Tag: Abiola

  • ‘Give Abiola GCFR national award’

    ‘Give Abiola GCFR national award’

    tHE Federal Government has been urged to confer a post-humous national honour of Grand Commander of the Order of the Federal Republic (GCFR) on the acclaimed winner of the June 12, 1993 election, Chief MKO Abiola.

    The first son of Abiola, Chief Kola Abiola, made the call at the annual Nigerian Television Authority (NTA)/MKO Abiola Ramadan Lecture organised by TALMOT Communications at the premises of NTA Channel 10 Tejuosho, Lagos yesterday.

    Kola noted that he had been at the forefront of a crusade for the Federal Government to honour the man, who through his steadfastness and the quest to claim his mandate, laid down his life for democratic governance being enjoyed today.

    “This hero of democracy was never given a national honour during his lifetime, despite his tremendous developmental projects, which he single-handedly executed in all regions of this country, even more than some state government.

    “I am using this occasion to urge the Federal Government to accede to our request of honouring this great man post-humously, with the national honour of GCFR. This will go a long way in ensuring that all his works geared towards entrenching democratic government in this country will not go unnoticed,” he said.

    Former Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly Saabit Ikuforiji lamented the situation whereby heroes of democracy like Abiola are not well-remembered and appreciated for their efforts.

    He noted that Abiola should not be an individual that should be forgotten in the nation’s history.

    “If not for his steadfastness and resolve to ensure justice is done by enthroning democratic governance we are enjoying today, most politicians today would have been unknown,” the ex-speaker said.

    He enjoined the Federal Government to accord Abiola the due recognition he deserved by making his name special in the heart of the citizens and ensure that June 12 is declared a national remembrance day.

  • ‘Abiola died shortly after being offered tea’

    ‘Abiola died shortly after being offered tea’

    The personal physician to the late Chief Moshood Abiola, Dr Ore Falomo, recalls the health challenges that led to the death of the late politician in government custody and the circumstances surrounding his death. He spoke with Assistant Editor Leke Salaudeen.

    DID you have access to Abiola while in government custody? Yes. I made requests to see him twice in a week. The procedure was that I would first meet the Commissioner of Police, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, who would then arrange for making Abiola available at the Police Headquarters, Abuja. The Commissioner would provide a space where I can do a quick examination of Abiola’s health.

    That was the procedure initially. Later on, we discovered it was very uncomfortable to all parties involved. It used to take the police two hours to get their acts together. As a result, they decided I should be seeing Abiola where he was kept. That was more comfortable for all of us. Abiola was kept in a two-bedroom flat. I used to examine him in the presence of the security officials. The place is under camera surveillance.

    Abiola was incarcerated for five years before he died. Sometimes when I go to Abuja to visit him, the security men would change their minds and prevent me from seeing Abiola. Thus, I would be forced to return to Lagos without seeing my client. They would not give any reason for their action. I experienced these aborted trips for about one-fifth of the time Abiola spent in detention.

    Did you observe anything untoward in Abiola’s health while in detention?

    The major challenge to his health came when he had a scuffle with a security officer.  It happened when I went to visit him. I asked the Commissioner of Police if I could give him a magazine to read in the presence of other security men. The Commissioner of Police acceded to my request. But, when one overzealous officer noticed the magazine in Abiola’s hand, he rushed to grab the magazine. But Abiola refused. Then, the two of them struggled for the magazine. The security officer got hold of Abiola and threw him against the pillar in the office of the Commissioner Police. Abiola groaned. He sustained an injury on his spine. There was slight uproar. Everybody present was shocked at the behaviour of the security officer.

    Abiola had always been on solitary confinement. He had no access to information, except when they want to feed him with sad news such as when his wife Kudirat died. I drew the attention of the whole world to this unfortunate treatment meted out to Abiola in government custody. I wrote the Head of State, Gen. Sani Abacha, pointing out the danger against Abiola’s health. Abacha ordered that he should be taken to Military Hospital, Kaduna, where he was examined by orthopaedic surgeons. The x-ray report showed that part of Abiola’s spinal cord had extrusion. We realised we have to do more scanning to get more information on the injury. Most of the machines needed for scanning were not available in the teaching hospitals, including the then newly-commissioned Igbinedion Hospital.

    We requested that Abiola should be flown to London for further treatment. After a lot of argument and uproars, Abacha conceded to grant him bail with conditions, so that he can go and look after his health. Suffice it to say that there was division among the political family on whether he should accept or reject the bail. He did not eventually travel abroad for medical treatment. We managed him. It took about 11 months before the spinal cord become normal. Thank God, the injury did not inflict irredeemable damage on him; otherwise he would have remained paralysed.

    Most of the other medical complaints of Abiola were managed by me and my colleague, Dr Bako, a government doctor. Many times too, I have to call on members of the Nigeria Medical Association (NMA) to assist in handling Abiola’s health.

    Abiola was able to manage his health, but nothing is good in solitary confinement. It was a psychological war waged against Abiola by the military government t to depress his mind. We ensured he did not put on weight because he was not provided facilities like small gym to exercise himself. We resorted to small in-door exercises in his room. He tried to brighten himself anytime he heard I was coming on a visit. They tried to stop me from communicating with Abiola in Yoruba. I told them they cannot decide for me the language I should use in communicating with my client. They concurred.

    When his wife died, there was a need for a psychologist to work on him, but government refused to buy the idea. We have to handle him by ourselves; we talked to him and pleaded with him. He kept reading the Qur’an and the Bible. We were trying to a write book on Abiola, but government was on our neck. They were not comfortable with the idea. But, the book will be written. You cannot suppress an event like Abiola’s ordeal in the hands of the military.

    Is there a link between the tea offered Abiola by the United States delegation and his death?

    There is no argument about Abiola’s death. He died on July 7, 1998 at about 3pm at Aguda House when he was being visited by an American delegation. He died shortly after being offered a cup of tea by the leader of the delegation. On that day, Abiola was very alert. He recognised Susan Rice whom he saw last in 1982. The Americans came with a flask containing tea. The flask had three layers. Why should they come with their own tea, special tea?

    Is it normal for visitors to come with tea and offer a prisoner? It was abnormal. This can’t happen anywhere in the world. It was a conspiracy. The visit was authorised by Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar and they allowed Abiola, a prisoner, to go and receive them without security. They didn’t tell him who the visitors were.

    The two security men that brought Abiola from detention did not taste the tea. Abiola took about half cup of the tea; soon he was having pains in the chest. According to the Americans, they asked somebody to get him pain tablets. How did they know Abiola get pain tablets? Who was the doctor that prescribed pain tablets and at what time?

    At that time Abiola had become very restless. He said he wanted to go to the toilet; may be that would make him feel better. Abiola went to the toilet; he didn’t come out on time. Nobody accompanied him. He should have been accompanied by a security guard, so that he would not harm himself.

    When he came out, he was so restless. He was holding his chest. Then he slumped. His breathing was very shallow. He was writhing in pains. Then, they called on personal physician to General Abdulsalami Abubakar , a very nice, decent doctor — Dr Wali. Abiola was already dead by the time he was asked to attend to him.

    It is now left to all of us to find the cause of Abiola’s death. He died 15 minutes after the tea. My conclusion is that the tea is probably fundamental to his collapse and sudden death. Until detail investigation is carried out, the death of Abiola will continue to generate controversy, supposition, reasonable and unjustified conclusion for a very long time to come. Abiola died in government custody. It is the duty of government to unravel the cause of Abiola’s death, after drinking a cup of tea.

    Who should be held responsible for Abiola’s death?

    The Federal Government under General Abdulsalami Abubakar should be held responsible. We were not afraid of Abiola’s life under Gen. Abacha. It was an irony of fate that the jailer (Abacha) died before the jailed (Abiola). There was a haste in getting rid of those giving them (America) headache and MKO followed.

    What was the result of the autopsy that you and expatriates conducted on Abiola?

    The autopsy report showed that there were fatty layers in the vessels that supply blood to Abiola’s heart. The layers narrowed the space of the blood vessels. The amount of blood being supplied to the heart was reduced because of the narrow space. There was no area of blockage in the blood vessels. Nothing had stopped the supply of blood to the heart. But, the quantity had reduced. Nothing stops the heart from functioning once it is getting adequate blood supply.

    Did you submit the autopsy report to the Federal Government?

