Category: South East

  • When Niger Delta stood still for Pere Monbene III’s 10th anniversary

    When Niger Delta stood still for Pere Monbene III’s 10th anniversary

    OGBE-IJOH, widely described as the “pride of the mangroves”, became the centre of attention across the Niger Delta recently when His Royal Majesty, Pere Ama-Okosu Monbene III, celebrated his 10th coronation anniversary as the traditional ruler of Ogbe-Ijoh Warri Kingdom.

    The celebrations, which lasted five days from September 22 to 26, showcased the rich culture and values of the Ijaw kingdom. It drew an impressive crowd of indigenes, political leaders, traditional rulers and cultural enthusiasts from across the Niger Delta and beyond. By the time the monarch appeared in full regalia at the palace grounds in Ogbe-Ijoh Town for the grand finale, thousands had gathered to pay homage. Ewein Hall in Ogbe-Ijoh, headquarters of Warri Southwest Local Government Area, was filled with gaily dressed men and women, adding colour to the event.

    The grand finale drew friends of the kingdom, the monarch and his subjects, from far and wide. Located deep within the mangrove creeks, Ogbe-Ijoh is accessible both by land and water. The days leading up to the coronation finale saw the waterways bustling with boats ferrying guests from Warri Club, Miller Waterside, and the Main Market jetty. Others made the journey by road through Aladja, where convoys of vehicles carried indigenes and dignitaries into the town.

    For many, the effort underscored the importance of the occasion, and the reverence that Monbene III enjoyed from within and outside. The Ogbe-Ijoh Kingdom, founded centuries ago by the ancestor Ewein, has long been a cultural and political force within the Ijaw nation.

    The relocation of the council headquarters from Ogbe-Ijoh to Ogidigben in Escravos sparked a wide and wild protest that culminated in the Warri Crisis. Monbene III’s 10th anniversary became both a celebration of his reign and an affirmation of the people’s heritage and pride of the Ijaw in the area.

    The palace grounds were transformed into a carnival-like arena. Traditional drummers and trumpeters set the tone, while Ijaw cultural troupes performed dances that highlighted the community’s and the tribe’s famed waist movements, hips swaying and feet stamping in intricate rhythm of fast drums.

    Popular Ijaw musician J King Alfred thrilled the crowd with live performances of traditional highlife and Ijaw songs. Harrysong, the Nigerian pop star who traces his roots to the area, added a contemporary flair. But it was the Bayelsa State Arts and Culture Troupe stole the limelight, combining hypnotic dances with a spirited rap in the Ijaw language that electrified native Ijaw and visitors alike.

    Women adorned in patterned lace blouses, wrappers, and gele (head ties) that made fashion statements formed dancing circles, singing along in call-and-response style. They were joined by young men and children wearing crested white T-shirts and wrappers, showcasing generational continuity of Ijaw traditions. Masquerades later appeared, sparking excitement among children who pushed forward to catch a glimpse of the colourful, towering figures.

    One of the most striking features of the anniversary was the solidarity and large turnout of traditional rulers from across Delta, Bayelsa, and other Niger Delta states. More than 30 kings were in attendance, turning the event into a symbolic royal conclave. Among them were the Pere of Gbaramatu, the Ebenanaowei of Ogulagha Kingdom, the Pere of Akugbene-Mein, the Pere of Tuomo, the Pere of Isaba, the Pere of Kabowei, the Pere of Olodiama, the Pere of Iduwini, and the Pere of Oporomo. They were joined by monarchs from Urhobo and Isoko lands, including the Ovie of Uvwie, the Ovie of Oghara, the Ovie of Idjerhe, the Ovie of Ozoro, the Ovie of Okere-Urhobo, the Ovie of Ellu, the Ovie of Igbide, the Ovie of Arhavwarien, and the Odiologbo of Olomoro. Also present were the Obi of Aboh, the Obi of Atuma-Iga, the Oruarivie of Abraka, the Okobaro of Ughievwen, and others.

    Their collective presence gave the event a rare stamp of legitimacy and unity, underscoring Ogbe-Ijoh’s central place in the politics and culture of the Niger Delta.The event also attracted a wide spectrum of political leaders and business executives. Present were Dr. Dennis Otuaro, Administrator of the Presidential Amnesty Programme; Speaker of the Delta State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Emomotimi Guwor; Chairman of Warri Southwest Local Government, Chief Sylvester Oromoni; Hon Jukius Pondi, member representing Burutu Federal Constituency in the National Assembly, state lawmakers; and several government functionaries.

    Read Also: Niger Delta ex-agitator Amagbein hails new service chiefs

    From the corporate sector came Chief Tunde Smooth, a respected Ijaw leader and chairman of Smuton Nigeria Limited; Chief (Engr.) Kestin Pondi, Managing Director of Tantita Security Services Nigeria Limited, and Julius Berger’s General Manager, Renner Jensch, who was conferred with a chieftaincy title in recognition of his contributions to educational development in the region.

    Other indigenes and notable personalities and sons and daughters of the kingdom, included Chief Boro Opudu, Chairman of the Delta Waterways and Land Security Committee; Chief Frank Omare, Director General, Special Programmes to the Governor of Delta State; Ambassador Francis Oyimi; Chief Monday Keme; Chief Beatrice Izoukumor, the Amabenemo Ere of the kingdom; and lawyer Eric Omare. The ceremony, though, was more that the pageantry and stunning regalia and the colourful exotic Ijaw dancers, it was also an opportunity for the kingdom to demand more from the government.

    Speaking through his spokesman, Chief Favour Izuokumor, the Pere expressed gratitude to his subjects for their loyalty but also painted a sobering picture of the challenges facing the kingdom. The traditional ruler’s reign has been dogged by the unending tribal conflict with neighbouring Aladja community in Udu Local Government Area of the state.

    It was against the dark background that Izoukumor recalled that barely a year after his ascension in 2015, the renewed land dispute with Aladja disrupted peace and progress. Although relative calm has since returned, as was demonstrated by the presence of the Udu LGA Council, Chief Vincent Oyibode, he lamented that Ogbe-Ijoh remains underdeveloped despite its contributions to the state.  

  • Urhobos are Warri landowners, not tenants – Adehor

    Urhobos are Warri landowners, not tenants – Adehor

    Chief Westham Adehor is the Eguono of Agbarha-Warri and Osia of Okere-Urhobo kingdoms in Warri, and also the Urhobo ethnic nationality’s focal person in INEC exercise. He spoke with Elo Edremoda, emphasizing that the ethnic groups are better off as partners in progress rather than adversaries.EXCERPTS:

    On Credibility of INEC ward delineation exercise

    We at the Agbarha-Warri axis are conducting our own verification. Once we confirm that the coordinates (longitude and latitude) in our area are accurate, we’ll make our position known. If you look around Warri and its environs, most of the city’s population resides in Agbarha-Warri and Okere-Urhobo communities. That shows how significant our presence is.

    Itsekiris’ claim that Urhobos are customary tenant

    That’s not true. The Urhobos, particularly Agbarha-Warri, have been in Warri long before colonial contact. We have two riverine communities, Ukpokiti and Oteghele, and five in the urban area.

    When the Portuguese first arrived, they met Agbarha people on the ground and exchanged gifts. Later, the British came and signed treaties directly with our ancestors. Unfortunately, copies of those treaties were destroyed when the Itsekiris burnt the house of Igbi, the first Okuovo of Agbarha-Warri. But when we checked the British archives, we found the original records confirming our ownership.

    Even the courts acknowledged that once we locate the treaty, it remains valid evidence of our ownership. So, how can people we signed treaties with claim we don’t own our land? As for the Okere-Urhobo Kingdom, one of their families was taken to court by the Olu, and they won at the Supreme Court. The judgment clearly states that Okere-Urhobo was founded by three Urhobo brothers.

    Read Also: Olori Atuwatse III vows to ‘bring the world to Warri child

    We Urhobos are peace-loving and accommodating. We intermarry with our Itsekiri and Ijaw neighbours. Every family here has ties across ethnic lines. The truth is simple: the Urhobos are not tenants in Warri.

