Tag: atiku

  • Analysis: Atiku…..what next?

    Analysis: Atiku…..what next?

    For Atiku Abubakar, the journey of 30 years has ended in a fiasco. 

    After six futile attempts, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s bid for President suffered another collosal defeat yesterday. The Supreme Court ruled that his appeal against the tribunal’s affirmation of President Bola Tinubu’s victory during the February 25 poll lacked merit. 

    Atiku, 77, came and saw, but he could not conquer. A long distant runner, the Waziri Adamawa failed to breast the tape. Both at the level of ballot box and the temple of justice, his ambition to rule the country finally clashed – at least for now. 

    What next for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate?

    It is a major tragedy for the main opposition party, which has been left in the cold since 2015. PDP has been confronted by adjustment difficulties. Since then, it has failed to live to the billing of a proper opposition platform. 

    Unable to put its house in order, it has finally failed to bounce back through the judicial process.

     That Atiku was on its ballot for 2023 poll was a mistake and a deservice to its tradition. Atiku is a great politicians and an elderstatesman who does not believe in the zoning, rotation of the presidency and power shift,  if he would not be the only and direct beneficiary. 

     It was evident that the divided PDP was on the way to disaster right from its presidential convention when some Generals from the North were said to be dictating to some delegates from a particular region. Their strategy failed. While former Sokoto State Governor Aminu Tambuwal eventually stepped down for Atiku, other aggrieved stalwarts who started perceiving him as a liability and common enemy teamed up against him.

     Besides, Atiku lacked an accurate understanding of the dymamics of the party. While he and his friend, Senator Iyorchia Ayu, embattled national chairman, were bragging about being the founding fathers who should be deferred to by young turfs in the party, the five governors only saw them as spent forces and obstacles to a brighter future. 

     The G-5 never left PDP. Yet, its members refused to work for the party. Even now, it is difficult to expel them.  A mathematical illiterate, Atiku held on to one man, Ayu, who refused to step down as chairman, as previously agreed, only to in the process of rigidity lose five governors.

     A desperate politician, the former PDP candidate also indulged in illusions. As the battle shifted from the ballot box to the temple of justice, he deluded himself into thinking that sentiments of social media miscreants, beer parlour views of armchair critics and propaganda in the court of public opinion could aid his push for victory in court. It is a great lesson. 

    Atiku is a courageous politician endowed with audacity of hope, which has served as the elixir of political life. Whether he had leaned on the assurance of a marabouts as alleged or not, he has been very focussed, determined and resolute.

    Between 1991 and 2023, he had contested six times for the presidential ticket on different platforms, not minding the blow of fate at every election circle. For him, the attainment of the presidency is a critical factor in self-actualisation.

    In the aborted Third Republic, Atiku challenged the late Chief Moshood Abiola to a duel at the historic Jos convention of the defunct Social Democratic Party (SDP). According to observers, he was running for the highest office by proxy. The main issue at that time was his political mentor, the late Major General Shehu Yar’Adua, who later asked him to step down for Abiola during that tensed moment of horse trading, wheeling and dealing.

    Having placed his hands on the plough, Atiku never looked back. Although he was elected governor of Adamawa State, fate catapulted him to the position of number two citizen at the federal level. It was his closest to the exalted seat.

    Atiku’s second attempt was in 2003 when he made a feeble attempt to contest against his former boss, tormentor and pretender, former President Olusegun Obasanjo. Atiku was said to have the backing of many governors, including Orji Kalu (Abia) and James Ibori (Delta). It was a risky venture. The president was said to have either prostrated or knelt down for his deputy as he implored him to opt out of the race. If he had contested at the convention, may be, he would have won the ticket. That episode marked the parting of ways between the former numbers one and two citizens.

    Henceforth, the presidency and the PDP became hot for Atiku. He was de-robed as ‘deputy president.’ He became a proper spare tyre. Even, an administrative panel headed by Mallam Nasir el- Rufai indicted him. He was in court six times fighting the threat to his ambition.

    When he defected from the PDP in 2007, he sought refuge in the defunct Action Congress (AC). He ran for president, but without success. He was defeated by the younger brother of his mentor, the late President Umaru Yar’Adua. Atiku’s runnning mate then was Senator Ben Obi.

