Category: Interview

  • ‘Nigeria loses billions due to non-compliance with bilateral agreements’

    ‘Nigeria loses billions due to non-compliance with bilateral agreements’

    Mr. Dayo Bush-Alebiosu, accomplished architect, astute administrator and lawmaker of the Federal Republic, is currently Chairman, House Committee on Treaties and Bilateral Agreements. Bush-Alebiosu who acknowledged the fact that Nigeria is a signatory to over 400 treaties and protocols covering a wide range of bilateral agreements among others, is, however, unhappy that the country is yet to reap the socio-economic benefits of most of these conventions. He spoke with Ibrahim Apekahde Yusuf

    Nigeria is a signatory to over 200 protocols and conventions but from preliminary investigation, I understand a little over 15 have been ratified so far. Why is this so and what do we stand to gain by signing these treaties?

    To be honest with you, I used to think that Nigeria has just 200, and I thought less than a quarter of these conventions had been domesticated. But now we know it’s close to 400. The whole essence of been part of any treaty or protocol is so that the nation and the citizenry at large can benefit I suppose. But that has not been the case with Nigeria.

    But one country that has reaped bountifully from treaties is South Africa. I can say without any fear of contradiction that South Africa has been the sole beneficiary because of how seriously they have taken treaty.

    As to whether Nigeria is thriving in that area, I will tell you no. it is based on the treaty that we signed we have companies like Shoprite, Protea Hotel, Stanbic IBTC, Standard Chartered Bank and so many of them. You can imagine how well they’ve done here because they could understand this and took good advantage of existing treaties.

    It is based on some of these treaties we have signed out there that is why you see all kinds of companies operating here today.

    For example, look at the Bilateral Air Safety Agreement (BASA) we have signed that is why the British Airways at the moment enjoy a lot of unfair advantage over us. For instance, they can fly to any part of the country without any restriction as such. But a national carrier or airline operating from Nigeria would to make connecting flights from London to other parts of UK, which means that you are also helping to boost the revenue earnings of those towns because you cannot fly there straight from Lagos or Abuja.

    What this means is that our local aviation industry cannot and will never thrive because we don’t have the quantum of investment other competing nations have.

    I remember a couple of years back during the argument between Nigeria authorities and BA, when the Prime Minister David Cameron, said in an interview that the solution is to first of all ensure that we domesticate the BASA.

    Is there any constitutional backing for some of these conventions and beyond rhetorics, what really is in it for Nigerians?

    I’m aware that Section 12 of the 1999 Constitution expressly states that for any treaty to have the backing of the law it must be passed by an act of the National Assembly. The act that established the procedure goes on to explain how these treaties must be domesticated before imposing financial obligations on the country.

    Talking about benefits, there is a lot we can gain from domesticating these treaties as I have said. But for the domestication of the Montreal Convention on compensation of air accident victims, the victims of the Dana Air crash there won’t have been compensation for the victims’ families. In the Montreal convention, it is stated clearly how much they were to be paid and all that. But we kept hearing that we have not been able to locate the families.

    In Lagos state for example, if you die without a will there is a department in the ministry of justice that takes charge pending when things are going to be resolved.

    So, the only way we can really benefit from the various treaties is by ensuring that we domesticate them first of all. I believe where there is a will, there is a way.

    Can you be more specific on the quantum of losses that Nigeria has greatly suffered in recent times as a result of non-domestication of these treaties?

    As far as I know what we loss in terms of revenue and foreign exchange runs into billions yearly. It is mindboggling. For example, if you look at how much is being lost in the aviation industry you will be amazed. How many connecting flight are lost. So how do you expect the Chanchangi airlines of this world to enjoy a level playing field if they run their operations at such an exorbitant cost?

    So if you continue to drive me out of business because I don’t have the fund, how will the business grow? And that’s why we will continue to have the problem we have in the aviation industry. Aviation is not something you play around with, the BASA is very important and then you hear some people say it’s not necessary, maybe they need to go double check the way it’s been done in other countries.

    A country like the United States, I’m aware though is signatory to many protocols is known to have breached some of them. Take the Kyoto protocol on climate change for instance. The US is known to have violated this. As a country don’t we also have a right to say no, we can’t be bound by some of these conventions?

    Before I answer your question let me say for the records that our committee is peopled by experienced lawyers, diplomats who have a good grasp of international diplomacy, bilateral agreement, negotiations and all that. Some of them are professors, technocrats among what have you. So, we are on a familiar terrain.

    As some other advance countries do, before they enter into any treaty they argue on the basis of what is favourable to them and all what not because they see these texts well ahead. But it might interest you to know that most of these conventions are hardly available in black and white so it is nearly almost difficult to attempt a clinical study on them as such. Speak with 30 expert lawyers, you will find that quite a number of them don’t have access to the text of most of these treaties and this creates a problem.

    I don’t want to play the blame game but in all of this you could see that somebody somewhere is not actually doing his job. You recall shortly that the National Assembly are suppose to be a part of the whole process but they never seems to be doing that, so I can put it to you that your constituency is actually to blame largely for the way things have actually gone?

    I beg to disagree there. First, the committee on treaty is a new committee of the House, it’s never been there, we’re the pioneer committee and the reason the National Assembly established this committee was us to get things right. Normally, there are processes and procedures before we say bring this treaty, and let us domesticate it and that is what has necessitated us into passing the bill. The treaty making deal was sponsored by Hon. Emmanuel Ejime, chairman, Tobacco Control. He said, you know what, with the way things are its high time will consulted with the National Assembly. Right from the onset before going ahead to pass this bill, I mean to sign these treaties, you can see clearly now what will happen.

    I will give you another example; Nigeria went and sign to become a ratified the premium for tobacco and shortly after signing, we gave a lot of room for tobacco company to come.

    I’m not trying to play the blame-game here, but when these companies come here they are given tax cuts, whereas Nigerian companies that have gone outside the country to operate to enjoy similar incentives.

    Still talking treaties, what best practice can Nigeria readily adopt maybe within West Africa sub region or even advance economy?

    I tell you when it comes to best treaties; Australia has the best legislation in that area. We can also copy Ghana because they are doing well. Yes it’s an executive function to sign these treaties, but this must be done in conjunction with the lawmaking body, which is the National Assembly before the laws of the land can stand. If by now less of the treaties are yet to be domesticated these have infringed on the treaties that have been for long are yet to be domesticated and yet, they have gone to sign and even imposed financial obligations on the country one way or the other. Yet what they are paying is not even recognised by the constitution. What court do you take them to? They can go to court and that’s why in some cases, companies perpetrating oil spillage can’t be tried in Nigeria because some of the conventions guiding their operations haven’t been domesticated in the first place so they can run go scot free should any issue arise.

     

  • Asari Dokubo: We want independence

    Asari Dokubo: We want independence

    For about one hour last Tuesday, the founder of the Niger Delta People’s Volunteer Force(NDPV), Alhaji Mujahid Asari-Dokubo, spoke with Managing Editor, Northern Operation, Yusuf Alli and Correspondent, Faith Yahaya, on burning political issues – everything from ongoing infighting within the Peoples Democratic Party, President Goodluck Jonathan’s 2015 ambitions to the insurgency in the North East. Excerpts:

    What is your assessment of the Amnesty Programme?

    For me the way the amnesty programme is being managed, it has brought a lot of positive result. A lot of people have been trained; there has never been any adult scholarship programme in Nigeria that has trained as many people as the amnesty programme has done. A lot of people have been given a new lease of life; a lot of people have changed for the better.

    Are you satisfied with the programme so far?

    I think the name amnesty should be changed. It should be a collective programme for the people of the oil-bearing communities in Niger Delta. It is wrong for you to single out a group of people. These people when they started their agitation, according to them, they were not agitating for themselves, they were agitating on behalf of the people, so you cannot go on and give them a bribe (amnesty programme) in total exclusion of the people they claimed they were fighting for. And it is also wrong for them to accept the amnesty because they were delegates and they considered themselves as delegates, so they were on errand for the people. So, morally it is wrong. So, the programme should be given to the oil-bearing communities and not the whole of Niger Delta. It should be given to communities who have suffered deprivation, degradation of their environment and social dislocation.

    Are you suggesting expanding the scope of the amnesty?

    Yes, the amnesty programme, as presently constituted, is criminalised because first, you have to demoralise the people, criminalise the people to grant them a pardon, which is wrong. Then the people who accept amnesty have betrayed the people because when they started they said they were fighting on behalf of the people, so if you go and accept benefit and that benefit does not translate to the improvement of lives of those people, then you have betrayed the people.

    Is it in terms of benefit they have betrayed the people?

    Yes, it is in terms of benefit because if they take the amnesty, they go for training and they are paid N65,000 while the generality of the people who they claimed they were fighting for did not have such benefit.

    In spite of the programme, we still have prevalence of oil theft and people are now saying the amnesty is not succeeding. What is your take on this?

    That is why the amnesty is wrong, the amnesty is immoral. It is for 30,000 people as against the millions of people from the oil-bearing communities. Why were they singled out? Other people said, “Oh, so una dey give them bribe, oya now, make we see whether that bribe go work.” So the people own the oil, they own the land in which the oil comes from and if they single out other people and give them and leave others, then they will take from the pipeline because everything you are saying is in the pipeline.

    Are ex-militants behind oil theft?

    I don’t know who a militant is; I have never known them. I don’t know the meaning of militant and I have never known that word. I have never even checked it in the dictionary.

    What will you call those who have been agitating in the Niger Delta, including those in your group?

    Was Mandela called a militant? Was Kwame Nkrumah called a militant? If they did not call Mandela, Kwame Nkrumah and even Saro Wiwa a militant, why should I be called a militant? I am not a militant and I don’t know the meaning of militant.

    Are you a revolutionary?

    Yes, I am. Revolution means violent action towards change.

    Now, the amnesty programme has a timeframe…

    I don’t know. The question is not for me because I took the government of the late President Umaru Yar’Adua to court challenging him under the constitution of Nigeria whether he had the power to grant amnesty…he did not have the power to. I took him to the Federal High Court in 2009.

    In spite of that they are still running the programme. Why are you still making an issue out of it?

    That is because Nigeria is a lawless country. The whims and caprices of individuals cannot now become law. Yar’Adua cannot be moving on the street of Abuja and then see me and say: ‘I have granted you amnesty because you are from the Niger Delta and you look like a militant.’

    I thought you were part of the deal

    I am shocked and it shows that you didn’t read my write up because if you did, you would have known that I took them to court. You would have known that I refused to be given pardon and I have not accepted pardon from anybody because I have not committed any crime and I am not a militant.

    Due to oil theft, multinational companies are trying to disinvest in the Niger Delta. Are you not concerned about this?

    Very good! They should leave, that is what we have been praying for. They should not just disinvest onshore, they should also disinvest offshore.

    Who will manage our oil considering that they have the technical knowledge?

    Who said we want them to manage any oil? Nobody said so. We don’t want our oil to be used, our environment to be degraded, our people to suffer from all sorts of diseases occasioned by oil production and exploitation. If they stop, good for us.

    How will Nigeria manage its oil sector or take over?

    What is my business? Why would Nigeria come and take over what is in Buguma, did I go to take over what is in Kano? Why should Buguma matter be different from Kano or Sokoto? Why would the governor of Adamawa talk about Buguma when I don’t have anything to do in Yola?

    These are natural resources that belong to the people of Buguma, how would you exploit them?

    Buguma people are not ready to exploit it now. When they are ready, we will, but for now we don’t want anything. If they are going, we will applaud them. There is no reason whatsoever for you to exploit my resources to come and develop Abuja. I support convocation of Sovereign National Conference which is the simple minimum demand we are making.

    What about true federalism?

    I don’t know anything about that because in dictionary, I have never seen any word like true federalism as illiterate as I am, but there is federalism. Nigerians cannot be creating words to the exclusion of the whole world. We know what federal system of government and unitary system of government are, there is nothing like true federalism. You are a federation and even if you are, the people must agree to be Nigerians and we have never sat down to agree. Nations are not built by one Lugard or when someone says from today, you people are Nigerians. That is what is wrong with Nigeria.

    But the argument of the government is that there can’t be two sovereignties?

    We have gone past that. The president said he is not averse to the convocation of a Sovereign National Conference. The president of the Senate, David Mark, has come out and said national conference is necessary. So, we are getting nearer. Those of us who have been shouting on top of our voice are coming nearer and closer. Sovereign National Conference, I pray, will be convened in my lifetime. That is my ultimate dream. By that time, I will campaign among my people for what we want and what we want is independence. After the independence we will go our separate ways peacefully so that we will not be hearing about Boko Haram or MEND which will be a Niger Delta problem and from there, it will become an Ijaw problem. I cannot be carrying other people’s burden.

    Does that mean you don’t mind if the nation is dismembered?

    I am the first person who advocated it to the Supreme Court and that was why I was put on treason trial. My belief, aspiration or prayer is that Nigeria should be dismembered. This Nigeria, I don’t want it.

    What is really wrong with Nigeria having come such a long way?

    We didn’t come anywhere. Somebody cannot just say from today you are Nigerians. Why? What power does he have? Is he God? And he says he’s an English man. Do you know that anybody who calls himself a Nigerian is an inferior person? How can someone just look at you and call you a Nigerian and so you are?

    I thought there is now equity in Nigeria since power has shifted to the South-South?

    If power has shifted to the South-South and one man or some people say if Jonathan wins the PDP primaries by default or by any other means, he will fail at the general election… and if he wins, they will make the country ungovernable and now they have fulfilled their words of making the country ungovernable. Kano and Jigawa states’ governors have clearly said if Goodluck gets PDP ticket, they are going to disgrace him at the general election – which they cannot. So they have continued in their drumming of crisis and war. They failed in 2011 and they are going to fail in 2015. So, why would you want to be part of a country where some people think they are born to rule?

    But I thought at a stage, you granted an interview and you had some grouses against the president and his re-election bid?

    You did not read my interview, if you had read my interview, you won’t say so. I can quote my words as printed by PUNCH Newspaper. If some people decide to say what they like, that is their business. This is what I said and thank God, book no dey lie. It was published in PUNCH on the 22nd of December 2012.

    I said: “First, there was no need for Jonathan, whatsoever, to disagree with Obasanjo. I don’t like Obasanjo, I don’t like his face, I hate him, but he was instrumental to bringing Jonathan to power. And the greedy people around Jonathan have not managed him well enough to prevent an open clash between him and Obasanjo. And if you check, all the people who supported Jonathan and fought to bring him to power have openly disagreed with him, what were the causes of these disagreements? These are the questions we want to put to the president. It is alarming because the South-South must have its uninterrupted eight years’ tenure which is constitutional, but with how things are going under Jonathan, we are afraid that we may not be able to have our eight years, because there will be no magic about it, if it is going to be one-man-one-vote.

    “Some people say Obasanjo is manipulating Jonathan, that is why Jonathan is disagreeing with him, and we ask: ‘what has Jonathan’s government achieved to show that it is a departure from other governments that have existed since 1956?’ For us, nothing has changed. It is still business as usual. So, what is the advice that Obasanjo gave to Jonathan that is so difficult for him to fulfill, that made him to decide to fall out with the former president? Obasanjo was instrumental to and manipulated the process that illegally removed Diepreye Alamieyeseigha as the governor of Bayelsa State and installed Jonathan as governor, then made him vice-president, fought for him to become acting president and also fought for him to become President of Nigeria. Apart from Obasanjo, there are so many people who supported Jonathan; some have been pushed out by those who were not there to give him any support, while some others are trapped and they cannot talk.

    “The problem is that the president is surrounded by very greedy people who do not want him to make any progress. I have known the president for more than 20 years, and I know he is very simple and humane, but he has allowed himself to be imprisoned by the people around him, and this is what we are saying that the situation must stop. After the election and before his swearing-in, I granted an interview where I said that if Jonathan failed to perform in six months, he would lose all the goodwill, and today as we can see, the president is losing all the goodwill. The social media was one of the avenues the president used to come to power, but today, anywhere you go on the social media, he is being called all sorts of names: clueless and other derogatory names. We cannot continue to take punches for the president when he has refused to wear his gloves. The president is removed from his own people, his people do not have access to him; so, people like us who have access to him become targets. When Joseph was sold into captivity in Egypt, from slavery to prison and from prison he became a prime minister, the first thing he did was to invite his family from Israel to Egypt to come and partake in his new-found glory.

    “There is something wrong somewhere, the people around the president have fenced him and put him in ‘Kirikiri Prison’ so that he cannot even see his direct family. I have complained to Ijaw elders, that I cannot keep quiet over things that I have seen, and they say I should wait. I am asking here, how long will we keep quiet? Our people now feel that we are at the riverside and yet use spittle to wash our face. People are dying on the East-West Road, Jonathan and (Godsday) Orubebe are doing nothing. Both of them will account for the deaths on the road. I continue to be an advocate of an eight-year presidency in the South-South and eight years in the South-East because the old Eastern Region was the most deprived region in this country if you consider the people that have ruled this country.” So, how was I against the president? People continue to quote me wrongly and say I am against Jonathan.

    Are you still standing by some of these observations?

    Yes! Go to the East-West road now, something massive is going on and it is almost completed. You can drive from Port Harcourt to Elele, from Warri to Ughelli, work is also ongoing. So, if I said something in December last year and after I said it, the Catholic Bishop said it also at the funeral of Azazi, Amaechi said it and different socio-cultural organisations including the Council of Warlords said it. They reechoed what I have said.

    Does it mean the president is responding?

    Yes, he is responding not only to the road but on a lot of vital issues.

    On what basis does Jonathan deserve a second term?

    He deserves a second term first. No apologies. He is an Ijaw man like me; he deserves it and no apologies whatsoever. Second, which is most important to any other person is: when the colonialist left, they left functional railways, but before Goodluck came to power the railways were dead. When the colonialists were leaving, they left functional agriculture but all of them died before Goodluck came to power. Today, agriculture is being revived. During Obasanjo’s eight years, you could not travel the Ore-Benin road; it was a death trap but today the road is open and people are travelling. Go to Oyo-Ilorin road, it has been expanded and people are travelling.

    Obasanjo awarded Abuja-Lokoja road at an unbelievable amount but construction did not go beyond two to three kilometres. Yar’ Adua came and he did not do anything. But now the road is near completion. Direct foreign investment has increased. So, if, from 1956 to 2010, they were not able to achieve anything and somebody in a space of three years has changed these things and has achieved so much, then if you add all of them together, they have not achieved as much as what Jonathan has achieved in three years.

    That means you are not disturbed by the activities of the G-7 PDP governors and the Baraje faction?

    They are political miscreants because there is no faction in the PDP. PDP is the PDP and there is only one PDP recognised by the law. What they are doing is illegal and against the law.

    But the same president is holding peace talks with them

    That is why we are angry with Jonathan. Why should the president hold meeting with them? The president should put them where they belong.

    Where do they belong?

    Where they belong is to be chased from the PDP and those of them that do not have immunity, the full weight of the law should be brought against them and they should be dealt with decisively.

    But the fear is that they can stop the president

    How? Did the president win in Kano, Sokoto, Niger, and Jigawa in 2011?

    But he won in Kwara?

    Yes, and he is going to win in Kwara, he will win in Niger now clearly and he will win more votes in Kano. He will win. Did Kwankwaso people not print his poster with Buhari in 2011? Did Kwankwaso support Goodluck? If it is Lamido, yes, we agree, but did the support translate into victory? So all this bragging is nothing. Did Amaechi bring any vote? I was the chieftain of ACN, all other parties scored zero. Goodluck scored 100% vote in my ward. There were agents for all the parties but in my ward, every party scored zero, they didn’t score one vote. Did Amaechi bring it or did he come near my ward? Amaechi cannot even win in his unit; he does not have the capacity to win election even in his unit.

