Tag: Court

  • Court freezes 32 individuals, firms’ accounts linked to Aug. protests

    Court freezes 32 individuals, firms’ accounts linked to Aug. protests

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has issued an order freezing 32 bank accounts belonging to individuals and firms linked to the economic crisis protests, which took place in the first week of this month.

    The protests took place in spite warnings by security agents it stood the risk of being hijacked by hoodlums and criminal elements.

    Lootings, destruction of public and private properties accompanied the action as a result of which more than a hundred people were arrested. Some people, including policemen, were confirmed dead.

    Justice Emeka Nweze, who issued the order, said the accounts shall remain frozen pending the conclusion of police’s investigation and prosecution of the case.

    Justice Nweze issued the order while ruling on an order ex-parte motion filed and argued for Inspector General of Police (IGP) Kayode Egbetokun.

    In the ruling rendered on Thursday, an enrolled copy of which The Nation sighted yesterday, the judge equally ordered the banks to apprehend the account holders or any person transacting business on the said accounts.

    He ordered the banks to contact the Nigeria Police Force through the telephone numbers: 08035179870 and 07032449912 as soon  as any arrest was  made.

    Justice Nwite said: “The banks are hereby directed by this honourable court to issue details of the account package(s) and to place a Post-No-Debit (PND) on the accounts, disable the ATM while allowing inflow into the said accounts as from the date of this court order.”

    Read Also: Ganduje lauds Ododo, Uzodinma over Supreme Court’s victories

    Listed as respondents in the case, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1219/2024, are PA.LIN.HO Global Service Ltd, Innocent Angel Lovet Chinyere Nkiru, Obidient Movement Multipurpose Cooperative Society, Innocent Angel Lovet, and Great Communicators Champion Multipurpose Cooperative Society Ltd.

    Others are: Great Communicators Champion Multipurpose Cooperative Society Ltd, Opaluwa Eleojo Bob-Simon, NUEE State Chapter,  Adeyemi Abiodun Abayomi, Adaramoye Michael Tobiloba and Popoola Festus.

    The affected accounts are domiciled in major national banks, microfinance banks and fin-tech banks.

    Counsel to the Egbetokun, Ibrahim Mohammed, while moving the motion, said the accounts as contained in the schedule in respect of which reliefs sought are subject of investigation and are reasonably suspected to be warehousing proceeds of unlawful activities or fraud.

    He added: “If there is any dealing with the account by way of withdrawal or transfer to another account by the persons under investigation/investigator and the persons that have absolute power to deal with the account will render nugatory any consequential order(s) which the court may make at the conclusion of this application.”

    He stated that  the accounts are used to promote the offence of criminal conspiracy, terrorism financing, treasonable felony, cyberbullying and cyberstalking which was illegally transferred to the account of the accused persons now at large.

    Mohammed added: “That the accused persons were involved in hosting another country’s flag in order to undermine the sovereignty of Nigerian state.”

    In a supporting affidavit, it was stated that preliminary investigation revealed that some suspects arrested were being recruited by some financiers to cause mayhem and destroyed life and property.

    Mohammed said preliminary investigation further revealed that the financiers were sending money to recruit the indigents and other vulnerable individuals to carry banners and overthrow a democratically elected government.

    He added that preliminary investigation further reveals that some foreign nationals were the harrow head in the unscrupulous act of treasonable felony and promoting terrorism financing in Nigeria.

    Mohammed stated that the act of the respondents was akin to the offence of criminal conspiracy, terrorism financing, treasonable felony, cyberstalking and cyberbullying.

    He said it is the function of the police to stop this act by apprehending the offenders as offence to one is an offence to all.

    According to him intelligent report gathered so far reveals that the suspects are making effort to transfer or withdraw money from the accounts and unless this honourable court grants this order, otherwise, the investigation will be jeopardise.

    He added: “That it will be in the interest of justice to grant this request by freezing the account of the said suspects and order their immediate arrest on sighting them pending the outcome of the investigation and possible prosecution.”

  • EndBadGovernance protest: Court freezes 32 individuals, firms’ accounts

    EndBadGovernance protest: Court freezes 32 individuals, firms’ accounts

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has issued an order freezing 32 bank accounts belonging to individuals and firms linked to the organisation of the recent #EndBadGovernance protest.

    Justice Emeka Nweze, who issued the order, said the accounts shall remain frozen pending the conclusion of the police’s investigation and prosecution of the case.

    Justice Nweze issued the order while ruling on an order ex-parte motion filed and argued for the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Ibrahim Mohammed.

    In the ruling rendered on Thursday, an enrolled copy of which The Nation sighted on Sunday, August 25, the judge equally ordered the banks to apprehend the account holders or any person transacting business on the said accounts.

