Tag: APC

  • The new PDP – APC merger in perspective

    The new PDP – APC merger in perspective

    Nigerians have not seen the last of PDP’s troubles

    Not even the most audacious hater of the banal PDP could have , this time a year ago, conjectured that the political behemoth could  come crashing so ignominiously under the sheer weight of its sins against Nigeria and Nigerians. The sins of biblical Sodom from which only Lot’s family escaped eternal judgment, would pale into literal insignificance compared to PDP’s banality which, in  its  mere fourteen years stranglehold over Nigeria  reduced a resource –rich country, which should ordinarily have been the pride of black peoples all over the world, to an absolutely beggarly country wallowing in the lowest rungs of the world’s development index. In those fourteen years, the only time, as of recent, when a Nigerian can truly feel proud of this country is when our yet to be adulterated youth, win some sporting laurels far away  from our shores; more from their own individual efforts than any deliberate policy of the PDP-controlled federal government.

    Only recently, a Ghanaian minister lost her high office simply because she expressed a mere intent to have some huge amount of money at her disposal to politically control the people but  here in an amoral PDP- controlled Nigeria, a minister continues to sit pretty in President Jonathan’s cabinet despite copious evidence of  her moral, financial and constitutional  derelictions  and weeks after the president’s panel of inquiry set  up, more to obfuscate than to adjudicate, had submitted its report. In like manner, the government has washed its hands clean of any responsibility to ensure that those who creamed off billions of naira through the oil subsidy scandal are promptly brought to book, merely by handing them over to the courts which is equally under its baleful control, sure the accused ones will, at best, be given a slap on the wrist. After all, children of PDP Chairmen, past and serving, are among. But presidential spokespersons will waste no time in telling you how the president does not control the judiciary. Nigerians, however, know better than the courts which unashamedly declare that there is no split in the PDP, in your face as it is, straight from the party’s Abuja mini convention.

    Those who stole billions from the pension fund are not any different. Indeed, so horrible was the pension scam, and the government’s effort at cover up, that in spite of a court order to arrest him, the police claimed it could not locate an accused top gun in the pension’s department, who was, incidentally being guided round the clock by dozens from the same Nigeria Police until he was allegedly helped to escape from the country.

    Given the above scenario many Nigerians have refused to be excited at the historic merger of a huge chunk of that same political party with the All Progressives Congress, claiming, indeed, that Nigerian politicians are all the same: what with ownership mentality, imposition of candidates and the fact that corruption is basically party- blind, though much more at home in the PDP.

    My response to all these has been that although one individual Nigerian is hardly different from  the other, PDP  in its corporeal sense and dealings,  is completely irredeemable, no matter how good its individual members may be. It was for this reason that Moremi Funmi Olayinka, the late Ekiti State Deputy Governor, used to liken it to a virus. The reader is certain to know a decent PDP member who is, however, party to the large scale treasury looting and perverse election rigging over which the government has superintended these many years. They are getting worse by the day.

    Many have, therefore, wondered as to how these big guns ‘porting’ into the APC from PDP will not spoil the broth and my answer is  two-fold;  one,  that the milieu is by far different. Whereas all those murky practices are more the directive policies of the PDP, a party from which you could hardly identify a lone biblical Lot for redemption, you will find among the  APC leaders, individuals like its Chairman, Chief Bisi Akande,  General Buhari and many others,  who are, indeed, Nigerian poster boys of the incorruptible. These two leaders have held high public offices and have been adjudged completely above board, leaving office in flying colours and with serial testaments to their patriotism and honesty. It is equally true that while accusations of imposition and the lot could hold true in smaller, regional parties, it is totally unthinkable that individuals, qua individuals, could exercise the same level of influence in a much bigger, national party, like the APC.

    However,  much more important is the fact that APC’s hope of rescuing Nigeria from the evil stranglehold of the PDP, rests mostly on comprehensively galvanising the people to make it a mass movement  by aggressively pushing to the public space, PDP’s record of  unprecedented corruption and non-performance since 1999; one that has no single redeeming feature, not even the GSM phenomenon wrongly attributed to Obasanjo but  which  the thoroughly disreputable Abacha regime had, in fact, initiated.  APC should let the world know that PDP luxuriates in illegalities such as abrogating the electorate and robbing the treasury blind. These negativities should be comprehensively enumerated and their evil consequences brought home vividly to Nigerians. The APC must show, very clearly, how and why, these are the very reasons an otherwise blessed country like Nigeria is wallowing in the abyss of ignominy with the poverty level of its citizens in the high 70s.  The recent resignation of the chairman of SURE-P, though allegedly for health-related reasons, should best be seen in the fact that the programme was fast becoming a cesspool of patronage and corruption with which the decent man will never ever be connected. These inglorious facts about the PDP, therefore, impose a moral obligation of probity on all levels of the APC membership: leaders, officials and ordinary members alike, if it must lay claim to any higher moral ground which is a sine qua non for victory.

