Tag: Atiku Abubakar

  • APC and  Atiku

    APC and Atiku

    FORMER Vice President Atiku Abubakar has finally dealt what appears to many commentators as his last card by crossing over to the All Progressives Congress (APC). The putative progressive party will no doubt welcome him with open arms, for they are as anxious to denude the ruling party of its spine as they are indifferent to what any critic might say of the sanctity of their ideology. After having once crossed from the PDP to the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), the ancestor of the APC, and then crossed back to the PDP, the combative former vice president has completed his galactic peregrinations. If he attempts to cross to anywhere after this latest foray, it is certain he will have no place in the world’s orbital arrangement.

    The APC has welcomed him. So, too, does Barometer, though not as if it really mattered. He has, however, not given a hint why he is probably Nigeria’s leading political nomad, traversing the nation’s lush grazing fields. Does he have an eye on the presidential race? Some say no. Was that why he enacted a most illustrious consultation across the country’s political zones? Surely, he knows that the APC’s presidential wannabes constitute a long and illustrious list, daunting even to the best and most practical politician in the party or indeed anywhere. Nigerians must hope that when the party dashes ambitions, as it will certainly do, a re-enactment of the famous Mfecane Movement that rocked and roiled Southern Africa in the early 19th century would not be triggered.

  • 2015: Atiku’s new calculations

    2015: Atiku’s new calculations

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has defected to the All Progressives Congress (APC). Will he revive his presidential ambition on the new platform? Group Political Editor EMMANUEL OLADESU writes on the prospects and constraints of his struggle for the Presidency.

    He is a big catch for the main opposition party, the All Progressives Congress (APC). He is not new to the platform, having worked variously with many of its national leaders, either as the Vice President, presidential candidate of the defunct Action Congress (AC) and automatic member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Board of Trustees (BoT). However, it is believed that his defection may change the permutation in the party, especially as the opposition leaders search for a credible presidential candidate.

    The odds weighed heavily against the Turaki Adamawa in the PDP. In the ruling party, he had a slim chance of survival. History is repeating itself. In 2007, he had defected to the defunct AC and emerged as its presidential flag bearer. But, he was defeated at the poll by the late President Umaru Yar’Adua. Shortly after the poll, he retraced his steps to the PDP. He attempted to mend fences with his former boss, former President Olusegun Obasanjo. But, even as the consensus candidate of the Northern establishment in the 2011 presidential elections, he could not defeat President Goodluck Jonathan.

    After the election, Atiku was sidelined by the PDP leadership. Since he has not dumped his presidential ambition, he was perceived as a threat to Dr. Jonathan. Many pro-Jonathan crusaders have branded him as the politician on the prowl, stressing that he may likely emerge as the beneficiary of the push for power shift to the North.

    The Adamawa-born politician also had a running battle with the former PDP National Chairman, Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, and Governor Muritala Nyako over the running of the state chapter. He had chided the former chairman for high handedness and overbearing attitude. He said Tuku’s leadership traits are offensive to democracy.

    Atiku complained that he was never carried along in the running of the party, despite the privileges conferred on him as a former Vice President by the PDP constitution. An attempt was even made to exclude his name from the list of delegates to the last national convention of the party in Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory (FTC). His right was restored, following a formal complaint by him to the national secretariat. However, he parted ways with the mainstream PDP at the convention when he emerged as one of the arrowheads of the New PDP.

    The former Vice President has remained a major factor in national politics since he joined the fray in the Third Republic. He has been a consummate politician, great mobiliser, master strategist and crowd puller. In the PDP, it was believed that he was gathering forces, ahead of 2015. His associates have confided that he will renew his bid for federal power in the APC.

    Atiku’s ambition to rule the country had hit the rock four times. In the aborted Third Republic, he was projected by his mentor, the late General Sheu Yar’Adua, the founder of the Peoples Democratic Movement (PDM). That was when the military leader, Gen. Ibrahim Babangida, excluded him and other key politicians from the race. At the Jos convention of the proscribed Social Democratic Party (SDP), he stepped down for the late Chief Moshood Abiola, who emerged as the flag bearer.

    He had the chance in 2003. But, as his former associate, former Governor Orji Kalu of Abia State recalled, the former Vice President bungled it. That year, many governors were ready to serve as campaign managers for Atiku. They believed that, if he contested, he would beat his boss, Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo, thereby saving them from persistent persecution. But the former Vice President failed to seize the moment. At midnight, he directed his supporters, who were in the majority, to endorse Obasanjo.

    In 2007, he was not as strong as he was in 2003. Although he was more determined, the power of incumbency wielded by Obasanjo was so overwhelming. Yet, he was undeterred. In 2011, Atiku picked up the gantlet. He was on the firing line. He successfully mobilised the Northern leaders to select him as the regional candidate. But the regional support collapsed at Eagles Squares, Abuja, during the subsequent presidential primaries.