    He ordered the banks to contact the Nigeria Police Force through the telephone numbers: 08035179870 and 07032449912 as soon as any arrest was made.

    Justice Nwite said: “The banks are hereby directed by this honourable court to issue details of the account package(s) and to place a Post-No-Debit (PND) on the accounts, disable the ATM while allowing inflow into the said accounts as from the date of this court order.”

    Listed as respondents in the case, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1219/2024, are PA.LIN.HO Global Service Ltd, Innocent Angel Lovet Chinyere Nkiru, Obidient Movement Multipurpose Cooperative Society, Innocent Angel Lovet, Great Communicators Champion Multipurpose Cooperative Society Ltd.

    Others are Great Communicators Champion Multipurpose Cooperative Society Ltd, Opaluwa Eleojo Bob-Simon, NUEE State Chapter, Adeyemi Abiodun Abayomi, Adaramoye Michael Tobiloba, Popoola Festus.

    The affected accounts include 4010073491 (Fidelity Bank), 1255130019 (Access Bank), 0006084167 (Abbey Mortgage Multipurpose Bank Plc), 0821931299 (FCMB), 1012007655 (FCMB), 0000575573 (A AG Mortgage Bank Plc), 1007871587 (UBA), 2037117333 (UBA), 5421031104 (ECOBANK ) and 0024541201 (Union Bank).

    Others are 1022899050 (UBA), 8755008491 (Branch International Services Ltd), 5630208636 (Fidelity), and 4936992542 (Fairmoney Microfinance Bank).

    Also included are 8755008499 (Branch International Financial Services Ltd), 2088228208 (UBA), 2115678044 (Zenith Bank), 3041823452 (First Bank), 1011828445 (New Edge Finance), 3024402748 (Fusrt Bank), 0161502459 (GTBank) and 0040580047 (Access Bank),

    They also include 0250291788 (Wema Bank), 6112464260 (Branch International Financial Services Ltd), 1000774097 (Sparkle Microfinance Bank Ltd), 3434649965 (Fair money Microfinance Bank), 2013556714 (KUDA Microfinance Bank), 3104962864 (Polaris Bank), 6112464267 (Branch International Finance Services Lit), 8137051249 (OPAY) and 8137051249 (PALMPAY).

    Read Also: Nwoko urges Tinubu to replace humanitarian ministry with national social security agency

    Mohammed, while moving the motion, said the accounts as contained in the schedule in respect of which reliefs sought are subject to investigation and are reasonably suspected to be warehousing proceeds of unlawful activities or fraud.

    He added: “If there is any dealing with the account by way of withdrawal or transfer to another account by the persons under investigation/investigator and the persons that have absolute power to deal with the account will render nugatory any consequential order(s) which the court may make at the conclusion of this application.”

    He stated that the accounts are used to promote the offence of criminal conspiracy, terrorism financing, treasonable felony, cyberbullying, and cyberstalking which was illegally transferred to the account of the accused persons now at large.

    Mohammed said: “That the accused persons were involved in hosting another country’s flag in order to undermine the sovereignty of the Nigerian state.”

    In a supporting affidavit, it was stated that a preliminary investigation revealed that some suspects arrested were being recruited by some financiers to cause mayhem and destroy life and property.

    Mohammed said preliminary investigation further revealed that the financiers were sending money to recruit the indigents and other vulnerable individuals to carry banners and overthrow a democratically elected government.

    He added that preliminary investigation further reveals that some foreign nationals were the arrowheads in the unscrupulous act of treasonable felony and promoting terrorism financing in Nigeria.

    Mohammed stated that the act of the respondents was akin to the offence of criminal conspiracy, terrorism financing, treasonable felony, cyberstalking, and cyberbullying.

    He said it is the function of the police to stop this act by apprehending the offenders as an offence to one is an offence to all.

    According to him, intelligent reports gathered so far reveal that the suspects are making an effort to transfer or withdraw money from the accounts and unless this honourable court grants this order, otherwise, the investigation will be jeopardised.

    He added: “That it will be in the interest of justice to grant this request by freezing the account of the said suspects and order their immediate arrest on sighting them pending the outcome of the investigation and possible prosecution.”

  • Court remands man, 20, for raping four-year-old girl

    Court remands man, 20, for raping four-year-old girl

    A 20-year-man identified as Philip Jonathan has been remanded by a Chief Magistrate Court in Minna for raping a four-year-old girl.

    The suspect had lured the victim into his room at Gwanzunu in Suleja Local Government and had sexual intercourse with her. The mother of the victim discovered that her daughter had bruises on her private parts and her legs and during questioning, her daughter stated how the incident occured.

    Read Also: You’re a testament to hard work, selfless service, Tinubu tells Ariwoola

    The mother reported the incident to the police who arrested the suspect.

