Tag: Africa

By Mohammed Basah

I’ve met brilliant people on the streets of Lagos, Abuja, Kaduna, Jos, Gombe, Kano, Port Harcourt, Calabar, Uyo, Enugu, Nnewi, Johannesburg and Cape Town. Not just people who can talk big ideas, but young men and women who can build, who can sell, who can make things happen — the kind of people who can turn a N10,000 idea into something that feeds a family. Yet every time I talk to them, there’s a familiar sadness in their eyes, a mix of drive and exhaustion. It’s not that they don’t have ideas. It’s that they don’t have systems. Talent can start a fire, but systems keep it burning.

That, in simple terms, is Africa’s biggest challenge — not a shortage of skill, creativity, or passion. Those we have in abundance. What we lack are systems that help ordinary people transform their spark into sustainable impact. We’ve repeated a lie so often it sounds like truth: that Africa has a talent problem. The truth is, we don’t. What we have is a conversion problem. Every year, our universities, polytechnics, and training centres produce millions of graduates — dreamers, creators, and innovators — but only handful ends up building enterprises that survive beyond the first year.

It’s not because they’re lazy or unserious; it’s because the ecosystem around them is broken.

They face barriers on every side. Information poverty keeps them from making informed business decisions. Market disconnect ensures they don’t know how to find or retain customers. And then there’s execution fatigue — they’re doing everything alone, without structure, support, or a framework to help them scale. Yet these same people have the same drive as their peers in Singapore, South Korea, or Finland — countries that invested early in systems, not slogans.

We love inspiration in Africa. We love motivational quotes and loud conferences. We love to say “Don’t give up.” But inspiration without structure is just emotional caffeine — it gives you a rush, then a crash. If motivation alone built nations, Nigeria would be an economic superpower by now.

Systems are what separate success stories from survival stories. Look at Japan, China, South Korea, Singapore, and Finland — countries that transformed their economies within a generation. They didn’t do it through speeches. They built robust systems that allowed talent to flourish: education systems that taught problem-solving, industries that encouraged innovation, and policies that supported entrepreneurs instead of stifling them.

In Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew didn’t just preach hard work. He built frameworks for accountability, innovation, and excellence. Finland stopped teaching rote memorization and focused on problem-solving — and became a global education model. Meanwhile, we’re still teaching young people to memorize states and capitals instead of how to solve problems in their communities.

I’ve watched young men with potential fall through the cracks. They start with a small dream — maybe a tech idea or a tailoring business. They work day and night, hustling to feed themselves and their dream. Then one day, they burn out. Not because they’re not talented, but because there was no ladder for them to climb. That’s what happens in countries without functioning systems. Talent keeps trying to climb, but the ladder is broken — there’s no access to finance, weak policy support, little business education, and a near absence of mentorship. The painful truth? For every young Nigerian that “makes it,” there are hundreds of equally talented ones who never get the chance. We must fix the ladder, not just cheer the climbers.

Read Also: itel holds maiden  Nigeria cycling challenge in Lagos

Africa’s future will not be defined by politicians or its biggest corporations, but by its builders — those who take raw ideas and craft them into systems that others can build upon. We need a generation of people who stop asking for opportunities and start building the platforms that create them.

So, what can we do? We need to teach systems thinking early, not just dream selling. We must reward execution, not eloquence. We must invest in entrepreneurial infrastructure — not just conferences that motivate for a day but change nothing. And we must build collaboration between academia, government, civil society, and business.

Above all, we must change the narrative. Let’s stop calling failure “laziness” when it’s really “system failure.” If we get this right — if we build systems that help people translate potential into performance — Africa will no longer be known as the land of untapped talent, but as the continent of unstoppable builders.

Everywhere I go, I meet young people who still believe. They’re not waiting for government jobs or foreign aid — they just want a fair chance. They remind me that hope is not dead in Africa; it’s just waiting for structure. And so, as I tell every aspiring entrepreneur I meet: your idea is the seed, your skill is the soil, but the system — that’s the rain. Let’s make it rain.

•Basah wrote from Abuja. he is the Founder of Ideas Foundry Limited and Chief Curator of Entrepreneurship Tonic.

• By TJ Ishola

The intervention in Iraq was couched in benign terms. The intervention in Libya was couched in benign terms. I could give a hundred examples where “humanitarian concern” was the stated justification for invasion. Each time, the rhetoric of compassion masked the calculus of power.

Now, that same pattern is re-emerging. Donald Trump, returning to the political stage, has declared that he would “defend Christians in Nigeria from genocide.”

On the surface, it sounds noble. But there is no Christian genocide in Nigeria. What exists is terrorism — the indiscriminate killing of both Muslims and Christians by extremists, bandits, and political opportunists. Terrorism, not genocide. Yet this single, emotive word is being weaponised again, the prelude to intervention dressed in moral clothing. The pattern is painfully familiar.

Because let us remember: when Rwanda was drowning in the blood of nearly a million people in 1994, the world’s so-called champions of democracy looked away. There was no Trump, no CNN panel, and no “international outcry.” The genocide was too small to touch Western oil or gold, too far from geopolitical convenience to matter. But now, the very mention of Nigeria’s economic sovereignty, of its attempt to standalone, awakens Western conscience overnight.

