Tag: BUHARI

  • Why power supply improved under Buhari, by Nebo

    Why power supply improved under Buhari, by Nebo

    Former Power Minister Prof. Chinedu Nebo has attributed the nation’s improved power supply to efforts of former President Goodluck Jonathan.

    He argued that it would be wrong for Nigerians to attribute the improvement in power supply to President Muhammadu Buhari’s body language and his anti-corruption stance.

    The former minister, who served as the pioneer vice chancellor of the Federal University, Oye Ekiti (FUOYE) before he was appointed minister, said Jonathan did his best to transform the power sector, but was frustrated by saboteurs.

    Nebo spoke in Ikole Ekiti on Saturday, where he was conferred with an honorary chieftaincy title of the Atayese of Egbeoba kingdom by the Elekole, Oba Ajibade Adewumi Fasiku.

    The traditional ruler also honoured the ex-minister’s wife, Felicia, with the title of Yeye Atayese of Egbeoba kingdom.

    They were honoured for their contributions to the establishment of the FUOYE’s Faculty of Engineering in Ikole town during Nebo’s tenure.

    Nebo said:  “Some said it was Buhari’s body language that brought the improvement, but I didn’t know what they meant. You can see that these saboteurs have stopped regular bursting of the gas pipes that powered the electricity since President Buhari came on board. Some people did not want Jonathan to succeed.

    “Some of these people were doing this great disservice because they did not like President Jonathan. The regular supply is Jonathan’s

    labour. The present administration has not added any value to the sector and Nigerians must appreciate this.

    “President Buhari will do wonders if he strengthens embedded generation and built more infrastructure for transmission of power.

    “He should also change the threshold for licensing from one megawatt to five megawatts because the former has no incentive for investors and I believe Nigeria will leapfrog from 4,000 megawatts to something more appreciable, if this is done.”

    On the perceived marginalisation of the Southeast from key appointments made so far, Nebo appealed to the people of the zone to be patient with the President.

    He noted that the lopsidedness would be corrected in the next appointments.

    The Elekole said the conferment of the titles on Nebo and his wife was in acknowledgement of their contributions to the university and the town’s development.

  • Ijaw groups warns Buhari to be wary of Clark

    Ijaw groups warns Buhari to be wary of Clark

    President Muhammadu Buhari has been advised to be wary of Ijaw elder statesman, Chief Edwin Clark and investigate him for corrupt practices.

    The advice was contained in a statement issued by a non-government organisation; the Ijaw Justice Forum (IJF), signed by its President, Karona Etonye and Secretary, Ekenwan Akwagbe.

    The group lamented the comments attributed to Chief Clark last the week in which he cast aspersions on the immediate past Nigerian president, Dr Goodluck Jonathan.

    The Warri-based group recalled that Chief Clark’s comments were reminiscent of the sort of treatment he meted out to past governors of Delta state, from whose administrations he allegedly made immense gains.

  • Politics and Buhari’s ministers

    Politics and Buhari’s ministers

    On the surface, President Muhammadu Buhari’s 21 ministerial nominees are a study in technocracy and brilliance.  Some of them were governors who achieved renown; and others are either famous for the projects they undertook or the policies and programmes they enunciated. In all, the nominees look set to add value to the Buhari presidency. But there is no wow factor in the list, and no surprise. Most of them are quite known to us and to the president himself. Why did the president then have to wait for four full months to reveal this largely familiar list? Was it a reflection of the pawky caution and methodicalness many observers attribute to him, and which he himself boasted of? Or was it a reflection of his newly acquired habit of hesitations and tentativeness, that is, assuming we accurately read his actions and administrative style as a fast-paced revolutionary when he was head of state for some 20 months in the early 80s?

    The weight of evidence so far suggests that President Buhari is more indecisive than he is cautious. The two attributes are not the same. There is no one on the list of 21 whom he could not have engaged in a month, or with a little more diligence, even before he assumed office. All of them may not be politically exposed to all parts of the country, but there is none who is not exposed one way or the other to at least a small part of the country. Had the president not demonstrated clear reservations about the usefulness of federal ministers, reservations loudly expressed at international fora and which he wished he could get away with, it seems he could have secured their services in weeks rather than in painfully tortuous months.

