Tag: Donald Trump

  • Remi Tinubu’s presence at U.S. prayer excites Trump

    Remi Tinubu’s presence at U.S. prayer excites Trump

    United States President Donald Trump yesterday acknowledged the presence of Nigeria’s First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu, at the 74th National Prayer Breakfast  in Washington, D.C.

    In his address during the event, Trump drew attention to Mrs. Tinubu. He described her as a respected figure and noting her role as a Christian pastor in the largest church in Nigeria.

    The event, a long-standing tradition in the U.S. capital that brings together political and religious leaders, took a notable turn when the American president paused his address to spotlight the Nigerian First Lady.

    President Trump described her as a woman of significant influence and faith, acknowledging her spiritual role back home.

    “We’re honored to be joined today by the First Lady of Nigeria, who also happens to serve as a Christian pastor at the largest church in Nigeria. A very respected woman. First Lady, please, where are you? Thank you very much. It’s a great honor. Thank you very much. Very respected person, too,” Trump said, searching the crowd before acknowledging her presence.

    READ ALSO: The dynamics of Kano governor’s defection

    The recognition followed a period of complex diplomatic exchanges between Washington and Abuja.

    Recently, the U.S. government has kept a close eye on security and religious dynamics within Nigeria.

    This followed earlier comments from the U.S. administration concerning the protection of faith-based communities.

    The Federal Government had maintained that the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu remains dedicated to upholding the rights of all citizens, regardless of their creed.

    The National Prayer Breakfast is an annual event that brings together political leaders, faith leaders, and dignitaries from across the world for prayer and reflection.

  • Donald Trump, Xi discuss Iran

    Donald Trump, Xi discuss Iran

    • U.S. presses nations to break from Tehran

    President Donald Trump said yesterday that he and Chinese President Xi Jinping discussed the situation in Iran in a wide-ranging call that comes as the U.S. administration pushes Beijing and others to isolate Tehran.

    Trump said the two leaders also discussed a broad range of other critical issues in the U.S.-China relationship, including trade and Taiwan and his plans to visit Beijing in April.

    “The relationship with China, and my personal relationship with President Xi, is an extremely good one, and we both realize how important it is to keep it that way,” Trump said in a social media posting about the call.

    The Chinese government, in a readout of the call, said the two leaders discussed major summits that both nations will host in the coming year and opportunities for the two leaders to meet. The Chinese statement, however, made no mention of Trump’s expected April visit to Beijing.

    Read Also: PDP condemns Senate’s rejection of electronic transmission of results

    China also made clear that it has no intention of stepping away from it’s long-term plans of reunification with Taiwan, a self-governing, democratic island operating independently from mainland China, though Beijing claims it as its own territory.

    “Taiwan will never be allowed to separate from China,” the Chinese government statement said.

    Trump and Xi discussed Iran as tensions remain high between Washington and Tehran after the Middle East country’s bloody crackdown on nationwide protests last month.

    Trump is now also pressing Iran to make concessions over its nuclear program, which his Republican administration says was already set back by the U.S. bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites during the 12-day war Israel launched against Iran in June.

    The White House says that special envoy Steve Witkoff is slated to take part in talks with Iranian officials later this week.

    Trump announced last month that the U.S. would impose a 25% tax on imports to the United States from countries that do business with Iran.

    Years of sanctions aimed at stopping Iran’s nuclear program have left the country isolated. But Tehran still did nearly $125 billion in international trade in 2024, including $32 billion with China, $28 billion with the United Arab Emirates and $17 billion with Turkey, the World Trade Organization says.

    Separately, Xi also spoke  yesterday with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    Xi’s engagement with Trump and Putin comes as the last remaining nuclear arms pact, known as the New START treaty, between Russia and the United States is set to expire Thursday, removing any caps on the two largest atomic arsenals for the first time in more than a half-century.

    Trump has indicated he would like to keep limits on nuclear weapons but wants to involve China in a potential new treaty.

    “I actually feel strongly that if we’re going to do it, I think China should be a member of the extension,” Trump told The New York Times last month. “China should be a part of the agreement.”

    The call with Xi also coincided with a ministerial meeting that the Trump administration convened in Washington with several dozen European, Asian and African nations to discuss how to rebuild global supply chains of critical minerals without Beijing.

    Critical minerals are needed for everything from jet engines to smartphones. China dominates the market for those ingredients crucial to high-tech products.

    “What is before all of us is an opportunity at self-reliance that we never have to rely on anybody else except for each other, for the critical minerals necessary to sustain our industries and to sustain growth,” Vice President JD Vance said at the gathering.

    Xi has recently held a series of meetings with Western leaders who have sought to boost ties with China amid growing concerns about Trump’s tariff policies and calls for the U.S. to take over Greenland, a Danish territory.

    The disruption to global trade under Trump has made expanding trade and investment more imperative for many U.S. economic partners. Vietnam and the European Union upgraded ties to a comprehensive strategic partnership last month, two days after the EU and India announced a free-trade agreement.

  • Canada PM denies retracting Davos comments in talks with Trump

    Canada PM denies retracting Davos comments in talks with Trump

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney yesterday said he spoke to US President Donald Trump on Monday but denied he had retracted comments last week that irritated the American President.

    U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Carney “was very aggressively walking back” some of the remarks he made during a speech in Davos in which he urged nations to accept the end of a rules-based global order.

