Category: Politics

  • Politics of exco composition in Benue

    Politics of exco composition in Benue

    Correspondent UJA EMMANUEL writes on the intense lobby for executive council positions in Benue State by politicians and other stakeholders.

    Since Benue State Governor Gabriel Suswam sacked the Secretary to the government and 11 commissioners, there have been intense lobbying for cabinet positions by many politicians. Anxiety has also gripped the remaining five commissioners who were no were not affected by the sack, following feelers that they may be re-assigned to new portfolios.

    It was the first major cabinet shake-up since 2007 when the governor assumed office. Suswam issued a stern warning that nobody should lobby him or his deputy ,Chief Lawani, for appointment. He said the sacked commissioners had served the state and should come to terms with the reality that they cannot be in the cabinet for ever.

    Many believe that the dissolution was long overdue. However, the criteria for the sack and retention of four commissioners was strange to them.

    There is also disquiet in the various political camps over the fate of the affected commissioners because they were very close to the governor. Some influential political leaders are already mounting pressures on Suswan to re-appoint them. Some of the commissioners involved in the intense lobby to bounce back are Hon. John Ngbede( Water resources and Environment), Hon. John Tondo( Lands and survey) and Hon. Benjamin Ashaver(Works and Transport).

    Those mounting pressures on the governor on their behalf are of the opinion that, apart from performance, they are tested and trusted.

    There is also the feeling that Governor Suswam is very unfair to the trio of Ngbede, Ashaver and Tondo, who worked hard to ensure that he was re-elected for a second term and remained loyal when he was defending his mandate at the tribunal and court.

    Besides, the three of them command large followers, especially among the youths who are the strength of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) the state. Others have reasoned that their premature departure from the cabinet may likely affect the chances of the party in the future electoral contests. Some party leaders felt that the former commissioners may team up with the opposition to wreck havoc on the PDP.

    “John Ngbede is forced to reckon with in his Apa/ Agatu area and the entire Zone C,while Bejamin Ashaver is the only man from Sankera in the PDP who could check Professor Daniel Saror, his uncle, who contested the election against Suswam on the ticket of All Nigeria Peoples party (ANPP. John Tondo is the toast of the PDP youths as he has empowered many of them”, said a PDP chieftain in Makurdi.

    A youth leader in Gboko local government, Comrade Terwase Akure, told The Nation that those sacked from cabinet are incidentally the ones supporting Suswam to build the PDP and those retained have not added much value to the party. “The end of the PDP may be near becaue those sacked from the cabinet are popular and they may team up with the APC”, he added. But those retained disagreed with this view, saying that they are loyal to the party and the administration.

    To avoid any political calamity, Akure appealed to Governor Suswam to reappoit Asahver, Ngbede and Tondo in the interest of the party.

    It is not clear whether the governor will yield to these appeals. Lask week, he read a riot act to the PDP chieftains. He said that any political appointee who engages in 2015 campaigns would be sanctioned. They grumbled at this threat.

    For now, the ruling party and other stakeholders are waiting for the new list of commissioners. Many believe that the composition may shape the political calculations ahead of 2015 in the state.

  • ‘Lagos PDP will fail in 2015’

    The Chairman of the Lagos State Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), Chief Henry Ajomale, has said that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) will build on its electoral failure in the next general elections.

    He urged Nigerians to support the All Progressive Party (APC) in its bid to dislodge the party at the centre and offer a credible leadership to the country.

    Ajomale, who spoke in Lagos, said the PDP had destroyed crippled the economy and extended the national lean years.

    The party leader said that God had heard the voice of the masses who are struggling to overcome poverty, adding that they would be liberated by the APC in 2015.

    Ajomale said: “The Poverty Development Party will fizzle out. They have misused the wealth of the nation. Nigerians are tired of the PDP. That is why they are waiting to support APC in the future elections. PDP is already jittery because the masses have accepted APC. The end of the PDP is near”.

    The politician described the Jonathan Administration as a national burden, pointing out that its transformation agenda has collapsed.

    Ajomale added: “It is time for all Nigerians to support the APC to send PDP out of the Nigeria in the 2015 elections. PDP has failed Nigerians and they should be sent parking. They cannot intimidate any of us. They are just spreading lies all around.Whether they like it or not, APC has been accepted by the people and people continue to troop in everyday.

    “ People are tired of the PDP and they are ready to get involved. We must rededicate ourselves to the task of liberating ourselves from the PDP, which has destroyed our economy and increased poverty in the land”.

  • Internal crisis will consume PDP, says Afenifere spokesman

    Afenifere Publicity Secretary Mr Yinka Odumakin has said the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) may be consumed by its internal crisis, ahead of the 2015 general elections.

    He said that more attention and energy would be deployed by President Goodluck Jonathan to crisis management, instead of governance.

    He told The Nation that the sudden emergence of the PDP Governors Forum, which recently selected Akwa Ibom State Governor Godswill Akpabio as sitting chairman, has tilted the balance of power in favour of some vested interests.