    The ministerial list was an anticlimax, not to say a paradox. Only last month in France, the president had denigrated the office of minister.  But before then and even after, he had announced he was assembling the best team, and probably the best brains, to add value to his government and to join hands with him in redeeming, developing and remoulding the country. Could ministers whom he snorted were only a little better than noisemakers rise to the lofty height of reformers or an army of change agents executing his party’s change mantra? There cannot be a direct or simple answer. It must be assumed, however, that being a closet satirist and humorist, President Buhari merely likened ministers to noisemakers as part of his increasingly famous predilection for self-deprecating commentaries.

    At bottom, too, perhaps the president was never really comfortable with a packed and charged group of polemicists and ideologues — only that we never really noticed when he was military head of state. From his disparaging remarks on ministers and his laudatory appraisal of the pivotal role played by permanent secretaries, perhaps the president feels more comfortable with the top civil servants and what many withering years of bureaucratic attrition has turned them into — an assortment of ideologically disemboweled group of yes-men and dutiful conformists more anxious to keep their jobs than offer sometimes radically dissenting opinions. By the time the president finalises his list of ministerial nominees, the nation will be able to pass a firmer and more accurate judgement on the cabinet and the mindset of the man who assembled them. Preliminary assessment, however, suggests that in assembling his ministers, President Buhari was stimulated by indecision and other sentiments than by carefulness or methodicalness.

    Whether by design or accident, however, the president seems to have unleashed quite a few forces destined to shape his government now and in the future, as well as determine just how re-electable he will be a few years from now. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the Southwest. When the president made his first set of appointments, and it was widely judged as embarrassingly skewed in favour of the North, this column pointed out that he was inadvertently empowering a faction of the Southwest elite who bitterly opposed his election. That bitter faction had campaigned that the pro-Buhari faction was unwisely, slavishly and recklessly mortgaging the future of the South and, in particular, the Southwest. Though they lost the argument, and the Southwest embraced change, the narrowness of the first set of Buhari appointments, not to say the lack of ethnic diversity in the president’s kitchen cabinet, seemed to have armed the anti-Buhari faction of the Southwest political elite to voice their concerns to popular southern acclaim.

    For those who understand the nuances involved in the selection of the 21 ministerial nominees, the list seems capable of further fracturing the Southwest’s dominant and therefore triumphant elite. Here is why. It is well known that the Southwest’s political elite is divided into pro- and anti-Buhari tendencies. But what is not well known is the fact that even the pro-Buhari Southwest political elite is further divided into two stealthily conflicting groups. One group is radical, daring, pushy and enterprisingly and confidently ‘internationalist’, and the other is more amenable to President Buhari’s ways, less adventurous and questioning, somewhat isolationist, and anxious to serve without provoking tremors or ruffling too many feathers. The president prefers the latter and has included them in his first set of nominees. They may be intelligent and technocratic, but they will not rock the boat or dissent vigorously. Nor will they have masterful control over the Southwest, a control that was just beginning to accrete.

    As far as the first list is concerned, the president may have unwittingly empowered the anti-Buhari forces of the Southwest. This could yet prove fatal to both the president’s second term ambition and the country’s stability. Given the immense and, in some respects, unpopular concessions made by the Southwest to the Buhari project, the region’s radical elite needed to have something more substantial to show for all their efforts. In the event, the legislative leadership elections robbed them of that leverage, and in the ministerial appointments the radical internationalists of the Southwest’s pro-Buhari political elite may again have been left holding the short end of the stick. This could leave the Buhari presidency bereft of powerful defenders in the continuing national contest for political space and control. It may not be obvious, but the ultimatum given to President Buhari over the rampage of suspected Fulani herdsmen, and the hint of self-determination given by Yoruba leaders last Thursday, may be a reflection of the budding alienation being felt by the Yoruba, an alienation that seems to be underscored by the shortcomings of the legislative leadership elections, the skewed Buhari appointments, and the structure and temper of the ministerial list.