    After the unsuccessful attempt, he retraced his steps to the PDP. Later, former governor of Anambra State, Peter Obi, followed suit. The AC family felt betrayed. They complained that he jumped ship without informing party leaders. He lost the confidence of a political family that tried to salvage his career when the hand of Obassnjo was heavy on him.

    In 2011, Atiku threw his hat into the ring again. At the regional selection process, he defeated former President Ibrahim Babangida. But, he could not cross the next hurdle. At the PDP primary in Abuja, the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), he was defeated by President Goodluck Jonathan, who had the backing of Obasanjo, the political coach-in-chief.

    A serial defector, Atiku later left for the APC after the formation of the party by the legacy platforms – the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP), the Congres for Progressive Change (CPC), a faction of the PDP and All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA)

    During the 2015 primary, he contested along with President Buhari, Senator Rabiu Kwakwanso, Owelle Rochas Okorocha and Sam Nda Isaiah, publisher of Leadership newspaper. 

    When the Ebora Owu, fondly called OBJ, heard about Atiku’s ambition, he retorted:”I decided laugh o.”

    At the primary, he came third, trailing Kwakwanso. Gen. Buhari was elected as candidate.

    Later, the former vice president said goodbye to the APC. His foes chided him for impatience and political harlotry. He unfolded his presidential ambition, thereby drawing attention to himself as an opposition leader. By the time he returned to the PDP, he had revived his old structures and networks across the six geo-political zones.

    In 2019, he got the PDP and named Obi as his running mate. Prominent Southeast PDP leaders kicked, saying that he never consulted them about his choice. But, Obasanjo turned around to support him. For the first time in many years, the former vice president also travelled to the United States. 

    To warm himself to the politically conscious and highly enlightened people of the Southwest, he campaigned to them on the borrowed platform of restructuring. His campaign manager was former Ogun State Governor Gbenga Daniel, who is now an APC Senator. But, already a household name in Nigeria, Atiku needed no introduction.

    The eminent politician displayed a wider experience about mobilisation during the 2019 primary and general election. His ambition polarised the polity. He succeeded in moderating the public perception of his personality and political career. He maintained that he has never been tried and convicted for corruption.

    What also worked for Atiku during the poll was that he had tentacles across the zones. He gave a good fight. But, the presidency still eluded him. The Supreme Court dismissed his appeal against Buhari’s victory. After the judgment, it was alleged that Atiku abandoned the party and went to Dubai. 

    Predictably, he returned ahead of 2023 electioneering. 

    Full of resilience, he became the man to beat at the last PDP convention. But, his platform was ebbing away. Zoning became a bone of contention. It is the tradition and legacy of the PDP. But, Atiku insisted that it was his constitutional right to throw his hat into the ring. His insistence divided the fold and contradictions in the main opposition party heralded failure. 

    Read Also: Supreme Court: Wait till 2031 for your ambition, Ganduje advises Atiku, Obi

    Although he was the more formidable northern candidate on the ballot, he was dazed by the votes garnered from the bloc geo-political zone by President Tinubu. 

    However, many supporters doubted that Atiku will be discouraged by the verdict. Will he return to the drawing board? Will he play the role an effective opposition leader?

    His party thirsts for a credible leadership that can forge unity and cohesion. Can Atiku lead the way and be the symbol of reconciliation?

    The PDP cannot be ruled out in the scheme of things. Although it has lot federal power, it has governors in many states. APC can only ignore this fact to its peril. 

    By 2027, Atiku will be 81. Will he run or sponsor a candidate? Time will tell.

  • Supreme Court: Ogbu-Aguocha congratulates Tinubu, urges Atiku, Obi to join hands in nation-building

    Supreme Court: Ogbu-Aguocha congratulates Tinubu, urges Atiku, Obi to join hands in nation-building

    The candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) for Enugu East senatorial election, Princess Adaku Ogbu-Aguocha, has hailed President Bola Tinubu over his victory at the Supreme Court on Thursday, October 26.

