Category: Special Report

  • Will Nigerians be poorer in 2020?

    Smarting from the bitter pills served in the outgoing year in different facets of life, many Nigerians desire a big break and look forward to a very prosperous year in 2020. But virtually all the indices from governance, fiscal, monetary policies, to mention just a few show things do not bode well for the economy. Ibrahim Apekhade Yusuf and Charles Okonji examine the issues

    For Azubuike Okoro, a middle age man who lost his job at one of the new generation banks years ago and now works shifts at a printing press in uptown district in Somolu, Lagos, year 2019 was to say, the least, a mixed bag of sorrows and misfortunes. He began the year on a sore note, as he lost his lifesavings which he had been keeping to offset his kids’ fees to some phony business schemes. While he was still trying to wriggle out of that ugly situation, he lost his aged mother who was depending on him for sustenance just as his landlord gave him eviction notice as he owed arrears in rents. He searched everywhere for succour to no end.

    However, gazing listlessly into space as he shared his tale of woes with our correspondent on a sunny Thursday afternoon, he was nonetheless optimistic that the year 2020 was going to be a bright year for him indeed.

    Okoro’s case typifies the growing optimism being expressed by many Nigerians, who despite obvious challenges of the past 12 months are hopeful of better things to come.

    While majority of Nigerians are overly optimistic about the prosperity of the coming year, a few discerning Nigerians and external bodies rather than shout Eureka, want the populace to manage their expectations very well as a lot of things may not necessarily add up. Talk of forlorn hope.

    2020 outlook from Rating Agencies

    Scores of ratings from different groups, chief among which is Fitch Ratings for 2020 has revised the country’s Long-Term Foreign-Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to Negative from Stable, and affirmed the rating at ‘B+.’

    Specifically, Fitch Ratings states that a combination of slowing economic growth, sustained low interest rates and unprecedented levels of indebtedness will broadly influence the global credit outlook in 2020.

    Based on key ratings drivers, the Economic Outlook revision for 2020 reflects the increasing vulnerability from the current macro policy setting, raising risks of disruptive macroeconomic adjustment in the medium term amid continued real appreciation of the naira.

    A sharp devaluation of the exchange rate under the current policy framework would stoke macroeconomic volatility and significantly weaken some of Nigeria’s key credit metrics, including its GDP per capita in US dollars and its share in world GDP.

    The substantial real appreciation of the naira over the last year appears uncorrelated with macroeconomic fundamentals and is set to continue, driven by high inflation. Commodity terms of trade have deteriorated somewhat and will decline further, weighed down by lower oil prices. However, Nigeria’s real effective exchange rate has surged by around 20% since April 2018 and is now close to its high reached in mid-2016, prior to the exchange-rate devaluation in the wake of the oil-price shock.

    Fitch expects the current account (CA) balance has shifted to deficit from a long-standing surplus, pointing to deteriorating macroeconomic imbalances and adding to external vulnerability.CA will record a deficit of 1.6% of GDP in 2019, its second-weakest level in 24 years, after a surplus of 2.6% in 2018; Fitch forecasts the CA deficit will moderate to an average of 0.7% of GDP in 2020-2021.

    FX reserves will average 4.7 months of CA payments over 2019-2021, down from 6.1 months in 2018. This will still be much higher than the forecast ‘B’ median of 3.5 months, but reliance on short-term financial inflows – particularly into OMOs – for building reserves and a significant portion of reserves pledged in swaps mean that Nigeria’s liquid foreign assets offer only a modest liquidity buffer against external shocks.

    Fitch projects an average GDP growth of 2.4% in 2019-2021, well below the ‘B’ median of 3.4% and the five-year average demographic growth rate of 2.7%. The prospects for supply-side, fiscal and exchange-regime reforms that could tackle the major constraints for Nigeria’s credit profile are weak, as reflected by the record in recent years. Emerging rivalries within the ruling APC party, possibly sparked by early dissensions over the 2023 succession to President Muhammadu Buhari, could hamper policy-making.

    Like Fitch Ratings, Vetiva Research shows a delicate sprout. Citing outcome of 2019 sub optimal performance, Vetiva’s outlook report highlights how several challenges facing the real sector (ranging from inadequacies in power supply, budget implementation and transport infrastructure) have capped Nigeria’s economic growth.

    The group however expressed hope that it is looking forward to a better capex performance in 2020, underpinned by the government’s drive to revert the budget plan to a normal (January-December) cycle, coupled with less political distractions. While we believe a normal budget cycle would facilitate a better capex spend in 2020, we posit that a suboptimal revenue performance could dilute this benefit.

    Nigeria can expect modest growth in 2020 at 2.4% year-on-year just as envisaged by IMF at 2.5% year-on-year, driven by sturdier growth in agriculture.

    “On the flipside, we believe oil sector growth would slow to 3.0% y/y in 2020 from 4.5% y/y in 2019, given our underwhelming outlook for oil investments. Overall, while we expect Nigeria’s economy to strengthen in 2020, we opine that this growth is rather a delicate sprout, as shocks, such as lower-than-expected crude prices and disruptive policies, could dwindle our growth projections,” Vetiva Research stated.

    Veracity of Fitch Ratings

    Nigeria does not publish consolidated fiscal data on a general government basis, which complicates the assessment of fiscal performance. But Fitch produces its own estimates for general government fiscal metrics based on disaggregated data on federal, state and local government revenue, spending and debt published by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), the CBN, the Debt Management Office (DMO), the Budget Office of the Federation (BOF), the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and the Office of the Auditor General for the Federation (OAGF).

    LCCI 2020 outlook

    While attempting a prognosis of the year 2020 outlook, Dr Muda Yusuf, Director General, Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry, in a statement obtained by our correspondent expressed blessed assurances of a brighter year but urged caution all the same.

    In his assessment of the broader economy, Yusuf said, economic growth may remain subdued at around 2% by 2020 as consumer demand, as well as private sector investment, will most likely remain weak, a development, which resonates with the position of World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that growth will prime at 2.1% and 2.5% respectively, which is below the population growth rate of some 3%, implying per capita income will contract further, making more Nigerians poorer.

    “Amidst continued global slow growth and trade wars, we expect growth to be slow albeit stable in 2020 in the face of implementation of recent policy measures by the government. We note that the Nigerian economy remains susceptible to external shocks most especially oil price fluctuations. Thus, we reiterate that government as a matter of urgency must intensify efforts in diversifying the productive base to other high-impact and growth-driving non-oil sectors like agriculture, manufacturing and services.”

    Way forward

    For Nigeria to achieve strong growth of about 6-8% that is needed to effectively tackle poverty and unemployment, the LCCI boss urged economic managers and policymakers to embrace structural reforms such as deregulating the oil & gas sector; harmonising the multiple exchange windows, privatising redundant state assets, fixing infrastructural problems of poor power supply and bad roads.

    These reforms, he maintained, will in no doubt deepen investor confidence and make the country a better destination for private investment.

    According to the economist, headline inflation is expected to trend higher in 2020 driven by myriads of factors such as implementation of new minimum wage which will stimulate aggregate demand; continued closure of the land border; higher VAT rate of 7.5%; early disbursement of funds for budget implementation following the return of the budget cycle between January – December cycle and negative real return in fixed income market which disincentivizes investment.

    The CBN is expected to maintain status quo by continuing to inject liquidity in the currency market to protect the local currency at current levels against the US dollar. However, its ability to intervene in the foreign exchange market could be limited if external reserves sustains its downward trend which could be triggered by lower oil prices and weak investor confidence.

    The country’s debt profile is expected to trend upwards by 2020 on approval of $3 billion credit facility from World Bank for power sector reforms and based on possible ratification of $29.96 billion loan request for infrastructural development fueled by wider fiscal deficit of N2.7trn to increased appetite for government securities by institutional investors following their exclusion from OMO.

    However, the rising indebtedness of the economy calls for concern as increased debt stock failed to stimulate neither growth nor infrastructural development. Given Nigeria’s revenue challenges, the country will continue to spend a large chunk of its earnings to service debt.

    Quick wins

    According to analysts, from policy perspective, the prolonged closure of the land borders will further add impetus to agricultural output in 2020. They were however, quick to add that risk factors to their prognosis include security challenges in the North-east zone, a major food producing region in the country just as resurgence in herders-farmers clash in the North-central region. Overall, they expect the sector to sustain its upward growth trajectory in 2020.

    In the area of manufacturing, the LCCI holds the views and very strongly too that the sector will continue to benefit big from CBN’s aggressive credit push to the real sector. “In furtherance, we see scope that competition between foreign and local producers will fade on prolonged closure of land borders. Also, early budget implementation for capital projects is positive for the sector.  We are of the view that failure by government to fix structural constraints with regards to fixing power challenges and rehabilitating deplorable road networks, will perpetuate the poor productivity and performance of the sector.”

    Besides, they note that performance of trade sector in 2020 will be shaped by the direction of government policies. In our opinion, continued protectionist measures of government will most likely limit growth in 2020.

    “Elsewhere, the level of the country’s engagement in Africa Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) scheduled to kick-off July 1, 2020, will also impact the performance of trade sector.”

    Overall, the LCCI states that the potentials for growth of the Nigerian economy is immense but adds that in order to unlock these huge potentials, appropriate policies, regulations and institutions need to be put in place.

    “Investment is critical to the growth of any economy.  This is even more so in an economy that is struggling with revenue and other resources.  Growth in private investment will boost employment, impact on revenue, promote social stability and enhance the welfare of citizens.  Even more important is the promotion of economic inclusion through a right mix of fiscal, monetary and investment policies. Thus it is very fundamental that we create an enabling environment for investors [domestic and foreign] to create wealth and jobs for the country.  There is also a need to deepen the consultative process between the policy makers and the private sector.”

    Nothing to cheer in 2020

    Like others who have offered salient views on the state of the economy in the coming year, Bismarck Rewane, Chief Executive Officer, Financial Derivatives Company Limited, is also less enthusiastic about the polity.

    Speaking at a public forum organised by the Capital Market Solicitors Association, where he ventilated his views on the Nigerian Economic Prospects in 2020, he cited low credit to the private sector, low investments as well as huge infrastructure deficit of over $300billion as factors that may further weaken the already troubled economy.

    Pressed further, Rewane expressed fears that litigation is likely to increase because of the various policies, just as the government would continue to deal; with the issue of trust.

    NACCIMA’s 2020 outlook

    In the view of President of the Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (NACCIMA), Saratu Iya Aliyu a lot would give in 2020, albeit positively judging by the swift passage of the 2020 Budget in line with the promises of the ninth Assembly to revert the budget cycle to a January to December period.

    She was however quick to add that some of our concerns raised during the presentation of the budget proposal in October 2019, noted that the budget deficit continues to rise from N1.9 trillion in 2019 to N2.8 trillion proposed in 2020 just as foreign debt is estimated to increase by 64 per cent based on the 2019 budget, and 180 per cent based on the 2018 budget while capital expenditure is two per cent higher than the 2019 budget 34 per cent lower than the 2018 budget. Recurrent expenditure continues to rise, possibly due to the implementation of the proposed minimum wage.”

    “NACCIMA notes that the government has adopted an oil price benchmark of $57 per barrel, a daily oil production estimate of 2.18 mbpd and an exchange rate of N305 per US Dollar for 2020. However, this statement appears at odds with Nigeria’s current crude oil output of 1.69 million barrels per day and according to the Minister of State for Petroleum which assures the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) of Nigeria’s commitment to compliance with OPEC’s new production quota of 1.774million barrels per day. This raises some concern on the revenue projections expected to fund the budget.”

    Speaking in the same vein, Frank Onyebu, Chairman, Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, Apapa branch, in his projection, laments that he does not see any better horizon about 2020 economic outlook with the current situation in the country.  “There is nothing that the government is doing that is giving me that silver lining. I have not seen it,” Onyebu argued matter-of-factly.

    However, making a volte-face, he said the only good thing is that the budget has been passed on time. “I just hope that the government would realise the kind of problems the country would be plunged into if they don’t take positive actions to rescue manufacturing from total collapse. Now the country has signed AfCFTA and this means that we are going to be opening up our economy, knowing that power situation has not improved, and infrastructure has not been put in place.”

    Manufacturers, he maintained, have been complaining about the issue of multiple taxation to no avail but regrets that the government does not seem to understand the need of harmonising tax, and instead VAT is increased. “All these things are the problems we are facing that if not tackled, 2020 would be a difficult one for the manufacturers.”

    Emefiele’s priorities for 2020

    Expectedly, while a lot of bookmakers are hard pressed to believe that a lot would happen for the better in the coming year, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) governor, Godwin Emefiele, one man who controls the levers of the economy believes otherwise.

    While listing the Bank’s priorities for 2020, he expressly stated that there would be support for greater economic growth, price stability and low inflation, even as he hinted on the continued tight monetary policy stance of the Bank and the establishment of a Bankers’ Charitable Endowment Fund.

    Emefiele unveiled the bank’s plans for the next year while delivering the keynote address titled, “Strong Sustainable growth for the Nigerian Economy” at the 54th Annual Bankers’ Dinner organised by the Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria (CIBN) in Lagos on Friday, November 29, 2019.

    The governor announced the establishment of a Bankers’ Charitable Endowment Fund that will fund a major charitable initiative every year starting in 2020. According to him, the Bankers’ Charitable Endowment will directly fund strategic social programmes in states and local communities across Nigeria. He expressed the hope that the Fund would spur a trend across other industries and sectors to collaborate and work together to better the lives of all Nigerians.

    Speaking on the developments in the country’s economic and financial sector, over the past year, and how they affect the macro-economic outlook for 2020, he said in spite of the positive growth the economy experienced, growth had remained slow due to “some structural constraints” in the economy.

    According to him, the pace of growth, given Nigeria’s growing population, exposed the economy to shocks, such as changes in the oil price, and sentiments in the global financial markets.

    Disclosing plans by the CBN to support the economic recovery and enable stronger growth for the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Mr. Emefiele said that the Bank would continue its current tight stance, particularly in view of rising inflation expectations.

    “Though we will act to appropriately adjust the policy rate in line with unfolding conditions and outlooks, the CBN will continue to ensure that the policy interest rate is delicately set to balance the objectives of price stability with output stabilisation,” he explained.

