Category: Sunday magazine

  • Christmas: Anglican Bishop charges Nigerians on courage, hope, faith

    Christmas: Anglican Bishop charges Nigerians on courage, hope, faith

    The Diocesan Bishop of Lagos (Anglican Communion), Rt. Revd. Dr. Ifedola Gabriel Okupevi has called on Nigerians to embrace courage, hope, and renewed faith in God as the nation celebrates Christmas.

    In his Christmas message issued to The Nation on Wednesday in Lagos, Bishop Okupevi anchored his reflections on Luke 3:10-11, describing Christmas as a sacred reminder of God’s unwavering love and the assurance of His abiding presence. He noted that the birth of Jesus Christ signifies Emmanuel—God dwelling with His people—bringing light into a world often overshadowed by darkness.

    “Christmas is not merely the remembrance of a child born in Bethlehem,” the Bishop said, “but the celebration of God’s presence with His people in every circumstance of life.”

    Reflecting on the outgoing year, Bishop Okupevi acknowledged the trials Nigeria has faced, including economic hardship, inflation, insecurity, and the rising cost of living. 

    He empathised with families struggling to make ends meet and those burdened by uncertainty, while affirming that God’s sustaining grace has been evident despite the challenges.

    He recalled that the Diocese declared 2025 as “The Year of God’s Presence and Divine Courage,” highlighting that God’s faithfulness has strengthened believers and empowered them to press forward in faith.

    Drawing inspiration from the angel’s message to the shepherds, Bishop Okupevi reiterated God’s word to Nigerians: “Do not be afraid.” He urged citizens to reject fear and place their trust in God, whose government knows no end, stressing that no situation is beyond His redemptive power and no darkness too deep for His light.

    The Bishop encouraged hope for peace amid conflict, justice where oppression persists, and resilience where despair seems overwhelming. He challenged both citizens and leaders to recommit to truth, righteousness, and the fear of God, fostering love, forgiveness, and compassion in homes and communities.

    Addressing political leaders directly, Bishop Okupevi reminded them that leadership is a sacred trust to be exercised with integrity, fairness, and accountability, considering the impact of decisions on lives created in God’s image. He also urged the public to continue shining as the light of Christ through kindness, generosity, and faithful service.

    As families gather for Christmas, the Bishop called for gratitude and generosity, encouraging Christians to remember the hungry, the lonely, the displaced, and the grieving. 

    Looking ahead to the New Year, he prayed for God’s continued presence and the release of divine courage to face the future with strength and hope, expressing confidence that the Lord who has been faithful throughout the year will perfect all things in His mercy.

  • RCCG set to feed 15,000 people at love carnival 2025

    RCCG set to feed 15,000 people at love carnival 2025

    The Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) has announced plans to feed no fewer than 15,000 people at The Love Carnival 2025, a two-day Christmas outreach designed to spread love, hope, and community support during the festive season.

    Scheduled to take place from December 25 to 26, 2025, the event will be held at the Open Field opposite Mega Chicken, Apple Junction, Amuwo Odofin/Festac, Lagos. Activities are slated for 5:00 pm – 7:00 pm on December 25 and 7:00 am on December 26, with thousands expected to attend.

    Organised by RCCG Lagos Youth Provinces Family (LGAF) in collaboration with the church’s youth and outreach arms, The Love Carnival is positioned as more than a celebration. 

    It is a large-scale humanitarian initiative aimed at providing meals, gifts, and a sense of belonging to individuals and families during Christmas.

    According to RCCG, the first 2,000 attendees to get to the venue will also receive free Christmas gifts, further reinforcing the event’s focus on generosity and care for the community.

    The carnival will feature gospel ministrations, live music, and appearances by notable ministers and personalities including Pastor E.A. Adeboye, Pastor Leke Adeboye, Pastor Samuel Oloruntoba, Pastor Jacob Obara, Pastor Anthony Ibe, Pastor David Ugenyi, Pastor Daniel Olawande, as well as guest ministers Greatman Takit, Lilian Nneji, and Bidemi Olaoba.

    With its theme centered on love in action, The Love Carnival 2025 underscores RCCG’s ongoing commitment to social impact, faith-driven compassion, and community development, especially at a time when many households face economic pressure.

    Everyone is encouraged to attend, arrive early, and participate in what promises to be one of the largest Christmas feeding outreaches in the state this year. The venue once again is at the Open Field opposite Mega Chicken, Apple Junction, Amuwo Odofin/Festac, Lagos. 

  • How red tape hinders moves to secure Nigeria’s ageing population

    How red tape hinders moves to secure Nigeria’s ageing population

    – More than 10m elderly Nigerians now at risk of worsening poverty

    Fourteen years after Nigeria’s First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu (CON) proposed a comprehensive bill towards tackling the welfare challenges confronting Nigeria’s elderly population, bureaucratic red tape, legal frameworks and budgetary constraints are still stifling the initiative.

    According to a 2022 World Bank estimate, Nigeria has approximately ten million people above 60 years of age and approximately 6.5 million above 65 years.

    While the corridors of the National Assembly and venues of government events are currently buzzing with high-minded rhetoric about honoring the “labours of our heroes past,” a cold reality permeates the streets outside: for millions of elderly Nigerians, growing old is becoming synonymous with becoming invisible.

    The Nation’s findings show that despite what seem to be constitutional guarantees, Nigeria’s laws and budgetary allocations appear very unfair to the elderly and according to activist, Moses Adedeji of Child Rights Network (CHRINET), “current legal architecture for elderly care is built on a foundation that is legally shaky.”

    Section 16(2)(d) of Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution mandates the State to provide “old age care and pensions but it falls under Chapter 2 – the Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy – a chapter which legal experts have long argued to be non-justiciable as no citizen can sue government for failing to provide it.

    Currently, Nigeria’s strongest legal framework for elderly care is the NSCC Act of 2017 that established the National Senior Citizens Centre, the first corporate body mandated to identify and cater to the needs of senior citizens.

    However, while the Act allows the Centre to initiate health and social programs, critics point out that without a dedicated, heavy-weight social security fund attached to it, the Centre risks becoming a purely administrative body rather than a welfare-dispensing one.

    Current concerted moves by both the Senate and the House of Representatives for the new “Older Persons (Rights and Privileges) Bill, 2025” appears to be very promising but an in-depth critique of the existing legal framework, the national budget, and the sheer demographic reality of over 14.8 million persons aged 60 and above, reveals a widening chasm between legislative intent and the actual delivery of welfare.

    Altogether, data from various pension sources indicate that less than 11% of the Nigerian workforce participates in the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS), with the implication that the roughly 9 out of 10 Nigerians currently working mostly in the informal sector, will retire with zero formal pension savings.

    Also, projections associated with the National Senior Citizens Centre (NSCC), shows that Nigeria is home to over 14.8 million persons aged 60 and above.

    Current data on Nigeria’s poverty rate suggests that roughly 70% of this demographic falls into the “poor” or “vulnerable” category, lacking access to regular income.

    On-going fragmented efforts include the National Assembly’s new effort to pass the Rights for Older Persons Bill aimed at making welfare justiciable (suable) rather than just a policy objective while the executive is working through the NSCC, to try to operationalise the National Policy on Ageing and the National Social Safety-Nets Coordinating Office (NASSCO) is continuing to expand the National Social Register to capture more vulnerable households for the Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programme.

    Reps push stronger rights, welfare guarantees for elderly Nigerians

    The House of Representatives on Wednesday revived national attention to the plight of elderly Nigerians, as lawmakers moved to tighten welfare guarantees and expand legally enforceable rights for senior citizens who, according to Speaker Abbas Tajudeen, “have been left far too long at the mercy of a collapsing family support system.”

    The Speaker spoke at a public hearing on the Older Persons Rights Bill, a proposed legislation seeking to secure free medical care in government hospitals, tax reliefs, monthly stipends for indigent seniors, and a suite of protections against neglect and discrimination.

    Read Also: ICPC invites Dangote over $7m school fees claim against ex-NMDPRA boss

    The session, organised by the House Committee on Women Affairs and Social Development chaired by Hon. Kafilat Ogbara (APC, Lagos), drew wide participation from ministries, pension regulators, and social protection agencies.

    Said Speaker Abass: “Our older people now face abuse, marginalisation and deprivation. This Bill will bridge that gap by creating a formal and enforceable structure of protection.”

    The Speaker faulted existing legislation — including the National Senior Citizens Centre Act (2018) — for failing to respond to the specific vulnerabilities older persons face. He also argued that constitutional safeguards against discrimination under Section 42 do not fully address injustices based solely on age.

    He described the proposed law as “a progressive step that aligns Nigeria’s social welfare system with contemporary realities.”

    The draft makes provisions for free medical care in government hospitals, tax exemptions for older citizens, monthly stipends for indigent elderly persons, legal safeguards against abandonment and neglect as well as civil and social rights that ensure inclusion and dignity.

    Tajudeen stressed that Chapter Two of the Constitution — which outlines socio-economic obligations of the state — is not enforceable, making a specialised law for the elderly necessary.

    Committee chair, Hon. Ogbara, framed the Bill as a moral and civic obligation.

    “As we know, older persons face unique challenges that affect their health, economic stability, and social participation. This legislation is designed to confront those issues head-on and guarantee their rights as citizens who still have value to contribute,” she said.

    Stakeholders push for amendments, warn against gaps

    Regulatory agencies welcomed the Bill but called for clarity, harmonisation and stronger financial architecture.

    The representative of National Social Investment Programme Agency (NSIPA), Nsikak Okon, urged lawmakers to ensure the Bill aligns seamlessly with the NSCC Act to avoid operational conflicts.

    PENCOM, represented by Martins Ikagu, described the move as a “positive step for social security” but flagged several clauses — including 2, 3(2), 4(1), 5, 17(1), 30, and 38(2) — for revision.

    He raised concerns about: Funding sources for the proposed monthly stipends

    ·           Lack of guidance on where the funds would be domiciled

    ·           The need to specify MDAs involved in social protection

    ·           A clause excluding existing pension beneficiaries, which he argued may violate Section 42 on discrimination

    Ikagu also recommended that participation in a social security scheme be compulsory for all employed Nigerians, formal and informal, to ensure long-term sustainability.

