The case involving a Danish citizen, Mr. Peter Nielsen over the alleged murder of his Nigerian wife, Zainab Nielsen an upcoming musician also known as Alizee and her three-year-old daughter, Petra, may have once again put to test the ability of the Nigeria Police to thoroughly investigate such a high profile case.
The sensational trial of Nielsen had continued on February 20 before Justice Mobolanle Okikiolu-Ighile sitting at the High Court of Lagos State, Igbosere.
The trial is being followed by the international media, where prosecution was led by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Lagos State Ministry of Justice, Ms Titilayo Shitta-Bey.
The defence was however, led by Mr. Olasupo Shasore (SAN), a former Attorney General of Lagos State, who challenged the two police witnesses about diligent investigation, particularly in a trial showcasing Nigeria’s justice system to the international audience.
The defence counsels are insisting on proper investigation by the police to unravel what really transpired between the couple on the fateful day and what actually led to the death of Zainab and her daughter.
In the first part of the trial which lasted three days, the court accepted the request made by defence counsel to gain access to the crime scene.
The court also ordered that blood samples of the late Zainab and those of her mother (Ruth Madaki) and her two step sisters (Gift and Favour Madaki) be taken for the purpose of scientific evidence.
During the trial, Nielsen’s former driver informed the court of how he was informed by security personnel from Bella Vista in Banana Island of the death of the late Zainab and her daughter.
The trial is attended every time by the Danish Ambassador and embassy staff with a Danish television crew.
The prosecution called Inspector Babashola Afolayan of Ikoyi division and Prosecution called its eighth (8th) witness, Assistant Superintendent (ASP) Gafar Oderinde.
Even though the state contended that the police conducted a thorough investigation, Mr. Shasore in cross examination was able to bring to the court’s notice the fact that the seasoned Inspector had not -reviewed the CCTV footage from the apartment building; checked the telephones of occupants of the apartment; inspected all the rooms in the apartment or even spoken with the neighbours around the apartment before he came to a conclusion that the defendant was the only suspect.
Mr. Shasore, who is a listed defence counsel with the International Criminal Court at The Hague, Netherlands, and of ALP Legal, the law firm chosen by the Danish, stated that the role of the police is vital and if the police themselves did not conduct their investigation diligently then there could be a miscarriage of justice.
Mr. Shasore asked the investigator if he agreed that the case depends on investigation and that a good investigation would lead to justice and a bad investigation would lead to injustice in this case, the Inspector answered in the affirmative.
ASP Gafar Oderinde, who gave evidence-in-chief narrating his investigation which commenced on February 6, 2019, stated that his decision to arraign the defendant was based on his findings in the course of his investigation including that the defendant was the only adult male in the apartment.
He said that there was no evidence of any break-in; the nanny who could have gained access into the apartment through the kitchen door could not do so because the door was locked from behind; and the wound on the defendant’s finger could not be attributed to a fall as the defendant alleges.
The Court later adjourned the case till 25 March for continuation of trial.
The position of the defence counsel has been that Nielsen has no reason to murder his wife with whom he reportedly had a very good relationship and that he couldn’t have carried out such an action knowing that there was no way he could escape justice if he committed such an offence.
Leave a Reply