Category: Politics

  • ‘Why crisis persists in Ogun PDP’

    ‘Why crisis persists in Ogun PDP’

    The Chairman of the Ogun State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Adebayo Dayo, has said that the chapter is enveloped in crisis because certain party elders have refused to embrace change.

    He lamented that the party members instigated by these elders have capitalised on their negative disposition to the State Executive Committee of the party to foment trouble .

    Dayo, an engineer, gave the party’s situation report at the meeting of the Southwest PDP Stakeholders chaired by the Zonal Caretaker Committee Chairman, Chief Isola Filani, in Lagos. At the meeting, which held at the Lagos Airport Hotel, Ikeja, the representatives of the PDP chapters in the six states also spoke on the crises rocking the party.

    In Ogun State, the group loyal to former President Olusegun Obasanjo has not fully reconciled with the Dayo leadership, following the directive of the national chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, that Senator Dipo Odujinrin was not the duly elected state chairman. Members of the group shunned the Lagos meeting.

    Dayo explained that certain elders, who have refused to face the reality of change and forget the past are fueling the protracted crises in the Ogun PDP. He stressed: “We will cooperate with our leaders in the six states to succeed. We have problems in the six states. If we don’t bury our differences, there will be problem.

    “We are fighting to be in government. Unfortunately, we have some elders who do not believe in change. Change has come. We must bury our hatchet and work together. Southwest PDP will continue to be marginalised, unless it wins elections”.

    Giving report on the state of the party in Ekiti State, a member of the Board of Trustees (BoT), Chief Dayo Okondo, said that only a consensus governorship candidate can win power in 2014. He promised that the chapter will present a formidable candidate for the poll.

    A PDP elder from Osun State, Senator Oluwole Alabi, said: “We will put our house in order and present able and acceptable governorship candidate for the next election”.

    Former Works Minister Senator Adeseye Ogunlewe, who spoke for the Lagos PDP, said: “Disunity is our problem. Abandonment of the leadership is the problem. The leadership has been marginalised. Things are not too weel in the Lagos PDP. It is still rocky. Some leaders are still outside. They have grudges against their exclusion from the party. They must be brought back to be part of the party structure”,

  • APC  will provide better leadership, says Igbokwe

    APC will provide better leadership, says Igbokwe

    THE Publicity Secretary of the Lagos State Action Congress of Nigeria(ACN), Joe Igbokwe, has said that the new mega party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), will provide effective leadership for the country.

    In a statement in Lagos, Igbokwe noted that Nigerians have been asking sundry questions about what impact the APC would make, when it is registered. He assured that the country will certainly make progress under the party.

    He said: “Some Nigerians are asking what the new party can do to restore the dignity of Nigeria. As we move close to 2015 Presidential elections, political watchers are asking to know the difference between APC and PDP. A lot of questions are coming to the political desks of APC throughout the country: is this party different from PDP? Are the progenitors not the same Nigerians we know? What does this party have in store for 150 million Nigerians? Can this new party make a difference? Can it fill in the gap in Nigeria’s political landscape? Can APC have the courage and the political will to fight the dreaded monster in Nigeria called corruption?

    “Nigerians want change and APC is ready to provide the long-awaited change. But the change is not going to come easy knowing the antics of the ruling party and their criminal disposition when it comes to electoral issues. To them, every presidential election is a do or die affair, a fight to finish, and the mother of all battles.

    Igbokwe asked Nigerians reclaim the country from the hand of pretenders.

    He added: “It is left for Nigerians to fight to reclaim their God-given country from pretenders and to all intents and purposes this is not going to be easy. This is a struggle for the soul of Nigeria, a struggle for economic, social and political freedom, a struggle to reclaim our rights to life. It is now or never. Yes, we can!

    “Well, APC may not have all the answers to these very strong questions posed above, but the truth of the matter remains that things will never be the same again. One thing is clear: Nigeria is not making progress in the midst of plenty. Nigeria is not making progress in the age of success. APC believes that investment funds must be retrieved from the pockets of few corrupt Nigerians and the money ploughed back to the economy to create jobs”.

    Igbokwe hinted that the party would invest massively in education as a panacea to poverty.

    He stressed: “APC leaders know that the only way to fight poverty is through massive investment in qualitative education. I can go on and on but APC cannot do everything in one fell swoop. Please take notice that this is not the manifesto of APC. After the formal registration, the party will sell its manifesto to Nigerians, and I know that it may not be too far from what I have said above.

    “Nigeria’s problems are well known for a long time in this country, dating back to the early 90s. For over 20 years we have been dancing around our problems without addressing them frontally and today we have gone full circle. The problems have magnified to become an octopus.

  • PDP: An elusive reconciliation

    PDP: An elusive reconciliation

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is embroiled in multi-faceted crises, which are connected with the 2015 elections. Unless the party puts its house in order, its fortunes may continue to nosedive. Assistant Editor LEKE SALAUDEEN writes.

     

    IS the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) actually ready for reconciliation? Can it broker peace between President Goodluck Jonathan and Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi on one hand and the National Chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, and the governors on the other hand? The prospect of reconciliation was seen in Abuja last week by Akwa Ibom state Governor Chief Godswill Akpabio, after a meeting of the PDP National Convention Planning Committee.

    Akpabio said the PDP was not ready to lose its governors to the opposition political parties. He disclosed that both the PDP Governors Forum and the party were committed to reconciliation in the troubled party.This statement coming from Akpabio who was blowing hot and cold on the suspension of Amaechi, with threats to sanction his supporters among the PDP governors, has proved that there is a limit to arbitrariness and show of power.

    Other governors at loggerheads with the party over its suspension of the Rivers state governor are Aliyu Babangida (Niger); Aliyu Wamakko (Sokoto); Rabiu Kwakwanso (Kano); Sule Lamido (Jigawa); Murtala Nyako (Adam-awa); and Abdulfatah Ahmed (Kwara). They had been in the forefront of moves for the removal of the PDP National Chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, over his alleged interference in the running of the Adamawa state chapter. They also fell out with the party after it suspended Amaechi on May 27, 2013, for seeking a second term as the Chairman of the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF), despite the warning from the PDP leadership. But the party’s National Working Committee (NWC) said Amaechi was suspended for his “refusal to obey the lawful directive of the Rivers PDP Executive Committee to rescind his decision dissolving the elected executive council of Obiokpor Local Government Area of Rivers State”.

    The grounds on which the party suspended Amaehi were flimsy they include, that he sought for re-election as the NGF chairman. He is also said to have been respended over the Obi/Akpor Local Government crisis. Amaechi insists that the House of Assembly suspended the council for alleged fraud, not the governor. NGF is a club of governors elected on various political platforms. NGF is not a PDP organ. It has a constitution that regulates its operation. It is not the PDP Governors Forum that the party could dictate to or meddle in its affairs. There is no logic in the second allegation. The Rivers State House of Assembly dissolved Obiokpor Local Government not the governor. There is separation of powers. The executive can’t interfere or usurp the powers of the legislative and vice versa. Is it proper for the party state executive to issue directive to state governor on matters that border on governance? The party can only advice which is not binding.

    There are ‘classified offences’ committed by Amaechi that incurred him the wrath of the presidency. It was widely reported how the First Lady, Mrs Patience Jonathan, snatched the microphone from Governor Amaechi at a public function when she felt dissatisfied with the governor’s explanation. That was the beginning of his problem with Aso rock. The rumoured ambition to be running mate to Governor Sule Lamido of Jigawa State as presidential candidate of PDP in 2015. Despite Amaechi’s denial, the presidency still perceives him as a traitor who should be dealt with ruthlessly. Perhaps, the reason why President Jonathan would not forgive Amaechi was the NGF opposition to Sovereign Wealth Fund. The matter was decided in favour of the Governors Forum by the Supreme Court.

