Tag: Donald Trump

  • Trump and his Deplorables

    Hillary Clinton had a point. In September 2016, the Democratic presidential candidate criticized some of her rival’s supporters for backing him. “You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” she said at a fundraiser in New York. “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.”

    Clinton distinguished these people from some of Trump’s other supporters, whom she described as “people who feel that the government has let them down, the economy has let them down, nobody cares about them … and they’re just desperate for change.” She told her supporters that this latter basket included “people we have to understand and empathize with as well.” That nuance escaped the Trump campaign, which rallied around the “deplorable” label and said it showed how Clinton was out of touch. Mainstream news organizations tsk-tsked her for breaking a cardinal rule of political campaigning by criticizing the electorate.

    Two years into Trump’s presidency, “deplorable” seems almost kind. It’s clear by now that racism is an animating force of Trump’s presidency, yet many of Trump’s supporters and most of the Republican Party still back him after every bigoted slight and discriminatory policy he makes. They may not be willing to admit that they agree outright with everything he says or does, but their continued political support makes the distinction meaningless. Even those Republicans who do voice objections to Trump tend to treat each outburst as a discrete incident, thereby denying the obvious, deeper problem. At this stage, to not object to the president outright is to be complicit in his racist presidency.

    The latest evidence comes from where it often does: the president’s personal Twitter account. Speaker Nancy Pelosi sparred last week with “the squad,” a group of four progressive freshman House Democrats, leading its most prominent member, Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, to claim Pelosi was singling out women of color in the Democratic caucus. Trump, for whatever reason, decided to publicly defend Pelosi by saying she wasn’t a racist. When those lawmakers then criticized Trump, he responded with an extraordinary series of tweets attacking their citizenship.

    His hostility is unsurprising. The squad—which also includes congresswomen Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Ayanna Pressley—represent everything that Trump is not. These young women are unsparing in their criticism of him and his presidency; Tlaib famously said they would “impeach the motherfucker” shortly after she was sworn into office in January. One can hardly blame them for their zeal, since voters first elected them to Congress in the 2018 midterms as part of the electorate’s broader rebuke of Trump.

    Even by Trump’s standards, it was an extraordinary diatribe. “Go back where you came from” is a popular taunt among white nationalists, one that’s used to instill feelings of otherness and alienation in the target. It’s also become a staple of schoolyard bullying against children of color after Trump took office. It did not matter to the president that all four of the lawmakers are American citizens, or that three out of the four were born in the United States. His underlying assertion is that they—and other nonwhite Americans—can never be full members of the American nation by virtue of their race.

    If this were the first indication that Trump harbored racist views, his remarks would have been a tremendous shock. But it was not. He announced his presidential bid by claiming Mexico was sending murderers and rapists across the border, and campaigned on banning Muslims from entering the United States. He said an Indiana-born federal judge couldn’t be fair to him because he was “Mexican.” He told lawmakers he didn’t want immigrants from “shithole countries.” He constantly taunts Senator Elizabeth Warren’s claims of Native American ancestry by calling her “Pocahontas.” He described the white supremacists who marched in Charlottesville as “very fine people.” And that’s just since 2015.

    Trump, who knows these views helped elect him, doubled down on his remarks in a press conference on Monday, rebuffing criticism that they echoed white nationalists. “It doesn’t concern me because many people agree with me,” he replied. “All I’m saying is if they want to leave, they can leave. It doesn’t say leave forever. It says leave.” Trump didn’t bother denying that his comments were racist, just that they weren’t as racist as everyone believed. His assumption that his racist views hold quiet but widespread currency is a familiar trope among racists, too. In their eyes, they are bold truth-tellers amid a silent majority that keeps quiet out of political correctness.

    Denialism abounds. Marc Short, Vice President Mike Pence’s chief of staff, argued that Trump couldn’t be a racist because Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao is Asian American. “So when people write the president has racist motives here, look at the reality of who is actually serving in Donald Trump’s cabinet,” he told reporters. (Chao is married to Trump’s most powerful ally in Congress, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.) Others tried to define racism down into oblivion. “Trump’s ‘go back’ comments were nativist, xenophobic, counterfactual and politically stupid,” Fox News anchor Brit Hume opined. “But they simply do not meet the standard definition of racist, a word so recklessly flung around these days that its actual meaning is being lost.” Hume did not explain how one could be a nativist xenophobe without also being racist.

