Tag: Court

  • Agency awaits courts’ decision on contractor’s claims

    Agency awaits courts’ decision on contractor’s claims

    Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) is yet to release money to oil-producing states or consultant because such payment is subject to confirmation by Accountant General of the Federation  and Ministry of Finance, it was learnt yesterday.

    Centre for Anti-Corruption and Open Leadership (CACOL), in a statement by its Chair, Debo Adeniran, faulted a publication by Zilcon Higgs International: “Firm petitions RMAFC Chair Shehu over $330 million payment.”

    It urged Zilcon to await Federal High Court and Court of Appeal, Abuja, judgment “instead of resorting to allegations and campaign of calumny against RMAFC Chair, Muhammed Bello Shehu and staff of the commission”.

    Zilcon, a consulting firm, claimed it was yet to be paid for a job it allegedly carried out for the nine oil-bearing  states.

    Chief Executive, Sampson Orji, said the firm was contracted by governors of the states to recover $2,471,040,983.38 omitted in the recommendation of the FAAC post-mortem committee in an earlier refund to states.

    Read Also: Nigerians lose ₦42bn to POS, mobile fraud in Q2 2024

    CACOL said it observed Zilcon had alleged the Nigerian Governors’ Forum gave the job to Tiaras White Consult to the states for the same job.

    The group noted RMAFC chair had told EFCC that Tiaras White was the only consultant engaged by the states.

    CACOL wondered why Zilcon “is crying more than the bereaved” rather than allowing the affected states to claim their money before asking for their consultancy fee.

    The group noted RMAFC chairman’s explanation that the funds will only be paid to the beneficiary states subject to federal accountant general and the ministry’s approvals.

    CACOL also stressed that RMAFC cannot authorise or make deductions from statutory allocations without authorisation of states and councils.

    The group said: “It is maladroit to continue to effect payments of judgment debts arising from contracts or agreements entered into by either NGF or ALGON which are to be financed by deductions at source from statutory allocations due to states or councils without proper appropriation.

    “We cannot forget a similar incident involving consultancy and contract claims associated with payment of London-Paris Club refunds.

    “When a case is before a court, it is subjudice for parties to continue to make public statements. We believe this is why RMAFC does not want to join issues with Zilcon Higgs.

    “It is our opinion the firm should await courts’ ruling…”                              

  • Court stops BEDC from disconnecting UNIMEDTH

    Court stops BEDC from disconnecting UNIMEDTH

    An Ondo State High Court sitting in Akure has restrained the Benin Electricity Distribution Company (BEDC) from disconnecting electricity at the state-owned University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital (UNIMEDTH), Ondo, over alleged indebtedness.

    It also stopped the BEDC from tampering with the cable that supplied electricity to the hospital.

    Justice B J Akinwumi granted the ex-parte order in a suit filed by the hospital through its counsel, Iyiola Afolabi.

    Read Also: Court lifts order restraining INEC, SIEC, others over Kwara council poll

    The hospital dragged BEDC to court over fear of disconnection of its power owing to alleged indebtedness.

    It prayed for “An Order of interim injunction restraining the Defendant, its agents, servants, privies staff or officers or anybody claiming through or for the Defendant from disconnecting or threatening to disconnect electricity supply to the claimant pending the determination of the Motion on Notice.”

    The motion was brought under order 20 Rule 1 (1) and (2), Rule 15 of the Ondo State High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019 and under the inherent jurisdiction of the Honourable Court.

    Justice Akinwumi in his order after reading affidavits that accompanied the motion.

    No date has, however, been fixed for the hearing due to ongoing courts’ vacation.

  • Court fixes October 28 for Lagos pastor’s trial

    Court fixes October 28 for Lagos pastor’s trial

    Magistrate Antoinette Dirisu of the Lagos Magistrate Court, Ogba, Ikeja, Lagos, has adjourned the trial of a Lagos-based pastor, Jude Ojo, in an alleged perversion of justice and conspiracy suit to October 28.

    The pastor was arraigned by the Lagos State Commissioner of Police on a three-count charge, including conspiracy, obstructing justice, and aiding the escape of five suspects accused of threatening the life of High Chief Kehinde Kalejaiye, the traditional ruler of the Otumara community in Lagos.