    Atiku is back in the ring at a critical point in national history. Ahead of 2015, the debate on good governance is on the front burner. The North also is intensifying its agitating for power shift, based on an inexplicable agreement on presidential zoning between President Jonathan and Northern leaders. The ruling party is in turmoil, torn apart by acrimony and intrigues.

    However, analysts contend that Atiku’s defection to the APC is not motivated by any ideological drive. Neither was the civil war in the PDP an ideological war. But, his argument is solid and convincing. “The country is in crisis and every effort must be made to rescue Nigeria”, he told reporters in Lagos. He explained that he was on tour of the six geo-political zones for consultation on the way forward. During the consultations, the options were weighed. Some of his supporters persuaded him to stay on in the PDP. But, their argument was countered by other associates who pointed out that there will be no level playing ground for ambitious party chieftains at the primaries. They reasoned that the primaries will be designed for the endorsement of President Jonathan.

    Other associates advised him to explore the possibility of nurturing the PDM. But, it was discovered that those handling the PDM project have never attempted to project the party to all the regions. Therefore, it lacks taproots across the zones. This is at variance with Atiku’s posturing as a man who has built networks across the country. Also, old PDM members are ready to discredit the platform. Last year, one of the founders, Chief Tony Anenih, the PDP BoT Chairman, said that Atiku did not have the mandate to revive the group without consultation with the surviving members. He said the former Vice President cannot single handedly transform the political group into a political party without their collective support.

    Sources close to Atiku revealed that the only option was the APC. Many APC leaders are his associates. “Having endorsed the push for democratic change in 2015, the former Vice President is not interested in polarising the rank of the opposition, whose cause he has identified with. He is putting the country first before any ambition”, added the source.

    If Atiku enters the presidential race, he will be eyeing the elusive office for the fourth time. In his first attempt, he was prompted by the late Gen. Yar’Adua. From the onset, he was an integral member of the PDM kitchen cabinet, a dependable ally of the Tafida Katsina and confidant at the birth of the Peoples Front of Nigeria (PFN). He was not in the dark when it was resolved that the political machinery should join the defunct Social Democratic Party (SDP), one of the two parties decreed into existence by former military President Babangida.

    When Yar’Adua was being edged out of the presidential race, he decided to groom Atiku, his loyal associate, for the number one job. Atiku became the third SDP presidential aspirant, along with Alhaji Baba Gana Kingibe and Abiola at the Jos Convention. In those days, embattled politicians were involved in a lot of horse trading. To defeat Kingibe, Atiku was asked to step down for Abiola at the shadow poll. But a deep gulf later ensued between the Yar’Adua and Abiola. The bone of contention was Abiola’s refusal to accept Atiku as his running mate, contrary to Yar’Adua’s calculation. The 14 SDP state chairmen made it impossible by throwing their weight behind Kingibe. The loss of the two slots-Presidency and Vice Presidency was painful to Yar’Adua. The only option left for him was to gain the control of the party. He installed Anenih as the SDP national chairman. It is an irony of political life that both Anenih and Atiku, who harmoniously defended the PDM’s interest at that time, are now divided by the power games of the post-Yar’Adua period.

    After the annulment of the historic 1993 presidential election, politicians were in disarray. Yar’Adua wanted to bounce back. Atiku was part of that scramble for power as a member of the PDM in the 1994 constitutional conference set up by the late Head of State, Gen. Sani Abacha. Along with Yar’Adua, he pursued the goal of setting a disengagement day for the military. Yar’Adua later died in mysterious circumstances in the prison, following his conviction over a phantom coup. After his demise, the bereaved PDM members started to look up to Atiku, the successor to the vacant stool of his mentor.

    When the former Head of State, Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar, set up a transition programme, PDM became the engine room and most formidable caucus in the PDP. Atiku worked with other members, including the late Chief Sunday Afolabi, Chief Anenih, Prof. Ango Abdullahi, Senator Jibril Martins-Kuye, Alhaji Lawal kaita, Chief Dapo Sarunmi, Chief Olorunfunmi Basorun, Chief Yomi Edu, Senator Rashidi Ladoja, Senator Tony Adefuye, Mrs. Onikepo Oshodi, Mrs. Titilayo Ajanaku, and Alhaji Abubakar Rimi, to install Obasanjo as the President in 1999.

    In 1999, Atiku dumped his presidential ambition. He returned to Adamawa State and emerged as the governor-elect. Obasanjo, the President-elect, was just floating in the PDP. He had no root. He emerged based on three factors. The North had reluctantly conceded the Presidency to the Southwest. Some Northern elements believed that, when he was the military Head of State, he did not work against the interest of the region. Also, the military wanted to remain as a factor and power broker. No other Yoruba man could be trusted, since Chief Olu Falae refused to join the PDP.