    At the same time, by Monday afternoon, a number of elected Republicans chimed in to critique Trump, but not without caveats; some made sure to also criticize the four women lawmakers in question, as if to insulate themselves from potential backlash from the Republican base. “POTUS was wrong to say any American citizen, whether in Congress or not, has any ‘home’ besides the U.S.,” Texas Representative Chip Roy wrote on Twitter. “But I just as strongly believe non-citizens who abuse our immigration laws should be sent home immediately, & Reps who refuse to defend America should be sent home 11/2020.”

    Even moderate Republicans had to make clear that they were offering a qualified defense of their fellow lawmakers. Maine Senator Susan Collins alluded to the squad’s “views on socialism, their anti-Semitic rhetoric, and their negative comments about law enforcement” before admonishing Trump to “take that [tweet] down.” South Carolina Senator Tim Scott noted that the Democratic Party was “embroiled in racial controversy” before Trump’s “unacceptable personal attacks” stole the spotlight. “I couldn’t disagree more with these congresswomen’s views on immigration, socialism, national security, and virtually every policy issue,” Pennsylvania Senator Pat Toomey said in a statement. “But they are entitled to their opinions, however misguided they may be.”

    What could be driving such tepid responses? Maybe they really disagree with the squad’s views so strongly that they have to mention them whenever given the chance. Maybe they’re so intimidated by the Republican base’s embrace of racist politics that they don’t want to distance themselves too much from it. Maybe they’re simply worried that Trump will turn that base against them. Whatever the reason, their hesitation gives the appearance that they don’t really oppose Trump’s racism. They just want him to be quieter about it.

    •  This article was originally published in The New Republic – www.newrepublic.com
  • Video: Trump becomes first US sitting leader to set foot in North Korea

    United State President, Donald Trump has become the first sitting US leader to cross the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) between the two Koreas, meeting with North Korea Leader, Kim Jong-un.

  • Trump: US to start deporting migrants after July 4

    UNITED States President Donald Trump says deportation of undocumented migrants will begin after July 4.

    “We will be removing large numbers of people… starting sometime after July 4,” Trump said, having earlier noted that the deportations would begin “unless we do something pretty miraculous.”

    Additional report said that U.S.  Immigration authorities had earlier announced plan to launch a sweeping effort to deport recently arrived undocumented families.

    The operation is expected to target up to 2,000 families facing deportation orders in as many as 10 U.S. cities, including Houston, Chicago, Miami and Los Angeles, according to a media report.

    Read Also: Trump’s World War Plan

    A spokesman for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) declined to comment, saying: “Due to law-enforcement sensitivities and the safety and security of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel, the agency will not offer specific details related to enforcement operations before the conclusion of those actions.”

    The Acting Director of ICE, Mark Morgan, said the agency would target for deportation families that have received a removal order from a US immigration court.

    Morgan said ICE wanted to deport undocumented families who had recently arrived in the U.S. to discourage more Central Americans from arriving.

    Trump had tweeted, before the formal kickoff of his 2020 re-election campaign, that ICE would begin removing “the millions” of undocumented immigrants in the US.

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the country’s top Democrat, responded, saying, “The president’s new threat of a mass deportation dragnet is an act of utter malice and bigotry, designed solely to inject fear in our communities.”

  • US drops tariff threat after immigration deal with Mexico

    The United States and Mexico have reached an 11th-hour deal to crack down on migration from Central America with President Donald Trump relenting on threats to slap potentially devastating tariffs on the neighbouring country.

    With Trump ready to impose 5 per cent tariffs on all Mexican good starting Monday, senior officials hammered out an agreement after three days of intense negotiations at the State Department.

    Migrants cross the Rio Grande into the US to turn themselves over to authorities and ask for asylum, as seen from Ciudad, Juarez.

    Under the deal, Mexico acknowledged and agreed to expand its policy of taking back migrants from violence-riven Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador as the United States processes their asylum claims.

    Read Also: You are sanctions addict: Iran tells United States

    In turn, Mexico managed to avoid a proposal it had continually rejected – that it process asylum claims on its own soil before migrants try to reach the United States.

