transparent, and fair.

    “The court will play a pivotal role in decongesting the dockets of our regular High Courts by taking on commercial cases that require specialised expertise. “It will help ensure consistency in commercial jurisprudence and provide a dependable forum for businesses to resolve disputes without fear of undue delays or uncertainty.

    He said: “ By resolving business-related conflicts expeditiously and professionally, we are creating a legal environment that will encourage investment, promote entrepreneurship, reduce delays, enhance judicial expertise in commercial matters, reduce the cost and promote ease of doing business in our state.

    “Beyond its value to the business community, this court will also serve as an institutional tool for enforcing the fiscal and regulatory responsibilities owed to the state.

     He appealed to  residents and corporate entities operating in Lagos to comply with their tax obligations and other statutory payments. “Government cannot deliver on its promises of infrastructure, education, healthcare, and security without adequate revenue. Let it be known that while the state remains open to voluntary compliance and amicable resolution, we will not hesitate to enforce the law against deliberate defaulters.

    “The court stands ready to ensure that public obligations are no longer treated with levity”, he said..

    The Chief Judge of Lagos State, Justice Kazeem Alogba, commended Governor  Sanwo-Olu for his unwavering support for the judiciary, describing the commissioning of the new Tapa Commercial High Court on Lagos Island as a testament to the governor’s commitment to justice and infrastructure development.

     Justice Alogba recalled the foundation-laying ceremony that sparked the vision of the court’s establishment.

    “I remember that day, my predecessor was in the office when we came to do the foundation laying here. We were dreaming about how this would come to fruition,” he said.

    “But today, because of the resilience of Mr. Governor and his belief in ensuring that everything that has to do with the distribution of justice is given priority, we have this edifice standing,” he said.

    Justice Alogba expressed  gratitude to the governor, stating, “You have really done well for the administration of justice in Lagos. And I’m sure you are not tired of doing more.”

    Referring to past events, the Chief Judge noted the symbolic significance of the court’s location and when the place was burnt down.

    He also used the occasion to highlight other judicial infrastructure projects undertaken by the Sanwo-Olu administration, including the magistrates’ quarters in Ketu and a new judicial warehouse in the Majidun area.

    “That warehouse will bring a new song to how we handle enforcement of judgments. It will restore public confidence in the rule of law,” he added.

  • Rain of tributes for Access to Justice convener Joseph Otteh

    Rain of tributes for Access to Justice convener Joseph Otteh

    Tributes are pouring in from lawyers and associations for the Convener of Access (A2J) to Justice, Mr Joseph Otteh, who passed on in Lagos.

    They hailed the life of an activist who spent much of his life pushing for a more transparent, independent, and accountable judiciary.

    According to lawbreed.blog, Otteh became ill on the night of March 27, 2025, and passed away the next day in a Lagos hospital.

    His work through A2J focused on strengthening the legal system and ensuring justice for all.

    With decades of experience fighting for judicial reforms, the rule of law, and human rights protections, Otteh was a well-known voice in legal advocacy.

    He was a Global Public Service Scholar at NYU and received a Master’s degree in law from both the University of Lagos and New York University.

    He also served as a Visiting Researcher at the Danish Centre for Human Rights.

    Otteh authored Fading Lights of Justice and Litigating in the Public Interest.

    He contributed extensively to legal scholarship, consulting for institutions such as the British Government’s J4A Programme, the Open Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA), the Nigerian Bar Association, the European Union’s Rule of Law and Anti-Corruption Programme (RoLAC), and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ).

    Read Also: FG rakes in N6.5BN from mining fees, registers 118 buying centres

    As a key figure in legal reforms, Otteh served on committees that shaped Nigeria’s legal framework, including the Lagos State Committee on the Review of Criminal Procedure Laws and the Committee on the Review of the Coroner Law.

    His work contributed significantly to strengthening human rights safeguards and improving justice administration in Nigeria.

    Through Access to Justice, the organisation he founded, Otteh helped drive advocacy for judicial independence and accountability.

    He earned accolades such as the MacArthur Foundation’s Award for Effective and Creative Institutions and the NBA’s Gani Fawehinmi Award for Human Rights and Social Justice.

