Tag: Agbakoba

  • Agbakoba tasks Buhari on nation rebuilding

    Agbakoba tasks Buhari on nation rebuilding

    Human Rights Activist and maritime lawyer, Dr Olisa Agbakoba, on Monday urged the President-elect, Muhammadu Buhari, to begin his administration with the rebuilding of the nation.

    Agbakoba made the plea in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos.

    He said it was necessary and important that Buhari made an emergency proclamation before the National Assembly to enable him tackle the foundational problems before any meaningful structure could be built.

    Agbakoba said that Buhari should also be ready to present his report card for the first 100 days even as he would begin on the path of rebuilding the nation.

    “My own advice is that the president-elect needs to build on his massive goodwill and convince Nigerians that in spite of the challenges, he is up to task and he can do what to make Nigerians proud.

    “And I think that he must have a milestone to report back the famous 100 days, so by September 6, 2015, he would be giving us his report card.

    “But because the tasks are so huge, he must get a big force behind him. So, I suggest that he does an emergency proclamation before the National Assembly, laying out the broad issues that he wants to tackle.

    “First would be the fragile political structure of Nigeria, if you don’t sort it out, it’s unlikely that you cannot build anything on top. So, the constitution is the way to resolve Nigeria’s political challenges.

    “But, we have used a model or a process that has failed in the past, that is, each time we want to amend the constitution, we start from A-Z, it is not necessary,” he said.

    Agbakoba stressed the need to re-balance the federation through constitutional amendment, “which should involve taking powers from the centre and giving to the states, to get them busy and become responsible”.

    He said an amendment to insulate the security institutions and INEC from executive interference was also necessary to control abuse of power.

    According to him, Nigeria will be greater and better if the incoming administration agrees to fashion its plans after this agenda.

     

  • Agbakoba to Buhari: reform anti-graft agencies

    Agbakoba to Buhari: reform anti-graft agencies

    Former President of the Nigerian Bar Association Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) has urged the President-elect, Muhammadu Buhari, to reform the anti-graft agencies to enable him fight corruption headlong.

    Agbakoba, who spoke at a conference in Lagos yesterday, said there has to be reforms in the anti-corruption agencies, if corruption must be reversed.

    He said this would enable the president-elect concentrate on other challenges, as the agencies carry out its job without interference.

    The Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) and Independent Corrupt Practice Commission (ICPC) have been criticised for lack of diligence in their responsibilities.

    Agbakoba said a situation where the emolument of legislators takes about 25 per cent of the national budget is unrealistic, noting that it is unconstitutional to spend beyond the approval of the Revenue Fiscal and Mobilisation Commission.

    He said: “Corruption is also manifest in the over-bloated budgets for the Presidential Villa and government houses, corrupt/weak public procurement procedure and abuse of discretion of ministers in the award of contracts.”

     Agbakoba explained that the country is in utter chaos and disorder, stressing that the disease of disorder has eaten deep into the country’s fabric.

    “The absence of order has badly damaged the national psyche, love of the country is absent, the coming government must work out a framework to reverse disorder and instill discipline.

    “It is strongly recommended that priority should be given to the national question and resolved urgently. The nation will not settle or move forward without settling the issue of disorder,” he said.

  • Confederacy ‘ll solve Nigeria’s problems, says Agbakoba

    Confederacy ‘ll solve Nigeria’s problems, says Agbakoba

    Former President of Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Dr.Olisa Agbakoba, yesterday explained that the adoption of confederalism is the only solution to the challenges confronting peace and stability in Nigeria.

    Speaking during a press conference held in his Lagos office, Agbakoba observed that the current campaigns by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the All Progressives Congress (APC) have failed to address the real issues facing the nation.

    He said: “Nigeria is a nation with diverse ethnic groups. A national order is urgently needed to manage our diversity.

    “It is my view that Nigeria can only resolve the existing conflagration of diversity if we ask and seek answers to the questions posed by the late Bola Ige when he said ’there are two basic questions that must be answered by all Nigerians. One, do we want to remain as one country? Two, if the answer is yes, under what conditions? I respectfully suggest that Bola Ige’s questions are well framed as the issues we need to resolve in order to create a national order. “Confederalism is the only solution we need to progress as a nation.There is a need for devolution of power to make Nigeria work.” Agbakoba expressed disappointment that recent national conferences in Nigeria have failed to address the unity of the country. “It is in this light that the late Aka Bashorun, my most illustrious predecessor as president of NBA, articulated the collective disappointment of Nigerians by making the call for a sovereign national conference as far back as the 1980s.It is regrettable, however, that all national conferences organised to discuss Nigeria’s national order have been unsuccessful.”

