Tag: cbn

  • CBN unveils IT standards for banks

    CBN unveils IT standards for banks

    The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) says it has released Information Technology (IT) standards to commercial banks to ensure quality service delivery in the banking system.

    In a circular to all banks last Thursday, the CBN said that the standards were in pursuant to the need to identify and adopt global IT standards for Nigerian banks.

    It said that the standards would serve as reference points to ensure quality IT service delivery through Infrastructure Transformation programme

    The circular added that the blueprints for the standards and the framework had been defined and released for adoption pending the completion and launch of the Bankers’ Committee IT Standards Portal.

    The apex bank said that the IT Standard Council would be reconstituted after two years and would drive the adoption, implementation and compliance to IT standards in the banking industry.

    The circular said that the compliance audit would begin at the end of the prescribed periods as indicated on the implementation roadmap.

    It said that the baseline assessment for ‘priority 1’ standards should be carried out in banks in first quart

  • CBN directs banks to pay 30% MPR on savings

    CBN directs banks to pay 30% MPR on savings

    The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has asked banks to pay a minimum of 30 per cent of Monetary Policy Rate (MPR) as interest on savings accounts.

    The order, contained in the Financial System Stability report issued by the regulator, is part of the ongoing efforts to improve the savings culture among the people.

    The report, endorsed by CBN Deputy Governor, Financial System Stability, Dr. Kingsley Moghalu said the MPR, which is the benchmark rate by which the apex bank determines interest rate, has been kept at 12 per cent since October 2012.

    Moghalu said interest rates were relatively stable in the money market during the first half of last year, though lower than their levels in the second half of 2012.

    He said the report showed average interbank call and open buyback (OBB) rates stood at 11.55 and 11.36 per cent during the review period, down from 13.44 and 12.87 per cent in the second half of 2012.

    The Deputy Governor said average term deposit rate also fell to 6.87 per cent, from 7.51 per cent in the second half of 2012. Also, prime and maximum lending rates fell by 0.43 a n d 0 . 3 4 p e r c e n t a g e p o i n t s to 16.58 and 24.18 per cent in the review period.

    Therefore, the spread between the maximum lending and the average term deposit rates stood at 17.31 percentage points, a 0.3 percentage point higher than the level in the second half of 2012.

    He said with the inflation rate at 8.4 per cent in June 2013, most deposit rates were negative in real terms, while lending and most money market rates were positive in real terms. The negative real rate of return on deposits acts as a disincentive to savings.

    “Thus, as part of the ongoing efforts to improve the savings culture, the CBN revised the Guide to Bank Charges requiring banks to pay a minimum of 30 per cent of MPR on savings accounts, among others,” he said.

    He explained that inflationary pressures moderated in the first half of 2013, partly in response to the tight monetary policy stance of the CBN and the stability in the supply of petroleum products.

    “Year-on-year headline inflation decelerated to 8.4 per cent in June 2013, from 12 per cent in December 2012. Also, core and food inflation declined to 5.5 and 9.6 per cent, from their respective rates of 13.7 and 10.2 per cent in December 2012,” he said while listing key risks to inflation in the short to medium term as possible accelerated fiscal releases in the latter part of the year and the upward review of electricity tariffs.

    He said the growth in money supply was sluggish in the first half of last year. “Broad money supply (M2), grew by 0.7 per cent to N15.5 trillion, compared with the growth of 14.8 per cent at the end of the preceding period.

    On an annualised basis, M2 grew by 1.4 per cent, compared with the indicative benchmark of 16.4 per cent for last fiscal year.

    “The growth in money supply reflected the 4.7 per cent rise in net domestic credit of the banking system, demand deposits (DD) declined by 11.2 and 2.3 per cent,” he said.

     

  • CBN, NDIC to quit NERFUND in October

    CBN, NDIC to quit NERFUND in October

    • Team still working on ‘N5.7b loss’

    Acombined team of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) officials managing the National Economic Reconstruction Fund (NERFUND) will quit in October, The Nation has learnt.

    The team was deployed in NERFUND on October 14, last year to revamp the agency following a N5.7 billion loss.

    The team appointed by the Ministry of Finance is headed by Muhammad Gidado Kollere of the NDIC as Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer. Mr Ihua Elenwor of the CBN is the Executive Director (Operations).

    It is involved in the recovery of outstanding loans, and reconciling all accounts with correspondent banks. It also renders quarterly report to the Board of the Fund, headed by the Permanent Secretary, Federal Ministry of Finance.

    An insider in NERFUND said the agency’s receivership is for one year, after which a substantive Managing Director will be appointed to replace the former one, Baba Maina Gimba, who left last year. The source said there was intense lobbying on who replaces Gimba. The new managing director, the source said, might not be an insider.

    The source also faulted the N5.7 billion loss, saying the total fund obtained by the body from government since inception was not up to N5.7 billion being declared as loss.

    The Fund received N2.8 billion in 2010, and $141 million from the Africa Development Bank (AfDB) at an exchange rate of N9.9 to a dollar, in 1991.

    NERFUND also got another N350 million loan from the Federal Government. The source said the cumulative funds, made available to NERFUND till date were below N4 billion.

    NERFUND was established by Decree No. 2 of 1989 to provide medium to long-term loans to participating banks (PBs) for on-lending to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) for the promotion and acceleration of productive activities in such enterprises.

    The government took over the Fund following President Goodluck Jonathan’s approval of the recommendations of the CBN and NDIC Joint Special Examination report on its books.

    It claimed that the capital invested in the institution by the Ministry of Finance had been eroded with the gross losses.

    The Fund, it was learnt, has not been able to service loans taken for on-lending from the AfDB, the Ministry of Finance and other sources.