    “I am pleased to inform you that The United States of America has reached a signed agreement with Mexico.

    “The Tariffs scheduled to be implemented by the US on Monday, against Mexico, are hereby indefinitely suspended,” Mr Trump wrote on Twitter shortly after returning from a trip to Europe.

    “Mexico, in turn, has agreed to take strong measures to stem the tide of Migration through Mexico, and to our Southern Border.

    “This is being done to greatly reduce, or eliminate, Illegal Immigration coming from Mexico and into the United States.”

    Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who had planned to head Saturday to the border city of Tijuana to show solidarity ahead of the tariffs, said that his trip would instead be to “celebrate.”

    “Thanks to the support of all Mexicans, we were able to avoid tariffs on Mexican products exported to the United States,” tweeted Mr Lopez Obrador, who since his election last year has tried studiously not to antagonise Trump.

    Newsnow.co.uk

     

  • Donald Trump: An unconventional, unusual president

    President Donald  Trump has been visiting the United Kingdom on the eve of the departure of the second female prime minister of that country, Theresa May ,who in tears resigned a few weeks ago over her failure to secure parliamentary approval for her agreement with the European Union over BREXIT. The visit could not have come in a more inauspicious time. This State visit must have been planned over months ago and it is not something that could  have been changed  easily bar a state of war. But it seems the occasion suits the  cantankerous Mr Trump. Ordinarily the British government would have laid the red carpet for any American president within the first year of his incumbency. In July 2018 Mr Trump paid what was called a “ working visit” to Britain and a State visit was promised for a year later.

    Before leaving the USA Mr Trump tweeted that the Pakistani British mayor of London was unfit and unequal to the task  of governing a first class international city like London . Sadiq Khan had also said he should not have been invited at all because Mr Trump represents the worst standard in leadership of a western democratic state. The dislike was mutual. But the fact that the mayor of London the capital of a major ally  of the USA will be so rude to an American president shows how low president Trump has brought the American presidency, the most awesomely powerful political institution in the world. Before leaving the USA a journalist had asked Trump what he felt about the 2016 remark of the Duchess of Sussex the American Meghan Markle  calling him a misogynist. Instead of letting it pass,  Trump described the Duchess as a nasty person. This is so undiplomatic that everybody was shocked. On approach of his plane to land in London he tweeted again calling the London  mayor a “stone cold dead loser“ who reminds him of another “useless mayor“ Bill de Blasio of New York except that he is twice as big as the diminutive Sadiq Khan.

    He had also said he would support Boris Johnson the rabble rouser racist former mayor of London as the successor to Theresa May. This at a time when about thirteen people have thrown in their hats into the ring to contest for the leadership of the British Conservative party and prime minister of Great Britain. In other words Mr Trump is arrogating to himself the power to choose the next British prime minister. He bases his support for Boris Johnson on the grounds that the mercurial and unstable Boris Johnson likes him. If the position of the prime minister of Great Britain will be filled on the basis of his liking Mr Trump then the British are in trouble .Trump has also been publicly advising the British to crash out of the European Union and forget its treaty obligation to that body to pay 50 billion on exit. He has also been promising the British “ fantastic trade deal” if it exits the European Union by crashing out and avoiding any idea of customs union. Yes as  a single  country  the USA takes about 18% of British exports. But the E. U together takes close to 30% of British exports. America can never replace Europe in terms of proximity, security, people to people relations and culture. Trump has also been loudly telling the British to include Nigel  Farage  in its negotiating team with Europe . Farage is a populist hater of non British  people and what can be called a “little Englander “ and belongs to the group of nationalists sweeping the whole  of Europe from the Atlantic to the Ural mountains  in Russia. When he was elected in 2016 he undiplomatically told Theresa May to appoint Nigel Farage as the United Kingdom’s Ambassador to Washington D.C. He was rebuffed and told it is only the British government that nominates to the Queen who will be Her Britannic Ambassador to any where in the world. He has angered members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation ( NATO) singling out Germany for allowing a Russian  gas pipe line to be built to supply gas to Germany thus making Germany easy for Russian energy black mail. For personal family reasons of his grand father having been expelled from the German state of Bavaria in late 19th century he seems to dislike Germany and particularly Angela Merkel whom he accused of letting one million Arabs fleeing war in the Middle East into Germany. He has fallen out with  President Macron Of France by withdrawing from the Paris environment protocol necessary to reverse global environmental abuse and to preserve the world for future generations . He has also angered most leaders in Europe over withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal agreed to under United Nations auspices to prevent Iran from developing nuclear grade uranium and having a nuclear weapons program. This was an agreement of the 5 permanent members of the Security Council namely, Russia, USA , Britain, France ,and China plus Germany. Trump took America out of the international agreement and mounted economic pressure on the other signatories to abandon the Iran nuclear deal. He has not quite succeeded. But in the last few weeks he has sent an armada of ships and flown nuclear bombs carrying B52 bombers to the region threatening to wipe out Iran from the surface of the earth.

