Tag: Court

  • Federal High Court releases activities’ schedule during Christmas vacation

    Federal High Court releases activities’ schedule during Christmas vacation

    The Federal High Court has released a schedule of court activities during this year’s Christmas vacation planned for between December 19 and January 7.

    In a statement on Monday, the Court’s spokesperson, Dr. Catherine Oby Christopher said the schedule of activities is as contained in a circular signed by the court’s Chief Judge, Justice John Tsoho.

    According to the circular, “the court will commence its Christmas Vacation for the year 2025 on Friday, 19th December 2025.

    “This vacation schedule is issued pursuant to Order 46, Rule 4(c) of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2019 (as amended).

    “Court sittings shall resume in all judicial divisions on Wednesday, 7th January 2026.

    Read Also: Federal High Court plans annual judges’ conference December 15

    “During the vacation, the core judicial divisions – Abuja, Lagos, and Port Harcourt – will remain operational and accessible to the litigating public.

    “Only matters pertaining to the enforcement of fundamental rights, the arrest or release of vessels, and issues of urgent national importance shall be entertained by the vacation judges.”

    Judges designated to serve during the vacation period are: Justices Emeka Nwite and M. S. Liman (for Abuja division); Justices Akintayo Aluko and Isaac D. Dipeolu (Lagos division); Justices P. M. Ayua and A.T Mohammed (Port-Harcourt division) and Justice F.O.G. Ogunbanjo (Enugu division).

  • We ride with criminals to court, magistrates cry out

    We ride with criminals to court, magistrates cry out

    • Say lives in danger over lack of official vehicles

    Magistrates in Ondo State, under the umbrella of Magistrates Association of Nigeria (MAN), have decried the absence of official vehicles required for effective discharge of their duties.

    They lamented that the situation has forced many of them to rely on commercial vehicles often in the company of suspects and litigants, posing danger to their safety and undermining the dignity of their office.

    Speaking during a courtesy visit to a former Senator representing Ondo North, Hon. Bode Olajumoke, the association’s spokesperson, Chief Magistrate Damilola Sekoni, disclosed that no fewer than 60 magistrates in the state currently operate without official vehicles.

    Sekoni, who was accompanied by MAN’s state chairperson, Magistrate Funmi Edwin, said the development compromises both the security and efficiency of judicial officers in the state.

    According to him, some magistrates have sustained varying degrees of injuries from commercial motorcycle accidents on their way to court to perform official duties.

    Describing the situation as unacceptable, he said it is demoralising to see judicial officers commute in the same commercial vehicles as litigants and crime suspects.

    “On a daily basis, we hop on commercial vehicles, most times with criminals and litigants standing trial before us, exposing ourselves to grave security risks.

    “Magistrates in the state are constrained to share public transport with the public, including litigants appearing before them in court,” Sekoni said.

    He appealed to Senator Olajumoke to intervene by raising their concerns with Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa, stressing that the request for official vehicles is a necessity, not a luxury.

    Read Also: AMCON officials, lawyers face contempt charges for alleged contravention of court orders

    Also speaking, the Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Akure Branch, Onimisi Friday Umar, lamented what he described as the poor treatment of magistrates by the Aiyedatiwa administration.

    Umar noted that the last time magistrates in the state received official vehicles was during the administration of former Governor Olusegun Mimiko, adding that many beneficiaries have since retired.

    He further recalled that although approval had been granted for the procurement of 10 new official vehicles, nothing had been heard regarding the implementation.

    “It is sad that magistrates in this state board the same commercial vehicles with criminals to attend court, while their counterparts in other states travel by air to attend conferences.

    “We do not know what the judiciary has done to deserve this kind of treatment. We need a respite,” he said.

    The NBA chairman urged the governor to prioritise the welfare of judicial officers, saying this would enhance morale, ensure safety, and promote the efficient delivery of justice.

    He also commended Senator Olajumoke for constructing a relaxation centre for the NBA.