    Odumakin, who spoke with our reporter on the state of the nation in Lagos, said: “The PDP Governors Forum and the Amaechi’s Governors Forum do not have the interest of Nigerians at heart, but they were founded for power struggle. There is none that is about the interest of the people of Nigeria but the power that be. The fora have nothing to do about the welfare of Nigerians.

    “The two groups are for themselves . It is the night of long knives; the wolves are out and they want to devour us. What is going on in the PDP is a personal fight between the wolves and the masses often pay for such internal crisis.

    “Those who take the people’s patient for cowardice, and when they protest they can use guns to chase them off the streets should know that, one day, the situation will change. We can actually see what is going on across the country today when the people are pushed to the wall. They confront the authorities force for force.”

    Speaking on the recent merger of the opposition political parties, Odumakin said the most important issue is practical leadership. He recalled that political parties, which had merged in the past lacked the courage to fulfill their vision.

  • ‘APC will tackle Nigeria’s problem’

    The Special Adviser to Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola on Environment, Hon.Bola Ilori, has expressed optimism that the All Progressive Congress (APC) will rescue the country from its present precarious situation.

    Ilori, who is a chieftain of the Action Congress of Nigeria(ACN), spoke to reporters at the High Court premises,Akure,the Ondo State capital when on a solidarity visit to the party supporters at the tribunal.

    He said the merging of the parties underscores the collective resolve aimed at rescuing the people of the country from the ‘’ruderless Peoples Democratic Party government”.

    Ilori emphasised that the merger is not to advance the political interests of the two leaders; Asiwaju Bola Tinubu and General Muhammadu Buhari (rtd), adding that it is in the national interest.

    The former Chairman of the Alimoso Local Government Area of Lagos State predicted success for the APC at the general elections.

    Ilori said the political leaders have overcome the problems that undermined the previous alliances, urging Nigerians to brace up for change at the centre.

    He described the PDP as a divided house assailed by a protracted civil war, adding that a house divided against itself will fall.

    Ilori stressed: “PDP has over the years used billions of dollars to produce darkness and poor quality of education. There is mass unemployment, particularly among the youths. The opposition is concerned. APC will soon flow down to the state level when all the necessary things are sorted out at the national level. Nigerians will reject PDP in 2015 and embrace the APC because they are tired of the inept PDP administration”.

    On the electoral litigation involving the ACN and Labour Party (LP) in Ondo State, Ilori said that, with the unprecedented evidence before the panel about all the illegalities that characterised the last governorship election, the case would be addressed in favour of Akeredolu.

    The politician urged the party supporters to remain steadfast and pray to God for the panel to uphold truth and justice.

  • ‘We no longer have problems in Ogun House’

    ‘We no longer have problems in Ogun House’

    Honourable Remmy Hazzaber of  Ogun State House of Assembly. In this interview with Assistant Editor, Dare Odufowokan, Hazzan speaks on the issues that led to the crisis in Ogun State House of Assembly and how the governor of the state, Senator Ibikunle Amosun, nipped it in the bud. Excerpts

    Can you give us an insight into what happened on the floor of the house last Tuesday?

    First and foremost it is important to state here that the intervention of the State Governor, Senator Ibikunle Amosun has led to a truce. There is no crisis in the assembly. We are one happy family and we all intend to remain that way. None of us is interested in fomenting any form of trouble in the House. We are as committed to performing our duties as ever before. That notwithstanding, we can still appraise some of the issues involved in the matter. The truce actually was meant for us to be able to resume plenary and get to critically look at issues that were in contention.

    But there are insinuations that the Ogun Assembly has broken into factions in such a short time?

    Like I always say, in the legislature, you are permitted to have leanings whether along party lines, along tribal lines and even in some countries like America, along racial lines. There you have the Black Congressional Caucus. It is such leanings that develop into formidable groups that you can call caucuses. The onus now is on the leadership to ensure that all of the caucuses that exist one way or the other, he is directly or indirectly connected to them all. This way, it will be ensured that these caucuses don’t grow into factions. Because if they grow into factions, that will not be in the interest of the legislature.

    Was it the emergence of caucuses that led to the crisis?

    We had issues. Ordinarily, there are machineries provided by our rules for resolving such issues but we were beginning to see that those laid down rules and procedures were being subverted. And we were no longer comfortable. And of course when such happens, suspicion will come in and you will now begin to read in between the lines. There will be indications suggesting that some people have ulterior motives. And of course there were issues also coming up in the press insinuating that some of us have been penciled down for suspension and what have you. When I heard that I just disregarded it as a rumour especially when I considered the fact that with the kind of caucus we have, it is going to be difficult if not impossible for any suspension to sail through. So, we were confident that nothing of such could happen.

    What were these issues that were so serious as to lead to the kind of turmoil we saw on the floor of the house?