    Asked by reporters whether he had walked back the comments, Carney said “No”.

    That contrasts with Bessent, who told Fox News that Carney was “aggressively walking back” his remarks during the call.

    While warning that the tariff would be “a disaster for Canada,” Bessent emphasised that the president’s recent conversation with Carney suggested a shift in tone from the Canadian leader.

    “I was in the Oval (Office) with the president today. He spoke to Prime Minister Carney, who was very aggressively walking back some of the unfortunate remarks he made at Davos,” Bessent said.

    Carney said Trump phoned him on Monday and they had a “very good conversation” that touched on Ukraine, Venezuela and Arctic security. He stressed that his message to the president was consistent with the one he delivered in Switzerland last week.

    “To be absolutely clear, and I said this to the president, I meant what I said in Davos,” Carney told reporters in Ottawa.

    Read Also: Türkiye, Nigeria target $5bn trade volume as Erdogan, Tinubu seal new economic push

    “Canada was the first country to understand the change in U.S. trade policy that he initiated, and we’re responding to that. We’re responding positively by building partnerships abroad, building at home and prepared to respond positively by building that new relationship with CUSMA. He understood that.”

    CUSMA is the acronym often used by Canadian officials for the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, the trade deal Trump agreed to during his first term.

    In his speech at the World Economic Forum, Carney declared the international rules based order a “fiction” that is now effectively dead, urging mid sized nations to build new systems of cooperation and resist economic coercion by aggressive superpowers.

    Carney said he walked Trump through Canada’s push to diversify trade — “12 new deals, four continents, in six months” — including Ottawa’s new tariff-relief deal with China and the opportunity to advance USMCA

    “This is the context of our discussion: what Canada is doing positively to build new partnerships around the world,” he said.

    Trump threatened 100 per cent tariffs on Canadian goods on Saturday if Canada “makes a deal with China.” Carney has emphasized that Canada is not seeking a free-trade deal with Beijing and the recent agreement is focused on lowering certain tariff barriers.

  • U.S. felon, global outlaw

    U.S. felon, global outlaw

    US felon, global outlaw?  A grim logic, isn’t that? So, why is the globe acting surprised? 

    Whatever the utterly insecure US President, Donald Trump, tries with the world — thus making it far less safe — he had practised (and gone away with) in his own country. Will he get away with global outlawry?  That is still in the womb of time!

    Back to his American felony.  On 30 May 2024, Trump earned due conviction for 34 felonies in his native New York.  Instead of the state tossing him inside the can, though an ex-president, all he got was a confetti of votes to return to the White House.

    In that theatre of the absurd, the US court that should sentence for felony duly proven, solemnly pronounced its own impotence.  After being voted president though a proven felon, the court neutered its power to punish, after due process.

    The final verdict?  “Unconditional discharge” — to commit more felonies?  That was 10 January 2025, after Trump’s triumph in the November 2024 presidential election.

    Four years hitherto — 6 January 2021 — he had spat and shat on the holiest shrine of American democracy.  That day, to reverse his defeat by Joe Biden in November 2020, he had marshalled his thugs to sack the US Capitol.

    But by institutional self-loathing and partisan brinksmanship, the Republican segment of the US Senate gave Trump a slap on the wrist, though the House of Representatives did own duty to duly impeach.

    Read Also: Top 10 Africa’s most powerful passports in January 2026

    The moral of this judicial-legislative abandonment: if Trump’s own country fled  from bringing the felon to heel — if not for out-and-out criminality, then for violent political chaos — what global order, which at best runs on conventions, can stop Trump from becoming a preening, dashing, unfazed global outlaw, unleashing US fearsome might to hide his personal shame and sate his sundry insecurities?

    That’s the Trump global tragedy playing out!  US felon, global outlaw!

    On 25 September 2025 when Trump went to the United Nations General Assembly to ridicule everyone (see “Nebuchadnezzar”, 30 September 2025), this column dismissed the US president as the 21st century Nebuchadnezzar, doomed to falling on his sword, at the zenith of his hubris, just as the Babylonian original (reigned: 605 BC-562 BC).

    But that image is a tad too restrictive.  Nebuchadnezzar seems even truer of the American electorate.  If a fella had sacked your parliament — the very sacred symbol of your republicanism, your liberty and your democracy — and was also duly convicted by your court — what sort of hubris would make you pick him as your president?

    The haunting words of Kamala Harris, Trump’s Democratic Party opponent, still hang eerily in the air, an eternal rebuke, long after the deed had been done!

    “On day one, if elected,” Vice President Harris had warned, “Donald Trump would walk into that office with an enemies list … Donald Trump intends to use the United States military against American citizens who simply disagree with him.  People he calls ‘the enemy from within’.  This is not a candidate for president who is thinking about how to make you better.  This is someone,” she insisted, “who is unstable, obsessed with revenge, consumed with grievance, and out for unchecked power”!

    Talk of Kamala hitting the bull’s eye, home and abroad!  What prescience!

    At home, Trump’s paramilitary US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), with icy terror, wields raw power to maul, crush or even kill, particularly that Trumpian scum, called “immigrants”. 

    Incidentally, documented or not, Trump and fellow hypocrites and xenophobes, once belonged to this class, being settlers from Europe and elsewhere.  Only the native Indians were no immigrants.  They owned the land.  But those had been near-blotted out by frontier savages, the western world imposed on their native horizon.

