Tag: Aminu Tambuwal

  • Tambuwal: Court stays proceedings indefinitely

    Tambuwal: Court stays proceedings indefinitely

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has stayed indefinitely, further proceedings in the suit filed by House of Representatives Speaker, Aminu Tambuwal.

    Justice Ahmed Mohammed agreed to a definite stay of proceedings in the case upon being convinced that the appeal filed against his December 1 ruling has been entered at the Court of Appeal, given appeal number, and that the record of appeal has been transmitted from the High Court.

    Tambuwal had, shortly after the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Suleiman Abba, ordered the withdrawal of his (Tambuwal’s) security aides, challenged IGP’s decision in court.

    He also challenged threat by his former party, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), to declare his seat vacant.

    Shortly after Tambuwal filed the suit, some lawmakers, representing his constituents, applied to be joined as co-defendants in the suit.

    On November 28, Israel Olorundare (SAN) and Moyosore Onigbanjo (SAN) argued the two sets of applications filed by those seeking to join the suit.

    Olorundare argued the application filed by Chairmen of Kebbe and Tambuwal Local Governments in Sokoto State – Bala Konkani and Sambo Modo – while Onigbanjo argued the one by three members of the Sokoto State House of Assembly – Abdussamad Dasuki, Suleiman Hantsi, and Shuaibu Umar, representing Tambuwal East, Tambuwal West and Kebbe constituencies.

    Justice Mohammed, in a ruling on December 1 , refused the joinder applications on the ground that the interest they sought to protect had been effectively protected by the plaintiff with his institution of the suit.

     

  • 10 Reps defect across parties

    The House of Representatives witnessed series of defections on Tuesday.

    Speaker Aminu Tambuwal read out the announcement of the defectors at plenary.

    Five lawmakers from Ogun State moved from the All Progressives Congress, APC to the Social Democratic Party, SDP.

    They are Babatunde Ogunola ( Ado-odo/Ota), Adekunle Adeyemi ( Ifo Ewekoro), Olumide Osoba (Abeokuta North/ Obafemi- Owode/Odeda), Abiodun Abudu-Balogun (Ogun Waterside/Ijebu North /East) and Taofik Buraimoh ( Remo Federal Constituency).

    Four members also moved from the People’s Democratic Party, PDP to the All Progressives Congress, APC.

    They are: Isau Mohammed ( Adamawa) Ibrahim El Sudi, (Taraba,)  Jagaba Adams, (kaduna) Herman Hembe ( Benue).

    The only female on the defection train, Aisha Ahmed Dahiru ( Adamawa) moved from the PDP to People’s Democratic Movement, PDM

  • National Assembly peaceful as lawmakers resume

    There were sighs of relief Tuesday morning as legislators and workers resumed at work at the National Assembly in Abuja without being confronted by gun- welding and hooded security operatives.

    The Speaker, Aminu Tambuwal and his aides drove into the complex at about 10.10am without police escorts.

    The Speaker’s convoy was not stopped for security search.

    There was apprehension that armed operatives might invade the National Assembly complex like they did on November 20 when attempts were made to stop the Speaker from gaining entrance into the complex.

    The lawmakers were to converge for a special session to consider President Goodluck Jonathan’s request for extension of emergency rule in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe States.

    Some lawmakers had to scale the NASS gate and were tear-gassed by the police following the blockade of the gate.

    However, against all expectations, the National Assembly complex was devoid of external security operatives, hooded or armed.

    The comprehensive stop and search conducted by hooded Department of State Services (DSS) was also non-existent as the combined team of NASS Police personnel and Sergeant At Arm were seen conducting the searches.

    Meanwhile there was no mention of the contentious Petroleum Industry Bill or a revisit of the Emergency on the Order paper for Tuesday.

    It was however gathered that the Emergency rule debate might come up under Message from the President which is item number four on the Order paper.

  • Court declines to stop Tambuwal

    Court declines to stop Tambuwal

    •Judge: no to speaker’s removal

    THE Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) failed yesterday in its bid to sack House of Representatives’ Speaker Aminu Tambuwal.

    The  Federal High Court in Abuja refused an ex-parte motion filed by the party’s member, Abiodun Akinlade.

    Akinlade, a member of the House or Representatives, representing Yewa South/Ipokia Federal Constituency of Ogun State, had by the motion, sought to restrain Tambuwal from continuing to act or parade himself as the Speaker of the House of Representatives, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice.

