Tag: dismiss

  • Police dismiss three cops for reckless shooting

    Police dismiss three cops for reckless shooting

    THE police in Lagos have dismissed two Sergeants and a Corporal attached to Amukoko Division for reckless use of firearms.

    Sergeants Saturday Osaseri  (25759), Segun Okun (359075) and Corporal Adekunle Oluwarotimi  (496833) were dismissed after an orderly room trial convicted of breaching the Nigeria Police’ rules of engagement.

    According to police spokesman, Chike Oti, a Superintendent (SP), the dismissed Non-commissioned Officers (NCOs) committed the offence on January 11, at about 9:30pm at Ifelodun Street, Amukoko.

    Oti said they disproportionately responded with bullets fired from their weapons at some youths alleged to have hurled stones, sticks and bottles at them.

    He said the actions of the dismissed NCOs led to the death of one of the youths, while another was injured.

    Oti said: “They  were arrested, detained and tried immediately on the orders of the Commissioner of Police, Edgal Imohimi. The guilty verdict was passed on them by the adjudicating officer who considered that the officers did not appreciate the situation critically and ought not to have applied maximum force on the unruly youths.a

    “The officers would be charged to court next week, while a duplicate copy of the casefile would be sent to the Directorate of Public Prosecution (DPP) for legal advice.

    “Sequel to the above occurrence, the Commissioner of Police has directed all Area Commanders and DPOs in the state to warn their men against misapplication of force. He further warned that officers must abide by the Rules of Engagement (ROE) as stipulated in Force Order 237.”

  • AGF urges court to dismiss suit  seeking Magu’s sack

    AGF urges court to dismiss suit seeking Magu’s sack

    Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) Abubakar Malami (SAN) has urged a Federal High Court in Abuja to dismiss a suit by two lawyers seeking the sack of Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Ibrahim Magu.

    The AGF made the request in a notice of preliminary objection he filed for himself and on behalf of President Muhammadu Buhari against the suit.

    The plaintiffs – Ahmed Yusuf and Peter Asa – filed the suit on March 24, this year.

    They listed Magu, the AGF, the President, the Senate and the President of the Senate as defendants.

    The plaintiffs claimed to have been aggrieved by the appointment of Magu as the substantive Chairman of the EFCC by the President despite Senate’s refusal to confirm his appointment.

    They queried the competence of Magu’s continued occupation of the seat of EFCC Chairman, his nomination by the President having been rejected twice by the Senate

    The plaintiffs  primarily seeks an order restraining the President from further re-nominating or re-presenting Magu’s name to the Senate for confirmation, the name having earlier been rejected twice by the Senate.

    They also want a declaration that by the combined effect of the provisions of Section 2(3) of the EFCC Act and Order 131 of the Rules of the Senate, Magu or any other person cannot validly occupy the office of the Chairman of the EFCC in acting capacity.

    But in a notice of preliminary objection, the AGF argued that not only was the suit wrongly initiated by the plaintiff, they equally lacked the locus standi to file the suit.

    Malami argued that the plaintiffs did not have sufficient interest in the determination of the matter and have not shown that their civil rights were breached by the defendants.

  • Police dismiss four for extortion

    Police dismiss four for extortion

    the Police have dismissed four policemen attached to Ijebu-Ode Area Command in Ogun State for extorting N50,000 from their victim.

    The money was allegedly meant for bail.

    Officer in charge of Public Complaint Rapid Response Unit (PCRRU) ACP Abayomi Shogunle gave the name of the dismissed personnel as: AP. No 122800 Inspr. Mufutau Olaosun, F/No. 366127 Sgt. Adebayo Temitope, F/No. 455593 Cpl. Bakare Taiwo and F/No. 455554 Cpl. Adesoye Ayokunlehin.