    We are waiting and we pray to God to keep us alive till 2015, then you will come and see if Amaechi can win in his unit in 2015 and not to talk of his ward. In the last election, didn’t you hear what they did to a policeman in Amaechi’s town? How police officers were stripped naked by the people of his community. He is not able to control his community and he wants to rule Rivers State. Look at people they are training in Kano for martial art, if I do it in my school they will say I am training militia.

    You seem to have no fear about 2015, what is the secret?

    I don’t have any fear, except for what God will do and Goodluck will not be alive which we pray that God will not at this time that he has brought us to a reasonable level of development. Goodluck will not leave us mid-stream, he will take us to the shore because 2015 is a foregone conclusion. There is going to be political cemetery for many political heavy weights where we are going to inter them because Goodluck is going to demystify everybody. People should not be afraid. And for the men of God that said God sent them, people will know that God did not send them.

    How about this coalition of opposition coming together to form All Progressives Congress, you were once in their midst, what happened?

    I was, because we shared the same political belief, ideology and aspiration but if somebody leaves that platform to join people who are conservative and you want me to join them I cannot. I saw NPN as a young man before I joined UPN, and I became the youth leader of UPN in Degema community. I saw PDP before I joined AD, I saw PDP before I joined ACN. So, if you now merge the PDP elements with yourself and you want me to join, why would I join? That is not the political ideology I saw and joined.

    Would there really be war if Goodluck does not win in 2015?

    Goodluck’s winning is a foregone conclusion. He will never lose, Insha Allah. It is they who said if he wins, they will make the polity ungovernable. So it is they who will bring the war and we will reply them. For every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction. They said the baboons and the dogs will be soaked in the street. We will help them to soak the street with more blood. I have no apology for that as I said on Channels TV. As you prepare for war, you think say me I go sleep? No, me too dey prepare. Allah said in the Quran, ‘they plotted and we too are plotting, we are the best of plotters.’ So, if you plot to soak the blood of the dogs and baboons, should we fold our hands and expect them to come and kill us? No, it is not possible.

    Ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo has been trying to assist the president by convening peace talks to meet with feuding members of the PDP, but some people are saying…

    Don’t say some people; I was the first person who came out to say that Obasanjo is the agent provocateur. I was the first person who said Obasanjo is the instigator. Atiku has also come out to say Obasanjo is the one; Atiku who is a co-conspirator. Obasanjo is an insatiable man.

    How?

    Let me tell you a secret, when Yar’Adua was there, I met with his then Chief Economic Adviser, Tanimu Yakubu. Please, write it the way I said it. He (Tanimu) came to meet me in my hotel room and said, the place Obasanjo put you, you will go back there. Tanimu is alive, if he fears God, he will not deny it. If Yar’Adua had continued, Obasanjo would have been in jail and he knows that. So whatever thing Obasanjo and Goodluck are doing together (like the friction), I don’t know. But I know that Obasanjo has not been fair to Goodluck. I have known Goodluck for over twenty years; I don’t know what Obasanjo tells Goodluck because Goodluck has not told me. When I said Goodluck had no business quarrelling with Obasanjo, one Yoruba retired military officer called me on phone and spoke with me for more than one hour. He said Obasanjo is a fox. He said he has known Obasanjo for as long as his adult life and he knows that Goodluck has not done anything against Obasanjo. He said Obasanjo’s life is about constant plotting and betrayal; that is what the general told me.

    When you came from the creek and met Obasanjo at the Villa, what was your impression of him?

    Was it not after I met with him and gave out about 3200 firearms and over 300 ammunition and bombs that he invited me to the police station and arrested me and threw me into prison? Is that a man to be trusted? He did not honour his own part of the agreement, he cannot honour because he believes in brute force and anyone who is dealing with him should also deal with him that way. Obasanjo has no business being free and moving freely for all that he stole. For the destruction of Odioma, Zaki Biam, he has no business walking free. I have been in court over Zaki Biam and Odioma. Our court system or judiciary is so bad and corrupt that any case they don’t want, they don’t listen to it.

    How should the president manage Obasanjo?

    I don’t know how he should manage Obasanjo but I believe that the president ought to take Obasanjo for what he is and subject him to the scrutiny of the law.

    But will that be fair to President Jonathan’s predecessor and mentor?

    If a mentor has turned an enemy, what would you do? You will allow him to continue to breed crisis that occasions loss of lives and properties?

    What is your opinion about the spate of violence in the north and even the recent incident in Kenya? How can we curtail terrorism in this country?

    It is a global problem. It is a clash of civilisation; Islamic civilisation and the Jewish-Western civilisation controlled by the Jewish Masonic order. Islam is the only other ideology that has refused to succumb to the Jewish Masonic order and for that, Muslims are being oppressed all over the world. America invades Muslim countries, they kill Muslims at will, promoting Jewish Masonic order, promoting Zionism. Strangers were brought from Europe and put on Arab land, they confiscated a cage and put Arab in an open prison and concentration camp. Arabs were not Hitler. If Hitler put Jews in concentration camp, is that why Arabs have to be put in concentration camp in Gaza where they cannot go out? Today in Libya, there is no peace and development, they destroyed Libya. In Egypt now, election was won by the Muslim Brotherhood’s Justice and Freedom Party, but they overthrew the government and killed thousands of people. America is talking about killing of people with gas but somebody came out openly to shoot people in the full glare of international television and nothing is done about it. They unleashed on Syria their dogs and thugs to perpetually keep the Muslim land unstable. Let America mind their business and the world will have peace.

    Is terrorism the solution considering the fact that Islam is a religion of peace?

    If they attack you, will you not attack back? Islam does not support a person to go to a shopping mall to go and kill people. That is cowardice. You cannot kill unarmed people but we should also know that when somebody is frustrated, he can do anything.

    Back home, how do we resolve the issue?

    Nigerian matters or crises? The people that should be arrested and brought in for questioning are the Kaitas and the Ciromas. They should be arrested because they are the people who promised mayhem in 2011 and the mayhem is taking place in their home. “He who rides on the back of a tiger, e go easy to end up for tiger belle.”

    Does that mean there is political undertone in all these crises in the north?

    Yes, they thought that they could control these elements; they didn’t know that there are some people you cannot control. They want to use them to exact confusion…that is what these political miscreants led by the so-called seven governors are doing. They want the president to say he will not contest for second term. It is the same Boko Haram demand which Dr. Ahmed Gumi said, once the president says he is not contesting, Boko Haram insurgency will end. So there is a connection with what the seven governors are demanding and Boko Haram. There is a connection because they encourage them.

    But the president is trying to reach out to them but they are not embracing it?

    That is what we are saying, the president is wrong. He should leave them alone, let them do their worst. Where they go pass impeach Jonathan now? There are certain things they cannot imagine not to talk of doing. The president should not bother himself about them. How many times did they try to impeach Obasanjo? Mark my word, Goodluck Jonathan will win. If he won with 6million votes before, he will win now with 10million.

    What do you make of the political tension in the country?

    Don’t allow a man who you think is a weak man to wake up; don’t force him to wake up. When a man is sleeping, don’t force him to wake up. When someone is sleeping and you keep tapping him, when he wakes up, he will become wild. Don’t wake a sleeping man because the claws of government, when he digs it inside their flesh, it will rip off their flesh. When you force a man to do what he does not want to do… In Nigeria, you can only compare Goodluck with ex-President Shehu Shagari. These people are easy going people and when you continue to criticise him, you are giving chance to those of us who are extra-extremist to be telling the president to behave like a president and then his name will change from ‘clueless’ which they have started and they have changed to ‘bully’ and from ‘bully’, he will be called ‘dictator.’ That is what will happen. As for governors Adams Oshiomole and Rotimi Amaechi they have calculated well; they are thinking of post-2015 politics. If Goodluck is president till 2019, Amaechi will be out of power from 2015 to 2019. Even if he goes to the Senate, he will not be anything but an ordinary floor member. But if Goodluck goes, he will either become the Vice President or the Senate President. All he (Amaechi) is thinking about is manipulation. For Oshiomole, he is from the South-South and he is in the political cooler because there will be no election in the next three years and maybe by then, he will lose political relevance and he does not want that to happen. It is not like the United States of America where if you are a democrat, you are a democrat. So they have calculated and it is their personal greed they are pursuing.

    Where did you get this inspiration to be a revolutionary?

    I grew up under my grandmother and my grandmother was the transition between the glorious past of our people. That was when our people were free. My grandmother was born on the 22nd of November 1900. Her grandfather was King Amakiri. He died and was buried on the 15th of November 1900. My grandmother lived in a world where she saw and owned slaves, she had people serving her but all that came to an end with the coming of Nigeria. When my mother had me unlike my other siblings, I was taken to my grandmother and she taught me the lessons that I still carry with me. She said, “Do everything to restore the glory of the past.”

    Was she the one who sent you to school?

    I attended primary one to four before my father came back from law school, but as at that time I had been given enough education by my grandmother and then I became close to radical political ideology from Iran and Libya. I visited the late Muammar Ghadaffi in Libya several times because he was my political mentor and he was one of the greatest men God has created on earth. He was the greatest lover of Africa. I have never met anybody who loves Africa as much as Ghadaffi. I got to know about this through my interaction with him. When you speak with someone, you will know his passion. I used to talk to him into the wee hours of the night and he hardly spoke English with anybody but I forced him to speak English with me. He understood English very well but he brought someone to translate and I persuaded him to speak with me in English. Ghadaffi used to see me as one of the hopes of Africa and he had connection and interaction with Nelson Mandela and all the genuine freedom fighters in Africa. My interaction with these people who love freedom has really influenced my life.

    Were you born into Islam?

    I became a Muslim on the 17th of September 1988 at Calabar. I was influenced by the Iranian Revolution and it was the greatest influence because I have always detested America. I have always detested the bullying and the double standard of America. So when the Iranian Revolution started, I started reading about Islam and I later became a Muslim.

    Is your being a revolutionary for personal gain because people say ex-militants are now moneybags?

    I don’t know what ex-militants are, so when you are talking with me, you should know the word to use. I am 50 years old and I come from a background of kings who ruled their country until 1899 when Britain cajoled them to sign their protectorates to become Nigeria. So if I had come from United Arab Emirate, Great Britain, Saudi Arabia, and I am a prince, what will I be called? Are you saying that I should not fight to restore that sovereignty? I am an Amakri, I don’t know where I get money from. So the Otedolas, the Adenugas, the Dangotes are entitled to have wealth from the resources from my place but I don’t have the right to make money. The very purpose of my struggle is to free my people and restore the totality of what belongs to us. We want our sovereignty and wealth, so those who are from poverty stricken places, those who ordinarily would have been slaves should keep on wallowing in their poverty and slavery. There is no reason for Mike Adenuga to have money while the son of Saro-Wiwa does not have. It is immoral and unjust.

    They sign pieces of paper and give them oil blocks just like that to go and take resources from another man’s backyard because it is Nigeria. Some of them have never been to the places where they have these oil blocks and their accounts are fatter daily to the shock and sweat of other people.

    Are you saying there is nothing wrong with ex-militants getting pipeline or maritime protection contracts?

    Who should be given the contract? If Tompolo is not given contract, who should be given? If they are giving any Niger Delta contract, who is more qualified to have it?

    Is it not the job of the NNPC?

    Is it not the job of NNPC to explore oil, why should Dangote and Otedola be given an oil blocks? Is it not the job of NNPC to explore oil? Tompolo is a citizen of Nigeria and is expected to have equal access to wealth that is exploited from his back yard. The pipeline contract that I was given has been terminated since July 2012. Am I dead now? I am alive and I am still going to be alive. They don’t understand me, if they do, they won’t say what they are saying. Obasanjo gave me endless opportunities to become so many things and I rejected them. People have become rich overnight because of this amnesty and if I was after money, I would have embraced it. Is the north not demanding for amnesty to collect free money? How many can do what I did? When you accept pardon, it shows that you committed a crime. Who was more popular than myself in the Niger Delta? If they are claiming amnesty, I should be the first to claim it. The day Tompolo came to handover, Yar’Adua said one person is still remaining, but I refused because I am not a militant. So, money is not the issue because I was born to be rich.

     

  • ‘Asaba people were victims of genocide’

    ‘Asaba people were victims of genocide’

    Having written about the civil war, what is your take on it considering the fact that part of the war was fought at Asaba?

    I lost my family in the war. And this is a product of the civil war. There was a genocide committed by the Nigerian Army at Asaba. We were not Biafrans. The Biafrans would take their case anywhere. We Asaba people, we were not in Ojukwu’s Biafra map. We were in Nigeria’s map. Some of us fought for Biafra. Some people fought for Nigeria. General Iweze fought for Nigeria. My uncles, some of them fought in the Nigerian Air Force. So, for anybody to come and tell you there was no genocide is talking nonsense.

    How about Biafran involvement in genocide?

    There was no Biafran genocide. Because the underlying word in genocide is plot. Did they plot for any Nigerian side to be wiped out? There is a United Nations conclusive finding under Dr. Edem Kojo, in 1969, that there was a genocide against the Igbo. I can give you the paper. It is not a question of somebody cheating anybody. Nobody sat down and planned that this part of Nigeria would be wiped out.

    What is your impression about General Alabi Isama’s war memoir, Tragedy of Victory?

    General Alabi Isama’s book is incomplete because he failed to talk much about Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu. The leader of the January 15th coup was Christian Anuforo. Nzeogwu was not in the coup. Nzeogwu came later because of his way of life. Nzeogwu did not drink. Nzeogwu didn’t smoke. Nzeogwu’s driver was a Hausa boy. Nzeogwu never attended any Ibo town union meeting. He never attended any local, tribal meeting. His best music was martial music and his mentors were Gen (Tito) of Yugoslavia, Patrice Lumunba, and Che Guevara. Those were his mentors. And he would wake up 7am and go to mass but he was a Hausa boy, shaving, and wearing babariga. He never chased any woman. He wasn’t going to get married. His mission was to go and fight in South Africa. So, he needed a Nigerian leader that would help him. That was why he switched from the Sardauna to embrace Awo, no Igbo. The other leader was Emmanuel Ifeajuna, who has been into revolutions from the University of Ibadan. Revolution has been on his mind. And if you’re from my side, Onitsha people say that they are Igbo, like Ngwa people say they are not Igbo. Some people from Nsukka area, they relate with Idoma. We know who are the Igbo. Ifeajuna at his time was the greatest high profile athlete when he scaled 6.9 (metres) in Vancouver. He was the first black athlete. He pulled off his shirt, like what these athletes do now. And there was pandemonium in the city of Vancouver. If you go to any exercise book in the 50s, 60s, 70s, you will see him on the cover. All his life was at Ibadan and his best friend was Segun Awolowo, Christopher Okigbo, Wole Soyinka. Achebe was not a revolutionary, he was just a writer. And they were chasing the best women in Ibadan. That was why Christopher Okigbo was able to marry the princess from Attah. These boys were not talking tribes.

    Some of those authors of books on the Nigerian Civil War were players in the war and could not have had the benefit of hindsight and research which you had. Why do you give much credence to Gen Olusegun Obasanjo?

    You know Biafra surrendered unconditionally. I won’t come here to denigrate Ojukwu. But if Ojukwu had listened, Biafra could have gotten back its currency, it could have gotten its army reintegrated. Go and read the Think-Tank Memoranda of the Addis Ababa Peace Conference. A man, (Habeeb Bogiva) from Tunisia, said, when the British troop came, they said they’re bringing Obasanjo, he’s the only one who has the humanity that can make Biafra surrender and you’re telling me that he is a coward, that he was shot in the buttocks. That is their problem. Then, you have demystified the surrender. Biafra can now go and claim that they didn’t surrender. That is the meaning of that lie. What happened when the Biafrans came to Mid West, they were involved in collateral damage. And it was not a Biafran Army. There was no order from the headquarters for them to do what they did in Warri, which I acknowledged in my book. In fact, they were to move straight to Lagos. Gowon was flying to Zaria until the same Obasanjo you’re saying had no courage said no. And it was the same Obasanjo that took Nzeogwu’s paper from Kaduna to come and negotiate with Agunyi Ironsi during the fledging days of the 1966 coup. And I’m telling you, the coup was a perfect success. Go and read the biography of Mallam Aminu Kano. Aminu Kano was to be deputy to Awo in that coup. The principal aim of January 1966 coup was to install Obafemi Awolowo as the Prime Minister of Nigeria. And the boys would now move to South Africa. Nzeogwu was not interested in Nigeria.

    We have spoken enough about genocide. Let us move away from that. There is this argument that the battle in Owerri was not conclusive. What to you were the elements that made it impossible for each of the sides to cave in during the crisis that lasted more than one year?

    You know, I’m not an authority in military battles but I know that in a way, you’re asking me about the commander. They said Scorpion (Gen. Benjamin Adekunle) was the best that Nigeria could offer. I do not disagree with him on battleground confrontation. That is not my area. My area is on civilian consequence but I know about Owerri. The greatest Biafran commander was not my uncle Achuzia. Achuzia would go to battle with a battalion, he would come back with a company, sometimes the mission was not complete. He would shoot some of them himself. The greatest commander of Biafran Army was Timothy Onwuatuegwu and that is why I am saying here that Danjuma and all of them, in military convention, after the war and you announce that you have surrendered, you don’t touch soldiers, you arrest them. Obasanjo did that. He arrested all the soldiers in Owerri. And he was very nice to them, even though they said they didn’t get this or that. Up to when they got to Lagos. Black Scorpion would not do that. And I told you the story of Murtala Muhammed. Three trailers had koboko, (whips) not bullets. So, what would koboko do, if they had entered Biafran heartland? Koboko was for us – for gentlemen to be flogged to death. So, in answer to your question, Owerri was concluded. Remember that Major Utuk, the Calabar commander at Owerri, was surrounded by the 8th Brigade commanded by Timothy Onwuatuegwu who was the best. Any time that there is crisis, he’s the one they call. So, Owerri was taken back from the federal troop but at a stage, they allowed an area for them to escape back.

    Who wanted to bomb Port-Harcourt?

    The man is alive. I can give you his number. It was these people who did Ogbunigwe. So, when the British came and they knew, that was reversed – that they were bringing this commander down who had a lot of humanity in him. In fact, the man who stopped the war was Akanu Ibiam. Ojukwu was not ready. Ojukwu believed he was going to win because they knew (Aju Ala). The Ogbunigwe became (Aju Ala). In artillery acquisition, the Russians are better than the US. The Russian mortar can go 24 miles but the Biafran artillery, the (Aju Ala) was going 26 miles. The Russians were alarmed. That was the main reason they supported Nigeria. They had sympathy for the Biafrans because every revolution claims sympathy for the Eastern countries, like the MPLA, Ethiopia, Lumumba, they had this. For the first time in Africa, Russia said ‘we’re suffering from yellow malaise – that is China.’ This black danger is coming – 26 miles was this Biafran mortar. It’s very crude, it may not be direct. There were many other problems but people were still dying. So, what I’m saying is that, I’m not here to defend Obasanjo. I’m here to say that man has managed, whether it is luck, whether it is destiny, to remain like Peron of Argentina in the balcony of the power corridors of the world.