    When I hear people talking about honour as regard this issue, I feel very bad because ordinarily we would have expected decorum in the hallowed chamber. But I must let you know something; what happened in our chamber on Tuesday was ordinarily avoidable if due process has been followed.

    Due process followed, by who?

    I mean due process on the part of all of us. It is what is expected of everybody, including those of us on the floor and the man in the chair. We have our rules as members of the house and of course, the Speaker also has rules as the presiding officer on the chair. Everybody has sets of rules provided for in the constitution, in our standing orders, in our extant laws and also by conventions that we have adopted. So, when you are abreast with all of that, you are confident that what ought not to be cannot be especially based on those sets of rules. But when you begin to see that what ought not to be is beginning now to want to be, you are expected as a lawmaker that is worth your salt to speak up or remain voiceless and irrelevant.

    Was there a specific issue before suspicion began?

    The issue actually was about the tenders’ board in the house. We had it not before. What we have been operating was the fund management committee. But of course there was a petition to some anti-graft agencies but when it was discovered that there was no substance to the petition we were advised that the fund management committee should not also be the same committee that will do the award of contracts. That we should have a tenders’ board based on the provisions of the conforming act. And we had no such practice before but having been that advised we have to quickly put that in place.

    We had to vote over the report. That was the genesis of the crisis.

    So what is the situation in the House now?

    We have no problem in the house again. Like I said, some things happened and tempers rose. Now we are back as one happy family.

    We have to commend the governor of the state for offering leadership at such a crucial time.

    His leadership in promptly calling for a truce is really commendable. He has shown a lot of maturity. Having been part of the crisis in the house during the last dispensation, I will not in any way want us to go back to the trenches.

  • Ihedioha’s new game plan in Imo

    Ihedioha’s new game plan in Imo

    Okodili Ndidi in Owerri reports that Deputy Speaker of House of Representatives, Emeka Ihedioha has developed new strategies to reposition Imo State PDP ahead 2015 elections

    Since the defeat of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)-led Ikedi Ohakim administration in the 2011 governorship election in Imo State, the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Emeka Ihedioha, has assumed the status of leader and rallying force of the party.

    While this is to be expected since Ihedioha is the highest-placed national figure of the PDP from Imo State and second in the South-East generally, the extent to which the deputy speaker has rallied the party from the jaws of defeat in the last elections to a beautiful bride now being freshly courted by politicians in the state has become a source of concern and discussion in Imo political circles.

    One of the top PDP chieftains in the state, in an attempt to explain the role being played by Ihedioha said during the week, “Providing leadership to a party slammed with defeat in an election is not tea party as it requires mobilization skills and abilities, deployment of resources as well as attraction of federal presence into the state. These we know are key if there is a chance of a resurrection of the party. And this is the task before Ihedioha which he has been striving hard to meet up with in the last two years here in Imo,” he said.

    Iheioha’s Chief Press Secretary, Mr. Oke Epia, also explained his principal’s role in the same wy. “He has joyfully taken up the leadership role enthrusted on him. For his party, which is now the opposition party in the state, he has to play mobilisation role. “

    Our investigation in Imo State shows that some politicians who had either left PDP before or had been undecided since the incumbent All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) government came on board have either returned or shown interest to do so.

    Only last weekend, Ihedioha received Hon. (Dr.) Celestine Njoku and a horde of supporters from Mbutu into the PDP fold after a stint in other waters. Ihedioha was joined in receiving the returnees by Hon. (Mrs.) Ngozi Pat Ekeji, Minority Leader of the Imo State House of Assembly, Mr. Charles Ikwu, PDP Chairman, Aboh Mbaise Local Government Area and Mr. Peter Apuamadi, the party’s Ward Chairman in Mbutu.

    Reports also indicate that Ihedioha has also used his office and position in government to attract projects and programmes to Imo State beyond his constituency of Aboh Mbaise/Ngor Okpala. Epia, emphasizing this fact said, “Ihedioha has a lot to showcase: his road and electricity projects, education facilities, water projects; hospital facilities and so on are significant and verifiable. For instance, he got the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) to award contract for OKpala-Igwuruta Road, linking Imo to Rivers with the first phase, costing N4.2billion, he facilitated the award of the contract for the dualization of Owerri-Elele (Omayelu) 35-kilometre road at N23b.

    Another strategy that has sustained Ihedioha’s leadership role is the fact that he has kept faith in his annual ritual of constituency briefing with his Constituents and the entire Imo State.

    As the years rolled by, the import and the wisdom behind the festival-like gathering at the Mbutu country home of the Legislator is beginning to be manifest in the cult-like frenzy that greets the one day ceremony as people of all class and category turn out in their numbers to be part of the event.

    Speaking during last edition of the annual briefing, Ihedioha told his teeming supporters, who were showered with variety of gifts that the first quarter of 2013 would be committed to aggressive empowerment programme for his Constituency and the entire state. He promised to influence budgetary provisions for infrastructural development in the state.