    Doing a recap of the highlights for 2019, Mr. Emefiele recalled that the country’s GDP had remained positive, adding that the positive growth in GDP had been driven by improvements in agriculture, oil and gas, manufacturing and ICT as well as the intervention programmes of the CBN, along with sustained supply of foreign exchange and stability of the naira.

    He also attributed the decline in inflation to the Bank’s maintenance of a tighter monetary policy rate at 13.5 percent, and its efforts at improving local production of key staple items.

    Speaking further, he said the Nigerian financial system was now stronger due to the fact that capital buffers and liquidity in the banking system have continued to improve.

    According to him, industry-wide Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) had increased from 10.2 percent in December 2017 to 15.5 percent in September 2019. He added that the percentage of non-performing loans in the banking sector had reduced from a high of 14.7 percent in January 2017 to under 7 percent as at October 2019.

    He equally disclosed that credit conditions in the banking system had improved supported by the CBN’s new policy measures announced in June 2019, which require banks to maintain a minimum 65 percent loan to deposit ratio. Furthermore, he said banks in the country are now able to recover delinquent loans from customers’ accounts in other banks, adding that the measures now placed Nigerian banks in a much better position towards supporting a stronger economic recovery. This, he added, had increased gross credit by N1.16 trillion between May and October 2019.

    On the country’s External Reserves, the governor said the Bank’s effort at supporting domestic production in the agriculture and manufacturing sectors among other policies had continued to encourage foreign exchange inflows into the Nigerian market. According to him, over $60 billion worth of transaction had taken place since the inception of the Investors’ and Exporters’ window in April 2017, adding that Nigeria’s foreign exchange reserves were above $40bn as at October 2019, compared to $23bn in the same period in 2016.

    The governor also highlighted the Bank’s effort in development financing, which he said the CBN had sustained in order to help support growth in critical sectors of the economy such as agriculture and the manufacturing sectors, through programmes such as the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme, the Commercial Agriculture Credit Scheme and the Bankers Committee Agri-Business/Small and Medium Enterprises Investment Scheme (AGSMEIS).

    Alluding to the economic face-off between some countries, as well as the likely challenges the economy could face due to moderate oil prices, he stressed the need for Nigeria to build up the necessary buffers that would protect the economy from pressures in the global market. He then restated the need to boost local production and diversify the country’s export base.

    “We should encourage Nigerians to consume goods that can be produced in Nigeria, knowing full well that a time will come when we may not have the foreign exchange to aid such activities, if we continue to rely on earnings from the export of crude oil,” he emphasised.

    Recalling the country’s economic glorious past when the economy was heavily reliant on agriculture, with increased cultivation and exports of primary products such as cocoa, palm oil, cotton and groundnut, Emefiele posited that it possible to envision a productive Nigerian economy that is not reliant on exports of crude oil.

    The governor urged all stakeholders to believe in Nigeria’s greatness, stressing that the country was blessed with abundant human and natural resources, which if truly harnessed would propel Nigeria into one of the world’s top 20 economies.

    “We must redouble our efforts to continue to support actions by the monetary and fiscal authorities to diversify the base of the Nigerian economy through encouragement of made in Nigeria products.

    “We must also consume what we produce and produce what we consume. We must discourage the propensity to import what can be produced in Nigeria. This is because if we do not reduce import, the same imports will kill us knowing full well that such activities do not aid our efforts to create jobs and support the growth of our local industries.

    “If we choose to follow the trend of supporting imports of goods that can be produced in Nigeria, we will lose jobs, our industries will die and insecurity and other social vices in our land will continue to increase. We must choose this alternative path of improving domestic production, which will support growth of our local economy,” he charged.

    As part of the Bank’s priorities for 2020, he said the CBN was determined to maintain its stable exchange policy stance in the near to medium term given the relatively high level of reserves. He said the Bank would also sustain these efforts in 2020 as part of our plan to reduce our financial exclusion rate to under 20 percent over the next year.

    The governor said the Bank will also improve access to credit for farmers and SMES by deepening its intervention efforts through the Anchor Borrowers’ Programme, Commercial Agriculture Credit Scheme and the Real Sector Support Funds, amongst others. Similarly, he said the Bank, in pushing to improve access to finance and credit, would protect them from unfair banking and lending practices by maintaining oversight on the banks and other financial institutions.

    In addition to making sure that financial institutions support the growth of the real sector, Mr. Emefiele said the CBN, working with the Nigerian Export Import Bank (NEXIM), improve access to the N500bn facility designed to support the growth of Nigeria’s non-oil exports.

    While disclosing that the Bank, working with the fiscal authorities, will support the recovery of the economy, the CBN boss reiterated that Nigeria was open to business and urged investors to take advantage of the investment opportunities in Nigeria. He assured that investments in Nigeria would be duly protected by the authorities.

    Like Vladimir and Estragon, the two characters in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot, would Nigerians get the expected reliefs promised by the government? Time will tell.

  • Rule of law, rights protection under Buhari: Not yet celebration time

    The decision by the Federal Government to comply with court orders by releasing ex-National Security Adviser (NSA), Mohammed Sambo Dasuki and online publisher, Omoyele Sowore has attracted commendation. But many have cautioned that it is not yet jubilation time, but a moment to step up the fight for a society, where the rule of law and citizens’ rights are supreme. Eric Ikhilae, reports on prospects for change in the new year.

    In its “Freedom in the World 2019” report, the global rights monitoring group – Freedom House – said Nigeria improved in its observance of human rights and compliance with the rule of law principle of democratic governance. Freedom House, in the report which assesses the country’s performance in the previous year, labelled Nigeria as “partly free,” scored it 50 over 100. And, after a sector-by-sector scrutiny, observed that the country recorded some progress in 2018, with the potential of doing more this year.

    This was before the December 24, 2019 announcement, by the Minister of Justice and Attorney general of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami, of the Federal Government’s decision to comply with the many court decisions, granting bail to former National Security Adviser (NSA), Mohammed Sambo Dasuki and online publisher, Omoyele Sowore.

    The decision has been greeted with mixed feelings. Some with optimism, seeing it as a sign of good things to come, while many are simply indifference, seeing it as a mere flash in the pan, and arguing that a lot still needs to be done.

    There is indeed more to be done in view of the many existing factors capable of either constraining the nation’s progress or aid its retrogression in its future rating. These factors exist in some key thematic areas and more.

    Reluctance in obeying court orders

    The President Muhammadu Buhari-led government was gradually assuming the toga of an administration with scant regard for the key democratic practices of observance of rule of law and respect for citizens’ rights until it made the announcement on December 24, 2019.

    The release of Dasuki and Sowore has seen many calling on the Federal Government to, not only sustain the momentum, but improve on it by releasing others still being held in custody. Prominent among those, whose release is being demanded is the leader of Islamic Movement of Nigeria (IMN) Sheikh Ibrahim El-Zakzaky.

    Beside members of the IMN, notable names like Mike Ozekhome (SAN), Femi Falana (SAN) and others commended the Federal Government and urged it t extend the gesture to El-Zakzaky, who has been in custody, with his wife, since 2015.

    Ozekhome said: “I am happy the government has finally realised its faux pas and is seeing the same light which I saw since 2015, when I kicked against the illegal incarceration of Dasuki. It is never too late to take corrective measures and make amends. There is nothing like something good happening at a bad time, or something bad happening at a good time.

    “This government is beginning to see the importance of the rule of law prevailing over rule of the thumb and over so- called national security, which is a euphemism for security of a government in power.

    “The government should add El-Zakzaky to the list of detainees to be released, because the whole world, aside government apologists and grovelers, see all of them as political prisoners.

    “Respect for rule of law and citizens’ fundamental rights constitute some of the key building blocks of democracy. Obedience to court orders, however distasteful, constitutes the irreducible minimum of a civilized nation.”

    On his part, Falana, who acted as El-Zakzaky’s lawyer urged government to release other political detainees and criminal suspects in line with valid and subsisting orders of courts.

    Falana said: “In particular, we request the Federal Government to liaise with the Kaduna State Government to withdraw the charge filed against Sheikh Ibraheem El-zakzaky and his wife, Mrs Zeenat Elzakzaky who have been detained since December 14, 2015.

    “The Federal High Court had on December 2, 2016 declared the detention of the couple illegal and unconstitutional and ordered the federal government to release them from custody forthwith.

    “Apart from awarding them reparation of N50 million the Federal High Court also ordered the Federal Government to provide them with a temporary accommodation since the Nigerian Army had destroyed their family house in Zaria.

    “However, in a bid to stop the protests of the Shiites who were demanding for the release of their leaders on the basis of the orders of the federal high court the federal government asked the Kaduna state government to arraign the couple in the Kaduna state high court.

    “Even though they have been charged with procuring certain persons to kill a soldier the Kaduna state high court has since discharged and acquitted the persons allegedly procured by the El-Zakzakys to kill the said soldier.”

    However, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami has distinguished the cases. He argued that while the cases involving Dasuki and Sowore are within the control of the Federal Government, whose agencies are prosecuting them, that of El-Zakzaky and his wife are outside its control.

    Malami faulted claim Falana that the Federal Government has control over how the trial of El-Zakzaky and his wife was being conducted and could influence their release. He noted that they were being tried by the Kaduna State Government under its laws.

    The AGF said, in a statement issued by his spokesman, Umar Gwandu, said: “In determining the authority responsible for compliance with a court order with particular reference to bail, one must be guided by the law under which the accused person is charged and granted bail.

    “On one hand, where the accused is charged under a state law, the order of the court granting bail for an accused person bail is targeted at the state authorities for compliance. On the other hand, where charges are framed under federal offences, the order granting bail is targeted at the federal authorities for compliance.”

    Despite the AGF’s attempt to distinguish the cases, there is actually a similarity in the three cases. The similarity exists in the manner the Federal Government and its agencies have handled the cases so far, particularly in relation to compliance with court orders. This development, perhaps accounts for why many do not seem to see the dissimilarity that on the AGF alone seem to be seeing.

    El-Zakzaky: When FG ignored court orders

    El-Zakzaky

    The El-Zakzaky couple was arrested December 14, 2015 shortly after a deadly clash between members of the IMN and a convoy of the Chief of Army Staff and was subsequently detained.

    On realizing that the Federal Government would neither charge them with any offence nor release them, but instead preferring to keep them in custody, El-Zakzaky and his wife filed two fundamental rights enforcement suits, marked: Zakzaky marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/281/2016 and FHC/ABJ/CS/282/2016 before the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    Despite opposition by the Federal Government and denial of any wrong doing, Justice Gabriel Kolawole, in a judgment on December 2, 2016, upheld the argument made for the couple by Falana, and declared their detention unlawful.

    Justice Kolawole, who faulted the claim by the Department of State Services (DSS) and the AGF (who were listed as 1st and 3rd respondents) that the couple were kept in protective custody, said no law in the country provide them (the state agents) with such powers.

    The judge said after reviewing the arguments of parties and the documents filed, he was unable to find any law that justifies the detention of El-Zakzaky and his wife since December last year.

    In the judgment, Justice described the invasion of the couple’s residence by soldiers, the physical attack on the man and the couple’s detention as unlawful, and awarded N25m damages to each of them. He likened the reported invasion and eventual destruction of El-Zakzaky’s residence in Kaduna to the 1977 invasion the Lagos home of the late Afrobeat musician, Fela Anikulapo Kuti.

    Justice Kolawole said the description of the invasion of the applicants’ home by armed soldiers between December 12 to 14, 2015 (as contained in their supporting affidavit) could best be categorised as “rather gory and blood chilling in a democratic state and arguably, in peace time.

    “It, for me, as a student of judicial history, bear a sad reminder and telling reminiscences of the unfortunate incidents that involved the illustrious family of the Nigerian popular musician, the late Mr. Femi Anikulapo Kuti in February 1977 under the military government and which eventually, led to the Supreme Court’s judgment in Chief Dr. Mrs. Olufunmilayo Ransome Kuti & 3 others v. The AGF & 8 others (1985) 2 NWLR (pt 6) SC 211.

    “The 1st and 3rd respondents, in my view, in so far as they have also not preferred any criminal charge, in a court of competent jurisdiction, against the applicants, may have unwittingly, even with the best of intention, acted in gross violation of the provisions of Section 35(3),(4) and (5) of the Constitution in relation to the applicant and his wife, who is an applicant in a sister suit, which was directed to abide the eventual outcome of this suit.

    “The applicant and his wife shall be released within 45 days from today from the 1st respondent’s custody, and shall be handed to the 2nd respondent (IGP), who shall, in turn, take the applicant and his wife to the accommodation, which the 3rd respondent (AGF) is directed to provide pending when the applicant is able to sort himself out with the case, I am told, he has filed in the High Court of Kaduna State against the Nigerian Army, whose soldiers allegedly destroyed his residence in the manner similar to what happened, some 39 years ago, to the family of the late Mr. Fela Anikulapo Kuti in Lagos State,” he said.

    The judge warned that he will treat it as a deliberate disobedience of the order of court should the DSS and the AGF failed to release the applicant and his wife from custody at the expiration of the 45 days given.

    He equally warned the IGP and his officials against mis-interpreting or abusing the order that they should provide 24 security for the couple and its family.

    Justice Kolawole explained that his reason for not ordering the immediate release of the couple, as requested in their applications, was because of the information that their residence had been completely destroyed and they may have nowhere to live.

    He explained that the order for 24 hours police protection of the couple was informed by the claim by the DSS and AGF that they had information about the possible attack of the applicant and his wife by aggrieved neighbours.

    The judge added: “The IGP or any of its subordinate officers, not below the rank of Assistant Inspector General (AIG), when he received the applicant and his wife, as ordered herein, shall take immediate step, within 24 hours of receiving them for the 1st and 3rd respondents, convey the applicant and his wife, under necessary security escort to their place of abode as would have been provided by the 1st respondent working in conjunction with the 3rd respondent.

    “The 2nd respondent shall then provide the applicant and his wife , adequate police protection which shall operate 24/7 until the alleged threats which were not proved by any admissible evidence, but left in the realm of speculation, are removed or significantly diminished.