    Then, the US president’s flagrant misuse of the National Guard, against Democratic states he dubs “enemies”, though he has been forced to retreat in some states, after being blocked by the courts.

    But either by ICE terror or National Guard muscling, the “immigrant” scum aren’t the only victims.  Collateral damage seeps into the Trump racial blue bloods, as the Minneapolis woman in Minnesota, Rennee Nicol Good, fatally shot by an ICE agent. She was neither Latino nor Black, nor was she an “immigrant”!  The rich also cry?

    Still, it’s on the global plain that Trump’s mail-fisted outlawry has been most rankling in its triumphalism.

    After his initial rhapsody over seizing Canada as America’s 51st state, punching Mexico hollow with US trade tariffs and unilaterally renaming Gulf of Mexico as Gulf of America — a move the world ignored with quiet scorn — Trump made the most brazen of his move, thus far, at the turn of 2026.

    On January 3, he announced that his goons had captured and kidnapped Venezuela President, Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. In a fit that hovers between triumphalist glee and outright power lunacy, the US President, a few days later, even proclaimed himself “Acting President of Venezuela”, on his Truth Social platform, to a roar of applause from his MAGA fanatics!

    Though he code-named that invasion “Operation Absolute Resolve”, it’s Trump’s own roguish “Operation Shock and Awe” — a parody of President George W. Bush’s 22 March-9 April 2003 Iraq II campaign, which not only nabbed Iraqi strongman, Saddam Hussein, but eventually hanged him on a Sallah day!

    That Iraq invasion — crooked, to be sure, but glossed by the legal technicality of a UN Security Council approval — stole the Iraqi soul.  But it also unleashed ISIS terror on the globe.  What further chaos will the Venezuela invasion and Maduro capture unleash on the Americas?

    Flush from this roguish victory — and his insane lusting after Venezuela’s oil — Trump has upped his ante to grab Greenland, a frigid, autonomous region of Denmark,  whether “they like it or not!”  Indeed, such is the gripping power lunacy, sweet and delirious, that Randy Fine, a Republican member of the House of Representatives has drafted a bill to cover the proposed Trump steal! 

    Just imagine: the US House of Representatives turning House of Representathieves over Greenland!  Still, there’s a counter-Bill by a Democratic member, aside a bi-partisan Senate bill.  Trump times!

    A menacing, self-destruct image looms: a mad dog mauls foes, no big deal. But when it mauls its owner?  That’s the Trump misadventure into Greenland! That land is under NATO protection, which guarantor-in-chief is Trump’s America!  That he’s threatening his Europe opposers on Greenland, with hefty tariffs, is a classic bandit’s bay!

    Much eerier: Trump’s global outlawry is flaring in 2026 — the year America clocks 250 years!  At 250 years, the British Empire, hitherto the ruthless global lord of the manor, started melting.  So did the Ottoman Empire, which peaked at 250.

    By this year too, trust in US public institutions will sink below 20%. That fatal threshold (19% trust in public institutions), triggered the fall of the old Soviet Empire in 1991.

    So, deja vu America at 250?  We’ll see!  That obtuse Trump can’t grasp the force of history is a red flag.  So, are a FIFA President gifting Trump — a war monger — global football’s peace tinsel, and Maria Corina Machado, giving Trump her Nobel Peace Prize he’ll never own, in a fit of self-loathing!  Both are a false lull, in a historical tempest.

    But one thing is clear: the American century and days of blind global bullying is ebbing! 

    Nigeria — and other smart nations — should brace up for a post-American epoch.

    Happy new year, folks!  It’s nice to be back!

  • European military forces arrive in Greenland as Trump presses U.S. claim

    European military forces arrive in Greenland as Trump presses U.S. claim

    A small French military contingent has arrived in Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, as several European states deploy small numbers in a so-called reconnaissance mission.

    The limited deployment, which also involves Germany, Sweden, Norway, Finland, the Netherlands and the UK, comes as U.S. President Donald Trump continues to press his claim to the Arctic island, which is a semi-autonomous part of Denmark.

    French President Emmanuel Macron said the initial contingent would be reinforced soon with “land, air, and sea assets”.

    Senior diplomat Olivier Poivre d’Arvor saw the mission as sending a strong political signal: “This is a first exercise… We’ll show the U.S. that NATO is present.”

    Poivre d’Arvor said the initial French deployment involved 15 people, hours after Denmark and Greenland’s foreign ministers travelled to Washington for a meeting with U.S. Vice-President JD Vance on Wednesday.

    Following the meeting, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said while the talks were constructive, there remained a “fundamental disagreement” between the two sides and later criticised Trump’s bid to buy Greenland.

    Trump, meanwhile, doubled down on his bid to bring Greenland under U.S. control, telling reporters in the Oval Office, “We need Greenland for national security”.

    Although he did not rule out the use of force, he said late on Wednesday that he thought something could be worked out with Denmark.

    Read Also: EPL: Arsenal go six points clear after goalless draw with Liverpool

    “The problem is there’s not a thing that Denmark can do about it if Russia or China wants to occupy Greenland, but there’s everything we can do. You found that out last week with Venezuela.”

    Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said Poland was not planning to join the European military deployment to Greenland, but warned that any U.S. military intervention there “would be a political disaster”.