    In a statement in Abuja yesterday, the police said the affected policemen were charged, tried and found guilty in an orderly room conducted at the Area Command Headquarters, Ijebu-Ode for two offences against discipline as provided for in Paragraphs E (iii) Discreditable Conduct and C (ii) Corrupt Practice under the First Schedule of Police Act and Regulations Cap. P19. Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004.

    The statement said on June 12, 2017, the unit received a complaint via its WhatsApp number 08057000003 about misconduct of some policemen.

    The complainant, according to the statement, said he was sent by his boss to withdraw money from the bank and on his way back, a police car  pulled over. The policemen  in the vehicle collected  his phone and he was accused of stealing the phone.

    He added that he was taken to the station where he was accused of being an Internet fraudster, he was beaten, forced to write a statement dictated to him and that N50,000 was collected as money for bail.

    Shogunle said the complaint was immediately registered with tracking number PCRRU451591  and investigation initiated.

    According to the statement: “The Divisional Police Officer (DPO), Igbeba Division, Ijebu-Ode was mandated to commence an enquiry straightaway.

    “The policemen were identified and it was discovered that they apprehended the complainant on June 7, 2017 without any reasonable cause and extorted the sum of N50,000; bail money despite the #BailisFree campaign before he was eventually released same day.

    “The extorted N50,000 was subsequently recovered from these unethical policemen, who were armed in plain clothes on the day of the incident. Their action is contrary to the directives of the Inspector-General of Police and unacceptable…

    “The complainant was also handed back his N50,000 with an apology a day after he lodged the complaint.”

  • UI, students dismiss bomb threat

    UI, students dismiss bomb threat

    The University of Ibadan (UI) has tightened security following a threat by a terrorist group to bomb the institution before the nation’s 56th Independence anniversary. Some students share their thoughts on the matter with MERCY ADEDIGBA (100-Level Communication and Language Arts Education).

    At a time when the University of Ibadan (UI) is basking in the euphoria of its new feat of ranking 601 among top 1,000 universities globally, and the only Nigerian university on the list, a message from a terrorist group, Al-wilayat al-Islamiyya Gharb Afriqiyya, threatening to bomb the university before October 1, is not creating panic on campus.

    But news of the latest ranking published by Times Higher Education (THE) on its website made the university community ecstatic.

    The message from the terrorist group was mailed to some members of staff. Part of it reads: “Most of you are going to die before Independence Day. You will not spend the Independence Day in peace, you and your students.

    “Even your little searches at the gate won’t do anything. By the time we are through with you, your government will be sorry.

    “You people are an embarrassment to Nigeria and are the people that brought in western education to Nigeria. You doomed this nation and in turn you are all going to be doomed.”

    Reacting to the message, the  Director of Public Communication, Mr Olatunji Oladejo, urged members of the community not to panic, describing it as a mere rumour.

    In a statement signed by Oladosu Olaleye Lystra of the Public Relations unit, the university said it had made efforts to secure the campus.

    “The bomb threat message was sent to cause unnecessary panic.  The Police and the Social Security have deployed intelligence officers to provide optimum security in the institution in order to forestall any tragedy or disaster, and the police and Social Security officials  are on top of the matter. “

    However, there has been mixed reaction to the threat.  Some students said they were not aware of the threat. Olukotun Tosin, a 300-Level student of Agronomy, believes the university is not doing enough to avert a bomb threat.

    “Whatever would be would be.  If the institution would be bombed it cannot be prevented.  Despite the threat, the institution did not bring any of the armed forces to help; just the institution’s security has been searching vehicles and people at the gate. Even Muslim women were searched. Let’s just hope it is not true,” he said.

    Many of those aware have however called the group’s bluff, describing the message as a rumour.

    Dike Glory, a 300-Level student of Agronomy, thinks it is a bluff.

    “It is impossible. How can they bomb UI? It cannot happen. Never!” she said vehemently.

    Adeniran Kehinde , a 200-Level student of  Biochemistry, said: “Let me tell you, whether I go home or I stay in school, if it is my time to die, I would die. The bomb could detonate at the gate. But I heard it is a rumour”.