    What is even more evident from the ministerial list is the general indication of absence of political strategies. The first tentative step towards re-election is often laid by ministerial and other presidency appointments. In both the presidency appointments and the cabinet list, there has been no deft political touch, one capable of rousing the country’s constituencies and herding them into the Buhari column. And by unreasonably delaying the list for four months, it enabled the anti-Buhari elements in many states to regain their composure and begin plotting the downfall of many of the nominees or thoroughly destabilise them. Though the problem is worse in the Southwest due to its peculiar and sometimes incomprehensible divisions and factions; the absence of political strategies and calculations in the list is no less noticeable in other parts of the country, especially the rest of the South. The ruling All Progressives Congress is riven by bitter dissent and conflicts, and the president has not demonstrated the courage or sagacity to tackle it aggressively. He has dilly-dallied over the Senator Bukola Saraki rebellion, while his wife, Aisha, even delegates responsibilities to Saraki’s wife, Toyin, who is under EFCC investigations. And while he has handled the anti-Boko Haram and anti-graft wars with aplomb, the other parts of the country have neither seen him nor felt his touch in the real sense of the word.

    President Buhari does not have as much time as he thinks he has. Worse, he appears to be laying suspect foundations for his re-election, or even behaving as if he is uninterested. If he is truly uninterested in re-election, surely his party, which has made a hash of intra-party politics, cannot be uninterested. Nigerians must not only see and feel the politics in President Buhari’s cabinet, just as they want to see and feel his performance, they must also have assurance that the man they voted into office possesses the highest qualities and strength of character of a patriot, nationalist and tactician. So far neither the cabinet list nor his appointments have shown any of those attributes.

  • Tinubu not under security watch, says presidency

    Tinubu not under security watch, says presidency

    The Presidency last night said a leader of the All Progressives Congress( APC), Asiwaju Bola Tinubu is not under watch by any security agency.

    It also said there is no strain in the relationship between President Muhammadu Buhari and Asiwaju Tinubu.

    It said it was unaware of any plot against Buhari by Tinubu.

    The Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Mallam Garba Shehu, who made the clarifications in a statement in Abuja, said such insinuations by a newspaper were products of perverted logic.

    The government warned Nigerians against falling victims of such mischief.

    Shehu said: “The attention of the Presidency has been drawn to a false and sensational story by a leading newspaper to the effect that a pillar of the governing party, the All Progressives Congress, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu is “under security watch over alleged plot against Buhari.”

    “Nigerians are hereby advised to ignore this story because it is false and baseless.

    We wish to confirm without any equivocation that the Asiwaju is not of any particular interest to any arm of the security services.

    “The relationship between him and the President cannot be better than it is at the moment.

    “According to the perverted logic of the newspaper, the respected leader of the APC is into a plot against the leader of the country. The presidency is unaware of any such plots against the President.”

    Shehu explained that heads of security agencies in the country confirmed that they were unaware of Tinubu being under surveillance.

    Shehu added: “I got on the phone a short while ago with General Babagana Munguno, (Rtd), the National Security Adviser and the Director-General of the SSS, Lawal Daura who both dismissed the published reports as acts of pure mischief. They are not aware of the Asiwaju being on any kind of watch.

    “It would appear that a competition is on between two or three newspaper establishments on how best to breach the excellent relationship between the pillars of our party and government.
    ” So far, they have not made a headway and there is no indication that they will succeed in the future.

    “It suffices to say that such reports, written without fairness and balance can only take away from whatever is left of the credibility of these newspapers. The general public is hereby advised to ignore them on these reports.”

  • ACF backs Buhari on recovery of stolen funds

    ACF backs Buhari on recovery of stolen funds

    The Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) has supported President Muhammadu Buhari on the steps taken by his administration to recover stolen public funds.

    It described as appropriate and timely, the steps taken by the Federal Government to investigate and prosecute those who have stolen public funds, saying the method would “sanitise the system and revive prudence and discipline among public officers”.

    The northern socio-cultural group hailed the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Germany, France and other western nations for helping Nigeria to track down, recover and repatriate stolen funds.

    The ACF Board of Trustees headed by elder statesman, Mallam Adamu M. Fika, made the observations yesterday in Kaduna at the end of its meeting with members from the 19 northern states.

    Fika, who is also the Wazirin Fika, in a statement noted that “the meeting therefore applauded the international cooperation and support the Federal Government is receiving in the effort to recover and repatriate stolen funds.”

    The ACF said it noted with “dismay the recent embarrassing and divisive statements from elder statesmen, which are capable of causing disaffection among the various components of Nigeria.”

    It urged such elements to employ civility and caution in their utterances “for peace and harmony to prevail in our fledgling democracy.”

  • Buhari: why boosting national security remains our priority

    Buhari: why boosting national security remains our priority

    President Muhammadu Buhari said yesterday that improvements in national security remained the priority of his administration.