    Olumide Ayeni (SAN) wrote: “The profundity of the Access to Justice Programme assisted us in reforms of the administration of justice sector in Ogun State in my time as Attorney-General.”

    A lawyer, Kingsley Ejiofor, wrote: “Nigeria has lost a great man! He stood for what was right and just.

    ‘‘I called him Prophet Jeremiah following his Vanguard article of 20 February 2025 on the state of the Judiciary, amongst other issues he highlighted. He simply laughed it off and sent an emoji to me.

    ‘‘May his gentle soul rest in perfect peace.”

    Bob Arnot wrote: “Joseph worked with us on DFID and EU-funded programmes.

    “He was a modest man and an excellent colleague. Condolences to his family and friends from the Arnot family.”

    Senior Programme Manager, Africa, at National Endowment for Democracy, Christopher O’Connor, wrote: “Joseph will be missed. He was a tremendous advocate for judicial reform.

    “I am certain his legacy of compassion and vision for a better tomorrow will continue to inspire others.”

    Prof Chidi Odinkalu wrote: “Raised in Agbor, Delta State, in the Niger Delta by a father who was a high school teacher from Imo State, Joe was one of the first two colleagues whom I engaged in the legal directorate of the Civil Liberties Organisation (CLO) in Lagos in 1991.

    “He brought tremendous integrity, intellect, and industry to the role, and had remarkable reserves of both clarity and empathy.

    “Joe received his legal education at the Obafemi Awolowo University, in Ile-Ife.

    “In 1999, Joe founded the group Access to Justice ‘to work towards rebuilding the institutional credibility of the Nigerian legal and justice system, restoring public faith in its institutions’.

    “He approached that task with both courage and single-mindedness, doing a lot of good along the way.

    “Joe epitomised the lawyer as a gentleman and professional of civic virtue.

    “Unknown to most, Joe was the force & craftsman behind the current revision of Nigeria’s Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules.

    “It reflects very much not merely his ability to identify problems but also his commitment to forging the relationships required to address them.

    “On 28 March, Joe succumbed reportedly to complications from diabetes, leaving behind an aged mother, wife and three children.

    “Thirty years ago, in 1995, Joe authored a defining study of the customary court system in the 17 states of southern Nigeria under the title: The Fading Lights of Justice.

    “As an advocate, Joe did his utmost to ensure that those lights were kept aflame; to postpone the date when the future he divined would come to pass.

    “That title could only have come from a man who was well ahead of his time and had the acuity to see the future.

    “The heavens will be enriched by the acquisition of this incredible angel.”

  • Why NBA should refund N300m to Rivers, by Banwo, Adegboruwa

    Why NBA should refund N300m to Rivers, by Banwo, Adegboruwa

    The demand by the Rivers State for the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) to refund the N300 million it received from the government got the backing of two senior lawyers: Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa (SAN) and legal tech expert, Dr Ope Banwo.

    For Adegboruwa, there is no basis for the NBA to go “cap in hand” to beg for money to host a conference paid for by lawyers who also pay annual practising fees.

    Stressing that lawyers are the conscience of society, expected to champion the rule of law, he said they should not be seen to be romancing with any government amid poverty and rights abuses.

    “We have no basis for retaining the ‘gift’ from Rivers State, so NBA should refund the money immediately.

    “We should not hide under any semantics or bureaucracy to retain the money,” Adegboruwa said.

    The SAN urged his colleagues to contribute N1 million each to cover any deficit if the money had been spent.

    Adegboruwa said: “I urge the elders of the Bar to intervene urgently to take away this collective shame.

    “If the money has been spent, I urge all SANs and senior lawyers to contribute N1 million each in order to raise the money.

    Read Also: Varsities, polys, others grapple with new operational guidelines

    “Going forward, the NBA should tread cautiously in raising funds from all manner of persons and institutions. Lawyers in Nigeria are well endowed to fund any programme for the NBA.”

    Banwo, who disagreed with Dr. Monday Ubani (SAN)’s earlier support of NBA’s position, said the issue “goes to the very heart of institutional independence, professional ethics, and the moral compass of the legal profession in Nigeria”.