    The suspect was arraigned on a one-count charge of unlawful sexual intercourse under the Child Rights Law of Niger state.

    Presiding Chief Magistrate, Court 3, Hajiya Halima Balaraba Yusuf, said the court would give accelerated hearing to the case.

  • N1.4b ‘fraud’: Court freezes seven businessmen, firms’ accounts

    N1.4b ‘fraud’: Court freezes seven businessmen, firms’ accounts

    Federal High Court in Lagos has placed a “Post No Debit” on accounts of seven businessmen and four firms in eight banks pending probe of how N1,426,100,430 was fraudulently transferred from a Lebanese firm.

    Justice Akintayo Aluko granted the order on August 20, sequel to a motion ex parte moved by Department of State Security (DSS), through its counsel, Michael Bajela. The order subsists for 90 days.

    The complainant is Fouani Nigeria Limited; respondents and  bank details are: Haruna Adam Abubakar – 1709985717 (Access); Anthony Godwill Ifeanyi – 1236732473 (Access), Tochukwu Modestus Obodoefuna – 1565420706 (Access), M. Munzali Dara Worldwide Business 5601060742 (Fidelily); Anthony Ifeanyi Electronic Trading 5420158002 (Keystone); Kholobekian Joseph Mesrob 1016886802 (UBA); Izuchukwu Stanley Alaman Jo 2137303667 (UBA); A.S. Rano Lubricant Toll Inv. 1305567771 (Providus), Obioma Emeka Daniel 1005922923 (FCMB); Esto World Mega Venture Resources 2004467010 (Globus); and Mubarak Buhari 8066868814 (Opay).

    Read Also: FG, ASUU meet Monday on outstanding demands

    The court adjourned till November 22, for report of compliance.

    “Post No Debit” is restriction preventing customers from  withdrawals, transfers, or other debits from their accounts.

    In applying for the order, Bajela supported his application with a affidavit sworn by DSS operative, Joshua Babalola.

    Babalola averred the applicant (DSS) received a petition from Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System (NIBSS) with the heading, “Request for probe into unauthorised fund transfers on Fouani Account.”

    Dated August 1, and signed by Richard Bello, in Audit and Olusola Odediran in Information Security, it claimed ‘‘N1,426,100,430 was fraudulently transferred by  respondents from Fouani account 0690342734 in Access; 0004018789 GTBank; 1010248929 Zenith Bank; and 1004536508 (UBA Bank).

  • Forceful removal: Appeal Court to hear ex-CJN Onnoghen’s appeals filed since 2019

    Forceful removal: Appeal Court to hear ex-CJN Onnoghen’s appeals filed since 2019

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja will today hear three appeals filed by a former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, against the judgment of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) which ordered his removal from office in 2019.

    The Court of Appeal informed parties in the matter of the hearing date in a notice it issued through its Registry, which The Nation sighted yesterday.

    The notice reads: “Please, take notice that the above matter is listed for hearing on Tuesday, August 20, 2024 at 9 o’clock in Court Appeal, Abuja Division. Please, take note that this serves as a hearing notice.”

    The appeals, filed since 2019, have the Federal Republic of Nigeria as the sole respondent.

    By the appeals, Justice Onnoghen is, among others, praying the Court of Appeal to set aside the judgment delivered by the CCT on April 18, 2019, which sacked him from office.

    He is contending, among others, that the CCT was without the requisite jurisdiction, was biased and allegedly denied him fair hearing.

    The CCT had, in its judgment, convicted Onnoghen on all the six counts contained in the charge on which he was tried, including an alleged breach of Code of Conduct for Public Officers.

    In its lead judgment delivered by the then Chairman, Danladi Umar, the CCT ordered Onnoghen’s immediate removal from office as the CJN.

    It also stripped him of all offices he earlier occupied, including the Chairman of the National Judicial Council (NJC), and Chairman of the Federal Judicial Service Commission (FJSC).

    The tribunal also ordered the forfeiture of his five bank accounts and the money in the accounts which he did not declare in his asset declaration form submitted to the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB), an agency of the Federal Government.

    In his appeals, Onnoghen, maintained that the CCT panel erred in law and caused a miscarriage of justice against him, when it failed to decline jurisdiction to entertain the six-count against him.

    Read Also: First Dangote PMS delivery set for September

    He contended that the CCT chairman ought to have recused himself from presiding over his trial.

    In his seven-point reliefs, the ousted CJN applied for an order setting aside his conviction as well as quashing the order for forfeiture of his assets.

    He prayed the court to discharge and acquit him of all the charges levelled against him.

    Listing some of the particulars of error in the CCT’s verdict, Onnoghen argued that he was a judicial officer at the time the charges were filed against him on January 11, 2019, adding that as such he could not be subjected to the jurisdiction of the lower tribunal.