    On June 5, 2013, Wamakko was suspended by the PDP National Working Committee for allegedly ignoring party directives. However, his suspension was believed to have been orchestrated by some party leaders over his support for Amaechi at the NGF election on June 24.

     

    Oil wells dispute

     

    The disputed oil wells between Rivers and Bayelsa states is a major issue that must be resolved for any meaningful reconciliation to take place. According to the Rivers State government, the oil wells are located in Soku, a community in Akuku Toru Local Government Area of Rivers State. It said Bayelsa State is claiming the ownership because the land belongs to the Kalabari people, not minding which state they belong. The revenues from the disputed oil wells were originally fixed in an escrow account to await the resolution of the boundary dispute. This was the situation until recently the Federal Government decided to release the monies from the disputed wells to Bayelsa State, a move which the Rivers state described as unfair and unjust decision? which made it to file a suit at the Supreme Court. The state further posited that Bayelsa made reference to facts without addressing them but instead, choose to instigate the presidency against the government and people of Rivers. The apex court according to the Rivers state, decided that it would be appropriate to await the final delineation of the boundary by the National Boundary Commission.

    But Bayelsa justified the ownership of the disputed oil wells on the fact that the Rivers state government had filed two suits against Bayelsa at the Federal and the Supreme Courts respectively in order to assert its ownership of the oil wells, but all the suits were struck out by the courts. Besides, Bayelsa claimed that the name, Soku Oil. wells, was wrongly given by Shell Petroleum Development Company Ltd because Soku, a village in Rivers state, was their operational base at that time, while the oil wells and the flow station are located in the Oluasiri clan in Nembe Local Council of Bayelsa.

    Being the aggrieved party in this matter, Rivers state government has raised a number of questions: Why would the accruals from the disputed oil wells which have been kept in escrow all these years to await the final resolution of the matter be suddenly paid to Bayelsa state just recently? “Why place reliance and give effect to an administrative map whose authors have acknowledged its inaccuracy and promised to remedy? Is it not unjust, even highly immoral to allow a party to a disputed and in the face of an erroneous map to the detriment of the Kalabari communities of Rivers State?”

    Analysts say the oil wells dispute gave Dr Jonathan an opportunity to wield big stick on Governor Amaechi, who was considered a stumbling block to the 2015 re-election plan. According to the analysts, the decision to pay the accruals from the oil revenue to Bayelsa through the back door was a game plan to cede the disputed oil wells to Bayelsa and an attempt to reduce Rivers State status among the oil producing states.

    The war between Rivers and Bayelsa states is akin to the one that trailed the ceding of 76 oil wells from Cross River to its sister state, Akwa Ibom. Their relationship dates back to many years before they became separate states when additional states were created. Because of the inherent financial implications, the authorities in Cross River are still concerned about the circumstances surrounding the 76 oil wells that are bound to further boost the revenue capacity of Akwa Ibom State.

     

    Regional crises

     

    PDP has always taken pride in its avowed ability to manage its crises and resolve them through the family affair approach. At the inception of democracy in 1999, it was a very large political formation bringing under its umbrella the decision makers from different parts of the country. PDP controls 23 out of 36 states. It has comfortable majority in the Senate and House of Representatives ditto and many state Houses of Assembly. In spite of this the party is wobbling from one crisis to the other across the six geo-political zones. The crises are so daunting that some members of PDP are skeptical about its possible resolution before the 2015 general elections.

    The crises are the potent threats to the party’s electoral fortune in 2015, if not well managed.

     

    North and 2015

     

    The disclosure by the Chairman of Northern Governors Forum, Governor Babangida Aliyu of Niger state, that President Jonathan signed an agreement with the northern governors before the 2011 presidential election that he would serve for one term has sparked crisis. This is so, given the ongoing moves by the north to reclaim presidency. Even though, the president’s camp came out to deny signing any agreement with the north, Governor Aliyu promised to make it the agreement public at the appropriate time. Since then, the governors have drawn a battle line with the presidency while insisting that presidency must move up north in 2015. How well the party handles this problem is critical to its survival as the 2015 polls gather momentum.

     

    PDP governors

    versus Tukur

     

    The relationship between the PDP governors and the national chairman is anything but cordial. The governors have accused the chairman of running the party in an autocratic manner. Among the reasons why they want Tukur removed were holding party’s meeting in his personal house, refusal to convene the National Executive meeting since he assumed office last year and his role in the Adamawa State congresses that produced two party executives. Tukur, in a letter co-signed by the former acting national secretary recognised a faction allegedly loyal to him. It was also alleged that Tukur’s rejection of the faction loyal to the state governor was to ensure that the governorship ambition of his son in 2015 sail through.

    The crisis festered further when most of the northern governors boycotted the zonal reconciliation tour of the National Working Committee (NWC) led by Tukur. Despite holding the reconciliation meeting in the three zones- Northeast, North-central and Northwest on different days, many of the PDP governors declined to show up at the meetings. The reconciliatory tour further exposed the underbelly of the party crisis. The governors insisted that Tukur must go for peace to reign in the party. But President Jonathan sees no reason in their demand. Hence, Tukur remains the chairman against all odds.

     

    Obasanjo/Jonathan

    face off

     

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo had a good time with President Jonathan at the early stage of his administration, given Obasanjo’s frequent visits to Aso Rock then. All of a sudden, they turned strange bed fellows. This has affected the PDP fortunes in the Southwest. In Ogun State, Obasanjo’s home state, the party is factionalised, a development that was clearly manifested in the 2011 general elections. The party lost woefully to the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN).There is a faction loyal to Obasanjo. the Buruji Kashamu group is allegedly working for Jonathan. The crisis eventually consumed the erstwhile PDP National Auditor Chief Bode Mustapha, who was sponsored by the Obasanjo group. He was replaced by Olawale from the Buruji group.

    The Southwest Zonal chapter headed by former Ekiti State Governor Olusegun, Oni was sacked by the former NWC following a court order. Oni fought tooth and nail to regain his office, but all is now history with the turn of events. Similarly, the fomer Osun state governor Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, was removed as national secretary. His removal was a fall out of Ogun state crisis. The Kashamu group approached the court to void the congress that nominated Oyinlola for the post as illegal, the court granted the prayer and ordered Oyinlola’s removal. Both Oni and Oyinlola belong to the Obasanjo group.

    In Oyo, Ondo, Lagos and Osun, similar scenario is playing out. In-fighting has destabilised the party with factions trying to lord it over themselves. Former Oyo State governor Adebayo Alao-Akala is embroiled in a battle of supremacy with other leaders of PDP in the state. He is contemplating leaving the party to team up with his former boss, Senator Rashidi Ladoja, in Accord Party to realise his senatorial ambition, In Lagos state the party is polarised into Olabode George and Adeseye Ogunlewe groups. Though both of them came out recently to admit reconciliation, but it is still a game of wait and see. The Ondo state chapter is yet to get over the last year’s governorship election result. The party’s candidate Chief Olusola Oke was allegedly sabotaged by the party elders. They were alleged to have shifted allegiance to Governor Olusegun Mimiko of Labour Party, who was also favoured by the Presidency to win the keenly contested election. In Ekiti, the return of former governor Ayo Fayose has renewed the popularity contest with Oni, the immediate past governor. The PDP Governors Forum made futile attempts to resolve the crises in the southwest. The governors withdrew because all attempts to make the aggrieved parties to embrace peace failed.

