Tag: Afenifere

  • Restructuring: Between Afenifere and Osinbajo

    SIR: In Yoruba culture, you do not call an elder a liar. However, recent pronouncements by Afenifere elders about their own son and kinsman, Vice President Yemi Osinbajo that he does not believe in what the sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo believed inabout federalism is very far from the truth. This they gave as a reason for endorsing Abubakar Atiku. Osinbajo has fought and won battles in law courts fighting for the entrenchment of federalism more than any of the advocates now accusing him of working against restructuring.

    It is a very sad commentary on the conscience of our revered elders led by Chief R.F. Fasoranti and Chief Ayo Adebanjo. Professor Osinbajo has become a role model for the Yoruba race. Indeed, the DNA of the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo is running in his blood by marriage. His boss, President Muhammadu Buhari is described by the international community as being “STINGY” because he is taking his time to pour the oil in tricklesrather than all at once in his style of governance. It is said that the foundation of character is the quality of integrity. Integrity here means honesty: always telling the truth. It is an expression of the person you really are inside. You cannot determine the beliefs, goals and values of what a person says, writes, or declares when running for public office. It is what a person actually does that shows the real truth about that person as we were taught.

    Nigerians should remember on Saturday that it is going to be “CAVEAT EMPTOR – BUYER BEWARE” and also “VOLENTI NON FIT INJURIA” meaning in law “you cannot complain from an injury caused from your own voluntary act”. If you vote in looters, don’t complain about an empty treasury. Atiku’s strategy about restructuring may be courageous and brave but certainly he is swimming against the tide and he is on his own. He cannot score own goal and expect to be applauded by his people. Alexander the great wanted to be master of the then known world. At the age of 15, the Delphic Oracle had told him he could live a long life full of peace or a short life full of glory. He chose the latter. Research has confirmed that before Nigeria can be successfully restructured, there must be a convincing class/social and power structure on ground, suitable to absorb the shock of the reorganization that will result, in order not to leave our northern brothers in the cold, already stripped naked of their past glory in agricultural exploits due to the discovery of black gold in the Niger Delta region.

    Buhari was elected in 2015 with a clear mandate to deal with corruption. Nigeria stands to lose if we do not give him the opportunity on Saturday to finish the assignment. He is presently the only strongman with charisma that can finish the job of dealing with looters and jailing them. We must not allow anyone to terminate any progress made so far on the anti-corruption war. We cannot trust a goat to watch over our yams anymore. We must avoid opening the gates to locusts coming to devour us again and bring about famine and death.

     

    • John R. Jimoh, Sagamu, Ogun State.
  • Group slams Odumakin for comments on Afenifere

    A socio-cultural group, Yoruba Young Progressives (YYP), has chided Mr Yinka Odumakin for his comment on the summit held recently in Ibadan by the Afenifere (Egbe Ilosiwaju Yoruba).

    YYP President Morris Awosile in a statement yesterday described as laughable the attempt by Odumakin to discredit the “respectable Yoruba leaders.”

    Awosile said: “We understand that the pot of soup of Odumakin is being threatened following the decision of the Yoruba leaders to support the re-election of President Muhammadu Buhari and Prof Yemi Osinbajo.

    “Odumakin should come out to tell the world his source of income. As active participant in the summit held in Ibadan by the Afenifere (Egbe Ilosiwaju Yoruba), we stand by the unanimous decision to support all the candidates of All Progressives Congress (APC) as the party has proved beyond reasonable doubt that it is a progressive party who preach and implement the ideals of the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo.”

    YYP said the attacks on Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Prof Osinbajo were out of envy and lack of relevance in the political realm of Southwest.

    Awosil said: “If not for selfishness, why would the Yorubas support a party who failed for 16 years to address the challenges in the Yorubaland but only being deceived with restructuring it could not do when it was in power for close to two decades.

    “We need to restate the position of our elders that we will not lose our prime position in government by voting for the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), who offered position and benefits lower than Vice President currently occupied by a Yoruba person,” he said.

    “The summit held in Ibadan comprises of the real representatives of the Yorubas, thousands in numbers. Any other group claiming to be Afenifere should be treated as jesters. It is evidenced that the party of the late Chief Awolowo is progressive and if he were to be alive, he will have nothing to do with PDP as exhibited in his political activities. The PDP as a party, has never claimed to be progressive in all its stay in government.

    “There is no good intention behind the noise of Odumakin and his co-travellers. They are always in opposition to progressive moves. It is crystal clear that PDP political ideology is alien to Awolowo philosophy.

    “Yorubas were not moved by the recent adoption of the PDP presidential flag bearer, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar by Odumakin’s group. The same way they did in 2015 general elections of which they lost gallantly in the presidential and governorship elections in the Southwest. This has further proved their irrelevance in the politics of Southwest and false representation of the Yorubas.”

  • Afenifere, Ohanaeze, Middle Belt Forum, NEF, PANDEF endorse Atiku

    PEOPLE’S Democratic Party (PDP) presidential candidate Alhaji Atiku Abubakar yesterday received a major boost to his ambition with the leadership of five major social cultural groups endorsing his candidacy ahead of the February 16 election.

    Coming under the auspices of Nigeria Leaders and Elders Forum, the leaders of Afenifere, Northern Elders Forum, Ohaneze Ndigbo, Middle Belt Forum and the Pan Niger Delta Forum said they were endorsing the Atiku for the presidential election because they believe that among all the presidential candidates, he has what it takes to lead the country back on track and place it where it should be in the comity of nations.

    In a communique at the end of their meeting in Abuja, they explained that have studied the presidential candidates and they were convinced that Atiku demonstrated deep understanding of critical need of the country and possesses the capacity to proffer clear solutions.

    The communique read by Yinka Odumakin said the forthcoming elections was vital to the country’s democratic survival and co-existence and called on Nigerians, irrespective of religion or ethnicity, to stand in unison behind the Atiku candidacy.