    “0n the authority of Nganiiwa v. FRN (2018) 4 NWLR (Pt. 1609) 30: at 340. 341, only the National Judicial Council (NJC) has the power to discipline the appellant for misconduct and not the lower tribunal.

    “The lower tribunal had, in the case of FRN V. Sylvester Nwali Nguta in charge number CCT/ABJ/01/2017 delivered on January 9, 2018, affirmed the position of the court in FRN Nganjiwa v. FRN and dismissed the charges and acquitted and discharged Justice Ngwuta being a judicial officer subject only to the discipline of the National Judicial Council.

    “The lower tribunal has no jurisdiction over serving judicial officers, such as the appellant, save the National Judicial Council.

    “The Motion on Notice, dated January 14, 2019, challenging jurisdiction ought to be granted in all material particular as it purports to save the lower tribunal of needless futile exercise.”

  • Calabar High Court grants Ex-Gov. Ayade’s aide Ofuka, bail

    Calabar High Court grants Ex-Gov. Ayade’s aide Ofuka, bail

    A High Court sitting in Calabar, the Cross River State Capital has granted bail to Dr. Oscar Ofuka, a former aide to immediate past governor of the state Ben Ayade on Cocoa Development and Control.

    Ofuka who has been languishing in police custody since July 8, 2024 was granted bail on Friday.

    He was arrested and detained by the State Security Service while facing trial on allegation of murder.

    In suit No. HC/84F/24, presided over by Justice Ukpai Ibitham, in a matter of application by Ntufam Dr Oscar Ofuka, for enforcement of his fundamental rights to life, fair hearing and freedom of movement.

    A matter between Ofuka (applicant), and Secretary to Cross River State Government SSG, Prof. Anthony Owan Enoh, Major.Gen. Okoi Obono, and seven others, as (respondents).

    The court held that Dr. Ofuka should be granted bail once he meets the bail condition of  N50 million and reliable surety who owns landed property.

    However, admitting the applicant Dr. Ofuka, through his counsel, Ntufam MBA Ukweni (SAN), who was represented in court by Barr. Anthonia Enang, expressed happiness over Ofuka ‘s bail which the court said is pending the determination of the substantive application or the conclusion of investigation by the Force headquarters, Abuja.

    Read Also: Tinubu orders reduction of Nigeria’s official delegation to UNGA

    In a motion to admit the applicant to bail brought in pursuant to order IV Rules 3&4 of fundamental enforcement (Civil Procedure) rule, 2009, as well as section 36(6) (B) of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

    The Court has however restrained the respondents the Nigeria police, Secretary to State Government SSG, State Security Adviser and other seven respondents from taking further steps in connection with the matter or staying all actions pending the determination of the substantive application or the conclusion of investigation by the Force headquarters, Abuja.

    Recall that Ofuka’s lawyers had disclosed that their client had reportedly been in a coma, fell down at the customary court and allegedly hit his head on the floor of the court before he was rushed to the hospital for medical attention.

  • Appeal Court vacates orders barring Secondus, Omehia, Opera from PDP’s meetings

    Appeal Court vacates orders barring Secondus, Omehia, Opera from PDP’s meetings

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja has set aside the orders made by the Federal High Court, Abuja barring  three chieftains of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) from further attending any meeting of the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC) or participating in deliberations or proceedings of the meetings in any manner.

    The PDP chieftains are the party’s former National Chairman, Uche Secondus, sacked Rivers State Governor, Celestine Omehia and a former Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives Austin Adiele Opara.

    In three separate judgements yesterday, a three-member panel of the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the appeals filed by Secondus, Omehia and Opera for being meritorious.

    The appellate court held that the issues of whether members of a party should attend the party’s meetings or participate in any of its activities are issues to be determined by the political party.

    The court was of the view that issues relating to whether or not members of a political party attend the party’s meetings being internal affairs of the party, are not justiciable and on which the court lacked jurisdiction.

    It held that the Federal High Court ought not to have entertained the cases because it lacked the jurisdiction to hear and determine the suits dealing with issues within the realm of the internal affairs of the political party.

    The Court of Appeal proceeded to declare null and void the proceedings conducted in the three cases before the Federal High Court, voided same, including the restraining orders made ex-parte by the court on April 5.

    The Federal High Court made the orders in its decisions in the separate suits filed by three members of the PDP in Rivers State.

    The suit against Secondus and the seven others was filed by Titus Jones. The suit against Omehia and five others was filed by Precious Wobisike, while the third against Opara and seven others was filed by Chisa Amadi.