     

    Special convention

     

    The party has scheduled a special convention for July 20 to elect new members of the NWC because the elections that brought them office were not acceptable to the Independent Electoral Commission (INEC). From all indications, there may be no changes in the new NWC that is likely to emerge from the convention. The results are predictable; most of the former members of NWC would return, so far their loyalty to President Jonathan is not in doubt. The devil that you know is better than the unknown. The president cannot afford to shop for new faces now because of 2015. So, the tendency that the party will come out of the convention more divided is very likely, given the magnitude of animosity that various stakeholder may carry to the convention.

    The pattern is the same in the southeast zone. The case of Anambra is as worrisome. there is no recognisable party executive. There are several factions of PDP in Anambra loyal to different godfathers.

    The fight over which zone should produce the governorship candidate in Enugu state in the next election has polarised the party. The Nsukka zone says it is their turn since the incumbent Governor Sullivan Chime who hails from Awgu zone would be serving out eight years in office. The Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu also from Awgu is preparing to succeed Chime in office. Hence, the Nsukka zone is crying of being marginalised.

    With the threat of disintegration posed by the crises, analysts say the PDP stakeholders should evolve political strategies that would unite the party to counter the divide and rule tactics of the presidency that has ruined the party in the last two years. The special convention offers a rare opportunity for the party leadership to redress the crises through with aggrieved members for peace to reign. In the alternative the party would go to the polls in 2015 as a divided family as it happened in 2011 in some states hitherto controlled by the PDP. The consequence is still being felt.

     

  • 2015 behind Rivers  crisis, says commissioner

    2015 behind Rivers crisis, says commissioner

    Rivers State Commissioner for Commerce and Industry Chuma Chinye spoke with CLARICE AZUATALAM in Port Harcourt on why President Goodluck Jonathan and Chief Nyesom Wike, the Minister of State for Education, are fighting Governor Rotimi Amaechi.

     

    Many people have expressed disappointment over the Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) election of May 24. What is your reaction?

    My first take is that there is hope for Nigeria, that we will be able to conduct free and fair elections. But, that hope wavers in the face of the rather disappointing reaction of the other 16 governors, who participated in that election. It is worrisome because it is reflective of the general tendency of the Nigerian politician not to accept the outcome of election results.

    I watched with amazement Governor Godswill Akpabio saying that Governor Amaechi practically forced them to hold the election. If you look at their sizes, Amaechi doesn’t quite look like the biggest or strongest. He is certainly by no means the oldest. He is younger than most of them.

    They went there and in spite of the mischief they had in mind, they blundered by allowing the election to hold in the first place. Once the election held, the minimum they should have shown by way of integrity as leaders in Nigeria was to accept the outcome and congratulate the winner. Therefore, it was shameful that in spite of the fact that they participated in the election, the results were clear, the election was free and fair, they turned round and began to manipulate and turn things around in a way that is not good for the future of Nigerian politics.

    What do you think is the cause of the crisis in the state?

    It is simple. Those who think that they mean well for the President, but are actually selfish and ambitious individuals, are busy stoking the fire of another civil war in Rivers State simply because they think or they accuse Governor Amaechi of having the ambition to be the Vice President to somebody.

    In my study of the history of the world, I have not seen or heard or read where somebody was running for the office of Vice President before the Presidential nominations have taken place. I think that it is idiotic and I say this with all sense of responsibility, it is idiotic for anybody to begin to fight a man because he is perceived to have a vice – presidential ambition, when in fact, all you need to do is to tackle the man that you think has the presidential ambition. Because, if you tackle the man that has the vice-presidential ambition, he can only become a vice-president if only there is a president.

    Has it always been like this?

    No. I have the privilege of working as the Director of Finance and Administration in the PDP campaign office in Rivers State in the 2011 elections and I know the charge that the Governor gave to myself and the then DG, the Minister of State for Education, Chief Nyesom Wike, to deliver PDP and ensure that the votes that we garner for President Jonathan will be the one that will surpass everyone in every part of Nigeria and we delivered.

    If the governor did not love his President, he would not go the extent that we went to ensure that the highest votes that the President had came from the Southsouth. It is on account of the number of votes that we delivered to the President that he conceded a second ministerial slot to Rivers State. That second slot is the one occupied by Wike. If this was a governor that hated the President or did not want him, he wouldn’t go to the extent he went.

    Therefore, if I may go back to what I was saying earlier on, if you begin to destroy Rivers State because Amaechi is perceived to have a vice presidential ambition, are we saying that we prefer the offices we want to occupy to the people of Rivers State?

    Are we saying that, because of 2015, we should first destroy all the good works that Governor Amaechi has done in Rivers State? If you want to occupy a house, do you set it on fire first? Those who want to be governors in 2015 should wait. when the time comes they can seek office. But it is the highest form of disservice to Rivers people, to any person whosoever, to begin to damage Rivers State simply because they want to take it over.

    Is there a plot to remove the governor?

    It is quite clear that there is a plot to remove Governor Amaechi from office now. For those who are behind this plot, have they asked themselves some questions, the voice that comes from heaven, have you examined yourself? Are they saying that the works that Amaechi is doing is not good enough for him to complete his second tenure?

    I read Chief E.K. Clark saying that the President is entitled to run for office, but he turned round to say that Amaechi is not entitled to aspire to be the Vice president because the Southsouth only deserves a President. Now, this President is not a President of the Southsouth; he is the President of Nigeria. Amaechi is the Governor of Rivers State. If the President has a right, so does Amaechi.

    Interestingly, neither the President nor Amaechi has said that they want to run for anything. But now, Rivers people are returning to the days of carrying their hands up to walk simply because people around the President think that Amaechi must be stopped at all costs. Stopped from being what?

    Critics have said that, if he is really as good as he is saying, he shouldn’t be in PDP. How do you react to that?

    My answer to them is that the right place for this kind of futuristic leader to be is in PDP. Because, if you look back, look at your Bible, the world got so bad, God Himself got so worried and wondered what He should do about the world. He decided to come and be part of the world. To see what we see, to feel what we feel, faced the temptations and the challenges that we face and in spite of those challenges, to stand firm and make a change. The changes that Amaechi is making in PDP are there for all to see.

    It didn’t start today. To become governor he effected changes which led to constitutional amendments. Before the constitutional amendments, his stand led to the historical Supreme Court judgment. Today, he is still standing by these virtues, by these truths. My fear for him is that he is probably ahead of his time.

    The governor has expressed fear for his safety. Do you share his anxiety, too?

    In 2007, on AIT programme, Focus Nigeria, on the issue of whether they were right to substitute Amaechi or not, I told the coordinator that they had the chance. And that what they needed to have done was to have killed him. But because they could not and change his name, once the 66 days elapsed, there was nothing they could do. Today, I also say that the mistake they have made is that they have failed to take him out. But since they haven’t done so and the man is alive, if they try to kill him now, Nigerians will rise. They are trying to remove him from office. It will not work because Nigerians and Rivers people will rise. But like I said, I have my fears and these fears are that leaders like him usually are ahead of their time and when you are ahead of your time they try to extinguish your candle.

    There is a man in Cross River State who was governor, Donald Duke. He came ahead of his time, stood for what is right. Where is he? They have pushed him aside. Nigeria has a habit of extinguishing its lights. Those persons who are most outstanding are usually pushed aside. Governor Amaechi has something to add to the national leadership of Nigeria, whether he is vice president, whether he is President, whether he is senator, whatever it is, he has served Rivers State and Nigeria for close to 16 years. The experiences and the candour and the integrity he has brought into public office should not be allowed to waste because some persons are ambitious. His fate should not become like that of Nasir El’Rufai. Nasir El’Rufai has something to add to Nigeria, whether you like him or you don’t like him.