    January 15 coup’s main purpose was to topple the federal authorities under the corrupt regime of Abubakar Tafawa Balewa and at that point in time, there was genocide established going on in Gboko, Tiv land. There was mayhem on the streets of Lagos, Ikorodu, Ibadan, Ijebu-Ode, Ijebu-Igbo up to Ekiti area. Balewa was like Jonathan. He couldn’t arrest the situation. Go and read The Man Died; that is why I don’t joke with Wole Soyinka, no matter what they are saying. Nzeogwu was the first Nigerian trained intelligence officer. He started the SSS at Apapa in 1963. It’s in my book, Nzeogwu, the unknown. So, they knew there was going to be a January 17th coup. The coup was to eliminate all the western intellectuals; Tai Solarin, Wole Soyinka, Bola Ige. What happened was that they were fed up with what was happening. If you come out to the streets of west, they burn you alive, whether you’re for this or that. This was the situation when the boys came out. You cannot just say somebody murdered Sardauna or Balewa. Nobody shot Balewa. This was corroborated by Segun Osoba. He was there at the launching (Isama’s Book). He (Osoba) was a Daily Times reporter at that time. And I wrote my own because my aunty was a girlfriend to Balewa at that time. If you want a wife, you must come to Asaba – Babangida, even Balewa who wasn’t chasing women, they gave him my aunty. She told me that Balewa had asthma. Balewa couldn’t swim in that their State House, Marina. Living opposite Balewa was Okotie-Eboh, the richest man then. And when the January 15th boys came, they came for him. He was to be shot at sight. Mbadiwe was to be shot at sight. Balewa, not to be touched because he was a gentleman. Sardauna of Sokoto shot at sight. Akintola shot at sight. Agunyi-Ironsi shot at sight. People are mixing it up. So, Nzeogwu said, give me Agunyi-Ironsi, I know him. If you don’t get him dismantled, that is the word, not shot, the coup would not happen. They said, ‘go to Sardauna’. So, what he did in Kaduna, the coup was successful, coup was successful in the west. So, which place was the coup not successful? Lagos. Who stopped the Lagos operation? Major Obienu, another Igbo man. He was the commander of a unit in Abeokuta. He didn’t show up. His boys had taken over the key security structures. The man who was to announce the coup who was not Nzeogwu, not Ifeajuna, it was Ademulegun. That was his only job. Up till now, we’re still researching why he didn’t announce the coup. And he was to announce that there was a revolution and Obafemi Awolowo is released. That was Nzeogwu’s number one purpose. He said, ‘if you don’t bring Awo as the Prime Minister, I will not join you because he is the only one talking about free education,. And his best friend was Segun Awolowo. How did he die? Mystery. How did the man that they suspected killed him die? The same place that this publisher of Tribune had his own motor accident.

    So, when Nzeogwu waited for them for four hours, he made that spontaneous announcement in Kaduna. He wasn’t supposed to announce it. So, who is telling me it is tribal? So, in summary, what I am saying is any book that starts writing Nigerian military without first acknowledging that first, there was a lot of blood on the streets. I’m not talking about military people. Blood in Ibadan, you couldn’t come out on the streets in 1966. I’m coming back to the second phase of Nigerian crises – the war. Gowon benefitted from the coup. There was nothing like revenge coup. Nobody did any coup. What happened was that the Nigerian federation came together and every group wanted something. The Igbo, I don’t know what they want – up till now, I cannot find their interest. But, I can tell you straight, the northerners always wanted power. They want to control the army. They want their religion (Islam) to be dominant in our culture. The Yoruba want all the banks, the stock exchange, they want to control the financial events of the country. And they want Lagos to remain the capital, no matter if Abuja is there. And they want the Yoruba language spoken not only in Nigeria but up to the world. And I acknowledge them for that. The minorities, I’ve read The Kahama Declaration by Isaac Boro. They wanted to be out of this federation because their wealth was being depleted but now that things have changed, it looks like they want to stay. Now, during serious conflagrations by these major tribes, they always go with the north. This time, they’re there. It seems the easterners are the main support. I’m looking at the two sides before we make our conclusions. Those of us who are Midwestern Igbo had it so bad during the war from both sides. Because the Biafrans came, they didn’t tell us they were coming in. And if they were coming in, that plan originally was Nzeogwu’s plan. Nzeogwu said he was going to lead it. And he told Ojukwu, don’t declare Biafra, let us fight against the north. These people have everything. Like now, the whole military instalment is just in Kaduna, Zaria. So, if there is a massive air force attack on Nigeria concentrated on Kaduna and Zaria, we’re finished. There is nothing here. So, I’m saying we cannot write a Nigerian civil war book without telling us about Nzeogwu. I thought the General, being a commander of a training school – he started with training school according to his book, should have told us more about Nzeogwu, whether he believed or not. He should have started with what happened before the military came in. He just went straight into the war and tried to defend what they were doing.

    You cannot prescribe what someone is going to write. Someone is writing a book, he has a right to say, this is my focus.

    I am being called to comment. I have a right to critique also. There are areas I agree with him. I’m not saying he has no right to write the book. It’s just that somebody said, why did Achebe do his own? I agree with you. What I am saying is if I’m doing a review of that book, I have a right. In fact, to me, that book should have been three books because I know Nigerian readers. They won’t finish that book.

    But what is your overall impression about the book?

    This book is a classic. It is the first chronicle coming from the Nigerian side since the edited Nigerian Army book from General Momoh. That one is vast and very complete. But, this one from a personal diary – that establishes Alabi Isama as a General. Most generals never kept diaries; this man kept diaries, kept photographs – so you can compare his book to the other category on the other side of Alex Madiebo. I’m talking about field diaries of Generals. The only thing that I’ve said is missing is he could have told us about the man who started it all – Kaduna Nzeogwu. And he didn’t.

    Secondly, I agree with him that even though the Nigerian First Division was the most favoured in armoury, in administration, in support, in equipment, the Third Marine Commando gave the Biafrans black eye. They were the most deadly army Biafrans faced. I agree with him there.

    You said something like there was never a counter or revenge coup.

    There was no revenge because when you say revenge, that means some people were against it. The people who organised the January 15 coup were not Igbo.

    That’s your claim

    It is not a claim.

    Before the war, the Igbo were prominent in politics, in the army and there was co-habitation. That first coup truncated that. So, the perception was that the Igbo wanted to take over and the first coup was to go back to status quo.

    Scientifically, from our studies, there is nothing like a revenge coup. When somebody took away your wife and you go for revenge. When somebody stole your money or beat your child up, you go for revenge. That word, I want to define the word revenge. When you say there was revenge, that means somebody did something to them, right.

    Let me say this. Up till now, the mainstream of Nigerian politics, even the Igbo, believe that there was a revenge coup. Even if you go through There was a Country, Achebe said that, ‘okay if we killed them on January 15, killing the 200 Igbo officers, why did we go to civilians?’ I’m saying the boys may answer Igbo names. (But) Nzeogwu was not Igbo, he was Hausa. Nzeogwu is from my area, Okpanam in Asaba. He spoke Hausa more than any other language. What I’m saying is that Nzeogwu was extraordinary. Nzeogwu had a brother – a professor of Agro-economics, one of the best in United States. His name is Okeleke Nzeogwu. He went to school at Mayflower School, (Ikenne). He was trained by Mrs. Sheila Solarin. And who brought him there? Olusegun Obasanjo. He didn’t bring him to Lagos. And if you go to that part of Nigeria (Ikenne), there is Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu Street. There were still fighting when Tai Solarin put the street there. There is a reason. Nzeogwu was the one who wrote the people who were to be – Tai Solarin was to be minister of education.

    You said something now that if Obasanjo had been there and Nzeogwu was coming, the forces would have been resolved. I want to compare that to when Soyinka went to meet Obasanjo. He gave Banjo message to him. And he said, so long as he was the head of the Ibadan Garrison, his allegiance was to Lagos. Would he have given a different answer to Nzeogwu?

    I don’t talk battle line diaries. I’m not a military expert but I’m an expert in conflict resolution in Africa. I have in my confidential report that originally, it was Nzeogwu’s plan. Nzeogwu had told Ojukwu, ‘don’t declare Biafra. If you declare Biafra, you’re inviting Nigerians who can fight on any pretext.’ At that point in time, the northerners had everything. There was only 89 enlisted Yoruba in the Nigerian Army. It’s there in my book. There was Daramola, Majekodunmi, Obasanjo, mostly Majors. The biggest of them had been killed – Samuel Ademulegun and Sonije killed because of their positions. So, what I’m saying is that Nzeogwu planned it. ‘Don’t give these people frontal confrontation. Let’s go through the west. Ogbemudia was part of their group. Obasanjo is not with Alabi. It is clear. He has shown it.

    So, it was to be south against the north. Soyinka, Solarin, all were prepared to support it. Gowon was about to fly to Zaria. That was why Wole Soyinka came and he didn’t come with the Awo group. They were extreme radicals. He came with the Aluko, who was still teaching at University of Nigeria, Nsukka then. He mentioned three forces – the first one was Gowon, the second force was Biafra, then, the third, anyone that wins. That was why they were incarcerated. He wrote it in a book, ‘The Man Died’ in prison. But for anybody to come and denigrate Obasanjo while I’m still alive is not possible.

    What do you mean by denigration? That the man did not run away from enemy fire? That he wasn’t shot in the rump? Because Daramola was there at the launch and he said that the general fled!

    What I’m saying is that commanders are different. He wants to demonstrate that Obasanjo had no courage. I don’t think so. It shows that the Biafrans were not push-over. So, if Obasanjo saw the fuselage coming, it would be suicidal not to run away.

    But, look at the context. The man wrote in ‘My Command’, and if you link it with ‘Not My Will,’ you’ll see the full gamut of the Obasanjo personae which ensured to put everybody down and pronounce himself as the only hero. That is the context in which the author wrote.

    I’ve defined what that man said. He has destroyed the myth surrounding the Third Marine Commando and the Nigerian Army winning of the war when you say your commander ran away. That is what I’m saying. And I’m comparing what has happened.

  • What went wrong with Biafra  —Ben Gbulie

    What went wrong with Biafra —Ben Gbulie

    Col. Ben Gbulie is widely known for his role in the January 1966 coup in which he and other majors and captains upturned the political and military status quo in the country. Having been detained in Enugu alongside Victor Banjo and others who participated actively in the coup by the Federal Government, he was subsequently released by Emeka Odumegwu Ojukwu at the outbreak of the Nigerian Civil War in 1967. He rose to the rank of a Colonel in the Biafran Army  where he held important positions which included the de facto commander of the 7th battalion, Nsukka, Supply and Transport and later as the Military Administrator of Aba Province. In this interview with Edozie Udeze and Chris Orji in Enugu, he reiterates how he and Gen.Alabi-Isama and others joined the Nigerian Army in March 1960, why Obansanjo’s My Command is full of half-truths and how Nzeogwu was killed, among other salient war related issues. 

    Gen Alabi Isama was emphatic in his book that the invasion of the West by the Biafran forces through Ore was a serious blunder. He said instead invading Lagos from Ilorin, or any other alternative route would have been a better military option. What do you think?

    Now, with regards to the war itself, I fought on the side of Biafra, what you call the rebel side. In other words, the Biafran side, because there was a country if you can refer to Chinua Achebe. And he (Isama) fought on the Nigerian side.

    Now, with regards to the Ore issue…First of all, Alexander Madiebo has actually resolved this matter; that the Biafrans going into the Mid-West was Ojukwu’s way of pleasing Banjo. And that alone raises a number of other questions, because I was detained prior to all that due to the coup of January 1966. And Banjo was also with us in prison. I don’t know if you have read my book titled The Fall of Biafra.

    If you have read it, you’ll see where I talked about Banjo speaking to us in Enugu prison before we were released by Ojukwu before the war started. And Banjo made it quite clear that he didn’t support any question of secession. That instead he wanted the creation of more states. Initially, the North didn’t want the creation of states. But they let superior argument prevailed and so they let the British guide them. And so they supported the creation of states. As at that time, Ojukwu in Enugu, well, in the Eastern Region, said it was not right to create states. That it was to emasculate the East. Ojukwu and the East were against the creation of states. So, when Banjo came out of prison with us, released by Ojukwu himself, he asked the Ojukwu the same question what about the creation of states.

    It is all covered in my book. Now, as to the question of we going into the Mid West in August 1967, it was a matter for Biafrans to decide. So, you don’t decide for us. Not even Alabi Isama himself, because Alabi-Isama is a strategist. He did courses in strategy and so there is no question of him asking why should we do this or why should we do that. No, he shouldn’t do that; it is all in the past. The thing had taken place.

    Banjo, by the way, a Yoruba man, took former Easterners to the Midwest, that alone in my book, I said, is a monstrous gamble. It is like paying your own assassin. So, there are many questions that came out of that. Do you understand? So, Banjo alone was bad news, because he didn’t support Biafra. But Ojukwu too, he was bad news, because he was pig-headed. He wanted to use Banjo to go to Lagos. But Banjo also wanted to use Biafran troops to get to his people, to overthrow Gowon and become head of state of Nigeria. This was very clear to everybody. So, whether we should have gone into the Midwest or not, it was the choice of Ojukwu and Banjo. So the critique is well-taken. But those two people are dead already. So, what am I going to say?

    The larger issue was that the Biafran high command didn’t collectively take that decision.

    Now, you are talking about Biafran high command. What was the Biafran high command? What was it? Ojukwu was everything. Okay, if you read Madiebo, he wrote an addendum by way of foreword in Alabi’s book. I have a copy of it. He did say that even the commander of the Biafran army did not know about Biafran crossing to the Midwest. We were not told. Ojukwu was not telling people about a lot of things. Even where our arms and ammunitions were kept, he didn’t tell anybody. He was always dealing with civilians, sending them abroad to even buy ammunitions of war for us. And if we want to face facts I must say that anybody on sideline outside Biafra could feel free to criticise our own way of handling things. But Isama did also give us credit for having some flashes of genius in the war. He did. And so I cannot fault him entirely.

    What other blunders were also caused by the Biafran high command?

    Good Lord! Again you are talking about Biafran commanders. Be very careful. You got to study Biafra and the way Biafrans were organised in the war before you start asking such questions. For instance, Ojukwu was the commander of the Biafran troops and at the time when Biafran troops entered the Midwest it was Njoku who was the commander. But Njoku was arrested and detained by Ojukwu. He was detained throughout the war. Don’t you know that? So, what is all these about? Biafran hierarchy or whatever, did we have any?

    Ojukwu was everything and that was one of the problems we faced. And eventually what happened? A number of people- Victor Banjo, Emmanuel Ifeajuna, Alali and Agbam, they were shot by firing squad. Don’t you remember all that? Don’t you know? We equally had our own inherent problems. Even Nzeogwu was not involved in the war. He decided, because he was an Igbo man to go and give us support at the Nsukka sector. And he paid with his life. But Ojukwu never involved him in the war, because of petty jealousy. You ought to understand these things. Anyway, this is not to tell us that I hate my people, my dear Igbo people. No. It is to me that I am looking inwards and discussing with you what actually went wrong. Many things went wrong. For instance, the declaration of Biafra took effect at the wrong time. It was wrongly timed. Whereas other military leaders in the West, in the Midwest were cooperating with Gowon, even if you didn’t like Gowon.

    Don’t you remember that Adebayo was the governor of the West and both Awolowo and the western officers were saying that northern troops should leave the West. But eventually they supported Gowon and that didn’t mean they liked Gowon. You play up to someone until your time is ready. But Ojukwu had not much patience. That was not the way to handle it and he did not do it well, anyway. So, you can now deduce from what I am saying whether Alabi was right or wrong in some respects. I have told you that by hindsight, anyone can say anything. In other words, referring to what had happened based on what had happened and the result and that is what happened today.

    In other words, why did we go into the Midwest in the first place? After all, Midwest was actually a buffer area. Midwest was not enemy of Biafra. We had plenty Midwest officers who were Igbo or Ika. Why did we go there in the first place? By that we upset the apple cart as it were. So, it is only Ojukwu who can say that. Ojukwu promised us before he died (may his soul rest in peace) that he would produce the The Book. But he never produced it and died. And so I am not going to write it for him.

    I have written my book, The Fall of Biafra in which I criticised a lot of things. And there are many things I criticised and you know what, Ojukwu held a press conference saying – I am not going to rejoice with Gbulie on the fall of Biafra. He held that press conference in Lagos and until a long time we never saw eye-to-eye. Not because he was not my senior or commander. Oh, he was. For instance, the problem with our people is that we don’t look inwards, we don’t consider issues thoroughly.

    Do you know that Ojukwu was one of the people that aborted the coup of 1966 in which I participated? And he said so in his book Because I am Involved. That was on page 120 or something like that. I was just reading it this morning. Read the book yourself. He aborted the coup. And now get me right. When he was appointed the governor of the East and the Northerners started acting on the killings of January 1966, he started defending Igbo people.

    This was a man who created the impression ipso facto that the coup was an Igbo affair and then he later became a messiah for Ndigbo. That was where the problem lay. Because the people he was defending were being killed in large numbers in the North as a result of the impression that the coup was on Igbo affair.

    What situation gave rise to the issue of saboteurs in the Biafran army then?

    (Laughs) You know why I am laughing? Why I am laughing is that there is what you call the human element. Ojukwu was indeed entitled to his own human element. Ojukwu would say something and he wouldn’t want anybody to argue with him.

    By the way, that does not mean that some Igbo senior officers were not against him. They were. For instance, in the case of the sabotage levelled against Ifeajuna, Agbam and Alali, my thinking was that it must be true. Yes, it must be true.

    Ifeajuna, in my book, supported Banjo. He supported Banjo and the plan was that Banjo would get to Lagos with our own troops, the Biafran troops, overthrow Gowon, take over Nigeria. Then they would send Ifeajuna to the East, to his own Biafra, flush out Ojukwu and then he Ifeajuna would become the governor of the East. That was their plan. And a man called Wale Ademoyega would be made the governor of the West. So it was clear-cut and it was clear Ojukwu knew about this. Do you know that when we were released in March 1967, Ojukwu did so, because we were being held in his domain? He released us, that was after Gowon had taken power. After we were released, Ojukwu was clear-cut that he understood what was happening. He gave us instructions, those of Igbo, that we should go home, spend one week or so, then get ready to come back to join our various units. Thereafter, we were deployed. I was deployed to Nsukka. Now what happened to Ifeajuna and Banjo, who were living with him at the government house here in Enugu?

    That was why when Ifeajuna was told he’d been deployed to Nsukka, he turned him down. It is in my book. Ifeajuna was in government house together with Victor Banjo because before the Nigerian crisis, Ojukwu was the quarter-master-general of the Nigerian army. And Ifeajuna who joined the army later, by then I was an officer-cadet, but Ifeajuna had a university degree. He joined and their total aim was to rule the country. There was no doubting that. Now, if you read Professor Eleagwu’s book titled Gowon, even then Ojukwu was reported to have been planning a coup. That was in 1964. But ours was in 1966.

    Do you know why? As at that time, there was this federal election in which the NCNC refused to take part. And Zik decided not to recognise Abubakar Tafawa Balewa. It is there. Eleagwu is talking sense and you have to read that book. It was Gowon who reported Ojukwu who was able to wriggle out of it.

    If the Biafrans had put their acts together, is it true that they would have won the war instead?

    Just a minute, wait a minute! The same Alabi also said if they had put their acts together in the Nigerian side, they would have won the war in three months. Do you know that Gowon gave us only twenty-four hours within which to win the war? Do you know it was called a police action – that is using only the police to overrun Biafra? That presupposed that the war would not last for more than one month? But what happened? Never you think that some people are weak. You think that some people are weak until the time comes for them to act, to prove themselves.