    The principal witness, High Chief Kalejaiye, led in evidence by prosecuting counsel, Ben Emuerhi, alleged a conspiracy between the defendant and the five suspects who are now at large to pervert justice.

    He told the court: “It’s a conspiracy. There is a game plan between the defendant and the five suspects to pervert justice. My Lord, the defendant wine and dine with the suspects every day in the community. They are friends. He chose not to produce them before the court to answer to allegations levelled against them by the police.

    “The defendant is a conspirator. Let me cite an instance of a case I instituted against the defendant and the suspects at large in 2020. It borders on a similar count charge as the court is hearing today. It happened that in 2020, the defendant and the suspects at large were charged to court for assault, harassment, breach of public peace, and bullying me for championing the construction of a Senior Secondary School in the community. But after much plea from them and interventions from eminent personalities in the community, I discontinued this only for them to repeat the same act four years after.”

    The prosecuting counse,l however, tendered a CTC of the charge sheet of the case which was instituted against the defendant alongside the suspects in 2020.

    Read Also: Federal High Court resumes today from annual vacation

    According to Emuerhi, the document established a link between the defendant and the suspects at large.

    Addressing the court, the prosecuting counsel said: “With the document before this court, the witness has proved that the defendant intentionally didn’t want to produce the suspects at large before the court. My Lord, the defendant is one of the suspects at large. The defendant therefore is making an attempt to pervert justice not only by not producing the suspects at large before the court but also by joining in a case as one of the complaints at Zone 2 to effect the arrest and eventual prosecution of the witness.”

    The defence counsel, Mariam Ilo, objected to the document, arguing that it has no relevance to the case at hand.

    She said: “The defendant stood surety for unknown suspects who are now at large. He cannot produce them, therefore it has no relevance to the case at hand. Any attempt to muddle the water will create a wrong impression before the public. The fact in the said document is extraneous to this case.”

    Magistrate Antoinette Dirisu of the Magistrate Court in Ogba, Ikeja, Lagos, admitted the document in evidence and adjourned the case to October 28 for further hearing.

  • Court to INEC: recognise Edo APC polling/collation agents

    Court to INEC: recognise Edo APC polling/collation agents

    A Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from excluding the All Progressives Congress (APC) polling and collating agents from participating in governorship election holding in Edo State on Saturday. 

    The court presided over by Justice Emeka Nwite also orded INEC to temporarily accept and give effect to the list of the polling and collation agents for the poll.

    In the case with Suit Number FHC/AB/CS/1326/2024, the APC is challenging the non-recognition exclusion of its agents from taking part in the poll.

    Read Also: Gas explosion renders many homeless in Akwa Ibom community

    After hearing the application of APC counsel-Abdulghani Arobo, leading Ayodele Toe and Ayodeji Ibekunle, the judge ordered that the electoral comission not to exclude the polling and colation agents, pending thd hearing and determination of tgr motion on notice. 

    The case was adjourned to September 18, 2024.

    Justice Nwite said: “An order of interim injuction of this Honourable court is gereby made restraining the defendant from depriving the polling and collation agents of the plaintiff official tags and full participation in the forthcoming Edo governorship election and instead directing the defendant/respondent to temporarily publish or issue customised rags with the names, details and documents of the plaintiffs polling agents or submitted for for the purpose of the forthcoming Edo State governorship election, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice.”

  • Paternity dispute: Court restrains IGP, others from investigating ex-Minister Turaki

    Paternity dispute: Court restrains IGP, others from investigating ex-Minister Turaki

    • Hadiza’s parents accuse ex-Minister of responsibility 

    An Upper Area Court in Kado, Abuja has issued an order restraining the Inspector General of Police (IGP) and other police personnel from further investigating the paternity dispute between a former Minister of Special Duties and Inter-Governmental Affairs, Kabiru Turaki and the family of a former acquaintance – Ms. Uwani Arabi, pending the determination of a suit the ex-Minister filed. 

    A judge of the court, Mr. Shehu Ahmadu issued the order in a ruling in which he particularly restrained the IGP and others  from Musa Baffa, Uwani Arabi and their daughter, Hadiza Baffa, in relation to the ex-minister as the matter is already before the court.

