Category: Taxation

  • Taxation of contract and direct labour procurement of Ministries,Departments and Agencies (Mdas) of government in Nigeria. (1)

    The Nigerian Tax Laws have provisions for the Taxation of contract Expenditure including those of Government, Ministry, Department and Agencies. The withholding tax (WHT) provision was introduced into the tax system in 1997 with limited coverage to rent, dividends and directors fees. Tax deduction at source has since been expanded to include:

    – All aspects of building, construction and related services.

    – All types of contract and agency arrangement, other than outright sale and purchase of goods and property in the ordinary course of business.

    – Consultancy, technical and professional services.

    – Management services.

    – Commissions

    – Interest and Royalty.

    The introduction of WHT regime came about in order to address the problem of tax evasion although, there is the overriding objective of full disclosure, transparency, predictability and fairness.

    Despite the huge Tax Revenue from award of contract and related source deductions, there is a growing interest in the usage of direct labour system in project procurement in Nigeria especially in the public sector. Direct Labour system is one of the several options of procurement used for project delivery process. This type of system is regarded as in-house because procuring entity, as different from contractor’s staff carry out the project delivery process and activities. One of the reasons for the preference for direct labour procurement is the Tax effect. Government Ministries, Department and Agency consume the services of contractors and hence are to be charged VAT by contractors who execute contract for them.

    This paper is intended to highlight how Government Expenditures are taxed in Nigeria and the extent to which direct labour procurement can be a Tax evasion scheme. This paper will not in any way address Tax issues relating to Corporate and Individual Expenditures.

     

    The Public Procurement Act 2007 And Award Of Contract

    By the provisions of the Public Procurement Act 2007, the following should be noted about award of contract and Public Procurement:-

    i. Procuring Entities should outsource those services that are either not part of their core business activity or for which there is a fluctuating requirement in terms of specialist skills or Equipment, or where the open market provides a more efficient and commercial alternative.

    ii. The approval and maintenance of monetary and prior review thresholds is important for the faithful implementation of the PPA. The thresholds establish relevant approving authorities and methodologies. “Monetary Thresholds” is defined in the interpretative section of the Act to mean the value limit in Naira set by the Bureau outside of which an approving authority may not award a procurement contract.

    iii. Procurement to be executed:-

    a. by open competitive bidding, except as otherwise exempted;

    b. In a manner which is transparent, timely, and equitable for ensuring accountability and conformity with the Public Procurement Act and regulations deriving therefrom;

    c. With the aim of achieving value for money and  fitness for purpose;

    d. In a manner which promotes competition, economy and efficiency; and

    e. In accordance with the laid down procedures and timelines.

    iv. Where the Bureau has set prior review thresholds, no funds shall be disbursed from the Treasury/federation Account/ or any bank account of any procuring entity for any procurement falling above the set thresholds unless the cheque, warrant or other form of request for payment is accompanied by a “Certificate of ‘No Objection’ to Award of Contract” duly issued by the Bureau.

    v. Subject to the monetary and prior review thresholds for procurements, the Parastatal Tenders’ Board of a government agency, Parastatal, or corporation or in the case of a ministry or extra-ministerial entity, the Ministerial Tenders’ Board shall be the Approving Authority for the conduct of public procurement.

    vi. The following procedure shall be observed by ministries, extra ministerial offices, and other arms of government in implementing their procurement plans, viz;

    a. Advertise and solicit for bids in accordance with guidelines prescribed by the Bureau from time to time;

    b. Invite two (2) credible persons as observers in every procurement process, one from a private sector professional organization relevant to the procurement and the other from non-government organization working in transparency, accountability and/or anti-corruption areas;

    c. Receive, evaluate and make a selection of the bids in accordance with prescribed guidelines;

    d. Obtain the approval of the tenders board for the award of contract to successful bidder.

    e. Obtain “certificate of ‘No objection’ to award contract” from the Bureau where contract is outside the threshold.

    vii. All bidders in addition to requirements contained in any solicitation documents shall:

    a. Possess the necessary:

    – Professional and technical qualifications to carry out particular procurement

    – Financial capability;

    – Equipment and other relevant infrastructure;

    – Shall have adequate personnel to perform the obligations of the procurement contracts.

    b. Possess the legal capacity to enter into the procurement contract

    c. Not be in receivership, the subject of any form of insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings or the subject of any form of winding up petition or proceedings

    d. Must have fulfilled all its obligations to pay taxes, pensions and social security contributions.

    viii.         Procurement Approval Threshold  (2012)

    ix. Reduction or Contract splitting is an offence in the Public Procurement Act.
    x. The Accounting Officer of every procuring entity shall be the person charged with the line supervision of the conduct of all procurement process; in the case of Ministries, the Permanent Secretary and in the case of Extra Ministerial Departments and Corporations, the Director General or Officer of Coordinate responsibility.
    xi. Procurement by Accounting Officers must be on the

    basis of approved quotation or Tender. Selection must be made from at least three quotations.

    xii. Section 19 of the Public Procurement Act 2007 specifies conditions for “Force Account” i.e Direct Labour, which should be executed within three months, to include

    – The procuring entity has ascertained that a schedule of rates, cost – plus or target contract would not be feasible, as quantities of work to be carried out cannot be defined in advance;

    – Works are small and scattered or in remote locations with no local contractors and demobilization costs for outside contractors would be too high;

    – Works must be carried out without disrupting existing operations;

    – The risk of unavailable work interruptions is better borne by procuring entity than by a contractor;

    – No contractor is interested in conducting the work at a reasonable price;

    – It has been demonstrated that Force Account (Direct Labour) is the only practical method for constructing and maintaining works under special circumstances; or

    – Where national security would be compromised if any other method was used.

     

    BLIBLIOGRAGHY

    1. Financial Regulations (Revised to January 2009); Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    2. Public Procurement Act 2007: Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    3. Companies Income Tax Act, Cap C. 21, LFN 2004

    4. Value Added Tax Act, Cap V.1 LFN 2004.

    5. Federal Inland Revenue Service Information circular No: 9801 (1998)

    6. Federal Inland Revenue Service Information circular No: 9502 (1995)

    7. Federal Inland Revenue Service Information circular No: 2006/02 (2006)

  • Guidelines on tax exemption for Ngos

    Guidelines on tax exemption for Ngos

    A non-governmental organisation (NGO) is an association of persons registered under Section 590 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 1990. Upon registration of the association, the body corporate may contract in the same form and manner as an individual in accordance with Section 605 of CAMA 1990. It is to be noted that by virtue of the provisions of Section 23 of the Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) any organisation registered under any law within the federation or any part thereof as a co-operative society shall also be treated as an NGO.

    NGOs include organisations, institutions and companies engaged in ecclesiastical, charitable, benevolent or educational activities of a public character. Many countries, including Nigeria have recognised the significant role being played by these organisations in building a strong, caring and well-functioning society as well as in contributing to its welfare and economic growth. In recognition of this, government grants tax incentives to such organisations in form of exemption of their profits (other than those derived from trade or business carried out by them) from income tax and zero rate of Value Added Tax (VAT) for their humanitarian services.

    The role of the tax authority is to ensure that these tax incentives or benefits are appropriately enjoyed and not abused and that the obligations associated with the tax benefits are complied with by the NGOs. Therefore, these guidelines are to check possible abuse and ensure standardization.

    Legal basis

    Section 23(1) of the CITA Cap C21.LFN 2004 states that the profit of any statutory, charitable, ecclesiastical, educational or other similar associations are exempted from CIT obligations provided such profits are not derived from any trade or business carried on by such an organisation or association.

    Where an NGO engages in any trade or business, the profit derived there from will be subjected to income tax as provided for in the Act. Also, where the NGO invests its assets in any institution, the income derived from such investment shall be subjected to tax. It should be noted that Capital Gains Tax (CGT) shall arise where assets are disposed of by the NGOs at a gain.

    Case Laws

    A relevant  case is that of Arbico Ltd Vs FBIR, (1996) 2 All NLR 303. The plaintiff in the dispute, Arbico, had acquired a plot of land, erected a building and sold the property at a profit. The company was subsequently assessed for tax on the proceeds of the sale of the property. The company objected to the assessment on the basis that the transaction was a one-off and did not constitute “trade”. The case was, ultimately, settled in the Supreme Court.

    In the ruling, the court laid down two important precedents:

    • Firstly, that the word ‘trade’ should be interpreted in its widest sense in accordance with its common everyday meaning;

    • Secondly, that an isolated one-off transaction can still constitute a ‘trade’.

    Tax reliefs available to NGOs

    In addition to the income tax exemption granted to NGOs as noted above, Section 25(3) of CITA provides that any company making donations to such an organisation listed under the fifth Schedule to CITA shall enjoy tax deductible donation not exceeding 10 per cent of the total profits of that company for that year as ascertained before any deduction of such donations is made and must not be of capital nature.

    Goods purchased for use in humanitarian donor funded projects are zero rated under the VAT Act Cap V1 LFN 2004 as amended.

    Registration with FIRS by NGOs

    All NGOs are expected to register with the nearest tax office of FIRS with the following documents:

    • A copy of registration certificate issued by Corporate Affairs Commission.

    • Certified copy of memorandum or constitution, rules and regulations governing the NGO,

    • List and profiles of the trustees/board members nominated; one of the trustees/board member must be a serving government official from relevant government agency responsible for the activity of the NGO;

    • Copy of the Tax Clearance Certificate (TCC) of each of the Trustees and

    Filing of returns by NGOs

    In line with section 55 of CITA, it is mandatory for all NGOs to file a tax return every year and such return shall contain:

    • The audited accounts, tax and capital allowances computations and a true and correct statement in writing containing the amounts of its profits from each and every source computed in accordance with the provisions of CITA;

    • Such particulars as may by such form or return be required for the purpose of the Act and any rules made with respect to such profits, allowances, reliefs, deductions or otherwise as may be material by virtue of the CITA; and

    • A declaration to be signed by a director or secretary of the organization that the information contained in the return is true and correct.

    Responsibilities of the tax office

    • Clarification of tax status: An NGO seeking clarification on its tax exemption status shall direct such enquiries to the tax office  where it was registered and the NGO desk in the relevant office shall process the enquiry and respond to it.

    • Application for TCC: An NGO shall direct its application for  TCC to the tax office where it was registered and file its tax returns. The relevant office shall process the application and issue the  TCC if the NGO is found qualified and if unqualified be given reasons in writing within two weeks of the application.