    “Let it be clearly stated and for the avoidance of doubt, that the protection, which the 2nd respondent shall accord to the applicant and his wife, shall not be used under any guise by the 2nd respondent to place or confine the applicant and his wife under any form of restriction, which would invariably translate to the 2nd respondent substituting its own ‘safe custody’ with the 1st respondent’s ‘protective custody.’

    “The essence of the order, which I have made is to enable the applicant and his wife to be able to live their normal lives whilst being under constant protective watch by the 2nd respondent’s officers in their new place of abode,” Justice Kolawole said.

    Rather than comply with the orders contained in the December 2, 2016 judgment, the Federal Government took no steps. It kept the couple in detention and went about arrested members of IMN who later became violent in their persistent protest of their leader’s detention without trial.

    On April 18, 2018 the Kaduna State Government filed an eight-count charge of unlawful gathering, criminal conspiracy and culpable homicide against El-Zakzaky and three others.

    Some of the alleged offences are punishable under sections 59 and 190 of the Kaduna State Penal Code Law, 2017. The allegation of homicide is punishable by death, under Section 190 of the same law

    El-Zakzaky and wife were later arraigned before a Kaduna State High Court and have been remanded since then. The court rejected their request for bail, but instead granted them, on August 5, 2019, permission to travel abroad for medical treatment. Although the couple left Nigeria on August 12, 2019 for Medanta Hospital in New Delhi, India, they returned home sooner than expected on August 16, 2019 on the grounds that they were not comfortable with the arrangement.

    The couple, who have all this while been held in the custody of the DSS, upon their return from India, applied to be moved to prison, an application that the court granted on December 5, 2019 and adjourned until February 6, 2020 for the commencement of trial.

    Other cases of rights violation by state agents/agencies – soldiers, policemen, etc

    Beside the known cases of Dasuki, Sowore and El-Zakzaky, there are many more Nigerians who have had their rights violated under the current administration. Such cases may not be instigated by the state, they are committed by agents of the state, who still operate freely owing to the failure of the government to act appropriately.

    Amnesty International in late 2016 made public a report on Nigeria alleging that 240 people, including infants, died in military detention camps in the North East while 177 pro-Biafran agitators were allegedly extra-judicially killed in the same year.

    Bothered by this report and other allegations of abuses against the military, the Federal Government, in August 2017 constituted a panel headed by Justice Biobele A. Georgewill of the Court of Appeal to investigate compliance by officials of the Armed Forces with human rights obligations and rules of engagement, especially in local conflict and insurgency situations.

    As part of its terms of reference, the panel was “to review extant rules of engagement applicable in the Armed Forces of Nigeria and extent of compliance thereto.”

    It was equally “empowered to investigate alleged acts of violation of international humanitarian and human rights law under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), Geneva Conventions Act, African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act and other relevant laws by Nigerian security agencies.”

    The panel went about its job, held public sittings in Abuja, Maiduguri, Port Harcourt, Enugu, Kaduna and Lagos where it heard from victims and witnesses, who described a range of alleged violations by security forces, including extra-judicial executions, torture, rape, enforced disappearances and the burning down of villages.

    The panel submitted its report in February 2018 and since then nothing has been heard about u=its findings and what the Federal Government has done with them.

    In the height of the intense clamour by Nigerians for the disbandment of the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) of the Nigeria Police following frequent reports of rights abuses associated with its operations, the Federal Government directed the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to investigate the agency and suggest needed reforms.

    In compliance with the presidential directive, the NHRC in September 2018 inaugurated a seven-man Special Investigative Panel to look into the activities of the SARS and make recommendations for its reform.

    The panel sat for months and at the completion of its assignment, submitted its report to President Muhammadu Buhari on June 3, 2019. But till date, nothing has also been heard from the Federal Government about the findings and recommendations of the panel on SARS.

    Indeed, the panel on SARS like other panels constituted by this government before it, made some mind boggling findings and suggested needed reforms that would have transformed the relevant institutions, but for the consistent inaction on the part of the government, who seems to enjoy setting up panels and committees, where public funds are expended, but with less interest on the outcome of the exercises.

    The panel on SARS for instance, found cases of extortion, use of torture as mean of investigation, outright conversion of exhibits and other confiscated items by police officers.

    On the issues of arbitrary arrests and detentions, the panel found that “there were cases of arbitrary arrests and detentions of persons by some police officers on the pretext that they were suspecting them. Some of the persons arrested and detained were later labeled by the police as armed robbers or responsible for crimes they did not commit.

    “In the process of such arrests, police officers would resort to methods that are outside the legal guidelines, police methods and procedures and subjecting suspects to inhuman and degrading treatment in the form of beatings, hitting with gun butts, insults, threats, gunshots and intimidation.

    “It was apparent that some of the operatives of SARS, mostly the upcoming young police officers, lack in-depth knowledge of Police procedures and processes which could partly explain their arbitrariness in arresting and detaining suspects or deliberate disregard to the law, rules of procedure and police regulations.”

    On the complaints of abuse of the bail process and other forms of extortion, the panel said it “established cases of extortion by police officers of the SARS using various methods. This included asking suspects or their relations to pay money for the release of the suspect that were arbitrarily arrested; asking suspects whether they had money on them to give the police; and, making suspects to withdraw from ATMs to give officers.

    “Bail had become a source of making money by the side as no records of bail funds collected appear to be recorded for accountability. Hence the resort to arbitrary arrests and detention when officers of SARS are broke as a way to raise quick funds for their weekends, house rents or children School fees or personal development projects or to acquire and confiscate the property of others.”

    The panel equally found that “properties, especially vehicles, were confiscated from the complainants and taken to the offices of the SARS pending investigations. The seized vehicles were not properly documented and were subsequently, without following due process, auctioned to police officers.

    “As a result of the auction the owners of the vehicles were made to suffer deprivation of the use of their vehicles and property contrary to Section 44 of the Constitution.

    “The confiscation of property by police officers raises questions on the character of some of the police officers operating under the auspices of SARS with further damaging effect on the reputation of the police as an institution charged with the responsibility of protecting life and property. However, in this case, it was the police that became the perpetrators of confiscation of property from citizens.”

    A lawyer, Dr. Abubakar Dutse expressed disappointment that the Federal Government was reluctant to act on the findings and recommendations of the various panels and committees it has set up before now on the issue of right abuses and the need to deepen democratic culture by adhering to the rule of law.

    Dutse added: “It is sad that this government is chasing shadows when there a lot to be done. What happened to the reports and recommendations of the panel that you spoke about? Why would a government constitute a panel, fund its activities with public funds only to turn around and discard the report of the same panel?

    “That is a waste of public funds and a form of corruption. Why waste the nation’s scarce resources on the panel whose reports and recommendations you know you will not act on?” He said.

    Need for conducive atmosphere for citizens to exercise their rights to vote

    Some have also argued that a government did not necessarily need to arrest and detain citizens before their rights are said to have been infringed on. They not the persistent violence being witnessed during election, which has consistently made it impossible for many electorate to participate in the electoral process for fair of being harmed or killed.

    After the last governorship elections in Bayelsa and Kogi states, it was the view of many that the level of violence and desperation witnessed has depicted this government as one amenable to the deprivation of citizen’s right to freely perform their constitutionally guaranteed right to choose their leaders and determine who should run their affairs.

    At a recent function in Abuja, Falana warned that if the Federal Government and other stakeholders in the nation’s electoral process fail to take action against electoral impunity and brigandage, “as recently witnesses in Kogi and Bayelsa,” the people’s voting right would have been successful stolen by the politicians.

    He added: “With what happened in Kogi and Bayelsa states, you do not expect people to want to participate in a war. Because, in Nigeria, election has become war for the ruling class, because if you win, you win in all manifestations.

    “You win the battle for the control of the treasury, you win the battle for impunity, and you win the battle to destroy the values that we hold dear in this country. If we are therefore going to address this problem, we have to decide as a people the type of country we want.

    “What had just happened in Bayelsa and Kogi states is what I call gun boat democracy. It was a war. Anybody who participates in a war know that he/she is going to lose his/her life. That is why the number of voters will continue to reduce, if we fail to address impunity on the part of the ruling class.”

    Needs for laws to discourage rights abuses and impunity

    There is also the argument that this administration has not done well by its inability to engaged in robust review of the nation’s laws and enact new ones that encourage the protection of citizens; rights and respect for rule of law.

    Rights activists, Chidi Odinkalu and Sunday Essienekak queried the proprietress of the National Assembly’s decision to direct efforts at restraining the people’s right to freedom of speech in the form of the Hate Speech Bill and Protection from Internet Falsehoods and Manipulation and Other Related Matters Bill when they could devote their legislative time to meaningful uses.

    On the Bill that seeks to monitor citizens’ uses of the internet and social media, Odinkalu argued that “contrary to its title, the bill is far from solely or even substantially about Internet falsehoods and manipulation.

    “Like Decree No. 4, this bill creates nebulous crimes in open-ended, subjective language, such as statements ‘likely to be prejudicial to the security of Nigeria or any part thereof.’

    “The crime of making a statement ‘prejudicial to public health, public safety, public tranquility or public finance’ can be used, for instance, to jail any citizen for criticising a thieving politician.

    “The bill also proposes to criminalise statements that are likely to ‘influence the outcome of an election to any office’.

    This provision effectively would prohibit digital campaigns by opposition parties, because all campaign statements made digitally are designed to influence election outcomes. It’s a charter for a single-party state and an end to political pluralism,” Odinkalu said.

    Essienekak wants the enactment of laws that will promote human rights and rule of law rather than those with the capability to stifle them, He cited the provision of Section 84 of Sheriff and Civil Processes Act (SCPA). which he argued, encourages impunity among public officers and public institutions.

    He argued that it was unfair on Nigerian for Section 84 of SCPA which forms part of the nation’s colonial relics to still exist in Nigeria even when the British has since scrapped the law.

    “With Section 84 the battle for human rights in this country is no more encouraging. The reason why the police and other security agencies continue to abuse human rights is because of the existence of this Section 84.

    “Take away Section 84 of the SCPA you would effectively curb arbitrariness and impunity among personnel of these security agencies. If you publish in a newspaper today that anybody with judgments or cases of rights abuses against the police and other security agencies to come forward, I believe you will get over two million,

    “This is because if they initiate garnishee proceedings to enforce this kind of  monetary judgment, the Central Bank of Nigeria becomes a defendant and they swiftly raise the flag of Section 84 of the SCPA, which requires that you must first obtain the consent of the Attorney General at the federal level or the state level, depending on which government agency is involved. And you can hardly get any Attorney General to grant you consent.

    “So, quote me very well. The reason why human rights are not respected in this country is because of the existence of Section 84 of the SCPA. Any day that section is struct out or invalidated, that is when you will see the government officers and security agencies begin to respect human rights.

    “Section 84 of the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act is evil. And, it is the only reason why human right is a child play in Nigeria. Sadly, despite the harm that this law is doing, the Legislature, the Judiciary and even the Nigeria Human Rights Commission folds their hands to watch the deteriorating situation of human rights in Nigeria.

    ‘We only pay lip service to human rights in the country. The battle to have Section 84 expunged from our law book ought to be championed by the NHRC. The commission is supposed to propose a legislation for the repeal of that section of the law. The Nigerian Bar Association and other stakeholders ought to be interested in this,” Essienekak said.

  • Filthy, grimy Lagos markets

    A market place where food and other edibles are sold is expected to be clean and hygienic, but what exists in Lagos and environs often the opposite. Gboyega Alaka and Omolara Akintore report.

    In Ikotun, the story is the same, if not worse. Just a few weeks before penning this feature, the market centre point was an eye-sore, with heaps of refuse threatening to submerge the market women. Of course, the stench perforated the whole market atmosphere, causing a visitor – at least one who is not used to the environment – to wonder if this was indeed a market where foods and other consumables are sold, or a sewage cistern area.

    A couple of refuse evacuation vehicles were packed, rather aimlessly, with filth and grime spilling. Yellowish liquid, residue of decaying refuse meandered on the floor, making indiscriminate branching. Perhaps one of the worst sights for this reporter was an occasion when one of the roasted fish sellers spilled her wares and immediately bent and picked them, not minding the fact that a couple actually fell into the stinking liquid. A woman, not too far from this reporter grimaced in irritation, but virtually every other who witnessed the spectacle simply went about their respective business. Possibly, they’ve become so used to such sights that they needed not waste their emotions.

    One of the traders said she could not tell if the refuse vehicles were functional or if they were going to be moved anytime soon, as they had been stationary there for days.

    However, on a second visit, early December, the situation at the market centre earlier described, had significantly improved, though not satisfactorily. The mountain of refuse had been levelled, though the refuse vehicles remained, with the dregs and the stench.  Green bottle flies also buzzed freely, compounding the rather dangerous situation. One of the traders volunteered that the market leaders asked them to contribute N6,000 each to clear the refuse.

    Asked how comfortable they were sitting and trading in the sordid atmosphere, one of the traders, a fruit seller, simply shrugged and said, “Nothing. As you can see, they have cleared the refuse. If you had been here a few weeks back, you would have understood what I’m trying to say.”

    When reminded that the stench and the buzzing flies could be as dangerous as the heaps of refuse that had disappeared, she simply shrugged and said, “I don’t think so. We even eat here and nothing happens to us. As you can see, we are here morning till night every day, sometimes on Sundays, and nothing happens to us.”

    Another trader, a plastic seller, who was eating at the time of this visit, simply waved this reporter away, saying, “Oga please go, dirty no dey kill black people.”

    One of the fresh fish sellers overlooking the refuse centre also said she didn’t see any danger in the exposure of her fish to the filth, since buyers would cook them anyway.

    This is however contrary to the position of Dr. Chidinma Okafor, a Public Health Physician with the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (NIMR), who declared that “most diarrhoea diseases are gotten through this means. Lassa fever is a disease acquired from unhygienic conditions. Some of these food, apart from exposing them in the daytime, even when the sellers are going home, they still keep them exposed, and we know that Lassa fever is gotten from the excreta of rats. If it is a rat that has the virus, it automatically transfers it to human beings.”