    “A conflict or attempted annexation of the territory of a NATO member by another NATO member would be the end of the world as we know it – and which for many years guaranteed our security,” he told a press conference.

    Russia’s embassy in Belgium meanwhile, expressed “serious concern” at what was unfolding in the Arctic, accusing NATO of building up a military presence there “under the false pretext of a growing threat from Moscow and Beijing”.

    However, the European NATO deployment consists of only a few dozen personnel as part of Danish-led joint exercises called Operation Arctic Endurance. While heavy in symbolism, it was not immediately clear how long they would stay.

    Finland is sending two military liaison officers for what it said was a fact-finding mission during what was currently a planning stage of the operation.

    “Right now we are not ruling anything out, but we are not specifically considering anything,” Janne Kuusela, head of the defence ministry’s policy department, told the BBC.

  • Donald Trump: ‘We are going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not’

    Donald Trump: ‘We are going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not’

    The United States must acquire Greenland, President Trump has unequivocally said.

    Trump averred that despite an existing US military presence on the island under a 1951 agreement, such arrangements are insufficient to guarantee its defense, adding that the United States needs to acquire Greenland to keep Russia or China away from occupying it in the future.

    “We are going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not. Because if we don’t do it, Russia or China will take over Greenland, and we’re not going to have Russia or China as a neighbour,” Trump told reporters at the White House while meeting with oil company executives.

    Trump said the U.S. must acquire Greenland, even though it already has a military presence on the island under a 1951 agreement, because such deals are not enough to guarantee Greenland’s defence. The island of 57,000 people is an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark.

    “You defend ownership. You don’t defend leases. And we’ll have to defend Greenland. If we don’t do it, China or Russia will,” Trump said.

    READ ALSO; Obi’s defection sets teeth on edge

    Trump and White House officials have been discussing various plans to bring Greenland under U.S. control, including potential use of the U.S. military and lump sum payments to Greenlanders as part of a bid to convince them to secede from Denmark and potentially join the U.S.

    Leaders in Copenhagen and throughout Europe have reacted with disdain in recent days to comments by Trump and other White House officials asserting their right to Greenland. The U.S. and Denmark are NATO allies bound by a mutual defence agreement.

    On Tuesday, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Britain and Denmark issued a joint statement, saying only Greenland and Denmark can decide matters regarding their relations.

  • Trump admits Muslims also killed in Nigeria

    Trump admits Muslims also killed in Nigeria

    • Warns more strikes coming ‘if Christians are killed’
    • Cancels ‘second wave’ of attacks on Venezuela due to country’s cooperation with US
    • Pope denounces resort to force by countries to assert dominion

    The United States President, Donald Trump, acknowledged that Muslims are also being killed in Nigeria, while warning that he could order more airstrikes on Nigeria if the killings in the country continue.

    Reacting, Pope Leo XIV condemned attacks on sovereign nations by the United States, Russia and others.

     On Christmas Day, the U.S.hit two camps run by a jihadist group called Lakurawa in the largely Muslim state of Sokoto, in north-western Nigeria near the border with Niger.

    The strikes occurred about a month after Trump threatened to send troops into Nigeria “guns-a-blazing to wipe out the terrorists killing our cherished Christians, as some US politicians repeatedly claimed that there was a genocide against Christians in the West African nation.

    It is still unclear if there were any casualties, as neither the US nor Nigerian government has provided figures, and there has been no update on the outcome of the attack.

    Trump, in a wide-ranging interview with the New York Times, dropped hints of another strike.

    “I’d love to make it a one-time strike. But if they continue to kill Christians, it will be a many-time strike,” he said.

    Though Nigeria’s government has continued to deny the accusations that it is failing to protect Christians from jihadist attacks, it has, however, agreed to cooperate with the US and other friendly countries in tackling the insecurity in the country.

    Last October, Massad Boulos, Trump’s senior adviser for Arab and African affairs, said Boko Haram and ISIS were killing more Muslims than Christians.

    Asked about his adviser’s statement, Trump said: “I think that Muslims are being killed also in Nigeria. But it’s mostly Christians.”

    Cancels ‘second wave’ of attacks on Venezuela

    Trump said early Friday that he had cancelled a “previously expected” second wave of attacks on Venezuela due to the country’s cooperation with the United States.

    It comes nearly a week after he ordered a military operation to oust Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who is currently in US custody along with his wife, Cilia Flores.

    Shortly after that military operation, Trump said in a news conference, “We are ready to stage a second and much larger attack if we need to do so. … We actually assumed that a second wave would be necessary, but now it’s probably not.”

    In Friday’s Truth Social post, Trump said the US and Venezuela are “working well together, especially as it pertains to rebuilding, in a much bigger, better, and more modern form, their oil and gas infrastructure.”

    “Because of this cooperation, I have cancelled the previously expected second Wave of Attacks, which looks like it will not be needed; however, all ships will stay in place for safety and security purposes,” he added.

    Trump went on to say that Venezuela was “releasing large numbers of political prisoners as a sign of ‘Seeking Peace,’” adding, “This is a very important and smart gesture.”

    Venezuela began releasing the high-profile prisoners on Thursday, including opposition politicians in an effort to “seek peace,” the acting government said.

    Following the military operation last week, US officials had demanded, among other things, that Venezuela’s interim government release political prisoners, according to a source familiar with the US administration’s briefing with key lawmakers this week.