    Yes we did. There were two copies. I kept a copy and sent one to the Federal Government. I have distributed copies to eminent Nigerians for safe keeping. A copy was also deposited in the bank. Unfortunately, the Federal Government has taken no action on the report. We had thought the Oputa panel would resolve the matter. Much as we supported the idea of setting up the panel, no one has seen the report or the White paper, if any. The objective of Oputa panel was to reconcile aggrieved parties. Unfortunately, reconciliation has not taken place on Abiola’s matter.

  • When ‘ll Abiola be immortalised?

    When ‘ll Abiola be immortalised?

    June 12, 1993 has been widely acknowledged as a milestone in Nigerian politics. But, 23 years after, the acclaimed winner, the late Chief M. K. O. Abiola, has not been officially recognised by the successive administrations in the country. Assistant Editor Leke Salaudeen sought the views of a cross section of Nigerians.

    SUNDAY, June 12, 2016, is the 23rd anniversary of the June 12, 1993 presidential poll, which is widely regarded as the freest and fairest election in Nigeria’s political history. The election was symbolic because it was a moment Nigerian displayed a spirit of tolerance, inclusiveness and unity of purpose, by voting for the Social Democratic Party (SDP) which insisted on a Muslim-Muslim ticket. It was a day millions of Nigerians put aside primordial issues in electing their leaders. The fact that the flag bearer of the defunct SDP, the late Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola and Babagana Kingibe were both Muslims did not matter to them. Their ethnic background was also not a factor during the election. The primary focus of the electorates was the programmes of their party and the personality of the candidates.

    Abiola and Kingibe got 58 per cent of the votes in a country almost equally divided between Muslims and Christians. They defeated Bashir Tofa of the National Republican Convention (NRC), despite the fact that the NRC chose a southern Christian, Mr. Sylvester Ugoh, as its vice presidential candidate, to appeal to the ethno-religious sentiments in the country. But, Nigerians rejected what they deemed an unnecessary balancing.

    The voting exercise was peaceful nationwide, without any hitches or disturbances. While the vote count was on, with Abiola comfortably leading, the self-styled military President, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida, struck. He ordered the National Electoral Commission (NEC) to stop further announcement of the results and on June 23, 1993, he annulled the election.

    A chain of tragedies followed the annulment of the election. Abiola died on July 7, under questionable circumstances. He was in the custody of the Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar who took over after the death of Gen. Sani Abacha. Abacha had taken over from Interim National Government (ING) of Ernest Shonekan, whom Babangida hurriedly handed over to when he “stepped aside” on August 26, 1993. Abiola’s wife, Alhaja Kudirat, was assassinated in 1996 by alleged agents of the Abacha junta. Hundreds of Nigerians lost their lives in the course of the struggle for the restoration of the June 12 mandate. Notable among them were Pa Alfred Rewane, Alhaja Suliat Adedeji, Chief (Mrs) Bisoye Tejuoso, Bagauda Kaltho and Toyin Onagoruwa.

    Twenty three years after June 12 poll was annulled and 18 years after the death of Abiola, successive governments have neither recognised the election described as turning point in the history of Nigeria, nor honoured the presumed winner by immortalising him. Former President Olusegun Obasanjo, Abiola’s kinsman who benefitted indirectly from the injustice meted out to the late business mogul, did not make any attempt to honour him. However, an attempt by the former President Goodluck Jonathan in this regard was deemed inappropriate. He had renamed the University of Lagos after Abiola without consulting the institution’s authority. Many described Jonathan’s move as an attempt to score cheap political points in the Southwest ahead of 2015 general elections.

    Many Nigerians believe the country may not get it right politically, unless the injustice meted out to the late Abiola is addressed. Professor Ayo Olukotun said the first step to honour Abiola is for the government of the day to set the record straight, by declaring Abiola as winner of the election and according him the status of a former President. He said the posthumous recognition should include extending to him all the benefits attached to the office of the President. “Until government comes to terms with the fact that there was an election on June 12, 1993 and the election was won by Abiola, there will be no justice,” he added.

    Olukotun, a lecturer at the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, Osun State, said: “Abiola is the progenitor of the current Nigerian democracy. June 12 gave birth to the present democracy in the country. The blood of the martyr (Abiola) was used to fertilise and germinate the current democratic dispensation. It is only proper that we should immortalise the martyr.

    “Government should restore his mandate. He should enjoy all the benefits attached to the office of Head of State. A national edifice should also be named after him. Besides, June 12 should be Democracy Day, so that the bitter experience and the sacrifice of men like Abiola would infuse a sense of equity, fairness and justice in us.”

    Senator Shehu Sani agrees with Olukotun. He called on President Muhammadu Buhari to correct the injustice against June 12 and honour the winner of the historic election. He said Abiola deserves the highest recognition by the Nigerian nation for his role in the democratic struggle.

    Sani, who represents Kaduna Central Senatorial District in the Senate, said all political office holders are beneficiaries of Abiola’s struggle. He advised Buhari to name the Eagle Square, Abuja, after Abiola. “The democracy we are enjoying today is a product of the struggle and the sacrifice of late MKO Abiola and other distinguished Nigerians who sacrificed their lives and liberty in the struggle for a democratic Nigeria.

    “The truth of the matter is that after 17 years of the return of democracy, we have been in self-denial of recognising MKO’s contributions to democracy in Nigeria. There is no Nigerian in the last 25 years that had made such enormous sacrifice like Abiola. Without his sacrifice and resistance against military dictatorship, Nigeria could not have transited into democratic rule.

    “The success of March 28, 2015 presidential election will be better attributed to the sacrifice made by Abiola. He lived at a time when human sacrifice was very rare. To Nigerians, Abiola remains the hero of freedom and democracy and the foundation of our democratic journey in the past 17 years. It was resistance against the annulment of June 12 that gave Nigerians the inspiration to resist dictatorship and call for positive change”.

    Former Chairman Nigeria Bar Association, Ikeja branch, Mr. Monday Ubani, said unless the Federal Government immortalises Abiola, the ghost of June 12 will continue to hunt the country’s democracy. “Abiola’s election was beyond doubt; he paid the supreme sacrifice in the struggle to revalidate his mandate,” he said.

    The way out, according to Ubani, is: “for the Federal Government to declare June 12 a national public holiday; build a monument and name it after Abiola. Previous administrations had regarded June 12 as a non-issue; nobody can kill the spirit of June 12. It is a national event that cannot be wiped out in the political history of this country.

    “I am happy the Yoruba people are still keeping June 12 alive. Abiola deserves being immortalised; his philanthropic activities transcended Yoruba land. He was a national hero.”

    Veteran politician, Dr. Junaid Muhammed, also lent his voice to the call for the recognition of Abiola by the Federal Government. He said “Abiola stood his ground against injustice; he resisted intimidation and paid the supreme sacrifice for the cause he believed in.”

    The Kano-born politician regretted that some characters whose contributions to democratic struggle were not comparable to Abiola’s had national monuments named after them. He said it is inhuman for those who are opposed to Abiola’s politics to talk ill of him after death.

    Muhammed, a Second Republic lawmaker, said Abiola had through his perseverance and political philosophy immortalised himself in the heart of many Nigerians. He added: “The Federal Government should honour him and avoid the mistake the Jonathan administration made, by attempting to rename the University of Lagos after him, without amending the edict that established the institution.”

    Civil Rights activist, Comrade Moshood Erubami, stressed the need to uphold June 12 as Democracy Day in Nigeria, as against the insignificant May 29. He said the time is auspicious, 23 years after the annulment, to set the records straight, by officially declaring June 12 as Democracy Day and a national public holiday.

    Erubami said: “For Buhari to be seen to be a true progressive, he must go beyond the tokenism of former President Jonathan, who attempted to rename the University of Lagos after Abiola. But, it never materialised.

    “Nigerians should insist that the University of Lagos be renamed after the man who died in his quest for the restoration of June 12; to ensure that the principles inherent in June 12 do not elude the country forever. Government should further name the Abuja Stadium after him; it should also name the presidential villa, Aso Rock as MKO Abiola State House.

    “MKO should be given the highest honour of this country posthumously. The Federal Government should rebuild the businesses of the late Abiola, which collapsed after his demise. Finally, the government should establish a National Freedom Square where Heads of State will be addressing and reading annual State of the Nation address.

