Tag: Buhari administration

  • Fuel Price Hike: Don’t test our resolve, NLC warns FG

    Fuel Price Hike: Don’t test our resolve, NLC warns FG

    The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has warned the federal government against testing the resolve of Nigerians by contemplating an increase in the prices of petroleum product when Nigerians were yet to overcome the earlier increase.

    The congress also backtracked on its earlier support for the plan that the Buhari administration to borrow about $29 billion, saying the government should instead pursue and recover government funds stashed away and use same to fund infrastructural development

    Speaking at the opening of its National Executive Council meeting in Sokoto, President of Congress, Comrade Ayuba Wabba expressed concern over ongoing media campaign and contradictory statements from the NNPC and government official on the rumoured price increase of petrol.

    He said the congress was totally opposed to any form of increase in prices of petrol as such an act will further increase the suffering of Nigerians, adding that congress will mobilise Nigerians to resist any such increase.

    Wabba said: “While Nigerians are still struggling to cope with the severe hardship imposed on them by the last increase in the price of petroleum products, there are ongoing media campaigns and contradictory statements by the NNPC and government officials on yet another plan to review the template for the pricing of petroleum products.

    “We are totally opposed to any further increases as we are yet to seeing the benefits of the last increase even as the current Minimum Wage Act has not been reviewed. It would amount to unleashing further hardship on workers and the poor if any further price increase is allowed.

    “The government must not take us for granted; indeed the patience and perseverance of the entire populace must not be taken for granted as we will sure mobilise the entire citizenry for mass protests in addition to other legitimate actions to resist any further increase.

    “What is urgently required of government is not another increase but a downward review of the current pump price of petroleum products.

    “The current National Minimum Wage Act has long elapsed and as you are already aware, we have long submitted our proposal for a review but Government seems not in a haste to recognise the urgency in attending to our demands.

    “Nigerian workers and pensioners are as important to the growth of the economy and must not be allowed to continue to suffer further hardships. We therefore reiterate our call on government to treat the review of the minimum wage and pension with the utmost urgency they deserve.”
    While commending the Federal Government in its sustained battle against corruption and determination to ensure good governance in our country, Wabba said the battle should be more systemic and institutionalised with strong laws and institutions strengthened enough to sustain the battle, adding that “our country has been seriously harmed both in image and resources by the impunity with which public funds were looted for decades such that what we need is beyond a flash in the pan approach.

    “We will support government in all areas that will promote good governance at all levels and all facets of the Nigerian society as long as it sustains its commitment to delivering people driven governance that will promote decency and growth in all spheres of our socio economic and political endeavour.

    “But we will not support the plan by the Federal Government to borrow more money from anywhere as we obviously have enough to attend to our immediate needs.

    “For instance, if the government vigorously pursues those in possession of our collective wealth, especially multinationals who have refused to remit funds meant for corporate Nigeria, we would have enough to rejuvenate the economy and the quality of the lives of our people.

    “NEITI has already been quoted to have discovered that $22billion (Twenty two billion dollars) has not been remitted by multinational firms to the federation account. This amount alone can take care of some of the areas any new loan is expected to be expended on.

    “If we must borrow, perhaps such borrowings, on terms strictly not against our collective interests and in particular not designed to deepen our debt burden, it should be directed towards revitalising rail transportation and roads and not for servicing remunerations or tastes of public office holders. Loans must have specific targets in public interest and strictly directed to their original uses; that is if we must take any at all.

    “We are also opposed to the idea of giving public funds to bail out commercial banks or interests, especially the recent proposal to give out $7 billion as bailout funds to commercial banks without any repayment schedule whatsoever.

    “While we also support the need for budget reform, we urge the government to ensure that the process is all inclusive, transparent, accountable and in line with the principle of good governance.

    “Once more, we urge government to be very careful with the process of economic reforms and development as it has become clearer around the world that neo liberal prescriptions handed troubled economies has not been of any help but rather further unleashed mass poverty and infrastructural decay on recipient countries and their citizens.

    “The prescriptions only generate massive wealth for the tiny few rich while devastating the quality of lives of the citizens. Indeed, a prominent report by Forbes has alarmed that “unless it changes, capitalism will starve humanity by 2050”.

    “We should not be seen to be accepting alien economic recovery policies that have been proven to be responsible for our problems in the first instance as all previous prescriptions from the Breton Woods institutions have only ended up destroying our economy and impoverishing our people.

    “We have enough intellectual capacity in our country that can develop people driven policies that is truly rooted in our specific circumstance for the recovery of our economy.”

     

  • Fayose cries out over alleged freezing of account by EFCC

    Fayose cries out over alleged freezing of account by EFCC

    Indications have emerged on Monday that a personal account run by Ekiti State Governor Ayo Fayose has been frozen by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Fayose’s  personal account in the Zenith Bank, Ado Ekiti branch, was allegedly frozen on the order of the anti-graft agency,  a source in the bank confirmed last night.

    The development was later confirmed by a statement signed by his Chief Press Secretary, Idowu Adelusi and a broadcast relayed on the Broadcasting Service of Ekiti State (BSES).

    The governor who accused the Buhari administration of running a “selective anti-corruption crusade” alleged that the accounts of his political associates and followers were also frozen by the EFCC.

    He claimed that he was not informed that he had committed any offence because his account was frozen.

    Fayose, who had earlier  issued a counter-cheque to make withdrawal and was rejected by the bank, visited the Bank located at Onigari  , GRA in Ado Ekiti,  describing the action as criminal and illegal.

    The governor accused some leaders of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and a prominent lawyer from the state of being the brains behind the action.

    While condemning the action, Fayose said under the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, especially th‎e provisions contained in Section 308, he enjoys immunity and wondered why his personal properties should become the targets of Federal Government and it’s agencies under the guise of fighting corruption.

    “Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution gives me immunity just like the President. I wouldn’t know why these people are intolerant of others and in a haste. Let them wait till 2018 when I will end my tenure for them to do their investigati‎on. The other time the EFCC accused me of embezzling N1.2 billion poultry project fund, I was the one who voluntarily reported myself to the EFCC.

    “It was ‎when I got a hint of their move that I wrote a cheque to withdraw some money from the account and I came myself. I was denied access to the account as I was told the EFCC has placed restriction on it. That is executive rascality taken too far. Even when I had case with EFCC my properties were not affected.

    “If they say they are investigating money spent on election, does it mean it is only Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) that spent money on election? A lot of people and groups supported my campaign then.

    “Where did APC and their leaders get the money they spent on 2015 general elections from? Now it is only in PDP that they find thieves, to them there are no theieves in the APC.