    Ever a master of self deceit and unprecedented rigging in whatever level of election, local, state or federal, the PDP had been loudest in  proclaiming on roof tops, how the exit of no less than five state governors and sundry legislators at all levels  would not affect  it. I imagine, therefore, that even if, as a result of its many problems, President Jonathan decides to dump the party today, some jokers like Gulak would claim that nothing has happened as long as Chairman Tukur remains his rambunctious and all-conquering self. It can only be a shame that President Jonathan could not see the disaster Chairman Tukur had become to the PDP.  A well-heeled and aristocratic former governor, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, unfortunately, sees the party only as an extension of his vast holdings where he is the undisputed authority. He could, therefore, not tolerate the elected party secretary, nor did it matter to him whether or not meetings of the national executive of the party, which he saw as no more than the nominal boards of his many companies, met as statutorily expected. Rather, it was game for him to summarily dissolve state executive committees which he replaced with some fringe, unpopular members as long as his word would be law. The result was that when concerned members, state governors inclusive, raised these troubling issues with the president who is the party leader, it mattered nothing. Indeed, to ensure he had his way, Alhaji Tukur went back many decades to drag the one and only Umaru Dikko, to head his self-appointed Disciplinary Committee; all these while the soporific PDP leadership slept. Today, they can only gnash their teeth as it matters nothing to them either if their party could no longer field a governorship candidate from within its own ranks but must go shopping for one in other political parties. Nigerians have certainly not seen the last of PDP’s troubles as the party’s winter is already here.

  • APC enlargement: rise of  citizenship over subjecthood?

    APC enlargement: rise of citizenship over subjecthood?

    Whether before or after elections, citizens have been relegated in the last fourteen years to the realm of subjects

    Dominocracy is where rulers are too powerful; where there are inadequate means of challenge, scrutiny and accountability; and political life itself, as well as the quality of citizenship, is eroded and devalued.
    The absence of secure forms of sub-central government, the lack of independent institutions that are more than the creatures of the government of the day, the failure to develop the apparatus of social and economic participation; all this, and more, properly reflects a politics of subjecthood rather than of citizenship. – Tony Wright, British MP

    The much-vaunted electoral democracy in Nigeria in the last fourteen years has not resulted in the birth of a democratic culture that enhances the participation of citizens in their governance. With one political party in power for so long, democratic choice for citizens has been restricted to disagreement within the ruling party that has come to perceive itself as invincible and irreplaceable. PDP has over internalised and exaggerated its superiority over other political parties so manifestly that some of its leaders often refer to the party as the largest political party in Africa and as a party ordained to rule for the next sixty years. The effect of what appears as the end of the politics of choice to voters has been frustration for citizens who have generally felt more like subjects than citizens. But this past week appears or promises to have brought the politics of choice back to the country’s political landscape, and hopefully with it, a good measure of optimism that change to democracy from what Tony Wright has, in another context, called dominocracy may very well be on the way to Nigeria.

    The new kid on the political block is the enlarged APC. The PDP is not new to Nigerians in many respects. It is a party that has ruled the country rather than governed it for the past fourteen years, without being able to change for the better most of the dismal statistics in terms of human development index that the first PDP government inherited in 1999. Over 65% of Nigerians still live in destitution after fourteen years of governments supposedly chosen by citizens and are thus subjected to citizens’ scrutiny and approval, as distinct from decades of military autocracy that owed the citizens no explanation for whatever it did or failed to do. Nigeria is lagging behind many African countries with respect to improving the situation of maternal and child mortality, percentage of citizens with access to safe potable water and proper sanitation; access to electricity for industrial and residential use, access to good roads, functional education, etc. In other words, it is only the PDP that needs to be on the defensive politically.

