Follow @davidblawal
President Muhammadu Buhari on Tuesday congratulated President Barack Obama of the United States of America on his birthday.
The President in his congratulatory message wished Obama 'more great years ahead in health, strength, and service to humanity'.
"I can wager that years ahead will be more rewarding for your family, country and humanity. Happy birthday," he said.
The message, which originated from President Buhari's personal twitter handle, @MBuhari, brought back the handle to live after no fewer than 30 days in-activities.
Born in Honolulu, Hawaii, Obama, who turns 54 today is the 44th and current President of the United States, and the first African American to hold the office.
Obama is a graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School, where he served as president of the Harvard Law Review. He was a community organizer in Chicago before earning his law degree.
He worked as a civil rights attorney and taught constitutional law at University of Chicago Law School from 1992 to 2004. He served three terms representing the 13th District in the Illinois Senate from 1997 to 2004, running unsuccessfully for the United States House of Representatives in 2000.
[news_box style="3" display="tag" link_target="_blank" tag="Obama" count="4" show_more="on" show_more_type="link" header_background="#1b911f" header_text_color="#f2f2f2"]
Tag: Barack Obama
-

Buhari greets Obama at 54
-

Kenyans welcomed Obama, rejected gayism
The people of Kenya last weekend welcomed President Barack Obama of the United States of America, who was visiting his fatherland first time since becoming American president, but he was not entirely welcomed.
Kenyans in Nairobi, the capital and largest city in Kenya, on Sunday gave a muted and measured response to Obama’s firm support for gay rights during his visit.
According to AFP in YahooNews, Obama answered a journalist’s question on gay rights by drawing equivalence between homophobia and racism while standing alongside President Uhuru Kenyatta outside State House on Saturday.
“As an African-American in the United States I am painfully aware of what happens when people are treated differently under the law,” Obama said.
The comparison is particularly stinging in Kenya, which, like other African countries, has a proud history of resisting and overcoming colonial rule by white foreigners.
Edna Kendi, a 29-year old software developer was unimpressed by Obama publicly advocating gay rights. “He has to respect our culture,” she said. “People can be gay but they should do so in private and quietly.”
Kendi urged Obama to “stick to issues that are pertinent to the visit,” for her, corruption and trade.
Moses Abok, a 49-year old motorbike taxi driver waiting for customers beneath a shady jacaranda tree, echoed Kenyatta’s view.
“To me, it doesn’t matter. The spirit of gayism is inside just a few people,” he said using a common Kenyan term for homosexuality. “It’s not a big deal for us.”
But Abok also welcomed Obama’s words. “What he said is we should value all people, we shouldn’t alienate or eliminate those people, because they are part of us, they are human beings,” he said.
Ruo Maina, a 50-year old businessman in the manufacturing industry who had popped out to buy the Sunday papers, said what you do at home is nobody’s business.
“As long as you do it in private, we don’t care,” he said. Maina was not interested in public debates on gay rights, but added that Kenya’s vocal anti-gay extremists are equally indulging in unnecessary “provocation”.
“We don’t need to be saying it is deviant,” he said.
Deputy President William Ruto periodically addresses evangelical Christian churches to warn against homosexuality. There is “no room” for gays in Kenya he told worshippers in May, and in July railed against the US for allowing “gay relations and other dirty things.”
Anti-gay firebrand Irungu Kangata leads a cross-party caucus seeking to have the country’s existing anti-homosexuality laws – which include a maximum 14-year sentence – to be strictly applied and makes frequent media appearances to explain that “gayism” is a lifestyle choice that can and should be unmade.
Vincent Kadala, an aspiring politician whose Republican Liberty Party has no seats in parliament, threatened to rally 5,000 naked men and women in order to show Obama “the difference between a man and woman”.
The promised protest attracted a lot of media attention but was never held.
-

Obama okays Buhari’s leadership style
President Barrack Obama of the United States of America has expressed confidence in President Muhammadu Buhari’s ability to overcome the various challenges facing Nigeria.
He made the remark in Washington DC on Monday while receiving President Buhari, who was on 4-day official visit to the United States.