    Although no decisive political statements were made at the last meeting to confirm the speculated gubernatorial ambition of the Deputy Speaker, the body language of the Lawmaker and the spirit of his foot soldiers suggest that the annual ritual as it has become is a political gambit put in place to keep the presence and influence of Ihedioha very much alive in the state.

    What this will metamorphose into ahead the next governorship race in Imo State and the general election in 2015 remains to be seen.

    One thing has however become apparent, the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives is one politician to watch in the state’s politics today and that of the entire South- East, said Kenneth Ezeala, one of the guests at the last briefing.

  • Awa Kalu at 60: A tribute

    The 18th century English Ballad, George Bernard Shaw wrote; ‘Life is no brief candle to me. It is a sort of splendid torch which I get to hold for a moment and I want to make it burn as brightly as possible before turning it over to future generations’.

    A lot of creative ink has been spent in evaluating and sometimes comparing the existence of human beings on planet earth with the chemical bye-product called candle. Celebrated song writers and singers have held the world spell bound with timeless songs depicting the sojourn of man on earth as a candle in the wind. Thus, a human life that trudges on and counts 60 years by all stretch of logic and perhaps reason is deserving of clinking the glass. Where however, the life of such a human being in a manner of speaking bestrides his time like a colossus, a celebration of such life is therefore non-negotiable. That is the case of a quintessential gentleman, humanist, consummate teacher, respected scholar, eminent jurist, administrator par excellence, patriot, husband and father, Awa Uma Kalu, Senior Advocate of Nigeria, who turns 60 years on March 9, 2013.

    Awa Kalu who was born on March 9, 1953 hails from the Ohafia Community in Abia State. His parents were devout Christians of the Presbyterian denomination. He had his early education at Anglican Grammar School, Umuahia and the famous Methodist College, Uzuakoli. He proceeded immediately to the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University) Ile-Ife to study Law. At Ife, he distinguished himself as an academic numero uno and won several elite awards. Some of such awards were Olu Ayoola prize as Best Over-all LL.B. part 1. Student; Irvine & Bonner Scholarship as best over-all LL.B. part II student and Justice Madarikan prize as best over-all final year law student. He graduated in 1977 and earned the LL.B (Hons) Degree of the prestigeous University.

    Awa Kalu fondly and variously called Papa, Papus and Prof. by his friends and peers maintained the streak of excellence at the Nigerian Law School, where he was admitted and called to the Nigerian Bar in 1978 and is a member of the unparalleled ‘class of ’78 that boasts of Justices of the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and indeed all superior courts of record. After his compulsory NYSC programme in Sokoto State as Pupil State counsel, he enrolled at the Law Faculty of the University of Lagos for his Masters degree programme in law. Thereafter, he settled down at the University of Lagos as a lecturer before he was head-hunted by the venerated scholar and administrator, Professor M.J.C. Echeruo to transfer his services to the then young Imo (now Abia) State University to work with great scholars like Professor Oye Cukwurah and Professor Osita Eze to establish a veritable law faculty.

    As a foundation staff at the then Imo State University, established by the government of the visionary Chief Sam Mbakwe, Awa Kalu worked tirelessly with his colleagues to ensure that the products of the school, especially the law faculty, measured up to the accepted professional standard.

    It therefore stands to reason that inspite of the illustrious accomplishment of Awa Kalu, Senior Advocate of Nigeria, his real bench mark as we celebrate his 60 birthday is the galaxy of his ex-students who are dominant figures today in commanding heights of our national life. As he turns 60, Awa Kalu, SAN deserves a befitting toast for his contribution to legal education, legal scholarship, advocacy and character moulding. Prominent amongst his former students are Senator Anyim Pius Anyim GCON, Secretary to Government of the Federation; Chief Ume Kalu, Attorney-General of Abia State; Mr. J. U.K Igwe, SAN; Elder Paul Ananaba, SAN; Prof. Anselm Chidi Odinkalu, Chairman, Human Rights Commission; Chief Emeka Wogu, Hon. Minister of Labour & Productivity; Hon. Uzo Azubuike of the House of Representatives; Chief Chuka Odom, former Minister of State for FCT; Professor Nnamdi Obiaeriri, Associate Professor Chris Anyanwu, Associate Professor Sam Erugo, Dr. K.U.K. Ekwueme, several judges of various State/Federal High Courts, corporate executives etc.

    As an advocate, Awa Kalu is painstaking. He had the unique opportunity of serving two Attorneys-General in a stretch, Hon. Prince Bola Ajibola SAN and Hon. Sir. Clement Akpamgbo SAN.

    Awa U. Kalu has selflessly served his fatherland diligently and meritoriously. At different times he was Secretary National Committee on Corruption and Economic Crimes; Secretary National Committee on Malpractices in Banks and other Financial Institutions; Member, National Committee on Town Planning Law in Nigeria; Member, Editorial Committee, All Nigeria Law Reports; He was also a member of the Nigerian delegation on the Democratization Process in Ethiopia, 1992; Member, Nigerian Delegation to the 46th and 47th Session of the UN General Assembly 1991 and 1992; Delegate, Human Rights Workshop, Banjul, the Gambia, 1989: he also provided a platform for robust academic and intellectual pursuit vide the publication of Lawyers’ Bi-Annual, a journal of Nigeria and Comparative Law of which he is the Editor-in-chief.