    “Even the President cannot claim to be an angel. The estate he built in Abuja is known to us. His wife was indicted over the Halliburton Scandal. When that American, Jefferson, was being sentenced, the President’s wife was mentioned as having wired $170,000 to Jefferson. Her name was on page 25 of the sentencing of Jefferson. We can serialize the judgment for people to see and read.

    “We will not allow this and we will defend our rights within the law of the land. Those who th‎ink they can silence me are mistaken. I am a person who is not perturbed by things like this.

    “Let them wait till 2018 when I will finish my term and I will be the one to go and meet them. I won’t run away and let them investigate the whole world, I have nothing to hide or fear,” he said.

    Fayose who vowed to  challenge the action appropriately.

  • FG will harmonise university tuition fees – Minister

    FG will harmonise university tuition fees – Minister

    The Federal Government will harmonise tuition fees in all federal universities to stop arbitrary charge of fees by some university authorities.

    The Minister of Education, Malam Adamu Adamu, made this known while fielding questions on the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) Forum in Abuja on Tuesday.

    “Since the protests started, we have summoned the authorities of the universities and sat down with them and we are going to harmonise everything.

    “Because, I think it is N45,000 that is the maximum that should be charged. I know in some places, there has been other arrangement.

    “But the ministry would harmonise everything and I believe there will be no more protests over fees, ” she said.

    NAN recalls that the Universities of Lagos, Ibadan and Port Harcourt were recently shut down following students’ protests over increase in fees, lack of water and power supply on the campuses.

    Adamu said that the Federal Government was discussing with management of the affected universities, adding that efforts were also ongoing to introduce harmonised fees for all federal universities.

    Adamu, who decried the excessive fees charged by private tertiary institutions in the country, explained that the government does not have the power to regulate fees in that sector.

    “First, I will agree with you that they charge exorbitant fees. But I wish I had the power to do something about it. If I had the power I would stop them.

    “But I think the thing is being treated like a market where you buy what you can afford. But I do believe the government should intervene, “he said.

    On the industrial peace that has prevailed in the education sector since the inception of the Buhari administration, Adamu attributed it to partnership with the unions.

    He stressed that the government would strengthen partnership with all the unions in the sector to sustain the existing industrial harmony.

    “ASUU and the other unions are very patriotic people who are concerned about the state of education in Nigeria. And most of what they do is motivated by this belief.

    “So, as far as I am concerned, they have got fellow travellers in this administration.

    “I believe the president and his ministers are really passionate about education. And they would want to do everything to make education succeed.

    “ASUU and the administration are going in the same line. So, we would not have a ground to disagree.

    “We are not waiting for unions to strike before we go to them. So, we are already making the approach to all the unions. So, I think there would be no strikes.

    The minister pledged government’s commitment to release N200 billion annually for the implementation of the NEEDS Assessment Report, to enhance the quality and standard of tertiary education.

    He added that fate of tertiary education depended on the full implementation of the NEEDS Assessment Report, which according to him, “this government is committed to deliver’’.

  • Looters beware

    Looters beware

    Federal Government owes the country a duty to ensure that all looted fund is recovered in the open

    When the Federal Government announced that another tranche of looted fund amounting to N31 billion  had been uncovered, Nigerians were happy that the war against corruption would be given effect. It was also expected that the Buhari administration that had promised to ensure good governance but appeared incapacitated by paucity of funds could after all take off with the money so recovered. Those interested in justice, too, looked forward to the arrest, arraignment and prosecution of the suspected looters who had, by their action, sent many to their early graves. However, suggestions by the presidency that the looters could be given soft landing are disquieting. We are surprised that so early in the life of this administration that held out so much promise during the election, a bleak prospect is being painted already.

    We warn that the alleged crime is neither against President Muhammadu Buhari nor the Federal Government. It is against the Nigerian state. The money involved belongs to the Nigerian state and people. Therefore, the government owes it to the entire public to handle all issues appertaining to the fund transparently. It is unbelievable that at a time like this, some Nigerians could constitute themselves into a cabal and embezzle what should have made section 14 of the constitution and the welfare provisions in the supreme law of the country relevant.

    The issues involved are too grave to be treated with a slap on the wrist. In a country where petty thieves are sentenced to more than 10 years for stealing goats, what justice is being promoted if plunderers of the treasury are told to go and sin no more?

    Plea bargain might not be strange to our law. It might have been introduced to ensure that cases do not drag on for too long. But, what was the essence of the new Administration of Criminal Justice Act? It is the duty of the three arms of government to ensure that enemies of state are given appropriate punishment. We note, too, that if plea bargain is to be entertained in whatever guise, it is not the responsibility of the executive to handle the transactions. Apart from putting the details in the public domain, the case must be charged to court to enable the judiciary adjudicate the matters. The lawyers have to come up with all the issues; we must be told all those involved and how much has been traced to each. It is not the duty of government to shield those who have bled the economy, rendering so many young Nigerians jobless and industries comatose.

    We recall a recent statement by the President that some of those responsible for the decadence of the system have been quietly returning their loot. We reiterate that this is unacceptable. It is not left for the looters to take action as and when they deem fit. It is not about their convenience, but Nigeria’s. We look forward to actions this administration would take in sanitising the justice sector- from arrest, to detention, arraignment, prosecution and sentencing. A lot has gone wrong over the years and now is the time we expect a government that prides itself as committed to effecting wholesale change to swing into action.

    Nigeria prides itself as a democracy. It lags far behind so many other countries, including some in Africa. It is therefore right that the people are fully brought into the picture as democracy is hinged on popular participation. The day is gone when a President could describe himself as the sovereign. The people are the kings. If the looting culture is to end, all those who treated themselves to opulence at the expense of the state should be appropriately handled.

    It is apposite to bring it to the attention of the incumbent administration that building a country- a democracy- is not hinged on strong men, but institutions, mechanisms and processes. This is the responsibility bestowed on it. Negotiating with suspected looters amount to a betrayal of the confidence reposed in the government and subversion of institutions of state. The day is long gone now when sloppy prosecution by anti-graft agencies could be contemplated and condoned. All agencies and institutions must be alive to their duties. Agencies such as the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) should patriotically handle their constitutionally assigned duties.

    President Buhari, the Federal Executive Council and the Attorney General of the Federation are key officials and agencies of state charged with ensuring that the end of justice is well served in the matter at hand and other similar loots. They must live up to their responsibilities.

  • The Buhari administration: Prospects and problems

    The Buhari administration: Prospects and problems

    It is said that thunder hardly strikes twice at the same spot. If the now civilianized former military ruler from Daura is remembered for little else, he will be memorialized as the man under whose watch thunder struck the Nigerian political firmament twice. It is no mean achievement. Let us now elaborate on this political conceit.