Obama noted that Buhari came on board with a clear agenda to tackle the problems of corruption, insecurity occasioned by the activities of Boko Haram sect and other violent criminal activities.
Expressing appreciation to Buhari for his leadership style so far, Obama said that his administration would continue to assist and help Nigeria in overcoming the challenges.
He said: “It is a great pleasure to welcome President Buhari and his delegation here in the White House for his first visit since the historic election that took place.
“Nigeria is obviously one of the most important countries in the world, one of the most important countries in the African continent.
“Recently we saw an election in which a peaceful transition to a new government took place. Nevertheless, the people of Nigeria understand that only through a peaceful political process can change takes place”.
Continuing, Obama said: “President Buhari came into office with reputation for integrity and a very clear agenda, that is to make sure that he brings safely security and peace to his country.
“He is very concerned about the spread and the violence that is taking place there and the atrocities and has a very clear agenda in defeating Boko Haram and extremists.
“I want to emphasize how much I appreciate President Buhari’s work so far. I have seen him put together a team so that we can do everything that we can to help him succeed and help the people of Nigeria succeed”, he added.
He also assured that the American Government would continue to partner with Nigeria towards ensuring political stability in Africa and around the World.
Describing Nigeria as one of the most important countries in the world, he congratulated the country for conducting peaceful elections.
He also commended Nigeria for taking leadership position in the fight against the spread of diseases like Ebola and Polio and pledged that his administration would continue to accord Nigeria the necessary recognition to bring peace to Africa and the world.
In his remarks, President Buhari commended the American Government under the leadership of President Obama for mounting pressure on former Jonathan’s administration to conduct a free and fair election in Nigeria.
Nigeria, he said, will remain forever grateful to America for the singular act.
He said: “The visit of the Secretary of State before the elections to see the former president, the chairman of Independent National Electoral Commission and the opposition was a positive trend that saw us through the elections.
“And the maintenance of pressure by United States mainly and Europe to make sure that the elections were free, fair and credible made us to be where we are now.
“It would have been almost impossible if the United States did not maintain the pressure on the former Nigerian Government.’’ he said
He thanked President Obama for inviting him to visit US and his administration’s support to Nigeria.
Governors of Nasarawa, Borno, Imo, Oyo and Edo States as well as some Nigerian government officials accompanied President Buhari during the visit.
-

Obama urged to ensure return of Nigeria’s stolen assets
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has urged President Barack Obama to back up his commitment on stolen assets by taking thoughtful and aggressive steps towards returning them to Nigeria.
The organisation which made the plea in a statement issued in Lagos ahead of the meeting of President Muhammadu Buhari with officials of the Obama government this week, urged the US government to deal with the problem with the seriousness and intensity that has been previously lacking in similar exercise.
In the statement signed by SERAP executive director, Adetokunbo Mumuni, the organisation welcomed the commitment by President Obama to assist the Buhari government to track down billions of dollars in stolen assets from the country.
It stated that greater efforts are required by the Obama government to follow through its commitment if it is to secure a measure of justice for Nigerian victims of corruption and money laundering.It urged the Obama government to move quickly to resolve the issue of returning the assets to the country in an expeditious, just and fair manner.
“Unless this is done, the rare opportunity the Obama government now has to right the injustice aided and abetted by the US banks will be gone,” it said.According to the SERAP, “Recovering stolen assets from the US is a lingering issue that requires justice and fairness especially given the complicity of US banks and other institutions in corruption and money laundering in Nigeria, and the fact that stolen assets have contributed to the growth of US economy. Therefore, thoughtful and aggressive steps are needed if the Obama government is to change the asset recovery fatigue that characterised previous US administrations.”
It therefore urged President Obama to “establish a Presidential Advisory Committee and facilitate a congressional hearing on stolen assets from Nigeria. These initiatives would be tremendously important in bringing renewed attention to repatriation of stolen assets to Nigeria.
“Corruption, money laundering and systematic violations of human rights go hand in hand and that is why President Obama should do everything within his power to get to the bottom of the stolen assets from Nigeria kept in the US,” the organisation said.
-

Will Iran deal secure Barack Obama’s presidential legacy?
