Leaders, legacies and foresight

The  death of former Soviet leader leader Mikhail Gorbachev  in the midst of the Russian invasion of Ukraine ,  a former Soviet satellite state is a very important news laden with history as well  the need  for   scrutiny  on  the quality of leadership at crucial  moments in the history  of the world .Leaders globally  make decisions that make or mar their reputation and history is always there to judge them and to applaud or  condemn their sense of responsibility and accountability  in the context of the decisions they make or refuse to make .In Nigeria the President while receiving some governors said reportedly that Nigerians will  soon appreciate  him because he will  not interfere or influence any   more  elections till he leaves office .Similarly the MD of NNPC justified  the decision  to award  oil  pipeline  security contracts to private contractors as the right decision because there  was  an open  bid and that  is enough to give oil  pipe lines contracts to warlords who later under arms turn round to declare secession and agitate for self  government against  the government that gave them pipeline  protection contracts .Anyway  the governor of Ondo  state is not impressed  that government is giving huge contracts to private contractors   on  security but is not   prepared to allow the state governors to have state police or the security  wherewithal  to protect their    own citizens who  are being killed in large numbers by  terrorists  , bandits , kidnappers  and armed Fulani  herdsmen .

I  have  highlighted all   these  decisions  to show that leaders at times are  the architects of their own misfortune in the reckoning  of history especially when they  make decisions that are plainly  stupid and unreasonable but insist on getting the job done no matter whose horse is gored . It is my  intention to  highlight such draconian and controversial decisions  today  both  in the present and the past starting  with the death of Gorbachev  the innovator of Glasnost and perestoika   who  nevertheless  presided over the liquidation of the former Soviet Union and its dissolution into its 15  constituent  states .

I believe I  do not exaggerate if  I say  that present Russian leader Vladmir Putin  will  certainly regard  the demise of Gorbachev as  good  riddance to bad rubbish  , which really  is in bad  taste but  is borne out   by  the fact  that ,  all his political  life ,  since becoming Russia’s leader  , Putin  has been trying to  undo  what  Gorbachev  achieved ,  which  is the collapse of the Soviet Union .Putin   since   coming to  power  has squared  up to the west in rejecting a unipolar world dominated by the US and with the weakness of the Obama Administration then over Syria and the use of   chemical  weapons against Syrians by their  government , the invasion of   Crimea in  Ukraine in 2014 and  now the invasion of Ukraine ,   Putin is telling the world that Russia will  have its way and does  not need the patronage or support of the west . Putin  has  a fitting ally in   the Chinese  and they  are teaming up  to  make life difficult  for the west  whose priority  any way is to enforce gay  rights and destroy family  life both of which goals are an abomination to both China and Russia . I  doubt  if Gorbachev  will get a state funeral as he is adored far  more in the west than at home  in Russia .Even  that adulation is a source of fury   and    intense  indignation for Putin as he concentrates on using  oil to deal with the EU nations who stupidly under the leadership of former German Chancellor Angela believed that oil pipelines built in cooperation with Russia will not be used as weapons of war .Which is what has happened now  since the west imposed   economic sanctions on Russia for invading   Ukraine .

Let  us now compare some of the hard headed  decisions that serve no public good at large but which some leaders persist in  executing  just  because they are in power . I do  not agree with the NNPC MD  that it was the right decision to give  oil    pipeline  protection  contracts to  private  companies who  later  use the money to acquire ammunition and rise against the state . It is a suicidal  way for any  government to willingly breed insurgency and rebellion against  itself .There is no sane explanation for that and it cannot be the right decision .Similarly  the Federal  government should do more to help  the states protect their people by allowing them to have state police . It is the wise thing to do and the government should not make non interference in elections its main legacy  when  the issue of insecurity  and the challenge  of forces of insecurity are mammoth and are making security of life and property  the main concerns of millions of Nigerians as they go towards the 2023 presidential and general elections .

I  see this  sort of decisions with dubious motive and intent in some  issues  especially  with the drive for climate change and the destruction of the fossil  fuel  industry  in the EU nations and the US .An  observer  has  noted that collapsing the oil industry  because of climate change will create  poverty in the developed world . This is because they have no oil,  and prices will  rise and people  are preparing to use coal or wood which was something they did ages ago .What  is the use of preparing the world for the future when one cannot exist comfortably  in the present ? Yet  the Biden Administration campaigned on making climate change its priority  and sees rising fuel  prices and the attendant inflation as hardships to be endured on the way to a green energy world  compatible with its campaign for an energy  free world .I cannot  but marvel at  such misguided and economically ruinous policy and legacy .

Similarly  the decision of the FBI   in   the US  to invade the residence of former President Donald Trump  lacked foresight and circumspection and the FBI  should  know better . Given that Trump  was harassed    in    office  with the Russian Collusion hoax  which the FBI started and could  not prove even with the Muller investigation  , the FBI should have evolved other ways of letting the former president know that he is violating the rules on how presidents keep classified documents and put him on notice for further action if he did not play  ball .Now  the Facebook  boss has revealed that it was the same FBI  that dropped the hint to the tech giant that Hunter Biden’s lost and found laptop  could be another Russian misinformation. That  was on the eve of the 2020 US presidential election which Trump believed he would have won if the Hunter Biden laptop  content  was investigated  . The FBI  aborted  the investigation and Biden  won. . It  is quite easy for Trump’s  supporters to conclude that the FBI  is up to its old tricks of finding nothing good in Trump both as  incumbent and   past  president  when  on the eve of his announcing his palns to contest again in2024  the FBI  took the unpredecented decision  to raid the house  of a former president .The FBI should  know it stands on wobbly feet in its investigation since it has established malice and hatred for Trump in his one term in office on the Russian collusion and has since lost credibility on any investigation on the same Trump now bracing up to contest for the [presidency again in 2024 . The FBI  should  learn fast that those  who  live in glass  houses should not only  not throw stones  but must  also acknowledge that   in law  , those who come to equity must come with clean hands. In  raiding Trump’s  house mindlessly the FBI  threw caution  to the winds and left its ratings on  credibility in tatters and its legacy and foresight  at an abysmal , dubious low .  Which  is pathetic  for an  investigative  bureau,  indeed .

More posts