Tag: EFCC

  • EFCC detains Edo lawmakers over alleged forgery

    Three principal officers of the Edo State House of Assembly have been arrested and detained by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission over alleged signature forgery.

    The lawmakers are – Speaker Uyi Igbe, Majority Leader, Philip Shaibu and Chief Whip, Folly Ogedengbe.

    They were asked to report in Abuja on Wednesday and were still detained at the time of filling this report.

    The Chairman, Edo Assembly Committee on Information and Sports, Hon. Kabiru Adjoto, said the trio were being detained by the EFCC for allegedly forging the signature of Hon. Abdularazaq Momoh whose seat has since been declared vacant.

    Hon. Momoh, who recently defected to the Peoples Democratic Party was said to be among signatories to the petition that led to the impeachment of former Deputy Speaker, Festus Ebea.

    Adjoto, who spoke at a press briefing, urged the EFCC to investigate serious financial crimes committed under the PDP led Federal government rather that pursue impeachment proceedings.

    He said the detained lawmakers were denied medical attention despite injuries they sustained during last Saturday attack on them by hired hoodlums.

    “Hon. Shaibu was seriously wounded. In fact, three of them were wounded during the attack on us. The Speaker collapsed two times at Abuja. EFCC said they forged the signature of Hon. Razaq Momoh when former deputy speaker, Festus Ebea was impeached.

    “When has EFCC become an agency to investigate forgery of signature? When has forgery of signature becomes a financial crime? Impeachment of either Mr. Speaker of deputy speaker is an internal affair of the assembly. EFCC has no business to do with this. We are surprise that the EFCC can reduce itself to investigating a crime that has already been spelt out.”

    “It is a criminal matter to forge signature. The punishment is as spelt out in the criminal code. The EFCC was not an establishment to investigate forgery of signature. That they have reduced themselves to this is most unfortunate.

    “Information available showed that they are not just acting. Leadership of the PDP is meeting with the EFCC now. We understand that President Goodluck Jonathan has given directives for the Speaker and others to be detained, charged to court and remanded indefinitely,” Adjoto stated.

     

     

  • EFCC withdraws fraud charge against Ajudua

    A Lagos High Court, Ikeja, on Tuesday discharged socialite Fred Ajudua of an alleged $1.69million fraud case instituted against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

    The presiding judge, Justice Kudirat Jose, discharged Ajudua because of the commission’s inability to provide key foreign witnesses to give evidence in court.

    ‎The socialite and his co-defendant, Charles Orie were first arraigned before Justice Joseph Oyewole in 2003 for allegedly defrauding two German businessmen – Remy Cina and Pieere Vijgen of $1.69 million, but jumped bail in 2005 until his reappearance in 2013 after an arrest  warrant was issued by Oyewole.

    The duo were alleged to have conspired with Rasheed Adekunle, Abisola Fawehinmi and Stephen Joiner, who are still at large to commit the crime between 1999 and 2000.

    ‎At the resumed hearing on Wednesday, counsel to the EFCC, Mrs. E.A. Sanusi, told the court that the commission’s inability ‎to provide key foreign witnesses was because some of them refused to come to Nigeria to give evidence.

    She told the court that some of the principal witnesses had cited the Ebola outbreak as one of the reasons for their inability to come to the country to give evidence‎.

     

  • Alleged N430m fraud: Ogunbambo’s lawyer dumps case

    Alleged N430m fraud: Ogunbambo’s lawyer dumps case

    •EFCC to bring defendant from hiding

    A Lagos High Court, Igbosere, yesterday granted leave to a lawyer, Raphael Oluyede, to discontinue his representation of suspected fraudster, Seun Ogunbambo.

    The accused is facing an alleged N430 million loan scam before Justice Olabisi Akinlade. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) filed the charges against him.

    Charged with his firm, Adeline Investment Limited, the defendant, who has been declared wanted in an alleged subsidy fraud case before another judge, was  alleged to have collected a loan facility worth over N430 million from Stanbic IBTC Bank Plc between February and September 2009.

    When the matter came up yesterday, Oluyede notified the court of his intention to withdraw from the case on the grounds that he did not know Ogunbambo’s whereabouts.

    In a Motion on Notice brought pursuant to Section 234 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law of Lagos State, 2011, Oluyede prayed the court to allow him withdraw his representation for Ogunbambo.

    In support of his application was a 15-paragraph affidavit deposed to by Bola Akintude, where the lawyer stated that efforts to get in touch with the defendant were abbortive.