    But then, you don’t remember the tenacity of people, about the resilience of people, about the indomitable will of the people. You don’t easily conquer people like that. No, you don’t. So, Alabi is entitled to his views but I wish he can come and argue with me.

    Let’s go back to Nzeogwu. You mentioned professional jealousy…

    Oh, no, no. You are talking about jealousy. No, no. you see, he and Ojukwu had only clash of personalities. It wasn’t a question of professional jealousy between the two. That Nzeogwu did the January 1966 coup, he became very popular. He was a revolutionary. Yes, he was indeed. Ojukwu didn’t quite like this. It is in my book titled Nigeria’s Five Majors. We sent captain Udeh to Kano and he was arrested in the Officers’ Mess. Ojukwu was there with him while the coup was going on.

    There’s this belief that Nzeogwu was not actually killed by the federal troops…

    Look, Look! Wait, wait! I want to stop you there because if you ask me I was not there on the spot. But I do know that Nzeogwu would have died earlier. I do know, because I fought at Nsukka sector. He would have died earlier the way he was carrying on. He was having what I would call a maniacal or suicidal bravery. He would put his head and everything into what he was doing. He came to Nsukka on the second day of the war without anybody inviting him. Then, he took over command. Col. Eze was our commander and then Nzeogwu burst into our Zik’s hostels at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Eze was his senior by the way. But Nzeogwu would not know whether you are his senior or not. He would just take over command. He was very dynamic and so he started dishing out orders, including giving orders to the then Major Emma Udeaja, to me and to Eze himself.

    And that was the first issue of sabotage, because before you knew it, that was about 7pm of that day, there was an explosion downstairs. Somebody had exploded a grenade and Nzeogwu quickly dashed downstairs and threw another grenade. Remember in January coup, he threw grenade. He loved throwing grenades but he was a very great man. He was hurt in that grenade. He was a dare-devil, no doubt about it. So he could have died then. As at the time he died, nobody called him. Our headquarters, in fact, was at Opi Junction at the time. He just arrived and decided to go for an operation by himself.

    He went on patrol in the night and he used this armoured car, a monstrosity that had nothing but was called armoured vehicle. So, he paid with his life. They were ambushed by the federal troops. It was the same federal government that announced his death. So, anybody who tells you that Ojukwu killed him or something else is talking rubbish, complete rubbish. Nigeria announced his death and his body was taken to Kaduna, was buried in a cemetery in Kaduna with all military honours. This is indeed the complexity of the Nigerian situation. This was a man who did a coup and you termed it Igbo affair and the same man who organised it, you killed him and then gave him military burial. And you said he was misguided. Who was not misguided?

    The Abagana war sector was said to be the largest gathering of the army…?

    Hah! Which army? Whoever was there to say it was the largest army? Who had the statistics to say so? Where did they get the fact from? What was the strength of the army? It was the second division – second div., under Murtala Muhammed. They tried to cross through the Niger three times but failed. If you read Alabi-Isama, when they tried to cross the Niger, a lot of people died. A lot of people perished. Nigerians perished in the water. A lot of people, over 2000 people, died. So, he sent the troops, those carrying arms, ammunitions, petrol and other things through the main land. And they came in and there was an ambush at Abagana. I don’t want to go into that because I was not there myself. I went to see it but I was not there.

    Many people have claimed credit; that they were the people who did it. That is absolute rubbish because we know those who claimed credit when something good happened to Biafra. But anytime anything went wrong you won’t see them.

    Was it true also that the federal troops kept prisoners of war whereas the Biafran side kept killing their own during the war?

    Who said so? Can you please listen to me? The matter is that most people go with the winner. They never go with the loser. If we lost the war so anybody can concoct stories against us. That is rubbish. This one is not true and could never be. I can name many people killed even after the war by Nigerian troops. One of them was Tim Onwuatuegwu, another was Major Ukpai. Kalu Ezera was also killed. I don’t want to start naming them here now. So what are they saying? They died, they were killed. So, let’s let sleeping dog lie.

    Another issue was the Owerri sector. It became tough that the Federal troops would capture a part and the Biafran troops would regain it. Why was it so for a long time?

    Please, please, you should know that Owerri was strategic in its location. It was very near our airport and the centre of gravity for Biafra. The centre of gravity was the Uli airport. So, the airport was actually a beehive of activities in Biafra. Things were coming into the nation from there.

    We were surrounded by the federal troops, by land and by air. So, the only place that was available was Owerri. Don’t forget Alabi gave us credit for building two airports within the time of the crisis. Is it easy? Yes, there were things that happened as it were and you see the ingenuity of the Igbo man. So it was actually this tenacity of purpose and this indomitable spirit of the Igbo that made them to last so long in the war. Otherwise the war would have been a matter of days and it was over for us.

    Owerri was strategic. Initially it was captured by the 3rd Marine Commando under Col. Benjamin Adekunle. By the way, Adekunle and I met at Sandhurst. He was my senior there. But he was ruthless with his artillery, with his weaponry. He was always known to deploy artillery pieces and fire them all at the same time. He called them his own personal thunder. So, he captured the place, I mean Owerri, but Biafrans took it back because of the strategic nature of the place. It was like Nigeria going to capture Oguta. It was so strategic to us too. It couldn’t happen and we were prepared not to let it happen no matter how long. But eventually what must be must be. It happened when it had to happen. By then our leader had left for Ivory Coast.

    What is your comment on the book, There Was a Country by Chinua Achebe

    All I can tell you is that Chinua was a writer of high standards. He was a raconteur, a prolific story teller of immerse proportion. He was telling a lot of stories. I saw a lot of inaccuracies in some of what he said. I saw a lot of them. Anybody could see them. Alabi pointed them out. For instance, one of the causalities of our war was truth. So, Alabi said it was actually Biafrans who committed a lot of atrocities in Ikot Ekpene and other places in the area. And he was right. We didn’t impose the war on Nigeria, Nigeria imposed the war on Biafra. And we resisted because we wanted to protect lives and property. There were errors in that book but that does not make the book bad. Achebe is not alive today to defend himself.

    You have read My Command by Obasanjo and Isama’s book…

    Yes I have read all…

    Can you compare the two books?

    Listen. Let me answer it straight away. Obasanjo was captain when I was captain in the Nigerian Army. We served together but he was my senior just like he was Alabi’s senior too. We were in the same army engineer. He said he was my commander in his book. No, he was my OC that is Officer-Commander and OC and CO are two different things. But it doesn’t matter. I saw many lies in Obasanjo’s book.

    I saw them with my eyes because I happened to be with Obasanjo in the army. I also happened to be with Alabi in the Nigerian Army. I happened to know what was happening. I was in fact in the vortex of the crisis, for which I was detained by Ironsi from 1966 when the coup took place till 1967 when Ojukwu released us here in Enugu.

    Gowon said Ojukwu had no right to release us. So, he detained us again. So, from 1970 to 1974, I was in prison, languishing behind prison bars. We were eight of us. Alabi is writing on facts. This man called Obasanjo is writing on half-truths. I tell you something that book is full of half-truths and that is it. In the launching of Alabi’s book, Gowon wrote a foreword which though belated is what I believe in. That the government of the day, that is Gowon, appointed Obasanjo the commander of the 3rd Marine Commando.

    There is no disputing the fact. So, at the end of the war, whether Obasanjo was quarrelling with Isama or Akinrinade or with other people, it was not really what mattered. Obasanjo was the one who stood in for the federal government and received the instrument of surrender. That fact has to be made clear at all times. And Gowon put it quite clear for everybody. He had every right to do so because he was the commander, even though he was not there on the spot. Even though Akinrinade had come down before him, he was the commander. The commander was appointed by the head of state.

    And therefore if you want the buck, the buck stops on the table of the commander. Akinrinade came first and then Effiong came into it. Later Obasanjo came and we were called. If you read My Command, he addressed me there as a captain which was the rank I was before the war started. He said that Captain Ben Gbulie was Effiong’s secretary, while Lt. Col. Akinrinade was his, which is ridiculous. Then he pointed out that Akin and Gbulie were course-mates at Sandhurst which is the truth. So, you see there are complexities here and there.

  • Younger artistes  should learn from  my ugly fate –   Nollywood actor Emma Edokpayi  down with amnesia for 13 months

    Younger artistes should learn from my ugly fate – Nollywood actor Emma Edokpayi down with amnesia for 13 months

    The Father’s House, a Pentecostal church in Akute, Ogun State, is a Mecca of sort for the celebrities that live in that community and its environs. Popular actor, Emma Edokpayi, is one of them. He maintains a front seat in the church and his almost completely grey beard and hair stand him out in the congregation.

    On this particular day, the reporter’s attention was drawn by Edokpayi’s animated responses to the preaching of the pastor, Dr. Richard Udoh. Until he ran into a health crisis a few years ago, things were really looking up for Edokpayi as an established cameraman and an A-list actor. He was easily one of the golden boys of the era when cinema was just becoming a culture in Nigeria.

    Until the ‘Benin boy’ began to experience the other side of life, he never thought that life could be cruel. In August 2004, he suffered a stroke while shooting a documentary on an oil field. He was down and out of circulation for years on account of the ugly incident.

    He said: “I came to realise that the stroke affected me not only physically but mentally. It affected my mind. I lost almost every memory. I was brought back to Lagos and I remained in my house. I could not remember my friends. I could not remember any phone number. People came to see me but I could not recall their faces.

    “I was more or less hiding from people. I was just a different person from what I used to be. Before then, if you gave me a script, I didn’t need to spend hours studying it. All I needed to do was to read a line and I would get the whole picture and get ready. I stopped seeing people. I didn’t want anybody to pity me.

    “At the time I had stroke I had N6 million. I told my wife that by the time we finished this money, I would bounce back. By the time it was six months, the money had been exhausted but I was still not okay.”

    At the height of his predicament, he dwelt in self-pity and he became impatient with people. Stringing sentences together became a problem.

    “In an attempt to correct it, I messed up. I was avoiding people. People felt my wife was hiding me, whereas I was the one that did not want to see people, because when people were talking, I would not be able to talk, my contribution would be nonsense. I could not articulate. I could not piece two sentences together so that at the end, everybody would just keep quiet.”

    Since he resumed from the unsolicited sabbatical, he has participated in a film called Alero, but he recalled that it was a painstaking experience. “They knew that everybody had to relax for me. Most of the lines were patched and towards the end, my brain started grabbing things,” he said.

    Edokpayi may not be very active in the entertainment industry right now, but people like Wale Adenuga, the producer of popular TV series, This Life, still recognise his acting dexterity and gave him a role in it.

    It is not as if he does not want to act in movies. The problem, he said, is that he no longer gets invitation from producers. He said: “I don’t really select movies. It is just that I’m not sought after by producers. Maybe I don’t go out or frequent the environment or maybe they don’t know about me. If you don’t know where to find this man, you may not look for him when you have production.

    “It is a question of producer looking for me and fixing me for a role. I’m living more of a quiet life now. But living a quiet life does not mean that I’m not willing to act. It is a question of me going out again. If I’m beginning to circulate, I will find roles.”

    The two-seater cane chair inside his compound is where he spends his time enjoying fresh air and reading the Bible. And he counts himself lucky that he lives in his own house, because many of his colleagues are not that lucky.

    “Most of the people find themselves in the industry of glamour and the glamour takes away from them the consciousness of what they should do. In the industry, you find glamour. Everybody hails and patronises you. If you are not careful or God-fearing, you may not realise that you are losing out in life. You have to build for tomorrow,” he said as a matter of warning to other artistes.

    Of course, he is well positioned to counsel the younger generation of artistes. He was once like some of the wealthy ones among themcomfortable and rich. At a time that many of today’s A-list artistes were still struggling, Edokpayi could boast of more than four state-of-the-art cars like Mercedes Benz Concorde and SUVs. He recalled that at a time as far back as more than a decade ago, he had started earning between N100,000 and N300,000 per week.

    “When the money comes, you want to go high to the top. You go partying and drinking. And because it is a thing of glamour, you want people to see you at your best, even when it is not the best of times for you. You always want to show yourself in the best form and mood so that people would not see you as not living quality life.

    “Most times, even the little money we made, instead of using it to build the future for ourselves, we use the money to live in glamour. Even the business itself is glamour. You drive in the best car, you live in the best house that is not yours and in the end, if you go to the innermost recesses of people who live this kind of life, you will see that they are just doing window showing of themselves.

    “At a time, I was at my peak and suddenly it crumbled. Events will overtake you and you begin to see that you are not the kind of hot kid you used to be. You find that the flow is not there and you had not prepared anything for yourself. You had not built anything that will sustain you. So, you begin to die. I’m not saying clinical death, I mean spiritually.”

    Edokpai said the house he lives in today was built in error, as he never wanted it. But he is full of thanks to a good friend he said “cajoled” him to build it because he never saw himself as one that would live in the backwaters of Lagos. But that is where fate has put him and he is thanking his star for making the right choice of friend.

    “I lived like many of the present crop of artistes. The luck I had was a very wonderful friend named Dayo Ojo. He was working at Mobil at that time. He used to tell me: ‘Emma, go and buy a land. But I was always looking at land as a problem,” he said.

    He said it was even his friend that made money available to buy the land. The land, valued at about N10 million today, was bought for about N550, 000. He said he did not want to have anything to do with the house until the reality of life forced him to live where he would not have lived.

    He said: “When you are blindfolded by glamour and the worldly pleasures that accompany stardom, a life of idolism or idolatory, it takes you away from reality, which is the path to God, the road that leads you to everlasting peace. Before I knew it, he said ‘old boy, come and stay in the house.’ Before I knew it, I bought a 35KV generator. I did suspended borehole. Everything was in the house, but I still didn’t want to come to the house.”

    After his experience, Edokpayi now speaks like a preacher. And he believes that although he can no longer carry the camera the way he used to do, this is the time he is more useful to the society because he can teach drama and language as a graduate of English and Literary Studies.

    In his neighbourhood in Akute, he is known as both an artiste and a pastor. As he was seeing the reporter off, a commercial motorcycle operator stopped and offered to take him to wherever he was going. That, he noted, was a testimony to the benefits he enjoys. But he says he would feel more fulfilled if he is able to help others too.

    Explaining his seemingly deep knowledge of the Bible, he says it did not just start today. He was brought up by strictly religious parents, especially his mother. Fortunately or unfortunately for him, his mind was tilted towards the theatre. He said although he was not leading his class as a student, he was one of the best.

    “My mother would send me to the market to go and buy something. On the way, I would watch Ajasco. Those things attracted me. At the time I told them that I wanted to do drama, they asked me if it was a job, because nobody saw drama as a job then,” he recalled.

    He said he embraced Christianity because his mother was a fervent Christian. He was taught bible stories and he still knows them very well, and that is why it is convenient for him to preach. “Even when I was following women, drinking and walking round the town, I knew all these but did not realise that all they were being controlled by the Spirit of God,” he said.

    Twice he gave his cars out because God instructed him to do so. The first was a Mercedes 230 he gave to a pastor who had just got married. “God told me to give it to the pastor. He was not my friend. God told me to give it to him but I did as if I didn’t hear. I refused to give the car to the man. But my ear was pricking me until I gave the car,” he said.

    The second car, he said, was a Pathfinder. “I drove to church in a Pathfinder and went home in a taxi. Since then, I have been here, no car. They were contributing money to the church and I had no money to give, so I gave that car.”

    Right now, jazzing up Christian drama is uppermost in his mind as he plans to replicate what he is doing in the church outside of it. “I foresee an explosion of this type of production,” he said with confidence.

    Since the stroke he suffered had led to amnesia, he enrolled for a leadership course at Daystar Church in order to regain lost memory. “In the school, everybody knew me. They would see me and say good morning sir. I would sit at the back. I could not write, so I would sit and listen. And immediately I left there, I would not remember anyone.

    “But I kept going to school. I was changing the cognitive intake. My brain was now trying to take in things. I was not talking to anybody. The lecturer would think I was hearing well.”

    The fighter that he is, he drove himself to school while a part of his body was still paralysed. Explaining why he had to do so, he said: “I had a driver but he left suddenly. I entered my car and everybody started shouting. I normally left home at 5 am, because if you came late thrice, you might not graduate. When my driver did not come, I entered my car and drove to Daystar. I also drove back home and the second day, I drove too. That was how I started driving. The amnesia lasted one year and one month”.

    He is still passionate about a project he started with the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC). But he doubts if he would be able to make the dream come true because “the people who were working with me at that time messed a lot of things up”.

  • Jonathan has  been ambushed by  non-politicians – Mantu

    Jonathan has been ambushed by non-politicians – Mantu

    Senator Nasiru Ibrahim Mantu was Deputy Senate President from 2003 to 2007. He was Director-General, defunct National Republican Convention Presidential Campaign, 1993; National Chairman of the defunct Peoples Democratic Alliance and National Publicity Secretary, defunct United Nigerian Congress Party, UNCP. He was also Chairman, National Assembly Committee on Constitution Review. Senator Mantu, in this interview with Assistant Editor, LINUS OBOGO, went down memory lane on his alleged role in former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s botched third term project and expressed his views on President Goodluck Jonathan, among other issues. Excerpts:

    One of the harshest criticisms today against your party, the PDP, is that it is heading a government that has elevated corruption to an art and as a cardinal principle of governance. Just like insecurity, is it not also a serious challenge to governance?

    My friend, please say it louder. Indeed, let me say that it is corruption that has given birth to the insecurity in the country today. If we had not been corrupt, we would have been able to manage our resources very well, and in turn, provide social security to the nation’s teeming populace. It is this absence of social insecurity that has consequently given rise to the various agitations across the country.

    Corruption, like you rightly stated, has been the foundation of all our problems. If we are able to fight corruption, and I can tell you that even if we are not able to solve all problems immediately, we will no longer have the kind of crisis that we are having today. If we sincerely and judiciously channel all our money that is being cornered by corrupt political officials, we will be able to have good roads, hospitals, schools, electricity and potable water as well as put in place social security for our people and make life worth living.

    Sincerely speaking, anyone who is enjoying good life will not like to die. It is the absence of good life that is pushing the people to the wall to act the way they are acting. Corruption is the basis of everything that is happening to us today. No government has been able to successfully fight corruption to a standstill. It is only in Nigeria that when you are fighting corruption, corruption fights back. In fact, they have just been scratching the surface and paying lip-service to the war on corruption.

    There is no denying the truth that today, every facet of our society is corrupt. From the judiciary to the executive and the legislature, corruption is pervasive. People have lost faith in the judiciary because of corruption. Why will you run to the judiciary when you know that the man whom you are taking to court will engage a SAN who is going to be given certain privileges by the judge simply because he is a SAN? The entire country is engulfed in various dimensions of corruption. It is so endemic in our system and I am of the opinion that we have not really got our act together to fight corruption.

    The All Progressives Congress (APC), an amalgam of four opposition parties, has finally become a reality after the initial confusion that threatened its registration. With your party, the PDP, literally becoming a “Fuji House of Commotion”, how much threat does APC pose ahead of 2015?

    For someone like me who has been around the political terrain for over three decades, I hope and pray that the emergence of the APC or the merger itself becomes a reality after all. I have witnessed three failed mergers in this country, and I pray earnestly that this latest merger does not go the way of others before it.