    The ruling was on an ex-parte motion filed by Turaki, marked: M/26/2024.

    A Certified True Copy (CTC) of the enrolled order, seen by The Nation on Friday, reads: “The respondents are hereby restrained, especially the 4th to 10th respondents from accepting any complaint from the 1st to 3rd respondents, especially the 2nd respondent or carrying any investigation relating to the applicant as the matter is already before a competent court of law, the Upper Area Court Kado FCT, in CV/35/2024 until the determination of the motion on notice before this honourable court.

    “This order is given under the hand and seal of the honourable judge.” 

    Sued by Turaki are Musa Baffa (father), Hadiza Baffa (daughter), Uwani Arabi (mother), Nigeria Police Force (NPF), the IGP, DIG Sylvester Alabi (DIG Force CID), AIG Muhammad Dan Kwara (Force CID), CP Musbahu Ajani (CP Admin, Force CID), CSP Mohammed Gashua and SP Ibrahim Shugaba.

    Turaki, in the substantive suit marked: CV/35/2024 claimed to have been falsely accused by Musa Baffa, his (Baffa’s) daughter, Hafiza and estranged wife Ms. Arabi of gathering a female child through Hafiza.

    The ex-Minister, who equally claimed to be a benefactor to Hafiza and her mother (Ms. Arabi), denied the paternity of Hadiza’s pregnancy, which resulted in the female child.

    Turaki also claimed that Hadiza had a boyfriend who he said was responsible for the pregnancy.

    The ex-minister alleged that sometime in 2016, Ms. Uwani, who was his acquaintance in Kano before her marriage to Baffa, called him on the phone and sought his advice on her plans to relocate her daughter, Hadiza, “who was then schooling, according to her, at University of Maiduguri, because of the activities of Boko Haram.”

    He said he advised Ms. Uwani to secure admission for her daughter at Bayero University, Kano; Usman Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, or the University of Ilorin. 

    The ex-Minister added that after some weeks of the previous discussion, Ms. Uwani called and told him that she was coming to Abuja together with Hadiza and begged him to arrange accommodation for them.

    He said he obliged by securing an accommodation at Ideal Guest House, Garki which was a furnished apartment that is let out for short or long stays. 

    He said Ms. Uwani secured admission for Hadiza at Baze University in Abuja and he supported her with N1 million out of the N3 million for registration fees. 

    Read Also: Fed Govt, World Bank collaborate on electricity access reforms

    He alleged that Ms. Uwani pleaded with him to serve as Guardian for her daughter, Hadiza.

    The ex-Minister stated that he took responsibility for Hadiza’s upkeep, adding that he was surprised to discover that Hadiza connived with her mother to change her surname to Turaki without his knowledge and consent.

    He claimed that when Hadiza’s criminal acts became so intense, he drove her away and directed his staff not to allow her close to her office anymore.

    Turaki alleged that after walking out on the daughter and the mother for a month or thereabout, Ms. Uwani called him on the phone and requested to see him.

    He said during the meeting, Ms. Uwani told him that her daughter was pregnant and she said he was responsible.

    Turaki averred that he out rightly denied the allegation describing it as a blackmail.

    He alleged that Hadiza’s father, who he said had abandoned the daughter for 28 years, called him around May regarding the issue.

    However, in their joint statement of defence, Baffa, Ms. Arabi and Hafiza denied Turaki’s claims.

    Hadiza and Uwani stated that, as against his claim, it was the ex-Minister who reached out to Ms. Uwani and offered to help her daughter “by enrolling her into Baze University in Abuja, bear the cost of her education and accommodation; and serve as her guardian.”

    They claimed that the plaintiff (Turaki) committed to doing everything for the 2nd defendant because according to him, he considered her as his daughter. 

    They alleged that it was Turaki who suggested the university, contrary to his claim.

    They said Hadiza’s registration fee when she gained admission in 2014 was N950, 000 and that the ex-minister gave her $2000 dollars for the fees.

    Uwani said contrary to Turaki’s claim, the former minister offered to serve as Hadiza’s guardian.