    As if this was not enough he has been threatening to overrun Venezuela over the Maduro government’s oppressive regime in that country. His Secretary of State Pompeo says all options including military options are on the table to deal with Venezuela in case economic pressures do not bring the leftist government there down .In recent weeks Trump has given an ultimatum to the government of Mexico its southern neighbor to stop the flow of illegal immigrants into the USA. He has said starting from a week or so he would start taxing Mexican goods entering the United States by 5% to be increased every month until it reaches 25% if Mexico does not seal its southern borders with her neighbors to the south from where the illegal immigrants are flowing into the USA .If he carries this out, the measure is a double edged sword which will hurt Mexico and the USA but the pain will be more severe on Mexico.

    On coming to office in 2016 he immediately called for the cancellation of NAFTA( North American Free Trade Agreement)binding Canada, the USA, and Mexico together in a continental free trade area which has led to the prosperity of the three countries . Trump complained the agreement undermined the economy of the so called “rust belt” that industrial area of America producing iron and steel and aluminum. He also disliked the treaty because it was one of the landmarks of the Bill Clinton’s Democratic Administration . The agreement perhaps needed amendments here and there but cancellation of two decades old agreement is not the way to go . Its replacement negotiated by the Trump administration is bogged down in Congress which must approve it before it can become law .

    Trump has also targeted China with Tariff war over its huge trade balance in favour of China and the stealing of intellectual property of America by Chinese companies which always insisted that American companies trading in China must enter into joint ventures which allows chinese companies access to Americas research secrets which the Chinese sometimes perfects to a more advanced level .There has been retaliatory tariff war between the two countries whose economies have become intertwined with China benefiting from the huge American market while producing goods cheaply because of low wages in China thus undercutting American industries and laying waste several installed industrial machinery that can no longer compete in the global market with the Chinese. A case in point of Chinese company bettering American company is that of Huawei which has been marketing its G5 equipment to mobile networks in Britain and the rest of Europe which Mr Trump wants to stop on the grounds that the company may pass security information to the Chinese state.

    In all his battles Mr Trump May have a case but the aggressive way he is fighting like a bull in  a china shop is not the best way lest he brings down the global edifice on all of us . In the dinner speech by Queen Elizabeth on the 3rd Of June 2019 ,the monarch reminded the visiting American President the painstaking effort taken to build a post war global architecture after the ruins of the Second World War . The building may be old but pulling everything down at once may be dangerous said the Queen. She is right . Trump should know that no system is perfect . Yes America has a right to prevent its  country being overrun by the poor of the world . Trump may be right to demand balanced trade with Europe and China . He may even be right to want to maintain pacific relations with Russia because of its awesome nuclear weapons . But he must be told there are rules of the game of international politics .No Nation is self sufficient and even an awesome power like the USA needed the channel provided by Sekou Toure’s  Guinea  in 1962 for it to negotiate with the old USSR to prevent nuclear Armageddon . Trump should read Robert Kennedy’s book on The Cuban Crisis.

  • Donald Trump tells Britain to embrace no deal Brexit

    Donald Trump has said Britain should embrace a no-deal Brexit if Brussels refuses to meet its demands.

    The US president said the UK should “walk away” from talks and refuse to pay the £39 billion divorce bill if requests are not met.

    And he told the Sunday Times it was a “mistake” not to involve Brexit Party leader Mr Farage in negotiations, saying he has a “lot to offer” and is someone he likes “a lot”.