    He also sought an order dispensing with personal service and for substituted service on Tambuwal “by serving all processes in this suit in the office of the Speaker, House of Representatives”.

    Akinlade’s lawyer Babs Akinwumi, while moving the ex-parte motion, urged the court to grant the interim injunctions sought by his client pending the hearing of the substantive suit earlier filed by the lawmaker.

    Ruling, Justice Ahmed Mohammed refused Akinlade’s prayers on the ground that it was unfair to defendants in the case for the court to make ex-parte orders against them when they were already aware of the case and were represented in court by lawyers.

    He ordered Akinlade to convert the ex-parte application to a motion on notice and serve it on the defendants to enable them respond to it.

    “In this situation, all the parties are represented in this case. It will be most unfair to grant an order ex-parte against a party that has representatives in a case,” the judge said.

    He fixed January 19 for further hearing in the case.

    Defendants in the suit are Tambuwal (as the first defendant), the House of Representatives and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

    In the substantive suit, Akinlade is seeking a “judicial interpretation” of an earlier judgment delivered by Justice Evoh Chukwu of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which held that there was no division in the PDP.

    The suit is intended to justify the PDP’s position that Tambuwal’s defection to the All Progressives Congress (APC) on October 28 was “illegal” and in breach of Section 68(1) (g) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    Akinlade is urging the court to declare Tambuwal’s seat vacant on the ground that his defection is illegal.

    The suit was earlier assigned to Justice Chukwu.

    He withdrew from handling it on December 2, after Tambuwal petitioned the court’s Chief Judge, Justice Ibrahim Auta, requesting the transfer of the case to another on the ground that he was likely to be bias in view of his earlier position in a similar case.

  • Police: Tambuwal must apply for protection

    Police: Tambuwal must apply for protection

    The police said yesterday that House of Representatives Speaker Aminu Tambuwal must apply for protection as a governorship aspirant if he desires to be protected.

    Tambuwal will still not enjoy any police protection as speaker since his guards were withdrawn following his defection from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    The Federal High Court judge sitting in Abuja had ruled that the status quo ante bellum must be maintained in the matter. But the police still did not restore the speaker’s security.

    Inspector General of Police Suleiman Abba declared when he appeared before the House Committee on Police Affairs that he would no longer recognise Tambuwal as speaker. Members immediately called it a day.

    Police spokesman Emmanuel Ojukwu said: “It is the duty of the police to provide protection for all aspirants but they have to apply to be given police operatives.

    “We have enough work on our hands and we cannot be running after candidates who need our protection.

    “All candidates must apply for police protection.”

  • Buhari, APC and 2015

    Buhari, APC and 2015

    Until Aminu Tambuwal, Speaker of the House of Representatives, dropped out of the six-horse race to pick the All Progressives Congress (APC) ticket for the presidential contest, it was hard to tell whether former military head of state, Gen Muhammadu Buhari, would have achieved runaway victory. I rooted for Hon Tambuwal for reasons I had spelt out in this place at least three times. I expected he would win or come near doing so for possessing believable democratic credentials, for being liberal and gregarious without being populist and pedestrian, and for being modern, expansive, intellectual, intuitive and full of solicitudes, as his fellow lawmakers can attest. But as I warned here last week, would the country still be ready for him some four years or more down the road? Of the five aspirants left in the race, I think that notwithstanding his weaknesses and adeptness at courting controversies, Gen Buhari is today easily the man to beat. This will be his fourth try, and the last. His 2011 effort was his best attempt ever, physically, emotionally and logistically. However, I think he will run the 2015 race virtually in a state of suspended animation, buoyed up by other people’s emotional capital, logistical deployment and physical rigour.

    The other four aspirants can’t hold the candle to Gen Buhari, notwithstanding his advanced age and sworn mendicancy. Abubakar Atiku, for reasons best known to nature, is dogged by bad press, some of it actively cultivated and insinuated by his former boss, President Olusegun Obasanjo. Nothing was ever really proved against him, but Chief Obasanjo and many others seem to believe that the former vice president lives above his means, procures favours with disarming malfeasance, and dispenses them equally mala fide. Chief Obasanjo is notorious for never proving any allegation he makes, and is in fact never interested in substantiating anything were he to be deliberately and violently prodded. The country has unfortunately embraced the same notoriety, against which Alhaji Atiku will constantly come a cropper. And given the military and political exigencies of the moment, it is doubtful whether the easy-going affirmation of Alhaji Atiku, his self-assuredness, his accessibility and consensual politics, and his talent for head-hunting excellent technocrats will avail much or persuade the electorate to give him a chance.

