Tag: corruption

  • Corruption: Confession or conviction

    Those who have had the impunity, to steal audaciously, from our  common patrimony, in the recent past, must be laughing at the misery, of the rest of us. They will be happy that our elite,are locked down in battle, over who to prosecute, how to prosecute, where to prosecute, when to prosecute; while the looters association of Nigeria, whose membership dates back in time, celebrate their unbelievable respite, in the early reign of their old nemesis, President MuhammaduBuhari (PMB). But it is hoped, that this orchestrated din of confusion, is not allowed to suffocate what shouldbe, a national emergency.

    For the avoidance of doubt, what is at stake, is how to recover, as much of our common patrimony, as is possible, from a rapacious elite. Of course, the first step is to determine, who and who, were involved in the stealing. The proper process would involve the auditing or probe of relevant agencies or officials of government; except where there are clear cases of stealing, which can immediately be referred to a law enforcement agency, for investigation and prosecution. Ordinarily, this should not raise any dispute, but unfortunately many are already up in arms, with this first process.

    There is the dispute, between those that want the probe to be restricted to the President Goodluck Jonathan’s era and those that insist that the probe should go back in time, to 1999. The protagonists on both sides of this argument cut across the country, but for reasons that have not been properly canvassed, eminent legal icon, Professor Ben Nwabueze, claiming to represent an Igbo interest group, argues that to restrain to the probe to only the Jonathan era, would amount to a witch-hunt. While Prof is a preeminent Igbo son, I think it is unfair, unless he said so, to represent the view of his group, as the view of the Igbos, as some commentators have claimed.

    However, the issue of who the group represent, should not detract from the substance of their argument. For in conducting a probe or an audit of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), for instance, it has to stretch back to the last audit. And it will ridiculous, an abuse of office, and a criminal connivance, for any official of the state, to gloss over, cover, ignore or condone, a criminal infraction, just because they like the face of the President, who presided, at the time,any suspected sleaze, took place. But it is will unfair to argue for, and expect, that were glaring cases of humongous stealing has been established, against an official,who helped himself under the immediate past regime, that no trial should take place, unless a similar indictment and trial, of an official of the previous era, is also afoot.

    So, what Professor Nwabueze, and all lovers of due process of law, which incorporates fair and equitable treatment of all persons, should be on the watch out for, is any unfair and unequal treatment of all citizens, by the government of PMB, in the fight against corruption. That love for due process, must however, not involve, a premeditated obfuscation of the real issues; which is, how can Nigerians encourage and support the recovery of as much of our stolen common resources, as is possible, under PMB; who clearly got a democratic mandate, from Nigerians, to wrestle corruption to the ground. Unless the procedure is manifestly unfair, it should not matter, the tongue or tribe, of those who may be caught in the web.

    The attack on Bishop Hassan MatthewKukah, for daring to ask PMB, to take it easy, with the officials of former President Jonathan, even when all that has taken place are mere threats, has shown what majority of Nigerians, would ordinarily love to do to the looters. Mob action. In the past few days, the reputation of the nationally acclaimed cleric, has been shredded. As if his advice, can be equated to the 6 billion US dollars, allegedly stolen by one Minister, under the government of President Jonathan, the armada of our national opprobrium, against those that have perpetually placed our nation among the list of failing states, in the last three decades, have been unleashed on one of our national icons.

    Perhaps Bishop Kukah, was merely living up to his professional calling, by intervening on behalf of the regime of President Jonathan. As a priest of the Catholic Church, when a sinner confesses his sins, he is asked to make some restitution, not necessary in full measure, as the priest determines, the measure of atonement. But if indeed,half of the report in the media, concerning the enormity of the financial brigandage that took place under the regime of President Jonathanis true, then, then the type of contrition, which the Bishop by his vocation is used to, would not be enough. Short of a mob action, the type of restitution needed, would be a near complete restitution.

    But would the brigands who have ran a circle around our national life, give up without a serious fight. The chances are that, they won’t. That perhaps explains the tactical manoeuvre of PMB, to find the best possible way, to corner the rats that have eaten deep, into our national treasury. The challenge faced by this government, as to how to go about this national emergency, underscores the critical incompetence of our criminaljustice system. Most likely, PMB, appreciates this fundamental challenge. That may have informed his inauguration of a Presidential Advisory Committee, led by eminent Professorof law, Itse Sagay, and populated by fecund minds, to wriggle Nigeria, out of the quagmire. What PMB therefore needs, is our national support, not orchestrated confusion.

     

     

  • Corruption responsible for huge revenue loss, says Osinbajo

    Corruption responsible for huge revenue loss, says Osinbajo

    Vice President Yemi Osinbajo said yesterday that official corruption and privatisation of public enterprises have led to huge losses in public revenue.

    Osinbajo spoke at the 55th Annual Conference of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in Abuja.

    According to him, the penchant for graft was high and Nigerians spent a lot of time meant for creativity to pursue wealth.