    APC has not been in control of the central government and thus should have no reason to invest its utmost energy on optics and rhetoric. Citizens are expecting to hear messages of motivation and not of manipulation from the new political party that has brought a party of equal weight to stand up to the ruling party. Many APC states have good records to show about doing so much with so little for their citizens. Many APC states have a political pedigree that is generally referred to in popular parlance as progressive tradition of politics in the country. It is also significant that there are many states that are willing to be infected by the virus of progressive politics, thus making it possible for the recent enlargement of APC. The enlargement must be made to translate into empowerment of the party. The principle of ‘no founder, no joiner’ provides a level playing field for all party gurus. But the initial philosophy that brought APC into existence must not be lost in the process of preparing a level-playing field. The main challenge about bringing change to the country may now rest on the new party for the obvious reason that it is APC that has set a new goal for itself and citizens with like minds: saving democracy.

    To save democracy, the party is in a good position to use its national spread and the experience of its new members, as well as the recent experience of the party in Anambra. One thing that militates against democracy in the country is the absence of independent institutions. Such absence has since 1999 encouraged the personalisation of politics and privatisation of power, with the result of a culture of impunity across the land. Independent institutions that require struggling for before 2015 elections include getting a new Independent Electoral Commission that can perform the function of an impartial umpire. Election is too crucial for the survival of representative democracy to be left in the hands of persons that are constrained in any way. Unlike the judiciary, INEC officials do not have the security of tenure of judges and thus need every protection they can get to do their job without any trace of partiality. This has not happened since 1999 and it has to happen if democracy is to be saved.

    More eyes are thus going to be on APC to re-define democratic politics and put the polity back on course. APC is expected to provide leadership in terms of the politics of ideas, particularly popularisation of a vision that sees Nigeria beyond just a site of enormous power for those who are ready to play the game. Citizens are already too hungry for a party that has a vision that is rooted in an ideology that accepts that the role of government is the improvement of the life chances of citizens in all spheres. Whether before or after elections, citizens have been relegated in the last fourteen years to the realm of subjects. Their desires have thus not been able to enjoy noticeable space in the planning of a centralised state drowning under the weight of a burden it prefers to have but not to carry in an efficient and democratic manner. APC cannot afford not to persuade citizens about finding another way to govern this country well. More questions are certainly going to be thrown by citizens at the APC because more answers are expected from it than from the party that has been in power for the past fourteen years and that appears to have exhausted and enervated itself in the process.

    While elections are important in a democracy as the only means of peaceful change, democratic politics is much more than electoral democracy. Citizens want to be included in the way they are governed. They want to have a say not only at elections but at all times about the performance of their government. Democracy is not just for the sake of executive and legislative leaders; it is mainly for the sake of citizens. Any political party with the confidence of citizens has little to fear before, during, and after elections. APC should not allow the success of the last few days to diminish the attention it gives to mobilisation of average citizens. It needs to shift the focus of its membership drive to average citizens now yearning to become co-owners of a party that has announced plans to enter into a ‘monitorable’ social contract with citizens. Doing this can enrich democratic politics in the country, as it is capable of allowing other parties to upgrade themselves ideologically and culturally.

    People across Nigeria have a vision of the Nigeria they want to live in and leave behind for their children. They have ideas about what they believe the government can and should do to make their citizenship of the country fruitful and fulfilling for them. Citizens across the country are not in the dark with respect to the need to ‘re-constitutionalise’ the governance of the country. APC as the alternative party must be ready to deal with hard questions from citizens and to assuage their fears about a country that has for long appeared to be ‘irreformable’ at the hands of military dictators and post-military rulers alike.

  • APC, PDP, LP to boycott poll

    APC, PDP, LP to boycott poll

    A massive moral and legal burden hangs over the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) today as it insists on proceeding with the controversial supplementary governorship election in Anambra State.

    Dr. Chris Ngige,the candidate of the All Progressive Party (APC), Mr.Ifeanyi Ubah of Labour Party (LP) and Comrade Tony Nwoye, Peoples Democratic party (PDP) have opted out of the supplementary poll.

    They are demanding outright cancellation of the November 16 election, which they said was characterised by fraud.

    The candidate of APGA, Chief Willie Obiano, has however endorsed the conduct of the election.

    Mr. Ubah has already gone to court to challenge the legality of the supplementary election.

    He says Supplementary election is not known to the 1999 Constitution.

