The Nation Newspaper

Category: Yomi Odunuga

  • This-And-That Nigeria Unlimited

    This-And-That Nigeria Unlimited

    Every week in Nigeria brings its own unique dose of drama, oscillating between the good, the bad, and the ugly. For content creators, especially those profiting millions from social media, the supply of material seem endless. As long as they keep an eye on the latest happenings in the country, inspiration flows in abundance. There’s never a shortage of events to fuel creativity — though, it must be noted, this often stems from the misfortunes of others. Whether it’s the bustling motor parks, the busy markets, the state houses, or the National Assembly; from the Presidency to the judiciary, and from the daily grind on the streets to the familiar scenes in our homes — Nigeria is constantly bursting with moments that are as unbelievable as they are confounding, all against the backdrop of a struggling economy.

    Yet, Nigerians have mastered the art of resilience. No matter the hardship, the people carry on, often with a surprising sense of equanimity. While many in other parts of the world would lose their composure in the face of such events, the average Nigerian tends to brush it off – moving on to the next day or issue, showing a rare ability to remain unshaken, unless pushed to the edge. Only then does the Nigerian steel truly show itself — when they are provoked beyond measure. Until that point, they seem calm, unruffled, and unfazed.

    Speaking of dramatic moments, one particularly memorable event unfolded in Edo State on Tuesday when Governor Monday Okpebholo presented the Edo State 2025 Appropriation Bill to the House of Assembly. In what seemed like a scene straight out of a political comedy, the governor struggled to read the budget figures in the bill, stumbling and stuttering until it became clear that he was on the verge of embarrassment. Eventually, after a few awkward moments, he declared that the figures were confusing, promising to try again. He did, eventually managing to read them out, but not before giving political opponents plenty of fodder to roast him on the social media. For a man who had been criticised for his refusal to engage with the media in the months leading up to the election, his performance that day didn’t come as a surprise.

    What was more baffling, however, was how his aides allowed such an avoidable fiasco to unfold. Despite all the political manoeuvring, it remains hard to understand why the figures weren’t written out in words, given the governor’s well-known limitations and the serious implications of such an embarrassing display for the credibility of the new government. What followed was even more perplexing: Jarrett Tenebe, the Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Edo State, attempted to justify Okpebholo’s blunder with some outlandish explanations. First, he claimed the governor shared a trait with former South African President Jacob Zuma, who allegedly struggled with reading figures due to a health condition. Then, Tenebe added that only corrupt politicians, like the former Edo governor and Okpebholo’s opponent in the election, the respected Azue Ighodalo, could confidently read out such large numbers without flinching. To cap it all off, Tenebe made a rather shocking remark, telling anyone dissatisfied with the governor’s performance to “go to hell and burn to ashes.” Really?

    Now, don’t ask me if there will be any consequences for this kind of unrefined behaviour, because we all know the answer: none. In fact, it’s entirely possible that many Nigerians will dismiss the episode as just another source of comic relief. It wouldn’t be surprising if party loyalists and hangers-on were already flocking to the Edo State Government House to commend Okpebholo for his “brilliant” performance in presenting the 2025 Appropriation Bill, alongside congratulating Tenebe for his spirited defense of the governor. That, in essence, is how things operate here. Another drama is bound to unfold soon, and we’ll all move on, as usual.

    Amidst all this, who’s asking the important questions? Like, how can a man who struggles to read out figures running into billions of naira be expected to handle the manipulations of the contractors and officials who will undoubtedly try to pull the wool over his eyes? For Tenebe and those who rushed to crown Okpebholo the “best-performing governor” only weeks into his tenure, I suppose it’s enough to know that Okpebholo isn’t corrupt (what a tendentious excuse)— so the fact that he can’t handle large numbers is somehow acceptable. That’s the verdict from his fawning supporters. The same verdict that was given when former Governor Yahaya Bello was ruining Kogi State for eight arduous years of blind larceny. Naija!!!

    Speaking of comical drama, Edo people should brace themselves for much more in the coming years. For instance, less than 24 hours after the budget presentation fiasco, Okpebholo was back at the National Assembly for his valedictory sitting, marking the official end of his term as a Senator. During this event, his political godfather and campaign spokesperson, Senator Adams Oshiomhole, took the opportunity to lavish praise on Okpebholo, describing him as humble, diligent, committed, and intelligent. Oshiomhole even went so far as to predict that Okpebholo, who he claimed had already “distinguished himself” as the best thing to happen to Edo since the creation of the state, would make a grand return to the Senate after his eight-year tenure as governor. This from a man who, during his time in the Senate, never sponsored a bill or made a noteworthy contribution in plenary. But does any of this matter? After all, in Nigeria, no one expects a father, especially one whose biological son was the first to be appointed as commissioner in the new administration, to speak ill of a political son he helped into power. Isn’t it the unwritten rule too that you don’t bite the hand that feeds you? So, let’s all congratulate the Edo people for being blessed with such a “humble” and “intelligent” leader, whose only real challenge is reading out numbers with too many zeros. In the end, perhaps the important thing is that the jobs get done — and if the figures need to be adjusted later, so be it. Naija!!!

    In other news, on Wednesday, Nigeria once again experienced a national grid failure, the 12th this year. As usual, most Nigerians barely batted an eyelash. The power sector’s decades-long failure has become so routine that people are more resigned to it than outraged. Even when there’s no total blackout, the power companies have mastered the art of generating “megawatts of darkness.” Worse still, their attempts to rationalise the blackouts by creating arbitrary bands of darkness only leave the public more confused. If a country suffers an average of one major power failure per month, isn’t it time to declare a national emergency in the sector, especially given the growing insecurity across the nation? Of course, in Nigeria, where leadership often prioritises personal interests over the general well-being of the people, the failure of the power sector is just another “baraku” — one of those quirks that make us different. We laugh off our own incompetence and move on. As usual, the Minister of Power will come out with the same tired excuses and indolent phrases, promising that “everything has been put in place” to prevent further grid collapse. But hasn’t this been the story since the days of the Electricity Corporation of Nigeria, which became NEPA, then PHCN, and now… who knows what? Naija!!!

    Read Also: Tax reform: Tinubu is bold, courageous leader Nigeria needs – Dogara

    And in yet another spectacle, this week saw an uproar over comments made by Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Conservative Party in the United Kingdom, regarding her preference for talking about her experiences in the UK rather than her birthplace, Nigeria. Nigerians were understandably offended by her remarks, especially since she had benefited from the privileges of being Nigerian, despite her disparaging comments. Similarly, Davido, the famous Afrobeat icon, equally faced a backlash for slamming Nigeria during a podcast interview with an American celebrity some weeks back. Many feel that both of them, having enjoyed some measure of success as Nigerian-born international figures, should not have so readily painted their country in such a negative light. I wholeheartedly agree with the Vice President, Kashim Shettima, who criticised Kemi for reducing her country of origin to a mere political prop in her quest for power in the UK. Shettima rightly pointed out that figures like Rishi Sunak, despite the challenges in his native India, have never publicly denigrated their homeland in pursuit of political gain. Unfortunately, wise words do not always benefit the person they are directly meant for. You are free to interpret this in anyway you wish. But that’s the truth.

    That said, it is also necessary for Nigerians to take a long, hard look in the mirror and reflect on whether Kemi’s criticisms are rooted in truth or merely the result of her own disillusionment. Kemi spoke of Nigeria as a land of broken dreams, of politicians lining their pockets, and of a system that stifles progress. She claimed she came to Britain seeking the freedom to be herself, away from a country plagued by corruption and poverty. While it is clear that her words have struck a nerve with many, perhaps it’s time for Nigerians to ask: Is there any truth to what she says, or is it just another case of someone airing their personal grievances?