Republicans round on US president over his “cosmic bet” on Iran, calling the deal “appeasement” and accusing Obama of being “a very, very naive man who does not know how the world works.” By Peter Foster
First there came the fanfare and backslapping of a signing ceremony in Vienna, then an early morning presidential statement from President Barack Obama in the White House lauding the “historic” agreement to resolve a decade-long crisis over Iran’s nuclear programme.
But in the offices of a senior Republican senator up on Capitol Hill the sounds were not of jubilation but audible, stunned disbelief, as the 159-page accord with its five lengthy technical annexes finally downloaded into anxious inboxes.
“It’s just appalling, I really don’t know what to say,” spluttered the national security director of one Republican senator as he scrolled through Annex II, the 31-page list of Iranian individuals and companies that will be released from international sanctions.
Even independent experts, like Suzanne Maloney, an Iran specialist at the Brookings Institution expressed surprise at the speed and scope of the relief being offered to Iran – lifted not in a phased manner, as the Obama administration had previously promised, but in one fell swoop.
“If these individuals and companies start to cheat, how are we even going to begin to deal with that? Do we even have a plan?” asked the disbelieving senate aide, running down the long list of Iranian generals and officials, many listed as a terrorist by the US.
When it comes to judging the Iran deal it has often been said that the “devil is in the detail”, but to understand the backlash that Barack Obama is now facing, it is necessary to know that for many of the deal’s opponents in the US, the devil is not in the detail – he’s in Tehran.
So when Republican presidential candidates queued up to scorn the agreement – Jeb Bush called it flat out “appeasement” – they were not dissecting the minutiae but arguing that handing $150 billion in sanctions relief to a nation still on the State Department’s terror list was little short of madness.
“Laughing all the way to the bank” was the headline in the tabloid New York Daily News above a picture of Iran’s whiskered foreign minister, Javad Zarif, grinning like a Cheshire cat at the ceremony in Vienna. “Joke’s on us” was the front-page verdict in the New York Post.
Rick Perry, the former Texas governor who is running for president in 2016, expressed the typical Republican view of Mr Obama’s decision to reward a country that still holds four Americans in its jails, killed thousands of American soldiers in Iraq and regularly holds rallies chanting ‘death to America’.
“I saw a very, very naive man who does not know how the world works,” he said, “who cannot put the dots together, and stood in front of the American people and said I really don’t care if Congress likes this or not, I’m going to do it.”
Mr Obama acknowledges that such criticisms are not limited to Republicans, but are shared by many in his party who have deep misgivings of their own.
It was to allay those fears that Mr Obama took the risk of giving a no-holds-barred press conference at the White House, at one point almost dancing like a boxer entering the ring, inviting the press corps to hit him with their best shots.
“Have we exhausted Iran questions here?” he asked, looking over to his press secretary, Josh Earnest, who was having near palpitations in the corner. “I really am enjoying this Iran debate … [Are there any] topics that may not have been touched upon? Criticisms that you’ve heard that I did not answer…?”
It was a bravura performance, displaying absolute and lawyerly mastery of the detail, discoursing minutely on the modalities of the 24-day inspection regime, uranium stockpiles and the ability to “snap-back” sanctions – but largely talking past the fundamental differences that separate both sides.
The black-is-white nature of the debate was most clearly expressed by the fact that both opponents and supporters argued with equal fervour that deal could both trigger an arms race – or prevent one.
On the cable TV shows, Ron Dermer, the Israeli ambassador warned that the agreement had left his country in deep peril, while in the very next segment, Sir Peter Westmacott, the British ambassador, came on to say the precise opposite.
“We think this is going to make the situation much worse. We think this is going to endanger Israel,” Mr Dermer told MSNBC’s Morning Joe. “We think it makes the world a safer place,” said Sir Peter, “we think without this deal we would be in much greater danger of Iran securing a nuclear military capability.”
Mr Obama defends himself from the accusation of recklessness by arguing simply that Iran is further from a bomb under the deal than it would be without it.
“We are not measuring this deal by whether it is changing the regime inside of Iran,” he told Thomas Friedman of the New York Times, “We’re not measuring this deal by whether … we are eliminating all their nefarious activities..[but whether] Iran could not get a nuclear weapon.”