    • Monitoring : The relevant tax office shall monitor the activities of NGOs within its jurisdiction regularly to ensure compliance with the provisions of the tax laws.

     

    Other statutory obligations of NGOs

    In addition to its obligation to file tax returns at  the appropriate tax office, NGOs are statutorily required to:

    • Maintain accurate record of employees;

    • Maintain proper books of accounts

    • ‘Deduct Pay-As-You-Earn  from employees’ salary and remit same to the appropriate tax authority;

    • Pay VAT on goods and services consumed except those purchased exclusively for its humanitarian projects or activities;

    • Pay tax as and when due on non-exempt activities.

    Failure to comply with the above requirements will attract appropriate the penalty prescribed by law.

    It is to be emphasised that the fact that an NGO is exempted from payment of income tax does not remove the obligation to file returns regularly. It is also to be emphasised that profits derived from business or trading are liable to tax. All NGOs should abide with the tax  regulations to continue to enjoy the tax incentives granted by the government in furtherance of their charitable activities.

     

  • Change in accounting date: Tax implications

    Change in accounting date: Tax implications

    Different and sometimes challenging business decisions can force companies to change their accounting dates. Sometimes regulatory pronouncements such as that issued to banks post consolidation to have a uniform year end was an event which saw all banks in one fell swoop change their different accounting dates to December. While some companies have adopted calendar years, some others use fiscal years, whichever method is adopted is subject to tax implications. Whereas in the United States the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) must give permission for companies to change their accounting dates, especially to tackle tax avoidance, and may take as much as 10 years to effect another change in some cases, it is not yet so in Nigeria, an area which should be addressed.

    However, a lot of companies still do not know that there are tax implications to change of dates in their accounting period beyond the approval they get from their shareholders to do so. The FIRS being aware of different methods applied by tax consultants and tax officers in the treatment of changes in accounting dates, with each method yielding different results in under-assessment or incorrect assessments levied on taxpayers issued a circular in February 2006 as a guide to officers who have responsibility for filing and assessment duties, and those who may be required, as a matter of duty to carry out preliminary reviews on tax returns submitted by companies as well as officers vested with audit responsibiliq`ties, who from time to time will come across cases of change in accounting dates in the course of their audit assignment.

    Changes in accounting dates

    There are a number of reasons why a business may wish to change its accounting date and these reasons may include:

    i) The need to synchronize the accounting date of a subsidiary with that of the holding company.

    ii) The convenience of stock taking at a particular period of the year.

    iii) A business may take over the operation of another and as a result wish to change the accounting date of the company taken over to that of its own.

    Where a change in accounting date takes place, be it a sole trader, partnership or a limited liability company, the provisions of section 29(4) of the CAP 21 LFN of 2004 will apply. The Act provides that the Tax Authorities have the power to decide the basis of computing the tax liability for the year in which the change occurs and the two following years of assessment.

    As should be expected, the tax official will base his decision on the best advantage to the tax authority. It is important to note that the three relevant years to be considered are:

    i) The assessment year in which the accounting date becomes different from the date of the earlier years.  This is known as the year when the change occurred.

    ii) The next two years of assessment following that in which the change occurred.

    In practice, calculations are made on both the old and new dates. The greater of these two aggregates will be the likely choice of the revenue authority.

    Years involved in the tax computations

    Whenever a request for a change of accounting date has been approved, the company making the change shall be assessed to tax through a special process of determining the basis of assessment.  This process requires computations for three relevant years. Where the year of cessation is involved (ultimate year) in these three relevant years, the request for a change shall not be approved.  However, where the year immediately before the year of cessation (penultimate year) is involved in these three relevant years, the request may be approved by the FIRS, depending on other evidences before it.

     Assessment procedure on change of accounting date

    For an on-going business, assessment is based on preceding year.  But whenever there is a change of accounting date, a normal accounting period may not have ended in the year of change.  This is so because when there is a change of accounting date, it is either that an account is prepared for more than twelve months to the new accounting date or even less than twelve months to the new accounting year end. The FIRS will often adopt the following procedures to determine the assessments for the three relevant years:

    i) Identifying the first year in which the business has failed to make up the accounts to its usual accounting date.

    ii) Identifying the two years immediately following the year of failure.

    iii) Computing assessable profit for the three relevant years based on the old accounting date (on preceding year basis).

    iv) Computing assessable profit for the three relevant years based on the new accounting date (on preceding year basis).

    v) Adding up the assessable profits for the three years in (iii) and (iv) above separately.

    vi) Selecting the higher of the two profits added up in (v) above.

    Illustrations

    Example 1

    Julius Blake Nigeria Limited has been in business for many years. It has for a long time prepared its annual accounts up to 30th April.  In 1996, it decided to change its accounting date to 31st October.  Available figures showed its adjusted profits as follows:

                    N                            (No. of Months)

    Year ended                       30/4/1995                          450,000                 12

    Period ended                   31/10/1996                        830,000                 18

    Year ended                       31/10/1997                        590,000                 12

    Year ended                       31/10/1998                        600,000                 12

    You are required to compute the correct assessments for all the relevant years in the light of the change in accounting date.

     Solution

    Julius Blake Nigeria Limited

    Computation of Assessment

    Note: The last account submitted before the change was 30th April 1995.  Therefore, the year of change is 1996.  The three relevant years are therefore 1996, 1997 and 1998.

    a) Original Assessments (Based on old Accounting date of 30th April)

    Year of Assessment. Basis Period Assessment

    1996 P:Y.B(1/5/94-30/4/95)     N450,000

    1997    1/5/95 – 30/4/95 12/18 x 830,000 N553,333

    1998 1/5/96 – 30/4/97 (6/18 x 830,000) + (6/12 x 590,000) N571,667

     

    b)         Assessment Based on 31st October

    Year of Assessment. Basis Period Assessment

    1996 1/11/94 – 31/10/95 (1/11/94-30/4/95) + (1/5/95-31/10/95)  (6/12 x 450,000) + 6/18 x 830,000) N501,667

    1997 P.Y.B. to 31/10/96 1/11/95 – 31/10/96 12/18 x 830,000 N553,333

    1998 P.Y.B. to 31/10/97 N590,000

    c)          Summary of Assessments

    Year                        Old date of                            new date of

                                         30th April                             31st October

    N                                            N

    1996                       450,000                                501,667

    1997                       553,333                 553,333

    1998                       571,667                 590,000

    1,575,000                              1,645,000

    Conclusion:

    The Revenue Service will choose to raise assessments on the basis of the new accounting date as it results in greater assessment.

     

     

  • Tax relief for pioneer firms

    he government has over the years put in place many different and overlapping incentive schemes to attract both local and foreign investment. Tax exemption is generally regarded as an industrial investment device; many developing countries like Nigeria offer it as one of their major incentives.  Basically, tax incentives are designed to encourage investments in certain preferred sectors of the economy and sometimes geared towards attracting inflow of foreign exchange to complement domestic supplies for rapid economic development.

    Tax exemption otherwise known as Tax holiday is one of the most widespread tax incentive.  Tax exemption simply means a period of exemption from payment of taxes imposed by the government and this may be complete or partial. The grant of pioneer status, therefore, gives a company a preferred position in getting established, usually through exemption from income tax.

    A pioneer company is a company that engaged manufacturing, processing, mining, servicing and agricultural industries whose products have been declared pioneer products on satisfying certain conditions in as determined by Industrial Development Coordinating Committee (IDCC) of the Government under the Industrial Development (Income Tax Relief) Act Cap 179 LFN 1990.  The pioneer Tax holiday is for an initial period of three years or subject to further extension of two years or five years (ones and for all without further extension).

     

    • Enabling Act

    Act Chapter 179 laws of the federation of Nigeria (LFN) 1990 but first enacted by Decree No22 of 1971 and commenced on 1/4/1970.

     

    Commencement Date April 1, 1970

    • “An Act to repeal and re-enact, with major changes, the industries Development (Income Tax Relief) Act and to make provision for Tax relief for certain industries that may be issued with pioneer certificates by the minister and other matters ancilatory there to”

     

    Conditions

    • Industry is not being carried out on a   suitable     scale as required and there are prospects for further development          in the country or its product.

    • If it is in the public interest to encourage the industry or its product.

    • Application may be made for the inclusion of a product on the pioneer list

     

    Mode of Application

    • All application to be addressed to the Minister.

    • State the status of the company.

    • Give details of qualifying capital expenditure to be incurred.

    • Give sources of qualifying capital expenditure and estimated cost.

    • Specify location of Assets.

    • Date of production of pioneer products.

    • Any by product not being a pioneer product.

     

    Terms of Pioneer Certificate

    • Must be in terms of the application to which it relates.

    • Specify permissible by-products to be produced.

    • Specify period within which company must be incorporated and conditions to be endorsed.

    Pioneer status will only be issued from a date when company was incorporated and shall be effective.

     

    • From a date not earlier than the date on which the application was submitted to the minister or date of incorporation, which ever is the later.

    • Any other condition will be specified by the minister

    • The minimum Tax relief period not exceeding five years to be stated 3(6)(a-b)

     

    Amending Pioneer Certificate to Add New Product

    Section 4 (1) – (3) allowed a company during its pioneer period to make application in writing to the Minister to add a new product.

     

    Retrospective Pioneer Operation

    • Where a pioneer certificate is to be operative from a retrospective date, all Acts shall be treated as not having been closed or not having happened and all taxes paid (if any shall be repaid as soon as may after the expiration of three months from the production day.

     

    Production Date

    • No later than one month when the company is going into commercial production (marketable quantity), the company shall apply in writing for the certification of its production date.

    • Not later than one month after the production date or any extended period granted by the Board, the company shall make application in writing to the Board for the certification of the amount incurred as qualifying capital expenditure prior to the production date.

     

    Cancellation of Pioneer Certificate

    i) Company may apply for cancellation

    ii) If company contravened any provision of the Act or failed to meet conditions set.

     

    Tax Relief Period

     

    i) Commencing from the production date, it shall continue for three years (but can be extended):

    ii) For another one period of two years (if the standard and rate of expansion are satisfactory), local raw material utilization expansion, Training and Development of Nigerians, Government Policy Priority)

    iii)       Five years (once and for all).