    He has secured an order for accelerated hearing in the suit filed at the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    His counsel, Mr.Olagoke Fakunle (SAN), in a letter to the INEC Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, yesterday drew the chairman’s attention to the “processes filed in that action” and for him to “respond to these processes not later than the 6th of December 2013.”

    He said: “You would have noticed that amongst the processes is a Motion on Notice for interlocutory injunction restraining you from conducting any further election in Anambra State with regard to the office of the Governor of the State,until the court has had an opportunity to review the legality of your pre-election processes towards that election.

    “It was for the reason of the urgency and importance of this action that the Federal High Court ,on 28th November 2013, made an order to abridge the time within which you and other Defendants may file your responses to both the application for injunction and the originating summons.The court also granted accelerated hearing of the matter by adjourning the hearing to 9th December, 2013.”

    The court order and the pendency of both the motion and substantive suit, Fakunle said, “have activated the doctrine of lis pendens.”

    He added: “The doctrine of lis pendens precludes you from taking any steps in furtherance of your planned supplementary or other election in Anambra State with regard to the office of governor of the state until the Court has determined the application for injunction and the legality of your pre-election processes and the planned supplementary election itself.”

    He asked for the postponement of today’s supplementary election to “avoid a situation whereby you would have foistered a fait accompli on the court and the court in response will therefore be constrained to void everything you have done including the outcome of the proposed supplementary election.”

  • APC not about Buhari, Tinubu, says Lagos ex-gov

    APC not about Buhari, Tinubu, says Lagos ex-gov

    National leader, All Progressives Congress (APC), Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, declared yesterday that the party is bigger than any individual, including himself and former military head of state, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari.

    The APC, according to him, is essentially about Nigeria and the need and commitment to rescue the country from inept leadership.

    He spoke to reporters in Abuja on the sideline of the 2012/2013 Call to Bar ceremony of the Nigeria Law School.

    ‘’The APC is not about Tinubu, Buhari or any of its leaders. It is about the nation and how we can come together and work together to rescue Nigeria from inept leadership. The implication is change,” he said in response to a question about the significance of the five former PDP governors joining APC and the implications for Nigeria.

    He added: “We want to change the way things are done by working together and investing our ideas. We must change the way we do things. Imagine from the 60’s till date. The cutlass of the 60s cannot be used for farming now. We need leaders that can think outside the box.’’

    Describing Nigeria as a blessed nation with talented youths whose potential must be harnessed for the development of our country, Asiwaju Tinubu said Nigeria needs a democratic revolution that will unleash infrastructural development and massive industrialization.

    ‘’The lamentations must stop. After so many years of lamentation with action, we must lead the new resolve to rally for the much needed change our country badly needs,’’ Tinubu said, and condemned the posture of the Federal Government to the continued strike by ASUU.

    Reacting to the December 4 ultimatum the federal authorities gave the striking lecturers to resume or be fired, he said: “’We are not in a military era. The language used shows a government out of tune with the general feelings of Nigerians.

    “Nigeria cannot afford to continue to lose her best brains to the diaspora.’’

  • APC, PDP, LP to boycott poll

    APC, PDP, LP to boycott poll

    A massive moral and legal burden hangs over the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) today as it insists on proceeding with the controversial supplementary governorship election in Anambra State.

    Dr. Chris Ngige,the candidate of the All Progressive Party (APC), Mr.Ifeanyi Ubah of Labour Party (LP) and Comrade Tony Nwoye, Peoples Democratic party (PDP) have opted out of the supplementary poll.

    They are demanding outright cancellation of the November 16 election, which they said was characterised by fraud.

    The candidate of APGA, Chief Willie Obiano, has however endorsed the conduct of the election.

    Mr. Ubah has already gone to court to challenge the legality of the supplementary election.

    He says Supplementary election is not known to the 1999 Constitution.

    He has secured an order for accelerated hearing in the suit filed at the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    His counsel, Mr.Olagoke Fakunle (SAN), in a letter to the INEC Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, yesterday drew the chairman’s attention to the “processes filed in that action” and for him to “respond to these processes not later than the 6th of December 2013.”

    He said: “You would have noticed that amongst the processes is a Motion on Notice for interlocutory injunction restraining you from conducting any further election in Anambra State with regard to the office of the Governor of the State,until the court has had an opportunity to review the legality of your pre-election processes towards that election.

    “It was for the reason of the urgency and importance of this action that the Federal High Court ,on 28th November 2013, made an order to abridge the time within which you and other Defendants may file your responses to both the application for injunction and the originating summons.The court also granted accelerated hearing of the matter by adjourning the hearing to 9th December, 2013.”