    In his lead judgment in the appeal by Secondus, marked: CA/ABJ/CV/522/2024, Justice Jimi Bada said: “It suffices to say that the issue of whether the appellant was entitled to attend the meetings of the party having been suspended or no longer a member of the political party are issues for the political party and its members  to resolve, not that of the court.

    Read Also: Edo 2024: PDP’s Ighodalo has capacity to govern successfully, says Nwaokobia

    “The totality of the questions put forward for determination by the court in the plaintiff’s case, as contained in the originating summons, borders on the suspension of the membership of the first respondent (Secondus) and invoked the question, whether the first respondent, having been suspended as a member of the party, could attend the meetings of the party.

    “Undoubtedly, it is not an issue that can be determined by the court, being a non-justiciable matter, a matter within the domestic fold of a political party and the internal matter of the second respondent (the PDP) best suited for determination by the political party.

    “In short, the lower court lacked the jurisdiction to adjudicate on it. The lower court lacked the jurisdiction to bar a member from attending meetings of a political party or restraining the party from issuing notices of meetings and invitations to a member.”

    On whether the trial court acted lawfully in issuing the April 5 ex-parte restraining order, Justice Bada held that the ex-parte order ought not to have been granted because there was no urgency shown by the plaintiff to warrant the grant of such an order without hearing from those against whom the order was directed.

    Justice Bada added that since the substantive suit and the ex-parte motion bordered on who has the right to attend the meeting of a party, the issue of who is or not a member of a party is a matter within the domestic affairs of a political party.

    He proceeded to hold that “having resolved all the issues, nominated for determination, against the respondents and in favour of the appellant, this appeal succeeds.

    “The lower court lacked the vires and jurisdiction to entertain the substantive action and, by extension, grant the ex-parte order.”

    Justice Bada then declared the proceedings of the lower court in respect of the substantive suit and the ex-parte order granted null and void, and proceeded to set them aside.

    The appellate court made similar findings in the appeals marked: CA/ABJ/CV/520/2024 and CA/ABJ/CV/521/2024 filed by Opera and Omehia.

  • US court slams three life sentences, 76 years imprisonment on Nigerian accused of rape

    US court slams three life sentences, 76 years imprisonment on Nigerian accused of rape

    •Shuns CCTV footage, DNA test vindicating alleged offender
    •Convict alleges frame-up, betrayal by friend he banked on as witness

    •Begs FG, Osun governor for intervention

    A rare judgment by a US court has condemned a 38-year-old Nigerian to three life sentences with additional 76 years imprisonment while the convict, who had travelled from his base in Japan to America where he ventured into car business only to be accused of raping a teenage girl, insists he is innocent and accused the presiding judge of bias for allegedly ignoring the evidence that would have proved his innocence. TOBA ADEDEJI examines the issues around the court verdict as well as the allegation of racism against the American justice system.

    I was sentenced to three life imprisonment and 76 years jail term. The meaning is that if I come back to life after dying in this jail, I will again be kept in jail till I must have died three times. I will then serve another 76 years before I would be set from here in Dooly State Prison, Georgia, United States.”

    Those were the words of Adedoja Olaniyi Bah, a native of Ilesa, Osun State, who spoke with our correspondent through his sister, Toyin Fanu, from his base in Georgia, United States of America where he is currently serving three life sentences and an additional 76 years in prison for allegedly raping a teenage girl.

    But he insists that he is as clean as a hound’s tooth as the rape allegation was merely a frame-up for reasons that remained yet a mystery.

    Olaniyi said: “The evidence brought by the police was contradictory. The DNA test results of the perpetrator of the crime did not match mine according to the police expert.

    “Yet I was jailed as the court looked away from those inconsistent facts put forward against me because of racism.

    “I can still win this case, but the American justice system is worse than Nigeria’s.

    “I can make Nigeria proud if I can hire an independent lawyer to represent me at the Appeal Court.”

    According to The Nation findings, Olaniyi’s journey out of the shores of Nigeria began in 2007 when he left for Tokyo, Japan in search of greener pastures. Upon his arrival in the Asian country, he started running a dancing club and recorded landmark success.

    This was when he met his Japanese wife and their union was blessed with two kids. In Tokyo, he had also met a Nigerian named Atunnise Olutoye and they became friends until the latter departed Japan for the United States of America in 2009 and their interaction became limited to occasional telephone conversation. 

    Vacation results in Olaniyi’s imprisonment

    On April 20, 2017, Olaniyi embarked on a vacation to New York, United States of America. Upon his arrival in God’s Own Country, he contacted Olutoye who had relocated from Japan to the US some years earlier. Olutoye then invited him to Georgia for reunification after they had stayed apart for eight years.