    There was even a court case over Warri Cemetery. The land belonged to the Ejenavo family from Agbassa. When the British wanted to pay £21 in compensation, the Olu demanded £13. The court rejected that claim, awarding £15 to Agbassa as community property, £5 to the Ejenavo family, and just £1 to the Olu. That clearly shows ownership. Everyone knows their boundaries: Agbarha has its land, Okere-Urhobo has theirs, and the Itsekiri have theirs.

     On delayed implementation of delineation exercise

    INEC is following due process. The initial report had some errors, and we’ve identified and submitted them for correction. We’ve also engaged the offices of the National Security Adviser and the Attorney General to ensure fairness and transparency.

    Each group has presented its documents to justify claims over certain areas, and INEC is reviewing them. Once corrections are made, the final delineation will be published. There’s no need for violence. Anyone who feels aggrieved should follow the proper channels. I’m confident the government will do the right thing.

    We must all live together peacefully. Leadership can be shared, if today an Urhobo man is council chairman, an Itsekiri or Ijaw can be vice chairman, and vice versa. We just need mutual respect and must stop using derogatory words like “tenants” or “slaves.” The Nigerian Constitution is clear: anyone who has lived in a place for ten years can vote and be voted for. We should focus on coexistence, not division.

  • Ogbe-Ijoh people own Warri – Keme

    Ogbe-Ijoh people own Warri – Keme

    Chief Monday Keme, Principal Secretary to Amako-Suo (King) of Ogbe-Ijoh Warri Kingdom, spoke to Shola O’Neil, on his monarch and peoples perspective on the issues surrounding Warri.

    On fear of fresh crisis in Warri

    There will be no return to crisis. Nobody wants to relive the pain of the past. The Ijaw, Itsekiri, and Urhobo are close neighbours, and disagreements are natural, but they must be resolved peacefully.

    The last crisis began with the quest for fair political representation, which was later resolved through the courts. The case went from the High Court to the Supreme Court over 11 years, and INEC is now implementing that judgment. Those who oppose it should go to court, not resort to violence. Besides, wards and being the majority in an area doesn’t guarantee victory; collaboration does.

    On Recent Ijaw/Itsekiri clash in Warri over billboards

    The incident was unfortunate. Billboards are just means of communication; the reaction was unnecessary. It reflects a lingering misconception that Ogbe-Ijoh people are not part of Warri.

    Historically, that is false. In 1955, the colonial government divided the Warri Division into two councils – the Warri Divisional Council and the Warri Urban District Council. Ogbe-Ijoh was one of seven councils under the Division, with four electoral wards within the Urban Council. Those wards were later fragmented through political interference, erasing Ogbe-Ijoh names and creating wards like Pessu. The struggle to restore our rightful recognition has continued since then.

    Read Also: Relief for commuters as Warri-Itakpe rail services resume

    On Past Government efforts

    Governor James Ibori acknowledged Ogbe-Ijoh’s political suppression and created Community Development Committees (CDCs) to ensure representation. Under Governor Uduaghan, the CDCs were scrapped, citing high governance cost. But every administration knows Ogbe-Ijoh’s presence in Warri.

    During the 1999 crisis, the Traditional Rulers and Chiefs Edict was amended to recognize four monarchs in Warri South: the Olu of Warri, Amako-suo of Ogbe-Ijoh; Orosuen of Okere-Urhobo, and Ovie of Agbarha. The Olu of Warri challenged this in court but lost both at the High Court and Court of Appeal.

    On Ogbe-Ijoh claims to Warri land

    The facts are clear. The Warri Assessment Report and the Southern Nigeria Civil Service List (1910) state that Warri land originally belonged to the Ogbe-Ijoh and Urhobo. The first British land lease, dated July 30, 1906, covered 360 hectares of Ogbe-Ijoh land. The warrant chief, Dore Numa, an Itsekiri leader, only signed on Ogbe-Ijoh’s behalf as a colonial intermediary. We still have written proof of that acknowledgment.

    On INEC ward delineation, outcome

    It’s the most credible delineation ever conducted because it was based on verified field data and the Supreme Court ruling. I led the Ogbe-Ijoh team in Warri South, and we were allocated three and a half wards. If we had four in 1955, it’s logical that our number should increase, not decrease. The exercise is fair, but its success depends on political will to implement it.

    On Argument that Demography has Change

    Not significantly. Much of our land is still occupied by government. Besides, INEC is constitutionally limited to 20 wards per local government, so adjustments must be fair, not political.

    On Argument over Olu of Warri title

    Historically, the title was “Olu of Itsekiri.” It was changed in 1952 by the Western Region government, sparking protests from the Ijaw and Urhobo. Later, a law clarified that the Olu’s authority does not extend to Ogbe-Ijoh or other Ijaw territories. If titles were tied to geography, the proper name would be “Olu of Benin River,” since treaties with the British used that title.

    Itsekiris accuse other tribes ‘Stealing’ Warri into their kingdoms

    The name Warri actually comes from the Ijaw word Wari, meaning “house.” When the British established their administrative base there, the name stuck. The Delta State Traditional Rulers Law recognizes Itsekiri as a kingdom, not Warri, just as Urhobo and Ijaw kingdoms are named after their communities.

    On Solution to crisis in Warri

    Peace depends on justice. INEC must be allowed to complete its work without interference. Majority alone doesn’t guarantee leadership; cooperation does. The new delineation reflects realities on the ground — 14 wards for the Ijaw and five for the Itsekiri in Warri South-West. The government must sustain peace, assure investors, and treat every ethnic group with fairness.

  • Urhobos, Ijaws are customary tenants, don’t own land in Warri – Mene

    Urhobos, Ijaws are customary tenants, don’t own land in Warri – Mene

    Mr. Sunny Amorighoye Mene is the Secretary of apex Itsekiri socio-cultural body, Itsekiri Leaders of Thought. In this interview with Shola O’Neil, explained why the FG and Delta State government are responsible for perceived spike in violence against his ethnic group, why the group are against the INEC ward exercise in Warri. EXCERPTS

    On the brewing crisis in Warri:

    The headquarters of Warri South-West Local Government Area was relocated from Ogidigben, its statutory location, to Ogbe-Ijoh, an Ijaw community. To date, official federal documents still list Ogidigben as the headquarters. However, the Delta State Government and House of Assembly amended the Federal Act to relocate it, and it has remained so, albeit illegally.

    When the government granted amnesty to those involved in the Warri crisis, it gave them economic benefits without addressing the criminal aspects of the conflict. That blanket amnesty created the impression that might is right and criminality pays because one man confronted the Federal Government through acts of brigandage and violence, shutting down the area, killing people, and committing heinous crimes.

    The Ijaws often threaten mayhem and war, believing that violence can once again bring them advantage. This remains one of the major issues fuelling the current situation in Warri. Now, the Urhobos are trying to leverage the same advantage. They joined forces with the Ijaws during the crisis and now seek to benefit as the Ijaws have done.The two groups believe they can use their demographic strength in Delta State to suppress the Itsekiri in their own homeland.

    There’s also a growing issue of territorial expansionism in defiance of the rule of law. Every inch of land in Warri territory has been litigated, and judgments exist. Yet, people are now twisting or disregarding these rulings to pursue territorial claims.

    Some believe their might is right because of the patronage they enjoy from government and oil companies. They see the Itsekiri as weak in numbers and military strength and therefore try to use force against them.

    On Ward Delineation: Why are Itsekiris Afraid?

    We (Itsekiris) were apprehensive about INEC’s ward delineation from the start because the commission failed to obey an Appeal Court judgment on the 10 – 12 ward structure for over 20 years.

    When wards were initially delineated nationwide, Warri South, Warri South-West, and Warri North each had 10 wards. But INEC later re-delineated Warri South into 12 wards. Under the 10-ward system, the Itsekiri had eight wards and the Urhobo had two. INEC’s new delineation reduced Itsekiri representation to six, effectively transferring many Itsekiri units to Urhobo-dominated areas, shrinking Itsekiri influence and expanding Urhobo control.