But hostile sections of the Washington foreign policy establishment argue that such a narrow interpretation is simply naive, given Iran’s track-record and the “cash windfall” the regime in Tehran will now receive.
Others simply believe that Mr Obama cut the deal because he has always secretly yearned for a rapprochement with Iran that would curb Sunni excesses and rebalance the Middle East.
They noted that at Wednesday’s press conference Mr Obama – for the first time – said that Iran must be “part of the conversation” in the resolution of the Syrian civil war, a view likely to confirm Israeli, Saudi and Gulf suspicions about his ultimate motives.
In the final analysis, Mr Obama’s willingness to deal with Iran – even if diplomatic relations are not likely to be restored any time soon – is the faultline that divides supporters and opponents of a deal the White House must now ram through a sceptical US Congress.
In the run-up to the agreement, polls found America’s war-weary public to be marginally in favour, with the most recent Fox News poll putting the split at 47-43 per cent, but that support will now be tested by an intense lobbying campaign on both sides.
As Nate Silver, the polling and statistics guru noted this week, divisions over the deal mirror almost exactly America’s views on Mr Obama himself – broadly Republicans hate it, Democrats like it and everyone else is somewhere in between.
The tribal lines get blurred, however, by Democratic politicians with close ties to Israel, with its enduring influence in the US political system.
Robert Cohen, the president of AIPAC, the most powerful pro-Israel lobby group in the US, said the organisation would oppose the deal in the House and Senate with the “entirety of our institutional resources”.
The campaign promises to be bare-knuckle and brutal, with opponents absolutely determined to squeeze vulnerable Democrat senators and congressmen as hard as politically possible.
“AIPAC is all in”, one operative who is close to the campaign told The Sunday Telegraph. “Pro-Israel, hawkish Democrats will be squeezed between their values, their constituents and the demands of the White House.
“That’s where this fight’s gonna take place. Members will be clear that the price of them supporting this deal will be their donor-networks, their voters – and ultimately their own political futures.”
These are not idle threats, although it remains to be seen whether – as happened over the 2013 Syria vote on bombing the Assad regime for using chemical weapons – opponents can whip up enough protest to really rattle the White House.
Should Congress vote to disapprove, Mr Obama has promised to use his presidential veto to push it through, leaving opponents needing to find 13 Democrat senators willing to rebel against the White House to override the veto and actually scupper the deal. In the end, the widespread consensus is that enough Democrats will choose to defend their president’s single greatest foreign policy achievement, and leave the final verdict in the hands of history.
For Dr Maloney, the former State Department adviser and Iran-specialist at Brookings, the only certain thing about a deal that has so starkly divided both US politics and America from its traditional Middle Eastern allies, is that its consequences will be momentous – one way or the other.
“Iran has an incredible moment now,” she says, adding that there is no certainty that Tehran will not squander the immense geopolitical opportunity offered now offered them.
The Islamic Republic has had chances to emerge in the recent past, she notes, including winning the war against Iraq in the 1980s and the oil boom of the 2000s, but both times found itself unable to seize the opportunity, hamstrung by a mixture of “ideology and incompetence”.
“I don’t think that there is any guarantee that they won’t do it again,” she says, “but this is a true and historic opening and one that can lead to Iran’s full integration into the international community. That would be a tremendous benefit to Iranians and, over time, a real benefit to the region and the rest of the world.”
In an onimous sign, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, on Saturday launched a scathing attack on the United States and its Middle East policies, saying Washington sought Iran’s “surrender”.
Delivering a fiery speech at a Tehran mosque, punctuated by chants of “Death to America”, Khamenei said he wanted politicians to examine the agreement to ensure national interests were preserved, as Iran would not allow the disruption of its revolutionary principles or defensive abilities.
“We will never stop supporting our friends in the region and the people of Palestine, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Bahrain and Lebanon,” he said. “Even after this deal our policy towards the arrogant US will not change.”
As one US commentator put it, Mr Obama has placed a “cosmic bet” on Iran by agreeing to this deal – the world now waits to see how the chips may fall.