  • Nigeria doesn’t need crude oil to survive, says Agbakoba

    Former Nigerian Bar Association NBA President, Olisa Agbakoba  (SAN), has said Nigeria does not need crude oil to survive.

    He spoke at the launch of his firm’s Policy Dialogue Series as part of the rebranding  of the law firm from Olisa Agbakoba and Associates to Olisa Agbakoba Legal.

    He said the series is a platform by the law firm to discuss crucial national issues.

    Nigeria, he said, could overcome its economic challenges by adopting appropriate legal frameworks to drive the relevant sectors for national growth.

    Agbakoba said: “The solution to our challenges has to do with policy issues and the understanding of what law can do to identify money. Remember that in my specialty, which is shipping, I’ve pushed for two major laws: the Cabotage Act, because shipping is one of eight critical sectors supporting any economy. And the purpose of the Cabotage Act was to put Nigeria,  owners,  actors and players in the shipping industry first, and not last in their own country. No Nigerian vessel carry crude. So there are a lot of things: transportation, logistics, down streams, so many things.’’

    He said in 2004, the Chamber of Shipping and the Nigeria Indigenous Shippers Association calculated that the resource available in that sector was worth about N7 trillion and could create 10million jobs.

    The law, he said, had not been implemented to create a large industry.

    “When I came to Apapa 30 years ago, it was booming but today it’s all dead, nothing is happening. Then, you should go to crude oil itself. I was also instrumental in the Local Content Act, which in some ways has worked. But it’s still a long way to go. It’s only law that can identify the resources. So, Shell was invited to explore for crude, but the government does not understand that there is the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Authority  (NIMASA)  law that localises 50 per cent of the oil resources to Nigerians. There are at least 30 by products from the production of one barrel of crude but Nigeria only takes four.’’

    On banking, he said, no indigenous bank plays a role in crude oil reserves. ‘’Shell will simply wire the money to their bank and they will later pay. So, it is like me keeping your money for you and wherever you want it, you tell me,’’ he added.

    He also said the insurance companies are dead. Thirty years ago,  he said, Marine insurance was big, with UNIK Insurance and Royal; you know, they are all dead now, because all insurance underwriting are done abroad.

    “Then, you talk about legal services; no Nigerian law firms actively, to my knowledge, are involved in matters relating to the energy sector. I am very happy that this has happened because it’s only when you have a challenge, that you think. So, I’d like oil to even go down to $20 a barrel, so that we can then say, you know, oil is no longer what keeps us,” he added.

    “ But if you don’t have an effective legal framework for land tenure, how can you do industrial farming? No governor, even the efficient Fashola, has an efficient land tenure system where land can be released for mechanized farming. So without mechanized farming, you can’t grow. Some countries like Greece depend only on olives, pasticcio tomato, pineapple, fruits, for their economy. So, law can play a very strong role in identifying sources of revenue, gas, for instance. Gas. The Indonesian Minister of Oil was telling our Nigerian Petroleum Minister that the money is   no longer in Petroleum, it’s in gas. But we can’t even legally enforce the gas flaring laws. Why that is so, I don’t know.

    “We have the Department of petroleum Resources, which is supposed to be the institution responsible for regulating the industry. It’s not working. We have MTN, that one is unbelievable. They come here, suck our resources.

    “ MTN makes more money than all  the  Nigerian banks put together. And they cart away all the money without any problem. Then they refuse to be listed on the stock exchange, and there is no legal framework that says you can’t do business in Nigeria unless you are listed. All it needs is an amendment to the Investment and securities Act, just one paragraph, so that MTN will be forced to declare its profit, rather than what it is doing  in collaboration  with and cohorts with a couple of Nigerians,’’ he said.

     

     

  • Agbakoba, Ngige, others  condemn kidnap of Wali, urge FG to secure his release

    Agbakoba, Ngige, others condemn kidnap of Wali, urge FG to secure his release

    A Former  Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President Mr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), Chief Emeka Ngige (SAN) and other senior lawyers have condemned the abduction of the association’s immediate past Okey Wali (SAN).

