Tag: Court

  • JUST IN: Man sentenced to death for killing wife, brother-in-law in Lagos

    JUST IN: Man sentenced to death for killing wife, brother-in-law in Lagos

    A Lagos State High Court, presided over by Justice Sherifat Sonaike at Tafawa Balewa Square, has sentenced Benjamin Ogundero to death by hanging for the gruesome murder of his wife, Chinyere Ogundero, and her brother, Ifeanyi Joseph, in April 2022.

    The court found Ogundero guilty of setting both victims on fire while they slept in their home in Abule Ado, Lagos, following a heated domestic dispute.

    Delivering the judgment on Thursday, February 27, 2025, Justice Sonaike ruled that the prosecution had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Ogundero deliberately planned and carried out the attack. Describing the act as “wickedness of the highest order,” the judge condemned his actions as one of the most heinous crimes a person could commit.

    During the court proceedings on Thursday, February 27, 2025, Justice Sonaike emphasized that the evidence presented proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Ogundero committed the heinous act.

    “He devised, prepared, and executed the act. This is wickedness of the highest order,” the judge stated, condemning the defendant’s actions as one of the worst a person could inflict upon another.

    In addition to the murder charge, Ogundero was also found guilty of arson and sentenced to life imprisonment, which will start from the date of conviction.

    The prosecution team, led by Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) Mr. Martins Babajide, argued that the man had been angry over the fact that his wife owned the house they lived in, which she had purchased while working in the banking sector.

    Read Also: We reject Obasa in totality – Lagos lawmakers

    This anger, it was said, was a key factor in his decision to commit the crime.

    Witnesses described the horrific scene, with one testifying that Chinyere’s body was so badly burned that her limbs fell off. Ifeanyi Joseph died from severe burns that caused his body to stop circulating blood.

    The court also heard from a neighbor who saw Ogundero running from the burning house with a fuel gallon, further solidifying his involvement in the crime.

    Benjamin Ogundero’s actions were deemed to be driven by personal grievances and anger, with the court finding no remorse throughout the trial.

    Details shortly…

  • OML 46: Court reaffirms Halkin E&P as owner, operator

    OML 46: Court reaffirms Halkin E&P as owner, operator

    The Federal High Court in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, yesterday ruled on the disputed OML 46 which has been in contention between Halkin Exploration and Production Limited and the Bayelsa Oil Company Limited, reaffirming that the former- Halkin Exploration and Production Limited, as the rightful owner and operator of the Atala Marginal Oil Field, OML 46.

    In his judgment, Justice Ayo Emmanuel dismissed the suit filed by Bayelsa Oil Company Limited, ruling that the case was statute-barred and that the plaintiffs lacked the legal standing to challenge the re-award of OML 46 to Halkin Exploration. The court further held that the plaintiffs failed to meet the required legal conditions before initiating the lawsuit, making their claim an abuse of court process.

    Justice Emmanuel, citing Section 2 of the Public Officers Protection Act and Section 307 of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021, which bar certain claims after a specified period, dismissed the suit by Bayelsa Oil Company in its entirety and reaffirmed Halkin Exploration’s legal ownership and operational rights over the Atala Marginal Oil Field.

    Reacting to the ruling, the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC), which filed an objection to the suit by Bayelsa Oil Company, through its counsel, Chikaosolu Ojukwu, S.A.N, said: “This judgment upholding Halkin E&P’s ownership of OML 46 marks a significant victory for the upstream oil and gas sector. This outcome underscores the seriousness and integrity behind the bidding and awarding processes of marginal fields and deep offshore assets.”

    Read Also: Court reaffirms Halkin E&P as legal owner, operator of OML 46

    According to Ojukwu, the ruling is a further affirmation that under the leadership of the NUPRC’s Chief Executive, Gbenga Komolafe, the Commission has consistently upheld the rule of law, ensuring that all operators in the upstream sector comply with regulations.

    “This commitment has contributed to improved crude oil production and promoted the Seven Pillars of Divestment, fostering sustainable development within the industry.”

    The dispute dates back to February 25, 2003, when the former Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) now NUPRC, awarded OML 46 to Bayelsa Oil Company Limited. However, on April 6, 2020, the Federal Government revoked the lease due to the company’s failure to develop the field and bring it into full production. For a long time afterwards, Bayelsa Oil Company failed to contest the revocation, and OML 46 was re-awarded to Halkin Exploration on July 7, 2021.