    Responding, Senator Olajumoke assured the delegation that he would look into their demands and discuss the matter with the governor.

    He also urged members of the association to uphold professional ethics at all times.

    In his remarks, the Publisher of Vanguard Newspapers, Mr. Sam Amuka-Pemu, applauded the magistrates for the visit and encouraged them to continue defending the rule of law and maintaining integrity within the justice system.

    Efforts to reach the Attorney General and Commissioner for justice in the state, Kayode Ajulo,

    SAN, yielded no result as his mobile phone was switched off when contacted.

  • Court sentences Okada rider to death for raping, killing minor in Ondo

    Court sentences Okada rider to death for raping, killing minor in Ondo

    The Ondo State High Court, Akure Division, yesterday sentenced a commercial motorcyclist otherwise known as Okada rider, Dare Ojo, to death by hanging for raping and killing a minor, identified as Zainab Adeyemo at the Ese/Irun-Akoko road in Akoko North-East Local Government Area of the state.

    Ojo committed the offence on July 17, 2020, while conveying the 11-year-old Adeyemo to a market in Irun-Akoko.

    During the trial, the court heard that the girl’s mother had hired Ojo to transport her daughter from Ese-Akoko to the Irun-Akoko market.

    However, when the girl failed to arrive on time, her worried parents contacted her mother’s colleagues at the market, who said they had not seen her.

    Read Also: Senate seeks urgent construction of Ode–Omifufu–Ofosu road to link Ondo, Edo

    The family then reached out to Ojo, who claimed to have dropped the girl off at the market.

    A search party was later organised in the community, and the naked body of the deceased was found in a bush along the Ese/Irun-Akoko road.

    In his verdict, Justice Yemi Fasanmi held that the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, relying on the findings of a pathologist from the Federal Medical Centre, Owo, which showed signs of struggle and confirmed that the victim had been forcefully penetrated.

    Justice Fasanmi also noted that the police investigation revealed that Ojo led officers to the scene of the crime.

    Although there was no eyewitness account, the judge invoked the “doctrine of last seen,” stating that Ojo was the last person seen with the victim before her death.

    “The accused was the last person who saw Zainab Adeyemo alive. There was no other person who saw her after he took her away,” he said.

    Counsel to the defendant, Kolawole Olusegun Oluwa, pleaded with the court to be lenient.

    Ojo himself also begged for mercy.

    However, the court sentenced the convict to life imprisonment for rape under Section 31(1–3) of the Ondo State Child’s Rights Law, 2007, and death by hanging for murder under Section 319(1) of the Criminal Code, Cap 37, Vol. 1, Laws of Ondo State, 2006.

    The defence counsel lauded the court for its diligence in the case.

    Speaking to journalists, the prosecution counsel, Bolanle Afolabi, a Director in the Ondo State Ministry of Justice and Administrative Secretary of the Ondo State Agency Against Gender-Based Violence (OSA-GBV), said justice had been served for all parties involved.

    “This is a case of rape and murder. The accused was charged with having sexual intercourse with a child, contrary to Section 31 of the Child’s Rights Law, 2007, and with murder, punishable under Section 319 of the Criminal Code.

    “The case began in 2020 and went through several amendments before being opened in 2023. The prosecution called six witnesses, while the defendant testified alone. In the end, he was found guilty of both counts,” she said.

    Afolabi described the judgment as a relief, noting that it delivered justice to the deceased, her family, and the state.

    She said: “Though the child is gone, today she got judgment. Justice was served for the victim, the family, the state, and even the defendant because he was convicted for offences he committed. That is the beauty of the law.

    “And today, we are happy. We are grateful to the courts, and we are happy even for the deceased. Even though she’s dead, we are also happy that the family members also got judgments. Let me add this. I must also commend the prosecutor, the legal officer, the director of legal services in the Agency Against Gender-Based Violence, John Joshua, who prosecuted this case from the beginning to the end. I’m commending for his doggedness,” she said.