    I lived in Abuja when he was the minister and I go to Abuja. I still have a property in Abuja and I see the difference. I am not criticising the present minister. But quite frankly, there is a difference. I have met El’Rufai; he has something to add.

    Nuhu Ribadu has something to add to Nigeria. Where is he? These men are on the sidelines why? Because they are like Governor Amaechi.

    I must say that if Amaechi has any ambition to move from the state level to the federal level into any office, I will stand by him. And I will stand by him not because I am his Commissioner but because having worked with him, I know that he means well. I have never met a public officer who means better for his people like Governor Amaechi and I have related with quite a number of them. In my lifetime I have served as Special Assistant to all kinds of people, including ministers and I have never seen one like Governor Amaechi.

     

  • Scramble for grassroots power in Anambra

    Scramble for grassroots power in Anambra

    It has been 15 years since the last local government elections were held in Anambra State. October 5 has been fixed for the elections. NWANOSIKE ONU reports that stakeholders are skeptical about the possiblity of the polls.

     

    The last local government election in Anambra State was conducted 15 years ago by the military in 1998. It was followed later by the governorship election that brought Governor Chinwoke Mbadiuju’s administration into office

    Once the tenure of that set of elected council executives ended in 2002, successive administrations in the state have constituted one caretaker committee or the other for the administration of the councils.

    On few occassions, however, such duties have been entrusted into the hands of the heads of service of the councils.

    There are 21 local government areas in the state with a total of 326 wards. An additional ward was created to bring the total tally to 327.

    During the tenure of Senator Chris Ngige, preparations for the conduct of the council elections got to an advanced stage in 2004. All the materials were ready, but hoodlums, who were alleged to be members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), disrupted the process.

    The incident occured during the infamous November 2004 mayhem when the headquarters of the Anambra State Independent Electoral Commission (ANIEC) was set ablaze and vital electoral materials destroyed.

    It was alleged then that the onslaught was perpetrated by those who wanted Ngige out at all cost, following the failed bid to abduct him at the Choice Hotels in Awka.

    Soon after, in February 2005, another attempt was made by Ngige, but former President Olusegun Obasanjo allegedly threw a spanner in the works. He was said to have advised Ngige not to go ahead with it on the ground that security reports did not favour the conduct of local government elections.

    Last year, it was generally believed that the polls would hold in December. In fact, the chairman of the state’s Independent Electoral Commission, Prof Titus Ezeh, described the proposed December 4, 2012 date as “sacrosanct”. But certain technical challenges came up.

    First, it was discovered that the voter’s register was full of fictitious names from the North, Southsouth and Southwest and it was stopped following a public outcry against it.

    Before then, ANSIEC had carried out large scale sensitisation in all the 21 council areas. And some political parties had collected millions of naira from their aspirants through the sales of nomination forms.

    There was the case of a particular party, which imposed N1 million on each of its chairmanship aspirants for the nomination form. The party allegedly collected millions of naira only for the elections not to hold. That incident remains a talking point and it is causing ripples in the party till date.

    Ever since the failed attempt of last year, the commission and the government have been playing hide and seek on the issue.

    Expectedly, the attitude of the state government and ANSIEC pitched them against some groups and individuals. The government became jittery as civil society groups such as the Civil liberties Organization (CLO) led by Alloy Attah; Intersociety led by Comrade Emeka Umegbelasi; Movement for the Conduct of Local Government Elections, led by Comrade Osita Obi and Transform Nigeria Movement led by Comrade Obi Ochije turned the heat on the government and the commission.

    This forced Governor Peter Obi into making some pronouncements in that direction at some public functions but nothing concrete came out of them all. His common excuse has been that the court cases instituted by those at the helm of affairs in the commission were hampering his plans to conduct the elections.

    Former ANSIEC chairmen, Chief Cornel Umeh who served during the era of Ngige till Obi came in and Prof Titus Ezeh, who Obi had described as the man for the job, had both gone to court to challenge their removals from office by the state government without due process at different times.

    Some of these cases, which the governor referred to, are still pending in different courts till date. And until they are vacated, it would be difficult for the election to hold in Anambra.

    Furthermore, the constitution does not allow an acting chairman to conduct such an election, therefore, the commission, as it is presently constituted without a substantive chairman, may be wary of conducting the election, considering the fact that money, resources and time would have been waisted in no small measure.

    Besides, the chairmen of some political parties in the state, believe that the Governor Obi Administration is not sincere in its quest to get democratically elected individuals to pilot the affairs of the council areas.

    Critics in the state say that the reluctance to conduct local government elections is not just a problem that is peculiar to Governor Obi but a general political malady plaguing the system in the country. They argue that the desire to control allocations from the federal government, was the reason behind the reluctance of state governors to conduct council polls.

    They further claim that governors are more comfortable working with transition committee chairmen and their members because they are more amenable to doing the biddings of state executive governors.

    However, Governor Obi last week told members of the Movement for the Conduct of Local Government Election at the Government House, that he is now ready to conduct the council polls.

    Speaking to over 200 members of the group, at a meeting he held with them at the Conference Hall of the Government House, Obi said that if the money made available for ANSIEC in the 2013 appropriation bill was not enough, he would ensure that funds were made available to facilitate the conduct of the election.

    But in an omnious note, Obi reminded his visitors that he is not the commission that would conduct the polls.

    “I am not the commission, I have become your member today, but go to the ANSIEC and liaise with them to fix a date for the election and you will be assured of my assistance” Obi told them.

    The Nation learnt that ANSIEC was allocated 400 million naira in the 2013 budget, an amount political observers say is too meager for the conduct of council polls.

    Osita Obi, the leader of the group and his members had threatened that if the council polls was not conducted in the state, the governorship election in the state may also not hold. The activist said that he was ready to lay down his life to actualize his campaign, saying that Anambra and indeed, the aspirants had become a laughing stock in the society after 15 years.

    Following the agitation, ANSIEC acting chairman Sylvester Okonkwo, named October 5, 2013 as date for the conduct of the election. However, he did this without releasing the other necessary guidelines as earlier planned by the commission. He postponed that to this week.

    He merely announced that all nomination and completed forms by aspirants should be submitted to ANSIEC on or before August 15, 2013.

    But curiously, what he tagged as interactive sessions with stakeholders was not to be. He moved quickly into his office after the announcement, leaving the state party chairmen.

    Okonkwo’s action sparked instant protests from the party chieftains, who sat glued to their seats, waiting for the acting chairman to come and offer some explanation. But when he failed to turn up, they left in anger.

    The Nation learnt that what the acting chairman of ANSIEC did was a mere smokescreen designed to deceive the party leaders. It was alleged that the acting chairman did what he did under duress. Furthermore, a government source, who spoke with The Nation in confidence, last week said there will be no local government election. He added that “The Governor is planning to put sole administrators at the helm of affairs at the councils”.

    The tenure of transition committee members expired on June 12, 2013, and The Nation learnt also, that the aim of giving lawmakers 12 million naira each as constituency funds by the state government was to have its way on the plan.

    Anambra State PDP chairman Kenneth Emeakayi, told The Nation that as far as he was concerned, their mission at ANSIEC office was a jamboree. “The aim of the meeting, according to ANSIEC, was to have an interactive session with the stakeholders; rather, what we saw was a different thing. The acting chairman of the commission just refused to speak with us”.