    Obasanjo did not have any blue-print. PDM members-Atiku, Afolabi, Sarunmi and Edu-were part of the numerous delegations asking him to return to power. Obasanjo had a nightmare selecting a running mate. Four names were presented to him-Rimi, Bamanga Tukur, Prof. Abdullahi and Atiku. He settled for Atiku because of the PDM’s influence.

    As the Vice President, Atiku was the de facto President. He was the Controlling Minister of the Economy. To get things done, politicians and others must pass through Atiku route. The former Vice President was also popular among the governors. Thus, in 2003, many of them urged him to displace Obasanjo. The President was sweating profusely at the primaries. He prostrated before Atiku before earning re-nomination. At that point too, Atiku ceased to be the apple of Obasanjo’s eye.

    Henceforth, the former Vice President was under security watch. He was accused of corruption and disloyalty. He became a nominal figure in the government with no duties to perform. The government even made frantic efforts to cripple him politically. But Atiku ran to the court for security and survival. The former Vice President enjoyed tremendous goodwill as the AC presidential candidate. However, after the election, he returned to the PDP. The move embarrassed the AC leadership. Other PDP defectors and associates of Atiku, including Kaita and Ghali Umar Naa’ba, fired salvos at the party, saying that it was not different from the PDP. But Atiku also took other steps. He ran to Abeokuta to make peace with his estranged boss, Obasanjo. It was to be a secret fence-mending meeting. But, coming out of the meeting, an embarrassed Atiku was accosted by many reporters. The former President yelled at his visitor. Irked by the turn of events, former Abia State Governor Kalu chided Atiku for the wrong step. The reconciliation was not fruitful. It did not lead to any renewal of contact. When the former Vice President indicated unfolded his plan to contest for the Presidency in 2011, Obasanjo laughed mischievously. “I dey laugh o”, he said. It was loaded with meanings. Indeed, Obasanjo joined forces with President Jonathan to abort Atiku’s dream. When Atiku was tearing the record of the President at the primaries, Obasanjo stood up and whispered some words into the President’s ears. Atiku lost.

    Last year, at a public lecture at Ibadan, Oyo State capital, Obasanjo castigated Atiku. He said he refused to hand over to him because he could not vouch for him.

    Now that Atiku is back to the progressive fold, what are his chances? A source said that he needs to reconcile with former AC leaders in the APC, who may be weary of his style. Many of them have described him as an inconsistent politician, who jumped the ship after losing the presidential election.

    With the defection of the former Vice President, APC now has six presidential aspirants. They are Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, Senator Bukola Saraki, Kano State Governor Rabiu Kwankwaso, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, and Sam Nda-Isaiah.s

     

  • Tinubu: Atiku’s return is good for democracy

    Tinubu: Atiku’s return is good for democracy

    •Excitement as Akande, Nyako, Marwa, others unite for APC in Adamawa

    Yola, the Adamawa State capital, was agog with political excitement yesterday when the state’s top political leaders and national leaders of the All Progressives Congress (APC) launched the party.

    In attendance were former Vice President Atiku Abubakar; Governor Murtala Nyako; former Lagos State Governor Buba Marwa; former presidential candidate Nuhu Ribadu and Senator Mohammed Bindow Jibrila – all Adamawa indigenes.

    They were joined by the leaders of the party, led by its Interim National Chairman, Chief Bisi Akande and National Leader, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu.

    The party chieftains were supported by other APC leaders from parts of the country, including Senator Ali Modi Sheriff, Senator Danjuma Goje, ex-Bayelsa State Goverbor Timpreye Sylva, Senator Sani Yeriman Bakura, Dr Ogbonnaya Onu and Dr Audu Ogbe.

    The host was the Interim State Chairman Kobis Aris Thimnu. He received the party’s flag from Chief Akande.

    The APC reaffirmed its objective of winning the federal elections next year.

    Akande, who formally received Atiku, following the former vice president’s defection on Sunday, said the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) had been rested.

    He urged Adamawa interim state executive to ensure that the registration of members was not by allocation or proxy but by physical registration.

    Tinubu urged Nigerians to celebrate the ousting of the PDP .

    The foremer Lagos State governor advised Nigerians to sweep away the dirt and social vices of the PDP with APC’s broom.

    The APC leader described the return of Atiku to the progressives fold as a giant stride that would enhance democracy.

    He hailed Nyako’s efforts at resolving the internal crisis in the party in the state.

    Nyako said the PDP had died and Nigerians should await its final interment.

    He said: “The PDP has gone for good for the reign of impunity. The party is dead. Nigerians should rally round to bury it.”

    Sylva apologised to Nigerians, on behalf of the people of Niger Delta region, for mobilising them to vote for President Goodluck Jonathan in 2011.

    He regretted that the President had failed to deliver democracy’s dividends to Nigerians.

    Sylva said: “In 2011, I was in Yola to mobilise the Adamawa people to vote for our son, Dr Goodluck Jonathan. You kept to faith by voting for him as president of Nigeria. In 2014, I am here to apologise to Adamawa people for the failure of our son, Goodluck Jonathan.”

