Tag: Court

  • Court dissolves 15-year-old ‘loveless marriage’

    Court dissolves 15-year-old ‘loveless marriage’

    A Grade I Area Court in Kubwa, Abuja, has dissolved a 15-year-old “loveless marriage” between Abdulrahman Umar and Hauwa Ibrahim.

    Delivering judgment, the Judge, Malam Musa Sabo dissolved the marriage according to Islamic Law, following Umar’s prayer for confirmation of divorce.

    Sabo ordered that the divorce certificate be issued to the respondent.

    Read Also: Navy arrests nine pipeline ‘vandals’, recovers 408 drums

    Earlier, the petitioner had told the court that married the respondent under Islamic law on March 10, 2010.

    The father of five, said he divorced Ibrahim for the first time in 2019, the second in 2023 and the final divorce on February 3.

    ” I divorced my wife for the third time, which is final between us, as required by the Islamic Law through a text message on the said date.

    ” I pray the court to confirm that the marriage between me and Ibrahim is over and issue a certificate of divorce to her,” he said.

    Ibrahim was, however, not in court.

  • Court orders substituted service in N550m suit against Army, COAS

    Court orders substituted service in N550m suit against Army, COAS

    Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered the service of a fundamental rights abuse suit against the Army and seven others via substituted means.

    The court documents are to be published in any newspaper with a wide circulation in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    The judge gave the order while ruling on an ex parte application filed and argued on behalf of the plaintiff, Mr. Ambrose Akhigbe, an Assistant Director at the Command Secondary School in Ipaja area of Lagos State.

    The plaintiff sued the Army, the Chief of Army Staff (COAS); the General Officer Commanding (GOC) of 81 Division; the Commandant of Command Day Secondary School, Lagos, Lt. Akabor; Private Sani; Private Ahmed, and Private Montero, who are the first to eighth respondents, for alleged threat to life, assault, battering, and maltreatment, amongst others.

    The plaintiff’s lawyer, Mr. Wayne Elijah, told the court that the bailiff had not been able to serve the court documents on the respondents, hence would request the court to give an order directing the service through substituted means by pasting same on the notice board of the Federal High Court and sending scanned copies to the respondents’ email addresses.

    In her ruling, Justice Abdulmalik averred that the respondents, not being staff members of the Federal High Court, would not be able to see the court documents and, therefore, ordered the service through newspaper publication.

    She fixed the hearing of the matter on May 5, ordering that the service of hearing notices be served on all respondents.

    The plaintiff alleged that the respondents, particularly the fifth, sixth, and seventh respondents, violated his rights when they beat him up and nearly killed him for allegedly making videos of inhumane punishments meted out to the senior secondary school (SSS) 3 girls who were asked to roll on muddy, dirty water.

    “The fifth respondent then suggested we all report to the commandant’s office to resolve the issue, which I agreed to. But while I led the way in walking down to the Admin Block, the sixth, seventh, and eighth respondents, acting on the instructions of the fifth respondent, battered me from behind with the sole aim of killing me as they were saying: ‘We will kill you today, you bastard,’ as they continued to lynch and assault me, targeting my face and neck, using plank, koboko (whip), sticks, pipe canes, irons, and their first punch.

    “The video evidence of this brutalisation on me by the respondents is herein attached and marked V1 in Exhibit Flash A series,” Akhigbe said.

    Read Also: Court acquits ex-NBC boss Kawu, others of alleged N2.5bn fraud 

    The plaintiff claimed that the beatings and attempted murder on him led to a ceaseless flow of blood from the skull of his head, causing an immediate hold in academic activities in the school as all civilian workers staged a protest in solidarity to the oppression he faced against the respondents.

    He said the fourth respondent, who immediately handed over the fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth respondents to the military police to be kept in custody pending investigation, also took responsibility for the medical bills of N65,000 and another N115,000.

    “That shortly after the incident, my union, the Association of Senior Servants Civil of Nigeria, served the respondents with a letter of demand wherein several demands, including adequate compensation, were made,” he said.

    The plaintiff recalled that on August 6, last year, while preparing to take his bath, had a mild concussion which worsened on August 8. He said the incident led to his being rushed to a hospital in Abuja.

    “I was given drip treatments and cared for by a nurse in my apartment in Abuja as the injury to my skull caused by the respondents became aggressively worse by the day.