    Olaniyi gladly honoured the invitation and hopped on the plane to Georgia with Olutoye’s wife picking him up at the airport and driving him to their house where a room was given him to stay in.  Olutoye, a car merchant, then asked Olaniyi to venture into the business of buying and selling second-hand cars. Subsequently, Olaniyi purchased five cars with guidance from his friend.

    However, in June the same year, Olutoye told Olaniyi that his mother would be coming to America on a visit and would be staying in the room occupied by Olaniyi. The development forced Olaniyi to rent an apartment at Sweetwater Creek, Austell, because he had not finished his car transaction.

    On June 3, 2017, Olaniyi had an accident with one of the cars and sustained minor injuries. He informed Olutoye about it and the latter mooted an idea that they could make money with the accident from what insurance would pay for medicals and other bills. He then urged Olaniyi to claim that he (Olutoye) was also involved in the accident, and both of them started receiving treatment at AICA Ortho and Spine, a facility situated on Thornton Road.

    It was learnt that Olutoye only used the opportunity of the accident to access medical attention for some issues he had had in his neck and back but did not have enough money to address. 

    How jealousy grew against Olaniyi

    During the period, Olaniyi bought another car through through a registered and accredited dealer; an auction route Olutoye did not know about. The development was said to have infuriated Olutoye who became jealous and allegedly complained that “because my friend has money he is now buying from where I don’t know.”

    It was gathered that they were both receiving treatments for four week after which Olaniyi was tired as a result of failure of the Insurance company to pay them any money over the accident. He then informed his friends that he would be going back to Tokyo as his return ticket date was near.

    But Olutoye was infuriated by his decision to return to Tokyo because it would abruptly end the medical attention they were receiving together. He implored his vacation friend to tarry for a while so as to end the medical check-ups. Olaniyi rescheduled his return flight to July 30, 2017. 

    Arrested for alleged rape

    However, before his departure date of July 30, 2017, an ill-fatebefell Olaniyi. As he was returning home from shopping, the police on routine patrol stopped him in his car at the Kruger Parking lot and searched the car without finding anything suspicious.

    Olaniyi said: “They asked me to follow them to the Douglas County Sheriff Department for further questioning about the vehicle. I humbly complied and drove myself to the Douglas County Sheriff’s Department, even though there was no warrant or any charges preferred against me, except the questions about my vehicle acquisitions. On my way to the department, I informed Olutoye about what was going on.

    “Upon arrival at the Sheriff’s station, I was asked how I bought the cars and made payments. I provided the dealership contact address and provided evidence of payment received from my family bank account in Tokyo and also evidence of payment from my Bank of America account to the dealership bank account.

    “After no fault was found with the car purchase process, the police shifted their line of questioning and told me that a crime had occurred at the complex where I lived, saying that the closest surveillance footage around the area showed me. The officer asked me to share any information or individuals I might have seen, as that could assist in their investigation.

    “I explained that I had moved to the complex less than a month ago and was not familiar with the residents or their faces. Despite my attempts to clarify this, the officer continued to press me for information. Eventually, I requested to leave but the officer threatened to charge me with rape and other sexual offences if I did not help them in the investigation.”

    He noted that on the night of his arrest, samples were taken from him for a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) test. It was learnt that his hair, pubic hair, saliva and fingernails were scraped for the test to ensure it match the sample found on the girl they raped. 

    Ordeal with Douglas police

    Olaniyi continued: “I was arrested and detained without any probable cause that I committed a crime. It took a week before my friend, Olutoye, appeared at the station, and that was the first and the last time he ever visited.

    Read Also: Court reminds man for alleged attempted homicide

    “After months in detention, I hired an attorney to represent me. In one of my attorney client visitations, as I was emphasising my good character, telling the attorney that this was my first time in Atlanta Georgia and I just moved into the complex, I requested that he reached out to my friend Olutoye.

    “However, upon checking his records, the attorney shook his head in disappointment. Then he told me that ‘unfortunately, the Olutoye you considered your friend, has agreed to testify for the State against you, so there is no way I can contact him.’

    “He then asked me, ‘Do you have anyone else who can vouch for your character?’ I replied with a no, as Olutoye was the only person I knew in Atlanta, Georgia.

    “The truth is Olutoye had thousands of my money and my SUVs are in his possession, which he could have sold to secure legal services for me but he chose not to show up. I was unaware that Olutoye had become a witness for the state, and I couldn’t understand why he did so at the time.”

    According to T Mobile report of Olaniyi obtained by The Nation, the Nigerian father of two was in front of AICA Ortho and Spine facility located on Thornton Road as he was on a call for five minutes 43 seconds between 6:55 pm and 7:01 pm on the day he was alleged to have raped the white teenage girl.

    A 911 record obtained by Adam Kiker, a policeman who was around the area when the rape incident occurred at the park of Sweetwater creek, Austell, showed that the emergency call by Englett around 7:14 pm notified the police that “the suspect is a black male wearing a red shirt and khaki shorts.”