    He said: “The NBA, a body that ought to embody the conscience, independence, and integrity of the legal profession, is caught in a scandal that goes far beyond optics.

    “The revelation…has not only triggered a political and legal firestorm—it has raised a fundamental question: Can a supposedly independent professional body continue to claim neutrality while receiving financial handouts from political actors?

    “Let us not be distracted by technicalities. Whether the money was conditional or not, whether it was explicitly tagged to the conference venue or not, is beside the point.

    “The real issue is the ethical rot and institutional compromise that such transactions represent in principle.

    “Whether dressed in legalese or sugar-coated with tradition, the idea that an independent professional body like the NBA should collect hundreds of millions of naira from a sitting state governor—especially one enmeshed in political crisis—is not just problematic; it’s dangerous.

    “It sends the wrong message to the public, undermines the credibility of the Bar, and exposes us all to the accusation of hypocrisy the next time we speak on justice, democracy, or the abuse of state power.”

    Banwo argued that refunding the money is not a weakness but would be a wise decision.

    He added: “The real test of integrity is not what the courts say, but what our conscience says. If the NBA wants to retain its standing as the voice of justice in Nigeria, it must return that money.”

    Responding, Ubani faulted Banwo’s views, saying they were “at best, overly idealistic and, at worst, dangerously disconnected from the operational realities of our present national context”.

    According to the SAN, the argument that a donation in itself constitutes a compromise of institutional independence lacks both legal foundation and factual proof.

    “Dr. Banwo’s position is emotive, not evidential. This is without prejudice to the NBA returning the fund if they are convinced that it is the right thing to do,” Ubani said.

    Insisting that neither the Legal Practitioners Act, the NBA Constitution, nor the Rules of Professional Conduct was contravened, Ubani said it was routine for state governments to offer financial and logistical support to professional bodies, especially when such associations bring their national conferences to those states.

    “The harsh judgment on the NBA over the present donation is very unfair and unacceptable…

    “A Bar Association that aims to remain independent in thought and effective in impact must be resourced.

    “Denying assistance from state actors, who may genuinely wish to support intellectual and professional engagements, is not a badge of morality; it is the embrace of unnecessary hardship.

    “I am of the view that proper guidelines should be mapped out to guide the acceptance, and conditions well spelt out for future engagements with them,” Ubani said.

    Defending the Bar, Ubani insisted that the NBA has not sold its conscience but only accepted a donation, without strings, to advance its professional goals. “That, in itself, is not a sin,” he said.

    “If we truly believe in institutional progress and growth, the better approach is not to sever public partnerships but to manage them transparently, ethically, and with a clear firewall between sponsorship and influence. That is a better and godly position if you ask me.

    “Dr. Banwo wants the Bar to be bold again. I concur. But boldness is not the refusal of help from credible sources, it is the courage to accept support without surrendering principles and integrity.

    “The NBA is not for sale. But neither is it a monastery. It exists in the real world, funded by real people, facing real challenges,” Ubani added.

  • Court orders final forfeiture of Livingtrust Mortgage Bank’s N6.6bn Shares, N42.4m, $26.44

    Court orders final forfeiture of Livingtrust Mortgage Bank’s N6.6bn Shares, N42.4m, $26.44

    Justice F. N. Ogazi of the Federal High Court sitting in Ikoyi, Lagos has ordered the final forfeiture of 2,041,087,747.00 units of Livingtrust Mortgage Bank Plc, formerly known as Omoluabi Mortgage Bank Plc, valued at N6,674,356,932.69.

    The court also ordered the final forfeiture of the sums of N42,461,096.66 and $26.44.

    The shares and the funds in the accounts were traced to Cititrust Holdings Plc and its subsidiaries.

    The Judge gave the order, following a motion on notice filed by the Lagos Zonal Directorate 2 of the EFCC, Okotie Eboh, Ikoyi, Lagos through its counsel, Ahmad A Usman.

    Justice Ogazi had earlier granted the interim forfeiture of the properties and also ordered the publication of the said order in a national newspaper for any interested parties to show cause why they should not be finally forfeited to the victims.