    He averred that the last time the matter came up, the court was informed that Ogunbambo sustained an injury which affected his spinal cord and presented a medical certificate to the court.

    Oluyede said since then, they had not been able to reach him because of his injury and the nature of his treatment.

    He stated that several methods were employed to get in touch with Ogunbambo so as to obtain further instruction from him in respect of the charge but has been unsuccessful.

    “Several telephone calls and text messages as well as e-mail were sent to the first defendant but none went through or delivered.

    “On April 28, 2014, counsel to the first defendant wrote a letter addressed to the first defendant requesting for a clear undertaking as to whether he would be well enough to attend court for his trial but there was no reply.

    “Since no instruction has been received from Ogunbambo in respect of the case and my inability to bring him to court; I would not engage in unnecessary delay of the matter,” he stated.

    Although the EFCC did not oppose the application, the commission’s lawyer, Musa Jamir vowed that the agency would search for the defendant and bring him to court for trial.

    In her ruling, Justice Akinlade granted the application and adjourned the matter till March 26, 2015.

     

  • Alleged scam: Prosecution closes case in ex-NIMASA chief’s trial

    Alleged scam: Prosecution closes case in ex-NIMASA chief’s trial

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) closed its case yesterday in the trial of a former Nigeria Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) Director-General, Mr Temisan Omatseye.

    He was tried before Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia of the Federal High Court in Lagos on an amended 27-count charges of contract scam.

    Omatseye was accused of contract splitting involving about N1.5 billion, which violates Section 58(4) (d) of the Public Procurement Act 2007 and Section 14(a) of the money laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2004.

    He pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    Prosecution lawyer Godwin Obla (SAN) told the court he had no more witnesses to call. Three witnesses testified for the EFCC.

    Defendant’s lawyer Olusina Sofola (SAN) said his client intended to make a “no-case” submission.

    Obla noted that the prosecution also had a right to respond to the application within 14 days.

    Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia ruled that she would hear the “no-case” application and EFCC’s response to it same day.

    Omatseye was re-arraigned on January 21, last year. EFCC opened its case on February 4, calling its first witness, an Investigating Police Officer (IPO), Mr Ibrahim Ahmed.

    On May 30, last year, Obla called his second witness, a former NIMASA Acting Director of Procurement, Mr Mohammed Shehu.

    The third witness was a Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) worker, Mr Aminu Aliyu.

    Shehu said NIMASA’s board was responsible for award of contracts until a tenders’ board was set up.

    He said most of the contracts awarded during Omatseye’s tenure were handled by the board’s Secretary.

    The witness said the contracts he sent to Omatseye for approval were within his threshold.

    He also said Omatseye’s approved threshold was N2.5 million for goods, and N5 million for works.

    Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia adjourned till December 2 for arguments.

     

     

    “Based on the recommendations of the technical staff, I always endorsed the contracts because they fall within his (Omatseye’s) threshold,” he said.

    The witness said a contract awarded for generator “was never executed”.

    “Money was never paid in respect of the generator. It was never executed during the tenure of the accused person,” he added.

    On award of contract for supply of Blackberry devices, Shehu said the NIMASA board approved it, and not himself.

    “When I got to NIMASA, there was virtually nothing – no Parastatals Tenders’ Board. Procurements were done by the governing board.

    “The needs of departments are forwarded to the Director-General, who will request the department to write the board a memo.

    “Whenever there’s a board meeting, the memos will be collected by the Secretary of the board for presentation to the board.

    “Those contracts were then approved by the board. The contracts approved by the board will be sent to the Direct-General by the board secretary as ‘extracts’. That was how the Blackberry contracts were processed,” Shehu said.

    The witness said sometimes board memos would be taken to the board chairman, who “gave anticipatory approvals.”

    “The function of contract awards was taken over by the secretary of the board,” Shehu said.

    The witness said Omatseye did give him any directives as regards the award of the Blackberry contract, adding that the Information Technology (IT) department handled the processing.

    Shehu said following the intervention of the Bureau of Public Procurement, a parastatals tenders’ board was set up at NIMASA “towards the end of 2010.”

    According to him, to the best of his knowledge, the contract for the supply of Blackberry mobile devices followed due process.

    The contract, he said, was awarded to Anchor Offshore Services Limited.

    “There was no pre-arrangement that the Blackberry contract would be awarded to Anchor Offshore,” he said.