    My take in all this is simple: There is a Yoruba proverb that says: “Ká pa’ nu po le kolokolo lo na ki a to wa fi abọ fún adie.” This proverb is germane to the discourse. Literally, it means “let’s come together to pursue the fox first before reverting back to the wandering hen.” Yes, it is difficult to chew what Kemi spewed about the country just like no one would like seeing a fox chasing their chickens for a meal. But, having chastised her for running her mouth like a bird with a broken beak, can we now sieve the truth from her rant? Can the elite class begin a process of purging themselves of this attitude of putting self above the collective and doing everything within their power to sabotage the will and expectations of the people? Can these foxes of doom allow the hens to breathe and blossom without any of those encumbrances of raw display of power and irritable greed? When will the deceit stop and when will Nigeria stop foisting round pegs on square holes? When will this narrative of gloom change so that the likes of Kemi would have no reason but to sing the praises of a country they have erroneously concluded was incapable of freeing itself from a harvest of self-inflicted maladies? When? Naija!!!

  • Nigeria’s tax reform: To be or not to be?

    Nigeria’s tax reform: To be or not to be?

    Nigeria, a nation deeply embedded in both promise and paradox, finds itself at a critical juncture in its developmental trajectory. From the moment it gained independence, the country’s political and economic landscape has been marred by struggles for power, which often obscure the path to meaningful progress. While we often celebrate the strength of our diversity, it is all too evident that this same diversity has been undermined by mutual suspicion and the prioritisation of ethnic, religious, and cultural interests over the collective economic good. These deep divides have hindered our ability to forge a unified vision for national growth, and the current debate over tax reforms under President Bola Tinubu’s administration is the latest battleground for this divisiveness.

    There could not be a clearer example of the politicisation of critical national reforms than the on-going discourse in the National Assembly over the four tax reform bills introduced by the Presidency. While it is expected that such transformative bills would be subject to robust scrutiny, the arguments against them seem to stray far from the core details of the legislation. In some instances, the opposition appears to be manufacturing unrelated reasons to block these reforms, casting doubt on their merit based on unfounded claims and misinformation. Despite efforts by the government to clarify the potential benefits of these reforms, discussions in both the Senate and the House of Representatives have stalled, leaving the nation in suspense.

    It is only through a patient process of reading through that one can genuinely understand the substance of the proposed tax reforms and have good insights into how to personally address misconceptions that vigorously thrive on sentiments. The tax reform bills are not only a response to Nigeria’s perennial fiscal challenges, but they represent a long-overdue restructuring of a system that has failed to adequately generate revenue or attract significant investment. However, this reform has been met with significant opposition, particularly from some Northern governors who claim that the bills, once passed, will disproportionately burden their region, which is already grappling with economic difficulties, including unpaid salaries and stalled development projects.

    At the heart of the opposition lies the misperception that the reforms will lead to an increase in the Value Added Tax (VAT) from 5% to 7.5%. Critics argue that this increase will inevitably raise the cost of goods and services, further squeezing an already struggling population. While such concerns are legitimate in certain contexts, the fears surrounding the reforms seem to be based on exaggerated projections. The proposed VAT hike is not a decision made in isolation, but rather part of a broader strategy to increase the country’s revenue base in order to meet the ever-growing demand for infrastructure and social services.

    Read Also: First Lady donates N50m endowment fund for best graduating FUTO female student

    To be clear, the fear that VAT hikes will lead to higher prices and reduced sales for businesses is largely unfounded. Economic history shows that the relationship between tax rates and price inflation is complex, and businesses, especially larger corporations, are well-equipped to absorb moderate increases in tax liabilities without drastically raising prices. Furthermore, an efficient and equitable tax system that ensures all sectors of the economy contribute their fair share is essential for the country’s long-term fiscal health.

    These notwithstanding, it must be recognised that fears and concerns over innovative measures are sometimes inevitable and it is important for all stakeholders to consider having a robust measure of inclusive dialogue.

    It is undeniable that tax reforms, particularly the expansion of the tax net to include small businesses and individual taxpayers, will raise concerns. Many fear that this will place undue pressure on the most vulnerable members of society and stifle economic activity. The government must address these concerns with sensitivity, offering reassurances that the implementation of the new system will be done gradually, with safeguards to protect small businesses and low-income individuals from excessive burdens.

    The situation is further complicated by the politicisation of the reform process. Instead of focusing on the genuine issues at hand, certain political leaders have introduced extraneous arguments into the debate, some even resorting to religious rhetoric to stir division. The idea that the proposed reforms are aimed at disadvantaging one region over another is entirely without merit. The bills, as proposed, contain no provisions that favour any particular religious or ethnic group. Nonetheless, this misinformation has gained traction, with some advocating for outright rejection of the reforms based on groundless accusations.

    It is crucial that Nigeria’s leadership rises above such petty distractions and refocuses the discussion on the real purpose of the tax reforms: generating the revenue needed to fund critical development initiatives across the country. A fair and balanced tax system is not a tool for punishment, but a means of promoting sustainable growth, job creation, and poverty reduction across all regions.

    The task ahead is to ensure that the tax reform process is both transparent and inclusive. It is important that the government takes the time to consult with all relevant stakeholders—state governments, businesses, and civil society groups—before finalising the legislation. By doing so, the government will not only foster trust but also ensure that the reforms address the genuine concerns of all Nigerians.

    Additionally, it is worth exploring alternatives to the current tax reform proposals. One possible solution would be a more progressive tax system, where higher-income individuals and large corporations are taxed at a higher rate. This approach could help address concerns about fairness, while also increasing the revenue available to fund social programmes and public services. Tax incentives for businesses that invest in critical sectors, such as agriculture and manufacturing, could also be explored as a means of spurring economic growth and job creation.

    The government must also commit to ensuring that tax revenues are used effectively and efficiently. Given the widespread distrust in the country’s financial systems, it is essential that the implementation of the reforms is monitored closely to prevent misuse and corruption. Public education campaigns on the benefits of taxation, as well as programmes to raise awareness of taxpayers’ rights and obligations, should be prioritized.

    Ultimately, the success of the tax reform will depend on the government’s ability to engage with the public, address concerns transparently, and ensure that the reforms are aligned with the country’s long-term development goals. If implemented effectively, the reforms could significantly boost the country’s revenue generation, promote economic growth, and improve the living standards of all Nigerians.

    Critics must genuinely acknowledge that Nigeria’s tax system cannot continue to be a relic of inefficiency and underperformance. The reforms proposed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu are a necessary step toward securing the financial future of the country. However, the debate surrounding the bills must be grounded in facts, not divisive rhetoric or political posturing. By putting aside ethnic, religious, and regional interests, and focusing on the common good, Nigeria has the opportunity to build a tax system that is fair, transparent, and capable of fostering sustainable economic growth for all.

    The road ahead may be challenging, but with broader consultation, thoughtful debate, and a commitment to transparency, these tax reforms could be the catalyst Nigeria needs to secure a prosperous future for generations to come. The stakes are too high for anything less.

    Conclusively, it must be said that the tax reforms being proposed by President Tinubu represent an essential step toward modernising Nigeria’s fiscal policy and ensuring sustainable economic growth. While opposition and concern are natural, it is imperative that the debate remains focused on the facts and not driven by misinformation, sentiments or needless political division. The government must engage stakeholders meaningfully, address concerns transparently, and demonstrate a commitment to fairness and equity in the reform process. By doing so, Nigeria can build a tax system that works for all, promotes growth, reduces poverty, and improves living standards across the country.

  • Who are the beasts beating and killing our daughters, mothers?

    Who are the beasts beating and killing our daughters, mothers?

    In a world where everyone seems preoccupied with the harsh realities of shrinking economies and the struggles for survival, it becomes alarmingly easy to ignore issues that pose a greater threat to our collective humanity. One such issue is the escalating scourge of Gender-Based Violence (GBV). Even more terrifying is the prevalence of femicide, a brutal outcome of unchecked GBV. Tragically, in societies like ours, femicide is often unconsciously normalised, dismissed as an inevitable tragedy in male-dominated relationships. The situation is exacerbated in traditional and religious settings, where grievous crimes against girls and women are cloaked in layers of cultural and religious hypocrisy.