    “I sent a letter of demand through my lawyer’s law firm, WCE & Co. Chambers, to the respondent on August 10, 2024, for the respondent to be aware of my predicaments and to take responsibility, but did not respond to me, even after the three weeks given in the letter had elapsed.”

    Akhigbe prayed the court to declare that the actions of the fifth to eighth respondents in unprovoked assaulting, attacking, abusing, maltreating and battering him while he was peacefully making a phone call on June 10, 2024 amount to a gross violation of his right to personal dignity and not to be subjected to any inhumane and degrading treatment, as guaranteed under Section 34(1) of the Constitution and Articles 4 and 5 of the African Charter on Human and People Rights.

    The plaintiff is also praying the court to declare that the actions of the fifth to eighth respondents in attempting to kill him after unlawfully seizing and searching his phone amount to a gross violation of his right to life, as guaranteed by law.

    He is also seeking an order of perpetual injunction restraining the respondents, their personnel, authorised agents, staff members, employees and cohorts by whatever name so called from further disturbing, breaching or interfering with his rights, as guaranteed under the law.

    According to his lawyer, Akhigbe is seeking, among others: “An order directing the fifth to eighth respondents to film and publish a video apology on behalf of the respondents to the applicant, to be published on two national television (stations) for the unwarranted infringement of the applicant’s fundamental right in threatening the life of the applicant and assaulting, attacking, abusing and maltreating the applicant while he was peacefully making a phone call and exercising his fundamental freedom of expression within the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court of law.

    “An order directing the respondents jointly and severally to pay the applicant the sum of N500 million only as compensation for the gross infringement of the applicant’s fundamental right guaranteed by the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    “An order directing the respondents – jointly and severally – to pay the applicant the N50 million as costs of this action.”

  • Court acquits ex-NBC boss Kawu, others of alleged N2.5bn fraud 

    Court acquits ex-NBC boss Kawu, others of alleged N2.5bn fraud 

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has discharged and acquitted former Director General of the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), Modibbo Kawu and two others charged with diverting the N2.5 billion seed grant for the Digital Switch-Over (DSO) programme of the Federal Government.

    In a judgment on Thursday, Justice Folasade Giwa-Ogunbanjo held that the prosecution failed to supply sufficient evidence to prove the offences alleged.

    The Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC) had, in 2019 arraigned Kawu with the Chairman of Pinnacle Communications Limited, Lucky Omoluwa; the Chief Operating Officer of Pinnacles, Dipo Onifade and Pinnacle Communication Ltd on a 12-count charged.

    They were accused among others of misleading a public officer with the intent to defraud the Federal Government in contravention of Section 19 of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000, which they denied.

    At a point in the life of the case, Omoluwa died in 2020, leading to the amendment of the charge and reduction of the count to five.

    At trial, the prosecuting lawyer, Henry Umore (now the Director, Legal Services at the ICPC) called eight witnesses.

    The witnesses gave evidence in support of the prosecution’s case that the defendants conspired among themselves to confer corrupt advantage and laundered the sum of N2.5 billion.

    They also gave evidence to the effect that then Minister of Information, Lai Mohammed was misled in approving the seed grant and payment of the money to Pinnacle Communication Limited.

    In her judgement and Thursday, Justice Giwa-Ogunbanjo held that the prosecution failed to establish the ingredients of the charge.

    Read Also: Afrijet expands route network, adds Port Harcourt, Bangui

    The judge further held that the prosecution did not tender any exhibits to prove conspiracy, adding that it made no efforts in leading its witnesses to establish evidence of conspiracy.

    Justice Giwa-Ogunbanjo observed that the prosecution witnesses did not testify that Omoluwa was related to Kawu or how he (Kawu) used his office to confer corrupt advantage on himself or on the late Omoluwa.

    On the claim that the minister was misled by Kawu in approving the payment of N2.5 billion as seed grant to Pinnacle Ltd, the court observed that there was no documentary evidence to support the statement of the witnesses.

    The judge noted that despite several adjournment to enable the prosecution call the then minister (Mohammed) to give evidence of how he was misled in approving the seed grant, the prosecution failed to do so.

    Justice Giwa-Ogunbanjo added: “There is no evidence before the court that the defendants committed the offense they were charged.

    “I find them not guilty as charged. They are hereby discharged and acquitted,” the judge said.