    During the Obasanjo era, the House of Representatives adopted a motion that the National Stadium, Abuja, be named after Chief MKO Abiola for two reasons. It noted that Abiola’s contribution to the development of sports not only in Nigeria, but in Africa was unparalleled; such that he was referred to as “Pillar of Sports in Africa”. The lawmakers acknowledged that without the sacrifice made by Abiola, democracy would not have returned to Nigeria in 1999. He was described as martyr of democracy. For eight years Obasanjo kept mute over the resolution.

  • ‘Allegations on Abiola Airport ill-informed’

    •Osun PDP calls for probe of project

    The consultant to the Osun State government on the M.K.O. Abiola International Airport at Ido Osun, Mr Wemimo Adebajo, has said the allegation of inflating the cost of the project is ill-informed.

    The expert, who addressed reporters during an inspection of facilities at the airport, was reacting to a statement credited to the state’s chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) that the cost of the project had been inflated by Rauf Aregbesola administration from N4.5 billion to N15.5 billion.

    He said the claim was far from the truth.

    Adebajo said the airport would rank among those with the longest runways in Nigeria, adding that the current site of the project was the first place where aviation activities took place in West Africa.

    According to him, with the level of work at the airport, the state government had spent N2.7 billion from the revised N11 billion.

    Adebajo said the project had reached 25 per cent.

    The consultant said the West African Frontier Force (WAFF) was conveyed from the Ido-Osun Aerodrome during the World War II, adding: “For this reason, the state government wants to make the airport the best in Nigeria, if not in Africa.”

    He said the tour was to ensure that reporters were adequately informed about the work done to situate the criticisms of the opposition in proper context.

    Adebajo said the airport’s runway, which would soon be laid with 500 millimetre (mm) asphalt, is 3.5 kilometre long with 12.3 metres excavation.

    The expert said it would be re-filled with laterite.

    He added that both sides of the runway are equipped with water pipes, which would be the first of its kind in Nigeria.

    Adebajo noted that with such features, the airport would have been equipped with facilities that would make emergency fire fighting readily available near the runway, in case of any emergency landing or fire.

  • Abiola deserves GCFR, says son

    Abiola deserves GCFR, says son

    The presumed winner of the June 12, 1993 presidential election, the late Bashorun Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola Abiola, deserved the highest national honour as compensation for his sacrifice for the country, his son Kola, said at the weekend.

    According to him, Abiola, who died in detention following his declaration of himself as president, could only be compensated with the award of the Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR) as a mark of honour.

    “He won the election but he was denied and he died in detention. The award of GCFR which is given to only presidents is what can really show the nation’s appreciation for his sacrifice,” Mr. Abiola said at a reunion meeting of the ex-staff of Concord Press Limited in Lagos at the weekend. The late Chief Abiola was the publisher of the Concord titles.

    His son spoke of plans to bring back Concord, adding that a documentary on the life of the Bashorun of Ibadan and the 14th Aare Ona Kakanfo of Yorubaland would be produced soon to properly situate his place in history.

    Mr Abiola said Concord remained a major legacy of his father.

    The call is the latest from Nigerians who are seeking the government’s recognition of Abiola’s role in Nigeria’s democracy. Abiola died in 1998.

    The Concord group, which dominated the scene in the 80s and 90s, was founded by the late billionaire business mogul in 1980. It published National Concord, Sunday Concord, Weekend Concord, African Concord Magazine and a host of vernacular and community newspapers.

    Friday’s occasion was also used to honour ex-Concord employees, who were recently appointed or elected into public positions.

    Among those honoured were Secretary to Lagos State Government Mr Tunji Bello and spokesman of President Muhammadu Buhari, Mr. Femi Adesina.

    Also honoured were Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) President Waheed Odusile, one of his predecessors and House of Representatives member Mallam Sani Zorro; Group Public Affairs Manager of the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) Mr Ohi Alegbe, Senior Special Assistant (Media) to Niger State Governor, Mr. Jide Orintunsin and Managing Director of The Sun Mr. Eric Osagie.

    Another of the late Abiola’s sons, Deji, attended the ceremony, which was presided over by Dr. Doyin Abiola, the former managing director of Concord and wife of the late politician.

    Dr  Abiola, admonished members of the “Great Concord Press Family” appointed into public offices to use their offices in enhancing greater public good rather than enriching themselves.

    According to her, this would help in rating high the journalism profession and making Nigeria an enviable country among the comity of nations.

    She bemoaned the decline in public and moral values in the country, adding that only a great and sincere effort could bring back the country’s glory.

    The event was attended by former Deputy Managing Director Stanley Egbochuku, Mr Mike Awoyinfa, Lisa Olu Akerele, Alhaji Liad Tella, Mr. Kunmi Olayiwola, Mr Louis Odion, Mr Lanre Arogundade, Mr. Jonas Agu, Mr Aliu Mohammed, Mr. Goke Odeyinka, Mr. Mojeed Jamiu, among others.

  • Fond memories of Abiola

    Fond memories of Abiola

    Life is a hypocrite and living it is an even greater lie. It causes everyone to dance to unfamiliar rhythms and prompts a forgetfulness that is a recurrent cycle. It is factually ephemeral, and this is its realistic abstract than the concrete of the joys that we find in it. The scar from an injury may have healed, but the tortuous period of pain and pang is best described by the sufferer. Fact is, no other person can best explain a mother’s birth pain than she, who has herself laboured and later came to birth; same way as homelessness, which is not the narrative of one who dwells in palatial hacienda.

    Truth has charted an unwavering cause, so that the dead can rest well where their souls are reposed, and those who are living in Judas’ denial can choose to come clean, stay dirty or have their hoary scalps interred as un-worthy sojourners to earth.

    The President Who Never Ruled is the story of An African Self-Made Billionaire as written by Jamiu Abiola, the son of the late Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola – and his late wife Kudirat- the acclaimed winner of the June 12, 1993 general election in Nigeria. In a total of one hundred and ninety seven pages, forty four chapters and three parts, the writer takes the reader through a journey with a true insider perspective, one that is akin to an on-the-spot account in the heat of a warfare.

    Records cannot but be set straight and as a Yoruba adage has it, lies could thrive for a thousand years, but truth will always have its day of reckon. The days of sober reflections are indeed here, as doubt and blurry vision are to receive emancipation from their hitherto shackles. The tragedy of liars and lies thrives in the delusion of decapitating truth for its sinister antonym, but unknowingly, the auto-decimation of pathological liars and all devious species of the human kind is as guaranteed as phenomenal constants

    In this timely non-fiction, the author arouses our consciousness to the fact that, August 4, 2015 would have marked the 78th birthday of the Late Chief MKO Abiola, which is somewhat related to the same year he entered politics (1978); while his late wife, Kudirat Abiola would have turned 63 years, but the annulment of the June 12, 1993 elections on June 23 of the same year, by the Ibrahim Babangida led military administration leaves Nigerians with rhetorics that one hopes will soon become answered questions some day.

    Jamiu Abiola rightly corrects the wrongs of near-established untruths and assumptions and does it brilliantly by piecing the past to the present, in a bid to offer, unmistakably, the Absolute Truth about his father, as well as his mother, thus providing a template of integrity and a Sanskrit of honesty for those whose zest and thirst for the unbiased account remain effervescence.

    The beauty of this narrative fact takes the reader to the background of the The late Chief MKO Abiola, whose demonstration of precocious attributes strikes a chord, because such innate perception is a rarity in many of his age then and even as of now. Salawu and Zuliat Abiola-his parents- would not have asked for a greater gift from their creator, especially with the losses his parents suffered in having children, before he eventually became “something that was witnessed” (Moshood).

    The author moves controllably through various stages in his father’s life and presents to the reader another era which generated huge controversies. The ITT years brought with it its grass to grace accounts, and unlike what was peddled in hushed tones and songs, the late MKO Abiola Worked hard and long as a trained accountant and as an astute businessman to attain the height he reached and made the money that was his.

    His relationship with the Nigerian Military was set on course when the Ministry of Defense owed the organization he worked for –ITT- a whopping 3.5million Pounds. Having started the journey with the telecoms giants on April 1, 1969, Abiola went on to be the lifeline for the organization over a long period of success.  His success at helping to repatriate company funds redefined his status, and this propelled him further towards healthier ambitions.

    The persons of the former Chief of staff of the Nigerian Army, Brigadier Usman Katsina; the permanent Secretary at the ministry of Defence then, Mr. Yusuf Gobir and the Army Signals Inspector, the late Lt. Col.  Murtala Mohammed featured. Each of these men played key roles in all that led to Moshood’s early breakthrough and as the saying goes, the deeds of men live with them and in-fact outlive them.