    As the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Government of Abia State between May 1999 till 2005, Awa Kalu repositioned the administration of justice in the state for greater efficiency. He consistently and courageously led the state team in many legal battles challenging one perceived constitutional infraction or the other that enriched the jurisprudence of our Laws as well as advanced the institutions of democracy.

    As a community leader, he has awarded numerous scholarships to deserving indigent students from his Ohafia community. In recognition of his unflinching willingness to contribute meaningfully to his community, Awa Kalu was honoured with the chieftaincy title of Onochie 1 of Ania Ohafia in 1993.

    The attainment of the age of 60 years by our teacher, mentor and friend, Awa Kalu, calls for celebration.

    We pray God to keep and sustain Awa Ume Kalu, SAN a treasured diamond at 60. Happy Birthday, our beloved teacher and friend.

    Dr. Soni Ajala, a legal practitioner, writes from Abuja

  • Jonathan/Obasanjo face-off: South West PDP leaders in dilemma

    Jonathan/Obasanjo face-off: South West PDP leaders in dilemma

    Worried that the personality clash between President Goodluck Jonathan and ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo could prove fatal to the fortunes of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the South-West, stakeholders of the party in the zone are meeting soon to chart the way forward, reports Remi Adelowo

    The personality clash between President Goodluck Jonathan and ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo has put members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the South-West geo-political zone in a dilemma of sorts, The Nation’s investigations has revealed.

    Long before the battle between Obasanjo and Jonathan blew into the open with the former’s consistent criticisms of Jonathan’s administration, resulting into the decision by the National Working Committee (NWC) to suspend loyalists of the former president, Chief Segun Oni and Alhaji Bode Mustapha from the NWC, members of the party from the South West had waited in bated breath hoping that the crisis would be nipped in the bud.

    The same day Oni, who was the National Vice Chairman (South West) of the party and Mustapha, the National Auditor were suspended, the national headquarters of the party had also recognised the Adebayo Dayo-led Ogun State executive council of the party as against the Senator Dipo Odunjinrin-led faction allegedly backed by Obasanjo. This development followed the ‘edging out’ of Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, another perceived loyalist of Obasanjo, as the PDP’s National Secretary.

    These decisions were interpreted by analysts as a clear intent on the part of the president’s camp to take charge of the structures of the party in the South West.

    Only very few members of the party in the South West saw it coming, according to a source. For many of these people, they had hoped that both Obasanjo and the president would find a common ground to resolve their disagreement.

    But with the current development, there are fears that if something urgent is not done, the party faces extinction in the zone ahead the 2015 general elections. This party’s case, according to a former senator who spoke to The Nation on the condition of anonymity, is not helped by the control of government in the zone by the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN).

    Investigations revealed that while many top PDP members in the South West don’t agree with most of Obasanjo’s decisions and domineering attitude, however, they also find objectionable the way and manner the ex-president has been allegedly rubbished by the president.

    For fear of a backlash from the Presidency, supporters of the former president, particularly those interested in seeking for elective offices in 2015 are afraid to express their displeasure. Many of them have, however, been holding informal talks with the ex-president, while allegedly pledging their loyalty.

    Contrary to public statements by leaders of the party in the South West that there are encouraging signs in the ongoing reconciliation of aggrieved members in the zone, The Nation gathered that many influential stakeholders of the party are yet to embrace the newly appointed caretaker zonal executive of the party headed by Chief Ishola Filani.

    Some days after his appointment was made public, Filani had allegedly paid a visit to Obasanjo at his Abeokuta hilltop mansion where he reportedly promised his host that while his appointment lasted, he would not engage in any act that would be interpreted as disrespectful to the former president. He also allegedly told the ex-president that his appointment came to him as a surprise, while also soliciting for the ex-president’s support in his bid to move the party forward in the south west.

    A source privy to the meeting told The Nation that Obasanjo’s response to Filani’s almost 15-minutes speech was simply to wish him the best of luck. The meeting, according to a source, lasted for less than 30 minutes.

    There are strong indications that top members of PDP in the South West will be meeting soon at a yet to be determined location to deliberate on the developments in the party as it affects the zone in the last few months and chart the way forward in preparations for the next general elections in 2015.

    The meeting, a source revealed, will be attended by former and current political office holders of the party from the zone, including former governors, senators and other leaders of the party.

  • The battle gets messier

    The battle gets messier

    The recent withdrawal of the Bachelors degree certificate awarded former Governor Orji Uzor Kalu by Abia State University, Uturu, has been a subject of controversy. Associate Editor, Sam Egburonu, examines the issues.