    Trump also has not ruled out the possibility of longer-term military involvement, and said Thursday that his administration will soon begin actions to target cartels on land, following months of strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific.

    Read Also: Trump’s oil push widens with seizure of Russian-flagged tanker linked to Venezuela

    Trump has also said he would say hello to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado when she travels to Washington, DC, next week. He added in an interview with Fox News that it would be “a great honour” to share Machado’s Nobel Peace Prize after she suggested doing so.

    US ‘ll ‘hit Iran hard’ if protesters are killed, says Trump

    The United States President, Donald Trump, has threatened to attack Iran.

    There have been nationwide protests demanding regime change, with many having lost their lives in the protests.

    In a swift reaction, Trump said Ayatollah is “looking to go someplace” to escape, adding that Iran is on the “verge of collapse.”

    He warned that the US would ‘hit the country hard,’ if protesters were killed, saying he had “put Iran on notice.”

     At least 40 protesters and several police officers have been killed in the clashes, according to rights groups and local media, with 2,200 arrests so far.

    Iranians have demonstrated in more than 100 cities and towns across the country, according to human rights groups.

     “There’s so many people protesting,” he said.

    “Nobody’s ever seen anything like what’s happening right now, but I have put Iran on notice that if they start shooting at them, these people are totally unarmed people, and they love their country.

    “They want something to happen. Look at their country. They’ve gone back 150 years. But I’ve warned them that if they do anything bad to these people, we’re going to hit them very hard. I’ve said it very loud and very clear, that’s what we’re going to do.”

    Pope raps US, Russia, others

    However, Pope Leo XIV on Friday denounced how nations were using force to assert their dominion worldwide, “completely undermining” peace and the post-World War II international legal order.

    “War is back in vogue, and a zeal for war is spreading,” Leo told ambassadors from around the world who represent their countries´ interests at the Holy See.

    The Pope didn´t name individual countries that have resorted to force in his lengthy speech, the bulk of which he delivered in English in a break from the Vatican´s traditional diplomatic protocol of Italian and French. But his speech came amid the backdrop of the recent U.S. military operation in Venezuela to remove Nicolás Maduro from power, Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine and other conflicts.

    The occasion was the Pope’s annual audience with the Vatican diplomatic corps, which traditionally amounts to his yearly foreign policy address.

    In his first such encounter, history´s first U.S.-born pope delivered much more than the traditional roundup of global hotspots. In a speech that touched on threats to religious freedom and the Catholic Church’s opposition to abortion and surrogacy, Leo lamented how the United Nations and multilateralism as a whole were increasingly under threat.

    “A diplomacy that promotes dialogue and seeks consensus among all parties is being replaced by a diplomacy based on force, by either individuals or groups of allies,” he said. “The principle established after the Second World War, which prohibited nations from using force to violate the borders of others, has been completely undermined.”

    “Instead, peace is sought through weapons as a condition for asserting one´s own dominion. This gravely threatens the rule of law, which is the foundation of all peaceful civil coexistence,” he said.

    Leo did refer explicitly to tensions in Venezuela, calling for a peaceful political solution that keeps in mind the “common good of the peoples and not the defense of partisan interests.”

  • Key global determinants in 2026

    Key global determinants in 2026

    Trump 2.0:

    I project that President Donald Trump will continue to disrupt global dynamics in 2026. Love him or hate him, President Trump is a force to reckon with (for good or bad reasons). Importantly he follows his rhetoric with actions. Therefore any individual or Country that ignore him, do so at their own peril. President Trump will sustain and upscale his trajectory in terms of his foreign, and economic policies for the United States of America.

    The removal and arrest of President Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela is a demonstration of President Trump’s resolve to follow his rhetoric with actions. His threat to  the President of Columbia and his sustained intention to annex Greenland and threats to the EU, NATO, etc are indications of days to come in 2026.

    Global Economy:

    The World Bank projects a global average economic growth of 6.2% in 2026-27. In addition, the World Trade Organization (WTO) projects a declining global trade volume growth at 0.5%, having downgraded it from a previous expectation of 1.8%. According to the WTO, “Trade growth is expected to slow in 2026 as the global economy cools and as the full impact of higher tariffs is finally felt for a full year,”.

    In my view, the aforementioned outlooks will be driven by President Trump’s Tariff Policies, and the consequent global trade barriers, geopolitics, climate change as it impacts agriculture and environment, etc.

    Artificial Intelligence (AI):

    AI will continue to evolve and dominate global growth across all sectors. 2025 closed with a major buy – a $2.2 billion purchase of an AI company – Manus by Meta, as indication of consistent growth of AI amid concerns of control and what the future holds in terms of regulations of AI. For African Countries, how proactive they are in terms of the development of infrastructure, human capital development, political stability and good governance will be a critical success factor for us to catch up with the AI evolution.

    The increasing use of autonomous systems for electric vehicles and AI in our movements and travel systems, health care systems, agriculture, education, warfare, etc will be dominated by China. China will continue to dominate the AI space.

    The United States of America is also very dominant and visible in the AI space with investments of Trillions of US Dollars and ownership of AI companies and infrastructure. However Europe needs to up its game in 2026.

    BRICS:

    I reckon that BRICS will continue to grow cautiously, consistently, as it is becoming a likely alternative platform to the US dollar.