    The former governor said he was in the state to team up with the North so that they could salvage Nigeria from the pangs of deprivation.

    “The country is not performing. The ship is sinking due to poor leadership,” he said.

    Ribadu spoke on unity of the party at all levels, saying unity and mutual respect were the sure roads to success.

    The former EFCC chairman said the APC had grown into a formidable force that could uproot the PDP.

    Marwa said the power squabble within the party had been resolved to make the state better.

    Jibrila, who spoke on behalf of defected senators, assured that after the elections, the APC would form the government at the centre.

    Nyako thanked Atiku for joining hands to fight the bad leadership of the PDP.

     

  • Mu’azu can’t end PDP crisis, says Atiku

    Mu’azu can’t end PDP crisis, says Atiku

    Proponents of peace in the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) got yesterday a damning message from former Vice President Atiku Abubakar. The crisis in the party is not about to end, he said, adding that National Chairman Adamu Mu’azu “can’t make anything out of his reconciliation tour”.

    Mu’azu visited former President Olusegun Obasanjo in Abeokuta on Sunday.

    Speaking on Kaduna-based Liberty Radio, Atiku said Obasanjo pushed him out of the PDP.

    Atiku said since he returned to the party, he had been kept out of its activities, adding that he could only offer his assistance towards rebuilding the party if the leadership sought his help.

    “If I’m requested to, no problem. But let me say, first of all, that I did not leave the PDP. I was pushed out of the PDP by my former boss and ever since I returned four years ago, the PDP has not communicated to me and I have not communicated to PDP.

    “I have not attended any of their meetings and they have not invited me. I’m supposed to be a member of the Board of Trustees; I’ ve never attended. I’m supposed to be a member of the National Executive Committee (NEC); I have never attended one. I’m supposed to be a member of caucus, by convention, because when we were in office, we said the President should always nominate the Vice President. That was why Alex Ekwueme was nominated. But I ‘m not in the caucus.

    “I’m just looking at them. If you don’t participate in a process, how do you contribute with your experience and so on in resolving problems in the party?”

    He noted that the tour of the chairman to convince those who left the party to return would not make any difference, saying: “I told him it won’t make a difference. Before he took up the job, he (Mu’azu) came to me and told me he wanted the job, I told him, leave it because you are not going to do anything about it’.”

    On the 2015 elections, Atiku said he and Gen. Muhammadu Buhari had shared their concerns and agreed that they had not seen the country in such a crisis since the civil war. He described the situation as “grim”.

    Atiku said: “It is no longer about ambition but about Nigeria. We have got to a stage when you have an ambition, if the environment permits. The environment does not even permit that. So, you have to restore normalcy to the environment first before you begin to think about ambition. This is because if you allow your ambition to override it, you will find that you don’t even exist. Buhari and I have never seen things as bad. It’s really serious.

    On the proposed national conference, the former Vice President said there was nothing wrong about Nigerians talking to one another.

    He pointed out, however, that the Jonathan administration does not have the capacity to conduct elections and the national conference in the same year.

    He said the government should have done the conference much earlier than now and ruled out the possibility of having a sovereign national conference (SNC). The nation cannot have the SNC when there is an existing constitutional arrangement, Atiku explained.

    He condemned the Rivers State crisis, saying there was absolutely no need for the Federal Government to use the police to undermine the state government in a democratic situation.

    Commenting on the directive by the leadership of the All Progressive Congress (APC) to its lawmakers in the National Assembly to block the passage of the 2014 budget, Atiku called for caution, saying that there were other legislative processes the party could use to bring the government to order.

    He lamented that the Jonathan administration had exhibited so much impunity to the extent that the opposition has nothing else to do when they have been pushed to the wall.

    Atiku said: “There is nothing new in clamping on the government; it happened in the United States and the government shut down for a couple of weeks. We saw that politicians can resolve their differences. Sometimes it may be necessary for that to happen.

    Atiku dismissed claims that the exit of former PDP Chairman Bamanga Tukur would end the crisis in the party, saying: “No; I don’t think so. The troubles in the PDP are still going on and more yet to come. I don’t think Bamanga Tukur is the issue.”