    Ogbu-Aguocha, who spoke with journalists in Abuja, said the final judgment of the apex court is a testimony to the fact that Tinubu won the 2023 presidential election, having defeated all opponents to emerge the president.

    She expressed optimism that given the road map Tinubu has highlighted since his inauguration as president, there is no doubt that he would liberate the country from the numerous challenges facing it.

    She called on the opposition to tow the path of peace and reconciliation by embracing the court verdict, stating that “this is time for nation-building, and we need every Nigerian to support the president.”

    Ogbu-Aguocha noted: “The victory of His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu at the Supreme Court, shows that he won this election hands down. The apex court has spoken. I must point out here that the job of governing Nigeria at this point in time is very challenging, and that is why anyone keen on nation-building must support the president and his government.

    Read Also: Supreme Court verdict: Justice has been served – Tinubu

    “I hereby urge the opposition parties to please sheathe their swords. Elections are over. Litigations are over. We have passed the stage of political party business and moved to nationhood right now. It is time for nation-building. Knowing the level of enthusiasm the opposition put in, I am sure they are inspired by the urge to build Nigeria. Now that President Tinubu has emerged winner, they should join him and also call on their supporters to join in supporting this government.

    “The task ahead is enormous. Nigeria is passing through challenging times and all of us, irrespective of party affiliation must put in an effort to get us to the El Dorado of our dreams. Nigeria must excel. Once again, congratulations my dear President! You deserve this victory.”

  • Supreme Court: Don’t run away from Nigeria, group tells Atiku, Obi

    Supreme Court: Don’t run away from Nigeria, group tells Atiku, Obi

    A pro-democracy group, Coalition for Good Governance and Change Initiative (CGGCI) has appealed to the opposition presidential candidates of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar and Labour Party (LP), Peter Obi not to run away but stay in the country to join hands with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to build the country.

    The National Coordinator of the group, Comrade Okpokwu Ogenyi during a unity rally in celebration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s electoral victory at the Supreme Court in Abuja on Thursday said the two leaders should stay back and contribute meaningfully to the project Nigeria.

    The advice came on the heels of reports that Atiku may be jetting out of the country following his defeat again at the apex court on Thursday.

    Addressing newsmen shortly after members of his group along with other jubilant marched and danced around Eagle Square and along major roads around the Supreme Court, Ogenyi advised the two leaders to accept the outcome of their appeal and contribute meaningfully to the development of the country.

    According to Ogenyi, “We wish to reiterate and call on all those who participated in the last Presidential election are welcome to join the new Nigeria of our dream, an egalitarian Nation where peace and justice shall reign.

    “We specifically single out the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Alhaji Atiku Abubakar and the candidate of the Labour Party (LP), Mr. Peter Obi, not to abandon Nigeria.

    Read Also: UPDATED: Senate okays Aliyu as ICPC chairman

    “It is our opinion that they should stay back and contribute meaningfully to the project Nigeria. We believe that as citizens of Nigeria, one must not become a president or vice president before he or she can make a meaningful contribution to the development of our Nation.

    “Alhaji Atiku Abubakar as a former Vice President and Mr Peter Obi as a former governor should not hesitate to give appropriate advice devoid of politics and self-aggrandisement. They should continue to reign on their supporters to embrace peace and tranquillity.

    “For now, the struggle for political power has ended for the duo but that does not mean they do not have opportunity in future. Therefore, before the said future will come there is a need to cooperate with the incumbent and ensure that we all succeed together as a Nation.”

    Dedicating the outcome of the appeal to Almighty God and the less privileged who voted massively for Tinubu, the group commended the judiciary for standing by the side of the law and democracy.

    “This victory is dedicated to God the Father and to the less privileged people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria who voted and vehemently defended their votes believing in the capacity of His Excellency President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the man anointed by God to take Nigeria to the promised land.

    “We are here today to celebrate the victory of democracy, social justice, equity and fairness. To us, the judiciary has done an exceptional job by delivering the most sound judgement ever in the history of election petition in Nigeria, by strengthening critical issues of legal dichotomy, democracy has indeed won.”

    The group then called on all Nigerians to join President Tinubu’s “Renewed Hope Agenda” and trust his administration to lead the country to the promised land.