    On page 70, paragraph 4, the author writes:

    “… Moshood, in his thirties, became one of Africa’s richest men. His orientation changed completely afterward and his main interest became a quest for an ideological meaning to life”

    It was at this juncture that his ideals emerged. He needed to do more and that he would not be stopped by any opposition in sight. Moshood may would have rested on his oars, but the poverty in the country caused him to want to do more as he was the epitome of philanthropy. Jamiu Abiola in this factual account reveals the very fabric of his father’s personality, as his weakness was in strengthening others in need.

    The demise of Murtala Mohammed, an honest man resulted in another turn for ITT. Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, who was later the Head of State, neglected the communications firm had thrived under the headship of an administration that was accountable, but he however kept government expenditure low, which was a noted positive.

    The chronicle of “The President Who Never Ruled” also examines the presidential aspiration of the acclaimed winner of the 1993 general election. Although he suffered a crushing defeat at the party’s convention in Benue while under the banner of NPN, he did not decamp. Shehu Shagari however won the election and took over the reins from Obasanjo in 1979. Having finished his first term, a second term was guaranteed for the Shehu Shagari led government, but five months into the administration it was toppled, on December 31 1983 by General Mohammadu Buhari.

    On page 78, last paragraph, Abiola said of Shagari’s government:

    “The fact is now glaringly evident that among the factors which contributed most significantly to the demise of the Second Republic was the absence was any objective and critical assessment of is workings while it lasted.”

    The defining moments in the late MKO Abiola’s political career opened when he won at the presidential convention held on  March 27, 1993. Alhaji Baba Gana Kingibe- who later vied as Abiola’s vice presidential candidate – and Alhaji Atiku Abubakar were defeated by Abiola to be the Social Democratic Party (SDP) flag bearer. Although, the late Alhaji Shehu Yar’adua supported Atiku Abubakar, his bid to have him as Abiola’s vice presidential flag bearer did not succeed, thus causing a rift between Abiola and the Yar’ardua team. It was also mentioned, that though the military gave green light in allowing democracy reign, the Head of State then, General Ibrahim Babangida wanted Pascal Bafyau, who was the President of the Nigeria Labour Congress to be Abiola’s running mate.

    HOPE 93 however left many Nigerians hopeless, beginning from the appointment of Chief Tony Anenih by Alhaji Yar’ardua as SDP chairman. It must be stated, that names are as important as our legacies, which is why the role played by the likes of Arthur Nzeribe – Association for Better Nigeria; Bassey Ikpeme, who ruled that the election must not take place; Dahiru Saleh, that prevented Professor Nwosu from releasing the election result.

    Former Head of State, Ibrahim Babangida, under whose administration the cataclysm held sway and the inventor of the interim government scheme; to Chief Ernest Shonekan, whose inability to say no is at best treacherous to a kinsman; to Baba Gana Kingibe; who deserted his fellow flag bearer for obvious pecuniary passion; to the late General Sani Abacha, under whose machination Alfred Rewane became history, Kudirat Abiola was assassinated, Abiola incarcerated and the hope of Nigerians became concretely lacerated and mutilated. General Abdulsalami Abubakar also played a role by his refusal to release the late MKO Abiola even after other political prisoners were released from detention. This to the Abiola family has casts him in the light of those whose names and legacies must be forgotten as long as the family’s pains still linger.

    Jamiu Abiola has through this work un-earthed what many Nigerians may love to forget or at best remember every twelfth day in the month of June. The impact of the huge loss of both parents on a young university graduate as of then and how this painful exit still leaves an unfilled gap in the lives of their children and Nigerians will move one to tears and sober the reader up.

    It is needful to state, that the unforgettable role played by his wife, the Late Kudirat Abiola is a huge attestation to a woman, who lived her life for a just cause, her husband and thus her memory definitely indelible.

    This collector’s item written in episodic plot makes for very interesting and effortless read and as the experiences shared gives the reader an unquestionable and scintillating perspective, we need to ask how we hope to be honourably remembered.

    This is the honour in reverence of the late Chief MKO Abiola and his wife, Kudirat Abiola, whose impact sure resonates here on earth and in without a doubt, in the hereafter.

     

  • ‘Buhari should declare Abiola winner of June 12’

    ‘Buhari should declare Abiola winner of June 12’

    The Secretary General of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), Mr Ayo Opadokun, in this interview with Musa Odoshimokhe, explains why Buhari Administration should honour Chief Moshood Abiola.

    Would you say democracy has deepened after the annulment of June 12?

    Certainly not. It is great pain for people like me when I remember the phenomenon called June 12 and the aftermath. This is as a consequence of the campaign we took against the military, against General Sani Abacha and his military junta. We succeeded in a way in sending the military back to the barracks, but the military went back to the barracks on their own terms. I will say, consequently, their agents and surrogates have remained in power. Democracy, I hope, given this new administration, will be nurtured, tendered and assisted to grow, in such a manner that will bring the confidence they people expected under the dispensation. That Nigerians will be able to say with some measure of relative importance, that the concept of democracy has taken firm root in our country. Until General Muhammadu Buhari and Prof. Yemi Osinbajo took over a while ago, it was a circumspective democracy that Nigeria has been going through. Most of the stage actors or the military men and their surrogates, took over all the major strata of governance in Nigeria. That on it own has a telling effect. It is the same reason the civilians who were elected now behave in consonance with military conduct. They have no regard for procedure; they have no regard for electing the best of candidates to govern the country. The governors almost govern with decrees and edicts at the state level. Remember that with the coming of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, the method adopted in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) leadership of the country followed dictatorial pattern. They had almost five party chairmen under his administration. At a time when Obasanjo was the president, the party chairman, Col. Ahmadu Ali (rtd) was a military man. He had so many of his juniors in the army as governors and at the National Assembly. So, democracy could not grow. Obasanjo did not believe in democracy anytime. He was extremely dictatorial; he could not stand democratic norms. Remember that Lagos State government took all legal steps to create additional local governments, but he withdrew the money meant for local governments. Even when the Supreme Court, the highest court of the land, asked him to release the money, the man simply refused. He totally crippled democracy.

    You said the military went to the barracks on their own terms…

    That is the major reason, why Nigeria has not made progress in terms of democracy. In the Latin American states, what happened was that after the civilian populace succeed in establishing themselves as the authority over the military, they did only arrested, but prosecuted important military officers, who ruined their state. It happened in Argentina. They succeeded in putting laws in place, to the extent that it will be difficult, it will be foolhardy for any man to come around to remove any civilian from office. Therefore, in the case of Nigeria, they went on their terms and none of them has been brought to book. None of them has been tried for the extent of ridicule they brought to Nigeria. How can you go to court to obtain injunction that the state institutions must not arrest or investigate you. So many ex-governors are carrying out their businesses today, the way they wanted on that basis. The Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) attempted washing their own hands off because of the challenges they faced in carrying out their functions. So, there was nothing the military left that has changed.  No public institution that was not negatively affected. That was why when Abacha wanted to score a point; he set up the Justice Kayode Eso panel, to investigate the Nigerian judiciary and bring recommendation that will make the judiciary be what the public expected it to be. The late Eso did a marvellous job and submitted, but Abacha had no political will to work with it. If the recommendation of Justice Eso had been implemented, many would have been sacked, including former Chief Justices of Nigeria. The Nigerian judiciary has gone bad, but once upon a time, Nigeria judiciary was one of the prominent in the world. I just hope that with this new administration, things will change.

    The actors of behind the annulment have not shown remorse. Do they owe Nigerians any explanation?

    Well, General Ibrahim Babangida has kept on begging the very issue on what happed as the leader of the country. That does not explain the matter, it is more than that. A group of military jackboots decided to annul the popular will of the Nigerian people, the voting of a particular candidate with about 14 million votes is treacherous. There can be no greater destruction that the common man could have suffered more that. It much more evil than the military putsch, they normally do at the midnight to topple government. May the soul of the late General Hassan Katsina rest in peace; I had it on good authority that he called General Babandida and said he must hand over. He said, ‘if you knew you were not prepared to leave, why did you allow the election to hold. Since that election has held and M.K.O Abiola has won, I am afraid there is no room for you to remain in office. You should allow him to assume office, let him now misbehave; Nigerian people will deal with him’. The old man went further, called on the late Inspector General of Police, M.D Yusuf, urged him to work with his colleagues in the Southwest, General Adeyinka Adebayo, and the Yoruba leadership caucus, to take stern action. Unfortunately, what was supposed to be done was not done. I really feel so bad that those who are in the frontline of the annulment, including David Mark, Sambo Dasuki and quite a number of them, have become the beneficiaries. But the distinguished and credible service man, Col. Abubakar Umar, former governor of Kaduna State, who surrendered his commission on the basis of the annulment, has not got much. How can you allow a David Mark presiding over the most important National Assembly in Africa and was there for almost 12 years. So, how can people like us be happy? They have not shown any remorse. They kept on behaving as if they are our lord and master. I still believe that someday, some time they would be called to account for their deed.