- Courtesy: The Telegraph
-

Open letter to ‘Black man in White House’
- “Nothing splendid has ever been achieved except by those who dared believe, that something inside of them was superior to circumstances.” – Bruces Barton.
Years back, I became interested in the startling story of one of the finest American presidents: Theodore Roosevelt. After reading something very striking about him somewhere, I jumped into the study of this bright and enigmatic leader. In the course of my dramatic search, I later discovered that the famed and one of the longest serving United States presidents, Franklin D. Roosevelt, was related to him (note: Franklin was his cousin). Surprisingly, other information and facts began to emerge, much to my intellectual excitement.
Interestingly enough, one of the items that sparked up this article was when I realized that this widely-known great president of the United States, added the adjective, ‘WHITE’ to the official presidential residence of today’s U.S. presidential lodge, the famous ‘White House’. Immediately, something struck the ‘walls’ of my inquisitive mind.
My world temporarily stood still. Questions began to crowd the sanctuary of my now awakened mind. Questions such as: Why the choice of white? The colour black, as it were, was synonymous with blacks, niggers and slaves! Was America, at that time, a white- only country? Were there no promising blacks, Jews, native Indians and\or other potential immigrants? What conditions of the mind or circumstantial factors and other unknown sources conspired to influence the president’s choice of ‘WHITE?’
At that moment, a gentle thought knocked on the doors of my ‘overcharged’ mind, the words of B.F. Skinner swam like a wave through it saying, ‘When you find something interesting, drop everything else and study it.’ This writer, obeyed.
So, the quest began and I had to put on my research gloves and thinking cap. The first thing I expended my energy and thinking on was, what could be the relationship between my desire to probe the ‘White” adjective and the emergence of the first black American president – Barack Obama? Suddenly, a thought provoking title gushed out of my mind like a volcano!
This intellectual insight birthed the title of this research-driven article. I quickly wrote the title in a file, and like Sir Isaac Newton, under the apple tree, I started thinking, researching, wrestling with my brain to provide insights, ideas, information and direction to take in the creation of an article, that, putting into consideration the already established literary tradition, will not benefit the Nigerian cumAfrican students alone, this time, but the entire black race!
At this juncture, I shall formulate hard scientific questions, which will assist in giving literary direction to the entire body of this confidence-building and life-enriching article, especially for the black race! Note that a great mind once said ‘you know a person who is knowledgeable by the person’s answers; and the wise person by the nature of their questions.’
The first question is: How did this fatherless African American (whose ancestral home is in Kenya), rise to be the first black man to occupy the most sought after and enviable office in the world – ‘The White House? This question is so important considering the various odds and obstacles the blacks have to contend with in the world, especially in the United States, even today!
Kindly ponder on the words by Professor Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, while trying to explain the conditions of the black race in the southern states, in the 19th century. They argued in their insightful book titled, ‘Why Nations Fail’, that, ‘In the meantime, blacks continued to be excluded from power and are repressed. Plantation-type agriculture based on low-wage, poorly educated labour persisted….’
Honestly, one cannot fully say that the situation has completely disappeared in the 21st century! So, the second question is: What are the core factors, or defining characteristics responsible for the political evolution of this black man (Barack Hussein Obama, Jr), and his bold ascendance into the Theodore Roosevelt’s so-named ‘White House?’
Third, linking Obama’s behaviors before his emergence as the President of the world’s most powerful nation, with the broad-based behaviours which he has consistently displayed, so far, in his close to seven years in the White House, what insights and lessons can one glean, and if possible, package, for the benefits of Africans, Nigerians and blacks, everywhere?
In my long-term and continuous study of successful students, groups, peoples, and nations etc., I have repeatedly found one basic unifying trait, common habit synonymous with this unique sect. And, this group of distinct habits, which I term – HBR (Habit, Behaviour and Routine), is one of the core reasons behind their successes, no matter the nature of their competitive fields.
Like one of my distant literary mentors wrote in one of his brilliant books titled, ‘The 100 Absolutely Unbreakable Laws of Business and Success’, Brian Tracy puts it thus: ‘You can study others who have achieved the same goal and by doing what they did, you can get the same results”.