    Chief Joseph Otumara and others challenged this illegal act in court and won. The court declared INEC’s action null and void, directing it to revert to the 10-ward structure. That judgment, now over 25 years old, remains unimplemented. So, when this new delineation exercise began, our apprehension was justified. The same INEC that ignored a lawful judgment for decades cannot be trusted to treat us fairly now.

    Can Itsekiri Distrust halt a Supreme Court Judgment?

    We know it cannot. We are not opposed to enforcing the Supreme Court judgment, even though we disagree with the initial claims made at the lower court that the existing polling units and wards in Warri Federal Constituency are fake and fictitious.

    We are not against compliance with the judgment, but INEC must follow due process. Before implementation, we asked INEC to ensure neutrality and objectivity by removing Prof. Rhoda Gumus, an Ijaw, in the committee. She had previously handled a related case. It violates natural justice for her and other Ijaw elements within INEC to participate. We asked that she recused herself. INEC ignored our request and proceeded with Prof. Gumus leading the process. We believe this has compromised the outcome.

    When we noticed these irregularities, we sought an audience with the INEC Chairman, knowing he had met with Ijaw and Urhobo representatives twice. Despite several letters, our requests were ignored.

    INEC must comply with the Nigerian Constitution and the Electoral Act. These laws clearly outline how wards and polling units should be created. Section 20 (i) and (ii) of the Electoral Act states that delineation must rely on the voters’ register, not arbitrary data, not Google Maps, and certainly not ethnic profiling.

    INEC has no authority to conduct its own population census or to determine ethnic majority in any area. It also cannot create polling units without registered voters, as it did in some Ijaw and Urhobo areas.

    INEC must also adhere to its own criteria and guidelines for creating polling units and wards. In Warri North, INEC illegally extended coordinates into Ondo State, and in Warri Federal Constituency, it brought coordinates from Burutu LGA.

    Ijaws Say the Exercise is purely about population, now land ownership

    We never brought land ownership into the matter, INEC did. In its compiled list of communities, INEC inserted fictitious Ijaw and Urhobo settlements that do not exist. By doing so, it introduced ethnicity into an exercise that should be purely administrative. The voter register contains no ethnic classifications.

    In Warri South, INEC created three so-called “Ijaw wards” in areas where the Ijaw have no presence, inventing places like Buruama and Ewein. This was a deliberate attempt to help the Ijaw lay claim to Itsekiri territories. INEC was heavily compromised and induced. I stated this clearly in the office of the National Security Adviser. Those who undermined the integrity of this exercise should be arrested, investigated, and, if found guilty, punished to serve as a deterrent to others.

    Anyone who examines this case objectively will see the truth. INEC overstepped its boundaries, acting as if it were the NPC, Boundary Adjustment Commission, and even a legislative body empowered to create communities and local governments.

    Ogbe-Ijoh Lands in Warri Metropolis

    There are very clear judgments, some of which went all the way to the Supreme Court, stating that the Ijaws do not own any land in Warri metropolis. The courts have also barred any Ijaw individual from challenging the Itsekiris on land ownership in Warri.

    In a more recent judgment delivered by Justice Mukoro Marshall a former Chief Judge of Delta State, in suit No We/277/2012, the position of the Supreme Court was reaffirmed that  the Ijaw cannot contest ownership of land in Warri. The matter is foreclosed.

    Read Also: Okowa lauds Urhobos’ contribution to Nigeria’s devt. 

    Therefore, it is baffling that INEC would wake up and begin to act as a court of law by declaring that the Ijaws have land in Warri and even proceed to create three new wards for them, on what legal basis?

    In the Warri urban area, there were three principal leases that the colonial authorities used in creating Warri Urban; the leases of 1906, 1908, and 1911. The lessor in all three was Chief Dore Numa, acting on behalf of the Itsekiri people. These leases have since been returned to the Itsekiri Land Trust –  the original and rightful owners of the land. We have certified copies of all the relevant documents.

    The very word Warri, contrary to what anyone may claim, is a corruption of Iwere, (the Itsekiri word for their homeland). We are not saying there are no Ijaws or Urhobos living among us. We all coexist in Warri and desire peace, but peace cannot mean surrendering what rightly belongs to us. We cannot allow anyone to take over our ancestral lands under any pretext.

    On Ijaw landmarks in Warri South – Ogbe-Ijoh Market and other areas

    The Ogbe-Ijoh Market is merely a name, a nomenclature, just like you have Ibo Market in the same Warri. Does that mean the Igbos own that land? There’s Oku-Isoko in Effurun, do the Isoko people claim it as theirs? There is Dauda (named after a Yoruba), Alders Town, do these names confer ownership? These names were simply derived from people or tribes associated with the area at some point, but they have no title to the land.

    The Ogbe-Ijoh people went to court to claim ownership of that market, and they lost. So, what next? Does their loss in court mean nothing? Should they now resort to lawlessness and brigandage to achieve what the courts have denied them? That is precisely what we are witnessing; attempts to create confusion and provoke conflict despite subsisting court judgments.

    On Ijaw, Urhobo Court Victories on Warri Land

    They do not have. Let them bring forward the judgments they claim to have. I challenge them. We are talking about documented, verifiable court rulings, not propaganda.

    On Claims Itsekiri Warrant Chief Manipulated Treaties with Colonialists

    That is a very shallow and uninformed argument. We have the actual documents, the leases, the court judgments, and nowhere did Dore Numa sign as an agent for anyone other than the Itsekiri. Those making these allegations probably haven’t even seen the documents they are talking about.

    Each of those leases explicitly states that Dore Numa signed on behalf of the Itsekiri people – the owners of the land. The Warri Urban area, as it exists today, was created from those three leases of 1906, 1908, and 1911. That was why, in 1959, the colonial authorities returned the lands to the Itsekiri Land Trust because the Itsekiri were the lessors, the original owners.

    Those lands were acquired to create the Warri Township, and it wasn’t just Dore Numa who signed. Others, like Chief Ogbe and other notable Itsekiri nobles, also signed those documents, giving out those lands as Crown Lands.

    When the colonial masters were preparing to leave at independence, they returned the leases to their original owners – the Itsekiri Communal Land Trust. The same procedure was followed in Benin, Sapele and other areas.

    The deed of release stated that some portions of land, such as the Warri General Hospital, the Naval Base, the Police Station, the Court premises, and similar public facilities, would remain under government use. But all other lands, including those housing markets, private companies, and residences, were released to the Itsekiri Land Trust.

    Under the deed of mandate, the Trust was instructed to issue fresh leases to individuals or companies with unexpired leases. This was duly carried out by the Itsekiri Communal Land Trust. We have certified true copies of all these deeds, and they are available in government records. If the Ogbe-Ijoh people or anyone else had genuine documents, why didn’t they tender them in court when they challenged the Itsekiris, and lost?

    You must separate facts from propaganda. The Itsekiri position is grounded in law and documented evidence. What others have are sentimental and political arguments, not legal ones.

    In our memorandum to the National Security Adviser, we listed all the relevant cases and judgments. Those currently occupying parts of these lands have no valid documents proving ownership. Their occupation doesn’t confer title; the law is clear on that.

    On Calls to Change Olu of Warri to Olu of Itsekiri

    Let’s be very clear: the Urhobos and the Ijaws are settlers within the Warri Federal Constituency where the Olu of Warri is the traditional overlord. Unfortunately, government policies and political considerations have worsened these conflicts. The Agbassa people, for instance, cannot claim to have a kingdom. Any community that did not have a kingdom before Nigeria became a republic in 1960 cannot suddenly declare one. The same goes for Okere, it is not a kingdom.

    On Urhobo legal Victory on Warri Land

    This is being twisted. In Dudu vs. Daniel Okumagba, Justice Ekeruche made it clear that the case did not address radical ownership. It only recognized possessory rights, which means the right to farm and occupy land given by another. How can they now suddenly have a kingdom there?

