Tag: Crude oil

  • Osinbajo decries loss of 400, 000 barrels of crude oil per day

    • Laments rise in poverty, unemployment rates

    The vice presidential candidate of All Progressives Congress (APC), Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, said the daily loss of 400,000 barrels of crude oil to oil thieves and organised criminals was totally unacceptable.

    Osinbajo, who was the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice in Lagos under former Governor Bola Ahmed Tinubu, linked the ‘prevailing oil theft’ to the monumental rise in poverty rate.

    He expressed concern over the socio-economic crisis confronting Nigeria at the first annual lecture series to mark the 73rd anniversary of the General Overseer of Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG), Pastor Enoch Adeboye at the 10 Degree Event Centre, Oregun, Lagos.

    Osinbajo, who spoke on the theme, Harmonising Virtues to Gain Heaven and Earthly Prosperity, said the loss of 400,000 barrels of crude oil per day was unexplainable and unacceptable in a sovereign country.

    He said the oil theft simply “shows that there is no law and order in Nigeria. In orderly society, the daily loss of 400,000 barrels of crude oil will not be possible. It demands urgent action in order to save our country.”

    He added: The activities of oil thieves and economic saboteurs “have compounded poverty level in the country. According to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) data, more 112 million Nigerians are extremely poor.

    “Nigeria is the largest economy in Africa. Yet, more 60 per cent of our population are extremely poor. We are one of the 33 poorest country in the world. Currently, more than 80 per cent graduates are jobless.”

    Osinbajo also linked the oil theft trend to the country’s worsening social indices, citing the astronomic increase in the infant mortality, which he said, was put at 3.9 million between 2009 and 2014.

    He also expressed disappointment at the magnitude of corruption in the country, which he said, was disturbing and unbelievable, citing the subsidy petrol scam of over N2.6 trillion; the kerosene subsidy scam of $7 billion and the missing excess crude account fund put at one billion dollars.”

    He, therefore, said the country’s diverse challenges “present personal and communal obstacle to commonwealth, prosperity and happiness, which he said, God ordinarily expected human beings to create.”

    Osinbajo canvassed fairness, equality and justice for all his countrymen irrespective of tribe, religion and political persuasion which he said, should be upheld Nigeria would overcome her prevailing challenges and crisis.

    He urged Nigerians across the ethnic, political and religious divides to imbibe a culture of selfless service; by giving priority to education; embracing hard work, integrity, care for the downtrodden, love their enemies and humility, without which he said, growth and development would be a mirage.

  • Fed Govt prepares for further crash in crude oil prices

    Fed Govt prepares for further crash in crude oil prices

    The Federal Government  has prepared additional measures to cushion the impact of the continuos fall in the price of crude oil and its effect on the economy, the Coordinating Minister for the Economy and Minister of Finance, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, has said.

    Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala, who spoke yesterday in Abuja at the Launch of the Action 2015 program, where she had a dialogue with school children of 15 years of age.

    She denied claims that the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) has been withdrawn from the National Assembly.

    “Let me just tell you that measures are being put in place so that we can manage the budget and the economy at whatever the oil price bottoms out. Right now no one knows the bottom because it’s falling everyday. Once it stabilises and we know the bottom, we will accompany it with appropriate measures. So we are working everyday with scenarios, we are following exactly the plan we told Nigerians.”

    She added that government has different scenarios for $55, $50 per barrel price of oil “and below that of the additional measures that will be needed and I believe that though this will be a very difficult year for the country, we have the tools, we know how to apply them and we know that working together, we will be able to take this country through this year and then to a brighter 2016.”

    The minister did not give details of the additional measures being planned, but indicated that 2015 would be a very difficult year for the economy, but with appropriate fiscal and monetary policy instruments, the government  “would manage the economy in a manner that would be beneficial to all.”

    Okonjo-Iweala noted that since the budget was submitted to the National Assembly, the government was monitoring developments in crude oil prices so as to come up with appropriate measures once the decline “bottoms out.”

    To assist the poor to cushion the impact of the difficult times, the Minister said government is building a platform on which it would assist those at the bottom of the pyramid.

    “We are doing something that is technological which is trying to give every Nigerian a smart-card and their generation will be the one to mostly appreciate this.

    “It will enable us to target those at the very bottom once they have a card to be able to help them with some assistance that can assure basic health care and their children being in school through a conditional cash transfer program, adding that the program is being put together by the  President.

    She explained that ‘Action 2015’ is an international movement to call for more attention in the area of fighting corruption, inequality and climate change, and it is based on the belief that 2015 can be a pivotal year that will change the future.

  • Brent crude oil falls to new five-year low

    Brent crude oil falls to new five-year low

    HE price of Brent crude oil has fallen to a new five-and-a-half year low of $51.12 per barrel, its lowest level since March 2009. It follows Monday’s six per cent plunge in prices. The BBC said the fall appeared to have been prompted by Saudi Arabia cutting prices to Europe.

    At the same time, the kingdom, Opec’s largest oil-producing nation, raised them for Asian customers. Some analysts said the price cuts reflected Saudi Arabia’s deepening desire to defend its market share in Europe. US oil fell further on Tuesday to $48.01, having fallen below the symbolic threshold of $50 a barrel for the first time since April 2009 on Monday.