    In March 1984 and after the first hundred days of his first coming, it was clear that the lean ramrod straight infantry general meant exacting business. Now thirty one years apart, and after another hundred days of the new civilian regime headed by the selfsame but now retired general, Buhari has again shaken Nigeria to its political foundation. A brief historical detour is in order.

    At the close of the month of December 1983, a group of senior military officers led by Major General Mohamadu Buhari , as at then the General Officer commanding the Third Division of the Nigerian Army based in Jos, overthrew the  civilian regime headed by Alhaji Shehu Aliyu Shagari. There was widespread jubilation and applause across the length and breadth of the nation. The joyous mood of the nation was captured in the enraptured refrain: “Happy new year, and happy new regime!!”

    It is interesting to note that when Buhari was toppled twenty months later in a palace coup spearheaded by the then Chief of Army Staff, Major General Ibrahim Babangida, the applause, if any at all, was muted.  There was no general jubilation except among disaffected factions of the political class. As far as the general populace was concerned, it was a play of giants among military juggernauts in which Nigerians were nothing but spectral spectators.

    But as fate and divine destiny would have it, thirty years after his ouster by his colleagues, Buhari has been returned to power as a civilian after another major ruling class implosion and this time on the cusp of a pan-Nigerian revolt against corrupt and inept civilian rule. This was after three storied attempts in 2003, 2007 and 2011 which ended in tears and much gnashing of teeth.

    This time around, nothing could have stopped the Buhari momentum as it swept the cobwebs of elite mischief and ancient feuds before it. Never in Nigeria’s history has the national multitude rooted and rallied valiantly for one individual. Since no one can argue with a political volcano, the utterly remiss and renegade Nigerian ruling class quietly slunk away after one last ditch attempt to torpedo the entire process.

    It should be noted that the old military coalition which swept Buhari to power was an inchoate, contrary and contradictory amalgam comprising of careerists, rightwing power venders, professional coupists and a sprinkling of genuine nationalists officers. Very soon, the stress and strains began to manifest and it was clear to the discerning that a military showdown was all but inevitable.

    It was said that Alhaji Shehu Shagari, the ousted and absconding former civilian president, aborted his precipitate flight around Lafia upon learning of the headship and composition of the new military junta. It was not a revolution, so to say. It was an orderly revolt among military orderlies of the oligarchy.

    Demonstrating astonishing political virginity, General Buhari himself did not help matters. A devout  traditionalist obviously insulated from the then prevalent national mood and temperament, he addressed a press conference denouncing those who were insinuating that Alhaji Shagari was brought down to Lagos in chains. This was at a time when Shagari’s deputy, Alex Ekwueme, had been hauled into detention where he developed a beard that would make Nebuchadinazeer wince in fearful admiration.

    By the time Buhari was ousted, what was perceived as the less than evenhanded handling of the cases of corrupt self-enrichment and other sensitive national matters had cost the administration considerable elite sympathy particularly among the Southern factions. The powerful ASUU gave up after dismissing the junta as the military wing of the NPN.

    Wole Soyinka, soon to be ennobled—or ennobeled—was on fearsome rampage tearing the administration to pieces at every available forum. Two respected civil war stalwarts from the west tore into the administration. In a coup de grace, the inevitable General Obasanjo gave a lecture at UI in which he warned that Nigeria was not the exclusive property of a section and must not be so ruled. It was the beginning of the end.

    In retrospect, it can now be seen that just as the military amalgam that originally brought Buhari to power was inchoate and irredeemably conflictual, the civilian coalition that has brought him to power almost thirty two years after is even more inchoate, contradictory and roiling with mutually exclusive political tendencies. It has already occasioned much stress and tension in the polity. The senate is lost to a desperate counter-revolutionary group who do not care a hoot about Buhari’s messianic mission.

    It is only a mere hundred days into Buhari’s civilian administration and writs are already flying all over the place. Investigative organs are being legally defanged or disabled on a daily basis. The masses who are still solidly behind Buhari do not own either newspapers or electronic organs of counter-revolutionary dissemination of virulent nation-tearing propaganda and they can only watch in fearful dismay. It is obvious that if thunder can strike twice, so can retrogressive reaction.

    What remains is at this point is to take a prospective analysis of the balance of forces, the problems that may fatally entrap Buhari this time around as a result of certain persistent political peccadilloes and the political formations that will shape up in opposition to the retired general in all their structural, systemic, ideological and institutional dimensions. This should serve as a political primer and mnemonic device for the retired general as well as a handy manual for a chronically conflicted nation.

    In a brilliant, profoundly ironic comparison of the two Bonapartes, Karl Marx once observed that history often repeats itself, the first time as a tragedy and the second time as a farce. In an interesting gloss on this passage, Terry Eagleton, the notable Anglo-Irish Marxist literary theorist,  has noted that it was not just that Louis Bonaparte was a pathetic parody of his more illustrious uncle but that that was the way Napoleon Bonaparte himself would have appeared had he shown up around that time: A regressive caricature of his former self. In other words, time changes everything and change also must time itself.

    It is important to save General Buhari from becoming a self-parodying caricature of his former self. The first time he ruled Nigeria, it was as an absolute military autocrat with all the power, the symbolic aura and paraphernalia of military despotism. This time around as a civilian ruler, he can no longer tap into or avail himself of such wide, untrammeled powers. Military rule is passé and the international community abjures autocratic civilian rule.

    But besides all this, and much more importantly, the National Question, in the intervening decades, has been critically exacerbated and Nigeria has become a roiling cage of contrary nationalities clawing at each other to death.  The Nigerian post-colonial state is completely demystified and desacralized. Nothing is sacred or sacrosanct anymore.

    President Buhari should therefore not be surprised or miffed if every step he takes to bring succour and solace to Nigerians irrespective of tribe, creed or region is subject to stringent scrutiny and every appointment is viewed from ethnic, religious and regional prism. Many will cock a snook at him just for the fun of it. Others will try to derail him out of bitter primordial malice, and he cannot resort to extra-constitutional measures in a just bid to sanitize the nation without calling into question the fragile national fabric. The Nigeria political elites have never been this bitterly polarized.

    Yet it is a scary and precarious situation when a seeming revolution cannot employ revolutionary methods to deal with a historic mess. The former general just has to get on with the job within the circumscribed and constricting ambit of law and order.  Unlike the first time around when he was able to slam a tense somnolence on the nation by sheer military muscle, many more writs will erupt this time around as his sense of justice, evenhandedness and fair play is called into question by ethnic barons and ideological charlatans who have suddenly found their voice after keeping quiet when Jonathan’s misrule appeared to favour their section.