    He said: “Official corruption and privatisation of public resources have caused massive losses in public revenue.

    “Indeed the truth is stranger than fiction in this matter of corruption in the public service. Dysfunctional government bureaucracies, waste and misallocation of resources.

    “A great deal of talent and enterprise that should focus on creativity and innovation is concentrated in wealth seeking activities,” he said.

    The Vice President also urged lawyers to find means of changing the public impression that justice could be bought and also remove the legal profession from all sorts of compromise.

    He noted that enforcing contracts and the general area of dispute resolution in the country were bugged down by “judicial process that is slow, burdensome and notoriously open to dilatory tactics.”

    Osinbajo went on: “Perhaps even more damaging to attracting investments is the largely and compelling narrative that Justice can be purchased.

    “This is a major problem of perception in our justice system and of cause a major problem of bringing business in the country. Even local investment suffers when there is a sense that the Justice system can be compromised.”

    The Vice President said that it was absolutely important that integrity in the judicial system is dealth with, just as the overall question of corruption is dealth with.

    He pointed out that if corruption is not handled squarely, the justice system will be so degraded that it will be practically impossible to get very much done or to encourage anyone to come into Nigerian economy.

    He advised the NBA members to find ways of ensuring that authentic dispute resolution were not caught up in the slow moving justice system.

    “Applications of all types in the civil courts to stop or delay arbitrary processes run their slow course in many business disputes. An economy that must provide jobs for 80 per cent of graduates from our universities and a youth unemployment population of 40 per cent cannot afford destructive delays in creating these wealth opportunities.” He said

    The Vice President said it was the plan of the administration to initiate consultations at the highest levels of government to re-write the story of the nation’s business environment.

    He listed some current challenges in power, infrastucture, employment, and monetary policies as he assured that the administration was committed to finding lasting solutions to them.

    A former President of the NBA, Mr Olisa Agbakoba, (SAN) said that the citizenry needed more action from the government to demonstrate the need for change in the country.

    He said the NBA was glad that government was talking tough on corruption and that the Association was ready to key into the programme.

    “One of the challenges we are posing to government is that we have had so much of talking on different issues. What we would now like to see is action.

    “So, if for instance you say you want to fight corruption, in what way? How will you be able to recover all the loot because access to that is easy? I think the essence of the conference is that when we leave here government can begin to take action that we can measure.

    “If you want to turn around poverty we can see so. If you want to see new jobs, NBA is demanding action from our government.’’ he said

    He said that it was not true that counsel were deliberately slowing down legal processes and said it was the responsibility of judges to speed up all legal matters.

     

  • Criminal justice bill ’ll reduce corruption’

    Criminal justice bill ’ll reduce corruption’

    The implementation of the ‘administration of Criminal Justice Bill’ passed signed into law by the last administration will assist President Muhammadu Buhari in his war against corruption, Speaker of the Kwara State House of Assembly Dr Ali Ahmad has said.

    Ahmad, who was the Chairman, House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary in the 7th Assembly, told reporters in Ilorin, the Kwara State capital, that the anti-corruption crusade will see the light of the day.

    The former University of Ilorin (UNILORIN) law teacher also urged President Buhair to name his Attorney General and Justice minister and put the structures in place to fight corruption.

    He said: “If he does not do that, I am afraid these lawyers are very smart, they will take charge and take advantage of loopholes and mess up the anti-corruption war. In six months those cases can be dispensed of, if we take advantage of the administration of criminal Justice Act, if he appoints an attorney general and implement the law.

    “The war on corruption in my view, in a political dispensation will be won this way: one in court as the president has said and two by following due process. In court, the federal government is now armed fully with laws and bills that it can channel towards corruption in a democratic dispensation.

    “The last legislature passed the Administration of Criminal Justice bill which was signed at the last moment of President Goodluck Jonathan. President Buhari should take full advantage  in implementing it.

    “If President Buhari does not implement this law, I am afraid, his war on corruption will be scuttled in the law court by senior lawyers. You are all aware that when you fill a case, lawyers will first of all challenge the jurisdiction, they will stall the case and it will go to the Supreme Court for seven years. President Buhari does not have that time. He has been assisted by the passage of the law. But that law needs to be implemented. The Attorney-General needs to be appointed immediately.

  • In the war against corruption effective prosecutions not probes are the ultimate weapons (2)

    In the war against corruption effective prosecutions not probes are the ultimate weapons (2)

    As promised at the end of this column last week, this concluding essay in our series on effective prosecutions versus probes as weapons in the war against corruption in our country will focus on the Administration of Justice Act of 2015. Most Nigerians, including lawyers, seem either to be totally unaware of the existence of this Act or if they are aware of its existence, do not seem to have a grasp of what it would take to make it work. It was for these reasons that in my concluding remarks last week, I promised to bring a prominent member of the Bar to the conversation with a view to publicizing through this column, the difference that this Act could make in the fight against corruption in our society. The lawyer that I will bring into this conversation is none other than Femi Falana, SAN. I am sure most readers of this piece would agree that he needs no introduction other than the following: Femi Falana is Femi Falana! Before bringing him into the conversation directly through his responses to three questions that I posed to him, permit me in a few paragraphs to provide a historical and political context for the short interview with Falana.