    He he kidnapped last Saturday in Port Harcourt.

    They urged the federal government to secure his release.

    Agbakoba said he was too shocked by the kidnap. “What! Too shocked for words,” he said.

    Ngige said: “The news of the kidnap of the immediate past President of Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Mr Okey Wali, SAN by some gun men at his Port Harcourt residence last night is to say the least, the most shocking and disheartening news I have received in recent times. Okey is a peace loving and easy going gentleman who abhors violence in any shape or form.”

    According to Ngige, Wali did nothing to warrant his being kidnapped gunme,  noting that while serving as the 26th President of NBA, he stood for and fought for human liberties and cessation of all form of violence in our national life.

    “Indeed the NBA under his leadership organised a the first ever Security Summit where issues bordering on the state of insecurity in Nigeria was thoroughly considered.

    The report of that summit along with its recommendations was forwarded to the Presidency for its consideration. Sadly, nothing was ever heard from the Government in that regard.

    “The kidnap of Mr. Wali brings once more to the fore, the recurring issue of the state of insecurity in Nigeria and in Rivers State in particular. The Police in that State are now more interested in engaging in partisan political activities instead of protecting lives and property.

    “This is another kidnap too many! Yesterday it was Ilochi Okafor, SAN, Mike Ozekhome, SAN, Doyin Rhodes-Vivour and others. Today it is the turn of Okey Wali. Who knows whose turn it will be tomorrow? It is on this note that I join all other well wishers in calling on the abductors to release Okey from their custody forthwith and unconditionally. It is an irony that a person who has stood on the side of the downtrodden and oppressed in the country will be treated this way. But this is Nigeria, where life is now ‘nasty, short and brutish,’ a country that is now strictly speaking, a failed state! I call on the Security agencies to brace up on their responsibilities in ensuring that protection of lives and properties are maintained at the highest level nationwide”, he said.

    Former General Secretary NBA, Mr. Dele Adesina (SAN) said: “The news of the kidnap of the immediate past president of the NBA, Okey Wali SAN, yesterday night, came as a rude shock to me. One was under the mistaken belief that cases of kidnapping have become a thing of the past for which Nigerians were beginning to show signs of relief.

    “The prayerful hope for security seems to have been shattered once again. The kidnap of Okey Wali SAN is certainly a great pain not only to the members of his nuclear family, but also to the NBA family nationwide.

    “ I appeal in the name of God to the captures, wherever they may be, to please set the captive free. I also call on the government and the security agencies to secure the release of  Okey Wali (SAN)  unharmed. I would like to, with all sense of responsibility, call on our government at all levels to double efforts at ensuring the security of lives and properties of the people of this country, as this is their primary responsibility”, he prayed.

    Former General Secretary NBA, Mr. Lawal Rafiu Rabana (SAN) said: “  The kidnapping of our immediate past President  Okey Wali (SAN) is very unfortunate and a reflection of the total breakdown of our moral values.

    “The threat to freedom of movement and apparent ease with which the kidnappers operate calls for an urgent national security summit to specifically address this degrading menace. I join other well meaning Nigerians to call for his immediate release”.

  • Agbakoba to challenge conviction of soldiers for mutiny

    Agbakoba to challenge conviction of soldiers for mutiny

    A former president of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) faulted yesterday the death sentence handed to 12 soldiers for alleged mutiny.

    In a letter to the Chief of Army Staff, Lt.-Gen Kenneth Tobiah Jacob Minimah, Agbakoba said the verdict was an “unconstitutional decision.”

    He said he would  challenge the constitutionality of the Armed Forces Act in relation to Court Martial in court.

    The 12 soldiers were sentenced to death for mutiny and attempted murder after shots were fired at the General Officer Commanding of the 7 Division, Maj.-Gen. Ahmed Mohammmed, on May 14.

    They were angry after a convoy was ambushed on a road frequently targeted by Boko Haram insurgents.

    Five other soldiers were acquitted and one was convicted on another count. All denied the charges at a Court Martial in Abuja.

    Agbakoba, in the letter also copied to the Attorney-General of the Federation Mohammed Bello Adoke (SAN), said the manner, procedure and process by which the condemned soldiers were sentenced to death was contrary to the constitution.

    The reason, he said, was because the army was the investigator, prosecutor and judge all rolled into one.

    According to him, “this is contrary to the rules of natural justice as consecrated at Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution.”