    The source said the agency’s last governing board was dissolved in 1993, adding that it was being run by an Interim Management Committee headed by Permanent Secretary, Federal Ministry of Finance before the arrival of the new CBN/NDIC team.

     

     

     

    She said the firm has over time canvassed for reconstitution of its corporate governance board, recapitalisation and total restructuring. The spokesman said there were also previous plans to merge it with other Development Finance Institutions (DFIDs), which also failed.

    Conditions set for accessing the NERFUND Micro Enterprises Credit Scheme entails that prospecting businesses must be engaged in manufacturing, mining, quarrying, agro-allied, industrial support services, equipment leasing and other ancillary services.

    Besides, the enterprise should be wholly Nigerian owned and must source its raw materials for the project locally but could source plant and machinery either locally or from abroad. The projects to be financed must be financially and economically viable, and should have positive impact especially in employment creation in the operating environment.

    According to NERFUND statutes, the expected project could be a start-up, expansion, rehabilitation or diversification of existing business while the beneficiaries are expected to own 10 per cent equity of the proposed business. The prospective beneficiary must have a limited liability company or registered enterprise and can only access between N100,000 and N5 million.

    It further explained that the first step securing the loan is the identification of a bankable project, which is one that is technically feasible and commercially viable. Also, applications for funding are to be accompanied with a simple business plan attached with a pro forma invoice, stating the price and source of proposed plant and machinery.

     

  • Critical sectors need more investment, says ex-CBN director

    Critical sectors need more investment, says ex-CBN director

    A financial analyst, Titus Okorounmu, has advised the Federal Government to invest the 27 per cent earmarked for capital expenditure in the 2014 federal budget on critical sectors.

    Okorounmu, a former director at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), gave the suggestion in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos.

    NAN reports that of 27 per cent of the N4.6 trillion Federal Government budget for 2014 is earmarked for capital projects, while the recurrent expenditure is about 72 per cent.

    According to him, the government should set aside N500 million for small and medium businesses as part of ongoing economic transformation programme.

    “The small businesses should have access to this pool of funds to grow and develop the sector.

    ”It is a fact that the small businesses are the engine of growth and development in every economy,” he said.

    Okorounmu said that the government could expand the economy by rehabilitating the refineries and increase their current capacities to meet domestic demand for petroleum products.

    “The existing capacity can also be expanded and the excess of the products exported to some West African countries.

    “Since refineries in the sub region are not commensurate with the population of the region, automatically the countries are large markets for our products,” he said.

    Okorounmu also urged the government to introduce macroeconomic policies to support local manufacturers.

    “Indigenous manufacturers should be given some import duty waivers in order to crash their cost of production.

    “The waivers could come inform of machineries and equipment that support production,” he said.

     

  • GEJ vs. SLS!

    GEJ vs. SLS!

    By now, Nigerians must be sufficiently alarmed at latest turn in events over the ‘missing’ $49 billion. By this, I do not mean the frenetic pace of book reconciliation said to have brought the figure to $10.8 billion, or even the more shocking attempt by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to pass off the $10.8 billion as routine “expenses”. Rather, I am talking of the reported altercation between President Goodluck Jonathan and the rambunctious Central Bank of Nigeria Governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi.

    The story is that the President ordered – on phone – the CBN governor to hand in his letter of resignation. The latter, who had all along indicated his intention to proceed on his terminal leave effective March, had, according to the reports yet to be denied by the authorities, pointedly told the President that he would not be stampeded out of office. As if to give flesh to the story, the CBN governor would later be reported as convoking a ‘family meeting’ where he told his staff that he would now be staying put until the very last day of his term – in June!

    Understandably, opinions would remain divided over the question of whether Sanusi’s continuing stay in the office was still tenable in the aftermath of the finding by the reconciliation team that the ‘missing’ money was nowhere the $49 billion claimed in Sanusi’s September letter. Now, I have also heard that the letter was actually leaked to embarrass the President. The argument of course continues to go forth and backwards on the propriety of the government banker ‘squealing’ on the same government.

    Let me state that these are unusual times. It requires extraordinary times for the government’s top banker to write to the President alleging a whopping discrepancy of nearly $50 billion in the nation’s finances without the benefit of a formal acknowledgement of the latter for nearly the whole of three months. And more extraordinarily – we have since found out that the top banker didn’t even get his sums right before putting pen to paper on a subject that should ordinarily be within his remit!

    More intriguingly, now that the letter marked – KIV by the President– has now become the hot potato in street corners, the President appears to have resolved to kick the butt of the inveterate squealer – as against those of the outrageously inept, figure-juggling gate-keepers in the NNPC!

    No doubt, there is a tribe out there who would swear that Sanusi was disrespectful to the person and the office of the President. To this tribe, I guess it’s no use seeking to persuade them – or anyone for that matter – to be sober in their appraisal of the situation; not now after what is perceived to be Sanusi’s latest insolence against the person of the President. I guess its part of the notion of the Nigerian Presidency as the most powerful one on the face of the earth – something I describe as the Kabiyesi syndrome. It sums up to the notion of an all-knowing, unchallengeable institution, an illusion that continues to be sold and bought by many Nigerians.

    In this, I was drawn to re-read the typically illuminating piece by my brother and colleague, Segun Ayobolu with the title Transformational Power of the Nigerian presidency published December 28 last year. Although the subject was on the potentially transformative power of the office when properly deployed; he drew clear examples from the nation’s recent experience to illustrate how it has often been deployed more like a force for evil – rather than good. Today, when Nigerians talk about the power of the number one office, they hardly ever do so in the sense of the intendments of the constitution but in the context of wilting institutions or what is now the penchant by the incumbent to press state institutions in the service of ignoble causes. Yet, it is to the credit of the framers of the nation’s constitution that they actually inserted enough safeguards to guard against arbitrary use of power and to ensure that actors play by the rules.