  • Obasanjo pushed me out of PDP- Atiku

    Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar has said that his boss, former President Olusegun Obasanjo pushed him out of the Peoples Democratic Party.
    Speaking on a Kaduna based Liberty Radio programme Issues and event, Atiku said that since he returned to the party, he has been kept out of activities of the party.
    He however said he will only offer his assistance towards rebuilding the party if the leadership ask for his help.
    “If I’m requested to, no problem. But let me say, first of all that I did not leave the PDP. I was pushed out of the PDP by my former boss and ever since I returned four years ago, the PDP has not communicated to me and I have not communicated to PDP.
    “I have not attended any of their meetings and they have not invited me. I’m supposed to be a member of Board of Trustees, I’ ve never attended. I’m supposed to be a member of NEC, I have never attended one. I’m supposed to be a member of caucus by convention because when we were in office, we said the President should always nominate the Vice President, that was why Alex Ekwueme was nominated. But I ‘m not in the caucus.
    “I’m just looking at them. If you don’t participate in a process, how do you contribute your experience, your expertise and so on in resolving problems for the party?
    He noted that the current tour of the new chairman to convince those who left the party to return will not make any difference, saying “I told him it won’t make a difference. Before he took up the job, he (Muazu) came to me and told me he wanted the job, I told him leave it because you are not going to do anything about it.”
    Speaking on the 2015 elections,Atiku said he and General Buhari had shared their concerns and agreed that they had not seen the country in such a crisis since the civil war, describing the situation as “grim”.
    According to him, “It is no longer about ambition but about Nigeria. We have got to a stage when you have an ambition if the environment permits. The environment does not even permits that. So you have to restore normalcy into the environment first before you begin to think about ambition. This is because if you allow your ambition to override it, you will find that you don’t even exist. I and Buhari have never seen things as bad. It’s really serious.

  • Atiku: rising poverty unacceptable

    Atiku: rising poverty unacceptable

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has said the level of poverty in Nigeria is unacceptable.

    He said the nation’s leaders should not take the continued patience of the people for granted.

    The former Vice President urged political leaders at various levels to brace up to the challenges of nation-building and economic prosperity for Nigeria and its people.

    Atiku, however, urged Nigerians to face the future with optimism.

    He hoped 2014 will be a better year than the outgoing year and the previous ones.

    In a New Year message yesterday in Abuja by his media office, Atiku thanked God for keeping Nigeria together, despite its myriad of security, political and socio-economic challenges.

    He said: “Despite our challenges in security, infrastructure, politics and economy, I am grateful to God for keeping us together. It is my hope that we will face the future of our country with confidence and fervent hope that God will grant us the better tomorrow we are working for.

    “With hard work and dedication, elected leaders and public servants can rise to the expected challenges of national development and economic prosperity to redress the deepening poverty of ordinary Nigerians in 2014.

    “Public office holders should not take the magnanimity of the Nigerian people for granted.”

  • Treason, what treason?

    Treason, what treason?

    •Call for presidential impeachment cannot amount to treason, since impeachment ais a constitutional provision

    On December 15, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, the All Progressives Congress (APC) interim national publicity secretary, called on the National Assembly to commence immediate impeachment proceedings against President Goodluck Jonathan, for sundry constitutional infractions. He claimed he spoke with a “high sense of responsibility”.

    Alhaji Mohammed accused the Jonathan Presidency, and the smarting Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), of plotting to plunge the country into chaos, by courting the courts to declare vacant the seats of its five former governors that just defected to the APC, despite the precedence of a Supreme Court judgment that rejected a similar prayer, when former President Olusegun Obasanjo attempted to remove estranged Vice President Atiku Abubakar, for defecting into the then Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN).

    Hinting at a possible judicial collusion bordering on high corruption, Alhaji Mohammed warned of “widespread repercussions as the APC has resolved that henceforth, every act of impunity of the PDP and the Presidency would be met with stiff resistance in the form of a vociferous telegraphing of people power, the likes of which have not been witnessed in these parts”. He added that since impeachment is “stipulated in the 1999 Constitution”, and the Jonathan government is at sea on security, corruption, massive unemployment and mass hunger, not to mention impunity, impeachment was a legitimate means to remove the president.

    But Dr. Reuben Abati, chief presidential spokesperson, dismissed “the reckless and irresponsible call by the APC” for Jonathan’s impeachment; and warned that “the APC and any persons who make themselves its willing tools for the breach of public order and safety will be made to face the full sanctions of the law. Those who are threatening fire and brimstone,” he declared, “should be ready for consequences of treasonable action”, adding that the APC could not browbeat the courts in pending political cases before them.

    Beyond legitimate attack and response, emotion and counter-emotion and partisan bile and counter-bile, the two issues here are impeachment and treason.

    Does an urge to impeach the president amount to treason? Certainly not, for a provision of the Constitution cannot be said to subvert the same constitution. That would be a contradiction in terms.

    But could a call for impeachment be reckless? Yes, if it is just to settle political scores; and thus slaughter the Constitution on the altar of crass partisanship. But is that the case here? Political exchanges are never clear-cut, for emotions mix with stark facts to produce a strange mixture.

    Still, the Jonathan Presidency would appear legitimately charged with flat-footedness in anti-corruption (witness the Stella Oduah case, for instance, in which the president appears helpless even with the House of Representatives asking him to dismiss the minister); and with dire constitutional breaches (the partisan abuse of the police in Rivers State; and the reprehensible conduct of the police commissioner, Mbu Joseph Mbu, in virtually levying war against the state government; and against real or perceived presidential opponents in that state).