    I am very confident as an advocate of BRICS,  that BRICS will definitely make an impact in the global socio-economics and politics as the body becomes stronger and more relevant.

    China’s Resilience:

    In terms of global trade, China is reasserting itself as the global trade super network and supply chain hegemony – a production superpower. In 2025, President Xi Jinping steered China on the trajectory of continuous utilization of special economic zones/ free trade zones to provide the incentives required to continue catalizing,  and promoting  trade and investment within China, and between China and the global trade ecosystem. In addition to that, we also witnessed how China’s focus on producing high-quality development and high-quality products to the world. China will sustain those trajectories in 2026.

    Significantly for Africa, in 2026, African nations will take advantage of the zero tariff provided by China on almost all import products for 53 countries in Africa, as against the tariff war by President Trump rates on. That is a major shift by China, considering the fact that there are major producers of electronics, industrial materials, and other highly demanded products around the world. This is critical success factor for China, and why China will remain ahead of the game with regard to technology, and trade, and with regards to economy.

    Furthermore, China is also creating digital hub around Huizhou, Guangzhou, Hanai provinces, building massive data centers for AI, which are the bedrock of the AI revolution. This level of investment, and commitment by the Chinese leadership will ensure that China remains o resilient and on a positive trajectory in terms of economy, and geopolitics.

    Another important point to note is China’s internal growth strategy and and focus on that a they call “the small beautiful things”, i.e the continuing support of the small medium scale enterprises within China, to ensure that  the people of China are happy and the general well-being of Chinese is upgraded, while closing of the gap between the rich and the poor.

    Basically, China’s key drivers for growth in 2026 will be innovation, resilience, diversification, and global re-alliances, consolidation.

    Bad Governance and Insecurity as Opportunities for Imperialism:

    Interestingly, President Trump’s disdain for Africa has changed in perspective and a new purpose of economic imperialism. I am of the view that this change is because President Trump now realizes the fact that Africa has abundance of critical minerals. Critical minerals/ Rare earth metals are crucial to 4th and 5th industrial revolution. Developed Countries are scrambling for the critical minerals which are cheaply available in Africa more that anywhere else in the world.

    For instance, in 2025, President Trump weighed in on the protracted war in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and struck a deal to mediate between the warring parties in the DRC, i.e the M23 Rebel forces (backed by Rwanda) and the Incumbent Government of DRC.

    The DRC has the world’s largest reserves of cobalt, along with significant quantities of coltan, lithium, and uranium, all of which are overwhelmingly mined and processed by Chinese firms.

    On December 5, 2025 (last month), President of the DRC Félix Tshisekedi, and Rwandan President Paul Kagame visited Washington to formalize the peace deal. Consequently, the United States and DRC signed a new strategic partnership on critical minerals and security cooperation. The terms offer U.S. firms preferential access to Congolese mineral reserves when doing business with state-owned mining companies.

    Furthermore, I expect that President Trump will ride on the momentum, and leverage the intervention the USA is currently providing to contain insecurity in Nigeria, to secure a deal for the USA to gain significant access to the critical minerals that are abundant in northeastern, northwestern and north central Nigeria. After all there is no “free lunch” in foreign policy.

    Read Also: Tinubu’s painful reforms prevented Nigeria’s economic collapse — Tunde Lemo

    Accordingly, I also reckon, that President Trump will maximize the new Presley he has if Africa and use the opportunities to secure more deals for critical minerals. I also expect that more African countries will have to sign these deals with the USA under the guise of interventions. As to whether or not the deals will benefit the African Countries – your guesses are as good as mine.

    Indeed, bad governance and heightened insecurity are the new opportunities for President Donald Trump. Africans should blame themselves and their leaders for opening the opportunities not just for President Trump but for China, and any other serious Country that is ready to partake.

    For example, Sudan is currently experiencing one of the worst humanitarian crisis in human history. According to the latest figures from the UN, at least 21.2 million people are facing high levels of acute food insecurity, 9.5 million people are displaced internally, 4.35 million people have fled the country, and 10 million children are out of school with classrooms destroyed, occupied, or unsafe to reach. The worst affected in the war are women and children.

    Yet the African Union is aloof as the imperialists position to take over the critical minerals abound in northwestern Sudan.

    Russia-Ukraine Imbroglio

    With regard to the Russia-Ukraine war, I do not see any end in sight in 2026. This is due to the sustained hardline positions taken by Russia, Ukraine and the EU/NATO. While the war rages on, complications of the war with heavy social and economic impacts are more on  Ukraine that they are on Russia. Currently, as the winter chills on, there are over 1million people in urgent need of heating and water. In my view, so far, President Putin’s strategy has been working more for him than the US and EU/NATO strategy for Ukraine. If the Russia-Ukraine imbroglio continues unabated without a change in the political strategy disposition, it will continue to impact negatively on global and national economies.

    Israel-Palestine Conflict – The War in Gaza

    With regard to the Israeli-Palestinian war in Gaza, I don’t expect much to change, because the successive US Presidencies and administrations have maintained a consistent strategic position and actions with regard to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Therefore, the position of the United States of America in this regard will not really change the fortunes of the Palestinians.

  • US to withdraw from United Nations, 65 other global bodies

    US to withdraw from United Nations, 65 other global bodies

    United States President Donald Trump has announced plans to withdraw the US from 66 United Nations and international organisations.