    On the provision requiring 25% of the national minimum wage as monthly stipends for indigent seniors, he insisted that “clear and codified funding mechanisms are necessary to avoid implementation failures.”

    He also flagged a drafting issue in Clause 17(1) on accessibility aids, urging lawmakers to review the phrasing for coherence.

    Elderly Care: A test of political will

    Budget analysts note that broader social protection considerations occupy only a tiny slice of a budget that years of accumulated burdens has shaped into prioritizing security and debt service with the implication that the fiscal headroom for quick expansion of elderly services is limited.

    Also, coverage is narrow and uneven as the contributory pension scheme largely benefits those who worked in the formal sector and who had contributions lodged into Retirement Savings Accounts that tends to exclude a large numbers of older Nigerians who are informal traders, subsistence farmers, domestic workers and many women who provided unpaid care.

    Where pensions do exist, beneficiaries still face practical obstacles: delays in payment, opaque arrears procedures and sometimes difficulty in proving entitlement; even though PenCom and pension administrators have made reforms and public statements about improved payments and the handling of accrued rights, complaints about delays and gaps persist.

    Outside pensions, there is no universal non-contributory old-age (social) pension in Nigeria  –  a regular cash transfer to all older citizens regardless of past employment; proposals and draft bills have circulated for years but there is not yet a nationwide automatic pension for all elderly citizens

    The Ogbara Committee is expected to collate stakeholder submissions, refine the draft, and present a harmonised report to the House for further legislative action.

    For millions of older Nigerians watching from the fringes of an unforgiving economy, the outcome could determine whether their twilight years are lived with dignity — or further neglect.

    The Older Persons Rights Bill is one of the most ambitious attempts in recent years to address the vulnerability of ageing Nigerians, many of whom live without pensions, health coverage, or reliable family support.

    If passed, the law would situate Nigeria among African countries moving toward formalised, enforceable welfare guarantees for the elderly.

    But as one senior committee aide told The Nation, the real battle will be at the budgeting stage:

    “Everyone agrees older people deserve dignity. The challenge is finding the money — and the political will – to make these promises real.”

    Spokesperson of the National Senior Citizens’ Centre, Abdulfatai Otori, spoke with The Nation on efforts being made by NSCC to address the welfare of elderly citizens.

    Healthcare and Social Care

    The NSCC has conducted comprehensive medical outreach programmes across various states, offering free laboratory tests, routine check-ups, and surgeries for conditions like cataracts and glaucoma. We also distribute assistive devices such as wheelchairs, hearing aids, and guide canes to improve mobility and independence.

    A key focus is the development of a skilled geriatric social care workforce, with the first cohort of certified caregivers having completed their training in August 2025.

    The most recent medical outreach in collaboration with the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Reduction which held in Jos, Plateau State in commemoration of the International Day of Older Persons, provided hundreds of senior citizens with free healthcare services, including general medical consultations, eye screenings, surgeries, as well as  the distribution of essential medicines. Assistive devices such as walking aids were also provided to improve mobility and independence.

    Earlier in the year, over 500 elderly persons from the 31 local government areas in Akwa ibom state also benefited from a free medical outreach.

    NSCC is also partnering the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to protect the rights of older persons in Nigeria. This collaboration includes joint initiatives to combat abuse, advocate for protective laws, and integrate the concerns of senior citizens into national policy and development frameworks.

    NSCC is actively adopting a multi-sectoral, sector-specific approach to older persons’ welfare. This strategy involves targeted programmes across different areas like health, income security, and social engagement, rather than a single, general solution.

    Continuing Engagement Bureau (CEB)

    Through this programme, NSCC connects skilled retirees from both formal and informal sectors to opportunities for continued valuable contributions, either through volunteerism or paid employment, to supplement earnings.

    Pensions

    The NSCC is also working with the Pension Transitional Arrangement Directorate (PTAD) to ensure pensioners receive correct and timely payments and to include older persons in a national social protection policy for potential cash transfers.

  • Senate, Reps push for stronger protections for Nigeria’s elderly, but implementation gaps persist

    Senate, Reps push for stronger protections for Nigeria’s elderly, but implementation gaps persist

    Over the last several years the National Assembly has taken a number of legislative and oversight steps to recognise and support older Nigerians, most notably the National Senior Citizens Centre Act, and, in 2025, both chambers have moved again to expand statutory protections, social care and health benefits for the elderly.

    But experts and advocates say the legal framework has not yet translated into consistent, nationwide access to cash support, healthcare relief or guaranteed services for many older Nigerians.

    For instance, as a former Senator representing Lagos Central, the First Lady, Mrs Oluremi Tinubu, sponsored a Social Security Bill in 2012, which aimed to provide a social safety net for vulnerable citizens, including the elderly.

    The objective of the Bill was to create a formal system for supporting the less privileged, especially the elderly, with the aim of alleviating poverty and improving quality of life for vulnerable populations. The bill passed its second reading in the Senate in March 2012 and was referred to relevant committees for further review. However, it was never passed by the Senate.

    In 2022, the Senate passed a bill to establish the National Social Security Commission. The bill sought to “provide a comprehensive legal and governance framework for the proper administration and management of all-inclusive, integrated, preventive, promotive and transformative national social security regime.”

    It was aimed to put in place a national social security protection funding to take care of the needs of the unemployed, elderly and underaged children below 18 years from broken marriages.

    However, the Bill neither gained concurrence from the House of Representatives nor was it assented to.  Similarly, the Senate passed the Older Persons (Rights and Privileges) Bill 2020. The Bill on Older Persons (Right and Privileges), according to Senator Betty Apiafi, who was then chair of the Senate Committee on Women Affairs, was aimed at addressing the social and economic challenges triggered by aging and the need for government to formulate policies that would incorporate the elderly and cater for their well-being. The Bill, she said, further provided for a fine of N2 million or N200,000 from organisations or individuals respectively found to have discriminated against older persons.

    She had said: “Without prejudice to this Bill, any prosecution, conviction or otherwise of any person for any offence under this Bill, does not preclude the right of the victim to maintain a civil action against any such person committing the offence or causing injury.”

    Read Also: CBN asks banks to configure ATMs, POS terminals for foreign card transactions

    “Government shall ensure that older persons enjoy the right to adequate standard of living, including the right to food, water, clothing and housing and to improve their living conditions without discrimination on the basis of age. Government shall ensure the provision of seats in walkways, other public facilities specifically designed for the comfort of older persons.”

    However the Bill was not assented to.

    What exists now: law, centre and policy: National Senior Citizens Centre Act (2017/2018).

    The National Senior Citizens Centre was established pursuant to the National Citizens Center Act 2017 with mandate to identify the needs of senior citizens and to cater for them. It is the first distinct national corporate body with focus on social inclusion of senior citizens in sustainable development and the improvement of the quality of living and well-being for self-fulfillment. NSCC is to identify opportunities for trainings to enhance capacities of senior citizens, initiate, facilitate and implement educational, health and social programmes, productive activities and work schemes in order to provide income or otherwise supplement earnings of senior citizens. NSCC is to also ensure the provision of recreation, sports and counseling programmes, all aiming to enhance dignity, independence, security and care of Nigeria’s senior citizens.

    Although the law sets out the NSCC’s functions but it does not itself create a national pension top-up or universal cash transfer targeted only at older persons.

    Also, the Federal Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs, Disaster Management and Social Development, produced a National Policy on Ageing in 2020 that sets priorities for health, social protection and inclusion of older persons and cross-references the NSCC Act as the institutional anchor for ageing policy in Nigeria.

    This year, the House of Representatives held public hearings and begun consideration of a bill aiming to “guarantee social and civil rights” of older persons. The Bill proposed measures such as free medical care in public hospitals, tax exemptions, stipends for indigent older persons and stronger safeguards against abandonment or neglect.

    Speaking at a public hearing on a Bill seeking to provide certain rights for Older Persons to ensure health and economic relief and protection for their social and civil rights organised by the Committee on Women Affairs and Social Development, Speaker Tajudeen Abbas, said many of these social benefits were previously covered by traditional family support systems.

    Abbas said the House resolved to provide a formal legal structure that would protect the aged from abuse. He said: “This Older Persons (Rights and Privileges) Bill has become necessary because existing legislations, like the National Senior Citizens Centre Act, 2018, have not fully taken care of the peculiar needs of older persons and their rights are constantly abridged by others – from family members to public institutions and the rest of society.

    “This Bill is, therefore, an attempt to provide comprehensive protection for the specific rights of older citizens and meet our obligations towards safeguarding their welfare.

    “Section 42 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended, guarantees certain inalienable rights for every Citizen and forbids the discrimination of persons on the basis of religion or race or gender, but it fails to cover the peculiar injustices that old people suffer simply because they are old.”

    “The Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy in Chapter 2 of the Constitution also make provisions for the well-being of citizens, but they are not obligations that are justifiable or enforceable.

    “In sum, current policy and legal frameworks for the protection of old people are either fragmented or incomplete, and mostly cannot be enforced by the courts. This Bill not only hopes to address a wider range of issues, including social and economic challenges, but also to provide a legally binding framework for older people.

    “The important thing here is that old people are now to be protected by legally enforceable rights, and they can hope to get restitution from the courts if these rights or entitlements are breached. It is a very progressive bill which seeks to bring the social welfare programme available for old people up to date. “It examines the pressures that joblessness, loneliness, neglect, insecurity, poverty, retirement, and health challenges foist on the aged and make provisions for safeguards and benefits that will enable them to live better.”

    Proposed provisions in the Bill include free medical services in government facilities, some forms of tax exemption, stipends, and protection against abandonment.

    “Many of these were previously covered by traditional family support systems, but as those weaken, we must provide a formal legal structure that will protect the aged from abuse,” Abbas said.

    The Chairman of the House Committee on Women Affairs and Social Development, Kafilat Ogbara, said the provisions of the Bill “reflect on our collective responsibility to ensure that our older population receives the dignity, respect, and support they deserve. I call it The Society Giving Back”.

    She added: “As we know, older persons often face unique challenges that can affect their health, economic stability, and social engagement. This legislation aims to address these issues head-on by establishing a framework that guarantees their rights and protections.