    The communique reads:  “We adopt the PDP candidate, as the consensus candidate for the office of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as he has demonstrated the deep understanding of the critical need of the country at this time and possesses the capacity to proffer clear solutions in that respect.”

    Atiku, in his response to the endorsement, said the move has placed a greater challenge on his assignment.

    In a statement yesterday, which was personally signed by him, Atiku expressed hope for the country as Nigerians go to the polls to elect a new president in a few days.

    The statement said: “I am moved to tears that in the midst of deep divisions and deliberate use of instrumentalities of state to set our people against themselves in the last three and a half years, responsible and respected leaders across Nigeria have agreed to come together for the purpose of endorsing my candidature for the February 16, 2019 presidential elections.

    “The endorsement by the leading lights of our nationalities – Afenifere, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Northern Elders Forum, Pan-Niger Delta Forum and Middle Belt Forum is a loud statement that there is hope for our country as we go to the polls in a few days.”

    But, the APC Presidential Campaign Council rejected Atiku’s endorsement.

    The party described it as a fraud by desperate members of the PDP.

    Its spokesman, Festus Keyamo, while reacting to the endorsement, said those who gathered under the various regional groupings were only members of the PDP endorsing their party’s candidate.

    “Secondly, as to the voodoo percentages allocated to Alhaji Atiku Abubakar in some voodoo projections by some media houses (which should have since changed their crests to the umbrella – the symbol of the PDP), it is laughable to see them project a tight race between President Muhammadu Buhari and  Alhaji Atiku Abubakar.

    “For instance, we note with amusement the clear lead given to Atiku in the Southeast, just because his running mate is from the region, but fail to see that same clear advantage given to President Buhari in the Southwest from where the vice president comes.”

  • Atiku ‘moved to tears’ by endorsement of Afenifere, Ohanaeze, NEF, others

    The presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Atiku Abubakar has relished the endorsement by five socio cultural associations, saying the move has placed a greater challenge on his assignment.

    The Afenifere, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Northern Elders Forum, Pan-

    Niger Delta Forum and the Middle Belt Forum after a meeting in Abuja on Sunday, thrown their full weight behind Atiku’s presidential aspiration.

    In a statement Sunday, which he personally signed, Atiku expressed hope for the country as Nigerians go to the polls to elect a new President in a few days.

    The statement reads: “I am moved to tears that in the midst of deep divisions and deliberate use of instrumentalities of state to set our people against themselves in the last three and a half years, responsible and respected leaders across Nigeria have agreed to come together for the purpose of endorsing my candidature for the February 16th, 2019 presidential elections.

    READ ALSO: Afenifere, NEF, Ohaneze, PANDEF, others endorse Atiku

    “The endorsement by the leading lights of our nationalities – Afenifere, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Northern Elders Forum, Pan-Niger Delta Forum and Middle Belt Forum is a loud statement that there is hope for our country as we go to the polls in a few days.

    “Today we put aside all our prejudices to elect a President with religion and ethnicity playing no role in our elections. I profusely thank our Leaders across the country who have created this wonderful moment for us to come to the table of brotherhood.

    “Once again, and in the words of our old National Anthem, we can proudly sing: ‘Though tribes and tongues may differ, in brotherhood we stand’.

    The opposition presidential candidate said the endorsement has buoyed him to lead a Pan-Nigerian team that will give practical interpretation to what has been done by the time he takes the baton of leadership of the country, “by the grace of Allah, on May 29, 2019”.

    Continuing, Atiku said: “Many countries of the world have been led into disintegration by strongmen (one in each country) and we have seen how individuals who understand the management of diversities have rallied their people for unity.

    “I have been chosen to unite our people and exactly that I will. I will run a properly federated Nigeria through constitutional reforms to bring out the best from all sections of Nigeria to make Nigeria work again like in the past when the Saudi Royal family came to Nigeria to access Medicare.

    “We will promote an inclusive Nigeria based on productivity that every section of Nigeria will bring out the best under their soil, and in their brains to make Nigeria assume its position in Africa and the global community.

    “It would be 100% for every section of Nigeria as I would not understand any arithmetic outside that. I enjoin our people across Nigeria to come out en-mass to vote on February 16 to pull our country from the brink and propel it to greater heights so we can live a better life. Take my words as a covenant with  Nigeria”.

     

     

     

  • Afenifere endorses Buhari for 2019 presidential election

    MEMBERS of the pan-Yoruba socio-political group, Afenifere, rose from their summit in Ibadan, Oyo State yesterday with an endorsement of the candidature of President Muhammadu Buhari of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as the group’s choice for the February 16 election.

    The group, led by Second Republic Senator Ayo Fasanmi, had after its meeting at the House of Chiefs, Agodi State Secretariat in Ibadan on December 20, last year, said it would announce on January 29  its preferred candidate for the presidency.

    It endorsed Buhari for the February 16 election.

    At the endorsement, which took place at the International Conference Centre, University of Ibadan, the group argued that it endorsed Buhari because of his outstanding performance.

    At the event were Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, Chief Fasanmi, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s representative and former Minister of State for Defence Demola Seriki, Lagos Deputy Governor Mrs. Idiat Adebule and her Ogun State counterpart Mrs. Yetunde Onanuga.

    The royal fathers were represented by the Ewi of Ado-Ekiti, Oba Rufus Adedejuyigbe; Akirun of Ikirun, Oba Abioye Oyebode, Oniye of Iye-Ekiti, Oba Adeleye Oni among others.

    House of Representatives member (Atiba/AFIJIO/Oyo East/Oyo West) Akeem Adeyemi; Asimiyu Alarape; Chief Akin Fasae and gubernatorial candidate of the ruling APC in Lagos State, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, also attended the event.

    Prof Osinbajo, who was the special guest of honour, arrived at the venue at 3.50pm. He was handed a copy of the lecture, titled: “Restructuring for harmonious and optimal socio-economic development: Prospects and challenges”.

    The lecture was delivered by Senator Olubunmi Adetunmbi.