    However, one thing Buhari has going for him which his military regime did not enjoy is massive international support and global approval. Having helped to bleed Nigeria senseless through its tacit support for executive pickpockets, the west is now showing some remorse about the fate and tragedy of the greatest conglomeration of Black souls in the world. Buhari should be able to leverage this global opprobrium for looters of our national patrimony irrespective of their status as the internal battle against corrupt enrichment gets underway.

    But character is fate as the ancient Greek sages noted.  What may eventually derail President Buhari are certain character traits which may be admirable when viewed in isolation but which when viewed holistically may represent a classic instance of how personal virtues may become political handicaps in the ethnic hotbed and political bedlam of fractious nations.

    For example, Buhari’s contempt for the Nigerian political class is legendary .This contempt is well-deserved and shared by many patriotic Nigerians. But such was this contempt that the first time around,  it didn’t allow him to even contemplate a Transition Programme for a return of the country to civil rule. The enemies who would eventually oust him pounced on this.

    This time around, the same contempt is driving Buhari to throw the baby away with the birth water by stiffly ignoring the call for another look at the structural misalignment that has hobbled the nation’s march to authentic nationhood. The president sees it as mere political irritation but it may eventually be discovered that without this drastic structural surgery, good governance and probity may simply not be enough.  An opportunistic but expired faction of the political elite has already latched on to this as causus belli, knowing how it resonates with wide sections of the nation.

    The other problem is Buhari’s seeming inability to transcend a confining cultural and religious milieu. Nobody can grudge a man for his fidelity to the spiritual and cultural conditioning of his political habitus. This is in the nature of human acculturation. But to rule a fractious multi-national nation like Nigeria requires far more cosmopolitan gamesmanship and metropolitan expansiveness than the president has shown. No one is asking him to admit contrary elements into his inner spiritual chambers, but he needs to widen and broaden his political associations in order to avail himself of the political, economic and spiritual intelligence that he will need in the struggle to redeem Nigeria.

    If he has not been told, then he must be told that he could not have come to power without this .That critical political intelligence, economic surveillance, cultural patrolling and intellectual trouble shooting will be quite decisive as the battle to redeem Nigeria shapes up in the months ahead. The first time around, General Buhari did most things right, but left his military flanks exposed which proved fatal.

    This time around, President Buhari has been doing most things right while leaving his political flanks exposed which may prove equally lethal. The senate fiasco ought to have taught him a lesson. Even as the benefits of his nationalist reforms are beginning to kick in, he will still need a countervailing patriotic political cadre to shield him from political hyenas and to serve as the conduit pipe and transmission belt of a new national consciousness. It is morning yet after a mere hundred days and whatever the elite carping about posts and postings, Mohamadu Buhari is doing very well.

  • Catharsis before closure

    Catharsis before closure

    Aristotelian drama in Nigeria

    As the Buhari administration settles down to real business, the consequences of the last general elections are beginning to unfold before us in all their ungainly profile. Once again, elite division and disorientation are shaping up in their ethnic, cultural and regional particularities. We are beginning to see a sneak preview of the antagonistic forces that will shape up to, and shape in turn, the contours of the new regime.

    Let us get this clear. We have argued several times in this column that in inchoate colonial contraptions conveniently described as nations, elections do not resolve National Questions. At best, they sharply accelerate the national contradictions or at worse they exacerbate them. While the Nigerian masses are swooning over the dramatic improvement in some aspects of their daily existence, there is a resurgence of elite mischief over the seeming ethnic and regional insularity of the president.

    There is therefore a sense in which it can be argued that President Mohammadu Buhari is both the nemesis and saviour of the Nigerian ruling class. As nemesis, he must purge them and whip them historically into line. As saviour, he can redeem them and save the nation from ethical implosion.  On this crucial point, we can only conclude with the great historians of the past that in human societies, there are certain periods when certain exceptional individuals encapsulate the drama and cruel dilemmas of the age. It is beginning to look as if Buhari is such an individual.

    Going forward in divinely ordained reprieve from the hangman’s noose, or going into well-deserved oblivion as it seems to be the secret wish of some sections of its errant ruling class Nigeria, as we know it, is passing before our eyes. No matter what happens or does not happen, this country will never be the same again after the second coming of the man from Daura.

    We must revert to our favourite Lenin quote: “There are decades when nothing happens and there are weeks when decades happen”. The old iconic revolutionist should know, having earlier lost his own beloved brother to the Tsar’s implacably proactive executioners. Revolutions do not suddenly erupt on the stage, and in a jiffy. They are usually a chaotic combination of remote and immediate causes.

    But because revolutionary circumstances represent a radical rupture with the past, they are usually accompanied by much tempest and turmoil. The world is no longer at ease. There is a foul and fearsome distemper abroad. As the old ruling class expires before our very eyes and the long-suffering masses finally find their voice, there is fear and trembling in the land. A drama of restitution is playing itself out. It is a chain of actions and reactions the end of which no one can foresee.

    For decades, Nigeria has been roiling in an organic crisis of state and nationhood.  An organic crisis, as this column never tires of reminding us, occurs when the ruling class fails in a major national endeavour or its own self-imposed mission. From the current chaotic mess, it is obvious that the ruling class has failed in the project of giving Nigerians a sense of genuine nationhood and has been utterly remiss in the economic empowerment of the desperate citizenry. It has accordingly lost its raison d’etre.

    The failure of a particular ruling class is not the absolute historical tragedy it seems as long as there is a viable and coherent alternative to step into the void and vacuum. This is where the problem seems to lie at the moment. The old order is dead, but the new is taking its time to emerge from the womb of time. It is a revolutionary situation without genuine revolutionaries. President Buhari’s messianic populism may just not be enough and being a democratically elected leader, he cannot revert to the draconian despotism of old or seek revolutionary measures to handle the situation without provoking a nation-threatening backlash.

    Yet if the sanitisation of the policy is stalemated by a recourse to legal chicanery or by a combination of ethnic and religious blackmail by desperate factions of the political elite, Buhari may be panicked into losing the surefootedness and assurance with which he has proceeded so far. As the dazed and traumatised Nigerian populace continues to bray for vengeance and restitution , the Nigerian post-colonial state is besieged and embattled on many fronts by non-state actors. It is a novel situation which is structurally, systemically and ideologically different from Buhari’s first coming.

    It is just as well, then, that the trope from the stage and acting comes in handy at this point. There are moments when dramaturgy imitates life and there are moments when life itself is indistinguishable from compelling drama. At this point, the Nigerian post-colonial state and its restive denizens resemble a vast Aristotelian theatre as the action approaches a climax.