    Danger in the market place

    Food safety has therefore remained a major concern, especially amongst health workers. The location of some restaurants and food processing endeavours has been known to contribute greatly to food poisoning. Madam Okafor Justina had gone for shopping in an open market on her free day. She planned to stock the home with food items – both raw and fresh. However, after having done with the shopping, she realised that she was famished and needed to eat. Some Good Samaritan directed her to a ‘bukataria’ inside the market. On getting there, Okafor discovered that a dumpsite was not far from the food vendor, but many people patronising her seemed less concerned. To them, satisfying their hunger seemed to be more important than whatever health implications the dumpsites may be posing.

    Aside being essential for living, food provides nutrients for the body. Nutrients are substances that provide energy for activity, growth, and all functions of the body such as breathing, digestion and keeping warm. They also provide materials for the growth and repair of the body, and for keeping the immune system healthy.

    On the other hand, fruits according to nutritionists are essential for preservation of the human body, and in assurance of good health as they offer vital nutrients needed for the body to function appropriately.

    Lagos, no doubt is experiencing explosion in trade in food, particularly fruits and vegetables. Sadly, most of the avenues for dispensing these food items – particularly the open markets – are either situated in very dirty environments, in a sea of refuse, or on reclaimed wasteland.

    A visit to markets such as Idi-Oro fruit market, Ketu/Mile 12 and Ile-Epo markets, among others reveals that they all share the same characteristics – environment of filth.

    Some are so dirty that buyers go there with special protective gears, including, rain boots and nose cover. The detestable stench oozing from these markets as a result of decomposed food and fruits under high temperature is so upsetting that it takes a bold mind to shop in them.

    This perhaps dictated the recent shut down of Oyingbo market in Lagos. The Managing Director of Lagos Waste Management Agency, LAWMA, had sited indiscriminate dumping of refuse and refusal to patronise the Private Sector Participation (PSP) operators

    Heaps of refuse – fresh and decaying, are common and unending sights in Lagos markets. This complicates matters for traders and patrons as well as residents in the environs, as they are not safe from the stench and resultant air, pests and insect-borne diseases and possible epidemic.

    Sikirat Abdul, who resides not too far from Ile-Epo Market on the outskirts of Lagos, lamented the improper handling of fruits and other food items in the market, which she said exposes consumers to avoidable diseases.

    According to Biola Ashiyanbi, a biochemist, refuse sites harbor disease-causing bacteria, which can be dangerous to both buyers and sellers. “For instance when flies from such filthy sites perch on fruits, food and water, they can develop diseases such as cholera, diarrhoea and typhoid fever, which can kill many people within few hours.”

    One major barrier to food safety in most Nigerian markets is lack of proper waste disposal and toilet facilities. Most of the markets are marked by unsanitary conditions, such as poor drainage systems, overcrowding and poor waste disposal which leads to poor hygiene (personal and environmental).  Of great concern also are the food ingredients and the source. Raw materials and ingredients are usually purchased from the open markets, where items are displayed openly on tables, on bare ground, sometimes muddy places and around filthy gutters. Also, buyers are mostly in the habit of touching the food stuffs with unwashed fingers either to feel the texture or to ascertain the fineness of the powder in case of grounded stuff.

    This is in addition to hordes of flies that buzz all over and perch on the food items such as meat, fish, fruits and grounded food stuff such as garri, yam flour and co, posing potential danger of contamination.

    Nigerian markets not the best for hygiene – Public health physician

    According to Dr. Chidinma Okafor a Public Health Physician with the Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (NIMR), generally speaking, Nigerian open markets cannot be referred to as best considering the unhygienic exposure of foods and fresh fruits.

    “But in a place where we have proper regulatory services, where the markets obey the right standard, there is nothing wrong with open markets especially if those foods are not exposed to the hazards of the environment. There are so many health hazards to all these foods, starting from the diseases acquired from it. Not only are you exposing the food to dust alone but also to flies, which transfer diseases from one place to the other. A buyer gets to the market, buys the food without washing his hands, puts it in his mouth, and most diarrhoea diseases are gotten through this means. Lassa fever is a disease acquired from unhygienic condition, some of these foods apart from exposing them in daytime, even when the sellers are going home they still expose them where they keep them and we know that Lassa fever is gotten from the excreta of rats. If it’s a rat that has the virus, it automatically transfers the virus to human beings.” Okafor explained.

    “Also, having dumpsites around open markets is dangerous. We are not expected to have dumpsite close to where foods that are uncovered are sold because the ease of transmission of diseases is much enhanced in those unsanitary conditions. Another is contaminants from dust and pollutants in the air, dirty water around that splash into the foods such as Garri, Crayfish, as well as cooked foods. There is also the spectacle of people coming to touch this exposed food with their soiled hands. Where the foods are covered, it reduces contacts; most of the meats, fish sold in open markets are also contaminated because you see millions of flies milling around them. All these pose infection to those that consume them. The danger is worst with cooked food, because the food is already made, and the buyer comes, buys the food and consumes directly into the stomach. So if the vector like housefly has transmitted any dangerous organism into the food, it goes right into the stomach and this can cause food poisoning which can lead to death.”

    Asked how this situation can be averted, Okafor said, “Fruits can be protected by being put in serviceable cartons, and other foods kept in transparent cellophanes whereby people can see what is inside the nylons. This reduces the dangers of touching and the dangers of contamination from vectors around the place, as well as other pollutants in the air.”

    She therefore advises that “individuals should be wary of where they get what they consume. People are advised now to go into subsistence farming, whereby they plant what they eat. But when we have the proper regulatory authorities they should be able to checkmate all these loopholes. Those who sell foods in the market should also undergo Food Handlers Test. These foods should also be tested before they are pushed into the market.”

    “Finally,” she said, “public education is key. Giving people rights to life saving information will help, because this will increase their literacy level, promote their health and help them to live in a healthy way.”

  • Making the ports work for agriculture

    Nigerian farmers and agribusinesses could create a N200 billion food exports market by 2030. This, however, experts believe will depend on the government working with the private sector to create a seamless transportation infrastructure to support the nation’s growing agro exports sector, writes DANIEL ESSIET.

     

     

    The United States (US), Netherlands, Germany, Brazil, France, China, Spain, Canada, Belgium and Italy lead the chart of the world’s largest food exporting countries.

    According to data provided by http://www.countriesnow.com, the United States contributes $150 billion, Netherlands $94 billion, Germany $86 billion, Brazil $79 billion, France $74 billion, China $63 billion, Spain$50 billion, Canada $49 billion, Belgium $44 billion and Italy $43.7 billion.

    Brazil is the largest supplier of agricultural commodities to the European Union (EU), a market of 28 countries.

    Collectively, the top 10 countries contribute more than $500 billion value in agri-food trade. Over the past 10 years, they raised the most in world rankings. The success of agricultural trade in these countries, besides being linked to competitiveness and innovation, is attributed to governments’ support for a functional transportation system.

    Netherlands is the world’s second largest exporter of agricultural products, after the US. Developing business in commodities such as fresh fruit and vegetables represents great potential for growth and employment.

    To achieve this, the country has built capacity of the relevant trade support institutions required along the value chain, from production to export.

    Most importantly, the country has paid greater attention to the role of transportation and logistics, both in increasing food security and boosting exports earning.

    International trade routes converge on Rotterdam, the largest port in Europe and at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, a major international air logistics hub.

    For this, the government recognises logistics –services and knowledge- as a key element in achieving sustainable food security, and thus a driver of competitiveness and economic development.

    Indeed, the international trade’s impact to Nigeria’s economy cannot be denied. The conditions for a vibrant and competitive agriculture industry abound.

    One of the most profitable export industries in Nigeria is agriculture. Nigeria’s agricultural exports achieved a reasonable growth last year by producing 2.75metric tons, which diverted the attention toward the ability of the sector to grow during the upcoming years.

    Cocoa, cashew and sesame seeds are the most prominent crops that Nigeria is self-sufficient in their production.

    In 2016, according to PWC, total agriculture exports stood at N60.7 billion or 0.7 per cent of total exports for the period. In 2017, total agricultural exports grew by 180.7 per cent over the previous year to close at N170. 4 billion and it accounted for 1.3 per cent of total exports. By 2018, agriculture exports increased by 77 per cent over 2017 to close at N302. 3 billion, and accounted for 1.6 per cent of total exports.

    This year, the nation’s agricultural export rose to N152.3 billion from January to June, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS); covering the first and second quarters of 2019.

    The major agricultural exports included Sesame seeds, Cashew nuts, fermented Cocoa Beans, Superior quality raw cocoa beans. Others were frozen shrimps and prawns, Ginger and Natural Cocoa butter, ginger and agro-foods.

    While this is progress in a sense, stakeholders believe Nigeria can earn more from agro exports.

    One of the institutions is the Nigerian Export Promotion Council (NEPC) which said estimated untapped potential by 2021 for Nigerian exports of cocoa beans to the 10 best markets (Germany, Malaysia, Singapore, Turkey, Netherlands, Italy, Japan, France, Mexico and Indonesia) is around $425 million.

    To this end, NEPC is campaigning for policy ties in logistics support, a better trade regime and states-led product development to connect farmers to global markets.

    Making the ports work for agriculture

    Poor logistics system

    That Nigeria has the potential of becoming world’s leading agro exports producer is not in doubt. Also, the importance of agriculture and agricultural exports to the economy seems only likely to surge with increasing global food requirements and with the hoped-for increasing integration of its agricultural products into the global economy.

    All things being equal, Nigeria agro exports are expected to reach record levels this year, putting the country’s creaking export infrastructure under huge strain.

    Speaking with The Nation, the President, Federation of Agricultural Commodities Association of Nigeria(FACAN), Dr. Victor Iyama said the  agricultural sector has a lot more to offer the world in the years ahead, but only if it can overcome its logistics challenges. He said national exports could rise by 50 million tons, but only if infrastructure was improved so that growers could reach overseas markets at competitive prices.

    Iyama said there was need to address obstacles that increase the logistics costs of selling agricultural products into world markets.  He said principal logistical limitations that constrain the system include rail transport, water transport.

    If Nigeria was to realise its full export potential, he said, billions of naira of investment in transport infrastructure and super structure would be required. He also said the country needed more investment in storage facilities.

     

    Experts’ opinions

    Despite being considered as the driving force of Nigeria’s economic growth, agriculture has been held back by an incomplete logistics system which fails to ensure quality and connect farms with markets, according to the Chief Executive, Agricultural and Rural Management Institute (ARMTI), Ilorin, Kwara State, Dr. Olufemi Oladunni.

    Being a top agro-trading nation, he noted that making logistics industry paramount makes a lot of economic sense.

    From the logistics infrastructure such as ports, airports, highways and railways to the service providers and government regulators, he stressed that they must come together to provide a total logistics solution ecosystem.

    Oladunni believes that farmers and agribusinesses can create N200 billion food exports food market if the government works with the private sector to create a seamless transportation infrastructure to support the nation’s growing agro exports sector.

    He said improving agro exports logistics will require a smart strategy to develop and maintain connective infrastructure. This, according to him, should start by building durable roads, ports and airports.

    Oladunni said government must promote the establishment of industrial estates and Free Zones developed throughout the country. The zones, according to him, will be categorised as export processing zones, which cater for the requirements of export-oriented industries.

    He observed that the country couldn’t compete with produce from other countries in terms of quality and price due to drawbacks of the existing logistics system.

    According to him, the expenses for storing and transporting agricultural products account for up to 30 per cent of selling prices, higher than those of other African and Asia countries.

    Also, low-cost logistics services lack quality control indicators, causing high losses due to damage and bacterial infection.

    Sometimes, the produce comes through many stages before finally approaching markets; as a result prices are pushed higher while farmers do not benefit from the process.

    Like other exporters, Sunny Anjorin has urged the government not to “overlook ports as federal infrastructure investments plans are made.”

    For him and other stakeholders, outdated port infrastructure threatens the food supply chain and the country’s economy and the development of a national strategy for infrastructure investments. He  underscored  “the importance of agriculture to government’s determination to maintain and boost its high growth rates, create more jobs, significantly reduce poverty and grow enough cheap, nutritious food to feed its families, export its surplus crops while safeguarding the continent’s environment.”

    He said the time has come for the government and the private sector to make agriculture and agribusiness catalyst end poverty.

    “In Europe, even with hundreds of trucks of agro-exports streaming onto ships regularly for the ports, traffic still moves quickly and smoothly. There is clockwork efficiency which ensures the timely supplies of fresh produce and other goods.  In one hour, the produce are in the ports.

    Few hours later, they are on their way to their destinations in Europe and Africa. But the experience is different here, the Chief Executive Officer, Multimix Group, Dr. Obiora Madu said.

    He said the role of logistics is a crucial factor in the nation’s agro trade and economic growth and as an enabler of export-oriented economy; its importance cannot be over-emphasised.

    According to him, logistics cover procurement, transport, inventory control and distribution of goods. It also involves the integration of information, transportation, inventory, warehousing material handling, packaging and clearing.

    He added that logistics is increasingly becoming a strategic source of competitive advantage, and that the high logistics cost makes Nigerian agro-exports less competitive in the international market

    He said storage systems; especially cold rooms were unable to satisfy the rising demand for agricultural exports.

    In an industry with perishable produce, Madu said improved logistics is an integral part of the system.

    Moving forward, he said there is much room for improvement.

    To enable the logistics sector to handle greater volumes of freight, to speed up the time taken to deliver goods across the supply chains and to lower the cost of delivery, he said several improvements need to be made.

     

    Cold storage infrastructure

    According to the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), an arm of the United Nations (UN), reducing food waste is an important way to lower production costs.

    For example, in sub-Saharan Africa, on-farm losses of fruits and vegetables are ranging from 0 to 50 per cents.

    One area experts cited as a challenge is the lack of cold storage infrastructure for moving agro exports, particularly perishable exports. They said the sector doesn’t provide cold storage technologies, such as refrigeration systems for produce such as fruits and vegetables to significantly mitigate the possibility of wastage of temperature-sensitive goods.

    While there has been an increase in the number of temperature-controlled facilities in the country, the Chairman, Sustainable Livelihoods and Development Network for Africa (SLIDEN AFRICA), Prof. Kola Adebayo, said there was a need for specialised cold chain logistics infrastructure to increase agricultural production and meet international food safety requirements.