     

    Transition From Pioneer Status

    Conditions of Old Trade or Business of a Pioneer Company

    • The old trade shall be deemed to ceased permanently at the end of the tax relief period

    • The pioneer company deemed to have set up a new trade on the day next following the end of its relief period

    • All capital expenditures incurred and used by a pioneer company shall be deemed have been incurred on that day next following the end of its tax relief period

    • Where it incurs a Net loss, that loss shall be deemed to have been incurred on the date on which its new trade commences i.e. it will be allowed to deduct all the losses brought forward from the pioneer period

    • The company must submit to the Board a list of its assets for certification.

    • At the end; the Board will issue a certificate of qualifying expenditure

    The Board is expected to issue the company for each year, the amount of income as ascertained and loss as arrived at (if applicable).

     

    Treatment of Capital Allowances and Losses

    • A capital expenditure incurred shall be deemed to have been incurred on that day next following the end of the pioneer period. i.e. regardless of the number of years granted a pioneer company, all capital expenditures incurred in line with the provision of the second schedule within the periods shall be deemed to have been incurred after the Tax relief period.

    • For losses incurred within the pioneer period, the cumulative amount will be deemed for computing total profits to have been incurred on the day, next following the pioneer period i.e. it will be allowed as a deduction in the new business.

     

    Documentation Required By FIRS

    • Memorandum and Article of Association

    • Certificate of Incorporation

    • Answer to standard questionnaire

    • Pioneer Certificate issued

    • The period approved

    • Production date

    • Products and by-products

    • For a going concern, the Audited account ended before the production date to be furnished (regardless of the number of months).

     

    Rendition of Returns

    • The conditions governing the submission of tax returns in CITA are applicable to a pioneer company.

    • One year from commencement of production date.

    • Period of one year successively.

    • Example:  Kano Money Lender Ltd was granted a pioneer status.

     

    • Commencing from July  1, 1999. The company has 31/12 as its accounting date.  The period granted was for five years.

    • At expiration of the pioneer period, it submitted Accounts for the years ended 31st December, 2004 and 2005 you are given these additional data:

     

    The data:

    2004 (N)                 2005 (N)

    i)Net Profits                                       16,980,155              9,758,273

    ii)Depreciation                                  32,157,000              46,102,328

    iii)Capital Allowance b/f                                172,314,886               —

    iv)Investment Allowance                                10,378,700             8,033,243

    v)Initial Allowance                          75,414,556              58,020,388

    vi)Annual allowance                       37,975,662              60,659,786

    You are required to compute basis period and the relevant taxes payable by this company.

     

    Solution:

    • The account is for twelve months and therefore are prorate for six months for the first year

    2004                                                                                        N

    1st Year 1/7/2004 – 31/12/2004

    Net Profit                                                                              16,980,655

    Add Depreciation                                                                32,157,000

    Assessable Profits                                                                49,137,155

    49,137,155 x 6/12    =24,568,577.50

    Less Investment allowance                                10,378,700

    14,189,877.50

     

    Less Capital allowance                                    285,705,104

    Unrelieved Capital Allowance                      271,515,226.50 c/f

    Income Tax                                                                        Nil

    EDT N24,568,577.5 @ 2%  =                              491,371.55

     

    2005

    • 1/7/2004 – 30/6/2005

    • First twelve months: 6/12 x 49,137,155 + 6/12 x 55,860,601

    (24,568,577.50) + (27,930,300.50)                                                                                                                         =                52,498,878

    Assessable profit                                                                              52,498,878

    Less Investment allowance                                               8,033,243

    44,465,635

    Less Capital allowance b/f                             271,515,226.50

    for the year                                                          118,680,174.00

    390,195,400.50

    Unrelieved Capital Allowance c/f                    345,729,765.50

    Income Tax                                                             NIL

    EDT N52,498,878 @ 2%        =              1,049,978.56

     

    2006

     

    • 1/1/2005 – 31/12/2005                                                N

    Net Profits                                                            9,758,273

    Add. Depreciation                                               46,102,328

    Assessable profit                                 55,860,601.00

    Less: C. A. b/f                                      345,729,765.50

    For the year  60,659,786                     406,389,551.50

     

    Unrelieved Capital Allowance c/f                                                                                350,528,950.50

    Income Tax NIL

    EDT N55,860,601  @ 2%                                                                                       1,117,212.02

     

  • Tax audit and minimum tax computation

    Tax audit and minimum tax computation

    Taxation, worldwide, constitutes a major source of revenue to governments for funding their capital and recurrent expenditures. In recent times, there has been the urge for tax authorities in Nigeria to carry out spontaneous and sporadic tax audits and investigations on taxpayers, especially corporate bodies, suspected of tax evasion or tax delinquency. In doing so, the tax authorities, in discharge of their duties as contained in the enabling tax laws, adopt various methods in tackling taxpayers. The taxpayers, on the other hand, are quick to resist any additional tax burden that might drain their pockets. While tax authorities do have statutory powers to conduct tax audits and investigations on taxpayers to ensure that the revenues due to government are not lost by way of false returns, these powers are, however, not without legal limits.

    Tax audits and investigations are very complex and tasking processes and as such, tax managers and their consultants must understand the ‘rules of the game’. On the other hand, according to the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), minimum tax is justifiable on the premise that every asset generates income. The minimum tax regulations are therefore anti-tax avoidance measures whether or not the affected company declares a profit, or the company was dormant during the relevant year of tax assessment.

    Where a company is dormant, minimum tax is usually charged on the company’s net assets or on its share capital, whichever is the higher of the two.

     Meaning of Audit

    An audit is an examination usually by an independent person, on a set of the accounting books, records, documents, etc, from which a  financial statement has been prepared and/or an examination and verification of a company’s financial and accounting records and supporting documents by an independent party after which an opinion is given on the state of affairs of such books and records.

     Objectives of Statutory Audit

    The primary objective of audit is to express an opinion on the financial statements of an enterprise as to whether:

    i. Proper books have been kept,

    ii. The financial statements are in agreement with the books,

    iii. The requirements of the applicable legislations, for example, the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 1990 (as amended) have been complied with,

    iv. Applicable accounting standards (both local and international) have been complied with,

    v. The financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the financial affairs of the enterprise as at its balance sheet date,

    vi. The financial statements give a true and fair view of the result of the operations of the enterprise for the period under consideration.

    Tax Audit

    This is an additional audit to the statutory audit and is carried out by tax officials from relevant authority. The approach and scope of work would be slightly different from that to be carried out for an audit under CAMA, 1990.

    Objectives of Tax Audit

    The objectives of tax audit are to enable the tax auditors determine whether or not:

    i. Adequate accounting books and records exist for the purpose of determining the taxable profits or loss of the taxpayer and consequently the tax payable,

    ii. The tax computations submitted to the authority by the taxpayer agree with the underlying records,

    iii. All applicable tax legislation have been complied with,

    iv. Provision of an avenue to educate taxpayers on various provisions of the tax laws,

    v. Discourage tax evasion,

    vi. Detect and correct accounting and/or arithmetic errors in tax returns,

    vii. Provide feedback to the management on various provisions of the law and recommend possible changes,

    viii.      Identify cases involving tax fraud and recommend them for investigation,

    ix. Forestall a taxable person’s failure to render tax returns,

    x. Forestall a taxable person rendering incomplete or inaccurate returns in support of the self-assessment scheme.

     Powers of FIRS to Audit

    Prior to the introduction of the self-assessment scheme, there was no specific provision in   Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) for tax audit. Subsection 4 of Section 43 was introduced to empower FIRS to carry out tax audit. The sub-section states: “Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Section or in any other provisions of the Act shall be construed as precluding the Revenue Service from verifying by tax audit any matter relating to entries in any books, documents, accounts or returns as the Service may from time to time specify in any guideline.”

    An integral part of the self-assessment scheme is the need to periodically verify the tax returns filed by taxpayers through  tax audit procedures. The tax audit exercise essentially is meant to enable the revenue authority to further satisfy itself that audited financial statements and the related tax computations submitted by the taxpayer agree with the underlying records.

     Types of Tax Audit

    The scope and type of audit steps to be executed would depend on the type of audit to be performed, the underlying trigger and the objectives to be achieved. At present, FIRS is involved in the following types of audit:

    1. Registration Audit – The purpose of this audit is to bring all relevant companies and individuals into the tax net. The audit involves obtaining information on businesses from the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), the Nigeria Customs Service, other third parties and routine visits to premises of suspected non-registered taxpayers in order to ensure that all companies and individuals who fall under FIRS’ tax jurisdiction are properly registered. In some cases, information in this regard can be obtained from other FIRS departments who may alert the Tax Audit Processes and Policies Department on the need to carry out registration checks regarding certain companies and individuals who are outside the FIRS tax net.

    At the end of each registration audit, companies and individuals found to be outside  tax net are usually registered and given Taxpayer’s Identification Number, and  a Permanent Note Jacket  file is opened

    2. Advisory Audits – A visit to newly established businesses advising them of their obligations in terms of tax types, filing of declarations, payment of amounts due, records to be maintained and likelihood of audit if it is considered to be a risk and the sanctions that might apply for non-compliance. Obtaining information on newly registered companies from CAC and visiting their offices to advise them of their obligations under the law.

    3. Record Keeping Audits – A check on enterprises that may have a reputation of not keeping adequate records. The visit would point out the obligations of the taxpayer as provided for in the CITA Section 63 regarding the keeping of records.  Penalties are to be computed in line with CITA Section 92.

    4. Desk Audits – Audits will generally require field visits. However, it may be possible to undertake some basic checks from the tax office. These can be conducted with regards to specific issues of a small enterprise when the auditor is confident that all necessary information can be ascertained by conducting the examination in the office. They can also be used as a preliminary examination of declarations/returns, analyzing ratios and cross-checking information to determine if an audit is warranted.

    5. Single Issue Audits – These are quick response audits  with a narrow focus. Their limited objectives focus on a single tax type or a single period concerning an individual taxpayer as opposed to the comprehensive audit. For instance, FIRS may only be examining whether the taxpayer has met their obligations in respect of employment – Pay-As-You-Earn, Withholding Tax (WHT), and Value Added Tax (VAT) or Company Income Tax (CIT).

    6. Refund Audits – Verifying the taxpayer’s right to a refund prior to processing the refund in accordance with the provisions of Section 23 of the  FIRS Establishment Act. Therefore, audits are usually undertaken for the first refund claim as well as where the refund claims varies significantly from established patterns and trends.