  • Keyamo to Atiku, Obi: call and congratulate President Tinubu now as ‘true patriots’

    Keyamo to Atiku, Obi: call and congratulate President Tinubu now as ‘true patriots’

    The Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo has urged Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Peter Obi of the Labour Party (LP) to call and congratulate President Bola Tinubu as true patriots.

    Keyamo advised that nation-building should be at the front burner, urging citizens to close ranks in helping steer the country in the right direction.

    He said: “By the judgment of the Supreme Court today, the laymen prowling all over social media can now clearly see that there is a wide chasm between emotions and law.

    “These were Election Petitions pursued with unnecessary venom and hatred by most of those involved.

    “Today, they have learnt a bitter lesson that such venom, hatred and sentiment have no place in judicial proceedings and deliberations. Their journey has come to a grinding end.

    “We had consistently made the same points to the opposition, but they kept giving their supporters false hopes and goading them in the wrong direction.

    “Unfortunately for them, all the vituperations poured out against the judiciary actually cut no ice with it. Our Justices are always firm, courageous, and cerebral. Kudos to them.

    “What is now left is nation-building. The other Presidential candidates must now call President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and congratulate him as true patriots. We as patriotic citizens must also now close ranks to help steer our country in the right direction. I wish all of us well.”

  • UPDATED: Supreme Court dismisses Atiku’s bid to file fresh evidence against Tinubu

    UPDATED: Supreme Court dismisses Atiku’s bid to file fresh evidence against Tinubu

    The application by Atiku Abubakar and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) to present fresh evidence on the Chicago State University (CSU) diploma of President Tinubu has been dismissed by the Supreme Court.

    The deposition by the Registrar of the CSU, Caleb Westberg, was rejected and ruled inadmissible on the ground that the Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction because the 180 days timeline for determination of election petition had elapsed.

    Justice Okoro noted that since the time for trial at the Court of Appeal had elapsed, the Supreme Court cannot accept fresh evidence on appeal.

    He noted that Atiku’s attempt to introduce fresh evidence with a view to extend the time to adjudicate the case is unfortunate.

    Read Also: Supreme Court dismisses Atiku’s bid to file fresh evidence against Tinubu

    According to him, since the Presidential Election Petition Court has no jurisdiction to entertain fresh evidence, the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to accept fresh evidence.

    He said it has to be noted that the 180 days imposed is immutable and cannot be extended.

    He said Atiku failed to convince the Supreme Court why he waited until the PEPC concluded the appellant’s suit.

    Justice Okoro said Atiku’s lawyers were tardy and not diligent in obtaining the documents from CSU.

    According to him, on this application, fresh evidence is not received as a matter of cause.

    After the expiration of the time limit by the Electoral Act, he said petitioner shall not be allowed to amend their petitions after the 21 days allowed by law.

    Citing section 182 of the Electoral Ect, Justice Okoro says Atiku failed to apply to the court to amend his petition to bring fresh evidence against Tinubu.

    He stated it is shocking to have Atiku’s argument in print knowing how election petitions have suffered delays in the past.

    Justice Okoro said it would be unfortunate to go back to the dark old days.

  • BREAKING: Supreme Court dismisses Atiku’s bid to file fresh evidence against Tinubu

    BREAKING: Supreme Court dismisses Atiku’s bid to file fresh evidence against Tinubu

    The application by Atiku Abubakar and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) to present fresh evidence on the Chicago State University (CSU) diploma of President Tinubu has been dismissed by the Supreme Court.

    The deposition by the Registrar of the CSU, Caleb Westberg, was rejected and ruled inadmissible on the ground that the Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction after the 180 days timeline for determination of election petition had elapsed.

    Read Also: Partial waiver approval: ASUU NEC, lecturers weigh options

    Justice Okoro noted that since the time for trial at the Court of Appeal had elapsed, the Supreme Court cannot accept fresh evidence on appeal.

    Details Shortly…

  • Atiku, Obi versus Tinubu:  It’s judgment day today

    Atiku, Obi versus Tinubu:  It’s judgment day today

    • It is judgment day at the Supreme Court today.