    One cannot help but wonder how some men have arrived at the dangerous assumption that women are inherently created to endure an unending dose of forbearance in a world dominated by male brutality. The truth is stark: it is increasingly difficult to fathom the chauvinistic and masochistic mindset that drives men to kill women with such unrestrained cruelty. This issue transcends momentary fits of anger in crisis situations. It reflects a profound lack of self-control and an entrenched culture of meanness that extinguishes lives without remorse. Daily, we are inundated with stories of how minor domestic disagreements spiral into fatal violence, with women and girls often being the casualties.

    The statistics are sobering. The United Nations and UN Women have repeatedly raised alarm over the escalating numbers, challenging us to confront this menace with urgency. Yet, the figures released as part of the ongoing 16 Days of Activism against Gender-Based Violence paint a grim picture. Nigeria is reported to lose trillions of naira annually to GBV, representing approximately 1.5% of its GDP. The emotional, psychological, and physical toll on survivors is incalculable, and the implications for economic growth are severe. Despite these dire consequences, the societal response remains muted.

    In 2023, the United Nations reported that an estimated 85,000 women and girls were intentionally killed worldwide, with 60%—around 51,000 deaths—occurring at the hands of intimate partners or family members. Africa bears the unenviable distinction of recording the highest rates of such killings. These figures should alarm us all, prompting us to task governments, civil society organizations, and individuals to act decisively. Sima Bahous, Executive Director of UN Women, succinctly articulated the challenge: “Violence against women and girls is not inevitable—it is preventable. We need robust legislation, improved data collection, greater government accountability, a zero-tolerance culture, and increased funding for women’s rights organizations.”

    However, the culture of silence around GBV and femicide in Nigeria remains pervasive, rooted in patriarchy and systemic inequalities. Many victims, trapped in economic dependence or fearing societal stigma, suffer in silence. Cultural and religious norms often reinforce these cycles of abuse, making it harder for women to speak out or escape violent relationships. This silence emboldens perpetrators, creating a vicious cycle of abuse and impunity.

    Unless we want to continue with the brazen pretentiousness that has not taken us this low, we should collectively accept that our inability to speak with one voice and tackle headlong this menace has only empowered the perpetrators of this criminal act. Daily, we read reports of abuses mostly by men who think that, perhaps, it is their calling to deploy their strength against the female folks. The other day somewhere in the South-South we saw how a lawyer publicly battered his wife, inflicting life-threatening injuries on her. Despite the intervention of neighbours bent on ensuring justice for the abused woman, the matter was ‘amicably’ settled with the wife doing everything to protect “the father of her children” from facing the full wrath of the law. On another day in Lagos State, we read about how an enraged husband killed his wife in a domestic scuffle. By the time the agency in charge of prosecuting such cases of violent attacks on spouses stepped in, an intriguing twist was added to the tale. The two families had met and agreed to resolve the matter so that the killer husband can take care of the children left behind by the woman he claimed to love ’till death (totally due to his cruelty) tore them apart.” As I write this, many women, including those still living under the same roof with their abusive husbands, have countless tales that they dare not tell due to several reasons. Millions of these women publicly display scattered laugher while enduring the pain in silence. They die daily. For how long can any society allow this to continue?

    Read Also: Sola Sobowale marks twin daughters’ birthday

    It is not impossible for some men here to accuse those advocating for gender equality and the eradication of SGBV as base scaremongering. But the figures are staggering. For example, it was estimated that Nigeria’s loss to GBV annually runs into trillions of naira representing about 1.5 percent of the annual GDP which constitutes a major clog to national development. That is not all. 42 percent of women are equally said to be financially excluded in Nigeria compared to its male counterpart of 35 percent. When it comes to holding elected positions, women only hold less than 5 percent, the report says. These figures, according to the World Bank Country Director for Nigeria, Mr. Ndiame Diop, are exclusive of the productive hours lost when GBV victims take time off work to attend to injuries inflicted on them by their partners. Are we now making a sense of it all or do we need to throw more insights into why SGBV remains a clear and present danger to the country’s economic growth?

    To reverse this troubling trend, comprehensive institutional and policy reforms are critical. Strengthened laws, robust enforcement mechanisms, and an unbiased judiciary are essential to ensuring that perpetrators face the full weight of justice. Support systems—such as shelters, counseling, and medical care—must be prioritised to empower survivors and provide a pathway to safety. Corruption within the justice system, which often lets abusers off with a mere slap on the wrist, must also be addressed.

    Equally important is a cultural shift. Society must adopt a zero-tolerance stance against violence. Advocacy and public campaigns must challenge the normalisation of abuse, while schools, religious institutions, and the media play their part in reshaping attitudes toward gender equality. Men must also be actively engaged in conversations about their roles in dismantling toxic masculinity and promoting respectful relationships.

    The media, which should be a powerful ally in this fight, must amplify the stories of survivors, highlight the consequences of GBV, and demand accountability from policymakers and institutions. The First Lady of Nigeria, Mrs. Oluremi Tinubu, aptly observed that while progress is being made, countless women and girls, particularly in rural areas, remain trapped in cycles of violence and inequality. This harsh reality demands urgent affirmative action.

    The faster we fix this problem, the better for humanity. The issue of gender equality and women’s right must continue to prick the conscience of all well-meaning individual that cares for a balanced world. Left unchecked, these beasts that beat, maim and kill our women would think the society has given them the licence to unleash terror on our girls and women. Surely, this cannot be the case. No community thrives on such sacrilege and abuse of power. It is imperative to understand the embedded message in Eyom’s statement that, ‘gender-based violence is beyond a man beating his wife. It can reduce a nation’s economic growth. Nigeria will never rise above poverty if GBV is not reduced!” I hope this message strikes a chord in the hearts of policy makers and any other person still pretending that issue gender equality and women’s right don’t really matter. They do. 

    And so, as the world marks the 16 Days of Activism Campaign, let us all resolve to add our voices to the #NoExcuse and #16Days, and to take concrete steps to build a safer world where no woman or girl lives in fear of violence. That was the message issued by the Executive Director of the Centre for Communication and Social Impact, Ms. Babafunke Fagbemi on Monday in Abuja. This is the reality we cannot run away from. Women’s lives matter. Their freedom and dignity are non-negotiable. We must all take concrete steps to build a society where every woman and girl can live free from fear. The time to act is now. Shall we

  • That flurry of good news from Aso Villa

    That flurry of good news from Aso Villa

    The past week has been one of unusual optimism in Nigeria’s political landscape. For once, high-ranking government officials confidently stepped forward, highlighting what they perceive as significant strides made by the administration over the last year and seven months. This wave of positivity, however, came amid the persistent chorus of economic discontent from citizens grappling with daily hardships. It was also a week marked by a fierce war of words between former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and Bayo Onanuga, spokesperson for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Their heated exchanges, laced with sharp retorts and acidic jabs, reflected the escalating tension of Nigeria’s political arena as 2027 looms on the horizon. Well, some people say it is all part of the intriguing politicking that is sure to lead to the next big election in 2027 when, barring last minute changes, Tinubu and Atiku may, once again, enter the political fray for the last throw of the dice at the Presidential seat. Already, the darts are flying and it appears nothing is being spared in a crazy deployment of foul, distasteful and un-statesmanlike language in pushing forth an argument. Since most of the points one was expecting to grasp from the series of pressers were mostly subsumed under the insults and brickbats, I would rather skip this discourse until such a time when both parties are prepared to truly address issues of bread and butter that would better the lives of the people they claim to lead, other than engaging in a contest of who has the highest capacity to demean the other.

    Back to serious matters, it was a week where The Presidency that has been pummelled and with truckloads of criticism found its voice and highlighted what it considered as major achievements that the ordinary eye may have neglected or completely ignored due to the angst over prevailing poverty. Beyond the political drama of elite competition for power and an opposition figure’s very determined bid to finally make good in 2027, attention shifted to the flurry of self-appraisals emanating from Aso Villa. After enduring months of harsh criticism, The Presidency launched a concerted effort to publicise its achievements and at the forefront was Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, the National Security Adviser, who spoke on behalf of the President. Ribadu’s narrative painted a picture of triumph: improved security, an uptick in crude oil production, a sanitisation of the Central Bank of Nigeria, and a growing portfolio of foreign investments. His bold declarations—tinged with sanctimonious flair—spurred both applause and skepticism. While some many saw it as a much-needed morale boost, some viewed it as an elaborate exercise in political spin.