    How should Abiola be honoured under this dispensation?

    I will imagine that the executive will collaborate with the legislators to take one or two concrete steps, to give him a posthumous national honour and award. That is after they must have officially pronounced him as the winner of that election. They can now go to the next level of giving him significant thing that will be immortally focussed, that no matter what in the history of the anal of the country, you will not be able to change it. There should be institution, where the role of Abiola will be sufficiently crystallised.

    Some want the May 29 Democracy Day changed to June 12…

    For all I know, General Abdulsalami Abubakar made up his mind of not staying longer in office. When the ruling body agreed on the day of election, Abubakar wanted to leave office three weeks after the election or thereafter. It was the then Attorney General that advised that he has to give room for electoral petition to do it work. So, he now asked them to count the days from the day of the election that was how they arrived at May 29. It was kind of thing that was not supposed to be given prominent, but it has come and our ‘Mr. Wisdom’ decided that he should make the day Democracy Day. I will say without mincing words that it is only the election of Buhari that has really took us to the actual Democracy Day. It is only the election of Buhari/Osinbajo that is comparable to June 12 election.

    As someone who was close to Abiola, how as the family bear his demise over the years?

    From the interaction that I read about the family annually, Abiola was a man of great status. He had many wives, many children and a man of that standing died suddenly. The way this happened to him too sudden, but systematically water will find its level. There are people in the family who are committed to the disposition of Abiola. Most of them will continue to relate with the progressives wing of the political class. Just last week the Kudirat Abiola was celebrated, she was a martyr.

     

     

  • ‘Buhari should declare Abiola winner of June 12’

    ‘Buhari should declare Abiola winner of June 12’

    The Secretary General of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), Mr Ayo Opadokun, in this interview with Musa Odoshimokhe, explains why Buhari Administration should honour Chief Moshood Abiola.

    Would you say democracy has deepened after the annulment of June 12?

    Certainly not. It is great pain for people like me when I remember the phenomenon called June 12 and the aftermath. This is as a consequence of the campaign we took against the military, against General Sani Abacha and his military junta. We succeeded in a way in sending the military back to the barracks, but the military went back to the barracks on their own terms. I will say, consequently, their agents and surrogates have remained in power. Democracy, I hope, given this new administration, will be nurtured, tendered and assisted to grow, in such a manner that will bring the confidence they people expected under the dispensation. That Nigerians will be able to say with some measure of relative importance, that the concept of democracy has taken firm root in our country. Until General Muhammadu Buhari and Prof. Yemi Osinbajo took over a while ago, it was a circumspective democracy that Nigeria has been going through. Most of the stage actors or the military men and their surrogates, took over all the major strata of governance in Nigeria. That on it own has a telling effect. It is the same reason the civilians who were elected now behave in consonance with military conduct. They have no regard for procedure; they have no regard for electing the best of candidates to govern the country. The governors almost govern with decrees and edicts at the state level. Remember that with the coming of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, the method adopted in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) leadership of the country followed dictatorial pattern. They had almost five party chairmen under his administration. At a time when Obasanjo was the president, the party chairman, Col. Ahmadu Ali (rtd) was a military man. He had so many of his juniors in the army as governors and at the National Assembly. So, democracy could not grow. Obasanjo did not believe in democracy anytime. He was extremely dictatorial; he could not stand democratic norms. Remember that Lagos State government took all legal steps to create additional local governments, but he withdrew the money meant for local governments. Even when the Supreme Court, the highest court of the land, asked him to release the money, the man simply refused. He totally crippled democracy.

    You said the military went to the barracks on their own terms…

    That is the major reason, why Nigeria has not made progress in terms of democracy. In the Latin American states, what happened was that after the civilian populace succeed in establishing themselves as the authority over the military, they did only arrested, but prosecuted important military officers, who ruined their state. It happened in Argentina. They succeeded in putting laws in place, to the extent that it will be difficult, it will be foolhardy for any man to come around to remove any civilian from office. Therefore, in the case of Nigeria, they went on their terms and none of them has been brought to book. None of them has been tried for the extent of ridicule they brought to Nigeria. How can you go to court to obtain injunction that the state institutions must not arrest or investigate you. So many ex-governors are carrying out their businesses today, the way they wanted on that basis. The Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) attempted washing their own hands off because of the challenges they faced in carrying out their functions. So, there was nothing the military left that has changed.  No public institution that was not negatively affected. That was why when Abacha wanted to score a point; he set up the Justice Kayode Eso panel, to investigate the Nigerian judiciary and bring recommendation that will make the judiciary be what the public expected it to be. The late Eso did a marvellous job and submitted, but Abacha had no political will to work with it. If the recommendation of Justice Eso had been implemented, many would have been sacked, including former Chief Justices of Nigeria. The Nigerian judiciary has gone bad, but once upon a time, Nigeria judiciary was one of the prominent in the world. I just hope that with this new administration, things will change.

    The actors of behind the annulment have not shown remorse. Do they owe Nigerians any explanation?

    Well, General Ibrahim Babangida has kept on begging the very issue on what happed as the leader of the country. That does not explain the matter, it is more than that. A group of military jackboots decided to annul the popular will of the Nigerian people, the voting of a particular candidate with about 14 million votes is treacherous. There can be no greater destruction that the common man could have suffered more that. It much more evil than the military putsch, they normally do at the midnight to topple government. May the soul of the late General Hassan Katsina rest in peace; I had it on good authority that he called General Babandida and said he must hand over. He said, ‘if you knew you were not prepared to leave, why did you allow the election to hold. Since that election has held and M.K.O Abiola has won, I am afraid there is no room for you to remain in office. You should allow him to assume office, let him now misbehave; Nigerian people will deal with him’. The old man went further, called on the late Inspector General of Police, M.D Yusuf, urged him to work with his colleagues in the Southwest, General Adeyinka Adebayo, and the Yoruba leadership caucus, to take stern action. Unfortunately, what was supposed to be done was not done. I really feel so bad that those who are in the frontline of the annulment, including David Mark, Sambo Dasuki and quite a number of them, have become the beneficiaries. But the distinguished and credible service man, Col. Abubakar Umar, former governor of Kaduna State, who surrendered his commission on the basis of the annulment, has not got much. How can you allow a David Mark presiding over the most important National Assembly in Africa and was there for almost 12 years. So, how can people like us be happy? They have not shown any remorse. They kept on behaving as if they are our lord and master. I still believe that someday, some time they would be called to account for their deed.

    How should Abiola be honoured under this dispensation?

    I will imagine that the executive will collaborate with the legislators to take one or two concrete steps, to give him a posthumous national honour and award. That is after they must have officially pronounced him as the winner of that election. They can now go to the next level of giving him significant thing that will be immortally focussed, that no matter what in the history of the anal of the country, you will not be able to change it. There should be institution, where the role of Abiola will be sufficiently crystallised.

    Some want the May 29 Democracy Day changed to June 12…

    For all I know, General Abdulsalami Abubakar made up his mind of not staying longer in office. When the ruling body agreed on the day of election, Abubakar wanted to leave office three weeks after the election or thereafter. It was the then Attorney General that advised that he has to give room for electoral petition to do it work. So, he now asked them to count the days from the day of the election that was how they arrived at May 29. It was kind of thing that was not supposed to be given prominent, but it has come and our ‘Mr. Wisdom’ decided that he should make the day Democracy Day. I will say without mincing words that it is only the election of Buhari that has really took us to the actual Democracy Day. It is only the election of Buhari/Osinbajo that is comparable to June 12 election.

    As someone who was close to Abiola, how as the family bear his demise over the years?

    From the interaction that I read about the family annually, Abiola was a man of great status. He had many wives, many children and a man of that standing died suddenly. The way this happened to him too sudden, but systematically water will find its level. There are people in the family who are committed to the disposition of Abiola. Most of them will continue to relate with the progressives wing of the political class. Just last week the Kudirat Abiola was celebrated, she was a martyr.