    The prices of both Brent crude and US oil, known as West Texas Intermediate crude, have now fallen by more than 50 per cent since mid-2014.

    Investors are worried that a combination of global oversupply and weak oil demand could cause prices to tumble further. US oil production has soared recently, as fracking – or the process of extracting oil from shale rock by injecting fluids into the ground – has revolutionised oil production in the country, transforming US states such as North Dakota and Pennsylvania in the process.

    However, the increase in production has come just as demand for oil in economies across the world from Europe to China – the world’s second-largest consumer of oil – has slowed.

    Recent data also showed that Russia’s 2014 oil output hit a post-Soviet era high and exports from Iraq, Opec’s second-largest producer, reached their highest since 1980.

  • Nigeria doesn’t need crude oil to survive, says Agbakoba

    Former Nigerian Bar Association NBA President, Olisa Agbakoba  (SAN), has said Nigeria does not need crude oil to survive.

    He spoke at the launch of his firm’s Policy Dialogue Series as part of the rebranding  of the law firm from Olisa Agbakoba and Associates to Olisa Agbakoba Legal.

    He said the series is a platform by the law firm to discuss crucial national issues.

    Nigeria, he said, could overcome its economic challenges by adopting appropriate legal frameworks to drive the relevant sectors for national growth.

    Agbakoba said: “The solution to our challenges has to do with policy issues and the understanding of what law can do to identify money. Remember that in my specialty, which is shipping, I’ve pushed for two major laws: the Cabotage Act, because shipping is one of eight critical sectors supporting any economy. And the purpose of the Cabotage Act was to put Nigeria,  owners,  actors and players in the shipping industry first, and not last in their own country. No Nigerian vessel carry crude. So there are a lot of things: transportation, logistics, down streams, so many things.’’

    He said in 2004, the Chamber of Shipping and the Nigeria Indigenous Shippers Association calculated that the resource available in that sector was worth about N7 trillion and could create 10million jobs.

    The law, he said, had not been implemented to create a large industry.

    “When I came to Apapa 30 years ago, it was booming but today it’s all dead, nothing is happening. Then, you should go to crude oil itself. I was also instrumental in the Local Content Act, which in some ways has worked. But it’s still a long way to go. It’s only law that can identify the resources. So, Shell was invited to explore for crude, but the government does not understand that there is the Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Authority  (NIMASA)  law that localises 50 per cent of the oil resources to Nigerians. There are at least 30 by products from the production of one barrel of crude but Nigeria only takes four.’’

    On banking, he said, no indigenous bank plays a role in crude oil reserves. ‘’Shell will simply wire the money to their bank and they will later pay. So, it is like me keeping your money for you and wherever you want it, you tell me,’’ he added.

    He also said the insurance companies are dead. Thirty years ago,  he said, Marine insurance was big, with UNIK Insurance and Royal; you know, they are all dead now, because all insurance underwriting are done abroad.

    “Then, you talk about legal services; no Nigerian law firms actively, to my knowledge, are involved in matters relating to the energy sector. I am very happy that this has happened because it’s only when you have a challenge, that you think. So, I’d like oil to even go down to $20 a barrel, so that we can then say, you know, oil is no longer what keeps us,” he added.

    “ But if you don’t have an effective legal framework for land tenure, how can you do industrial farming? No governor, even the efficient Fashola, has an efficient land tenure system where land can be released for mechanized farming. So without mechanized farming, you can’t grow. Some countries like Greece depend only on olives, pasticcio tomato, pineapple, fruits, for their economy. So, law can play a very strong role in identifying sources of revenue, gas, for instance. Gas. The Indonesian Minister of Oil was telling our Nigerian Petroleum Minister that the money is   no longer in Petroleum, it’s in gas. But we can’t even legally enforce the gas flaring laws. Why that is so, I don’t know.

    “We have the Department of petroleum Resources, which is supposed to be the institution responsible for regulating the industry. It’s not working. We have MTN, that one is unbelievable. They come here, suck our resources.

    “ MTN makes more money than all  the  Nigerian banks put together. And they cart away all the money without any problem. Then they refuse to be listed on the stock exchange, and there is no legal framework that says you can’t do business in Nigeria unless you are listed. All it needs is an amendment to the Investment and securities Act, just one paragraph, so that MTN will be forced to declare its profit, rather than what it is doing  in collaboration  with and cohorts with a couple of Nigerians,’’ he said.

     

     

  • Exposing illegal bunkering, oil theft in the Niger Delta

    Exposing illegal bunkering, oil theft in the Niger Delta

    A report on oil theft called “Private Gain, Public Disaster: Social Context of Illegal Oil Bunkering and Artisanal Refining in the Niger Delta,”  details how the economic sabotage could be reduced to the barest minimum, since completely wiping them out would be an impossible task, writes BISI OLANIYI in Port Harcourt

    Crude oil was first discovered in commercial quantity in 1956 at Oloibiri in Ogbia Local Government Area of Bayelsa State, with Nigeria now losing huge revenue through crude oil theft/illegal bunkering, illegal refining and pipeline vandalism, leading to the pollution and degradation of the environment.