  • Court adjourns Onikoyi chieftaincy dispute suit till Jan. 19

    Court adjourns Onikoyi chieftaincy dispute suit till Jan. 19

    • By Adebisi Onanuga and Kafilat Lawal

    An Ikeja High Court has adjourned the hearing of a suit filed by members of Onikoyi Royal Family, challenging the appointment and installation of Prince Kunle Fafunwa as the Oba Onikoyi of Ikoyi and Moba land till January 19, 2026.

    Justice Olalekan Oresanya adjourned the case for further hearing of pending applications after it came up for mention yesterday.

    The claimants were represented by Jimoh Lasisi (SAN) and former Lagos Attorney-General, Adeniji Kazeem (SAN), while the fourth defendant, Oba Onikoyi, was represented by Wale Adesokan (SAN).

    Ikeja High Court complex was turned into spectators’ arena, as family members and hundreds of people from the communities under the reign of Onikoyi thronged the court to solidarise with the monarch. 

    Read Also: FG issues 23 refineries ‘license to establish’ in four years

    The claimants in the suit are Otunba Abdul Ganiyi Kolawole Onikoyi, Prince Akinola Oyeniyi Fafunwa, Prince Abdul Waliu Omogbolahan Sulaimon, Chief Hassan Kehinde Elegushi, Alhaji Musiliu Abidemi Onikoyi, Alhaja Wosilat Quadri, Mrs. Adeola Davies, Prince Babatunde Onikoyi, Prince Babatunde Shadeko and Alhaji Ashraf Akinyemi Esinlokun.

    They instituted the action for themselves and on behalf of the Onikoyi Royal Family, otherwise known as the Onikoyi Chieftaincy Family.

    Other defendants in the suit are Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Commissioner for Local Government, Chieftaincy Affairs and Rural Development, Eti-Osa Local Government and Prince Kunle Fafunwa, the fourth defendant.

    In the suit filed by their counsel, Mr. Ademola Ekundayo of Hill City Associates, Ikeja, the claimants are seeking several declaratory and injunctive reliefs against the defendants.

    They contended that the purported selection, approval and installation of Prince Kunle Fafunwa as the Oba of Ikoyi and Moba Land was illegal, null and void.

    They argued that the process leading to Fafunwa’s appointment violated the provisions of the Onikoyi Chieftaincy Declaration of 2006 and the Obas and Chiefs Law of Lagos State, which regulate succession to the Onikoyi stool.

    The claimants are, therefore, asking the court to set aside the purported selection, approval and installation of the fourth defendant. They prayed the court  to issue an injunction restraining him from parading himself or acting in any capacity as the Oba Onikoyi of Ikoyi and Moba Land.

    They also sought an order directing Lagos State Government and relevant authorities to confirm and install the third claimant, Prince Abdul Waliu Omogbolahan Sulaimon, as the legitimate Oba Onikoyi of Ikoyi and Moba Land.

    The claimants insisted that it was the turn of Ojubiari branch to ascend the throne.

    According to their statement of claim, the Onikoyi Royal Family consists of one ruling house known as Muti Ruling House, which has 10 branches, namely Fafunwa, Ojubiari, Kubayije, Ilumo, Idewu, Kugbamola, Aluko Ajose, Dosunmu Ajiwe, Adelo and Dosunmu.

    The family contends that under the 2006 Chieftaincy Declaration, the rotation of succession among these branches makes it the turn of the Ojubiari branch to produce the next Oba, following the demise of Oba Patrick Ibikunle Fafunwa, who hailed from Fafunwa branch.

    The claimants further alleged that the purported appointment of Prince Kunle Fafunwa, son of the late Oba Patrick Fafunwa, breaches the principle of rotation among the branches and offends established custom and tradition of the Onikoyi Royal Family.

    They averred that the family never nominated nor consented to the selection of the fourth defendant and that no valid family meeting or public notice was issued by the relevant authorities as required by law.