  • June 12: How should Abiola be immortalized?

    June 12: How should Abiola be immortalized?

    Twenty-two years after the late Chief Moshood Abiola won the historic June 12, 1993 presidential election the man who paid the supreme price by dying as a martyr for democracy remains largely unsung. In the light of the popular yearning to give the country a new direction, what are the ways to properly recognize the late businessman and politician, Deputy Political Editor RAYMOND MORDI, asks.

    Are Nigerians likely to witness a change of attitude from the Federal Government with regards to the recognition of June 12 as a unique day in the political history of the country? Would President Muhammadu Buhari honour the late Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola, the alleged financier of the coup that sent him packing 30 years ago? These are some of the questions that may agitate the minds of some discerning Nigerians, as the country marks the 22nd anniversary of the historic presidential election of June 12, 1993, when Nigerians waved aside ethnic and religious differences to vote for the late Chief MKO Abiola in the electoral contest that was annulled by the military led by the then Head of State, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida, popularly known as IBB.

    A United States-based Nigerian and legal practitioner, Mr. Owolabi Alaba, said if Buhari does that, he would be seen as the change that Nigerians all over the world can believe in.  He said: “It would be like Mandela forgiving the apartheid regime in South Africa. If he did, Buhari will be more popular in the Southwest than any politician. It is the right thing to do. June 12 is the day Gen. Babangida fought against Nigerians and lost and had to step aside.”

    Two years ago, the immediate past Goodluck Jonathan administration attempted to immortalize Abiola by announcing the renaming of the University of Lagos as Moshood Abiola University. But, in what must go down as one of the greatest ironies of Nigerian history, what should have marked the highpoint of nearly two decades of democratic struggle for the recognition of one of the most iconic symbols of Nigeria’s democratic journey was received with mixed feelings by many who had looked forward to such recognition.

    Given the fact that the March 28 presidential election is widely regarded as a re-enactment of the June 12 magic and also because many of those in the vanguard for the struggle for the official recognition of June 12 and Abiola’s contribution to the present democracy are part of the new administration, the time may be auspicious to immortalize the widely acclaimed winner of the June 12 election. Like June 12, two major parties dominated the March 28 presidential election. As witnessed during the March 28 presidential election, the current de facto two-party system reduced ethnic coloration and religious sentiment, as the de jure two-party system of 1993 did.

    Against this background, what would be the appropriate way to immortalize the late Abiola? One of the most recurring suggestions is that June 12 should replace May 29 as the Democracy Day. For instance, Alaba echoed that when he said: “If June 12 is confirmed at the Democracy Day, IBB will constantly remember the evil he committed with the death of Abiola. If Buhari rises above the anger and his treatment by the manipulative government of IBB and recognizes the contribution of M.K.O Abiola to the fruits of democracy he enjoys today, he would be seen as the change that Nigerians all over the world can believe in.”

    For years now, seven states have declared June 12 as public holiday to accord due recognition to the 1993 presidential election. The states are: Lagos, Edo, Oyo, Ogun, Osun, Ekiti, and Oyo. What these states have in common is that they are states governed by governors under the platform of the defunct Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), one of the three major political parties that metamorphosed into the All Progressives Congress (APC) about two years ago.

    The Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP), which until May 29, 2015 had been the ruling party at the centre since 1999, had turned deaf ears to entreaties that June 12 should replace May 29 as Democracy Day. Now that the APC has become the ruling party at the federal level, is it likely to declare June 12 a national public holiday and a day to celebrate democracy?

    Beyond that, there are many other fundamental suggestions. The founding Secretary-General of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO) and the Convener of the Coalition of Democrats for Electoral Reforms (CODER), Mr. Ayo Opadokun, is of the view that through the collaborative efforts of the executive and the legislature, one or two concrete steps should be taken to give the late businessman and politician a posthumous national honour and award. He said: “That is after they must have officially pronounced him as the winner of that election. They can now go to the next level of immortalising his name. For instance, there should be institution where the role of Abiola will be sufficiently crystallised.”

    Civil society activist and President Nigeria Voters Assembly (VOTAS), Mashood Erubami, agrees. He said process of immortalisation of the late Chief Abiola should start from his recognition as a winner in that election by the Buhari administration because his election victory was a re-incarnation of the principle of oneness of Nigerians witnessed during the June 12, 1993 election.

    In the spirit of reconciliation, Erubami wants the Buhari administration to organize a special posthumous installation ceremony where the late Abiola would be officially recognized as a former President of Nigeria. This posthumous ceremony, he said, should be organized in conjunction with the family of the late Abiola and members of the human rights and pro-democracy community that fought gallantly for the de-annulment of that election and it should be witnessed by governors of the states that constitute the Southwest and other guests from across the nation. He added that it is imperative for the event to be telecast live on television and radio.

    Erubami added: “This should be followed by the inclusion of his names and photographs in the list of former Heads of State. This is because the election of President Buhari on March 28 came with big joy that the ruling political tormentors were not power drunk and driven by their unethical credentials to annul the election, it should therefore open  the door for the execution of all the good tidings resident in the June 12, 1993 presidential election as it were.”

    Senator Shehu Sanni, who represents Kaduna Central at the upper legislative chamber, said he will use the Senate platform to ensure that a presidential library in Abuja and a monument in the National Assembly are named after the late Chief Abiola. He said the late Abiola remains the hero of freedom and democracy and that he helped to lay the foundation for the current democratic dispensation. He added: “Without the sacrifice made by Abiola there would be no democracy in this country today. All political office holders are beneficiaries of Abiola’s sacrifice. The success of March 28 presidential elections will be better attributed to the sacrifice made by Abiola. He lived at a time when human sacrifice was very rare. It was resistance against the annulment of June 12 that gave Nigerians the inspiration to resist dictatorship and call for positive change. Buhari was one of the few northerners who called for the revalidation of Abiola’s mandate in the heat of the struggle.”

    Erubami believes the best way to immortalise Chief MKO Abiola in the context of the new change mantra under President  Buhari is to ensure that the principles inherent in June 12 presidential election manifest in the changes to be driven by the APC. He said until the late Abiola is immortalised, the nation will continue to grope in the dark in search of democracy “because he is the rightful symbol of democracy who taught Nigerians that politics and democracy is worth living and dying for.”

    He noted that the best legacy of June 12 is the principle of oneness it introduced into Nigerian politics.  He said: “The acclaimed winner of the June 12 election defeated his opponent Bashir Tofa in all constituencies across the nation, including his home constituency in Tofa Village. It was the first election in the history of Nigeria that a pair of Muslim/ Muslim Candidate from a party, the Social Democratic Party (SDP) became acceptable without consideration by Nigerian electorate for race, religion and sex.

    “For the first time the election represented a transition for many years of power from the North to the South and from the military to a civilian administration in the most peaceful and fair manner. Against the permutations of the military oligarchy that permitted the transition, they never believed that the election can be globally and locally adjudged as the fairest, freest and most legitimate, having been won through the popular votes of the people.”

    The activist said the attempt to rename the University of Lagos after Abiola without legal backup by former President Jonathan was a mere smokescreen. He wants the new administration of President Buhari to renew efforts to assert the renaming the university, as well as the National Stadium in Abuja after him. In addition, “the suggested Centre for Democratic Studies whenever it is established and wherever it is located should also be named after him to demonstrate we have learnt from the lessons inherent in June 12,” he added.

    In addition, the VOTAS President said Democracy Day must be changed from May 29 to June 12 and that the day must be declared as public holiday, to honour Abiola, just as Americans remember and appreciate Martins Luther King.

    He lamented that Abiola lost his mandate, his life, his businesses and his loving wife, noting that no family in Nigeria ever lost so much for the entrenchment of democracy. He added that the posthumous award should be accompanied with cash donation and government commitment to join hands with the Abiola family to resuscitate his business empire. Erubami also wants other patriots like the late Pa Adekunle Ajasin, the late Pa Alfred Rewane, the late Pa Anthony Enahoro, the late Chief Gani Fawehinmi, the late Dr. Beko Ransome Kuti, the late Prof. Olikoye Ransome Kuti, the late Comrade Ola Oni, the late Comrade Chima Ubani, the late Baba Omojola to also be immortalised on the day of the posthumous award, as people who have worked and died for democracy , good living and livelihood for humanity.