    In their goodwill messages, the governors of the six Southwest states  – Abiola Ajimobi (Oyo); Ibikunle Amosun (Ogun); Oluwarotimi Akeredolu (Ondo); Adegboyega Oyetola (Osun) and Akinwunmi Ambode (Lagos) – urged the people of the zone to ensure the re-election President Buhari and Osinbajo next month. They were all represented.

    Mrs. Onanuga, who spoke for Amosun, said: “ Ogun State  is very important in the history of  the Southwest because it has produced personalities like the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Pa Abraham Adesanya and Prof Osinbajo and as a result, the state has contributed to the socio-economic development of the country.”

    She called on all to vote for President Buhari and Osinbajo.

    Mrs Onanuga urged the people to collect their PVCs to enable them exercise their franchise.

    Prof. Bayo Ademodi, who stood in for Akeredolu, congratulated Afenifere for the summit and hailed the group’s leader for his steadfastness.

    He said: “Afenifere truly stands for progressivism. It is imperative we focused on restructuring. And the only party that stands for progressivism is APC. And come February 16, that is the direction we are going.”

    Oyo State Deputy Governor Otunba Alake Adeyemo, who spoke for Ajimobi, expressed delight on the lecture’s title, adding that the Federal Government cannot close its ears to restructuring as a mere noise in the market place.

    He said: “There is no denying the fact that Nigeria has gone through series of restructuring since independence.”

    Oyetola’s representative Dr. Charles Akinola, paid tributes to the Afenifere leadership for its regular intervention in the affairs of the nation and described the topic as “timely”.

    The motion for President Buhari and Prof Osinbajo’s endorsement was moved by an octogenarian, Senator Olabiyi Durojaye. It was supported by other five leaders of the group – Prince Tajudeen Olusi (Lagos), Prof Bayonile Ademodi (Ondo), Elder Yemi Alade (Ekiti), Chief S. M. Akindele (Oyo) and Sooko Adewoyin (Osun).

    Fasanmi said Buhari deserved another term because he has performed credibly.

    He said: “I want all of you to work and vote for Buhari who has performed very credibly and I think he deserved second term in the office.

    “He is the only candidate that is campaigning about a corruption free society. I am pleased that all the Southwest under the APC fold is going this direction.”

     

  • Afenifere: Back to Awo

    A highly perceptive columnist with this newspaper, last Sunday, reflected critically and clinically on the three contending strands or tendencies within the Yoruba socio-cultural group, Afenifere, the dialectics of their relationship and their respective stances towards this year’s general elections. It is an important issue, which we will focus on in this space this week.

    The Chief Reuben Fasoranti-led Afenifere has unapologetically and unequivocally declared its support for the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, largely on account of the latter’s promise to undertake the restructuring of the country within his first six months in office. On its part, the Pa Ayo Fasanmi-led tendency within Afenifere is obviously inclined towards the reelection of President Muhammadu Buhari even though it has been rather tentative and less vociferous in asserting its position. I am unaware that Honourable Wale Oshun’s Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG) has expressed an opinion on the matter publicly.

    Incidentally, all three Afenifere tendencies trace their organizational, ideological and philosophical lineage to the legendary Chief Obafemi Awolowo, the first Premier of Western Nigeria in the first republic. This column has no cause to doubt the Awoist credentials of any of the three groups or their commitment to the best interest of Yoruba land. The difference between them has to do more with personality conflicts and different perceptions of political strategy rather than fundamental divergences of ideology or philosophy.

    However, is there really any concrete historical, organizational link between Awolowo and Afenifere as we know it today as represented by any of its current tendencies? What really are the historical roots of Afenifere? In his meticulously researched as well as lucidly and thrillingly narrated book, ‘The Kiss of Death: Afenifere and the Infidels’, Honourable Wale Oshun offers valuable insights into these questions. On pages 26 and 27 of the book, the author gives an account of a historic encounter between Chief Ayo Adebanjo and the late Chief Bola Ige as regards the origin of Afenifere at a reconciliatory meeting of the body in Ijebu Igbo on March 26, 2000. Chief Ige claimed on that occasion “that he founded Afenifere in 1994 in his Ibadan home, and reeled out names of persons who were with him from the start”.

    Chief Ayo Adebanjo, by Honourable Oshun’s account, countered that “Afenifere came into being in 1954” and that “Chief Meredith Adisa Akinloye coined the word “Afenifere” at the meeting of the Action Group leaders who wanted an easy sell to their non-literate Yoruba followers”. In chapter three of the book, Honourable Oshun offers his own position when he submits that “I am prepared to postulate that until January 15, 1966, when the first military coup occurred and swept away all the political parties, Afenifere was both an organization and a slogan…I am prepared to contend that any time Action Group as an organization was mentioned, it was “Afenifere” for the non-literate Yoruba for whom it was coined”.

    It is difficult to fault Honourable Oshun’s position that Afenifere existed as a slogan to simply explicate the Action Group motto of ‘life more abundant’ for the benefit of non English speaking Yoruba members prior to January 15, 1966. But I find it difficult to support the contention that Afenifere had any concrete organizational existence before the Cicero of Esa Oke founded an association named Afenifere at his Ibadan home in 1994. Since politics was banned at the time, Bola Ige obviously gave concrete organizational expression to the slogan, “Afenifere” in 1994 to mobilize the Yoruba in the struggle against the annulment of the June 12, 1993 presidential election won by Chef MKO Abiola.

    In the Second Republic, the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) was the lineal organizational descendant of the Action Group of the first republic. But UPN was known in Yoruba land as “Egbe Imole” and not “Afenifere”. “Egbe Imole”, literarily means the party of light, which was derived from UPN’S symbol of a flaming torch. Thus, Afenifere existed neither as a slogan nor as an organization in the second republic. And neither in the first nor in the second republic was Awolowo ever a member of any concrete organizational structure known as Afenifere.