    7. Audit Projects – Audit can be organized as a separate project for specific groups of taxpayers or tax types (e.g. VAT, WHT) on a regional or national scale.  These projects may cover an industry (e.g. construction) or a line of business (e.g. retail) and/or certain items from the declaration or profit and loss account (e.g. capital allowance). They will consist of specific checks and are used to address a particular risk or to establish the degree of non-compliance in a particular sector.

    8. Comprehensive (or full) Audits – All tax obligations over one or more tax periods are typically referred for extensive examination when discrepancies are uncovered during more routine single issue audits. As they are usually time consuming, comprehensive audits should only be applied to taxpayers when there is evidence of underreporting that will have an impact across taxes.

    9. Mergers and Acquisition Audits – As part of mergers and acquisition strategies, it is usual for companies involved in the process to investigate their potential partners. Such investigations are undertaken by independent professional accountants and lawyers on behalf of the parties involved. A tax audit shortly after a merger or an acquisition has enormous potential for audit yields as the new entity’s financial statements would often materially differ from its previous components.

    10. Public Offers Audit – Securities and Exchange Commission rules require companies involved in a public offer to disclose their financial history covering a period of at least five years to the investing public. Again, professional accountants, lawyers and other professionals usually carry out a number of investigations in order to provide for public disclosure the information required to be disclosed by the regulatory authorities. A tax audit shortly after a company has made a public offer has enormous potential for audit yields.

    11. Post Pioneer Period Audits – During its pioneer status period, a company would not only operate without paying taxes but would also carry forward any losses sustained from the commencement of operations to the end of its pioneer status period. In this regard, tax audit would serve to revalidate the losses and capital allowances carried forward.

     Minimum Tax Legislation

    Section 32 (2) of the CIT Act (as amended) provides that where in a year of assessment, the ascertainable profits of a company, from all sources, results in a loss or where the company’s ascertainable profits results in no tax being liable for payment, or where the tax payable is less than the statutory minimum tax allowable, such a company shall be liable to be charged and to pay a statutory minimum tax, which amount will be dependent on whether the company has a annual turnover of less than N500,000, or more than N500,000.

    A company with an annual turnover of N500,000 or less, that has been carrying on business for at least four years, is liable to charge to a minimum tax of any of the higher of the following sums:

    (i)         0.5% of the company’s gross profit; or

    (ii)        0.5% of the company’s net assets; or

    (iii)      0.25% of the company’s paid up share capital; or

    (iv)       0.25% of the turnover of the company for the relevant year of tax assessment.

    Where, however, the turnover of the company is more than N500,000, the minimum tax payable shall be the higher of the above rates that is charged for companies with an annual turnover of N500,000 or less, plus 0.125% (or 50 per cent) on the excess of the turnover that is above N500,000 will be charged as minimum tax.

    Exemption from Minimum Tax Regulations

    Companies that are involved in agriculture, companies that have not carried on business during the first four years of their incorporation, or companies that have at least 25 imported equity capital fully paid for by a foreign company, are among the exempted corporations to whom the minimum tax provisions stated above do not apply.

    Capital Allowances and Minimum Tax

    For each year of tax assessment in which minimum tax is payable, the capital allowance for that year shall be computed together with any unabsorbed allowances brought forward from the previous years, and these shall be deducted as far as possible from the assessable profits for the relevant financial year, and or carried forward to the next financial year.

    Dormant Companies and Minimum Tax

    The general perception that dormant companies are not liable to pay any tax at all as they are not engaged in any trade or business is not correct. As a tax avoidance measure, minimum tax is charged on the higher amounts of such a dormant company’s gross profit, or on its net assets, or on its paid-up share capital, or on its turnover, at the rates stated above. The only exemptions to this rule are as also stated above.

    To avoid penalties for non-compliance, owners of companies that are dormant for any reason, or are not making any profits, will do well to contact their tax advisers for compliance in order to avoid tax penalties that could finally liquidate such companies.

     

     

  • Basis period for assessable profits

    Basis period for assessable profits

    According to the Nigerian Tax Laws it is mandatory for companies deriving income from Nigeria to pay various forms of taxes. The laws equally provide for how the taxes are to be computed on the company’s profits and when they should be paid. The focus of this article is on how to determine the basis period for assessable profits to be subjected to tax.

     

    Assessable Profit

    The accounting profit arrived at in the trading, profit & loss account is not usually the same as “tax profit”. This is because in ascertaining the accounting profit some expenses which are not allowed for tax purposes may have been reported and some income included in the accounting profit are tax-free.

    In simple terms, assessable profit is simply computed as adjusted profit less losses (unrelieved c/f) before taking into consideration capital allowances, balancing allowance and or balancing charge. This is also a profit in which education tax is treated at 2%. It should be noted that treatment of this profit depends on the tax type as companies income tax treatment differs from petroleum profit tax treatment.

    Adjusted profit is computed as below:

    Net Profit (as per account)                                              ****

    Add:   disallowable expenses taxable income (not reported)

    Less: allowable expenses (not reported) non-taxable income (reported)

    Apportionment of Assessable Profit

    Section 29 (6) allows for the apportionment and aggregation of profits in order to arrive at the profit of a year of assessment. Any apportionment shall be made in proportion to the number of months in the respective periods.

    In practice, this is usually obtainable under the abnormal situations. i.e. under Commencement of new business, Change of date or cessation of business.

     

    Meaning of Basis Period

    Basis period is simply time within which an assessment is raised/computed on a taxpayer for the purpose of establishing the correct amount of tax liability in a particular period. Basis period can also be seen as the basis upon which tax liabilities would be computed. Every business has its accounting year end (accounting period) as it suits the company’s operations except for few industries in Nigeria where the permanent year end is determined by the applicable authority. e.g Banks . More so a company’s accounting date may not correspond with the government fiscal year; which is 1st January to 31st December. Based on the above, it can be said that for the sake of equity; which is one of the qualities of the Nigerian tax system, the Nigerian government through the TaxAuthorities provides for the basis upon which taxes would be computed on a common ground.

     

    Types of Basis Period

    A Careful study of the provisions in the Nigerian tax laws (CITA,PPTA,CGTA,PITA etc.) show that we basically have two (2) types of basis period applicable to every company liable to tax. They are:

    • Preceding Year Basis

    • Actual Year Basis

    Preceding year Basis Period

    Section 29 (1) of the Companies Income Tax Act, C21 LFN 2004 (as amended) provides that; ….the profit of any company for each year of assessment from such source of its profits (hereinafter referred to as the “assessable profits”) shall be the profits of the year immediately preceding the year of assessment from each such source.

    This simply means that the profit to be subjected to tax in a particular year will not be that earned that same year but the profit of the immediate past year. Assessable Profits are computed on the amount of the profits of the year ended on that day in the year preceding the year of assessment.

    Note that for companies, profit is being ascertained on an annual basis. This means that every basis period determined on preceding year basis must be up to 12 months ending on a company’s permanent year end.

    Under normal circumstance, the basis period is the same as the accounting period. What differs are the “accounting year” and “tax year”

    Example:

    Determine the tax year and basis period for company that has just filed 2013 financial statement, having 30th September as its permanent year end. The company has been in operation for over five years.

    Suggested Solution:

    • Tax Year: 2014

    • Basis Period: 1/10/2012 – 30/9/2013

    Actual Year Basis Period

    This simply means that the months in the basis period of a year of assessment shall be within the same year. However, unlike preceding year basis period, the year of account will coincide with the year of assessment.

    Considering the earlier example, the year of assessment will not be 2014 but 2013 and the basis period will be 1/1/2013 – 31/12/2013.

    Taxes that are assessed on actual year basis include: Petroleum Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Personal Income Tax etc.

     

    Normal Basis Period

    A basis period is considered to be normal if the following conditions are fulfilled:

    • The number of months in the basis period must be exactly twelve (12) because year of assessment literally means twelve months

    • The basis period must have commenced the day after the end of the previous one. There must be continuity

    • There must be only one permanent year end.

    Example:

    Consider a company whose permanent year end is October 30 every year. What will be the basis period for assessable profits for 2012 to 2014 years of assessment?

    Suggested Solution:

    Tax Year                             Basis Period

    2012                                     1/11/2010 – 30/10/2011

    2013                                     1/11/2011 – 30/10/2012

    2014                                     1/11/2012 – 30/10/2013

    It is worthy of note that it is only a business in continuous operation (say over 3 years) and that has neither changed permanent year end nor cease operations that will have a normal basis period.

    Abnormal Basis Period

    Any basis period that does not fulfill the conditions stated under the normal basis period is said to be abnormal. An abnormal basis period can be obtained under the following circumstances:

    • Commencement of a new business

    • Change in the accounting date

    • Cessation of a business

    The above requires special treatments as adequately provided for in the relevant tax laws

    Commencement of a New Business

    Section 29 (3)(a-e) provides that;

    The assessable profits of any company from any trade or business for the year of assessment in which it commenced to carry on trade or business (or in the case of a company other than a Nigerian Company, for the year of assessment in which it commenced to carry on the trade or business in Nigeria) and for two following years of assessment (which years are in this subsection respectively referred to as “the first year” “the second year” and “the third year” shall be ascertained in accordance with the following provisions:

    (a) First Year: the assessable profits shall be the profits of that year(i.e. from date of commencement up to the end of the same year)

    (b) Second Year: the amounts of the profits of one year (i.e. 12 months) from the date of commencement of the business.

    (c) Third Year: Shall be computed in accordance with Section 29 (1) as earlier highlighted. This means the basis period will be on a preceding year basis except otherwise provided.

    (d) For the third year, it may not be possible to obtain a realistic basis period as the period might begin in a month earlier than the month of commencement. This arises where the month of commencement is after the month chosen as the permanent year end. In such situation, the repetitive rule will be applied.

    Example:

    OWOGOKE Limited commenced business on 1st October, 2002 and makes up its account annually to 31st May. Its assessable profits were as follows:

    N

    Period ended 31st May, 2003                          240,000

    Year ended 31st May, 2004                              516,000

    OWOGOKE Ltd – Computation of Assess. Profits

    YOA       Basis Period                      Assess Profit (N)

    2002     1/10/02 – 31/12/02           (3/8 * 240,000)                                                                                                                    90,000

    2003     1/10/02 – 30/9/03           (240,000 + 4/12*516,000)                                                                                                       412,000

    2004        1/6/2002-31/12/3                                               ^^^^^

    Noticeably, the basis period for 2004 YOA begins in a month earlier than the date of commencement. The general practice is to repeat the basis period for the second year.