It is not about Christianity. It is not about genocide. It is about control — narrative control, economic control, and political obedience dressed up as moral duty.

The convenient fiction of Western morality

Every time Africa attempts to define its own path, it finds itself redefined by Western vocabulary. When insurgents kill Africans — both Muslim and Christian alike — it becomes a “religious conflict,” never “terrorism.” When a Western power bombs a country into dust, it becomes a “peacekeeping mission.” The violence of definition itself becomes a weapon.

Nigeria’s terrorism problem is not genocide. It is the chaos of a nation where years of mismanagement, insurgency, and political greed weakened the state. The killings — brutal, senseless, and tragic — are indiscriminate. Muslims, Christians, soldiers, farmers, traders —are all victims of the same rot. There is no state-sponsored extermination, no systemic annihilation of a group. Yet to the Western mind, the label of “Christian persecution” is a political key that unlocks the evangelical base at home and justifies intervention abroad.

Hypocrisy of purity: How the West sells corruption

But perhaps the greatest irony lies in how the West narrates corruption. Western ink writes the global dictionary of virtue and vice. Financial systems in the so-called “cleanest” nations quietly host the looted wealth of the “dirtiest” nations. Meanwhile, the nations of Africa, from which that money was stolen, are eternally branded as cesspools of graft.

What greater corruption exists than the one that launders the suffering of the poor into profit? Yet the Swiss banker is called “efficient,” while the African politician is “morally bankrupt.” Both are guilty, but only one writes the dictionary.

Western groups and organisations supported this idea of right and wrong, such as Transparency International and the World Bank. They decide what is corrupt based on how different it is from Western standards. If a nation’s corruption disrupts Western profit, it becomes a scandal. If it enriches Western banks, it becomes “foreign investment.”

These indices measure how well a country aligns with Western expectations, not how honestly it treats its people. It is why a country that manipulates global tax loopholes for trillion-dollar corporations can still lecture others on accountability. It is not about ethics; it is about ownership of narrative.

The tragedy of borrowed thinking

Meanwhile, Africa’s intellectual goldmine gathers dust. At the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS) in Kuru, some of the finest African minds have, for decades, researched pathways out of poverty, models of local governance, conflict resolution frameworks rooted in indigenous knowledge systems — all largely ignored. Their reports lie buried in government archives while the same governments pay millions of dollars to Western consultants who know little of Africa beyond their hotel balconies in Abuja or Nairobi.

We keep importing “solutions” that do not speak our languages. Foreign experts come with PowerPoint presentations, while NIPSS scholars have already published blueprints for land reform, education renewal, and counter-insurgency tailored to Nigerian realities. But because the ideas are not stamped “London School of Economics” or “Brookings,” they are dismissed.

This intellectual dependency mirrors our economic dependency — the same refusal to believe that knowledge can be African, that wisdom can come from within. It is easier for our leaders to quote the IMF than to consult our own scholars, easier to be tutored than to think.

The war of narratives

In the end, everything comes down to who tells the story. The West has mastered the art of moral storytelling — of defining others while remaining invisible in its own guilt. It decides who is civilised, who is corrupt, who is oppressed, and who is free. The African tragedy is not only that we suffer, but that we allow others to explain our suffering for us.

This is why Trump’s sudden defence of “Christians in Nigeria” is not compassion but choreography. It is an old play, dusted and repackaged, with Africa as the eternal stage for someone else’s redemption arc.

But the truth must be told plainly: Nigeria’s problem is not genocide; it is governance. Not religion, but leadership. Not the lack of Western pity, but the lack of African self-respect. Until we tell our own stories — define our own terms — we will continue to live inside someone else’s fiction.

Read Also: Steve Babaeko is IAA’s VP/ Area Director, Africa

The politics of energy and independence

This renewed Western agitation coincides, quite conveniently, with Nigeria’s bold step toward energy sovereignty: the decision to stop exporting crude oil and to refine locally. For decades, Africa has supplied the raw materials while the West reaped the value-added profits. Crude leaves Lagos; petrol returns to Lagos — and we pay for our own sweat. But now that the cycle is breaking, the moral panic begins.

When an African nation begins to refine its own oil, the West refines its own narrative. Suddenly, security concerns emerge. Suddenly, religious persecution headlines reappear. It is an old tactic — to moralise what they cannot monetise, to demonise what they cannot dominate.

The spectre of “Christian genocide” is therefore not about faith; it is about fuel. It is about a continent learning to process its own resources, define its own economy, and escape the stranglehold of dependency. The fear in Western capitals is not that Christians are dying — it is that Africans may start living on their own terms.

Reclaiming the right to define

The power to define is the power to rule. The West rules through language, data, and “indices.” It rules through who it chooses to call corrupt and who it calls clean. But Africa must now refuse this dictatorship of perception.

Let us dig up those NIPSS reports, read our thinkers, build on our own research, and stop translating ourselves through the grammar of others. Let us understand that the battle for Africa’s freedom is not only political or economic — it is epistemological. It is about whose knowledge counts, whose morality defines the world.

And until Africa begins to speak for itself — boldly, unapologetically, and with intellectual courage — it will remain, in the eyes of the world, a story told by others, for their benefit, in their language, and to their applause.

• Ishola writes from United Kingdom.