    According to him, handling perishable goods requires temperature-controlled environments and uninterrupted handling of all processes in the value chain to meet food safety standards and customer demands.

    At present, newcomers to logistics are finding the industry riddled with issues. This is mainly due to the nation’s existing infrastructure not being up to latest standards: inadequate storage facilities and frequent power outages are just some of the challenges businesses are facing. Many of the nation’s trucks also lack the equipment to maintain required temperature levels to perishables during last-mile delivery.

    At the moment, the industry is not connected to all the food production centres in remote agricultural communities.

     

    Freight costs impact Nigeria’s competitiveness on world stage

    The Director of Operations, AgroEknor, Adedoyin Adesanya, said the issue of logistics and infrastructure is killing export business.

    “For instance, when our shipment leaves Kano for Lagos, the trip shouldn’t be more than four days, but currently, a truck can spend up to 22 days on the road due to bad state of the roads.

    “We are the first company to export hibiscus from Port Harcourt Airport, Onne, and it was successful. It is faster and convenient than Lagos, but the issue is that it is more expensive compared to exporting through Lagos.

    “High levies are charged in Port Harcourt. Instead of the N140, 000 fees for exporting a container; it shoots up to N200, 000, including hotel accommodation and logistics. The extra cost affects our profit line.

    Kidnapping, insecurity and other challenges are also responsible for exporters ignoring Port Harcourt Airport. But we took that risk. Operations there are very fast unlike Lagos.”

    Madu observed that freight costs have continued to dampen Nigeria’s competitiveness in agriculture on the international markets.

    He said freight costs were critical to maintaining Nigeria’s global competitiveness and would continue to impact agriculture’s export performance in the future.

    He said Nigeria needs a functional logistics system to enable farmers to move produce to markets by air, rail and sea.

    He said the nation’s agriculture and logistics industries have to be refined so that if a supermarket in London suddenly wants more agro exports, it can get them in a better condition in a matter of hours.

    He explained that Nigeria commands a strategic position as a maritime hub in the regional and global arena, and that the maritime industry should support the agro exports sector to remain major contributor to the nation’s economy.

    He said that the most prominent logistical problems for agricultural exports include the procedures for ships to enter some countries and the legislations by which these countries operate.

     

    Challenges

    Currently, two major ports, Apapa and Tin Can are responsible for processing the bulk of trading activities, but infrastructure and logistics challenges continue to impact export, as well as import activities.

    A survey conducted in 2018 showed that Nigeria lost about $10 billion on two non-oil exports due to gridlock at the port.

    The gridlock has led to refusal by buyers to renew contracts and in dire cases, outright cancellation of contractual agreements.

    The Nigerian Cashew Association of Nigeria (NCAN) alleged that in March, there was an incidence of delayed shipment of 50,000 tons of cashew valued at $300 million due to gridlock which prevented the trucks from accessing the ports.

    The Africa Centre for Supply Chain (ACSC), stated that the profit margin of corporate entities, especially those who make use of the Lagos ports, have gradually declined, as a result of increased costs of logistics. ACSC said dilapidated roads, among other infrastructural problems, has led to a N2.5 trillion losses in corporate earnings across various sectors of the economy. The development was also similar in transporting containers.

    The International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) said in Africa south of the Sahara, weak infrastructure, such as poor roads, has led to high transportation costs and longer transit times. These obstacles, according to the institute, can be particularly serious for production and marketing of perishable goods such as fruits and vegetables.

    It said export growth plays a crucial role in overall development, especially by driving economic growth, creating jobs and providing an importance source of foreign exchange. Appreciating the constraints facing African exporters, it stressed, is important if these constraints should be alleviated for Africans to take advantage of the opportunities in the rapidly growing markets for high-value agricultural products.

     

    AfCFTA and the prospect of Nigeria agro exports

    The Executive Secretary, Institute of Export Operations and Management (IEOM), Mr. Ofon Udofia said the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement offers Nigeria a huge opportunity to boost agro exports.

    According to him, AfCFTA, being a common market arrangement, will encourage unhindered flow of Nigeria’s agricultural goods to key markets in Africa that are in need of them.

    However, the country will need to improve on the issues and challenges impacting negatively on agriculture export growth in in order to capitalise on the advantages of the untapped market potential that AfCFTA provides.

     

    Railways

    Nigeria  being a large country in terms of land mass, so the distances over which agro exports  is shipped are sufficiently great so much so that rail and water transport systems should be of economic advantage.

    According to analysts, railway infrastructure and capacity bottlenecks have to be upgraded to support agricultural and other freight shipments in multiple locations.

     

    Cold chain logistics

    Cold chain logistics is seen as temperature-managed transport that is essential to deliver perishable products as fresh as possible. World Bank Consultant, Prof. Abel Ogunwale said what the sector needs are cool storage warehouses for temporary storage of trans-shipped perishables at the airport.

    Getting agricultural exports to feed fast expanding offshore markets, he added, won’t just rely on smart farmers producing more food regardless of testing seasonal conditions – the pressure is on supply chain service providers, too. The real challenge, according to him, is ensuring that customers in Asia or the Middle East get the products which will not spoil due to the tropical heat at an airport freight terminal.

  • Billions lost to weak tax regime as poverty bites

    Billions lost to weak tax regime as poverty bites

    Every year, Nigeria loses trillions of naira to tax dodging and tax breaks that deprive people of vital public services and economic empowerment. Are the penalties for tax evasion and avoidance adequate? What reforms are needed? Deputy News Editor JOSEPH JIBUEZE sought answers.

    An Akaeze, a community in Ivo Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, 43-year-old commercial motorcycle rider Sunday Okereke lives in a mudhouse with his family.

    In early November, a tragic incident turned their lives upside down.

    Okereke’s four children and their mother, Elizabeth, were in the house when heavy rain began.

    The mudhouse could not withstand the downpour. It collapsed, killing three of the children. Elizabeth and one of her sons, both injured, survived.

    Like the Okerekes, about 90 million Nigerians live in extreme poverty, according to the World Data Lab’s Poverty Clock.

    The World Economic Forum (WEF) says almost six people in Nigeria fall into the poverty trap every minute.

    Partly due to illicit financial flows (IFFs) that occur through a weak tax regime, revenue which could have gone to poverty reduction is lost.

    The Global Financial Integrity (GFI), in its 2018 report, says Nigeria loses about $15.7billion annually.

    With Nigeria’s 2019 budget being about $29 billion, the country loses nearly half of its annual budget through IFFs.

    “We are working to lift Nigerians out of poverty and set them on the path to prosperity.

    “We intend to lift 100 million Nigerians out of poverty over the next 10 years,” President Muhammadu Buhari said during a retreat for his ministers.

    Weak compliance

    Tax compliance remains a problem as Nigeria struggles with widespread evasion.

    Nigeria’s tax to GDP ratio is one of the lowest in the world, according to the Tax Justice Network.

    At fewer than six per cent, it is far below the sub-Saharan African average of 20 per cent, and the 15 per cent considered necessary to fund public services.

    Aware of the situation, the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), on December 18, gave a seven-day notice to tax defaulters to pay up or be prosecuted.

    Multinationals are also culpable. According to the Corporate Tax Haven Index, governments globally lose over US$ 500 billion in tax each year due to corporate tax havens.

    It noted that multinationals are taxed under an international regime set up a century ago, and which has utterly failed to keep pace with secret banking and transfer pricing abuses.

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Prof Fabian Ajogwu, said most African countries, including Nigeria, have been lagging in the fight against IFFs.

    “The statistics are mind-boggling. We are looking at about $854 billion that has disappeared from Africa between 1970 and 2008,” he said.

    According to him, while Africa receives aid from abroad, the money leaving the continent is in the ratio of 2:1.

    “So, for every $1 Africa is given as aid, $2 has disappeared through IFFs.

    “The legal framework has to be toughened…We must harmonise our laws to block these loopholes and tackle the issues of under-declaration and non-declaration of resource trading,” Ajogwu said.

    The senior lawyer wants stiffer penalties for tax avoidance and evasion.

    “We need to have a track on offshore tax-shelters, where people set up businesses solely to avoid tax or to just not declare their true returns,” he said.

    Dr Jane Lethbridge of the Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU), University of Greenwich, London, said much of Nigeria’s IFF problem stems from off-shore tax evasion, where companies set up off-shore offices or engage in transfer pricing to evade tax.

    She noted that a lack of coordination between different structures facilitates tax evasion.

    “For example, it is possible to register with Nigeria’s Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) without registering with the FIRS,” Lethbridge said.

    Helpful incentives?

    The Tax Justice Network says Nigeria has been granting many tax incentives (reduced or no tax) to some multinational companies in a bid to attract foreign direct investment (FDI).

    Last year, the Federal Government launched the Compendium of Tax Incentives to promote Nigeria as an attractive investment destination using tax incentives.

    But, a report by the Tax Justice Network and Actionaid says corporate tax incentives significantly reduce revenue and do not necessarily attract FDI, compared to providing an enabling environment.

    “Our research shows that three countries alone – Ghana, Nigeria and Senegal – are losing up to $5.8 billion a year to tax incentives,” the report says.

    It recommended: “Publicly review and assess all corporate tax incentives, with costings and justifications provided for each.

    “Ensure that all new incentives get parliamentary approval, are overseen by a single well-resourced entity, and end discretionary corporate tax incentives.”

    Needed reforms

    The Tax and Fiscal Law (Amendment) Bill, also known as the Finance Bill, seeks to raise revenue through tax reforms and is awaiting the President’s assent.

    The Bill seeks to amend the Company Income Tax Act (CITA) of 2004 to curb “Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)”.

    It also seeks to amend the Petroleum Profit Tax Act, Customs and Excise Tariff Act, Personal Income Tax Act, Value Added Tax, Stamp Duties Act and the Capital Gains Tax.Nigerian Law Reform Commission (NLRC) Acting Chairman Prof Jummai Audi noted an aspect of the CITA that needs an amendment.

    “The powers of the President to exempt any company or class of companies from the payment of tax under this Act are very wide.

    “The powers of the President and minister to allow certain donations to be deducted from the profits of a company for tax purposes are also very wide,” he said.

    The review, he said, should involve increasing tax default penalties, which are currently too low.

    Mr Olanrewaju Suraju, Head of Project at Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA Resource Centre), a research and policy advocacy group, said Nigeria’s tax regime and weak law enforcement allow IFFS.

    “Our laws are inadequately implemented to secure the country from IFFs. The country is losing substantial revenues to the weak tax regime.

    “The elites and multinational corporations are the most culpable,” Suraju said.

    Chairman of the Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), Prof Bolaji Owasanoye, said the Federal Government has set up an inter-agency committee on transfer pricing to check abuses.

    “We need to strengthen regulators that have roles to play in stemming IFFs.

    “We need to strengthen, for instance, the capacity of the FIRS to recover taxes and to learn new ways companies avoid taxes.

    “We need to change the laws with regards to beneficial ownership – a major way through which IFFs occur.

    “Nobody should incorporate a company with a nominee or a proxy,” he said.

    Owasanoye wants Nigeria to strengthen its information exchange mechanisms.

    “Our tax-collecting agency must have information about the true profit of companies operating in Nigeria.

    “If you don’t have access to their global income, the jurisdictions they’re operating in and the records they’re filing in those places, it’ll be much more difficult to tax them effectively,” he said.

    At a national workshop on Reform of Tax Laws in Nigeria, Attorney-General of the Federation Abubakar Malami (SAN), spoke on the need for tax law reforms.

    “The Nigerian legislative framework lacks the required efficacy to address the challenges resulting from the implementation of CITA, hence the need to review and reform the Act,” he said.

    Maya Forstater, a tax expert at the Center for Global Development, Washington DC, said there was the need for legislative reforms to curb trade mis-invoicing and tax avoidance by multinationals.

    “Legislative changes can shift behaviours…and administrative improvements and information sharing can make it easier…,” she said.

    Dr Christiana Okojie of the Partnership for African Social and Governance Research believes the large volume of illicit transfers from Nigeria must be addressed.

    She said much of such transfers occur through tax malpractices and corruption.

    Other IFF enablers, she said, are trade mis-invoicing, “especially by Nigeria’s oil trading partners”, and excessive tax exemptions/incentives.

    “Tax reforms are required to block some of these avenues as well as to improve revenue generation,” Okojie said.

    A tax expert, Dr Fredrick Akinfala, writing in the Journal of Economics and Development Studies, says all corporations, big and small, must be registered for tax purposes.

    “Nigeria must institute costly consequences for corporations who flout anti-corruption laws or who evade taxes with impunity.

    “The government could look into banning such corporations from any future government procurement agreement no matter who the culprit is…”

    According to Akinfala, Nigeria can only successfully prevent IFFs if it musters the political will to drive stringent policies to stem the tide.

    “Government, through its watchdog agencies, should require that beneficial ownership information is provided when companies are incorporated or trusts registered.

    “This information must be updated regularly and placed on the public record,” he adds.

    • This story was produced by The Nation. It was written as part of Wealth of Nations, a media skills development programme run by the Thomson Reuters Foundation in partnership with the Institute for the Advancement of Journalism. More information at www.wealth-of-nations.org. The content is the sole responsibility of the author and the publisher.

     

  • Dasuki’s long walk freedom

    Since August 2015, Col. Sambo Dasuki has been on trial for illegal firearms possession and money laundering. Courts have ordered his release, which the Federal Government complied with yesterday, writes ERIC IKHILAE

    Sambo Dasuki, who served as the National Security Adviser (NSA) during the administration of President Goodluck Jonathan, was arrested shortly after President Muhammadu Buhari took over the reins of power.

    Dasuki has three different charges pending against him in courts. One is before Justice Ahmed Mohammed of the Federal High Court, Abuja, while the other two are now before Justice Hussein Baba-Yusuf of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Maitama, Abuja.

    He is prosecuted alone in the charge before the Federal High Court which relates to illegal arms possession and money laundering.

