Tag: Agenda

  • Group seeks women’s input in community agenda

    A group, Centre for Environment, Human Rights and Development (CEH-RD), has canvassed for women’s  participation in oil community agenda because they suffer more from environmental despoilation.

    This is contained in a commu-niqué issued by CEHRD, civil society organisations and the media at the end of a forum on “Human Rights and the Environment in the Niger Delta” held in Port Harcourt, the Rivers State capital.

    The forum, which was orgainsed by CEHRD with the theme “Feeling the Pulse of Communities: Oil Corporations and Human Rights Violations in the Niger Delta” also resolved that women are the integral part of society and therefore their interests must be protected, especially as they are the most impacted by oil activities.

    In the communiqué signed on behalf of the group by the Head of Governance, CEHRD Mr. Lawrence, it was also advocated that women be included in community decision-making and constitution drafting for elections to be democratic.

    While advising that communities be sensitised to the rights of women, the forum also urged women to be more organised.

    The forum also stated that for there to be a harmonious working relationship between the oil companies, regulatory agencies and oil communities, the “Petroleum Industry Bill should be passed into law in order to give NOSDRA the needed muscle to do its work.”

    Oil-impacted communities were also advised to begin to look beyond the usual corporate social responsibility projects such as roads, schools, scholarships and demand equity shares in in-coming oil companies to their areas.

    While urging civil society organisations to sensitise communities for awareness on the divestments springing up in the region, the media was enjoined to “inform the public on divestment, protect public interest and work with civil society to enthrone respect for human rights and environment in the Niger Delta.”

  • My legislative agenda for Ikeja, by Mohammed

    My legislative agenda for Ikeja, by Mohammed

    A member of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Hon. Folajimi Mohammed, has urged members of his constituency to communicate effectively with him through emails and messages,  instead of telephone conversations.

    He also urged them to get their petitions across to him through the social media.

    “Effective communication in  this present age is tantamount to good governance. It helps the masses and even those in rural areas to air their views and petitions. It also brings governance closer to the people. The masses can now speak for themselves”, Mohammed said.

    The legislator spoke at the Ikeja Constituency Town Hall meeting held at the Lagos Country Club, Ikeja.

    He said messages and emails are more effective than telephone conversations, adding that he may not be able to respond to the high number of calls daily.

    Mohammed, however explained that he is not complaining about the number of calls, but for the communication to be more effective, written form of communication is better.

    He urged the people clamoring for social amenities, including borehole, market and transformers, to be patient, promising to try his possible best to actualize them.

    The former Chairman of Onigbongbo Local Council Development Area (LCDA), Hon. Francis Oke commended the stakeholders, meeting as a laudable project that ought to be encouraged and emulated because  it helps the representatives hear from the masses directly .

    “This is a very good development as those who are representing us can now come back to the us to seek for our opinion and counsel. Through this medium, we are carried along directly md this would speed up the development process”, Oke said.

    The Southwest Women Leader, Mrs Kemi Nelson, commended the stakeholders and urged Hon.Mohammed to act on their different petitions.

    The meeting was witnessed by monarchs, representatives of wards, market women, artisans, religious leaders, ethnic group leaders, politicians and well wishers.

  • We’ve no offensive economic agenda, says EU envoy against Nigeria, says envoy

    We’ve no offensive economic agenda, says EU envoy against Nigeria, says envoy

    • €6.5 billion trade development grant coming 

    The European Union (EU) has no offensive economic agenda against Nigeria on the implementation of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between the EU and West Africa, the EU Ambassador/Head of Delegation to Nigeria & ECOWAS Ambassador, Micheal Arrion has said.

    Rather, the EU’s mission in Nigeria and West Africa, he said, is to ensure the advancement of the sub-region as well as the enhancement of the competitiveness of its various economic segments.

    Arrion made the clarification in Lagos while announcing the fourth EU-Nigeria Business Forum (EUNBF) with the theme Unlocking Opportunities for Diversification.

    The EPA seeks to create a Free Trade Area (FTA) between the EU and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of states (ACP). Under the scheme, the EU would immediately offer the 15-member ECOWAS and a non-member state, Mauritania, full access to its markets. In return, ECOWAS would gradually open up 75 per cent of its markets – with their 300 million consumers – to Europe over a 20-year period.