I argued in a recent article, which was published by ‘The Nation’ and ‘The Leadership’ newspapers, respectively, titled, ‘Education: The Cloning of a Nobel Laureate’, (many thanks to these patriotic and ingenious organizations); this writer talked about the concept of (HBR) at length.
Besides, in my research for this academic article, I came across the story of this interesting American acclaimed self-made millionaire, Dr. John Demartini. How he studied the lifestyles, behaviours and belief systems of Nobel Laureates.
He applied the insights he gleaned from his study in his life, and today, he is not only a leading light in his field, he consults for CEOs(Chief Executive Officers) and other top leaders in the world.
Therefore, another thought-generating question is: what are the basic behaviors and beliefs of President Barack Hussein Obama, Jr, that if applied by blacks all over the world in their diverse fields, would, based on natural laws and principles of human progress, generate – ‘The Barack Obama Effect’? That is: Blacks, emerging firsts, bests and tops in all fields of human endeavours, including the scientific realm and other brain and mind driven arenas, not majorly football\soccer, boxing, music, basketball and other brawl and muscle oriented endeavours?
I studied and keenly observed Barack Obama, read books written by him i.e. ‘The Audacity of Hope’; critically listened to his various mind-grabbing speeches, public addresses, watched documentaries, commentaries, critiqued his thoughts and quotes, tried to understand the nature and texture of his belief system etc.; in order to pierce through the Barrack Obama ‘thought-sphere’.
It is based on this observational cum exploratory research and my modest scientific understanding of this black African presidential phenomenon that this article was conceived, birthed and taken to the print for the sole benefits of one of the most-maligned races on Earth: the Black people!
In effect, I uncovered what I term the ‘4Bs of Barrack Obama!’ They are, first, Brainpower; second Belief System (BS); third, Bold Aspiration (BA); fourth, Best Mind-set (BM). Empirical evidence and other supporting data are employed to proof each of the 4Bs.
The world, and especially the 21st century is today, a ‘Knowledge Economy.’ Contemporary writers, however, call it – the Information Age, Talent Age or the Age of Thinkers etc. Before now, Africans and blacks in general are taken for people who are intellectually-laid back.
Some say they lack CIA (Cognitive and Intellectual Ability); and even some believe Africans and blacks are sub-humans. So many other laughable labels are formulated against this race, in order to keep their backs, permanently down!
Put differently, education, as generally agreed, is one of the most important elements of the brain and if incorporated with DHL (Daily Habit of Learning), it transforms the human brain into brainpower. President Barack Obama is lucky to be born in the 60s; that is, 50 years plus in an ecosystem with the best educational system in the world, today. Being raised by educated parents (Dad, the late Barack H.
Obama, Sr, was a senior Kenyan government economist and mum, Stanley Ann Dunhan, an American anthropologist), even though his dad died when Barack was very young, his mother, Indonesian step-father, and relatives ensured that his education didn’t end up benighted.
He capitalized on the opportunity to get himself the best of education. After his primary education, and post primary, he preceded to Columbia University and later, Harvard Law School, where he became the first black president of Harvard Law report.
It is no secret that the legal profession is predicated on thinking, reasoning, research and communication; all these factors convert brain into brainpower! Via solid and sound educational background, Obama has been able to use his mind (intellectual competence) and mouth (communicative prowess) to bewilder the American electorates.
These, amid other vital forces, gave him the political clout to emerge as the first black U.S. president. What do these aforementioned insights mean for all blacks? Truth is, it means, as the evidence clearly shows, that we need to strive and get the best of education, first, with this in our competitive kit, then, we can embark on the race for the top in all fields.
We all know that our educational backwardness, resulting in our meagre global knowledge output, is the most critical bane of black undoing amongst other races. Nelson Mandela puts it like this, ‘Education is the most powerful weapon which we can use to change the world.’Also,the first black African American first lady, Michelle Obama adds, ‘A good education can lift you from the most humble circumstances into a life you never could have imagined…’
Could it ever, have crossed Obama’s mind to aspire to the world’s N0. 1 office if he was an illiterate in one of the drug-dominated slums of Alabama, U.S.? I surrender the answer to you, dearest reader!
In the second place, from my study, one important and revealing behavior of Barack is his Belief System (BS), or personal ideology, generally speaking.