    Trump said he will also be pulling his country out of major forums for cooperation on climate change, peace and democracy.

    According to a presidential memorandum by the White House, Trump said that the decision came after a review of which “organisations, conventions, and treaties are contrary to the interests of the United States.”

    The changes would see the US cease participation and also cut all funding to the affected entities, Trump added.

    The list shared by the White House included 35 non-UN organisations, including notably the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance and the International Union for Conservation of Nature.

    Although the IPCC was included in the list of non-UN bodies by the White House, it is a UN organisation that brings together top scientists to assess the evidence related to climate change and provide periodic scientific assessments to help inform political leaders.

    READ ALSO: Senator Kalu replies Otti, says Tinubu, APC will win Abia in 2027

    In addition, the White House said it was withdrawing from 31 UN entities, including the UN’s top climate change treaty body, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the UN Democracy Fund and the top UN entity working on maternal and child health, the UNFPA.

    Several of the UN entities targeted also focused on protecting at-risk groups from violence during wars, including the UN Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary General for Children in Armed Conflict.

    UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said that the UN expected to respond to the announcement by Thursday.

    Despite publicly claiming he wants the US to have less involvement in UN forums, Trump has not held back from influencing decision-making at the international level.

    Last October, Trump threatened to impose sanctions on diplomats who formally adopted a levy on polluting shipping fuels that had already been agreed to at an earlier meeting, effectively sinking the deal for 12 months.

    The Trump administration also imposed sanctions on UN special rapporteur Francesca Albanese, after she published a report documenting the role of international and US companies in Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.

    In 2017, Trump also threatened to cut aid from countries that voted in support of a draft UN resolution condemning the US decision to recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

    As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, the US also holds considerable power at the United Nations, as one of only five countries able to veto measures it doesn’t like, a power the US repeatedly used to block efforts to end Israel’s war on Gaza before mediating a ceasefire late last year.

    Since beginning his second term in January last year, Trump has already withdrawn the US from the World Health Organization (WHO), the Paris climate agreement and the UN human rights council.

    Trump also quit these three organisations during his first administration, but the withdrawals were all later reversed by the administration of former US President Joe Biden.

    The US withdrawal from the WHO is set to come into effect on January 22, 2026, one year after it was ordered by the White House.

    Between 2024 and 2025, the US contributed $261m in funding to the WHO, amounting to about 18 percent of the funding the organisation receives for its work encouraging global cooperation on a wide range of pressing health issues, including tuberculosis and pandemics, like COVID-19.

    The Trump administration has also continued a US funding ban on the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, that began under Biden.

  • Thank God for Donald Trump

    Thank God for Donald Trump

    After about eight weeks of threatening to bombard ISIS camps in Nigeria, in what the United States President Donald Trump said would be “powerful and deadly” strikes against groups Washington claims are affiliated with ISIL (ISIS) in Northwest Nigeria’s Sokoto State, the bombs finally dropped on Christmas Day, last year. It was a big relief to Nigerians who had anticipated that the terrorists would want to disrupt the end-of-year festivities by carrying out significant, perhaps never-to-be-forgotten deadly strikes on several communities, particularly in the volatile areas of the north. The airstrikes probably averted such disasters.

    America had insisted it would rain the bombs on the heads of the terrorists since October 31, 2025, when it re-designated Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC). That it eventually carried out its threat in collaboration with the Federal Government is indeed heartwarming.

    As far as the Americans are concerned, they had to drop the bombs in order to protect Christians who had been victims of several attacks by some Islamic fundamentalists. As Al Jazeera noted in a December 31, 2025, piece titled ‘How many countries has Trump bombed in 2025?’, the strikes were ‘’timed, analysts say, to appease Trump’s Christian supporters as Washington doubles down on a narrative of “saving” Nigerian Christians, although Nigerian authorities insist the strikes are not about any one religion.’’ The Federal Government admitted that there was a problem of insecurity, with victims cutting across faith.

    I pitch my tent with the Nigerian government. This is not necessarily because I want to be patriotically correct but simply because that would seem to me to be the truth. Although Christians who had lost loved ones to these senseless attacks would not agree with this position (and I won’t blame them; as they say, “he who wears the shoe knows where it pinches’’). What I know as a fact is that it was only at the beginning of the insurgency that the attacks were targeted mainly at Christians. At that time, many Muslims felt unconcerned. But it was only a matter of time for the insurgents to turn even against fellow Muslims that they also see as infidels because they do not accept to practice Islam as they (fundamentalists) practice it.

    So, what we have in Nigeria today is not necessarily targeted against Christians; it is not Christian genocide but general insecurity imposed on the country by ragamuffins who had imbibed the wrong side of Islam’s pristine doctrine. They had been fed with the wrong assumption that the more blood they spilled in the name of the religion, the more the number of virgins they would have the opportunity to disvirgin in heaven!

    Read Also: Donald Trump’s war on global governance: Lessons from the past on how to fight back

    Expectedly, some Nigerians have criticised the Federal Government over the American bombings. Interestingly, for such different folks, it was different strokes. There are those who felt the American bombings demeaned Nigeria’s sovereignty. I do not know what that is supposed to mean. The last time I checked, it is only the living that can talk of sovereignty; not the dead. So, we need to be alive first to be sovereign. Notwithstanding my reservation on their reason for the American intervention, those of them who may feel genuinely so concerned about our sovereignty should accept my sympathy.