    Okere (Warri) has six quarters. Five of them are Itsekiri quarters, and only one (Idumu-Sobo), is Urhobo. The Urhobos came in as in-laws to the Okere people, who gave them land for farming. They planted rubber trees on the land, and over time, that became their area of residence. But to now turn that into a “kingdom” is historically and legally baseless.

    The latest trend of converting clan structures into kingdoms is dangerous. If the government doesn’t stop this illegality, in 10 or 15 years, Nigeria will have over 3,000 so-called kingdoms. Historically and officially, Agbassa, Gbaramatu, and Ogbe-Ijoh are clans, not kingdoms.

    For the Olu of Warri, Chief Obafemi Awolowo did not change it. It was Olu of Warri from time. After the 88-year interregnum in Warri Kingdom, when Ginuwa II was to be crowned in 1936, the Urhobos resisted, arguing that since then Warri Province (included Urhobo land, which now sits in 8 LGA, Ijaws in current three LGAs and other areas up to Kwale), the title would make him overlord. To avoid conflict, he was crowned Olu of Itsekiri.

    When Ginuwa II died in 1949, and Erejuwa II was to be crowned, the matter resurfaced. By then, the Warri Province was under the Western Regional Government. The debate reached the parliament in Ibadan. After due consideration, and the Warri Province had been renamed Delta Province, Erejuwa II was crowned Olu of Warri, restoring the title to its historical and rightful form.

    The Urhobo Progressive Union petitioned the Secretary of the Colonies, but investigations confirmed that Olu of Warri was the correct title, with the Warri Province then covering just the the present Warri Federal Constituency. These are verifiable historical facts.

    The Ijaws cannot have a Pere of Ogbe-Ijoh Warri Kingdom. It simply doesn’t make sense. Warri is Itsekiri land, and Ogbe-Ijoh is Ijaw. You can’t dislike the Itsekiris yet covet their land, name, and heritage.

    The Urhobos often raise such issues when their kinsman is governor. But the current governor has rightly distanced himself from it; he’s the governor of all Deltans, not just the Urhobos.

    Recipe for Peace Coexistence

    We must all learn to live in peace. My wife is Urhobo, from the Ekwerre family in Agbarho, Ughelli North. All my children bear Urhobo middle-names. My brother’s wife is Ijaw, from Gbaramatu. We have no personal issues with any ethnic group. All we ask is that our neighbours respect our history and our rights. We want peace, but not peace at the expense of justice.

  • Warri on edge, again: politics reopen old wounds, fault lines

    Warri on edge, again: politics reopen old wounds, fault lines

    • How, why INEC wards threatens fragile peace

    Two decades after conflict tore through Warri, stealing its peace and slowing its progress, unease is once again rising across its creeks. A Supreme Court–ordered ward delineation has reopened old wounds between the Ijaw and Itsekiri in the creeks. On the upland, the Itsekiri are locked in new disputes with the Urhobos of Okere and Agbassa, and the Ijaws of Ogbe-Ijoh in battles rooted in land ownership and the contested title of the Olu of Warri. South-South Regional Manager Shola Nath O’Neil traces the politics, history, and lingering resentments threatening to pull this oil-rich region back into turmoil.

    The Ijaw/Itsekiri crisis in Warri, Delta State, end 22 years ago, but residents of the oil-rich constituency are once again sleeping uneasily. The same undercurrents of tribal distrust, political rivalry, and economic tension that triggered the bloody conflict between 1996 and 2004 are resurfacing, pushing the fragile peace toward the brink.

    Across the creeks and city centers, leaders of the two rival groups have resumed verbal hostilities, each accusing the other of provocation and injustice. In the riverside communities of the three Warri local government areas, the rhetoric is fiery; in the upland, tension is heightened by the Urhobo-Itsekiri dispute over who truly owns Warri. The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) recent ward delineation exercise has further complicated an already combustible situation.

    For many residents, the atmosphere brings back haunting memories of the dark years when tribal militias ran amok through the city, killing, maiming, and setting homes and businesses ablaze.

    The unease is being stoked by a new kind of warfare; digital and physical. “Keyboard Warriors” from the rival ethnic camps now trade venomous words on Facebook, X, TikTok, and WhatsApp, posting hate-filled content and spreading false news in a bid to please their patrons.

    Yet, while community leaders publicly call for calm, developments on the ground tell a more worrying story. Chief Godspower Gbenekama (Fieowei of Gbaramatu Kingdom) and Monday Keme of Gbaramatu (Principal Secretary to the Amako-suo of Ogbe-Ijoh Warri, alongside Itsekiri and Agbarha leaders, told our reporter they remain committed to peace, the conditions, followers’ actions suggest otherwise.

    These actions, activities of fifth columnists, and the struggle among political and economic interest groups to retain control of oil royalties, political offices, and proceeds from illegal bunkering are steadily eroding the region’s uneasy calm.

    In the riverside areas, the Itsekiris and Ijaws of Gbaramatu, Ogbe-Ijoh, Egbema, and surrounding communities in Warri Southwest and Warri North LGAs are sparring over land, political positions, and territories gained or lost during the last war. In the metropolis, the Urhobo and Itsekiri are once again clashing over the legitimacy of ‘newly created’ kingdoms and traditional titles, while quietly positioning themselves for future electoral contests. The Ogbe-Ijoh community revived claim to parts of Warri, particularly the waterfront enclaves and wards recently allocated by INEC, has reignited old suspicions.

    Emeka Nworie, an eastern businessman who lost his shop and livelihood during the war, said he sees disturbing similarities between now and the buildup to the 1996 violence.

    “These days, we are constantly bombarded with threats of war on social media,” he said. “This time it’s worse because, in the 1990s, there was no Facebook or TikTok to issue threats. It shows we learned nothing from the pain of that crisis, which still stares us in the face.”

    For many like Nworie, the parallels are chilling. The same actors, the same grievances, and the same fiery rhetoric that plunged Warri into chaos decades ago are once again on the rise, herding the area into yet another dark chapter in its history, if the key players do not pull the plug.

    Recurring Patterns of Attacks and Violence

    This reporter recalls how floats celebrating the first anniversary of Ogiame Atuwatse II, the Olu of Warri (1987–2015), were attacked in May 1988 by some Agbassa youths for allegedly “trespassing” into their kingdom. That incident marked one of the earliest sparks in a chain of events that crippled economic and social life in Warri and pushed Delta State to its knees.

    Thirty-seven years later, the feeling of déjà vu is unmistakable, and strong. The former prince from that royal household, Tsola Emiko, the son of Ogiame Atuwatse II, now sits on the throne as Ogiame Atuwatse III. Ironically, though he was only four years old when the 1988 attack occurred, his own anniversary celebration has suffered a similar fate. In early September, a float marking his fourth coronation anniversary was attacked by youths from the same Agbassa area.

    These recent incidents have rekindled ethnic suspicion and reopened old wounds, leaving the peace between the communities fragile once again. The latest clashes have already been linked to at least two deaths.

    Two weeks after the attack on the Olu of Warri’s celebration float, Itsekiri youths from the Ekurede-Itsekiri area of Warri metropolis were accused of launching an assault that left several Ogbe-Ijoh indigenes badly injured. The victims were part of a team putting up posters to announce the 10th coronation anniversary of their monarch, His Royal Majesty Couple Oromoni, Monbene III, the Pere of Ogbe-Ijoh Warri Kingdom.

    Chief Keme condemned the attack in an interview with our reporter in Ogbe-Ijoh. “The posting of banners or billboards does not justify such violence,” he said. “Posters are simply a means of passing information.”

    While that may be true on the surface, the underlying motives tell a deeper story. An Itsekiri leader who also spoke with our reporter accused the Ijaw youths of provocation and of attempting to rewrite historical boundaries.

    “Find out where those so-called victims were attacked,” the Itsekiri leader said. “They were pasting banners right inside Itsekiri territory. Were they really just posting, or were they throwing stones at Ekurede-Itsekiri by the bypass?. Beside, it was not the Itsekiris that tore their banners, it was the police who felt that the action could start another fight.”