    “House Bill 2098 seeks to ensure health and economic relief for older persons, recognising that access to quality healthcare and financial security are fundamental human rights. It also emphasises the importance of protecting their social and civic rights, allowing them to participate fully in society and contribute their wisdom and experience.”

    The National Coordinator of National Social Investment Programme Agency (NSIPA), Badamasi Lawal, said the Older Persons Bill, 2025, under consideration should be harmonised with the National Senior Citizens Centre Act, 2018 for ease of operationability in supporting Older Persons in Nigeria.

    Speaking on behalf of the National Pension Commission (NPC), Martins Ikagu described the proposed legislation as a positive development which would further strengthen and expand the legal framework on social security in Nigeria.

    If passed by the House, the Bill will require the concurrence of the Senate and ultimately the assent of the President to become law.

  • Ijebu-Jesa Grammar School @70: Old Students commission landmark projects

    Ijebu-Jesa Grammar School @70: Old Students commission landmark projects

    It was a colourful and memorable celebration recently as members of the Ijebu Jesa Grammar School Old Students Association gathered to mark the 70th anniversary of their alma mater.

    The week-long celebration, which began on Tuesday, December 3, featured a series of activities and climaxed on Saturday with a grand finale filled with glitz and glamour.

    Old students dressed in elegant traditional attires converged on the school premises to commission several landmark projects executed by the association under the leadership of the immediate past President, Professor Kolawole Kazeem.

    The Elegboro of Ijebu Jesa, Ọba Moses Oluwafemi Agunsoye (Abikehin Ekun Agunsoye II), commended the old students for their dedication and commitment to giving back to the institution that shaped them.

    Ọba Agunsoye, himself an alumnus of the school, applauded the association for upholding and promoting the legacy of excellence for which the school is known.

    He further urged other alumni to join hands in supporting the continuous development of the school to sustain its standards and good reputation.

    Delivering the anniversary lecture titled: “Building the Culture of Learning and Character From the Base,” Professor Julius Abiola Ademokoya emphasised that secondary school is the bedrock of character formation.

    He noted that indiscipline left uncorrected at this stage becomes difficult to reverse later in life.

    Projects commissioned during the celebration included an indoor sports hall, a Sick Bay,  solar-powered street lights, a multipurpose basketball court, and a newly constructed perimeter fence, all donated by the old students.

    Read Also: ICPC invites Dangote over $7m school fees claim against ex-NMDPRA boss

    The Celebration continued at a community Event Centre where alumni gathered for a dinner and awards night.

    The atmosphere was filled with joy as distinguished old students, both living and departed were honoured for their contributions to the association and the school’s development.

    The Paramount Ruler of Ijesaland, Ọwá Obòkun Adimula, H.I.M. Clement Adesuyi Hastrup, who also received an award, praised the alumni for their commitment to the school.

    Pa Jaiyeoba, one of the school’s pioneer graduates, and Chief Joshua Olufunsho, a former teacher, both testified that Ijebu Jesa Grammar School has produced outstanding individuals who continue to make significant contributions to society.

    In the meantime, the newly elected Global Executives of the School under the leadership of High Chief Olutise Isaac Adenipekun has assumed office.

    The Executive Council will run the affairs of Ijebu-Jesa Grammar School Old Students’ Association for the next two years.

  • Inside Nigeria’s largest private education intervention

    Inside Nigeria’s largest private education intervention

    For millions of Nigerian children, the classroom is often a battlefield—against poverty, distance, and the relentless cost of learning. In Lagos, Aliko Dangote, Africa’s richest man and founder of the Dangote Group, unveiled a bold intervention: a ₦100 billion annual education initiative—more than ₦1 trillion over the next decade—crafted not as charity, but as a strategic, long-term investment in talent, opportunity and the nation’s future, reports Associate Editor Adekunle Yusuf

    Nigeria’s education crisis rarely announces itself with sirens. It unfolds quietly—in students who do not return after a term break, in families forced to choose between school fees and survival, in talents lost not to failure but to cost. Aliko Dangote, founder and CEO of the Dangote Group, placed a bold wager against that silence. On Thursday last week in Lagos, Africa’s richest man, announced a ₦100 billion annual commitment to education—more than ₦1 trillion over the next decade—not as charity, but as a deliberate attempt to keep Nigerian futures from slipping out of the classroom.

    What Dangote unveiled was neither symbolic nor episodic. It was a long-horizon intervention designed to confront the structural pressures pushing millions of young Nigerians out of school. From 2026, the Aliko Dangote Foundation’s Education Support Initiative will extend to all 774 local government areas, expanding steadily until it supports more than 155,000 learners each year. By the end of its first decade, an estimated 1.3 million students will have passed through its reach—each one a quiet rebuttal to the idea that poverty should determine who gets to learn.

    The Presidency wasted little time in placing the initiative in context, calling it the largest private education support programme ever launched in Nigeria and a decisive boost to the Federal Government’s human capital development agenda. In a country where public education has long been strained by funding gaps, overcrowded classrooms and economic shocks, the announcement landed as both a relief and a challenge: proof of what is possible, and a reminder of what remains undone.

    Dangote’s voice, calm and deliberate, returned repeatedly to a single point—that the greatest barrier confronting Nigerian students is not intelligence or ambition, but money. Fees accumulate, transport costs mount, materials are unaffordable, and eventually many families are forced to choose survival over schooling. “This is not only charity. This is a strategic investment in Nigeria’s future. Every child we keep in school strengthens our economy. Every student we support reduces inequality. Every scholar we empower becomes a future contributor to national development. Our young people are not asking for handouts. They are asking for opportunities. They are asking for a chance to learn, to grow, to compete and to succeed. And we believe they deserve that chance,” he said.

    The Foundation is designed with surgical precision, targeting the points at which Nigeria’s promise too often falters. In public universities and polytechnics, tens of thousands of undergraduates in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics will have their tuition fully covered, ensuring that financial barriers no longer truncate ambition or cut short the careers of the country’s most talented young minds. These students, whose curiosity and drive have long collided with fees and paperwork, will now be able to pursue their studies unimpeded, their potential aligned with opportunity.

    Yet the intervention does not stop at classrooms or lecture halls. In technical and vocational institutions, 5,000 students annually will receive funding not only for tuition but also for the tools, materials, and specialised training that transform education into employable skill. By complementing the Federal Government’s policy of free TVET tuition, the programme ensures that learning translates into competence, and competence into livelihood. In these workshops and laboratories, Nigeria’s future craftsmen, engineers, and technicians will no longer be constrained by cost—they will be equipped to build it.

    Read Also: CBN asks banks to configure ATMs, POS terminals for foreign card transactions

    For girls in public secondary schools, the Foundation reaches even earlier, at a stage where the threat of dropout is most acute. The MHF Dangote Secondary School Girls Scholars programme—named for Dangote’s daughters Mariya, Halima, and Fatima—will support 20,000 girls each year, from junior secondary through senior school and into tertiary education. Prioritising states with the highest numbers of out-of-school girls, the initiative tackles one of the nation’s most stubborn inequities. In regions where poverty, early marriage, or domestic demands have long curtailed education, the programme offers continuity, opportunity, and hope, turning fragile years into a bridge toward ambition, resilience, and empowerment. Together, these complementary strands—STEM, technical skills, and girls’ education—form a network of support that is at once unprecedented in scale and transformative in purpose, ensuring that talent, not circumstance, defines Nigeria’s next generation.

    Yet Dangote was careful to stress that students alone do not make a system. Teachers do. Classrooms do. Expectations do. Understanding that the impact of education is only as strong as the instruction that shapes it, the Foundation has designed the Dangote Teacher Training Programme, a large-scale initiative that begins with 10,000 secondary-school STEM teachers in 39 government colleges attended by MHF scholars. These educators will receive intensive training, equipping them with modern pedagogical methods, subject mastery, and the tools to inspire curiosity and critical thinking. But the vision does not stop there: the programme is set to expand across all six geopolitical zones, creating a nationwide network of skilled, motivated teachers capable of transforming classrooms into engines of learning. The objective is not merely to keep students enrolled, but to ensure that every hour spent in school is meaningful, every lesson empowering, and every teacher a catalyst for the intellectual and personal growth of Nigeria’s next generation.

    For Dangote, this focus on education is both a continuation and a deepening of a philanthropic philosophy that has guided the Foundation for more than three decades. Health, nutrition, economic empowerment and humanitarian relief have all featured prominently in its work, but education, he said, remains the axis around which national progress turns. No nation rises above the quality of education it offers its young people. Education is the most powerful equaliser, the surest engine of social mobility, the difference between inherited circumstance and chosen destiny.

    That conviction shaped the tone of his remarks. Nigeria’s young people, he insisted, are not asking for handouts. They are asking for opportunity—for a chance to learn, to grow, to compete on equal terms and to succeed. Financial hardship must not be allowed to silence their dreams, not when the country’s future depends on their skills, resilience and leadership. The initiative, he added, is a starting point, not a solution in isolation. Government, the private sector, communities and families all have roles to play, and only collective effort can deliver lasting transformation.

    If Dangote’s words framed the moral case, Vice President Kashim Shettima supplied the demographic urgency. Nigeria’s population growth, he warned, makes investment in education not optional but indispensable. “A population becomes a liability only when it is uneducated,” he said, describing the initiative as the single largest private-sector education intervention in the nation’s history and a masterclass in nation-building. In his telling, the programme exemplifies a form of patriotism that measures greatness not by accumulated wealth but by the number of lives lifted from the shadows into the light.

    Shettima situated the intervention within a broader landscape of reform under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration, pointing to the Nigerian Education Loan Fund, expanded basic education infrastructure, strengthened tertiary funding and renewed attention to technical and vocational training. These efforts, he said, are designed to improve Nigeria’s standing on the Human Capital Index and prepare young people for a skills-driven global economy. Dangote’s contribution, structural and long term, aligns seamlessly with that ambition.

    Education Minister Tunji Alausa echoed the sentiment, calling the initiative “pure human capital development.” Its nationwide reach, touching every local government area, marks it out as both symbolic and practical. Over a decade, he noted, the secondary-school girls’ programme alone could enrol an estimated 170,000 students, a significant stride toward closing Nigeria’s stubborn gender gap in education and accelerating the shift from a resource-based to a knowledge-based economy.