    According to the aforementioned section, a new business is entitled, on giving notice in writing within two years after the end of the second year to the Board to require that the assessable profits both for the second year and third year (but not for one or other only of those years) shall be the actual profits of the respective years of assessment (i.e. profits of 1st January to 31st December of the second and third years of assessment). This is same as actual year basis discussed earlier.

    In other words, the taxpayer reserves the right to be assessed to tax in the second and third year on actual year basis instead of the rule highlighted under the commencement of business.

    Naturally, the taxpayer will exercise this right only where it may result in a lower tax liability.

    DORO-DAPO Limited commenced business on November 1, 1999 and decided to prepare its accounts to April 30 annually. Its adjusted profits were as follows:

    Period ended 30th April, 2000                        420,000

    Year ended 30th April, 2001                           480,000

    Year ended 30th April, 2002                           600,000

    Compute the assessable profits for the first 3 years of assessments and decide whether or not Doro-Dapo should exercise its right of election.

    SuggestCed Solution

    DORO-DAPO Limited

    Computation of Assessable Profits

    a. Original Assessment (without Election)

    YOA       Basis Period                      Assess Profit(N)

    1999 1/11/99 – 31/12/99             (2/6 * 420,000)                                                                                                                        140,000

    2000   1/11/99 – 30/10/00                              (420,000 + 6/12*480,000)                                                                                                                     660,000

    2001     1/11/99 – 30/10/00                           (Repeated) 660,000

    1,320,000

     

    1. Revised Assessment (on election)

    NOTE: Only the assessable profits of the second and third year will change if the right of election is exercised.

    2000   1/1/00 – 31/12/00    (4/6 *420,000 + 8/12*480,000)                                                                                                                            600,000

    2001 1/11/99 – 30/10/00   (4/12 *480,000 + 8/12 * 600,000)                                                                                                                       560,000                                                                                                                   1,160,000

    Decision

    It is to the advantage of Doro-Dapo Ltd to exercise its right of election to be assessed on the profits of 2000 and 2001 years of assessment since this result in tax savings of N160,000 (1,320,000 – 1,160,000)

    Summary of Assessable Profits

    YOA                    Assessable Profits (N)

    1999                     140,000

    2000                     560,000

    2001                     560,000

    Note: Based on the requirement of the law, the right of election must be exercised on or before 31st December, 2002 (i.e. within two years after the end of the second year – 2000)

    31st December, 2002 is 26 months from the date of commencement. Can we now infer, as against the requirement of the law,that the first set of returns can hold till 31st December, 2002?

    Revocation of the Notice of Election

    The law equally gives a taxpayer the opportunity to revoke his earlier request for an election by giving notice in writing to the FIRS within twelve months after the end of the third year of assessment.

    Example

    KILOBADE Limited commenced business on 1st March 2001. it makes up accounts annually to 31st August and its profits as agreed for tax purposes, were:

    Period ended 31st August, 2001     300,000

    Year ended 31st August, 2002         720,000

    Year ended 31st August, 2003         900,000

    Solution

    KILOBADE Limited

    Computation of Assessable Profits

    Original Assessment (without Election)

    YOA       Basis Period      Assess Profit(N)

    2001 1/3/01 – 31/12/01                 (300,000 + 4/12 * 720,000)                                                                                                                540,000

    2002   1/3/01 – 28/2/02   (300,000 + 6/12*720,000)                                                                                                                    660,000

    2003     1/9/01 – 31/8/02               720,000

    1,380,000

    Revised Assessment (on election)

    2002   1/1/02 – 31/12/02                 (8/12 *720,000 + 4/12*900,000)                                                                                                                          780,000

    2003     1/1/03 – 31/12/03 (8/12 *900,000 + 4/12 * 960,000)                                                                                                                  920,000

    1,700,000

    Decision

    The total assessable profits for the second and third YOA under commencement rule is N1,380,00 which is lower than N1,700,000 under election. Therefore, it is in the interest of KILOBADE Ltd not to exercise its right to avoid payment of higher tax.

    However, if an application for election had already been made, the company should renounce it in writing before the expiration of 12 months from the end of the third year of assessment (i.e. on or before 31st December, 2004).

    Summary of Assessable Profits

    YOA                    Assessable Profits (N)

    2001                     540,000

    2002                     660,000

    2003                        720,000

  • What constitutes ‘trade’ for tax purposes: Guidelines for the general public

    What constitutes ‘trade’ for tax purposes: Guidelines for the general public

    This article clarifies the FIRS’ position on what constitutes ‘trade’ or business for tax purposes. In accordance with the Companies Income Tax Act (CITA), and the Personal Income Tax Act (PITA), any trade is subject to tax under CITA and PITA, even if that trade is carried out by friendly societies, co-operative societies, charitable and ecclesiastical organizations, or trade unions. .

    CITA states that “any trade or business for whatever period of time such trade or business may have been carried on” shall be subject to Companies Income Tax (Sec 9(1)(a)). The profits of certain institutions are exempt from tax under CITA, but only in so far as such profits are not derived from ‘trade or business’ (Sec. 19(1) (a, b, c, e)). This means that the profits of any organization that are derived from ‘trade’ shall be subject to Companies Income Tax. This raises the question, what exactly constitutes ‘trade’?

    A definition of the word ‘trade’ cannot be found in Nigerian tax legislation although an attempt was made in PITA. The interpretation Section of the Fifth Schedule of PITA defines “trade or business” to mean “trade or business or that part of a trade or business the profits of which are assessable under this Act”.

    However, the issue has been addressed in several legal cases, the rulings of which provide some legal certainty regarding how the courts interpret the word (see Section 2). In line with these rulings, ‘trade’ can be regarded as “the business of buying and selling or bartering goods or services”. Furthermore, the one-off nature of an activity in no way invalidates that activity as constituting trade. This interpretation matches the approach in other jurisdictions, namely the UK and USA (see Section 3).

     

    Case Law in Nigeria

     

    Although no explicit definition of ‘trade’ exists in the law, the issue has been addressed in several legal cases, the rulings of which provide some legal certainty regarding how the courts interpret the word. The most important case is that of Arbico Ltd v. FBIR, {1996} 2 All NLR 303. The plaintiff in the dispute, Arbico, had acquired a plot of land, erected a building, and sold the property at a profit. The company was subsequently assessed for tax on the proceeds of the sale of property The Company objected to the assessment on the basis that the transaction was a one-off and therefore did not constitute ‘trade’. The case was ultimately settled in the Supreme Court. In the ruling the Court laid down two important axioms:

     

    • Firstly, that the word ‘trade’ should be interpreted in its widest sense, in accordance with its common everyday meaning;

    • Secondly, that an isolated one-off transaction can still constitute a “trade”.

    In line with the ruling of the Supreme Court, the following definition seems to capture the common meaning of the word ‘trade’. Trade is “the business of buying and selling or barter in goods or services”(taken from Black’s Law Dictionary, Eighth Ed. (2004)).

     

    Treatment in Other Tax Jurisdictions

     

    In considering what constitutes ‘trade’ for tax purposes it is useful to consider how the issue is addressed in other jurisdictions.

    In the UK, as in Nigeria, there is no statutory definition of the word ‘trade’. Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) relies on case law to formulate a working definition. HMRC states that “Usually, trading involves the provision of goods or services to customers on a commercial basis”. As in Nigerian case law, “Simply because a venture is a one-off or occasional does not mean that it will not be treated as trading for tax purposes”. It is interesting to note that although the HMRC definition employs the notion of ‘commercial basis’, HMRC explicitly states that whether or not the profits of an activity are ultimately used for charitable purposes is not relevant for the determination of whether or not that activity constitutes a trade.

    In the USA, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employs a similar approach to HMRC. IRS regards ‘trade’ as including “any activity carried on for the production of income from selling goods or performing services”. It is interesting to note how IRS treats the trading activities of an organisation that also carries out tax exempt activities. IRS states that “an activity does not lose its identity as a trade or business merely because it is carried on within a larger group of similar activities that may, or may not, be related to the exempt purposes of the organizations. In other words, a single organisation can undertake both exempt activities and trading activities. This implies that an organisation cannot argue that none of its activities constitute ‘trade’ just because it undertakes some exempt activities.

     

    Badges of Trade

     

    In 1955 in England, the Royal Commission on the Taxation of Profits and Income in reaction to whether a statutory definition of trade was necessary, said that “each case must be decided to its own circumstance (1955 Cmnd.9474 para.116) and suggested badges of trade” which they considered to be the major relevant considerations that will facilitate in determining whether any profit is a taxable trading profit or not. Badges of trade refer to certain indicators that may be used in determining the factual question as whether an activity is trade or not. Case law has expanded it to 9. The badges of trade are:

    • Profit seeking motive. An intention to make a profit supports trading, but by itself is not conclusive.

    • The number of transaction. Systematic and repeated transactions will support ‘trade’. An isolated transaction may also constitute a trade.

    • Existence of similar trading transactions or interests.  Transactions that are similar to those of an existing trade may themselves be trading.

    • Changes to the asset. Was the asset repaired, modified or improved to make it more easily saleable or saleable at a greater profit?

    • The way the sale was carried out. Was the asset sold in a way that was typical of trading organizations? Alternatively, did it have to be sold to raise cash for an emergency?

    • The source of finance. Was money borrowed to buy the asset? Could the funds only be repaid by selling the asset?

    • Interval of time between purchase and sale. Assets that are the subject of trade will normally, but not always, be sold quickly. Therefore, an intention to resell an asset shortly after purchase will support trading. However, an asset, which is to be held indefinitely, is much less likely to be a subject of trade.

    • Method of acquisition. An asset that is acquired by inheritance, or as gift, is less likely to be the subject of trade.

    These ‘badges’ will not be present in every case and of those that are, some may point one way and some the other. The presence or absence of a particular badge is unlikely, by itself, to provide a conclusive answer to the question of whether or not there is a trade. The weight to be attached to each badge will depend on the precise circumstances.