    Governor Rabiu Kwankwaso of Kano State holds a lot of promise both as a thinker and as an administrator. In Kano he has provided the state a safe pair of very steady hands, and has handled governance with the care, trust and even-handedness the constitution quintessentially envisages. He has rebuffed the xenophobia rage that lathers many parts of Nigeria, and promoted the kind of ethnic amity Nigerians have always dreamt of, and a commercial city like Kano cannot do without. But Kano has been to Governor Kwankwaso a cocoon, from which he had before his presidential race seldom ventured. His visage and inner qualities show him quite capable of ruling a complex society like Nigeria, but running a presidential race, let alone winning it, requires long preparation, venturing out to other parts of the country, and staying evocatively and munificently in public glare.

    I am afraid I am not persuaded that either of the remaining two aspirants, to wit, the intrepid publisher Sam Nda-Isaiah and Governor Rochas Okorocha, is actually serious or prepared for the race; nor is it clear they can muster enough goodwill to run a race against such an implacable foe as President Goodluck Jonathan, or whether they have the calibre to trigger excitement and emotions in Nigerians seeking romantically for knights and miracles against the unrelenting harassment by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Mr Nda-Isaiah is young, energetic and a gifted columnist. But as his columns indicate, he is also impatient, and often acerbic and cocksure of everything. Owelle Okorocha is eloquent, empathetic but sometimes grandiloquent. But either as governor or presidential aspirant, he is often detached and distracted, quite unable sometimes to match input with output, his modest talents with the lofty goals and accomplishments of his boyish dreams.

    The APC presidential primary will in my opinion revolve around the challenges Nigeria is facing. The economy is not yet in a tailspin, but it is nearly spinning out of control, its managers lacking in the requisite initiative and discipline to rein it in. Insecurity is rife in all parts of the country, with emphasis on the insurgency in the Northeast. If it persist for much longer, there is no certainty the entire country will not be engulfed. Nigeria is at the moment truly distressed, buffeted on all sides by political rancour, socio-economic paralysis and decay, deliberate attacks on the constitution and civil liberties by the government and secret service, and wearied by a terrible feeling of ennui that has lingered for more than four or five years. Few doubt the incapacity of the Jonathan presidency to grapple with these monumental problems, and no one doubts his government’s absolute lack of discipline, motivation and ambition. Whatever doubts exist concern the ability of the APC to give us a candidate able to provide effective leadership at this trying moment. The PDP has offered Dr Jonathan, and he is absolutely feckless.

    Perhaps in quieter times, the talents of Alhaji Atiku, Governor Kwankwaso, Mr Nda-Isaiah and Owelle Okocha would recommend them suitably for the presidency. But at this time of pressing danger and mortal threat to national security, the electorate and the APC would be disposed to someone with a safe pair of hands than the dreamy and distracted Dr Jonathan has offered or is ever able to offer. It seems to me that the only man in the APC able to subdue the threats of the moment is the inflexible and emotionless general from Daura. He has been head of state once, and he has had the experience of many battles from which he never flinched. He has expressed his readiness, even covets the chance, to lead once again and re-establish order in this increasingly fissiparous country. The APC will give him the ticket, for he seems both prepared to do battle, and he appears the only one among the five aspirants able to face Dr Jonathan implacability for implacability, toe-to-toe, head-to-head, and if necessary, malice for malice.

    The APC is not unduly finicky to worry that a Buhari presidency could become intractably distant from constitutional reality, a sentiment the country itself has expressed many times given the general’s antecedents. But if they desire to win the election, and if the country hankers after order and discipline without which development cannot take place, their best bet will be the retired army general. He often seems too set in his ways, surrounds himself with a coterie of often hawkish and insular officials and technocrats, and some of his ideas hark back to distant times and eras. But the party will assume the confidence to mould him and reorient him, and as a disciplined officer and leader, he will constantly remind himself of the supremacy of the constitution. These sentiments will be shared by the country, for the alternative is too grim to contemplate, an alternative replete with Jonathan induced failures, paralysis, indiscipline, mismanagement, cowardice, poor judgement, gaffes, unfathomable avarice, arrogance, nepotism and parochialism.