    A new chapter has been opened in the raging political battle between Abia State Governor, Chief Theodore Orji, and his predecessor, Dr. Orji Uzor Kalu, since last week’s Friday, March 1, 2013, when the Senate of the Abia State University, Uturu, suddenly withdrew the degree certificate it awarded the former governor while he was a sitting governor of the state.

    Although the senate neither cited political issues nor linked the sitting governor as being part of their decision, Kalu and his supporters, on hearing the news, alleged political considerations.

    The statement released and signed by the registrar and secretary of the Senate of the university, Mr. Earnest Onuoha, after the senate meeting, where it was approved that the certificate be withdrawn and cancelled, said among others that the “The decision of Senate was based on the following grounds among others:

    *The violation of the Academic Regulations of the university on Admission-by-Transfer, which rendered the offer irregular, ab initio.

    *The non-completion of the mandatory six (6) semesters (i.e. three academic years of study), before he was awarded a degree of the university. He spent only two semesters in all.

    “The university Senate maintained that its action, aforesaid, derived from the exercise of its onerous statutory responsibility to guard and maintain, at all times, the Academic Regulations of the University, its hard-earned reputation and the credibility of the certificates it awards.”

    The hot exchanges

    Reacting to the news of the withdrawal of his certificate, Kalu alleged that it was the handiwork of Governor Theodore Orji, who he said had been trying to silence him.

    In a statement signed by his Special Adviser, Oyekunle Oyewumi, Kalu said “What the Senate of ABSU has done amounts to shifting the goal post after the goal has been scored. No one can deny the fact that His Excellency (Kalu) was in ABSU for lectures and examinations. And how do you withdraw a degree that has been duly awarded? To think it is the same Senate that awarded it that is withdrawing it. It is obvious where the drummer is playing for the Senate to dance from.”

    Alleging that the action was politically motivated, Kalu said: “Must the academic community allow politics and politicians to influence its decision? Our answer is no.”

    Aside relatively high security presence reported around the campus the day the senate met and withdrew the certificate, allegations of direct pressure from Abia State Government House is yet to be ascertained as most of the members of the senate and lecturers, who spoke to The Nation off record, said they acted professionally.

    “The former governor may try to win sympathy by alleging political marginalisation. We are not politicians and will not want to be part of political battles. Nobody forced us to do this. It has to be done in the interest of the institution,” said a member of the senate.

    Also, the Chief Press Secretary to Abia State governor, Ugochukwu Emezue, reacting to Kalu’s claims faulted the allegation that Governor Orji was behind the revocation of the degree certificate.

    The consequences

    Dr Sony Ajala, a lawyer in Abuja, told The Nation in a telephone chat that the development will not negatively affect the reputation of the institution and the credibility of the university’s products. “No, it will not diminish the reputation of the university and the credibility of its products. Even in Harvard, you may have such isolated case. You may have a situation where, after awarding degrees, the university may find out that the admission process of one or two former students was faulty. This does not mean that all the other students are affected. It’s usually an isolated case. So, the credibility of the certificates of the products of Abia State University is not in doubt at all. We are talking of a university that has produced a senate president, secretary to the government of the federation, permanent secretaries, Director-Generals of federal government agencies, top security officials, many senior advocates of Nigeria, professors, top professionals and captains of industry. Such an institution, known for excellence, can not be affected just because efforts are being made to correct an isolated error committed some years ago.”

    Professor Nuhu O Yaqub is however troubled by the development. The former Vice Chancellor of University of Abuja, told The Nation in a telephone interview that the way and manner the withdrawal of the certificate was made raises some questions about the competence of the university senate in question. “It is rather unfortunate that the senate of the university, which awarded the said degree, not just to an ordinary student, but to a former governor of the state, will at this point in time come out to say it failed to take into consideration some certain things before awarding the certificate. Such a senate should answer some questions. Why did it award the said certificate then? Was the senate under pressure when it awarded it? Did the members of the senate hen take due diligence before awarding the certificate? Why is it that it is now that the former governor and the current governor are having some political battles that the senate would come out to withdraw the certificate?

    “I am worried and disturbed by the development because it is not only Abia State University’s senate that may come under public’s scrutiny as a result of the matter. All other institutions of learning might be affected. This is so, especially now that most universities are facing hard times,” he said.

    Responding also, Prof. Tam David West, former Minister of Petroleum, told The Nation that in academic issues like this, the position of the institution’s senate is final. Asked if the certificate withdrawal was in order, given the political interpretations, West said: “I will not jump into conclusions. All I can tell you for now is that the timing seems untidy. Why did it take the university so long to carry out the investigation? That is part of what must have subjected the action to political interpretation. Haven said that, I must state categorically that in academic matters like this, the university senate is supreme, and it’s decision is final. If the admission process and award of the said certificate are found to be irregular by the senate, then the senate has the right to withdraw the certificate. It is done. It is the timing that is however worrisome. So, if the former governor is not satisfied with the development, and is alleging that his admission process was, contrary to the senate’s claims, regular, it is incumbent on him to prove it. The ball is in his court.”