    “He is a very smart person. They won’t bring him in. Think how well they would do if they did. They just haven’t figured that out yet,” he said.

    Trump also vowed to “go all out” to secure a free trade deal between the UK and US within months of Britain leaving the EU.

    The president added that he would back Boris Johnson to become the next Prime Minister, and defying diplomatic norms, said he would have to get “to know” Jeremy Corbyn before authorising the sharing of highly sensitive US intelligence.

    Read Also: I’ll send 1,500 troops to Middle East, says Trump

    He hinted that he “may” meet with Mr Johnson during his UK trip.

    The US politician is set to arrive on UK soil this morning for a three-day state visit and has a packed schedule ahead.

    Among his engagements are a meeting and State Banquet with the Queen, plus tea and a photo opportunity with Prince Charles and Camilla the Duchess of Cornwall.

    He said he expected his visit to be “very important” and “very interesting” as he left the White House on Sunday evening.

     

  • Trump plays golf, presents trophy to sumo champion in Japan

    President Donald Trump of the United States of America played golf and watched sumo wrestling with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on Sunday, the second day of his four-day state visit to Japan.

    Climbing into the sumo ring, Trump presented a special U.S.-made trophy to rank-and-file wrestler Asanoyama, the winner of Japan’s Summer Grand Sumo Tournament in Tokyo.

    “In honour of your outstanding achievement as sumo grand champion, I hereby award you the President’s Cup,” Trump said on the ring at the Ryogoku Kokugi-kan.

    “I’m too pleased for words,” said Asanoyama, who received the 137-centimetre trophy weighing about 30 kilogrammes.

    Trump and first lady Melania Trump watched the last five bouts of Sunday’s sumo tournament, hosted by Abe and his wife Akie.

    “We bought that beautiful trophy which you’ll have hopefully for many hundreds of years,” Trump said.

    “That was an incredible evening at sumo,” Trump said before an informal dinner with Abe. “We really enjoyed being there. I always wanted to see sumo wrestling. So, it was really great.”

    Earlier in the day, Abe and Trump, who arrived in Tokyo on Saturday, were joined by Japanese professional golfer Isao Aoki.

    Aoki joined them to play 16 holes at the Mobara Country Club, south-east of Tokyo.

    They had breakfast and lunch together at the club.

    Their lunch included double cheeseburgers made with U.S. beef, Japanese officials said.

    “The prime minister and I talked a lot about trade, about military and various other things,” Trump said after arriving at a restaurant in Tokyo for a dinner.

    Earlier in the day, Trump, who has repeatedly criticised Japan for its chronic trade surplus with the U.S., claimed that “great progress” was made in trade talks with Japan.

    “Great progress being made in our Trade Negotiations with Japan. Agriculture and beef heavily in play,” tweeted Trump, who previously urged Abe to open the country’s automotive and
    agriculture markets.

    “Much will wait until their July elections where I anticipate big numbers!” he added, apparently referring to Japan’s July upper house elections.

    Speaking with Japanese business leaders the previous day, Trump had said that his intention was to make bilateral trade “a little bit more fair”.

    He was apparently referring to his country’s trade deficit with Japan.

    “With this deal, we hope to address the trade imbalance, remove barriers to United States exports, and ensure fairness and reciprocity in our relationship,” Trump said.

    “Japan has had a substantial edge for many, many years, but that’s OK, maybe that’s why you like us so much,” he added.

    Bilateral trade is one of the major topics when Trump and Abe hold talks on Monday.

    Japan’s Economic Revitalization Minister Toshimitsu Motegi said late Saturday the two countries would not reach any trade agreement during the two leaders’ meeting.

    “The Japanese and U.S. positions remain apart at this point, and we will work to fill that gap,” Motegi told reporters after holding talks with U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer in Tokyo.

    North Korea is also another major topic between Trump and Abe.

    Trump once again downplayed North Korea’s firing of a series of projectiles earlier this month, including some identified as ballistic missiles.

    Read Also: I’ll send 1,500 troops to Middle East, says Trump

    “North Korea fired off some small weapons, which disturbed some of my people and others, but not me. I have confidence that Chairman Kim (Jong Un) will keep his promise to me,” the president tweeted.