  • Salesgirl remanded over alleged N5.2m theft, others

    Salesgirl remanded over alleged N5.2m theft, others

    An Eti-Osa Chief Magistrates’ Court, has remanded a 23-year-old saleslady, Nifemi Friday, in the female custodial centre of Nigerian Correctional Services (NCoS), Kirikiri, Lagos for allegedly stealing goods worth N5.2 million and defamation of character.

    The Magistrate, Mrs T. F. Oyaniyi, remanded the defendant, after she pleaded not guilty to the two counts charge brought against her by the police.

    The police in the charge marked ET/C/18/2025, accused the defendant of stealing the goods at a mall, and for allegedly calling a businessman, Mr. Lateef Lawal, and his wife ritualists.

    Read Also: Rumbling in PDP deepens

    The defendant was arraigned on the charges by the prosecutor, Inspector Adeleye Ganiu, of Ogombo Police Division, Lagos.

    The prosecutor told the court that the defendant committed the offences about 1.00 p.m last December 23, at Obas Mall Okun Ajah, in Eti-Osa of Lagos State.

    The prosecutor told the court that the defendant apart from the goods she stole, also acted in a manner that is likely to cause breach of public peace, by defaming one Mr. Lawal and his wife.

    The defendants was alleged to have sent out voice note messages via social media handles, calling Mr. Lawal and his wife ‘ritualists’.

  • Court acquits Fani-Kayode of medical forgery

    Court acquits Fani-Kayode of medical forgery

    Justice Olubunmi Abike-Fadipe of an  Ikeja Special Offences Court has discharged and acquitted the Former Minister of Aviation, Femi Fani-Kayode, of the charge of medical forgery leveled against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Justice Abike-Fadipe while delivering ruling on the no case submission filed by Fani-Kayode’s Counsel, Mr Wale Balogun (SAN), held  that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendant.

    Abike-Fadipe said the prosecution failed  to establish a link between the defendant and the offences for which he was charged.

    She said the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against  the defendant.

    She noted  that  the prosecution also failed to present the defendant’s associates who allegedly collected money from him or the lawlwyer who allegedly stated that the defendant had instructed his law firm to take the medical reports to the Federal High Court.

    The court held that the extra-judicial statements which are intended as evidence, cannot be used for any purpose other than to contradict the person who made the statement when he is in the witness box.

    “I have carefully studied the evidences of the prosecution witnesses and I cannot find  where the defendant committed the offences  being  alleged.

    “The prosecution has failed to establish a prima facie case which  would  require the defendant to open  his defence.

    “As to the issue of costs, the defendant is at liberty to file an action report and do so in private.”

    The judge consequently discharged and acquitted the defendant of the alleged offences.

     EFCC had on November 11, 2021 charged Fani-Kayode on a 12-count charge of procuring and execution of documents by false pretences, use of false documents, fabrication of evidence and use of fabricated evidence.

    During trial, the prosecution had called seven  witnesses to testify against the former minister and closed its case.

    Fani-Kayode had on December 7, 2024 filed  a no case submission and submitted that  the prosecution had failed in establishing the charges against him.

    Chief Femi Fani-Kayode has faced criminal prosecution and criminal charges and trials in four major cases and four appeals by the EFCC which have jointly lasted over the last 18 years.

    Read Also: JANUARY 15th 1966: A MORNING OF MURDER, MAYHEM AND CARNAGE by Chief Femi Fani-Kayode.

    He has been discharged and acquited  of all the cases and the last one was  on February 4, 2025.

    He was prosecuted from 2008 to 2015 by EFCC at the Federal High Court Lagos before Hon. Justice Ahmad, Hon. Justice Binta Nyarku and finally Hon. Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia.

    He was discharged and acquitted on July 1, 2015 by Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia.

    He was prosecuted by EFCC from 2016 to 2023 at the Federal High Court Lagos before Justice M.S. Hassan,  Justice Aikawa and finally  Justice Oziagor.

    The charges that were proffered against him before Justice Oziagor were quashed by the Court of Appeal sitting in Lagos on April 21, 2023.

     He was prosecuted by EFCC from 2016 to 2025 at the Federal High Court Abuja before  Justice John  Tsoho, the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court,  on  three-count charge of money laundering levelled against him by EFCC.

    He was discharged on all counts on January 15, 2025 by  Justice  Tsoho, the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court. 