    Read Also; Sokoto: Lamido, Wamakko in supremacy battle

    Ribadu’s rhetoric was unequivocal. According to him, “Nobody ever dares Tinubu and wins.” He celebrated what he termed the “Tinubu gains”—notably the decimation of Boko Haram insurgents and a reinvigorated economic agenda. “Boko Haram is running out,” he declared, adding that crude oil production has climbed to 1.8 million barrels per day, while a revitalised Central Bank is now free from financial malfeasance. He highlighted significant reforms aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s integration into global value chains.

    For many, these proclamations should serve as a beacon of hope. However, the juxtaposition of these triumphs against the daily struggles of ordinary Nigerians invites hard questions.

    The skepticism is understandable. Experience has shown that declarations of victory over insurgents often precede news of fresh attacks. Ribadu’s figures—whether on crude oil production or the Central Bank’s operations—should inspire confidence, but they also demand verification. After all, didn’t we once trust the Central Bank under the previous administration, only to later learn of monumental fraud? Nigerians have grown wary of grandiose claims that fail to translate into tangible improvements in their daily lives. When Ribadu asserts that Nigerians can now move “free of fear,” it sounds true in many places but one wonders if this aligns with the reality faced by those in volatile regions still plagued by banditry, kidnappings, and violent crime.

    Ribadu’s assertion that “nobody dares Tinubu and wins” holds a kernel of truth in the political arena. Tinubu has consistently proven his resilience against formidable opponents. Yet, political victories are no substitute for economic transformation. The growing foreign reserves and $30 billion in new investments are commendable, but the critical question remains: who benefits? Why does economic progress feel so elusive to the average Nigerian?

    I repeat again that Ribadu is right about one thing: Tinubu has won all his political battles. Those who dared him are still licking their wounds. But there are some critical battles that he and indeed, the entire nation needs to win before it is too late: the economy is inflicting an unprecedented poverty on the majority of the people and they are not seeing the much-touted gains as being espoused by Ribadu and others in the government. As things stand today, it is clear that Nigeria’s economic realities – a result of accumulated inactions and wrong-headed actions in generous measures – is daring Tinubu to a fierce, gritty brawl while potent vestiges of long-entrenched insecurity waits on the queue as a clear and present danger. Collectively, the nation’s intelligence and security apparatus have decisively moved forward but in the battle against insecurity, nothing is good enough until total success is guaranteed. These are the battles the President cannot afford to lose and winning them require him to unleash a devastating, brain-resetting TKO on them and not just reeling out figures that some even complain about as being of less impact on their lives.

    As the administration celebrates its successes, it must address the widening gap between its narrative and the lived experiences of its citizens. Poverty, insecurity, and economic uncertainty have grown tap roots over the years and they remain daunting challenges across Nigeria today. Tinubu’s administration cannot afford to lose these battles. It must translate its policies into palpable changes that uplift the masses, not just in rhetoric but in reality. Winning this fight requires consistently bold, decisive action—a knockout punch against the entrenched socio-economic problems holding the country back.

    Will President Tinubu rise to the occasion, or will the drumbeats of blatantly mischievous criticism and long-drawn economic discontent drown out the symphony of “Tinubu gains”? Only time will tell.

  • Now that Trump is president again

    Now that Trump is president again

    The imminent return of Donald Trump to the Oval Office as the 47th President of the United States is a classic case of thunder striking twice; no doubt, it has sent shockwaves far beyond American borders. His triumph over Vice President Kamala Harris in the November 6, 2024, election—a stunning upset that defied most pre-election polls—feels like history repeating itself. Much like in 2016, when the then-political novice Trump vanquished seasoned Democrat Hillary Clinton, this victory once again leaves the world pondering: what does Trump’s presidency mean for global stability and the sanctity of democratic norms?

    This second coming is steeped in controversy and apprehension. His campaign, riddled with incendiary rhetoric and relentless attacks on perceived enemies, struck a chord with over 73 million voters. The electorate, it seems, prioritized immediate, tangible concerns over Trump’s questionable moral compass. In a political landscape increasingly shaped by “stomach infrastructure”—policies that address economic and existential anxieties—the allure of populism eclipsed calls for decency and decorum.

    In 2016, Trump’s shocking ascent to power was met with a mixture of disbelief and dread. At the time, I reflected on the uncanny parallels between his victory and Nigeria’s 2015 election, where Muhammadu Buhari, another populist figure, unseated Goodluck Jonathan against formidable odds. The mood then, as now, was one of profound unease.

    Back then, I wrote:

    “For Trump, the author of the bestseller Think Like a Champion, victory over a formidable opponent like Hillary Clinton validated his mantra: ‘Quitters never win.’ Despite his crude, often demeaning rhetoric, Trump’s populist playbook resonated deeply with a segment of American society disillusioned by the establishment.”

    Trump’s strategy was clear: he courted the disenfranchised, amplifying their grievances and stoking their fears. His supporters—many of whom are white, working-class voters—saw in him a champion who could disrupt the status quo. Their rallying cries of “Lock her up” during the 2016 campaign now seem eerily prophetic of the vendettas he may pursue during this term.

    One cannot examine Trump’s political trajectory without revisiting the dark stain of January 6, 2021. On that day, a mob of his supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol, driven by Trump’s baseless claims of a stolen election. That unprecedented attack on American democracy left an indelible mark, raising questions about the resilience of the nation’s institutions.

    Fast forward to 2024, and those concerns have resurfaced. Trump’s rhetoric on the campaign trail—marked by threats to jail political opponents and dismantle perceived obstacles—signals a leader unrepentant and emboldened. Can the world expect a more restrained Trump in 2025? Or will his presidency further polarise a deeply divided America?

    Read Also: Trump names Susie Wiles as Chief Of Staff

    Trump’s return heralds significant geopolitical ramifications. Foreign policy experts, including Nigeria’s former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Prof. Bolaji Akinyemi, warn of turbulent times ahead and indeed, Europe’s leaders appear to be huddling together with anxiety-driven whispers on what to do and how to do it with the re-emergence of Donald Trump. Within a few hours after Trump was declared President-elect, those that should know have already painted a picture of a troubling scenario. In Nigeria, Prof. Akinyemi said there was nothing to be happy about and that the world should prepare for a tough time in American diplomacy with Trump in the saddle. He said if what he did in his first term in office was anything to go by, we should be prepared for a rude shock because the world would be left worse off in its relations with the USA. Several other persons have expressed the same sentiments, especially about what would happen to Ukraine in its war with Russia; the Israel/Gaza war and the growing tension in the Middle East; the fate of immigrants and undocumented persons in the USA, the issues of race and gender in the scheme of things and the role they played in the eventual emergence of Trump in addition to a plethora of sundry other issues. We cannot forget easily that Trump’s isolationist stance during his first term strained alliances and emboldened adversaries. His withdrawal from multilateral agreements, coupled with erratic diplomatic moves, left the world scrambling to adapt.

    Today, key flashpoints loom on the horizon. There is the Russia/Ukraine conflict going on; with Trump’s lukewarm support for NATO and his chummy disposition towards Vladimir Putin, Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression may face new hurdles. There is also the Israel/Iran tension that has pulled in Iranian proxies across Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen. Trump’s unyielding support for Israel could exacerbate tensions in the already volatile Middle East but there is some strong likelihood too that his tough stance may include a firm, rapid push for all to head to the negotiation table.

    On Trump’s domestic front, his hard-line stance on immigration is expected to resurface, potentially upending the lives of millions of undocumented immigrants. Much to the admiration of Africans whom pro-LGBT advocates in the USA during the Obama/Biden era label as homophobes, Donald Trump has sent out resounding signals about his plans to overturn what has been existing. The issues of race and gender in the scheme of things and the role they played in the eventual emergence of Trump add to a plethora of sundry other issues. It must be noted that these challenges are coming at a time when global leadership demands tact and cooperation. Yet, Trump’s adversarial approach may leave little room for the kind of diplomatic finesse required to navigate such complexities.