    The claimants said several letters and petitions were sent to the state government and Eti-Osa Local Government, but they were not answered.

    The claimants said they therefore instructed their counsel to institute legal action to prevent what they described as an “illegal imposition.”

    They had earlier filed an ex parte application for judicial review in Suit No. LD/9134GCM/2025, seeking an order of mandamus, compelling the state government to recognise and install Prince Sulaimon as the rightful Oba Onikoyi of Ikoyi and Moba Land.

    During proceedings, the fourth defendant, through his counsel, Adesokan, (SAN) notified the court of a Motion on Notice filed on behalf of the fourth defendant, Prince Kunle Fafunwa.

    The motion was praying the court to set aside the service of the Writ of Summons on the grounds that the fourth defendant was not personally served.

    Justice Oresanya adjourned the case till January 19, 2026, for further mention

  • Court jails motorcyclist four years for trafficking 10.7kg of cannabis in Osun

    Court jails motorcyclist four years for trafficking 10.7kg of cannabis in Osun

    A Federal High Court sitting in Osogbo, Osun State, has sentenced a commercial motorcyclist, Musa Mohammed, to four years in prison for unlawfully transporting 10.7 kilograms of Cannabis Sativa along the Gbongan-Ibadan Expressway.

    Justice Mashkur Salisu, who presided over the case, found Mohammed guilty of the charge brought against him by the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA).

    During the arraignment on March 13, 2024, NDLEA prosecutor, Olufemi Ijimakin, told the court that the convict was apprehended on March 1, 2024, for trafficking 10.7kg of cannabis in Osun State, an offence contrary to Section 11(b) of the NDLEA Act.

    Ijimakin presented three witnesses and tendered ten exhibits to support the prosecution’s case, while Mohammed pleaded not guilty to the charge.

    In his judgment, Justice Salisu ruled that the prosecution had successfully proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and consequently convicted the defendant.

    Counsel to the convict, Olayiwola Adeniyi, pleaded for leniency, describing Mohammed as a first-time offender.

    Justice Salisu, noting that the offence carries a possible life sentence, opted for a lighter punishment and sentenced Mohammed to four years imprisonment without the option of a fine.

    The court also ordered that the seized cannabis be destroyed and the motorcycle used for its transportation be forfeited to the federal government.

  • BREAKING: Court rejects ex-AGF Nwabuoku’s no-case submission over alleged N868m fraud

    BREAKING: Court rejects ex-AGF Nwabuoku’s no-case submission over alleged N868m fraud

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has overruled the no-case submission filed by a former acting Accountant-General of the Federation (AG-F), Chukwuyenre Anamekwe Nwabuoku in his ongoing money laundering trial.

    Justice James Omotosho, in a ruling on Thursday, held that the prosecution has established a prima facie case against Nwabuoku to warrant his being called upon to enter his defence.

    Read Also: Nwabuoku advocates for zero-accident construction sites

    Nwabuoku is being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on money laundering related charges, involving about N868 million.

    Details shortly…

  • Killer-suspect Olori Esho for trial Jan 19

    Killer-suspect Olori Esho for trial Jan 19

    • By Adebisi Onanuga and Kafilat Lawal

    Justice Oyindamola Ogala of a Lagos State High Court, Ikeja yesterday fixed January 19, 2026  for commencement of trial of Wasiu Akinwande, a.k.a  Olori Esho and two others for alleged murder.

    The judge also ordered further remand of the suspects at the Kirikiri Maximum Custodial Centre pending commencement of trial.

    Those remanded alongside Akinwande included Qudus Egbere, and Sola Edun Tomiwa.

    The defendants were remanded by Justice Ogala after they  pleaded  not guilty to an amended  five count charge brought against them by Lagos State government 

    The five-count charge bordered on alleged conspiracy, murder and belonging to unlawful society before Justice Ogala.