    In a way, in our seemingly unending war against corruption, the coming to power of Buhari in 2015 is very much like the coming to power of Murtala Ramat Mohammed exactly forty years ago in 1975. Within weeks of coming to power, Mohammed instituted probes into corruption and malpractices in virtually all areas of public life in the country, with specific application to the government from which he took over, that of General Yakubu Gowon and the continuing influence and authority of Gowon’s appointees both at the federal and state levels. Buhari has also announced that his “probe” will be limited to the administration of his predecessor, Goodluck Jonathan. Though he is yet to actually and concretely “deliver”, Buhari, again like Mohammed before him, inspires great confidence in the generality of the Nigerian people that in this “war” he is serious, that he “means business”. Finally, almost in the same manner in which Mohammed did not spare members of his own “party” – the military – in his anti-corruption war, Buhari has also stated that no one would spared in the probe of the period of the Jonathan administration; he has promised that governors and public officeholders of all parties would be probed.

    However, having noted these similarities between the two men in the war against corruption, we must not be uncritical and too quick in coming to the apparent conclusions that these analogies between Mohammed and Buhari might seem to indicate. Mohammed went far beyond probes to both summary dismissals and criminal prosecutions of identified wrongdoers. It astonished Nigerians and the whole world that soldiers could deal with themselves in the war against corruption. Especially, it delighted Nigerians to be shown concretely that no one was so powerful, so “connected” that he or she could not be touched, could not be held accountable for looting government monies and public assets. Thus, the “essence” of Mohammed’s legacy is that probes are not enough; they must be backed with effective action; they must end with restitution for the wronged and deterring punishment for the wrongdoer. Mohammed made many mistakes and created many enemies for himself in that “war” (as he did in the civil war proper); but he was absolutely insistent that restitution and punishment must follow exposure of corrupt practices through probes.

    As a moral and practical benchmark for Buhari, Mohammed’s legacy in the war against corruption is a tough and complex act to follow. As a military ruler, Mohammed could make summary dismissals; Buhari, as an elected civilian president, cannot. Compared to its colossal scale now, corruption in the time of Mohammed was not unmanageable. That was why, in the criminal prosecution of named and identified wrongdoers, Mohammed did not have senior and distinguished lawyers and judges who use perpetual stay of proceedings to block successful prosecution of looters to contend with; Buhari does. Moreover, they constitute the cream of the Nigerian legal profession. What Buhari has that Mohammed did not have is the Administration of Justice Act of 2015 – if he and his administration, with massive support from the Nigerian public, can make it work. And on this note, we move to the short interview with Femi Falana.

    Question: What is “revolutionary” about this Act? What are its key provisions that everyone should know about?

    Falana: With regard to the specific issue of the war against corruption, the Act has far-reaching provisions that will make it impossible to unduly delay or permanently prolong the prosecution of criminal suspects. To ensure speedy trial, objections shall not be taken in criminal proceedings on the ground of an imperfect charge. All objections shall be considered along with the substantive issues at the time of delivery of judgment. An application for stay of proceedings pending appeal will not be entertained as the trial of the defendant shall proceed from day-to-day until conclusion. Where day-to-day trial is impracticable, no party shall be entitled to more than five adjournments provided that the interval between each adjournment shall not exceed 14 working days. The elevation of a high court judge to the Court of Appeal will not delay trial as the Judge shall have dispensation to continue to hear and conclude any part-heard criminal matter within a reasonable time.

    To really appreciate how far-reaching these provisions are, we have to go back to where and how frustration of successful prosecution of criminal cases against the rich and the powerful started. In Nigeria under colonial rule, trial by jury was part of the criminal justice system. By 1960 when Nigeria became independent that tradition was continued. Trial by jury was however stopped in 1975 on allegations of abuse of the procedure by many jurors. The impact of the abolition was not immediately felt as Nigeria was then under a military dictatorship which decreed that criminal offences be tried summarily by courts and tribunals.

    However, ultimately, the abolition of the jury system historically led to undue delay in criminal cases in the regular courts which also have to deal with many civil cases. The delay of criminal cases reached ridiculously high proportions in the year 2000 when suspects charged with corruption in the high courts had their trials stayed to await the decision of the Supreme Court in the case challenging the validity of the Independent and Corrupt Practices Offences Commission Act. Although the law was upheld by the Supreme Court, the trial of cases which had been suspended could not commence as fresh objections were filed by the defendants. That was how the procedural practice of suspending trials via stay of proceedings was smuggled into the Nigerian criminal judicial order, ultimately becoming perfected as a system.