    In the same vein, a Federal High Court in Abuja had on January 15  discharged  the former minister of the three-count charge of money laundering levelled against him by EFCC.

    Justice John Tsoho in his ruling, held  that  EFCC failed woefully in proving the charge against Fani-Kayode.

    Tsoho held that the court’s decision was based on the prosecution’s failure to provide sufficient evidence linking Fani-Kayode to the alleged offences.

    He had said: “The prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendant and therefore, the no-case submission was upheld.

    “The prosecution presented three witnesses and tendered exhibits to support their case. However, this court finds that the evidence presented was inconsistent, contradictory, and unreliable.

    “The evidence of PW3 (Mohammed Goji) left more questions than answers and was not conclusive.

    “PW1’s (Victor Ehabhi) evidence under cross-examination showed fundamental inconsistencies and PW2 (Francis Abu) did not link the defendant to the charges.”

    The ruling delivered by Justice John Tsoho  reminiscent of a similar case in 2015, where Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia discharged and acquitted Fani-Kayode of money laundering charges.

    Fani-Kayode’s ordeal began in 2016 when he was initially arraigned by EFCC on a six-count charge, which was later amended to three counts in 2023.

    EFCC alleged that Fani-Kayode received and used N26 million in 2014, which was purportedly for a media campaign on behalf of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the office of the President.

  • Court to hear contract breach suit against Virgin Atlantic Feb. 27

    Court to hear contract breach suit against Virgin Atlantic Feb. 27

    The Federal High Court in Lagos has fixed February 27 for the hearing of a suit filed by a security expert, Alhaji Ahmed Rabiu, against Virgin Atlantic Airways over allegations of breach of contract and the loss of his luggage on board its London to Lagos flight on September 24, 2024.

    The court, which had initially fixed Monday for the hearing, adjourned due to the absence of Justice Alexander Owoeye, who was said to be attending an official function outside the state.

    Rabiu is demanding $4000 for the value of the items contained in the stolen luggage and N20 million as damages for the distress, inconvenience and solicitors’ fees incurred in the course of recovering the luggage.

    In an affidavit filed in support of the suit, the passenger averred that he boarded flight No. CNY3JV from London-Heathrow, United Kingdom, to Murtala Mohammed Airport in Lagos after undergoing rigorous security checks.

    He was properly checked in, along with his tagged prime luggage, by the Defendant’s operational staff.

    But after the plane landed in Lagos, he waited at the conveyor belt from the moment the baggage carousel was activated until it was switched off.

    He said other passengers picked up their luggage except him as he was left devastated.

    The plaintiff also maintained that he immediately informed the defendant’s staff on ground and he was given the Defendant’s Loss of Baggage Form to fill out and submit, which he did immediately.

    Read Also: Court restrains family from entering Badagry community

    But the airline neither gave him his luggage, replaced it or pay for the value of the contents of his luggage.

    The plaintiff claimed that he was devastated by the fraudulent action of the defendant’s relevant operational staff and their recklessness or negligence.

    This, he said, led to the disappearance of his newly bought bag containing his purchases in London properly received and tagged in an accident-free flight which landed in Lagos on schedule.

    He further stated that the defendant’s failure to deliver his luggage to him upon arrival in Lagos after straining his finances to purchase the defendant’s flight ticket was a huge breach of contract.

    Ahmed also claimed that upon the theft and loss of his luggage, he caused his lawyers to write the defendant a demand letter requesting the luggage or payment for the contents of the luggage.

    The plaintiff alleged that the defendant did not respond to the letter, and his lawyer, yet again, sent a reminder, which, again, was not responded to.

    He insisted that he had suffered enormous economic losses and emotional distress and that it was in the interest of justice that the court grant his claims.

    The plaintiff averred: “There was neither accident nor armed robbery on the plane from London-Heathrow to Lagos Nigeria and there no reason why the Plaintiff’s prime luggage could no longer be found upon arrival in Lagos.

    “The plaintiff’s luggage was at all material times at the care and control of the Defendant’s staff, who ought to exercise maximum care on the plaintiff’s luggage.

    “The theft and loss of the plaintiff’s luggage under the defendant’s custody has caused significant inconvenience and distress, and the contents of the said luggage were precious valuables purchased from Zara stores, Mark and Spencer, Diesel jeans outfit, Primark, Calvin Klein, Puma and AC & Co for the plaintiff’s use, his five male children, family and friends as well as valuable gift items for the plaintiff’s boss and colleagues in the office valued over £4000 (Four thousand Pounds). The Plaintiff shall rely on the Loss of Baggage Form showing the loss of the Plaintiff’s luggage.”