    But the EPA has been largely criticised by some members of the business community particularly manufacturers who raised concerns over perceived potential negative impact of the deal on the nation’s industrial sector if certain products were allowed tariff-free entry into the Nigerian market. The thinking was that the EPA would not be in the overall interest of the Nigerian economy over the long term.

    But the EU envoy noted that most of the arguments against the EPA were wrong, bordering on emotions than facts. He said in pushing for EPA, investors from EU’s 28-member states see Nigeria as a place they can invest and so had no hidden agenda whatsoever. “We have no offensive agenda for Nigeria because we believe that Nigeria and ECOWAS are very important places where European or other non-European businesses could invest because there is enough room for investment,” he said.

    Arrion, however, assured that in investing in Nigeria and other ECOWAS member states, the EU would not invade the West African market with products that could compete with domestic products which Nigeria and other countries in the region would be producing, pointing out that the EU has removed all its export subsidies to the West African market.

    Arrion stressed the importance of the EUNBF, which started in Lagos yesterday and ends tomorrow, noting that it would bring together business leaders and policy makers from both the public and private sectors in the EU and Nigeria to discuss business opportunities and impediments to investments. Specific sessions have been designed to address obstacles to the effective development of the agricultural value chain and the opportunities which exist in the framework of the EPA between the EU and West Africa.

    “The forum will aim to increase domestic and foreign investments particularly in agribusiness, in line with Nigeria government’s diversification efforts,” he explained, announcing €6.5billion financial trade related development assistance for Nigeria’s growth and development for every five years till 2035. He said the gesture was to demonstrate the EU’s strong belief and confidence in the Nigerian market.

    “Every five years, we are committed to giving grants and development assistance. The EU and its 28 member states have agreed to give a minimum of €6.5billion for every five years. We are very comfortable to provide this development assistance,” he said, adding that since 2012, EUNBF, a collaborative effort of the EU and its member states in Nigeria, has served as a platform for private sector participants to gather essential market information, identify business opportunities and connect with key players.

    Noting that EU’s economic relations with Nigeria have been robust, with the EU being the top destination for Nigeria’s oil and non-oil exports, Arrion said the volume of trade between Nigeria and EU stood at €34.4billion in 2013, accounting for 29.6 per cent of Nigeria’s total trade in that year.

    He stated that the forum will build on these strong relations to deepen understanding of the role that EPA can play in supporting the diversification of Nigeria’s economy. “It will also strengthen EU-Nigeria business relations through identification of opportunities in agribusiness and forging of partnerships, while also addressing bottlenecks related to the effective development of agribusiness in Nigeria,” he added.

    Arrion however, pointed out that many of Nigeria’s economic policies are at variance with the basic rules of ECOWAS trade operations in the sub-region. He said, for instance, that since January 2015 when the new ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET) came into force, giving member states 14 months to comply, Nigeria is yet to comply in clear disregard for agreements and conventions of ECOWAS.

    “Nigeria is maintaining import bans against ECOWAS. You can do this outside ECOWAS but not within. You are part of the same community and bound by some rules relating to free movement of goods and people,” he stated.

  • Poverty, inequality to top AEC agenda, says AfDB

    Poverty, inequality to top AEC agenda, says AfDB

    The African Development Bank (AfDB) has said   addressing poverty and inequality will dominate discussions at the forthcoming Africa Economic Conference (AEC) to be hosted by the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) next month.

    A statement by AfDB said the theme for the conference is: Addressing Poverty and Inequality in the Post 2015 Development Agenda.

    The conference will hold between November 2 to 4, in Kinshasa, the DRC capital,

    Citing documents from the African Union’s (AU) Agenda 2063 and Africa’s Common Position on Post-2015 Development Agenda, the statement envisioned an Africa developed by its citizens. “The vision is for an integrated, prosperous and peaceful Africa, driven by its own citizens and representing a dynamic force in the global arena.

    “Key among Africa’s aspirations is to achieve prosperity that is based on inclusive growth, and development that is people-driven and that also unleashes the potential of women and youth,” the statement read in part.