     The system, the practice has since continued to the huge detriment of criminal justice in Nigeria. It is pertinent to note that the defence lawyers engaged by politically exposed persons and other members of the ruling class to manipulate the criminal justice system are senior lawyers. To show how pernicious the system has become, it is important to note that “fat cats” who could not be tried locally in Nigeria have been successfully prosecuted abroad. This has exposed the Nigerian criminal justice system to ridicule internationally.

    Beyond the specific issue of the war against corruption, the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 also has other far-reaching provisions that deal with justice and fairness in general to all accused persons, especially those who are too poor, too powerless to “buy” justice. It is important to note here that Nigerian prisons are full of thousands upon thousands of inmates who are “awaiting trial”. Under the new law a suspect is entitled to consult a lawyer of his/her choice or free legal representation by the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria before making a statement. Arrest of innocent persons in lieu of suspects or on a civil wrong or breach of contract is prohibited. To ensure that violence is not unleashed on suspects during interrogation and to avoid trial within trial, confessional statements of suspects shall be recorded electronically.

     An officer in charge of any detention facility shall report to the nearest Magistrate the cases of all suspects arrested without warrant within a month. The reports shall be forwarded to the Criminal Justice Monitoring Committee. All places of detention other than a prison shall be inspected at least once a month by a chief magistrate within a territorial jurisdiction. The Comptroller-General of Prisons shall make returns every 90 days to the head of the court in which the prison is situated and to the Attorney-General of the Federation of all persons awaiting trial beyond 180 days from the date of arraignment. The Nigeria Police Force shall have a Central Criminal Records Registry while the Attorney-General of the Federation shall establish an electronic and manual database of all records of arrests.

    Question: How was it possible to have this Act passed? Who were the major players in having it passed? How did they manage to succeed in having it passed?

    Falana: Well, the bill for this Act was submitted after Lagos State passed the Administration of Criminal Justice Law of 2007 upon which, as a matter if fact, this 2015 Act is based. The paths to the enactment of both Acts are rather circuitous. Following the conviction of Ex-Governor of Delta State, Chief James Ibori in London on the same charges for which he had been unsuccessfully prosecuted in Nigeria, together with the reckless grant of stay of proceedings in many corruption cases, the Human Rights community mounted great pressure on the National Assembly to pass the bill. It was passed and signed into law by President Jonathan on May 13, 2015. So in a way, the credit must go to the Human Rights community. Incidentally, the current Vice President, Professor Yemi Osinbajo, was the Attorney General of Lagos State who shepherded the passage from bill to law of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law of Lagos State 2007. We should hope that he will have a special interest in the success of the Administration of Justice Act of 2015 as a major weapon in Buhari’s war on corruption.

    Question: In what ways can the provisions of this Act be made widely known and enforced? Who will be the key players in this task?

    Falana: No doubt, the Administration of Justice Act, 2015 which came into force on May 13, 2015 is a revolutionary intervention in the criminal justice sector in Nigeria. To ensure the success of the law the federal government has to provide adequate funding for the justice sector. However, the Human Rights community should mobilize the Nigerian people’s support the enforcement of the provisions of the Act, with special regard to both the successful prosecution criminal suspects that have stolen government monies and assets and the defense of the rights of all suspects, poor and rich, guaranteed by the law.

    Biodun Jeyifo                                                                                             bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu

  • Transparency, corruption and governance

    Given  the charming disposition, body  language  and warm smiles on our President‘s face as he receives reports from Federal Permanent Secretaries delegations in  Abuja recently, there  is no doubt  that he is  more at ease with civil  servants in governance  than politicians. That  to  me is an obvious  fact and has nothing to do  with the fact that he has not chosen his cabinet yet. Given his background and the fact that he served as a military  head of state before you  can  say  that is to  be  expected.

    For  a man  with a proven reputation for integrity  you  can even  concede that given the financial  mess he found on the ground on being elected he would  rather know the true state  of affairs  from the Permanent  Secretaries who as the Chief Administrative Officers in the Ministries are  also the bona  fide Chief  Executive  Officers in our public  service. The  danger  however  is that this  same set  of  Permanent  Secretaries  served the last government  that looted our treasury  very  diligently  and  cannot  like  Pontius  Pilate  was  their hands clean  of the looting  and rape of our  economy which the last  administration did  so  maliciously  and  majestically. Even  with  great impunity  as if tomorrow  will never come and detection  of such abysmal  crimes will never arise.

    My  contention  here is that transparency  is an inherent part  of the fight against corruption  and the present bunch  of Permanent  Secretaries  are just  incapable  of  it. Their  reports  should ipso  facto  be taken with  a pinch of salt by the president as they  cannot claim ignorance  of the various breaches of due processes that resulted  in the abysmal looting of our treasury. This has so much astounded  and  astonished  the president that he had  to cry out on the magnitude of the embezzlement  for all Nigerians to know and to assure them that he will not do much else until the culprits  have  been apprehended  and brought  to book. A    decision  which  has the approbation of all  Nigerians except the  looters,  their cronies, stooges and  beneficiaries  of their  atrocities.