    Seeking to overturn this decision, Bayelsa Oil Company filed a lawsuit on June 20, 2024, at the Federal High Court, Yenagoa Judicial Division, requesting a declaration that the re-award of OML 46 to Halkin Exploration was unlawful, null, and void.

    On July 18, 2024, Halkin Exploration, represented by its counsel, Mr. Kehinde Ogunwumiju, S.A.N., filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection, challenging the court’s jurisdiction.

  • Court to hear 9Mobile ownership suit March 19

    Court to hear 9Mobile ownership suit March 19

    The Federal High Court in Abuja will on March 19 hear a suit on the ownership and control of Emerging Markets Telecommunication Service (EMTS) – the holder and operator of 9Mobile Telecommunication licence.

    The plaintiff, Abubakar Isa Funtua, sued General Theophilus Yakubu Danjuma (Rtd), his company LH Telecommunication Limited and others over the ownership of EMTS trading under 9Mobile.

    The others are Seltrix Limited (first defendant), the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), HayatuHassan Hadeija, Teleology Nigerian Limited and Mohammed Edewor, a Director in Teleology Nigeria Limited.

    The plaintiff seeks a declaration that he is the beneficial owner of the 43,000,000 ordinary shares held in trust for him by the first defendant (Seltrix Limited) in the capital of the third defendant (Teleology Nigeria).

    He is also praying for “a declaration that the acquisition of the 43,000,000 ordinary shares purportedly transferred or surrendered to the third defendant (Teleology Nigeria) in breach of the first defendant’s duty as trustee of the plaintiff and in contravention of Clause 48 of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the first defendant is null, void and of no effect.”

    Read Also: Maradona IBB cannot dribble Nigeria again over June 12 annulment, says Onjeh

    Funtua further claimed: “That the purported registration of the transfer by way of surrender/gift of 43,000,000 ordinary shares held by the first defendant in the capital of the third defendant is unlawful, null and void.

    “A declaration that the purported registration of the increase in the share capital and the allotment of the newly created 1,910, 000, 000 ordinary shares in the capital of the fifth defendant (EMTS) to the eighth defendant (LH Telecommunication Limited) is in contravention of Section 127 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020 and is therefore null, void and of no effect.”

    The plaintiff seeks: “An order setting aside the purported registration by the sixth defendant (CAC) of the transfer by way of surrender/gift of 43,000,000 ordinary shares held by the first defendant in the capital of the third defendant.

    “An order setting aside the purported registration by the sixth defendant of the increase in the share capital and the allotment of the newly created 1,910, 000,000 ordinary shares of the fifth defendant (EMTS) in contravention of Section 127of the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020.”

    The plaintiff also seeks N1 billion as general damages from the defendants jointly and severally, amongst other reliefs.

  • JUST IN: Court orders reinstatement  of sacked Lagos Assembly Clerk Onafeko

    JUST IN: Court orders reinstatement  of sacked Lagos Assembly Clerk Onafeko

    The National Industrial Court sitting in Lagos has ordered the reinstatement of the sacked Clerk of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Olalekan Onafeko.

    The order follows an ex parte application to the Court made by Onafeko through his counsel, Yusuf Nurudeen, in a case he filed against Lagos State Government, Lagos State Civil Service Commission, Lagos State House of Assembly Service Commission, The Speaker, Lagos State House of Assembly, Attorney-General of Lagos State and Mr. Ottun Babatunde.

    Onafeko was the Clerk of the House before January 13 when Hon. Mudashiru Ajayi Obasa was removed as Speaker, with the then Deputy Speaker, Mojisola Lasbat Meranda elected as the new Speaker.  

    Obasa’s removal, a decision that sparked controversy within the Lagos House and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), also led to Onafeko losing his position, with Babatunde Ottun appointed as his acting replacement.

    Read Also: Rebasing of economy: will it bode well for Nigerians?

    The claimant in the suit marked: NICN/LA/23/2025 sought for an interim injunction restraining the six defendants from parading any individual including Babatunde as the clerk pending the hearing of the motion on notice for Interlocutory injunction already filed in the suit.