    But, given that President Muhammadu has so many challenges on his hands at the moment, Barrister Niyi Akintola noted that it might be too early to expect him to tackle the issue of immortalization of Abiola right now. He said: “His focus would be how to build a united nation, how to ensure that there is peace and security in the land, how to curb corruption and how to combat the lingering economic crisis in Nigeria at the moment; the country is in serious trouble now over the issue of economy. As we speak, the pounds sterling is N240 and that would have multiplier effect on our economy because we are not producing anything; whatever you import you are going to pay more in naira.”

    Nevertheless, he said many areas can be exploited to immortalize Abiola, because he touched many lives in different fields of human endeavour. His words: “There is the area of sports, where he was widely acknowledged as the pillar of sports in Africa. If the National Stadium in Lagos or the one in Abuja is named after him that would not be too much.

    “Former President Goodluck Jonathan got it wrong he tried to play to the gallery by attempting to rename the University of Lagos after him. He never appreciated the fact that the Yoruba are a different kettle of fish altogether. I read a statement credited to the former President, saying he doesn’t understand the Yoruba. Apparently, he doesn’t understand the psyche of the average Yoruba man; the average Yoruba man believes that you must have justice before you can be talking of peace.

    “Jonathan actually wanted to reap where he did not sow. Irrespective of the fact that the late MKO Abiola was our son, we don’t believe that a national institution like the University of Lagos should be named after him. In fact, the University of Lagos was the very institution he (Abiola) himself attended; he was not the founder. Jonathan would have been applauded if he had named the National Stadium in Abuja after Abiola. There are many national institutions Abiola contributed so much in building that would have attracted the attention of any visionary leader in immortalizing the late Abiola.

    For instance, Akintola said one of the democratic institutions like the National Assembly complex or the Court of Appeal complex could be named after him. He said Abiola was instrumental to bringing about the democracy that Nigerians are enjoying today. He said: “It was the struggle for the restoration of June 12 that gave birth to the defunct National Democratic Coalition (NADECO); it was the struggle by NADECO that brought about the present democracy. So, one of the democratic institutions like the National Assembly complex could be named after him. The Court of Appeal complex could also be named after him; this is a man that went to court to challenge the annulment of his election. We had conflicting court judgments during this era. It was through the late Abiola’s efforts that the Interim Nation Government (ING) was declared illegal.”

  • Abiola, June 12 and the road not taken

    Abiola, June 12 and the road not taken

    Renowned journalist and one of the founding editors of TELL magazine, Mr. DARE BABARINSA, tells the story of the June 12 annulment from his recollections of what took place at the time. The story could not have been better told; Mr. Babarinsa, as a former Executive Editor and Member, Board of Directors of TELL, was a participant-observer who witnessed some of the events surrounding the saga first hand.

    Twenty-two years down the road, it is necessary to evaluate and understand the centrality of Chief Moshood Abiola’s sacrifice in bringing us the Fourth Republic. Chief Abiola was the winner of the June 12 1993 presidential election whose victory was voided by the military dictatorship of General Ibrahim Babangida. It was Abiola’s and other heroes’ and heroines’ sacrifice that has given us the long democratic dispensation we have been enjoying since 1999.

    The Abacha coup of November 1993 was a turning point in the struggle of Abiola to claim the presidency of Nigeria. With his victory in that year’s presidential election, Abiola became Nigeria’s President-presumptive and Alhaji Babagana Kingibe, the Vice-President presumptive.  Then Abacha seized power and the struggle entered a new phase.

    The Abacha putsch was a coup-foretold.  It was indeed, a creeping coup in which Abiola may have actively participated.  A few days after the coup, Chief Ebenezer Babatope, the Director of Organisation of the defunct Obafemi Awolowo’s Unity Party of Nigeria, UPN, during the Second Republic and a pillar of the Awoist Vanguard, came to my office at the then corporate headquarters of TELL, on Acme Road, Ikeja.  He looked agitated.

    “Abiola has collapsed,” he blurted out.  He said that morning, a meeting had been held at Abiola’s residence in Ikeja, and it was resolved that the Abiola group would support the new Abacha junta.  He said the resolution of the meeting was communicated to the Awoist group which was then meeting regularly at the Ikeja home of Chief Alfred Rewane, the liberal businessman and former private secretary to Chief Awolowo.  He said in view of Abiola decision, the Awoist group would be nominating members into the new government.  He said because of this, Abacha had agreed that supporters of Abiola would be nominated as deputy-governors to military governors that would soon be announced by the junta. He said most likely, Kingibe, Alhaji Lateef Jakande, the popular former Lagos State Governor and several top politicians who were close to Abiola, may also join the Abacha cabinet.  He said he, Dr Olu Onagoruwa and Mrs Mobolaji Osomo, may also be joining the cabinet on the strength of a recommendation from the Awoist group.

    “I do not have full details of the deal,” Babatope said. “But if Abiola intends to reclaim his mandate, he has no business allowing his supporters to join a military regime.  His only deal should have been to support it until they hand over to him. If they join the government, how would they look forward to the revalidation of his mandate?”  Would he take up the appointment if it was announced?

    “I will,” he said.  “I am only obeying my leaders.  But if I were Abiola, I will not go the same route.  Our leader, Papa Awolowo would not have agreed to that also.”  Chief Awolowo died in 1987, but for Babatope, he forever remains a reference point.

    Babatope left me puzzled and troubled.  Few days earlier, we saw on national television, the fuzzy footage of Abiola’s visit to Abacha in Lagos.  We were told later that he was accompanied on that visit by many of his top supporters including Kingibe, Jakande and a young Senator from Lagos, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who was promised the post of deputy-governor. Few days later, Babatope, and most of the other nominees of the Awoist group and the Abiola group were appointed ministers. Abacha reneged on his promise to appoint civilian deputy governors and he was determined to do worse.

    In the early days of the regime, Babatope, Osomo, Alex Ibru (publisher of The Guardian who was also made the Minister of Internal Affairs) and Onagoruwa were briefing the meeting at Rewane’s house regularly.  In the end, most of them, claiming they were occupied with state’s assignments, were not showing up.  It was also clear that they were under serious security watch.  I went to see Papa Rewane with my friend, Funminiyi Afuye, (Baba Abraham Adesanya nicknamed him Afemo!) to complain about the turn of events.  We had not formed Idile Oodua then, but we had an informal group which included the likes of Engineer Adebayo Adenekan, Prince Ademola Oyinlola, my colleague in TELL, Kayode Anwo, an engineer, Biodun Bamkefa, also an engineer and now a pastor, Paschal Idowu, an insurance executive, Prince Adedokun Abolarin, lawyer (now Kabiyesi, the Orangun of Oke-Ila, Osun State) and Barrister Rotimi John. Papa Rewane said the Awoist group cannot refuse to collaborate with the Abacha junta if Abiola was in league with the regime.

    How to actualize Abiola’s victory had been a matter of contention among his supporters, especially those of us were ready to join the fray. In the wake of the June 12 annulment, there were many theories and suggestion on which road to take.  One of the biggest supporters of Abiola originally was General Olusegun Obasanjo, the retired military ruler who was then living on his farm in Otta, OgunState. He was a big pillar for TELL in our confrontation with General Ibrahim Babangida, the head of the ruling junta. Each time they seize copies of our publication, we always run to him for intervention. He had come out openly that Babangida must honour his pledge to hand over to an elected successor come August 27, 1993. After the election, my colleagues at TELL, NosaIgiebor, Editor-in-Chief and KolawoleIlori, Executive Editor, visited Obasanjo in his farm house. He was on the phone most of the time monitoring the result state by state.

    “This is a great day for Nigeria,” he told them. “Abiola is going to be President. The reputation of the military has been saved.”

    After the annulment was announced through a press statement distributed in Abuja by NdukaIrabor, the press secretary to military Vice-President Augustus Aikhomu, I went to Otta in the company of Dele Omotunde, the deputy Editor-in-Chief of TELL. Obasanjo was in a bellicose mood.

    “Annulment or no annulment, Babangida must leave by August 27,” he said.  “He made the promise, he has to keep it!”

    Then through a convoluted route that involved serious muscling and pressure from General Obasanjo, the military led by General Sani Abacha, the political class led by Abiola and his old friend and lately rival, Major-General Shehu Musa Yar’Adua, the civil society, led by BekoRansome-Kuti and Gani Fawehinmi and the Press, Babangida “stepped aside” on August 27, 1993. He left power in the powerless hand of an Interim Government allegedly led by Chief Ernest Adegunle Shonekan, a corporate titan who was at sea in the turbulent terrain of Abuja high-wire politics.