     

     FIRS Position

     

    A definition of the word ‘trade’ cannot be found in Nigerian tax law. However, the issue has been addressed in several legal cases, the rulings of which provide some legal certainty regarding how the courts interpret the word. In line with these rulings, ‘trade’ can be regarded as “the business of buying and selling or bartering goods or services”. Where one or more of the criteria on the badges of trade apply, FIRS will treat such transaction as trade. Furthermore, the one-off nature of an activity in no way invalidates that activity as constituting a trade. This interpretation matches the approach in other jurisdictions, namely the UK and USA. The following decided cases are relevant in this regard:

     

    i In the case of Marlin Vs Lowry (1955)3 All ER 48; 11 TC 297), a person without previous knowledge of linen trade bought a surplus stock of aeroplane linen from government which he sold to the public in small lots. He engaged employees for the re-packaging and embarked on sales” promotion through extensive adverts and campaigns. It was held that he was trading.

    ii In Murray Vs I.R. Comrs (1951, 32 TC 238), where a timber merchant who bought standing timbers in two plantations and could not cut them due to labour cost, sold the rights to cut the timbers to meet his indebtedness. He was assessed to tax on the profit from the transaction. He contended that the sale was a capital transaction since it was not in the normal course of his business but it was held that the transaction was part of his normal trading as a timber merchant.

    iii In Burge Vs Pyne (1969, All ER 467), a club proprietor providing facilities for bar, dancing, cabaret, fruit machines and gambling, appealed against the inclusion of his winnings in his assessment. The appeal was dismissed on the ground that the winnings formed part of his regular income from the trade of running the club.

    From the foregoing and in accordance with the provisions of CITA, any friendly society, cooperative societies, charitable and ecclesiastical organizations or trade unions that carry out trade as defined and described above would be liable to tax on income derived from such trade.

     

  • Tax implication of mergers and acquisitions

    Tax implication of mergers and acquisitions

    Tax implication of mergers and acquisitions

    Merger is defined as ‘‘any amalgamation of the undertakings or any part of the undertakings or interest of two or more companies or the undertakings or part of the undertakings of one or more companies and one or more bodies corporate’’. Simply put, a merger is a combination or integration of existing companies to form a single company.

    Acquisition on the other hand, is known as take-over. It is the take-over of by one company of sufficient share in another company to give the acquiring company control over that other company.

     

    Statutory requirement under Companies Income Tax Act (CITA)

    The CITA in Section 29(12) Cap (21, LFN, 2004) provides that ‘‘no merger, take-over, transfer or restructuring of the trade or business carried on by a company shall take place without having obtained the Service’s direction under sub-section 9 of this section and clearance with  any tax that may be due and payable under the Capital Gains Tax Act’’. The implication of this provision is that the approval of the Federal Inland Revenue Service is a condition for the completion of the process in a merger or acquisition bid. Therefore, no merger or acquisition bids would be fully consummated without the companies involved having obtained consent from the FIRS.

     

    Procedure for obtaining the Service’s Approval

    From the start, the merging companies are required to submit to the FIRS, copies of the scheme of merger and scheme of arrangement on the consolidation request for its study and proper evaluation in order to ensure that taxes which may result from the companies’ transactions are correctly assessed and collected. Herein lies the relevance of the Service’s powers under section 29(9) (i) to require either of the companies directly affected by any direction which is under the consideration of the Service to guarantee or give security to its satisfaction for payment in full of all tax due or to become due by the company which is selling or transferring such asset or business.

     

    Tax issues in mergers and acquisitions

    A merger may result in any of the following situations:

    · Formation of a new company.

    · Continuation of the consolidated business by one of the merging parties, in its name or under a new name.

    · Cessation of business by the other merging parties.

    In acquisition, there is only an acquiring company (ies) and the company being acquired.

     

    Emergence of a new company

    Rendition of annual returns

    Where a new company emerges from a merger process, then, the new company is expected to file its returns, in line with the provisions of Section 55(3)(b) of CITA. The section provides that “every new company shall file with the Service, its audited accounts and returns within 18 months from the date of its incorporation or not later than six months after the end of its first accounting period as defined in section 29(3) of this Act, whichever is earlier’’.

    It should however be understood that a mere change of name does not make an existing business entity a new company. Such companies will continue to be treated as old businesses as a on-going concern.

     

    Basis of assessment

    Commencement rule as provided under Section 29(3) will apply to the new company, except where any of the under-listed circumstances arise:

    (I) Where the merging parties are connected parties, the Service may direct that commencement rule be set aside, in which case, the new company will file its returns as an on-going concern and its assessment will be determined on preceding year basis.

    (II) Where the new business is a reconstituted company, taking over the trade or business formerly run by its foreign parent company.

     

    Claim of allowances

    Companies Income Tax Act (CITA) did not categorically address the value at which assets may be transferred for the purpose of capital allowances claims. However, International Accounting Standard 22 prescribes that in merger accounting, the assets, liabilities and reserves must be recorded at their carrying balances, implying that merger process does not permit the recording of assets at their fair value in the event of consolidation. The new company will therefore not be entitled to any investment allowance claim or initial allowance on the transferred assets; it will only be entitled to claim annual allowance on the Tax Written Down Values (TWDV) of the transferred assets.

     

    Unabsorbed losses and unutilised capital allowances brought forward

    The new company may also not be permitted to inherit the unabsorbed losses and capital allowances of the absorbed companies, except under the following circumstance:

    (i) where a reconstituted company is carrying on the same business previously carried on by this company and it is proved that the losses have not been allowed against any assessable profits or income of that company for any such year; in that case the amount of unabsorbed losses shall be deemed to be a loss incurred by the re-constituted company in its trade or business during the year of assessment in which the business commenced.

     

    Taxes and deductibility of related expenses

    (i) Stamp Duties

    Duty payment will arise on the share capital of the new company, subject to the provisions of Section 104 of the Stamp Duties Act, in relation to capital and duty relief.

    (ii) Consolidated Expenses

    Fees paid to statutory bodies such as SEC, NSE, CBN, Land Authorities etc, including professionals like accountants, stockbrokers, issuing houses, and solicitors are regarded as capital in nature and will therefore not be allowed as deductible expenses by virtue of Section 27(a) of CITA.

    (iii) Taxation of consolidation fees:

    Fees paid to professionals for services rendered in connection with consolidation will be subject to VAT and WHT at the rates of five per cent and 10 per cent.

    4.3.1 Tax indemnification

    Section 29(9)(i) of CITA provides that the Service may require the new company to guarantee or give security for payment in full, for any tax due or that may become due by any of the ceased companies.

    4.3.2 Approval for Pension Scheme

    The new company will need to obtain a Joint Tax Board (JTB) approval for its staff pension scheme.

     

    Status of a surviving company in relation to taxation

    It is a possibility that one of the merging companies survives and its old name or a new name to inherit the assets, liabilities, reserves and entire operations of the merging parties. Where this happens, the following points must be noted:

    (i) The surviving company must file its returns in line with the provisions of section 55(3)(a) of CITA.

    (ii) Commencement rules under section 29(3) of CITA will not apply to the surviving company, as it will be regarded as an existing company.

    (iii) The surviving company will not be allowed to claim investment allowance on the assets which were transferred to it and will also not claim initial allowance on such assets.

    (iv) The surviving company may, however, claim yearly allowance only on the tax Written down Values (TWDV) of the assets transferred to it.

    (v) The surviving company may not inherit the unabsorbed losses and capital allowances of the merging companies, except it is proved that the new business is a reconstituted company.

    (vi) All fees payable on merger bids or consolidation will be liable to VAT and WHT just like it is applicable on the emergence of a new company. Stamp duties will be paid on the increase in share capital and the company will have to obtain its own staff pension scheme approval from the JTB.

     

    Ceased Businesses

    The merger or consolidation exercise may also result in cessation of business for any of the merging parties. In this case, cessation rule as applicable under section 29(4) of CITA will apply to any of the merging companies which have now ceased business permanently, except if any of the following circumstances occur:

    (i) Where the merging companies are connected. Here, the Service may direct, in line with its discretionary powers, under section 29(9) of CITA that the cessation rule may not apply.

    (ii) Where a reconstituted company is formed to take over the trade or business formerly run by its foreign parent company. (See Section 29(10) of CITA.

     

    Capital Gains Tax Shares or Cash Received

    Section 32A of Capital Gains Tax Act (CGTA) Cap 121LFN 2004 provides that a person shall not be chargeable to tax under the Act, in respect of any gains arising from the acquisition of the shares of a company, either merged with, or taken over or absorbed by another company, as a result of which the acquired company has lost its identity. However, where shareholders are either wholly or partly paid in cash for surrendering their shares in the ceased business, the gains arising from the cash payment will be subject to CGT.

     

    Effect of taxations on consolidation acquiring/acquired companies

    The tax implications of consolidation on an acquiring company or acquired companies are similar to those of mergers. Acquisition expenses are non-deductible while fees paid to professional bodies are equally subject to WHT and VAT.

  • Withholding Tax (WHT) administration

    Withholding Tax (WHT) administration

    Withholding Tax (WHT) is an advance payment of income tax. In principle, it is a payment for the ultimate income tax liability of the taxpayer or company. It is not a separate tax and does not confer an exemption from the filing of yearly tax returns by the company which suffered WHT. The tax is deducted at source when a payment is to be made to the beneficiary.

     

    Applicable Tax Law

    Withholding Tax (WHT) is not a distinct tax type and therefore has no legislation of its own. It is only a mechanism for the collection of other taxes. Consequently, its application is provided for in the enabling law of other tax types i.e. Section 81 of Company Income Tax Act, Section 54 of Petroleum Profit Tax Act, Section 73 of Personal Income Tax Act and Section 13 of Value Added Tax (VAT) Act.

     

    Tax coverage and income subject to WHT

    It seeks to collect taxes that may have been lost through evasion and/or avoidance. It is to ensure that taxpayers are correctly taxed but it must be understood that transactions that are ordinarily not liable to tax in Nigeria are also not liable to WHT; thus, contracts and supplies of goods and services performed entirely outside Nigeria by non-resident taxpayers will not be liable to WHT. The residence of the taxpayer is not relevant for determining liability to tax or the application of WHT, but it is important to consider whether the provider/supplier of the goods or services is liable to tax.

    The rate of tax applicable to the various goods and services is provided in later parts of this paper. The introduction of the WHT regime came about to address the problem of tax evasion although, there is the overriding objective of full disclosure, transparency, predictability and fairness. In the light of these objectives and bearing in mind that the tax is intended as an advance payment of tax, its operation should always be optimised to ensure that taxpayers are not overtaxed and Government does not lose revenue.