    He also said Omatseye’s approved threshold was N2.5 million for goods, and N5 million for works.

    Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia adjourned till December 2 for arguments

     

  • N750m contract scam: Ex-Mint  boss kicks against extradition

    N750m contract scam: Ex-Mint boss kicks against extradition

    Aformer Managing Director of Nigeria Security Minting and Printing Company (NSPMC),Emmanuel Ehidiamhen Okoyomon yesterday opposed application for his extraction to the United Kingdom (U.K.) by the office of Attorney-General of the Federation.

    The application, which was filed before Justice E.S Chukwu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, could not go on because of the preliminary objection raised by the ex-Mint boss.

    But the judge ordered that the accused person be remanded in  Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) custody.

    Okoyomon’s extradition is being sought by the UK government over his alleged role in the bribery scandal involving officials of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), the Nigeria Security Minting and Printing Company (NSPMC) and Securency International Pty of Australia between 2006 and 2008.

    According to a statement by the Head of Media and Publicity of the EFCC, Mr. Wilson Uwujaren, the court has adjourned the case to October 16 for the hearing of the extradition application and preliminary objection.

    The statement read: “When the case was called for mention today, the defence counsel, Alex Iziyon (SAN) told the court that he had filed a preliminary objection challenging the jurisdiction of the court to hear and decide the matter”.

    Iziyon argued that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter saying, “there is no extradition treaty between Nigeria and the UK”.

    “We want to be shown where this is in the law. What we have is only protocol not extradition treaty,” he added.

    Responding, the prosecuting counsel, M.S Hassan told the court that he had not been served with the application.

    He urged the court to remand the accused in prison custody, pending the hearing and determination of the application.

    The statement added: “Justice Chukwu, after listening to the submission of both counsel, ordered the defence to get the prosecution duly served with all necessary processes while EFCC should take custody of the accused till the next adjourned date.

    The case has been adjourned to Thursday, October 16,  for hearing.

    The late President Umaru Yar‘Adua had in company with the then CBN Governor, Prof. Charles Soludo launched the new N5, N10 and N50 polymer notes  on September 30, 2009 at the Presidential Villa.

    The circulation of the new bank notes coincided with Nigeria’s 49th Independence Anniversary day celebration.

    But there were allegations of shady deal between some CBN officials and Securency International Pty of Australian.

    The Australian Federal Police (AFP) had already probed the alleged N750million bribe offered by Securency to win the contract.

    Although the contract for the printing of N5, N10, N50 notes were awarded in 2009, the bribery scandal involving Securency was perpetrated in 2006.

  • Don’t encourage criminal  activities, says EFCC

    Don’t encourage criminal activities, says EFCC

    Professionals in the non-banking professions have been reminded that professional confidence and privacy with clients do not translate to encouraging criminality.

    They were also asked to carry out due diligence for politically exposed persons, their relations and friends before engaging them as clients.

    The call was made by an Assistant Director in the Economic Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mr. Gbolahan Latana in Lagos, where he spoke on “Structuring business for an effective regulatory compliance”.

    He said there is wisdom in doing diligence on clients in order not to run foul of the relevant laws of the country as ignorance according is not an excuse. Canvassing the importance of knowing your customer (KYC), he stressed the fact that centralisation of information collected from customers is a requirement of law that has to be kept for five years by professionals and not to be manipulated in any way.

    Noting the damage that terrorism and money laundering can cause an economy Latana canvassed a culture of complying to relevant laws backed with strict law enforcement and regulation, where adequate punishment is meted to offenders. He argued that terrorism and other economic crimes could only be achieved by cutting off the flow of terrorists financiers to ensure a stable economy.

    On how money laundering is indirectly encouraged by professionals, its Director, Nigeria Financial Intelligence Unit, Mr. Francis Usani said currently money cannot be easily laundered through financial institutions but rather through non banking institutions due to the absence of reporting lines or vague communication, absence of audit on business and organisational standards in most businesses.

    He encouraged professionals such as lawyers, accountants, estate surveyors and others to restructure their businesses in line with regulatory demands.

    He advised on the need for organisations to put into line internal proceedings in addition to appointing compliance officers with in the management level of organisations to ensure strict compliance.

    Usani also empahsised the need for organisations to create a channel through which an employee could report suspicious transactions to his/her superiors without getting hurt in the process.

    Insisting that professional practice can only prosper in a regime where laws are made and obeyed.