    Awolowo was never named leader of Afenifere as mistakenly believed in many quarters. Rather, as Chief Bola Ige narrates in his book, ‘People, Politics and Politicians of Nigeria’, Awolowo was unanimously chosen as ‘Leader of the Yoruba’ at a meeting of 100 notable Yoruba leaders from all political and ideological shades convened in Ibadan by the then military governor of the Western State, General Adeyinka Adebayo. Leadership of Afenifere is not synonymous with leadership of the Yoruba.

    It is instructive that with the exit of the military in 1999, Chief Bola Ige’s revived Afenifere then led by the late Pa Abraham Adesanya could not participate organizationally in the politics of this dispensation. Rather, it founded the defunct Alliance for Democracy (AD) as its political arm to contest for political positions and fight for political power. The stresses and contradictions arising from the failure to distinguish between AD’s role as a political party and that of Afenifere as a socio-cultural group not only weakened the latter, it led to the disintegration of the former.

    But Awo with characteristic prescience had foreseen this possibility as early as the 1940s. In 1945, Awolowo had spearheaded the formation of the Egbe Omo Oduduwa in London as a socio-cultural group with the aim of forging unity among the Yoruba whom he described at the time as “a highly progressive but badly disunited group who paid lip-service to a spiritual union and affinity to a common ancestor – Oduduwa”. However, with the birth of the Action Group as a political party on the 21st of March, 1951, Awolowo made a conscious decision to keep the new party organizationally distinct from the Egbe Omo Oduduwa, which was an essentially cultural association.

    In his autobiography published in 1960, Awolowo writes about the tension that initially existed between the Egbe Omo Oduduwa and the Action Group. In his words, “About May 1950, the Egbe feared that the Action Group when fully launched might become its rival and might even eclipse it. The Egbe, therefore, decided to enter into politics and to have its own political wing. It called on those of its members who were organizing the Action Group to abandon it and join the Egbe’s political wing…I was quite prepared to have the Action Group disbanded, leaving the Egbe free to start its political wing”.

    But at the end of the day, Awo writes, “The view was firmly held that it would be dangerous and contrary to its declared ideals for the Egbe to engage in party politics. Accordingly, a committee was appointed to meet the Central Executive Committee of the Egbe to argue the matter out and allay the fears of the Egbe. In the result, the Egbe reversed its former decision and agreed to remain a cultural organization, giving itself freedom of action to back any political party whose policy and programme appealed to it in the Regional elections”.

    Awolowo would no doubt have had serious reservations about any socio-cultural group claiming the proprietary right to take political positions on behalf of the Yoruba without being given any electoral mandate to do so. He would have been even more uncomfortable with any group claiming political or moral superiority to other groups in Yoruba land simply because they claim association with his name or political principles. This is obvious from the message he sent from prison to the Western Regional Conference of the Action Group held at Ibadan on 6th July, 1963, and published in his collection of speeches, ‘Voice of Reason’.

    Permit me to quote him at length: “Within the past few days, a good deal of words and ink has been expended in propagating the unity of the Yoruba, as if the Yoruba are disunited. Time was when there was real disunity among the Yoruba. But since the birth of the Egbe Omo Oduduwa in London in 1945, this objective has been relentlessly pursued and accomplished. Those who, however, believe in the unity of the Yoruba, of the Igbo, of the Hausa, etc, must never rest on their oars. But the line has been drawn, and must be kept indelible, between a Cultural Organization like the Ibo State Union, Ibibio State Union, Egbe Omo Oduduwa etc, on the one hand, and political parties like the Action Group and the NCNC on the other”.

    And to demonstrate that he did not consider his political tendency superior to others in Yoruba land, Awolowo told the AG delegates unequivocally that “It is erroneous to equate the Action Group of Nigeria with the Yoruba people, or to regard our party as being a Yoruba organization. Furthermore, whilst the Action Group does not participate in the Federal Government since January 1960, some outstanding Yorubas have been in the Council of Ministers since the last Federal elections. There are others in the NPC. These persons are as loyal to the cause of the Yoruba people as those of us in the Action Group”.

    All the tendencies within Afenifere should go back to Awo. As a cultural organization, no strain of Afenifere should take partisan political positions purportedly on behalf of the Yoruba. They have no mandate do so. They have no structure to meaningfully mobilize politically behind any candidate or party. As a group, let Afenifere outline for the people its vision of the political programme it considers best for the Yoruba at best as a guide or advisory. Let the choice of party or candidate be left to the best discretion of the individual.

  • Afenifere, APC and 2019

    THERE are essentially three factions jostling for the soul of Afenifere, the pan-Yoruba socio-political group, and the heart of the Yoruba people. One is led by Ayo Fasanmi; another is led by Reuben Fasoranti; and a third, distinctively called the Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG), is led by Wale Oshun. While the Fasoranti Afenifere is very active and media savvy, the Fasanmi Afenifere is no less authentic but somewhat laid back. The ARG is the most ideological and nostalgic of the three. All three factions trace their genealogy to the Afenifere formed in 1951 by Obafemi Awolowo. While they dispute one another’s authenticity and pedigree, it is safe to consider all of them as representing diverse Yoruba worldviews and political persuasions, regardless of the clamorous denunciations and characterisations they sometimes hurl at one another.

    As the 2019 presidential campaigns intensify, and are rounded up this January and mid-February, the differences between the wrangling Yoruba groups are likely to be exacerbated. No one should think that any of the three groups has an implacable hold on the Southwest. The media-savvy Fasoranti faction, now leaning heavily in the direction of the Atiku Abubakar Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidacy, will stridently portray itself as the unique, altruistic and truly representative faction determined to act in the best interests of the Yoruba. But the Fasanmi faction will remind them that their leader, Pa Fasoranti, having complained in 2015 of the distractions and contradictions rampant in their faction, resigned his position in frustration until he was prevailed upon to rescind the resignation. The Fasanmi faction also continues to indicate clearly that they are more authentic than any other.