    The Rivers State case is especially serious, for it taints the Presidency, and somewhat projects it as recklessly contemptible of the law that created that high office. That is a recipe for disaster, except the presidency changes tack and calls the constitutional bandits at the “front” to order; or faces possible sanction itself, if the opposition could muster the required number in parliament.

    Still, the impeachment option should be the very last, for it signals a point of no return for a republic grilling in illegality perpetrated by a president, its supposed guarantor-in-chief of law and legitimacy.

    So, let neither side go for broke. But let the Jonathan Presidency do the needful, after a frank soul-searching for, if the bitter truth must be told, its relentless impunity has turned PDP into a boiling cauldron; and pushed the country to this sorry pass.

    But as the opposition should be cautious in its utterances, let no one criminalise a justified call for impeachment. It’s no use issuing threats and flexing muscles, when the administration could quietly lower the political temperature by doing the right thing by law. It is the manifest folly of projecting power instead of projecting reason.

  • INEC seeks  powers to disqualify candidates

    INEC seeks powers to disqualify candidates

    •Makes case for Diaspora voters

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is seeking powers to disqualify candidates who do not satisfy the requirements for the positions they are contesting for.

    The electoral umpire wants its independence to be constitutionally guaranteed in all its operations and in its management and control of the electoral process, as was the case in Decree (now Act) 17 of 1998 which first established the Commission before the 1999 Constitution.

    It also wants any person convicted of an electoral offence to be disqualified for 10 years from the date of conviction from contesting any election or holding any party office.

    INEC Chairman Prof. Attahiru Jega spoke at a retreat on the 2010 Electoral Act organised by the Senate Committee on the review of the 1999 Constitution.

    Jega said: “With such decisions as Atiku Abubakar V INEC and the proviso to Section 31 of the amended Electoral Act, the Commission has no right to prevent even an obviously unqualified or disqualified person from being on the ballot.

    “For example, it cannot prevent an under-aged or foreign citizen from contesting the election, even when this is obvious from the documents submitted or even a person who admits that he presented a forged certificate to the Commission if it seeks to disqualify such persons. The Commission must go to court. This is not desirable.

    “Paragraph F, item 15 of the Third Schedule to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria1999 (as amended) dealing with the powers of the Commission to be further amended by inserting the clause ‘disqualify candidates who evidently do not satisfy the requirements for the position he/she is contesting for as provided’ in relevant Sections of the Constitution.

    Jega said that it should be enacted a new Section (3) to Section 158 providing as follows Section 158(3) “The Independent National Electoral Commission shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other authority or person in all its operations”.

    He said the Commission shall notify the political party of the disqualification of its candidate and the grounds for the disqualification.

    The INEC boss said it was desirable that every candidate who aspires to govern shall be a registered voter.

    He said the clause “he is registered to vote” should be inserted as paragraph to sub Section(2) of Section 65 and as paragraph (e) of Sections 106, 131 and 177 of the Constitution.

    On disqualification of electoral offenders, Jega said any person convicted of an Electoral Offence (including registration offence, campaign finance breaches and breach of political party finance provision) should be disqualified for a period of 10 years from the date of the conviction from contesting any election or holding party position.

    He would like the clause ‘Within a period of 10 years before the date of the election, he has been convicted of an electoral offence by a court of tribunal” inserted immediately after each of paragraph (d) of Sections 66, 107,137,and 182 of the Constitution.

    Jega said interested Nigerians who are of age but resident overseas should be allowed to register and vote.

    He said that the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended) empowers INEC to deregister political parties that fail to win at least a seat in a state Assembly.

    The chairman spoke also on the clamour for the registration of more parties, saying it continued to rise.

    He said that whereas the Constitution allows for freedom of association it is practically impossible to have all registered political parties on the ballot.

    Jega said that INEC should be empowered, in consultation with political parties to determine the criteria for getting on the ballot.

    The criteria, in his view, should include payment of fees prescribed by the Commission, securing of certain percentage of votes at general elections and winning seats in the legislative election.

    Jega said Sections 134 and 179 of the Constitution, which deals with Presidential and governorship election should be amended by adding the word “valid” before “vote” wherever this appears in the Sections so as to remove any ambiguity.

    Candidates “should be elected on valid votes cast only”.

    Jega suggests the establishment of an Electoral Offences Tribunal to guarantee timely prosecution of electoral offenders.

    He said INEC should be empowered to appoint dates the presidential, governorship, National Assembly and State House of Assembly elections will hold.

    Jega suggested that Section 8 of the Electoral Act be amended to include a statutory tenure for the Secretary of the Commission to wit: “The secretary shall serve for a period of four years which may be renewable or another period of four years only.”

    The INEC chief suggested that political parties be made to substitute their unqualified candidates with the second runners up during the primaries.

    He said: “It is suggested that subsection (6) of Section 31 be amended to make provision that where the court finds that a candidate submitted by a political party did not meet the qualifications required for contesting the election.