    Chairman of the Labour Party (LP), Hon Sam Oraegbunam said the date of the election as announced by ANSIEC is not feasible. He told The Nation after the meeting that ANSIEC was only playing to the gallery and that it lacked focus.

    As for the chairman of the All Nigeria Peoples Party, Chief Pat Orjiakor, the entire arrangement by ANSIEC was “pure deceit”. He said the electoral body was not sincere to the project. “Anybody who holds any office should be a man of honour and integrity”.

    The same argument was put up by the state chairman of Advance Congress of Democrats (ACD), Lolo Oby Okafor. She said that ANSIEC called the party leaders to “ridicule them”. According to her, “the public can testify that there are no plans by anybody to hold council election, we were happy when we were summoned to come for this meeting, but on getting here, it was another thing altogether” Okafor said.

    But the chairman of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), Chief Mike Kwentoh and the factional chairman of the party Egwuoyibo Okoye, commended ANSIEC moves.

    The state chairman of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), Chief Amechi Obidike told The Nation that the possibility of the election holding is remote.

    According to him, the fact that there are some impending cases in court against the commission that have not been dispensed off, and that the acting chairman of ANSIEC has no powers to conduct council polls and as such the whole project is doubtful.

     

  • How to resolve PDP crisis, by Atiku

    How to resolve PDP crisis, by Atiku

    In this piece, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar reflects on the crisis rocking the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and suggests the way out of the logjam.

     

    At the onset of the present democratic dispensation, it was clear to the founding fathers of the Peoples Democratic Party that the major challenge confronting our nation was the establishment of an enduring democratic platform with a sustainable legitimacy. We were also convinced that such platforms should possess credible internal capacity to produce leaders who will be committed to the public purpose and whose leadership will be informed by a common good and sustained by the popular will of all citizens.

    The PDP was conceived as a national party not only because of the desire to provide responsive leadership, but also because it is within such a national party that we can guarantee national harmony, promote human development and safeguard the freedom and dignity of all citizens. The constitution of the party was designed to promote collective leadership that is inclusive and upholds the principles of justice and fair-play without denigrating the legitimacy of dissent.

    I have said it and I will continue to say it that the party is headed in the wrong direction as it moves from one crisis to the other. It appears that in the pursuit of our personal ambition, we have continued to trample with impunity on the rights not only of the members, but also on the freedom of Nigerian citizens who deserve a right to choose who should govern them and for how long.

    Sometimes, progress involves stepping backwards. In the South West, this is such a moment for the Peoples Democratic Party.

    The PDP became a very strong political party in the South West as a result of the efforts and commitment of leaders who commanded the respect of the generality of the people of the South West. By the year 2009, the party had 5 of the 6 Governors in the zone, 14 of the 18 Senators, 46 out of the 71 House of Representatives seat, 102 members of the State Houses of Assembly, and 115 Local Governments. Members of the PDP also occupied all commissionership and special advisers positions, in addition to all statutory board membership.

    However, the fortunes of the PDP in the South West took a startling reverse from 2011 such that today, the party has no Governor in the region, has only 1 Senator, 7 Members of the House of Representatives and only 18 Members in all the State Houses of Assembly. Of course, not a single Local Government administration is PDP-controlled in the entire region.

    It is not only in the interest of PDP, but indeed that of the Nation that this trend be reversed.

    As a founding member of the PDP, the prevailing situation of the party in the South West is very disturbing.

    I am sure that our party didn’t come to this sorry state in the region because the party men failed to deliver good governance to the people. Landmarks of achievements by PDP governments dot the region.

    It still remains a paradox to me how the presidential candidate of the party would win massively in all but one state of the South West, yet the party failed to produce a single state Governor in the region and could only produce 18 State Assembly members in the same election. My experience in politics tells me that this paradox can only be explained in one way that is the leadership of the party must have abandoned the party and negotiated the victory of the President at the expense of the Party.

    Recent events have shown that the leadership of the party has demonstrated insufficient sincerity in resolving the numerous crises which are pitching the party members against themselves. Political manoeuvring that relies on the politics of patronage and arbitrary application of sanctions will not sustain the popular will of the people through which the party can recover the lost ground.

    A group of concerned professionals with PDP interest from the South West carried out a study in which a state-by-state analysis of the crises in the party was made. The body made far-reaching recommendations in their document which was submitted to the leadership of the Party. If the party leadership had paid attention to some of their recommendations, the outcome of the election in Ondo State could probably have been different.

    It will be useful for the incoming South West Executive Committee to study this report and prepare a blueprint for the reversal of the dwindling fortunes of the party in the region.

    The eloquent silence of respected leaders on the various crises is a disturbing sign which leaves majority of the members confused.

    The national leadership of the party needs to respect the democratic wishes of party members in the zone and discourage the deliberate creation of factions, and upturning the results of duly conducted elections at the various congresses and the national convention.

    In all we do, the adherence to the constitution of the party in the conduct of the party’s affairs is the only hope for sustaining the existence and legitimacy of the party. Also, the legitimacy of the party can only be sustained if the provision of the welfare needs of Nigerian citizen takes precedent in the heart of the leaders rather than primordial politicking.

    There is need to reverse the declining trend of PDP in the South West. PDP cannot afford to depart from the South West.

     

    Atiku Abubakar is the Turaki Adamawa and former Vice President of Nigeria

     

  • Dickson’s antidote to insecurity in Bayelsa

    Dickson’s antidote to insecurity in Bayelsa

    Before now, Bayelsa state was under siege by the cultists. Locked in a supremacy battle, members of rival cult groups turned the state, especially its capital, Yenagoa, to a killing field.

    Staccato of gunshots were a regular feature of daily life in Yenagoa. It was common to see people running in different directions to escape from a sudden violent scene created by cultists.

    Gun-wielding and machete-carrying youths overran the city at night and in broad daylight and mowed down their rivals with impunity.

    Each day, a group of armed youths raided pubs, beer parlours, eateries and other relaxation centres and killed their perceived enemies including innocent fun-seekers.

    September 2011, was particularly bloody in the state. It recorded a harvest of deaths. No day passed without stories of violent skirmishes. In fact, within one week in September, about 11 persons were reported killed at different parts of the city.

    Cultism had hitherto defiled solutions in the state. In flamboyant display of wealth, cultists lived large, own business empires and occupied juicy political positions. Membership of a cult group was believed to be part of a bargaining power for allotment of political positions.

    It was obvious that the then government lacked the will to tackle the menace. Security ,especially the police, appeared handicapped as superior orders were issued to them to release cultists in their custody.

    The development dealt a deadly blow on the state’s economy. Investors avoided the state like a plague. Panic-stricken business owners closed their shops and retired home early to escape the anger of the marauders.

    Clubs, beer parlours and other business owners prayed earnestly for the end of cultism and the reign of terror in the state.

    The question, however, on all lips is: can the efforts of the current administration of Governor Seriake Dickson eradicate cult-related activities in the state?

    The governor had from inception toed a path of zero-tolerance to crime and declared his readiness to stamp out all forms criminalities including cultism.

    Dickson went further to give legal backing to the war against cultism by signing into law, the Bayelsa State Secret Cult, Kidnapping and Similar Activities (Prohibition Bill, 2012), a law that prescribes 10-year jail term for convicted cultists.

    Shortly after assenting to the bill, he said: “In the last few years, this state became the headquarters of cult-related violence.

    “I want to thank the security agencies for heeding our call for normalcy to return because in the past three months, we are witnesses to a semblance of normalcy, that has returned to the state, particularly, the streets of Yenagoa. But this is not good enough.