    May the good Lord bless the ancient Greek. They were a wise and sober lot. Their tragedies were in fact barely disguised ancient morality plays designed to inculcate certain morals particularly the virtues of rectitude, humility, decency and sobriety in the citizens of that glorious civilization. When exceptional men and women who owe much to the society are brought low by their fatal failings, they must pay restitution. This is the ideological principle on which dramatic tragedy is anchored.

    This is what is known as catharsis. Ordinary people shudder at the plight and fate of extraordinary people and are bound over to be of good conduct when they witness how great men can be unhorsed and brought down to bare earth. No tragedy is complete without this cathartic expurgation of unwholesome emotions and desires as a way of moral rearmament for the entire society. No crime against humanity, irrespective of the status of the person in society, will go undetected and unpunished by the stellar array of ancient gods no matter how long it takes.

    This is why those who urge President Buhari to move on without exacting restitution and justice on those who looted Nigeria dry are dead wrong and profoundly mistaken. The poor people of this country and those who are crying from their untimely graves will not be silenced until they have seen justice done. The large scale and unprecedented burglary of the Nigerian exchequer has put Nigeria in an ethical cul de sac from which it cannot emerge without wholesale cleansing of the land.

    There can be no untimely closure until there is timely catharsis. Even if this is what Buhari manages to achieve in four years, it shall be said of him that a man once came to this land who laid the foundation for good governance and moral rectitude. Without this ethical salvation, Nigeria is doomed as a viable nation.

    Democracy is usually an elite driven affair.  For a long time, this column has been warning the Nigerian ruling class to put its house in order and to get its act together.  In every sane and sober society, the political elites act as the glue that binds the whole nation together. But when they allow pressures from down below and from the margins to overwhelm the political architecture of a nation, the ruling class loses the initiative to hostile elements and everybody is imperiled.

    There is every possibility of mob rule and mob justice.  This is what should concern the organic intellectuals of a decadent and retrogressive ruling class and all those fanning the embers of religious and ethnic opposition to Buhari’s sanitising imperative. There will be no place to hide when the dam of popular fury breaks as the solid wall is already breached—if the foul public mood is to be believed.

    In retrospect it can be seen that the feckless and heedless Goodluck Jonathan ruled the country in deliberate political extremis as if he was convinced that after him the deluge would be such that Nigeria would cease to exist as a viable entity. In his complicated simple-mindedness, Jonathan might have decided that he would be the last ruler of Nigeria as a corporate entity if he didn’t have his way in ruling the country in perpetuity. Only this can explain the psychotic state larceny that took place under his watch.

    But having failed in this Samsonine option, having failed in his bid to bring the national roof crashing on his head, the former president and his hench-people must be ready to pay restitution to the land. It will be unfortunate if this looks like or is seen as ethnic and religious witch hunting. Jonathan could not have come to power based solely on the votes and sole endorsement of his ethnic nationality. He was elected on behalf of the Nigerian ruling class. In civilised climes, the ruling class sacrifices its own once they transgress certain bounds. Every now and then, as an English wag famously put it, an admiral is quartered to encourage others.

    However, it may well be the case that Jonathan ruled the country in political, religious and economic extremity as a result of sullen resentment against past and howling injustice in the land. If that injustice cannot be redressed without opening a Pandora’s Box or resorting to extra-constitutional measures, a case can be made for letting the poor man and his accomplices off the hook once restitution has been made and stolen money recovered.  A genuine foundation for justice and equity would have been laid and Nigeria can start on a clean slate.

    But it is an ethical quicksand for General Mohammadu Buhari which would require utmost political sagacity and statesmanship rather than unwise self-righteousness. It will also require him looking out of the cultural conditioning of his immediate habitus. How does he balance the demand for prompt and instant justice of a political mob that has sniffed blood with the delicate architecture of a multi-nation nation that has endured five and a half decades of serial abuse in the hands of various political and military hegemonies?

    Perhaps history will be very kind to the Daura born former infantry general. Twice in his lifetime, it has been the unfortunate lot of this man to be called upon to salvage a nation after a major ruling class implosion and at periods of revolutionary combustion.  The first time around, aborted catharsis occasioned by the failure of Buhari’s corrective mission in particular and military messianism in general led to a thirty year wandering in the political wilderness for the country. This time around, the nation’s tattered and thread worn fabric cannot endure such a historic rigmarole. The consequences will be more immediate and far more devastating.

  • Boosting non-oil export sector: An agenda for Buhari administration

    Boosting non-oil export sector: An agenda for Buhari administration

    Successive administrations have acknowledged that if the country must achieve its set goal of becoming one of the top 20 largest economies of the world, Nigeria must embrace and develop the non-oil export sector. It has also been generally observed that the country must develop the non-oil sector with resources from oil. The sustained volatility of world oil prices, the global tendency towards a diversified export based economy and the urgent need to expedite the process of economic growth and development has made it imperative that we either focus on non oil export or we regret it.

    From available statistics, only few countries of the world can match Nigeria’s endowment in natural resources. With an estimated population of over 160 million, and onshore and offshore that boast of some of the finest deposits of oil and natural gas, a rainforest belt that offers the best cash crops and hard wood and a savannah region with very large tones of oil seeds, coffee, chilies, spices and abundant solid mineral resources.  In fact, the opportunity that Nigeria offers investors in export is immense and irresistible. In spite of all these, Nigeria’s economy has remained largely monolithic with investment in non oil export sector being everything but strategic.

    There is no gain saying that any policy or strategy aimed at achieving the nation’s Vision 20 2020, this country’s economic recovery should, therefore, integrate the development of the non-oil export sector to play its desired role.  Indeed, only a purposeful and well-articulated non-oil export development policy that must form part of our general development plan can achieve such a goal.

     

    Export and National Development

    The close connection between international trade and development in developing countries cannot be over emphasised.  As a result, the pattern of trade, the institutions involved in it, and the strategies employed for maximising benefit as well as best terms of trade are of utmost importance to developing countries.  The importance of the trade sector to the economy of developing countries shows significant contribution of the export sector. Given the above scenario, there can be no significant development in Nigeria unless something is done about our non-oil export sector.

    The non-oil export sector, which has suffered neglect over the years, suffered a major setback as the total income generated from its export has been unstable. For example, the total earnings from non-oil exports dropped by 34 per cent in just one month, the latest economic report released by the Central Bank of Nigeria has indicated.

    A report recently obtained from Cenntral Bank of Nigeria (CBN) noted that the revenue fell by 34.8 per cent and 4.5 per cent below the levels in the preceding month and the corresponding month of 2013, respectively. The drop in the non-oil exports reflected, largely, the fall in the earnings from food products, manufacturing and industrial sectors.