    Ironically   and  unbelievably,  a  public  servant  like these permanent  secretaries blazed  a trail on transparency in public service  in  Nigeria this last week  and that person is a Nigerian. That person is  Amina  Zakari  the Acting Chairman  of  INEC, a lady  after my heart,  with  no romance intended,  but who by her revelations on the last 2015 elections  was a lesson  in vintage transparency   of   the type our president should look  out for  and reward  in his  lofty   and famous  tussle with corruption  in  our polity.  Zakari,  under attack  by the opposition PDP  not  to be confirmed as INEC boss  for  being purportedly  a relation of the president  went about her duty with great   aplomb  and candor.  She    announced that as at  now even after  the last 2015   elections, 10 m  voters  cards  have  not been collected by  registered  voters.  Which confirms  that INEC  disenfranchised 10 m  Nigerians  for  no just  cause   even  after  the postponement   and the Jega  affirmed  state  of readiness. This  fact  was  never revealed  by her former  boss  and  her  known    penchant for   truth  and frankness   must  have dissuaded her former  boss from recommending her as his    successor, as  he   chose someone else  before the  president  announced Zakari’s  name and Jega’s  choice  had  to go into limbo.

    Now  Zakari  has defined her  relationship with the president and debunked the in law issue. She  even  announced that some  44, 000 voters cards were  not delivered  at  all.  That  to  me is transparency  in the face of all odds and  regardless  of whose ox  is gored  including herself as INEC  boss. It  is such  a person that  all Nigerians should wish  to conduct  elections knowing that she  will say  the truth on the state of readiness  to conduct a free and fair elections and  receive wide  credibility in saying so.  That  really  is the catalyst   for  a real  democracy  as elections  are the engine  room of  any  viable and vibrant  democracy.

    Transparency  was on display  too at our legislature  this last week  but  it was  of a very disturbing type. The news  was that  our  Senators  and Representatives have shared N12.9bn in two months whereas  they  have not passed any bill  since they  opened  shop on June 9  and shocked  the nation  and the majority  party in the nation and legislature with a bizarre leadership election which the Police has now confirmed was   enacted  with  bent house rules. According to media reports the  109  Senators  got  N 36.4 m  each  and  the 360  members  of the House  of  Representatives  got N25m  each. While  one can commend  the legislators  for being transparent  in making their allowances  and emoluments  public one  cannot  but recoil in disgust  and annoyance  at  the huge amount  the legislators  are  paying  themselves. It  is even  more odious to recall  that they have rejected  a plea  by a Committee they set up in house  to review these same emoluments down wards. This  is a legislature that over the years have acquired  the dubious reputation of holding the executive by the jugular  over its  constitutional  duty of approving the budget. The  Nigerian legislature is noted  for asking the executive to jack up its budget to accommodate the  allowances of legislators and add it to the budget before approving. Whereas the duty of a worthwhile and really honorable  house is to cut national and budget costs  to  have a productive  and salutary  deficit. I  am  sure that when the budget is presented the legislators  will still  repeat the same chicanery  in spite  of what they have done just two  months  into their  tenure.

    It  is  necessary  to let  the legislators  know  that they are the elected representatives  of  the  Nigerian  nation and  people  to whom  they  are  accountable  every time and day  and not just at election time. Nigerians  are  hurting and are pained  by  the huge  and unrealistic amounts  our legislators are paying  themselves as if they live on the moon  and are not fellow Nigerians like those unfortunate enough to have elected them but whose   trust  they have now  betrayed by the amounts  they are paying themselves  for elective offices.

    They  should  know that they  do  not live in a vacuum and that their  present disposition is bound  to have serious repercussion given the present socio economic living conditions  of those  who elected them which are  quite harrowing as most live on subsistence  level. Meaning most  Nigerians live from  hand  to  mouth  and cannot comprehend why those they have just elected  can be earning over N20m  in  just   two  months after being elected to make laws which they  have  not found time to make. Certainly  the legislators  need to know that with such  emoluments in the midst  of so much  suffering they are virtually  getting away with  murder. For  how long they can do that is a matter  of conjecture and I  will  illustrate   from a childhood cartoon, with what  a Red  Indian Chief  told an American Officer in charge of the Indian Reservation Camp where the Officer  was  stealing the meat meant for the Indians and  giving them rotten meat instead. The Indian Chief  told the officer named Lang. ‘Believe  me Lang, my patience  grows thin. This rotten  carrion I  will  not  give to a dog. If  my people should  rise against  you in their  anger, it  were better that you and your kind had  never  been born. ‘A word  I think  is enough  for the  wise on this high legislators allowances and emoluments.   Again, long  live the Federal  Republic  of Nigeria.

  • Corruption: Before the prosecution starts

    SIR:  A few weeks ago, President Muhammadu Buhari promised Nigerians that the prosecution of those who have short-changed the country and have stolen our collective wealth will soon commence.