    One of the cases before the FCT High Court is a 22-count charge in which Dasuki and others are accused of breach of trust and diversion of about N13billion by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    He is charged with a former governor of Sokoto State, Attahiru Bafarawa, Bafarawa’s son, Sagir, a former Director of Finance and Administration in the Office of the NSA, Shuaibu Salisu; a former Minister of State for Finance, Bashir Yuguda; and Sagir’s firm, Dalhatu Investment.

    This charge was originally before Justice Peter Affen (also of the High Court of the FCT) in Maitama. It was later transferred to Justice Baba-Hussein before whom an earlier 19-count charge, also filed by the EFCC, was already pending, in which the ex-NSA and some others are accused of diverting N32bn part of the funds meant to procure arms.

    Named with Dasuki in the 19-count charge are Salisu, Aminu Baba-Kusa and Baba-Kusa’s two firms – Acacia Holdings Ltd and Reliance Referral Hospital Limited.

    First arraigned on August 31, 2015, and granted bail on self-recognition

    The ex-NSA was first arraigned before Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court, Abuja on August 31, 2015, on a one-count charge bordering on illegal possession of firearms, an offence punishable under section 27(i) (a)(i) of the Firearms Act Cap F28 LFN 2004.

    He pleaded not guilty to the charge, following which the trial judge, Justice Adeniyi Ademola, granted him bail on self-recognition, upon an application filed by his lawyer, Joseph Daudu (SAN).

    The prosecution lawyer, M. S. Diri, did not oppose the application for bail, but left the issue at the court’s discretion.

    Justice Ademola ordered Dasuki to deposit all his international passports with the court’s Deputy Registrar, Litigation. He ordered that the passports should be retrieved, if they are currently being held by other government agencies, and handed to the named court’s official.

    The prosecution later amended the charge and raised it to five-counts and included the offence of money laundering.

    Although Dasuki met the conditions attached to the bail granted him, he was briefly released by the DSS, but rearrested.

    On December 18, 2015, Justice Baba Yusuf granted Dasuki bail at N250 million bail alongside Salisu Shuaibu, a director of finance in the office of the NSA and one Aminu Kusa. They were asked to provide a surety who owns a property in the FCT worth N250 million.

    Justice Affen equally granted Dasuki and others, who were arraigned before him bail. When the case before Affen was moved to Justice Baba-Yusuf’s court upon complaint by the defence team that it amounted to double jeopardy for their clients to be standing trial in two courts simultaneously on similar charges, the new judge allowed them to remain on the bail earlier granted them.

    While the others were allowed on bail, the state held on to Dasuki on the grounds that he was being held in relation to separate offences, a position Dasuki challenged up to the Supreme Court.

    And in its decision on March 2, 2018 Supreme Court rejected Dasuki’s claim that his continued detention was a violation of the bail earlier granted him. The court refused Dasuki’s request for the freezing of his trial pending when the state would agree to release him.

    In the judgment, a five-man panel of the apex court headed by Justice Dattijo Muhammad noted in a judgment on two separate appeals by Dasuki that the trial initiated in 2015, had been frustrated at the High Court of the FCT by various interlocutory applications and appeals.

    Instead of acceding to Dasuki’s prayer, the Supreme Court granted an order for accelerated hearing of the trial after dismissing Dasuki’s two appeals.

    Dasuki had appealed to the Supreme Court against the judgments of the June 15, 2016 Court of Appeal, Abuja, which had affirmed the earlier separate rulings of the FCT High Court.

    Both the FCT High Court and the Court of Appeal had dismissed Dasuki’s prayers, ruling that his re-arrest by the operatives of the DSS after he met his bail conditions and was released from Kuje prison on December 29, 2015, did amount to the disobedience of the trial court’s order granting him bail.

    On October 4, 2016 the Community Court of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) upheld a fundamental rights enforcement suit, with which Dasuki challenged his continued detention.

    The ECOWAS Court, in a unanimous judgment of a three-man panel, read by Justice Chijioke Nwoke, also awarded N15m damages against the Federal Government.

    It ordered the Federal Government to release him and his belongings that were seized from him by the state agents.

    The court held that the Nigerian government was unable to substantiate the former NSA’s continued detention, concluding that the government’s act violated both national and international laws on the right of persons and citizens to personal liberty.

    On realising the Nigerian government was unwilling to obey the decision by the sub-regional court, Dasuki again, returned to the Federal High Court with a fundamental rights enforcement application, similar to the one the ECOWAS upheld.

    And in a judgment on July 2, 2018 Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu of the Federal High Court equally held in Dasuki’s favour, declared his detention illegal.

    Justice Ojukwu granted Dasuki bail at N200m with two sureties who must be residents of Abuja. She said the sureties could be civil servants not less than Grade Level 16 in the employment of the Federal Government or private citizens not employed by the government.

    If the sureties are Federal Government employees, they will deposit the certified copies of their letters of appointment and last promotion letters with the court, the judge said. But the judge said if they were private citizens not employed by the Federal Government, they must own properties in the Abuja metropolis and must submit the original title documents to the registry of the court.

    Such sureties are also to submit to the court, their evidence of tax payments for 2015, 2016 and 2017.The judge also ordered that either of one of two sureties to be presented or Dasuki himself, should pay the sum of N100m to the court’s account which could only be taken back after the completion of the case against him, to guarantee the bail.

    While the court ordered that Dasuki’s passport must remain in the custody of the court, it also ordered bailiffs to verify the addresses of the sureties.

    Unable to meet the conditions and with the trial court’s unwillingness to vary the conditions, Dasuki headed for the Court of Appeal Abuja for a variation of the bail conditions, which the appellate court acceded to on November 22, 2019.

    In a unanimous judgement on November 22, a three-man panel of the Court of Appeal expunged the requirement that Dasuki produced a Level 16 civil servant, who must own a property worth N100million within the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) as surety

    Justice Stephen Adah, in the lead judgment, said the inclusion of civil servants as surety was an oversight on the part of the court.

    He ordered that Dasuki should, instead, produce two sureties, with property worth N100m within the FCT.

    The Court of Appeal’s judgment of November 22, 2019 was a review of its earlier judgment delivered on June 13, 2019 on the original appeal filed by Dasuki against the stringent conditions, he claimed were attached to the bail granted by Justice Ojukwu.

    In the June 13, 2019 judgment, the Court of Appeal had ordered that Dasuki produce a surety, who must be a Level 16 official in the Civil Service of either the Federal or state government, who must own a property worth N100m within the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    But, Dasuki found this part of the Court of Appeal judgment of June 13, 2019 difficult to meet and returned to the court, via an application, and prayed for a further review.

    He stated in the application that it was difficult to find a Level 16 Civil Servant who could own a N100m worth of property in Abuja through his legitimate earnings.

    Justice Stephen Adah, who read the Court of Appeal judgment on November 22, 2019, in the appeal marked: CA/A/806/2019, said the court’s decision to request that Dasuki produce a civil servant as surety, was an oversight.

    “Of concern to us is that we as a court must be ready and sensitive enough not to do anything that will run against the laws of the land.

    “The issue of involving civil servants or public officers in the service of the federation or the state in bail of people accused of offences has never been the practice anywhere that is civilised, and we should stop it at this level.

    “It was an error that we allowed that to stay. So, it is in this respect that we will act ex debito justitiae (as a matter of right) ensure that that aspect of the condition is removed from the conditions of bail that were granted.”

    Incidentally, while Dasuki moved from one court to another, challenging his detention, no meaningful progress was made in the three cases pending against. It is hoped that with his release, he will be able to prepare for his defence.

  • Sowore, Dasuki: CAN, SANs, Ekweremadu, SERAP hail Fed Govt

    Onyedi Ojiabor, Abuja, Deputy News Editor Joseph Jibueze, Adebisi Onanuga, Gbenga Omokhunu, Abuja and Robert Egbe

     

    THE Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Senior lawyers, former Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu and the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) on Tuesday welcomed the Federal Government’s order for the release of #RevolutionNow protest convener, Omoyele Sowore and the immediate-past National Security Adviser (NSA), Col. Sambo Dasuki, from custody.

    They urged the government to go a step further and follow the rule of law by obeying court orders.

    He was detained by the secret police in August while Dasuki has been in DSS’ custody since 2015, despite court orders granting them bail.

    The government refused to obey the orders on grounds of, among others, threats to national security.

    Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs), Femi Falana, Chief Mike Ozekhome, Yusuf Ali SAN and Ade Adedeji said the government’s action was in order.

    Falana said the order suggested that the AGF had “jettisoned the reactionary position that national security takes precedence over the rule of law.”

    Falana said: “In particular, we request the Federal Government to liaise with the Kaduna State government to withdraw the charge filed against Sheikh Ibraheem Elzakzaky and his wife, Mrs Zeinat Elzakzaky who have been detained since December 14, 2015.

    “The Federal High Court had on December 2, 2016, declared the detention of the couple illegal and unconstitutional and ordered the federal government to release them from custody forthwith.

    “Apart from awarding them reparation of N50 million, the Federal High Court also ordered the Federal Government to provide them with temporary accommodation since the Nigerian Army had destroyed their family house in Zaria.”

    Ozekhome also called for El-Zakzaky’s release.

    He added: “The order by the Federal government through the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, SAN, for the immediate release of Colonel Sambo Dasuki who has been in detention for about four years, and Omoyele Sowore, who has been detained since August 2019, is salutary for democracy, respect for fundamental rights of the citizens and observance of rule of law.

    “I am happy the government has finally realised its faux pas and is seeing the same light which I saw since 2015 when I kicked against the illegal incarceration of Dasuki. It is never too late to take corrective measures and make amends. There is nothing like something good happening at a bad time, or something bad happening at a good time.

    Ali said the government’s action was “better late than be the late”.

    For Adedeji, it was a welcome development, but “it is necessary to emphasise the fact that they must continue to submit to the decisions of court even when such decisions are not convenient or at the risk of so-called national security.

    But Activist-lawyer Louis Alozie (SAN) described the government’s action as “an insult” to the judicial arm of government.

    He said: “In a presidential democracy with separation of powers, court orders are meant to be obeyed. They are not subject to any executive orders before they can be obeyed.”

    Read Also: Timeline in Sowore’s arrest, detention

    SERAP, in a statement by its Deputy Director Kolawole Oluwadare, said it was “a positive step by the Nigerian government.”

    It urged President Muhammadu Buhari to “immediately withdraw all charges against Mr Sowore and Olaware Bakare and all others detained simply for exercising their right to freedom of expression. They should never have been charged in the first place.”

    It also called for the “immediate and unconditional release of journalist Agba Jalingo.”

    Ekweremadu, in a statement by his media aide, Uche Anichukwu, described the government’s action as “the best public relations job for the President Muhammadu Buhari government in 2019.”

    “Although we should never have travelled this road in the first place, the intervention of the Attorney-General of the Federation and the directive for the immediate release of Sambo Dasuki and Omoyele Sowore come as a big relief for the nation’s democracy and will a long way to restore confidence in the sanctity of the judiciary and its place as the last hope of the common man,” Ekweremadu said.

    CAN commended the Federal Government for releasing Col Dasuki and Sowore.

    In a statement by CAN President Rev Samson Ayokunle, the body described the gesture as a Christmas gift to the populace and the cleric, adding that it is a New Dawn for the country’s democracy.

    His words: “We are very happy with the decision of the Federal government to release the duo of former National Security Adviser (NSA) and the publisher of Saharareporters, Omoyele Sowore as mandated by the Federal High Court, Abuja. We appreciate the Attorney General of the Federation and the Minister of Justice for his intervention and counsel.

    “The action of the government is commendable and it is a New Dawn for Democracy. As long as the Federal government continues to respect the rule of law and the Constitution, the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) will continue to work with the government to ensure that there are peace and stability in the polity. We will not cease to pray for President Muhammadu Buhari and his team for a successful tenure of office. Nigeria should be a pacesetter for the continent in everything good, being the giant of Africa in the abundance of human and material resources.”

  • Is the road clear for Eco?

    With the West African Economic and Monetary Union agreeing with France to several changes to the CFA franc currency, including a new name, Assistant Editor BOLA OLAJUWON writes about the hurdles against the taking off of the Eco currency initiative.

     

    THE Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), on June 29, announced the adoption of “Eco” as its monetary currency and January 2020 as tentative date for its take-off. To many economic analysts, the CFA franc used in two African monetary zones – one for eight West African countries and the other for six, mostly petro-states, in Central Africa – was seen as a major hurdle against the implementation of the regional currency initiative.

    But on Saturday, Ivory Coast’s President Alassane Ouattara said the West African bloc inched closer to a split from French-backed CFA franc currency. He said the West African Economic and Monetary Union has agreed with France to several changes to the CFA franc currency, including a new name. The monetary union will keep its euro peg while moving its currency reserve from France, the former colonial power. Ouattara told reporters during a two-day visit by French President Emmanuel Macron that France would no longer have a representative on the board of the central bank.

    “This decision shows our determination to create an integrated and dynamic regional market, a source of prosperity for us and for future generations,” Ouattara said.

    The decision constitutes a key step in the long-standing hurdles between the West African Economic and Monetary Union and France. For the countries that have used the CFA franc since independence almost 60 years ago, the changes marked a significant shift.

    The Ivorian leader also flew to  Abuja same day, where he briefed a meeting of presidents of member-states of ECOWAS on the agreement with France. President Muhammadu Buhari welcomed Macron’s decision not to oppose the creation of the new regional currency.

    Benin’s President Patrice Talon last month called for on West Africa’s Francophone countries to move some reserves from France to have more control over the management of their currency. “Psychologically, with regards to the vision of sovereignty and managing your own money, it’s not good that this model continues,” Talon said.

    Moving closer to the dream of integration

    The Authority of ECOWAS Heads of State and Government, at their meeting in Abuja, on June 29, moved closer to the dream of integration as espoused by the organisation’s founding fathers. The leaders, in a communiqué read by Nigeria’s Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mr. Mustapha Suleiman, at their 55th Ordinary Session, adopted Eco as the name of the sub-region’s single currency to be issued in January. It came after the implementation of the single currency was postponed several times since 2003. They instructed the ECOWAS Commission to work in collaboration with West African Monetary Agency, West African Monetary Institute (WAMI) and member-states’ central banks to accelerate the implementation of the revised roadmap on the symbol of the single currency.