    From the states came assurances of partnership. Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu, speaking on behalf of his colleagues, praised Dangote for once again choosing purposeful leadership. Wealth, he observed, offers many options; Dangote has repeatedly chosen to deploy his in service of national development. Nigeria, he said, would remember that choice.

    The breadth of support extended beyond government. Traditional rulers, educators and development leaders all found in the initiative a rare convergence of scale, intent and execution. His Highness Justice Sidi Dauda Bage, Emir of Lafia and chairman of the Programme Steering Committee, described the commitment—more than ₦1 trillion over ten years—as unprecedented. The multiplier effects, he suggested, would ripple far beyond the 1.3 million direct beneficiaries, reshaping human capital, social indicators and economic prospects for decades.

    The Ooni of Ife, Oba Adeyeye Enitan Ogunwusi, Ojaja II, framed the initiative as both transformational and strategic, recalling moments when the Foundation had intervened during crises in his own community. In education, he suggested, Dangote is again applying private-sector resolve to public need, investing not only in people but in the conditions that allow societies to heal and grow.

    From beyond Nigeria’s borders, the endorsement carried a global note. Speaking virtually from the United States, United Nations Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed said the scheme would create an enabling environment for children to learn and families to prosper, reinforcing the link between education, stability and sustainable development.

    Behind the speeches lies a meticulous operational plan. The Foundation intends to deploy a fully digital, merit-based system for verification, disbursement and monitoring, working with institutions such as NELFUND, JAMB, NIMC, NUC, NBTE, WAEC and NECO. Outcomes will be measured not only in enrolment numbers but in retention, completion and post-school impact. Sustainability, Dangote disclosed, is anchored in his formal commitment to dedicate 25 per cent of his wealth to the Foundation, with progress to be reviewed in 2030 as part of the Dangote Group’s Vision 2030 strategy.

    The initiative also builds on a substantial educational footprint already in place: university hostels across several states, early-learning programmes in Kano that have reached thousands of children, a dedicated school for orphaned girls in Maiduguri supported by an annual ₦500 million commitment, and a multi-billion-naira pledge to upgrade a state university in Wudil. What is new is the scale and the coherence—the sense of a system being assembled rather than isolated projects being funded.

    As the event drew to a close, Dangote turned his attention to the young Nigerians at the heart of the endeavour. Their dreams matter, he told them. Their education matters. Their future matters. The Foundation believes in them, is investing in them, and is committed to ensuring that they do not walk the journey alone. In a nation often weighed down by statistics of what is lacking—classrooms, teachers, funding—the announcement offered a counter-narrative rooted in possibility. It suggested that education, properly financed and thoughtfully delivered, can convert Nigeria’s vast youth population from a looming liability into a decisive asset. The true measure of the initiative will emerge over years, in graduations quietly attended, skills steadily acquired, and lives redirected by the simple fact of staying in school.

  • Nigeria’s tax reset: what changes, what’s at stake

    Nigeria’s tax reset: what changes, what’s at stake

    On January 1, 2026 Nigeria will quietly cross a fiscal threshold that could reshape the relationship between the state and its citizens. While fireworks and countdowns mark the beginning of a new calendar year, a far more consequential transition will unfold beneath the surface: the take-off of a new tax regime designed to recalibrate how government raises revenue, enforces compliance and funds development in Africa’s largest economy. For a country long trapped between ambitious spending needs and chronically weak revenue mobilisation, the reforms represent both an opportunity and a risk, depending on how effectively they are implemented. Assistant Editor Nduka Chiejina reports

    For decades, Nigeria’s tax system has been defined less by what is written in law and more by what happens in practice. Despite successive reforms, tax revenue has remained stubbornly low, hovering around 9 to 10 per cent of Gross Domestic Product, far below the African average and a fraction of what comparable emerging economies generate.

    The consequences have been severe: limited fiscal space, ballooning public debt, rising debt-service costs and an overreliance on oil revenues that fluctuates with global prices and geopolitics. Each economic shock — from oil price crashes to the COVID-19 pandemic — has exposed the fragility of this model.

    Against this backdrop, the new tax regime taking effect at the start of the year is being presented by policymakers as a turning point. It is not a single law or policy, but a bundle of interlinked changes aimed at widening the tax net, simplifying administration, improving transparency, reducing leakages and aligning Nigeria’s tax framework with the realities of a digital, services-driven economy. At its core is the recognition that Nigeria can no longer fund governance on oil rents alone, nor can it continue to place a disproportionate tax burden on a narrow segment of compliant businesses and workers.

    Central to the reform drive is a renewed focus on efficiency and coordination among tax authorities. For years, businesses and individuals have complained about multiplicity of taxes, overlapping mandates between federal, state and local authorities, and aggressive enforcement practices that discourage investment and voluntary compliance. The new regime promises clearer rules, improved harmonisation and a stronger reliance on technology to reduce human discretion and corruption. Whether these promises translate into everyday reality remains an open question.

    Equally important is the readiness of the institutions charged with implementing the reforms. From the Federal Inland Revenue Service to state internal revenue services, customs authorities and other regulatory bodies, capacity constraints have long undermined policy ambitions. Weak data systems, limited interoperability, inadequate staff training and resistance to change have slowed past reforms. As the new tax framework takes off, attention is shifting from policy design to execution: are the agencies prepared, the systems tested and the personnel equipped to deliver?

    There is also the question of trust. Nigeria’s tax-to-GDP challenge is not only a technical problem but a social one. Many citizens remain sceptical of paying taxes in a system where public service delivery is uneven and accountability often questioned. Roads, schools, hospitals and security are still largely self-provided by households and businesses. Without a visible link between taxes paid and services received, compliance becomes a hard sell. The new tax regime, therefore, carries an implicit social contract: that improved revenue collection will be matched by improved governance.

    For the private sector, the reforms signal both relief and adjustment. While simplification and clarity could lower compliance costs in the long run, the transition period may bring uncertainty as businesses interpret new rules, update systems and engage with tax authorities. Small and medium-sized enterprises, many of which operate informally, face a particularly critical moment as government intensifies efforts to bring them into the tax net without stifling growth or innovation.

    Why Nigeria’s Tax System Needed a Reset — And What Is Changing Under the New Regime

    Nigeria’s new tax regime did not emerge in a vacuum. It is the product of years of fiscal stress, structural weaknesses and growing recognition that the old framework had reached its limits. For much of the past two decades, the country’s tax architecture struggled to keep pace with economic realities, demographic pressures and the rapid transformation of how Nigerians earn, spend and invest. By the time policymakers settled on a comprehensive reset, the cracks had become impossible to ignore.

    At the heart of the problem was a paradox. Nigeria consistently recorded one of the lowest tax-to-GDP ratios in the world, yet millions of households and businesses complained of being overtaxed. The contradiction stemmed from a narrow tax base and uneven enforcement. A small pool of salaried workers and compliant companies carried the bulk of the burden, while vast segments of economic activity remained informal, lightly taxed or completely outside the system. The result was not only weak revenue but deep resentment and widespread tax fatigue.

    Multiplicity of taxes compounded the problem. Across federal, state and local governments, overlapping levies, fees and charges proliferated, often with little clarity on legal backing or accountability. Businesses faced demands from multiple agencies for similar taxes, while individuals encountered arbitrary enforcement practices that blurred the line between taxation and harassment. In many cases, revenue collection was outsourced to third parties whose incentives were tied to aggressive extraction rather than fairness or due process. This environment discouraged investment, undermined voluntary compliance and eroded trust.

    The structure of consumption taxes also raised equity concerns. Value Added Tax applied broadly, including on items that made up a large share of household spending, such as food, education and healthcare. For low- and middle-income Nigerians already squeezed by inflation, these taxes were regressive, reducing purchasing power and worsening living standards. At the same time, the system offered limited reliefs that meaningfully reflected household realities, such as rent, healthcare costs or education expenses.

    Corporate taxation presented a different but equally serious challenge. While headline tax rates appeared competitive on paper, compliance costs were high, incentives were fragmented and opaque, and smaller businesses often found themselves trapped between informality and punitive regulation. Many small and medium-sized enterprises operated outside the tax net not by choice, but because the cost of compliance outweighed perceived benefits. This stunted growth, limited access to finance and entrenched informality.

    It was against this background that Taiwo Oyedele, Chairman of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reform Committee designed the new tax regime as a reset rather than a patchwork adjustment. Central to the reforms is a shift in philosophy: away from extracting more from the same taxpayers and towards broadening the base while reducing the burden on those least able to pay. The reforms explicitly reject the idea that higher taxes are the answer to Nigeria’s revenue challenge. Instead, they aim to collect better, not simply collect more.

    One of the most far-reaching changes put forward by the Committee is the recalibration of personal income tax. Under the new framework, low-income earners are either exempt or face significantly reduced tax liabilities. Individuals earning the national minimum wage or below fall outside the tax net entirely, while annual incomes up to defined thresholds attract zero or minimal tax. For middle-income earners, tax rates are reduced to ease pressure on disposable income at a time when living costs remain elevated. In effect, the system tilts toward progressivity, ensuring that the burden rises with capacity to pay.

    Consumption taxes are also being restructured with equity in mind. The removal of VAT on basic food items, education and healthcare marks a significant departure from past practice. These categories account for a large share of household expenditure, particularly among low-income families. By zero-rating or exempting them, the reforms aim to lower the cost of living and reduce the inflationary impact of indirect taxes. Rent, public transport and selected energy-related items are similarly treated to cushion households and support broader economic stability.

    For businesses, especially at the lower end of the scale, the changes are even more pronounced. Small companies below defined turnover and asset thresholds are exempt from corporate income tax and VAT obligations, effectively lowering their cost of entry into the formal economy.

    Under the Nigeria Tax Act (NTA) 2025, a small company is defined by the following criteria:

    Annual Gross Turnover: Not exceeding N100 million. Total Fixed Assets: Not exceeding N250 million. “Small Companies” are fully exempt from Companies Income Tax (CIT), Capital Gains Tax (CGT), and a new Development Levy. This exemption applies to businesses that meet specific financial thresholds under recent tax reforms.

    The intention is clear: to remove the fear that formalisation automatically leads to punitive taxation. By offering zero rates rather than temporary holidays, the reforms seek to create a stable environment in which small enterprises can grow, invest and hire without the constant risk of sudden tax liabilities.