    Supporters argue that America’s robust institutions will act as a check on Trump’s power. But history suggests otherwise. During his first term, Trump often circumvented norms, leveraging executive powers in unprecedented ways. His judicial appointments, including to the Supreme Court, may provide him a protective shield against legal challenges, further consolidating his grip on power.

    What makes this presidency particularly concerning is Trump’s apparent vendetta against those who opposed him. His vow to root out “deep state” operatives and pursue political adversaries threatens to undermine the democratic fabric. A Trump unrestrained by reelection concerns could wield power with little regard for precedent or consequence.

    And so, As the world braces for Trump’s inauguration on January 22, 2025, uncertainty reigns. Can Trump’s presidency steer America toward unity and progress, or will it deepen existing fault lines? The stakes are high—not just for the U.S., but for the global community. In the end, as America grapples with its political identity, the world watches, hopeful yet wary, of what the next four years will bring. One thing is certain: the era of Trump 2.0 will be anything but ordinary as everyone looks towards January 20, 2025 when Donald Trump is expected to begin this fresh journey to, as he says, Make America Great Again while damning what the world feels about that!

  • Dear Sir, Honourable ‘Senator’ Mascot Ikwechegh

    Dear Sir, Honourable ‘Senator’ Mascot Ikwechegh

    Today, nearly every active player across the social media landscape of Nigeria is familiar with the name Mascot, which happens to be the middle name of a proud member of the House of Representatives, Mr. Alex Ikwechegh.

    Known more as “Eminem” by his friends for his rap-like fluency in Eminem’s songs, his early passion for music and casual charm once painted him as a man of the people. But since ascending to the House of Representatives, this “pride member” of Nigeria’s legislative elite has become ensnared in controversy, his recent behaviour shocking Nigerians across the board. Mascot’s unfortunate clash with a Bolt driver, Stephen Abuwatseya, who arrived at his Maitama residence to deliver a package on behalf of a client, has left a sour taste, spotlighting the dangers of unchecked power and self-importance.

    Could becoming a local government chairman early and handling all those fat monthly federal statutory allocations fuel pomposity and immodesty? It shouldn’t, even though in most parts of Nigeria, getting into such a position easily translates one’s status from ‘ordinary citizen’ into a ‘big man’ that throngs of poor people queue to see – at least, at the local level.Ikwechegh who hails from Igbere in Bende local government of Abia state was lucky to become Chairman of cosmopolitan Abia North local government council at the age of 28.

    Read Also: My unforgettable battle with traditionalists in Ota, by cleric

    For the “offence” of asking Ikwechegh to collect his  package from the car, the lawmaker resorted to aggression, exposing a troubling entitlement symptomatic of the insulated privilege many Nigerians feel has hollowed out their representatives.

    Mascot’s rage came from an age-old divide: a perception of entitlement that made it inconceivable to him that a “common” Bolt driver would expect a man of his “standing” to leave his posh Victorian gate and meet him. After all, how could a driver challenge a ‘Honourable’ who, by some reports, monthly pockets a sum that far exceeds the take-home pay of most, if not all, Nigerian university Professors? Fuelled by a “Do you know who I am?” mentality, Mascot made sure to “educate” the young man—apparently because N20 million in taxpayer income wasn’t enough for him to feel secure without demanding an attitude of fealty from those less privileged.

    According to records, Mascot was among Nigeria’s youngest elected local government chairmen in Aba North, Abia State. After an impressive yet winding political journey, he earned a seat at the House of Representatives through court rulings in his favour. Sometime in 2020, Ikwechegh was awarded the chieftaincy title of Nkuma Dike Igbo Amaghi by the Eze Ndigbo of Ikeja, Lagos State. Before then, in 2018, he received Ndigbo Times’ Merit Award.

    Yet, despite his degree from the University of Calabar (or perhaps only a WAEC certificate as per the National Assembly records), his recent outburst in the viral video underscores a deep-seated hubris. Wikipedia now captures this moment succinctly: “In October 2024, Ikwechegh was arrested by the Nigerian police for allegedly assaulting a Bolt driver while refusing to pay for a delivery service. He was caught on record threatening to make the man disappear and boasted of his perceived immunity.”

    But if the Wikipedia entry is charitable, Mascot’s behaviour was anything but. His tirade spiralled into the kind of language that evokes gangsters, not gentlemen. Using words that would shock even local councillors, he unleashed threats and insults, calling Abuwatseya “stupid” and “silly” while jeering at his “disrespectful” attitude. The disparity between the ideals of an “Honourable” and Mascot’s behaviour became painfully clear in his brazen words, his callous threats a jarring departure from the public respect and humility Nigerians expect in leaders.

    Their conversation goes as follows: Alex: “Do you know where you are? Do you know who I am? So, you think I will give you my money with the way you have spoken to me?”

    Driver: “I did a job for you, and you have to pay me.”

    Alex: “You will not see a penny from me with this great level of disrespect. You are very stupid. Very, very stupid.” (Then, on the phone) “Madam, who is this foolish boy you sent to my house? I can make him disappear from the whole of Nigeria, and nothing will happen.”

    Driver: “You have been insulting me, and I have been quiet.”

    The exchange continued, with Alex asserting his status repeatedly, eventually slapping the driver three times—each one met with the driver’s plea for payment. Mascot Ikwechegh revealed his belief that power and wealth afford him the freedom to act with impunity, his threats of violence against the driver illustrating a chilling disregard for dignity and fairness.

    The fact that Ikwechegh issued a public apology shows that he is at least aware of public opinion. Yet, his apology is undermined by his subsequent court plea of “not guilty,” indicating that he may not be as remorseful as his statement suggested. Indeed, his claim of a journey toward self-discovery and anger management seems hollow when contrasted with his plea and the court’s proceedings.

    As is so often the case, such spectacles may soon fade from the collective consciousness. The police, who appear to have initially shown bias, may yet be influenced to dismiss the issue altogether. The same police, whose head was rubbished in the video and whose men had already set up Abuwatseya for the kill before the video evidence changed the narrative, would likely still connive with Mascot to walk away as a free citizen. It is not impossible for them to conclude that his threat to make a human being disappear without consequences would be brushed off as a statement made in anger.

    But before Nigerians shift their focus, it is worth reflecting on the symbolism of this episode. Mascot’s claim of “seeking professional counselling” and his supposed commitment to “promoting respect, empathy, and understanding” will remain mere words until he shows he is willing to mend his ways. His apology and the ensuing court plea speak volumes, yet whether he has truly embarked on a path of “healing and growth” remains to be seen.

    Whatever happens, it is important for one to remind Mascot of the imperative of taking seriously the content of his letter of apology wherein he noted that: “I am seeking professional counseling to ensure that such behaviour never happens again. Additionally, I will be engaging in community service initiatives focused on promoting respect, empathy and understanding”.  With what happened on Wednesday at the court in which a seeming show of remorse to cooperate with the police ended with hard copies of the malignant residues of that air of arrogance and infallibility, Mascot sure needs our prayers on his “journey to healing and growth”. He truly needs to grow up and take responsibility of his actions as every honourable member of the society ought to!

    In the end, Mascot Ikwechegh’s behaviour exemplifies a sad truth in Nigerian politics: the title of “Honourable” is often just that—a mere title that is often alien to the substance of its true meaning. It speaks to neither character nor capability, only as a political station. Nigeria would do well to demand more of its representatives, to ensure they embody the principles of humility, empathy, and accountability they so often preach but rarely practice.

  • EFCC: To be or not to be?

    EFCC: To be or not to be?

    It is unsurprising to those familiar with the intricate, cutthroat dynamics of Nigerian politics that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is currently at the centre of discussions in Nigeria’s ongoing fight against pervasive corruption. For as long as I can remember, successive administrations have paid lip service to this fight, a commitment that could, quite absurdly, rank as the highest in the world. Throughout my adult life, no regime—whether military, civilian, or interim—was considered complete without outlining its mandate to wrestle corruption into submission. Yet, ironically, with each passing government, corruption continues to grow monstrously as top officials outmaneuver one another in this blind plunder of public wealth. It reached the point where one leader, in a moment of dark humour, remarked that there must be something special about Nigeria to survive such continuous looting without going financially comatose.