    The offences are contrary to Sections 223 of the Criminal Laws of Lagos State, 2015 and the Unlawful Societies and Cultism (prohibition) Law of Lagos State, 2021.

    Read Also: Religion not Nigeria’s crisis, says Soyinka

    The Lagos State Government charged the defendants to court on an amended information dated November 10, 2025.

    During their arraignment, the state prosecutor A. O Azeez told the court the state  filed an ammended charge against the defendant yesterday morning.

    When the court registrar read the charge to them, they pleaded not guilty.

    The defendants were represented by their counsels, Olanrewaju Ajanaku, and M.D Obadeyi.

    When the counsel to second defendant orally requested that the second defendant be allowed to continue to enjoy the administrative bail, the court declined and urged her to file a proper bail application.

    The state prosecutor consequently prayed the court for a trial date.

    Justice Ogala adjourned the matter to January 19, 2026 for commencement of trial.

    Count one reads, “That Qudus Egbere, Wasiu Akinwande, and others now at large on 31st Day of July, 2024 at about 1100 hours at Moshalashi Street, Mushin in the Lagos State in the Ikeja Judicial Division conspired to commit felony to with murder of Bolanle Yusuf.

    Count two “That Qudus Egbere, Wasiu Akinwande, and others now at large on 31st Day of July, 2024 at about 1100 hours at Moshalashi Street, Mushin  Lagos State in the Ikeja Judicial Division conspired to commit felony with murder of Yusuf Ramadan.

    Count three stated: “That Qudus Egbere, Wasiu Akinwande, and others now at large on 31st Day of July, 2024 at about 1100 hours at Moshalashi Street, Mushin in the Lagos State in the Ikeja Judicial Division conspired to commit felony killed Bolanle Yusuf by using machete and gun.

    Count four stated: “That Qudus Egbere, Wasiu Akinwande, and others now at large on 31st Day of July, 2024 at about 1100 hours at Moshalashi Street, Mushin in the Lagos State in the Ikeja Judicial Division conspired to commit felony killed Yusuf Ramadan by using machete and gun.

    The fifth count stated: “that you Qudus Egbere, and Sola Edun Tomiwa and others now at large on 31st Day of July, 2024 at about 1100 hours at Moshalashi Street, Mushin in the Lagos State in the Ikeja Judicial Division belonging to unlawful societies to wit Eiye Confraternity.

  • Court orders petroleum marketer to pay bank N20.7b judgment sum

    Court orders petroleum marketer to pay bank N20.7b judgment sum

    The Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered a petroleum marketer, Kehinde Elliot Ogbor, and his company, Danium Energy Services Limited, to pay a judgment sum of N20,732,299,999.21 to Union Bank Plc.

    Justice Deinde Dipeolu, who gave the order, also granted Union Bank exclusive possession of all properties belonging to Ogbor and his company.

    The affected properties include: Plot 13, Zone R, Federal Government Layout, Banana Island Foreshore Estate, Ikoyi, Lagos; Plot 197, Victoria Island Annexe, Lagos Island (now known as Plot 325, Akin Ogunlewe Street, Off Ligali Ayorinde Street, Victoria Island, Lagos); 3A, Bose Enemoh Close, Off Inupa Drive, Ikoyi, Lagos; and the company’s head office building at 10, Anifowoshe Street, Off Adeola Odeku Street, Victoria Island, Lagos.

    Justice Dipeolu gave the orders while delivering judgment in a suit filed by Union Bank Plc against Ogbor and his company.

    Other defendants in the case include Ajibola Bankole Adetutu, Garba Mohammed, and Lolag Sons (Nigeria) Company.

    Read Also: Terrorism: Court forecloses Nnamdi Kanu, sets judgment for November 20

    Union Bank, through its counsel, Adetunji Adeniyi-Adedoyin, had approached the court seeking the interpretation and enforcement of contracts executed between the bank and the defendants through several offer letters and a Memorandum of Settlement dated March 6, 2018.