    The court order and the pendency of both the motion and substantive suit, Fakunle said, “have activated the doctrine of lis pendens.”

    He added: “The doctrine of lis pendens precludes you from taking any steps in furtherance of your planned supplementary or other election in Anambra State with regard to the office of governor of the state until the Court has determined the application for injunction and the legality of your pre-election processes and the planned supplementary election itself.”

    He asked for the postponement of today’s supplementary election to “avoid a situation whereby you would have foistered a fait accompli on the court and the court in response will therefore be constrained to void everything you have done including the outcome of the proposed supplementary election.”

  • More PDP governors will defect to APC – Okorocha

    More PDP governors will defect to APC – Okorocha

    Imo State Governor, Rochas Okorocha, on Friday disclosed that more governors are on the verge of dumping the crisis-ridden People’s Democratic Party (PDP) for the All Progressive Congress (APC).

    Commending the five PDP Governors for their courage, Okorocha assured that the action of the governors will further strengthen the country’s democracy and midwife the much desired two party system.

    Addressing journalists at the Sam Mbakwe International Cargo Airport, Owerri, shortly after he arrived from Abuja, the governor said that he had earlier predicted the “crossover” of the aggrieved governors to APC, adding that the country is now heading to a two party system which would create opportunity and freedom synonymous with healthy democracy.

    He restated calls for the total cancellation of Anambra State governorship election, adding that it was marred by “noticeable irregularities.”

     

     

  • Anambra poll: Buhari, Tinubu, others protest at INEC headquarters

    Anambra poll: Buhari, Tinubu, others protest at INEC headquarters

    Top leaders of the All Progressives Congress (APC) led by a former Head of State, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari defied police and military barricade to march on the headquarters of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in protest against the shoddy conduct of the governorship poll in Anambra State.

    They demanded outright cancellation of the election by INEC.

    They also called for the resignation of INEC Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega and dissolution of the management of the electoral body.

    Reminiscence of pro-democracy struggle between 1993 and 1998 during the dark days of military era, the leaders trekked for about five kilometers from APC National Secretariat in Blantyre Street in Wuse II part of Abuja to Zambezi Crescent in Maitama District where INEC is located.

    The initial stage of the trek was piloted by Governors Ibikunle Amosun (Ogun State) and Kayode Fayemi (Ekiti State) and many members of the National Assembly.

    The great trek was later coordinated by a former National Secretary of the defunct Congress for Progressives Change, Engr. Buba Galadima.

    But when the procession took off, Buhari and some top leaders of APC withstood the rigours of standing in an open lorry for the protest march.

    Others tucked in the lorry were the National Chairman of APC, Chief Bisi Akande, the National Leader of the party, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu; a former National Chairman of the defunct All Nigeria Peoples Party, Chief Ogbonnaya Onu; a former National Chairman of the defunct All Peoples Party(APP), Alhaji Yusuf Ali; ex-Governor Ahmed Sani Yerima, ex-Governor Segun Osoba; ex-Governor Niyi Adebayo; Senator Nazif Suleiman; the Deputy National Secretary of APC, Mallam Nasir el-Rufai, Senator Abu Ibrahim; and a former member of the House of Representatives, Comrade Dino Melaye.

    Others who participated in the hectic protest were Senator Oluremi Tinubu; Senator (Prof.) Sola Adeyeye; Senator Domingo Obende; Senator Anthony Adeniyi; Senator Ahmed Lawan; Senator Gbenga Asafa; House Minority Leader, Hon. Femi Gbajiabiamila and the Chairman of the House Committee on the Diaspora, Hon. Abike Dabiri.

    Others were the Deputy Minority Chief Whip in the House, Hon. Garba Datti; Deputy Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, Hon. Suleiman Kawu; Hon. Umar Bago; Hon. Adeola Solomon; Hon. Yakubu Balogun; Hon. Pally Iriase; Hon. Munir Hakeem; Hon. Abayomi Ayeola; Hon. Taiwo Adelekan; Hon. Adeyinka Ajayi; Hon. Gafar Akintayo; Hon. Sunday Adepoju; Hon. Ajibola Famurewa; the APC National Women Leader, Barrister Sharon Ikeazor, APC National Treasurer, and Hajiya Sadiat Umar Farouk,

    Waving brooms amidst blare of revolutionary songs, traffic was brought to a standstill for about two hours along the ever busy Ademola Adetokunbo Street in Wuse II.