    Exhibit F claimed that the vehicle driven by Olaniyi was allegedly used to hide the clothes which have not been found till now.

    In a supporting document by Kiker, a report of surveillance cameras at the scene of the crime, he noted in the document that “the maintenance Manager, Joseph Bates, allowed me to go into the leasing office and watch surveillance video footage.

    “The video showed a black male wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and tan khaki shorts walk from the 100 building to the south side of the leasing office.”

    Also, the 14-year-old victim of the rape (name withheld), in a transcripted document, corroborated the 911 report and surveillance cameras report of the cloth worn by the perpetrator of the offence.

    She noted that the suspect was not armed while raping her as he only used his “strong arms” to fondle her private part before she was penetrated.

    The sister of the victim, Angiethomas, corroborated the testimony of her sister that the suspect was a black male wearing a red shirt and khaki shorts.

    Report of another witness named Joshua Miller noted that he saw the video surveillance and the suspect was a dark male who wore a red shirt and khaki shorts.

    However, a video footage of Olaniyi presented in court showed that he wore a hoody of purple colour coated with white and red strips. The hoody was long-sleeved. He also wore a multi-coloured trousers like army camouflage.

    Olaniyi also said the exact video on which his prosecution was based was never produced in court till he was sentenced to life imprisonment. Similarly, the result of the DNA test conducted by the police to prosecution expert, MS Hinkle on both Olaniyi and the victim do not match each other. She said there was no meaningful match between the virginal swap of the victim and that of Olaniyi. Hinkle noted that it is 50 per cent probable and she also said “the DNA result is inconclusive.”

    The DNA expert of Olaniyi named Dr Acton disagreed with the police expert noting that there should not be anything called ‘inconclusive’ with the explanation she gave about the result.

    Countering the police expert before the court, he said: “I have the defendant’s profile here and I have an evidence profile here. You can go ahead and conduct statistics on that profile.

    “But if they’re not the same, that means you don’t have the evidence to do anything with it.

    “In essence, if you have these alleles missing that the defendant possesses, that’s the basis for exclusion. Meaningful match statistics were not obtained.

    “Well, your first step in the process is not statistics. Your first step is to have profiles from two different samples that are consistent. Then you can apply statistics.”

    Police witness, Jay Hayes noted that Olaniyi committed the offence between 6:51 pm and 7:03 pm, a claim countered by Olaniyi’s call history and GPS that he was at the hospital at that particular time.

    During the judgment, the judge disqualified the DNA expert employed by Olaniyi on the basis that he did not have a recommended certificate as stated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

    This forced the expert and Olaniyi to go for Daubert Hearing which revealed that the DNA samples on the victim and Olaniyi do not match each other.

    However, Olutayo testified against Olaniyi that he was not sure of his character because they had parted ways in Tokyo for more than seven years. Subsequently, the court sentenced Olaniyi to three life imprisonments and another 76 years jail term.

    Olaniyi told the reporter that the case is presently at the Appeal Court but the government lawyer that is currently representing him is not tendering documents or puncturing the loopholes in the prosecution by the police.

    He lamented that he had spent more than $150,000 to hire lawyers and experts in the case; a development that has left him bankrupt, hence the government that wrongfully jailed him is now the one providing a lawyer to defend him.

    Olaniyi pleaded with the Nigerian government and Governor Ademola Adeleke of Osun State in his case for fair hearing in the case.

    His words: “I want to appeal to the Federal Government through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission and other well-meaning Nigerians to come to my aid for a fair hearing.

    “This is a pure case of racism aided by my jealous friend. The American government system of prosecution and court judgment was faulty.

    “My situation is a result of jealousy and racism. But it won’t last for long. I will make Nigeria proud. Shame on America’s justice system. It is worse than what we have in Nigeria.”

    He added that all the cars he bought were still in his friend’s possession with the thousands of dollars in his hand.

     Distraught mother pleads with Nigerian government

    Olaniyi’s mother, Madam Victoria Adedoja, said her son’s case was marred by lack of proper legal representation.

    The distraught mother pleaded with Nigerians to help get her son out of prison by ensuring that he is given fair hearing in the case.

    While seeking help for her son’s appeal, she stated that she was not aware of her son’s predicament until she received a phone call from Olutoye, her son’s friend that invited him to the US, as well as his mother and one of Toye’s prophets, informing her about the arrest of her son and a demand for the sum of $20,000 to get her son out of the police station, which she couldn’t raise.

    She said: “I was at the MFM Camp in Lagos when I got a phone call from a man who introduced himself as Olutoye Atunnise, breaking the news of my son being in detention in Atlanta.