    Recall that in the First Republic, the opposition came together to wrest power from the NPC which was the ruling party then, but when the time came to choose their candidate for the prime ministerial position, everybody wanted to be the candidate. When they could not agree on a consensus choice, the merger crumbled like a pack of cards.

    The same scenario played out again in the Second Republic, and what appeared then like a foregone conclusion failed woefully. So, this time around, I am praying for them to succeed so that we can have a formidable opposition party as an alternative to the ruling party. I feel strongly that Nigerians need an alternative party to put the PDP on its toes.

    The emergence of a viable alternative party will nudge the party in power from its slumber. That is the culture all over the world, and Nigeria cannot be an exception. Nigerians will have a well informed choice, if there is a credible and viable opposition party in the country.

    But the only way an opposition party can be successful is to put national interest above personal and narrow interest. But I hope and pray that this time around, the merger arrangement works. Nigerians need an alternative party, especially when they are tired of the PDP.

    Would you also subscribe to an alternative to President Goodluck Jonathan in 2015, as Nigerians are tired of what they consider as his leadership failure, nearly three years in the saddle?

    I want to answer your question by saying that Jonathan’s presidency is divinely ordained. Today, nobody can say with all sense of conviction that he was responsible for bringing President Jonathan to power. Only God can take that glory. Power is from God and not from man. If it was not the will of God, nothing any man or woman would have done to install Jonathan as President.

    Frankly speaking, as I said before, Jonathan is a good man and he has a good heart. But people are taking advantage of his good nature by not carrying out some of the fantastic programmes he has laid down for implementation as he would have had them executed.

    Part of the problem I have identified in the system is the fact that Jonathan is surrounded by ministers and aides who are not politicians. A lot of people are of the wrong notion that it is only when you go and bring those in the Diaspora in the name of technocrat to form your cabinet that your government can succeed. If I were an engineer and I have been practising in Nigeria, does that not qualify me as a technocrat? And if I were a lawyer and I have been practising in Nigeria all through the years, am I not a technocrat? Does the fact that you have been holed up in America or one European country confer on you technocracy? My answer is no. An economist in Nigeria and an economist in Britain are economists. The two are economists.

    These are some of the problems that Jonathan is actually facing because he is surrounded by people who are not politicians and do not know how Nigerians live and survive beyond Abuja. The greatest problem of Jonathan is that he is surrounded by people who are supposed to implement his policies and programmes, but who are not doing that because they are not politicians. I really do not have any problem in bringing experts into the government, but they can be brought in as advisers. You will agree with me that not many of his ministers or advisers went out with him during his campaign for his presidency. So they may not be bothered whether he wins the next election or not because they are not politicians in the real sense of the word. Many of them do not seem to appreciate the fact that they owe the electorate an obligation to deliver on the President’s promises. But if these people were like politicians, they would know what it means by making promises to the people and not fulfilling them. As election is drawing nearer. I think the President must have learnt his lessons, and I am sure he is going to address some of these issues because we still need him.

    Some of your staunch critics who think they have watched keenly your brand of politics tend to pass you off as one they jocularly would refer to as “Any Available Government in Power” or “Any Government in Power”. They cite your alleged role in the adoption of the late General Sani Abacha for the presidency and former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s botched third term, among others. While the label of “AGIP” may be untrue, would you be available for President Jonathan, should he need you as one of his foot soldiers in 2015?

    Let me say that the greatest perpetrators of ignorance in this country today are the media. The media are expected to be better informed than any other segment of the society. It is only in Nigeria that the media will write anything and go scot-free. It does not happen anywhere else except in Nigeria.

    Some media have accused me of going to Ota to lobby Obasanjo to contest election in 1999. It is not true. I was never in the PDP, rather I was in the ANPP where I contested for the Senate and won. So how would I have been part of the lobby group to bring Obasanjo to contest election in 1999? In 1999, we had our own presidential candidate. Therefore, there was no way I would have canvassed for Obasanjo or anyone in the PDP for the presidency.

    With regards to the alleged third term bid, I will come to that presently. But of note is, when have I ever been in government in appointive or elective position in this country in my 35 years in politics? I have only been in government for once from 1999 to 2007 in an elective capacity. So, how many governments have I actually participated in to deserve the label, “AGIP”? I am asking you. If I were like my friend who has served so many different military and civilian regimes and is still serving, I would not take offence at the appellation.

    My only presence in government has been the legislature which is elective and not appointive. Now you can understand that I have been in government only with the mandate of my people. Throughout my political career, I have never been appointed into government.

    During the time of the late Sani Abacha, I remember forming my own party, the Peoples Democratic Alliance, PDA. Later we merged and became the Nigeria Centre Party( NCP). After the merger, I was elected as the National Deputy Chairman of the NCP. Three days later, I told them thank you and left the party. The NCP was not formed by Abacha. It was an amalgamation of 23 political parties.

    So if you are following someone’s track record, you should follow him correctly in order to analyse him in correct perspective. That is what I expect of the media. For instance, if you had not come to interview me, you would have viewed me as “AGIP “. If you had not come here to interview me today, you would never have got my own side of the story.

    I have been in politics since the First Republic. This was when Abacha had not dreamed of becoming the head of state. Even when he became the head of state, I was not a member of his regime. I have always followed my path as a politician, seeking elective office. I won an election as a senator during Abacha’s regime. In 1990, I also won an election as senator. I have never been minister or commissioner throughout my political career. I have always done it the hard way, contesting and winning elections so that I can open my mouth as wide as I want and talk on behalf of the people who offer me their mandate. I prefer to toe that path.

    Now, on the issue of me going to Ota, the only time I went to Ota to ask Obasanjo to contest was during his second term bid. Again, this is one area that Nigerians have got it wrong and I blame the media in particular. In case you have forgotten, I was the Chairman of the National Assembly Joint Committee on the Constitution Review. In case you may have also forgotten, I took over that assignment from somebody. I was not the pioneer Chairman, may be people thought I assumed that position because of my perceived relationship with Obasanjo at that time.

    Nigerians are quick to forget that in the entire National Assembly, nobody attacked Obasanjo the way I did. When I was Chairman of the Senate Committee on Information, Obasanjo was my breakfast, my lunch and my dinner because I was always attacking him. My attack on Obasanjo was so fierce that former President Nelson Mandela was in this house to beg me to soften my attack on Obasanjo who was his friend. As if that was not enough, former President Jimmy Carter personally invited me to Hilton for a dinner with him where he pleaded with me to reduce my attack on his friend, Obasanjo.

    When I was attacking him, nobody was clapping for me. No one remembers that. It is only when it comes to the issue of the third term that people are quick to remember. I became close to Obasanjo after I was elected Deputy President of the Senate. My election as Deputy Senate President was based on the fact that the National Assembly wanted somebody who was anti-Obasanjo. They wanted someone who hated Obasanjo with passion. To a very large extent, my perceived hatred for Obasanjo became part of my qualification for the Deputy Senate presidency. Owing to my position as Deputy Senate President, we were meeting with the executive weekly and that was the closest I came in contact with Obasanjo. For the first six months of our closeness during those sessions with the executive, both of us maintained our hostility to each other. But after a while, he came to appreciate the fact that I was criticising him objectively and not out of hate. One day, he called me and said to me that we should reconcile our differences. Nobody initiated it. It was Obasanjo’s own idea. He told me that even if I did not agree with his ideas or policies, it was good that I respected his age and office, and I agreed with him.

    As Deputy Senate President, I was also the Chairman of the National Assembly Joint Committee on the review of the constitution. My duty was to collate the views of Nigerians on the clauses of the constitution we wanted to amend. The Speaker of the House of Representatives was my deputy.

    The clauses we wanted to amend were based on the views expressed by Nigerians regarding them. By this time, people refused to differentiate my relationship with Obasanjo and my role as Chairman of the Constitution Review Committee. There were those who felt that Obasanjo must have appointed me. But Obasanjo had no power over appointment in the Senate or the entire National Assembly.

    After collating the views of Nigerians, one of the committees headed by Senator Ham Batsa came back with a report to the effect that some Nigerians were of the position that instead of two terms of four years, we should have three terms of four years in the constitution. According to them, Nigeria was on the same economic pedestal with China, India, Singapore and Malaysia. And since these countries have leaders who have stayed so long in office, much longer than Nigeria’s, they have been able to make tremendous progress, while we remained where we were. They felt that we should give more time to our presidents to be long in office in order to fast-track our developmental strides.

    We conceded to them as Nigerians to hold and express their views. There was nothing wrong with that. So we included that aspect under “Tenure Elongation” clause. After collating all the reports from the various sub-committees, I presented a report to the Senate, and it was accepted. From the moment my report was accepted, I had finished my job. The document presented became that of the National Assembly.

    When I had concluded my assignment, many people felt that I was actually behind Obasanjo’s third term ambition. I have said this time and time again and for the umpteenth time, I will love that this be presented factually. Obasanjo did not tell Ibrahim Mantu that he wanted to continue in office. But in the course of my job as the Chairman of the National Assembly Constitution Review Committee, I received a report from one of the sub-committees on tenure elongation which I presented to the National Assembly public hearing. The assignment of my committee was to collate views of Nigerians, whether bitter or sweet. I was just a mere umpire or referee. And as a referee, if you scored or committed a foul, I blew the whistle. But my assignment terminated the first day I collated all the views of Nigerians and submitted same to the National Assembly.

    The issue was that some people did not want Obasanjo to elongate his tenure, and so they started using the press. But in a democracy, no one has the right to deny another from expressing his own views. That is why I still describe the third term issue as a mere storm in a teacup. It was amplified by people who were more interested in going to Aso Rock than Obasanjo. People who were burning with the desire to occupy Aso Rock and at the end, they made us to throw away the baby with the bath water. One of our recommendations was to have two vice-presidents, one from where the president hails and another from the vice-president’s zone. The thinking was that if the president dies, the vice-president from the president’s zone will be sworn in as his replacement to complete his term.

    What was wrong in anybody saying he wanted Obasanjo to continue? Even after saying that, was that enough to have made Obasanjo to continue after his second term? If Obasanjo wanted a third term and he subjected himself to the due process of the constitution, what was wrong with that? As long as anybody subjects himself to the constitution to seek for what he or she wants, as far as I am concerned, I have no axe to grind with that person.

  • Power reform is on course – Dagogo-Jack

    Power reform is on course – Dagogo-Jack

    Reynolds Dagogo-Jack is the Chairman, Presidential Task Force on Power as well as member of the Presidential Action Committee on Power. He spoke with Steve Osuji in Lagos recently shortly after the federal government divested control of major unbundled electricity generating companies. Excerpts:

    If there is any timeline to the power sector reform programme (PSR) you must know about it; please can you tell us where we are right now?

    The power sector reform programme was started by President Goodluck Jonathan in June, 2010 to that extent it is about three years old. The focus of the PSR is market reform, change of the current ownership, attracting new investment in generation into the market, expanding the transmission capacity to increase the ability to wheel more power and then transfer of the distribution companies to private sector to reduce losses, to increase efficiency, to increase metering penetration. Now it’s all these efforts that will combine to produce electricity. So pretty much we have been focusing on the electricity supply profile more than we should be focusing on the critical steps that must be taken so that the market reform will be concluded. Where we are now is that the market reform has come to an advanced stage. As at end of July, the last remaining assets – the generating company at Afam and the distributing company in Kaduna – the preferred bidders were announced and soon the National Council on Privatisation will declare whether these bidders have succeeded and will be given the offer to buy. So to that extent, in the sense of the elements that will drive us to a sustainable electricity market, a lot of work has been done.

    But it just so happens that Nigerians want to measure the progress on the number of hours that we have and the quantum of power that they have which will come when the structural changes take root. So we have two challenges, first is to change the market, bring in private sector players. That of course takes some time to deliver. As we all know, just getting labour to come with us so that they will play their own role till new owners come has been one long round of negotiations, but until the new owners come, the expected efficiency will not come, until the efficiency comes, the supply cannot ramp up. Therefore, structural change of the market is more critical than power output because one leads to the other. But because we know that Nigerians will not appreciate it if we say we are doing a structural change and power is dropping everyday government has deployed resources to keep supply at the level we met it if we cannot add more but not to allow it to drop. That is what we call the service delivery leg of the reform. That is working but that has more challenges than the structural changes because that one requires people to continue to be as committed even knowing that there is a change of ownership. That one requires funding the sector even when you have sold some of these utilities. So that is slightly more difficult to manage but in the transition window, we are doing our best to make sure that we achieve a balance between changing the market and also sustaining the service level.

    You are saying in effect that we are at the crossing over point of the transition. So how soon are we going to begin to reap results?

    The truth of the matter is that until you have moved the ownership and the management of the sector into the private hands and until the private people have configured their business agenda, created the additional capital that they need to recover the lost capacities in our grid, changed manpower, retooled ICT, start to do those businesses the way private people do business instead of government, those things cannot be catapulted; there is so much speed you can run in that space.

    But is it left solely at their whims, are there not some timelines no matter how loose?

    Yes but let us look at it this way, you have sold them the assets. You cannot reprobate and approbate as the lawyers say. You can’t sell them an asset and the set a timeline for them as if it is not theirs. No. Remember they are profit driven people, they know the cost of these facilities, you don’t have to go and wake them up in the night to do their reform and their readjustment and reorganisation. It’s something that you should presume that it will happen. They borrowed money, the banks are on their back, you don’t need government to tell them to give us light tomorrow; light now becomes cash to them. Electricity supply is now their cash flow, you don’t need to teach a businessman how to make money. They are faced with a situation of no electricity, no cash; this is what we have been trying to communicate to the people for some time now. It is a step-wise thing, we move from one step of progress to another so we need people to understand that it can’t happen overnight, we need people to understand that we can’t take our eyes off the ball, we have to move in one direction no matter how slow that may seem but we have to move forward one step at a time.

    I still think my point stands, I understand your explanation but this a strategic asset, there still must be some oversight, there must be a perspective on all these and I am saying that all these taken together, six months down the road, we expect so and so hours or quality of power supply in so and so areas of the country…?

    I get you and I also think that Nigerians are very knowledgeable people, very knowledgeable. Such times when you want to hold down to a projection, it’s always good to caution yourself; sometimes it’s good to use benchmarks which will tell you whether you can approximate to it. This is because if you ask the people who did the telecoms reform to give any kind of projection as to where Nigerians will be in terms of teledensity, access to telephone, what they delivered and what they could have projected are miles apart. But you see a lot of pressure from Nigerians to kind of lock in a particular prediction whereas it is not scientific because to predict a market, you can only do so knowing the fundamentals. Yes our fundamentals are right; we are 167 million people and we need light and there is a market waiting to be tapped; we have capacity to pay and pay even more as we have seen in the telecoms sector in a relative sense as many have two or three handsets. So ability to pay is not the problem, availability of the population is not the problem as there are 23 to 24 million households in Nigeria. So, the demand is there. So are you saying that you will set the right platform for the private sector and the right tariff and the private sector will not cash in on it? So let us be faithful on the things we know which is to allow the private sector to take leadership here. By what you are asking, you are still trying to bring government into the mix. You need to support us to take government out then we go to the next step.

    Labour matter is a major challenge. What is the situation right now?

    Labour union has played a very critical role in the PSR. As most people know, we have reached the point when payment will start and as soon as that happens, the process of concluding this whole transaction will be pretty much assured. We believe that from the recent press release from the Honourable Minister’s office and from all the signals we have had from the Ministry of Power, payment will start very soon and that will be a major milestone and hurdle that we would have crossed. Let me also say that in terms of the cost of privatisation as relates to labour settlements, Nigeria is about to record one of the highest levels of financial settlement packages in order to reform power and move forward, but it’s a price the president is willing to pay because he clearly understands that there is no price you can place on darkness.

    What are the figures?

    It’s in the works, the Ministry has the accurate figures and it is better we get it from them but it’s slightly under N400 billion.

    What is the gas situation now, we know that has always been a problem, is that problem solved now?

    Okay, gas is a fuel for the generating plants just like all other elements in the value chain. They are moving targets. As we speak, molecules are being explored by the oil companies, pipelines are being built by the Nigerian Gas Company. So, every new capacity that is being added by way of molecules or pipelines increases availability of gas to the power plants. But to address your point, the truth is that in the past, the relationship between the gas owner and the generating plants was not contractual, it was what we call best endeavour. It was vertically integrated, government owns everything, if you are able to bring, bring, if you are not able to bring, don’t bring. We are moving away from all that. Part of this reform is that there will be a contractual relationship between the owner of the gas and the owner of the thermal plant. Such contractual relationship will be the basis for investment in gas; the basis for paying for gas that has been delivered without anyone saying that it is the government that owns them both. All of that is tightening up the system for efficiency. So, if the oil companies know that there is a contract, they know too well what a contract means. So, all of that are being put together and contracts are being signed as we speak.

    Apart from gas, are we exploring other fuel options?

    Yes, Nigeria is blessed with fuel sources but each source has a technology relationship and each fuel and technology matrix comes with construction time constraints. For instance, water, a typical medium to large hydro plant will require not less than six years before you have electricity, whereas a thermal plant, effectively delivered by a good project team will take about two and half years to realise. Of course, we could export coal if we want because we have a huge deposit of coal, but to convert coal to electricity will take a minimum of five years to realise. There has been a little bit of oversimplification of what is required to have electricity. Though there are other shorter sources, the renewable like sun which is technology-heavy. So, the cost of that is way higher than gas, way higher than coal and way higher than hydro, but again with improving technology, the prices are depressing. So we are looking at it. We have a lot of sun in the north and even in some places down south. Wind is another source of energy. We have a lot of wind and our wind map is very strong with potentials for wind turbines. So, all this will kick in when you see that the private sector has taken over the space. Even they will know well not to put their investments in one source but all this have to be market decisions. And because of our fundamentals which include heavy demand, and mark you, the population I told you is just home consumption, we have not factored in industrial needs large and small. At the end of the day, even the industries that relocated to Ghana will return because in Ghana you produce and bring it to Nigeria to sell, so why don’t you produce where you have the market. So, we expect an explosion of a dimension that we cannot quite stay here and project; it has to be methodical.

    Talking about Ghana, how come they seem to have gotten there power right over these years while we lag?

    No, that is not quite correct. Ghana is about 20 million people; it is about one fifth of Nigeria in land area. So, their transmission cost is almost zero compared to Nigeria’s. To transport power from Port Harcourt, for instance, to Yola, you know what that means. And after all the money you must have spent, it gets to Yola at half current so we are not in the same league. We supply them gas to fire their turbines. Ghana currently produces fewer than 2000 megawatts. When it produces up to 2500 megawatts the whole country will have power for 24 hours uninterrupted but we are on 4000 and we haven’t started.

    So are there any more challenges to realising the complete reform of the sector in the next two years?

    Yes some of the major issues which we need to keep our eyes on and close-mark in order for us to totally realise the power reform agenda include gas, which you raised earlier. But we are talking about gas disruption through vandalism, some people have argued that there can be some sinister motives to frustrate our progress or whatever their motives might be, so you see gas lines breached for no reason because we know that it is the tapping of crude oil and condensate pipes that we knew but now they are bombing gas lines. You can’t even take the gas, so again we are worried as the rate is growing. If we continue to have that challenge, there will be no gas to fire the plants and we can’t get the electricity we are designing; people are right now building massive generation plants in the hope of using this gas. So, vandalism is a major concern. As we do our utmost best, we also appeal to Nigerians to show some sense of patriotism and respect and safeguard our national assets for the good of us all.