    Observers familiar with the terrain say the issue runs much deeper than the “posting of billboards.” Disputes over ownership of the NPA, McIver, and Ogbe-Ijoh markets, as well as adjoining lands, remain festering wounds between the two groups. These flashpoints, which were heavily bombarded during the 1997–2003 crisis have long been subjects of bitter litigation and political maneuvering. Dozens of victims were killed in those areas, their homes burned, their fates sealed by tribal profiling.

    Today, the sense of unease among residents and community stakeholders is sharpened by the reappearance of some key figures from that earlier conflict. The current Pere of Ogbe-Ijoh, HRM Couple Oromoni, was a central figure during the 1997 crisis. He was directly affected when the military government of General Sani Abacha controversially relocated the headquarters of Warri Southwest Local Government Area from Ogbe-Ijoh town to the Itsekiri community of Ogidigben, despite an election that Oromoni had won.

    Oromoni had contested and defeated another Ijaw candidate, Mr. Bosin Ebikeme of Gbaramatu, in the council election. He barely had time to assume office before the crisis erupted, derailing his tenure, governance and igniting waves of violence.

    Nearly three decades later, the past seems to echo again. The monarch’s younger brother, Chief Sylvester Oromoni, has now emerged as chairman of that council. His emergence aided by an unwritten power-rotation agreement between the two ethnic groups as part of the post-crisis peace accord. He succeeded an Itsekiri, Mr. Taye Duke.

    Given this background and the familiarity of the main actors, many observers expected the leaders of both ethnic groups to draw lessons from the past and chart a new path to peaceful coexistence. But investigations reveal that the issues have long spiraled beyond the original dispute over the relocation of the LGA headquarters.

    The Warri Crisis opened a Pandora ‘s Box, one that extended beyond politics into the larger struggle to settle historical scores, fight for resource control and development of the Niger Delta. What began as a fight over administrative boundaries evolved into a broader contest for power, oil royalties, and recognition.

    Mr. Sunny Amorighoye Mene, Secretary of the Itsekiri Leaders of Thought, blames both the federal and state governments for mishandling the post-crisis phase. He said official patronage and political empowerment of those behind the violence emboldened some groups to act with impunity.

    “People now believe that might is right,” Mene said. “The government rewarded the aggressors without addressing the criminal aspects of the conflict. There’s a negative historical trajectory rooted in the 1997–2012 Warri ethnic crisis. One ethnic group believes it emerged victorious and that gave them the right to usurp and take whatever they want, including other people’s land. That perception has given it undue political and economic advantages.”

    All Groups Should Sheathe Their Swords

    Mr. Aaron Aghorigho, Managing Director of Dama Holdings Nigeria Limited – a thriving trading company near the NNS Delta Naval Base, like Nowrie, expressed deep concern over the latest threats to peace in Warri.

    Flaying the battle for control of the city, Aghorigho lamented that ethnic bickering and clashes over ownership have stunted development, curtailed business opportunities, and disrupted the lives of residents.

    “Nobody can claim ownership of Warri,” he said. “True Warri belongs to all tribes, not just those within the state. There are the Old Warri people – those from all over Nigeria who love the city and have invested in it. They have more at stake than the agitators, who have nothing to lose.”

    Appealing to stakeholders to “sheathe their swords,” Aghorigho highlighted the lack of investments and limited economic opportunities in the city. While unemployment among youths is rising, he said there is also a shortage of skilled manpower. He urged those with resources, who might otherwise prepare for conflict, to channel them instead into vocational and technical training programs.

    Read Also: Relief for commuters as Warri-Itakpe rail services resume

    Killing the Peacemaker:

    Tensions, however, escalated further after a series of gruesome killings, and alleged attack on Apata, an Ijaw village, by suspected Itsekiris marauders. Among the dead victims was Jerry Aduara, chairman of an Urhobo vigilante group, allegedly killed by Itsekiri militias on Odion Road in Warri. Aduara, 49, was reportedly on a peace mission to an Itsekiri enclave when he was murdered.

    Sources told our reporter that Aduara had devoted himself to mediating between Itsekiri and Urhobo communities, hoping to prevent the type of violence witnessed during the 1990s and early 2000s.

    Violence has been rising in Warri before that incident. Earlier in September, an Itsekiri youth, Dele Ogunmayo, was shot dead allegedly by men in military fatigues. His remains was deposited at Warri Central Hospital.

    These deaths and frequent brawls have amplified fear across the city, where the scars of past devastation are still visible. Thousands of warehouses in the NPA area remain largely unoccupied or taken over by mega-churches. Burnt buildings and graves of victims serve as reminders of the cost the war.

    Estimates suggest that about 3,000 people died during the Warri crises across the riverside areas and Warri metropolis. Many Itsekiri towns remain desolate and uninhabited, and the current unrest makes return to these communities highly risky. The city’s economy, and indeed that of the state, has struggled to recover from the resulting slump.

    This left a generation of young men without jobs or hope. Many turned to tricycle (keke) operations for a living, while others engaged in cybercrime, ritual activities, organ harvesting, and working for beneficiaries of the crisis. Several followed oil companies and contractors that abandoned the area and relocated to neighboring Bayelsa, Rivers and even Lagos states.

    Members of the Ndigbo Traders Association said many of its members lost their lives, others died from illnesses triggered by business setbacks during the crisis. Many relocated to their villages, where many succumbed to poverty and hardship.

    Who Owns Warri?

    The question of Warri’s ownership is central to recurring tensions. Both Ijaw and Itsekiri groups trace the name to colonial-era mispronunciations. While Itsekiri historians argue that Warri derives from “Iwere” (Itsekiri word for homeland), Chief Keme and other Itsekir leaders say it comes from the Ijaw word “Ware,” meaning house.

    However, Warri is home to many and more than a city. It encompasses three LGAs: Warri South LGA, with headquarters in Warri metropolis; Warri North (Koko is headquarter), and Warri Southwest, whose headquarters location from Ogbe-Ijoh to Ogidigben (Itsekiri town in Escravos area) sparked the first major crisis. These areas form Warri Federal Constituency, which is a part of Delta South Senatorial District. Ijaws, Itsekiris, and Urhobos (of Warri metropolis) call it home.

    Communal conflicts worldwide typically arise from land disputes, and Warri is no exception. In the metropolis, Urhobo residents of Okere and their Itsekiri neighbors have long fought over land ownership. Prominent Okere Urhobo leaders, including the Okumagba brothers, Daniel and Benjamin, engaged in decade-long  legal battles with Itsekiris of Okere, each side claiming victory.

    Along the waterfront areas, the settlements are inhabited by Ijaws of Ogbe-Ijoh and Itsekiris. Land disputes here, including ownership of properties in the NPA and Ogbe-Ijoh market, were flashpoints of the first crisis. In Warri North, Ijaws of Egbema and Itsekiris of Koko continue to contest ownership of hamlets and towns, though less intensely. The Warri Southwest conflict between Gbaramatu Ijaws and Itsekiris of Ugborodo and neighboring communities is well documented.

    Much Ado About the ‘Olu of Warri’

    The Olu of Warri, overlord of the Itsekiris across all three Warris and beyond, remains the most prominent traditional ruler in the LGAs and Delta State. His title, however, has long been a point of contention. Neighboring ethnic groups argue that the king’s influence is overstated, particularly over the Ogbe-Ijoh, Isaba, Diebiri, and Gbaramatu Ijaws in Warri Southwest, and the Urhobos of Okere and Agbassa in the metropolis.

    Attempts to change the title by the Ijaws and Urhbobos have repeatedly caused friction. In 2003, Comrade Ovouzorie Macaulay, who was Commissioner for Inter-ethnic Relations, said the title was untouchable, prompting criticism from Ijaw leaders, including Chief Edwin Clark, who slammed him as a Baby Commissioner.