  • Untold stories of the one-term pact

    Untold stories of the one-term pact

    As the preliminary preparations for the 2015 presidential election gather momentum, one major issue that has taken the front burner is the debate over alleged one-term pact in 2011  between President Goodluck Jonathan and northern governors. Associate Editor, Sam Egburonu and Assistant Editors, Remi Adelowo and Dare Odufowokan, report some of the untold stories of the controversial deal

    Since Nigeria began preliminary preparations for the 2015 presidential elections, one contentious issue that is poised to determine, to a very large extent, the fortunes of the People’s Democratic Party in the coming elections, is the one-term pact allegedly reached between President Goodluck Jonathan and political leaders of the north.

    While the President’s men continue to either deny the existence of the said pact or allude to the fact that it cannot be binding on the President in the run up to the 2015 presidential election, the opposition is saying there must be some iota of truth in the stories making the rounds.

    Investigation by The Nation revealed that talks about the single term pact didn’t start today. In fact, some chieftains of the ruling party recalled how the issue was used to campaign especially at several rallies in the north with the belief that such a revelation will sway the then aggrieved northern voters in favour of Jonathan.

    “I can still recall ex-president Olusegun Obasanjo at the grand finale of the presidential campaign in Abuja, commending Jonathan for agreeing to a single term. Obasanjo called it ‘an act of great sacrifice.’ When he made that comment, we all turned to look at Jonathan as we hailed and clapped for him. But I observed that his face was expressionless.

    “His face betrayed no emotion but could not hide the fact that he was either uncomfortable or in disagreement with Obasanjo’s proposition. That was the day I knew he had no intention of keeping the promise he made,” said Alhaji Yunus Ibrahim, former Organising Secretary of the PDP in Niger State.

    A chieftain of the PDP in the South-West said it is unimaginable to think that the President will deny agreeing to do a single term. According to him, while he may not know of a formal pact signed between the governors and Jonathan, he was at a meeting where former President Olusegun Obasanjo told Southwest PDP leaders of Jonathan’s decision to do just one term.

    “While making a speech when Jonathan met with Southwest PDP leaders in 2011, shortly before the PDP presidential primaries, Obasanjo told us Jonathan has resolved to do just one term in office. He said this right in the presence of the President and he didn’t say it is not so. Even when Jonathan later addressed us, he never said what Baba said was not so. He agreed with Obasanjo’s position that day.

    The PDP chieftain, who represented Osun State in the senate between 2003 and 2007, said it will be difficult for Jonathan to convince members of the party, especially in the northern geo-political zones, that he did not promise to do just one term in office.

    The chieftain directed our correspondent to look up the text of Obasanjo’s address at the said meeting on the internet. “I read it on the internet recently. I had a copy which I kept for a long time, so I am sure the one published on the internet is a true reflection of what Baba said at that meeting.

    “In the present circumstance, let me reiterate what I have said on a number of occasions. Electing Dr Goodluck Ebele Jonathan in his own right and on its own merit, which is there to be seen as the President of Nigeria, will enhance and strengthen our unity, stability and democracy and it will lead us towards achievement of the Nigerian dream.

    ‘We are impressed with the report that Dr Goodluck Ebele Jonathan has already taken a unique and unprecedented step of declaring that he would only want to be a one term President. If so, whether he knows it or not, that is a sacrifice and it is statesmanly. Rather than vilify him and pull him down, we, as a party, should applaud and commend him and Nigerians should reward and venerate him. He has taken the first good step.

    “Let us encourage him to take more good steps to achieve what we need to achieve for this country by voting for him in landslide victory as the first elected President of Nigeria on basis of our common Nigerian identity and for the purpose of actualising the Nigerian dream. God bless you all,” Obasanjo was quoted as saying at the said meeting.

    Ibrahim also recalled how President Jonathan while on a working visit to Kaduna State with the Vice President Namadi Sambo in 2011, had said he would only spend a single term of four years if voted into power in 2011 within which he would ensure that young men and women were engaged in various sectors of the economy so that they would be productive and things would improve generally in the country.

    “I can remember him saying if the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) delegates from the North West zone support him and Vice President Mohammed Namadi Sambo to emerge victorious during the 2011 Presidential election, he will spend just four more years and ensure greater development effort in the region. I think he was talking to party leaders then,” he said.

    In his own contribution to the discus, retired federal Permanent Secretary and astute public commentator, Akeem Baba Ahmed, recalled that the President had, while on a state visit to Ethiopia, talked about doing just one more term in office if elected in 2011.

    “In far away Ethiopia, President Goodluck Jonathan informed a group of Nigerians that he has no plans to run for another term in 2015. He stated that he will ensure free and fair elections from the April polls this year, and if voted in for the next four years, he will ensure significant improvements in key sectors of the economy such as security, power, education, roads and health, among others.”