    Agbakoba said the composition of the Court Martial was fundamentally flawed and violated the fundamental rights of the convicted soldiers to fair hearing and trial as enshrined in the constitution.

    He said: “The commander, Brig.-Gen. B.T. Ndiomu, who set up the Court Martial, is a party interested. He appointed the nine members of the Court Martial, namely the President, Brig.-Gen. C.C. Okonkwo, two waiting members, a judge advocate and two prosecuting officers and the investigators.

    “The judge advocate, who is to assist the Court Martial on legal points, is far junior to the president of the Court Martial. By military tradition of obedience to superior orders, it is difficult for the judge advocate to give unwanted advice to the president of the Court Martial, who is a far superior officer.

    “The Supreme Court decided in Gani Fawehinmi v LPDC…that ‘whenever a procedure allows admixture of the investigator, prosecutor and judge to be appointed or controlled by one authority, it is impossible for the accused to obtain fair trial.’

    “It is my opinion that the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Gani’s case are fully applicable to the decision of the Court Martial.”

    Agbakoba, therefore, urged the Chief of Army staff not to confirm the Court Martial’s decision, as it was alleged being illegal.

    “The legal framework upon which the Court Martial was constituted is contrary to the constitution.”

    He further enjoined the Army chief to “approach the National Assembly to amend the Armed Forces Act to bring it in conformity with the constitution so that Court Martial proceedings will be constitutional.”

    “Meanwhile, we will challenge the constitutionality of the Armed Forces Act in relation to the Court Martial in court,” Agbakoba added.

  • Insurgency: Agbakoba demands Badeh’s removal

    Insurgency: Agbakoba demands Badeh’s removal

    A former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), yesterday called for the removal of the Chief of Defence Staff, Air Chief Marshal Alex Badeh, for failing to contain the Boko Haram insurgency.

    “If I was the Commander-in-Chief, the Chief of Defence Staff should be dismissed,” he said.

    Speaking at a news conference in his Lagos office, Agbakoba said insurgency would not end until Boko Haram’s leadership was neutralised.

    “The only way to solve the Boko Haram insurgency is by a resolute decapitation of the leadership. The new tactic is to completely degrade them.

    “When they (Boko Haram) leadership is degraded, you will see that the whole thing will be over, otherwise the infestation will grow.

    “But with the insurgents seizing more territories in the Northeast, the army chiefs have to go.

    “The military high command should be removed immediately. Alex Badeh has failed in his commission and should be removed. The military has not done enough,” he said.

    Agbakoba said it was wrong to hold the view that Nigeria’s unity was sacrosanct.

    According to him, any region that wished to be independent should be allowed to go.

    “There is nothing sacrosanct about the existence of Nigeria,” he said, adding that it was time to agree on a peaceful separation, rather than forcing unity down everyone’s throat.

    “Nobody is saying Nigeria must continue as one, but here its all about force,” Agbakoba said.

    He recommended autonomous regions with presidents, as done in places like Catalonia.

    “There is no big reason why we must be together. And if we can’t be together, let’s part in peace,” he said.

    Agbakoba said, however, that Nigeria had the potential to be Africa’s true giant if it remained united.

    “Nigeria is seriously ill. It’s a fragmented country. Everyone speaks according to his own bible. ‘Is my brother there?’

  • Agbakoba sues Fed Govt over Unity Schools admission ‘discrimination’

    Agbakoba sues Fed Govt over Unity Schools admission ‘discrimination’

    Former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), has sued the Federal Government over alleged discrimination in admission into Federal Government Colleges, known as Unity Schools.

    He is challenging what he believes amounts to admission inequality into the colleges.

    The rights activist asked the Federal High Court in Lagos to declare that different cut-off marks for the 104 Unity Schools, based on gender, ethnicity and states of origin is discriminatory.

    Agbakoba said the differentiation also violates the fundamental guarantees to freedom from discrimination which the Constitution also guaranteees.

    He joined the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Mohammed Adoke (SAN) and the Minister of Education Nyesom Nwike in the suit, numbered FHC/L/CS/1358/2013.

    According to Agbakoba, in the published cut-off mark of 200, candidates from Zamfara and Bayelsa only need to score two and 72, while those of Anambra and Lagos states must score 139 and 133 to be admitted.

    “The implication of this policy is that pupils from states like Zamfara and Bayelsa with lower cut-off marks, for instance, will be accorded privilege or advantage in admission into the 104 Federal Government Colleges on account of their state of origin, irrespective of their low score.