    The report stated, “A breakdown by sectors showed that proceeds from agriculture, manufacturing, industrial, food products, minerals and transport sub-sectors stood at $658.32million, $115.47million, $71.61million, $11.82million, $9.82million and $68million. “The shares of agriculture, manufacturing, industrial, food products, minerals and transport sub-sectors in non-oil export proceeds were 75.92, 13.32, 8.26, 1.36, 1.13 and 0.01per cent.”

    The incentive regime has been very weak with only Export Expansion Grant occasionally working out of 12 incentives. Even the incentive that is working favours foreigners to the detriment of indigenous companies.

     

    Strategic Action Plan

    The new strategy being proposed by this paper is not a revolutionary concept, but rather an evolutionary one.

    The strategies earlier employed to boost the non-oil export capacity of Nigeria had all being anchored on one or more government agencies. This strategy proposes a progression of anchoring the strategy on a higher authority – the presidency.

    Taking a cue from Obama Export Initiative, there is need to constitute a NATIONAL STRATEGIC EXPORT COMMITTEE. The committee must be statutory and chaired by the President or the deputy. Other Public sector representatives must not be below the rank of Permanent Secretary. The bulk of the committee members will be private sector technocrats highly knowledgeable in the subject matter.

    This will further emphasise the sensitivity of non oil exports and the seriousness with which the government aims to tackle the much publicised diversification of the economic base of the nation in favour of non-oil export. The key function of the committee should be to formulate, monitor and review export plans, policies and targets to ensure compliance by operators.There should be sub-committees, which should meet more regularly to review the role of the sector and prepare inputs for quarterly meetings.To ensure continuity and stability, members should be allowed a minimum tenure of five years.

    This committee should also receive report of problems; fraudulent practices etc from both exporters and other operators, and make recommendations for solutions.  It should also be a one stop solution ground for exporters and all operators.The committee should take up the development of the service export sub-sector as a matter of national importance.

     

    Matters of urgent attention

    1.Introduce initiatives to improve conditions that directly affect the private sector’s ability to export by removing trade barriers abroad, by helping firms — especially small businesses overcome the hurdles to entering new export markets, by assisting with financing, and in general by pursuing a government-wide approach to export advocacy abroad, among other steps.

    2.Develop programmes designed to enhance export assistance to SMEs, including programmes that improve information and other technical assistance to first-time exporters and assist exporters in identifying new export opportunities in international markets.

    3.Revive all export incentive schemes currently not available to assist exporters. This is because these schemes will not run alone but will rather serve as the pivot for the success of other incentive schemes already in existence; that is why it is an evolutionary strategy.

    4.Promote services trade, including the necessary policy and export promotion tools. This has become necessary because the former incentives focus on agricultural products and manufacturing to the detriment of services and outsourcing in which Nigeria has comparative advantage.

     

    Other Recommendations

    In the face of unfavourable developments in the international oil market which is likely to be with us for some time to come, Nigeria must seek alternative exports or face the unhappy consequences of constantly reduced foreign exchange earnings.

     

    1. Activation of the commodity

    exchange

    In recognition of its dire need a commodity exchange was approved for Nigeria years ago; unfortunately, since its establishment the nation has not gained any benefit.  This absence of a commodity exchange has robbed the sub sector of growth opportunities.The inactivity of the commodity exchange market leaves all manners of characters in the trade and makes it possible for foreigners to get into the country and move directly to the farm gate to procure commodities by passing everybody in the commodity trading chain.

    As a result of all these, the pricing of Nigerian commodities since the scraping of the commodity Boards is governed by the laws of the market demand and supply. The ridiculous prices are either fixed by farmers and middlemen or by foreigners who wish to transfer funds out of the country.This leaves bona fide exporters out in the cold.  There are no signs that these outrageous domestic prices will abate hence the need for us to ensure as a matter of urgency the full take off of the commodity exchange market.

     

    2.Establishment of a National

    Institute For Export

    The international market is often described as ruthless, selective and fiercely competitive. In the face of the issues and difficulties associated with exporting, the personnel of an enterprise going into export must be trained to enable them handle the export functions effectively.They need to develop the necessary skills, knowledge and confidence to initiate and conclude export transactions.

    The truth about exporting is that the quality of your export is a reflection of the quality of your manpower.  The fact that we have not done so well in non-oil export is traceable to the absence of export education policy in the nation. Only one university in Nigeria offers a degree programme in International Trade. The absence of a national export institute has allowed charlatans to exploit exporters with sub standard training and ripped them office their scarce resources

     

    3.Establishment of Export Houses

    Export Houses are recognised secondary marketing channels for small and medium enterprises in export.  In Canada for example, 40 per cent of their exports outside the United States are contributed by Export Houses. Many developing countries have come to realise the need to have export houses to assist SMEs because of their numerous constraints.

    While large firms tend to possess necessary resources and skills to handle exporting in house, many small and mid-size manufacturers do not. Smaller firms tend to shy away from exporting, not only because of their limited resources and lack of knowledge regarding foreign markets, but also because of the perceived risk and uncertainty associated with overseas sales. As a result, during their initial stage of export involvement, they often need assistance from export intermediaries.

    Intermediaries perform an important economic function by linking individuals and firms that otherwise would not have been connected. Such a function is especially critical in export transactions characterised by the geographical and cultural separation between sellers and buyers. Usually dubbed ‘traders’, export intermediaries are specialised service firms whose mission is to bridge the gap between domestic manufacturers and foreign customers.

    Intermediaries can calm smaller manufacturers’ ‘fears’ about foreign markets by leveraging their knowledge about overseas markets and efficiency of selling products abroad. They economise on exporting costs, through their contacts, experience, specialisation and scale of operations, more efficiently than many manufacturers can achieve on their own. For the concept of an export management company to work, both parties must fully recognise the delegation of responsibilities; the costs associated with these activities; and the need for information sharing, cooperation, and mutual reliance.

     

    1. Evolving export-led Sme

    policies

     

    Just as recommended in the case of agriculture, it is imperative that SMEs’ policies have an export orientation at the point of conception.  This would culminate in the entrenchment of a wide-spread export culture in the country.  Experiences of industrialised countries have proven that small and medium scale enterprises are the pivot of exports as they account for at least 60 per cent of export activities. With SMEs in the centre of exports, repatriation of proceeds is guaranteed. It is recognition of this type of advantage that UNIDO has supported the Federal Ministry of Industries Trade and Investment in establishing and organising the Aba leather products-cluster.  This strategy should be extended to other products.