    The activities of oil thieves and illegal bunkerers, made the Federal Government of Nigeria to put in place the Joint Military Task Force (JTF), now codenamed Operation Pulo (Oil) Shield, with its operatives combing the creeks of the Niger Delta, but the criminals, backed by powerful persons, are still beating the security personnel, who at times collude with the oil thieves.

    A University of Port Harcourt’s (UNIPORT) Professor of Economic History, Ben Naanen, and Patrick Tolani, who is the Chief Executive of Oxford, United Kingdom-based Redeemers Relief Agency International, in their new book: “Private Gain, Public Disaster: Social Context of Illegal Oil Bunkering and Artisanal Refining in the Niger Delta,” which is the report of three years of research on oil theft in Nigeria, which they conducted, exposed illegal bunkering and refining, especially in the region rich in crude oil and gas and how they could be reduced to the barest minimum, since completely wiping them out would be an impossible task.

    The presentation of the research report, which took place at the Ebitimi Banigo Auditorium of UNIPORT, was chaired by the Pro-Chancellor and Chairman of the Governing Council of the university, Gesi Asamaowei, an engineer.

    The Bayelsa State’s Commissioner for Environment, Iniruo Wills; a member of the House of Representatives from Rivers State, Dr. Dakuku Peterside, who represents Andoni-Opobo/Nkoro constituency was represented by Benebo Alabraba; the Southsouth Zonal Operations Controller of the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), Mrs. Onyebuchi Sibeudu,  and many eminent personalities were also in attendance.

    Asamaowei, in his remarks, urged the Federal Government and the security agencies to frontally tackle illegal bunkering and refining of crude oil in the Niger Delta.

    The UNIPORT’s Pro-Chancellor also stressed that more attention should be focused on agriculture, rather that wholly depending on crude oil, which is non-renewable, describing the 122-page book as well-researched.

    Naanen, who is also a Trustee of the Port Harcourt, Rivers State-based Niger Delta Environment and Relief Foundation (NIDEREF), while speaking on the occasion, disclosed that the project started in 2011 and was almost abandoned, in view of the cost implication, while the research resumed in 2013.

    He noted that the research focused on Rivers, Bayelsa and Delta States, notorious for illegal bunkering and refining of crude oil, with Akwa Ibom State not considered, in spite of currently having the highest production of crude oil, but offshore, while the illegal activities take place onshore.

    Naanen, the pioneer General Secretary of the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People (MOSOP) and the former Chairman of the MOSOP Provisional Council, also stated that the research was risky, in view of the involvement of militants and cultists in the theft of crude oil and illegally refining it or sold to international buyers.

    The UNIPORT don (Naanen) said: “Nigeria loses more crude oil than any other country in the world – more than seven per cent of daily production. The Federal Government of Nigeria and the oil companies suffer huge financial losses, an estimated $6 billion per annum. Oil theft especially victimises the poor.

    “To reduce illegal bunkering and illegal refining, the socio-economic origin of oil theft must be addressed through a decisive attack on poverty, particularly through job creation, targeted at the youths, who are involved in oil theft.

    “The pipelines should be protected through community-based surveillance. A special judicial mechanism should be established to expedite prosecution of oil theft cases.”

    Naanen, an indigene of Bodo-Ogoni in Gokana Local Government Area of Rivers State, also lamented that Nigeria’s economy is dangerously dependent on crude oil, while stating that the consequences of oil theft are grave and widespread.

    Nigeria has total length of crude oil pipelines of 4,350 kilometres, which must be protected against oil theft and vandalism.

    The first Port Harcourt refinery, with capacity of 60,000 barrels per day (bpd), was inaugurated in 1965, while the second refinery in Port Harcourt has the capacity of 150,000 bpd.

    The Warri refinery in Delta state, inaugurated in 1978, has capacity of 125,000 bpd, while the refinery in Kaduna, which was put in place in 1980, has capacity of 110,000 bpd and it is linked to Niger Delta oil fields by 600 kilometres of pipelines, but designed to process imported heavy crude oil.

    Only 20 per cent of the total crude oil allocated to the four refineries for domestic consumption is utilised, making Nigeria to depend on imported petroleum products and artisanal refining to fill the gap.

    In 2012, according to the report, crude oil contributed 96.8 per cent of Nigeria’s total export earnings, 60.5 per cent of gross government receipts and 37 per cent of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), yet the country loses to crude oil theft, more than $6 billion worth of its crude oil production or 6.25 per cent of its total export value.

    Crude oil, the strategic backbone of the Nigerian economy, is what large scale oil thieves target at disconnecting, with the nation bleeding painfully and tragically from the pipelines, with the country appearing helpless and unable to curtail the danger.There does not seem to be adequate appreciation of the danger, not even among the top oil bureaucrats at the Federal Ministry of Petroleum Resources, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), among other stakeholders.

    Crude oil theft has international dimension, while artisanal refining locally also calls for concern.

    The theft of crude oil or illegal bunkering in national parlance and its corollary – artisanal refining – are fundamentally social problems.

    An artisanal refining unit is a simplified petroleum distillation unit, which is conceptualised like a crude school science project. It can also be likened to the production of the local dry gin, commonly called “Ogogoro.”