    Larger companies, meanwhile, benefit from lower corporate tax rates and improved VAT credit mechanisms. Under the old system, VAT often became a cost rather than a pass-through tax, particularly where refunds were delayed or denied. The new framework strengthens input VAT credits, reducing distortions and improving cash flow. Combined with a more transparent incentive regime that replaces discretionary waivers with targeted reliefs, the changes are intended to improve competitiveness and attract investment.

    Perhaps the most technically significant reform lies in capital gains taxation, particularly as it relates to the capital market. The previous flat-rate approach, which disallowed deductions for legitimate costs and losses, often penalised investors even when overall returns were marginal. The new framework aligns capital gains taxation with income tax principles, allowing deductions for losses and investment-related expenses. Progressive rates replace the flat rate, while generous exemptions protect retail investors, pension funds and other long-term institutional players.

    According to Taiwo Oyedele, Chairman of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, the upcoming Capital Gains Tax (CGT) framework will be reviewed from 30 percent to at least 25 percent come 2026. It also includes a “cost-base reset” designed to shield historical investment growth from new taxes. Under this policy, any appreciation in asset value occurring before 2026 is exempt from the new levy, as the government intends to tax only future wealth creation rather than penalizing long-term holdings.

    To illustrate this transition, the committee provided a scenario where an investor purchased shares for N5 that grow to a value of N20 by the end of 2025. On January 1, 2026, the tax authority will officially recognize N20 as the new “starting price” for that asset. Consequently, if those shares are sold later in 2026 for N25, the investor is only liable for the N5 profit realized after the law took effect. The initial N15 gain remains entirely tax-free, ensuring that the reform rewards patient capital and maintains investor confidence in the Nigerian market.

    Administrative reforms underpin these substantive changes. A unified tax identification framework anchored on existing national identity and corporate registration systems aims to reduce duplication and improve data integrity. Rather than introducing new identifiers, the system consolidates existing ones, simplifying compliance for individuals and businesses alike. Self-assessment remains the cornerstone, but with clearer rules and digital platforms designed to reduce friction and discretion.

    The creation of an independent Tax Ombud represents a notable institutional innovation. For the first time, taxpayers have a statutory body empowered to receive complaints, investigate unfair practices and mediate disputes outside adversarial court processes. This responds directly to long-standing grievances about abuse of power and lack of recourse. By embedding taxpayer rights within the system, the reforms acknowledge that compliance cannot be coerced indefinitely; it must be earned.

    Equally important is the effort to address multiple taxation at its root. Proposed constitutional amendments seek to clarify the taxing powers of each tier of government, cap the number of taxes that can be imposed and eliminate nuisance levies. If carried through, this could fundamentally change the operating environment for businesses and individuals, replacing uncertainty with predictability.

    Taken together, these changes amount to a reimagining of Nigeria’s tax system. The reforms are expansive, touching income, consumption, investment and administration. They aim to lighten the load on households, support enterprise and restore confidence in the fiscal social contract. Yet their success will depend not on legislative intent alone, but on execution, coordination and sustained political will.

    As the new regime takes effect, the critical question is no longer what is written in law, but whether the promise of a fairer, simpler and more growth-oriented tax system can be realised in practice. That question turns attention to the readiness of the institutions tasked with implementation — and to the capacity of the state to translate reform into lived experience for Nigerians.

    Readiness of the Tax Authorities: Institutions Under Pressure to Deliver

    As Nigeria’s new tax regime edges from policy ambition to operational reality, attention has shifted decisively to the institutions charged with making it work. Beyond the laws and fiscal philosophy lies a more demanding test: whether tax authorities at the federal and subnational levels possess the capacity, coordination and credibility to implement reforms that touch virtually every household and business. In recent weeks, a flurry of institutional actions by the Federal Inland Revenue Service and its partners has been interpreted as an early signal that revenue authorities are repositioning for what is widely seen as the most consequential overhaul of Nigeria’s tax administration in decades.

    At the centre of this transition is the Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, Dr. Zacch Adedeji, whose tenure has coincided with a decisive push to modernise Nigeria’s revenue institutions ahead of their reconstitution into the Nigeria Revenue Service by January 2026. The transformation is not cosmetic. It reflects a deliberate effort to align administrative capacity with the scale and complexity of the new tax framework signed into law by President Bola Tinubu.

    One of the clearest expressions of this outward-looking approach came with the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between the FIRS and France’s Direction Générale des Finances Publiques at the French Embassy in Abuja. The agreement focuses on areas of mutual interest, knowledge exchange and the promotion of efficient tax administration, particularly as digitalisation reshapes global revenue systems. Speaking at the event, Adedeji described the partnership as a response to shared challenges confronting modern tax administrations.

    “The agreement reflects a shared commitment to building a stronger, more resilient, and forward-looking tax administration for both countries, especially in an era where digitalisation is redefining economic activity and revenue mobilisation,” he said.

    The symbolism of the MoU extends beyond bilateral cooperation. For Nigeria, it signals a willingness to benchmark its tax administration against more advanced systems and to draw lessons on data integration, compliance management and dispute resolution. For a system long criticised for weak enforcement capacity and fragmented databases, international collaboration is being positioned as a tool for institutional learning rather than prestige.

    Domestically, the most visible marker of readiness has been the transformation of the Joint Tax Board into the Joint Revenue Board, following the signing of the Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Act 2025 by President Tinubu on June 26. The rebranding was formally unveiled by Adedeji during the 158th meeting of the body held in Abuja on December 10, marking a turning point in the architecture of revenue coordination in Nigeria.

    The change represents more than a new name. It signals a legal and institutional reset aimed at addressing one of the most persistent weaknesses in Nigeria’s tax system: the lack of harmony among federal, state and local revenue authorities. Under the new framework, the Joint Revenue Board is empowered to drive coordination, standardisation and policy alignment across all tiers of government, replacing a historically loose consultative structure with a more authoritative platform for cooperation.

    Describing the transition, Adedeji said the new identity was intended to reflect renewal and excellence in revenue administration, noting that the Board’s mandate is anchored on eliminating multiple taxation and fostering a revenue environment that supports growth and voluntary compliance. For businesses accustomed to navigating conflicting tax demands from different levels of government, the promise of a unified revenue architecture carries significant weight.

    Read Also: ICPC invites Dangote over $7m school fees claim against ex-NMDPRA boss

    Equally critical to the readiness narrative is the emphasis on technology and data harmonisation. The Executive Secretary of the Joint Revenue Board, Mr. Olusegun Adesokan, disclosed that the Board is fast-tracking the development of a unified national taxpayer database under the Tax ID project. The system is designed to integrate existing identifiers such as the National Identification Number for individuals and corporate registration numbers for businesses, generating a harmonised Tax Identification Number that can be recognised across all revenue authorities.

    According to Adesokan, the objective is to eliminate duplication, improve data integrity and ensure seamless interoperability among tax agencies. By anchoring taxpayer records on foundational identity systems, the reforms aim to close loopholes that have historically allowed economic activity to slip through administrative cracks. The digital shift is also expected to reduce human discretion, improve compliance tracking and limit opportunities for revenue leakages.

    Beyond systems and structures, readiness has also taken on a more confrontational dimension. At the conclusion of its December meeting, the Joint Revenue Board issued a communique calling for the immediate abolition of road stickers and other unauthorised revenue collection instruments imposed by both state and non-state actors. The Board formally requested the intervention of the Office of the National Security Adviser and the Nigeria Police Force to dismantle illegal roadblocks along major transport corridors.

    These roadblocks, often associated with arbitrary levies and extortion, have long been cited as a barrier to ease of doing business and a source of daily friction between citizens and the state. By publicly opposing the practice and urging Nigerians to resist illegal demands, the Board signalled an intention to assert control over revenue collection and restore legitimacy to the tax system.

    The push for readiness has not been confined to the federal level. Adedeji has repeatedly urged state governments to prepare for the operational implications of the reforms, particularly as subnational revenue mobilisation becomes increasingly central to fiscal sustainability. Speaking at the 155th meeting of the Joint Tax Board in Suleja, Niger State, he stressed the importance of strengthening internal generated revenue systems to support development outcomes.

    “At this critical point in time, it is necessary to strengthen the fabric of our IGR capacity to ensure that the revenue administration processes, especially at the subnational level, become as efficient as possible to optimise the collection of IGR for socioeconomic and human development,” he said.

    He acknowledged the work of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, noting that revenue authorities must now look beyond policy formulation to anticipate the operational impact of the reforms across all tiers of government. Adedeji expressed confidence that with diligent implementation and innovative approaches, states could significantly scale up revenue performance, citing the potential for Niger State to achieve a monthly IGR target of N5 billion.

    Legislative alignment has emerged as another benchmark of readiness. The Joint Revenue Board commended states that have begun domesticating the new tax laws, with Ekiti State recognised as the first to pass the Harmonised Taxes and Levies (Approved List for Collection) Law. By aligning local revenue practices with the national reform agenda, such moves are intended to ensure consistency in tax rates, bases and enforcement procedures.

    As the January 1, 2026 deadline for full implementation approaches, collaboration between the Joint Revenue Board and state internal revenue services has intensified, with the focus shifting to training, systems migration and public sensitisation. Officials describe the process as the most comprehensive fiscal transition in Nigeria’s modern history, one that will test not only institutional capacity but political resolve.

    Yet, beneath the confidence conveyed by new partnerships, rebranding exercises and digital projects lies a sobering reality. Readiness is not measured by announcements alone. It will be judged by how smoothly systems function, how disputes are resolved, how consistently rules are applied and how quickly trust can be rebuilt between taxpayers and the state. For Nigeria’s tax authorities, the reforms represent both an opportunity to redefine their role and a reckoning with long-standing institutional shortcomings.

    As the new regime takes effect under the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) the success of Nigeria’s tax transformation will depend less on the ambition of its laws and more on the ability of its revenue institutions to translate reform into predictable, fair and efficient administration. The coming months will reveal whether the groundwork being laid today is sufficient to meet that challenge.