    Granting the application, Justice M. N. Esowe in an ex parte order directed that Babatunde should cease to parade himself as Clerk.

    Esowe ordered that that what was in place in terms of the person in the saddle of the Clerk Office prior to the crisis rocking the House of Assembly should now prevail.

    “That both parties shall maintain the peace and status quo ante bellum until the motion on notice is heard and determined,” Esowe ordered.

    The judge slated the hearing of the motion on notice for March 3, 2024.

  • Crisis looms in Akure over Appeal Court sacking of Iralepo monarch

    Crisis looms in Akure over Appeal Court sacking of Iralepo monarch

    Communal crisis is looming in Akure, the Ondo State capital as the Deji of Akure, Oba Aladetoyinbo Ogunlade Aladelusi, move to implement an Appeal Court judgment which declared the Iralepo of Isikan to be a Quarter Chief in Akure.

    The Iralepo was upgraded to a Class C monarch under the administration of late former Governor Oluwarotimi Akeredolu.

    After the death the late Iralepo of Isikan, High Chief Olu Ojo., the Akure monarch appointed Chief Henry Gbenga as the next Iralepo in line based on his power(s) to appoint Minor Chiefs in Akure kingdom but Prince Olugbenga Ojo who was picked by the Omowa Isikan (kingmakers) was installed as Oba.

    In 2022, the state government issued a White Paper which recognised Iralepo stool as a Class C Oba.

    However, the Court of Appeal declared that it was unlawful to admit the Chieftaincy title of Iralepo into Part 1 of the Chiefs Laws of Ondo State as a recognised Chief with the consent of the Deji of Akure.

    It also granted an order of perpertual injunction restraining the Ondo State Government from appointing or installing anyone as the Iralepo of Isikan Quarters.

    Less than 48 hours after the court’s ruling, the Deji of Akure ordered immediate suspension of Ojo as the Iralepo of Isikan and cautioned him to desist from parading himself under any guise.

    Oba Aladetoyinbo announced appointment of Adeyeye as the new Iralepo of Isikan Quarters, Akure.

    A statement by spokesman to the Akure monarch, Michael Adeyeye said Ojo was requested to vacate the traditional palace of the Iralepo of Isikan with immediate effect and hand over all palace properties within his possession to the appropriate quarters for proper documentation.

    Read Also: Court remands motorist for assaulting OYRTMA officers

     According to the statement, “In view of the installation and appointment of High Chief Gbenga Henry Adeyeye as the new Iralepo of Isikan quarters, he is now entitled to wear all paraphernalia of office attached to the stool of the Iralepo of Isikan while Mr. Gbenga Ojo is advised to desist from parading himself in whatever manner.

    “We wish to inform Mr. Gbenga Ojo that any violation of the afore-stated shall be met stiffer penalties including committal proceedings.”

    Oba Aladetoyinbo subsequently presented certificate to the new Iralepo and witnessed by the Omowa of Isikan.

    But the Olisa of Isikan, Chief Kayode Oluyi, said the ancient throne of Iralepo was not any child’s play susceptible to the theatre of absurdity.

    Chief Oluyi said the Iralepo of Isinkan has only been appointed by the people of Isinkan and never by the Deji of Akure nor subject to his approval.

    “We implore our people to peacefully go about their businesses and not do or be involved in anything that would portray the great peace loving people of Isinkan as discourteous rabble rousing bumpkins. 

    “While we take due cognizance of the judgment of the Court of Appeal and exercising our further rights in that respect under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, we wish to assure all that the throne of the Iralepo of Isinkan is not vacant as Oba Oluwagbemiga Ajimokunola Olofin-Adimula (Arulewolasi III), the Olusi Obarisa, remains, and sits on the throne and in the palace of the Iralepo of Isinkan.”

    The Olu of Aladodo, Ayodeji Fatoki, said no Deji has ever installed or removed any Iralepo of Isinkan.

    He said: “Deji wants to cause crisis in the state capital”.

    Caption: Akure Monarch presenting Certificate to his appointed Iralepo of Isikan

  • Court remands motorist for assaulting OYRTMA officers

    Court remands motorist for assaulting OYRTMA officers

    A driver, Oke Ademola, has been remanded at the Agodi Correctional Centre by an Oyo State Mobile Court for allegedly assaulting two officers of the Oyo State Road Traffic Management Authority (OYRTMA).