    “This government has said it over and over that we had no room for criminality and violence. Especially, criminal activities that are violent in nature, whether they are products of militancy or cult related activities.

    “We are very serious about that and to underscore our seriousness and to show that in this government there would be no room for tolerance of crime, we sent a bill to the House of Assembly and they have passed it into law.

    “The consequences of this law are very severe. The security operatives now have the authority to go after all those who are members of cult groups listed in the law.

    “By my signature to this law, I have hereby proscribed all of them. They are hereby proscribed as associations and groups in Bayelsa State. By this laws that I have signed, it is a crime to belong to any of these groups in Bayelsa State”, he said.

    The law also made it a crime for any landlord to provide accommodation for cultists or allow his premises to be used in anyway by cultists. Governor Dickosn said this much when he declared that:

    “It is also a crime for any household or landlord and landlady or anybody who is in control of any premises whatsoever to allow that premises to be used for any cult-related activities or to allow any cult member to stay in any such premises.

    “Once it is proved and upon conviction, such premises, however big it is, will be forfeited to the state government. I want to use this opportunity to call on landlords and landladies to be vigilant and watchful, because I will see to the strict implementation of this law,” he warned.

    But the governor gave a lifeline through the law to the cultists. He made a provision for renunciation, an opportunity for members of secret organisation to publicly renounce such membership and benefit from a rehabilitation and reintegration programme.

    In pursuant of his olive branch, the Governor, through his Senior Special Assistant on Civil Society, Mr. Tony Ile, proposed amnesty for cultists.

    Ile described the proposed amnesty as part of government’s efforts to further extend the olive branch to repentant cultists, especially, those hiding in coastal communities and higher institutions.

    He urged such persons to register their names and submit their profiles to his office. He gave March 20 and April 5 as the period for such registration.

    “Government is therefore, calling on cult members to take advantage of this window of opportunity created to turn a new leaf and do something meaningful with their lives.

    “To demonstrate government’s commitment to this project, His Excellency, Henry Seriake Dickson, Governor of Bayelsa state, will meet with all repentant cultists at a later date to discuss and arrange for proper security of their lives as well as ways to engage and empower them”, he said.

    Following the approach described by many people as “carrot and stick”, 11,000 of the youths from the eight local government areas of the state, converged at the Banquet Hall, Yenagoa, to formally take oaths denouncing cultism.

    The youths who wore white T-shirts, symbolising peace, took the oaths administered on them by the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Chief Francis Egele in the presence of other government representatives led by Governor Dickson.

    Dickson, who was happy at the development, informed the youths that the government had earmarked N1bn as soft loans for young entrepreneurs.

    He said the government had concluded plans to hold a youth summit in the state to identify their problems. He said the youths would undergo training on skill acquisitions after their verifications.

    Addressing them he said, “If we do not help to build you all, then our future will not be assured. You are all aware of what our restoration government is doing; building schools, roads, hospitals, investing in security and making our state safe, talking to people to come here to invest so that we can create jobs for you.

    “All of these will come to nothing, if we don’t equip you with the skills that you need to partake in the economy to protect our future.

    “This exercise is not the end but the beginning; by the time my team concludes the verification exercise, which will be detailed, local government by local government, when we are through with all of these, we are going to engage you in a special youth empowerment programme. A total of 10,000 youths will be engaged.”

    He said the beneficiaries would be trained in agriculture, traffic management and the special surveillance system.

    Also the Commissioner for Youths Development, Mr. Akpoebide Alamieyeseigha urged the youths to embrace the vocational programmes initiated by the government.

    Following the reintegration programme of the government for the repentant cultists, he said anybody caught indulging in criminal activities would henceforth be penalised in accordance with the law.

    A petty trader who identified herself as Preye Ezekiel believes that the efforts of the governor are yielding dividends citing the existing peace in the state.

    She, however, asks Dickson to sustain the peace by creating jobs for the youths. “We cannot develop without peace. Let us encourage the governor, who has shown uncommon determination to secure our lives”, she said.

     

  • APC will provide better leadership, says Igbokwe

    APC will provide better leadership, says Igbokwe

    THE Publicity Secretary of the Lagos State Action Congress of Nigeria(ACN), Joe Igbokwe, has said that the new mega party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), will provide effective leadership for the country.

    In a statement in Lagos, Igbokwe noted that Nigerians have been asking sundry questions about what impact the APC would make, when it is registered. He assured that the country will certainly make progress under the party.

    He said: “Some Nigerians are asking what the new party can do to restore the dignity of Nigeria. As we move close to 2015 Presidential elections, political watchers are asking to know the difference between APC and PDP. A lot of questions are coming to the political desks of APC throughout the country: is this party different from PDP? Are the progenitors not the same Nigerians we know? What does this party have in store for 150 million Nigerians? Can this new party make a difference? Can it fill in the gap in Nigeria’s political landscape? Can APC have the courage and the political will to fight the dreaded monster in Nigeria called corruption?

    “Nigerians want change and APC is ready to provide the long-awaited change. But the change is not going to come easy knowing the antics of the ruling party and their criminal disposition when it comes to electoral issues. To them, every presidential election is a do or die affair, a fight to finish, and the mother of all battles.

    Igbokwe asked Nigerians reclaim the country from the hand of pretenders.

    He added: “It is left for Nigerians to fight to reclaim their God-given country from pretenders and to all intents and purposes this is not going to be easy. This is a struggle for the soul of Nigeria, a struggle for economic, social and political freedom, a struggle to reclaim our rights to life. It is now or never. Yes, we can!

    “Well, APC may not have all the answers to these very strong questions posed above, but the truth of the matter remains that things will never be the same again. One thing is clear: Nigeria is not making progress in the midst of plenty. Nigeria is not making progress in the age of success. APC believes that investment funds must be retrieved from the pockets of few corrupt Nigerians and the money ploughed back to the economy to create jobs”.

    Igbokwe hinted that the party would invest massively in education as a panacea to poverty.

    He stressed: “APC leaders know that the only way to fight poverty is through massive investment in qualitative education. I can go on and on but APC cannot do everything in one fell swoop. Please take notice that this is not the manifesto of APC. After the formal registration, the party will sell its manifesto to Nigerians, and I know that it may not be too far from what I have said above.

    “Nigeria’s problems are well known for a long time in this country, dating back to the early 90s. For over 20 years we have been dancing around our problems without addressing them frontally and today we have gone full circle. The problems have magnified to become an octopus.

  • Jonathan Presidency promoting ethnicity, regionalism

    Jonathan Presidency promoting ethnicity, regionalism

    Assistant Editor LEKE SALAUDEEN reports that President Jonathan’s approach to some national issues is fuelling ethnic disunity, religious and regional intolerance in the build-up to the 2015 elections.

    Today, our unity is firm and our purpose is strong, our determination unshakable. Together, we will unite our nation and improve the living standards of all our peoples whether in the north or in the south; in the east or in the west. Our decade of development has begun. The march is on. The day of transformation begins today. We will not allow anyone exploit differences in creed or tongue, to set us one against another.”

    That was President Goodluck Jonathan’s mission statement at his inauguration on May 29, 2011, at the Eagle Square, Abuja. The declaration was intended to reciprocate the massive support given him by the electorate at the poll. The vote that brought him to power cut across party lines. He won in opposition states not because of his popularity or the appeal of his party’s manifesto, but probably to compensate his geo-political zone that had never produced a Head of State or President.

    Two years down the road, the question is: Has President Jonathan kept faith with his pledge to unite the country, improve standard of living and promote even development across all regions?