    He said other socio-economic initiatives could not be implemented without security.

    The President spoke during an audience with Britain’s Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Nicholas Houghton, at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    Buhari, in a statement by the Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina, reaffirmed his administration’s determination to end the Boko Haram insurgency.

    He said: “For a country to be efficiently administered, it must first be well secured because other social and economic initiatives cannot thrive in an atmosphere of insecurity.

    “An environment has to be secured before it can be rehabilitated. Nigeria has about 1.5 million internally-displaced persons and they need to be returned to their homes and brought out of trauma.

    “Their schools, hospitals, churches, mosques, farms and livelihoods have been destroyed by insurgents. If they are not catered for, the country may lose their loyalty.

    “When Boko Haram is pushed out and the environment is secured, normal life will be restored. This is what we are determined to do. Other things, such as farming, economic activities and social life will then return. Nigerians are quite enterprising.” The President said Nigeria appreciated Britain’s support for the retraining of its Armed Forces and asked for more assistance in other areas, such as logistics, equipment and intelligence.

    He solicited more international support for regional efforts to improve security in the Gulf of Guinea through which crude oil stolen from Nigeria was shipped.

    Gen. Houghton said the Buhari Presidency was a huge opportunity for Nigeria to make progress.

    He said he was impressed with the progress the country made in the war against terrorism under President Buhari and assured him that Britain would support the Federal Government’s efforts to end insurgency.

    “We will also help to ensure that the causes of insurgency are removed. Beyond the military dimension, we are interested in the stabilisation dimension,” the Chief of Defence Staff said.

    Addressing State House correspondents at the end of the meeting, he said: “We are ensuring that we optimise whatever support we can to give Nigeria. Primarily, my concern is in the security situation, in particular the war being waged by Boko Haram.

    “I think that Nigerian armed forces have made progress in the last few months in pushing Boko Haram back, but as it comes to the end of the rainy season, I know that the President has got very strong ambitions to what he can achieve by Christmas.

  • Agenda for Buhari anti-corruption crusade

    SIR: When the last admini-stration of President Goodluck Jonathan came up with the economic jargon of rebasement which catapulted the Nigerian economy to the leading economy in Africa, we forgot to ask if corruption was also factored in as an economic index before they arrived at the alarming statistics that overnight changed the course of our economic prosperity.

    In the estimation of Nigerians, the Jonathan government was very guilty of corruption and the statement by the erstwhile president that his administration did not believe that jailing people would end corruption did not also help matters.

    Since the establishment of anti-corruption agencies in Nigeria during the President Olusegun Obasanjo administration, the issue of corruption and the fight against it has become the scorecard upon which Nigerians determine the performance of each administration.

    Although the Obasanjo government created the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the use of the agency to witch-hunt enemies of that administration did a lot of damage to the anti-corruption agency as it was widely seen as an attack dog of the president.

    In the administration of President Jonathan, the fact that the EFCC and Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC) could not make any significant prosecution of corrupt public officials gave the agencies away that they were toothless bulldogs.

    It was even speculated in different quarters that the decapitation of the anti-corruption agencies under the immediate past administration was deliberate, in order to provide some cover for senior government officials and friends of government who had compromised on the economy of the country.

    For far too long, Nigeria had been under the griping claws of corruption and, consequently, the prevailing political situation in the country had constituted an unpleasant jam jar and reached a proportion that Nigerians were beginning to lose hope in the country’s political leadership.

    Corruption has long been the bane of socio-economic cum infrastructural development in Nigeria. It can also be rightly said that corruption is so pervasive in Nigeria because of a culture of poor wages, absence of effective policy that softens the effect of poverty, weak government institutions and absence of key anti-corruption legislations.

    However, the new administration of President Muhammadu Buhari needs to understand that modern corruption has gone scientific, requiring scientific and institutional approaches in curbing it; there are many angles or dimensions to corruption. There are “political or government corruption”, “electoral corruption”, “legislated corruption”, “economic or financial corruption” and “civil corruption”.

    In all, it is shocking and alarming that those shouting “anti corruption” in Nigeria’s public offices as presently constituted are either do not understand its fundamental meaning or have chosen to use it  to deceive and mislead Nigerians for the  purpose of achieving cheap popularity and obtaining mechanical legitimacy.