    The aim of artisanal refining is to boil barrels of stolen crude oil with naked fire in a metal constructed sealed tank. The crude evaporates and passes through two parallel pipes, connected to the tank through a wooden constructed cooling water bath. The refined product then drips out slowly into a container at the other end, with different products emerging at different intervals.

    Delta State has the highest number of artisanal refining sites, according to the researchers, and they can be easily seen in creeks, forests and villages.

    It was also revealed that it takes about three days to get up to five drums of refined petroleum products. After the refining processes, the products are filled into rubber and metal drums for transloading and storage, from where they are transported to their final destinations.

    Since most of the artisanal refining sites are located near the creeks, the refined products are usually transported through the waterways to the neighbouring towns and villages, while transportation of large volume of crude oil to mother ships offshore is done by the use of barges.

    The barges and Cotonou boats are usually anchored within the creeks, where they are filled with the required volume of crude oil, before they are transported and transferred into the mother ship, which can be in the coastal waters of Ghana or Benin Republic.

    It is unlikely to visit jetties within any of the communities involved in illegal bunkering, without seeing piles of drums and rubber containers used for transporting the petroleum products.

    Most of the locally-produced petroleum products (through artisanal refining) are transported to the cities, where they are probably mixed with the regular products and sold in conventional filling stations. The dominant product is diesel.

    Since the tolerance of diesel engines in high, it is usually not easy to detect locally-refined diesel from the regular product.

    In Port Harcourt, the researchers observed that the main point of entry for the locally-refined products is the Akpajo Sandfill Jetty, stressing that most of the refined products coming from Bodo-Ogoni in Gokana LGA and the neighbouring communities are brought to the Akpajo Sandfill jetty, where buyers from the Port Harcourt city and other parts of Nigeria assemble to buy and resell to members of the public.

    A major driving force of the thriving illegal bunkering business in Nigeria is market demand. There is a huge local and international market for the crude oil stolen from Nigeria.

    While the stolen crude oil is sold in countries within the West African sub-region and Europe, the locally-refined petroleum products are mostly sold in the local villages and towns, but now getting to Onitsha in Anambra State and Lagos.

    The researchers disclosed that the weekly boat that sails from Ekeremor in Bayelsa State to Onitsha, usually carries illegally-refined petroleum products, while a drum of locally-refined diesel goes for N7,000 in the creeks and as much as N12,000 to N15,000 in the cities.

    The involvement of women in the whole process of illegal bunkering and artisanal refining is more or less secondary, because they are generally not involved in obtaining crude oil or in the refining process.

    Women, however, play pivotal roles in the transportation and marketing of the refined products, as well as cooking and provision of sexual services for the predominantly male operators.

    Children, mostly orphans and aged between 10 and 13, also work in the illegal bunkering sites and run errands at the camps, while absentee owners of illegal refining sites always appoint managers to run the operations.

    The JTF estimated in 2010 that there were 1,500 illegal refining operations in the region, with Bodo Creeks in Gokana LGA harbouring over 1,000 youths, who were directly involved in illegal refining, which might have been higher now.

    The JTF claimed that in 2012, it destroyed 4,349 illegal refining units.  Illegal bunkering business represents a substantial informal economy, whose value has never been captured, since it is regarded as illegal.

    The study reveals that there are three main sets of actors involved in illegal bunkering: those who compromise the pipelines by breaking and installing taps on them to procure crude oil for sale; those who buy the crude oil for export and the local operators who process stolen crude oil into low quality fuels for the domestic market, with the three sets of actors referred to as oil thieves or illegal bunkerers.

    Rivers, Bayelsa and Delta States account for 80 per cent of Nigeria’s onshore oil production and a predominant proportion of crude oil theft.

    The researchers held consultations with the people and leaders of Niger Delta communities, while over 200 persons directly connected to the illegal siphoning of crude oil and artisanal were interviewed, while top officials of the leading International Oil Companies (IOCs), NNPC, the regulatory agencies, the JTF, police, navy and other security agencies in the Niger Delta and Abuja were also spoken with.

    Naanen and Tolani also interviewed oil dealers in Europe, especially in Rotterdam, Aberdeen and London, as well as the people involved in the transportation and marketing of illegally-refined petroleum products in the Niger Delta and end users of the products, while direct observations of the refining processes were also made at many sites.

    Urine samples were taken by the researchers from the youths directly involved in refining and copies of questionnaire were also given to them to assess their health status, while fish samples were collected from two heavily-impacted sites in Rivers and Bayelsa states and one less impacted site, to test the level of contamination of sea food and the potential effects on human consumers.

    The samples were analysed at accredited laboratories in Nigeria and the results interpreted by an independent expert.

    The researchers said: “Illegal bunkering and artisanal refining are rooted in the grim economic and social circumstances of the Niger Delta. Poverty is endemic and unemployment is high. Nigeria loses $6 billion to oil theft annually. 28,000 people receive incomes directly or directly from illegal bunkering.

    “The illegal bunkering economy has an annual value of $9 billion. Those who export 80 per cent of the stolen crude oil are not poor people. They are connected to the political and military establishments, as well as the oil bureaucracy.