  • Court orders demolition of new buildings on disputed Oregunland

    Court orders demolition of new buildings on disputed Oregunland

    Justice Ganiyu Safari of the Lagos High Court in Eti-Osa has ordered the demolition of newly constructed buildings and structures on a disputed land at 10, Kudirat Abiola Way, Oregun, Ikeja, Lagos.

    He made the order in a bench ruling delivered on the motion filed by G. C. Nwosu for the claimants in the suit ID/1375/2011.

    The claimants are: Ayinde Egunaye, Chief Mudiratu Egunaye and Chief Tajudeen Egunaye, who sued for themselves and on behalf of the Egunaye family of Oregun, Ikeja.

    The respondents are Mrs. E. O. Fasehun, Estate of E. 0. Fasehun, Clay Industry (Nig.) Limited, Bamikole Adewunmi, Mrs. Deborah Situ and Mrs. Oyebanji Caroline.

    Justice Safari held: “It is my view that in order to protect the dignity and integrity of the court and in order not to turn the Court into a laughing stock, that this application be granted to send a serious warning to people with the potential to treat the court orders with levity.

    “Consequently, this application is granted. It is hereby ordered that all the new structures built or being built during the pendency of this suit on the land and after the order of Adebiyi J. of 15th May, 2013, being at No. 10, Kudirat Abiola Way, Oregun which is the subject matter of this suit be demolished forthwith.

    “It is ordered that the Deputy Sheriff of this Court, the police and all necessary Law Enforcement Agencies do go into and demolish all new structures built or being built during the pendency of this suit on the land after the order of Adebiyi J. of 15th May, 2013 being at No. Kudirat Abiola Way, Oregun which is the subject matter of this suit and the subject matter of this suit be preserved and left in the state it was as at 15th May, 2013 when the order to maintain status quo was made by my learned brother Adebiyi.

    “It is ordered that a picture of the Res of this case taken after the order of demolition is executed be filed in this Court after the demolition. This shall be the ruling of this court.”

    The claimants prayed for an order demolishing all new structures built or being built within the pendency of the suit on the land.

    They provided exhibits of photographs of the ongoing development on the land.

    According to them, “the court severally ordered that parties maintain status quo and have on several other occasions warned parties against resorting to self-help whilst the matter is before the court”.

    Read Also: S’Court dismisses Fubara’s appeal against 26 lawmakers

    They added: “Claimants had complained before this Honourable Court that one Olufemi Omoola Fasehun who attempted twice to be joined in this suit was developing the land against the orders of the court but the allegation was denied by Counsel for the party seeking to be joined.

    “The person or persons illegally developing the land had continued to develop the land for Engr. E. O. Fasehun despite this matter still being before this court.

    “The Honourable Court has the inherent powers to protect a Res before it and uphold the sanctity, integrity and respect of the Court.

    “The action of those developing the land is capable of causing a breach of peace.”

    The motion was supported by an affidavit deposed to by Chief Egunaye and an affidavit of urgency by Fatimo Abimbola.

    Upon moving the motion, Nwosu urged the court to grant the orders as prayed.

  • Court restrains family from entering Badagry community

    Court restrains family from entering Badagry community

    Justice Yetunde Adesanya of a Lagos High Court sitting at Tafawa Balewa Square has restrained the Idasa Iyesi family of Ilogbo Eremi from entering the Agunmo Community in Badagry Local Government area of the state.

    Justice Adesanya issued the order of injunction restraining Idasa Iyesi Community in a ruling delivered on January 23.2025.

    The order of the court  sets aside the wrongful execution illegally carried out on an area measuring 46.43 hectares of the community’s ancestral land over which possession notices, posts, marks and boards were erected by Idasa Iyesi family of Ilogbo Eremi.

    Justice Adesanya  further directed the removal of all illegal structures, notices and barred Idasa Iyesi family from entering the said portion of land, over which the judgment was delivered in Suit No.BD/28/2012 and Appeal No CA/LAG/CV/940/2020 were sought to be executed, but which  the Agunmo Community was not a party nor sued in the matter.