    Much as the President’s ego may have been ruffled by the Sanusi indiscretion, he and his advisers ought to know that he cannot remove the CBN governor by executive fiat. I don’t think there is any dispute as to where the ultimate power resides. The CBN Act is explicit enough. Section 11(2)9F): “A person shall not remain a Governor, Deputy Governor or Director of the Bank if he is removed by the President – provided that the removal of the Governor shall be supported by two-thirds majority of the Senate praying that he be so removed”.

    Now, the danger of the misadventure of the past week is that the aura and authority of the office may have been damaged irreparably. More worrisome is that the two outsized egos would not give up until one side is thoroughly vanquished. And just when you begin to wonder what the whole fuss is about, you are reminded that it is not about getting people to account for the $10.8 billion which the creative fellows in the NNPC insist we pass to their imprest account, or the needed overhaul of the shambolic public finance system under which a corporation does as it pleases with the commonwealth.

    No; it’s as simple as GEJ vs. SLS!

    Where do we go from here? If you ask me, I’ll just say that the President blew the chance big time. Sanusi’s suspension – an extra-constitutional step by the way – may please the presidency’s hounds so ready to draw blood. May we also remind them there is something described as the rule of unanticipated behaviour in power relations? How about stoking a fire you can never accurately predict the extent of its conflagration?

    Have I canonised Saint Sanusi? Far from it. If you ask me, I think the whole thing smacks of disorderly conduct on his part. Why would the man not disappear after the extravagant goof if not for the mortal sin of impudence? So, he does not want to be disgraced from office? Since when did hubris become a badge of honour? And where is honour here: staying put when you are clearly unwanted? Since when did Sanusi begin to worry about his legacy of double standards? Is it now that his hypocritical posturing is being laid bare as his exit nears?

  • CBN approves Semenitari’s appointment as Unity Bank’s CEO

    CBN approves Semenitari’s appointment as Unity Bank’s CEO

    THE Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has approved the appointment of Mr. Henry James Semenitari as the new managing director/CEO of Unity Bank Plc.

    The approval was contained in a letter to the bank on January 9.

    Rislanudeen Muhammad had been the acting managing director since Ado Yakubu Wanka resigned in August, last year.

    Semenitari has banking experience in Operations, Internal Control, Commercial and Retail Banking, Consumer Banking, Corporate Banking (Energy), among others, acquired in his over 22-year career at First City Monument Bank (FCMB), Zenith Bank, Diamond Bank, United Bank for Africa, ACB International Bank and Continental Trust Bank.

  • Jonathan vs Sanusi: Stakeholders urge caution

    Jonathan vs Sanusi: Stakeholders urge caution

    The letter from the Central Bank Governor (CBN), Sanusi Lamido Sanusi alleging that $49.8 billion was not remitted by Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to the Federation Account raised dust last week. President Goodluck Jonathan’s advice that Sanusi should resign for allegedly leaking the document to former President Olusegun Obasanjo, has met with varied reactions, with stakeholders calling for truce, reports COLLINS NWEZE.

    Unprecedented. That was the simple interpretation a senior banker gave to President Goodluck Jonathan’s advice to the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi to resign.

    Jonathan had accused Sanusi of leaking a letter on the supposed non-remittance of $49.8 billion by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to the Federation Account to former President Olusegun Obasanjo. This formed part of the kernel of a scathing letter Obasanjo wrote to Jonathan.

    While denying the allegation, Sanusi was quoted to have rejected the President’s advice, arguing, quite rightly, that it would take the Senate’s two-thirds to sack him. Expectedly, the development has elicited varied reactions from across the divide.

    Many who spoke on the issue have called for caution on the part of the President in the interest of the economy. They said it was left for Sanusi to either take the advice or leave it, adding that the President lacks the power to kick him out.

    They referred to Section 11 Sub-section (2) (f) of the CBN Act of 2007, which stipulates that the CBN Governor cannot be removed by mere pronouncement of a president. The section gave the conditions under which the Governor can be removed, such as the Governor being convicted by a court; where he is declared bankrupt, or by the President after securing the backing of two-thirds majority of the Senate. “A person shall not remain a Governor, Deputy Governor or Director of the Bank if he is removed by the President: Provided that the removal of the Governor shall be supported by two-thirds majority of the Senate praying that he be so removed.”

    Chukwuemeka Eze, Lead Counsel, Eze & Associates, said President Jonathan is aware that Sanusi cannot be removed by mere advice. “The President cannot remove him and he knows. That is why he advised him to resign, and mind you, resignation is a voluntary act. The Governor can take the advice or decline. If the Governor says he is not leaving, there is no law that can remove him. Legally speaking, Sanusi’s tenure is sealed till June 2.”

    Eze said the best bet is to allow him serve out his tenure because the heat that will be generated by a continued debate on the matter would be more injurious to the economy than forcing him to go.

    However, Eze said based on the sensitive nature of his position in the economy, Sanusi should have, firstly, written the NNPC to reconcile the figures. If the NNPC failed to give him the needed response, then, he could notify the President.

    Ekene Odum, Senior Lecturer, Labour Law at the Lagos State University (LASU), said the CBN Governor was appointed by the President, and this takes effect after the Senate confirmation. “The President cannot just wake up and say Sanusi should go. The President can suspend him. He can be disciplined, but can’t be removed without the concur of the Senate,” he said.

    He admitted that as the Chief Economist of the Federation, the leaked letter was a major embarrassment, adding that the Governor was too hasty to write the President. “Such writing has the capacity to cause confusion in both the local and international markets. Still, it would have made Sanusi a hero were the figures gotten totally right. But he made a statement only the brave could make,” he said.