    The statement said the central aim of Agenda 2063 was to eradicate poverty in all its ramifications. It added that it would also build shared prosperity through social and economic transformation.

    The statement explained that the AEC would bring together policy makers, researchers and development practitioners from Africa and from around the world.

    It said  the experts would make contributions to the implementation of Africa’s vision and the identification of concrete actions necessary for poverty and inequality reduction.

    The statement added that the conference would provide an opportunity to assess the impact of current growth strategies on poverty, inequality and human development in Africa.

    The conference would also discuss successes, lessons learned and identify remaining gaps, challenges and emerging issues on the topic.

    “The AEC 2015 will contribute to the policy dialogue and advocacy on inclusive growth by presenting the latest empirical evidence on poverty and inequalities in Africa. It will provide critical thinking on how policy makers, development partners, private sector, civil society organisations and academia should support the planning and implementation of post 2015 Agenda,’’ it said.

  • EU has no offensive economic agenda against Nigeria, says envoy

    EU has no offensive economic agenda against Nigeria, says envoy

    • €6.5 billion trade development grant coming 

    The European Union (EU) Ambassador/Head of Delegation to Nigeria & ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States), Ambassador Michel Arrion, has said the EU has no offensive economic agenda against Nigeria on the implementation of the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between the EU and West Africa.

    Rather, the EU’s mission in Nigeria and West Africa, he said, was to ensure the advancement of the sub-region as well as the enhancement of the competitiveness of its various economic segments.

    He made the clarification in Lagos while announcing the fourth EU-Nigeria Business Forum (EUNBF) with the theme Unlocking Opportunities for Diversification as its theme.

    The EPA seeks to create a Free Trade Area (FTA) between the EU and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of states (ACP). Under the scheme, the EU would immediately offer the 15-member ECOWAS and a non-member state, Mauritania, full access to its markets. In return, ECOWAS would gradually open up 75 per cent of its markets – with their 300 million consumers – to Europe over a 20-year period.

    But the EPA has been largely criticised by some members of the business community particularly manufacturers who raised concerns over perceived potential negative impact of the deal on the nation’s industrial sector if certain products were allowed tariff-free entry into the Nigerian market. The thinking was that the EPA would not be in the overall interest of the Nigerian economy over the long term.

    But the EU envoy noted that most of the arguments against the EPA were wrong, bordering on emotions than facts. He said in pushing for EPA, investors from EU’s 28-member states see Nigeria as a place they can invest and so had no hidden agenda whatsoever. “We have no offensive agenda for Nigeria because we believe that Nigeria and ECOWAS are very important places where European or other non-European businesses could invest because there is enough room for investment,” he said.

    Arrion however, assured that in investing in Nigeria and other ECOWAS member states, the EU would not invade the West African market with products that could compete with domestic products which Nigeria and other countries in the region would be producing, pointing out that the EU has removed all its export subsidies to the West African market.

    Arrion stressed the importance of the EUNBF, which holds in Lagos from November 5 and 7, noting that it would bring together business leaders and policy makers from both the public and private sectors in the EU and Nigeria to discuss business opportunities and impediments to investments. Specific sessions have been designed to address obstacles to the effective development of the agricultural value chain and the opportunities which exist in the framework of the EPA between the EU and West Africa.

    “The forum will aim to increase domestic and foreign investments particularly in agribusiness, in line with Nigeria government’s diversification efforts,” he explained, announcing €6.5billion financial trade related development assistance for Nigeria’s growth and development for every five years till 2035. He said the gesture was to demonstrate the EU’s strong belief and confidence in the Nigerian market.

    “Every five years, we are committed to giving grants and development assistance. The EU and its 28 member states have agreed to give a minimum of €6.5billion for every five years. We are very comfortable to provide this development assistance,” he said, adding that since 2012, EUNBF, a collaborative effort of the EU and its member states in Nigeria, has served as a platform for private sector participants to gather essential market information, identify business opportunities and connect with key players.