    “He spoke in a rude manner, asking me to look for money to bail him out from the police station because he committed a grievous offence. He said I should send the money to his account.

    “I told him I did not have that kind of money because I am a retired teacher and a widow. But he said E lo ta nkan toba ni (go and sell his property).

    “In panic, I demanded his account number in case we could raise any amount. He dropped a GTB account number 0174564903, and said if you get the money, send it to my account.”

    “Racism and my son’s friend’s envy and greed contributed to his plight,” she added.

    Olutoye responds to allegations

    When Olutoye who is now an American citizen was contacted, he debunked the allegation that he sold Olaniyi’s car, saying: “Olaniyi was in prison when he sold all the cars he had with me, I dare him to provide the proof that I sold his car.

    “It is unfortunate that he is crying that he is innocent. He should embrace his fate and start seeking forgiveness from God.

    “He cannot lie that he did not rape the girl. In Fact, he chased the girl from the liaison office to a garden where he had carnal knowledge of the girl from the back.”

    He continued: “There was a time Olaniyi was threatening me.  What kind of audacity is that; to threaten me that he met in America? I have both Japan and America passports.

    “I was shown the CCTV footage of the rape in court. He raped the girl. Olaniyi also did similar things in Tokyo. Even during his prosecution, the American government contacted Tokyo to aid the prosecution.

    “Olaniyi is bisexual. He even sold his kidney for the love of money. I dare him to take a picture of his body naked. I don’t care anymore about him.

    “Before this incident, I admonished him that my pastor saw a vision about him getting into trouble and that he should fast, but he never listened.

    “I tried my best for him. I never testified against him in court. I was only whether I knew him and I told the court that I do know him.”

    “The court was angry with him because he did not accept his fault. That is why he was sentenced to three life imprisonments and another 76 years.”

  • Court reminds man for alleged attempted homicide

    Court reminds man for alleged attempted homicide

    A Makurdi Magistrate’s Court, on Friday, remanded one James Aondongu, for allegedly breaking into a house and stabbing the daughter of the occupant.

    Aondongu, who resides at Apir village, Makurdi, is standing trial on a four-count charge of trespassing, house breaking, robbery and attempted homicide.

    The prosecutor, Insp Ato Godwin,  told the court that the defendant committed the offences on Aug. 5, at No. 26, Jerry Agber St., Ankpa Quarters, Makurdi.

    According to the prosecutor, the defendant unlawfully broke into the house of his distant relative with an intent to steal.

    Read Also: Court orders forfeiture of $2.04m assets linked to Emefiele

    He said that the daughter of the owner of the house, Ms Queen Aondona, saw the defendant when he broke into the house.

    “Aondona, raised alarm, the defendant, therefore, broke a bottle on her head, also stabbed her with a knife.

    “The complainant fell and was in the pool of her blood before she was  rushed to the Federal Medical Centre, Makurdi for treatment,” the prosecutor said.

    He said that the offences contravened Sections 230, 300, 350 and 351 of the Penal Code, Laws of Benue State, 2004.

    The prosecutor asked the court for an adjournment to enable the police conclude investigation.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the plea of the defendant was not taken.

    The Magistrate, Mr Kelvin Mbanongun, however, remanded the defendant to the correctional centre, after the charge was read.

    He adjourned the case until Nov 5 for mention.

    (NAN)

  • BREAKING: Appeal Court vacates orders barring Secondus, Omehia, Opara from PDP’s meetings

    BREAKING: Appeal Court vacates orders barring Secondus, Omehia, Opara from PDP’s meetings

    The Court of Appeal in Abuja has set aside the orders by Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court, Abuja barring  three chieftains of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) from further attending any meeting of the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC) or participating in deliberations or proceedings of the meetings in any manner.

    The PDP chieftains are the party’s former National Chairman, Uche Secondus; sacked Rivers Governor, Celestine Omehia and a former Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives  Austin Opara.

    In three separate judgements on Friday, a three-member panel of the Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the appeals filed by Secondus, Omehia and Opera for being meritorious.

    Read Also: Why we left PDP, by Igbinedion’s daughter

    The appellate court held that the issue of whether members of a party should attend the party’s meetings or participate in any of its activities are issues to be determined by the political party.

    The court was of the view that issues relating to whether or not members of a political party attend the party’s meetings being internal affairs of the party, are not justiciable and on which the court lacked jurisdiction.

    It held that the Federal High Court ought not to have entertained the cases because it lacked the jurisdiction to hear and determine the suits dealing with issues within the realm of the internal affairs of the political party.

    The Court of Appeal proceeded to declare null and void the proceedings conducted in the three cases before the Federal High Court, voided same, including the restraining orders made ex-parte made by Justice Ekwo on April 5.

    Details shortly…