    The communique directed the commission to ensure implementation of the recommendations of the meeting of the ministerial committee held in Abidjan on June 17 and June 18 as well as preparation and implementation of the Communication Strategy for the single currency programme. “The Authority takes note of the 2018 macroeconomic convergence report. It noted the worsening of the macroeconomic convergence and urged member states to do more to improve on their performance in view of the imminent deadline,” it added.

    A crawling baby

    The goal of ECOWAS leaders is to merge the new currency with the West African CFA franc – a currency used by the French-speaking members of ECOWAS since 1945. The common currency was proposed to be introduced in the West African Monetary Zone(WAMZ) countries – The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Conakry (a French-speaking which does not use the CFA franc), Liberia, Nigeria and Sierra Leone. It will then flow into the whole of ECOWAS countries. The Eco was first planned to be introduced in 2003, but this was postponed several times – to 2005, 2010 and then 2014.

    At a meeting of the Convergence Council of Ministers and Governors of West Africa on May 25, 2009, the start of the currency was rescheduled to 2015 due to international economic crisis. The December 2009 meeting also established a plan to begin work to merge the ECO with the CFA Franc immediately upon the launch of the Eco. This was planned to be achieved by next month.

    In 2001, WAMI was set up with headquarters in Accra, Ghana. It is to be an interim organisation in preparation for the future West African Central Bank. Its function and organisation are inspired by the European Monetary Institute. Thus, WAMI is to provide a framework for central banks in the WAMZ to start the integration and begin preliminary preparations for the printing and minting of the physical money.

    Can the revived dream fly?

    Loft as the dream of the single monetary currency may be, its implementation is doubtful, if available reports are anything to go by. The first hurdle confronting ECOWAS members-states is meeting the 10 convergence criteria for implementing the Eco monetary unit as set by WAMI.

    WAMI divided the criteria into four primary and six secondary criteria. Surprisingly, only Ghana has, up to the fiscal year 2011, been able to meet all the primary criteria in any single fiscal year. The four primary criteria to be achieved by each member country are: a single-digit inflation rate at the end of each year; a fiscal deficit of no more than 4% of the GDP; a central bank deficit-financing of no more than 10% of the previous year’s tax revenues; and gross external reserves that can give import cover for a minimum of three months.

    The six secondary criteria to be achieved by each member country include: prohibition of new domestic default payments and liquidation of existing ones; tax revenue should be equal to or greater than 20 per cent of the GDP; wage bill to tax revenue equal to or less than 35 per cent; public investment to tax revenue equal to or greater than 20 per cent; a stable real exchange rate; and positive real interest rate.

    According to available records, assessments of member countries’ efforts to meet the criteria are very bleak. The performance scorecard presented at the 2012 Annual Statutory Meetings of the WAMZ showed that GDP growth was projected to decline to 6.9% in 2012 from 8.7% in 2011. The convergence scale of the whole WAMZ area was also projected to go down from a score of 79.2% in 2011 to 62.5% in 2012; as no member met all the convergence criteria.

    The average annual inflation rate also increased from 11.6% in 2011 to 12.6% in 2012. The average inflation rate in 2019 is put at 8.38%. For 2020, it’s envisaged to be 8.04%.

    In a reaction to these indicators, Director of Multilateral Surveillance, ECOWAS Commission, Lassane Kabore, described the performance as “dismal”. But, Charlie Robertson, chief global economist at Renaissance Capital, was quoted as saying in a report that only five countries – Cape Verde, Ivory Coast, Guinea, Senegal and Togo – of the region’s 15 countries presently meet the single currency’s criteria of a budget deficit not higher than 4% and inflation rates of not more than 5%.

    But, Kabore affirmed the commitment of his commission to the establishment of the Eco.

    On February 23, 2018, an economist, Jean-Joseph Boillot, said no serious work on the technical aspects of this implementation has been undertaken, either at the university level or the state level.

    Low trading among ECOWAS member-states

    It is often said that countries that trade together grow together. But this is not the case of ECOWAS. The countries have the same international passport with assigning countries indicated on the back of the booklet. This has been lauded in the international circle as a major landmark. But still, ECOWAS is the least integrated region in the world in terms of cross border trade, a report by the Borderless Alliance group said. According to the report, the non-application of ECOWAS directives relating to the free movement of goods and people, ECOWAS Trade Liberalisation Scheme, ETLS, and the Common External Tariff, CET, are some of the factors responsible for the low level of trade integration in the region.

    Goods have been moving but with a lot of restrictions and undermining rules created by countries in violation of the ECOWAS agreement, which allows movement without tariffs and duties. Experts pointed out that local manufacturing among ECOWAS states is very low. About 92 per cent of the goods traded in the region are foreign and imported to the countries. Only Nigeria has a higher local production volume.

    According to a journalist and Executive Director of the Afri-China Media Centre, Lagos, Ikenna Emewu, there is also the problem of confidence – building between members-states. Investors in Nigeria have had terrible times in the hands of Ghanaian officials, because of the need to protect the market in Ghana. Nigerian traders are also experiencing other challenges in Ghana. For instance, the continued deportation of some Nigerians from Ghana on allegations of cybercrime, prostitution, and illegal stay as well as the use of domestic policies to stifle business owners in parts of Ghana have been cited as discouraging to the implementation of the economic integration agenda.

    Most members-states would rather prefer goods from outside the region and would mount obstacles to stop the domestic goods from the members-states market, Emewu said. Fewer restrictions have been placed on goods from Asia, Europe and America.

    A clarion call for more trade among ECOWAS countries.

    It is envisaged that the African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement (AfCFTA), described by the United Nations as a potential game-changer that could create the world’s largest free trade area of 55 countries, will help. AfCFTA is predicted to create a single market with a combined GDP of $2.5trn and 1.2 billion consumers. It goes beyond the scope of existing trade agreements on the continent, aiming to create a continent-wide single market in goods and services, free movement of people and investment, and eventually a customs union with a common external tariff. Advocates of AfCFTA believe that the trade deal will help to address Africa’s economic challenges and allow for the greater, prosperous flow of trade within the continent. They argued that ECOWAS will benefit from the ripple effect.

    The African Development Bank Group urged countries on the continent and ECOWAs especially to break down all barriers to trade and investment. The bank’s President Akinwumi Adesina made the call at the opening ceremony of the 54th Annual Meeting of the lender in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea. Adesina also urged countries to accelerate regional integration.

    Close of borders by Nigeria

    In August, just three months after celebrating its signing the AfCFTA, Nigeria, under what is called “Border Drill’, ban the movement of all goods from countries with which it shares a land border: Benin, Niger and Cameroon. Nigerian officials argued that the primary objective was to curb smuggling of goods such as rice, tomatoes and poultry to bolster Nigeria’s agricultural sector. It was also argued that it was designed to strengthen security along the borders. But analysts said the border drill will affect AfCFTA when it finally took off.

    Eco take-off to be changed?

    The January proposed take-off date for the commencement of Eco may not be realised as many countries within the region had yet to meet the convergence criteria for the monetary union, according to the Minister of Finance, Budget and National Planning, Mrs. Zainab Ahmed, who confirmed the development in Abuja. She said only Togo had met all the convergence criteria within the last two years for the monetary union.

    Mrs. Zainab Ahmed, who spoke on Friday at the opening session of a meeting of ECOWAS Ministers of Finances and governors of Central Banks on the ECOWAS single currency programme. The minister said the inability of other countries in the sub-region to achieve the criteria would make the operationalisation of the Eco currency in 2020 problematic. She said there was a need for member states to pursue appropriate policies and structural reforms that would enable them to meet the convergence criteria.

    “This meeting is important because we are at a crossroads. The recommendations we make will have significant implications on the monetary policies we undertake.”

    Can political will help?

    But, ECOWAS Chairman President Issoufou Mahamadou insisted that the single currency will be issued in January. “We have not changed that but we will continue with assessment between now and then. We are of the view that ready countries will launch the single currency and countries that are not yet ready will join the programme as they comply with all six convergence criteria,” Mahamadou said. He also said there was “a real firm political will” for the region to hastily achieve the single currency. Experts said they are waiting to see the walking of the talk by next month.

    But when it was expected most, Issoufou, at the end of the bloc’s meeting at the weekend, rather called on member states to take decisive steps in tackling terrorism in their countries instead of pronouncing the ECOWAS decision in respect of Eco currency take-off, thus adding to the assertion that the currency initiative may not fly next month.

  • Will the scourge of oil theft, pipeline vandalism ever end?

    Efforts by the government and organisations to curb oil theft and pipeline vandalism seem to be in futility. Billions of Naira had been lost to activities of oil thieves and pipeline vandals over the years. However, stakeholders in the petroleum industry are calling for collaboration to fight and stem the menace, writes EMEKA UGWUANYI.

    The Group Managing Director, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Mallam Mele Kyari, said the Corporation had recorded 45,347 pipeline breaks on its downstream pipeline network across the country between 2001 and January to June of 2019, to underscore the gravity of activities of oil thieves and pipeline vandals in Nigeria.

    On December 5, part of the System 2B pipeline was vandalised by oil thieves at Baruwa village in Egbe-Idimu Local Council Development Area of Lagos State. In the process of stealing refined petroleum product especially premium motor spirit (petrol), the pipeline caught fire and resulted in loss of several lives, revenue and environment pollution. The incident was the second in the year in the same area as similar attack occurred in November.

    The Chief Operating Officer, Downstream, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Mr. Adetunj Adeyemi, said Baruwa has become particularly a difficult area as there was fire outbreak twice there last year, in February and April, and this year alone, in November and December, all caused by pipeline vandals and oil thieves.

    The menace is not only restricted to Baruwa area but traverses every part of the country where there is crude, products and gas pipelines. This has led to loss of over 3000 lives and trillions of Naira in revenues that would have accrued from oil losses and burnt properties. For instance, In July 2000 in Jesse Delta State, over 250 were killed in pipeline explosion.  Also, on October 12, 2018, in Umuimo and Umuaduru village, close to Arongwa in Osisioma Local Government Area of Abia State, about 200 people died of pipeline explosion while many houses were burnt and properties worth billions of Naira destroyed. The victims often were people scooping refined petroleum products from vandalised pipeline.

    On 26 December 26, 2006 and December 19, 2018, scores of lives were lost and properties worth millions of Naira destroyed in the Abule Egba area of Lagos as a result of pipeline vandalism. Similarly, on July 4, at Ijegun area in Lagos, pipeline explosion caused by vandals, led to several deaths and loss of properties.

    The list is long and has been happening over the past few decades in different states including Rivers, Bayelsa, Imo and Enugu, among other states where there is petroleum pipeline.

    Besides loss of lives, economic and environmental ruins caused by these incidents, hardly are these vandals caught despite presence of security personnel assigned to man these pipelines. According to oil industry operators, the security personnel that monitor the facilities are grossly inadequate as the oil and gas infrastructure is huge.

    Current data from the Ministry of Petroleum Resources showed that the industry has 258 oil fields, over 2000 wellheads, 5,120 kilometres of pipeline for products, 4441 kilometres of pipeline for crude, 164 kilometres of pipeline for gas and 124 kilometres of pipeline for condensates. This makes it impossible for the security personnel to oversee all at the same time, the operators said, adding that there is need for robust collaboration with communities, law enforcement agencies and others to really secure the pipelines.

    Economic losses

    According to data obtained from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI), $41.94 billion was lost to crude and refined product theft in 10 years, 2009-2018. A breakdown of the losses revealed $1.56 billion worth of crude loss was incurred by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), $1.84 billion worth of refined products loss and $38.54 billion worth of crude losses by oil companies. Further breakdown showed volume of crude losses in the 10 years. In 2009, 69.9 million barrels of crude oil was lost; in 2010, 28.3 million barrels; in 2011, 38.61 million barrels; in 2012, 51.58 million barrels; in 2013, 78.3 million barrels; in 2014, 40.17 million barrels; in 2015, 27.12 million barrels; 2016, 101.05 million barrels; in 2017, 36.46 million barrels; and 2018, 17.46 million barrels.

    On losses incurred through pipeline vandalism and the monetary value between 2009 and 2015, NEITI said in 2009, about 1.77 million barrels estimated at $88.28 million was lost; in 2010 , about 2.33 million barrels worth $166.77 million; in 2011, about 6.39 million barrels worth $639.13 million; in 2012, about 3.05 million barrels worth $304.56 million; in 2013, about 2.40 million barrels worth $240.12 million; in 2014,  about one million barrels worth $100.01 million; and in 2015 , about 0.51 million barrels worth $25.93 million.

    On losses incurred through refined petroleum products between 2009 and 2017, NEITI said in 2009, $78.48 million was lost; in 2010, $72.10 million; in 2011, $98.68 million; in 2012, $201.71 million; in 2013, $284.01 million; in 2014, $273.55 million; in 2015, $287.56 million; in 2016, $37.49 million; and in 2017, $514.23 million.

    Meanwhile, in the first half of 2019 (January-June) between 150,000 barrels per day (bpd) and 400,000 bpd of crude oil was lost. The figures are between 7.5 per cent and 20 per cent of total production of Nigeria’s daily production two million barrels, NEITI said.

    According the Agency, 22 million barrels were lost in first half of 2019, which is valued at $1.35 billion, about five per cent of 2019 budget and higher than combined 2019 budgetary capital allocations for health, education, defence and agriculture.

    It is noted that the issue is not just a 2019 problem but actually a lingering ones, saying the data that showed the $41.94 billion loss in 10 years translated to $11.47 million a day, $349 million a month and $4.19 billion a year, which were colossal losses in ramifications.

    The Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers on Monday gave reasons for non-pumping of petroleum products through System 2B Pipelines Network by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation.

    Also whenever there is attack on the System 2B pipeline, it paralyses commercial activities substantially. The System 2B pipeline takes fuel from Atlas Cove Jetty in Lagos and supplies to depots in Ejigbo, Mosinmi in Ogun State, Ibadan in Oyo State and Ore in Ondo State as well as to Ilorin in Kwara State. Therefore, any breach on the pipeline puts consumers that depend on these depots for fuel supply on unsavoury situation.

    Besides, time and cost of fixing vandalised pipelines is long and huge causing drawbacks on social and economic activities. The Federal Government spends about N125 billion yearly on repairs of vandalised pipeline.