    “Concerted international action to check the Nigerian crude oil theft is not feasible, because the stolen crude oil represents a minor fraction of international crude oil traffic and does not present any credible threat to the world’s economy and international security.”

    The researchers said: “The notion that individuals and the people of local communities can engage in self help, by tampering with strategic national assets, such as the oil facilities, simply because they are located on their land, is fundamentally flawed.

    “There are also those who tend to believe that coming from the Niger Delta is all it takes to live a comfortable life, because the region produces crude oil. What the youths need is the opportunity to develop their potential and grow, not pampering. The state and the oil companies have to make a creative use of the resources of the region to create the opportunity.”

    While giving further insight into the menace of crude oil theft, Naanen and Tolani pointed out that some people have probably not thought about, in respect of the relationship between illegal bunkering and poverty is that persons who steal the larger volume of the crude oil for export, are not poor people.

    They said: “They are driven primarily by the imperative of capital accumulation. These are operators who can muster the financial capital necessary for a high risk illegal international business, as well as the political capital to protect the business. These are not ordinary men.

    “They are connected to the apex of Nigerian political, military and business establishment. They are known to the people who should know them, as they are not ghosts. Yet, there has been a systematic official refusal to reveal the identities of these supposedly mysterious oil barons and make them face the law.

    “This refusal speaks loud about the official identities of most of these illegal bunkering kingpins. Nigeria loses about 145,000 barrels of crude oil per day to oil theft-related incidents, which is more than the production of many individual oil exporting nations.”

    The researchers also noted that politically, the capture of oil revenues had become the driving force for political contestations in Nigeria, with illegal bunkering aiding the process, while Nigeria is passing under the control of persons with varying measures of legal and illegal interest in the oil and gas industry, a political trend they described as “petrocracy.”

    In combating illegal bunkering, they stressed that the Federal Government and the IOCs had tried many measures, ranging from criminalisation, advocacy and pipeline surveillance to the deployment of JTF personnel, which they said had not yielded the tangible results, in view of lack of implementation.

    On the high level political and military structures, three categories of operators were identified in the illegal bunkering and artisanal refining business: the tapping or bunkering point owners, who drill holes in the pipes and siphon crude oil for sale; the big players who buy the stolen crude oil from the bunkering point owners and export it and the artisanal refiners who purchase the stolen crude oil or occasionally steal it directly and process it into low quality fuels for the local market in the Niger Delta region and beyond.

    Artisanal refining is now undergoing structural changes, featuring concentration and centralisation, making possible oil theft on an industrial scale. The huge storage steel tanks being constructed  and other requirements, including security insurance in case of arrest, require considerable starter capital of about N1 million.

    A major implication of this change is that many of the small operators of the past now work for the powerful “big boys” and financiers, who can muster the capital requirement and necessary law enforcement contacts for the protection of the business.

    Workers and other people with legitimate livelihoods are investing in the illegal businesses of artisanal refining and bunkering, in order to provide for themselves an additional and more rewarding income stream.

    The industry is also undergoing technical innovations, while expanding its commodity chain. Well paid specialists now drill the holes and install valves on them for siphoning crude oil from pipelines.

    In Bodo-Ogoni, the researchers gathered that the fee for drilling a tapping point is between N250,000 and N300,000, part of which goes to the operatives of the JTF, with the changes giving the illegal bunkering and refining business the grounding for sustainability.

    It was also confirmed that the nationals who are mostly involved in moving stolen Nigerian crude oil are mainly non-English speaking, while it is common to sight Lebanese, Cameroonians, Pilipino, Romanians, Thais and Ghanaians, with the recipient refineries of crude oil stolen from Nigeria being in the United States of America, Brazil and the Gulf of Guinea.

    Among the many initiatives recommended by the researchers to mitigate illegal bunkering and refining, three specific areas that require immediate action were emphasised, including addressing the socio-economic foundation of illegal bunkering, through the attack on poverty and job creation targeted at the youths, who must be made to come out of the creeks.

    Also imperative is pipeline protection, through community-based surveillance programme, which will replace the present private contractor surveillance system, since the ineffectiveness of private contractors, according to the researchers, is glaring, with some of them implicated in the theft of crude oil.

    They noted that with community-based surveillance, the people of the various Niger Delta communities would take over the protection of the pipelines, while in exchange for the role, they would receive development support from the IOCs, through the Global Memoranda of Understanding (GMoU).

    The third approach is to ensure speedy prosecution of oil theft cases, by setting up a special judicial mechanism, exemplified by special courts.

    Naanen and Tolani said: “Nigeria has no excuse importing refined petroleum products. The country should control the petroleum products’ market in the ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States) sub-region, as a way of diversifying the economy, creating quality jobs and earning foreign exchange.

    “There should be policy reform to promote cottage/modular refineries that will contribute to addressing the local supply disequilibrium, build local capacity in the downstream sector and empower the local communities through job creation. Emphasis must also be placed on good governance.

    “The ten per cent community equity, recommended in the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB), will create a sense of belonging in the Niger Delta. However, the management of the fund will be problematic. Effective and agreeable management mechanism should be designed. Otherwise, the fund will fuel crisis in the communities.”

    The Federal Government of Nigeria must show strong political will to tackle the menace of illegal bunkering and artisanal refining, in order to move the nation forward.