    How the pact was sealed

    It was a stormy meeting that lasted for over five hours. For President Goodluck Jonathan, the outcome of the meeting would either make or mar his political future, both in the short and long term. And for the northern governors present, there was a steely resolve to gain as much political capital from the meeting as was possible.

    Held at the Presidential Villa, Abuja in the first week of January 2011, the parley between Jonathan and the governors elected on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), in the words of an aide to a former governor, who was present, was ‘heated and emotional’.

    With a voice barely audible, the president after welcoming his guests, reportedly took time to brief the governors of the many initiatives taken by his then eight-months old administration, which included the establishment of the Presidential Advisory Council (PAC), headed by Gen. Theophillus Danjuma (retd) and his plan to formulate a road-map for the power sector.

    Then the president, according to The Nation’s source, worked on the emotions of the governors, by recalling his relationship with his former boss, late President Umaru Yar’Adua, whom he said, he enjoyed an excellent relationship with until the death of the latter on May 5, 2010. He added that in spite of the ‘machinations’ of aides of the former president to pitch him against Yar’ Adua, he remained loyal till the very end.

    To cap up his speech delivered extempore, the president formally informed the governors of his intention to contest for the 2011 presidential election, while soliciting for their support in this regard. The governors, according to findings, took turns to explain to the president that contrary to insinuations in certain quarters, they had nothing against him, and that their perceived opposition to his (Jonathan) presidential ambition was borne out of the need to protect the political interests of their region.

    They further informed the president that it was imperative that a northern candidate completes the tenure of Yar’Adua until 2015, adding that throwing their weight behind Jonathan will put their own personal safety and political career at grave risk.

    Realising that the discussion was moving in an unexpected direction, Jonathan, according to a source, decided to act presidential. In a tone laced with subtle threats, he allegedly reminded his guests that as the president, he should be accorded the honour to contest the presidency, adding that as the President/Commander-in-Chief, he should not be compelled to deploy the awesome powers at his disposal to actualise his ambition.

    The governors were stunned. A source said it was a defiant Governor Bukola Saraki, the Chairman of the Nigeria Governors Forum (NGF), who allegedly told the president that the governors should not be bullied and that he (Saraki), regardless of the president’s threats, will also contest for the PDP presidential ticket.

    The meeting ended in a deadlock, but a follow up meeting was fixed for the following week.

    In the days preceding the next meeting, the president and his supporters embarked on a series of informal negotiations with key stakeholders in the north, whose support was vital for the success of the Jonathan’s ambition.

    Former President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, who was, unarguably, the chief promoter of Jonathan-for-2011 project, allegedly took on the responsibility of ‘convincing’ influential northern emirs and governors to back Jonathan’s aspiration.

    A source revealed, “It was Baba (Obasanjo) who called Bukola Saraki; Niger State’s Dr. Babangida Aliyu, who headed the Northern Governors Forum, Bauchi State Governor, Mallam Isa Yuguda, Governor Sule Lamido of Jigawa State and a couple of other governors in the north and pleaded that Jonathan be given another chance at the presidency.”

    The former president, it was gathered, also contacted traditional rulers, which included the Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Saad Abubakar; Emir of Zazzau, Alhaji Shehu Idris, Emir of Kano, Alhaji Ado Bayero, to mention but a few, urging them that supporting Jonathan will not only give minority tribes of the country a sense of belonging, but most significantly preserve the unity of the country.

    While Aliyu and Yuguda were allegedly receptive to Obasanjo’s entreaties, Saraki, it was gathered, told the former president that he would only support the president if he failed to get the endorsement of the Northern Elders Forum headed by former Minister of Finance, Mallam Adamu Ciroma, which was then in the process of screening interested presidential aspirants from the north.

    The four governors enjoy a somewhat close relationship with Obasanjo. Saraki served briefly as Obasanjo’s Special Assistant on Budget, while Aliyu and Yuguda served as Permanent Secretary and minister, respectively during the Obasanjo administration. Lamido was also a Minister for Foreign Affairs from 1999 to 2003.

    Northern aspirants who had indicated interest in the race were Saraki; former military president, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida; former vice-president, Atiku Abubakar and ex-National Security Adviser, Gen. Aliyu Gusau.

    Speaking on how the one-term pact was conceived, a source disclosed that it was Obasanjo, who, following his negotiations with influential northern stakeholders, informed Jonathan that the only option left to make his ambition fly is for him (Jonathan) to serve only one term in office. Left with no other choice, the president allegedly agreed to the one-term deal.

    In spite of all these allegations, recollections and revelations, the President and his handlers say there is nothing to discuss regarding the alleged pact between Jonathan and some governors to the effect that he would not be contesting the presidency in 2015.

    Interestingly, both PDP stakeholders and opposition parties are keen to see the end of the debate and it’s effect on the fortunes of the party. The question observers are asking is what would happen if Jonathan, in spite of the claims insist on picking PDP ticket?