    The bank prayed the court to determine, among other issues, whether the Memorandum of Settlement and the Consent Judgment of April 25, 2018, constituted valid and enforceable contracts between the parties, and whether or not the defendants’ failure to liquidate their indebtedness amounted to a breach of the agreements.

    Union Bank also sought orders directing the defendants to immediately liquidate their outstanding debt of N20.73 billion, authorising the bank to take possession and sell the secured properties, and compelling law enforcement agencies — including the Inspector-General of Police and the Commandant-General of the NSCDC — to assist in taking possession if necessary.

    The defendants, through their lawyer, Ikenna Emeh, filed a joint counter-affidavit and counterclaim, praying the court to dismiss Union Bank’s suit for lack of merit and to grant the reliefs in favour of Danium Energy Services Limited.

    The defendants sought, among others, the vacation of an interim Mareva injunction earlier granted against them; a declaration that Danium was entitled to set off N65.72 billion against the alleged outstanding N16.8 billion debt; an order setting aside the 2018 Memorandum of Settlement and consent judgment on the grounds of fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence, and duress; refunds and damages amounting to over N42 billion, plus interest and penalties for alleged excess bank charges; and a perpetual injunction restraining Union Bank from disposing of Danium’s assets or acting on the alleged indebtedness.

    They also contended that the settlement agreement between the parties was conditional upon Union Bank securing the unfreezing of Danium’s accounts by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), which they claimed the bank failed to do, thereby breaching the terms of the contract.

    After reviewing all processes and submissions by counsel, Justice Dipeolu dismissed the defendants’ counter-affidavit and counterclaim, holding that they lacked merit.

    The court granted all the reliefs sought by Union Bank, including the enforcement of the Memorandum of Settlement and consent judgment, recovery of the outstanding N20.73 billion debt, and the bank’s right to take over and sell the listed properties used as loan security.

    With the ruling, Union Bank can take possession of the petroleum marketer’s assets and proceed with recovery steps under its statutory power of sale.

  • Court freezes Indian businessman’s accounts over N9.5b ‘debt’

    Court freezes Indian businessman’s accounts over N9.5b ‘debt’

    The Federal High Court in Lagos has restrained all banks operating in Nigeria from dealing with, releasing, or otherwise tampering with any funds or assets belonging to Indian businessman Mr Arun Goswami and his companies, Metwest Steel Limited and Eastern Metals Limited.

    It is over alleged unpaid debts totalling N9,503,012,155.29.

    The defendants were alleged to be indebted to First City Monument Bank (FCMB), Union Bank Plc, and United Capital Trustees Limited.

    Goswami and his firms reportedly owe FCMB and United Capital Trustees N4,540,325,140.36, and Union Bank and United Capital Trustees another N4,962,687,044.93.

    Justice Akintayo Aluko also granted a Mareva injunction, restraining the businessman, his companies, directors, agents, and privies from transferring or dealing with any funds in Nigerian banks up to the value of the total debt.

    Read Also: Court to rule November 11 on Lamido’s request to stop PDP convention

    The order covers all commercial banks and financial institutions in Nigeria, pending the determination of the substantive suit.

    The order was granted following separate motions filed by FCMB and Union Bank in suits FHC/L/CS/798/2025 and FHC/L/CS/800/2025, respectively.

    Both motions were argued by Barrister A. Adedoyin-Adetunji, counsel to the two banks.

    Justice Aluko further directed the listed banks to file and serve affidavits within seven days, disclosing the balances in all accounts held by the defendants.

    He restrained the defendants from selling or transferring any of their properties, including the mortgaged property located at Km 16, Asaba–Benin Expressway, Issele-Azagba, Delta State, which was used as collateral for the loan facilities.

    The court ordered that the counter-claimants provide an undertaking as to damages to indemnify the defendants if the order is later found to have been wrongly made.

    The case was adjourned to February 23, 2026, for further hearing.