    Conclusion

    As Nigeria steps into a new era of taxation, the reforms taking effect mark a decisive attempt to recalibrate how the state raises revenue and how citizens relate to government. The shift signals an acknowledgment that sustainable development cannot rest on a narrow tax base, fragmented administration and weak trust. By widening the net, easing the burden on vulnerable households and small businesses, and strengthening institutional coordination, the new tax regime sets out an ambitious vision of fairness and efficiency.

    Yet, the ultimate verdict will be delivered not by legislation or rebranding, but by implementation. The capacity of tax authorities to enforce rules consistently, the willingness of states to align with national standards, and the ability of government to translate revenue into visible public value will determine whether the reforms endure. As January unfolds and the system is tested in practice, Nigeria’s tax transformation stands at a critical juncture — one that could redefine fiscal governance for a generation, or reinforce old scepticisms if promise fails to meet performance.

  • Safeguarding food security across Africa through improved logistics

    Safeguarding food security across Africa through improved logistics

    Africa food supply chain is edging toward a dangerous tipping point, as infrastructure struggles to keep pace with rising demand. Congested ports, insufficient deep-water capacity and outdated cargo-handling systems routinely trap food shipments offshore for days, sometimes weeks, leaving importers helpless, as perishable goods deteriorate before they touch land. Most food entering the continent travel through road networks riddled with potholes, security checkpoints, and long stretches of unsafe terrain, DANIEL ESSIET reports.

    Across Africa, a severe imbalance in logistics response is crushing farmers’ incomes and limiting consumers’ access to affordable food. From Mali to Ghana, Uganda to Kenya, the picture that emerges is one of a continental crisis rooted in inefficient transport and weak supply chains. Reports by the International Trade Centre (ITC), the World Bank and the African Union (AU), alongside media investigations, documented farmers confronting daily challenges that leave millions of tonnes of food unsold across major markets. In several cases, the reports revealed logistics and transportation systems unprepared for rising agricultural output.

    Nowhere is this more evident than in Nigeria, where post-harvest spoilage caused by poor logistics can claim up to 40 per cent of annual food production, resulting in billions of naira in losses. The scale of the problem underscores how logistical failures are no longer isolated operational issues but structural threats to food security and economic stability.

    According to the Chairman, Board of Trustees, Cocoa Association of Nigeria (CAN), Dr. Victor Iyama, the consequences of these failures extend far beyond the farm gate. He explained that transportation bottlenecks, delays and spoilage significantly increase the cost of moving agricultural goods. These added costs, he noted, are inevitably passed on to consumers, making food products more expensive at retail level. Studies further showed that small-scale farmers often lose between 40 and 50 per cent of potential revenue because they lack predictable and affordable logistics that would enable direct access to markets.

    This challenge is not unique to Nigeria. Across the continent, logistics costs remain disproportionately high.

    Log Update Africa recently quoted the Chief Executive Officer, Shippers Council of Eastern Africa (SCEA), Agayo Ogambi, as saying that transport costs in Africa ranged from $5 to $8 per kilometre per TEU, compared to just $1 to $2 per kilometre in Asia.

    He attributed these high costs to poor road conditions, extended transit times, congestion, multiple checkpoints and the absence of dedicated lanes for perishable cargo at weighbridges.

    Despite being a key supplier of fresh produce and vegetables to both local and global markets, Nigeria’s competitiveness is increasingly threatened by these constraints. Farmers and traders now brace for continued logistics uncertainty, rising costs, tariff inconsistencies and anxious consumers.

    Data from a U.S. International Trade Administration report, supported by the Organisation for Technology Advancement of Cold Chain in West Africa (OTACCWA), illustrated the gravity of the situation. The report estimates that Nigeria loses over 40 per cent of its food production to spoilage annually, valued at about ₦3.5 trillion. Stakeholders warn that deficiencies in logistics and transportation systems are causing significant physical and quality losses, particularly for perishable fruits, vegetables and agro-exports.

    The National Secretary, National Tomato Growers, Processors and Marketers Association of Nigeria (NATPAN), Sani Danladi, described the impact as devastating. He said the poor state of roads and the declining quality of logistics services linking tomato farms in the North to consumers in the South have resulted in massive financial losses and discouraged investment in the sector.

    Danladi explained that traditional transport methods worsened the problem. “Previously, when we loaded tomatoes in baskets stacked on one another, we recorded losses of between 70 and 80 per cent in some cases. The introduction of non-collapsible plastic crates has helped reduce spoilage, but it has also introduced new challenges. While the crates protect tomatoes better, the costs associated with renting and returning them have become a major burden,” he said.

    He noted that each crate holds between 20 and 22 kilogrammes of tomatoes and is the safest way to transport produce from northern farms to southern markets. “Using the crates ensures the tomatoes arrive looking as fresh as when they were harvested,” he said. However, the high purchase cost—ranging from ₦7,000 to ₦7,500 per crate—combined with a monopolised distribution system controlled by an association using colour-coding, has discouraged widespread adoption.

    Read Also: Catholic bishops to Nigerians: Evil will not prevail

    According to him, the registration process and risk of theft further deter potential investors.

    Yet the most significant challenge, Danladi stressed, lies in the return journey. Because the crates are not collapsible, they must be transported back empty. “You may pay ₦2.5 million to carry tomatoes, but even when the truck is empty, returning the crates can cost ₦1.5 million,” he said. To reduce costs, transporters often rely on trucks carrying heavy, low-volume goods such as iron rods from Lagos to Kano to bring back empty crates. This dependency can delay returns for weeks, limiting the number of trips possible in a season and reducing profitability.

    These concerns were echoed by the Executive Director, the Infrastructure Network for Africa Food Systems (INAFS), Muhammad Yakubu Bubayaro, who also heads Bunkasa Agritech Limited. He described the journey from northern farms to southern markets as fraught with obstacles, largely due to Nigeria’s deteriorating road network. “In some places, roads are so bad that drivers have to offload part of the tomatoes to lighten the truck before pushing it through muddy paths,” Bubayaro said. After crossing such sections, the produce is reloaded, increasing handling and the risk of damage.

    Beyond road conditions, he noted that actors across the value chain face intense pressure to ensure tomatoes and other fresh produce arrive in good condition. Packaging methods have evolved over time, with traders in markets such as Mile 12 in Lagos abandoning raffia baskets in favour of plastic crates to meet the demands of quality-conscious buyers.

    The economic impact of poor packaging, he explained, is severe. “If a truck carrying tomatoes in raffia baskets travels from the North to Lagos, more than half of the load may be lost before reaching the market. In some cases, growers lose up to 90 per cent,” he said. While plastic crates significantly reduce losses, the rental model is undermined by costly empty returns, which erode already thin profit margins.

    Access to crates also remains uneven. Bubayaro noted that large associations often dominate supply, making it difficult for smallholder farmers to participate. To address this, Bunkasa Agritech has adopted a cluster-based model that provides farmers with crates, price information, market linkages and logistics support, enabling better decision-making and reducing waste.

    The logistics challenge, however, extends beyond vegetables. Bubayaro confirmed that grains and other produce also suffer from inadequate transport solutions. The lack of specialised agricultural logistics companies, he said, leads to unreliable services, with drivers sometimes failing to show up for produce ready for harvest, resulting in further losses.

    Despite increased food production over the past three decades, the World Bank warns that weaknesses along Africa’s food supply chains continue to drive high costs. Its report, ‘Transport for Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa: Strengthening Supply Chains’ found that 37 per cent of locally produced food is lost in transit due to slow processing, poor infrastructure and non-tariff barriers.

    The report argued that prioritising investments in 50 key transport hubs—covering ports, border crossings and road segments—could significantly reduce food waste and benefit the 58 per cent of Africans currently facing food insecurity. Senior Managing Director of the World Bank, Axel van Trotsenburg, said food insecurity on the continent is not only about production but about fixing broken systems that prevent food from reaching those who need it most.

    The view was reinforced by the report’s lead author, Charles Kunaka, who noted that African food supply chains are four times longer than those in Europe, leading to delays, higher prices and wasted resources. He stressed that coordinated investments in transport infrastructure are essential to building a resilient food system. Cold chain deficiencies further compound the crisis.

    Speaking at a Cold Chain Roundtable in Lagos, OTACCWA President, Mr Alexander Isong, said Nigeria requires at least 25,000 refrigerated trucks to achieve minimal efficiency but currently has fewer than 1,000 to service over 11 million metric tonnes of perishable goods annually. He described the situation as both a logistical and humanitarian crisis, noting that Nigeria loses more than 20 million metric tonnes of food each year to spoilage. Isong added that the country’s cold storage capacity is “next to zero,” estimating a need for at least 100 large cold rooms with 500-tonne capacity to begin reversing post-harvest losses. These shortcomings are reflected in Nigeria’s ranking of 88th on the World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index. High operational costs driven by poor roads, unreliable electricity and outdated port and customs systems continue to undermine efficiency.

    The Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) estimated that inefficiencies in Nigeria’s logistics system cost the country about $8 billion annually, including $5.8 billion in corporate earnings lost by companies dependent on major ports such as Apapa, where logistics costs continue to rise steadily. These losses underscore Nigeria’s growing disadvantage in a global shipping landscape where efficiency increasingly defines competitiveness.

    Across the continent, only four African container ports made Lloyd’s List Top 100 Container Ports Ranking for 2025. They include Morocco’s Tanger Med, Africa’s strongest performer, which ranked 17th globally after handling more than 10.2 million TEUs in 2024—an 18.9 per cent surge that reinforces its status as a major transshipment gateway. Egypt’s Port Said and Alexandria followed with 3.9 million TEUs and 2.2 million TEUs respectively, alongside Togo’s Lomé Port. Collectively, these ports have driven intra-regional food exports and served as the lifeblood of agricultural commerce, shaping the competitiveness of industries and entire national economies.

    Analysts noted that Nigeria’s struggle with malnutrition and soaring food inflation is not driven by scarcity, but by systemic failures in moving produce from farms to markets. The country loses an estimated 40 per cent of its fruits and vegetables to spoilage due to inadequate refrigerated trucking, poor road networks, harsh weather conditions and corruption. Such post-harvest losses, common across much of the developing world, translate into lower incomes for farmers and higher prices for consumers.