    Atiku Abubakar, candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the February 25 poll, and his Labour Party (LP) counterpart Peter Obi will know their fate on their appeals challenging the affirmation of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s victory.

    The duo are challenging the September 6 judgment of the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC).

    The court issued a notice communicating the judgment date and time to the parties.

    A seven-member panel of the court, headed by Justice John Okoro, heard the appeals on Monday and reserved judgment.

    Other members of the panel are Justices Uwani Abba-Aji, Justice Emmanuel Agim, Mohammed Garba, Ibrahim Saulawa, Adamu Jauro and Tijani Abubakar.

    Before hearing the main appeals, the court heard the motion by Atiku and the PDP to supply fresh evidence in support of their appeal.

    Read Also: How college workers, students attacked our operatives, by EFCC

    While moving the motion, the lawyer to Atiku and the PDP, Chris Uche (SAN), urged the court to sidestep technicalities and do justice because of the special circumstances thrown up by the suit.

    Justice John Okoro asked Uche whether the court should be guided by the Constitution and the Electoral Act or that it should act arbitrarily.

    Uche said: “We have argued that this court is allowed under the Constitution and the Electoral Act and that it can still allow these documents.”

    Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), who led Tinubu’s legal team, faulted Uche’s submissions.

    Olanipekun argued that as it stands, the deposition is a lifeless document on which the court cannot act.

    He also faulted Uche’s contention that the 180-day limitation cannot apply to the Court of Appeal.

    Counsel for INEC and the APC – Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN) and Akin Olujinmi (SAN) – described the motion by Atiku and the PDP as novel, misconceived and misdirected.

    The PEPC, on September 6, struck out several paragraphs of Atiku’s petition. c

    The tribunal rejected and discountenanced exhibits, including witnesses’ statements, he tendered to substantiate his allegations of electoral irregularities and malpractices.c

    In a similar judgment, it held that Obi failed to provide several facts fundamentally required to support his petition.

    “All the petitions are devoid of merit and are hereby dismissed,” the PEPC ruled and affirmed Tinubu’s declaration. 

  • BREAKING: Supreme Court delivers judgment Thursday on Atiku, Obi’s appeals

    BREAKING: Supreme Court delivers judgment Thursday on Atiku, Obi’s appeals

    The Supreme Court has scheduled judgements for Thursday (October 26) in the appeals by Atiku Abubakar/the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Peter Obi/Labour Party (LP) against the September 6 judgment of the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC), which affirmed the victory of President Bola Tinubu in the last presidential election.

    It was learnt that the court has sent notices to parties to that effect.

    Read Also: Supreme Court grills Atiku’s lawyers over CSU documents

    A seven-member panel of the court, headed by Justice John Okoro, heard the appeals on Monday and reserved judgment to a date to be communicated to parties.

    Details shortly…

  • Supreme Court grills Atiku’s lawyers over CSU documents

    Supreme Court grills Atiku’s lawyers over CSU documents

    • Apex court dismisses APM’s appeal, reserves judgment in Atiku, Obi vs Tinubu

    The legal team of Atiku Abubakar had a tough time yesterday trying to convince the Supreme Court as to why he should be allowed to tender new evidence.

    It was during the hearing of the appeal by Atiku and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) challenging the affirmation of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s victory in the February 25 poll.

    The Justices reserved judgment in the appeal, as well as the one by Peter Obi and Labour Party (LP).

    The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the Allied Peoples Movement (APM) after its counsel, who was scolded for time-wasting, withdrew it.

    Atiku and Obi are challenging the September 6 judgment of the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC).

    Counsel for Atiku and the PDP, Chris Uche (SAN), said the motion was for leave to present fresh evidence based on a deposition on oath from the Registrar of the Chicago State University (CSU), United States.

    Uche said: “It is our contention that the issue involved is a weighty and constitutional one.”

    He added that the Supreme Court, as the custodian of the Constitution, should admit the documents in view of the exceptional circumstance that have arisen.

    Uche argued that the only opposition raised by the respondents against the motion was technical.

    He said the respondents’ objection was that the fresh documents were not properly pleaded and that they were being introduced late into the proceedings.