    Noting that EU’s economic relations with Nigeria have been robust, with the EU being the top destination for Nigeria’s oil and non-oil exports, Arrion said the volume of trade between Nigeria and EU stood at €34.4billion in 2013, accounting for 29.6 per cent of Nigeria’s total trade in that year.

    He stated that the forum will build on these strong relations to deepen understanding of the role that EPA can play in supporting the diversification of Nigeria’s economy. “It will also strengthen EU-Nigeria business relations through identification of opportunities in agribusiness and forging of partnerships, while also addressing bottlenecks related to the effective development of agribusiness in Nigeria,” he added.

    Ambassador Arrion however, pointed out that many of Nigeria’s economic policies are at variance with the basic rules of ECOWAS trade operations in the sub-region. He said, for instance, that since January 2015 when the new ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET) came into force, giving member states 14 months to comply, Nigeria is yet to comply in clear disregard for agreements and conventions of ECOWAS.

    “Nigeria is maintaining import bans against ECOWAS. You can do this outside ECOWAS but not within. You are part of the same community and bound by some rules relating to free movement of goods and people,” he stated.

  • ‘Our agenda is to take Kogi to next level’

    ‘Our agenda is to take Kogi to next level’

    The emergence of Governor Idris Wada as the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) for next month’s governorship election in Kogi State was not without challenges. In this interview with reporters in Lokoja, the state capital, he speaks on the intrigues and challenges that characterised the governorship primary and his chances at the poll. JAMES AZANIA was there.

    How did you survive the hurdle to become as the PDP governorship candidate?

    For me, everything I do, I put God first. I have a very plain heart and a very clear agenda for transformation of the state and the essence of my desire to seek a second term is to be able to consolidate on some of the things I have done so far, to ensure that we put the state on a path of sustainable development. So, with that determination, I was not deterred when challenges started coming in the course of the primary; I was not under any pressure or stress because of my faith in God Almighty and the clear and transparent agenda that I have for the transformation of our state. A lot of efforts were put in by the national leadership of our party, the elders at the state level, to try and broker peace to ensure that we stick together as a party and face the challenges of the primary. So, in Abuja several meetings were held to try and come up with a consensus candidate, but it did not work. Afterwards, we had no choice but to go and test our popularity with the delegates. Thus, I willingly subjected myself to the process. With the grace of God Almighty and the trust our members have in me, we went for the contest and the rest is history. But, I think it’s a credit to the PDP that we went through that process and came out basically unscratched, because there were three aspirants; one of them is working very closely with me and we are still talking with the other one. I have also set up reconciliation committees, to talk to various aggrieved groups within our party. This election is critical to the survival of the PDP. So, it’s about the PDP and not me as an individual.

    With the picture you have painted, will it be right to say that the PDP is going into this election as a united party?

    Yes, it is going into this election as a united family. Of course, in the party, like in a family, it is almost impossible to have 100 per cent carriage of people on one platform. There may still be a few issues that are not fully resolved. But, substantially, we will go into this election as a united family, because members know that the success of the PDP in this election is critical to the survival of our party nationally.

    Following the flag off of your campaign in Ayingba recently, how would you assess your chances of re-election in November?

    The impression I had during the flag off was that of being highly overwhelmed. We started the process of this rally abruptly. We concluded on our campaign time-table and decided that we will start with zonal rallies in the three senatorial districts; we just decided on Ayingba as the place to start and few people were tasked. We inaugurated the campaign committee a few days before the rally. But, the kind of turnout we witnessed was overwhelming; we have never seen that kind of crowd in a rally inAyingba. Even in 2011, I didn’t attract that level of popularity. We were all there. There was nowhere to pass, nowhere to park, people waited. When I went in and had a meeting at the university with the vice chancellor and the leadership, then we went to the traditional ruler before the campaign started. What this portends is that our people are beginning to see that this government has a clear agenda for the development and transformation of the state. They can see sincerity of purpose in the style of my administration; everybody is relaxing in the state now, nobody is afraid or under tension that the governor is going to victimize them or officials of government will victimize them. There is heightened security arrangement in the state; it’s very clear. Of course, there are minor crimes and all that, but you cannot foreclose such. We have worked hard to ensure peace and security in this state. We are also working hard on agriculture and infrastructure, as well as human capital development, education, health and industrialization. You can see sincerely that there is a sustainable path of development and transformation of this state and they are coming out now to show their support by coming out for this kind of rally. You could see they were not a rented crowd. We don’t have the money to rent crowd. There are 239 wards. So, I was highly encouraged and confident that our people are appreciating our efforts and they will support us into the next election.