Right from the day he hit the global headline, when he delivered a groundbreaking speech, in 2004; his style of behaviors has not changed, although, it might have been upped and polished, due to his current political status. More so, in ‘Contemporary Chinese Politics: An Introduction’, James C.F. Wangwrote in his information-laden book that ‘Ideology is a set of political values, feelings, and ideas that guides individuals to behave in a certain manner for the purpose of achieving a particular goal.’
Any keen observer of this great African American phenomenon will agree with me that President Barack Obama has not deviated from this unique habit. He believes in himself, in his noble ideals – what I call – ‘the audacity of self-belief.’ His personal philosophy has repeatedly been demonstrated in his pattern of practice.
And these distinct patterns of behavior have consistently spurred enviable empirical outcomes. The big question, again, is: How can this unique behavioural trait benefit the black race as Africa rises to take its highly-courted position in the comity of continents and earthly races?
After all, Barack Obama, like Neil Armstrong, walking on the moon for the first time, in 1969; has stepped on the moon for us (Africans and everyone whose skin is black!) We need to believe in ourselves; develop a consciousness that whatever we can conceive, we can, definitely attain; and this irreligious awareness will help us rise up to global greatness, in due course. Look at Asia, especially China, in today’s world.
Furthermore, call it scientific faith if you like, especially if you don’t subscribe to the concept of any Higher Power. Regarding Bold Aspiration (BA), as one of the observed characteristic of Barack Obama, this is a trait that one cannot fail to notice in the life of this great African American president. Obama displays this in the way and manner in which he attempts things that naturally, or based on circumstantial conditions, seem, ‘un-attemptable and sacred.’
It is the peculiar belief system of Obama that inspired him, to aspire to the presidency of the world’s most powerful nation; despite all the multifaceted odds against him. Blacks and Africans all over the world need to immediately remove the remaining vestige of slavery and start believing in themselves; especially by employing the ‘Barack Obama Model’ as anchor, in order to aspire and attain audacious aspirations, or what I conceive as 3G(Great and Grand Goals),beginning from now.
In the same vein, the late Nigerian sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo even put it philosophically, when he said, ‘It is not life that matters, but the courage one puts into it.’ Obama, from all intents and purposes, has consistently shown the audacity of boldness, of courage and of change, not only hope!
Barack Obama, himself said, ‘It is only when you hitch your wagon to something larger than yourself, that you will realize your full potential.’
He could not be further from the truth, taking a critical look at his life, the audacity of ambitions, his characteristic demonstration of courage , even when it relates to policies that seem utopian and outlandish like – ‘the largely contentious –‘Obamacare’ and the list is endless!
In reading the book of one of the brightest and early pioneers of ‘Positive Psychology’, James Allen, the legendary author of ‘Mind is the Master’; I diligently read and reflected on one of his collections titled, ‘As a Man Thinks.’ In this brilliant book, Allen clearly stated that ‘our thoughts determine our lives.’
If you think you are the best and that you deserve the best, this believe materializes in your life. Wait a minute, dear reader, please, let us reason together here, especially as it relates to Best Mind-set (BM) theory, have you pondered on why Obama vied for the president of the U.S.? Why he chose to study law, considering the fact that lawyers have ruled America more than people of other professions? Why he aspired to the president of the Harvard law report, and becoming the first black American to achieve such intellectual feat?
Why he elected to ‘net’ Michelle, a lawyer and obviously his senior in the field? The list goes on and on. Can you see similar patterns or mode of mind and of course, motion? What insights and lessons do all these present to every Nigerian, African and black, all over the world?
However, this reminds me of one time U.S. first lady, the intellectually wise Eleanor Roosevelt, who said long time ago that, ‘No one can make you feel inferior, except by your consent.’ I am aware of the psychological wounds, some of us still carry around, as a result of our past, skin pigmentation, and the continuous injuries and mental insults blacks suffer from remarks and biased studies being propagated and of course disseminated by some researchers, scientists and writers with regard to black intelligence, (IQ) as it is popularly known.