    He continued: “If it is confirmed that the President asked him to go, it will be an unfortunate scenario that could heat up the polity and economy. Remember that $49.8 billion is different from $10 billion. Still, $10 billion is a huge amount of money.”

    He said despite the stalemate, the President should allow him to do his job and not push him out of office, having performed creditably at the CBN.

    “It is human to err, but that should not take away his glory. Until he leaves, he still has the right to advise the President on economic matters, but whether such advice will be taken or not remains a different matter entirely. The President has technocrats that can advise him on economic matters, but to stampede or disgrace him out of office is not right,” he explained.

    Odum insisted that it was only during the military era that a sitting CBN Governor could be forced out of office, adding that there has never been any such precedence in constitutional democracy. “During the military era, yes, he could be forced out. But in the era of constitutional democracy, it has never happened,” he said.

    However, Dr. Austin Nweze, Senior Lecturer, Lagos Business School, said even though some people are lauding Sanusi for a job well done, he has caused a lot of problems for the economy, saying the President’s order that he quits is in order and should be respected.

    He said Sanusi should have confirmed the right figures on NNPC remittances before writing the President, adding that such attribute is unbecoming of the Central Bank Governor, the fallout of which will be a minus for the economy. “It is definitely going to affect the economy negatively,” he said.

    He said the Governor discouraged banks from taking business risks, which has affected the lenders’ drive for businesses. “He is long-overdue. The President should have sacked him three years ago. There is urgent need to rectify the damages he has done to the economy. If he leaves now, he will be the first CBN Governor to be sacked. What the President has told him is that he does not have confidence in him,” he said.

    Bismarck Rewane, Managing Director, Financial Derivatives Company Limited, said the President may not have told Sanusi to resign. According to him, Sanusi’s position remains strategic to the economy and if the President wanted to advise him to resign, it won’t be on the pages of a newspaper. “I don’t think that the government can say so. Until I am convinced, I won’t comment on the matter. I doubt the authenticity of the letter. I need to observe before commenting,” he said.

    Ademola Areago, a Constitutional lawyer based in Lagos, said if Sanusi must go, such act will lead to all kinds of signals. Firstly, such act will create feelings of political and economic instability in the country. “The CBN is banker to the Federal Government and the CBN Governor is also the Economic Adviser to the President. Now, if he bothers to give advice at all, what type will he be giving?,” he asked.

    Sanusi has the key to the strong room and vault of the country and the way he leaves is important. “The whole world is watching because it has not happened in any country before. The way the information was handled was wrong. It raises the issue of confidence and investors both local and international are watching,” he said.

    He argued that the fact that the President made his intention to remove him public is enough damage to the economy. That, he said, means that he is working against the President’s will.

    “This type of situation is unprecedented. He is not asking him to go because of inefficiency. For now, Sanusi is hanging on to the law. It will not be easy at all because the statement will be sending all sorts of signals,” he said.

     

    Chairman, Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Ikeja Branch, Monday Ubani, said the face-off portends great danger for the economy.

    He said Sanusi is in charge of the CBN’s vault and any altercation between him and the president is not healthy for the economy.

    Ubani said there is a breakdown of communication between President Jonathan and Sanusi, an indication that the apex bank’s helmsman may be frustrated about certain economic issues. “Sanusi does not want to be held accountable when something sinister happens to the economy. But President Jonathan must handle it with superior wisdom,” he said.

    The NBA boss agreed with Eze that Sanusi has the right not to resign because his position is tenured and must be allowed to run out. “Even if it is $1 billion that was found to be missing, there should be a ceasefire. President Jonathan should swallow his pride and allow the man to exhaust his tenure,” he said.

     

    The genesis of the problem

    The crisis started when Sanusi wrote the president alleging that $49.8 billion oil remittance that was supposed to have been paid by the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to the Federation Account was missing.

    This letter, it was alleged, drew the ire of the President Jonathan who directed Sanusi to resign for allegedly leaking his letter on the “missing $49.8billion” to ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo based on which the former president wrote a damning letter to him.

    The CBN governor allegedly denied any wrong doing, insisting that he would not be stampeded out of office. He insisted that it is only the Senate that could remove him and not a presidential fiat.

    It is believed that a statement by the CBN spokesman that the governor had told the workers that he would no longer proceed on a pre-retirement leave is a direct confirmation of Sanusi’s preparedness to stand on the point he made when he allegedly spoke with the president on phone. Presidency officials could not be reached for comments at the time of going to press.

     

    CBN reacts

    CBN spokesman Mr. Ugo Okoroafor has confirmed that Sanusi said he would no longer proceed on terminal leave at a “family meeting” with the bank’s staff. He spoke to reporters in Abuja on Sanusi’s tenure after a news conference on the execution of the bank’s Payment System Vision 2020 (PSV 2020) strategy.

     

     

    Implications for economy

    The implication of Sanusi’s forced resignation, analysts say, would be quite negative. First, a lot of foreign management partners will lose confidence in the management of the economy while the independence of the institutions that are part of the Central Bank and participating in economic management will equally be negatively affected.

    According to the Managing Director, SP&S Consulting, Debo Adebayo, reducing the power and independence of the CBN would send a signal of retrogression at a time others central banks are moving towards greater autonomy to enable them handle intricate financial crises.

    He said a strong economy anywhere is tied to the effectiveness of the conduct of its monetary policy. “You see, the monetary policy is a serious business; it could be very, very terrible to have a country where the monetary policy direction is doubtful. When a government subjects the conduct of monetary policy to political influence, you are not going to have a strong economy,” he explained.

    According to him, such development could hamper the effectiveness of monetary policy and the management of the macro-economic framework of the country. “The survival of the CBN is at the heart of the survival of the economy,”he warned.