    What new things are you bringing to the table?

    When I came in, I had a think-tank that produced a blueprint for transformation of this state. So, we have in mind a 10-year plan for the transformation of Kogi State. I know the maximum tenure I have is eight years, but by the time if we implement the 10-year agenda and you finish eight years it will be sustainable. Even if somebody comes and say I am not going to complete the next two years, substantially, a lot of the work has been done to put this state on a modern platform for development. So, it’s not about new things, it’s about consolidating what we are doing, so that in four years we would have done a lot of the things we have planned for the state in agriculture, industrialisation, education and health. These are key and critical elements of our economic and social agenda for the people. So, what I need to do is to work out on the implementation, work out on the improvement and work out on making sure that there is buy-in by all the critical stakeholders for the transformational agenda I have for Kogi State.

    What is the true situation of the bailout funds concerning Kogi State?

    The true situation with regards to Kogi State is that we were one of the first states to comply with all the documentary requirements of the CBN for this state. We applied for about N86 billion because this is a window that is rare in the economy of Nigeria; for the Federal Government to offer you a 20-year loan at nine percent. Given the interest rate of commercial loans, it as an opportunity to aggregate all our financial challenges and take this loan to clear outstanding commitments and move forward.  After assessment, it was reduced to about N50 billion, because the issues of pension, gratuity and bonds are not included. The priority is to restructure commercial bank loans. Kogi State had the lowest commercial bank loan in Nigeria. What we owed banks at that stage was N860 million.

    The next stage was salaries of workers. So, in our state we looked comprehensively at the loans. For some years we have been paying percentage salaries because the money from local government as a tier of government comes directly from federation account, and because our local governments are generally overstaffed because of our own social setting — this is a civil service state — I have hesitated to take any step that will lead to relieving workers of their jobs. I felt that whatever we have it is better we make sure that it covers as many people as possible; so we tried to pay something to workers. What we have done is to calculate some of the shortfalls in percentage payment and to utilise this loan to pay the workers, so that those who have lost some money over the years will be paid back. So, that was approved for our local government employees and our teachers and also for the civil servants that were being owed about two months’ salary. It’s actually one month, because we use money from other sources to pay salary, that’s why we are applying for two months, to sort out ourselves in terms of civil service. We are basically up to date in the civil service, but when you add workers of the state government, local government workers and then teachers, these are the three components of our bailout. We now returned the documentation, then the CBN sent us an email, saying they want to have biometric data on all the teachers and all the local government workers that we are claiming for, and we supplied. We have done biometric verification… then later they said they want BVN (Bank Verification Number) of these people, so we said, look BVN has just come in, many have complied, but there those that have not complied. So, we have notified them to go and get their BVN. But, that does not disturb the processing of the funds, because our workers are in expectation. They were threatening to block this highway to express their anger over the delay in payment of their salaries; because once you have now published N50 billion for Kogi State, if you go back  it will cause a lot of industrial problem. So, I spent one week in Abuja pursuing it.

    I can tell you now that we are very close and by the grace of God within the next three weeks or two we will be able to access this loan and come back and fulfill out our financial obligations to workers.

    There are insinuations that the opposition parties are working against it because they feel it might shore up your popularity…