    Chiefs Keme and Gbenekama, have again insisted that the title of Olu of Warri fuels tensions. They argue it grants the monarch undue sense of authority over other traditional rulers, tribes and kingdoms. “The title has an intoxicating effect on the monarch and his subjects,”

    Gbenekama, who vehemently condemned the tag of customary tenants on his Gbaramatu kinsmen by the Itsekiris contends that the title was politically imposed. “The Awolowo government of Western Nigeria changed it from ‘Olu of Itsekiri’ to ‘Olu of Warri’ in 1957. Yet, in doing so, it was made clear that the Olu’s authority does not extend to kings of Gbaramatu, Isaba, or Egbema, or their lands.”

    Mene however differed. He argues that Gbenekema and others are threatened by the influence and recognition that the Olu rightly deserves. He traces the compromise on the title back to 1936, when Ginuwa II was crowned Olu of Itsekiri to prevent conflict with the Urhobo, who argued that Warri Province at the time included their lands. By 1957, the title “Olu of Warri” was confirmed for the present Warri Federal Constituency.

    As the contest over Olu of Warri title go on, Urhobo kingdoms of Agbarha-Warri and Okere-Warri are sprung up. Ijaw kingdoms in the area have also added the prefixes of Warri to their kingdom to reflect their stake and claim. Ogbe-Ijoh Kingdom is Ogbe-Ijoh Warri kingdom, a move to reassert sovereignty in their sides of Warri.

    Beyond ceremonial concerns, the disputes reflect deeper struggles over land, patronage, and control of the region’s vast oil and gas resources. Warri area sits on vast reserves of oil and gas.  Battles over small hamlets and fishing settlements often relate to nearby oil wells and pipelines, which attract royalties and patronages from companies. This is why their names are subject of disputes. For instance, Ijalla (Itsekiri) versus Ijalagha (Ijaw), and Okerenkoko (site of the National Maritime University), claimed differently by Itsekiris of Omadino, as Okerenghigho.

    The aftermath of the Warri wars empowered the actors financially and politically, particularly the Ijaws of Gbaramatu. They view the conflict as a fight for freedom from the cultural and political influence of the smaller yet more educated and politically advanced Itsekiris.

    “What is happening now is about righting ancient wrongs,” said an Ijaw leader from Ogbe-Ijoh. “The Itsekiris used marriages and relationships with Europeans to gain influence, which they then used to oppress our forefathers,” one member said.

    “We Keep Conceding, Ijaws Want to Take Everything” – Itsekiri

    On the other hand, some Itsekiris leaders feel they have made too much concessions to the Ijaw groups to sustain the peace. When the Warri Crisis ended in 2003, key concessions were made by the Itsekiris to the Ijaws, including the rotation of political offices in Warri Southwest. The arrangement allowed Chief George Ekemupolo, an Ijaw and younger sibling of Chief Government Ekpemupolo (Tompolo), to be elected chairman of Warri Southwest LGA for the first time.

    In 2019, another Gbaramatu politician, Mr. Dennis Guwor, became the state lawmaker representing Warri Southwest LGA. By 2023, he was inaugurated as Speaker of the Delta State House of Assembly. Before Guwor, the seat was traditionally held by Itsekiris, including Hon. Daniel Mayuku and others (four terms).

    These political gains by the Ijaws have set off alarm bells among Itsekiri politicians and elites, who argue that the Ijaws overran and seized their communities during the crisis. Their fears are compounded by the state of their desolate riverside communities.

    Our finding showed that the Itsekiris have over the years after the crisis moved from the hinterland to the mainland, often building mansions in urban centers from wealth accumulated during construction booms such as the Escravos Gas-to-Liquid project in Ugborodo, and other activities at the expense of their villages in the rural areas.

    Although Chief Ayirimi Emami, built the 911 resort and other projects, the business and profitability are affected by infighting within the ethnic group. Similarly, some members of the tribe are facing questions over mismanagement of both communities’ wealth and national and international projects that they are saddled with executing in their communities. A new town project sponsored by Chevron, an FG shoreline protection project, and a FIFA stadium are among comatose or abandoned projects in Ugborodo that could have change the landscapes of Itsekiri areas.

    Conversely, Ijaw communities are experiencing boom. Oporoza, the traditional headquarters, Okerenkoko, Kokodiagbene, Kunukuma, Benikrukru, and others are now hosting major projects and drawing visitors, artistes and actors from across the country. Gbenekama said his kinsmen were returning home in droves and developing properties, which is raising the profile of those areas.

    An Itsekiri youth, who refused to be named because of his connection to Tantita Security owned by Tompolo, conceded that the Itsekiris were victims of both their failures and fear of Ijaw militias’ incursions. “Many Itsekiris were killed by Ijaw militants during the crisis. We lost family members and property, and were forced to flee. People are afraid of rebuilding because the unknown factor. The Ijaws who were the aggressors have no such fears. Governments’ agencies like DESOPADEC and NDDC found it easier to work in Ijaw areas because they wouldn’t be attacked, unlike in Itsekiri lands,” our source added.

    INEC’s Ward Delineation: Fuel on the Fire

    It was against this backdrop, that the recent ward delineation exercise by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) assumed more significance and has heightened tensions.

    In 2022, after many years of shunning politicis, the Ijaws secured a strategic Supreme Court victory aimed at better reflecting their population in the Warri Federal Constituency. The apex court directed INEC to carry out a fresh ward delineation.

    Historically, the Itsekiris dominated the Warri South seat in the House of Assembly since 1999. The House of Representatives and Warri North assembly positions were exclusive preserves of the Itsekiris, while Warri South constituencies are shared with Urhobos. But the INEC exercise and an emerging alliance between the Ijaws and Urhobo is set to change the political dynamics.

    The INEC ward delineation held between July 2024 and April 2025, is set to redraw the political map, handing advantage to the Ijaws. In Warri South, the number of wards increased from 10 to 20. In Warri Southwest, wards rose from 10 to 19; of these, Gbaramatu Ijaws received seven, Ogbe-Ijoh five, Isaba and Diebiri one each, and Itsekiris five. Warri North went from 10 to 18 wards, split nine each between Ijaws of Egbema and Itsekiris. In Warri South metropolis, Urhobos secured 10, Itsekiris seven, and Ogbe-Ijoh three.

    The Itsekiris have rejected the outcome of the exercise, accusing INEC of bias. Mene claimed that Prof. Rhoda Gumus, and other Ijaw INEC officials involved in executing the Supreme Court judgment, compromised neutrality of the commission. “INEC should have removed all Ijaw and Urhobo elements from the delineation committee. We challenged this in court, but while the matter was ongoing, INEC proceeded using an Ijaw official,” Mene said.

    “The exercise was skewed against the Itsekiris. INEC brought coordinates from Burutu LGA and Ondo State into Warri constituencies, exceeding its mandate.”

    For the Ijaws and Urhobos, however, the exercise reflected demographic realities. Dr. Paul Bebenimibo, a Gbaramatu focal person, described the exercise as one of the freest and most credible. “It was thorough, technically, and painstakingly executed,” he said.

    His kinsman, Gbenekama criticized the Itsekiris for constantly “changing the goalpost midgame.”

    “Why is it that any time something does not favor the Itsekiris, they try to derail it?” Ward delineation and politics are about numbers. For the past 15 years, the Ijaws have been developing their communities. Our young men are returning home, especially because of the Maritime University. Our communities are growing rapidly. Meanwhile, many Itsekiri areas are empty. We are polygamous and they are monogamous,” he said.

    Nevertheless, our findings revealed some discontentment even within Ijaw communities of Ogbe-Ijoh, Diebiri, and Isaba. Those who spoke were unhappy with the distribution of the 14 wards allotted to their ethnic group in Warri Southwest.

    “With this arrangement, no other Ijaw kingdom can produce a political officeholder without Gbaramatu’s consent,” one source said. “They gave themselves seven wards and reduced others to five or one. They want everyone to bow before them before gaining anything.”

    IN Warri South, Chief Westham Adehor told our reporter that the Agbarha Warri people are vetting the coordinates used in the exercise. He said some issues they raised have been presented to the relevant authorities.