    “Pupils from other states like Anambra and Lagos with higher cut-off marks will be subjected to disabilities or restrictions in admission on account of their state of origin, irrespective of their high score.

    “This violates Section 42 1999 Constitution which forbids executive or administrative actions which discriminates on account of ethnic group, place of origin, etc,” Agbakoba said.

    The lawyer, in the fundamental rights enforcement application, sought a declaration that the administrative acts of the respondents, particularly the minister of education, which prescribes different cut-off marks for candidates is discriminatory against his grandchildren and the group/class they represent.

    He prayed for an order directing the respondents to apply uniform admission requirements, especially cut-off marks to all candidates.

    Agbakoba sought an order of perpetual injunction restraining the respondents, particularly the minister of education from further acts of discrimination in admission to Federal Government Colleges.

    Justice James Tsoho adjourned the suit till March 6 for hearing.

     

  • Agbakoba faults Okunrounmu’s report

    Agbakoba faults Okunrounmu’s report

    A former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President Olisa Agbakoba yesterday said the report of the Presidential Advisory Committee (PAC) on the proposed National Conference is incapable of addressing the issues for a better Nigeria.

    The activist addressed a conference in Lagos, saying after consultations with civil society groups, he was submitting that the PAC’s report was a disappointment.

    He said the report would trivialise the conference to a mere talksshop, if steps were not taken to correct the shortcomings.

    Agbakoba said: “PAC failed to understand what the Constitution should contain. What it should be looking at is the devolution of powers, the structure(s) of the federation – if there should be six geo-political zones – the role of local government and the viability of the states.

    “Rather, the report dwells on issues, such as ‘god-fatherism’, return of schools to missionaries, nomadic education and other trivial matters. In the process, the report is mixing policy issues with constitutional matters.”

    The lawyer said the committee recommended that the Constitution be altered, instead of a replacement to be decided by the people.

    Agbakoba said: “The National Conference we want must be about a new Constitution and not an alteration. Nigerians want their own Constitution, not because it will solve all the problems but because it will give ownership.

    “The committee recommended representation on the basis of federal constituencies delineated by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). The unit of representation should be by ethnic nationalities.”

    The lawyer stressed that other interest groups should be represented while the backbone should be the ethnic nationalities.

    According to him, the exercise was going to be crammed together because the 2015 electoral circle would start by July.

    He said: “The 2015 electoral circle will start on July 30. If INEC is not aware and suddenly we have a crammed time table, the result will be disastrous. It is important we know that 2015 starts now.”

  • Why I won’t write a Will —Agbakoba

    Why I won’t write a Will —Agbakoba

    It all began way back in 1974 at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, during what was then famous as ‘October Drive’, when the coy, militaristic and young Olisa Agbakoba was literally cajoled into what would later morph into an enviable union with the then youthful Miss Lillian Harlem. For a young man who was weaned on the strict diet of discipline and who was just smarting from the experience as a child-soldier fighting on the side of Biafra, during the Nigerian Civil war, romance was considered more as a frivolity for Agbakoba, now a frontline lawyer, an activist and a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN).

    Hinting that he had never had anything to do with a woman, not until he met his would-be wife, Agbakoba reveals how the ice was eventually thawed, paving the way for an intimate relationship.  “It all started at the University of Nigeria Nsukka. Both of us were law students but I was a year ahead of her. It was during the famous ‘October Drive’ or what is now known as ‘October Rush’ that my best friend, Maxi Okwu, former factional chairman of CNPP, who was having a great crush on my friend, Miss Ngozi Nwokolo.

    Maxi came to me to do the ‘chasing’ or courtship for him. I went to Ngozi and told her what my friend Maxi felt for her. She agreed and said: ‘Okay, since you are bringing your guy for me, I am also bringing my friend, Lillian for you.’ Incidentally, she became my wife. Before then, I had never had a relationship, neither had I spoken to a lady in my entire life. Of course, my father was a very tough and a strict disciplinarian. And so I learnt to behave myself. So, Ngozi introduced me to Lillian Harlem, as she was then known.”

    On his coyness, Agbakoba offers an insight: “Back then, I was a very shy and withdrawn person and I was not used to the concept of girlfriend. Besides I was a highly militaristic and no nonsense kind of guy. I had fought on the side of Biafra during the civil war. I was a boy-soldier. So women were not one of my strong strengths. I was too serious for myself.