    According to the African Centre for Supply Chain (ACSC), logistics challenges, policy inconsistency and rising production costs have severely undermined Nigeria’s export sector. While the outlook for exports shows signs of gradual improvement, the think tank maintains that the condition and performance of Nigeria’s air and seaports have failed to support exporters in strengthening their global competitiveness. These structural weaknesses continue to weigh heavily on the country’s trade ambitions.

    At various fora, the ACSC has also highlighted how road congestion, pollution and rising costs are worsened by the under-utilisation of alternative transport modes such as rail, inland waterways and air freight. Although Nigeria was once a major player in freight transport, stakeholders argue that decades of infrastructure decay have limited its capacity to meet modern logistics demands. Inland waterways, in particular, remain largely untapped for food transportation despite government efforts to revive the sector.

    Speaking on these challenges, ACSC Director-General, Dr Obiora Madu, said the transport and logistics sector is a critical pillar of Nigeria’s agricultural economic infrastructure.

    According to him, weaknesses in the supply chain have exposed overlooked vulnerabilities, underscoring the need for a functional system capable of withstanding shocks, adapting quickly and keeping food moving in times of uncertainty.

    One of the most pressing gaps, Madu noted, was the scarcity of cold-chain facilities.

    He stressed the need for targeted interventions to strengthen refrigerated storage and transport networks, adding that Nigeria’s warehousing and cold-storage sectors remain in their infancy. Significant infrastructure gaps from farms to ports, he said, have contributed to massive food losses nationwide.

    To compete more effectively in the global economy, analysts and industry leaders are calling for a national multimodal transport strategy that comprehensively reviews air, land and water transport systems. They argued that increased funding is also required for technology adoption to reduce dock wait times, improve efficiency, strengthen resilience and enhance security across logistics corridors.

    These concerns are echoed by the Nigerian Export Promotion Council (NEPC), which has repeatedly warned about bottlenecks slowing the movement of goods through Nigerian ports. The council notes that cargo spends an average of 20 to 30 days before exiting terminals, compared with four to seven days at neighbouring ports—an imbalance that highlights Nigeria’s competitive disadvantage in regional trade.

    Beyond prolonged dwell times, the NEPC has identified excessive documentation requirements, overlapping inspections by multiple agencies and frequent system downtimes as persistent obstacles choking export flows. Together, these inefficiencies cost the country more than $10 billion every year, weakening the prospects of Nigerian products in global markets.

    In its assessments, the Produce Export Development Alliance (PEDA) has similarly observed that Nigeria’s logistics infrastructure is struggling to keep pace with growing demand. The organisation notes that the horticulture sector, valued at ₦191 billion, is experiencing a decline in international market share due largely to rising production costs and logistics challenges.

    PEDA Chief Executive Officer, Adetiloye Aiyeola, said the fresh vegetables export market offers significant foreign exchange opportunities for Nigerians but has become increasingly competitive and quality-driven. “A lot of Nigerians have been involved in it,” he said. “The motivation is the fact that they can earn foreign exchange. Exportation also helps us as a country to improve domestic standards. The more we embrace export standards, the more our domestic standards improve. The promise of access to a premium market is also a major attraction.”

    Despite this promise, Aiyeola believes Nigeria’s perishable exports continue to face formidable logistics hurdles, ranging from high costs and air-freight shortages to persistent cold-chain gaps. Until these structural challenges are addressed, stakeholders warned that Nigeria risks leaving vast agricultural value untapped, even as regional competitors strengthen their foothold in global food markets.

    Moving forward, making progress

    With Lagos’ agriculture industry continuing to expand, the Commissioner for Agriculture and Food Systems, Ms. Ruth Abisola Olusanya, noted that the sector urgently requires a more robust supply chain infrastructure, even as shifting trends and persistent challenges demand attention. According to her, the ability of the food system to meet growing demand now depends largely on how efficiently produce can move from farms and processing centres to markets and consumers.

    She explained that delays, high haulage costs and chronic congestion contribute significantly to food losses and higher prices across the state. In response, Lagos is undergoing a major overhaul of its logistics landscape, with modern logistics hubs emerging across the state to support expanding food cultivation, trade and consumption, while also easing pressure on existing transport networks.

    Building on this, the commissioner observed that a rapidly rising population, expanding food processing and manufacturing capacity, and an increasingly attractive business climate have converged to position Lagos as one of the country’s most dynamic logistics growth markets. These factors, she said, are reshaping how food is produced, moved and consumed, creating fresh opportunities for investment while underscoring the need for smarter coordination across the entire value chain.

    Against this backdrop, Ms. Olusanya said the state government is exploring a wide range of solutions to strengthen food logistics, improve traceability and promote sustainability within the sector. She emphasised that addressing logistics challenges cannot be left to government alone, noting that growers, producers, logistics companies, retailers and consumers all have critical roles to play in building a resilient and efficient food supply chain for Lagos.

    Progress in this direction, she added, is already visible. Construction of Phase One of the Lagos Central Food Security Systems and Logistics Hub at Ketu-Ereyun in Epe is nearing completion. When operational, the facility will serve as a key distribution and processing centre for major agricultural commodities moving into and out of Lagos.

    At the same time, the government is fast-tracking work on two additional mid-level agro-produce hubs expected to be completed before the end of the year—one at Abijo in Ibeju-Lekki and another at the Dairy Farm in Pen Cinema, Agege. These facilities, she noted, complement the already operational hub at Idi-Oro, Mushin, which has become a model for efficient produce aggregation and improved market access. Looking ahead, she disclosed that construction is also ongoing on new hubs at Opebi in Ikeja and Bombata on Lagos Island, with plans underway to replicate the model in Ikorodu, Lekki and Festac, further strengthening Lagos’ food logistics and distribution network. Indeed, agribusiness is thriving with innovations in food science, equipment, and supply chain driving an industry evolution.

    Africa bets on logistics

    From Nairobi’s flower corridors to Lagos’ ambitious food hub, Africa’s logistics sector is emerging as a decisive battleground for the continent’s food trade, competitiveness and security. Industry leaders, exporters, infrastructure developers and policymakers now agree on one point: logistics is no longer a support service but a strategic advantage that can make or break African trade. It was the heart of a recent high-level discussion on perishable logistics in East Africa, organised by Logistics Update Africa in Nairobi. The conference attracted stakeholders across the African perishable supply chain to the Kenyan capital, where stakeholders examined how weak transport links, fragmented cold chains and limited exit points continue to erode the value of Africa’s agricultural exports.

    Speakers repeatedly returned to a central concern: African farmers and exporters may be producing high-quality food, but poor logistics often means it reaches global markets late, damaged, or uncompetitive.

    Kenya’s horticulture exporters acknowledged that while the country performs better than some neighbours, infrastructure gaps remain severe. “We have only two main exit points that can handle fresh produce – Jomo Kenyatta International Airport and the Port of Mombasa. If you are growing produce in the Rift Valley or western Kenya, you must transport it long distances. That time on the road affects quality and cost,” said Technical, Training, Standards & Compliance Officer, Fresh Produce Exporters Association of Kenya (FPEAK) Patrice Genga. Genga warned that even the gateways could soon be overwhelmed.

    What African countries are doing to boost food logistics infrastructure

    For decades, declining rail volumes, congested ports and crumbling infrastructure have constrained Africa’s economic potential, pushing up logistics costs and weakening export competitiveness. Nowhere is the strain more visible than in West Africa, where agro-industrial growth is being throttled by poor transport networks and erratic power supply, despite the food economy accounting for about 35 percent of the region’s gross domestic product.

    According to the 2025 edition of Africa’s Development Dynamics, published by the OECD and the African Union Commission, logistics failures have driven local food prices 30 to 40 percent above global averages for comparable economies. Regional food demand is projected to surge from $126 billion in 2010 to $480 billion by 2030, but the report warns that inadequate transport and energy infrastructure remains a major barrier to meeting rising needs.

    The absence of rural road connections continues to isolate producers from markets, resulting in high post-harvest losses, while unreliable electricity undermines the competitiveness of small food processors. This gap has entrenched a contradiction between Africa’s vast agricultural resources and its heavy reliance on food imports. Sierra Leone is cited as a stark example, with 75 percent of arable land uncultivated and 80 percent of ready-to-eat food imported.

    National governments are stepping in as well.

    Senegal

    Senegal has launched a programme to build 100 warehouses and 20 cold rooms, expanding storage capacity by 250,000 tonnes to curb post-harvest losses estimated at CFA100 billion annually.

    South Africa

    In South Africa, renewed infrastructure investment in roads, rail and ports is aimed at easing congestion, restoring reliability and lowering the cost of doing business, as logistics firms such as FedEx expand technology-driven services.

    Despite these efforts, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD )and African Union Commission  (AUC) warned  that without urgent, large-scale investment in transport and energy networks, Africa’s food systems will remain inefficient, sustaining high import dependence and elevated consumer prices even as production potential continues to grow.

    Investors responding

    A new chapter of connectivity is unfolding in West Africa, led by the Africa Finance Corporation (AFC) as it embarks on ambitious railway projects aimed at bridging borders and tapping into the continent’s immense economic potential.

    From the dry expanses of the Sahel to the mineral-rich hills of Guinea, these multi-billion-dollar initiatives are reshaping the region’s logistics landscape.

    At the heart of this transformation is the Nigeria-Niger Kano–Maradi Standard Gauge Railway (SGR). Stretching 393 kilometers, this groundbreaking project marks the first cross-border rail link in West Africa in nearly seventy years. Currently under construction by Mota-Engil, the line has made significant strides toward completion by 2025, with recent updates from the government confirming it’s on schedule to reach Katsina by year’s end.

    This railway is more than just a set of tracks; it’s a game-changer for economic resilience. By linking Nigeria’s industrial powerhouse in Kano to Maradi, a bustling commercial center in Niger, the project aims to streamline the movement of goods and people. Once it’s fully operational, expected by early 2027, it will connect seamlessly with Nigeria’s existing SGR network, including the Kano-Kaduna line being developed by the China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC).

    To the west, the AFC plays a vital role in another transformative project: the 670-kilometer Transguinean Railway. The railway serves as the backbone of the Simandou integrated mine and infrastructure development, which recently celebrated a historic milestone with the start of operations  this year.