  • NSCDC intercepts vessel, crude oil

    NSCDC intercepts vessel, crude oil

    •One suspect arrested 

    A vessel loaded with bagged petroleum products has been intercepted by the Bayelsa command of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC).

    A suspect, Munemene Ziba, was arrested in connection with the vessel, which was laden with sacks of oil described within the creeks as “a condom system” of transporting crude oil.

    The state Commandant, Desmond Agu, said the suspect claimed to be a member of the anti-vandalism task force on oil theft in Southern Ijaw Local Government Area.

    Agu spoke at the weekend shortly after receiving the Commissioner of Police, Valentine Ntomchukwu and Air Officer Commanding, Mobility Command, Air Vice-Marshal Umar Omeiza.

    “He claimed to be a member of the task force that was set up by the government while he is not a member.

    “I am prosecuting him as an impersonator and for illegal possession of the product. He was caught at the Yenagoa waterside while coming from South Ijaw,” Agu said.

    The commandant said 638 illegal refineries were destroyed in Southern Ijaw by the task force, which was established in partnership with NSCDC.

    He warned persons wearing uniforms of security agencies to desist from such act and called on the police and other security agencies to protect their uniforms.

    Agu said the suspect was caught wearing a vest with an inscription, “SILGA Task Force”.

    He, however, said the suspect confessed that he stole the vest during the rally organised by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) at Southern Ijaw.

    But the suspect claimed that he was arrested at the waterside, adding that he knew nothing about the bagged product.

    “I was caught at the Yenagoa waterside. I was not even inside the boat. I was not driving the boat,” he said.

     

  • ‘We must address crude oil theft now’

    ‘We must address crude oil theft now’

    Senator Ahmed Mohammed Makarfi, former governor of Kaduna State and  chair of the Senate Committee on Finance, speaks in this interview with TONY AKOWE  on several national issues, including the allegation of missing money at the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and crude oil theft. Excerpts:

    Your Committee just submitted its report to the Senate  on the allegation of missing money made by the suspended governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi. Can we have an overview of the report?

    Well, our report is not final; we made certain interim recommendations, and there is an ongoing forensic audit and such recommendations will be subject to the outcome of the forensic audit. In our report, the Auditor General of the Federation and PriceWaterHouse, the external forensic auditors, are requested to forward the forensic audit report to us.

    That is what will certify whether the certification by PPPRA which is about 10 million dollars was correct, understated or overstated and by who. So, there are some of the recommendations that are subject to the outcome of the forensic audit and that is why I said it is not a final report. I have seen that major aspects of the report are captured in the papers. However, it is not yet a decision of the Senate because the Senate still has to consider our recommendations. We were asked to find out the whereabouts of some monies.

    For 47 billion dollars out of the 67 billion dollars, there was no dispute at all right from the time we started our sitting that the money was in the Federations Account. Where there was dispute was between the figure of 10.8 billion dollars and 20 billion dollars. Even that dispute did not state that the money was really missing, but what has been done with that money. It was not stated at that time that the money was missing, but that it was not remitted to the Federation Account. If it was not remitted to the Federations Account, it could be hanging in one account or the other. We took the larger figure of $20 billion so that we can investigate what happened to that money. Out of that money, five and half billion dollars was spent on PMS and what we needed to do was to find out if the money was appropriated. We checked the budget of the relevant ministries and discovered that the National Assembly appropriated the money. So, if the National Assembly appropriated money and it was expended, you cannot talk about money missing. Another four and half billion dollars was expended on subsidy on kerosene. But unlike that of petrol, the money was not appropriated by the National Assembly, but there was evidence and certification that the money was spent. Again, there is a difference between missing money and money spent without appropriation. You know what it was used for, but the fact is, was it authorised by law? It was not authorised constitutionally because all monies to be spent are supposed to be appropriated by the National Assembly. That takes care of 10 billion dollars out of the 20 billion dollars. One part of the money was budgeted for and spent, while another part was not budgeted for, but spent. We also discovered that about 8 billion dollars of the money does not entirely belong to the Federations Account. Our job was to determine how much of that money belonged to the Federation Account.

    Why was the money not entirely for the Federation Account? For example, I have a business and I need money to finance the business to make profit, but I don’t have money and I looked for other investors to invest and recover their money while we share the profit. Right from the beginning, it is wrong to assume that the entire money belongs to me because you have to take your money and your profit from the gross earning. That was the accounting that was done wrongly. What the person who makes the allegation alleged was that he believed that part of that money belonged to the Federation Account and our job was to find out how much of that money belonged to the federation, and has it been paid into the federation account? We determined how much belonged to the federation account and how much has been paid into the federations account and how much has not been remitted. Yes, there are monies that have not been paid into the federation account and we determined that it was substantially money belonging to other people and not the federations account. But even the money belonging to the federations account, not all of it has been remitted. It is all stated in the report and we made recommendations that those monies belonging to the federations account and not yet remitted should be remitted to the federations account. Even the agencies involved did not dispute our calculations and computations, but gave one excuse or the other and we asked them to remit it and show us evidence that it has been remitted. That resolved the issue of 8 billion dollars which is the most complex issue because it is money belonging to other people and so, we had to take time to decide how much belongs to who. We did that and our recommendation is in line with what we have determined to be shares for each party. But as I said earlier, even the share for the federations account, not all of it has been remitted and there is no dispute about that. That leaves 2 billion dollars to be accounted for, which the NNPC explained were expended in the cause of generation of revenue. This is different from spending on subsidy. The constitution allows for some expenses in the course of generating revenue. Whatever you are going to remit is net of the expenses related to generating the revenue. Our job was first to find evidence they were wholly and exclusively spent in the area of generating that revenue and that is the area we say we don’t have the required expertise and so, we appointed two firms of forensic auditors, gave them the documents and said, verify these things and they made a report to us on how much was liable and how much cannot be defended. What cannot be defended, we recommend that it be refunded. So, that basically accounted for the 20 billion dollars you are talking about.