     

    Swimming in controversial waters

    Appointed in the midst of 2009 debt crisis, Sanusi, 51, fired the chief executives of eight lenders within four months of taking office after an audit found evidence of mismanagement and reckless lending.

    His push for stability in the currency has helped bring inflation down to below eight per cent.

    But Sanusi’s actions have never strayed from controversy. He never stopped antagonising lawmakers by criticising their spending and courting controversy for his outspoken views, most recently on China’s role in Africa.

    In December 2010, lawmakers demanded his apology for saying a quarter of the government’s spending on overheads went to parliament and that was damaging for the economy. He refused, saying his estimates were correct.

    Again, two years ago, lawmakers attempted to whittle down the bank’s powers by proposing an amendment to CBN Act, hoping to strip him of his position as chairman of the bank’s board. They also pushed to include more external members on the board and have the National Assembly approve the bank’s budget.

    More recently, he criticised China’s role in Africa, saying it contributed to the “deindustrialisation and underdevelopment” in the world’s poorest continent. Africa must shake off its “romantic view of China” and see it as a competitor that’s “capable of the same forms of exploitation as the west,” Sanusi warned.

     

    CBN’s constitutional roles

    The CBN is empowered to maintain price stability and ensure a non-inflationary growth. It also has the responsibility to ensure a sound and stable financial system in addition to other developmental functions. These mandates and functions are peculiar to central banks across the world and no other institution plays such roles.

    These special responsibilities are enormous and have continued to pose increasing challenges to central banks largely because developments in the domestic and international economies create challenges in the financial systems and the art of central banking.

    Globalisation exemplified by economic and monetary unions has equally increased the challenges to central banking.

    Analysts insist that the effective discharge of these responsibilities requires that central banks be totally independent and shielded from political interferences.

     

    Sanusi’s successor

    According to Sanusi, whoever will be picked by President Jonathan to take over at the apex bank must be able to develop the market. “Central banking has changed. I think the market has developed. To be honest, if any Central Bank Governor misbehaves, the market punishes the economy immediately. So, the market is a major factor. Even as a governor, by the time your capital market crashes, and your currency goes down, you will know that it is either you restore stability, or you are out of the job. That’s important,” he said at a media conference held last month in Lagos.

    Analysts have tipped some of the CBN deputy governors among Sanusi’s likely successor. Deputy Governor, Operations, Tunde Lemo; Deputy Governor, Economic Policy, Sarah Alade; and Deputy Governor, Financial System Stability, Kingsley Moghalu have been mentioned. Also linked with the job are: Managing Director, Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), Mustafa Chike-Obi; Managing Director, FirstBank of Nigeria, Bisi Onasanya and Managing Director, Access Bank, Aigboje Aig-Imoukuede and recently, Minister of Trade and Investment, Olusegun Aganga.

    Analysts insist the next governor will probably have a different outlook or perspective, but one thing that is sure, remains that the fallout of the altercations between the President Jonathan and Sanusi may have just begun.

  • Banks begin Basel Capital Adequacy computation

    Banks begin Basel Capital Adequacy computation

    Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) are expected to start a parallel run of both Basel I and II minimum capital adequacy computation before the end of the month, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has said.

    In a report posted on its website, the CBN Director, Banking Supervision, Mrs Tokunbo Martins, said the full adoption of Basel II Accords will be executed by June but preliminary works would start soon.

    The Basel Accord is a financial analysis principle expected to give banks’ financials better credibility.

    Martins explained in a circular to all banks and discount houses on the implementation of Basel Accords in the country, that both policies specify approaches for quantifying the risk weighted assets for credit risk, market risk and operational risk for the purpose of determining regulatory capital.

    According to her, the computations are consistent with the requirements of Pillar I of Basel II, which is expected to ensure that banks have sufficient high quality capital to support their risk taking activities. The lenders are also expected to establish effective risk management systems commensurate with their level of operations.

    She said all banks and banking institutions are expected to adopt the basic approaches for the computation of capital requirements for credit risk, market risk and operational risk.

    “Within the first two years of the adoption of these approaches under Pillar I, it is hoped that an effective rating system would have developed in Nigeria. Banks and banking groups are projected to have gathered more reliable data and gained more experience that would prepare them to consider the adoption of more sophisticated approaches,” she said.

    The CBN chief said the adoption of the Standardised Approach for Operational Risk and other sophisticated approaches would, however, be subject to the approval of the CBN.

    “The guidance notes are applicable to all banks and banking groups licenced to operate in Nigeria and should be applied on a solo as well as a consolidated basis. The minimum capital requirement is retained at 10 per cent and 15 per cent for local and internationally active banks,” she said.

    She said in line with Basel II Pillar Two, banks are reminded of the importance of comprehensive risk management policies and processes that effectively identify, measure, monitor and control their risk exposures in addition to having appropriate board and senior management oversight.

    “Henceforth, banks are required to carry out their Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) on an annual basis, as at December 31, and forward copies of the report to the CBN for review,” she said.

    Experts said the global knowledge and expertise in Basel principles reduces the risks of getting things wrong adding that the adoption of the model will further enhance transparency and facilitate the restoration of investors’ confidence in the on-going efforts to sanitise and rebuild the financial services sector.

  • ‘Sanusi’s impending exit won’t affect key policies’

    ‘Sanusi’s impending exit won’t affect key policies’

    In a few months, Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor Lamido Sanusi will leave office. Will his exit affect banking policies? United Bank of Africa (UBA) Group Managing Director Mr Phillips Oduoza, in this interview with Capital Market Editor, Taofik Salako, does not think it will. The banking institution, he argues, is now so strong to withstand such a leadership change.

     

    Profile

     Institutions attended University of Lagos (UNILAG); Harvard Business School, USA.