  • Court freezes Indian businessman’s accounts over ₦9.5bn debt

    Court freezes Indian businessman’s accounts over ₦9.5bn debt

    Justice Akintayo Aluko of the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos has restrained all banks in Nigeria from dealing, releasing, further releasing in any manner whatsoever, with any and all monies and assets of an Indian businessman, Mr. Arun Goswami, and his companies, Metwest Steel Limited and Eastern Metals Limited, over alleged unpaid debts amounting to N9, 503,012,155.29 billion

    The India-born businessman and companies were alleged to have been indebtedness to two banks, First City Monument Bank (FCMB) and Union Bank Plc and a company, United Capital Trustees Limited.

    Specifically, they were alleged to be owing FCMB and United Capital Trustees Limited of the sum of N4, 540, 325, 140.36 billion. While they were accused of owning Union Bank Plc and United Capital Trustees Limited of the sum of N4,962,687,044.93 billion.

    The judge also made an Order Of Mareva Injunction, restraining the businessman’s companies, their directors, agents, servants, officers, privies or any other person natural or artificial howsoever called under their control from transferring or otherwise dealing with any and all of the monies standing to the credit in any of Nigeria banks, wherever situate up to the amount of the banks’ total claims, as at June 17, 2025; being the outstanding financial obligations owed by the businessman and his companies, in respect of the Bank Guarantee, Short Term Finance, Overdraft and CBN Term Loan facilities availed them by the FCMB and Union Bank, Counter-claim, which were guaranteed by the 2nd & 3rd Defendants to Counter-claim and collateralized by the property belonging to 1st Defendant to Counter-claim, situate at Km 16, Asaba, Benin Expressway, Azagba, Delta State vide a duly executed Mortgage Debenture Deed dated August 3, 2022, pending the hearing and determination of this suit is hereby granted.  

    Justice Aluko made above orders while granting separate motion on notice filed by the two banks, FCMB and Union Bank Plc, who were Counter-claimants in two suits numbered FHC/L/CS/798/2025 and FHC/L/CS/800/2025.

    The two motions were filed and argued by Barrister A. Adedoyin-Adetunji, lawyer to both Union Bank Plc and FCMB.

    In praying the Court for the orders and others, Adedoyin-Adetunji, told the court that the two motion Exparte were pursuant to Order 28 Rules 1 (2) and 2 (1): Order 26(6)(1) of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) rules 2019; Sections 10, and 13 of the Federal High Court Act and Under the court inherent jurisdiction, As Preserved By Section 6 (6)(b) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic Of Nigeria, 1999 {As Amended}.  

    The lawyer also told the court that that two motion on notice were supported with affidavits deposed by Osobase Michael, written address and some documentary exhibits.

    In granting the two motions, Justice Aluko held that: “…. and the court having A. Adedoyin Adeniyi Esq., with Sarah Nwobodo Esq., and T. Alade Esq.. for the 1st Defendant/Counter-claimant/ Applicant. 

    “And the court having also heard T. 

    Olopade Esq., for the Plaintiff/1st defendant to Counter Claim/respondent on their counter affidavit before the Court….