    That is politics; we are in politics. You can expect that from the opposition. They will do anything to make sure that they ensure that the PDP does not win the election. So, if they can use their clout at the federal level to stop us accessing the funds, they would do so. But, it’s a message to our workers that this a government that cares for about them; we are prepared to take a 20-loan to sort out their financial affairs. Any party who is blocking such effort by government is not a party they should support. They should support a party that cares about them. I have been very prudent with the management of the resource of this state; not taking loan anyhow. If I had taken N300 million loan and built things everywhere anyhow, by now that would have been restructured to 20 years. States that borrowed anyhow, their finances have been restructured. Those of us who were prudent have shown diligence in the management of public finance are now being made to look… and not to benefit from this window which President Muhammadu Buhari has opened for Nigerians. You are workers too, you may not be working for government, but you should recognise this sincerity. Our state could not have been approved for this kind of amount if we had over borrowed, if already half of our allocation is for paying interest and going into financial banks, we would have not qualified. We won’t be able to amortize the loan over the next 20 years. So, our efforts need to be recognised and not serve as punishment or for any political shenanigans. So, I praise President Buhari for opening this window to enable us restructure our finances, carry our workers along on a progressive agenda for our country.

    The APC challenge is real in Kogi State. What strategies is the PDP employing to overcome it?

    We recognise the APC challenge, particularly when they have the federal government. My appeal to President Buhari is to please create the enabling environment, an equitable environment, level playing field, for us to test our popularity and acceptability by the electorates. Let’s not have overwhelming federal presence in this election. It’s a state election, it’s not a federal election. Let the people freely express themselves, let’s have unbiased security and environment for us to test our popularity.

    So, the challenge is real, but I am confident that with what we have done and with what we plan to do for our people over the next four years, with the peaceful environment our people have, progressive agenda of my government and administration and with sincerity of purpose and honesty, I am confident that our people, looking at what will we do over the next four years and what we are doing now, will re-elect us to remain in-charge of the affairs of our state.

    Power shift has become an issue and is being used as a bargaining power by the political parties. How is the PDP going to implement it if re-elected?

    My position on power shift or power rotation has been consistent since I came into office. Within the first 100 days, I made a speech, outlining my vision for the state. I made it very clear that I want us to unite our people for a common purpose of leveraging on the human and natural resources of our state for transformation and moving the state to the next level; to make our state one of the 10 states to be reckoned with in Nigeria. So, I started on the platform and agenda of bringing our people together, trusting each other, that we are all equal before God and we are all equal stakeholders in the affairs of the state. I noted that what has made power rotation a dream rather than a reality is because it always comes into the political agenda whenever people are running for governorship. If they are running for House of Assembly or National Assembly, you don’t hear about power shift or power rotation. It’s only when people are running for governor and this topic comes up every four years.

    After we win the election, everybody forgets about it and people are running away from it. So, my position is that we should make it a continuous agenda, a topic for discussion, a topic for continuous engagement of the stakeholders from all the three zones, including the minority tribes in each of these zones, because each of these zones has a minority tribe. We are all talking of Igala, Igbira and Okun, how about the minorities among them? We have Bassa, we have Koto, and we have Ebira in Ajaokuta… a mixture of Igbira and Igala people. We have various minorities, we have Akpayan, we have micro groups, mini groups within these broad tribes and people that we have in the state.

    So, what are the social implications? What are the political implications? What are the economic implications?

    Where should it go to first? Is it Okun or is it Igbira? And then,when does it come back to Igala land, is it Igala, is it Bassa Komo… all these details need to be discussed openly over the next four years, for us to have a clear framework on how the power rotation can be actualised. These thing was debated during the recent National Conference, so there is already some kind of framework which were presented by about 20 members at the National Conference. So, this topic has already been discussed at nationally. We can borrow from there and use it to guide our steps here in Kogi. I am a leader you can trust because once I take a position I will do my best as a human being to actualise it. So, I am asking our people to let us engage ourselves over the next four years, trust me to provide the environment and framework to have this discussion, arrive at a position we can that we can actualize power rotation agenda and it will happen by the grace of God and the cooperation of all our citizens.

    For me, it is a matter of trust. Which of the candidates can you trust to deliver on this agenda?

  • Audu unfolds three-point agenda

    Audu unfolds three-point agenda

    The candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the Kogi State governorship election holding on November 21, Prince Abubakar Audu, has unfolded a three-point agenda.

    He unveiled the agenda at Alu in Yagba East Local Government when receiving the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) defectors in Yagba Federal Constituency.

    Audu said he would focus on power shift, declare a state of emergency in critical sectors of the economy and concentrate on ‘stomach infrastructure’.