    Naturally, there are also perpetual critics who have sworn not to see anything good in the Bola Ahmed Tinubu administration. These include, but not limited to people who had lived all their lives on fuel and forex subsidies that the Tinubu administration stopped, and would stop at nothing to blame the government even for things that are visibly positive or result-oriented. They are entitled to their opinion, although I owe them neither an apology nor sympathy.

    What we have to realise is that countries, from time immemorial, have always had cause to come to one another’s assistance in times of distress. Even in modern times, no country can be an island unto itself; hence, the different bilateral or multilateral agreements between and among the different countries. There is nothing unusual in America lending a hand in our fight against terrorism. Good enough, the US and Nigeria have a long history of security collaboration through training and intelligence sharing. The only difference is that the Christmas strikes marked the first known kinetic US military action in Nigeria.

    Apart from Nigeria, the Trump administration has struck in six other countries, this year. These include Venezuela, Somalia, Syria, Iran, Yemen and Iraq. In all, monitors say the US had carried out at least 111 strikes this year alone, and that this surpassed the number carried out under the George Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden administrations combined.

    Well, the lexical semantic differences notwithstanding, what matters most to me was that the December 25 air raids were eventually carried out successfully. And Trump has promised to drop more bombs should the need arise. The fact of the matter is that Nigeria has wasted too much time and resources fighting insurgents. If we have not been able to have a handle on the problem, what is wrong in the US or any other friendly country for that matter that has the superior fire power and other requirements coming to help us out?

    One of the things that pain me on this matter is this idea of some people saying we should negotiate with the terrorists, kidnappers who demand ransom, bandits, etc; or assimilate them into the society after deradicalising them. We have tried all of that in the last 16 years since the insurgency started, to no avail. I am pained the more because Nigeria has thrown more than enough good money into the bad rubbish that these nonentities represent. So, I do not see any patriotic Nigerian calling for a slap on the wrist for them given the havoc they have wreaked on the country. These are resources we should have spent to brush up people who value western education.

    Those who think it is ‘haram’ or forbidden to have western education should be free to live their lives like the caveman; but to want to hide under the guise of religion to coerce the rest of us to join them in the blissful ignorance is highly reprehensible. Even Saudi Arabia that is the birthplace of Islam and home to Mecca and Medina, its two holiest cities, making it the spiritual epicenter for Muslims worldwide, has since embraced western education and is indeed comfy in its relationship with the current world power, the United States of America, based on strategic mutual interests. So, where did these undesirable elements get their own brand of Islam?

    As I said earlier, I am not interested in semantics. I am more interested in the overarching needless loss of lives perpetuated by these murderers in human skin. What I am saying is that it is immaterial whether it is Christians or Muslims that are being wantonly killed. Human lives are too precious to be wasted on the altar of some jaded religious beliefs or, in terms of the Boko Haram, to curtail the spread of western knowledge.

    As a matter of fact, I do not think we have been told the full story of what these so-called insurgents want. For one, it is unthinkable that some people could be so daft to think they can turn Nigeria, a country whose population is a nearly even mix of Christians and Muslims, to an Islamic country. But that is what you have when people are just given birth to without adequate planning for how they would get education so they can be useful to themselves and the society at large.

    And for the so-called Boko Haram, too, how can people who are making use of the very products of western education say that western education is useless? What of the bombs that they sometimes use? Even if we talk about the Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) that the insurgents sometimes deploy, despite their being “homemade”, are they entirely devoid of western education or civilisation?  What of the motorcycles and vehicles that they transport themselves and their weapons in? 

    For me, Nigerians have the almighty God to thank for the December 25 airstrikes. I am delighted. Anyone who is not should put in his or her all to rein in the terrorists. All the kid’s glove treatment should be over by now for good. They have to impress it on the terrorists that they are on a wild goose chase if they ever thought they could convert Nigeria to a Muslim country. This is necessarily because no single religion has a monopoly of violence.

    Similarly, those of them who have problem with western education are living in fools’ paradise if they ever thought they can bring down the rest of us to their caveman level. But we should no longer continue to tolerate the situation where some misguided elements would make us continue pouring water into a basket, which is what the trillions we have spent fighting terrorism is, instead of using it to uplift our people’s lives. Those who want to continue pouring libation on terrorism are free to do so. But Nigeria as a country should not continue to pick the bill. Those who lost out to fuel and forex subsidies should not be allowed to continue to feast on our common wealth again via ransoms and terrorism; the new faces of subsidy.

    Once again, thank you, President Donald Trump. But don’t go too far away yet because we might still need you. The people we are fighting have been so brainwashed that they have become recalcitrant criminals who, like King Pharaoh, would rather prefer to perish rather than repent.

    As they say, ‘a child who says his mother would not sleep should also not have the opportunity to doze’. The criminals and their sponsors should not be allowed to continue to unleash mayhem on innocent Nigerians, Christian or Muslim. People cannot be giving us sleepless nights and all we do is trying to differentiate between bandits and terrorists. To the extent that they all maim, steal, rape and kill, leaving tears and blood in their trail, they are all birds of the same feather.

    Come to think of it; how can human beings with flesh and blood slaughter fellow human beings like cow and say they are fighting a just cause? I don’t think we should split hairs over whoever is coming to save us from such brutes.