    The Second challenge is labour. We need to close out on labour issues. We need the whole Nigerians to impress it on labour that it cannot get a better deal than we are offering them. Besides, after all this money is paid, the people will not go to China to pick the workers for these plants, most of them will come back the next day to continue work because there are no other people to do this work apart from them. Only those who have reached retirement age or those who think they can venture out with the money in their hands may opt out. Every other worker who decides to roll over has a good chance to roll over. So the earlier they put the issue of severance behind them, the better for everybody.

    The third challenge is transmission. As we work on generation, we must put transmission in view because it is the only aspect of the three segments that government is still holding as an asset for reasons of national security and issues of skill. We are doing that through the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN). So, there need to be conscious investments in this area in the short, medium and long terms.

    Are you saying transmission cannot be privatised?

    There is nothing that cannot be privatised but national grids in most countries are not privatised but can be concessional. But what we did is to bring in a management contractor, Manitoba, to manage it but the typical thing is to concession.

    The other challenge is distribution losses. The distribution companies are the ones yielding the money, they are the customer interface. It is the distribution company that puts meter in your house and comes to bill you so we have to ramp up efficiency in that area. Currently, because they are government companies, the losses are very high; we have to bring them down. When the losses come down, the tariff comes down and the customer is protected from increases in tariffs. When the new distribution companies take over, they then begin to deploy the tools for bringing down the losses including metering; there are still a lot of people who are not metered. We have to spend money to even bring the losses down. So I am telling you those areas we have to be efficient in so that this light that you and I want so badly will materialise. As you know, Nigerians are just interested in light, light, light –

    About time too –

    But it is also important to know how the light will come. It is like someone saying he must go to Lagos but he doesn’t have any idea where Lagos is or how to get there. There is also the challenge of serious technical gaps. PHCN for 20 years has not employed yet we want to grow our current capacity from 4000 megawatts to 20,000 megawatts. So that is a ratio of five. These megawatts we are talking about are equipment which will be manned by human beings. So, we have a huge skills gap. What that means is that labour ought to be working as one with us because if they understand where we are going, they would know that this place will explode and they are the ones to reap the immense benefits of filling the skills gap, they will be the ones to be given crash training programmes to take new vantage positions.

    Finally is the regulatory concern. This market can only work through strong regulation. We have NERC (National Electricity Regulatory Commission) in place. It is well constituted and has very capable people. So constantly, we have to keep looking out for areas where we will continue to make adjustments in the process so that both the customer and the investor are happy. These are basically the core issues we have our eyes on in order to wrap up the PSR.

    Let me drag you into a bit of politics. By virtue of the fact that you are from Rivers State and also by virtue of the fact of your position, what is your take on the crisis in Rivers State?

    Yes, being an indigene and a stakeholder who is impacted by what is going on, if you ask my honest opinion, what is going on is pathetic. But the more you look at it, you see in it, a deliberate agenda by the opposition, if you ask me, to distract the Goodluck Jonathan administration. It seems like a carefully orchestrated agenda to make sure that the president takes his eyes off governance because it is only governance that will yield the concrete milestones upon which the 2015 narrative will be engaged. We can’t go into 2015 in Nigeria talking about tribes or talking about zones. In 2015 we are talking about deliverables, what did you drop on the table while you are there? And that people know that the narrative of Nigeria is changing from tribe and region to performance, so if they can take his eyes off performance, when we get to 2015, the only thing that will be on the table is tribes and regions. This is the agenda of the opposition. Now what is upsetting people like us is that why should the people allow the opposition to define an agenda like that and suck them into the vortex of it.

    But the president doesn’t have to be distracted, he doesn’t have to be concerned about the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF) for instance, he has his duties well cut out for him in bundles?

    You are right but do you know that when somebody thinks that his strategy will work, he doesn’t care if the strategy is actually working or not, he just works at it. But the strategy is obviously not working. The president is an administrator, he has line managers, some of the best, in finance, in agriculture, in trade and commerce. Look at the ministers there, they are top-ranked people, they are doing their job and they are delivering for the president. But because these other people’s interest is in the president and the presidency, so they come up with all this agenda, thinking that they are distracting the president but it is not working because they have to be distracting the whole executives; they have to stop them from working. But people are working 24/7. So, when it comes to 2015 will they realise that their strategy is not working. And you know most of these things people are saying it doesn’t come from the president, you know how it works.

    In Rivers State, it is clearly a case of – both the people who grandfathered the governor and those that he appointed into his own cabinet are talking in different tones with him – is that the work of the president? The people who made him who he is in politics and the people he made are in the same room saying something different from what he is saying, was it the president that sent them? So, for me it’s a dysfunctional setting and it is unfortunate because it is the state’s resources that are suffering, it is the focus that should have been put in Rivers State that is being expended in Abuja, in other places and sometimes abroad. It is a loss of focus; it’s a loss, loss for us. We tackle somebody we shouldn’t tackle because we are thinking of politics, then you use all the energy you should have used to do your work to do something else and everybody loses, that is not on.

    There are a lot of issues and we can debate it from now till tomorrow, so let’s look at resolution. How can the Rivers crisis be resolved?

    To be honest with you, if the activities in Rivers State are a part of a grand opposition strategy, it will go on in one form or the other because it is an opposition strategy. But if it is as a result of a misunderstanding within a political family, it can be resolved, it is not too complex to resolve.But if it is a grand opposition agenda to needle the president and make him lose attention and focus until it is time for the next election, then it is an opposition strategy and you cannot tell the opposition not to play their game now. So, until we decode exactly what the problem is, to design a solution around it will be a nullity.

    You see a lot of people are giving different dimensions to this problem, there is a programming of public opinion to talk about David and Goliath; there is a programming of public opinion to make it seem like a big man is trying to crush a small man which is all not true.

    Which is why I ask again, can’t this small man be ignored?

    No, the small man cannot be ignored if being in this position gives him visibility, relevance, importance, national narratives, drama – these are the values that are being played out. There has never been a debate as to take Nigerians to the next level in any of the areas of our national endeavour, it’s who should be governor-general and all that; that is all we have down there now.

  • Biafra did not surrender – Achuzia

    Biafra did not surrender – Achuzia

    Col. Joe Achuzia was one of the major figures that held Biafra together while the Nigerian Civil war lasted. He commanded almost all the major sectors in the Biafran Army and also ensured that discipline was enforced throughout the duration of the war. Before the war ended, he was in charge of operations in the whole enclave called Biafra. This position made it possible for him to begin the necessary overtures to end the war. While Ojukwu was away, he took over control of the forces and then made the appropriate contacts to bring the war to an end. In this interview with Edozie Udeze, he debunks some of the claims made by Gen. Alabi Isama and Gen. Alani Akinrinade in their recent interviews.

    Gen. Alabi Isama in his latest book on the war alleged that Mid-western officers were alienated. Is it really true that as the Commander-in-Chief of the Biafran Armed Forces, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, did not trust some of the Midwestern Igbo officers while the war lasted?

    It is not true. Why I say it is not true is that for Biafra to have lasted so long, it was as a result of the efforts of the Mid-western officers. This was because Biafra was really being hard pushed until the mid-west operation began.

    And the Midwest officers that were supposed to go across, Alabi-Isama was one of them. Even then my own journey into the mid west when Banjo crossed into Mid west, Alabi too was one of those that I contacted. But somewhere along the line, after our meeting, after we gave him some instructions to follow across, Alabi defected. And he didn’t come back. So, for him to say that Ojukwu didn’t like some Mid west officers couldn’t be true. This was so because it was the Mid-west officers, all the way to the lower ranks, that really held Murtala from crossing over the bridge thereby entering Biafra.

    This was when Murtala started his so-called operation to cross the Niger. It was mid western officers who fought and sustained the momentum. These were the 52 and 57 brigades that are also manned by the Mid west officers. It is unfortunate that many people from hindsight now after over 40 years of the war are writing books on the war. This is an after-thought after having read over other people’s works on the war, reading newspaper comments and other people’s statements and interviewing people. Now, they have got themselves in the position as being authority on the war.

    I wouldn’t take Alabi’s document as a serious one. The only aspect of his statement that really deserves comment and which shows his inability to appreciate the war situation and reporting it as it were, was his reporting what did not happen in his presence. He talked about the end of the war, mentioning the participants. He is not in the position to say what he said about the end of the war. He wasn’t there.

    The first person who was there was General Alani Akinrinade. Also Tomoye. Then Tomoye was not a substantive colonel. The command that reached Orlu was Tomoye’s command. And it was Tomoye’s officer that my men and in a night operation and captured them that made it possible for me to take the step I took by declaring that everybody should lay down their arms. Then I said we could be announcing it until I was able to bring Akinrinade into my headquarters. The narrative by Alabi shows ignorance of what happened that day. That’s what I can say about that. The only person that many a time I look at and say let sleeping dogs lie is General Akinrinade. This was because of his behaviour from the moment we met was officer-like.

    And he conducted himself in a way that endeared him to me that up till date, we are still friends. Alabi, however, was right in one thing that the war had already ended before General Obasanjo came into the picture. And he came on the scene after I allowed General Akinrinade to make a call to him. And he told him that if he didn’t come, he might stand to lose his officers who were under my control then. When Akinrinade came, he came with only a few soldiers. We met at Orlu, I didn’t go to Owerri to look for any of them.

    Now, we told Tomoye to phone him because Tomoye stood to lose all his officers and in Brigade they ventured into our territory near Orlu.

    We assured Tomoye that we had already started to take steps to bring the war to an end. His officers that were collected were already deposited near my office in Igbo-ukwu. As a result, it wasn’t proper for me to claim that I went to Owerri looking for who to surrender to. Surrender who or what to who? After all, it was in my house while discussing with Akinrinade that we decided that in that instance we were bringing the war to an end. There was indeed no winner, no vanquished. The war had deteriorated into a state of stalemate, whereby we were trading one bullet for another.

    By this time our men were crisis-crossing the war front because both the Nigerian soldiers and our soldiers were tired of the whole thing; the whole episode.

    Could you please elaborate more on the last days of the war?

    Let me also elaborate more on the events of the last days…

    I read in the internet Akinrinade’s rejoinder. So I asked for it to be printed out. Akinrinade is the last person I expected to sanction what Alabi-Isama wrote or said about the end of the war. Isama wasn’t there. Akinrinade was there. Tomoye was there. The rest were just junior officers. Those collected that night of 11th were junior officers and they were in charge of a battalion which made it possible for us to move. It was almost a disaster. We could have capitalised on it but we were on the quest to bring the war to an end. Hence, we detained them at the DMI office in Igbo-ukwu, got them to send a message to their commander, Tomoye. Tomoye replied that he would contact Owerri. The officer at Owerri tactical headquarters, Col. Oni who replied that Obasanjo said he would send his chief-of-staff, Akinrinade, to come and negotiate with us.

    That was how Akinrinade came to the scene. And we asked when would this be? He said that myself and himself should meet at Orlu. Hence, I left, heading to Orlu with my own escort, while he was coming with his own escort. We met at Orlu, greeted one another and I asked that he follows me to Igbo-ukwu. If it was a war situation and they had the advantage they would have arrested me and held me hostage. But we were already holding their men hostage. That was how we came to my home and I am glad that Alabi confirmed that because Akinrinade told him.

    So, I had to do what I did because I was in full control of the situation. There was no way Akinrinade could have reached me in a hostile manner. I was the one who would have shown hostility but my mission was to bring the war to an end.

    I would have handed over to Bisala. Bisala’s men were at Awka, which as you know, is closer to my headquarters. When we concluded no winner, no vanquished affair with Obasanjo, treachery came into it. While we were all celebrating at Owerri, Obasanjo came to me and said whether he could talk to General Effiong and I said yes. Anything? He said no, just to discuss for old time sake. And I said okay, you can go ahead with him.

    So, they went out to discuss. It was Col. Anwuna who called my attention and said why did you allow Effiong and Obasanjo to meet alone and I said well, they are old friends. He said no, you better intervene. Obasanjo said ah, I am not eating your officer; we were just talking about old times. But the damage had already been done. On our way back to Uga, because that was where we took off from, it was then that Effiong told me and the rest of the people that he had promised Obasanjo that we would be going to Lagos to see Gowon. I said no, you don’t play a record we didn’t participate in crafting. He said it was necessary that we senior officers go with him; that they would provide the flight so that we and Gowon could see, that he had the final say for them. I said okay if we must go, all of you must go and put on your uniforms. Then he turned around and told me he also promised him we should go in mufty. So, I said in that case, I will not go. That was why I wasn’t in the entourage that went to Lagos. He said that it was important that I should go; that he even mentioned the names of the officers to go. I said, I will not go, I will not leave my troops undefended.

    Col. Ogunewe, he was of the same stature with me, said please colonel you have done so much. Give me your French suit, we are of the same size.

    So, he went in my place and that was why he was part of the team. I escorted them all the way to Owerri with reinforced company of soldiers. When we got to Owerri, Obasanjo and his men, with Col. Oni took over. They left from Port Harcourt. Instead, as they left from Port Harcourt, I continued with my company of soldiers all the way to Port Harcourt. Akinrinade will attest to this.

    When we got to Port Harcourt, I reported to Col. Oluleye who was the war commander. We booked in at the Presidential Hotel with my men surrounding me. It was in the morning, they had gone to Lagos, finished and Obasanjo brought them back and I was quite sure Obasanjo was monitoring what was happening and had been told by Akinrinade that I was in Port Harcourt with my troops. So, he arrived early hours in the morning with Effiong and the rest and they left for Owerri. Then he sent Akinrinade to call me. He came to the hotel and told me that Obasanjo was back and wanted to see me.

    I went with my troops to Owerri and we met and greeted. So, he said to me, was there any need for me to come with my troops?. And I said no. it was necessary for me because it was the cream of my men that you collected. Then we saluted and they escorted me across the Imo River at Owerri Nta. From there, I proceeded back to my home. Now, is that the position of a defeated army? If they want us to tell the truth about what happened, we’ll tell the truth. But for a group of people trying to make it look as if Biafra looked like a lily-livered army or a rag-tag army, no. No rag-tag army at all could hold a well-equipped army like Nigerian army to ransom for three years.

    The only thing, I repeat, is that the ground strategy adopted by Biafra made it possible for Nigeria to remain till today.

    In the face of all this, how did you warm your way into Ojukwu’s heart to become his favourite among other officers from the Mid-west?

    I don’t know about being anybody’s favourite. All I know is that each time Ojukwu gave me order I obeyed it. That people consider me his favourite, well why should a commander-in-chief, have a favourite? All his officers were his favourites. For anybody to consider himself not to be a favourite of the commander-in-chief he must have been harbouring some disloyalty attitude in his mind towards the commander-in-chief.

    But was Alabi-Isama fighting on the side of Biafra initially?

    No! He was one of the Mid-west officers in Benin. He was in Benin at the beginning.

    Now, let us look at another issue. Is it really correct to assert that while the federal troops had prisoners of war, Biafran soldiers were busy killing indiscriminately?

    Let me ask you, when Nigeria claimed that they won the war, were there any exchange of prisoners of war? Because that would have been the situation. There wasn’t. By the time the matter got to Lagos to Gowon, the war had been over. It was more of war of attrition at a point and so as it was on the Federal side so it was on the Biafran side.

    But why did you call for an end to the war when you did?

    We did so because of the situation we found ourselves. Certain things were happening at the time which up till now we haven’t told our people. For instance, they said Ojukwu left because the war was closing in on him and the entire Biafra. That also is not true. We had several options then. One of the options was to break out of the Biafra enclave to cause confusion. But we had studiously maintained that we were not trying to create a civil war but we were still being attacked based on the perceived situation that brought about the pogrom.

    Good enough, it was the pogrom that chased people out of the North. And when our people left the North, the pogrom continued and this made it impossible for our people to find relief in the West. There was no other alternative than to say, ‘to your tents oh Israel.’ So, our people left and came home. And even when organising the military defensive activity we still had it in mind that we couldn’t abandon a country we helped to build.

    But we couldn’t in trying to maintain the status quo we helped to build allowed ourselves to be exterminated. No. Consequently, we retreated. By retreating, regrouping, we said we will not carry our military exploits beyond our shores. Otherwise, as it were, we had several options. Take a brigade and break into Nigeria and cause havoc. That would have made the war total, but instead under the counsel of our commander-in-chief and our elders, we maintained an operational balance.

    It was for us to defend ourselves within our soil so that nobody could accuse us of either precipitating the war or as they try to accuse us that the coup was tailored against the North, an Igbo coup. If such a coup that had a universal acclaim could later change into an Igbo coup, what then would have happened if we had carried the war right into the North. The possibility was there and we didn’t do that.

    But then when Igbo officers and men crossed into the West why were they not coordinated, allowing soldiers scatter into different directions?

    No! No!! You see the war,… Every war produces certain actions and reactions. When it became clear after the second division of Nigerian army crossed over and attacked Biafra, we already heard that they were going to use the Mid-west whom we thought was the buffer zone between us and them. But the rampaging Nigerian army did not honour that. We were not prepared to allow them because once they did, it meant that they had three-quarters of the totality of the land in Nigeria. And that would have been very difficult for us.

    We were also mindful of the fact that during the pogrom in the North, the majority of the soldiers as far as the North was concerned, Midwest was an Igbo land. It was in fact an afterthought when they tried to woo the Benins, the Urhobo’s and so on, forgetting that the Benins and Urhobos were some of those they killed during the pogrom.

    So, ranging them against us by pacifying them as they did when they created Cross-River and Rivers States, it was not done to appease the North. No. it was done to range them against the Igbo people by telling them that they were sufficient to be on their own as states. And that they should not be an appendage of the Igbos. They even forgot that we could have done the same by moving into the North, bringing the Middlebelt against the Fulanis.

    But we didn’t do that. So, that was what it was like.

    Okay, were all these part of the blunders that prolonged the war?

    Of course, yes. If we had played the game the way Nigeria played it, we would still be in the battle field today. But our people have a saying that the hen with so many chicks doesn’t know how to run in a battle situation.

    At what point did the Biafran high command begin to consider some of the officers as saboteurs and what did it take one to be so considered?

    In many war situations, the word sabotage is a constant and recurrent decimal. This is so because not all believe in the cause that brought about the war situation. People have different ideas and ideals. And some people, according to their belief, put themselves in the position where they were either the loyalists or considered anti-war efforts. This was what gave rise to the word saboteur. So it happens everywhere and it occurs everywhere.

    You have nicknamed the Air Raid. How did this name come about?

    Oh, no, no. I can’t continue to dwell on this.

    But you’ve not told it to us before?

    Okay, why I say so is that soldiers, especially in a conflict situation have the tendency for giving one name or the other to their officers, depending on the situation they find themselves. So, they did that when they wanted.

    You didn’t start out as a commissioned officer, but rose to be a force to reckon with. How did it happen?

    No, no. you see, people don’t seem to understand that soldiering is an art. Just like engineering or medicine, when a doctor is made to be so. You cannot just go into an operating room, pick up your instruments and begin to work, if you haven’t been trained. So also in a war situation. You cannot go into battle field and carry out all the norms necessary for an officer who had been trained over the years.

    A civilian cannot plan war and execute war. It requires a trained military officer to confuse and configure the situation and operate. That is why many a time people say what they like and I don’t care. It doesn’t affect people like me; I am not interested. The situation occured within the purview of my duty and I operated just to show what I was trained for. After that I retired into a civilian life.

    What really happened – did you actually kill Haliday, the owner of Silver Valley Hotel in the presence of his wife and daughter as alleged by General Alani Akinrinade?