    In the past, there have been attempts at prosecuting persons perceived to be corrupt. Sadly, most of those trials achieved little results. Very few of them were diligently prosecuted to a logical conclusion, while the convicted criminals were usually given a pat on the back through the judgment of the courts. Otherwise, how does one explain the short prison sentences handed down by the courts, or the amounts the courts ask corrupt convicts to pay in lieu of a prison term, which is usually a far cry from what was  embezzled or stolen?

    The general feeling among Nigerians is that the current administration will be different in its fight against corruption.  In fact, the anti-corruption posture of the president was what endeared him to Nigerians during the elections. Their expectations are therefore are very high. What then can the administration do to sustain and maintain the goodwill it currently enjoys?

    In order to maintain and sustain the confidence of Nigerians, the fight against corruption should be total. In prosecuting corrupt individuals, the searchlight must go beyond the immediate past administration. From May 29th 1999 to May 29th 2015, there has been monumental embezzlement and the circulation of our collective patrimony by and among a selfish and greedy few. From 1960 to 1999, Nigeria reportedly lost $400 billion to corruption. Although there is no accurate figure, the country must have lost about $300 billion or more within the last 16 years.

    The prosecution of corrupt individuals should also not be limited to political office holders alone. The system is in dire need of a complete overhaul.  Anybody who has illegally eaten our yams must return them. Every institution of government should be cleansed.

    However, we will be merely scratching the surface if we are focused on fighting corruption by prosecuting corrupt individuals alone without tackling the root causes. There are multiple reasons why corruption thrives in Nigeria. These are (but not limited to): poverty, poor remuneration, nepotism, lack of openness and transparency in government, the mentality of Nigerians that an opportunity to serve is an opportunity to grab their share of the national cake, weak institutions to fight corruption, slow determination of corrupt cases. To curb corruption, we must cut it from its roots.

     

    • Frank Ijege

     frankijege@yahoo.com

  • Stealing is now corruption

    SIR: The immediate past prodigal administration would remain a reference point as the most corrupt and insensitive government in our nation’s democracy. To the immediate past president, stealing is not corruption. He identified with the corrupt and presided over a government that embezzled public funds with reckless abandon.

    After much criticism of his government, the immediate past president, in an attempt to demystify corruption made the worst political gaffe. “What is being referred to as corruption is common stealing,” he said.

    And when the opportunity came for Nigerians to decide who would rule them, the majority defied all odds to ensure that Muhammadu Buhari, a renowned and reputed anti-corruption crusader, was elected as president.

    With the emergence of Buhari as president, stealing is now corruption and all those that partook in one financial misappropriation or the other in the past have all been thrown into yesterday’s dustbin pending when the long arm of the law would descend on them.

    Before President Buhari’s inauguration, the fear of probe made many jittery, but Mr. President, in his wisdom, told the world he would not probe his predecessor’s government. How would someone elected to cleanse the Augean stables not probe those that contributed to the filth and corruption?

    Some have been manufacturing excuses why the immediate past administration should not be the first to be probed. The last time I checked – you don’t jump 3 to count 4.

     

    • Joe Onwukeme

    unjoeratedjoe@gmail.com

  • Parents seek principal’s probe for alleged corruption

    Parents and guardians of students of the Federal Government College, Efon Alaaye in Ekiti State, have petitioned the Presidency and the Federal Ministry of Education accusing the Principal, Mrs. Grace Ogunyemi, of corruption.

    In their petition, a copy of which was made available to The Nation, they accused Mrs. Ogunyemi of extorting money from their wards through imposition of illegal fees without the knowledge of the ministry.

    The aggrieved parents and guardians in the petition signed by their Chairman, Tolu Ajibade, Secretary Paul Omotayo and 57 others, urged President Muhammadu Buhari to raise a panel to probe the matter to prevent further exploitation.

    They attached a list of their grievances to the petition, including all related circulars regarding fees from the Federal Ministry of Education which Ogunyemi allegedly ran foul of.

    Besides, the principal was also alleged of running the college like her private estate through “declaration of unapproved holidays and resumptions while teachers and non-teaching staff were isolated from the running of the school,“ the petition further added.

    They accused Ogunyemi of running the college like a typical private school because of the exorbitant fees charged, thereby making life difficult for poor parents who had thought a federal school would give them some succour.

    The petition reads in part: “We have since found out that the principal was merely acting alone as such fees were never approved by the ministry.

    “We also have in our custody, a recent circular from the Federal Ministry, signed by the Director, Department of Secondary Education, Mr. D.C. Uwaezuoke and dated June 23, 2015 stating details of approved fees payable by students, but which the principal has continually ignored.

    “We want Mr. President and the ministry to act fast so that his good vision of transforming the education sector and making it affordable and accessible is not truncated by the activities of elements such as the principal of our children’s school,” the parents said.

    According to them, the Federal Government must ensure that an external auditor was also sent to the school while the principal must be made to refund illegal fee so far collected from parents and pupils to avoid crisis.

    The parents threatened to embark on street protests as well as disrupt students’ resumption if no action is taken to address their grievances before resumption.