    “Where, however, the person has been elected, the court shall order the person to vacate the office and the candidate with the second highest votes cast who has met constitutional requirement for the post shall be declared elected.

    “This suggestion is to avoid the waste of public funds to repeat election consequent upon removal of disqualified candidates.”

    He recommended that subsection (8) of Section 31 be amended to increase the fine awarded against a political party which submits the name of an unqualified candidate to the Commission.

    “This is because the fine provided therein is inadequate as a deterrent. Thus, Section 31 be amended in subsection (8) by substituting for the figure N500,000 the figure N1million,” Jega said.

    He added: “Guided by the provisions of Section 87 of the Electoral Act, 2010 (as amended) which requires candidates of political parties to emerge from democratically conducted primary elections, it is recommended that where a candidate who won a primary election and whose name was submitted to the Commission dies or withdraws from the election, the political party which nominated that candidate shall submit to the Commission the name of the candidate who scored the second highest number of votes at the primaries as the substitute candidate.

    “Section 45 allows political parties to notify the Commission of the appointment of Polling Agents in writing at least seven days before the date of the election. In order to give political parties sufficient time to sort out who their agents should be. It is suggested that the time should be extended to 14 day.

    “Sections 48, 49, 50, 52, 54, 55, and 60 of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended) which provide details on the procedure to vote at an election are restrictive and do not allow for improvement on procedure for voting. It is suggested that INEC be allowed, through Regulations/Guidelines, to determine the mode of voting at an election.

    “Section 77 provides for access to polling documents. Political parties and candidates should be allowed to inspect polling documents, but the Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) should only release Certified True Copies (CTCs) not the original documents.

    “Section 77 should be amended accordingly. It is however suggested that in view of the number of applications and the volume of the documents required, the time within which the REC shall certify or cause certified true copies of the documents to be issued should be reviewed upward from seven days to 14 days.

    “Whereas subsection (6) of Section 100 of the Electoral Act makes provisions to sanction any media house that violates the provisions of Section 100 of the Electoral A t, no sanction is provided similar to Section 101 against principal officers of the media house involved in the crime. Provision should therefore be made to sanction principal officers and other officers of the media house involved in the crime.

    “Thus Section 100 be amended by substituting for the existing subsection (6) a new subsection “(6)” – ‘100(6) Any person who contravenes subsections (3) and (4) of this sections commits an offence and upon conviction is liable: (a) in the case of a public media to a maximum of fine of N500,000 in the first instance and to a maximum fine of N1million or subsequent conviction; and in the case of principal officer(s) and other officer(s) of the media house to a maximum fine of N500,000 or go imprisonment for a term of 12 months.’

    “Paragraph 51(1) and 51(2) should be deleted as it contradicts Section 137(3) of the Act which says the petitioner need not join the Electoral Officer, Polling Officer, or Returning Officer.

    “Furthermore, the Commission is an independent body established by the Constitution, it is unconstitutional for a schedule to require it or its officials o consult or seek the approval or consent of the Attorney General in any matter in court. The Commissions’s discretion should be completely unfettered. The reference to the Attorney General in this schedule should be deleted.”

    He said even though the Constitution empowers the Commission to create electoral constituencies subject to approval of the National Assembly, “experience has shown that the National Assembly may delay consideration of the proposal.”

    He added: “It is recommended that a provision be made in the Electoral Act stating that when the proposal for creation of constituencies is made to the National Assembly, the proposal shall be deemed approved if no response from the National Assembly is received by the Commission within a period of three months from the date of presentation.”

  • Jonathan: NSA to meet governors over Boko Haram

    Jonathan: NSA to meet governors over Boko Haram

    President Goodluck Jonathan has directed National Security Adviser (NSA) Col. Sambo Dasuki to meet with the governors of the three states mostly affected by the Boko Haram insurgency, with a view to evolving a workable solution to the crisis.

    The presidential directive followed the insurgents’ attacks on an Air Force base in Maiduguri, the Borno State capital, on Monday in which many lives were believed to have been lost and facilities damaged.

    Jonathan yesterday in Gombe at the second North East Economic Summit, restated his administration’s commitment to ending all terrorists’ activities’ and insurgency by employing various strategies of conflict resolution.

    The Summit was attended by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Chairman Alhaji Bamanga Tukur, Northern Governors Forum Chairman Aliyu Babangida, who is also the governor of Niger State, Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor Lamido Sanusi Lamido and the governors of Yobe, Bauchi and Borno.

    There were also notable businessmen and technocrats from all walks of life.

    Although the President said he disagreed with the school of thought that seems to suggest that poverty and illiteracy should be blamed for the growing acts of terrorism in the region, he explained that he was committed to fighting the menace as peace remains a prerequisite for economic development.