    That’s a lie. You see, when the war ended, Nigerian officers didn’t know what to do about me. First, they couldn’t reach me. Every effort made to kill me did not succeed. Haliday was a friend. My house, before the war started, was a stone’s throw from Chief Haliday’s house. If such a thing happened, why was it only at the end of the war that we started hearing that I was the one that killed him?

    I commanded; I took over in Port Harcourt, when Port Harcourt was falling. And all that participated there will give testimony that I never picked a gun and shot him. I never picked my gun and shot at somebody. Why should I? I had soldiers who could do that. But instead, they tried to foist the death of Haliday on me. That exactly was what they’ve been saying; that I had been killing people indiscriminately while the war lasted. That also is not true. It took the way the war ended for most Biafrans to realise that it was really a lie that whenever I saw somebody I’d shoot. Shoot for what? For what purpose? And if that was the case, would I lay my life on the line to bring the war to an end? After all, the people who asked that the war be brought to an end are still alive. People like P.K. Nwokedi, a former justice of Enugu. Louis Mbanefo too. These were the people who came to my house and pleaded that I should try to stop the war.

    Normally, I would have called for their arrest, because they were members of Biafran Exco. They were party to the last meeting we held with Ojukwu to ask Ojukwu to go to the conference that was to hold in Monrovia, Liberia. That conference was engineered by Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe.

    It was this meeting that we arranged laboriously for where Ojukwu could stay so that there won’t be any sabotage against us. Hence, Felix Houphet- Boigny was one of those that recognised Biafran efforts. And the French were also partially assisting us.

    So, from Liberia, it was planned to move Ojukwu to Gabon and then to Ivory Coast. But we hadn’t settled down in Ivory Coast in readiness for the meeting when members of the EXco came requesting that I should bring the war to an end.

    How come then you were the man everybody wanted to see to end the war?

    I was the person in charge of operations. I was also visible. Yes, I was.

    Do you think because the Yoruba officers were the ones that saw to the end of the war, it has caused any friction between them and the Igbo people?

    No, because a day after my declaration, I started the announcement from 9a.m. Every 15 minutes, my broadcast was on. Sir Louis Mbanefo crafted the statement that we gave Philip Effiong to read. After it was read, it became necessary because in my broadcast, we said we had sent emissaries to various Nigerian military formations to inform them that we had decided to end the war.

    It is only people with authority who could do that. Any army on the run will not make such statement. So, we did it on a friendly basis. Today Akin is still my friend. We meet from time to time. He visits me here too. No, it has not caused any friction at all.

    Why was it possible for the Owerri battle front to be inclusive as it were?

    First and foremost, to take over Owerri was impossible. Owerri is the heartland of the Igbo nation. The heart land of our domain. Enugu is our foremost town which was prepared by the colonial masters as an administrative headquarters. Just as Lagos is to the West, even though Ibadan was the heartland of the Yoruba. So, also in the North, they have Kaduna State, which now they have Abuja, even though they have Sokoto, Maiduguiri and those other places.

    Nigeria is centered on a tripod, whichever way you push it, all that come to the surface are the Hausa nation, the Yoruba nation and the Igbo nation. Each of these nations has minorities. Today, all that people talk about are the minorities within the East, within the Igbo nation because of economic interest. If oil has not been the main source of income for the totality of Nigerians, nobody would care how the Ijaws, how the Itsekiris, the Ibibios, Kalabairis, the Efiks and so on, are faring. This is so because they’ve been in existence before the arrival of the Europeans.

  • I know my bounds  at home  as  a soldier’s wife —Olufunke Adekoya, SAN

    I know my bounds at home as a soldier’s wife —Olufunke Adekoya, SAN

    Mrs. Olufunke Adekoya is Head, Dispute Resolution Practice Group at AELEX, a firm of legal practitioners and arbitrators. She was appointed Notary Public in 1986 and elevated to the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) in 2001 (the fifth woman to be so elevated). She has been a member of the Body of Benchers since 1999 and was elevated to a life bencher in March 2007. In the field of arbitration, Mrs. Adekoya represents both local and transnational parties as counsel in both domestic and international arbitration proceedings within Nigeria and abroad, and has acted in numerous disputes as either-party appointed arbitrator, sole arbitrator and presiding arbitrator.  In this interview with Assistant Editor, LINUS OBOGO, the wife of Air Vice Marshal Oluwole Adekoya (rtd) speaks on the rise of women on the Bench, corruption in the judiciary, as well as the balance between her role as a lawyer and wife to a soldier. Excerpts:

    DOES coming from a family of lawyers mean anything special to you?

    My father was a lawyer, I am a lawyer and my daughter is also a lawyer. The one thing I could say I gained from having a father who was a lawyer is that I had to explain and give reasons for every demand that I made of my father. For instance, if I needed N100, I had to explain to him why and what I needed it for and how I was going to spend it. That was the kind of man my father was as a lawyer and a father. But if it was just any other man, he could say okay, here is the N100 or that he does not have exactly N100 and if I could manage N50.

    So, for my father, everything was in debate and in discussion. He taught me how to think logically and to be able to explain my actions at all times. There was no time I needed to go out and to return at say 8 pm or 9 pm, that my father would not insist on me explaining to him in detail why it had to be that time.

    As a lawyer married to an army officer, what was the atmosphere like in the house, given that in the military, there is this command and obey structure, or ‘obey before complaint’?

    As a lawyer married to a military officer, I knew and still know that I could only be a lawyer in the office and not in the house. Also, sometimes when there is a discussion between my husband and me, as a lawyer, what I usually say is ‘let’s reason it out, this is what I think should be done’. But as a military man, he will say ‘no, this is how I want it to be. I will say okay, you are the boss. So if it turns out the way I had earlier suggested, next time when such situation arises, he will remember and align with my position. But if he does not remember, we will do it his own way again until such a time that he realises that we may have to try my own point of view.

    Over a period of time, if I hold a view contrary to his, he will listen and engage my own view. There is the tendency for him to look at issues from the angle of the military, while I will like to consider the same issue from the position of law. That is how we have managed ourselves over the years; 35 years to be exact.

    What would you consider your most embarrassing moment as a lawyer?

    My most embarrassing moment was not exactly in court. It was in the office of my principal in Kaduna, where I started practising as a lawyer. We were the second set of youth corps members then. It happened that a male client walked into the office and demanded to see my principal. He was not only surprised to see a woman but one he actually regarded as a Nyarinya (young girl) as a lawyer. When I wanted to attend to him, he said ‘no, I want a lawyer’. He probably thought I was a secretary. Even when I told him I was a lawyer and that I was assigned to his case, he said no; that he wanted to see my boss who he thought was probably the only lawyer in the chambers. I went in to tell my boss that Alhaji did not want me and that he said he wanted a lawyer. Unfortunately for him, my boss led him out of his office with his file, and asked him not to come to his chambers any longer. He told him he was not handling his matter and that he could go elsewhere. The man started trembling.

    My boss told him that if I was the one handling his case and he did not respect me, it also meant he did not respect or have confidence in him (boss). Eventually, he allowed me. That, to me, was very embarrassing; for somebody to walk in and assume that because I was a woman, I was supposed to be a secretary and I could not be a lawyer, and he wanted to see a lawyer. Not even when I had told him I was a lawyer. He said ‘no, I want to see a lawyer, a man.’

    I went home that day and reflected on what being a woman was. For the first time, I was confronted with the issue of being a woman and actually came to terms with the gender issue for the first time. The assumption then was that as a woman, you could never be a lawyer.

    How do you relax?

    I read novels. And if I have the time, I go to parties and dance. That is just about it.

    If you were not a lawyer, what would you have been?

    If I was not a lawyer, I would have been in Nollywood as an actress. When I was in the university, Ife (OAU), to be precise, I used to be very active in the theatre. I was in the drama group, acting plays. We used to travel to Dakar, Senegal. During the holiday, I used to act in the now rested Village Headmaster. So, if I was not a lawyer, I would have been an actress.

    What would you consider as the most expensive piece of apparel in your closet?

    Honestly, I am not into fashion and so, I cannot see any expensive clothing in my wardrobe. What I have are just my office wears. I am not a style person. Rather, I am a functional dresser and I wear what I am comfortable in at any given time.

    What would you regard as your worst habit?

    What I will consider as my worst habit is perhaps the fact that I do not give much attention to myself. I am always busy doing one thing or the other for one person or the other without giving much attention to myself. I would not know if that is a habit. If it is, then, that may be my worst habit.

    With the elevation of a woman as head of the country’s apex court and with more promoted as justices of the Supreme Court, would you say the women are finally assuming their right of place, particularly in a sector dominated largely by men?

    Sincerely, I will say yes. The women are assuming their rightful place in the judiciary. Having said that, it is pertinent to point out that we have had women chief judges at the state level, in the northern, western and eastern part of the country. It is only at the Supreme Court that we are finally getting to the apex. Again, I will say that it is only a question of timing, because as we all know, from Justice Aloma Muktar’s CV, she has been in the profession a long time.

    However, I want to say that women in any career will also know that it takes a longer time to get to the height of their career than their male counterparts. This is because women have additional responsibilities as wives, mothers, other obligations and family commitments to take care of. So, while we are balancing all these various roles, one thing will take precedence at a particular time and another will take precedence at another time. Therefore, it generally takes a woman a little bit longer to rise to the top than it does take a man. And this is not any different in the legal profession.

    What, in your view, would you consider as challenges likely to constrain women, who have risen to the top from succeeding, whether in the judiciary or other sectors?

    Whether one succeeds or not, having climbed to the top has nothing to do with gender. Anybody who has risen to the top has the same responsibility to use the time to make a mark, to be different and stamp her own imprints on where he or she finds herself at that point in time.

    Maybe for Justice Aloma Mariam Muktar, I think because she happens to be the first woman to have risen to the position of Chief Justice of Nigeria, all eyes are on her. Also, given the state our judiciary has found itself at the time she assumed office, there will be a little bit more of the searchlight and the spotlight on her as people will expect her to be a magician and move mountains. But this may not be possible in the two years she has to be in office.

    But so far, she is doing her best and most people are quite happy with what she has been able to do. She has a two-year-tenure because she has to retire at 70 years.

    A lot of people would want to imagine that judges should be full of wisdom as they get older. Does it not amount to robbing the country of the wealth of experience and wisdom, when judges are statutorily stampeded into premature retirement at the age of 70 years?

    Absolutely! But while I wouldn’t link tenure to age because we have people who are well over 70 years and who are still very active. If I had my way, I would rather that at that level, it should be tenure than age. For instance, the late Justice Kayode Eso was well over 80 years, yet he was still very active at the arbitration community, even though he had retired from the Supreme Court. Conversely, we have people who are under 50s and 60s, yet they are already tired and finished. So, I would want to suggest that tenure should perhaps be reviewed to some renewable terms, in the same way that we have four years renewable term for the presidency. This is worth considering to have the chief judge of a state or the chief justice of the federation to have a four-year-tenure, during which if he or she fails to perform, he goes back to being part of the Bench and someone else takes over. But if you perform, your tenure should be renewed for as long as you are physically able to perform. I do not subscribe to the 65/70 years retirement age for our judges. If as a judge, you do not perform, you should rather return to the Bench, because leadership skills are not the same as the skills to judge or decide a case.

    Someone could be good at judging a case which makes him or her a good judge, but because by seniority you become the chief justice or the chief judge, if you do not have the administrative and leadership skills, you may not be able to lead. Apart from being a good judge, you need management skills as well. And if you cannot balance the two, in a situation where you have a good judge who is good at judging cases in leadership position, one of either will fall apart. The administration will suffer. So, if you cannot be the administrative head, you might as well go back to the Bench and someone else becomes the chief judge.

    There is this refrain that has gradually acquired a dated appeal, which is that ‘the judiciary is the last hope of the common man’. Today, the common man’s hope is irredeemably dashed, no thanks to obvious institutional corruption that has held the senior officers of the bench captive. Who, in your view will bell the cat?

    I must say that the Chief Justice is doing her best to face up to these issues. Additionally, the Bar also needs to face up to these issues. On our part, we are also trying to do something by setting up the anti-corruption committee. But on the whole, we really need to engage with the populace. Just like the SERVICOM, we can also have complaint boxes in the court rooms and court premises, where people can write and drop their complaints about corrupt legal officers. There can also be a website where people can send posts about legal officers demanding bribes to facilitate or obtain justice.

    Honestly, I think we are getting to a point where we must face up to the issues that confront us both as members of the Bar and the Bench. Hopefully, things will change if we continue like that. Obviously, the Bench is disciplining itself. Even in the profession, we have gotten to a point where we have said that as a legal profession, we are also involved. Some of our members are not helping the situation by corrupting the judicial process.

    We can also see that the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee is becoming more active in publicising it activities. And once the public gets to know that once you make a complaint, there will be a quick decision, confidence will definitely return. That is what we are trying to do.

    The trend all over the world today, is in the direction of how to settle dispute outside the usual court method through arbitration. Why is the emphasis still more on litigation in Nigeria than arbitration?

    I think that firstly, the arbitration community or practitioners in Nigeria have woken up to the fact that we are losing focus. People go to arbitration because they want a quick decision and they do not want to go to court. But we find a situation where people get a decision and yet they go to court to challenge that same decision. What the arbitration community has decided to do is to educate ourselves and secondly the judiciary. To educate ourselves as lawyers is to explain to our members that look, today you are in court and tomorrow, you are before the arbitration. If you appear before the arbitration and you are not satisfied or successful and you take the case to court, at the end of the day, you have destroyed 50 per cent of your potential income. For instance, if those who are bringing arbitration matters to you think that at the end of the day they will still end up in court, they will rather not bring arbitration matters to you.

    So, we are actually cutting down our own practice. Secondly, they may decide that they are not going to court at all. They may decide to leave the country and forget about the whole matter entirely. Alternatively, they may decide to take the arbitration abroad. What we are trying to do therefore, is to tell our members that in arbitration, you must choose the correct person as your arbitrator and once the correct arbitrator has given you the right decision, accept it and let your client accept it.

    We are also talking to judges to explain to lawyers what arbitration process is and that we are both partners working together, so that when arbitration matters come to their court, they should dispose of them quickly. And over a period of years, people will come to appreciate that it is not worth going to court to prolong what ordinarily should have taken a short time to resolve.

    How can arbitration be made accessible to the ordinary man without undue financial encumbrances to him and in a binding manner?

    Well, one of the things, for instance, that the Lagos State Government has done is that from January 2012, if you file any paper anywhere in court, the court will decide if it should go for mediation settlement or arbitration, and why it should not come into the full courtroom. That is one of the ways in which many cases will be resolved at the arbitration stage, or even mediation, trying to negotiate a settlement between the parties. Many of these instances will affect smaller disputes where you will not have to spend a lot of money and time in court.

    Courts also have mediation courthouses attached to them. You will find this in Lagos, Abuja and Port Harcourt, where you also have arbitration courthouses or court annex. Here, if you have a dispute, you just pay a small amount, after which they will collect your paper and call the other party and help settle the matter.

    Arbitration appears to be narrowly skewed in favour of a few privileged lawyers, despite that it is somewhat an integral part of legal service delivery, why the seeming segregation?

    You are not totally correct. In the law school, every single student takes a course in arbitration. In fact, it is called Alternate Dispute Resolution, ADR. It is arbitration, mediation conciliation and negotiation. Every law student takes the course. What has happened is the mentality of a typical Nigerian lawyer to want to try something new.

    In our part of the world, we have always been brought up to reason in a way that unless you put on the wig and the gown and go to court, you are not a lawyer. And this is what we have been trying to preach to everybody that arbitration is open to every lawyer. It is not restricted to select privileged lawyers in a way you are trying to paint the picture. If you want to be involved as a lawyer in arbitration, it is simple. If you have a dispute, do not try to rush to court. First and foremost, you have to check the agreement. If the agreement has an arbitration clause, you commend the arbitration proceedings.

    Sadly for many lawyers, when they have a dispute, they want to prove they are lawyers by rushing to court first before considering other options. That is what we are trying to explain to lawyers who think that arbitration is only for privileged lawyers that once you have taken that route of first going to court, you cannot go back to arbitration. You have to first think arbitration and it is only when that fails that you then explore the option of court.

    You recently chaired a workshop organised by the Centre for Corrections and Human Development (CCHD), an advocacy group against human and child/sex trafficking. What do you imagine to be the underlying motives behind the trade and the constraint in arresting the boom?

    It is purely economic. Both the trafficker and the trafficked are involved purely for the fundamental reasons of economic. Those engaged in human and child/sex trafficking do so purely for money and nothing else. They prey on the fact that the women and the children they are trafficking also want to make money. The workshop which was very well attended was an eye opener. It was the general observation that many of the women and the girl child do not go into it with the knowledge that they are going into prostitution or human slavery. They are usually told to begin fending for themselves soon after they leave secondary school and with the prospect of furthering their education apparently bleak. They are baited with fantastic pictures of European countries and the abundant job opportunities. The young hapless women see the opportunities as one to better their lives and they unknowingly jump on the chance. It is the same story with the woman in the village who begs a city woman to take her child to Lagos or Abuja to be assisted with one form of trade or the other. By the time the child gets to Lagos, he or she literally becomes a slave without the parents knowing it.

    The challenge, essentially, is to persuade people not to believe everything they are told. Many Nigerians are engaged in one form of menial job or the other in Europe and the U.S. without those back home knowing what they are into. Occasionally, they will send home a few dollars and some good photographs. Their innocent parents hardly get to know that their son or daughter wakes up as early as 4.am to clean the toilets for a white man or wash plates at the restaurants.

    The only way out is that we must make our economy as buoyant as possible to make our people stay back in Nigeria. The economic environment must be made conducive so that people do not fall victim to human trafficking. We need this kind of workshop from time to time to sensitise the unsuspecting and gullible public.

    As head of AELEX, a firm of legal practitioners and arbitrators, how is it like managing over 40 lawyers?

    It is all about being focused and knowing what it is that you want. You have to be prepared to make the compromises necessary. Managing a chamber such as ours is like marriage. Today the man wins and tomorrow the woman wins. That is it. It is also like putting yam in oil or putting oil in yam. As long as both come together, that is what is important. That is how we balance things in our chambers, among the partners and even among the lawyers. We understand and agree that we are looking at a common goal, which is to improve the profession and improve ourselves as lawyers. I think that women are better managers and administrators than men. As women, we have to manage our children, our husbands, our brothers and their wives and that makes women better managers.

    Speaking of women being better managers, why has it taken the women lawyers so long to rise to the headship of the Nigerian Bar Association, many years after Mrs. Priscilia Kuye, who was the first female NBA President?

    Well, I am aspiring to that position in the next election. But I do not think being the NBA president is an issue of gender. Rather, it is about whoever wants to be the president must be for a reason. You must have objectives or goals you think can be done differently or that can be achieved either differently or even better. We have a lot of women who are actively involved in the activities of the NBA. We have women who are chairmen of branches.

    But I think in the same sense in which before the CJN could rise to the top of her profession and become the CJN, this takes time because of other commitments. It is the same for women, even within the bar association. You cannot rise at the same as the men because you have other commitments and you have to do the balancing acts. But then, we have a lot of women who are actively involved in the Nigerian Bar Association.

    As for the next NBA presidency, I will put my hat in the ring when the time comes. But I will not say more than that so that I will not be accused of campaigning ahead of time.

    The NBA used to be known for its radical socio-political and economic activism. But same cannot be said today with allegations of the association reportedly becoming a willing tool available for hire by politicians for rallies. At what stage did the NBA sink to this level?