    The incident occurred at the Agodi Gate Bus Stop, where Ademola was accused of physically attacking OYRTMA officers, Kareem Yakubu and Ogunjimi Ayotunde.

    Ademola, who was driving an unlicensed Toyota Camry, was arraigned before the court on Friday on six counts, including disobeying traffic lights, refusing to park at designated motor parks, resisting arrest, assaulting an officer, driving without a license, and operating an unlicensed vehicle.

    Read Also: Court remands motorist for assaulting OYRTMA officers

    The defendant pleaded guilty to the assault charge.

    Magistrate F.R. Olaniyan, presiding over the case, reserved judgment until 26 February 2025 and ordered that Ademola be remanded at Agodi Correctional Centre pending the final ruling.

  • Court remands female lawyer in Kirikiri for alleged forgery

    Court remands female lawyer in Kirikiri for alleged forgery

    Justice Hakeem Oshodi of an Ikeja High Court has remanded a lawyer, Chinwe Onuoha, in the custody of Nigerian Correctional Services (NCoS) over alleged forgery.

    Onuoha would remain in the custody of the female section of NCoS, Kirikiri pending the hearing of bail application.

    The Police Special Fraud Unit (SFU) on Wednesday arraigned Onuoha and her company, Elhcrim Nigeria Limited before Justice Oshodi over alleged forgery.

     Onuoha was arraigned on a twelve-count charge bordering on conspiracy, forgery, and the uttering of false documents, aimed at defrauding the Bank of Industries (BoI).

    Read Also: Ataga: Defendants have a case to answer, court rules

    The defendants, along with others now at large, were alleged to have conspired in 2020 to forge a lease agreement dated February 12, 2018.

    The forged document was purportedly submitted to the BoI as part of a scheme to fraudulently secure a loan, to the detriment of one Ngozi Braide.

    These actions were allegedly carried out with full knowledge that the signatures were fake, intending to use the document as genuine before the bank.

    SFU prosecutor, Emmanuel Jackson, informed the court that the forged documents posed significant risks to the financial institution and the individuals whose signatures were fraudulently used.

    The defendant pleaded not guilty.

    Jackson requested the court to proceed to trial and sought the remand of the defendant at a correctional facility pending the conclusion of the case.

    However, defense counsel Ikechukwu Chiha urged the court to hear the defendant’s bail application, citing the need for her to prepare adequately for her defense.

    After hearing both parties, Justice Oshodi adjourned the matter to February 25 for the hearing of the bail application.

  • Alleged killing of final students: Kwara court remands Islmaic cleric, five others

    Alleged killing of final students: Kwara court remands Islmaic cleric, five others

    Kwara State Magistrate Court in Ilorin yesterday remanded one Islamic cleric, Abdulrahman Bello, and others for allegedly killing a final year student of Kwara State College of Education.

    Others are Ahmed Abdulwasiu, Suleiman Muhyideen, Jamiu Uthman, Abdulrahmon Jamiu

    They are cooling their heels at the Oke Kura Correctional Centre, Ilorin.

    The Magistrate Sanusi B. Mohammed adjourned the case till March 6.

    Bello was not represented by any counsel.

    They were accused of a three-count charge of criminal conspiracy, culpable homicide, possession of human parts and armed robbery.

    The offences are contrary to sections 97, 221 of the penal code law, Section 2 of Kwara state (prohibition law) of dealing in human parts Law 4 of 2018 and section 1(2) of robbery and firearms (special provision) Act CAP R11 Law of the federation of Nigeria 2004.

    According to the First Information Report (FIR), Islamic cleric allegedly committed the crime with his co-accused as accomplices.

    Read Also: Police inherited 13-year backlog of unsettled insurance claims, says IG Egbetokun

    The charge sheet added that, “during the course of investigation at the State CID, Ilorin you, Abdulrahman Bello ‘male’ indicted and confessed to have done the act with the consent and knowledge of the following persons; Ahmed Abdulwasiu, Suleiman Muhyideen, Jamiu Uthman and Abdulrahmon Jamiu all ‘male’, who were all into same occultic group and that led to their arrest.