    I think the choice before the APC is clear. They will have a few misgivings about the stubborn general, but the know which side their bread is buttered. As for the country in February 2015, it is presumed they understand they have reached a fork in the road, where the wrong turn will unleash catastrophic consequences. Unlike the APC which is expected to choose right in their presidential primary this week, the country may still entertain the view that it has the luxuries of time and choice. I don’t think they do. Indulgent and hardhearted as they may seem, they will probably, at the last moment, step back from the brink.

  • Tambuwal urges CJ to reassign suit

    Tambuwal urges CJ to reassign suit

    House of Representatives Speaker Aminu Tambuwal has petitioned the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Ibrahim Auta, in protest against a move by the Presidency and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to sack him from office through an ex-parte application.

    He urged the Chief Judge to reassign a new case filed by a member of the House of Representatives, Hon. Isiaq Akinlade, who is seeking an ex-parte order to declare his seat vacant, to a neutral judge.

    He said the trial judge, Justice ESJ Chukwu, cannot sit on appeal over his own decision.

    He also said Justice Chukwu has an “iron cast judicial position or opinion” in respect of the new suit on him, which has just been assigned to the judge.

    Tambuwal, in a November 30, 2014 petition to the Chief Judge, said there are five pending suits on a similar application by Akinlade.

    The petition reads in part: “My attention has been drawn to the above suit, which has been assigned to Court 8, presided over by Justice ESJ Chukwu and we wish to make the following observations:

    “Sometime in 2013, the said Presiding Judge, Justice ESJ Chukwu presided over the case of Peoples Democratic Party & 12 Ors VS. INEC & 4 Ors, wherein he made a judicial pronouncement, which has been interpreted by some , to the effect that there was no division in Peoples Democratic Party.

    “The above decision of Justice Chukwu, ESJ was heavily relied upon and cited severally in the case of Peoples Democratic Party VS. (1) House of Representatives; (2) the Speaker of the House of Representatives & 52 Ors, Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/4/2014.

    “Consequently, Justice A.F.A Ademola, relying on the said judgment of his brother Justice Chukwu, ESJ, even though the said suit before him had nothing to do with defection, ruled that there was no division within the Peoples Democratic Party.

    “And as such, the Defendants in that case, who are members of the House of Representatives, who have similar cases as mine, currently pending in the Federal High Court Abuja, were not protected by proviso to Section 68(1)(g) of the 1999 Constitution. He rested his decision on that earlier judgment of Justice Chukwu aforementioned.

    “The said judgment of Justice A.F.A Ademola, in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/4/2014 is subject of four pending Appeals at the Court of Appeal Abuja Judicial Division viz Appeal No. CA/A/343/2014 and Appeal No. CA/A/343A/2014 and CA/A/343B/2014 and Appeal No. CA/A/343D/2014.”

    He listed five similar suits before the Federal High Court which had not been decided.

    He added: My Lord, similar suits were variously instituted by various parties and are pending before the Federal High Court No. 7, presided over by Justice A.R Mohammed, in Suits No. FHC/ABJ/CS/621/2013; Between Senator Bello Hayatu Gwarzo & 78 Ors VS. Alh. Bamanga Tukur & 4 Ors and are at various stages of proceeding pending before Court 7, presided over by Justice A.R Mohammed, some of these cases are:

    •Peoples Democratic Party vs the  House of Representatives & 53 Ors – Suit FHC/CS/ABJ/4/2014.

    •Peoples Democratic Party VS. the  House of Representatives – Suit FHC/CS/ABJ/57/2014

    • Peoples Democratic Party  VS the President of  the Senate – Suit FHC/CS/ABJ/65/2014.

    •Nnamdi  Nwokocha Ahaiwe VS. the Senate President & Ors – FHC/ABJ/CS/79/2014

    •AG Federation VS. the House of Representatives– FHC/ABJ/CS/317/2014.

  • Tambuwal petitions CJ over ex-parte plot

    Tambuwal petitions CJ over ex-parte plot

    Following a fresh plot to remove him through the court, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Aminu Tambuwal, has petitioned the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Ibrahim Auta.

    He asked the Chief Judge to reassign a new case filed by a member of the House of Representatives, Hon. Isiaq Akinlade, who is seeking an ex-parte order to declare his seat vacant, to a neutral judge.

    Tambuwal in a November 30, 2014 petition to the Chief Judge also said there are five pending suits on a similar application by Akinlade.