    Critics of the Jonathan Administration have accused it of giving covert and in some cases, overt support to aides of the President and others who are sympathetic to his administration as they play both ethnic and religious cards to sustain it in office, especially, beyond 2015.

    Critics have maintained that in a country where these two tendencies are treated with so much emotional attachment, the outcome could be inimical to national cohesion. Besides, they also point to some political developments, allegedly ochestrated by the presidency, which has put a lot of pressure and heat on the polity.

     

    Dividing the NGF

     

    Analysts point to the recent Nigeria Governors Forum (NGF) election, which suddenly turned controversial, in spite of the emergence of a clear cut winner. They posit that the Presidency played a diabolical role in the crisis. Curiously, President Jonathan has sort of confirmed the point through his recognition of the faction, generally believed to have lost that electuion. Today, the elitist political forum is almost irreconcilably divided.

    Besides, there was also the sudden emergence of the Peoples Demo-cractic party (PDP) Governors Forum (PDPGF). Ananlysts believ that it is unhealthy and that it has the capacity to not only undermine the national body but also force other parties into forming their own governors’ forum. it is an open secret today that, the President’s position on who becomes the chairman of the NGF has put a lot of heat on the polity. Initially, the president made us to believe that he was not interested in who wins the NGF chairmanship election. But after the election, which Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi won with 19 votes as against 16 by his opponent, Governor Jonah Jang of Plateau State, it became apparent that he was very much interested in it. President Jonathan has, for the second time. given official recognition to the group that lost out when he held a meeting with them despite the warning by Amaechi that Jang should stop impersonating him. Thus, the President has “successfully” broken up the NGF for personal political survival.

    The division in the NGF has been extended to the Northern Nigeria Governors Forum (NNGF). The split has pitched the governors of Northwest states (Hausa/Fulani) against the minority states. The Presidency is suspected to have a hand in the crisis because the governors of the minority states are the arrow heads of the weak Amaechi-must-go-campaign.

    Abuse of privilege

    Critical stakeholders are unhappy that under President Jonathan’s watch, ethnicity has been elevated to an art. The popular opinion is that the President has subtly applied the divisive policy in his dealings with Nigerians.

    The President, Civil Rights Commission, Mallam Shehu Sani, said President Jonathan has wasted the immense goodwill he enjoyed in the run- up to the 2011 election.

    Speaking to The Nation in an interview, Sani described President Jonathan as the most divisive leader ever in the history of this country.

    “His presidency has polarised Nigeria more than any other president in this country. His supporters and foot soldiers have been engaged in fanning the embers of discord and disunity. His supporters have heightened the tension in the polity. Jonathan’s divisive approach to governance has disappointed his friends and emboldened his adversaries.

    “Jonathan’s presidency has destroyed the historic political solidarity and cordiality between the North and the Southsouth. Under Jonathan, the unity of Nigeria and its future has come into question as the nation is subjected to voices of disintegration and disunity”, he said.

    The Coordinator of Democrats for Electoral Reforms (CODER), Ayo Opadokun, said Jonathan was not the first leader to create division among people to achieve political ambition. He said it is a reflection of what is wrong in the society. Those accusing Jonathan of creating division among people , he said, would do similar thing when they are in power.

    Opadokun said Nigerian politicians would exploit the most suitable strategy to win comfort in their brinkmanship. “That Jonathan is using divisive method to neutralise the influence of his opponents is not out of place. The 2015 election is fast approaching; he’s in contention. He has government machinery and resources to divide them and win the election. When it comes to power, our politicians would go to any length to achieve their selfish interest”, he said.

    Social critic and political activist Prof. Tam David-West observed that President Jonathan has frittered away the goodwill that won him the presidential election in 2011. He said Jonathan is what he’s today because of northerners’ support. “Nigerians from all parts of the country voted for him to be president, without prejudice to my view that his election is stained.

    “Can the Ijaw or Niger Delta alone guarantee the constitutional provision that he must have won 25 per cent of the popular votes cast in two thirds of 36 states; that is 24 states? The answer is ‘no’. The total votes he had from his region was about 24 per cent. Now you turn round to say the Hausa/Fulani must not rule us again. People saying these are not the ones who put him there. They are abusing the people who put him there.

    “If Jonathan does not call them to order, his administration may be truncated. The abuses may have a backlash. He should stop the Ijaws surrounding him from making reckless statements and distance himself from the so called Ijaw leaders who are merely seeking attention and relevance”, he said.

    In the words of Sani, “Ijaw leaders, who were never heard during the military dictatorship, have now found a voice to churn out provocative and inciting utterances that clearly undermines the remnants of support Jonathan enjoys among Nigerians.

    “His administration is sustained by a barrage of propaganda and misinformation. The so called transformation agenda has turned into a political charade and facade for unbridled corruption and pervasive insecurity.

    “Worse still, Jonathan has not delivered on his promises and has only delivered Nigeria to poverty and crisis. He has abandoned governance for trivial issues in his desperation for re-election in 2015.

    “Just as he polarised the nation so also he split the PDP on whose platform he came to power. However, the disunity and confusion within the ruling party is a blessing for Nigeria. It is a sign of good things to come. A united PDP has been responsible for the destruction of Nigeria. The disunity in PDP will unite Nigeria”, he said.

    Playing up ethnicity

    The Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) has accused Jonathan’s kinsmen of promoting religious and ethnic division in the build-up to 2015. ACF noted that the inclusion of two of its members – Major General Lawrence Onoja (rtd) and Senator Wash Pam, who were among the leaders of minority ethnic extraction at the instance of the Ijaw leader Chief Edwin Clark, who visited to President Jonathan and urged him to stand for re-election in 2015 has an utterior motive.

    Recently, both the leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Yoruba Unity Forum in the Southwest stormed Aso Villa to complain to the President that the zone is being shortchanged in terms of political patronage. The Igbo Youth Movement made similar complain. The Kalabari in Rivers State, too, had accused the President of ceding the oil wells in their land to Bayelsa, his home state.

    David-West had harsh words for Ijaw leaders for portraying Jonathan as primarily an Ijaw President. He recalled that the Save Nigeria Group (SNG), founded and headed by a Yoruba, Pastor Tunde Bakare and his compatriots, forced the National Assembly, when it was reluctant to do the right thing as stipulated by the constitution, to take action when the late President Umaru yar’Adua was terminally ill.

    “The person that finally moved the motion in the National Assembly to make Jonathan acting President was an Hausa man. There was no Ijaw input. Everything that made Jonathan what he is today as President, 24% of it came from his ethnic group. The other inputs were from other ethnic groups. When the likes of Edwin Clark and Asari Dokubo talk, they are creating more problems for Jonathan. It behoves him as the President and an Ijaw man to ask members of his ethnic group to, please, not make things difficult for him. They should help him to solve the problems he is facing and not add more to them.

    “A President who is elected by only a section of the country cannot reasonably be expected to bring Nigerians together and help them live up to their potential. That is to say a President cannot preside over a divided people and expects to succeed.

    US concern over polarisation

    In what is clearly an external concern over the growing ethnic division in the country, an American diplomat challenged Nigerian leaders to depoly the diversity of the country to its advantage. Speaking at a seminar, United States Ambassador to Nigeria Terence McCulley noted that this is a country of diversity of thought, diversity of culture and diversity of beliefs.

    McCulley said:”Too often, when we talk about Nigeria and with Nigerians, we hear about the differences: the Muslim North and the Christian South, the Hausa, the Igbo and the Yoruba. Nigerians deserve better; Nigerians can do better. While you should be proud of your religion, your culture, your background, your beliefs, you can do so in the light of the fact that you are all Nigerians, drawing inspiration from the uplifting words of your national anthem, he said.