    Described as a silent killer of national growth and development, it is astonishing that the country remains standing despite the ongoing assault on the national treasury by pretentious political and financial bandits across both national and sub-national sectors. Rather than focusing on the collective good, key players seem determined to amass as much illicit wealth as possible, to the detriment of the nation. This unchecked greed has stunted economic growth and further impoverished the people. Today, Nigeria is not just seen as a poor country but one suffering from multidimensional poverty—a tragedy that defies logic in a nation blessed with abundant resources, continually squandered by a gang of avaricious leaders.

    Given this background, it is easy to understand why certain powerful forces within the system are now moving to weaken institutions like the EFCC, which, along with the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC), has made spirited attempts to bring these corrupt elements to justice. Isn’t it ironic that those pushing to emasculate the EFCC are themselves under investigation by the agency for corruptly enriching themselves or their cronies? Cloaked in legal arguments, the suit challenging the constitutionality of the EFCC’s existence claims to avoid a constitutional crisis, as many of these agencies, they said, were established through convention rather than legislation. The proponents argue that these bodies should not operate at the state level, suggesting that state governments should not be subject to federal oversight or control. The underlying message is clear: state governors and their agencies should be free from EFCC scrutiny. Wow!!!

    Of course, there is a limit to how one can interrogate this matter as it has reached an advanced stage at the court  This is a challenging issue, especially as the Supreme Court has reserved judgment on the matter. When the time comes, we will dive deeper into the hidden motives behind this argument.

    For now, the question arises: who is afraid of the EFCC? Certainly not someone like the former governor of Kano State, Senator Ibrahim Shekarau, who, while advocating reforms in how the EFCC operates, remains a staunch supporter of its existence. Why mention Shekarau? Because in a recent interview on Channels Television, he laid bare his thoughts on the matter. It is always heartening to hear people like Shekarau and former Cross River State Governor Donald Duke speak on issues with the calm and reasoned perspective of true statesmen. Having fully participated in the political system, they stand as rare exceptions—leaders who left office without being pursued by law enforcement agencies over allegations of mismanagement. Personally, as a consistent critic of the EFCC, I align with Shekarau’s argument that there is no need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Although not a lawyer, Shekarau questioned the wisdom of asking the court to disband an agency established by an Act of Parliament, especially when the ulterior motive seems to be to shield those benefitting from the system’s dysfunction from accountability.

    Read Also: Jigawa backs out of States’ suit against EFCC, ICPC

    While acknowledging that the EFCC has, at times, opened itself to criticism—particularly regarding its heavy-handed approach to apprehending suspects—Shekarau argued that the agency should be supported to reform and adopt best practices, given that it has achieved more positives than negatives in the fight against corruption.

    As I have often argued in this column, it is no surprise that those caught red-handed in the looting of our national wealth would call for the disbandment of an agency like the EFCC. This is, unfortunately, typical of our system. In the past, there have even been suggestions that states should establish their own anti-corruption bodies rather than allowing the federal government to empower the EFCC to extend its reach across the states. Critics claim this contravenes the spirit of federalism. I find this argument laughable. States cannot have their cake and eat it too. There is such a thing as responsibility—not just to the citizens of those states but to the Nigerian nation as a whole, represented by the federal government. Isn’t it absurd that the same state officials who go cap in hand to the Federal Capital Territory each month to receive financial allocations are leading the charge to weaken the EFCC’s powers, demanding unchecked freedom to manage these funds however they see fit? Haven’t we always known that even in Freetown, nothing is free? The EFCC is not asking for anything unreasonable—just probity and accountability as enshrined in its founding law. Why should this generate so much resistance, with over 16 state attorneys-general now in court challenging the agency’s constitutionality?

    The larger question is: who benefits if the EFCC’s powers are curtailed? In a country where recovered billions have been re-looted in the past, does it make sense to leave such transactions in the hands of powerful state executives without the oversight of the EFCC? This is a recipe for disaster in a country already rife with financial malfeasance. Some argue that the EFCC’s current legal battles indicate it is doing something right. I tend to agree, especially when the Kogi State government has shown a particular interest in how the case plays out at the Supreme Court. Even if other states drop out, Kogi seems determined to see this matter through to the end. Why? Because the Yahaya Bello fraud case, in my opinion, is closely tied to this legal wrangling. But I digress. If the EFCC hadn’t treated the ex-governor with kid gloves, we might not be here, fighting to save the agency from itself.

    Beyond occasional shows of raw power, it is fair to say that for many, the fear of the EFCC has been the beginning of wisdom. At least it cannot be said that Yahaya Bello is being targeted because of some personal vendetta. Former Kwara State Governor Abdulfatah Ahmed and his Taraba State counterpart, Darius Ishaku, wouldn’t be defending themselves if the EFCC had nothing against them. While they have faced interrogations and charges, Bello, with money laundering cases amounting to nearly N190 billion, continues to run from one court to another, seeking to block the EFCC from disrupting his peace of mind. What kind of delusional thinking is that? The Bible, in Genesis 4:7, says, “If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not, sin is crouching at your door.” The Yoruba interpretation of this verse is even more poignant: ‘Bi iwo ba se rere, ara ki yio ha ya o?’ Those desperate to dismantle the EFCC wouldn’t be so eager if they had truly conducted themselves well or planned to be transparent in office. It’s even laughable that some state attorneys-general didn’t seek approval from their governors before rushing to court to join the suit. More ridiculous still is the argument from Nasarawa State’s counsel that the EFCC’s cash withdrawal limits would prevent the governor from distributing funds directly to vulnerable citizens. What logic! In this age, surely it is more transparent to disburse funds through bank transfers, ensuring accountability.

    No matter how we examine the situation, the EFCC has secured significant victories while also bungling cases that could have enhanced its standing with critics. According to records available on its website, the agency is making strides that give hope for the future. Under Ola Olukoyede’s leadership, the EFCC has secured 3,455 convictions over the last year and recovered over N248 billion in naira, alongside substantial amounts in foreign currencies.

    And that’s not all. The EFCC has also handed over $180,300 and 53 vehicles to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, assets recovered for Canadian victims of Nigerian fraudsters. Similarly, on September 20, 2024, the EFCC returned €5,100 to the Spanish police, proceeds of a romance fraud recovered from a Nigerian scammer for a Spanish victim.

    If an agency is making such headway, even beyond Nigeria’s borders, shouldn’t we encourage it to address its shortcomings rather than scrapping it entirely or reducing it to a toothless watchdog? Without the EFCC, would we even know how our leaders abuse the privileges of their offices for personal gain?

    Those interested in the full list of names subjected to the EFCC’s scrutiny should visit the agency’s website for a humbling experience. Nigeria has come too far down the road of corruption to expect rapid change. Weakening the EFCC will only embolden the financial predators within the system, enabling them to inflict more pain on the nation’s collective well-being. Is that what we want? Should we throw out the baby with the bathwater? Certainly not! Given that the agency’s successes far outweigh its flaws, the sensible approach is to demand internal reforms that will strengthen it, making it an even more formidable foe against the enemies of Nigeria’s economic and financial progress. After all, hasn’t the EFCC undergone several reforms since its establishment during President Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration? Further reform can only help. On this one, these financial bandits cannot and should not have their way!!! Never!!!

  • This upward swinging economy and the rest of us

    This upward swinging economy and the rest of us

    If you ask a Nigerian government official to explain the state of the Nigerian economy in the simplest terms, you’re likely to hear that everything is on track and that Nigeria will soon emerge from the self-inflicted struggles it has faced since gaining independence from the British colonialists 64 years ago. Yet, the irony is that, during these 64 years, many other Third World nations that started their journey long after Nigeria’s graceless descent into economic hardship have surpassed all expectations, while Nigeria remains stuck in the dark, gasping for survival and uncertain about its future.