    Well, I am not really aware of the NBA being rented for rallies at any given time. NBA, like any association, has to move with the situation in which it finds itself. The stance of the NBA when we are in a military regime will be different from when we are in a civilian regime. So if you say we are no more radical, it is because if we were in a military regime, we may have to be a bit more vocal and more radical because you are confronting a regime, which from the point of view as a lawyer, does not have legitimacy and it is more likely to trample on the rule of law because of the manner of its training.

    In a civilian regime, you need to be a bit more circumspect to ascertain that the position that you are trying to put forward is one that has democracy behind it. If we all agree that democracy is government of the people, by the people and for the people, and if everybody says ‘that man is a thief, but we want him as our leader’, that is the voice of the majority, even when you as a lawyer would want to say this is wrong. So, one must be more circumspect. The role of the Bar association in a civilian regime is more of a partner with the government, the civil society and with the people to elevate everybody’s standard. Yes, we should speak out when we should, particularly when the government is not doing what it ought to do. But at the same time, we are expected to educate the populace about their rights.

    To say we are not radical may be as a result of the change of regime because we are no longer in a military regime. But having said that, I think we can do better and engage more.

    Some lawyers, not long ago advocated for the scrapping of the award of the Senior Advocate of Nigeria, arguing the award tends to confer undue privileges on the bearers of the title and which in turn tilts the balance of justice. Do you agree with this?

    I think SANship is still relevant and I do not subscribe that it should be scrapped. What I think should be done is for the process of elevation to be reformed. I feel it is relevant because everybody needs something to aspire to. Otherwise, we will become complacent in our comfort zone.

    Even in the media, a correspondent in the newspaper wants to be chief correspondent, a sub-editor wants to be editor, a publisher wants to be a proprietor etc. In every profession, there should be something for everyone to aspire to. In our profession, the privileges that we are given are for a reason. The major privilege is that your cases are often called first when you get to court.

    For me, my understanding is that even the courtroom is supposed to be a learning experience so that the younger lawyers who are there can acquire and acquire some level of additional knowledge and erudition from the senior lawyers who are Senior Advocates.

    Like every facet of our national life, the elevation procedure has its problems and this needs to be reviewed. I do not think that the award should be done by age or length of practice. As we speak, there are lawyers of forty years who have never practised, but have been doing tenancy agreement for the last forty years.

    Meanwhile, a lawyer of ten years may have been at a point where he is negotiating transactions with international lenders or international financial institutions, which brings us to what is called exposure. With that being said, we need to reform the award procedure and make it more transparent. This will bring back the prestige and the glamour.

    Also, among the Senior Advocates, we need to look at ourselves and tell each other the home truth that even as SANs, we are not performing up to the level expected of us as SANs. There are many Senior Advocates today who, having been made SANs, no longer go to court. It has become like a chieftaincy title to them. They are alright being addressed by the title and nothing more. They no longer lend their intellectual capacity to lift the younger lawyers. The process needs to be reformed but not scrapped. It should not be something of a monopoly. There is the notion that once you are made a SAN, it is million, million all the way. It is not true. The experience is that once you become a SAN, the first casualty is that you begin to lose your clients. Those who could afford your services before you became SAN will tell you, look, I can no longer afford your services. Having lost some of your clients because of SANship, you begin to build a new clientele all over again. I became a SAN in 2001 and I experienced it. I lost some of my clients who thought they could no longer afford me.

  • Nigerians need to pray for the mental stability of their leaders —Dickson

    Nigerians need to pray for the mental stability of their leaders —Dickson

    Governor Seriake Dickson of Bayelsa State has been saddled with the responsibility of heading a committee that will oversee the reconciliation of dissenting voices within the Peoples Democratic Party. In this interview with newsmen in Abuja last week, the governor explains why another committee is needed to look into the crises plaguing the party in most states, noting that the focus will be on non-PDP ruling states with the hope of presenting a cohesive party during the general elections. Managing Editor, Northern Operations, YUSUF ALLI and Deputy Editor, Nation’s Capital, YOMI ODUNUGA, were there. Excerpts:

    What does your committee hope to achieve?

    Ithought we should begin by looking at a few of the challenges that we are trying to solve arising from the mandate given to us by the working committee of our party. Already, as you may be aware, we have taken several steps to address some of the issues in the state chapters of our party. You will recall that the focus of our mandate essentially is on non-PDP states—reconciling the various factions and stakeholders and some members in the states that are not under PDP control for now. That in itself is challenging, and those states are about 13 or so in number. We have held series of meetings since our inauguration and because we are aware of the Independent National Electoral Commission’s guidelines released on the Anambra elections, which has made it imperative that actions must be taken immediately, we are taking that as a priority. In fact, I have just signed a circular calling a meeting for the members of the working committee of their state chapter and they have to be recognised by the national committee. As regards Anambra, we know there are so many factions, there are so many court orders and situations to resolve but we are starting from the known to the unknown. I think a day or two ago, the national committee recognised one of the factions and we want to start our interactions by engaging them and thereafter we will also have a section with all aspirants under the platform of our party. These series of interactions will take place from Thursday at Legacy House, which is the official secretariat of this committee. We also intend to interact with the chairman and members of our working committee in Ekiti State. You will recall that in the last couple of days and weeks, events in some state chapters of our party is fast deteriorating from bad to worse and we don’t want it to get ugly. So, it has become necessary for us to take some proactive measures and step in. So what would then be the immediate objectives of your committee? Of course, in all of this, the ultimate objective is to reconcile various stakeholders so that they can now understand the commonality of interest that should exist in a political party. In a party, we know people take personal interest too far. Inasmuch as the personal interests are legitimate, the party itself has its interest and that is what we are there to promote. We want to see how we can bring them together, play by the rules and then see how they can maintain a united front going into the general elections in Ekiti State. We hope to do so in almost all the state chapters, particularly state chapters that are not under the control of the PDP. As states that have PDP governors, that is a different challenge and that is slightly outside the area of our immediate focus even though it still falls under the general umbrella of some kind of reconciliation. For those cases, I think we need to work with other stakeholders and senior members of the party and maybe a different approach will be required because we have sitting governors who are also leaders of their party in those states who will also need to be part of the reconciliation effort. And that is why, in the wisdom of the National Chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, and the Working Committee, we have been told to focus on the non-PDP states. Since you have harped on the need to reconcile your party members in 13 non-PDP states while the PDP is already controlling the levers of government in 23 states, is the ultimate objective of this reconciliation to win more states? As a loyal party man, I believe in the capacity and potentials of our party to provide leadership in more states than we currently do have. But, as a democrat, it is my hope and belief that every party will sell its message as best it can and follow democratic due process and the best organised party with the best candidate should, at the end of the day, emerge. Again, as a democrat, the product of that outcome is what we will respect and work with. So, let the best party win. That is why we are democrats. Yes, it is my duty as a loyal party man to work for my party, advance the work of my party and its candidate duly selected and talk about the programmes and potentials of the party. I won’t stop without adding what is unique about the PDP. It is the party with the greatest potentials for uniting our diverse nation. The party, from pre-independence politics till now, is the only party that has provided a common platform for all Nigerians. It is the only platform that is not built on the fault lines of our nation, be it ethnicity or religion. It is the only party that has made it possible for a so-called minority to emerge as president. That is akin to what the Democratic Party did in the United States of America by sponsoring the first African American in the person of President Barack Obama. These are the unique features of the PDP. Other political tendencies are legitimate but we know that a number of times, they are built on the fault lines of our country. Whether fault lines of ethnicity, religion or even regionalism. The PDP is not an insular party, it is not a religious party and when the campaign starts, I expect that that message will sink. Yes, I will work for my party and we expect to win more states but we should win it fairly. Others also have the right to sell their message but we should respect the choice that Nigerians make because politics, as they say, is a market place of ideas. You have reconciled some aggrieved members. What were their grievances and how were they convinced to drop the case in court? Well, some of the operations, by virtue of oath we took, are confidential. Some of the grievances I have listened to were given in confidence and we will take them up with the appropriate authorities and address them. Members of a party have a right to their expectations, aspirations and views. I am a political liberal and therefore, I am in support of protecting the sanctity of individual opinion. But the party is a collective and so there comes a time when your individual’s views and opinion are subjected to the collective overall goal of the party. We are doing some of these things quietly. The important thing is that the gentlemen have submitted their grievances to the party under this committee and we are very grateful. I want to commend them again for that act, for realising that there comes a time individual expectations and aspirations end and the collective interest begins, otherwise there will be no organised society. So, this is what the gentlemen have done and my committee and I are looking at it and we will pass our recommendations to the appropriate authorities to address. Fundamentally, our appreciation is to them for withdrawing their case. If you said you have reconciled and the parties have agreed to withdraw the case, how come the lawyers refused to agree in court and the judge did not give a verdict that aligns with that line of thought? Well, let me say this. Firstly, it is not the duties of lawyers to take matters to a court for adjudication. It is also not their duty to take or resolve these matters out of court. That is the prerogative of the client. A lawyer is only a facilitator of process. Now, it is an on-going proceeding in a court and I will not want to go into the merits and demerits of the proceedings in court. I also don’t want to comment on what the judge should have done or shouldn’t have done but I know that the party will resort to the rule of law, follow due process to handle the challenge. Fundamentally, once you establish a desire on the part of a litigant to withdraw, from that time the desire is indicated to the court, the matter is dead. All that you have is a question of procedure. So, these are minor procedures because the cause of action is gone once a man says ‘I have withdrawn my case.’ The world is even moving towards Reconciliation and Mediation now. It is called Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and that is what every court exists to facilitate in the first place. It is only when that fails that you go for litigation. I think it is a major success because the parties have communicated the desire to withdraw the matter at the court. I know, as a lawyer, that there are some rules about how counsel is changed and those ones are technical legal things that don’t affect the fundamental issue which is that a man who has gone to court is at liberty to say, ‘judge, I have settled my matter.’ For me, that case is dead and because they have a right to counsel, that is a good thing with our constitution. The right to counsel is sacred; they can go to court with you and decide to change their mind. Still on reconciliation, is your committee looking at the larger picture especially now that some PDP governors appear to be engaged in a war of words with national leadership of the party? With the adversarial role being played by the Chairman of your party, how does that help the reconciliation effort? As I said earlier, you can only have too little reconciliation, we cannot have too many reconciliation. We have to reconcile, reconcile and reconcile. The Chief Tony Anenih-led committee is doing a great job which we are also going to look at. I am saying that in the context of the remark I earlier made that our primary focus is the non-PDP states and we are doing so precisely because of this issue. In the PDP states, we have governors in charge and therefore, if there are differences as there should be, we can always resolve them. We need to be clear about this. Maybe because of the long years of military rule, we have this attitude to politics that is not democratic. In a party, there must be allowance made for differences of opinion because democracy thrives on diversity of views. But when you have all these diverse views, the party is there to harmonise them and hold them together. I know that the Anenih committee is doing a lot of work in terms of engaging the governors and I am not aware of any PDP governor who is not happy with the party. All of us are in the party. Yes, there may be one little complain but these are all legitimate because politics allows for that. The important thing is how we reconcile all of these. There are efforts going on by the Anenih’s committee and the Ekwueme’s report and I believe that, by the end of the day, you will have a truly reconciled set of governors because they are major stakeholders in the party and none of them will want the party to disintegrate contrary to what you hear. We are colleagues and we talk. They all want a strong PDP but they are also entitled to their expectations and even when there are ambitions tied to it because it is politics and also because, sometimes in this game, you have got to manage differences of opinion, ideas and sometimes a clash of interest and sometimes even a clash of ego. So, all of that is part of the game. So I think, with what the senior members of the party are doing and I am happy that the seniors drive some of these efforts with our little humble support, we will resolve the problems. I don’t think it is true that the national chairman made the kind of comment that you talked about. It is very possible he was quoted out of context because the national chairman is the head of our party and subjected to the person who is the overall leader, President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan. You are also aware that the President himself, a few days back, engaged some of the governors you are talking about. I am also in touch with some of them because they are my leaders and I am privileged to work with some as colleagues. What you read does not matter, we meet at different levels and all share common idea of a united strong party. At all times, we should be united by national interest. Differences of views are allowed but you do all of that within the context of a common view about the national interest. A few weeks ago, a workers’ union described you as an absentee governor, how far have you gone in piloting the affairs of Bayelsa State? No comments on that because everybody knows what I am doing in Bayelsa and the absenteeism has nothing to do with what we are doing. I am okay when people disagree and criticise. It is all part of it but I cannot be an absentee governor when we are building primary schools, secondary schools and roads. We have done a lot of things in the state and I like situation where people visit and see things for themselves because I am not a propaganda governor. I am addressing the real challenges of development of our people. There is the challenge of providing security such that, in one year, Bayelsa has become the safest state. We are also turning Bayelsa to become a tourism destination, to be an investment destination within our country and within our sub-region and I have just started. I keep telling the people of Bayelsa that they have not seen anything yet. When I was campaigning, I told them to get ready for a big bang and they knew that what was coming their way was big and revolutionary. We are fighting poverty, we are addressing issues of human capacity development and we are at the same time transforming the rural infrastructure that we met on ground. We want to modernise it and then get it to be a springboard for the industrialisation that we seek. You know, Bayelsa is a state where we have deployed CCTV cameras and in the next couple of months, you are going to see a model society emerge. In the health sector; we are building hospitals and then the health insurance: it is an overall comprehensive development. We are building the first storage pharmaceutical centre in this country so that you will not talk about fake drugs in Bayelsa. We are investing a lot in tourism and very soon, you will not need to go to Dubai. The infrastructure must be provided, the atmosphere must be created for that and I think in no distant time, we will extend an invitation. In fact, when people visit, they cannot understand how we are able to put all of this within a short period and they keep asking themselves, ‘if this was possible, why was it not done before now?’ Why are we talking about free education now when in one year, we have sent over 100 Ph.D scholars across the world? In one year, we have selected primary schools pupils into boarding schools all across the country, in one year; we have built constituency secondary schools with boarding facilities. And they have not seen anything yet because I know that education is the most realistic tool anybody can use in transforming any society and I want that society transformed. Not only while I am there as the governor but even when I am out because I don’t want the society to be a breeding ground for militants, criminals and people who have no capacity to take part in their own economy. I want to arm them with the tools, skills and confidence that they must have in themselves to make a difference. Now, what is going on in the state is a revolution. It is something that you need to be there to understand and appreciate. What we have in the state is what is possible when there is leadership and commitment. This office that I hold is by the grace of God and the support of my people. There is enormous potential for good in every state and that is what I am demonstrating. When these secondary schools start, because we are building 30 secondary schools with boarding facilities because what has happened in this country is because we have neglected human capacity development. Even schools like Barewa College that has the honour of producing the first president of this country, we have allowed all those schools to die. Schools that Soyinka and Achebe attended, I am sure it is now in shambles. In this country, education is the key. Sometimes people tell me that I am investing too much on education and I tell them I have not even invested enough. When these schools are finished, you will see that it will be compulsory boarding from SSS1. I will take the children and put in these schools, that is why I am building schools close to the communities and they will be fed at the expense of the state. Now, they don’t pay school fees, they don’t pay for WAEC or JAMB, I pay because I proclaim free education and I meant it. I buy textbooks, uniforms and sandals; for a government in one year to build 400 schools, it is not a joke. I am building teachers’ quarters because when I send teachers out there, I don’t want to hear that they have no place to stay and the key to all of this is the Teachers Training Institute that I am building. You cannot be a teacher in Bayelsa without going through that school, I will say no to it. Yes, there are constraints I am dealing with. I have not imposed any new tax but I told them, they should all pay according to federal tax. Before now, workers in Bayelsa were paying 10% of tax and they feel it is too much money and I said no, everybody must pay his own part according to the federal law. That is, the Personal Income Tax Act. I have also done the welfare bill where, for the vulnerable members of our society, I give them stipends of N5000 once they are up to 75 years, the state maintains you. Also, the disabled and handicapped, the state has a responsibility. I am a people politician. I am in this game for service to the people. To make a difference in their lives and I am determined to make them have the highest possible best from their government and I am institutionalising these things. I am setting these things based on laws so that when I am gone, the laws are there. Just as I am doing on transparency, it’s a law because I don’t want any governor to take us back to where we were. Every month, the governor will do what I am doing. Today, I was happy when a local government chairman was doing his transparency programme to his people because for you to be a chairman in Bayelsa, you must announce what is coming to your people every month. Very soon, because of the terrible rot we inherited, you will see the benefits of what we are doing. We are doing a lot and we need support and understanding of our friends because for a long time, that place was like a dumping ground, nobody cared. Big men stay far from home. We are wiping all that and giving government back to the people. Like the criminals and cultists that renounced, after coming up with a law and enforcing it well, we will address their condition because, as a governor they are my people too. So, we have made it possible for their rehabilitation. You talked about the pension funds in Bayelsa, and there are speculations that you did not really deduct their envelopes well before taking the step. Sir, would you confirm to us that you don’t really know what happened to some pension arrears in the state? Let me tell you, pension arrears were owed for five years before my government came in. They had not paid pension liabilities for five years and I know who was governor for five years in case you don’t. Now, that is criminal. You cannot allow old people who served to go home without their entitlements. I came up and set a small administrative panel and they came up with unpaid pension of about N4bn. People are taking advantage of the weakness of institutions and laws in this country. So, the pension arrears were not paid and every month when I came, I made it a policy to save in addition to paying loans and facilities of about N4 bn every month. That is what Bayelsa sets aside to service loans and useless liabilities. In addition, I said these people are in this situation due to no fault of their and so, we must address it. And so I began to save N250m every month to address to backlog. So you see what I am doing that was not done before? I have paid over N1 bn. Later I said I will not pay the N250m again and I will set up a commission that will tell me when the payment of the pension arrears stopped, who were at fault, and my concern was to really find out what went wrong. And I am going to find out. It is not a question of not reading large, no. You see, the problem is that people thrive on propaganda and blackmail and I hope that we don’t promote criminals to take over leadership in this country with the way we are going because it is the criminals and despicable elements whose voices are heard loudest. It is a major challenge to our democracy. I know we are all savouring our new found freedom but we have to be very careful because people should be asking questions that they need to ask. So, I want to establish facts and then introduce measures that will prevent a repeat of this. I hate what has been done to these old people. My own small gratuity for the ten years I served as a police officer, I get it. I want to sanitise the pension system and when the result comes out, with the kind of interest you have, I am sure you will know. Still on the reconciliation, Nigerians expect that your committee will do all the reconciliation and go the whole hug. Nigerians expect that your committee will come up with a solution to the Rivers crisis. So, what is your committee doing to bring peace to Rivers? On Rivers State, I don’t want to talk about developments in Rivers State because I don’t even know the basis. But for you to say I started it because I am an interested candidate, I am not. I am interested just as other Nigerians are and nothing beyond that. It is not the duty of my committee unless there is a specific referral from the national leadership. It is not our intention to go into Rivers scenario reason being that we have so many matters in court and we have intervention by the National Assembly and there is an international dimension also coming up with people granting interviews to the international media. The only thing I can say is that Nigerians should pray for the mental stability of their leaders because it is part of what they owe us. They should pray that all those who take executive decisions should have stable mindset with which to do their job. When you say leaders should have mental stability, are you suggesting that they should undergo psychiatric test before aspiring to political office? I won’t say our leaders should undergo psychiatric test but I know it is a suggestion that has been made by so many people but I think in the light of some of these developments, it is something we need to discuss.