    The petition reads in part: “My Lord, similar Suits were variously instituted by various parties and are pending before the Federal High Court No. 7, presided over by Justice A.R Mohammed, in Suits No. FHC/ABJ/CS/621/2013; Between SENATOR BELLO HAYATU GWARZO & 78 ORS VS. ALHAJI BAMANGA TUKUR & 4 ORS and are at various stages of proceeding pending before Court 7, presided over by Justice A.R Mohammed, some of these cases are:

    1. PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY VS. THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES & 53 ORS – Suit FHC/CS/ABJ/4/2014.

    2. PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY VS. THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES – Suit FHC/CS/ABJ/57/2014.

    3. PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY VS. THE PRESIDENT OF SENATE – Suit FHC/CS/ABJ/65/2014.

    4. NNAMDI NWOKOCHA AHAIWE VS. THE SENATE PRESIDENT & ORS – FHC/ABJ/CS/79/2014.

    5. A.G. FEDERATION VS. THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES – FHC/ABJ/CS/317/2014.

    “My Lord, my apprehension is particularly in respect of the presiding Judge, Justice Chukwu, ESJ. having made a pronouncement on similar issues, in similar cases, decided by him, clearly shows that he has an iron cast judicial position or opinion in respect of Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/871/2014 concerning me Sir, which has just been assigned to him.

    “A perusal of the new case assigned to Justice ESJ Chukwu, No. FHC/ABJ/CS/871/2014 shows that the Plaintiff is asking the Court to interpret the decisions of the Court in the two aforementioned Cases. PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY & 12 ORS VS. INEC & 4 ORS and Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/4/2014. In effect, to sit on Appeal over his own decision.

    “My apprehension is further fortified by the fact that both decisions of Justice Chukwu and Justice Ademola as captured in the said suits are subject of Appeal in the Court of Appeal.”

    Tambuwal said if Akinlade’s suit must be heard at all, it should be assigned to a new judge.

    He added: “In view of the above stated facts, I humbly urge my Lord to re-assign the said Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/871/2014 to a neutral judge, who has not made any judicial pronouncement on the issue, or made public, his own opinion on the issue at hand.”

  • Presidency, PDP plan court ambush to oust Tambuwal

    Presidency, PDP plan court ambush to oust Tambuwal

    Supporters to stop ex-parte order to declare seat vacant

    Barely four days to the resumption of the House of Representatives, members have uncovered a plot to have a court declare vacant Speaker Aminu Tambuwal’s seat.

    The court may grant an ex-parte order asking Tambuwal to leave office pending the determination of the substantive motion.

    On the basis of the judicial ambush, the police will have “alibi” to prevent the Speaker from presiding over the House when it reconvenes on December 4.

    A three-time member of the House, Isiaq  Abiodun Akinlade(Yewa South/Ipokia Federal Constituency) is said to have filed an ex-parte application seeking to stop Tambuwal from presiding over the affairs of the lower chamber because of the Speaker’s defection to the All Progressives Congress(APC).

    Akinlade, who lost the governorship ticket to Governor Ibikunle Amosun, left the APC for the Peoples Democratic Party( PDP). He could not be reached for comments last night.

    As at press time, Tambuwal had not been put on notice, contrary to the rules put in place by the immediate past Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Aloma Mukhtar.

    A principal officer of the House, who spoke in confidence, said: “We have uncovered a judicial ambush to remove the Speaker on Monday. The Presidency and the PDP are sponsoring a lawmaker from Ogun State to seek an ex-parte order to sack Tambuwal.

    “This is a sheer abuse of court process because a similar suit is already before the same Federal High Court.”

    “What they have done is to look for a friendly judge to sack Tambuwal, not minding any pending suit.”

    Another source said: “In a move, which lawyers described as abuse of court process,  the PDP, through one of its members  in the House of Representatives,  Hon Isiaq Abiodun Akinlade, has asked the Abuja Division of the Federal High Court to sack Speaker Aminu Waziri Tambuwal from his position and membership of the House.

    “The case,  which is expected to come up today is seeking an ex parte ruling to remove Tambuwal from his seat and to ask Deputy Speaker Emeka Ihedioha,  to take over as acting speaker of the Green Chamber.

    “The decision to award the case for hearing has raised eyebrows in legal quarters, especially considering the fact that the Judge who is believed to have been assigned the matter, has given favourable judgments to the PDP in the past.

    Some lawyers who are familiar with the matter said it was curious the judge accepted to handle the matter, considering the fact that similar issues are before another judge also in the Abuja Division of the court.