    Said he: “Let me make my three-point agenda known to the people because I want to be held responsible for my words when I assume power. First, I will ensure power shift becomes sacrosanct.

    “I will be the first governor to change power. I must honour my agreement that after my tenure, I will ensure power moves either to Kogi West or Central.

    “Second, I will declare a state of emergency in the critical sectors of the economy, especially the infrastructural sector. Shortly after I won the primaries, I travelled outside the country where I met international business organisations, who are waiting for me to be sworn in so that they can invest in the critical sectors of the economy.”

  • MDGs and post-2015 agenda: Where are we?

    MDGs and post-2015 agenda: Where are we?

    When  world leaders  gathered in 2000 to unanimously draft and adopt a visionary agenda for the world tagged the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), a set of eight basic objectives expected to be fully achieved by this year, people across the world lauded the bold move and its prospects.

    The goals include: to eradicate extreme poverty, inequality and hunger; to achieve universal primary education; to promote gender equality and empower women; to reduce child mortality; to improve maternal health, to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases such as tuberculosis; to ensure environmental sustainability; and lastly to develop a global partnership for development.

    It is expedient to ask the world leaders at this critical period a question that demands urgent answer: how far have we gone in actualising the salient goals listed above? This question becomes necessary owing to the need to assess the gains and pains of the journey so far and what the future holds for us, especially at this point when world leaders are gearing up to review and reset the agenda towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

    As a student of history who has been monitoring and following the trend of things, especially as regards the above subject matter, I am optimistic that a keener and purposeful pursuit of these goals will make the world a better place.

    And what if we were to take a fair assessment of these goals and measure progress made so far?

    Goal number one centres on eradicating extreme poverty, inequality and hunger. According to the Millennium Development Goals Report of 2015, the scheme’s determination to eradicate poverty and inequality has yielded some results as over 1 billion people have been lifted out of poverty line, and also, there is an upward improvement in nourishment levels. Notwithstanding, over 60 million people have fled their respective homes at the end of last year due to conflict. It is, therefore, important to address the root and remote causes of conflict and lasting solutions should be profferedappropriately before jumping to Sustainable Development Goals.

    The second goal dwells on achieving universal primary education. The progress made so far on this is quite commendable. UNDP reports reveal that school enrolment in Sub-Saharan Africa has doubled from 62million to 149 million and the literacy level among the youths between the ages of 15 and 24 years has also increased globally from 83 percent to 91 percent. Nevertheless, there is still much efforts required to ensure that the universal primary education must be universal in theory and practice. This is achievable only if poverty is eradicated.

    Promoting gender equality and empowering women occupies the third place. Looking at the statistical analysis of the report, much progress has been made. The increase from 11 per cent in 1995 to 22 percent in January 2015 shows that progress has been made but in a very slow pace. 1995-2015 is 20 years which means only the progress within 20years is just 11per cent. Women should be encouraged to take up top leadership positions and be actively involved in governance and public service.

    The fourth goal is anchored on reducing child mortality. More than 71 percent of births were assisted by skilled health personnel globally in 2014, an increase from 59 percent in 1990. In the developing regions, only 56 percent of births in rural areas are attended by skilled health personnel, compared with 87 percent in urban areas.  51 percent of countries have data on maternal cause of death. In my opinion, much effort should be made by other countries that are still battling with working data on maternal cause of death. This must be done without further delay.

    The fifth goal harps on improving maternal health.A significant level of improvement has been recorded since the adoption of the MDGs. For instance, Southern and Eastern Asia have recorded great advancement in plummeting maternal mortality. Despite this development, every day hundreds of women die during pregnancy or from childbirth-related complications. The causes of their death must be revisited to avert a re-occurrence that may truncate the SDGs.

    Combating HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases is the sixth goal. New cases of HIV infections fell by approximately 40 percent between 2000 and 2013 and by June 2014, about 13.6 million people living with HIV were receiving anti-retroviral therapy (ART) globally, an immense increase from just 800,000 in 2003. However, the level of discrimination, stigmatisation and marginalisation of people living with the deadly disease is still very high. The United Nations should, as a matter of urgency, address this global menace.