  • Witness, EFCC disagree on threat to life

    Witness, EFCC disagree on threat to life

    Witness of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Kehinde Akinmolayan, has denied the commission’s claim that his life is under threat.

    Akinmolayan, who was said to be the star witness in a N1.1 billion fuel subsidy fraud charge brought by the commission against two oil marketers, Opeyemi Ajuyah and Abdullahi Alao, testified before Justice Lateefat Okunnu.

    Akinmolayan, a former Terminal Manager of Lister Jetty, Apapa, was  summoned to testify in the trial.

    EFCC Counsel, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo had told the court that Akimolayan, an engineer,  refused to honour invitations to give evidence.

    Oyedepo claimed that the witness alleged that some persons were after his life and that someone attempted to gain entrance into his residence.

    He said the witness refused to show in spite of assurances made to him to protect his life.

    Oyedepo then prayed the court to issue a summons on the witness.

    Justice Okunnu had granted his request.

    But at the resumed trial, Akinmolayan  denied that his life was under threat contrary to the EFCC’s claims.

    The witness, under cross-examination by defense lawyers, Mr Olarenwaju Ajanaku and Mr Aderemi Oguntoye,  said his life was not threatened.

    “I have not been attacked, but I am conscious of my security,” he added.

    The marketers, Ajuyah and Alao are being prosecuted with their firms, Majope Investment Limited and Axenergy Limited and a banker, Olanrewaju Olalusi.  They,  however, denied the charge.

    Akinmolayan confirmed to the court that  he supervised the alleged transaction between January 20 and  22, 2011.  “The vessel, MT Brave came to our jetty and we attended to it. We discharged 4,264 metric tonnes into the tank farm and the balance was taken away,” he said.

    Akinmolayan,  however, denied signing any of the documents relating to the said transaction because as he only played a supervisory role.

    Justice Okunnu adjourned till November 10.

  • 2015 : Idoma battles Tiv for power shift

    Uja Emmanuel in Makurdi takes a look at the current battle for power shift in Benue State and reports that the Tiv are yet to agree with their Idoma brothers on this issue

    The battle for power shift to Benue South Senatorial Zone, otherwise known as zone c, held sway by Senate President David Mark has begun in earnest.

    For 35 years since Benue was created out of Benue-Plateau State, the people of Benue South Senatorial zone, especially Idoma, have been crying of marginalisation from their Tiv brothers.

    Tiv and Idoma are the two major tribes in the state, with Igede coming third.

    They are three senatorial districts in the state. The Tivs, who are in the clear majority, both in landmass and population, dominates two senatorial districts ( A and B) and 14 local government councils , while their Idoma brothers are in minority with just nine local government councils , even out of this numbers ,  they share it with Igede people. Another ethnic group occupied two of the local government (Oju and Obi) , leaving David Mark’s kinsmen with only seven local government councils .

    From the aforementioned,  the Tiv people are the dominant ethnic group in Benue State and have effectively used their numerical strength  to occupy the governorship position at every election year.

    But, ahead of 2015 general election, the Idoma people in Benue South wants power to shift away from zone A and B to C. They insist the best time is now and have therefore begun the campaign.

    Recently, at stakeholders meeting , which took place in Otukpo, headquarters of Benue South Senatorial District, in Double K Hotel, all those who spoke resolved to persuade their Tiv brothers to cede power to Benue South.

    From Minister of Interior,   Abba Morro, who represented the Senate President, David Mark, to national and state lawmakers , among them , party elders, youths, women, opinion leaders and political office holders, they unanimously agreed that power must shift to Benue South come 2015.

    Idoma elders also used the meeting to prune down the number of governorship aspirants from Benue South Senatorial District to just three in order to boost the chances of the Idoma people to clinch the governorship position next year.

    The three governorship aspirants selected by Idoma elders are deputy governor, Chief Steven Lawani, former Medical Director of Federal Medical Centre ( FMC) Makurdi , DR. Mathias Oyigeya and Barrister Paul Harris Ogbole of Economic and Financial Crime Commission ( EFCC), Abuja.

    They remaining governorship aspirants were ask to step down and queue behind the lucky three.

    Hon Austine Awodi, a former member of the Benue State House of Assembly, representing Adoka/Ogbole told The Nation that come 2015, power should shift to Benue South for justice and fair play.

    Awodi said even though , the Tiv people are in the clear majority , God did not make a mistake of creating them in one state and called on all political parties in the state to zone the governorship position to Benue South so that in 2015, they would produce the governor for the first time.