    Also, it takes long to remediate lands where pipeline vandalism and oil theft occur because the oil damages the soil and water and render them useless for farming and fishing as well as pollute the air. These are hazardous to people living within the areas of the incidents.

    What the government is doing through NNPC

    The frequency of occurrence and the latest pipelines explosions occasioned by vandals underscores the need for concerted action to curb or stem the menace.  This becomes imperative considering the fact that some of the incidents happen at the same spots without the culprits being caught.

    The Chief Operating Officer, Downstream, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, Mr. Adetunj Adeyemi, apart from paying a visit to the Baruwa pipeline explosion site promptly, ensured the Corporation collaborated with other agencies including the fire service and Lagos State Government to put out and fire on time.  While talking to reporters, Adeyemi said: “We are here to assess the fire of December 5, 2019 at Baruwa village. We can all see that the fire has been put out.  This was done within 24 hours of the fire. We thank all the agencies of government, Lagos State Fire Service, officers of the Civil Defence, Nigerian Police, our contractors, who all came here and joined forces to put out the fire. We have started pumping of petroleum product to Mosimi and Satellite Depots. So everything is under control and we have enough products for supply.

    “But I must say that Baruwa is a particularly difficult area. Last year, there was fire outbreak twice in this Baruwa area. In February and April last year, and this year alone, in November and December. So this is an area that is very prone to fire and vandalism. We are doing our best in the NNPC to ensure we have security and have adequate maintenance in terms of pipeline integrity. We are also appealing to the residents here, the community leaders and religious leaders to ensure that they also protect the pipelines. This is Nigeria’s assets and we must protect it as Nigerians. Like they say, security is for everybody, so when you see something, say something.

    “We will continue to engage them. Our public affairs department and security departments are engaging them and we will continue to make sure that we do that engagement on a regular basis. We also have been enlightening Nigerians on the right of way (RoW) of the pipeline and the need to protect it. We will continue to engage Nigerians, put in place security measures and also technology to ensure that the pipelines are secure.”

    The Baruwa community lauded the NNPC for its quick intervention in containing the fire and remediation of the environment. The Bale of Baruwa Community, Alhaji Khalid Baruwa, identified with the push by the Corporation to tackle the issue of pipeline vandalism and oil theft headlong.  He stressed the need to fortify surveillance around the community with clear demarcation of pipeline Right-of-Way.

    Collaboration as the way out

    The NNPC has forged a formidable alliance with some key stakeholders in the downstream sector of the petroleum industry including the Nigerian Association of Road Transport Owners (NARTO) to ensure their members don’t engage in lifting fuel or crude from vandals and oil thieves; Tanker drivers, Community leaders. The collaboration is to enable NNPC join forces with them to combat pipeline vandalism not just in Baruwa Community but in all its pipeline right of way across the country. To the Corporation, the alliance will stamp out the ugly incidences of oil pipeline vandalism while ultimately sustaining the prevailing sanity in the supply and distribution of petroleum products across the country.

    The Executive Secretary, National Association of Road Transport Owners (NARTO), Mr. Aloga Ogbogo, said the protection of oil pipeline infrastructure should be the responsibility of every well-meaning Nigerian.

    The National Chairman of Petroleum Tanker Drivers (PTD), a branch of the Nigerian Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG), Comrade Salmon Oladiti, assured of the commitment of his members to work with NNPC to combat the activities of oil thieves and pipeline hackers.  He said PTD prohibited its members from partaking in the illicit transport of stolen products because it views it as an act of economic sabotage.

    The Chairman of Peace Estate Development Association, in Baruwa Community, Mr. Omojowo Adedeji, said the entire residents of the estate, which borders the scene of incessant attacks, fully aligns with the renewed drive by the NNPC to stamp out the illicit trade in stolen oil within and around the community.

    The Group Managing Director of the NNPC, Mallam Mele Kyari, corroborated Adeyemi. He said the Corporation has laid out steps to mitigate the twin menace of pipeline vandalism and crude oil theft in Nigeria’s oil and gas industry. Speaking in Abuja at the inaugural Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) Policy Dialogue, he said oil theft had remained a challenge in the Industry despite some strong interventions in the past.

    Kyari, however, assured that the gradual reduction in incidences of vandalism and theft would be sustained through improved collaboration, implementation of Global Memoranda of Understanding (GMoUs), and deployment of appropriate technologies, among other measures.

    Kyari who was represented at the event by the NNPC Chief Operating Officer, Upstream, Mr. Roland Ewubare, listed other measures to curb the menace to include a security architecture with single accountability for national critical infrastructure; Industry and regulatory commitment to transparent crude oil and products accounting; realistic expectation by host communities; and emplacement of sustainable social investment mechanism.

    He emphasised the need to inculcate shared values of integrity and transparency across every level of the governance structure for pipeline security, policy refill and enforcement of legal actions on economic saboteurs.

    The NNPC chief harped on the need to prioritize and instill in the nation’s teeming youth a sense of patriotism and national orientation.

    On the immediate and remote causes of oil theft and pipeline vandalism, Kyari stated that most stakeholders were of the view that oil theft was essentially a social problem, which is caused poverty in the communities, community-industry expectation mismatch and corruption.

    Others, he noted, include ineffective  law enforcement,  poor governance, poor  prosecution  of  offenders,  high  unemployment  in  the communities,  thriving illegal oil  market involving both Nigerians and foreigners, and inadequate funding of resources to combat oil theft.

    He lamented that NNPC, as an operator, had suffered severe attacks on its facilities and assets, noting that between 2001 to half year 2019, NNPC had recorded a total of 45,347 pipeline breaks on its downstream pipeline network across the country.

    Kyari said for the Nigerian economy to prosper, NNPC and other oil companies must be able to operate efficiently and profitably. “Unfortunately, the combination of crude oil theft, illegal refining and pipeline vandalism, has become a major threat to Nigeria in meeting its revenue projections in recent time,” he added.

    The Edo State Governor, who is also the Chairman of the National Economic Council (NEC) Ad Hoc Committee on Crude Oil Theft, Prevention and Control, Mr. Godwin Obaseki, stressed the need to institute a proper governance structure for pipeline security in the Industry. Obaseki called on the Nigeria Intelligence Agency (NIA) to work with the NNPC in identifying possible international markets and destinations of stolen Nigerian crude oil.

    He said the Industry must end the prevailing incentives that make it possible for crude oil theft and pipeline vandalism to flourish, adding that the National Economic Council (NEC) had upgraded the Ad Hoc Committee on Crude Theft to a standing committee with mandate to provide regular updates to NEC as may be required.

    The Executive Secretary of NEITI, Mr. Waziri Adio, reeled out the statistics on the ugly situation of oil theft and pipeline vandalism and challenged participants at the policy dialogue to come up with practical solutions as the theme of the dialogue is “Stemming the increasing cost of oil theft to Nigeria.

    Need for National Assembly to legislate against oil theft, pipeline vandalism

    At different fora in Nigeria and abroad stakeholders in the oil and gas industry including the Oil and Gas Trainers Association (OGTAN), Society of Petroleum Engineers, Nigeria Council and the Nigerian Association of Petroleum Explorationists, had stressed the need for the National Assembly to make laws that will deter oil thieves and pipeline vandals from engaging in the nefarious acts. To them, that will be the only sustainable way to stem the crime.  When there are laws that will appropriately punish vandals, oil thieves and economic saboteurs, the crime will drastically reduce, they added.

  • How to bridge electricity deficit

    Erratic power supply and its attendant crushing effects on the nation’s socio-economic development necessitated the privatisation of the power sector. Years after privatising the sector, Nigerians continue to groan in darkness. LUCAS AJANAKU writes on how to bridge the power deficit.

    About 140 years ago, electricity was discovered. Since then, many countries have made remarkable advances in power generation and distribution to unlock their economic potential, drive industrialisation and drastically reduce unemployment and poverty.

    According to the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), electricity generation began in 1896 but the first electric utility company, known as the Nigerian Electricity Supply Company was established in 1929.

    Despite the over 123 years since electricity generation began, stable power supply remains a wishful thinking in Nigeria. This is despite the billions of dollars invested in the sector to overhaul power infrastructure spanning generation, transmission and distribution. Not even the privatisation of power generation and distribution has delivered the desired results.

    For instance, between January and November this year, the national grid collapsed a record 11 times.

    A key objective of sustainable economic development, especially in a developing country such as Nigeria is to establish energy development paths that are both economically efficient and sustainable. This, however, depends significantly on having key players demonstrate commitment to taking leadership and investing in the human and material resources necessary to fulfil obligations in the energy/power value chain.

    A 2016 report by PwC highlighted the transformative potential of the power sector. The report noted that the country’s current economic slow-down and stated:  “In order to emerge from the current situation, Nigeria needs to take specific steps towards building internal capabilities which will enable and support the economy. One area requiring immediate focus and investment is the power sector, where the low availability of power is currently a major obstacle.”

    The report also cited the example of India that has shown a “strong commitment towards improving the business climate through addressing key bottlenecks in infrastructure.”

    The Indian government is seeking to attract investments worth $1trillion to the power sector by 2030. This is clearly one key factor that has marked India as one of the few emerging markets with promising growth prospects. Nigeria should borrow a leaf from this initiative.

    According to the PwC report, power supply comes from a mixture of sources. Thermal power (mainly oil and gas), that makes up the majority of power generation (82 per cent) with hydro-power making up 17.8 per cent and non-hydropower renewable sources shoring up the remainder.

    Gas as feedstock

    Because of the increasingly pivotal role of gas in the energy mix, the Federal Government approved the Nigerian Gas Master Plan on February 13, 2008.

    A guide for the commercial exploitation and management of the gas sector, the Master Plan targeted growing the economy with gas by pursuing three key strategies.

    The strategies are to stimulate the multiplier effect of gas in the domestic economy; position the country competitively in high-value export markets and guarantee the long-term energy security of the country.

    New aspirations

    The Federal Government aspires to increase electricity generation from the current 5 Gigawatts (Gw) to 20 Gw. This represents a huge development opportunity for Nigeria’s domestic gas industry.

    Currently, the country has around 12 GW of installed electricity capacity but often less than 5 GW is available on the grid due to inadequate and weak transmission infrastructure and other challenges.

    To address challenges of gas constraints in the power sector, the Group Managing Director, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Mele Kyari, said it will continue to expand and integrate gas pipeline network systems to meet domestic demand.

    But among players in the gas supply industry, Accugas Limited, a Savannah Petroleum Company has made tremendous strides in the gas supply space. The firm continues to contribute to economic development in the country by supplying gas to meet domestic consumption – for power generation and industrial use.

    It currently supplies gas to some power generating plants which deliver about 10 per cent of national power generation and industrial customers in the Southeast of the Niger Delta – driving industrialisation, providing employment for the skilled and unskilled local populations, in addition, to directly improving Internally Generated Revenues (IGRs) of some states in the region.

    With hundreds of millions of US dollars invested in the development and operation of a gas processing and transportation infrastructure network, including a 200 million standard cubic feet per day (mscf/pd) gas processing facility and about 260km of main gas pipelines capable of transporting 600 mscf/pd, among other investments, it has shown its confidence in the oil and gas sector and, by extension, the economy.

    With its 68km, 24-inch Uquo to Creek Town pipeline that currently supplies gas from the Uquo Field in Akwa Ibom State to National Independent Power Plant (NIPP) Calabar, Cross River State; it has demonstrated its confidence. If operated optimally, the Calabar NIPP has capacity to add 560 megawatts (Mw) to the National Grid.

    Power sector challenges

    In July this year, an industry publication, Petroleum Economist highlighted payment problem as one of the challenges hampering the power sector.

    “There is no doubt that Nigeria needs gas domestically. Electricity supply remains intermittent, despite successive administrations putting gas at the centre of the power sector reforms. However, gas supply is not the biggest bottleneck in the system,” it said.

    In a chat with Petroleum Economist, Gas Commercial Advisor at the Nigerian Petroleum Development Company (NPDC), Adedamola Adegun said: “We have oversupply. We have a liquidity or credit problem [so] gas suppliers don’t get their money.”

    Other challenges include a lack of sufficient investment in power and gas distribution infrastructure occasioned by several factors. Gas flaring is another challenge.

    According to the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), Nigeria’s total gas production stood at around 1.2bn ft3/d, out of which 41 per cent was exported and 48 per cent used domestically. 11 per cent was flared. Accugas and its parent company, Savannah Petroleum are helping to address this challenge by processing the otherwise flared gas at the Stubb Creek and delivering it to off-takers to power the Nigerian economy.

    Determined to reduce gas flaring, the Federal Government, in 2016, established the Nigerian Gas Flare Commercialisation Programme with the intention to encourage its use for power. A target date of 2020 for the elimination of gas flaring was set, but this target appears unrealistic.

    “Supply disruptions due to violence are an additional challenge observed across the power value chain in Nigeria. Militant groups recognise the impact of disruptions on the economy – as evident through rampant violence targeted at oil and gas pipelines which, in turn, impacts power generation,” PwC report said.

    Accugas has been able to deal with this through involvement of community stakeholders to jointly secure its pipelines in the region.

    The Managing Director of Savannah Petroleum Nigeria, the parent company of Accugas Limited, Ian Brown-Peterside has reiterated the firm’s commitment to Nigeria and support for the Federal Government’s effort in increasing national power output.

    “Accugas is a valuable partner of the Nigerian people. As a stakeholder in the Nigerian economy, we reiterate our commitment to and support for the Federal Government’s ongoing efforts to ensure increased and sustainable electricity supply to the entire country,” he said.

    He said the firm has demonstrated support by ensuring that its network of pipelines is strategically located to deliver gas to NIPP, IPP and industrial customers in the Southeast.

    “Our infrastructure, which cost hundreds of millions of dollars, has enabled us to provide a reliable supply of gas to various off-takers. Notwithstanding the challenges within the value chain, we expect to continue to increase our investment in Nigeria,” he said.

    “While there is no single short-term solution to Nigeria’s power challenges, there are a number of opportunities for companies to bring their global skills and expertise to the table and participate in the journey of powering Nigeria’s long-term growth,” the PwC report, however, stated.