    Read Also: Tinubu approves N15bn to avert flood disaster

    Moving the application for the final forfeiture, Usman said the Commission had published Cititrust Holdings Plc and some of its subsidiaries as part of the companies being prosecuted for operating as a Ponzi scheme. 

    He said the properties were found to have been purchased with several investors’ funds.

    “The shares were initially purchased from Osun State Government by Cititrust, using some SPVs and later harmonised and transferred to the name of Cititrust Holdings Plc,” he added.

    The respondent, Cititrust Holdings Plc, however, contested the EFCC’s application for the final forfeiture through a motion and an affidavit.

    In his ruling, the court discountenanced Cititrust’s application and affidavit to show cause and saw merit in the EFCC’s application.

    The Judge, consequently, ordered the final forfeiture of the 2,041,087,747.00 units of Livingtrust Mortgage Bank Plc, the sums of N42,461,096.66 and $26.44 to the victims. 

    The Judge also ordered that the victims be paid what is due to them and the remainder, if any, be forfeited to the Federal Government of Nigeria.

  • CSEP urges NJC to probe Imo Judges over alleged age falsification

    CSEP urges NJC to probe Imo Judges over alleged age falsification

    The Civil Society Engagement Platform (CSEP), a Coalition of Civil Society Groups, has  petitioned the  National Judicial Council (NJC) over age falsification allegations against 18 Judges of the Imo State Judiciary.

    In a copy of the letter and document made available to newsmen on Tuesday  in Abuja by the   Executive Secretary of the Coalition, Comrade Onyebuchi Emmanuel, CSEP detailed allegations against 18 judges of Imo State Judiciary.

    In the letter addressed to the NJC Chairman and Chief Justice of Nigeria, CSEP alleged that the 18  Judges have falsified their ages at various times so as to secure appointment into the judiciary and to gain undue advantage.

    “The Civil Society Engagement Platform CSEP, a powerful coalition of leading civil rights activists in Nigeria has unearthed an unprecedented age falsification scandal of an alarming proportion in the Imo State Judiciary.

    “This is at a level never seen before in Nigeria, involving a whooping 18 Judges of Imo State Judiciary; unbelievable!

    “Your lordship may recall that CSEP; through its diligent and painstaking covert operations, exposed the former Chief Judge of Imo State. Hon. Justice Chikeka for the same crime of age falsification.

    “We followed up with a petition to the NJC and she was eventually sacked after due process was followed.

    “We hereby demand action on this petition so as to save the Judiciary from continued ridicule as a result of the presence of certain Judges who are known to have falsified their ages and still parade themselves as Judges.

    “We are confident that you are one person who will not allow the Judiciary to be brought to ridicule,” the letter reads in part.

    Incidentally, the three most senior Judges in Imo State Judiciary are among the culprits and this must have necessitated the appointment of the fourth most senior Judge as acting Chief Judge of the State. 

    This is not the first time the NJC is been charged to beam its touch light on activities of state judiciaries, as  it has dealt with numerous cases involving age falsification by judges.

    For instance, in September 2016, the council announced the compulsory retirement of two of the High Court judges of Niger State over age falsification.

    Read Also: NJC urged to compel Uzodinma to reverse appointment of Imo acting chief judge

    Also, in April 2020, the NJC sacked a judge of the Imo State High Court following the falsification of date of birth from 1950 to 1958. The council said findings showed that he was supposed to have retired in November 2015 when he clocked the mandatory retirement age of 65 years.

    The council also sacked a judge of the Yobe State High Court for falsifying his age on two occasions. He was said to have declared February 1, 1955, and later August 27, 1955.

    He later declared December 30, 1959. He was supposed to retire on February 1, 2020, by virtue of his declared date of birth of February 1, 1955.

    Similarly, the council found an Osun State High Court judge to have falsified his date of birth from September 3, 1955, to Sept 1957.

    In all the cases, the NJC advised the State Governments to deduct from the gratuity of the judges all salaries received in the period they ought not to be in service and remitted to the public purse.