    INEC’s Head of Voter Education and Publicity in Delta State, Nse Abasi Udom, in an interview with our reporter in Asaba, debunked accusation of bias by the Itsekiri. She said the commission is busy with continuous voters registration.

    “We are not doing delineation now that process is over. What we’re doing is voter registration,” Udom said. “We are not compromised. I only resumed in Delta a few months ago, after the delineation exercise had been concluded, so I can’t comment on that process.”

    Udom urged the Itsekiri to channel their energy into mobilizing for registration rather than revisiting the delineation issue.

    Warri Federal Constituency Seat as the Target

    The INEC exercise and the resulting redrawing of wards have altered the political calculus in the Warri Federal Constituency. Once dominant, the Itsekiris now face political marginalization. The federal seat in Warri may soon become out of their reach, leaving them potentially as the only tribe in Delta State without representation at the national level.

    By comparison, the Urhobos, spread across eight LGAs in Delta Central, have three House of Representatives seats. The Ijaws have two exclusive constituencies – Burutu and Bomadi/Patani – while the Isoko (the fourth ethnic group in the constituency) has the Isoko constituency. These constituencies, along with Warri, largely determine the Delta South Senatorial seat, a position once held by Ijaw leader James Manager for a record five consecutive terms (2003–2023).

    “The Itsekiris risk becoming politically irrelevant under the new order,” a political analyst said. “Negotiation is the only viable option for them.”

    Yet, negotiation faces challenges. Many Itsekiri perceive the Ijaws, particularly from Gbaramatu, of pursuing an agenda to dominate, not just the Itsekiri, but the entire state.

    Chief Keme dispelled these fears, but called for dialogue, stressing that being the majority does not automatically guarantee election victory.

    Whether negotiation without the shadow of violence will succeed in Warri remains uncertain. How the tribes navigate this delicate path will determine the future of an area rich in resources but scarred by decades of conflict.

    Meanwhile, Governor Sheriff Oborevwori, is daintily skirting around the issues to avoid being sucked into the fray, after his faux pas at the initial stage. He came under attack when he told the warring groups to sheathe their sword until after his tenure, a statement that did not go well with the public.

    His aides said, “The governor is working behind the scene to douse the tension and forge another workable model for the three groups to live in peace. It is not everything that he does that should be publicized.”

  • Ethical Journalism: FG, UNICEF charge the media on child rights protection

    Ethical Journalism: FG, UNICEF charge the media on child rights protection

    Media practitioners in Nigeria have been urged to comply with the United Nations’ protocol on the rights of children while reporting issues involving them.

    Journalists were also asked to ensure accuracy, fairness and balanced reportage to dowse tention build trust and promote dialogue in the country; just as they were urged to shun framing news and casting headlines that violate the rights of the child or put them in harms way.

    The Chief of Field Office of the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Dr. Anselem Audu spoke while delivering a keynote Lecture at a two-day workshop by UNICEF and the Federal Ministry of Information, for journalists in the Southsouth, Southeast and North Central zones.

    The theme of the training was: “Ethical journalism and Child rights Reporting.” It was held in Port Harcourt, the Rivers State capital.

    Speaking, Audu described the media as a critical and powerful instrument to shapen public opinion, and amplifer of the voice of the vulnerable of the society, particularly, children.

    He further described ethical reporting as crucial and critical for safeguarding the child’s future, gives him chance to heal and facilitates his reintegration into the society without mental, social or psychological damage to his personality, adding that the name, image or illustrations that easily identifies him must be avoided in the reportage, and any interview on him must be with the consent of the parents or guardian.

    “I want to emphasize the critical role journalists play in shaping public perception and influencing the well-being of children in Nigeria.

    “Ethical journalism characterised by accuracy, fairness and balance is the antidote to misinformation, and hate speech.

    “The power of the media in shaping children’s lives cannot be overemphasised. The media has the power to amplify children’s voices, hightlight their struggles and bring attention to issues that affect their well-being. However, this power comes with great and major responsibility.

    “The way we report on children and the stories, can have a lasting impact on their lives.

    “Ethical reporting protects the vulnerable, especially, children and women. Children are not miniatures to adults, thy are vulnerable, their minds are impassionable and their futures are shaped by how thy are presented. Ethical Reporting means protecting their identity, it means never publishes a child’s name or images in a way that will stigmatise them, expose them to retaliation, or retraumarize them, especially children affected by violence, conflicts or abuse.

    “It means giving them a voice, not speaking for them, it involves interviewing children with dignity and consent, allowing them to share their experience in a safe and respectful manner, it means prioritizing ther best interests.

    “A sensational heading about a child might sale your papers, but an ethical story protects the child’s right to future free from shame and harm, you are not just Reporters, you are guardians of their dignity.

    “Ethical reporting exist because often times, damages are done whenever they (ethical reporting) is ignored, and the damage can be devastating.” Audu regretted.

    Corroborating UNICEF, the FG, further highlighted the dangers in engaging in what they called unprofessionalism in reporting children issues, and asked the media to always focus on the importance of responsible journalism in shaping public perception and positively influencing the well-being of children in Nigeria.

    Speaking, through the Permanent Secretary, Federal Ministry of Information and National Orientation, Mr. Chinasa Ogbodo, who was represented at the event by the Assistant Director and Head of the Child Rights Information Bureau , Falayi Temitoye, the FG emphasised on the need for media to be in forefront in propagating children’s interest and wellbeing with the view to building them up to be responsive and responsible in the future.

    Also, in his welcome speech, UNICEF Country Representative, Wafaa Saeed,
    regretted that children often times do not have voice, their voices are not heard, regarded in Nigeria, except by the media.

    Represented by the UNICEF Communication Specialist, Susan Akila, Saeed “we believe the media are the foot soldiers, important not just to UNICEF but to the children of Nigeria. This training ensures journalists do not report children in harm’s way, and that perpetrators of child injustice are not left unreported and unpunished,” she said, urging participants to use the training to sharpen their reporting skills on issues affecting children.”

  • Enugu lauds MTN Foundation for supporting education, youth empowerment

    Enugu lauds MTN Foundation for supporting education, youth empowerment

    The Enugu State Government has commended the MTN Foundation for its continued investment in education and youth empowerment across Nigeria, describing the company’s scholarship scheme as a vital contribution to human capital development.

    Governor Peter Mbah, who was represented by the Commissioner for Environment and Climate Change, Prof. Sam Ugwu, gave the commendation on Wednesday at the 2025 MTN Foundation Scholarship Award and Alumni Induction Ceremony held at The Dome Event Centre, Enugu.

    Mbah said the state was delighted to host this year’s edition of the programme, which recognises outstanding students in science, technology, and other disciplines, as well as visually impaired scholars under the Foundation’s special scheme for the blind.

    He noted that MTN’s intervention in education aligns with the state’s vision of transforming learning through innovation and technology, adding that the administration had made education a top priority with a 33 percent budgetary allocation.

    “We have launched the Enugu State Education Transformation Plan (EETP) to move from rote learning to experiential learning, innovation and productivity,” he said. “Through our Smart Green Schools, which commenced in September, we are equipping our children with the skills to compete globally.”

    The governor, while commending MTN Foundation for identifying education as a key driver of national growth, urged the telecom giant to extend its corporate social responsibility initiatives to other critical sectors that impact the lives of the people.

    “We share the same philosophy with the MTN Foundation in seeing education as a catalyst for development,” he added. “The state government is open to partnership with MTN in delivering more impactful projects to our people.”

    Read Also: MTN seeks Nigeria, South Africa collaboration to boost trade

    The General Manager of the MTN Foundation, Calima Inino, said the scholarship and alumni induction ceremony was a celebration of excellence, resilience, and the boundless potential of the Nigerian youth.

    He disclosed that the foundation had awarded nearly 15,000 scholarships since inception, benefiting over 5,000 students nationwide.

    “You are not here by chance,” Inino told the new scholars. “You have demonstrated not just academic excellence but character and resilience. With the MTN Skills Academy, we will continue to equip you with digital and leadership skills that prepare you for the future.”