    Reacting to the allegations against her, Mrs Ogunyemi said she should be appreciated for what she called “the great work” she had done at the college. In a telephone chat with our reporter, she said: “You know I am a civil servant. I am not supposed to talk on this matter, but you can come over to the school when we resume and see what God has done through me in that school.

    “You are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to my opinion. In whatever you do, don’t let other people use you to bring down somebody else.

    “I am at present in Abuja. I am not in Efon now, but you can visit the school and see what I have done.’’ Federal Government Girls College, Efon came first in the Southwest region in Mathematics and you can verify what we have achieved since we came in.

    “Those doing this are pursuing some interests; the mischief of human beings cannot stop the work of God,” Mrs Ogunyemi added.

     

  • Attacks on Buhari’s war against corruption – A prelude

    Attacks on Buhari’s war against corruption – A prelude

    Unsurprisingly, the war against corruption to which President Muhammadu Buhari has committed himself as a top priority, is threatening to assume an ethnic and religious colouration. The two colourations are equally dangerous for Nigeria’s unity and even existence, but for now it looks like the threat of ethnic colouration is more immediate and worrisome.

    The most obvious ethnic colouration was painted last week by Professor Ben Nwabueze, the respected constitutional lawyer and once minister of education under General Sani Abacha’s regime. In a widely publicised statement of over 3,100 words entitled: “Corrupt practices: Igbo leaders’ position on probe of past governments”, he enunciated what he claimed was the view of Igbo leadership on President Muhammadu Buhari’s declared war on corruption. He followed this with an equally lengthy interview in THE PUNCH of August 9.

    The president, he said, is right to consider his fight against corruption a priority but wrong to limit himself only to the administration of President Goodluck Jonathan he took over from. To do so, he said, would be selective which, in turn, would make his war unjust, unfair and, in the end, ineffective.

    On the surface, the professor’s argument looks impartial and unassailable. But read his statement and interview in between the lines and it becomes difficult, if not impossible, not to conclude that his objection to Buhari limiting his war on corruption to Jonathan’s administration was more because it was widely regarded, rightly or wrongly, as Igbo-dominated than because of the reasons he gave.

    Next week, God willing, I’ll examine the professor’s statement to show how it is not as impartial and unassailable as it looks at first glance.

    Meantime, to the other danger, namely that of giving the president’s declared war on corruption a religious colouration. This time the man with the big brush is the Bishop of Sokoto Catholic Diocese, Most Reverend Mathew Hassan Kukah.

    Bishop Kukah has been angry with the media for what he says is their misinterpretation of his call on Buhari to avoid the danger of populist posturing against corruption at the expense of good governance. The public seems to have perceived his warning as a call on Buhari not to waste time probing the Jonathan administration. As such the bishop has come under widespread attack, especially in the social media.

    Along with the professor’s veiled attack on Buhari’s anti-corruption war, I will, next week, God willing, examine the Bishop’s call on Buhari to reconsider his stance on corruption to show how the two calls are not as impartial as they seem on the surface.

    For the rest of this piece, I’ll like to return to my view that between the two dangers of giving Buhari’s war on corruption an ethnic and religious colouration, the former is more immediate and worrisome for now.

    A little over a month ago, on July 14, to be specific, my friend, Chief Loretta Aniagolu, a prominent Enugu politician and business woman, forwarded an email to me with a link to Radio Biafra in which the station claimed, in effect, that Buhari had declared the Igbo his mortal enemies in an interview with the Hausa service of the BBC. She said she had received similar mails from abroad and was at first inclined to dismiss them until she received the last one which she was forwarding to me.

    The “former dictator” speaking today on BBC Hausa services monitored in Kaduna, Radio Biafra claimed, said he was convinced the Igbo have always voted against him because of his role in the Nigerian civil war.

    “I don’t have any regret, and as such do not owe any apology to them, in fact if there is a repeat of the civil war again, I will kill more Igbo to save the country,” the station quoted him as saying.

    Chief Aniagolu said she was forwarding the email to me just to confirm if Buhari did indeed say so, even though she found it difficult, if not impossible, to believe. “Please go through and tell me…Did he really say this?, she asked.

    Buhari could never have said such a stupid thing, and never did, as his spokesman, Malam Garba Shehu, and the Hausa Service of the BBC itself have since confirmed. But this has not stopped the radio station from carrying on with its virulent campaigns against Buhari as someone who hates the Igbo. Chances are, millions of impressionable Igbo listeners, especially those who never experienced the war, believe the station.

    A careful reading of Nwabueze’s statement about the position of Igbo leadership on Buhari’s war against corruption suggests even the more enlightened leadership are probably inclined to believe Radio Biafra, albeit more out of political expediency  than because the station was saying the truth, which, of course, it wasn’t.

    Unfortunately, image, especially in this age of the Internet, has since become more potent than substance. If, therefore, the president wants to succeed in his war against corruption – and he owes it to the millions of Nigerians who voted for him to bring about change to do so – he simply must deal with the image that his government is against any tribe or religion, false though this image is.