     

    1. Making poverty alleviation

    programmes export-led

    All the poverty alleviation programmes must have export as part of their strategies for national economic growth. For this to be possible, people at the helm of affairs in these institutions need to be exposed in order for them to see the need to integrate export in their policy formulation. The International Trade Centre has an Export lead Poverty Reduction Programme we can copy from

     

    Conclusion

    Nigeria is no doubt one of the most promising countries in Africa and its potential as a net exporter of agro industrial products, manufactures and services has never been in doubt and will continue to attract high interest from the international business community.  The main thrust of all the sectoral economic reform policies is aimed at:

    • Diversifying the economy in favour of non-oil export and poverty reduction activities
    • Adopting strategies aimed at integrating the economy into the globalised economic framework, using domestic competitiveness as a lunch-pad for reasserting the country’s position in the globalisation process.

    Result from the various interactive stakeholders meetings in the past has indicated the preparedness of the Nigerian private sector to accept the challenge of driving the nation’s economy. This acceptance is, however, predicated on the ability of government to provide the proverbial enabling environment. It is, therefore, in recognition of this that recommended solutions need to be vigorously pursued.

    In doing this also, the government must accept and act on the fact that a lot of financial investments must go into the creation of the necessary support structures towards making Export the hub of the nation’s economic development and growth

    ‘There can be no significant development in Nigeria unless something is done about our non-oil export sector… Only a purposeful and well-articulated non-oil export development policy that must form part of our general development plan can achieve such a goal’

     

    • Madu is CEO, Multimix Export House and Director-General, African Centre for Supply Chain.

     

  • Buhari administration requires  N4.1t for a start, says Oyegun

    Buhari administration requires N4.1t for a start, says Oyegun

    • Hints Senators may be asked  to pass bills at short notice

    The Muhammadu Buhari-led administration will require a minimum of N4.1 trillion to get the country going when it takes over power on Friday, the National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief John Odigie- Oyegun, said yesterday.

    The amount is for sundry expenses, including oil subsidy payment, arrears of salaries at federal and state levels and debt servicing.

    Oyegun, speaking in Abuja at the opening of a retreat for APC Senators-elect, said the N4.1 trillion, was  “against the background of the falling oil prices, the unprecedented $60-billion-dollar debt which the outgoing government has left for the incoming one, the largely depleted Excess Crude Account (ECA), the 60 billion dollars that have been lost in the last four years to crude oil theft (and which are perhaps still being lost as we speak), the need to rapidly create jobs for our teeming army of unemployed youths, enhance the security of the citizenry and improve the economy.”

    He said the present economic situation in the country requires “unparalleled commitment, uncommon patriotism, unprecedented hard work and indeed a reservoir of the innermost strength,” from the government and the governed.

    He said the situation also means that the Senators-elect “may, in the course of their duty be required to pass important bills at short notice,” during what he said would be one of the most challenging periods in the history of our nation.

    His words:”Make no mistake about it. The days ahead will be tough, and this is not crying wolf. From the first day of this government, a total of 4.1 trillion Naira will be required for sundry expenses, including oil subsidy payment, arrears of salaries at federal and state levels and debt servicing, just to mention a few.

    “This is not a lamentation forum but still, we must tell ourselves the truth about the state of the nation and the expectations of our people. In fact, to a number of our compatriots, by May 30th, a day after the swearing in of our President-elect, all the streets in Nigeria will be air conditioned, while electricity will become stable and fuel scarcity will be a thing of the past.

    “Yes, we will get there but it won’t happen overnight. You, our Senators-elect, will be called upon to take extraordinary actions to address the extraordinary challenges that confront our nation.

    “The incoming President, more than anyone else, needs the support and cooperation of the 8th National Assembly to fulfill his campaign promise to Nigerians.

    “You may be required to pass important bills at very short notices. This will not be unprecedented, but will require a buy-in to the programmes of the President and the party and willingness to work with him and the party for the benefit of all Nigerians. The demands on you will be tasking but you are up to the task!”

    He solicited the support of the senators-elect for the executive arm as “all eyes will be on our party – and by extension on all of you – to see if our government will walk its talk in terms of running a lean and effective government, one that eschews waste, corruption and indiscipline, and one that will harness the nation’s human, material and natural resources for the well being of the people.”

    But he warned that “there is no magic wand to make our economy better overnight,” adding: “against the realities on the ground, some of which I listed earlier, reviving our economy will be a long and tortuous process.

    “Bold decisions will need to be taken and this can only be possible if there is a synergy among our party, the National Assembly and the President. We know you will not fail us, and you will not fail Nigerians.”

    Drawing a parallel between Nigeria’s situation and the response of the Nobel Laureate for Physics, Dr. Albert Einstein, to a question posed to him in 1921, Odigie-Oyegun said: “He was asked: ‘Dr. Einstein, why is it that when the mind of man has stretched so far as to discover the structure of the atom, we have been unable to devise the political means to keep the atom from destroying us?’

    “His answer: ‘That is simple, my friend. It is because politics is more difficult than physics.’ Now that you know the nobility of the calling in which you have found yourselves, I am sure you will not hesitate to show that politicians too can solve problems.”

    Also addressing the forum, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar said the real battle  to change Nigeria, as canvassed by APC during the last electioneering campaigns, “is only about to begin.”

    “We have a lot of work to do and we must start immediately.”

    He gave three conditions required for the party to succeed.

    These, according to him, are: “the Party, the Legislature and the Executive must work in concert rather than see one another as a competitor or rival.

    “Lawmaking for the overall good of our country requires that the Legislature, including the Senate, has the autonomy to discharge its legislative and oversight functions

    “For these to happen and be sustained, internal party democracy and electoral reforms are necessary to ensure that the people’s will always finds expression in governance.”

    Another party leader, Chief Audu Ogbe, said that for 30 years, the nation sat back and watched as the system decayed.

    But he was optimistic that the problems at hand are not beyond resolution.

    He said: “Politically, we are making progress, our democracy is growing. A sitting government is being replaced by an opposition government in Africa where such changes are rarely tolerated. It is indeed a fact for which Nigeria deserves commendation and from which we should derive self satisfaction.

    “After all, this year, 2015 was predicted to be our year of extinction. For this achievement, we have God in  heaven to thank and on earth, President Goodluck Jonathan.

    “It took courage to do what he did. Having arrived on the scene, we must now examine the terrain and the climate of the transition.

    “We can, without hesitation, say the climate is economically inclement and socially delicate. This period is going to be one of the most delicate in recent history.

    “Never have our people been more hopeful, more excited about good times to come, yet never has our economy been so fragile. Never have expectations been so high, yet reality so scary and cloudy.