    Read Also: Import licence: Court dismisses N100b suit

    “It is hereby ordered as follows; “that an order of mareva injunction restraining the following Commercial Banks in Nigeria to wit: Guaranty Trust Bank Limited, Access Bank Pic, Citi Bank Nigeria Limited, Ecobank Nigeria Plc, Fidelity Bank Plc, First Bank Of Nigeria Limited, First City Monument Bank Plc, Globus Bank, Jaiz Bank, Keystone Bank Limited, Opay Digital Services Limited, Palmpay Nigeria, Piggyvest, Momo Agent, Polaris Bank Limited, Providus Bank, Signature Bank, Stanbic Ibtc Bank Nigeria Limited, Standard Chartered Bank, Sterling Bank Plc, Suntrust Bank Limited, Union Bank Of Nigeria Plc, United Bank for Africa Plc, Unity Bank Plc, Wema Bank Plc and Zenith Bank Plc, and all other financial institutions operating in Nigeria from releasing, further releasing or dealing in any manner whatsoever with any and all monies and/ or whatsoever assets due to the Defendants to Counter-claim from any account whatsoever maintained by them and also all accounts with BVN: 22206681429 (2nd Defendant to Counter-Claim) their agents, privies or the like with any of the said Banks wherever situate up to the amount of the Counter Claimant/Applicant’s total claim in the sum N4, 962, 687, 044. 93 {Four Billion, Nine Hundred and Sixty-Two Million, Six Hundred and Eighty-Seven Thousand, FortyFour Naira, Ninety-Three Kobo} as at as at 17th June, 2025; being the outstanding financial obligations owed by the Defendants to Counter-claim in respect of the Bank Guarantee, Short Term Finance, Overdraft and CBN Term Loan facilities availed to the Plaintiff/1st Defendant to Counter-claim, which were guaranteed by the 2nd and 3rd Defendants to Counter-claim and collateralized by the property belonging to the 1st Defendant to Counter-claim situate at Km 16, Asaba, Benin Expressway, Issele-Azagba, Delta State vide a duly executed Mortgage Debenture Deed dated 3rd August 2022, pending the hearing and determination of this suit is hereby granted. 

    “That an order of mareva injunction restraining the Defendants to all Counter-claim, the directors of the Plaintiff/1st Defendant to Counter-claim, their agents, servants, officers, privies or any other person natural or artificial howsoever called under the control of the Defendants to Counter-claim from transferring or otherwise dealing with any and all of the monies standing to the credit of the Defendants to Counter-claim in any account whatsoever maintained by the Defendants to Counter-claim with any of the aforementioned Banks wherever situate up to the amount of the Counter Claimant’s total claim of the sum of N4, 962, 687, 044.93 {Four Billion, Nine Hundred and Sixty-Two Million, Six Hundred and Eighty-seven Thousand, Forty-Four Naira, Ninety-Three Kobo}, And N4, 540, 325,140. 36 (Four Billion, five Hundred and forty Million, three Hundred and twenty-five Thousand, one hundred and Forty Naira, thirty-six Kobo )as at as at 17th June, 2025; being the outstanding financial obligations owed by the Defendants to Counter-claim in respect of the Bank Guarantee, Short Term Finance, Overdraft and CBN Term Loan facilities availed to Plaintiff/1st Defendant to Counter-claim, which were guaranteed by the 2nd & 3rd Defendants to Counter-claim and collateralized by the property belonging to 1st Defendant to Counter-claim situate at Km 16, Asaba, Benin Expressway, Azagba, Delta State vide a duly executed Mortgage Debenture Deed dated 3 August 2022, pending the hearing and determination of this suit is hereby granted. 

    “That an order directing the above named Banks to file and serve the 1st Defendant/Counter-claimants Counsel within seven (7) days of service of the order on them, an affidavit disclosing the balance on the Defendants to Counterclaim’s accounts whatsoever maintained with the Banks as at the date of the Order is hereby granted. 

    “That an order restraining the defendants to Counter-claim from selling, transferring, assigning and/or dealing with any properties of the Defendants to Counter-claim that can be traced and located by the 1st Defendant/Counterclaimant including landed properties Km 16, Asaba, Benin Expressway, Issele-Azagba, Delta State being the property belonging to the Plaintiff/1st Defendant to Counter-claim used as security for the Bank Guarantee, Short Term Finance, Overdraft and CBN Term Loan facilities granted to the Plaintiff/ist Defendant to Counter-ciaim; during the pendency of this suit is hereby granted. 

    “That the Counter-claimant shall enter into an undertaking as to damages to indemnify the Defendants to the counter-claim.”

    The matter has been adjourned to February 23, 2026, for further hearing.