    Were there areas your committee did not look into?

    There are areas that we have not looked into and we stated so in the report. Such areas include crude swap, strategic alliances which involve contracts over transfer of assets. Whereas they have an impact on how much you generate, it does not affect account for the 67 billion. You account for the 67 billion first and then know how much is missing. I am going into this area because this is the area that can hurt the nation more because if you enter into a contract that continues to deprive government of needed revenue, that is a very serious business,

    From what you have said, did Sanusi miss the point?

    He did not miss the point in the area of subsidy on kerosene. Even before Sanusi raised the point about subsidy on kerosene, we had raised this matter with the NNPC and so, it was not new to us because he was not the first person to raise it. We got to know that money was spent that was not appropriated and then, his letter came and so, it was nothing new. He was right in the area of kerosene subsidy being spent without appropriation. He said that the late President Yar’Adua gave instruction to stop kerosene subsidy; we are not disputing that there was such an instruction. But there was never a time even under Yar’Adua that government stopped paying subsidy on kerosene. So, continued payment of subsidy on kerosene is not limited to the current government. It was an issue that continued even under the President that gave the instruction in writing. So, inadvertently, government must have given an instruction which it did not abide by. Who took the action? Some people feel that the NNPC on its own took the action or maybe the minister took the action. But we have evidence that the President is aware and consents to it. So, if the President is aware and consents to it, you cannot pick one Director or one individual and heap the blame on him. That was why we recommended that since the President is aware and consented to it, the constitution says where that happens, he should prepare a supplementary budget and bring to the National Assembly and if they like, they will approve it or sanction him. But until he does that, you can’t commence any action until he does that. Based on our report, if the National Assembly feels that it wants to take any particular action, our report is there and we have confirmed that some monies were spent without being budgeted for. We have also confirmed that some money was not remitted and how much it was, but it is nothing near the amount he was talking about and we have recommended what needs to be done.

     

  • Oil companies are environmental terrorists – Dickson

    Oil companies are environmental terrorists – Dickson

    Governor of Bayelsa State, Mr. Seriake Dickson, has decried environmental terrorism in the Niger Delta region blaming the oil companies of being the brains behind it.

    Dickson, therefore, advocated stringent environmental laws to protect and preserve the environment from such terrorism.

    The governor who spoke on Tuesday when members of the National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA), led by its Chairman, Major Lancelot Anyanya (rtd), paid him a courtesy visit in Government House, Yenagoa,

    He said oil companies were fond of abandoning crude oil spill sites without properly cleaning them.

    governors_Governor_Seriake_Dickson_463831975He said such sites had ravaged environment in the region citing Bayelsa State as the worst hit.

    Dickson while addressing members of NOSDRA said: “I have said it before that what has been going on in Bayelsa State, the Niger Delta and in all oil-producing areas concerning the levity with which oil companies treat the issues of the environment and the maintenance of environmental and health standards.

    “When you look at all of these and particularly listening to your chilly statistics, which I believe is only a tip of the iceberg, one is really left with no other conclusion than that, we are actually facing a case of environmental terrorism.

    “What has been going on in the Niger Delta since the discovery of oil; a situation where more than one spill takes place in Bayelsa every day, going by what your statistics is telling us and all these sites are treated with reckless abandon and the environment is left to fend for itself, the livelihood and in fact the lives of the people and the ecosystem are not attended to. What then is more of terrorist action than this?”

    He emphasised  the need for international oil companies operating in the Niger Delta region to protect the environment.

    He said an environmental summit would be organised by his administration soon to discuss ways of mitigating the effects of oil and gas exploration and exploitation in the region.

    He expressed his administration’s commitment to collaborate with NOSDRA to facilitate the speedy passage of the amended Act of the agency, which had undergone its first and second readings at the National Assembly.

    The governor explained that, health hazards arising from such environmental pollution were the reasons behind the establishment of the toxicology institute.

    He granted the request of NOSDRA for a functional office in the state and called on the agency to site its headquaters  in Bayelsa.

    He described the state as the host to the bulk of oil and gas operations in the region.

    As part of efforts to address environmental problems, Dickson proposed that the Federal Government should build receptacles to evacuate crude oil recovered from illegal refineries.

    He also asked the the government to design mechanisms for effective and proper remediation of impacted areas.