    Japan lodged a protest with the reclusive state over the firing of the missiles.

    Also, Trump’s national security adviser John Bolton told reporters in Tokyo on Saturday that Pyongyang’s actions were a violation of UN resolutions.

    The U.S. president has expressed interest in meeting Kim for a third time and attempt to make progress on the denuclearisation of the Korean Peninsula.

    Their second summit, held in Vietnam’s capital Hanoi in February, abruptly ended without yielding any results.

    NAN

  • I’ll send 1,500 troops to Middle East, says Trump

    U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he will send about 1,500 American troops to the Middle East, mostly as a protective measure, amid heightened tensions with Iran.

    However, the Republican leader played down the potential for military conflict in the region, saying he believed Iran did not want a confrontation with the U.S.

    “We want to have protection in the Middle East. We’re going to be sending a relatively small number of troops, mostly protective,” Trump said as he left the White House for a trip to Japan.

    The Pentagon said only about 900 of the 1,500 troops will be newly deploying and that 600 are already in the region and will be extended.

    It said they include Patriot missile battery personnel, manning for surveillance aircraft and engineers.

     “Right now, I don’t think Iran wants to fight. And I certainly don’t think they want to fight with us,” Trump said.

    “But they cannot have nuclear weapons,” he continued. “They can’t have nuclear weapons. And they understand that.”

    The U.S. military deployed a carrier strike group, bombers and Patriot missiles to the Middle East earlier this month in response to what Washington said were troubling indications of possible preparations for an attack by Iran.

    Rhetoric between Tehran and Washington has escalated in recent weeks as the U.S. tightened sanctions with what it said was the goal of pushing Iran to make concessions beyond the terms of its 2015 nuclear deal.

    Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and six major powers a year ago and now is seeking to block all Iranian oil exports.

    Washington believes a series of recent attacks in the region may have been inspired by Iran, including a rocket attack in Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone.

    Others are what Saudi Arabia described as armed drone attacks on two oil pumping stations and the sabotage of four vessels including two Saudi oil tankers.

    Trump warned on Monday that Iran would be met with “great force” if it attacked U.S. interests in the Middle East.

    (Reuters/NAN)

  • Trump walks out on Democrats as impeachment talk heats up

    Donald Trump erupted in fury on Wednesday at unrelenting probes into his links to Russia, as the top Democrat in Congress accused the president of a “cover-up” that could be an impeachable offense.

    A livid Trump abruptly shut down a White House meeting with Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, announcing he could not deal with them on policy until “phony investigations” are brought to a close.

    The clash marked a dramatic escalation in Trump’s war of words with congressional opponents seeking to bring him to account for what they say is presidential wrongdoing.

    Trump’s ire was seemingly triggered by House Speaker Pelosi, his nemesis in Congress, who declared following an emergency meeting with lawmakers earlier Wednesday: “We believe that the president of the United States is engaged in a cover-up.”

    “I don’t do cover-ups,” Trump shot back at a hastily arranged Rose Garden press event moments after the aborted White House talks.

    “So get these phony investigations over with,” Trump said — warning a failure to do so would spell gridlock on issues like fixing the country’s infrastructure, on which the two sides had hoped for a breakthrough Wednesday.

    “You can’t investigate and legislate simultaneously,” he added. “It just doesn’t work that way.”

    A two-year investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller into Russia’s interference in the 2016 US election concluded there was no hard evidence Trump’s campaign colluded with Moscow.

    But the prosecutor said he could not rule clearly on whether Trump obstructed justice, leaving it to the Trump-appointed attorney general, Bill Barr, to declare there was no obstruction.

    ‘Impeachable offense’

    The Democrats’ decision to pursue the grey areas of the investigation — and their open discussion of whether to pursue the politically perilous process of impeachment — has enraged Trump.

    “PRESIDENTIAL HARASSMENT!” he tweeted on Wednesday, as he stepped up his attacks on the probes.

    Any pretense of cooperation on policy evaporated as Trump and Pelosi locked horns, with the impeachment issue inching toward center stage in Washington.

    Trump was visibly angry when he arrived at the meeting with Pelosi and Schumer, according to people familiar with what transpired.