     Qualification B.Sc (Hons), First Class, Civil Engineering, University of Lagos; MBA, University of Lagos; AMP, Harvard Business School..

     Previous position Executive Director, UBA; Executive Director, Diamond Bank; Deputy Managing Director, Reliance Bank..

     Present position Group Managing Director, UBA.

     Experience Over 27 years.

     

    There were several regulatory changes in 2013, how did they affect banking ?

    Yes, 2013 was a very challenging year for financial services institutions globally but especially in Nigeria. It was the first year we witnessed regulatory induced reduction in income lines and also regulatory induced increase in some funding costs came into operation. First, the Commission on Transactions (COT), which used to be at N5 per mille maximum, was reduced to a maximum of N3 per mille. As you know, COT is a major component of the income lines of banks. The second was the N100 that was charged by banks for Automated Teller Machine (ATM) usage when a different bank’s customer uses another ATM. This was also eliminated. In fact, not only that it was eliminated, if you don’t have many ATMs you will end up, as a bank, bearing that cost, because the debits were not going to the customers but to the bank. Significant portion of our deposits comes from savings deposits especially for banks like us that have been around for a very long time. And then savings interest rates increased from a maximum of one percent to 3.6 per cent minimum and that was a substantial cost for us.

    Most of these regulatory induced costs happened in the second quarter of last year. By third quarter, another major one came in. The cash reserve ratio for public sector deposits, was increased from 12 per cent to 50 per cent, meaning that for every N100 that you generate from public sector you must sterilise 50 per cent of the amount or keep N50 at zero yield. That was a very big cost for banks and for UBA.

    How did we deal with this as a bank? The first is that our African operations came into play immediately. All these initiatives basically affected the Nigerian market and they did not apply to the various African countries where we operate. UBA operates in 18 African countries outside Nigeria, so we intensified our activities in these countries. The income losses that we suffered in Nigeria, we try to make from our 18 African countries where our subsidiaries operate. So, the first strategy was to increase revenue from the various African countries. Luckily for us, we had finished the first phase of our African expansion by last year, and had entered the consolidation phase. Therefore, we deployed more resources; we made some changes at senior levels in the various African countries. We intensified activities in the area of remittances and intra-African trade and the non-interest income arriving from these activities were very substantial though not enough to completely cushion the impacts of all these changes in general.

    The second thing we did was to start ramping up on our electronic banking services. Electronic payment generates revenue for us arising from the card usage (point of sale usage) and other income associated with that. Card usage also reduced our costs as customers migrate transaction from the banking halls to electronic space. Serving customers using electronic banking, is just a fraction of what it actually cost you to serve the customers using the banking hall. So, increased electronic banking by our customers did two things for us, significant reduction in our operating cost and an increase in the income level.

    Our strategy number three was the strategic shift that we made from investment in government securities, in treasury bills, and related instruments, into quality asset creation. Our risk asset portfolio last year increased significantly as you are going to see when we release our 2013 full year results. We are focusing basically on emerging sectors, like telecommunications, the power sector oil and gas upstream, agriculture. UBA is probably the biggest lender in the power sector under the new power sector reform and we are going to do more this year. Agriculture remains a very big area for UBA. Today, it actually has about 7 per cent of our portfolio compared to the industry target of 4 percent. These were some of the strategies we adopted to cushion the impact of the crunch that we experienced last year.

    Would you then say it is more profitable to run banks outside Nigeria?

    Not really, it is quite profitable but I cannot say that it is more profitable. Today, Nigeria has the second largest economy in Sub-Sahara Africa. So, the Nigerian market is very huge and with the almost concluded rebasing of the GDP, will even be bigger, overtaking South Africa as Africa’s biggest economy. So, Nigeria still commands about 75 per cent of the bank’s total revenue with other African countries contributing about 25 per cent. However, going forward, our African subsidiaries will continue to increase the proportion of their contribution with a target of achieving a 50/50 between Nigeria and other African countries.

    One continuing debate is the high interest rates being charged by banks, why do we continue to have such roof-top rates?

    I also want a lower rate. But when you look at it, you find that banks are an integral part of the economy. The actual reason why interest rate is very high in Nigeria is because of infrastructure that are not there, the deposit rate may not be as high as you will think but the additional cost that go towards the generation of that deposit is very high. As we speak here, UBA has about four generators that run simultaneously. Each of them is 1,500 KVA. So this office alone is generating six megawatts. It’s a mini power station. Diesel consumption alone is extremely high. Each of the branches that UBA has is using has two generators. One is the main generator while the other is for standby. We have cards all over the world; we cannot afford to go down for one second. People are using our cards in Japan, South Africa and America. Therefore that infrastructure has to be there. If you go to our offices you will see a whole lot of security people that are in place. We have to pay for that.

    So all these are costs that if you have to remain in business you must bear. This is why interest rate is very high. The cost of taking care of the cash is also very high. If you go to the banking hall, you will see how the note counting machines break down every day. So you either replace them or get the people who repair them. You have tellers lined up. This why we are pushing cashless banking. As cashless banking takes firm root, you will find out that the cost of handling cash will go down significantly impacting positively on interest rates.

    If you compare the financials of the Nigerian banks with those of other emerging and frontier markets, the cost to income ratio of the Nigerian banks are in the 60s. Some extreme ones are in the 70s. All the other emerging markets like Turkey, like Malaysia and co, their cost income rations are in the 40s. So, if we are able to deal with all these cost elements, I can tell you that the interest rate can come down to single digit.

    What is your view on the power sector reforms?

    We regard the power sector reforms as a revolution just like what we have experienced in the telecommunication sector. The overall impact on the economy is going to be very significant. It will have a multiplier effect on the economy. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are going to benefit significantly. I believe that, starting from this year- 2014, we are going to start reaping the full benefits of the privatisation of the power sector.