    A third source said:  “It is a public knowledge that Tambuwal has already filed a case in court seeking protection against moves by the PDP to declare his seat vacant.

    “Already,  Justice Ahmed Ramat Muhammed has ordered that status quo be maintained until the determination of the suit before her. Having been named defendants in this case,  the party has now instigated one of its members in the House to file another case seeking reliefs Tambuwal sought to stop in his case.

    A lawyer said: “The issue of the judge giving favourable judgments to PDP is now a source of concern to many. You are aware that he gave judgment against Baraje led-New PDP by saying there was no faction in the party. This ruling was contradicted by two respected judges in Sokoto and Ilorin divisions of the Federal High Court who held that by the facts before them,  there were indeed factions in the PDP.

    “By his stand on the Baraje issue,  his position on the availability of faction in PDP is already known. Speaker Tambuwal defected to APC because he was convinced there was faction in Sokoto PDP as par the ruling of the Sokoto division of the Federal High Court. Do you think Justice Chukwu is the right person to hear this application?”

  • Sad to see Tambuwal abandon presidential race

    Sad to see Tambuwal abandon presidential race

    On November 2, I suggested in this place that should Speaker of the House of Representatives, Aminu Tambuwal, enter the presidential race, I would be prepared to lend him my unqualified support. when I made the offer, I didn’t think his defection from the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC), nor his principled opposition to both the undemocratic practices of his former party and President Goodluck Jonathan’s uninspiring leadership, nor yet the huge cost to his comfort and esteem in the PDP were all for the purpose of winning the governorship race of his home state, Sokoto. If his exertions were simply to get him the governorship, I felt a little bewildered, it would be like killing a fly with a sledgehammer. At a point, he reassuringly did seem like he actually wanted to run for president. Indeed, when some lawmakers in the House of Representatives bought the expression of interest and nomination forms for him, I exhaled in relief; for even before November 2, I had twice admonished him to run, and asked the APC to lend him a strong helping hand.

    Sadly, Hon Tambuwal has now abandoned the presidential race in favour of the governorship race of his state. Two reasons probably explain his manoeuvres. One is that he had no guarantee he could get the presidential ticket, let alone win in February, in a race where he would have to first crush both the redoubtable Muhammadu Buhari, a retired general and former head of state, and former vice president Abubakar Atiku, a consummate party denizen and schemer, before finally locking horns with the desperate and increasingly autocratic Dr Jonathan. Two is the fear by many APC faithful that his entry into the race could create a lot of disaffection and turmoil that would fracture the party and weaken it before decision day in February. Considering how sensitive the Buhari campaign and image have become in this race, and the huge reputation and expectation of Alhaji Atiku that are on the line in the same race, it is probably true that disaffection could arise. If they lost, the party could not guarantee they would help a Tambuwal campaign.

    A third reason is advanced by analysts, some of whom are probably motivated by inexplicably venomous dislike for the opposition APC. They suggest that Hon Tambuwal was brought into the presidential race by some APC leaders in order to either checkmate Gen Buhari or cajole him into granting indeterminate concessions and future reprieves, since he is believed to be too rigid for party leaders’ comfort and seemed already constrained by a close and hawkish cabal. In all their explanations, there was no hint or mention of the sensible argument that APC leaders could in fact be propelled by the more altruistic reasons of putting forward the best, most modern, youthful and truly liberal candidate who, apart from being intellectually adequate and socially and politically flexible, would also be a firm president and consensus builder.

    I am persuaded that party leaders and analysts like myself were motivated by clearly noble and deeply philosophical reasons in our support for Hon Tambuwal. I do not think any party leader who briefly courted the idea of presenting him for the top race should feel remorseful, as if either Gen Buhari or Alhaji Atiku had been betrayed. Either of these two gentlemen may appear to display grit and readiness for the final jousting with Dr Jonathan, but there are enough reasons to convince everyone of Hon Tambuwal’s bona fides and suitability for the top office. The plain fact, perhaps somewhat sweeping and depressing to supporters of the two ageing politicians, is that Hon Tambuwal, by disposition and intellect, and by speech and human relations, towers above Gen Buhari and Alhaji Atiku. These conclusions are not without sound reasons.