    Uwani, who said she never requested or prompted such a decision, said that at that time she did not suspect that Turaki had sinister motives towards her daughter.

    Hadiza averred that she never suspected that Turaki’s benevolence towards her was to take her advantage. 

    Uwani said contrary to Turaki’s claim that she begged him to give her daughter a car, the woman said she never had any of such discussion with the former minister.

    According to her, it was the plaintiff who called her to pick up the Toyota Almera from his office at T.Y. Danjuma Street, Asokoro and she was surprise to see that the car particulars carried her name as “Hadiza Turaki.”

    Hadiza claimed that it was the ex-Minister who changed her name to “Hadiza Turaki” by putting the same on the vehicle papers he bought for her and persuaded her to use the same name on her Guarantee Trust Bank account number through which he sent monies to her severally through his account officer. 

    Hadiza alleged that she had challenges with her education, and faced physical and emotional trauma when the ex-minister “exploited her under the guise of being her guardian and frequently visited her in the apartments he got for her and severally lured her into having an illicit sexual relationship with him.”

    She claimed that the plaintiff severally threatened her not to let her parents know that he was taking advantage of her; thus, she was scared and traumatised, and the trauma affected her and her studies. 

    Hadiza added that when the plaintiff realised that she was going through psychological and physical trauma, he kept promising to marry her and began to build romantic phone and WhatsApp conversations with her. 

    She claimed that when she discovered that she was pregnant for Turaki, she informed him and he took several steps, including phone calls made to her trying to compel and push her to abort the pregnancy. 

    She said she decided to keep the pregnancy against all odds when she was advised against terminating it and the risk involved.

     She alleged that Turaki became wild against her when she refused to listen to him.

    Hadiza said she delivered the baby girl on April 3, 2023.

    “And when the plaintiff later saw the baby, he acknowledged that she was his daughter as a result of the striking resemblance with him,” she alleged. 

    Hadiza claimed that the ex-minister paid for her antenatal, delivery and postnatal care at the Nizamiyye Hospital in Abuja.

    Further hearing in the case had adjourned till September 24.

    The Nation learnt that Turaki had filed a similar case before the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, with suit number: CV/189/2024.

    It was further learnt that he has also filed a motion ex-parte before the High Court of the FCT seeking, among others, to restrain Baffa, Ms. Arabi and Hafiza from further making public comments on the dispute while the case is pending in count.

  • Paternity dispute: Court restrains IGP, others from investigating ex-Minister Turaki

    Paternity dispute: Court restrains IGP, others from investigating ex-Minister Turaki

    An Upper Area Court in Kado, Abuja has issued an order restraining the Inspector General of Police (IGP) and other police personnel from further investigating the paternity dispute between a former Minister of Special Duties and Inter-Governmental Affairs, Kabiru Turaki and the family of a former acquaintance – Ms. Uwani Arabi pending the determination of a suit the ex-Minister filed.

    A judge of the court, Mr. Shehu Ahmadu issued the order in a ruling in which he particularly restrained the IGP and others from Musa Baffa, Uwani Arabi and their daughter, Hadiza Baffa, in relation to the ex-minister as the matter is already before the court.

    The ruling was on an ex-parte motion filed by Turaki, marked: M/26/2024.

    A certified true copy (CTC) of the enrolled order, seen by The Nation on Friday, reads: “The respondents are hereby restrained, especially the 4th to 10th respondents from accepting any complaint from the 1st to 3rd respondents, especially the 2nd respondent or carrying any investigation relating to the applicant as the matter is already before a competent court of law, the Upper Area Court Kado FCT, in CV/35/2024 until the determination of the motion on notice before this honourable court.

    “This order is given under the hand and seal of the honourable judge.”

    Sued by Turaki are Musa Baffa (father), Hadiza Baffa (daughter), Uwani Arabi (mother), Nigeria Police Force (NPF), the IGP, DIG Sylvester Alabi (DIG Force CID), AIG Muhammad Dan Kwara (Force CID), CP Musbahu Ajani (CP Admin, Force CID), CSP Mohammed Gashua and SP Ibrahim Shugaba.

