Tag: dismiss

  • Newswatch: Ekpu, Agbese, others urge court to dismiss Ibrahim’s suit

    Newswatch: Ekpu, Agbese, others urge court to dismiss Ibrahim’s suit

    Four directors of the troubled news magazine, Newswatch, Ray Ekpu, Dan Agbese, Yakubu Mohammed and Soji Akinrinade – have asked a Federal High Court in Lagos to dismiss a suit by businessman Jimoh Ibrahim.

    They calimed the suit was without basis.

    The directors, who were in court yesterday contended that the suit showed no reasonable cause of action against them and that Ibrahim was not authorised by Newswatch to sue them.

    Their lawyer, Adekunle Oyesanya (SAN), said an alternate ground on which his clients opposed the suit was that it was wrongly instituted.

    He argued that the plaintiff ought not to have begun the suit via an originating summons because the issues raised are contentious and would require that parties call witnesses to resolve.

    Oyesanya observed that the originating summons showed that the plaintiff merely told a story of a business transaction between two parties, how the defendants purportedly resigned and how they entered into a contract over the company’s shares.

    He argued that as against what was required, the plaintiff failed to raise any complaint against the defendants.

    The counsel argued that the share purchase agreement between the parties did not preclude the defendants from declaring a trade dispute.

    Oyesanya said contrary to the plaintiff’s argument, the agreement contained a clause which allows a party to terminate the agreement.

    “There is no complaint in the affidavit that the defendants are trying to terminate the agreement.

    “That would have been an issue. But there is no such complaint.

    “Instead, they created an imaginary dispute outside the agreement by parties and rushed to the court.

    “In their claim, they have not made any complaint that is worthy of the court’s consideration,” he argued.

    Responding, the plaintiff’s lawyer, Adenrele Adegborioye, insisted that his clients’ suit was competent.

    He also faulted the defendants’ objection on grounds that it was faulty.

    Adegborioye argued that by failing to accompany their objection with an affidavit, the defendants’ objection should be struck out.

    “Where a party files an objection which raises issues of fact or mix law and fact, it must file an affidavit to support the preliminary objection, failure of which renders it incompetent,” he said.

    Adegborioye contended that the defendant’s objection dealt with issues of fact.

    He further argued that by contending that the suit showed no cause of action, the defendants have admitted their issues raised by the plaintiffs in the suit.

    He argued that the plaintiffs have raised enough issues in the suit to warrant the court’s intervention.

    In the suit filed by Ibrahim, his company, Global Media Mirror Limited and Newswatch Communications Ltd, the plaintiffs set six questions for the court’s determination and sought six declarative reliefs and an order.

    They prayed the court to, among others, restrain Ekpu, Agbese, Mohammed and Akinrinade from further acting as directors of Newswatch on grounds that they had allegedly resigned voluntarily from the positions.

    Justice Okon Abang adjourned till December 7 for them to further adopt their addresses to enable the court deliver its ruling within the stipulated three months.

     

  • Dismiss Oni’s petition, Fayemi, ACN urge court

    Ekiti State Governor Kayode Fayemi and his party, the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), yesterday said the fate of former governor Olusegun Oni had been sealed by the Court of Appeal.

    They said he could not reopen his case to return to office.

    Counsel to the respondents John Bayeshea (SAN), Femi Falana (SAN) and Dayo Akinlaja (SAN) made the declaration in their argument before the Supreme Court.

    The Supreme Court will, however, hear the case on January 8 because only five of its justices, instead of seven, were available yesterday.

    The Court of Appeal, Ilorin Division, had, on October 15, 2010, sacked Oni as Ekiti State Governor and declared Fayemi governor.

    Oni and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) filed a motion on March 14, last year at the Court of Appeal, Ado-Ekiti Division, to set aside the judgment of the Ilorin Court.

    On February 27, the Ekiti court dismissed the application.

    Oni and the PDP headed for the Supreme Court, seeking to set aside the judgment.

    The other respondents are the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN); the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC); the Resident Electoral Office, Ido Osi Local Government; the Returning Officer, Ijero Osi Local Government, the Inspector-General of Police and the police.

    Fayemi’s and ACN’s counsel described Oni’s application as a “subterfuge for appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal.”

    They urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Oni’s application because his fate had been decided to “finality.”

    They said: “It is humbly submitted that the appellants’ matter was not even presented under any enabling law.

    “It did not also fall within the ambit of Order 19 Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules.

    “We, therefore, humbly submit that the application of the appellants was far reaching and designed to ‘steal’ a show where it had woefully failed.

    “The appellants have merely embarked on an effort to whip up sentiment to clothe their case with fundamental human right issues, since they have nothing useful in law to use to convince your lordships.

    “We humbly urge your lordships to answer our lone issue in the affirmative and to dismiss this appeal.”

    But Oni, through his counsel, Prof. Ben Nwabueze (SAN) and Ladi Rotimi Williams (SAN), insisted that he was a victim of bias.

    “This appeal seeks to establish that where an issue of bias or likelihood of bias is raised, it bothers on the appellant’s right to fair hearing, which if found to have been denied, renders the proceeding and the judgment based thereon a nullity no matter how well conducted or written.”

  • Jonathan urges court to dismiss Oyinlola’s suit

    President Goodluck Jonathan has urged an Abuja Federal High Court to dismiss a suit by former Osun State Governor Olagunsoye Onyinola, seeking to stop the National Judicial Council (NJC) from re-instating the suspended President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Isa Ayo Salami.

    In a joint Counter-Affidavit with the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Adoke (SAN), Jonathan said the suit constitutes a gross abuse of court process.

    Besides, the NJC urged the court to dismiss the suit because the plaintiff lacks the locus standi to institute the action.

    Describing the suit as mischievous and a witch-hunt, the council said the suit was an extension of grievances nursed by Oyinlola against Justice Salami following the nullification of his election by the Governorship Election Appeal Tribunal in November 2010.

    Justice Abdul Kafarati yesterday fixed January 24 for ruling after hearing the preliminary objections.

    The plaintiff is seeking an order of perpetual injunction restraining President Jonathan from acting on the recommendation of the NJC to reinstate Justice Salami, contending that the recommendation is null and void.