    As the next presidential election comes into view, and given the many troubling and interconnected factors destined to shape that fateful election, the Afenifere factions are likely to become even more fractious and irreconcilable. More than a decade ago, the ARG had attempted to midwife a reconciliation in Ibadan between the factions. That spirited effort failed, leading Hon Oshun to actively pursue a different path whose trajectory sometimes coincides with the Fasanmi faction, particularly in politics. Indeed, for the purpose of the next presidential election, the three factions appeared to have filed behind the two leading presidential contenders, President Muhammadu Buhari of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and Alhaji Atiku of the PDP. More, given their political antecedents, the Fasoranti faction has been more naturally and militantly inclined towards the PDP, and the condominial Fasanmi/ARG faction has been more inclined towards the APC. The two factions debate and dispute which is the more progressive and which is the less conservative. In the face of the terrible fulminations by the groups, there are no clear answers.

    In 2015, as Nigeria headed for the polls, the Goodluck Jonathan presidency, sitting atop the PDP, appeared irredeemably conservative, if not entirely reactionary. That government was confused and profligate, and its leaders almost wholly irresponsible and incorrigible. In those days, it would have been unreasonable to regard the Jonathan presidency as progressive, and a party that ruled Nigeria for 16 years since 1999 concomitantly radical. But when elections beckoned in 2015, the Fasoranti group, despite their media and rhetorical prowess, simply cut to the chase, endorsed the Jonathan candidacy, and controversially and disingenuously imbued him with some form of progressivism on account of his promise of a distant utopia, to wit, restructuring. Though the Fasoranti group claimed to speak for the Yoruba, few hearkened to that call, and fewer still rallied to their cause.

    However, the predictable outcome of the 2015 presidential election and the ascendancy of the unreformed and truculent President Muhammadu Buhari has reawakened the fear of Fulani irredentism and the resurgence of bitter divisions in Nigeria. Consequently, what seemed like progressivism in 2015, as embodied by President Buhari and exemplified by the APC, has now transmogrified into the worst forms of conservatism. And what seemed like tolerable conservatism in 2015, as partially engendered by Dr Jonathan and emblematised by the PDP, has now become controversially acceptable progressivism. Time not only heals wounds, it also, it seems, redefines concepts and colours perspectives. Sensing the discomfort of the APC, the Fasoranti faction has, therefore, become very loud in their denunciations and triumphant in their retribution.

    There is no doubt that President Buhari — not the APC in particular — is a deeply and unrepentantly divisive figure. The Southwest is a testament to that division, a division destined to last for a much longer time in that disputatious region than the Yoruba are gifted both to manage and to heal. The Yoruba may have progressivism as the dominant strand in their democratic socialism ideology, and their cultural lodestar may be anchored on justice and fairness, yet cohesiveness and unity of purpose are generally episodic to them, not permanent features. Not even the rebellion of Afonja in Ilorin, the then Are Ona Kakanfo, could cajole them into unity until the Fulani began marching south. Even then that temporary unity was in danger of unravelling before the British took control. It also took the events surrounding the first coup and countercoup and the civil war to rally the Yoruba behind Pa Awolowo. But by 1983 and onwards, that unity was already being tested.

    Whatever they think, and no matter the fierce rhetorical exchange between them, the three squabbling Afenifere factions are unlikely in the present circumstance to forge a united approach to the next presidential election. It is doubtful whether it is even needed in the face of the conceptual ideological ambivalence that prevails in the Southwest, like elsewhere. President Buhari may typify the worst conservatism today, but there is little doubt, however, that the APC still represents a more discernible form of progressivism than the PDP, despite Alhaji Atiku’s promise of restructuring. For it is not clear how one promise or two can suddenly catapult a party from arch-conservatism to real progressivism. Indeed, what seems at play today is that Afenifere’s loyalties and ideological affiliations are a reflection of the indeterminate preferences and prejudices of key Afenifere personalities. Pa Fasoranti and Pa Fasanmi may be exempted from such insular and selfish loyalties and may in fact be really altruistic, but the younger elements in the two factions in reference are not immune to baser political, social and economic considerations.

    In particular, the younger elements in the Fasoranti faction make the mistake of seeking an impracticable unity of ideas that is neither possible nor desirable, nor yet sensible. It is not possible to make the Yoruba see either President Buhari or Candidate Atiku from the same ideological and political prisms. It makes it all the harder and inexplicable for the faction’s spokesmen to justify their rage against those in other factions — or even outside all the factions — who wish to make up their minds on whom to support based on totally extraneous factors. A Yoruba man does not have to be a member of Afenifere or support their viewpoint to be a Yoruba man. Surely, Afenifere spokesmen must see the futility of trying to bully the Southwest, using cultural and ideological concepts native to the region, into conforming to their worldview. Such bullying tactics negate the cultural lodestar that the spokesmen themselves try to preach and elevate into an ethnic ideology. Bad-tempered use of words and unflattering and sometimes libellous descriptions neither help the factions nor the Yoruba as a whole.

    The Yoruba pride themselves on being the most liberal, democratic and ideological ethnic group in the country. How is it then that they contradistinctively try to pressure their members and others into one worldview? How is it that they cannot understand that holding different political and even ideological positions do not amount to undermining the fundamental ethics of the Yoruba society? The Yoruba must begin to eschew the puerile tactics of labelling those who differ as traitors, or seeing one party as moral and the others as immoral. After all, both the APC and the PDP, given years of defections across party lines, have become operationally and ideologically indistinguishable. When the Fasoranti faction endorsed Dr Jonathan in 2015, most Yoruba were stupefied. But the faction nevertheless had the right to endorse whomsoever they wished. And when another faction endorsed President Buhari, the outcome of that endorsement has proved that no one, let alone a top faction of an ethnic group, is infallible.

    The spokesmen of the Fasoranti faction have often spoken self-righteously and indignantly about everything. It is a wrong-headed approach to politics. They of course reserve the right to lend support to anyone they like. But that right must never, ever be denied any other person or group. If the Yoruba are truly liberal as they often boast, now is the time to walk the talk. They speak glowingly of the rule of law and endearingly of the principles of natural justice; it is time they lived what they preach. No one has the right to drag the entire Yoruba people bad-temperedly into a bitter conflict over the PDP and APC, no matter what enticing promises the parties make, whether it concerns restructuring or the presidency in 2023, and no one has the right to arrogate to himself or his party the spokesman of the race.