    The supports to the power sector from us as a bank reflect our commitments to long-term financing. We believe these will provide steady cash flow and income for the period of that funding. Some of loans have five years, and some others are seven years tenor, and so over that period, the bank will continue to enjoy that revenue especially with the opportunities in the downstream end of the sector.

    UBA’s market consideration is trailing its peers in spite of commendable fundamental performance, do you think the market is under-pricing your stock?

    The market has not bought completely into our growth story. In 2011 when we cleaned up our books, we declared a loss which was very strange in this environment. I remember in 2012, I went to the stock exchange, met with stockbrokers, financial journalists and other players in the market and I addressed them. I told them that this is what UBA is doing. We were going to clean up our books and it was fallout of the 2008 crisis. The offshore banks did that, HSBC and other reputable international banks did that? In Nigeria, we were not doing that and we said no, we operate in major financial centres, we operate in London, we are monitored by the Financial Regulatory Services Authority(FSA), we operate in the New York and we are regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of Currencies, (OCC), we have a representative office in Paris. In addition to that, we operate in 19 other jurisdictions in Africa; therefore, we are not a Nigerian bank. Regulators in 22 countries are looking at us and we must do what is right and what is called the best global practice. So, we are going to write off all the loans- the ones we sold to Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), the ones that appeared to be distressed, we are going to write them off and then take them once at a go.

    When we presented that, people asked us, why do you want to do this? They told us we could write it off over a period of time but we said no. We insisted we had to do that. We believed that once we clean our books, we would now start the path of renewal. Stakeholders on the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) were initially alarmed. So, some people started selling their shares and UBA shares dropped to a low of N1.65. But some analysts saw the wisdom our decision and they started buying gradually and the share price of UBA moved from N1.60 to what it is now, in the region of N10. In the subsequent first quarter, UBA made a profit, second quarter, we made a profit and everybody started picking their shares. In 2012, UBA had the most appreciation in its share price in the stock market among financial services institutions and we closed 2012 with a return to profit.

    In 2013, the share price sustained its upward momentum and by December 2013, UBA has also seen the significant appreciation in the stock market. I believe the same thing will repeat itself in 2014. I also believe analyst will see UBA from a new perspective in 2014. Analysts will recognise that the bank’s growth has been sustained. If anything at all, the balance sheet is getting stronger. The profit margin is showing a significant improvement over and above competitors. So, I believe that an upward review of the bank’s rating is going to take place. Our current pricing is based on people’s memory not on our performance and prospects.

    Investors also lost a lot of money during the financial crisis, so a lot of them have not come back to the market and may not come back to the market for some time. There is definitely going to be an upward movement in our share price because our current performance shows that we are a bank to invest in.

    Now, how is your balance sheet like?

    The balance sheet of the bank is very robust. At the beginning of 2013, our loan-deposit ratio was about 38 per cent and that was about the lowest in the industry. We had substantial portion of our investments in government securities, treasury bills, bonds and associated instruments. So what we did was to gradually move from investment in securities into asset creation. UBA is one of the banks that have significant headroom to create risk assets. So even in 2014, we are going to see further increase in the risk asset book of the bank.

    The good thing about our risk assets creation is that we have created very top quality loans. Because before we made that strategic shift, we had to realign our risk management framework. The non-performing loans, NPL, for UBA remain one of the lowest in Nigeria. The previous year, for Nigeria, it was under one per cent and for the group as a whole, it was under three per cent. And this is within central bank’s limit of five per cent. So, we have lots of headroom, we have top quality risk assets and if you recall sometime in the past, we cleaned up our balanced sheets, realigned our positions and came up with a very decent book.

    Nigeria will appoint a new Central Bank Governor soon, what are your expectations?

    I’m not sure who is going to emerge as the new CBN Governor but whoever emerges, I do not think we are going to see a reversal in the key policies. These policies are working very well. For example, Nigeria is the only country among the emerging markets that has not suffered major currency depreciation for a long time. The inflation rate has been brought down to single digits. I don’t see any easing of the monetary policy rate. The cash-less policy has been very good and I believe it is something that should be embraced by all.

    This year, the cashless policy is going to roll out in all the states of the nation. I also see some flexibility in interest rates. One of the reasons why I believe there won’t be any easing in the monetary policy is because we are going into the election year. The pre-election spending is inflationary in nature and you will not ease the monetary policy when there is so much liquidity in the system. If anything at all, I believe we might experience some further tightening of the monetary policy. It is possible that the cash reserve ratio is going to go up further, not only for the public sector deposit but for also the private sector deposits and I believe that the CBN will continue to use its reserves to defend the local currency.

    There has been so much emphasis in recent time about UBA’s Project Alpha, what is this initiative really about?

    Project Alpha is our focused strategy for industry leadership across Africa, and it is a multi-year programme. The key elements of the project include; focusing on low cost deposits which are non-public sector, focus on customer appreciation and rapidly growing our customer base. We are also focused on intra Africa-trade, using our platforms in Africa to drive trade across Africa. We are focused on the remittance business and we are also focused on creation of third party quality risk assets, and customer service delivery is another aspect of the project.

    What we have done is that, having laid the components of project Alpha, we are focusing the resources that are required in delivering on the project. UBA is probably the only bank in Nigeria that has an executive director that is in charge of customer service and human resources, I don’t think there is any other bank that has that. So, we believe that for us to deliver on project Alpha, we must have people that are well motivated and well equipped with human management skills. A particular aspect of this is talent management and that is why the bank is attracting very good people and we are using them to drive Project Alpha. The second is customer service; we have seen the need for the re-alignment of our customer service delivery. Since 2013 we have been able to achieve some key parameters and by this year-end, we will achieve more milestones. In the next three years, we should be through with all the major milestones as mapped out in Project Alpha.