     

    Re-Boko Haram: the vindication of Shettima

    Sir,

    I think I disagree with your view today (August 12). Even if the war was being won by Boko Haram, Shettima shouldn’t have come in public to say such a thing. What solution did he suggest as governor? You guys, I think, are rather celebrating Boko Haram instead of condemning them.

    Awo, +2348062681413.

     

    Sir,

    Nonsense article as usual. Tribalistic and jaundiced columnist. +2348033468602.

     

    Sir,

    What a nice piece. Governor Shettima really deserves a pat on the back. +2348032766229.

     

    Sir,

    In your incisive article on the vindication of Shettima, you stopped short of the obvious conclusion i.e. the imperative of a thorough judicial prove of military spending in the last 16 years. The $9million in cash smuggled into another country still makes me weep for my country! We cannot sweep such things under the carpet!!

    Mansur Ahmed,  +2348033143403.

     

    Sir,

    Minimah’s submission is a harsh truth. If people like you had used your biro well, it would have made a difference in the fight against those criminals.  +2348036769949.

     

    Sir,

    For about a month now, Boko Haram (BH) has not struck. Is it as a result of weapons acquired by PMB? The truth is that BH has achieved the aim of most northerners and so they are winding up gradually. By December, as PMB said, there will be nothing like BH. We only wait to see how the North will solve the Chibok girls April fool.# +2348061562735.

     

    Sir,

    Truth is constant and God has vindicated Governor Shettima. However, Gen Badeh and Gen Minimah should thank their stars that President Buhari is now a committed democrat, least both will be behind bars explaining what happened to defence budgets under their watch, not to mention the humiliation and embarrassment they caused the military by announcing to the world that a former Army general and commander-in-chief of the Nigerian armed forces had no certificate, they are dammed jolly lucky fellows.

    Nyebuchi Wobo,  Port Harcourt.

    +2348057812496.

     

    Sir,

    Now that Shettima has been vindicated and the ‘arinis’ subdued, when he settles with them, I hope another group will not emerge, may be demanding that people should walk with their heads down. Maitatsine, Akaluka head hunters, etc. It is time they had pity on others and a permanent solution sought. Most of the countries in West Africa are smaller than some of our states. The yoking together of heterogeneous elements is a major problem. Please suggest something. +2348052813321.

     

    Sir,

    Re-Boko Haram: the vindication of Shettima. Irrespective of the condition of our army on the battlefield then, Shettima lacked the professional competence to make the de-motivating proclamation he did. What was his expense and military contribution when it was ‘hot’? How was the election that made him to have been re-elected made possible? It’s easier to use ordinary mouth to clear the bush meant for cultivation! Now, has boko haramism ended?

    Lanre Oseni.

    +2348033518726.

    Sir,

    It seems that the errors continue. The officer’s letter was not dated December 2004, but rather December 2014.

    Sagir Tanimu,   Department of Computer Science,

    Bayero University, Kano. +2347038946575.

     

    Read your column as I always do. The officer who wrote the former president would not have done so on 15/12/2004. Please do the necessary correction. Baba D. Hamidu, +2348023130090.

  • Buhari: no pressure will derail war against corruption

    Buhari: no pressure will derail war against corruption

    President Muhammadu Buhari has said that no amount of pressure will make him give up on the war against corruption.

    He spoke through an address delivered by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina, to a group of Nigerians under the aegies of “Nigerians March Against Corruption,” who were at the gate of the Presidential Villa.

    Members of the group came on a solidiarity visit to pledge their support for the Buhari administration’s  anti-corruption campaign.

    The President promised a relentless prosecution of the war with due regard for the rule of law.

    According to him, all persons charged with stealing the nation’s resources will have their day in court and that, upon conviction, their ill-gotten wealth will be seized and returned to government coffers.

    He said: “I believe it is time for Nigeria to change course. That is why I sought  election as President and got elected. As President, I am determined that Nigeria must move away from a course of endemic corruption that was leading us to perdition.

    “There can be no question of our willfully allowing anyone to get away with corruption. No matter the pressure and entreaties, the anti-corruption war will continue and all accused persons will have their day in court.”

    Describing the group’s support as encouraging, the President reaffirmed his commitment to curbing insecurity in the country and boosting employment opportunities for Nigerians, especially the youth.

    He called for the continued support and solidarity of Nigerians as his administration works to correct the wrongs of the past.

    The Nigerians March Against Corruption group led by Aisha Yesufu had condemned recent statements by some individuals against the President’s anti-corruption posture.

    They assured the President that the vast majority of ordinary Nigerians fully supported his ongoing efforts to curb corruption and urged him not to be deterred by the antics of those who do not share in his laudable vision of a fairer, more equitable, corruption-free and progressive nation.

    Among the inscriptions on the placards displayed by the protesters include: ”I voted Buhari to fight corruption” and “NASS, epitome of corruption”.