    The president did not shake hands or sit down, and accused Pelosi of saying something “terrible.”

    Republican leaders sought to pin the blame on Democrats.

    “Their obsession with impeaching this president is paralyzing any progress we could be making,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said on Twitter.

    Speaking after she left the White House, Pelosi doubled down, charging that Trump could have committed an impeachable offense by publicly refusing to comply with congressional subpoenas connected to Mueller’s probe.

    She likened it to the “cover-up” that brought down former president Richard Nixon in the Watergate crisis.

    “The fact is, in plain sight, in the public domain, this president is obstructing justice and he’s engaged in a cover-up,” she told a Washington conference. “And that could be an impeachable offense.”

    In a letter to the Democratic Caucus Pelosi wrote that Trump threw a “temper tantrum” — something the president denied.

    “This is not true,” Trump tweeted late Wednesday. “I was purposely very polite and calm, much as I was minutes later with the press in the Rose Garden.”

    He then wrote that House Democrats only want “put the Mueller Report behind them and start all over again. No Do-Overs!”

    Read Also: Trump blames Obama, Bush, Clinton for making China rich

    Pelosi’s remarks appeared to reflect the growing anger by Democrats at White House stonewalling, even as she has worked hard to tamp down talk of impeachment.

    A day earlier, Democrats were left seething when Trump’s former lawyer Don McGahn, a key figure in the Mueller report, refused to testify about obstruction allegations against the president.

    Goading Congress?

    Democrats also argue that Barr is subverting congressional oversight powers in order to protect the president.

    But on Wednesday, the House Intelligence Committee’s chairman said the Justice Department had agreed to begin honoring a subpoena for material related to Mueller’s probe.

    Despite her accusation of a cover-up, Pelosi has been mindful of the politically-charged nature of an impeachment move ahead of a 2020 presidential election, especially one that is likely to fail in the Republican-led Senate.

    She has argued in favor of keeping the focus on educating the public through the court process and congressional probes, rather than leaping to impeachment.

    The issue has divided Democrats for months. Even as some in Congress — and several Democratic presidential contenders — are eager to assert its historical oversight powers as a check against the executive, there are concerns the tactic could backfire, energizing Trump’s base ahead of the election.

    “He’s really trying to goad Congress into impeaching him,” congressman Peter Welch, a member of Democratic leadership, told CNN.

    Pelosi and Schumer meanwhile offered their own scathing descriptions of Wednesday’s heated scene.

    Schumer called the meeting’s dramatic cancellation “a pre-planned excuse” and said “what happened in the White House makes your jaw drop.”

    Likewise suggesting Trump manufactured the row to avoid committing to an enormously expensive infrastructure bill, Pelosi said: “I pray for the president of the United States.”

     

    (https://mg.co.za/)

  • We’ll engage US on ban, says Huawei

    Huawei Nigeria has stated its commitment to robust engagement with US government over the recent executive order by President Donald Trump banning American companies from using any telecoms equipment it manufactured.

    In a statement today in Lagos, the leading mobile phone manufacturer said the ban will not secure the US but only expose its market to inferior and expensive alternatives.

    It further stated the ban will ultimately harm US interests and companies as well as infringe on Huawei’s rights.

    The mobile giant said: “Huawei is the unparalleled leader in 5G. We are ready and willing to engage with the US government and come up with effective measures to ensure product security.

    “Restricting Huawei from doing business in the US will not make the US more secure or stronger; instead, this will only serve to limit the US to inferior yet more expensive alternatives, leaving the US lagging behind in 5G deployment and eventually harming the interests of US companies and consumers.

    Read Also: Inside Huawei’s multi-billion dollars empire

    “In addition, unreasonable restrictions will infringe upon Huawei’s rights and raise other serious legal issues.”

    On Reuters and Google suspending some business with Huawei, it said: “Huawei has made substantial contributions to the development and growth of Android around the world.

    “As one of Android’s key global partners, we have worked closely with their open-source platform to develop an ecosystem that has benefitted both users and the industry.

    “Huawei will continue to provide security updates and after sales services to all existing Huawei and Honor smartphone and tablet products covering those have been sold or still in stock globally.

    “We will continue to build a safe and sustainable software ecosystem, in order to provide the best experience for all users globally.”