    Turaki, in the substantive suit marked: CV/35/2024, claimed to have been falsely accused by Musa Baffa, his (Baffa’s) daughter, Hafiza and estranged wife Ms. Arabi of gathering a female child through Hafiza.

    The ex-Minister, who also claimed to be a benefactor to Hafiza and her mother (Ms. Arabi), denied the paternity of Hadiza’s pregnancy, which resulted in the female child

    Turaki also claimed that Hadiza had a boyfriend who he said was responsible for the pregnancy.

    The ex-minister alleged that sometimes in 2016, Ms. Uwani, who was his acquaintance in Kano before her marriage to Baffa, called him on phone and sought his advice on her plans to relocate her daughter, Hadiza, “who was then schooling, according to her, at University of Maiduguri, because of the activities of Boko Haram.”

    He said he advised Ms. Uwani to secure and.ission for her daughter at Bayero University, Kano; Usman Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, or University of Ilorin.

    The ex-Minister added that after some weeks of the previous discussion, Ms. Uwani called and told him that she was coming to Abuja together with Hadiza and begged him to arrange an accommodation for them.

    He said he obliged by securing an accommodation at Ideal Guest House, Garki which Is a furnished apartment that are let out for short or long stay.

    He said Ms. Uwani secured admission for Hadiza at Baze University in Abuja and he supported her with N1 million out of the N3 million for registration fees.

    He alleged that Ms. Uwani pleaded with him to serve as Guardian for her daughter, Hadiza.

    Read Also: Fed Govt, World Bank collaborate on electricity access reforms

    The ex-Minister states that he took responsibility of Hadiza’s upkeep, adding that he was surprised to discover that Hadiza connived with her mother to change her surname to Turaki without his knowledge and consent.

    He claimed that when Hadiza’s criminal acts became so intense, he drive her away and directed his staff not to allow her close to her office anymore.

    Turaki alleged that after walking out on the daughter and the mother for a month or there about, Ms. Uwani called him on phone and requested to see him.

    He said during the meeting, Ms. Uwani told him that her daughter was pregnant and she said he was responsible.

    Turaki averred that he outrightly denied the allegation describing it as a blackmail.

    He alleged that Hadiza’s father, who he said had abandoned the daughter for 28 years, called him around May regarding the issue.

    However, in their joint statement of defence Baffa, Ms. Arabi and Hafiza denied Turaki’s claims.

    Hadiza and Uwani stated that, as against his claim, it was the ex-Minister who reached out to Ms. Uwani) and offered to help her daughter “by enrolling her into Baze University in Abuja, bear the cost of her education and accommodation; and serve as her guardian.”

    They claimed that the plaintiff (Turaki) committed to doing everything for the 2nd defendant because according to him, he considers her as his daughter.

    They alleged that it was Turaki who suggested the university contrary to his claim.

    They said Hadiza’s registration fees when she gained admission in 2014 was N950, 000 and that the ex-minister gave her $2000 dollars for the fees.

    Uwani said contrary to Turaki’s claim, the former minister offered to serve as Hadiza’s guardian.

    Uwani, who said she never requested or prompted for such decision, said as at that time she did not suspect that Turaki had sinister motives towards her daughter.

    Hadiza averred that she never suspected that Turaki’s benevolence towards her was to take her advantage

    Uwani said contrary to Turaki’s claim that she begged him to give her daughter a car, the woman said she never had any of such discussion with the former minister.

    According to her, it was the plaintiff who called her to pick up the Toyota Almera from his office at T.Y. Danjuma Street, Asokoro and she was surprise to see that the car particulars carried her name as “Hadiza Turaki.”

    Hadiza claimed that it was the ex-Minister who changed her name to “Hadiza Turaki” by putting same on the vehicle papers he bought for her and persuaded her to use the same name on her Guarantee Trust Bank account number through which he sent monies to her severally through his account officer.

    Hadiza alleged that she had challenges with her education, faced physical and emotional trauma when the ex-minister “exploited her under the guise of being her guardian and frequently visiting her in the apartments he got for her and severally lured her into having illicit sexual relationship with him.”

    She claimed that the plaintiff severally threatened her not to let her parents know that he was taking advantage of her thus, she was scared and traumatised, and the trauma affected her and her studies.