    The seventh agenda lays emphasis on ensuring environmental sustainability. Interestingly, 2.1 billion people worldwide have gained access to improved sanitation. Globally, 147 countries have met the MDG drinking-water target, 95 countries have met the MDG sanitation target and only 77 countries have met both. This is equally commendable.

    Goal eight dwells on developing global partnership for development. Official development assistance from developed countries increased 66 percent in real terms from 2000 and 2014, reaching a record $135.2 billion.

    After taking a meticulous examination of the achievements so far recorded within the last fifteen years of the MDGs, it’s apparent that so much have been done and more is needed to be done especially at this point in time when the poverty index has shifted from $1.25 to $2.00 and insecurity remains a global challenge.

    I want to seize this opportunity to appeal to world leaders, as they gather in September, to look at the democratisation of the UN Security Council. More so, accountability should be demanded from African leaders on how the aids received are spent and henceforth, all foreign aids and financial assistance coming to Africa should be used for projects rather than releasing the funds to African leaders who are fond of recklessly mismanaging and siphoning public funds.

    Lastly, more attention should be placed on security; the remote cause of conflicts and the best way of addressing the challenges should be proffered.

     

    • Sheyi, is a Master’s of Conflict, Development and Security student, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
  • Peterside hails NNPC’s transparency agenda

    Peterside hails NNPC’s transparency agenda

    All Progressives Congress (APC) Rivers State governorship candidate Dr Dakuku Peterside has praised the new management team of the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), headed by Dr. Ibe Kachikwu, for promising a monthly publication of the corporation’s account.

    Peterside, who was a former chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Petroleum Resources, Downstream, said the corporation’s promise to open its books could not have come at a better time, given revelations of tardiness and impunity at the corporation.

    “The new policy on transparency and due process by the NNPC has renewed hopes that Nigeria has all it takes to run a world-class company. This is most encouraging.

    “No country or organisation can make any meaningful progress in an atmosphere of chaos and inconsistencies; vices, many believe, had pervaded the NNPC for many years.  Transparency in every organisation is key because it helps in measuring growth.

    “I am happy that the troubled corporation is living up to public expectation in line with the new change mantra of the APC–led government of President Muhammadu Buhari.

    ‘’I praise those behind these new initiatives, as the new ideas have can reposition the NNPC, if well implemented.

    “But the drivers of this new vision should take a step further towards comprehensive reforms, especially with regard to business models. They should examine critically the corporation’s inherent contradictions essentially in the area of being a player and regulator, all at the same time.

    “Steps should also be taken to get NNPC quoted on the stock exchange so that it can run properly as a viable commercial entity.

    ‘’This is the only way to turn around the fortunes of the NNPC”.

  • ‘ICT strategic to Buhari’s change agenda

    The Permanent Secretary, Federal Ministry of Communications and Technology, Dr. Tunji Olaopa, yesterday said that President Muhammadu Buhari considers Information and Communications Technology as an important tool to the success of his administration.

    Dr. Olaopa, who spoke at the opening ceremony of an in – house- training workshop organised for officials of the ministry in Abuja, said that Buhari was dissatisfied with the direction Nigeria took in the past.

    He, therefore, assured the trainees that the president will introduce changes that will be deliberate, spirited and reconstructive to reposition existing policies.

    Dr. Olaopa said: “It is within this broad policy indication of Mr. President that we are gathered today, to begin to set in motion a thinking process on how we should manage the change as it unfolds. This is coming against the background of the outcome of our 2014 end of year retreat and on-going effort to rethink our sector’s reform policies and programmes within the framework of the change agenda of the new administration as it unfolds.

    “This will ride on the on-going industry wide baseline study that we commissioned last year that will provide statistical basis for taking forward ICT sector development and contributions to the nation’s GDP in the next four years.

    “Mr. President has pronounced ICT as strategic to his change agenda. This change, from the statements of the President so far and measures already taken, arises from an acute dissatisfaction with the direction that the nation has taken in the last few years. Change therefore would mean a specific, deliberate and spirited reconstructive framework for recalibrating existing policies and institutional configurations as well as the values that underpins them.”