    Do you plan to further expand within Africa?

    Thanks, that is a very good question. When we started the Africa expansion, we decided to have a phased programme. We have just concluded the first phase which was to cover the key strategic markets in Africa. The only exception is Angola which is supposed to be a part of that phase but which has not been actualised. We are still reviewing our interest and strategy for Angola. However, we can we can say that we have completed the first phase of the expansion. We are now in the consolidation stage, which means you are not going to see further expansion from us across Africa for now until whenever we enter into the second phase, which is still far in the future and I probably will not be the one that will drive that expansion.

    Is there any plan to raise new capital this year?

    We do not have a reason to raise capital. When we raised capital, we use it to expand our presence in Africa and because we have completed that phase, there is no need for raising capital at this particular point in time. We will rather continue to consolidate our play in the various African countries and expect the revenue to come from these investments. Currently, we are expecting to crystallise the benefits from our investments in Africa.

    Your cost-to-income ratio appears quite high. What is responsible for this and how are you going to address this going forward?

    It is true that the cost-income-ratio is relatively high and I will explain why it looks so. The amount of money we have invested in Africa, if we were to bring that capital, put it in treasury bills, our performance today is going to be totally different. However, it is an investment in the future which is not pricing into our share price yet because investors are not looking long term. Fourteen of our African subsidiaries are making profit out of 18, apart from Nigeria. When all of them start operating at full steam starting from this year, the contribution will be totally different altogether.

    At the same time, we are writing off investments and amortising, and so we are bound to experience the current seemingly high cost-to-income ratio. We have recognised the expenses but the income will come in future. Already the cost-to-income ratio has been coming down. Don’t forget that in 2012, we closed with cost-to-income ratio of 78 per cent. First quarter of 2013, we came down to 65 per cent and in the second quarter, it had come down to 62 per cent and it has continued to reduce. Our ultimate objective is to come to 50s. It’s going to happen, very soon.

  • Three banks fail liquidity test

    Three banks fail liquidity test

    The liquidity stress test conducted on 23 banks by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) at the end of June showed that three lenders have problems.

    The CBN Financial Stability Report released at the weekend was okayed by the CBN Governor, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi.

    It said the industry liquidity ratio declined to 16.7 and 13.3 per cent after the five-day and cumulative 30-day shocks were applied, from the pre-shock position of 67.8 per cent.

    The liquidity ratios of most banks were below the regulatory threshold of 30.0 per cent for the five-day and cumulative 30-day scenarios.

    Similarly, three banks recorded negative liquidity ratios, following the application of a cumulative 30-day shock. However, the overall banking industry was resilient to liquidity shocks, though a few banks were found to be vulnerable.

    According to the report, the pre-shock liquidity ratios for the banking industry, large, medium and small banks rose by 14.14, 19.47, 3.15 and 3.07 percentage points to 69.70, 70.22, 75.45 and 68.47 per cent, compared with that of end of December 2012.

    “The banking industry was resilient to credit risk as the impact of the most severe credit risk shock (200 per cent rise in non performing loans, NPLs) resulted in Capital Adequacy Ratios (CARs) of 11.99 per cent, which was 1.99 percentage points above the 10 per cent threshold,” it said.

    According to the report, the large and medium banks were less vulnerable to the most severe shock, as they maintained CARs of 13.58 and 11.35 per cent. However, the small banks’ CAR deteriorated to 2.39 from 18.33 per cent, requiring N96.03 billion to raise their CAR to 10 per cent. Under this scenario, 11 banks maintained CARs above 10 per cent, six banks had between five and 10 per cent, three banks had less than five per cent but greater than zero per cent and three others recorded negative CARs

    It said the banking industry and the three peer groupings showed significant levels of concentration risk as indicated by the level of capital deterioration. “If the credit facilities of the five biggest corporate obligors were to deteriorate from “doubtful” to “lost”, the CARs of the banking industry, large, medium and small banks would decline from 18.69, 18.86, 18.25 and 18.33 per cent to 7.34 the banking industry resulted in the liquidity ratio falling to 33.48 per cent, though above the threshold of 30 per cent from 69.70 per cent,” it said.

    Also, large banks followed the same trajectory as their liquidity ratio deteriorated to 30.27 per cent from 70.22 per cent.

    “The medium and small banks showed more resilience as their liquidity ratios were 37.50 per cent for the medium and 45.37 per cent. Under this scenario, only five banks would be able to maintain CARs equal to or above 10 per cent, while the remaining 18 would record less than 10 per cent CAR,” it said.

    It said liquidity risk was moderate as the impact of a 10 per cent general runs on for the small banks, from 75.45 and 68.47 per cent. However, all the categories remained above the 30 per cent benchmark. The banking industry and the three peered banks were, therefore, resilient to the liquidity shock at the level indicated.

    Sanusi said in a statement that the efforts of the regulatory and fiscal authorities in addressing the challenges of the global economic and financial crises to achieve higher growth and employment were evident in the first half of last year.

    He said the projected weaker global demand, slower growth in key emerging markets and slow recovery of the Eurozone would require the monetary authorities to sustain the implementation of monetary and macro-prudential policies to achieve financial system stability.

    “The economy recorded some impressive macroeconomic achievements in the first half of 2013 despite some challenges. In specific terms, the country recorded strong GDP growth, single digit inflation, exchange rate stability, capital market recovery and growth in external reserves. As well, it maintained a stable banking system.

    However, oil production was less than expected owing to supply disruptions. Also, the high proportion of foreign portfolio investments (FPIs) in the financial markets presented a potential risk in the event of sudden capital reversals,” he said.