    Hadiza added that when the plaintiff realised that she was passing through psychological and physical trauma, he kept promising to marry her and began to build romantic phone and WhatsApp conversations with her.

    She claimed that when she discovered that she was pregnant for Turaki, she informed him and he took several steps, including phone calls made to her trying to compel and pushing her to abort the pregnancy.

    She said she decided to keep the pregnancy against all odds when she was advised against terminating it and the risk involved.

    She alleged that Turaki became wild against her when she refused to listen to him.

    Hadiza said she delivered the baby girl on April 3, 2023

    “And when the plaintiff later saw the baby, he acknowledged that she was his daughter as a result of the striking resemblance with him,” she alleged.

    Hadiza claimed that the ex-Minister paid for her antenatal, delivery and postnatal care at the Nizamiyye Hospital in Abuja.

    Further hearing in the case had adjourned till September 24.

    The Nation learnt that Turaki has filed a similar case before the HIgh Court of the Federal Capital Territory, with suit number: CV/189/2024.

    It was further learnt that he has also filed a motion ex-parte before the HIgh Court of the FCT seeking, among others, to restrain Baffa, Ms. Arabi and Hafiza from further makeing public comments on the dispute while the case is pending in count.

  • Court grants N10m bail to each of detained 10 protesters charged with treason, others

    Court grants N10m bail to each of detained 10 protesters charged with treason, others

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has granted N10 million bail to each of the 10 suspects arrested over the last #EndBadGovernance.

    They are: Michael Tobiloba Adaramoye (Lenin), 28 years; Adeyemi Abiodun Abayomi (Yomi), 34 years; Suleiman Yakubu, 28 years; Opaluwa Eleojo Simon, 50 years; Buhari Lawal, 21 years; Mosiu Sadiq, 28 years; Bashir Bello (aka Murtala), 51 years; Nurudeen Khamis, 47 years; and Abduldalam Zubair, 37 years.

    Justice Emeka Nwite granted them bail yesterday while ruling on the applications filed and argued by lawyers to the 10 protesters who were charged by the Inspector General of Police (IGP) with treason, publicly calling for military takeover, among others.

    Other conditions to be met by the 10 defendants, according to the judge, include producing one surety each in like sum, while the sureties must be residents of Abuja.

    Read Also: JUST IN: Court grants N100m bail to detained 10 #EndBadGovernance protesters

    The judge said each of the sureties must be property owners in Abuja and that they must deposit the documents of their properties with the court, besides swearing to an affidavit of means.

    Justice Nwite averred that both the defendants and the sureties must deposit their international passports and three recent passport photographs with the court.

    The judge restrained the defendants from further participating in any public rally during the pendency of their trial.

    He ordered that the defendants remain in custody pending when they are able to meet the bail conditions.

    Justice Nwite adjourned till September 27 for the commencement of trial.

    The defendants were arranged on September 2 in a charge in which they are accused of, among others, conspiring to commit treason, inciting violence, attacking public institutions, instigating mutiny against the Nigerian government.

  • Anger as pregnant banker remanded by Osun court gives birth in prison

    Anger as pregnant banker remanded by Osun court gives birth in prison

    There is outrage in Osun State following prolonged incarceration of a banker, Mrs. Awanat Ajayi, who is being held in the Ilesa Correctional Facility.

    The spokesperson of Osun Police Command, Yemisi Opalola, had recently disclosed the arrest of First Bank manager, Talabi Adeniyi over N650m fraud used for Proof of Fund (POF).

     Ajayi who is one of the bankers under Talabi who used to get money for POF from interested members of the public was arrested after she allegedly collected money from a Magistrate..

    However, the business deal went awry when Talabi allegedly lost N650m during the business deal.

    Hence, Ajayi was arraigned before an Osun State Magistrate’s Court presided over by Olusegun Ayilara for collecting a sum of N10m from Magistrate Oyindamola Daramola.

    Read Also: UPDATED: Appeal Court rejects Esene, Ojezua’s case to disqualify Ighodalo

    She was subsequently remanded despite an oral bail application made by her lawyer who noted that the offence was a bailable one and that she has a few weeks to deliver, coupled with the fact that she has Hepatitis B.