    More importantly, the bitter and effusive spokesmen of various Afenifere factions must begin to realise that supporting one party or another does not make one faction more Yoruba or less Yoruba. In addition, regardless of the closeness of a party to the dominant Yoruba worldview, supporting that party does not make a politician more ethical than another. Given the passage of time and the huge transformations that have taken place in the politics and economy of Nigeria, attempting to herd the Yoruba into one party may be both unwise and counterproductive. Let a thousand flowers bloom. After all, as Moshood Kashimawo Abiola and President Buhari have proved, to win a presidential election today will require a candidate to either form the right alliances or possess an appeal that cuts across ethnic boundaries. But how can a candidate forge the right alliances or possess the needed cross-cultural appeal if he allows himself to be put in the straightjackets insinuated by unthinking ethnic factions?

  • Afenifere endorses Buhari for 2019 polls

    •Public declaration January 29
    •‘Any other Yoruba not with us are renegade and usurpers’

    The Pan-Yoruba socio-cultural and political organisation, Afenifere, has endorsed President Muhammadu Buhari and Vice President Yemi Osinbajo as the Yoruba candidates ahead of next year’s presidential election.

    It said any other group that fails to align with the current position would be treated usurpers and renegades.

    The organisation recalled that Afenifere, as started by the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, should be progressive.

    Its spokesperson Biodun Akin-Fasae stated the group’s position yesterday while addressing reporters on the outcome of a meeting of delegates and elders from the six Southwest states in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital.

    The group is led by the longest-living senator in Nigeria, Pa Ayo Fasanmi.

    Notable figures at the meeting included a former Oyo State Governor Omololu Olunloyo, Prince Tajudden Olusi, Dr. Abayomi Fini, Chief Adeleke Adewoyin, Prince Biodun Ogunleye, former Oyo State Deputy Governor Iyiola Oladokun and Pa Ayo Afolabi.

    Governments’ representatives at the meeting included Dr Morounkola Thomas (Oyo), Mr Oladosu Oladipo, Chief Akin Fasae (Ekiti), Mr Muyiwa Ige (Osun), Prof. Adebanjo Ademodi (Ondo), Mr Tokunbo Ajasin and Mr Awa Bamiji.

    Akin-Fasae said: “We have decided to host the Yoruba land in Ibadan on January 29. It is to proclaim the support of the Yoruba for President Muhammadu Buhari in 2019 and to tell the world that the Afenifere that Baba Awolowo created before he left is still intact as a progressive movement. Any Afenifere person who is not in the progressive is not part of us.

    “We are now telling the Yoruba people and the whole world that Afenifere, as enunciated and enacted by the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, is still intact and we are going to support President Buhari and Vice President Yemi Osinbajo in the 2019 presidential election.”

    Asked why Afenifere was supporting the Federal Government, He said: “The economy is a collective issue. The economy has been bastardised for years. As at now, President Buhari is trying his best; he is bringing the economy up. The gross domestic product (GDP) is growing. Look at the programmes for youths and the children through empowerment and school feeding programmes in schools across the country; 26 states are already in the programme and many other states are happy with it.

    “So, President Buhari is trying his best and the best is yet to come. That is why we are asking people to vote for him, particularly in this Yoruba land, in the 2019 presidential election.”

    On the authenticity of the support in view of another faction of the group supporting another presidential candidate, Akin-Fasae said: “The Afenifere that we know in Yoruba land is a progressive movement. This is where we are today in Ibadan. The other Afenifere (the Ayo Adebanjo group) that is talking about Abubakar Atiku are not part of us. They are usurpers.

    “The Yoruba are not divided; there are not so many Afeniferes. Yoruba is a nation and even during the time of Baba Awolowo, there were dissent voices. So, we are not embarrassed. Our group is led by the longest living senator in Nigeria, Pa Ayo Fasanmi. You can see everybody there, including Senator Durojaiye, Dr Olunloyo, Baba Olusi. So, every other person in Yoruba land who is not a renegade is with us. There was no time Afenifere has not been a socio-political organisation. It is a socio-cultural and political organisation. That is just the full name of Afenifere…”

     

     

     

  • Afenifere: The Cry of Owl

    “O Allah! Rescue us from (the evil) of this (Yoruba) nation of oppressors and raise for us a formidable leader who can stand as our guardian in the face of treachery and oppression…” Q. 4:75

    Preamble

    In Yoruba mythology of yore, there was a bird called owl to which a strange myth was attached to the detriment of its coiners. According to that mythology, the owl was a symbolic bird that was highly respected for playing the role of alerting other birds regarding their times of sleeping and of waking up, as considered necessary, to save them from falling prey to predators. That special   but voluntary role made the owl a distinguished bird with awful posture wherever and whenever it appeared in the midst of other birds. But with time, the owl began to feel important as it started turning its voluntary service into an obligation for which others must pay even at the expense of their convenience. With that clandestine design, it stopped working for self-survival and went round to demand payment of compulsory tax from other birds on a daily basis in the wrong belief that without its own voluntary service, no other bird could survive.

    When it became apparent that the owl’s new flamboyant lifestyle was fully dependent on the sweat of the other birds, a joint decision was taken to do away with its voluntary service that was being turned into an enslaving imposition.

     

    How the Owl Became Pariah

    Through a unanimous decision of all the birds at a meeting, the payment of compulsory tax which the owl had cunningly imposed on the

    other birds was stopped. By then, those other birds had adapted to the times of sleeping and waking up without any disturbing noise by the

    owl. On the other hand, the owl also had fully adapted to feeding itself from the sweat of other birds haven taken its voluntary service for a full time job. Thus, with the stoppage of the owl’s unnecessary service, the latter became a disturbing idle entity which the other birds generally avoided.