    “This is an opportunity again for us to remind ourselves that we all have a duty to work together as government to government and it is also an opportunity for us to call on all stakeholders especially the oil companies, regulatory agencies and everybody to be alive to the need to protect our environment”, he said.

    Earlier,  a team of NOSDRA delegates led by the agency’s Director-General, Mr. Peter Idabo, said they were in the state of President Goodluck Jonathan to assess spill sites in various communities.

    Idabo said environmental pollution arising from crude oil spills in Bayelsa could only be compared to similar disaster in Ogoni, Rivers State.

    Idabo and his team first visited Well 12 operated by the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) near Imiringi in Ogbia local government area.

    “Pollution in Bayelsa is very rife, it is like what is happening in Ogoniland”, he said.

    He, however, observed that Well 12 where a truck discharged pollutants last year, had been cleaned.

    He said the visit of spill sites in the state was part of activities lined up by the agency in its tour of oil-producing states.

    He said the agency would consult and cooperate with the Governor of the state, Mr, Seriake Dickson, to tackle problems of oil spills in the country.

    In his remarks, Chairman of NOSDRA, Major Lancelot Anyanya (rtd), explained that the visit was aimed at strengthening the existing collaboration between government and the agency on efforts at curbing oil spills and its attendant effects.

  • Those 546 million gallons of crude oil spilled in the Niger Delta

    The figure is startling, in two regards. One, in terms of the foreign exchange the country could have made from them; and two, the damage they must have wreaked on the health of the people and the environment. A whole 546 million gallons of crude oil spilled into the Niger Delta over the last 50 years. The quantity amounts to 11 million gallons a year. Waoh!

    The revelation was made in a letter written by 13 local and five international Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) on the National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA) Bill before the Senate.

    Among those who endorsed the letter were Thelma Diwari, representing CBNHRSD; Head of Centre for Environment Human Rights and Development (CEHRD), Zabbey Nenibarini; Nick Hildyard of Cornerhouse; and the Executive Director of Foundation For Environmental Rights, Advocacy and Development (FENRAD), Nelson Nnanna Nwafor.

    The letter called for the passage of the NOSRDA Amendment Bill 2012 into law and remediation and protection of the environment in the Niger Delta.

    “The reform of the NOSDRA Act 2006 will provide clearer regulations and a strong response mechanism to deal with oil spills which will save millions of lives and improve the livelihoods of all the communities living in the Niger Delta,” it said.

    They also called for an end to the spilling and destruction of the environment and the unacceptable devastation on the lives of local communities in the areas of oil exploration.

    “This can be achieved by strengthening the institutional and regulatory power of NOSDRA, and enshrining the ‘polluter pays’ principle in law, which the NOSDRA Amendment Bill 2012 will do,” it added.

    The Niger Delta has been through a lot. It was the frustration with the system that led to the declaration of an Independent Niger Delta Republic by the late Isaac Adaka Boro during late Aguiyi Ironsi’s administration, just before the Civil War.

    The quest for justice was later championed by the late Ken Saro-Wiwa. He was killed as a result of his agitation by the late Sani Abacha regime.

    The alarm raised by the NGOs over the spillage is another phase of the quest for justice and it must be taken serious.

    The bill must become law soonest to end the evil oil spills do to the people, the environment and the economy. No right thinking person should waste time in getting this bill to become law and when it becomes law, it must be implemented to the latter. And only then can we truly say never again to the burying of 546 million gallons of crude oil into the soils of the Niger Delta and only then can the people, the environment and the economy stop bleeding to death as a result of this negligence and sabotage.

    The spillages have robbed children of playground; robbed farmers of farmland; robbed fishermen of fishes; robbed the economy of cash; robbed the people of their health; and on and on. The time to pass the bill is now.

    The National Assembly must show that it cares by passing this bill and the president must follow through by assenting to it after it has been passed. Anything short of this will amount to compromise and at the end, all will suffer for it.

     

  • Delta’s ‘crude oil grave’

    Delta’s ‘crude oil grave’

    Just weeks after Amnesty International accused Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) of manipulating information about spill from its facilities in the Niger Delta, a fresh crisis is brewing between the Anglo-Dutch oil firm and one of its host communities in Delta State over the resurgence of crude oil buried in the swamp of Odimodi.

    Initial reports have blamed “unknown persons” for the environmental crime. The people of Boutubo, a sub-clan of Odimodi community in Burutu Local Government Area of Delta State, are holding Shell responsible. They said the company or its agents deliberately buried the spill with the intention of avoiding proper clean-up and payment of compensation to the community.

    The crude oil “grave” is located around mangrove vegetation and natural ponds between the company’s 24″ Trans Ramos Trunk Line, which conveys crude oil from facilities in the Brass Creek through the Forcados River to the company’s terminal and Boutubo.

    The community reported the matter to the National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA) around August 2011-three years after the incident reportedly occurred in 2008.

    The petition led to a Joint Investigation Visit (JIV) of the agency, Shell and representatives of Odimodi community to the impacted area on October 24, 2011. Documents obtained by our reporter revealed that three sample pits dug during the JIV all confirmed the presence of crude oil in the area.

    A nine-page report by SPDC on the JIV tagged 715845 stated:  ”Investigation of the incident site showed that there is residual impact on site requiring further works.”