    Ajewole Olajumoke, a 200-Level student of Educational Management, said: “It is a lie joo; nothing can happen to me even if the whole of UI is bombed, I am safe”.

    Wisdom Ighodalo , a 100-Level student of English, said it wasn’t the first time the rumour would surface.

    “The Lord is my shepherd; nothing can happen to me. But I don’t think it is true.  The same thing happened about three years ago,” he said.

    Omole Brandie, a 400-Level student of Sociology, said students might be behind the threat.

    “I don’t think it is true . It might be a prank played by a student,” he said.

    The leadership of the Students’ Union of the institution also urged students not to panic, describing the message as a prank.

     

  • Police officers dismiss allegations against Idris

    Senior police officers have dismissed as baseless, report by an online medium that the Acting Inspector General of Police  (IGP) Ibrahim Idris was involved in massive looting, illegal auctioning of 30 police vehicles and breach of public trust.

    The Nation learnt that a video recording where some aggrieved retired assistant inspectors general of Police (AIGs) met to strategise on how to ‘bring the IGP down’ has been availed the President.

    The online platform accused the IG of unlawfully selling off of 30 cars to fictitious claimants, embezzlement of public funds, frequent abandonment of his post, and sexual liaisons with subordinates preceding his time as commissioner in Kano State.

    But the officers, who berated the ignorance of the online platform, insisted that no command officer has a hand in the auctioning of police vehicles.

    To them, should the medium had done due diligence, it could have realised that auctioneers take care of such issues on behalf of the police, at the expiration of deadlines given to owners to claim their abandoned vehicles.

  • AGF, NDLEA urge court to dismiss Kashamu’s suit

    AGF, NDLEA urge court to dismiss Kashamu’s suit

    The Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Abubakar Malami (SAN) and the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) yesterday urged the Federal High Court in Lagos to dismiss a fundamental rights suit by Senator Buruji Kashamu.

    Justice Ibrahim Buba, who had refused to disqualify himself from the case after being accused of likely bias by NDLEA, adjourned till November 18 for judgment.

    Kashamu is praying the court to restrain the Federal Government from seizing his property for alleged drug trafficking.

    He sought an order of perpetual injunction restraining NDLEA and the AGF from taking possession of his belongings.

    Arguing the application yesterday, the senator’s lawyer, Ajibola Oluyede, said Kashamu had been exonerated from charges of heroine importation into the United States of America.

    He said two United Kingdom courts also held that Kashamu had no case to answer, and that one of the courts held that he was mistaken for another person.

    Oluyede said it was on the basis of the same dismissed charges that the Federal Government made moves to seize his client’s property.

    He said: “The Federal High Court nullified the warrant of arrest. The respondents are still making moves to seize his property over the same issues over which he has been exonerated and for which the orders were made.

    “This action is not pursuing a right in property. It is seeking to protect the right to own property. We urge your Lordship to grant this application.”

    But counsel to the AGF, Oyin Koleoso, urged the court to dismiss the suit because Kashamu had no evidence to back his claims.

    He said: “Of all the property the applicant listed, there is nothing to link them with the applicant. No title documents. I urge the court to dismiss the application.”

    Kashamu said he learnt of moves by NDLEA and AGF to seize his property, including a 24-flat housing estate at Egbe, Lagos and hectares on Lekki Peninsula, Lagos.

    According to him, he acquired the property, which he said were worth N20billion, by dint of hard work and through his legitimate business.

    He said contrary to NDLEA’s alleged claim, the property were not proceeds of drug trafficking.

    Kashamu said right to own property as guaranteed by sections 43 and 44 of the 1999 Constitution would be breached if the respondents were not restrained.

  • Ambode, APC ask tribunal to dismiss Agbaje’s petition 

    Ambode, APC ask tribunal to dismiss Agbaje’s petition 

    Lagos State governor, Mr. Akinwunmi Ambode and the All Progressives Congress (APC) have asked the Lagos State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Ikeja, to dismiss the petition filed by Mr. Jimi Agbaje, of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).