     

    Like Owl, Like Afenifere

    The similitude of the owl of yore is like that of a Yoruba Christo-political group called Afenifere which today cries out disturbingly at random to make an untenable Christo-political demand from the generality of the Yoruba people of the the Southwest Nigeria.

    The group clandestinely assumed the position of a self0appointed megaphone for the Yoruba nation even as it illegally proclaims itself as the symbol of Yoruba thought on public issues including political decisions.

    Like the above cited mythological owl, Afenifere does not realize how irrelevant it has become in Yoruba land haven lost the service it once voluntarily decided to render to that sophisticated tribe in Nigeria.

     

    Meaningful Life

    Human life is like a coin with two sides. While one side bears the symbol of a crowned head, the other bears the sign of an animal’s tail. And the choice of head or tail is left to the custodian of the coin as determined by the contemporary democratic dispensation.

    Today, as in the primordial time, the essence of a meaningful life for any conscientious human group or individual in any decent society is not just to live and let live but also to work for posterity by nurturing the younger ones decently for an enduring heritage and by grooming them for impeccable continuity of a meaningful life. Anything contrary to that is nothing other than a fake life to which no decent individual person or group will want to be associated.  That is the factor that now makes Afenifere a pariah entity among the Yoruba people just like the owl of yore among other birds in the forest.

     

     The Nature of Owl

    Anybody who knows how the mythological night-marauding owl rigmaroles with its nauseating antics will not be surprised by the abominable role that the so-called Afenifere group is playing comically through the Southwest media today in Nigeria to the detriment of the overwhelming majority of Yoruba people who are Muslims. Here is a Christo-political group that operates like a fish in a shallow well which ignorantly proclaims itself the king of all aquatic animals including whales, sharks and hippos. The tendency for such a fish is to deceptively perceive its hollow environment inside the shallow well as larger than all oceans and seas in the world. And that is exactly what  the octogenarian members of Afenifere are doing with their deemed eyes of the past, to proclaim themselves as the leaders, in Yoruba land, who must dictate to the modern Yoruba people on what to do or not to do about their political and religious lives. Ironically, these are men and women of yesteryears who had spent their time and the time of their children as well as that of their grandchildren running after ephemeral benefits for themselves alone but still not satisfied with their accumulated wealth. Even at the twilight of their lives, these mostly octogenarian grandpas and grandmas are still seeking an opportunity to spend the time of their great grandchildren for their own parochial benefits alone.

     

    Weak Vision and Improvidence

    At a time when vision rather than improvidence is the order of the day, it is strange that this group’s deleterious political activities are still geared towards the search for self -relevance even where and when relevance for their primitive wish has become anachronistic. But what else should be expected from a group that once claimed to be progressive but has now terribly retrogressed into ultra-conservatism in the sheer belief that conservatism is today’s real bastion of stomach infrastructure for septuagenarian and octogenarian citizens who are in the twilight of their lives? Isn’t that belief a euphemism for advanced corruption? What legacy can such Nigerians leave behind for young Nigerians of today and tomorrow?

     

    Glass House

    Living in a glass house is a proverbial cliché connoting dignity in all its ramifications. In the English culture, anybody who is said to be an inhabitant of a glass house is deemed to be exemplarily dignified in utterances, actions and conduct. In virtually all civilized cultures of the world, that cliché is mostly attributable to elderly people who, because of their seeming leadership qualities, are deemed to be exemplary in knowledge and experience. It is only where a deviation occurs that pestering of verbal or written missiles becomes a weapon of ‘infra dignitatem’ from the victims of oppression. Those who are close to the so-called Afenifere should let that group know that today’s world is fast changing in such a way that the onetime values of pedigree are no longer a measure of dignity.

     

    The Plight of Yoruba Muslims

    The Yoruba Muslims of the current generation in the Southwest of Nigeria who were never privileged to witness the political and religious trauma which their parents and grandparents suffered in the hands of Yoruba oppressors in the 1950s and 1960s in this region, when Yoruba Muslims had not fully imbibed Western literacy, are still feeling the impact of that trauma today.  They may however take advantage of today’s atrocious spectacle to retrospectively view the religious cloak of those years and use same to unmask some dubious characters, who hid under those evil cloaks to stifle lives out of their parents socially and psychologically in those years to the detriment of today’s Muslim generation in the region.

     

    Religious Politics

    In 2015, when the general election was approaching in Nigeria, Afenifere told a particular Presidential candidate that Yoruba people had decided to give him their block voting. That insulting pronouncement in the name of Yoruba tribe, in anticipation of a richer stomach infrastructure, for its obscure members alone elicited a common question. Who mandated Afenifere to make such an fraudulent proclamation in the name of Yoruba nation? And,  eventually, both the Presidential candidate and the proclaimers of the fraudulent statement failed woefully. But characteristic of shameless people who often pursue their desired ambition desperately, the proclamation was repeated a couple of weeks ago as a confirmation of shamelessness on the part of those whose permanent political hallmark is self-aggrandizement. The fact that no one can give what he does not possess cannot be faulted. The days of abracadabra in local politics are gone forever.

     

    2014 National Confab

    Sometime early in 2014, this same group which sold the idea of national confab to President Goodluck Jonathan desperately hijacked the Southwest list of the Presidential nominees to that confab and chose 15 of its members (all non-Muslims) to the exclusion of the entire Muslim populace in the region whose numerical strength cannot be underestimated. It took the rebellious formation of a splinter group named A’fenifere Renewal Group’ for the greedy Afenifere to concede only one seat to the leader of that splinter group who was said to be the representative of millions of the Southwest Muslims at the national confab.

    When, in reaction to that clandestine act, the Muslim Ummah of the South West of Nigeria (MUSWEN) wrote a memo to the National confab to put the records straight, Afenifere quickly but deceptively wrote a letter to the Southwest Muslim Ummah (MUSWEN) inviting the latter to a meeting of mutual understanding. But characteristically, that deceptive meeting never saw the light of the day as Afenifere displayed its usual chameleonic prank as a way of dodging the meeting which it initiated.