    He said Dasuki had been instructed to meet with the Governors of Yobe, Borno and Adamawa, with a view to defining a workable solution that would elevate the region. His words: “We do not believe that poverty and illiteracy are solely responsible for the security challenges in the region. But we believe that without peace, there can hardly be any economic activity. And to show our commitment to peace, we have established the service division of the Nigerian Army in Maiduguri. Peace is a prerequisite condition for development in the area. “Without peace it will difficult for the private sector to invest in the region. That is why we are pleading with you to use the traditional method to work with the youth to ensure peace. The government will work with any area that peace has returned to rehabilitate the place.

    “I have directed the NSA to meet with the three states mostly affected by terrorism and insurgency to define a shared vision and workable strategy that would elevate the region.”

    Noting that his first priority as a President remains the economy, Jonathan listed agriculture, education and infrastructure as key elements that would propel the troubled region to rapid growth, if the security challenges can be collectively tackled. “We have never denied the need to give the region the support it needs to develop. I reject the characterisation of the region as poor and backward because we believe such characterisation is based on misconception. It’s history is rich, with great leaders for over 1000 years.

    “The Northeast is endowed with abundant natural resources, mineral resources and there is hardly any cash crop that cannot be grown in the region. It is a zone that is blessed and which can produce wealth for this country. We are, therefore, committed to doing all within our power to end the security challenges in the Northeast and help the region to develop to its full potential,” he said. The President advised the six governors from the region to ensure more access to education, in addition to an improvement the quality of education with special emphasis on girl/child education. “The people must be exposed to tertiary education, I was born by poor parents. What makes me to stand before people like you today is because I had the opportunity to receive university education. The statistics quoted now is not recent and I believe the governors in the region have done more and by the time we update the statistics, that would be reflected”’, he noted.

    Chief Host of the Summit and Governor of Gombe State, Alhaji Ibrahim Dankwambo, praised the President for his passion to develop a region whose development has been stalled by the activities of insurgents. The governor urged the President to develop what he called a Marshall Plan that would help the people of the region, noting that the quantum of resources needed to scale up development in the region is far beyond what the states can raise internally. He said destiny, geography and commerce brought the states together, hence the organisation of the Summit, which seeks a rapid transformation of the sub-region for sustainable economic development.

    “The pervasive security challenges continue to take their toll on the development of the region. All major indices are particularly at the lowest compared to other regions. The quantum of resources required is by far beyond what the states can afford but a reconstruction strategy should be developed to help the youth and resettle displaced persons. There ought to be a Marshall Plan towards helping the people of the region,” Dankwambo said.

  • Oritsejafor urges clerics  to stay off PDP crisis

    Oritsejafor urges clerics to stay off PDP crisis

    Following a row over the visit of some Niger Delta bishops to former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, the President of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, yesterday urged the clergy to stay away from the crisis in the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

    He said CAN did not engage in politics, adding that it would not dabble in the PDP crisis.

    There were indications that some forces in the Presidency and the PDP were uncomfortable with the visit to Atiku and Adamawa State Governor Murtala Nyako.

    It was learnt that the development forced the forces to conduct an “emergency” search at the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC).

    Oritsejafor, who spoke with some select reporters on the phone, said CAN did not know the affected clerics.

    The CAN President was reacting to the visit of Niger Delta Bishops and Christian Forum and the Southsouth Christian Forum to Atiku and Nyako.

    He said: “We have heard about them and their exploits on meeting various politicians and promising to mediate and initiate dialogue between the PDP and their members.

    “We are a Christian body; we don’t involve ourselves in the political party’s internal affairs, let alone mediating between the PDP and its crisis.

    “We, as CAN, are apolitical. Honestly, we don’t know them. Their activities are worrisome and I, as the president of CAN, wish to plead and admonish politicians to bear the characters of some Nigerians who use the name of the Christians in Nigeria to do all sorts of things.

    “They should be careful with some groups that use the name of CAN to commit atrocities and fraudulent activities. What type of mediation would the so-called Niger Delta Bishops and Christian Forum be doing? I am the President of CAN and I can inform you that we are not aware of them.”

    The Niger Delta Bishops and Christian Forum were led by Prophet Jones Erue. The other bishops are: Julius Ediwe, Bob Manuel, Abhulemen Josiah, Konel Offiong, Innocent Chiedozie, Alex Okubo, Felix Ezebunwo, Charles Okoh , Peter Abingon and Archbishop Eddy Ogbonda .

    Speaking with our correspondent last night, Prophet Erue said: “Our forum’s visit was borne out of national interest because the Nigerian project belongs to all of us. We are leaders in our own right, the country belongs to all of us, we cannot fold our arms and allow the situation to degenerate. We have core belief in truth, justice and peace, which are the foundations of every good nation. A country not built on these principles cannot thrive. We did not visit Atiku or Nyako on behalf of CAN, we felt we must be a part of those driving the Nigerian project. We were moved by the level of impunity, intolerance and insecurity in the country…”