    On July 4th 2024, Olusegun Ayilara granted her stringent bail conditions noting that a Bank Manager and level 14 officer should be her surety with a deposit of N5m before she can be released.

    On Wednesday, during the sitting, counsel to the banker noted that Mrs Ajayi had delivered a baby through a Cesarean section surgery.

    Magistrate Ayilara told the banker’s husband that giving birth is not a technical reason for discharge, noting that “Your wife’s bail condition has not been perfected, delivery not a technical reason for discharge. This is the law and even me doesn’t have power over it, it is only a higher court that can say otherwise.”

  • Court remands ex-governor’s aide for allegedly defaming Sokoto gov, wife

    Court remands ex-governor’s aide for allegedly defaming Sokoto gov, wife

    A Sokoto Chief Magistrate Court on Friday remanded Shafi’u Umar in a corrections centre for allegedly circulating falsehood against Gov. Ahmad Aliyu and his wife on social media platform.

    Umar, 37, who was the Special Assistant to former Gov. Aminu Tambuwal is charged with circulating injurious falsehood and engraving matter known to be defamatory.

    The case was first mentioned on Aug. 26, and the Police Prosecutor, Insp Abdurahman Mansur, said the  offence contravened the penal code law.

    According to the First Information Report (FIR), the defendant committed the offence  on July 18. 

    Read Also: BREAKING: Appeal Court rejects Esene, Ojezua’s case to disqualify Ighodalo

    The Prosecution said the defendant circulated a video of the governor’s wife, Hajia Fatima Aliyu , “ spraying” money during her birthday ceremony in spite of the present hardships faced by citizens.

    Umar was also allegedly accused of sharing a document that indicated that Gov. Aliyu failed his Senior Secondary School Examination, scored F9 and is incapable of speaking English.

    The defendant had pleaded not guilty to the charge.

    The lead Defence Counsel, Mr Al’Mustafa Abubakar, made an oral application for bail which was objected to by the Prosecution and. Magistrate reserved for ruling.

    Earlier, Abubakar urged the Judge to adjourn the case for definite hearing arguing that the prosecution not hide under the guise of investigation, which ought to have been completed before the next sitting.

    In her ruling, Chief Magistrate, Fati Hassan, said the only document before her  was the FIR and in recognition of the nature of the offence, the defence counsel needs to file a formal application for his client’s bail.

    Hassan adjourned the case until Sept. 18.

    She ordered that the defendant should be remanded in a corrections facility.

    (NAN)

  • Court jails 39 internet fraudsters in Ibadan

    Court jails 39 internet fraudsters in Ibadan

    The Ibadan Zonal Directorate of Economic and Financial Commission (EFCC) has secured conviction and sentence of 39 internet fraudsters from Justices O.S. Adeyemi, Bayo Taiwo and Ladiran Akintola, all of the Oyo State High Court, sitting in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital.

    The convicts were prosecuted on a separate one-count charge each, bordering on impersonation, cheating, possession of fraudulent documents and obtaining by false pretence.

    A statement by EFCC Head, Media and Publicity, Dele Oyewale said, “The convicts are: Fasanya Abdulqudus Gbolahan, Nkiri Oluchukwu Destiny, Fakoya Tobi Samuel, Owolabi Qudus Damilare, Isiaka Olajide Adebayo, Olawoyin Wasiu Olasunkanmi, Olawale Owolabi Abideen, Olayiwola Tunde Waheed, Kehinde Pelumi Abdulrauf, Okunlola Taoreed Abidoun, Okunlola Dolapo Mujeeb, Ademeso Raphael Olamide, Lawal Olajuwon Ridwan, Femi Dogo Oluremi, Ehinmowo Jeremiah Damilola, Joseph Isaac Justice, Enitan Tolulope John, Kolawole Toluwani Josaiah, Alo Ayokunnumi Emmanuel, Adetola Opeyemi Idris and Joshua Imole Shiyanbola.