    If a group of octogenarian members of Afenifere can still be known for such pranks even at the twilight of their lives, what legacy will they leave behind for the future leaders in the region?

     

    Evidence of Ignorance

    What these people do not and may not know in a foreseeable future is that with the coming of internet and social media the definition of literacy has tremendously changed from mere ability to read and write some old wives’ tales and fables to that of modern browsing and messaging through the internet in the 21st century. And without such standard of literacy this time around any person who still claims to be literate is half-dead. However, it takes only the seeing to recognize the light and make the best use of it. Therefore, it cannot be a surprise that the members of Afenifere group are still snoring in their primordial sleep while expecting others to be off line like them.

    Even in Yoruba land where Afenifere is supposed to be based, the group merely operates in certain obscure corners of the region only to randomly roar out to impress its ignorant allies in the Middle Belt and the Southeast on the pages of some obscure newspapers. But since

    the dance of a dragon fly on the surface of a brook can only be in a mandatory rhythm of the drummer beneath the water, no one should expect the owl to come home to roost for a meaningful purpose.

    Judged by the public utterances and conducts of its members, AFENIFERE has become a ridiculous paradox between yesterday’s fictitious dream and today’s disappointing nightmare. Had the members of the so-called Afenifere group known how much they have become a laughable stock in Nigeria today, they would have probably reclined into their obsolete shell and stopped behaving like the owl among birds.

     

    The 21st Century Southwest Muslims

    To this so-called Afenifere group, the usefulness of the Muslim multitudes in the Western region does not transcend voting and clapping for the region’s ‘lotus eaters’ which Afenifere typifies.

    Despite the glaring difference between the Muslims of the 1950s who were treated like slaves and those of the 21st century who are highly sophisticated in essence and substance, the group still plays an ostrich by pretending not to take note of that conspicuous change hence the ignorant wish to maintain its primordial status quo.

     

    Warning

    Let it be known to this self-elevated group that the antics of the yore with which the so-called Afenifere outsmarted and relegated Yoruba Muslims to the background in the past have gone with the irritating particles of the past. And any further attempt to want to continue such primitive antics to the detriment of Yoruba Muslims will be adequately resisted in letters and in law. We have paid our due in terms of tolerance, patience and endurance. Elasticity has its limit.

    No group of sheer opportunists that still ignorantly believes in the deceptive gimmicks of the past will be allowed anymore to continue riding roughshod over the Muslims of the Southwest. Enough is enough.

    Gone are the days when wisdom was genuinely attributed to old age because old age then personified wisdom based on experience. Like the rise of a modern building from the debris of the old mud building, the Yoruba Muslims of this generation have come of age and can no longer be swept into the refuse bin with the rubbles of the past. We do not need a borrowed mouth to speak out for us and nobody has a right to speak for us without our mandate.

    As it takes two to tango it must also take a give and take relationship to ventilate a peaceful environment in a multi-religious society. No group should assume any vain superiority over others and expect peace to thrive. To live side by side and cohabit in harmony, mutual respect must be in the front burner of our relationship.

  • Afenifere endorses Buhari for 2019

     

    • Public declaration on Jan 29

    Pan Yoruba socio-cultural organisation Afenifere has endorsed President Muhammadu Buhari and Vice President Yemi Osinbajo for reelection in 2019.

    It tongue lashed any other group against the decision and choice as usurpers and renegades.

    Afenifere’s spokesperson Chief Biodun Akin-Fasae spoke with reporters on outcomes of a meeting of delegates and elders from the six Southwest states at the House of Chiefs, Oyo State House of Assembly Complex, Agodi Secretariat, Ibadan on Thursday.

    The group is led by the longest living Senator in Nigeria, Pa Ayo Fasanmi.

    Notable figures at the meeting, which lasted about four hours, were a former governor of Oyo state Dr Omololu Olunloyo; Prince Tajudeen Olusi; Dr. Abayomi Finnih; Chief Adeleke Adewoyin and Prince Biodun Ogunleye.

    Others were a former Deputy Governor of Oyo state, Chief Iyiola Oladokun and Pa Ayo Afolabi.

    State government representatives at the meeting were Dr Morounkola Thomas (Oyo); Mr Oladosu Oladipo, Chief Akin Fasae (Ekiti); Mr Muyiwa Ige (Osun); Prof. Adebanjo Ademodi (Ondo); Mr Tokunbo Ajasin and Mr Awa Bamiji among others.

    Chief Akin-Fasae said: “We have decided to host the whole Yorubaland in Ibadan on January 29, 2019.

    “It is to proclaim the support of the Yorubaland for President Muhammadu Buhari in 2019 and also to tell the whole world that the Afenifere that Baba Awolowo created before he left is still intact as a progressive movement and any Afenifere person who is not in the progressive is not part of us.

    “We are now telling the whole Yoruba people and the whole world that Afenifere, as enunciated and enacted by Late Sage Obafemi Awolowo, is still intact and we are going to support President Muhammadu Buhari and Vice President Yemi Osinbajo come 2019 Presidential election.”

    Probed by reporters on why the apex Yoruba body was supporting the President despite economic situation of the nation, the spokesperson said: “The issue of the economy is a collective issue. The economy has been bastardised for years and as at now, President Buhari is trying his best.

    “So, Buhari is trying his best and the best is yet to come. That is why we are asking people to vote for him, particularly in this Yoruba land come 2019 presidential election.”

    When asked the authenticity of the support in view of another faction of the group supporting another presidential candidate, Akin-Fasae said: “The Afenifere that we know in Yorubaland is a progressive movement and this is where we are today in Ibadan. The other Afenifere (the Ayo Adebanjo Group) that is talking about Atiku are not part of us. They are usurpers in the group. They are usurpers.

    “Yoruba is not divided. There are not so many Afeniferes. Yoruba is a nation and even during the time of Baba Awolowo, there were dissent voices, so we are not embarrassed.”