    Their plea was contained in a preliminary notice of objection jointly filed before the three-man tribunal led by Justice Muhammad Sirajo.

    Agbaje had petitioned the tribunal challenging the declaration of Ambode as the winner of the April 11, 2015 governorship election in the state.

    Other respondents in the suit are the Independent National Election Commission (INEC) and its Lagos State Resident Electoral Commissioner.

    The PDP candidate had alleged irregularities during the election which he said breached the provisions of the INEC’s approved guidelines for the polls.

    Moving their application at the resumed hearing of the petition yesterday, counsel to Ambode, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), argued that the petition should be struck out for being incompetent.

    Olanipekun argued that there was no correlation between the reliefs being sought by the petitioner and the particulars of application on the one hand and the grounds for questioning the election on the other hand.

    “The grounds and particulars in the petition are at opposites with the facts and reliefs being sought within the purview of Section 285(2) of the 1999 Constitution. I urge my Lordships to dismiss the petition,” Olanipekun said.

    He further said that there was nowhere in the pleadings where the petitioners attacked the victory of the respondents or questioned the conduct of the election.

    Olanipekun said: “I submit that there is no petition before your Lordships known to law. There are no grounds challenging the election of my client under Section 138(b)(c) of the Electoral Act 2010 as amended.”

    According to him, the court cannot act on sentiment and sympathy of parties, emphasizing that sympathy does not override clear provisions of the law.

    Counsel to the APC, Dr Muiz Banire, aligned with the submissions of Ambode’s counsel, describing the petition as having no ground. He therefore asked that it should be struck out.

    ”This is a groundless petition; there is no petition before Your Lordships. I pray that the purported document before Your Lordships be struck out,” Banire said.

    However, counsel to Agbaje, Mr Clement Onwuenwunor, opposed their submissions and maintained that the petition was competent.

    Onwuenwunor argued that the issues for determination by the tribunal had been carefully spelt out.

    “Paragraph 13(a) and (b) of our petition questioned the election in Lagos State on the grounds of non-compliance with the Electoral Act and irregularities such as in the use of the card readers.

    We have looked at their preliminary objections in this case and have concluded that they are objections made on mere technicalities,” he said.

    He urged the tribunal to dismiss the notices of preliminary objection with substantial costs in favour of the petitioner. Justice Sirajo, thereafter adjourned the sitting of the tribunal till July , 2015 for ruling.

  • PENGASSAN urges court to dismiss members’ suit

    The Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff  Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) has urged the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN) to dismiss a suit filed by two of its Chevron Nigeria branch members, John Nwanosike and Jonathan Omare.

    The plaintiffs are seeking to nullify the association’s delegates’ conference because it was held in violation of a court order.

    Justice Kenneth Amadi had granted an order of interim injunction restraining the defendants from holding the conference until the plaintiffs’ suit is determined. But effort to serve the interim order on the National Secretariat of PENGASSAN at 288 Ikorodu Road was frustrated, as the association went ahead to hold the conference.

    The claimants jointed Chevron Branch of PENGASSAN, Mr Esanubi Frank and Mr Ayanate Kio as the defendants.

    The defence counsel, Mr Sola Iji, said he had just filed his processes opposition to the claimants’ suit.

    The claimants’ lawyer Mr Festus Aifeyodion said he was yet to be served with the papers. He urged the court to hear his motion.

    Justice Amadi, however, urged parties to return on a further date when all pending applications would be heard.

    The plaintiffs said they were duly elected as delegates to the PENGASSAN conference with their tenure valid for three years, only for their names to be struck out by the defendants, denying them the right to vote and be voted for at the conference.