    “We argue that this matter is akin to a jurisdictional issue; that the court, as a policy court, should have a look at these documents.

    “It should sidestep technicalities and do substantial justice in this matter,” Uche said.

    At that point, Justice John Okoro, who heads the court’s seven-member panel, asked Uche whether the court should be guided by the Constitution and the Electoral Act or that it should act arbitrarily.

    Uche said: “We have argued that this court is allowed under the Constitution and the Electoral Act and that it can still allow these documents.”

    Another member of the panel, Justice Emmanuel Agim, sought to know from Uche the nature of the documents.

    Uche responded by saying: “It is a deposition of a witness made pursuant to a court order.” 

    Justice Agim noted that the deposition, which is that of the Registrar of the CSU, Caleb Westberg, seemed like a product of a question-and-answer session.

    He observed that the proceeding leading to the creation of the document was conducted in the chamber of Atiku’s lawyer in the United States.

    Uche said the proceeding took place in Atiku’s lawyer’s office in compliance with the order of a US court, to which Justice Agim noted that the said order did not specify when it must take place.

    The justice added that the deposition, which is a testimony by the CSU’s Registrar under oath, cannot qualify as a court document because it was not a product of a court proceeding.

    He wondered why Atiku and the PDP chose to have the proceeding conducted in the office of Atiku’s lawyer.

    The justice said he had expected the CSU write to disclaim the documents supplied by Tinubu to INEC instead of a deposition by the Registrar.

    He queried whether the stenographer in Atiku’s lawyer’s office, who administered the oath on the CSU’s Registrar, had the legal authority to administer such an oath. 

    “We are dealing with a matter that touches on the national interest of this country,” Justice Agim said.

    He added that the procedure adopted by the appellants did not appear tidy.

    Uche said there was nothing unusual about the venue of the proceeding, noting that Tinubu’s lawyer was present and did not question the process.

    He added that the legal system in the US was different from that of the Commonwealth, which Nigeria adopted, admitting that the deposition was made in the law chambers of Atiku’s American lawyer. 

    Uche said the deposition was based on a court order to clarify the discrepancies observed in the communications from the CSU.

    He stressed that the deposition confirmed that the certificate submitted to INEC by the second respondent did not emanate from them.

    Justice Okoro noted that there were two conflicting letters from the CSU on the allegation of forgery – a criminal act that ought to be proved beyond reasonable doubt.

    The jurist wondered whether the Supreme Court has the luxury to entertain such a proceeding, particularly in the face of Section 285(6) of the Constitution, which imposes a 180-day limit on election petitions.

    Uche said: “Our contention is that the court should proceed in line with the Constitution, particularly Section 285 from sub-section 1 to 6.”

    The SAN argued that the Constitution does not refer to the Court of Appeal as a tribunal, which is affected by time limitations. 

    He added that the 180-day timeline cannot apply to the Court of Appeal, but only to an election tribunal.

    Olanipekun: deposition lifeless

    Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), who led Tinubu’s legal team, faulted Uche’s submissions.

    Olanipekun argued that as it stands, the deposition is a lifeless document on which the court cannot act.

    To him, it is like a statement that requires the presence of the witness in court to breathe life into it by adopting it and being cross-examined.

    Read Also: Supreme Court scolds APM, throws out appeal

    Olanipekun noted that parties before the US court were different, as INEC and the APC were not represented.

    He also faulted Uche’s contention that the 180-day limitation cannot apply to the Court of Appeal.

    The SAN cited Section 285(13) of the Constitution and the First Schedule to the Electoral Act to support his argument that the time limit applies to the Court of Appeal sitting as a trial court in a presidential election dispute.

    Olanipekun argued that it is petitions that are filed at the Court of Appeal over presidential election disputes and not appeals. 

    He picked from his table and showed the Justices a copy of the petition that Atiku and the PDP filed before the Court of Appeal sitting as the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC).

    Referring to an earlier decision of the Supreme Court in Obaseki vs. the APC, he noted that the court held that it is only the issuing institution that can confirm or deny the authenticity of a certificate. 

    Olanipekun added: “The 180 days is sancrosant. It cannot be extended. We are bound by the law. The law is to be interpreted as is it and not how it ought to be.”