    “Investigation conducted at the State CID, llorin revealed that, you Abdulrahman Bello, Ahmed Abdulwasiu, Suleiman Muhyideen, Jamiu Uthman, Abdulrahmon Jamiu all ‘male’ and others at large, criminally conspired together in killing of the victim for ritual purposes and equally robbed her of her jewelries and other valuables.

    “Further investigation conducted at the State CID, Ilorin revealed that, you Abdulrahmon Jamiu, Ahmed Abdulwasiu, Suleiman Muhyideen, Jamiu Uthman, Abdulrahmon Jamiu, ‘male’ and others at large are the syndicate that have been killing unsuspecting citizens of Kwara for rituals.

    “On 14-02-2025 at about 1400hrs, the above captioned case was transferred from ‘C’ Divisional Headquarters, Oja-Oba, llorin and referred to Anti-Robbery Section, State CID, Ilorin for discreet investigation. ‘‘

  • Court adjourns Naomi, Oriyomi, Fasasi’s case till March 10

    Court adjourns Naomi, Oriyomi, Fasasi’s case till March 10

    Oyo State High Court sitting in Ibadan has adjourned the case involving the proprietor of an Ibadan-based radio station, Alhaji Oriyomi Hamzat, former wife of Ooni of Ife Prophetess Naomi Silekunola and the Principal of Islamic High School, Bashorun, Ibadan, Abdulahi Fasasi, till March 10 for further hearing.

    The trio are facing trial for their alleged involvement in the Ibadan stampede that led to the death of 35 minors at the aborted Ibadan Children Funfair scheduled for Islamic High School, Bashorun, Ibadan.

    The case came up for mention yesterday.

    The Nation reports that the state government has filed fresh 18-count charges at the High Court after being released on bail on the case earlier filed at the magistrates’ court on the grounds that Holden charge is not known in the face of law.

    Read Also: South-West Govs to honour Adebanjo with grand funeral – Sanwo-Olu

    But, the court yesterday adjourned the case for further hearing.

    Counsel for one of the defendants, Alhaji Hamzat, Adekunle Sobaloju (SAN), said the court could not proceed on the defendants’ cases, because they have not been served with their complaints.

    Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice Abiodun Aikomo said the arraignment of the defendants was stalled because they could not confirm whether their sureties would still support them in the new case.

    All the defendants were in court.

    The Nation reports that Oyo State Government had slammed the suit on the trio in an 18-count suit with charge num

  • Court acquits father of defilement of daughter

    Court acquits father of defilement of daughter

    An Ikeja Special Offences and Domestic Violence Court has discharged and acquitted one Alfred Udiong of an alleged defilement charge of a 14-year-old girl (name withheld).

    Justice Rahman Oshodi held that the prosecution failed to prove the charge of defilement against the defendant by calling the survivor to give her testimony in the matter.

    “In this case, two elements were established, the survivor’s age through the defendant’s admission and sexual activity through the medical evidence.

    “However without the survivor’s testimony, the prosecution could not definitively establish the defendant as the perpetrator of the sexual acts evidence by the medical findings.

    “Consequently, the prosecution has not discharged its burden of proving the defendant’s guilt beyond reasonable doubts.

    “The defendant is therefore found not guilty of defilement. He is hereby discharged and acquitted,” Justice Oshodi held.

    The defendant was charged for the offence of defilement of his own daughter aged 14 years.

    He pleaded not guilty on April 26, 2022 when he was arraigned before the court.

    Read Also: FG must take actions against social media giants’ excesses, says advocacy group

    During the trial, the prosecution called three witnesses including the medical doctor, a social worker and the IPO.

    The medical doctor (PW1) in his testimony had told the court that the medical examination of the survivor on August 2021 revealed that her hymen was absent though there were no recent focal injuries to her genitalia.

    The defense counsel, C.O. Achonye, called one witness, the defendant, who testified for himself.

    He maintained that he never had sexual intercourse with the survivor and went further to tell the court that he works long hours as a driver at Citibank, leaving the home at 5 am and returning between10 pm and midnight.

    The defendant also told the court that the allegations might be fabricated by the acrimonious relationship with his estranged wife and after disciplining his daughter over the alleged improper relationship with boys in the neighborhood as confirmed by one Mr Chucks, their neighbour.