    The AFC’s 2025 State of Africa’s Infrastructure report revealed that over 7,000 kilometers of new rail lines are either under construction or in the planning stages across Africa.

    For instance, DHL plans to invest €300 million ($350 million) to expand logistics infrastructure across Africa, targeting warehousing, freight forwarding and last-mile delivery to support fast-growing sectors such as e-commerce and perishable goods. DHL Group Chief Executive, John Pearson, said Africa could become the world’s second-largest trade region within four years if supply-chain capacity improves.

    The World Bank has also intensified support for transport and logistics projects that strengthen food supply chains. Investments in rural roads and regional corridors have reduced travel times, cut border delays and lowered food transport costs across several African countries.

    Projects along the Abidjan–Lagos corridor, for example, have improved port efficiency and eased cross-border trade for millions of people.

    These and other initiatives are bringing renewed hope for food security across the continent.

  • Enugu under watch: drones, data and the end of invisible crime

    Enugu under watch: drones, data and the end of invisible crime

    There was a time, not too long ago, when Monday in Enugu State felt like a weekly rehearsal for despair. Streets that once throbbed with keke horns and market chatter went silent. Ogui Road, that restless artery of the Coal City, could look like a film set after the crew had packed up: shops shuttered, banks dark, schools empty. A criminal order, issued from nowhere and enforced by fear, had more authority over people’s lives than any law.

    It is against that memory that today’s security story in Enugu must be read. Because when Governor Peter Mbah says “Tomorrow is here,” and his team posts aerial shots of patrol vehicles, AI-embedded surveillance cameras watching over the state from many strategic points, and security drones criss-crossing the skyline, they are not just showing off gadgets; they are trying to tell citizens that yesterday, including its broken order is gone.

    What has emerged in Enugu over the last two and half years is not a perfect security system, but it is unmistakably very different. You see it first in the hardware: long lines of white Distress Response Squad (DRS) cars parked at strategic points front of the new Command and Control Centre, each fitted with AI-enabled cameras and manned by police officers wearing body cameras instead of just faded name tags; and now, the headline grabbers – high-impact security drones designed to look where human patrols cannot go.

    Supporters describe these drones in almost cinematic language: powerful enough to monitor Enugu and beyond, to pick out heat signatures in the forest, to trace kidnappers and bandits, who once vanished into thick bush after attacking highways. In the state’s political storytelling, they are portrayed as “first of their kind in Nigeria,” a visual proof that Enugu is not just complaining about insecurity, but trying to outthink it. Whether or not the “first ever” claim stands up to national comparison, the symbolism is evident: for a region traumatised by abductions, seeing your government put eyes in the sky matters.

    But the more interesting story is how all this equipment connects. The Command-and-Control Centre is the nervous system. From this building, feeds from cameras mounted across the state — on streets, in markets, on DRS vehicles — are streamed into a single room glowing with screens. Security chiefs who toured the facility called it “wonder-evoking,” not just because of the fancy hardware, but because from that one space, they could zoom into streets and junctions that used to be blind spots. “We will appear to them like ghosts,” the former Commissioner of Police, CP Anayo Uzuegbu, said of criminals who thought Enugu was still the old playground.

    The DRS is the muscle attached to that nervous system. Over 150 patrol vehicles, each tagged, tracked and camera-fitted, are deployed as a special police unit focused on rapid response. Instead of waiting for crime reports to drip into a station logbook, the state is moving toward live alerts: a suspicious gathering here, a vehicle flagged there, an emergency call relayed instantly from a control console.

    Then, above all this, the drones. In a country where abductions are often planned and executed from forests, valleys and abandoned farmlands, the ground has always had the advantage. Drones invert that logic. A farmer who hears gunshots no longer has to choose between silence and suicide; in theory, he can call a number, and somewhere in the Command Centre, a team can send an eye overhead without risking lives. Even if reality lags behind that ideal, the architecture now exists for Enugu to fight forest-based crime as a coordinated intelligence problem, not a guesswork patrol.

    None of this comes cheap, and Enugu has not pretended otherwise. In February 2024, Mbah finally activated the Enugu State Security Trust Fund (ESSTF), a law that had been sleeping since 2020. He amended it, appointed a Board of Trustees led by investment banker Ike Chioke, and set an ambitious goal: ₦20 billion for security, roughly ₦5 billion a year.

    The Trust Fund’s own literature is revealing. It talks less about buying more guns and more about the five pillars: fundraising, capacity building, technological advancement, advisory support, and community engagement. The money is meant to underwrite exactly what citizens cannot do on their own — the cameras, the communication systems, the training, the forensic tools, the drones — and to create a standing platform where businesses, diaspora professionals, and wealthy individuals can put their money where their security concerns are.

    There is a philosophical shift buried inside that institutional design. Security is no longer framed as “what Abuja sends us” or “what the police can manage,” but as a shared, long-term investment. In a state chasing a $30 billion GDP target, the message is straightforward: without sustained security, the numbers will never materialise.

    Has it worked? The answer depends on where you stand and what you remember. Governor Mbah says violent crimes have reduced in the state by 80 per cent.

    If you remember those ghostly Mondays of enforced sit-at-home, you cannot deny that something has changed. The government not only outlawed the order; it threatened sanctions for schools and markets that obeyed faceless directives, insisted that “we no longer take orders from non-state actors,” and backed those words with visible policing.

    If, however, your reference point is a kidnapping in Udenu or a robbery on the outskirts of town, the story feels less tidy. Crime has not vanished, and no serious analyst will claim that. The fact that these isolated events are no longer a norm, but news, underscores the difference the Mbah Administration has made. What has changed is the state’s posture: from denial and helplessness to a visible, sometimes aggressive presence — patrols at odd hours, cameras where none existed, aircraft buzzing overhead. The security chiefs themselves warn criminals to “steer clear” and urge parents and traditional rulers to preach peace, a subtle acknowledgement that technology cannot replace community vigilance.

    A reflective assessment of Enugu’s strategy has to wrestle with three big questions.

    The first is sustainability. Drones, AI cameras and command centres do not maintain themselves. They require steady power, skilled technicians, updated software, spare parts and training refreshers. The Trust Fund model offers a way to finance this, but Nigerians have seen too many “white elephant” systems decay after the ribbon-cutting. The real test will come not in the first two years of excitement, but in year five, when repairs are boring, spare parts are expensive, and political attention has drifted elsewhere.

    The second is trust. Surveillance at this scale is double-edged. AI-enabled cameras that track kidnappers can also track protesters. Drones that map forests can also hover over opposition rallies. If citizens begin to feel that the system is as interested in dissent as it is in crime, the fragile consensus around “security first” will fray. Clear rules on data storage, independent oversight, and transparent reporting will matter as much as any gadget on the governor’s shopping list.

    Read Also: Catholic bishops to Nigerians: Evil will not prevail

    The third is depth. Enugu’s strategy has rightly focused on making crime harder and riskier. But durable safety rests on more than fear of arrest. It depends on whether a young man in Nsukka or Nike sees more dignity in a job than in joining a kidnapping ring. It depends on whether the rural farmer, abandoned by her children, believes the state cares whether she returns alive from the farm. The administration’s wider agenda — smart schools, ward-level health centres, road networks that reconnect rural economies — is part of this deeper security story, even if it doesn’t fit neatly into a press release about drones.

    So, is Enugu safe? It is safer than it was. It is more serious about security than it was. And it is better equipped technologically than most states in the federation. A president has flown in to commission its Command-and-Control Centre; an Inspector General of Police has publicly praised its infrastructure; investors now openly tie their confidence in the state’s growth prospects to its emerging security architecture.

    But safety is not a medal you win once. It is a habit you must renew every day. Enugu’s new drones and patrol fleets are impressive not because they make crime impossible — they don’t — but because they mark a state that has decided to stop treating insecurity as an inevitable fate. The real genius will be to make that decision outlive this administration: to build systems that still function when the campaign jingles have faded and “Tomorrow is here” is no longer a slogan but an expectation.

    For now, when the drone lights blink over the forests also manned by the re-energised and reequipped Forest Guards, and the monitors glow late into the night at the Command Centre, they carry a simple, quiet promise to the people below: you are no longer alone in this fight. If Enugu can keep that promise — in the forests, on the roads, in the markets, in the minds of its young — then “Enugu is safe” will cease to be a boast and become something far more powerful: a normal sentence that no one feels the need to emphasise.

    Dr Jeff Ukachukwu is a public affairs analyst and writes from Enugu

  • Ibadan funfair tragedy: Prophetesses Silekunola supports bereaved families

    Ibadan funfair tragedy: Prophetesses Silekunola supports bereaved families

    The Founder of the WINGS Foundation, Prophetess Naomi Silekunola, has extended support to families affected by the 2024 children’s funfair tragedy in Ibadan, Oyo State, one year after the incident.

    The prophetess, accompanied by members of her WINGS Foundation—which focuses on supporting women and children—paid a condolence visit to the bereaved families.

    In a video seen by our correspondent on Saturday, the prophetess said the visit was to commiserate with the families and make donations in remembrance of the children who lost their lives.

    Silekunola said that although the incident was unfortunate, it had not discouraged her from fulfilling what she described as her divine calling.

    She explained that this year’s annual children’s funfair was redesigned to honour the victims rather than the usual celebratory format.

    She expressed sorrow over the loss of lives and offered words of encouragement to the affected families.

    It was gathered that prayers were also offered, alongside the distribution of materials.

    Silekunola said, “Sometimes God does things, and we are happy; other times, we are not, and we begin to question whether it is God who has done it.”

    Read Also: Let your voices be heard, Makinde charges Nigerians to rise for true federalism

    She added, “I did not come to make you sad. I pray that this time next year, you will not remember anything of sadness. You will witness joy, and this unfortunate incident will no longer define your lives.”

    One of the parents who spoke at the occasion said the families had come to terms with the incident.

    He said, “God is greater than man, and there is nothing He cannot do. We did not come here for anything, but when someone is honoured, the honour should be reciprocated.”

    Recall that in 2024, several children reportedly died while others sustained injuries during a stampede at a children’s funfair in Ibadan.

    The event was organised by Silekunola alongside an Ibadan-based broadcaster, Oriyomi Hamzat. The Principal of Islamic High School, Bashorun, Ibadan, Abdullahi Fasasi,