    A consideration of the circumstances of Hon Tambuwal’s emergence as Speaker in 2011 does not reveal someone whose politics and ideas are woven around repaying those who made his elevation possible. His politics and ideas are genuine. Nor does his emergence reek of the idiosyncratic opportunism that lathers and hobbles Nigerian politics. In fact, he has remained uncommonly true and faithful to the goals and objectives that prompted his emergence. He and his sponsors and supporters needed to mould a House of Representatives free of the manipulation and meddlesomeness of the executive branch, and free of the crass mechanicality that compels the ruling party to zone the chamber’s leadership to the point of ridicule. The lower house also needed to be weaned off the servility that tended to subordinate its thoughts and actions unthinkingly to both the party in power and the men in office. Hon Tambuwal’s innate independence therefore combined seamlessly with the defiant posture of APC leaders, leading them to summon the boldness needed to chart an enviable identity for the House of Representatives. Not only has Hon Tambuwal succeeded in maintaining and asserting the lower chamber’s independence, and has steered it towards enacting laws and passing great resolutions worthy of any democracy, he has administered its affairs so evenhandedly that even his enemies grudgingly admire him.

    Closely leashed to his style of administration and lawmaking is the indisputable fact that the Speaker has managed elegantly to adhere to principles and values that define classical democracy. It was not enough for him to protect the lower chamber from unhealthy influences and manipulations; in his view, legislative independence must be harnessed for the promotion of great values, whether practical as in defeating bad laws, or philosophical as in promoting both the doctrine of separation of powers and checkmating the executive’s constant flirtation with dictatorship. He resisted and resented the fawning practice of any member of the lower chamber representing members of the executive branch in ceremonies, as senators and their leaders are wont to do. Under Hon Tambuwal, the lower chamber quickly perceived Dr Jonathan’s dictatorial tendency, and sensibly built legislative and ideational ramparts against it. Until recent events blew up their delusions, many analysts, including the most rabid, never believed that Dr Jonathan exuded only a superficial form of democracy.

    Importantly too, Hon Tambuwal has behaved more statesmanlike than any of his competitors for the top prize inside or outside the APC. Dr Jonathan never gave a good speech, does not in fact appear capable of writing one, and in view of his persistent poor judgement, is incapable of coming across as a president or statesman. When Gen Buhari, Alhaji Atiku and Governor Rabiu Kwankwaso of Kano State  gave their declaration speeches a few weeks back, they were tedious, ponderous, lacking in the stirring philosophy that enriches politics and even ennobles society, and portentously detached from Nigeria’s complex history and cultures. But Hon Tambuwal gives speeches that resonate, whether he writes them himself or not; in any case they sound as he speaks. When in March he addressed lawmakers on the massacre of students of Federal Government College, Buni Yadi, Yobe State, it was celebrated by many as the speech the president should have given. (See Box). Had he been president, he would have visited the town and condoled with distraught parents. But in his response to the massacre, Dr Jonathan gave a bland and terse statement, and ignored the value of a condolence visit.

    Hon Tambuwal’s exit from the race is regrettable. I do not know whether if he had stayed in the race he would have won, but I think we would have made a great president of him, and he a great nation of us. Now, he has turned his gaze on Sokoto. I suspect that going by his national stature and accomplishment, not to say his character and integrity, he will probably win the governorship race. But I must wonder whether Sokoto, notwithstanding the powerful history of its caliphate forebears, can contain a man of his standing and eminence in this 21st Century. I do not insult Sokoto. As former French president Charles de Gaulle once argued, greatness is not just an abstraction; it is contingent, among other things, upon the importance of the territory a ruler is presiding over, the size of its economy, and the continental or international context in which the ruler is operating. Hon Tambuwal will be frustrated by the smallness of Sokoto, its location in the remote north-west of the country, the size of its economy and the near placidity of its politics. He will have his constant gaze focused on Abuja, and he will yearn for the national tapestry a consummate political artist and social philosopher and engineer like him love to write great history on.

    More, a thinker like Hon Tambuwal will ponder whether time and events, with their often cruelly wrought labyrinth, will wait for him in four or eight years from now to ferry him to the presidential mansion we think he will ennoble. We recognise his talents; but will his principles endure till the time is right for his coronation and canonisation? As many southern lawmakers in the House showed by sticking with him in his face-off with the Jonathan presidency, and northern lawmakers and political elites indicate by refusing to join the nefarious plot to unseat or destroy him, the forces of the moment have been good to him. It is impossible to tell, however, what the future will look like, even if he moves mountains to remain true to the principles and values that have made him an indomitable fighter and politician.

    * Next week: Buhari, APC and 2015