    Rents: This includes rental income on both real and personal property. As a general rule, income on a property (rent, hire or lease payments or rights (royalties) situated in Nigeria is liable to tax in Nigeria, the place of payment notwithstanding. Where a person rents or hires property/services from another, WHT at the rate of 10  per cent will apply. But where a person provides services to another for e.g. air/land transport service, using its own equipment/facilities, the transaction becomes a contract of services rather than rental or hire.

    Interest: This is income from investments of every kind. WHT is applicable to income from government securities and income from bonds or Treasury bills. Interest on loans paid by a Nigerian company is often not subject to WHT.

    Dividends:Refer to income from shares. The income is subject to tax whether it is received by a Nigeria company or a non-resident company. The tax imposed is regarded as final tax, but corporate bodies are allowed to recoup WHT deduction where the dividend is to be redistributed as Franked Investment Income (FII). The Petroleum Profit Tax Act (PPTA) however exempts dividends payable by oil producing companies on petroleum operations from WHT imposition.

    Royalty:Refers to unearned income which accrues to the owner from past endeavors. Permission must be obtained before it can be used. It is payment of any kind as a consideration for the use of or the right to use any patent, trade mark or right/

    Consultancy/professional/management/technical services-These are specialised services rendered by persons with the required knowledge and skills. The mere fact that services are provided by a company which has consultancy as part of its name does not by itself render such service as consultancy. The real content of the services being provided must be examined and if it amounts to a consultancy service, then the appropriate rate would apply; the same treatment applies to professional/management services. For instance, if an engineering company is carrying out a construction activity, the proper classification for the services would be ‘‘construction’’ as opposed to professional/technical services; similarly, the use of industrial machinery/equipment to provide a service does not render it to be ‘technical’’ because the industry position requires that only arrangements thatinvolve a transfer of technology should be classified as technical.

    All types of contracts and arrangements, other than sale and purchase of goods and property. This classification is wide enough to capture every transaction, other than outright purchase/sale of goods and property. The revenue holds the view that majority of the activities carried on in the oil industry are done by way of contractions, and should properly fall under this category. The issue of contracts and transactions, not being conducted in the ordinary course of business has over the years been subjected to series of reviews and amendments, aimed at improving the WHT system to achieve efficiency as well as minimise the cost of doing business.

    The aim of WHT is not to compound the problems of producers, manufacturers and those engaged in any activity, other than services. The definition of manufacturing activate as contained in the FIRS information circular No. 2002 appears to have further generated more controversy than expected. The following classification will assist in the understanding of circumstances where WHT will apply in relation to any production activity.

     

    Where there is a dual relationship between parties in a

    business transaction

     

    An example of this contract is where a manufacturer/producer require raw materials from a supplier for its production. This is dual relationship between both parties and the transaction will not be liable to WHT. E.g., a farmer supplies groundnut to a manufacturer of groundnut oil; a manufacturer of glass supplies bottles to a bottling company or soft drink manufacturer or an oil marking company supplies diesel direct to a user.

     

    Where there is a tripartite relationship between parties in a transaction

    In a tripartite contract relationship involving a manufacturer, supplier and agent, there could be either two options, depending on the level of financial arrangement. For example, where manufacturer A, engages agent C to procure or source for raw materials from supplier, B, for his production line, there is a tripartite arrangement here. There is nothing preventing manufacturer, A from dealing directly with supplier B to achieve a dual contract relationship.

    (a) If agent C is mobilised by manufacturer B with fund to source for materials for its operation, there will be need to segregate the service cost from the entire contraction, and only the service component will be liable to WHT.

    (b) If the agent, C, finances the sourcing of the raw materials for Manufacturer A, the entire contract value will be liable to WHT at the time of payment.

     

    Where a maufacturer delivers its normal products to its

    distributors and dealers for sale

    In this situation, the income accruing to the manufacturer will not be liable to WHT as it is regarded as transaction in the ordinary course of business, but the commission earned by the distributors/dealers will be subjected to WHT.

     

    Agency transactions and arrangements

    Agency arrangement implies a contract between a principal and agent. The reward for services by the agent is commission, which is subject to WHT of 10 per cent.

    However, if the principal is a non-resident, any sales proceeds from the arrangement will attract fie per cent WHT, where any of the conditions in Section 26(1) (b) of CITA holds.

    The organisations making the payments are required to withhold tax from such payments and pay over the withheld amounts to their respective relevant tax authorities within 30 days of receipt of payment or credit by the person or entity suffering the tax.

    The relevant tax authorities to receive the WHT tax transactions made by companies is FIRS and for individuals and unincorporated bodies subject to rules of residence is SIRS or FIRS.

     

    Person liable to deduct WHT

    The payer of WHT for any activity under this tax shall include company (corporate or non-corporate), government Ministries and Department, Parastatals, statutory bodies, institutions and other established organisation approved for the operations of Pay As you Earn System (PAYE).

     

    Who is taxable?

    • All persons, companies etc. who’s incomes are liable to income tax, are subject to Withholding Tax.

    • However, exempt entities, such as educational institutions, Government Ministries, Parastatals and other Agencies of government, are agents for the collection of WHT. They are required to deduct WHT on any payment made to a taxable body and remit same to the relevant tax authority.

    WHT implication on foreign transactions

     

    Non-resident companies/enterprises

    The revenue practice is that non-resident companies are not empowered to deduct any type of WHT. These categories of enterprises are practically outside the regulatory monitoring and control of the FIRS. It will be impracticable for revenue office to inspect the accounting books of these companies to confirm due deduction and remittance of WHT.

     

    Double Taxation Agreement (DTA)

    Transactions that are ordinarily not liable to tax in Nigeria are not liable to WHT in Nigeria. Thus contracts and supplies of goods and services performed entirely outside Nigeria by non-resident individuals are not liable to WHT. Nigeria has treaty agreements with about eight countries and these countries are granted a reduced rate of WHT deduction, usually at 75 per cent of the generally applicable WHT rate. 7.5 per cent. These countries include UK, Northern Ireland, Canada, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Pakistan and Romania.

     

    Permanent Establishment (PE) principle under Nigeria’s taxation

    The rules construe a PE where:

    • The company has a ‘fixed base’ in Nigeria.

    • The company operates in Nigeria through a dependent agent authorised to conclude contracts or deliver goods on its behalf,

    • The company is executing a turnkey project in Nigeria, or

    • The operation between the company and its Nigeria affiliate does not appear to be at arm’s length.

    • ‘Fixed base’ implies some degree of permanence and will include:

    • Facilities, such as a factory, office, branch, mine, oil or gas well

    • Activities, such as building, construction, assembly or installation

    • Provision of services in connection with the activities listed above.

    Principles of PE

    • The rules construe a Permanent Establishment where:

    • The company has a ‘fixed base’ in Nigeria.

    • The company operate in Nigeria through a dependent agent authorised to conclude contracts or deliver goods on its behalf,

    • The company is executing a turnkey project in Nigeria, or

    • The operation between the company and its Nigeria affiliate does not appear to be at arm’s length.

    ‘Fixed base’ implies some degree of permanence and will include: Facilities, such as a factory, office, branch, mine, oil or gas well Activities, such as building, construction, assembly or installation,  provision of services based on the above-listed activities.

     

    Other types of income not liable to WHT

    • Companies operating within the Free Trade Zones/Export Processing Zones.

    • Insurance premium.

    • Turnover/income from dealership or distributive trade

    • Telephone bills are not subject to WHT.

     

    Application of WHT

    Sections of CITA and PITA that provide for the deduction of withholding tax at the applicable rates below.

     

    Types of payment                            Applicable rates 

                                                                          Companies       Individual

    Dividends, Interest, Rent                                10%                         10%

    Directors Fees                                   10%                         10%

    Royalties                                                            15%                   15%

    Commission, Consultation,           10%                         5%

    Technical, Service Fees

    Management fees                                             10%                         5%

    Construction/Building

    Contracts                                                        5%                               5%

    Contracts, other than outright sales

    and purchase of goods in the

    ordinary course of business           5%                           5%

     

    Returns & Remittance

    Tax Returns are filed monthly with evidence of remittance and a detailed schedule of taxable transactions.

    Submitted schedule should show the following details:

     

    Name of supplier    Address Nature of   Invoice     payment   Amount   Rate @ Y% Tax

            Service      Date           Date

    • Returns for corporate suppliers should be filed within 21 days from end of month of transactions.

    • Returns for non –corporate suppliers should be filed within 30 days from end of month of transaction.

    • In practice, tax returns are filed in the same month they occur.

    • Tax deducted should be remitted to the revenue in exchange for a receipt of payment.

    • Tax is payable in the currency of the qualifying transaction.

    Following payment and filing of returns, the revenue processes credit notes for the suppliers on whose income tax was deducted.

    • Credit notes can be used in applying for tax credit against current and future tax liabilities (i.e. where it is not final tax)

    • Remittances are due to either federal or state tax authorities.

    Remittances due to Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS):

    • Corporate entities,

    • Nonresident individuals,

    • Members of the armed forces and police,

    • Resident of Abuja,

    • Foreign officers.

    Remittances due to state internal revenue service (SIRS):

    • All other individuals / partnerships resident in the state.

     

    Payment of currency

    Section 64B of CITA empowers the tax authority that withheld tax must be remitted to the tax authority in the currency in which the deduction was made. This means that transactions made in foreign currency are to be remitted in the same currency and that the tax so withheld is to be remitted in the same currency. Simultaneously penalty for default would also be calculated in the same currency.

    How to claim WHT credit (Credit notes)

    A taxpayer from whom tax has been withheld is expected to gain withholding tax credit notes from the relevant tax authority via the deducting organisation. All withheld taxes are forwarded to the tax authority, which in turn records the credit against the tax payer’s account, with a schedule containing details of the contract or service, on which basis the tax authority issues a credit note. Assessed tax and related charges are usually entered as debits in the taxpayer’s tax account, while he is expected to pay only the difference between his assessed tax and withholding tax credit at the time of filing their own returns.

    • It is this credit note that a taxpayer uses as a set off against tax assessed within that year or if unutilised within that year can be applied based on the taxpayer request to transfer the credit balance in that year to offset or reduce debit balance of another year.

    • In cases where there is an excess charge of WHT on a taxpayer, the 2007 amendments to CITA (Section 63 (7)) have even further empowered FIRS to refund proven excess withholding tax to any taxpayer within 90 days of filing a claim.

    Offences and penalties

    Offences

    • Failure to withhold tax or

    • Failure to remit or  late remittance of the tax withheld

    • Non remittance of the tax withheld within the time limit stipulated by the Revenue.