I am also aware of studies (and media utterances!) by James Watson, Professor Authur Jenson, Richard Herrnstein, Charles Murray etc. I have come across and sometimes read and reflected on other arguable and contentious intellectual works such as ‘The Bell curve’, ‘The Origin and Nature of Intelligence’, ‘Gene and Genius’ ‘Jewish Genius’, ‘Chinese Phenomenon’ etc…
Surprisingly enough, all this, didn’t deter President Barack Obama from believing in himself and aiming for gold! In fact, it should not restrain any of us; rather, inspire us to take the ‘right’ risks. Fellow blacks and Africans, it is all in the mind! Tony Robbins had said we should ‘Awaken the Giant Within’; and Lance Secretan wrote in world-class book, titled ‘Inspire! What All Great Leaders Do’, that ‘However, if you reflect honestly and deeply to mine the riches that are buried among your most precious inner resources – you may just change your life.’
We cannot afford to do less; it is inside each of us as a race. God is never partial! Therefore, henceforth, we should make education a matter of continental priority in general and national security issue in particular; believe in ourselves as God’s own people, too; put on the garment of courage and aspire to great and audacious dreams and inculcate the mindset of the best, going forward. The 21st century will not only be the ‘Age of Asia’, alone; but of the ‘Rise of Africa.’ Yes, we definitely, should!
Adedayo A. Olumuyiwa
An Academic Consultant
The author of ‘Education: Secrets of Chinese and Asian Students.’
-

Buhari vows to end insurgency in short time
… Receives pledges from France, Canada, Germany
President Muhammadu Buhari on Monday reaffirmed his administration’s total commitment to ending Boko Haram’s insurgency in the shortest possible time.
He spoke at a meeting with President Francois Hollande of France after his participation in Monday’s G-7 Outreach Programme in Germany.
Buhari, according to a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Media and Publicity, Mal. Garba Shehu, said Nigeria will welcome greater support and cooperation from France and other friendly nations for its ongoing efforts to overcome Boko Haram and restore full security and normalcy to areas affected by the group’s atrocities.
He said his administration was already taking concrete action to build a more efficient and effective coalition of Nigeria and neighbouring countries against Boko Haram.
Nigeria, the President said, would appreciate more intelligence on the terrorist group’s links with Islamic State, movements, training and sources of its arms and ammunition to facilitate the perfection of fresh tactics and strategies being evolved to overcome terrorism and insurgency within the country and the sub-region.
President Buhari reiterated at the talks with his French counterpart that there was absolutely no link between religion and the atrocities of Boko Haram.
He said: “There is clearly no religious basis for the actions of the group. Their atrocities show that members of the group either do not know God at all or they don’t believe in Him.”
In his remarks at the meeting, President Hollande commended President Buhari’s concerted efforts to galvanize Nigeria’s armed forces, security agencies and neighouring countries for more decisive action to eradicate Boko Haram.
The French leader assured Buhari that France will give Nigeria and its coalition partners greater support against terrorism and insecurity, including military and intelligence cooperation, to help them overcome the security challenge posed by Boko Haram and its global terrorist allies as quickly as possible.
He also called for greater bilateral cooperation between Nigeria and France in other areas including trade, economic and cultural relations.
President Buhari also received similar pledges of enhanced support from Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada and Chancellor Angela Merkel who he also conferred with before departing from the venue of the G-7 2015 Summit.
Buhari is due back in Abuja early Tuesday.
-

Terrorism: Obama to remove Cuba from list of state
President of the United States, Barack Obama, on Tuesday said that Cuba will be removed from the list of state sponsors of terrorism.
According to him, who has recently being meeting with President Raul Castro of Cuba on the sidelines of a regional summit in Panama, revealed that the decision is a key step towards fostering mutual relationship between the two countries.
The historic talk marked the first formal meeting between the leaders of their countries in a half-century.
In his statement to Congress, Obama maintained that the government of Cuba has not provided any support for international terrorism over the last six months.
Similarly, his statement to the lawmakers reads in part: “Cuba has provided assurances that it will not support acts of international terrorism in the future.”
Although, Lawmakers could veto the action of officially removing Cuba from terror list, Obama may ignore any such action.
Cuba is expected to be officially removed from the terror list 45 days after the president’s message gets to Congress.