    According to the certified true copy of the judgment, the Idasa Iyesi family of Ilogbo Eremi in Badagry Local Government Area of the state represented by Hon. Ayo Raji, and Mulero Ogunbiyi and five others had sued the Iyesi community represented by  Posu Asu Govoeyi and four others in respect of a large portion of land stated to be 108.425 hectares at Iyesi Idasa Land in Suit No.BD/28/2012.

    Read Also: End of Fubara’s ‘rascality’ close, says Speaker Amaewhule

    Judgment was delivered by Justice Yetunde Adesanya on June 22.2020 in favour of the Idasa Iyesi family.

    The defendants approached the Court of Appeal against the judgment.

    The parties entered into a consent judgment at the Court of Appeal, in Appeal No CA/LAG/CV/489/2020 where it turned out to be that the area over which the said defendants were in possession was actually 58.930 hectares, which was divided and partitioned into the ratio of 32.227 hectares and 26.603 hectares between the parties, and made the consent judgment of the Court of Appeal, contrary to the allegations that the entire land was 108.425 hectares.

    On January 31, 2023, the judgment creditors in the above Suit BD/28/2012 and Appeal No.CA/LAG/CV/489/2020 in their efforts to claim the other part of the judgment of the  High Court of Lagos State,  went to Agunmo Community which was not sued, and not party to either the suit or the appeal, with several buses filled with officers of Nigeria police armed with guns and land grabbers to levy execution on the portion of Agunmo land measuring 46.43 hectares from the boundary of Iyesi town, to the centre of Agunmo town where there is the popular Agunmo market marking several houses and erecting bill boards and possession  notices.

    The Agunmo Community, led by Chief Job Ogunbiyi, through their Counsel, Peters Oladipo Agboola, filed an application dated November 10, 2023,  praying the court to set aside the execution that was illegally levied on his client’s land on the ground that the said interveners/ applicants, who are Agunmo Community, are distinct and separate  and were not parties to any suit involving the Idasa Iyesi family at the High Court or the Court of Appeal.

    Counsel to the Judgment Creditors, Mr Ola Sobowale  urged the court to dismiss the application on the ground that the judgment was executed on the land covered by the judgment and did not get into Agunmo Land.

    In her ruling, spanning 34 pages, Justice Adesanya, granted the reliefs of the Agunmo  Community, and granted leave to apply to set aside the writ or warrant of execution, writ or warrant of possession/attachment including all processes ordered by the court including the possession notices, posts or marks in respect of the areas which was covered by the judgment, and those not covered by the judgment, over which the Agunmo community is in exclusive possession, since they were not sued and not parties to the suit and the judgement, set aside the execution, ordered the removal of the possession notices.

    The court also  granted an  order and injunction restraining the Iyesi Idasa community from trespassing into any portion of Agunmo Community land.

    The judge, however, refused the reliefs for damages claimed by the Interveners/ Applicants.

    Justice Adesanya ruled: “The Applicants/Interveners are in occupation of the land upon which possession notices were pasted and execution sought to be levied, and they were not parties to this Suit No. BD/28/2012. The Judgment Creditors/Respondents will, therefore, need to institute a separate suit against the applicants/interveners for either the enforcement of the Judgment or a determination of title as between them and the Applicants/Interveners.

    “On the totality of the foregoing, the application succeeds in part. Prayers 1-10 are granted as prayed. Prayers 11, 12 and 13 on damages are refused.”

    With the ruling, peace has returned to the Agunmo community who was not a party to the suit, whose judgment was sought to be executed upon it.

  • Court hears OTL property suit against  gov’s firm March 10

    Court hears OTL property suit against  gov’s firm March 10

    Justice Adebayo Oyebanji of a Lagos High Court sitting at Tafawa Balewa Square (TBS) has fixed March 10 for continuation of hearing in a suit between the Ojukwu Transport Company Limited, (OTL) and Maple Petrochemicals, over alleged 10-year lease of OTL property in Ikoyi.

    The firm,  Maple Petrochemicals, belongs to Kwara State Governor, Abdurahman Abdulrazak.

     The suit bordered on the controversy on the lease agreement between parties in the matter.

    The property situated at 14 Probyn Road, Ikoyi, Lagos belonging to OTL was allegedly ‘leased’ by an agent to Governor Abdulrazak’s Company, Maple Petrochemicals at N4m per annum from 2017 to 2027.