    He urged the court “to dismiss this very unusual application.”

    Counsel for INEC and the APC – Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN) and Akin Olujinmi (SAN) – described the motion by Atiku and the PDP as novel, misconceived and misdirected.

    Mahmoud said the time limitation provision in Section 285 applies to the Court of Appeal as it is to the election tribunal and urged the court to dismiss the motion.

    Olujinmi, who adopted the submission by Olanipekun, also urged the court to dismiss the motion on the grounds that Atiku and the PDP did not comply with the provision of the applicable Rules of the Federal High Court in applying for foreign documents.

    “When a party to a proceeding want to apply for foreign documents, there ought to be an order of the court hearing the matter, such was not done in this case,” Olujinmi said.

    The court did not allow adumbrations in the main appeal. 

    Counsel simply adopted their written briefs and prayed the court to either allow or dismiss the appeal.

    Uche urged the court to allow the appeal, set aside the judgment of the lower court, grant the prayers and disqualify the second respondent.

    Olanipekun, Mahmoud and Olujinmi urged the court to dismiss the appeal.

    Justice Okoro announced that judgment was reserved.

     Other members of the panel are Justices Uwani Abba-Aji, Mohammed Garba, Ibrahim Saulawa, Adamu Jauro and Tijani Abubakar.

  • Atiku gets knocks for press conference

    Atiku gets knocks for press conference

    The press conference by presidential candidate in the February election, Abubakar Atiku is an ambush against the judiciary, Bola Ahmed Tinubu Solidarity Vanguard (BATS-V) has said. 

    It noted Atiku could not tell the judiciary how to conduct its business. Also, he could not teach officials of Chicago University how to do their job or fault their academic decisions.

    In a statement, Special Adviser on Media, Southeast to Global Chairman  of BATS-V, Dare Owotombi, Anyaehie Anayo Simeon, praised Caleb Westberg, registrar of the university, for doing a good job.

     He urged Atiku to remember the statement by Chief Justice of Nigeria, Olukayode Ariwoola, that judges should not base their decisions on opinions but rather on the constitution, adding no matter how he (Atiku) laboured to spite Tinubu, he would fail.

    He noted Atiku and his co-travellers harboured negative tendencies in its voyage to Chicago University to access the qualification of Tinubu, in which at the end, it was proved that indeed Tinubu graduated with Bachelor of Science in Business Administration.

      “It is only a school that has the right to tell any authority, not even the court, those who graduated from their institution.

     ”The good news from Chicago State University has rendered useless the press conference Alhaji Abubakar called, seeking probity after his fruitless fishing mission in United States and it portrayed him as a desperate fellow scampering to incriminate anything good to blackmail the judiciary.

      “We are not surprised by the response from the Obedient family rejecting Atiku’s call for their solidarity, including other political parties in his mission of what he termed as enshrining probity in Nigeria’s politics.

    Read Also: Ondo Assembly pushes ahead with Aiyedatiwa’s impeachment

     BATS-V wondered why Atiku could be calling for probity when after former president Muhammadu Buhari, as a northern, has done eight years and for he (Atiku) wanted to take over and spend another eight years with the aim of handing over to Alhaji Aminu Tambuwal and it continues in that cycle ad infinitum.

      ”If Atiku, who was calling for Mr. Peter Obi’s support on probity, really loves value, appreciates Mr Obi and probity, why didn’t he support Obi’s presidential candidature in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) during the buildup to the presidential primaries. Rather, he was one of the allegedly persons behind the scenes that led to the frustration of Obi out of PDP, which made him seek solace in Labour Party.’’

    However, if Obi was not in his favour, why didn’t Atiku support Nyesom Wike’s candidature?

      ”This was a man during one of his presidential campaigns in the North urged Northerners not to vote for any Southern presidential candidate, forgetting that during the 2015 and 2019 Presidential elections, it was the block votes of Southwest that made former President Buhari to win.

     Earlier, in 1999, the group recalled, it was the landslide votes of Southeast and Southsouth that gave victory to the former president Olusegun Obasanjo, from which joint ticket Atiku became the vice president for two terms.