    Also speaking, the Commissioner for Science and Technology, Enugu State, Dr. Lawrence Eze, commended MTN Foundation for constructing and equipping a modern science laboratory at Union Boys Secondary School, Awkunanaw, which he said exemplified how public-private collaboration can transform education outcomes.

    One of the beneficiaries, Akas Favour Ngozi, a student of the Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO), thanked the Foundation for “believing in our ability and giving us the platform to pursue our dreams.”

    The event attracted education stakeholders, government officials, parents, and members of the MTN Scholarship Alumni network, who hailed the initiative as a model for sustainable youth development in Nigeria.

  • Arthur Eze endorses TYGF vision

    Arthur Eze endorses TYGF vision

    Prince Arthur Eze, Group Chairman of Atlas Oranto Petroleum International Ltd, has endorsed Tinubu Young Generation Forum’s (TYGF) vision and manifesto, stating that young people are instrumental to shaping the nation’s future.

    Eze, a renowned oil magnate and philanthropist made the endorsement during a roundtable meeting with delegates on Tuesday in Abuja.

    He praised the forum’s dedication to promoting President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, emphasizing the importance of youth participation in governance and nation-building initiatives.

    He stated that he firmly believes that the forum’s efforts will foster national unity and development while urging more young people to get involved in shaping Nigeria’s future, citing the need for collective action towards progress.

    As a prominent figure from the South East, Eze reaffirmed the region’s support for President Tinubu’s administration, calling for his re-election in 2027.

    He described Tinubu as “God’s gift to Nigeria,” highlighting his commitment to inclusivity, development, and national unity.

    During the visit, the National President of TYGF, Hon. Prince Kevin Timothy, who is also the CEO of Kev-Crave Global Ltd, led the Regional Manager of AVIC Aviation Industry to present the newly launched C919 and C909 aircraft models to his mentor and father figure, Engr. Arthur Eze.  

    Kevin applauded the endorsement and commitment of the Prince’s commitment to what young people are doing in Nigeria while highlighting discussions on business opportunities and investment prospects in Nigeria.

    “Through dedication and hard work, the youths remain the foundation of national development and I recommend that AVIC Aviation industry should consider establishing aircraft hangars and aviation training facilities in the SouthEast region.

    Read Also: Arthur Eze emerges Governing Council Chairman of Isaac Balami University

    “As a consultant for AVIC Aviation industry, I took the honour of extending a special invitation to Prince Engr. Arthur Eze to visit the Comac Airstand at the upcoming Nigeria International Air Show, scheduled for 2nd-4th December 2025.’

    “I am confident that this event will provide a unique platform for networking and exploring collaborations that can drive growth in Nigeria’s aviation sector.”he said.

  • Why I became a believer: Inside Governor Peter Mbah’s no-excuse revolution 

    Why I became a believer: Inside Governor Peter Mbah’s no-excuse revolution 

    • By High Princess Adaku Ogbu-Aguocha

    I wasn’t always a believer. When I first encountered His Excellency, Dr Peter Mbah, the Executive Governor of Enugu State, I was skeptical. He was in the PDP then, and I had no reason to trust his vision. But one evening changed everything. I sat with him and listened — really listened. I saw the intensity in his voice, the focus in his eyes, the clarity in his thoughts.

    This wasn’t a politician putting on a show. It was the quiet force of someone who had seen tomorrow and was determined to bring it into today. That night, his words echoed in my mind. Through Governor Peter Mbah’s eyes, I glimpsed a future where the glory of my beloved Enugu would shine brighter than ever before.

    After the war and years of neglect, our industries had gone quiet. Our proud civil servants held the fort in an economy that moved slowly — dignified, peaceful, but asleep.

    Then came Governor Mbah, with private-sector precision. And with almost startling speed, the work began. Sit-at-home ended. Insecurity was tackled. Not one, not two, but six ultramodern bus terminals were commissioned in a single day — a bold signal that motion had returned to Enugu. Then came the Smart Schools Project.

    Two hundred and sixty world-class schools — one in every ward. Learning systems built for the 21st century: solar-powered classrooms, digital labs, AI-assisted platforms, robotics, coding, green design. Imagine each school graduating at least five hundred students a year — that’s 130,000 young minds annually. A pool of ready talent to position Enugu as the Silicon Valley of Africa. With Governor Peter Mbah’s Smart Schools, our children’s tomorrow is already taking shape.

    At the same time, he’s reimagining Enugu as a global destination — a vision that came alive when the city hosted the Nigerian Bar Association Conference. Enugu exhaled after years of dormancy. Over 20,000 delegates arrived. Hotels sold out. Private homes, student hostels, even old guesthouses were refurbished and rented out. That one week put more money into more hands than a year of bureaucratic salary disbursements. It was a true awakening.

    Read Also: NFF, Jalla bicker over planned workshop on  amendment of statues at Ibadan AGM

    The five-star ICC Hotel is nearing completion, right beside the state-of-the-art hospital designed to support medical tourism, now almost finished. The Akanu Ibiam International Airport has been concessioned, with its international wing set to open in early 2026. Enugu Air launched just months ago, with six more aircraft arriving before Christmas. By the end of next year, four new branded hotels will be completed. And across the state, dozens of other high-impact projects are rising. Governor Peter Mbah’s government has set a bold target: attract three million visitors annually and grow Enugu’s GDP from four to thirty billion dollars.

    To anchor that ambition, he’s building what will soon be the tallest landmark in the state — the Cross of Hope. A monument of faith, culture, and tourism. It will draw pilgrims as Jerusalem and Rome do, reminding the world that spirituality and modernity can coexist beautifully on the hilltop of Enugu. Governor Mbah’s transformation plan is holistic — from power to infrastructure to culture.

    With the urbanization of Nkanu East fully underway, I know fresh investment and fresh purpose will soon pour into my hometown, Nara Unateze. So yes, I’m a believer. And a disciple. Politics must meet truth, and the truth is that Governor Peter Mbah is working — without excuses — for all of us. If you have a dream for Enugu, or children, or even business interests, take a moment to reflect on this. Verify if you must. And join me in defending, protecting, and championing Governor Mbah’s vision.

    I’m confident we’ll all witness the full sunrise of the tomorrow he’s building today. Because even if he reaches only halfway to the skies, Enugu will already be flying higher than it has in decades.

    But I believe he’ll reach them. And when he does, we’ll all say that a governor came who refused to dream small. Ndi Enugu, brace yourselves. The sleeping giant is wide awake. The hill is alive again — with the sound of music and a loud drum.

    Tomorrow is here indeed, and Governor Peter Ndubuisi Mbah is leading the charge.

  • Group mobilises traders for high turnout

    Group mobilises traders for high turnout

    The Social and Integral Development Centre (SIDEC) has begun mobilising traders across Anambra State to actively participate in the forthcoming governorship election. It said their involvement is crucial to achieving a higher voter turnout.

    SIDEC noted that only 92,000 out of over 2.6 million registered voters participated in the 2021 governorship election—a figure the organisation described as worryingly low.

    The group is currently implementing the Inclusive Mobilisation for Participation, Advocacy and Civic Transformation (Project IMPACT) in partnership with the Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room, with funding support from the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (UK-FCDO).

    Speaking during a voter education session at Ochanja Market, Onitsha, SIDEC’s Executive Director, Mrs Ugochi Ehiahuruike, stressed that good governance depends on the active involvement of citizens, not just elected leaders.

    “It is not their government but our government,” she said. “We all must take ownership, and one way to do that is by casting our votes for candidates of our choice.”

    Ehiahuruike urged traders not to stay away from the polls or allow a few voters to decide the future of the state.

    Read Also: I’ll end extortion of traders, transporters, Moghalu vows

    “November 8, 2025, is not a day for football matches or movie marathons. It is a day to decide the destiny of Anambra State for the next four years.

    Even if you choose not to vote, those who do will determine our collective direction. Come out and be counted. INEC has assured that every vote will count—speak loudly with your voter’s card.”

    She also appealed to candidates, supporters, and the electorate to maintain peace before, during, and after the election, stressing that development can only thrive in a peaceful environment.