    This situation would be somewhat understandable if Nigeria had not been blessed with abundant human, material, and natural resources stretching from the North to the South and East. With an impressive array of educated and technically skilled individuals who excel globally, Nigeria should be thriving. Instead, it remains an abused, impoverished, and drained nation—a painful reminder of what could have been if its leadership had not become its greatest burden. Yes, that judgment may sound harsh, but it’s our reality as we continue to search for answers to the poverty that has seized the people by the throat. Despite this grim reality, Nigerians have somehow mastered the art of smiling through a labyrinth of suffering. It’s one of the world’s unexplainable wonders—the Nigeria we dream of, and the Nigeria that confronts us every day.

    In recent months, it’s been unsurprising to see top government officials aggressively countering public concerns about the economy’s persistent decline and its impact on millions of citizens who struggle daily to make ends meet. Many of those raising concerns believe that two key policy decisions by the current administration—the removal of fuel subsidies and the floating of the naira—are responsible for the fatal blow dealt to an economy that was already on life support years before May 29, 2023. To be frank, former President Muhammadu Buhari handed over a deeply troubled economy to Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, burdened with significant debt. In fact, Buhari lacked the political will to tell the nation that he had effectively ended the fuel subsidy regime with his departure, as no budgetary provision was made for it beyond May 29, 2023. This left Tinubu with the unenviable task of navigating the consequences. Today, more than a year later, the shockwaves from the subsidy removal continue to affect Nigerians, many of whom are victims of the economic fallout.

    Read Also; Manchester United the only problem in my life – Adekunle Gold

    With inflation skyrocketing and food prices soaring in the days following the subsidy removal, policymakers faced the daunting challenge of justifying the necessity of the decision while finding strategies to alleviate the inevitable suffering it would cause. Government officials, while asking for patience, began touting the “huge gains” of these “painful but necessary” reforms. They argued that the aim was not only to revitalize the economy and ensure security but also to eliminate the petrol subsidy, unify foreign exchange markets, and alleviate inflation’s impact on vulnerable populations through temporary cash transfers to 15 million households. When hunger and poverty became too glaring to ignore, the government had to distribute grains and other palliatives. However, it remains unclear if these palliatives actually reached the vulnerable people they were intended for, given the peculiar way things are done here.

    While these measures, with impressive statistics, seemed promising, they ultimately offered little relief. By February 2024, inflation had soared to a 24-year high of 31.7%, with growth rates plummeting and GDP per capita stagnating compared to 2015-2022 levels. Reports indicate that poverty reached 38.9% in 2023, with 87 million Nigerians living below the poverty line. It was so bad that an economist remarked, “Hunger is now a family member of many Nigerian households.” Though some might dismiss this as an exaggeration, those who feel the pinch know just how real it is. The middle class, if it still exists, has been stretched to its limit, while the poor are left to deal with fluctuating petrol prices and a naira that seems locked in a losing battle with the dollar. Despite the eventual complete removal of the petrol subsidy, the anguish remains palpable, even as the government insists the reforms are reshaping the economy.

    So, where’s the disconnect between the government and the people it claims to serve? As they say, the devil is in the details. Economic growth that does not improve people’s lives cannot be considered true progress. For the government to genuinely claim success, the benefits of its policies must be felt in everyday life. When the Finance Minister said earlier this week that all the government’s actions are aimed at putting the economy on the right track, few would doubt the sincerity of that goal. However, what worries millions of Nigerians is how that translates into having enough food on the table and sufficient money to live well. With a national minimum wage rendered almost worthless by inflation, and rising petrol prices, people are struggling to see how the government’s “consistent strategic planning” has improved their daily lives.

    In fact, market surveys suggest that food prices may skyrocket even further before Christmas. Barely two months to the holidays, a 50kg bag of rice is selling for over N120,000 in some areas, even higher in others. Some families have stopped buying eggs entirely. A recent viral video showed Nigerians in a market scrambling to buy cartons of severed fish heads—a stark illustration of how dire things have become. These small, everyday realities should matter to any government that claims to care about its citizens. The growing gap between the ruling elite’s lifestyle and that of the common people must be bridged. While making tough economic choices may be necessary for Nigeria to emerge as a top player in Africa, why must the poor always bear the brunt? What sacrifices have government officials made that would justify their demand for shared responsibility in this journey toward shaping Nigeria’s future?

    The late British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher once warned that adopting the wrong economic system would naturally stifle wealth creation, especially if the framework fails to empower the people. “Countries are not rich in proportion to their natural resources,” Thatcher said. “If they were, Russia would now be the richest country in the world. Angola would be very rich, and there are many other countries with a lot of natural resources but no enterprise economy to develop them.” She pointed to Japan, Sweden, and Taiwan—countries with little to no natural resources but with systems that enhance the enterprise of their people.

    So, what exactly is the problem with Nigeria’s policymakers and the people who should be the primary beneficiaries of these policies? The contradiction is clear: while the World Bank, government officials, and private sector leaders speak of an “upward swing” in the economy, most Nigerians see only gloom. Ask them if their lives have improved since the reforms, and many will tell you that life has been hellish. That’s their reality, and no amount of impressive statistics can change it. That’s why it’s understandable that when the World Bank’s Senior Vice President, Mr. Indermit Gill, advised Nigerians to persevere for another 10 to 15 years for the reforms to have a meaningful impact, it was met with frustration. After enduring the past 18 months of economic hardship, many wonder why they should continue to suffer while the elite, both at home and abroad, seem to prosper. If Gill knew what they had gone through in the past 18 months, he wouldn’t have rambled about the people enduring more years of economic strangulation by the elite that he described as being the direct beneficiaries a N10 trillion loss “in fuel subsidies and multiple foreign exchange rates.” Why should the burden to persevere fall on the heads of the impoverished majority who have been bearing the brunt of the economic profligacy of the ruling elite and their crooked partners both at home and abroad for many decades?

    Yes, Nigeria has the potential to be an engine of growth in sub-Saharan Africa. But should that progress come at the expense of the blood, sweat, and tears of the impoverished majority? No! On this one, the people deserve to breathe!

  • The Bob that is risky and his entanglements (2)

    The Bob that is risky and his entanglements (2)

    Again, when VDM says that some officers of the all-powerful Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) collected a whopping sum of N15m from Okuneye to enable them drop the charge of money laundering from the gamut of charges to be brought against him at the court, it is not impossible that most of us would doubt the possibility of such “friendly arrangement,” knowing how corruption corrupts the seemingly incorrupt in the system. Unless we want to play the ostrich and close our eyes to the imperfections in the system, we all know that a lot of shady deals go on in the name of fighting corruption and, unfortunately so, some of the agents dip their hands in the corrosive till. That is the reality.

    Despite all the allegations raised by VDM, one would have expected that the institutions implicated—those mentioned in his exposé—would have promptly presented irrefutable evidence to discredit his claims. Surely, Nigerians deserve proof that the whole affair is nothing but baseless gossip, and that VDM was merely on a vindictive mission to tarnish the ‘good image’ of Idris Okuneye, a.k.a. Bobrisky, who, by the way, has filed a N1 billion lawsuit against VDM for defamation. Wonderful! But before the courtroom drama unfolds, Nigerians were treated to a preview of what could be the legal battles to come when the House of Representatives’ Ad Hoc Committee summoned all the key players involved in the controversy to appear before the National Assembly some weeks back.

    During the session, when asked why Okuneye, who was officially recognised as a male by the prison authorities, wasn’t placed in a male prison to serve his sentence, the Deputy Controller of Corrections at Kirikiri made a bizarre claim. He stated that Bobrisky has “distinctly female physical features, like breasts.” However, he conveniently avoided mentioning what was between the legs of the infamous inmate, which seemed to justify Bobrisky’s placement in a special “protective custody.” There, his needs, including food and drinks, were catered to by two of his relatives, Abiola and Moji Okuneye.