    Freedom from corruption or fight against corruption connotes impeccability of character, sound morality and cleanest mindset. It is therefore important that the Buhari government should avoid corrupting its anti-corruption agencies and go to equity with clean hands. That is to say that President Muhammadu Buhari must live by firm example by not only being clean, but also seen to be clean.

    It is no doubt cheering news that the new administration of President Muhammadu Buhari has launched a renewed campaign against corruption.

    It is also cheering news that, there appears to be a kind of attitudinal reset in every government institution on the seriousness of the anti-corruption crusade.

     

    • Nuradeen Ishiaku,

    Abuja.

  • Lawyer faults opposition to Buhari as Petroleum minister

    Lawyer faults opposition to Buhari as Petroleum minister

    A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Sebastine Hon has faulted opposition to the decision by President Mohammadu Buhari to appoint himself as Petroleum Minister.

    Hon, in a statement, argued that the controversy generated by the President’s decision was unnecessary because the Constitution supports President Buhari’s position on the issue.

    Citing the provisions of Sections 5, 130, 147, 148 and 150 of the Constitution, Hon concluded that the President’s self appointment as Minister of Petroleum is moral, lawful, constitutional and valid.

  • Boosting national security our top priority – Buhari

    Boosting national security our top priority – Buhari

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Thursday said significant improvements in national security remained the topmost priority of his administration as other socio-economic initiatives cannot be successfully implemented without adequate security in the country.

    He spoke during an audience with Britain’s Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Sir Nicholas Houghton, at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    Buhari, in a statement issued by the Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina, also reaffirmed his administration’s determination to end the Boko Haram insurgency as quickly as possible.

    He said: “For a country to be efficiently administered, it must first be well secured because other social and economic initiatives cannot thrive in an atmosphere of insecurity.

    “An environment has to be secured before it can be rehabilitated. Nigeria currently has about 1.5 million internally displaced persons and they need to be returned to their homes and brought out of trauma.

    “Their schools, hospitals, churches, mosques, farms and livelihoods have been destroyed by insurgents. If they are not catered for, the country may lose their loyalty.

    “When Boko Haram is pushed out and the environment secured, normal life will be restored. That is what we are determined to do. Other things like farming, economic activities and social life will then return. Nigerians are quite enterprising,”

    The President said Nigeria appreciated Britain’s support for the retraining of its Armed Forces and asked for more assistance in other areas such as logistics, equipment and intelligence.

    He also called for more international support for regional efforts to improve security in the Gulf of Guinea through which crude oil stolen from Nigeria is shipped.

    In his remarks, Gen. Houghton said the Buhari Presidency was a huge opportunity for Nigeria to make progress.

    The UK Defence chief said he was very impressed with the progress Nigeria has made in the war against terrorism under President Buhari and assured the President that Britain will continue to support the Federal Government’s efforts to end the Boko Haram insurgency.

     

     

  • Buhari meets Saraki, Dogara, others in Aso Villa

    Buhari meets Saraki, Dogara, others in Aso Villa

    President Muhammadu Buhari last night met behind closed doors with the leaderships of the Senate and House of Representatives at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    Senate President Bukola Saraki and House Speaker  Yakubu Dogara, led the leadership of the two chambers to the State House.

    Other Senate leaders at the meeting included Majority Leader Ali Ndume;  Deputy Majority Leader Bala Ibn Na’Allah;  Minority Leader Godswill Akpabio and Minority Whip, Philip Aduda.

     Deputy Senate  President  Ike Ekweremadu was absent.

    Members from the House of Representatives  included  Deputy Speaker Yusuf Lasun; and  Leader Femi Gbajabiamila.

    They arrived at the First Lady’s Conference Hall venue in a convoy at about 8.45pm.

    The meeting started about 9.15pm when Buhari, Vice President Yemi Osinbajo and some top government officials arrived at the venue.

    Reporeters were barred from covering the meeting.

    Even though the agenda of the meeting was not made public, it was gathered that it was not unconnected with moves to resolve the crisis and reconcile Saraki with the leadership of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Saraki, who is being prosecuted by the Code of Conduct Tribunal for alleged false declaration of assets emerged the President of the Senate against the party’s wish.

    Another issue that might be tabled during the meeting is the plan by the President to send a supplementary budget to the National Assembly.

    The meeting was still in progress as of the time of filing this report,