    Many workers in the business district abandoned offices to identify with the protesters.

    They wielded leaflets and placards with the following inscriptions: “Anambrarians, Nigerians are with you,” “Anambra Election: Jega, not the INEC Messiah, Resign Now,” “2015, No hope with Jega,” “No Supplementary Election in Anambra,” “Cancel Anambra Governorship Election Now,” “Election Fraud Must Stop Now.”

     

  • No going back on merger with APC – Baraje faction

    No going back on merger with APC – Baraje faction

    The Abubakar Baraje faction that on Tuesday merged with the All Progressives Congress (APC) alongside five erstwhile Peoples Democratic Party governors has declared that there is no going back on the agreement.

    According to the group, the agreement is a done deal because a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in respect of the merger had been duly signed by the two parties.

    Still smarting from the loss of five of its governors and some leading lights to the APC, the Bamanga Tukur led PDP on Thursday congratulated the merging parties for their action.

    A statement by the spokesman of the Baraje group, Chukwuemeka Eze said:

    “The MoU between us and the APC has been duly signed by both the nPDP national chairman, Alhaji Abubakar Kawu Baraje, and the national chairman of the APC, Chief Bisi Akande.

    “In this regard, the general public should disregard any statement from whatever source which tries to give the impression that the merger between us and APC is in danger. The truth in that the merger is waxing stronger by the day and that our resolve to save our fledgling democracy is unshakable.

    “President Goodluck Jonathan and the PDP leadership should come to terms with the fact that PDP is now an opposition political party and Jonathan should start writing his handover notes as APC is fully set to take over the Aso Rock Presidential Villa in 2015 so as to give Nigerians the dividends of democracy they have been yearning for.”

    Eze assured PDP members in the National Assembly intending to move to the APC of security of their tenure, saying their seats are guaranteed by relevant provisions of the Nigerian Constitution and the Electoral Act.

    “For the avoidance of doubt, there is no danger of their losing their seats as made clear by sections 68(1) (g) and 109(1) (g) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) in relation to the status of members of a legislative house (state and national) who defect from the political parties from which they were elected to join another political party.

    “The wordings of the aforesaid sections are in agreement with those of sections 64(1) (g) of the 1979 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria given judicial interpretation by the Supreme Court in the case of FEDECO Vs Goni (1983) FNR 203. This case was argued by the best legal minds of that era (Chief FRA Williams SAN and GOK Ajayi SAN). The court held that such a member keeps his seat if his defection is as a result of a division or split in his party.

    “In this regard, particularly now that we have the majority in the National Assembly, our members in the National Assembly should express no fear as they are well protected and covered by the Constitution of the Federal Republic seeing that Alhaji Bamanga Tukur and his cohorts have succeeded in splitting the PDP into old and new PDP and are free to join any party of their choice.”

     

  • Photo: APC protest at INEC HQrts

    Photo: APC protest at INEC HQrts

  • Governors’ defection: ACF advocates two party system

    The Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), the north’s socio-political organisation wants the nation’s political parties reduced to two for the growth and development of the political system.

    Reacting to the merger of the new Peoples Democratic Party and the G-7 governors with the All Progressive Congress, the forum said that it is clear that multi party democracy has not provided Nigerians with a clear choice because the parties have been “clone” of each other.

    The forum said the defection of five of the PDP governors to the opposition is “democracy in action.”

    The group said, “The defection of five PDP Governors to APC is democracy in action which allows players to change their political strategy towards declared goals when the need arises.

    “ACF sees the unfolding events as a healthy development towards emergence of a viable alternative platform for the polity, considering democracy without viable opposition is a sham.

    “You would note that ACF has been hankering for a two-party system that can provide clear choices for the voters. Before now, the multi-party practices has not provided Nigerians with clear choices painfully designed and laboriously erected by the political parties, precisely because the political parties have been clones of one another.

    “Consequently, the choice has been reduced from which political parties can deliver on the promise of democracy to which of the political parties has the capacity to win elections in a political economy that enables government to determine who gets what, why, where, how and when.

    “ACF therefore hopes the unfolding political dynamics will lead to the evolution of two political parties which are far-sighted, sure-footed and resolute in their determination to promote democracy premised on triple foundation of liberty, justice and common decency, needed for the development and growth of our democracy.”