    “Gradually I had to tone down my hard mien. Even though the war had ended in 1970, it was still fresh as late as 1974. So even while in the university, I was still carrying on and thinking like a soldier than a civilian. When people say soldiers are no-nonsense people, I understand exactly what they mean.”

    Butterfly in my stomach

    Overwhelmed by a mixture of timidity, naïveté and artlessness on issues of relationship, signs of goose bumps were evident as Agbakoba awaited his ‘package’. “So when Ngozi said she was bringing her friend to me, I knew I was trapped. And since I did not want to betray my friend, Maxi, I knew there was no way out for me. I was terrified about how I was going to manage the relationship.

    “At first, I did not know what to say or what to do. In fact, it was my wife who had to take the initiative. I did not know what to say. I was a bit timid and shy. Of course, it is the place of a man to do all of the courting, the talking and what have you. But I could do none of that. But slowly in the course of our four years of courtship, she bore with me.”

    Taking it a notch higher

    Most marriages usually start with a proposal, but for Agbakoba, theirs was way out of the ordinary. “There was no proposal. In fact, she made me to be conscious of where we were going after we would have left the university. After four years, we had bonded very well. So, it became a natural process for me to know that we were going to take the relationship a notch higher after our studies. So we did.”

    Distilling areas of commonalities and differences

    Besides their common background in law, both Agbakoba and Lillian shared a lot more in common. “Being law students, we were involved in a lot of academic and social activities that made us understand each other very well. It was clear to us that we were heading into marriage and we got to know that both of us were generally a quiet pair. We were very introverted and we are still a very introverted couple. Neither of us is outgoing nor a party person. Neither of us also is inherently genetically defective. There is a commonality that exists between us. A lot of marriages fail today purely on medically challenging issues.

    “So courtship enables you to distil commonalities and differences in marriage, which also allows you to decide whether, in spite of the differences, you still want to forge ahead.  What courtship does and what it did for us, was that we were able to share a lot of things in common. So as we are entering the final act, the bonding process is continuing until death do us part.

    “In the first two to three years of our marriage (They got married in 1979), my wife had a more stable income than me. And so she was the one paying the rent and picking up some bills. And when I eventually came into a much stronger means of income, nothing and absolutely nothing should stop her from enjoying my wealth. After all, we are part and parcel of each other.”

    Running joint account

    In an age where marriage relationship is now more highlighted by mistrust, suspicion and crass secrecy, the Agbakobas are like an open book whose pages continue to flip in your face as you rummage for its thematic thrust. He says: “If I drop dead today, my family continues because we have a succession plan. We run a joint account. All our property are jointly owned.

    “I am not going to write a will. But why should I, when I have a wife? We have gone past husband and wife. We are now talking about a transition. We know we will not live forever. So we are no longer keeping things in our names. For me, a strong family unit should not even own a legal document called a will for change to carry on. We have three daughters and we are now preparing for a transition from us to them.

    “My wife has integrally been part of everything I do and own. I have an irregular signature and because of that, my cheques are always returned. It is my wife’s signature that the banks rather recognise and I have no problem with that. She is the manager of the family’s resources and a bursar. Kids go to her for money. They do not come to me.

    “I am shocked when my clients come crying to my office that they do not know how to access their late husbands’ estate. How can you say you have married somebody for 40 years, yet she cannot legally access your property except through a court order? It is ridiculous.”

    We have our imperfections

    Is it always a bed of roses for the Agbakobas? He disagrees, insisting that they as a couple also have their occasional spats. For them, disagreement is part of the spice in a marriage. “Of course, we disagree all the time. Are we not human beings? The issue is not about disagreeing but how to reach an agreement after a disagreement. Disagreement is part of what strengthens the relationship because you must have a point of view. A few days ago, we were discussing the various political parties and she held a view and I had mine. So I didn’t agree with her and she got annoyed and said: ‘This is why I do not like talking about Nigeria with you’. There was a bit of tension and quarrel in the house, but the following morning, she made my tea and life went on. Any couple that says it does not quarrel is living a lie or living in denial.”

    The first to say sorry

    Well, she says I am stubborn. While I may not say I am sorry, my conduct shows. What if say I am sorry and I do not carry on as if I am truly sorry? That is hypocritical apology.