    As the Yoruba would say, or more aptly, as King Sunny Ade once sang, “what money cannot do dies with the earth.” A former South-South governor, now a prominent senator, even quipped that “what money cannot do, more money will.” Following the circumstantial evidence trickling out from this saga, it becomes easier to see how the tangled web of lies has been spun to cover up the festering rot beneath. Bobrisky, for his part, denied ever negotiating his way through the prison system, claiming that VDM used artificial intelligence to fabricate the conversation in which his voice was allegedly captured. VDM, on the other hand, insists he obtained the recording from a friend of Bobrisky, angry that the cross-dresser refused to repay the N4 million he had borrowed to help settle the N15 million reportedly demanded by the EFCC to drop money laundering charges. Interestingly, another voice recording has emerged after the initial one released to the public by VDM. We don’t know, for now, if this one is also the craftsmanship of Artificial Intelligence. But, to say the least , it is another damning, evidence of the sacrilege that goes on in high places.

    Other names were dragged into the matter, but those seem tangential, involving people merely doing their jobs. The EFCC, in its defence before the committee, argued that the money laundering charges were dropped because the evidence on hand supported naira abuse charges, not the additional charge related to Bobrisky’s failure to render proper returns for his business, Bob Express. Bilikisu Buhari, the EFCC prosecutor, explained that they acted on a report from the Special Control Unit Against Money Laundering (SCUML), which concluded that Bob Express wasn’t a designated non-financial business subject to certain regulations. Consequently, the EFCC decided to drop charges 5 and 6 in the interest of justice and fairness, without any influence or inducement from the defense. In support of her claims, Buhari submitted the SCUML report.

    As things stand, the matter teeters on a knife-edge, pending the outcome of an internal probe into the EFCC officials implicated in VDM’s bribery allegations. Unless the EFCC wants us to believe its prosecutor has already said everything there is to say, I expect the report, as promised by the EFCC Chairman Mr. Ola Olukoyede, to be made public. As I’ve often said, the EFCC needs to repair its public image and address the widespread perception that its officers are deeply entrenched in corruption. Last week, the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) Chairman, Dr. Musa Aliyu, announced that N13 billion in misappropriated public funds had been recovered in September 2024 alone. Incredible, right? Yet, this is merely the tip of the iceberg. If key officials could resist the lure of corrosive corruption, they might actually transform this nation for the better. It is disgraceful that the EFCC’s credibility has been eroded to the point where insignificant, loudmouthed figures now openly deride it due to the misconduct of a few bad eggs within its fold. Even worse, some of those officers stooped low enough to accept bribes from a character whose very identity remains controversial—even among the same officials who once assured us that the person parading in women’s clothing was indeed a man.

    Read Also: Falana denies speaking with Bobrisky

    As for Bobrisky, or Mr. Okuneye, there’s a lesson to be learned in this saga for anyone who seeks validation by flaunting wealth and influence on social media. The day will surely come when the carefully constructed image comes crashing down. They said he was catching fun? Now, he is catching fire for being loudmouthed and flaunting his stupidity. Would he survive the onslaught? He possibly would. Why, you ask? Well, this is Nigeria, where another celebrity scandal will soon emerge to drown out the uproar surrounding Bobrisky and his dizzying spiral of self-destruction. Given how we glorify the absurd in this country, I wouldn’t be surprised if someone is already considering nominating him for a national honour—perhaps for “surviving” prison and returning in grand style, riding the latest Range Rover with a praise band in tow. What a tragic commentary on our society.

  • The Bob that is risky and his entanglements

    The Bob that is risky and his entanglements

    Today, I find myself in a rather peculiar situation, writing on a topic I never expected to approach—no matter how relevant it might be to our collective mental health. Yet, I’ve come to realise that there’s often something comforting in turning away from the relentless onslaught of national problems to focus on the lighter, more curious aspects of life—providing a cathartic escape. This is precisely how I view the ongoing debate about whether Idris Okuneye, the infamous social media cross-dresser popularly known as Bobrisky, actually served his six-month sentence at the Kirikiri Correctional Facility after his conviction for currency abuse.

    Let’s be honest: in the grand scheme of things, should it really concern Nigerians if a pampered adult ends up in prison for violating the law? Especially one who has chosen a lifestyle that is not only unfamiliar to many but also contrary to what most Africans consider, at best, an aberration. I won’t even delve into how this individual has managed to attract millions of followers on social media and amass a fortune that affords him a life of luxury. These are just some of the puzzling questions that arise when trying to understand the phenomenon known as Bobrisky.

    So, who exactly is Idris Okuneye? From available records, we know that the impeccably dressed “lady” who once rained crisp naira notes while King Wasiu Ayinde Marshall (KWAM 1) performed at a birthday celebration was, in reality, a man dressed as a woman. I vividly recall watching that video with mixed emotions, wondering if my favourite musical icon had crossed a line by seemingly endorsing something that, in my view, should have been unequivocally rejected. I watched Bobrisky gyrating to KWAM 1’s praises, feeling a deep sense of unease. Something dangerous, I thought, was being unleashed on society, though I didn’t fully understand the scope of the threat. Often, it’s the small things we overlook that eventually grow into the monsters that haunt us.

    Read Also: FG recognises outstanding young achievers

    What alarmed me even more was seeing respected Nollywood actors, especially from the Yoruba film industry, joining in the festivities—dancing, spraying money, and celebrating with Bobrisky. I shook my head, realising they were embarking on a dangerous path. To them, it might have seemed like harmless fun, possibly just part of the theatrics of the entertainment world. They may have rationalised that Bobrisky was simply “catching cruise” and living his truth. But therein lies the problem—we rarely ask the tough questions, preferring to sweep them under the rug until they inevitably resurface and demand our attention.

    And now, the Bobrisky saga has come full circle, splattering us all with the fallout. When I say “us,” I mean everyone who stood by and encouraged his rise, when we could have extinguished the flames before they grew into the blaze that now engulfs us. If my memory serves me right, Bobrisky isn’t even Nigeria’s first or most famous cross-dresser—Denrele Edun held that title before him. But somehow, Bobrisky emerged from the shadows, becoming a sensation, acquiring properties in Abuja and Lagos, and surrounding himself with high-powered lawyers. His connections reportedly extended into the corridors of power, which might explain his boldness and apparent sense of invincibility.

    There was even a viral video of Bobrisky donating a substantial sum of money at a Muslim gathering, with the cleric praising his generosity despite his feminine appearance. In another video, Islamic clerics were seen praying for a lavishly dressed Okuneye as he handed out crisp naira notes. It was a disturbing sight. Given his high-profile clientele (don’t ask me what kind of business they engage in), it’s no wonder Bobrisky, like many others in our flawed society, began to see himself as untouchable. Wealth and a bit of fame often breed a dangerous level of confidence, and Bobrisky was no exception.

    And so, the recent controversy surrounding Bobrisky’s six-month jail term has shed light on the deeper issues plaguing Nigeria’s correctional facilities. Many Nigerians feel the sentence was harsh, considering the widespread nature of the offence. However, the real shock came when social media celebrity Martins Otse, aka Very Dark Man, exposed the preferential treatment Bobrisky received during his time at Kirikiri Maximum Prison in Lagos. It appears that Bobrisky enjoyed privileges typically reserved for high-ranking officials and the wealthy, raising concerns about corruption within the nation’s correctional facilities. This revelation has sparked outrage, but unfortunately, it’s not a surprise to many Nigerians who have long been aware of the systemic issues plaguing the country’s institutions. When VDM, in the video he posted on Instagram, said the palms of senior officers in charge of the Kirikiri facility were greased before Bobrisky was whisked to a special accommodation to enjoy his prison holiday, no one would have expected that such generosity would naturally come from the milk of kindness that flows through the veins of the authorities of the prisons. Like we put it in the local parlance, something must happen for something to happen. Again, when VDM says that some officers of the all-powerful Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) collected a whopping sum of N15m from Okuneye to enable them drop the charge of money laundering from the gamut of charges to be brought against him at the court, it is not impossible that most of us would doubt the possibility of such “friendly arrangement,” knowing how corruption corrupts the seemingly incorrupt in the system. Unless we want to play the ostrich and close our eyes to the imperfections in the system, we all know that a lot of shady deals go on in the name of fighting corruption and, unfortunately so, some of the agents dip their hands in the corrosive till. That is the reality.