    But Ojukwu Transport Limited (OTL) through their counsels, Chief Ifeanyi Okumah and Chief O. Ugolo (SAN), claimed that the annual rental  value of the said property was nothing less than N25m per annum.

    Read Also: IGP warns officers against gross violation of rights, misconduct

    The agent, Ogbonna Ojukwu &  Associates (with Mrs Victoria Ojukwu and her husband, Sylvester Debe Odumegwu-Ojukwu, who died in 2018, partners) allegedly endorsed the so-called lease with Maple Petrochemicals.

    But the ‘agent’ had ceased to work for OTL since 2007 as stated in OTL processes before the court .

    OTL is contending that the so-called lease was both fraudulent and of no consequence as the so-called agent facilitated it after his mandate to represent OTL had expired.

    OTL alleged that the agent is “fraudulent and has not remitted one Kobo to the company since 1995”, adding that they have been referred to the Police through a petition for investigation and prosecution.

    Based on the petition to the police over two years ago, Mrs Victoria Ojukwu was said to have been invited by the Police.

    “Mrs Victoria Ojukwu did not honour the police invitation and we believe that she absconded to the United States where webelieve that she has been for almost two years,“ OTL informed the court.

    The OTL further maintained that the said ‘agent’ had never been  a shareholder, director or officer of the company.

    OTL  also explained that it had no problem with Maple Petrochemicals remaining in their property till 2027 but insisted that Maple Petrochemicals “legitimise their stay and pay the appropriate rent  for the period 2017 to 2027.”

    In the processes filed in court, Maple Petrochemicals claimed that “the property is the ‘official residence of their Chairman’ and that they have enjoyed peaceful tenancy since 1997.”

    But Ojukwu Transport Limited and its directors told the court that they have not received a kobo in respect of the property and others, ‘managed’ by the agent from 1995 till date.

    Ojukwu Transport Limited in their own filing, stated that warrant was duly and validly executed in April 2022 after the judgment delivered by Justice Oyebanji in June 2018 in suit LD/794/2011 between Ognonna Ojukwu and anr Vs OTL and others.

    The OTL insisted that there was no agreement between them and Governor Abdurahman Abdulrazak or his company.

    At the last sitting of the court on December 11, 2024, the matter was adjourned to 10 March 2025.

    Maple Petrochemicals, through their counsel, Maple Petrochemicals was represented by Charles Musa (SAN) is asking the court to restrain Ojukwu Transport Limited from removing them from the property.

  • Court orders final forfeiture of $835,081 linked to firm, others

    Court orders final forfeiture of $835,081 linked to firm, others

    The Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered the permanent forfeiture of $835,081.46 traced to the dollar wallet of SDQ Facilitators Limited in Leatherback, also known as Rexel Nigeria Limited.

    SDQ is one of the users on the platform of Leatherback – a cross-border payment startup.

    Justice Deinde Dipeolu granted the order following an ex parte application by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The commission’s application by its counsel, Saadatu Yabo, was brought under Section 44 (2) (b) of the 1999 Constitution and Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud Act 2006.

    EFCC’s investigating officer Abubakar Magaji said the sum was reasonably suspected to be the proceeds of an unlawful activity.

    On December 10, 2024, the court granted an interim forfeiture order of the money and directed the EFCC to publish it so that any interested person would show cause within 14 days why the final forfeiture order of the money should not be made in favour of the Federal Government.

    Read Also: Six things you should know as FG begins contactless passport application system in Europe

    No one came forward, paving the way for the court to order the final forfeiture of the funds.

    In a supporting affidavit, Magaji said he was one of the officers assigned to investigate the petitions against Mr. Adegboyega Agbede, SDQ Facilitators Limited and Rexel Nigeria Limited (Leatherback).

    He said: “It was alleged in the petitions that the suspects obtained from the petitioners the cumulative sum of N136,951,378,633 under the false representation that they have $224,601,850.15 USD to sell to the petitioners.

    “That upon the receipt of the petitioners’ N136, 951,378.633, the suspects refused to remit the dollar equivalent or refund the naira but instead diverted the funds to their personal use.

    “That the petitions against the suspects – Mr. Adegboyega Agbede, LawalMuh’d Kazeem of SDQ Facilitators Limited and Rexel Nigeria Limited – bordered on fraudulent diversion and obtaining the total sum of $8,113,366 USD under false pretence from the petitioners.”