    “I believe Nigerians must work together to build their nation irrespective of their religious beliefs. If one puts continuous emphasis on differences, rather than working toward overall betterment while co-existing, one risks chipping away at the very fabric of the nation”, he said.

    With the recent utterances by various stakeholders across the country, it is obvious that the delicate fibre that ties Nigerians together in the face of a multiplicity of ethnicity, beliefs or faiths, political persuasions and economic inclinations is being badly assaulted. This has far reaching implications for the country as it threatens directly its efforts at forging unity and oneness. Will the President intervene to reverse the trend before 2015?

  • 2015 behind Rivers’ crisis, says commissioner

    2015 behind Rivers’ crisis, says commissioner

    Rivers State Commissioner for Commerce and Industry Chuma Chinye spoke with CLARICE AZUATALAM in Port Harcourt on why President Goodluck Jonathan and Chief Nyesom Wike, the Minister of State for Education, are fighting Governor Rotimi Amaechi.

    Many people have expressed disappointment over the Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) election of May 24. What is your reaction?

    My first take is that there is hope for Nigeria, that we will be able to conduct free and fair elections. But, that hope wavers in the face of the rather disappointing reaction of the other 16 governors, who participated in that election. It is worrisome because it is reflective of the general tendency of the Nigerian politician not to accept the outcome of election results.

    I watched with amazement Governor Godswill Akpabio saying that Governor Amaechi practically forced them to hold the election. If you look at their sizes, Amaechi doesn’t quite look like the biggest or strongest. He is certainly by no means the oldest. He is younger than most of them.

    They went there and in spite of the mischief they had in mind, they blundered by allowing the election to hold in the first place. Once the election held, the minimum they should have shown by way of integrity as leaders in Nigeria was to accept the outcome and congratulate the winner. Therefore, it was shameful that in spite of the fact that they participated in the election, the results were clear, the election was free and fair, they turned round and began to manipulate and turn things around in a way that is not good for the future of Nigerian politics.

    What do you think is the cause of the crisis in the state?

    It is simple. Those who think that they mean well for the President, but are actually selfish and ambitious individuals, are busy stoking the fire of another civil war in Rivers State simply because they think or they accuse Governor Amaechi of having the ambition to be the Vice President to somebody.

    In my study of the history of the world, I have not seen or heard or read where somebody was running for the office of Vice President before the Presidential nominations have taken place. I think that it is idiotic and I say this with all sense of responsibility, it is idiotic for anybody to begin to fight a man because he is perceived to have a vice – presidential ambition, when in fact, all you need to do is to tackle the man that you think has the presidential ambition. Because, if you tackle the man that has the vice-presidential ambition, he can only become a vice-president if only there is a president.

    Has it always been like this?

    No. I have the privilege of working as the Director of Finance and Administration in the PDP campaign office in Rivers State in the 2011 elections and I know the charge that the Governor gave to myself and the then DG, the Minister of State for Education, Chief Nyesom Wike, to deliver PDP and ensure that the votes that we garner for President Jonathan will be the one that will surpass everyone in every part of Nigeria and we delivered.

    If the governor did not love his President, he would not go the extent that we went to ensure that the highest votes that the President had came from the Southsouth. It is on account of the number of votes that we delivered to the President that he conceded a second ministerial slot to Rivers State. That second slot is the one occupied by Wike. If this was a governor that hated the President or did not want him, he wouldn’t go to the extent he went.

    Therefore, if I may go back to what I was saying earlier on, if you begin to destroy Rivers State because Amaechi is perceived to have a vice presidential ambition, are we saying that we prefer the offices we want to occupy to the people of Rivers State?

    Are we saying that, because of 2015, we should first destroy all the good works that Governor Amaechi has done in Rivers State? If you want to occupy a house, do you set it on fire first? Those who want to be governors in 2015 should wait. when the time comes they can seek office. But it is the highest form of disservice to Rivers people, to any person whosoever, to begin to damage Rivers State simply because they want to take it over.

    Is there a plot to remove the governor?

    It is quite clear that there is a plot to remove Governor Amaechi from office now. For those who are behind this plot, have they asked themselves some questions, the voice that comes from heaven, have you examined yourself? Are they saying that the works that Amaechi is doing is not good enough for him to complete his second tenure?

    I read Chief E.K. Clark saying that the President is entitled to run for office, but he turned round to say that Amaechi is not entitled to aspire to be the Vice president because the Southsouth only deserves a President. Now, this President is not a President of the Southsouth; he is the President of Nigeria. Amaechi is the Governor of Rivers State. If the President has a right, so does Amaechi.

    Interestingly, neither the President nor Amaechi has said that they want to run for anything. But now, Rivers people are returning to the days of carrying their hands up to walk simply because people around the President think that Amaechi must be stopped at all costs. Stopped from being what?

    Critics have said that, if he is really as good as he is saying, he shouldn’t be in PDP. How do you react to that?

    My answer to them is that the right place for this kind of futuristic leader to be is in PDP. Because, if you look back, look at your Bible, the world got so bad, God Himself got so worried and wondered what He should do about the world. He decided to come and be part of the world. To see what we see, to feel what we feel, faced the temptations and the challenges that we face and in spite of those challenges, to stand firm and make a change. The changes that Amaechi is making in PDP are there for all to see.

    It didn’t start today. To become governor he effected changes which led to constitutional amendments. Before the constitutional amendments, his stand led to the historical Supreme Court judgment. Today, he is still standing by these virtues, by these truths. My fear for him is that he is probably ahead of his time.

    The governor has expressed fear for his safety. Do you share his anxiety, too?

    In 2007, on AIT programme, Focus Nigeria, on the issue of whether they were right to substitute Amaechi or not, I told the coordinator that they had the chance. And that what they needed to have done was to have killed him. But because they could not and change his name, once the 66 days elapsed, there was nothing they could do. Today, I also say that the mistake they have made is that they have failed to take him out. But since they haven’t done so and the man is alive, if they try to kill him now, Nigerians will rise. They are trying to remove him from office. It will not work because Nigerians and Rivers people will rise. But like I said, I have my fears and these fears are that leaders like him usually are ahead of their time and when you are ahead of your time they try to extinguish your candle.

    There is a man in Cross River State who was governor, Donald Duke. He came ahead of his time, stood for what is right. Where is he? They have pushed him aside. Nigeria has a habit of extinguishing its lights. Those persons who are most outstanding are usually pushed aside. Governor Amaechi has something to add to the national leadership of Nigeria, whether he is vice president, whether he is President, whether he is senator, whatever it is, he has served Rivers State and Nigeria for close to 16 years. The experiences and the candour and the integrity he has brought into public office should not be allowed to waste because some persons are ambitious. His fate should not become like that of Nasir El’Rufai. Nasir El’Rufai has something to add to Nigeria, whether you like him or you don’t like him.

    I lived in Abuja when he was the minister and I go to Abuja. I still have a property in Abuja and I see the difference. I am not criticising the present minister. But quite frankly, there is a difference. I have met El’Rufai; he has something to add.

    Nuhu Ribadu has something to add to Nigeria. Where is he? These men are on the sidelines why? Because they are like Governor Amaechi.

    I must say that if Amaechi has any ambition to move from the state level to the federal level into any office, I will stand by him. And I will stand by him not because I am his Commissioner but because having worked with him, I know that he means well. I have never met a public officer who means better for his people like Governor Amaechi and I have related with quite a number of them. In my lifetime I have served as Special Assistant to all kinds of people, including ministers and I have never seen one like Governor Amaechi.