    Awodi, who threw his weight behind David Mark’s reelection bid expressed confidence that an Idoma man as governor would have no choice than to perform credibly in office.

    But the question today is whether Tiv people are actually prepared to cede power to their Idoma brothers?

    The relationship between Tiv and Idoma is like cat and mouse game. While the Tivs felt that Mark has cornered all the federal appointments for his kinsmen, Idoma on their part cry of marginalisation at the state level.

    A group known as Tiv Federal Quota( TFQ), led by Chief Har Joseph, told The Nation there is no way power would shift to Zone C, because Idoma people have shown that they are effective minority by cornering all the federal appointments.

    Har noted that in recent recruitments into the Army, Immigration, Navy, Police, Civil Defence, Road Safety and other federal agencies, Idoma names come top, even in Tiv speaking local government areas, so it would be suicidal to allow such a group to take power in the state.

    “They have shown that if they occupied Government House, Makurdi, there would be nothing left for the Tiv people, so we are not prepared to let the governorship position of Benue go to Idoma. Just like he added that politics is a game of numbers.

    Already , some Tiv people have allegedly zoned the governorship position to MINDA, a group among the Tivs’ spread in four local government areas of Gwer, Gwer west, Makurdi and Guma LGAs.

    So, it seems that the Tivs are not yet prepared for power shift, but for the Idomas, the battle for power shift has already begun. This means that only time will tell where the pendulum would swing at the end of the political battle.

  • EFCC appeals Ikuforiji, aide’s discharge

    EFCC appeals Ikuforiji, aide’s discharge

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on Thursday appealed against the judgment of a Federal High Court in Lagos which discharged the Speaker of Lagos State House of Assembly, Adeyemi Ikuforiji of money laundering charges.

    Ikuforiji and his aide, Oyebode Atoyebi, were arraigned on a 56-count charge bordering on the laundering of N273 million belonging to the Assembly.

    The Speaker and his aide, however, pleaded not guilty to the charges at their rearraignment on March 1, 2012 and June 24, 2013, respectively following the transfer of the case to two different judges.

    Justice Ibrahim Buba discharged the accused on September 26, after upholding a no case submission filed on their behalf by their counsel, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN) and Mr. Tunde Akinrinmisi, respectively.

    Dissatisfied with the judgment of the court, the EFCC filed a notice of appeal before the appellate court raising nine grounds.

    In the notice of appeal filed on September 30 by Chief Godwin Obla (SAN), the appellant wants the appellate court to set aside the decision of the lower court on grounds that it was erroneous and perverse.

    The appellant also wants an order of the appellate court, directing trial to commence “de novo” (afresh), before another judge of the Federal High Court other than Justice Ibrahim Buba.

    According to Obla, the trial judge erred in law when he held that the provision of Section 1 of the Money Laundering Act 2004 and 2011 only applied to natural persons and corporate bodies.

    “The lower court erred in law when it held and concluded that the case of the prosecution witnesses supported the innocence of the respondents.

    “The learned trial judge erred in law when he upheld the no case submission of the defendants and thereby occasioning a miscarriage of justice,” Obla averred.

    He therefore asked the appellate court to allow the appeal and nullify the judgment of the trial court.

    No date has been fixed to hear the appeal.

     

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the prosecution closed its case on June 20 after calling two witnesses.

    The witnesses, Mr. Adebayo Adeniji, an investigating police officer and Mr. Adewale Olatunji, a former clerk of the assembly, have given testimonies at the investigations conducted on the accused and activities of the House.

    Delivering judgment, Buba had held that the prosecution failed totally in establishing a prima facie case against the accused.

     

  • ‘Probe police pension scam’

    ‘Probe police pension scam’

    A group, the Conscience and Liberation for Federal Civil Servants (CLFCS), has called on the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to further investigate the police pension scam.

    The group, in a statement by its Chairman, Abdullahi Musa Yankaba and Secretary Benson Idoha, said the call became imperative, following unfolding events in the board after the EFCC has charged those indicted.

    It urged the commission to x-ray roles played individually in the alleged N23billion scam.

    The statement said: “We are sure that more people who are moving freely now will be indicted while those who are facing trial will be further indicted.

    “Re-opening and re-investigating the case with scientific approaches associated with modern techniques of investigating crimes and fraud will go a long way in assisting your operatives to unravel more tricks used by the perpetrators.

    “And those that are grumbling within the board that they are not involved in the fraud will be indicted, when the second round of the investigation begins.”