    The plaintiffs said  in a bid to also prevent them from exercising their franchise, the defendants set up a disciplinary committee to try them after they complained that their rights were been trampled on. The panel subsequently found them ‘guilty’ even when there was no evidence of any offence against them.

    The plaintiffs are, therefore, seeking a declaration that the removal of their names as delegates to the zonal and national conference was unconstitutional; as well as an order mandating the defendants to include their names as delegates.

    They also sought an order of perpetual injunction restraining PENGASSAN from holding the conference until the illegality occasioned by their removal was redressed.

    Justice Amadi adjourned till September 25 for hearing.

  • Wolves dismiss Mba transfer deal

    Wolves dismiss Mba transfer deal

    Warri Wolves have dismissed claims by Rangers they have agreed to pay the transfer fees of Sunday Mba and Chigozie Agbim.

    Rangers chairman Festus Onuh has disclosed they have agreed to clear Mba and Agbim on the terms demanded by Wolves.

    But Delta sports boss Amaju Pinnick said they are yet to reach any agreement on the transfer fees of the two internationals. “It’s not true,” Pinnick said.

    Pinnick also warned that if Rangers field the players in Sunday’s CAF Champions League clash against Recreativo de Libolo of Angola they risk disqualification.

    “If they field any of those players they should be ready to lose that game,” he warned.

    Both players have been training with Rangers since the close season.

  • Lagos council poll: ACN urges court to dismiss tribunal’s verdict

    The Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) yesterday urged the Local Government Election Appeal Tribunal sitting at the Lagos State High Court, Igbosere, to uphold its appeal against the verdict of the Election Petition Tribunal (EPT), which declared the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) winner of the Agbado-Okeodo chairmanship election.

    The Lagos State Independent Electoral Commission (LASIEC) declared the ACN’s candidate, Dr. Augustine Arogun, winner of the October 22, 2011, poll and the PDP’s candidate, Otunba Busari Akande, filed a petition at the EPT challenging the declaration.

    On November 22, last year, EPT declared Akande winner of the election.

    The lower tribunal, led by Justice Ade Owobiyi, voided the certificate of return LASIEC issued to the ACN candidate.

    It held that Akande polled the highest number of valid votes in the election, a decision Arogun appealed.

    Yesterday, LASIEC’s lawyer Oladapo Akinosun and Arogun’s counsel Kunle Adegoke, in separate appeals, urged the appellate tribunal to uphold their appeals against the EPT’s verdict.

    Akinosun argued that the EPT lacked jurisdiction to deliver the judgment.

    He said the law stipulates that a petition must be heard and dispensed with within 30 days, unless the petitioner brings a motion in writing seeking extension of time, insisting that the petitioner did not obtain such extension.

    Akinosun said jurisdiction is a creation of statute and cannot be conferred by the court, which he said the EPT tried to do even when it did not receive any application for time extension.

    On the issue of fair hearing which the PDP raised, Akinosun said it is only applicable when a petition is still alive.

    He said: “In this case, there was no petition since there was no application for extension of time when the 30 days lapsed.

    “We urge your Lordships to dismiss the judgment of the EPT and uphold our appeal. The judgment of the lower tribunal was entered in error and should be set aside.”

    ACN’s lawyer Mohammed Ajibola (SAN) also urged the court to uphold the appeal.

    Otunba Kunle Kalejaiye (SAN), counsel to the PDP and Akande, said the respondents filed a preliminary objection on the competence of the appeal.

    Urging the court to dismiss it, he said Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution supersedes any law, such as Section 14 (1) of the Local Government Election Tribunal Law, which imposes time limits on the determination of election petitions.

    Kalejaiye said: “The intention of the makers of the law is to provide an avenue for ventilation of election grievances. Therefore, any legislation that curbs the exercise of judicial powers would be null, pursuant to Section 36 of the Constitution.

    “We urge your lordships in the circumstances to dismiss the appeal and uphold the decision of the lower tribunal.”

    The Justice Opeyemi Oke-led panel reserved judgment till April 10.