    Others are: Idowu Ezekiel David, Salau Abeeb Ayomide, Adeyemi Samuel Adeleke, Philip Olabode Olatunde, Fasanya Gbenga Tunde, Seun Ayomide Babatunde, Ogoayo Alabi Sijuola, Akanji Timothy Bidoun, Quadri Salami Oyindamola, Samuel Adeyemi Oluwatobi, Ogunyemi Gbolahan Opemiposi, Olabanjo Oluwafemi Olatunbosun, Paul Nneji Uche, Ayomiposi Clement Akinyimika, Abdullahi Mustapha Adisa, Ajetunmobi Azeez Olashile, Oluwaseun Adeyeye Adeniran and Onah Austine Ayomide.

    “The charge against Austine Ayomide reads: “That you, Onah Austine Ayomide ‘M’ on or about 28th March, 2024, at Ibadan, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, fraudulently impersonated by representing yourself to be a white woman by the name Linda Mary from United States of America, through your Facebook account (Linda Mary) to one Clifton Deininger, from United States of America, with intent to gain advantage for yourself and thereby commited an offence of personation contrary to Section 484 of the Criminal Code Law Cap 38, Laws of Oyo State, 2000.”

    “They all pleaded “guilty” to the charges when they were read to them, following which prosecution counsel reviewed the facts of the cases, tendered incriminating documents and prayed the courts to convict and sentence them accordingly.

    Read Also: Court orders arrest of Briton, others for alleged terrorism, inciting mutiny

    Justice Adeyemi convicted and sentenced Austin Ayomide to one year community service or to pay a fine of N200, 000.00 (Two Hundred Thousand Naira), Tunde got one month jail term or to pay a fine of N250, 000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Naira), while Abeeb Ayomide, Adeleke, Babatunde, Biodun, Oyindamola, Oluwatobi, Olatunbosun, Uche, Akinyimika, Adisa, Olashile and Adeniran bagged six months community service each and to pay N50, 000.00 (Fifty Thousand Naira) each in addition to their sentence, besides Abeeb Ayomide who was slammed with N500, 000.00 (Five Hundred Thousand Naira) in addition to his sentence. 

    He slammed Sijuola with one month community service or to pay a fine of N100,000 (One Hundred Thousand Naira). Olatunde and Opemiposi were handed three months community service without an option of fine.

    Justice Taiwo on his part convicted and sentenced Taoreed Abidoun to three months imprisonment, Mujeeb to four months jail term, while Olasunkanmi and Abideen bagged six months community service each and were further ordered to pay a fine of N150, 000.00 (One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Naira) each in addition their sentences.

    He convicted and sentenced Gbolahan, Damilare, Adebayo and Abdulrauf to five months community service each and gave the latter a fine option N100,000 (One Hundred Thousand Naira). Waheed  and Samuel got four months community service, and a fine of N100, 000.00 (One Hundred Thousand Naira), while Destiny bagged two months community service.

    Justice Akintola convicted and sentenced Olamide, Oluremi, Damilola, Justice, Josaiah, Emmanuel and Shiyanbola bagged one year jail term each or  to pay a fine of N30, 000.00 (Thirty Thousand Naira), N50, 000.00 (Fifty Thousand Naira), N75, 000.00 (Seventy-five Thousand Naira), N75, 000.00 (Seventy-five Thousand Naira), N50, 000.00 (Fifty Thousand Naira), N120, 000.00 (One Hundred and Twenty Thousand Naira) and N100, 000.00 (One Hundred Thousand Naira) respectively.

    Damilola forfeited a green-coloured Nissan Micra car with registration number: LSD – 464 – GU with Chassis Number: SJNFBAK11U3001751; Emmanuel forfeited a black-coloured Lexus IS 250 car with registration number: MUS – 158 – JHS and Justice forfeited a black-coloured Toyota Corolla  car with registration number: FST – 607 – GN.

    Justice Akintola convicted and sentenced Idris and David to six months community service each or to pay fines of N60, 000.00 (Sixty Thousand Naira) and N150, 000.00 (One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Naira) respectively. Ridwan and John bagged three months community service each or to pay fines of N25, 000.00 (Twenty-five Thousand Naira) and N30, 000.00 (Thirty Thousand Naira) respectively.

    The convicts forfeited all items recovered from them to the Federal Government.

    All the convicts began their journey to prison when they were arrested in a sting operation for fraudulent internet activities.