    Penalties

    a. For companies

    A fine of 200 per cent of the tax not withheld or withheld but not remitted, plus interest at the prevailing commercial rate.

    b. For Individuals & other organisations

    A fine of the higher of N5,000 or 10 per cent of the amount of tax due, plus the amount of tax deductible, or  withheld but not remitted, plus interest at the prevailing commercial rate.

    • Interest on savings account of less than N50, 000 paid by a Bank, is not subject to WHT.

    The WHT system has come to stay since it is a veritable source of revenue to government. It enhances the collection efforts of tax authorities and it ensures that revenue is generated in advance. It is therefore imperative that the system should continue to be improved upon in the light of modern tax administration procedure. Usually, an advance payment of tax provides information that an income source has been identified through a third party. Such information being provided by the payer should be readily available for use in accessing a potential taxpayer. Field officers should always be ready to follow up on such information.

     

  • Laws, processes for payment of taxes, by  FIRS

    Laws, processes for payment of taxes, by FIRS

    The following list shows the tax kinds of collectible by the Federal Internal Revenue Taxes (FIRS), addresses the enabling legislation, the taxpayer, how and where to pay the tax.

     

    Companies Income Tax (CIT)

     

    Applicable tax law for persons subject to the Companies Income Tax (CIT):

    • All companies incorporated in Nigeria with the exception of companies engaged in petroleum operations.

    • All non-resident (foreign) companies that earn or derive income from Nigeria.

    • All organisations limited by guarantee (institutions of public character or charitable organisations) engaged in profit making activities other than the promotion of their primary objects.

    • The liquidator, receiver, or agent of liquidator or receiver of any taxable company or organisation.

     

    Where to pay CIT

     

    Companies incorporated in Nigeria and organisations limited by guarantee pay Companies Income Tax through any of the designated banks. Once payment has been captured by the bank collecting system, an e-ticket is issued is issued the company, this e-ticket is proof of payment and when presented at the Integrated Tax Office with jurisdiction an e-receipt will be issued.

    Non-resident companies make payment through remittance of tax deducted at source to the designated banks.

     

    How to pay CIT

     

    • Resident companies and organisations prepare and submit annual self-assessment tax returns as specified by FIRS accompanied by the evidence of the payment of the full amount or first installment of the tax due. Payment is made to designated banks

    • Non-resident companies are subject to Withholding Tax (WHT) deductions on the income they earn from Nigeria. This becomes their tax upon filing returns.

    Petroleum Profits Tax (PPT)

     

    Applicable tax law for persons subject to the Petroleum Profits Tax (PPT):

    • Companies engaged in petroleum exploration and production operations in Nigeria (up-stream operations)

    • A person resident in Nigeria, employed in the management of the petroleum operations carried on by a non-resident company

    • The liquidator, receiver, or agent of liquidator or receiver of any company carrying on petroleum operations in Nigeria.

     

    Where to pay PPT

     

    Companies carrying on petroleum operations in Nigeria make offshore payments to JP Morgan Chase Bank, the bank then advises the Central Bank of Nigeria to enable the bank credit FIRS accordingly.

     

    How to pay PPT

     

    Every company engaged in petroleum operations prepares and submits yearly returns as specified by the Petroleum Profits Tax Act within five months of the end of each assessment year. Payment is in two segments beginning with filing of estimated annual return not later than ending of February of each year. Payment for the tax due is then made in twelve monthly installments beginning from March of each year. Where the actual tax liability arising from the annual tax returns exceeds the cumulative estimated tax, a 13th month installment is payable and where the contrary is the case, a refund is due.

     

    Value Added Tax (VAT)

     

    Applicable tax law for persons subject to the Value Added Tax (VAT):

    Any individual, corporation sole, group, body corporate or organisation that consumes buys, procures or imports taxable goods or services is liable to pay the tax. How to pay the VAT.

    • During direct sales or open market transactions, the buyer or consumer shall pay the tax to the seller together with the cost of the goods or services bought. The seller then nets off the VAT paid at the time of purchase of the stocks sold from the VAT collected on the stocks sold and credit the balance to FIRS.

    • Where the goods or services were supplied to a Ministry, Department or Agency (MDA) or a company engaged in oil operations, the VAT payable by the MDA or oil company is deducted or withheld at source (at the point of payment). It is then credited directly to FIRS on behalf of the supplier

    • VAT payments are made monthly not later than 21days of every subsequent month. Tax payers prepare and submit monthly VAT returns accompanied by evidence of payment of the tax due at designated banks.

    Where to pay the Value Added Tax

     

    VAT remittances may be made at any designated bank, an e-ticket is immediately issued as evidence of payment. This e-ticket may be presented at the ITO and an e-receipt will be issued the taxpayer.

     

    Personal Income Tax (PIT)

    Applicable tax law for Personal Income Tax Act (PITA):

    • Persons subject to the Personal Income Tax Individuals resident in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.

    • Families, communities, trustees and estates resident in the Federal Capital Territory.

    • Persons employed in the Nigerian Army, Nigerian Navy, Nigerian Air Force and Nigeria Police other than in civilian capacity.

    • A person resident outside Nigeria who derives income or profit from Nigeria.

    • Officers of the Nigerian foreign service.

     

    Where to pay PIT

     

    • Persons employed in the Nigerian Army, Nigerian Navy, Nigerian Air Force and Nigeria Police, other than in civilian capacity, pay income tax at the designated banks

    • Individuals and enterprises in FCT pay at the designated banks obtain an e-ticket and may request an e-receipt at the Individual and Enterprise Tax Office, Abuja.

    • Organisations, companies and MDAs pay at designated banks, obtain their e-tickets and may request for the e-receipts at the Large Tax Office (LTO), Abuja.

     

    How to pay PIT

     

    • Persons on paid employment pay their personal income tax through the Pay As You Earn (PAYE) system. Under the system, employers deduct the prescribed tax from workers’ salaries and pay directly to the FIRS through the designated banks on behalf of the employees on a monthly basis

    Any individual, corporation sole, group, body corporate or organisation self-employed individuals and enterprises prepare and submit annual self-assessment tax returns as specified by FIRS accompanied with evidence of payment of the full amount or first installment of the tax due. All payments are made at the designated banks.

     

    Withholding Tax (WHT)

    Applicable tax law

    Withholding Tax (WHT) is not a distinct tax type and therefore has no legislation of its own. It is only a mechanism for the collection of other taxes. Consequently, its application is provided for in the enabling law of other tax types i.e. Section 81 of Company Income Tax Act, Section 54 of Petroleum Profit Tax Act, Section 73 of Personal Income Tax Act and Section 13 of Value Added Tax (VAT) Act.

     

    Persons subject to the Withholding Tax (WHT)

     

    Persons subject to the various tax types may be subject to Withholding Tax deductions for the purpose of offsetting their tax liabilities. WHT deductions are regarded as advance payments (or payments on account) of the relevant tax liability that will arise from the tax returns of the period concerned.

     

    Where to pay the WHT:

     

    Where the person benefiting from the payment and the income are taxable, Withholding Tax (WHT) is paid (deducted) at the point of making payment. It is withheld by the payee and the net amount is then paid to the beneficiary through the designated bank(s).

     

    How to pay WHT

    The amount deducted at the point of payment is remitted directly to FIRS through a designated bank in a prescribed format in the name of the person subject to the deduction.

     

    Education Tax (EDT)

    Applicable tax law for persons subject to the Education Tax

     

    All companies liable to Companies Income Tax are also liable to Education Tax. In other words, all companies registered or resident in Nigeria are liable to pay Education Tax.

     

    Where to pay the Education Tax:

     

    Education Tax is paid at the point of payment of Companies Income Tax or Petroleum Profits Tax.

     

    How to pay Education Tax

    As part of the annual Companies Income Tax self-assessment returns, taxable persons also compute and submit their Education Tax liabilities and make payment at the designated bank.

     

    Stamp Duties (STD)

     

    Applicable tax laws for persons subject to Stamp Duties

    The items and persons subject to stamp duties are instruments (written documents) relating to matters executed between a company and an individual, group or body of individuals. Instruments which may be subject to stamp duties include financial instruments/transactions, company memorandums and articles of association, statements of share capital ownership, bonds, conveyances on sale, depositions, lease agreements, mortgage bonds, debentures, etc.

     

    Where to pay Stamp Duties

     

    Stamp duties on eligible instruments can be paid through designated banks.

     

    How to pay Stamp Duties

     

    Companies and persons issuing or dealing with all chargeable instruments shall submit such instruments to the Stamp Duties Office for stamping. The Commissioner of Stamp Duties shall then assess the instruments submitted in line with the provisions of the Stamp Duties Act and specify the duties payable. The duties are then paid to FIRS at the designated bank.

     

    Capital Gains Tax (CGT)

     

    Applicable tax laws to persons and properties subject to  Capital Gains Tax (CGT)

    All companies incorporated in Nigeria which earns any capital gains or gains on the disposal of all forms of assets. All forms of property (whether situated in Nigeria or not) that are liable to capital gains tax include:

    • Options, debts and incorporeal property generally;

    • Any currency other than Nigerian currency; and

    • Any form of property created by the person disposing of it, or otherwise coming to be owned without being created

     

    Where to pay CGT

     

    Capital Gains Tax is paid at the designated at which the company making the chargeable capital gain pays its Companies Income Tax.

     

    How to pay CGT

     

    In line with the provisions of the Capital Gains Tax Act and the self-assessment regulations presently in operation, a company shall compute the gains on the disposal of all forms of assets in each year of assessment and submit same together with its Companies Income Tax returns. The returns shall also be accompanied by evidence of the payment of the full amount or first installment of the tax due. Payment is made to the designated bank.

     

    National Information Technology Development Fund (NITDF) levy

    National Information Technology Development Agency Act, 2007 for persons subject to NITDF levy

    Companies and enterprises with an annual turnover of N100 million and above operating as:

    • GSM Service Providers or telecommunications companies:

    • Cyber companies and internet providers;

    • Pensions managers and pension related companies;

    • Banks and other financial institutions;

    • Insurance companies.

     

    Where to pay NITDF levy

    The levy is paid through the designated bank at which the chargeable companies pay their Companies Income Tax

     

    How to pay NITDF Levy

    As part of its Companies Income Tax returns, a company shall compute one per cent of the profit before tax of each year of assessment. The tax due shall then be paid to FIRS through the designated bank.