    “Oil revenue are low, our foreign reserves dwindling, power supply is nowhere near stable, despite unbelievable investment figures in the sector. Gas pipelines keep getting blown so the repair contracts can keep flowing.

    “We have new figures for our GDP placing us at the top of the league in Africa, but we are soon to become the greatest contributor to world poverty. In another four years, especially in the north and by 2050, just 35 years from now, we will be the world’s third most populous nation with a population of 450 million.”

  • Implications of change manifesto (6)

    Implications of change manifesto (6)

    The Buhari administration, and by extension, those of all the governors and local governments of his party, must be subjected to monitoring of implementation of policies at all times

    The focus of last Sunday’s column was on the President-elect. Suggestions were made for his consideration as he prepares to assume the mantle of change in a country that had experienced more failure than success in the last few decades. The column reminded the new president that sustaining the integrity of the manifesto of change, upon which majority of Nigerians voted for him and his party, requires conciliatory attitude to those who did not vote for him. It also calls for an ever-present readiness on his part to restore national security, justice, rule of law, development-oriented economy, and an unflagging enthusiasm to fight corruption, the mother of the failure of the Nigerian State in the last four or more decades. Today’s piece, the last in the series on implications of Buhari/APC’s manifesto of change, is on the citizenry.

    It is instructive that political pundits and average citizens have started to acknowledge that Buhari/APC’s change manifesto was even before the election in tandem with citizens’ hunger for change, a complementarity that madeBuhari/APC’s victory over Jonathan/PDP seemingly predictable, once the APC primaries picked Buhari as the party’s presidential candidate. While INEC deserves to be commended for taking all risks to make the 2015 elections more free and fair than previous elections, it must be remembered that it is the decision of the people to exercise their sovereignty to choose the leader they prefer that, in the final analysis, gave Buhari and his party the electoral victory and the chance to change the culture of governance in the country in fundamental ways.

    The old saying that “citizens get the government they deserve” does not end with the power of citizens as voters to put a candidate or party of their choice in power as and when they feel they need to do so. In other words, citizens’ sovereignty does not terminate with electing a new government; it also includes an abiding obligation on the part of citizens to hold their leaders accountable for their policies and their conduct in office. Resolving to remain active in public life in the post-election era is the best way for citizens to assist the new government to fulfill its promise to bring political, social, and economic change to the polity and society. Any form of complacency on the part of the electorate or any attitude reminiscent of the feeling by voters that “we have done our part by voting them into power” can encourage bad behavior on the part of political leaders in power.

    In specific terms, there is much that citizens can do to support the process of change and also to protect the new government as it makes new policies capable of producing change in the polity, economy, and society.General Buhari’s integrity and love of probity in public life has become common knowledge to the extent that citizens believe he is capable of bringing out a rabbit from his hat with respect to most of the problems facing the country. As honest and resolute as he may be, he still needs the patience of citizens as he embarks on his mission of change as from next week.

    For change to be meaningful and effective, it is not only the way Nigeria has been governed that has to be changed; so must the sloppy attitude induced in citizens to public life over the years by public officers and civil servants who were deficit in terms of public spiritedness also requires change. Citizens in the workplace and in public space have also for decades been habituated to the culture of nonchalance,personalism, and patronage. Because of uncaring governments over the years, citizens have learnt how to feel unperturbed with conducting themselves as if they are local governments unto to themselves, such that many frown at paying their fair share of taxes on the basis that such revenue is more likely to be stolen by public officials and their bureaucrats. In the context of decline in revenue from petroleum, citizens need to perform enthusiastically their primary duty to government, prompt payment of tax.

    However, they need to invoke the principle of he who pays the piper monitors the relevance of the tune by becoming enthusiastic about their other role: engaging public officials and political leaders on issues of national, state, or community interest. The Buhari administration, and by extension, those of all the governors and local governments of his party, must be subjected to monitoring of implementation of policies at all times. It is too risky to stay aloof and wait for another four years to invoke citizen power in a democracy. Individuals and groups should play the role of civil society (putting pressure on their leaders to do right), without necessarily imbibing the careerism and entrepreneurship of what has become in the global periphery professionalization of civil society organizations or what critics in many African countries refer to as NGOISM, belief in the possibility of making a career in and with non-governmental organizations, particularly those that live off external funding.

    Despite the absence of triumphalism on the part of General Buhari and some of his party leaders, it is common knowledge that the traditional and social media are overflowing with triumphalist pronouncements. It is, for example, puerile for any group or party leaders to engage in self-celebration about how they won the last election while emphasis should be on how to use the victory to advantage. It is common knowledge that political parties in democracies win elections because citizens vote for them. Party enthusiasts who have to beat their chests for winning should keep such self-celebration in-house. Ordinarily, it should be the losing party that needs to console themselves with stories of how they lost. What supporters need to learn now is how to maintain constant vigilance and support of their party men and women in power as from May 29 while always respecting rights of those with different political views and affiliations who have to play the role of official and informal opposition. The focus should be on change, not on distractions.

    In the framework of separation of powers, it is not just the executive at every level of governance that citizens need to watch. They also need to monitor the legislature and the judiciary, to ensure they maintain the independence required of each branch of government. During the decades of military dictatorship, citizens had come to see government only in terms of those who perform executive functions. This mentality was carried into the post-military era to the extent that the legislature at all levels in the last sixteen years was virtually left on its own.

    Otherwise, how could lawmakers have been able to get away with giving themselves higher salaries than their counterparts in richer and more advanced countries of the world? How could lawmakers at the federal level get away with adding executive functions to their role in the name of constituency projects that generally got monetized for them? Despite receiving generous constituency allowances, most legislators at the center did not have functioning offices in their constituencies and had no consultative sessions with their constituents. And despite the provision in the constitution for citizens to call their elected representatives in the National Assembly to order, this did not happen in sixteen years. Citizens have to hold their lawmakers accountable by engaging them or protesting against them, if they try to avoid such engagement. No state governor should be allowed to avoid conducting local government elections as and when due, just as no governor should be allowed to tamper with funds earmarked for local governments.

    Finally, the absence of work ethics and general lack of discipline on the part of workers during regimes of self-interest need to worry every citizen as the country enters the moment of change. For too long, Nigeria had lived off easy money from petroleum to the point that the average citizen has come to believe in miracles, in the possibility that working hard and well is not a prerequisite for promotion and recognition in public service. Using having a job in government to ask for bribe before providing service to citizens will damage the reputation of the party of change. With the new regime, citizens must insist on restoration of the culture of honest delivery of public service, if they want the ideology of change to improve quality of life for all in our new country.

    Concluded