    After Shonekan’s ascension, my colleagues in TELL, Igiebor, OnomeOsifo-Whiskey, the Managing Editor, Ilori, and Ayo Akinkuotu, the Senior Associate Editor, who were earlier captured “as prisoners of war” by the agents of the Babangida dictatorship, were released.  Few days later, Shonekan sent a message that he would like to see us and we asked Igiebor and Osifo-Whiskey to go.  They met Shonekan at the Akinola Aguda House, Abuja. The denizens of the Aso Rock Presidential Villa claimed they were refurbishing the Presidential Palace and would not allow Shonekan to move in.  My friends said they would like to drink coffee.  Shonekan called the steward and ordered for coffee. The coffee was never brought until the meeting ended 40 minutes later.  This showed how powerful Shonekan was!

    Yet some of our leaders were ready to invest him with possibilities. At a meeting with some members of our group, one of our leaders said the public opposition to Shonekan would not work in our interest.

    “We need to support Degunle (Shonekan) to stabilize the country and conduct another presidential election,” he said.  “The alternative would be military rule.”

    “If they refuse to install Abiola, we will go to war,” one of us said.  “We don’t want military rule again.”

    “You don’t know war,” the big man replied.  “This is war:  You send 10 of your best reporters to go and cover a story in Maiduguiri.  Five of them are killed, three are wounded and only two came back home.  Then you are requested to send another batch of 10 reporters to Maiduguri and all the ten are killed.  That is war!”

    We did not agree with him.  Few days later, I tried to no avail to see Chief Abiola.  I complained to General Alani Akinrinade, who advised that I should see Otunba Olabiyi Durojaiye, former presidential aspirant on the platform of the Social Democratic Party, SDP, who was destined for the gulag under General Abacha. Durojaiye linked me up with Kudirat, Abiola’s senior wife who advised me to come 8 a.m the following morning. Sure enough, I met Abiola the following day by 8 a.m. I told him the advice of the bigman that he should cooperate with Shonekan so that another presidential election can be held.  Abiola shook his head and said this was unacceptable.

    “I did not vote for myself,” he said.  “Nigerians voted for me. I have already won the presidential election. You cannot re-sit for an exam you have already passed.”

    Indeed at that point, Abiola’s options were limited. He had expended huge amount of his personal vast fortune on the 1993 presidential elections.  I do not know of any group of Nigerians that donated money to Abiola’s campaign. He funded it virtually singlehandedly. To ask him to ‘re-sit for the exam,’ would have been very difficult considering the resources still available to his opponents, especially the enigmatic Major-General Yar’Adua and the shadowy elements in the military bent on stopping him at all cost.

    I gave him a one page recommendation from our own group.  He should continue to encourage “solidarity visits” from prominent individuals and groups. Elected governors too should be persuaded to place solidarity and congratulatory adverts for the President-elect in the newspapers, especially in Abiola’s National Concord. Abiola concurred to these suggestions. Two days later, adverts started coming out from the SDP governors congratulating the President-elect. We were very happy.  The American ambassador, like many other diplomats, visited Abiola. So was Lt. General Yakubu Danjuma, retired Chief of Army Staff. Danjuma visited and read an encouraging poem to him and other visitors.

    It was around this period that the Lagos State high court ruled that the ING was illegal. With this judgment, Nigeria was in a legal limbo. We expected that Abiola would be sworn-in as President in a revolutionary step.  There were protest across the country in his support, but the President-elect was looking at another direction instead of a direct revolutionary face-off with the government.  It was at this period that Professor BolajiAkinyemi, the former Minister of Foreign Affairs, wrote an article in the newspapers asking the military to intervene and save Nigeria from political uncertainties.

    After the judicial pronouncement, events were moving at a frenetic pace.  We were disappointed that Abiola did not make efforts to get sworn-in as President.  For us, this would have been the ultimate sign of defiance against the illegal ING. The atmosphere was charged with rumour of an impending coup which may be the result of a showdown between the military faction led by Major-General Dongoyaro and the other by Abacha.  Soon, Dongoyaro and many other top military officers were fired.  Then, the Abacha coup. Shonekan resigned with a gun literarily pointed at his head. He was shown on television claiming he was handing over power to “the most senior minister.” The sacked ING chairman was allowed to pick his suitcase from Aguda House and he quickly returned home.  Lucky man.

    Many weeks after Abacha had settled into the bosom of power, I was admitted into the small private sitting room of Abiola.  As I was approaching the landing of the staircase, several framed pictures of Abiola and some of his “friends,” starred from the wall.  Dominating that wall was the picture of Abiola and Babangida.  It gave one an eerie feeling. I think (but not too sure now) that there was also another picture of him and Abacha on the same wall.

    Abiola was in a cagey mood like a tiger at bay. I told him we were confused about the turn of events. What is going to happen now about his June 12 mandate? He admitted errors had been made.  He pointed out two “significant errors.” One was his choice of Kingibe as his vice-presidential candidate.  One of the earliest papers we presented to him was on the choice of a running mate.  We had recommended a candidate from the Middle-Belt, preferably, Dan Suleiman, a retired air commodore and former military governor. But the SDP governors preferred Kingibe and Abiola went with them. He said he did not know then that Kingibe had “extensive connections and relationship” with the security agencies and the military high command.

    The second error, he said, had to do with the emergence of Chief Anthony Anenih as the chairman of the SDP.  He said if he had shown sufficient interest, instead of trying to placate his old friend Yar’Adua, he would have been able to ensure the victory of Chief SergeantAwuse. With Anenih in charge, Yar’Adua came to virtually control the machinery of the SDP and it took a lot of efforts for Abiola to defeat Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, Yar’Adua’s protégé, during the presidential primary of the SDP.  When the annulment came, Abiola said Anenih did not consult him before “he negotiated away our victory.”  It was obvious then that Abiola had given up on his old friend, Yar’Adua, and the chairman of his party, Anenih.

    It was to be our last meeting.  Soon, the struggle would take on new dimensions corralling into its ever expanding vortex the likes of Chief Anthony Enahoro, Chief Adekunle Ajasin, Senator Abraham Adesanya, Chief Bola Ige, Soyinka, NdubisiKanu, General Akinrinade, Dr Amos Akingba (a man of unfathomable courage and daring), Durojaiye, Rewane, Tola Mobolurin, Dr Frederick Fasheun, Femi Falana, Olisa Agbakoba, Kola Omojola, Chris Anyanwu, Gbenga Adebusuyi, Baba Omojola, Wahaab Dosumu, Ayo Opadokun, Chief OluFalae, Arthur Nwankwo, Senator Ayo Fasanmi, Reuben Fasoranti, Dr Falaye Aina, Ayo Opadokun, Chief Ayo Adebanjo, Otunba Solanke Onasanya, Chief Frank Kokori, Comrade Adams Oshiohmole, Mrs Kofoworola Buknor-Akerele and many, many more, especially the redoubtable old men (and young men and women) of Afenifere. Many people do not remember now that the opposition National Democratic Coalition, NADECO, was formed at a meeting in the Ikeja home of General Adeyinka Adebayo, former military governor of the defunct Western State.

    Few weeks later, I met with Chief Babatope at a guest house in Ilupeju, owned by one of the parastatals of the Federal Ministry of Transport. He had now settled in as an Abacha minister.  I asked him pointedly whether and When Abacha was going to hand over power to Abiola.  Babatope said the situation has changed dramatically. “The National Assembly is gone, the state assemblies are gone, the governors are gone,” he said.  I reminded him that General Diya, the Chief of General Staff and deputy to Abacha had said “our stay will be brief.” Babatope said the situation has become more complicated.  “Only one man knows the answer,” he said unhappily.  “I don’t know.  Even Dipo (General Diya) doesn’t know!”

    Twenty three years later, our country deserves to know the truth about the June 12 annulment.  General Babangida has repeatedly accepted responsibility for that singular act that derailed his expensive but ultimately futile transition programme, but our country and posterity deserves to know the facts that led to that decision. President Mohammadu Buhari owes us the duty to let Nigerians know the truth about this singular event that has led us to where we are and ultimately gave us the current democratic dispensation.  Knowing the truth does not mean apportioning blames or dishing out punishment.  The truth is necessary for our liberation and progress as a country.